ving idiots for leaders. In this case they have criminals as leaders because they were actually promoted for doing things that maybe weren't technically illegal but look like they should have been. How smart is it to promote the people who get caught? The reason that we're talking about these two people who got rewarded is because we know what they did. I'm going to go with Trump. I prefer people who don't get caught. I think the smart people can do bad things and not get caught. But the Democrats have people who aren't smart enough to get away with it because they all got caught. But they got rewarded anyway. So I guess I should ask who's the smart one here? Is it me or them? They got promoted, so maybe they're the smart ones in this case.

Then we have the Biden dementia tapes. Still trying to get those. Apparently they've been locked in a SCIF so that somebody can go listen to them but they can't let you listen to it. That's right. So then when let's say some Republican listens to it and comes back and says, oh, it was really terrible, he was in bad shape, all they have to do is send down Adam Schiff to say no, he's not, he's fine. I listened to the same thing. So they're going to SCIF Schiff us. The play is to SCIF Schiff. The SCIF shift, as you put it in the SCIF, this highly secure place where nobody can take a picture of it or take a copy. They can only experience it inside that room. So all they have to do is send their best liars into the room and they'll come out and say, no, it was fine. I listened to it too. It's fine. The play here is so obvious. It's just so obvious that it's a SCIF shift play. Yeah, it's just a standard SCIF shift.

Well, my questions have been answered about the Soros organization or at least why Alex Soros is going along with his dad's ideas that are terrible and destroying the world. There's a clip of him at the WEF just talking about a topic. And I'll just give you one quote to show you that what we learn from watching him talk in public, he seems to be an idiot. He just actually seems to be dumb and maybe really dumb based on the clip. So he's talking to the public. One man, Donald Trump, literally came in and just took that, took that, took that all away. You know, so you know, you know, you know, you know, you took that, you took that checks and balances that, you know, we had these customs, these, well, you know, the customs and he came in like Donald Trump. He then he like took it all away from us.

Now I might be exaggerating a little bit on there, but you have to listen to it. If you listen to him talking, you will immediately understand why nobody asks him for interviews. There's no way he's going to say yes to an interview because he's incompetent talking in public. In fact, you would be hard pressed to find anybody who can't talk in public as much as he can't talk in public. He's really, really bad at it. So he probably just says no because he can't talk in public. I guess in that case he had to try, but it was just a train wreck. Yeah, wow. And he must be under the Trump is Hitler train because he thinks not only is Trump stealing your democracy but he's stealing your unwritten customs. That's right. Trump stole your unwritten rules. That's what he said in public. Wow.

Also, Konstantin Kisin did a great thing for the world that didn't work out at all. You know how I've been saying that we need to have legitimate debates on topics where you've got plenty of time but you've also got a strong host, a moderator who can really keep you in line and don't do it in like this political way where you let the politicians lie. You know, just get some experts, some people who really know what they're talking about, put them together, put a strong moderator in the middle. Boom. Everybody gets better informed and maybe you can work something out. That's what I thought until yesterday. And then I watched Konstantin Kisin do, again I'll say, a great thing for the public, which is he tried to pull off the very thing we think we wanted. And the topic was Gaza and what should Israel have done and what should they do now, I guess. And he had two sides.

And here's the model that I held in my head until that moment. When two parties disagree on something, you know, they might want different things. Some wants this, the other wants that. Usually, unless the parties are just totally bad people, you can usually find a compromise. You could find some way to find a negotiated settlement that everybody's not perfectly happy with but happy enough. And so we imagine that that model, which works all the time in business, right? In business you're always negotiating and usually you can work stuff out. So why can't they? Well, I found out why. And I'm going to tell you a reframe here that will explain a lot going forward. It's one I hadn't noticed before. It goes like this. The people who were on the two sides of the Gaza debate did not disagree on what should be done per se, although that's what it looked like on the surface. They disagreed on reality. They disagreed on reality. And they weren't even close.

And let me tell you, you can't negotiate a middle ground between two different versions of reality. You can't get there from here. So I thought that it could ever be negotiated while the two are living in completely different realities of how we got here and who's the bad guy and who's the good guy. You can't. You can't negotiate that. It's completely absurd. I actually used to think, and by the way this is something that one of the debate people said in effect, the pro-Palestinian arguers said the Palestinians have a set of demands that are somewhat reasonable. Now this would be their view. And if you were to make some action toward addressing their demands, you could stop the terrorism. So you could stop another October 7th by simply addressing the legitimate concerns of the Palestinians. And once they saw that things are moving in the right direction, the reason for terrorism would go away and they'd say, oh, this is working, so we'll just keep doing this peaceful negotiating because we got a few things, we'll get some more. That can't work if you're living in different realities. That only works if you're in the same reality and you want different things and then you have something you can work with because you don't want the same things. The same things that are limited resources, you can't make a deal if everybody wants the thing that there's only one of. You can't solve that. But in a normal situation, you want work, I want money, we can make a deal because we don't want the same thing and we live in the same reality. The reality is you have a job, I have skills, you have money. Same reality. You can always make that work.

But here are some of the things I heard. And let me tell you who I sided with. Both sides are completely upright. So there's a pro-Israel side. Everything they're doing is what you have to do in October 7th. And then the