Back to episode — Episode 2513 CWSA 06/22/24
Context —
destruction, at least of the assets and most of the military that matters, or else all they're doing is making them mad and they'll just shoot more rockets. So Hezbollah is not a situation where you can go in and rough them up a little bit then make some peace. If you're going to go in, it has to be to the end. It has to be a fight to the death. And I think a fight to the death probably favors Isr…
← Previous segment →s a strategic error. So I'd say it's guaranteed. And again I'm not for it or against it. I don't have any power over it. I'm just watching. There will be war with Hezbollah. Guarantee it.
CBS News cryptically says that the upcoming presidential debate that Biden will have surprises and that might include his physical performance. What the hell does that mean? What the hell does that mean? By the way, there's something wrong with my lighting. I can't get this part of the screen. I thought maybe the camera was fuzzy or something, but no matter how I change the lighting it doesn't change that big smudge in the corner. I'll work on that anyway. So I don't know what it means that Biden would have a physical performance surprise. The way it was spoken, it was like it would be on the upside, as in he would be maybe physically better than you thought. Or what, is it going to show up with a cane and a walker? Are they going to push him out in a wheelchair? I mean, how's that going to work? Oh God, I hope they don't. Oh no. What would happen if they pushed him out in the wheelchair and they said his brain is still great but I have to admit his walking is a little dangerous now. He might fall over. So he could still walk but for a lot of purposes we're going to wheel him around because you know his walking is not so good. I feel like he would get a sympathy vote that he wouldn't otherwise get. And I think it would take Trump's ability to mock him completely away. Because if they said his brain is good but we admit you know his body's got some issues, that would be very disarming. I don't think they'll do that. But it makes you wonder how it would go. Might actually be a winning play. I don't know. Could be. Because you know we're just sort of naturally trained that if you see somebody who's supposed to be the leader but they're acting weak, you can go after them. But you take that same leader and you put them legitimately in a wheelchair and we agree he should be in it, that really takes the fire out of your criticism, right? Because at that point you're saying, all right, are you saying that just because your legs don't work you can't be a president? No, nobody wants to say that. That would really be devastating actually. But it could go the other way too. People might say I don't want my president to look weak. And they might say if he can't stand up he looks weak. Could go either way. I don't know how that would go. That'd be an interesting poll, wouldn't it? Would you be more likely to vote for Biden if he accepted the wheelchair, which he probably should anyway? Maybe there will be surprises. We don't know.
And sources are saying that Biden's going to boast about his reproductive rights agenda, his positions on issues of democracy, and that he has an upper hand on the economy. So here's what I would expect Trump to respond with. When Biden boasts about reproductive rights, Trump can say that the Democrats are trying to draft women, which is real. That's a real thing that's happening now. Now that's not Biden per se, and he might say he's against it, but it's his team. And if Democrats are in charge, maybe women will get drafted or at least they'll have to register. So the current proposal is that they would have to register, not that they would be drafted. So I think that's a winning play. If Trump says, "Reproductive rights? I just took myself out of that." See, the frame that Trump has not embraced, it's the winning frame. They say Joe Biden, there's one thing that every woman in the United States can agree with me on, that I should not be the one deciding what they do with their body. Can we agree on that, Joe Biden? Will you agree with me that I, Donald Trump, should not be involved in decisions about women's bodies? Because that's what I gave you. I took it out of my hands, took it to the states. And the states are closer to the person. So the closer it is to the people in the state, the more credible the outcome will be of the laws. But can we both agree that taking myself out of that decision-making process is better for everybody? There's no way you lose on that message because it's completely, it's basically a kill shot. On the other hand, you're looking to draft our daughters. You're looking to draft our daughters, your team. And do you disavow the Democrats or do you think that's a good idea to register our women for the military while you're running two hot wars? Which he is.
I'd also say that reproductive rights aren't worth anything if you live in a lawless land where it's too dangerous to have a family. And that Joe Biden, you could at the trans thing, you'd say if you cared about women you wouldn't let biological men play women's sports or some version of that that doesn't sound too bigoted. When Joe does his fake hoaxes about the democracy, "Trump's trying to steal your democracy," I would first of all mock it and say something like, "Have you all noticed that most of Joe's complaints are about things that are imaginary? He imagines that I did this. He imagines that I'm going to be a dictator. How exactly would I become a dictator in a country full of people who have been trained to kill dictators?" If he had an audience, it would be more, "Yeah." Here's the thing. Here's the thing that he'll never say but it would be a kill shot. "You worry that I'll become a dictator? It's like you don't even know what a Republican is. A Republican is someone who's got fidelity to the institution. That's our basic nature. Even if you imagined I went rogue and tried to become a dictator, the other Republicans would kill me immediately and should." Imagine him saying that. "If I ever tried to become a dictator, you could rely on Republicans killing me. And they should, because that's what a Republican is. That's why we have the guns." Yeah. Now you would never forget that, would you? Now again this is all fantasy politics. He's not going to say it because I suggest it. But there are so many avenues of complete annihilation that Trump has. He just has to pick one. He has probably, I don't think I'm exaggerating, he probably has 12 kill shots that would take Biden completely out of the race. Probably at least 12 avenues. He can just pick the one he likes. Doesn't have to be that one. Anyway, he could mention that Biden's administration created a department to hunt Republicans and put Brennan and Clapper in charge of it. Imagine just saying that. "Is it true you created a department literally to target Trump voters and you put your same guys who ran the Russia collusion hoax and the laptop hoax in charge of it? And they're the ones that you put in charge of hunting Republicans? You know your news isn't covering that. But when it was discovered, you had to disband it. The reason you disbanded it was because it was exactly what it looked like. It was hunting Republicans. There was no other reason it was disbanded. It was simply discovered." You've completely given up. You know, between your censorship of social media, your complete domination of the lying media, your lawfaring of presidents and January 6 people, your complete hoax mentality that everything you talk about is a hoax. You know you're the one taking the democracy. And then on the economy they'll just both lie about stuff. So apparently the only way you can talk about the economy if you're running for president is you literally just make up. They both do it. But here's where the president should call them out. Biden will definitely say he created more jobs and that Trump lost jobs. Here's what you say. "Joe Biden, I don't think you should talk about the economy if you can't figure out how to handle the fact that we were in a pandemic. If you're comparing a pandemic to our normal economy, you're just lying to the public or you don't understand anything about how economics works. Whoever had been president after the pandemic was going to have major job growth unless the whole country disappeared. And it didn't. So when you stand up here and lie and say you created jobs, I think the country is smart enough to know that jobs were of course going to be created after you no longer shut down the whole country, you fascist." Probably without the F word, but I mean look at the number of attacks. The number of kill shots is just crazy. I mean this is going to be the greatest show on Earth. I can't wait for the debate. And I will be live streaming it, by the way.
There's new data on vaccinations danger. William Makis MD was talking about this
Context —
. I guess they did a study and the other people on the study were Dr. McCullough, Dr. Trozzi, Dr. Emmeryling, Gesling, and Alexander and Huden. So there's a bunch of doctors. What they did is they looked through a bunch of autopsy reports from the past and they looked at people who died not too long after having a vaccination. And then they put together a little study and they said that we found t…
Next segment → →