. I guess they did a study and the other people on the study were Dr. McCullough, Dr. Trozzi, Dr. Emmeryling, Gesling, and Alexander and Huden. So there's a bunch of doctors. What they did is they looked through a bunch of autopsy reports from the past and they looked at people who died not too long after having a vaccination. And then they put together a little study and they said that we found that 74% of deaths were directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID vaccinations. So they looked at 325 autopsy cases. Now do you trust that study? Let's do our fake news discovery stuff. Well, the first thing you should do is know the players. Is there any name on the list who has ever done anything that was clearly fake news? The answer is yes. But if I tell you what it is, you're going to argue with me and I don't want to get in that argument. So the first thing you need to know is there's at least one person on that list who's quite famous for a particular piece of fake news. But I'm not going to get into it. I'm just going to say that's what you would look for, right? Okay, I'll say it. Anybody who was in favor, who thought that the athletes were dropping dead and that nobody was talking about it on the actual teams, that's somebody you should raise an eyebrow when they have another study. One of them is selling a product that alleges to cure you of your potential vax damage. It'll remove the spike protein. So one of them makes money if you think that the vaccinations were dangerous and you've got some poison in your body that he can help you get rid of. Should you trust science where one of the members has a very public, nothing's hidden, very public financial incentive? No, no you should not.

How about how much should you trust just a study, just any study? How much should you trust that? Well, historically half of all scientific studies are not reproducible, meaning that it's a coin flip. Now the question was does the vax injure you or does it not, right? It's binary. Does it injure you or does it not? Now there's a little bit of a nuance because everybody knew that every new medicine injures somebody. So it's not a question of whether there was at least one person who got hurt. We all agree that at least one person got hurt. That's just how medicine works. But is it like a deadly problem or is it more like ordinary vaccination risk, which might not be so ordinary after all? So just hold this in your mind. A scientific study is a coin flip. You as the consumer of that news don't know if it's r