So that's one of the reasons that he's going to steal your democracy. The things he says he won't do, because they are trying to paint him as supporter of things he's not supporting.

Then there's all the gaslighting that Democrats did about January 6. So because January 6 was a whole op, a gaslighting op in which they pretended it was an insurrection and that Trump was in charge of it. An entire imaginary hoax. That's one of the main reasons that they have to say, well, if he did it once he'll do it again. But he didn't do it once. He left office on the day he was supposed to leave office, and there was never any possibility he could have taken over a country because some of his supporters trespassed or because he picked some alternate electors just to hold his rights, but that didn't work out.

And then there's the stuff that Democrats are hallucinating Trump might do if he becomes president. Literally they're afraid of the things he'll do that they don't really have a specific name for but think you won't leave office and just crazy. That is not observable and it seems to come out of pure mental illness. We're just lying.

And then of course there's the abortion question that he'll take away your bodily autonomy. Will he do that by taking himself out of the decision-making process? Because that's what he said he'd do. He said he would not be part of any national ban on abortion. In other words, he's not going to be a decision maker either way. He said he wants... he moved all the power to the states, which they've been wanting to do, so that it's not his role. How does giving your power away to the states suddenly qualify as stealing your democracy? I mean basically all he did is correct it. It's something that was seemed out of whack at one point, so he corrected it, put the power back in the states where it probably should have always been.

Now, have I made my case that the Trump stealing your democracy is purely imaginary? It's based on their own hoaxes and gaslighting. And all of theirs are obvious. It's a longer list and you can observe it. It's observable right now. You don't have to wonder what will happen in the future. It's right now.

All right. And then you have of course Biden defying the majority because ABC News says two-thirds of the public wants him to step down. Is he acting all democratic by staying in office when we don't know who's in charge and two-thirds of the country wants him to step down, including majority of his own party? So that's his view of preserving democracy, I guess. Not doing what people want. Now I know we're not a democracy. Let me just do an update for the NPCs. Swimming is the best form of exercise. The United States is a form of republic, not a democracy. And if somebody invents a new source of food it's probably Soylent Green. So if you're trying to remain an NPC in good standing, make sure that whenever any of those topics come up you add your value like I just did.

All right. Representative Anna Paulina Luna from Florida, she's leading up an effort to try to fine Attorney General Garland $10,000 per day until he turns over the Hur audio. Now the Hur audio is the one where we think President Biden was incoherent, but the transcript may have erased all the incoherence. So since they already have the transcript, what would be the big deal of hearing the actual audio? Well, I think we all suspect that the only reason you don't hear it is that it's really bad. And I think Hur was maybe being kind by saying he's too out of it to ever stand trial. I think he was right on that, and so far he's been vindicated.

But I would ask you this, Representative Luna. How's this good for us? How is it good? Because worst case scenario is that audio comes out tomorrow. Democrats say, oh okay, we're all out. And it goes to 90% Democrats want him out, and then basically has no choice. He's going to get pushed out. So how's that good for Trump? I think Trump's playing this right. Trump's playing it right. Because the question of whether Biden is mentally capable has been asked and answered. If you're still trying to ask and answer it, you're only introducing a variable that we don't need and could go wrong. Because the way it could go wrong is it might give the Democrats the ability to rapidly replace him, and then you don't know what you're getting. Then you don't know what you're getting. Could be better, although they still have the problem of how do you skip over Kamala. So I suppose the way they would do it is they would elevate Kamala Harris to the top. They would pick a really strong vice president, and then it would sell them as a team. They'd say, well, you know, if you don't like Kamala, it's a team. Look at this vice president pick. It's so strong. That's probably their best play. But I don't think we need to hear the Hur tape. It's not going to add anything, but it could subtract something. It could reduce the chances you get the president you want.

Joy Behar says that when Trump calls Kamala "laughing Kamala," that is sexist. That's not something you would never make fun of a man's laugh, would you? Like yeah, of course this is purely sexist because making fun of how somebody laughs, honestly that only happens to women. And conservatives only make fun of women who laugh wrong. Have I ever given you my Tucker Carlson laughing impression? I can't do the high pitch. Everybody makes fun of Tucker's laugh. Tucker's laugh is one of the most famous memes in all of right-leaning world. We love Tucker. No, Joy Behar has she could find more ways to be wrong about more things than anybody I've ever seen in my life. It's literally one of the most famous things that people make fun of is that Tucker has one of the most distinctive laughs in all of them. So no, it's not sexist anyway.

So the press conference will be 5:30 today Eastern time. And basically all the major outlets, news outlets that normally support the president are against him. In other news, Alex Soros, the heir to the Soros fortune now in control of its money, has married Huma Abedin. I'm just going to say it. That... do you want me to beat around the bush or do you want me to just say it? This is why it's good to be canceled. I would never say what I'm going to say next unless I'd been canceled. If you spend one minute Googling Alex Soros and images, he's very gay. All right, let's just say you've never seen a gayer guy hanging out in intimate poses with his boyfriends. He's not even slightly straight. He's the gayest gay guy you've ever seen in your life. Now if you don't believe me, just Google his images. There are plenty of them. It's really observable and obvious.

Now you will not tell me... here's what won't happen. I guarantee this won't happen. You're not going to go look at the pictures yourself and then say, well, I think you're misinterpreting this, Scott. No, you're not going to do that. There's no doubt from his personal life that he's a gay man. Now I love the LGBTQ community. I'm very pro-gay. So I'm not saying anything bad about him, you know, just to clarify. You know, it's 2024. You have to clarify in 2024. I shouldn't have to clarify that if I mention somebody's gay it's not an insult. Can we just... are we past that yet? Can we be past that? Can it just be a fact without it being some kind of assumed insult? We should be way past that. 'Cause the LGBT community is probably one of the most successful American communities, one of the ones I have the most respect for, honestly. Because you know why? Nobody ever said this: we don't want to go to that gay neighborhood because of all the crime and filth. It's like one of the most successful groups in America. So I have complete respect for that group.

Now he's obviously a member of the group, and he's marrying a woman who's what, 10 years older than him? Which is what billionaires do all the time, don't they? They marry people who are 10 years older than them? I don't think I've ever seen it, frankly. It's like that's like how something happens zero times. So your pattern recognition should be kicking in at this point. And your pattern recognition should say something like, huh, that looks a lot like somebody who's getting married for political reasons, doesn't it? What could that political reason be?

Well, we believe that George Soros, whether you think he's evil or not, is a brilliant, brilliant tactician. Would you agree? Nobody's ever called George Soros dumb. I mean he just keeps doing smart-looking things that you might not like, but he's certainly effective. Would you say the same thing about Alex? Well, I don't know. I've not seen any evidence that he's a highly qualified player. It seems that they're hiding him from interviews because given his outsized influence on the world — I mean really, really big — he should be on interviews every day. But they seem to be hiding him. If you can find an interview of him talking in public, you'll very quickly learn why t