hey're hiding him. I don't think he's good at it. I don't think he's good at it.

And I think that when you see Hillary Clinton's best friend and confidant marry him in a marriage that looks suspicious at best, you have to say to yourself, is there something else going on here? Now I don't know, but let me just speculate. It looks like Hillary is making a play to control the Soros fortune after George Soros passes, which will happen pretty soon, because all that money, or at least control of it, will go to Alex. Alex will be controlled by Huma, which gives Hillary functional control of the Soros fortune. That's the play, in my opinion. That's the play.

Now let's take it to the next level of conspiracy theory. What happens if Alex Soros dies in a boating accident tragically? What if he falls off a yacht and the sharks eat him? Because that could happen. He's on a lot of yachts. Accidents happen. People... accidents happen. Just the fact that he happens to be in Hillary's... I mean Hillary's... he's in Hillary's orbit. That doesn't mean something bad's going to happen to him. I mean I know you think that, but just because Hillary... I mean Hillary... just because Hillary would get functional control of I don't know $30 billion that she could use to control the world, that doesn't mean she's going to kill Alex and let Huma take over the money. And presumably Clinton has some influence over Huma. So I think it's exactly what it looks like. I think Huma is going to maybe make George Soros happy before he dies, as in maybe George Soros doesn't know his son is gay. And he might think, you know what, I really need is heirs. I want to make sure I have an heir. So it could be that Alex is making his father seem to be getting an heir, but he'll die before he has to see if there's an heir or not.

So every bit of this looks suspicious. They don't look like a couple even a little bit, honestly. If you see the pictures, I think it's exactly what it looks like. It looks like a Hillary Clinton play to get control of Soros's fortune because they don't think Alex Soros is dependable or smart, and they need to control it because it's essential to their power base. They can't lose control of that. That's what I think.

And I'm quoted in the Gateway Pundit. So here's what I said that they quoted. I said this on X: When Biden refuses to sign a bill preventing non-citizens from voting — which I think is going to happen. So the House passed a bill that says non-citizens can't vote. The Senate might pass it, we don't know. But if they did, it would get to Biden, and he said he would reject it. So here, that's the premise. So if Biden refuses to sign a bill preventing non-citizens from voting, that should become the only issue in the campaign because it also reveals everything else. It's like the key that opens up everything. It gives away the whole game. And what I mean by that is it's an unambiguous statement that Democrats prefer their power over your happiness. There's no other way to explain it. That they need a crooked election because they need the power and they don't care if it makes you unhappy and your country worse. They're just putting themselves over you.

And what I said is you should ask Democrats to defend it, and you should ask Biden to defend it. Like why would you veto a bill that says non-citizens can't vote? Now I think their reason is going to be... somebody's telling me that Huma is 47 so she's not going to be making any heirs. I disagree. They could probably use a surrogate and make a baby. So don't be surprised if you hear that there's a surrogate baby on the way. Anyway, so I would ask Biden to defend it, and I would ask the Democrats to defend why they don't want to limit voting to citizens. And I don't think they can defend it. I think that what they're going to say is, well, it's already illegal so don't worry about it. But that's kind of missing the point.

Well, The Daily Show had a little panel of six Black voters that they were asking about the presidency. And so they got... they're New Yorkers too, so they're Black New York voters, a mix of men and women. And half of the group, three out of six, said they would vote for Trump. The moderator who worked for The Daily Show was also a Black gentleman. And after three of the six of them said they'd vote for Trump, he said, and I quote, "We're an even split." I didn't see that coming. I didn't see that coming. I did. I would have guessed three out of six. If you said how many randomly picked are going to say Trump, I would have said about three out of six. That's you know two out of six maybe more often, but three out of six I think you could get there.

And as Mike Benz warns, and many of you are seeing, and I think Glenn Greenwald is warning on this too, the Democrats can't let go on this Russia is to blame for everything thing. Do you all understand why it's always Russia? Yeah, you have to know the history of the CIA. So the CIA is the CIA because of the Soviet Union. When the Soviet Union fell, they needed a new enemy to justify their actions and their budget. So like, well, Russia. Even though the entire point of disintegrating the Soviet Union was that Russia would basically become friends with the United States. Do you know why we're not friends with Russia when everything they were doing was for the intention of being our friends and never being at war with us? It's because it wouldn't be good for the CIA's budget. That's probably the only reason. Yeah, that's probably the only reason. Now there was also the oil, the energy stuff, you know, later, blah blah blah, and Putin maybe interfering in other countries where we wanted to interfere before he interfered. So there's certainly lots of little stuff. But if we had already made friends with them, Putin probably would already be working productively with us in these other countries. And if he wanted something like a warm port and they were our allies, we would have said something like, why would we object to you having a warm port? You're our ally. We don't object to France putting a port anywhere, do we? They're our ally.

So it seems to me that the reason Russia, Russia, Russia is because the intel people work with the Democrats, and the intel people need the Democrats to tell you that Russia, Russia, Russia so they can keep their budget. So I don't think that the Russia is an enemy is real. I don't think it's based on reality. I think some reality comes out of it because when you tell each other you're enemies you don't work together in other countries. Well, so we see that. But it feels like a manufactured problem. Totally manufactured. And it looks like it's manufactured to support the budget of our intelligence people and nothing else. It may be military too. That's what it looks like.

Eric Adams says sanctuary cities are a big mistake, wants them to go away. Of course.

All right, I've got a challenge for you. Oh wait, we'll do this first. So Joe R