tual button on the user interface yes it would be logged but if I just do it with code within the system with a little tweak it'd be the same as the heat button but it wouldn't be logged and nobody would ever be able to prove I did it. Huh. Well it sure would be good if something like that happened.

So if you imagine that TikTok is not controlled at a detailed level by China I don't know it feels naive. So we have a situation where the polls we know are going to be close on Election Day and they will be close enough that let's say a 2% swing would certainly determine the race. Because remember 2% is not just added to one group it's subtracted from the other. So a 2% swing is a 4% difference. You get that. So could TikTok cause a 2% swing in votes? Yeah easily. Easily. And not just by TikTok because TikTok content gets onto other services etc. So yes. So we've actually given the vote to China. Just let that sink in. China can move the election 2% with TikTok guaranteed. There's no question that they could do that. All they have to do is want to and then TikTok will do it I assume because TikTok doesn't want to deal with Chinese intelligence hating them.

So if American social media except for X folded like a cheap chair when American FBI and CIA wanted it to do stuff what do you think happens in China? You know if the CIA wants you to do stuff you're going to feel like you really need to do it even if they don't threaten you. But what happens if Chinese intelligence asks you to do it and you're a Chinese owned company or controlled? You're really really going to think you need to do it. So China basically has the vote now. So the Chinese vote will determine who the president is. So good on that.

Well here's a fun recreational belief getting back to science a little bit and the nature of reality. So somebody called — not somebody called this is his actual name — somebody with a name J. Anderson from the Project Unity is talking about some experiment in which they put plants in a darkened room where there would be a light source that would randomly go to different quadrants and it was completely randomized. So it'd just be a plant put in one corner but it wouldn't get light at all except randomly as that light would be lit up in different places. But mostly the light was where there was no plant because there was a room with mostly empty but one little plant. What they found was allegedly — remember this is a recreational belief I can't prove it's real — allegedly the randomized light would start in a statistically measurable way favoring the plant with no human involvement. In other words random stuff starts becoming less random if there's a living thing in the mix. And the idea is that even plants might be able to collapse reality.

So you know the experiments like Schrodinger's cat etc. So that quantum physics says you need an observer or it might be a device that's measuring something but if you don't measure it or observe it the reality stays in the superposition of neither yes nor no or up nor down. Has to be observed and then it becomes reality. Well apparently there's some suggestion that a plant can do that.

Now here's how this fits into my model of the world being a simulation. If the world is a simulation can you control it? And I think you can by having a clear idea of what it is you want which is one of the explanations for Elon Musk. I think Elon Musk always has a very clear idea of what he wants and he collapses reality in that direction. And I think the clearer your idea and the harder you think it the more likely it's going to collapse in your direction. Reality that is.

Now my life as I've told you many times is so weird so insanely unlikely but it also followed a path that I determined when I was six years old. When I was six years old I said I'm going to become a famous cartoonist and I never altered from wanting it. But there was a period of my life I didn't think it was possible but I always wanted it and it was always a really clear image of what it was and what it would look like and it happened exactly the way I meant exactly. And I can't explain that. And then you know my entry into politics had the same oddity about it that it just didn't look like it could have happened on its own. It looks like I'm authoring the simulation. So maybe the plant is authoring the simulation and maybe you are too. Maybe all of us are. And that the act of affirmations where you really focus on what you want and you repeat it or write it down 15 times a day that all that does is make sure that you have a clear view of what you want like a plant has a clear desire for sun. There's no ambiguity about what the plant wants if wanting is a thing right. It wants more light. I wanted to be a cartoonist. Elon Musk wanted to make an electric car, wanted to go to Mars.

All right there's a former NASA scientist who's doing a bunch of experiments to find out if we do live in a simulation. Thomas Campbell. So he's designed experiments to find out if our reality is more like a video game. And see Vicky Ver on X is reporting on this. And he's got say his experiments include a new spin on the double slit experiment. So I don't know the details but allegedly he's got a way to test whether we live in a simulation. How do you think that's going to go? I have no idea how that's going to go but the idea that we live in a simulation just keeps getting stronger and stronger. And that we don't have free will in the normal sense.

Well here's my final evidence that we live in a simulation. You ready for this? This really happened. So the vice presidential pick is Tim Walz you know that. So this created a situation where I swear this is true it puts President Trump or Donald Trump ex-President Trump in the position of opposing Walz. Come on. Trump the most famous build a wall guy in the world has to run against a Walz. He's opposing Walz. Come on. How did that happen on its own? How about Musk is suing a bunch of companies in that advertising space where I mentioned that GARM. So a bunch of advertisers are part of that. One of the advertisers that's mentioned that he's specifically suing through X is the Mars company. They make candy Mars bars and stuff. So Elon Musk is suing Mars. You tell me we're not living in the simulation. Trump is running against Walz. Elon Musk is suing Mars. And the assassination attempt against Trump involved somebody named Cheatle trying to stop somebody named Crooks and you don't trust either of them. How is this real? I mean seriously this just all happened by itself. I don't know. I'm having a real hard time believing any of this is happening accidentally because it looks exactly like a dream I might have. It's way like a dream I might have.

Anyway there's a whole bunch of new allegations about the Georgia 2020 election and I don't want to get you know Kraken meaning to get ahead of myself and say it's been proven. There's a bunch of election irregularities that have been proven. It's the Kraken cuz I think the Kraken was always a trap. I think that if there's real election irregularity the way to hide it is to come up with a fake Kraken. Give somebody important like Sidney Powell to believe it have her say it in public and then when it all falls apart you can say everything else was a Kraken too. So to me the Kraken always looked like an intelligence play to destroy the people who were too close to the real problem if there is one.

But you should know that there's a big video of a whole bunch of citizens doing a public event in which they made many claims of detected fraud or irregularities in the Georgia election. I don't have an opinion about the quality of any of that evidence because again you don't want to fall for a Kraken. But there's a lot of it and it sure sounds persuasive. But remember the Kraken sounded persuasive at one time too. So there's tons of evidence. We just don't know the quality of it. It's hard to say independently.

Then I saw a post by George — he goes by he's had an account Beisy tweets good follow but it just goes by the name George anyway. He says the Georgia state election board has passed a new rule allowing observers inside tabulation centers during this upcoming election. So that wasn't a thing before. Are you saying that we didn't have observers in the tabulation centers and that something could have gone wrong in the tabulation centers and there were no observers but now we do have observers or at least they'll be legal? Huh. Well that's interesting. Do you think the Republicans are going to find anything as they are more carefully watching this election?

Maybe there's a new lawsuit. America First Legal has got a lawsuit to sue Maricopa County Arizona for refusing to remove illegal aliens from their voter rolls out of the election. Now why in the world would they refuse to do that? The only reason I can think of is that they want to use illegal votes to get their way. Why else would they refuse to do it? If they had a list of all the people who were not legal voters and they had a list of all the people on their voting rolls it's not the biggest job in the world to subtract one list from another list programmatically but they have. So maybe there's more to the context of this but they refused and they're blatantly defying their own state law because