Back to episode — Episode 2559 CWSA 08/07/24
Context —
tual button on the user interface yes it would be logged but if I just do it with code within the system with a little tweak it'd be the same as the heat button but it wouldn't be logged and nobody would ever be able to prove I did it. Huh. Well it sure would be good if something like that happened. So if you imagine that TikTok is not controlled at a detailed level by China I don't know it feels…
← Previous segment →the state law mandates them to purge ineligible voters and they're just going to keep the illegal aliens apparently on the rolls. So in other words it looks like exactly they are planning to cheat in Arizona. We know how they're planning to cheat. They're showing you that they're not going to change it. They're going to disobey their own law and it looks a lot like they're planning to steal the election. Don't know for sure but it sure looks like it.
Well here's the good news. Lara Trump she said that they do have poll watchers, poll workers and legal experts will be everywhere votes are cast, counted. And she says do you want to help? So if you'd like to be part of the watcher group the URL to go to would be protectthevote.com. So any of you who want to be like onsite and watching for irregularities I think Lara's team will probably offer some guidance or training there and it's called protectthevote.com.
So here's my take on this. I think Republicans are going to uncover massive fraud only because they know where to look for it and they'll find it. I mean I think we can expect they'll find just all kinds of stuff. The whatever was happening in Georgia whether it was rigged or not I don't have proof either way. I think there's good evidence to show that things were deleted they shouldn't have been deleted and that you know there's a lack of forthcomingness in some cases. So there's something going on let's just say that. If you can't smell the smoke of some election irregularities I don't think you're paying attention. I don't think you're paying attention. There's something deeply wrong with our elections. They are not auditable which is all you need to know. They're not fully auditable. So when people say something got audited or double checked or counted they're usually looking at some very narrow thing that wouldn't tell you at all whether the election was rigged or not. It would just tell you if that very narrow thing was done right.
So for example they could recount mail-in votes and then they would call that an audit. But what if half of the mail-in votes were from people ineligible? Well they wouldn't check if they were eligible they would just recount them and say look we counted them right the first time second count matches I guess we're good nobody found any fraud. And then the legal system would say wait wait wait we did find some fraud and they take it to the courts and the courts say well it's too late or too little or you don't have standing we don't want to deal with it.
But if Laura Trump has done what I think she has done she has trained the watchers to really find the good stuff to know where to look. If they do find the good stuff or even if they allege they found the good stuff there's no way the election is going to get certified. So I'm going to double down on my election prediction that there won't be one. There will be voting but I don't believe that the country is sufficiently organized and honest enough to produce a result that we could even verify. So somehow we're going to have to pick a president but I think the vote will be ignored no matter which way it goes. I guess if the Democrats get their way they're more likely to try to push ahead but I don't know. I think the election will be so non-credible probably both ways that we're just going to have to figure out what to do.
All right so let me talk about the messaging from Harris and then Trump. All right so the Democrats have been pushing the Trump's going to steal your democracy which I don't think anybody understood. So Harris quite smartly tried to redefine that in a recent interview in which she said well you know rather than thinking about it as stealing your democracy there would be more accurate to think of it as stealing your freedoms that Trump would try to take your freedoms. So now you might ask what freedoms? What freedom is Trump trying to take? And here are the actual answers because Harris has now listed the freedoms.
So one is the freedom to control your own bodies which means birth control and abortion. Trump's view is he doesn't want to have anything to do with that stuff. So Trump's official policy is I don't want to be involved in making any laws about anything. I don't want to stop birth control of any kind the morning after pill or anything else and I don't want to be involved in decisions about abortion. I want the states to do that. Now given that every state has at least half of the men in favor of abortion right it's even more than that usually but at least half of the men are in favor of abortion that means that if women are in favor of it by majority there's a 100% chance they'll get it. Voting still sort of matters. So women have complete control in the states. They just have to organize and convince each other. So women will you stop pretending that men have anything to do with this? Convince women. If women by let's say 80% majority wanted abortion in their states and 50% of the men were on that side too they could stop anybody from getting elected anybody they could stop their funding. That would be such an overwhelming advantage on one of the top issues that they could kind of get anything they wanted.
It won't happen right away. So if Democrats are complaining that the end of Roe v. Wade created a situation where a third of the states I guess can't get the abortions that they want I would say for the people who wanted those abortions that's very bad in the short run. I think you have to admit that no matter where you are on the topic. But in the long run women have complete control of their bodies because they have complete control of the elections. They just have to be on the same side. If women are not on the same side why are you complaining to the rest of us? It's definitely women have to decide first and then maybe try to convince the rest of us. But if women can't decide although I think women are like two-thirds for abortion in the United States. So my argument about that is that women have full control of thei
Context —
r own bodies they just haven't executed on that control. Harris says you want the freedom to love openly and whoever you want openly and with pride to which I say which freedom is that? That's not a freedom you want. Do you want anybody to be able to express any form of love? I think you'd want to protect the children a little better wouldn't you? What about bestiality? Now here I'm not comparing…
Next segment → →