Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive May 24, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #2559

Episode 2559 CWSA 08/07/24

Episode #2559 Aug 7, 2024 1:32:16 33,099 views

Walz and Harris and all the absurdities about it. Trump and Musk too. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.

Opening General Commentary

What a show we got today. The stock market's recovering, the news is fun and funny. Oh, it's going to be good. Good morning everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. And if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that no human can un…

View segment →
SimultaneousSip General Commentary

people, how about a little news update and then we'll get into the vice presidential pick and all the stuff about politics. Well, the New York Post has a story that there's a new theory about how the pyramids got built. And maybe they used — apparently there was a lot of water in that area back in…

View segment →
NewsReaction Moist Robot Framework

lumn in the middle of it. And I would have an underground canal so that I could move those big blocks that are floating on wood into the middle of the pyramid. And then I would close off the place that the block came from and I would fill the column with water and it would float those big blocks all…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

oint. So how do they lose that? We'll see. But the important thing is that Musk decided to stop trying to play nice and he's just going to sue them out of business and just take the piss out of them. Some people are wondering why the ADL was not included in this. Maybe they'll be included later. Bu…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

little too much like Obama. But it's so strange to hear him do an actual impression of Obama. Now if it sounds like I'm criticizing that you're hearing it wrong. I'm going to compliment him on that. Let me tell you my secret for becoming a famous cartoonist. If you've never heard me say this before,…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

tual button on the user interface yes it would be logged but if I just do it with code within the system with a little tweak it'd be the same as the heat button but it wouldn't be logged and nobody would ever be able to prove I did it. Huh. Well it sure would be good if something like that happened.…

View segment →
Tangent Affirmations

the state law mandates them to purge ineligible voters and they're just going to keep the illegal aliens apparently on the rolls. So in other words it looks like exactly they are planning to cheat in Arizona. We know how they're planning to cheat. They're showing you that they're not going to change…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

r own bodies they just haven't executed on that control. Harris says you want the freedom to love openly and whoever you want openly and with pride to which I say which freedom is that? That's not a freedom you want. Do you want anybody to be able to express any form of love? I think you'd want to…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

she got fact checked hard by Greg Gutfeld who was there to tell her Trump never said drink any bleach nor did he say inject bleach. And here's the real thing here's the funny thing. She acted like she didn't know that. And I thought that she was kind of smart she just had you know different prioriti…

View segment →
NewsReaction General Commentary

ce? Is there even one person in the Palestinian areas in favor of peace? Haven't seen one yet. I assume they exist and I assume that I would be subject to being brainwashed by never seeing one. So I got a real question about the brainwashing on that point. I'd love to know what the real opinion of t…

View segment →
Closing General Commentary

ecause the ocean is just bouncing up and down with waves so it bounces the mechanical thing up and down. All right ladies and gentlemen that's all I've got for you today. It was amazing. Thanks for joining. I got to go do some other stuff and see if I can get insurance for my house today. I might n…

View segment →

What a show we got today. The stock market's recovering, the news is fun and funny. Oh, it's going to be good.

Good morning everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. And if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that no human can understand with their tiny shiny human brains, all you need for that is a copper mug or a glass or a tankard, a stein, a canteen, a jug or a flask — a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip. And it happens now.

Go. Oh, delightful. Delightful.

Okay people, how about a little news update and then we'll get into the vice presidential pick and all the stuff about politics.

Well, the New York Post has a story that there's a new theory about how the pyramids got built. And maybe they used — apparently there was a lot of water in that area back in the pyramid building days. There were rivers and canals. And they may have used the rivers and canals to power the building of the pyramid. So they may have been harnessing the water power to help them lift the heavy blocks. I'm not sure exactly how they harnessed it, but if I were building a pyramid, let me tell you how I would do it.

I would start with building a canal where I could float all the big rocks. So if you wrapped enough wood around them, I think they'd all float. So you float your big rocks from the quarry right up to the pyramid. But now you've got to get the rock up to the top of the pyramid. How do you do it? Well, I don't know, but the way I'd do it is I'd have the center of the pyramid always empty, like there's a big column in the middle of it. And I would have an underground canal so that I could move those big blocks that are floating on wood into the middle of the pyramid. And then I would close off the place that the block came from and I would fill the column with water and it would float those big blocks all the way up to the top of the pyramid, whatever has been built so far. And then you just take it off and put it where you want it.

So you could actually float the blocks to the top if you sealed off the column and allowed the pyramid to just be a big column of water and you just put the water in there. So maybe. But there could have been other mechanical ways they harnessed the water power.

There are new scientists who claim that you can use AI to detect intelligence, sexual preference, and political leaning just by looking at faces. Do you believe that? Do you believe that you can tell with a high level of accuracy somebody's intelligence, sexual preference, and political leaning just by their face? How many believe that you could not every time but that you could usually tell by their face? I do. If you can't tell those things by looking at people's faces, there's something wrong with you. You're missing some kind of social skill. Yes, of course you can tell those things. It takes you about all of one second to tell somebody's general intelligence by looking at them. You know it's true.

Now sexuality, if they're not hiding it, it's usually easy to tell. If they're hiding it, it's hard, of course. And political leanings, weirdly yes. Weirdly yes, you can tell people's political leanings. But that's not the fun part. Here's the fun part. It can detect lies. Now I haven't seen anybody do it yet, but I guarantee that if humans can do it — and you've seen me do it a million times, right? The tells for lying are very clear.

I was watching who was it the other day? Chris Murphy, who supports Harris, Democrat. I was watching him with the sound off, and when he gets to the lying part, his eyebrows go way up and his eyes get wide. And then he delivers the lie that he knows is a lie. And you know it's a lie. But if he opens his eyes really hard, maybe he can make you believe the lie that he knows is a lie and you know is a lie. They're really obvious. So yes, AI will be able to determine who's lying. And I don't think we're ready for that. Do you think we're ready for that? Because it's going to be pretty accurate, except for the people who really practice their lies. Those would be hard to detect anyway.

Science has also determined that there's a key brain chemical that determines whether you choose to exercise or eat some unhealthy snacks. That's pretty specific. So in rats anyway, they can tell if the rat will want to do physical activity or just indulge in a treat based on how much of this one brain chemical is there. Something called orexin. Now they haven't tried this on human beings, but the thinking is that they could change your desire to exercise versus snacking based on how much you change this chemical composition in the person.

But do you know what the real story is? It's yet more proof that we don't have free will. If you had free will, why would it matter how much of this chemical you had in your brain? Because your free will would just say I choose to exercise or it might say I choose to eat an unhealthy snack. But if you have free will, how could it possibly be affected by a chemical in your brain? No, you don't have free will. Free will has always been the most persistent illusion in all of humanity. And we imagine we have free will because it allows us to not go crazy, I guess. But no, you don't have any free will.

Yeah, I think I first realized that — I don't know how many decades ago — but when scientists said, you know what, I think some people are born with a tendency to be gay, to which I said, well, wouldn't that mean they don't have free will? And then science said, you know what, turns out that people who become addicts and alcoholics are genetically different. In other words, there's some genetic inclination to addiction. To which I said, well, I thought they could just choose not to be addicted. They got that free will, don't they? And they eventually realize that anything we attribute to free will will eventually be identified as a chemical state. And then you'll realize it doesn't exist and then you'll have to deal with that. So I'm getting you ready decades in advance. You're welcome.

All right, another thing the science found out is that your moral values could change with the seasons. So the seasonality — and this has been studied. A UBC study has revealed that regular seasonal shifts in people's moral values. Huh. Let's say if your moral values can shift based on, I don't know, sunlight and diet and temperature, that sounds a little like you don't have free will, huh? You might notice eventually that 100% of science is all in the same direction on free will. Every bit of it. Every single thing that they discover about humans reduces what you could imagine was their free will. It has always been an illusion. Hypnotists learned that in day one. In day one, the hypnotist learned that we imagine free will but we're just programmed machines basically. You can't really even be a hypnotist unless you understand that free will is fake.

You might be amazed to find that there's a new study that says no amount of drinking alcohol is good for you. Huh. Who told you that first? Me, 20 years ago for the first time probably. But yes, there's no amount of alcohol that's good for you. And there's a new study that says that it is a carcinogen and your odds of getting basically every kind of cancer goes way up if you've had any alcohol at all. So any amount of alcohol increases substantially your risk of cancer. So don't say I didn't warn you.

Here's another one. There's a teen that's suing Meta — so that would be Instagram and Facebook — for $5 billion for being addicted by Instagram. So it's a 13-year-old New York girl and she's filed this suit. It's a class action suit so it would be on behalf of all the other people as well. And it argues that Meta implemented addictive features, the like counts and the stories, despite knowing they could harm teens' mental health. And it used manipulative tactics.

Now what part of this is not common knowledge? Would you say it's common knowledge that the social media platforms use science to figure out what is most addictive? Well yes. Yeah, yes of course. So nobody's questioning that basic fact, right? It's really the DNA of all social media that it's addictive. So if you know it's addictive, and then secondly the claim is that Meta knew it was addictive and therefore harmful to teens' mental health. Do you think they can prove in the lawsuit that Meta was aware of the effects it would have on mental health? I think so. I think they can do that.

And then I say to myself, okay, but is this really an important lawsuit or is it just somebody's taking a run at some free money and you'll never hear about it again? Well it turns out that the lawyer representing the minor is famous lawyer David Boies. Now if you haven't heard that name it's because you're not enough of a legal geek to know that there's some names that are associated with big cases. He's one of those names that's often associated with big cases. And he's won enough that he can be on big cases. So it could be a really big deal.

What would happen if social media had to remove their addictive qualities? Well, what would be left? But it also asks a bigger question. Aren't all products addictive even if you're not trying to make them addictive? Everybody who makes a product of any kind that would cause you to spend your time doing one thing versus another, there's some kind of attractive addictive quality if you're going to use it more than once. So on one hand I'm kind of fascinated and interested that somebody might be able to make a case out of it. On the other hand there's definitely an unintentional effect that could come from that. Like I'm looking at basically everything in my room and I think, well I mean I'm addicted to my coffee. I'm addicted to creating these live streams. I mean I get such a kick out of doing this every morning that I'm addicted. Chocolate, yeah chocolate's addictive. Food's addictive. So I don't know how far you can take this lack of free will I can addict you thing. Because if you prove that nobody has free will, well then your whole legal system is in trouble. So we have to at least pretend we have free will.

All right, there's a report that Elon Musk is going to host Donald Trump on the X platform doing it as Spaces. This does not indicate that Trump is coming back to X. That would be a whole separate conversation which I don't think is happening. But my guess is that Trump contractually or at least ethically can't leave Truth Social because if he left Truth Social all the other stockholders would get nailed. And I don't think he can do that ethically. But he may also have a contractual agreement that he can't go back to X because that would be bad for the platform. So he's got billions of dollars at stake in not going back to X. So I wouldn't expect it. And it doesn't seem to make much difference because everything he says on Truth gets picked up on X anyway.

Anyway, the other Musk news is that the X platform and Linda Yaccarino — if I'm saying her name right, the head of X — have announced going after GARM. I forget what the letters stand for but that's the big group of people who allegedly were behind some anti-competitive behavior, maybe even RICO. It could be so bad in which they organized boycotts of advertisers to suppress free speech, say X and Musk and Yaccarino. Now is that something that really happened? Was there an organization that organized to suppress free speech? Yes, that is easily provable public knowledge. They were an entity. We know all the people. We know what they did for a living. We know that they did organize to take down X. We know why. It was because they didn't like the free speech. They would say it's disinformation but of course that's free speech.

And Rumble's CEO says they've joined in on this. This could be a really big deal because I don't see how they could lose. They have the goods. I mean it's basically public information at this point. So how do they lose that? We'll see. But the important thing is that Musk decided to stop trying to play nice and he's just going to sue them out of business and just take the piss out of them.

Some people are wondering why the ADL was not included in this. Maybe they'll be included later. But the ADL is part of the censorship behavior bad actor world. So if you weren't aware of how bad the ADL is, you should be. I'm sure they've done some good things in the past. I wouldn't discount that. But at the moment they're more of a Democrat attack dog kind of organization.

All right, let's talk about the new VP choice for Harris, Tim Walz. So he got introduced at a big event and we'll talk about all the things. But the first speaker was Josh Shapiro, who many people including me believed was already picked to be the VP choice. That turned out to be fake news which I fell for. So if you're keeping track, and you should keep track of how many times I fall for fake news, but also keep track of how many times other people fall for it. Now I don't remember what language I used when I talked about it but I talked about it like it was sort of a done deal but not confirmed officially. I went too far. I should have said this is not a confirmed thing but somebody's making this claim and here's why. So I think I failed you on detecting that. So I present myself as good at detecting but that one slipped past my filter. So you should first of all hold that against me like literally. But you should also look at the totality of things I predict and call on and just see how the total record is. One of the claims I would never make is that I'm always right in my detection. Nobody would make that claim. The best you can do is you know better than other people I guess. You know if you could do it better than other people you're amazing. I don't know if I do it better than other people. You can be the judge. But I missed that one. So keep that. Put that on my permanent bad record.

All right, so here's what I had heard about Josh Shapiro. They say he was a great orator and he would have been a stronger vice president. That he was not chosen. And we have a little disagreement about why. Some people say it's because he was Jewish and the anti-Semitic population within the Democrat party made that a problem. And as Van Jones points out, the anti-Semitism is marbled into the Democrat Party. Which by the way is a fantastic choice of words. So Van Jones said the anti-Semitism is marbled in and they need to work on that. You know they're going to have to figure out how to deal with that. I love the honesty of that.

But then I think other people, other Republicans etc. are saying that they think that's the reason that he was not picked, is that he's Jewish. But then the David Axelrods want us to believe the real reason he wasn't chosen is that when he met with Harris he was a little bit too alpha and too much — I think they use the term main character energy — meaning he looks too much like he should be considered as a future president because he has too much skill. So that it would be an uncomfortable fit with Harris who's maybe not the strongest political figure we've ever seen. And that maybe he asked for too much power. You know these are all rumored things that we can't confirm. And maybe that it just didn't seem like the right fit. So it could have been a combination of just knowing that the marbled anti-Semitism wasn't going to work out for him and maybe also knowing that he wasn't quite the right personality fit. And maybe you save him for a future presidential run which I think would be the smart play.

Now I had never heard Josh Shapiro speak and I'd heard somebody say in something I completely dismissed — somebody told me he speaks like Obama. Do you know what my reaction to that was? Sure, yeah okay yeah he talks like Obama. That this Jewish guy from Pennsylvania is going to sound like Barack Obama and I'm supposed to believe that? And so I listen to him talk and I'm sitting here at home saying he doesn't just talk like Obama. You know he has the hope and change kind of rhetoric in that category. I thought that when people said he sounds like Obama there was more of a vibe and I even thought that the vibe was a little overselling it. It's like no he doesn't have an Obama vibe. I was so wrong. It's not the vibe. He does an impression of Obama. He does an actual verbal impression where if you were listening at home and nobody told you it was Josh Shapiro you would actually think it was Obama's voice. It's an actual impression of Obama.

Now do you think he's aware of that? I wonder. I mean it could be that he's just a big fan and he was influenced and maybe picked up some of the techniques and went too far and it just sounded a little too much like Obama. But it's so strange to hear him do an actual impression of Obama. Now if it sounds like I'm criticizing that you're hearing it wrong. I'm going to compliment him on that. Let me tell you my secret for becoming a famous cartoonist. If you've never heard me say this before, you know people would ask early in my career what's the secret of how you develop this popular cartoon. And I would say honestly I would do the best job I could of copying good cartoonists but I would be so bad as an artist that when I tried to copy other cartoonists you couldn't tell I was copying them because I wasn't good at copying. But because I took something from those other cartoonists when I tried to copy them and maybe combined a few of them that I liked into my copying it looked original.

Yeah if you look at the Dilbert characters and then you look at Sergio Aragonés' work in Mad Magazine — he would draw the little Mexican guys with the Mexican hats in the margins of Mad Magazine when I was a kid a million years ago. If you look at The Far Side the characters have no necks like Dilbert characters. Yeah I was just copying those two guys basically, Gary Larson and Sergio Aragonés. But if you look at Dilbert you'd say what it doesn't look like you copied anything. It's because I'm a bad copier. So being a bad copier of somebody who is extraordinary is a really smart thing to do. So I'm not criticizing Josh Shapiro whatsoever. If he can do an impression of Obama and he can nail it and people would like Obama say I like what he's saying, I don't know why I like it, it's reminding me of something but it makes me feel good. It's brilliant.

So I would really worry about Shapiro if you're a conservative and you're worried about future elections. He does have the goods. He absolutely has the goods even though he's copying. Perfectly acceptable technique. I don't have anything bad to say about that anyway. He was a clear superior choice. I can see why he was a little too strong. I favor the combination explanation. It probably had something to do with anti-Semitism and it probably had something to do with he's too strong a character. Probably both.

So then Kamala Harris did her long introduction then she introduced Walz. And here's what I saw. I thought both of them looked drunk. Now I can't confirm. I mean I don't know that they imbibed anything but they acted drunk. They did the laughing uncontrollably about nothing that was especially funny. And the weird thing is that Walz tried to paste and copy Kamala Harris. Now that's a bad idea. So when Kamala Harris is on stage and he's standing behind her waiting to be introduced she goes into a cackle. It looked drunk to me. And then her vice president pick standing behind her, Walz, he imitates her cackle and he does this completely unnatural looking over laugh in the background. Like you go what is wrong with him? Is that his normal laugh or is he actually copying it? It looked like he was just pacing her, matching her. So he was matching her energy. So she went into drunk cackling, he went into drunk cackling. It was the weirdest thing to see.

So then she slurs her way through a speech like that. To me it sounded drunk. And then the weird thing is that while she was talking after he did an impression of Kamala Harris cackling he goes into a spontaneous impression of Joe Biden's vacant brain dead look. Did you see it? I have to take my glasses off to do it but I'm going to give you an impression of a face that he settled into while Kamala Harris was talking. That he didn't even look like a living human being. What the hell was that? All right here's the face. What is that? His mouth just went open like Hillary Clinton looking at the balloon drop but with the dead face that Biden has. I mean I swear to God it looked like he was channeling Biden up there looking like he had dementia or something. And then he snapped out of it. When he gave his talk he was actually very good. So if I'm going to judge him as a public speaker, A+. Good, good, good public speaker. And I wouldn't discount his capability as a politician. Very strong but weird. Weird as hell.

So we've got Josh Shapiro who is channeling Obama then you've got Tim Walz who's channeling Harris and then he's back there channeling Biden. You really don't know what you're getting do you? There's no way to know what you're getting because they just seem to be copying each other and pretending and playing some kind of weird characters. And of course her policies have all changed. You know Harris has reversed her policies so you don't know her policies, her personality. You don't know if she's drunk or sober. You haven't heard her talk and answer questions. Yeah the key is the less you know about them the better they'll do.

Then we did learn that Walz is a giant liar which makes him perfect for campaign. He just lied a bunch about JD Vance. Now the whole JD Vance lie about having sex with a couch that's not based on any real thing that he ever said or did, well as far as we know. But do you think that Walz is not aware that that's fake? Do you think he's not aware? Well I think he's aware. And I think that both sides do this. It's what I call recreational beliefs. Meaning there's some stuff that you just throw to your base because they want to pretend they believe it. You know Trump does the same thing and I would say that's a recreational belief. So if you get yourself all caught up in trying to debunk it like that's not true you're lying about that couch, well you're sort of being pulled into their trick. Because if you're talking about whether he did or did not fuck a couch you're not really promoting your side. So it's basically draining your energy away into something ridiculous that doesn't matter and they don't believe it. So debunking it doesn't make any difference anyway.

All right, he's being sold by the left as having Midwestern folksy values. So they're all trying to paint him as this Midwestern, he's the most ordinary not left kind of guy. But of course he has a number of views and policies that are really left. So he does cover a span. He's apparently okay with the NRA or let me say it a different way. The NRA actually gave him a good vote for being pro-gun. So he's a gun owner. He's been in the military. Looks like he's a hunter I think. So he's good on guns and he's got that Midwestern stuff but he's got a lot of stuff we'll talk about that's not so Midwestern ordinary stuff.

All right, to me the funniest thing last night was watching what I'll call the anti-white pundits mostly on CNN trying to say how excited they were about this old white guy. Cuz I don't think they were excited about an old white guy but they had to act like they were. And watching them struggle to come up with words that kind of were supportive but didn't really reveal their real feelings. So it was really funny watching them try to navigate that anyway.

And then some are saying that Walz was selected so they could get the white male vote. All right I'd like to talk to my white male viewers here. How many people think that they would vote for Kamala Harris because she picked a white guy to be vice president? Is there even one person in the entire United States who would say you know I didn't know who to vote for but because I'm racist — this is not me I'm doing an impression of somebody else — because a person might say that because they're racist they're really happy that Kamala Harris has a white man picked as her vice president. So in order to feel better the alleged racists would vote for the brown woman so they could have a vice president who was like them. There are zero white people who would do that. There's not a single one. I don't think you could get one person in the United States who would say you know I'm a white man and I was a little uncomfortable with Kamala Harris but now that she's got a vice president who agrees with her on everything now I'm convinced I'm going to go for that package.

So I don't know is there something wrong with the pundits or are white men especially completely misunderstood in this country? Who would really think that that would change anybody's vote? It's kind of jaw-dropping that that's even a possible conversation anyway. No he's not going to change anybody's vote because he's white. He might lose some votes but it's not going to gain any.

All right so we're going to be struggling over the question of whether he's super lefty or middle of the road. The Democrats want to paint him as middle of the road. I think he insists he's a moderate. Directly insists that. All right but here are some of the things he's been accused of. I don't know how many of these are true. Some of these may be out of context. We'll learn later. But these are the attacks that are coming against him. That he waited three days before deploying the National Guard to quash the BLM riots. So he is being accused of being a little too favorable to the rioters and not having the right empathy for his own state when he could have stopped it sooner. But of course he'd have an argument. You know maybe bringing in the military would have caused more trouble. I don't know. He has some argument for that. But the people who live there are not too happy that for three days they had to endure the rioting when he could have stopped it sooner they think.

Apparently he created a COVID snitch line so that again you might find that the context for all these is a little bit lacking cuz these are accusations. So don't assume any of these are true or completely in context but it's just what the attacks are. So you had a COVID snitch line they say so you could turn in your neighbor for being not vaccinated. I don't even know if I believe that at all. I mean it sounds like something somebody would have done but so that sounds terrible.

Some say he's doubling down on drugs and surgeries for kids and teens. Yeah so he would be a little too pro transitioning for children. That would be a complaint about him.

He has allegedly got a DUI when he was 30 and part of his excuse was that he lost his hearing in the military so he didn't hear the siren. I don't think anybody believes that. Or he didn't see it or something.

Then the worst one is that he was in the National Guard for years but when the Iraq war broke out he suddenly decided that was a good time to retire claiming that he had always planned to do it about then and run for politics. But the people who did not retire and stayed in and got deployed to Iraq are saying something more along the lines of you freaking turd. You have no loyalty. You know we all got deployed. You left. And again is there some more context to that that I don't know? Maybe. Maybe I would say for all of these attacks you should ask yourself am I missing any context? These might not all be true.

And let's see he is pro-abortion without restrictions which makes conservatives say that he's going to let babies born alive and let them die after they're alive. I think there might be some context to that missing. But I don't like get into the abortion question because I think that's for women to work out not for me.

All right apparently he created a DEI council as soon as he got into office saying that America was systemically racist and he pushed the diversity equity and inclusion thing really far. And to me of course that's completely disqualifying. Completely disqualifying.

Yeah we'll talk about that. I'm seeing a comment about me on there.

Then there's this weird video of after he gave his speech that his wife came on stage. This is Tim Walz and she comes up to him. And how do you greet your wife when you're a political candidate who's just been chosen to the world and you're standing on stage and she comes up and everybody's clapping and celebrating? What would be the typical way you'd greet your wife? Well I'm no politician but I would think something like a kiss on the lips you know unless there was some maybe lipstick issue going on there. Maybe at least on the side of the face. A hug, a real deep hug, something like that. He chose a handshake. He shook hands with his wife then she went in for the hug and he gave her the no naughty bits hug. If you ever hug somebody who definitely didn't want your sexuality to be part of the hug and they just do the leaning hug where the only part that's touching is the top of your chests — it's like not even breasts it's just like the top of your chest touches a little bit but your groin area is two feet apart because you're both leaning in — that's how he hugged his wife after he shook her hand. What the hell is going on there? I don't know.

All right the other big thing is that he's big on China. Oh he also signed a bill redefining the term sexual orientation to include pedophiles. So what that means is that there was a bill in his state to prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation but under his administration they included sexual orientation to include pedos so that you could not discriminate against somebody for being a pedophile. All right okay anyway.

Now I'm just going to say that loud. He gives me a feeling that I don't have any evidence for. I just get a feeling from him. Now I heard from other people that they got the same vibe and I don't have any information that would suggest that any of this is true. I just say he gives me kind of a vibe. So he's been a teacher and a coach so he's chosen careers that put him in contact with children and he just has a vibe about him. So that's my only statement is he has a vibe.

I will note that it seems like the Deep State really really prefers people they can blackmail. Now again I don't have any evidence of that and I don't have evidence that he has anything he could be blackmailed for. None whatsoever. But keep an eye on that because it just seems like a weird coincidence that so many people in politics look like well that's exactly the list of people I would think would be most blackmailable and yet they seem to have these prominent roles. So I don't know. I just keep an eye on it.

Now Walz also has this weird China connection. He's allegedly been to China 30 times. I don't know if that's confirmed. He worked there so he worked there for a time teaching I guess around children and he honeymooned there. Who honeymoons in China if you've been there dozens of times? Does that make sense? Does that sound like your romantic honeymoon destination? Well I mean he's got a strong connection to China so maybe it made sense but here's the thing we can know for sure. We know that Walz has a strong connection to China. I'll say connection because he's been there so many times and he's worked there. Strong connection. And then he set up some kind of a student exchange program when he was in America so Americans and I think Americans can go there. So there's that. So he loves — he seems to have some strong connection to China. And you would think that China would really appreciate that wouldn't you? If you were China wouldn't you love to have an American vice president who could become president someday? Wouldn't you love that he had a strong connection to your country? Well I think you would. I mean that would be a lot safer than somebody who didn't.

And we also know that China controls TikTok. We also know that TikTok has something called a heat button which if you push it it makes something trend more obviously. So you can basically control the brains of Americans, young Americans mostly, by any little tweak to TikTok. And we know it literally brainwashes people. You know you can see on X people are being well on the meta platform there's a lawsuit because it's addictive. Addictive and persuasive are pretty closely related. If there's some information source that's addictive I can tell you in advance it's persuasive. Scott there's a thing that's addictive everybody can't stop looking at it do you think it's persuasive? Yes yes obviously super super persuasive. I don't have to study it. If you're addicted to it it's persuasive. There's no way around that. There's no way you could be addicted to it and not be persuaded by it. That's not a thing.

So we have no information that would suggest that China has told TikTok to push any buttons. We just know that they have a gigantic national interest in controlling thoughts in America. We know they have the ability because they can simply tell them to push the button. Now let me describe it the way I described it in the man cave the other day. The CEO of TikTok says no they don't tell me what to do. That might be true. That might be true that they don't tell them anything directly about what to do. But everybody knows what to do indirectly don't they? Is there anybody who works at TikTok who doesn't know what China as a country would prefer to see more of versus what they'd like to see less of? Of course they know.

So if there were people who just worked at TikTok who had any control over the algorithm they don't need to be told what to do they just know what to do. But if I were China here's how I'd be controlling TikTok. I would say to the CEO hey CEO we don't want to control you do whatever you want but we'd like you to meet all the leaders of China so you really really know what they look like. You know we want to be kind of close to you. So that might be enough. But even if the CEO wants to have deniability no they never told me to do anything I've never done anything for them which would be good to keep that deniability. Here's what I would do if I were Chinese intelligence service. I would make sure that I became friends with the top engineers at TikTok. I would have lunch with them. I would give them favors. I would connect them with people that could help them. And I would make sure that the engineers knew that doing what Chinese intelligence wants is really good for them and if they don't do what Chinese intelligence wants it's really bad for them.

And then Chinese intelligence has dinner with their favorite engineer from TikTok and says you know there's these people running for office in America. One of them really likes China. He's been here 30 times. It'd be great for China if that guy got elected. Do you hear me engineer? Uh yeah I hear you're saying this guy's good for China right? And do you still control the algorithm? Well yeah I mean I could I just have to push that button. Would anybody know if you push the button? Well if I push the actual button on the user interface yes it would be logged but if I just do it with code within the system with a little tweak it'd be the same as the heat button but it wouldn't be logged and nobody would ever be able to prove I did it. Huh. Well it sure would be good if something like that happened.

So if you imagine that TikTok is not controlled at a detailed level by China I don't know it feels naive. So we have a situation where the polls we know are going to be close on Election Day and they will be close enough that let's say a 2% swing would certainly determine the race. Because remember 2% is not just added to one group it's subtracted from the other. So a 2% swing is a 4% difference. You get that. So could TikTok cause a 2% swing in votes? Yeah easily. Easily. And not just by TikTok because TikTok content gets onto other services etc. So yes. So we've actually given the vote to China. Just let that sink in. China can move the election 2% with TikTok guaranteed. There's no question that they could do that. All they have to do is want to and then TikTok will do it I assume because TikTok doesn't want to deal with Chinese intelligence hating them.

So if American social media except for X folded like a cheap chair when American FBI and CIA wanted it to do stuff what do you think happens in China? You know if the CIA wants you to do stuff you're going to feel like you really need to do it even if they don't threaten you. But what happens if Chinese intelligence asks you to do it and you're a Chinese owned company or controlled? You're really really going to think you need to do it. So China basically has the vote now. So the Chinese vote will determine who the president is. So good on that.

Well here's a fun recreational belief getting back to science a little bit and the nature of reality. So somebody called — not somebody called this is his actual name — somebody with a name J. Anderson from the Project Unity is talking about some experiment in which they put plants in a darkened room where there would be a light source that would randomly go to different quadrants and it was completely randomized. So it'd just be a plant put in one corner but it wouldn't get light at all except randomly as that light would be lit up in different places. But mostly the light was where there was no plant because there was a room with mostly empty but one little plant. What they found was allegedly — remember this is a recreational belief I can't prove it's real — allegedly the randomized light would start in a statistically measurable way favoring the plant with no human involvement. In other words random stuff starts becoming less random if there's a living thing in the mix. And the idea is that even plants might be able to collapse reality.

So you know the experiments like Schrodinger's cat etc. So that quantum physics says you need an observer or it might be a device that's measuring something but if you don't measure it or observe it the reality stays in the superposition of neither yes nor no or up nor down. Has to be observed and then it becomes reality. Well apparently there's some suggestion that a plant can do that.

Now here's how this fits into my model of the world being a simulation. If the world is a simulation can you control it? And I think you can by having a clear idea of what it is you want which is one of the explanations for Elon Musk. I think Elon Musk always has a very clear idea of what he wants and he collapses reality in that direction. And I think the clearer your idea and the harder you think it the more likely it's going to collapse in your direction. Reality that is.

Now my life as I've told you many times is so weird so insanely unlikely but it also followed a path that I determined when I was six years old. When I was six years old I said I'm going to become a famous cartoonist and I never altered from wanting it. But there was a period of my life I didn't think it was possible but I always wanted it and it was always a really clear image of what it was and what it would look like and it happened exactly the way I meant exactly. And I can't explain that. And then you know my entry into politics had the same oddity about it that it just didn't look like it could have happened on its own. It looks like I'm authoring the simulation. So maybe the plant is authoring the simulation and maybe you are too. Maybe all of us are. And that the act of affirmations where you really focus on what you want and you repeat it or write it down 15 times a day that all that does is make sure that you have a clear view of what you want like a plant has a clear desire for sun. There's no ambiguity about what the plant wants if wanting is a thing right. It wants more light. I wanted to be a cartoonist. Elon Musk wanted to make an electric car, wanted to go to Mars.

All right there's a former NASA scientist who's doing a bunch of experiments to find out if we do live in a simulation. Thomas Campbell. So he's designed experiments to find out if our reality is more like a video game. And see Vicky Ver on X is reporting on this. And he's got say his experiments include a new spin on the double slit experiment. So I don't know the details but allegedly he's got a way to test whether we live in a simulation. How do you think that's going to go? I have no idea how that's going to go but the idea that we live in a simulation just keeps getting stronger and stronger. And that we don't have free will in the normal sense.

Well here's my final evidence that we live in a simulation. You ready for this? This really happened. So the vice presidential pick is Tim Walz you know that. So this created a situation where I swear this is true it puts President Trump or Donald Trump ex-President Trump in the position of opposing Walz. Come on. Trump the most famous build a wall guy in the world has to run against a Walz. He's opposing Walz. Come on. How did that happen on its own? How about Musk is suing a bunch of companies in that advertising space where I mentioned that GARM. So a bunch of advertisers are part of that. One of the advertisers that's mentioned that he's specifically suing through X is the Mars company. They make candy Mars bars and stuff. So Elon Musk is suing Mars. You tell me we're not living in the simulation. Trump is running against Walz. Elon Musk is suing Mars. And the assassination attempt against Trump involved somebody named Cheatle trying to stop somebody named Crooks and you don't trust either of them. How is this real? I mean seriously this just all happened by itself. I don't know. I'm having a real hard time believing any of this is happening accidentally because it looks exactly like a dream I might have. It's way like a dream I might have.

Anyway there's a whole bunch of new allegations about the Georgia 2020 election and I don't want to get you know Kraken meaning to get ahead of myself and say it's been proven. There's a bunch of election irregularities that have been proven. It's the Kraken cuz I think the Kraken was always a trap. I think that if there's real election irregularity the way to hide it is to come up with a fake Kraken. Give somebody important like Sidney Powell to believe it have her say it in public and then when it all falls apart you can say everything else was a Kraken too. So to me the Kraken always looked like an intelligence play to destroy the people who were too close to the real problem if there is one.

But you should know that there's a big video of a whole bunch of citizens doing a public event in which they made many claims of detected fraud or irregularities in the Georgia election. I don't have an opinion about the quality of any of that evidence because again you don't want to fall for a Kraken. But there's a lot of it and it sure sounds persuasive. But remember the Kraken sounded persuasive at one time too. So there's tons of evidence. We just don't know the quality of it. It's hard to say independently.

Then I saw a post by George — he goes by he's had an account Beisy tweets good follow but it just goes by the name George anyway. He says the Georgia state election board has passed a new rule allowing observers inside tabulation centers during this upcoming election. So that wasn't a thing before. Are you saying that we didn't have observers in the tabulation centers and that something could have gone wrong in the tabulation centers and there were no observers but now we do have observers or at least they'll be legal? Huh. Well that's interesting. Do you think the Republicans are going to find anything as they are more carefully watching this election?

Maybe there's a new lawsuit. America First Legal has got a lawsuit to sue Maricopa County Arizona for refusing to remove illegal aliens from their voter rolls out of the election. Now why in the world would they refuse to do that? The only reason I can think of is that they want to use illegal votes to get their way. Why else would they refuse to do it? If they had a list of all the people who were not legal voters and they had a list of all the people on their voting rolls it's not the biggest job in the world to subtract one list from another list programmatically but they have. So maybe there's more to the context of this but they refused and they're blatantly defying their own state law because the state law mandates them to purge ineligible voters and they're just going to keep the illegal aliens apparently on the rolls. So in other words it looks like exactly they are planning to cheat in Arizona. We know how they're planning to cheat. They're showing you that they're not going to change it. They're going to disobey their own law and it looks a lot like they're planning to steal the election. Don't know for sure but it sure looks like it.

Well here's the good news. Lara Trump she said that they do have poll watchers, poll workers and legal experts will be everywhere votes are cast, counted. And she says do you want to help? So if you'd like to be part of the watcher group the URL to go to would be protectthevote.com. So any of you who want to be like onsite and watching for irregularities I think Lara's team will probably offer some guidance or training there and it's called protectthevote.com.

So here's my take on this. I think Republicans are going to uncover massive fraud only because they know where to look for it and they'll find it. I mean I think we can expect they'll find just all kinds of stuff. The whatever was happening in Georgia whether it was rigged or not I don't have proof either way. I think there's good evidence to show that things were deleted they shouldn't have been deleted and that you know there's a lack of forthcomingness in some cases. So there's something going on let's just say that. If you can't smell the smoke of some election irregularities I don't think you're paying attention. I don't think you're paying attention. There's something deeply wrong with our elections. They are not auditable which is all you need to know. They're not fully auditable. So when people say something got audited or double checked or counted they're usually looking at some very narrow thing that wouldn't tell you at all whether the election was rigged or not. It would just tell you if that very narrow thing was done right.

So for example they could recount mail-in votes and then they would call that an audit. But what if half of the mail-in votes were from people ineligible? Well they wouldn't check if they were eligible they would just recount them and say look we counted them right the first time second count matches I guess we're good nobody found any fraud. And then the legal system would say wait wait wait we did find some fraud and they take it to the courts and the courts say well it's too late or too little or you don't have standing we don't want to deal with it.

But if Laura Trump has done what I think she has done she has trained the watchers to really find the good stuff to know where to look. If they do find the good stuff or even if they allege they found the good stuff there's no way the election is going to get certified. So I'm going to double down on my election prediction that there won't be one. There will be voting but I don't believe that the country is sufficiently organized and honest enough to produce a result that we could even verify. So somehow we're going to have to pick a president but I think the vote will be ignored no matter which way it goes. I guess if the Democrats get their way they're more likely to try to push ahead but I don't know. I think the election will be so non-credible probably both ways that we're just going to have to figure out what to do.

All right so let me talk about the messaging from Harris and then Trump. All right so the Democrats have been pushing the Trump's going to steal your democracy which I don't think anybody understood. So Harris quite smartly tried to redefine that in a recent interview in which she said well you know rather than thinking about it as stealing your democracy there would be more accurate to think of it as stealing your freedoms that Trump would try to take your freedoms. So now you might ask what freedoms? What freedom is Trump trying to take? And here are the actual answers because Harris has now listed the freedoms.

So one is the freedom to control your own bodies which means birth control and abortion. Trump's view is he doesn't want to have anything to do with that stuff. So Trump's official policy is I don't want to be involved in making any laws about anything. I don't want to stop birth control of any kind the morning after pill or anything else and I don't want to be involved in decisions about abortion. I want the states to do that. Now given that every state has at least half of the men in favor of abortion right it's even more than that usually but at least half of the men are in favor of abortion that means that if women are in favor of it by majority there's a 100% chance they'll get it. Voting still sort of matters. So women have complete control in the states. They just have to organize and convince each other. So women will you stop pretending that men have anything to do with this? Convince women. If women by let's say 80% majority wanted abortion in their states and 50% of the men were on that side too they could stop anybody from getting elected anybody they could stop their funding. That would be such an overwhelming advantage on one of the top issues that they could kind of get anything they wanted.

It won't happen right away. So if Democrats are complaining that the end of Roe v. Wade created a situation where a third of the states I guess can't get the abortions that they want I would say for the people who wanted those abortions that's very bad in the short run. I think you have to admit that no matter where you are on the topic. But in the long run women have complete control of their bodies because they have complete control of the elections. They just have to be on the same side. If women are not on the same side why are you complaining to the rest of us? It's definitely women have to decide first and then maybe try to convince the rest of us. But if women can't decide although I think women are like two-thirds for abortion in the United States. So my argument about that is that women have full control of their own bodies they just haven't executed on that control.

Harris says you want the freedom to love openly and whoever you want openly and with pride to which I say which freedom is that? That's not a freedom you want. Do you want anybody to be able to express any form of love? I think you'd want to protect the children a little better wouldn't you? What about bestiality? Now here I'm not comparing LGBTQ to bestiality so don't try to do that to me. I'm not. These are not similar things. Not similar. I'm just saying the statement can we allow everybody to love who they want with pride? If somebody wants to have sex with farm animals should I respect it? Again I'm not comparing that to being gay. These are not comparable things. I'm just saying this is a pretty big statement and I would say the answer to that is conservatives mostly just want to be left alone. Conservatives don't care what you do behind your closed door. They might think it's a sin but they're not going to try to stop you from doing it. It's your business. Conservatives want to be left alone but they also want to leave you alone behind closed doors. So that one just seems dumb.

And I don't think conservatives want to be forced to celebrate anybody else's love choices. And I don't think conservatives want to be told that anybody should have pride about who they love. How about you just love who you love and you could be proud about it but why should I be proud of it? Why am I proud of your gay kid? I might like your gay kid. I might have complete respect for every human being and all their different choices because we're all infinitely different. I'll definitely have that. But why do I have to be proud about it? Why is anybody proud about it? How about it just is. It just is. You don't have to be proud about it. You don't have to be mean about it. You don't have to try to stop it. How about it just is and everybody's different and we just have to live in that world where everybody's different and maybe if we just left each other alone a little bit more that'd be great. So no I think that's dumb.

She says also freedom from gun violence. Okay that's a made up and stupid right. And first of all nothing that the left is doing is compatible with reducing violence. The left wants to defund the police. They supported riots. They don't want cash bail. They want open borders. They're pushing DEI and every other kind of racial division. There's no evidence no evidence that the left wants to reduce violence. It looks like they want to increase it. So that's a dumb argument. And it also ignores the fact that guns can protect you from a dictatorship.

They also talk about freedom to have access to a ballot. Okay we're still waiting for the first human being ever to say I'd like to vote but I've been prevented from doing it. None. We haven't met the alleged Black citizen who can't get an ID to vote. None. Not a single Black person ever in an interview or on TV or anybody you've ever met or anybody you talk to any of your friends any of your co-workers not a single Black person has ever said you know what I'd love to vote but I can't figure out how to get an ID. No. And yet they're selling that like it's a thing. None anyway. So I think those are ridiculous made-up rights. It's the whole thing is just complete garbage. Doesn't look like anything that professionals came up with. You know I sometimes say hey this looks like professional persuasion. That doesn't look professional. That looks like people who are writing some kind of college essay. They said all right write a college essay on how Trump is let's say stealing your freedoms and then you go in and you're like all right academically can I make an argument that he's stealing my freedoms by making everything the opposite of what it is and ignoring the context over here? Yeah it just seemed like some weird academic thing. It's not persuasive. It's just kind of dumb. But maybe it works for Democrats. I don't know.

Well one of the so-called — oh here's the let's talk about Trump messaging. So Trump said that the Harris Walz ticket will turn America communist immediately. I don't think the communist attack lands at all because every time I hear it even I you know I'm on Trump's side but when I hear him call the other side communist I think what in what way? Do they want the government to control all the means of production? Like do I not understand what a communist is? Do they want a dictator? I don't understand it at all. Now if they had said socialism then that's a problem too because when I hear socialism I say you mean like every modern country where there are some programs to take care of the people who can't take care of themselves? You mean socialism? So the trouble is that neither socialism nor communism really works too well as an attack. I think maybe it's just good for your own base but the base is already with you so I don't know it feels like wasted words to me. There are so many things that they could attack that going for communist just makes everybody here go well I don't know I don't see that. And I don't think anybody knows what Marxism is. You know maybe 2% of the country knows even what Marxism is. So that doesn't work too well. So all of those you're a liberal you're a Marxist you're a communist I don't see any of that messaging being effective. Whereas I would see I can help the economy I can keep you out of a war I can keep them from putting you in jail those feel like real things. So I'd like to see more of that.

So one of you remember Trump had these so-called fake electors. One of them just pleaded guilty to a single reduced charge. So those cases are still ongoing. So it was Lorraine Pellegrino. She was an Arizona 2020 so-called fake elector. But here's what she pleaded guilty to. A single misdemeanor charge of presentment of a false instrument for filing. Does that sound real to you? If the alternate electors thought they had a case meaning that they believed that there was nothing illegal about registering as an alternate elector which the left would call fake electors if they didn't know that any of that was illegal they wouldn't have been aware that their documents were illegal anyway. So I feel like this is a little bit of lawfare and maybe Lorraine Pellegrino just took the plea because it got her out of all penalties basically didn't have to go to jail didn't have to be on any kind of program. So I think there was just some kind of unsupervised release and it's just a misdemeanor. So who knows if any of that actually happened was a real law but it looks like maybe the law just forces people to take the plea and get out of there. So I don't know how any of that could have been illegal.

Now we also know that ex-Trump attorney Jenna Ellis reached some kind of cooperation agreement with law enforcement so that could be interesting. We'll see if anything comes out of that. Meanwhile another member of the so-called Squad in Congress lost in a primary. So Squad member Cori Bush lost her primary so she will be out of Congress. And she was allegedly attacked with heavy spending by pro-Israel groups. So do you think that pro-Israel groups took her out? It looks like it. If the money made the difference and they put in a lot of money maybe. Could be that she was just bad at her job and it didn't take much money.

There's a story that says the Harris Walz team is trying to pay influencers to say good things and do interviews and stuff for Harris and there's some documentation that shows that that's the case. But some of that may be a response to the fact that we heard that Baron Trump young Baron Trump is the one who had some connection to that Aiden Ross guy from Kick who did the 100 million views thing with Trump in the Cybertruck etc. So Baron Trump might turn into a player you know meaning his instincts might be really good and who knows maybe he's a future president who knows.

So Jessica Tarlov on The Five yesterday brought up the drinking bleach hoax and she got fact checked hard by Greg Gutfeld who was there to tell her Trump never said drink any bleach nor did he say inject bleach. And here's the real thing here's the funny thing. She acted like she didn't know that. And I thought that she was kind of smart she just had you know different priorities and different political views but you would have to be kind of stupid to not know that was a hoax or if you didn't know it was a hoax that's kind of stupid. Here's how you should know that's a hoax. Nobody would say that. That's it. You don't even have to research it. Nobody would say that. Do you know how I know that? Well I mean basically it's a good test if you just say to yourself would any human ever say that and if the answer is no nobody would ever say that that's your answer. You don't have to look into it.

So that was fascinating. I thought she was a lot smarter than that but she proved that she is not terribly smart if you literally believe that Trump suggested injecting bleach or drinking bleach. I don't know how you explain that except low IQ. I don't. Could you be that hypnotized? I don't know.

Meanwhile America First Legal is doing good stuff again. So they went after that Brennan Clapper intel community they're calling it in which they were trying to do this whole of government approach to silence political dissent. So these two ex top intel people in the United States were part of an organized Democrat program to make sure that free speech was limited. That's a real thing. It's just amazing that that's real. So anyway America First Legal's after him. They publicly released all the documents from that committee so and that they obtained that in litigation. So there's going to be litigation.

Here are some updates on other things. There SciTech Daily has a story that if you add dopamine to an Alzheimer's patient it almost immediately helps. So Japanese researchers have discovered that dopamine treatments could alleviate Alzheimer's symptoms because it promotes production of something. And so I guess they've tested in mice and they've got good hope that it might work in humans but they haven't tested yet.

Now here's another one where you could have asked Scott. I believe I've told you on livestream that dopamine is implicated not just in making you happy because that's how we usually think of it but it's an emotion it creates activity in your body. If you don't have dopamine you'll just sit there you won't get up. Your brain will say I should get up you just won't do it if you don't have dopamine. So I knew from one of my smartest friends a while ago that Alzheimer's could be treated with a dopamine like treatment. That's what L-Dopa is. L-Dopa is an existing treatment for Parkinson's because they thought dopamine would help. So this is new research and maybe they got a deeper understanding of it but yeah it's dopamine. Dopamine is what the Alzheimer's people need anyway. So I was thinking of Parkinson's actually. I think I was conflating Parkinson's with Alzheimer's in my bad explanation to what's happening. But I do think that generally speaking dopamine is sort of a necessary component for all of your functioning. So I'll broaden that and try to correct what I just said wrong because I was thinking of Parkinson's when I said L-Dopa. But if you think that your muscles need dopamine is it any surprise that your brain does? I feel like you could have just guessed that without doing this study anyway.

Here's a Venezuela update. The Maduro regime is trying to jail the opposition leaders of course. I guess that's what happens when he win happened in the United States so why wouldn't it happen in Venezuela?

Hamas has picked a new chief because somebody and maybe it was Israel assassinated the head of Hamas. So now the new head is their head of their terror group previously. So you've heard of him Yahya Sinwar. So they took the worst terrorist leader within Hamas and promoted him to be the actual head of Hamas because that guy got assassinated. Now let's talk peace huh.

Have you seen any of the interviews with Palestinians after October 7? I've seen a number of interviews on the street kind of thing where somebody will say all right was October 7 justified? And every person I saw interviewed everyone said oh yeah totally justified. And then they would be asked do you think a two-state solution could work? And every one of them says no no no there's no two-state solution there's a one-state solution and their one state solution is Israel goes away.

Now am I getting accurate information meaning these street interviews are they intentionally editing out the Palestinians who say something like yeah we just need our two states and we can live next to each other and everything will be fine we just need to stop fighting. You know we'll try to get the Hamas people to settle down a little bit we'll work on that on our side maybe you could work on your side and we'll get together. Nothing like that. No. So I have a question whether I'm being brainwashed because it would be a good brainwashing technique to do all these people in the street interviews and just edit out anybody who was for peace and then you would get the impression that there would be no point in even talking to the Palestinians because they only want to destroy Israel. Now it might be true you know maybe it's like 85% of the population I'm just guessing but what if 85% of the population wants nothing except the destruction of Israel? I think that could be the case but I wouldn't say it based on all the interviews because you know they're not reliable. But I do think that the brainwashing among the Palestinians is probably strong enough and comprehensive enough that there's nobody in the public who wants peace. They wish they weren't being shot at and they wish they could do what they want and they wish Israel didn't exist and all that but I don't think they want peace. I don't see any movement to it.

And if anybody wants to convince me that the Palestinians want peace it would be really useful for somebody on that side you know a pro-Palestinian journalist to go over there and show me some interviews of just ordinary people stopped in the streets who say yes please we want to end fighting and have a two-state solution that's living in peace next to each other. I don't know that they exist do you? Is there anybody watching who's had enough connection with Palestinians who are in the area who can tell me am I wrong? Is there not a single person in the entire community who wants peace without destroying Israel? I don't know that's a pretty big question isn't it? Why are we even talking about a peace deal if we don't know the answer to the question is anybody in favor of peace? Is there even one person in the Palestinian areas in favor of peace? Haven't seen one yet. I assume they exist and I assume that I would be subject to being brainwashed by never seeing one. So I got a real question about the brainwashing on that point. I'd love to know what the real opinion of the Palestinian people is over there. But I can tell you that if Hamas is picking the Sinwar guy as their new leader they have decided that October 7 worked and that more terrorism is better for them. So they're certainly not looking for peace. You don't put this guy in charge and say you know we'll put our best terrorist in charge because Israel is going to kill that guy. Israel has said in no uncertain terms we're going to kill that guy. Do you think if he showed up to negotiate they wouldn't kill him? I think if he shows up for a negotiation they could drop a bomb on him because they've said unambiguously we are going to kill that guy for sure. There's no way around it we're killing that guy. So even if he showed up for some state sanctioned thing they'd probably just kill him. I think they've got a case for it anyway.

And then there's a story that some guy got caught allegedly trying to arrange assassination attempts in the United States that would include Trump and it would be Iran's revenge for Trump taking out Soleimani. And the question I have about this Bill Malone is reporting on this Fox News and the question I have is I don't trust this story because the last thing I want to hear after all that sketchy Secret Service protection of Trump the last thing I want to hear is oh there's another country trying to kill Trump. So if we say that enough and we really do some things that make it look like another country is trying to kill Trump if something happened to Trump well what would the first thing you would look at would be these other countries. So I'm a little concerned that we're being brainwashed about the Iranians trying to assassinate Trump. I'm not saying it's not true I'm just saying there might be a little brainwashing involved on that.

Well meanwhile Iraq's Parliament is taking the first step to lower the legal age of marriage for girls from 15. Wow the legal age of marriage for a girl in Iraq is 15 but they're looking to lower that to nine. Nine huh. So that would be compatible with Sharia law I guess. So good job Americans for taking over Iraq and that didn't work out quite the way anybody hoped.

And the last good news is did you ever wonder why we don't make more electricity out of waves in the ocean? You know the ocean is continually going up and down and back and forth why can't we get electricity from that thing? Well it turns out there's a megawatt scale wave project that might be coming to realization according to the New Atlas Eco Wave. So what they do is they put these big floaty things in the water and as the waves bounce them up and down the float there's it's connected to some levers that create some electricity. So that's cool. I would think that you might have the same problem as the windmills. You know the windmills seem to be killing whales so I'd watch out for the whales because it's going to be loud because it's mechanical and it puts a loud mechanical thing in the ocean. Isn't that what the problem with the windmills was because it was loud and it was in the ocean that caused the I don't know the sonar of the whales to go crazy something like that.

All right we talked about GARM. Lunar powered yeah I guess it would be in a sense it would be a little bit lunar powered but that's not the only reason there are waves. So it's not so much the tide it doesn't work on the tide it just sits out in the ocean because the ocean is just bouncing up and down with waves so it bounces the mechanical thing up and down.

All right ladies and gentlemen that's all I've got for you today. It was amazing. Thanks for joining. I got to go do some other stuff and see if I can get insurance for my house today. I might not be able to. All right I'm going to say something privately to the people on Locals and I'm going to say bye to the rest of you on X and Rumble and YouTube. Thanks for joining. See you tomorrow. All right Locals coming to you privately right now.

what a show we got today stock market's recovering the news is fun and funny oh it's going to be good good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams and if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that no human can understand with their tiny shiny human brains all you need for that is a copper mug or a glass of tankered shell or steain a canteen jugg or flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure the dopamine of the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous SI and happens now go oh delightful delightful okay people how about a little uh news update and then we'll get into vice presidential pick and all the stuff about politics well the New York Post has a story that there's a new theory about how the pyramids got built and maybe they used the apparently there was a lot of water in that area back in the pyramid building days there were rivers and canals and they may have used the rivers and canals to uh Power the building of the pyramid so they may have been harnessing the the water power to help them lift the heavy blocks I'm not sure exactly how they harnessed it but if I were building a pyramid let me tell you how I would do it I would start with uh build bu a canal where I could float all the big rocks so if you if you wrapped enough wood around them I think they'd all float so you float your big rocks from the Quarry right up to the pyramid but now you got to get the rock up to the top of the pyramid how do you do it well I don't know but the way I'd do it is I'd have the center of the pyramid always empty like there's a big column in the middle of it and I would I would have an underground um Canal so that I could move the things into the move those uh move those big blocks that are floating on wood into the middle of the pyramid and then I would close off the place that the block came from and I would fill the column with water and it would float those Big Blocks all the way up to the top of the pyramid whatever has been built so far and then you just take it off and put it where you want it so you could actually float the the block the blocks to the Top If You sealed off the column and allowed the pyramid just to be a big column of water and you just put the water in there so maybe but there could have been other mechanical ways they harnessed the water power to there are a new scientist who claims that you can use AI to detect intelligence sexual preference and political leaning just by looking at faces do you believe that do you believe that you can tell with high level of accuracy somebody's intelligence sexual preference and political leaning just by their face how many believe that you could not every time but that you could usually tell by their face I do if you can't tell those things by looking at people's faces there's something wrong with you you're you're missing some kind of social skill yes of course you can tell those things it takes you about all of one second to tell somebody's general intelligence by looking at them you know it's true now sexuality if they're not hiding it it's usually easy to tell if they're hiding it's hard of course and uh political leanings weirdly yes weirdly yes you can tell people's political leanings but that's not the fun part here's the fun part it can detect lies now I haven't seen anybody do it yet but I guarantee that if humans can do it and you've seen me do it a million times right the the the Tells for lying are very clear I was watching who was it the other day uh Chris Murphy supporting who supports Harris Democrat um I was watching him with the the sound off and when he gets the lying part his eyebrows go way up and his eyes get wide and then he delivers the lie that he knows is a lie and you know it's a lie but if he opens his eyes really hard maybe he can make you believe the lie that he knows is a lie and you know is a lie they're really obvious so yes AI will be will be able to determine who's lying and I don't think we're ready for that do you think we're ready for that because it's going to be pretty accurate except for the people who really practice their lies those would be hard to detect anyway um science has also determined that there's a uh key brain chemical that uh determines whether you choose to exercise or eat some unhealthy snacks that's pretty specific so in rats anyway they can tell if the rat will want to do physical activity or just indulge in a treat based on how much of this one brain chemical is there something called or rexen now they haven't tried this on human beings but the thinking is that they could change your desire to exercise versus snacking based on how much you change this chemical composition in the person but do you know what the real story is it's yet more proof that we don't have free will if you had Free Will why would it matter how much of this chemical you had in your brain because your free will would just say I choose to exercise or it might say I choose to eat an unhealthy snack but if you have free will how could it possibly be affected by a chemical in your brain no you don't have free will Free Will has always been the most persistent illusion in all of humanity and we imagine we have free will because it allows us to not go crazy I guess but no you don't have any free will yeah I think I first realized that I don't know how many decades ago but when um scientists said you know what I think some people are born with a tendency to be gay to which I saidwell wouldn't that mean they don't have free will and then science said you know what turns out that people who become addicts and alcoholics are genetically different in other words there's some genetic inclination to addiction to which I said well I thought they could just choose to be addicted they got that Free Will don't they and they eventually realize that every anything we attribute to free will will eventually be identified as a chemical State and then you'll realize it doesn't exist and then you'll have to deal with that so I'm getting you ready decades in advance you're welcome all right another thing the science found out is that your moral values could change with the seasons so the seasonality and this has been studied a UBC study has revealed that regular seasonal shifts and people's uh their regular seasonal shifts and moral values huh let's say if your moral values can shift based on I don't know sunlight and diet and temperature that sounds a little like you don't have free will huh you might notice eventually that 100% of science is all in the same direction on free will every bit of it every single thing that they discover about humans reduces what you could imagine was their free will it has always been an illusion hypnotist learned that in day one in day one the hypnotist learn that we imagine free will but we're just program machines basically you can't really even be a hypnotist unless you understand that Free Will is fake um you might be amazed to find that there's a new study that says no amount of drinking alcohol is good for you huh who told you that first me 20 years ago for the first time probably uh but yes there's no amount of alcohol that's good for you and there's new study that says that it is a carcinogen and your odds of getting every basically every kind of cancer goes way up if you've had any alcohol at all so any amount of alcohol increases substantially your risk of uh cancer so don't say I didn't warn you here's another one there's a teen that's suing meta so that would be Instagram and and Facebook for uh5 billion for being addicted by Instagram so it's a 13-year-old New York girl and she's filed this suit it's a class action suit so it' be on behalf of all the other people as well and it argues that meta implemented addictive features uh the like counts and the story despite knowing they could harm teens mental health um and it used manipulative tactics now what part of this is not common knowledge would you say it's common knowledge that the social media platforms use science to figure out what is most addictive well yes yeah yes of course so nobody's questioning that basic fact right it's really the it's the DNA of all social media that it's addictive so if you know it's addictive and then secondly the claim is that metan knew it was addictive and therefore harmful to teens's mental health do you think do you think that they can prove in the lawsuit that meta was aware of the effects it would have on Mental Health I think so I think they can do that and then I say to myself okay but is this really an important lawsuit or is it just somebody's taking run at some free money and you'll never hear about it again well it turns out that the lawyer representing the minor is famous lawyer David boy now if you haven't heard that name it's because you're not a enough of a legal geek to know that there's some names that are associated with big cases he's one of those names that's often associated with big cases and he's one enough that he can be on big cases so it could be really big deal what would happen if social media had to remove their addictive qualities well what would be left but it also asks a bigger question aren't all products addictive even if you're not trying to make them addictive everybody who makes a product of any kind that would cause you to spend your time doing one thing versus another there's some kind of attractive addictive quality if you're going to use it more than once so on one hand I'm kind of fascinated and interested that somebody might be be able to make a case out of it on the other hand there's definitely a uh unintentional effect that could come from that like I'm you know I'm looking at basically everything in my room and I think well I mean I'm addicted to my coffee I'm addicted to creating these live streams I mean I get such a a kick out of doing this every morning that I'm addicted chocolate yeah chocolate's addicted food's addictive so I don't know how far you can take this um lack of free will I can addict you thing because if you prove that nobody has free will well then your whole legal system is in trouble so we have to at least pretend we have free will all right there's a report that uh Elon Musk is going to host Donald Trump on the xplat form doing as spaces this does not indicate that Trump is coming back to X that would be a whole separate conversation which I don't think is happening but my guess is that Trump uh contractually or at least ethically can't leave truth social because if he left truth social all the other stockholders would get nailed and I don't think he can do that ethically but he may also have a contractual agreement that he can go back to X because that would be bad for the platform so he's got uh billions of dollars at stake in not going back to X so I wouldn't expect it and it doesn't seem to make much difference because all of everything he says on Truth gets picked up on X anyway anyway the other uh musk news is that the xplatform and Linda yako if I'm saying her name right the uh head of x uh I've announced going after the GM I forget what the letters stand for but that's the big group of people who allegedly were behind some anti-competitive Behavior maybe even Rico it could be so bad in which they organized boycots of advertisers to suppress Free Speech say x and musk and yakar youo now is that something that really happened was there an organization that organized to suppress free speech yes that is easily approvable public knowledge they they were an entity we know all the people we know what they did for a living we know that they did organize to take down X we know why it was because they didn't like the Free Speech they would say it's disinformation but of course that's free speech so and Rumble has uh Rumble CEO says they've joined in on this um this could be a really big deal because I don't see how they could lose they they have the goods I mean it's basically public information at this point so how do they lose that we'll see but the important thing is that musk decided to stop trying to play nice and he's just going to sue a out of business and just just take take the piss out of them some people are wondering why the ADL was not included in this maybe they'll be included later but the ADL is part of the uh censorship B Behavior bad actor world so uh if if you weren't aware of how bad the ADL is you should be I'm sure they've done some good good things in the past I wouldn't discount that but at the moment they're more of a Democrat you know uh attack dog kind of organization all right let's talk about the new VP choice for Harris uh Tim Walls so he got introduced at a big event and we'll talk about all the things but the first speaker was Josh Shapiro who many people including me believed was already picked to be the VP choice that turned out to be fake news which I fell for so if you're keeping track and you should keep track of how many times I fall for fake news but also keep track of how many times other people fall for it now I I don't remember remember what language I used when I talked about it but I talked about it like it was sort of a done deal but you know not confirmed officially I went too far I should have said this is not a confirmed thing but somebody's making this claim and here's why so I think I failed you on detecting that so I I present myself as good at detecting but that one slip past my filter so you should first of all hold that against me like literally but you should also look at the totality of things I predict and call on and just see how the total record is one of the claims I would never make is that I'm always right in my detection nobody would make that claim the best you can do is you know better than other people I guess you know if you could do it better than other people you're amazing I don't know if I do it better than other people you can be the judge but I missed that one so keep that put that on my permanent bad record all right so here's what I had heard about joshiro was say he was a great orator and he would have been a stronger um stronger vice president that he was not chosen and we have a little disagreement about why uh some people say it's because he was a Jewish and the anti-semitic um population within the Democrat party made that a problem and uh as van Jones points out the anti-Semitism is marbled in to the Democrat Party which by the way is a fantastic choice of words so van Jones so van Jones uh you know said the anti-Semitism is marbled in and they need to work on that you know they're going to have to figure out how to deal with that I love the honesty of that um but but and then I think uh other people you know other Republicans Etc are saying that they think that's the reason that he was not picked is that he's Jewish um but then uh the uh let's see the David Axel rods want us to believe the real reason he wasn't chosen is that when he met with Harris he was a little bit too Alpha and too much I think they use the term Main character energy meaning he looks too much like he should be considered as a future president because he has too much skill so that he it would be an uncomfortable fit with Harris who's maybe not the strongest political figure we've ever seen and that maybe he asked for too much power you know these are all rumored things that we can't confirm and uh maybe that it just didn't seem like the right fit so it could have been a combination of uh just knowing that the the marbled anti-Semitism wasn't going to work out for him and maybe also knowing that he wasn't quite the right personality fit and maybe you save him for a future presidential run which I think would be the smart play now I had never heard Josh Shapiro speak and I'd heard somebody say in something I completely dismissed somebody told me he speaks like Obama do you know what my reaction to that was sure yeah okay yeah he talks like Obama that that this uh this Jewish guy from Pennsylvania is going to sound like Barack Obama and I'm supposed to believe that and so I listen to him talk and I'm sitting here at home saying uh he doesn't just talk like Obama you know he has the The Hope and change kind of rhetoric you know in that in that en category I thought that when people said he sounds like Obama there was more of a A vibe and I even thought that the vibe was a little overselling it it's like no he doesn't have a he's not gonna have a Obama Vibe I was so wrong it's not the vibe he does an impression of Obama he does an actual verbal impression where if you were listening at home and nobody told you it was Josh Shapiro you would actually think it was Obama's voice is an actual impression of Obama now that do you think he's aware of that I I wonder I mean it could be that he's just a big fan and he was influenced and you know maybe picked up some of the techniques and went too far and it just sounded a little too much like Obama but it's so strange to hear him do an actual impression of Obama now if it sounds like I'm criticizing that you're hearing it wrong I'm going to compliment him on that let me tell you my secret for becoming a famous cartoonist if you've never heard me say this before you know people would ask early in my career what's the secret of how you develop this popular cartoon and I would say honestly I would do my best job I could of copying good cartoonists but I would be so bad at an as an artist that when I tried to copy other cartoonist you couldn't tell I was copying them because I wasn't good at copying but because I took something from those other cartoonists when I tried to copy them and maybe combined a few of them that I liked into my copying it looked original yeah if you look at the dilber characters and then you look at Sergio Aragon's work in Mad Magazine he would draw the little Mexican guys with the Mexican hats in the margins of Mad Magazine when when I was a kid a million years ago if you look at the far side the characters have no necks like dilber characters yeah I was just copying those two guys basically Gary Larson and Sergio aragones but if you look at Dilbert you'd say what it doesn't look like you copied anything it's because I'm a bad copier so being a bad copier of somebody who is extraordinary is a really smart thing to do so I'm not criticizing in Shapiro whatsoever if he can if he can do an impression of Obama and he can nail it and people would like to Obama say I like what he's saying I don't know why I like it it's reminding me of something but it makes me feel good it's brilliant so I would really worry about Shapiro if you're a conservative and you're worried about future elections he does have the goods he absolutely has the goods even though he's copying perfectly acceptable technique I I don't have anything bad to say about that anyway uh he was a clear Superior choice I can see why he was a little too strong um I favor the combination explanation it probably had something to do with anti-Semitism and it probably had something to do with he's too strong a character probably both so so then uh KL Harris did her long introduction then she introduced to wals and here's what I saw I thought both of them looked drunk now I I can't confirm I mean I don't know that they bibed anything but they acted drunk they they did the Laughing uncontrollably about nothing that was especially funny and the weird thing is that wals tried to paste and copy K Harris now that's a bad idea so when K Harris is is on stage and he's standing behind her waiting to be introduced she goes into a cackle it looked drunk to me like and then and then uh her vice president pick standing behind her walls he imitates her cackle and he does this completely unnatural looking over laugh in the background like you go what is wrong with him is that his normal laugh or is he actually CAU C in it looked like he was just pacing her you know matching her so he was matching her energy so she went into drunk cackling he went into drunk cackling it was the weirdest thing to see so then she slurs slurs her slurs away foodish speech like that to me it sounded drunk um and then the weird thing is that while she was talking after he did an impression of K Harris cackling he he goes into a spontaneous impression of Joe Biden's vacant brain dead look did you see it I have to take my glasses off to do it but I'm going to give you an impression of a face that he settled into while KL Harris was talking that he didn't even look like a living human being what the hell was that all right here's the face what is that his his mouth just like you know went open like Hillary Clinton looking at the balloon drop but with the the Dead face that uh Biden has I mean I swear to God it looked like he was channeling Biden up there looking like he was had Dementia or something and then he snapped out of it when when he gave his talk he was actually very good so if I'm going to judge him as a public speaker A+ good good good good public speaker and I wouldn't I wouldn't discount his his capability as a politician very strong but weird weird as hell um so that so we've got Shapiro Ben or Josh Shapiro who is channeling Obama then you've got Tim wals who's channeling Harris and then he's back there channeling Biden you really don't know what you're getting do you there's no way to know what you're getting because they just seem to be copying each other and pretending and playing some kind of weird characters and of course her policies have all changed you know Harris has reversed her policies so you don't know her policies her personality you don't know if she's drunk or sober you haven't heard her talk and answer questions yeah the the key is the less you know about them the better they'll do um then we did learn that wals is a giant liar which makes him perfect for campaign he you he just lied a b bunch of about JD Vance now the whole JD Vance lie about having sex with a couch that's not based on any real thing that that he ever said or did uh well as far as we know but do you think that um wal is not aware that that's fake do you think he's not aware well I think he's aware and and I think that um both sides do this it's what I call recreational beliefs meaning there's some stuff that you just throw to your base because they want to pretend they believe it you know Trump does the same thing and I would say that's a recreational belief so if you get yourself all caught up and trying to debunk it like that's not true you're lying about that couch well you're sort of being pulled into their trick because if you're talking about whether he did or did not f a couch you're not really promoting your side so it's basically draining your energy away into something ridiculous that doesn't matter and they don't believe so debunking it doesn't make any difference anyway all right um he's being sold by the uh the left as having Midwestern folksy values so they're all trying to paint them as this Midwestern he's the most ordinary not left kind of guy but of course he has a number of views and policies that are really left so he does cover a span he's apparently okay with the NRA or let me say it a different way the NRA actually gave him a good vote for being pro uh gun so he's a gun owner he's been in the military um looks like he's a hunter I think so he's good on guns and he's got that Midwestern stuff but he's got a lot of stuff we'll talk about that's not so Midwestern ordinary stuff all right um to me the funniest thing last night was watching the what I'll call the anti-white pundits mostly on CNN trying to say how excited they were about this old white guy cuz I don't think they were excited about an old white guy but they had had to act like they were and watching them struggle to come up with words that kind of were supportive but didn't really reveal you know kind of hiding what their real feelings were so it was really funny watching them try to navigate that anyway um and then some some are saying that wals was selected so they could get the white male vote all right I'd like to talk to my white male viewers here how many people think that they would vote for commel Harris because she picked a white guy to be vice president is there even one person in the entire United States who would say you know I didn't know who to vote for but because I'm racist this is not me I'm I'm doing an impression of somebody else because of a person might say that because they're racist they they're really happy that KL Harris has a white white man picked as her vice president so in order to feel better the alleged racists would vote for the brown woman so they could have a vice president who was like them there are zero white people who would do that there's not a single I don't think one I don't think you could get one person in the United States who would say you know I'm a white man and I was a little uncomfortable with k Harris but now that she's got a vice president who agrees with her on everything now I I'm convinced I'm going to go for that package so I don't know is there something wrong with the pundits or are white men especially completely misunderstood in this country who would really think that that would change anybody's vote it's kind of jaw-dropping that that that's even a possible conversation anyway no he's not going to change anybody's vote because he's white he not lose some votes but it's not going to gain him any all right so um so we're going to be struggling over the question of whether he's super lefty or middle of the road the Democrats want to paint him as middle of the road uh I think he insists he's a moderate directly insist that all right but here are some of the things he's been accused of I don't know how many of these are true some of these may be on a context we'll learn later but these are the attacks that are coming against them that he waited three days before deploying the deploying the National Guard to quash the BLM riots so he is being accused of being a little too favorable to the riers and not having the right empathy for his own State when he could have stopped it sooner but of course of course he'd have an argument you know maybe the bringing in the military would have caused more trouble I don't know he has some argument for that but uh the people who live there are not too happy that for three days they had to endure the rioting when he could have stopped as sooner they think apparently he created a covid snitch line so that again you might find that the contexts for all these are a little bit lacking uh cuz these are accusations so don't assume any of these are true or completely in context but it's just what the attacks are so you had a covid snitch line they say so you could turn in your neighbor for being not vaccinated I don't even know if I believe that at all I mean it sounds like something somebody would have done but so that sounds terrible um some say he's doubling down on drugs and surgeries for kids and teens yeah so he would be a little Pro too much prot transitioning for children that would be a a complaint about him uh he has allegedly got a DUI when he was 30 and part of his excuse was that he lost his Hearing in the military so he didn't hear the siren I don't think anybody believes that or he didn't see it or something um then the the worst one is that he was in the National Guard for years but when the Iraq war broke out he suddenly decided that was a good time to retire claiming that he had always plan to do it about then and run for politics but the people who did not retire and stayed in and got deployed to Iraq are saying something more along the lines of you freaking turd uh you have no loyalty you know we all got deployed you left and again is there some more context to that that I don't know maybe maybe I would say for all of these all of these attacks you should ask yourself am I missing any context these might not all be true and let's see he us pro-abortion without restrictions which makes conservatives say that he's going to let babies born alive and let them die after they're alive I think there might be some context to that missing uh but I don't like get into the abortion question because I think that's for women to work out not for me all right apparently he created Timol created a Dei Council as soon as he got into the daily wire is saying this as soon as he got into office saying that America was systemically racist and he pushed the uh diversity equity and inclusion thing really far and uh to me of course that's completely disqualifying completely disqualifying uh yeah we'll talk about that I'm seeing a comment about me on there um then there's this weird video of after he gave his speech that his wife came on stage this is Tim ws and she comes up to him and how do you greet your wife when you're a political candidate who's just been shoes to the world and you're standing on stage and she comes up and everybody's clapping and celebrating what would be the typical way you'd greet your wife well I'm no politician but I would think something like a kiss on the lips you know unless there was some maybe maybe some lipstick issue going on there maybe at least on the side of the face uh a hug you real deep hug something like that uh he chose a handshake he shook hands with his wife then she went in for the hug and and he gave her the no naughty bits hug if you if you ever hug somebody who definitely didn't want your sexuality to be part of the hug and and they just do the the leanin hug where the only part that's touching is the top of your chests it's like not even breasts it's just like the top of your chest touches a little a little bit but your your groin area is 2 feet apart because you're both leaning in that's how that's how he hugged his wife after he shook her hand what the hell is going on there I don't know all right the other big thing is that he's uh he's big on China um oh he also signed a bill redefining the term sexual orientation to include pedophiles so what that means is that uh there was a bill in his state to prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation but under his administration they included sexual orientation to include pedos so that you could not discriminate against somebody for being a pedophile all right okay anyway um now I I'm just going to say that loud he gives me a feeling that I don't have any evidence for I just get a feeling from him now I heard from other people that they got the same Vibe and I don't have any you know information that would suggest that any of this is true I just say he gives me kind of a kind of a Vibe so he's been a teacher and a and a coach so he's chosen careers that put him in contact with children and uh he just has a Vibe about him so that's that's my only statement is he has a Vibe I will note that um it seems like the Deep State really really prefers people they can blackmail now again I don't have any evidence of that and I don't have evidence that he has anything he could be blackmailed for none whatsoever but keep keep an eye on that because it just seems like a weird coincidence that so many people in politics look like well that's exactly the list of people I would think would be most black mailable and yet they seem to have these prominent roles so I don't know I just keep an eye on it um now wal also has this weird China connection he's allegedly been to China 30 times I don't know if that's confirmed he uh worked there so he worked there for a time um teaching I guess around children and he honeymooned there who honeymoons in China if you've been there dozens of times does that make sense does that sound like your romantic honeymoon destination well I mean he's got a strong connection to China so maybe it made s St but here's the thing we can know for sure we know that wall has a strong connection to China I'll say connection because he's been there so many times and he's worked there strong connection and then he set up some kind of a student Exchange program when he was in America to so Americans and I think Americans can go there so there's that so he loves he seems to have some strong connection to China and you would think that China would really appreciate that wouldn't you if you were China wouldn't you love to have an American vice president who could become president someday wouldn't you love that he had a strong connection to your country well I think you would I mean that would be a lot safer than somebody who didn't and we also know that China controls Tik Tock we also know that Tik Tok has something called a heat button which if you push it it makes something Trend more obviously so you can basically control the brains of Americans Young Americans mostly by any little tweak to Tik Tock and we know it literally brainwashes people you know you can see on X people are being uh well on the meta on The Meta platform there's a lawsuit because it's addictive addictive and persuasive are pretty closely related if there's some information Source that's addictive I can tell you in advance it's persuasive Scott there's a thing that's addictive everybody can't stop looking at it do you think it's persuasive yes yes obviously super super persuasive I don't have to study it if you're addicted to it it's persuasive there's no way around that there's no way there's no way you could be addicted to it and not be persuading you that's not a thing so we have no information that would suggest that China has told Tik Tock to push any buttons we just know that they have a gigantic National interest in it in you know controlling thoughts in America we know they have the ability because they can simply tell them to push the button now let me describe it the way I described it in the man cave the other day the CEO of Tik Tock says no they don't tell me what to do that might be true that it might be true that they don't tell them anything directly about what to do but everybody knows what to do indirectly don't they is there anybody who works at Tik Tok who doesn't know what China as a country would prefer to see more of versus what they'd like to see less of of course they know so if there were people who just worked at Tik Tok who had any control over the algorithm they don't need to be told what to do they just know what to do but if I were China here's how I'd be controlling Tik Tock I would say to the CEO hey CEO we don't want to control you do whatever you want but we'd like you to meet all the leaders of China so you really really know what they look like you know we want to be kind of close to you so that might be enough but even if the CEO wants to have deniability no they never told me to do anything I've never anything for him which would be good to to keep that deniability here's what I would do if I were Chinese intelligence service I would make sure that I became friends with the top engineers at Tik Tok I would have lunch with them I would give them uh favors I would connect them with people that could help them and I would make sure that the engineers knew that doing what Chinese intelligence wants is really good for them and if they don't do what Chinese intelligence wants it's really bad for them and then Chinese intelligence has dinner with their favorite engineer from Tik Tock and says you know there's these people running for office in America one of them really likes China he's been here 30 times it'd be great for China if that guy got elected do you hear me engineer uh yeah I hear you're saying this guy's good for China right and uh do you still control the algorithm well yeah I mean I could I just have to push that button would anybody know if you push the button well if I push the actual button on the user interface yes it would be logged but if I just do it with code within the system with a little tweak it'd be the same as the heat button but it wouldn't be logged and nobody would ever be able to prove I did it huh well it sure would be good if something like that happened so if you imagine that Tik Tok is not controlled at a detailed level by China I don't know it feels naive so we have a situation where the polls we know are going to be close on Election Day and they will be close enough that let's say a 2% swing would certainly determine the race because remember 2% is not just added to one group it's subtracted from the other so a 2% swing is a a 4% differ you get that so could Tik Tock cause a 2% swing in votes yeah easily easily and not just by Tik Tok because Tik Tok content gets onto other services Etc so yes so we've actually given the vote to China just let that sink in China can move the election 2% with Tik Tock guaranteed there's no there's no question that they could do that all they have to do as want to and then Tik Tok will do it I assume because Tik Tok doesn't want to you know deal with Chinese intelligence hating them so if American if American social media except for X um folded like you know a cheap chair when American FBI and CIA wanted it to do stuff what do you think happens in China you know if the CIA wants you to do stuff you're going to feel like you're really to do it even if they don't threaten you but what happens if Chinese intelligence asks you to do it and you're a Chinese owned company or controlled you're really really going to think you need to do it so China basically has the vote now so the Chinese vote will determine who the uh president is so good on that well here's a fun recreational belief getting back to science a little bit and the nature of reality so somebody called not somebody called this is his actual name somebody called somebody with a name J Anderson from the Project Unity is talking about some experiment in which they put plants in a darkened room where the there would be a light source that would randomly go to different quadrants and it was completely randomized so it' just be a plant put in one corner but it wouldn't get light at all except randomly as that light would be lit up in different places but mostly the light was where there was no plant because there was a room with mostly empty but one little plant what they found was allegedly remember this is a recreational belief I can't prove it's real allegedly the randomized light would start in a statistically measurable way favoring the plant with no human involvement in other words random stuff starts becoming less random if there's a living thing in the mix and the idea is that even plants might be able to collapse reality so you know the experiments uh like schro Schrodinger's cat Etc so that quantum physics says you need an observer or it might be a device that's measuring something but if you don't measure it or observe it the reality stays in the super impo superposition of neither yes nor no or up nor down has to be observed and then it becomes reality well apparently there's some suggestion that a plant can do that now here's how this fits into my model of the world being a simulation if the world is a simulation can you control it and I think you can by having a clear idea of what it is you want which is one of the explanations for Elon Musk I think Elon Musk always has a very clear idea of what he wants and he collapses reality in that direction and I think the clearer your idea and the harder you think it the more likely it's going to collapse in your direction reality that is now my life as I've told you many times is so weird so insanely unlikely but it also followed a path that I determined when I was six years old when I was six years old I said I'm going to become a famous cartoonist and I never I never altered from wanting it but there was a period of my life I didn't think it was possible but I always wanted it and it was always a really clear image of what it was and what it would look like and it happened exactly the way I met exactly and I can't explain that and then you know my entry into politics had the same Oddity about it that it just didn't look like it could have happened on its own it looks like I'm authoring the simulation so maybe the plant is authoring the simulation and maybe you are too maybe all of us are and that the the act of affirmations where you really focus on what you want and you repeat it or write it down 15 times a day that all that does is make sure that you have a clear view of what you want like a plant has a clear desire for sun there's no ambiguity about what the plant wants if wanting is a thing right it wants more light I wanted to be a cartoonist Elon Musk wanted to make an electric car wanted to go to Mars all right there's a former NASA scientist who's doing a bunch of experiments to find out if we do live in a simulation Thomas Campbell so he's designed experiments to find out if our reality is more like a video game and see Vicky ver on X is reporting on this and he's got uh say his experiments include a new spin on the double slit experiment so I don't know the details but allegedly he's got a way to test whether we live in a simulation how do you think that's going to go I have no idea how that's going to go but the the idea that we live in a simulation just keeps getting stronger and stronger and that we don't have free will in the normal sense um well here's my final evidence that we live in a simulation you ready for this this really happened so the vice presidential pick is Tim Walls you know that so this created a situation where I swear this is true it puts president Trump or Donald Trump ex president Trump in the position of opposing walls come on Trump the most famous builda wall guy in the world has to run against a wall or walls he's opposing walls come on how did that happen on its own how about musk is suing a bunch of companies in that advertising space where I I mentioned that garm so A bunch of advertisers are part of that one of the advertisers that's mentioned uh that he's specifically suing through X is the Mars company they make candy Mars Bars and stuff so Elon Musk is suing Mars you tell me we're not living in the simulation Trump is Trump is running against walls Elon Musk is suing Mars and the assassination attempt against Trump involved somebody named cheel trying to stop somebody named Crooks and you don't trust either of them how how is this real I mean seriously th this just all happened by itself I don't know I'm having a real hard time believing any of this is happening accidentally because it looks exactly like a dream I might have it's way like a dream I might have anyway there's a whole bunch of new allegations about the Georgia 2020 election and I don't want to get you know Kraken meaning to get ahead of myself and say it's been proven there's a bunch of election irregularities that have been proven it's the Kraken cuz I think the Kraken was always a trap I I think that if there's real election irregularity the way to hide it is to come up with a fake Kraken give somebody important like Sydney Powell to believe it have her say it in public and then when it all falls apart you can say everything else was a kraken too so to me the Kraken always looked like an intelligence play to destroy the people were too close to the real problem if there is one but you should know that uh there's a big video of a whole bunch of citizens doing a public event in which they made many claims of detected fraud or irregularities in the Georgia election I don't have an opinion about the um quality of any of that evidence because again you don't want to fall for a kraken but there's a lot of it and it sure sounds persuasive but remember the Kraken sounded persuasive at one time too so there's tons of evidence we just don't know the quality of it it's hard to say independently then I saw a post by George uh he goes by he's he's had an account beisy tweets good follow but it just goes by the name George anyway he says the Georgia state election board has passed a new rule allowing observers inside tabulation centers during this upcoming election so that wasn't a thing before are you saying that we didn't have observers in the tabulation centers and that something could have gone wrong in the tabulation centers and there were no observers but now we do have observers or at least they'll be legal huh well that's interesting do you think the Republicans are going to find anything as they are more carefully watching this election maybe there's a new lawsuit America First legal has got a lawsuit to sue Maricopa County Arizona for refusing to remove illegal aliens from their voter roles out of the election now why in the world would they refuse to do that the only reason I can think of is that they want to use illegal votes to get their way why else would they refuse to do it if they had a list of all the people who were not legal voters and they had a list of all the people on their voting roles it's not the biggest job in the world to subtract you know one list from another list programmatically but they have so maybe there's more to the context of this but they refused and uh they're they're blatantly defying their own state law because the state law mandates them to purge ineligible voters and they're just going to keep the illegal aliens apparently on the roles so in other words it looks like exactly they are planning to cheat in Arizona we know how they're planning to cheat they're showing you that they're not going to change it they're going to disobey their own law and it looks a lot like they're planning to steal the election don't know for sure but it sure looks like it well here's the good news Lara Trump um she said uh that they do have pole Watchers pole workers and legal experts will be everywhere votes are cast encountered and she says do you want to help so if you'd like to be part of the Watcher group uh the URL to go to would be protect thee.

comom so any of you who want to be like onsite and watching for irregularities I think uh Lara's team will probably offer some guidance or training there and it's called protectthe vote.com so here's my here's my take on this I think Republicans are going to uncover massive fraud only because they know where to look for it and they'll find it I mean I think we can expect they'll find just all kinds of stuff the whatever was happening in Georgia whether it was rigged or not I don't have proof either way I think there's good evidence to show that things were deleted they shouldn't have been deleted and that you know there's a lack of forthcoming this in some cases so there's something going on let's just say that if you can't if you can't smell the smoke of some erection election erection election irregularities I don't think you're paying attention I don't think you're paying attention there's something deeply wrong with our elction they are not auditable which is all you need to know they're not fully auditable so when people say something got audited or double checked or counted they're usually looking at a very some very narrow thing that wouldn't tell you at all whether the election was rigged or not it would just tell you if that very narrow thing was done right so for example they could recount they could recount mailin votes and then they would call that an audit but what if half of the mill in votes were from people ineligible well they wouldn't check if they were eligible they would just recount them and say look we counted them right the first time second count matches I guess we're good nobody found any fraud and then the legal system would say wait wait wait we did find some fraud and they take it to the courts and the courts say well it's too late or too little or you don't have a standing we don't want to deal with it but if uh if Laura Trump has done what I think she has done she has trained the Watchers to really find the good stuff to know where to look if they do find the good stuff or even if they alleg they found the good stuff there's no way the election is going to get certified so I'm going to double down on my uh election prediction that there won't be one there will be voting but I don't believe that the country is uh sufficiently organized and honest enough to produce a result that we could even verify so somehow we're going to have to pick a president but I think the vote will be ignored no matter which way it goes I guess if the Democrats get their way they're more likely to try to push ahead but I don't know I think the election will be so non-credible probably both ways that we're just going to have to figure out what to do and all right so let me talk about the messaging from Harris and then Trump all right so the Democrats have pushing the Trump's going to steal your democracy which I don't think anybody understood so Harris quite smartly uh tried to redefine that in a recent interview in which he said well you know rather than thinking about it as stealing your democracy uh there would be more accurate to think of it as stealing your freedoms that Trump would try to take your freedoms so now you might ask what freedoms what freedom is Trump trying to take and here are the actual answers because Harris has you know now listed the freedoms so one is the freedom control your own bodies when which he means birth control and abortion Trump's view is he doesn't want to have anything to do with that stuff so Trump's official policy is I don't want to be involved in making any laws about anything I don't want to stop birth control of any kind the morning after pill or anything else and I don't want to be involved in decisions about abortion I want the states to do that now given that every state has at least half of the men in favor of abortion right it's it's even more than that usually but at least half of the men are in favor of abortion that means that if women are in favor of it by majority there's a 100% chance they'll get it voting still sort of matters so women have complete control in the states they just have to organize and convince each other so women will you stop pretending that men have anything to do with this convince women if if women by let's say 80% majority wanted abortion in their states and 50% of the men were on that side too they could stop anybody from getting elected anybody they could stop their funding that that would be such an overwhelming advantage on one of the top issues that they could kind of get anything they wanted it won't happen right away so if Democrats are complaining that the end of row verse Wade created a situation where a third of the states I guess um can't get the abortions that they want I would say for the people who wanted those abortions that's very bad in the short run I think you have to admit that no matter where you are on the topic but in the long run women have complete control of their bodies because they have complete control of the elections they just have to be on the same side if women are not in the same side why are you complaining to the rest of us it's definitely women have to decide first and then maybe try to convince the rest of us but if women can't decide um although I think women are like 2/3 four for abortion in the United States so my argument about that is that women have full control of their own bodies they just haven't executed on that control um haris says you want the freedom to love openly and whoever you want openly and with pride to which I say which freedom is that that's not a freedom you want do you want anybody to be able to express any form of love I think you'd want to protect the children a little better wouldn't you what about beastiality now here I'm not comparing lgbtq to beastiality so don't don't try to do that to me I'm not these are not similar things not similar I'm just saying the statement can we can we allow everybody to love who they want with pride if somebody wants to have sex with farm animals should I respect it again I'm not comparing that to being gay this these are not comparable things I'm just saying this is a pretty big statement and I would say the answer to that is conservatives mostly just want to be left alone conservatives don't care what you do behind your closed door they might think it's a sin but they're not going to try to stop you from doing it it's your business conservatives want to be left alone but they also want to leave you alone behind closed doors so that one just seems dumb and I don't think conservatives want to be forced to celebrate anybody else's love choices and I don't think conservatives want to be told that anybody should have pride about who they love how about you just love who you love and you could be proud about it but why should I be proud of it why am I proud of your gay kid I I might like your gay kid I might have complete respect for every human being and all their different choices because we're all infinitely different I I'll definitely have that but why do I have to be proud about it why is anybody proud about it how about it just is it just is you don't have to be proud about it you don't have to be mean about it you don't have to try to stop it how about it just is and everybody's different and we just have to live in that world where everybody's different and maybe if we just left each other alone a little bit more that'd be great so no I think that's dumb um she says also freedom from gun violence okay that's a made up and stupid right um and first of all nothing that the left is doing is compatible with reducing violence the left wants to defund the police they supported riots they don't want cash bail they want open board orders they're pushing Dei and every other kind of racial division there's no evidence no evidence that the left wants to reduce violence it looks like they want to increase it so that's a dumb argument and it also ignores the fact that guns can protect you from a dictatorship they also talk about freedom to have access to a ballot okay we're still waiting for the first human being ever to say I'd like to vote but I've been prevented from doing it none we we haven't met the alleged black Citizen who can't get an ID to vote none not a single black person ever in an interview or on TV or anybody you've ever met or anybody you talk to any of your friends any of your co-workers not a single black person has ever said you know what I'd love to vote but I can't figure out how to get an ID no and yet they're selling that like it's a thing none anyway so I think those are ridiculous madeup rights it's the whole thing is just complete garbage doesn't look like anything that professionals came up with you know I sometimes say hey this looks like professional persuasion that doesn't look professional that looks like people who are writing some kind of college essay they said all right write a college essay on how um Trump is uh let's say stealing your freedoms and then you go in and you're like all right academically can I make an argument that he's stealing my freedoms by making everything the opposite of what it is and ignoring the context over here yeah it just seemed like some weird academic thing it's not persuasive it's just kind of dumb but maybe it works for Democrats I don't know well um one of the so-called oh here's the let's talk about Trump messaging so Trump said that the Harris walls ticket will turn America communist immediately I don't think the Communist attack lands at all because every time I hear it even even I you know I'm on Trump's side but when I hear him call the other side communist I think what in what way do they do they want the government to control all the means of production like do I not understand what a communist is do they want a dictator I I don't understand it at all now if they had said socialism then that's a problem too because when I hear socialism I say you mean like every modern country where there are some programs to take care of the people who can't take care of themselves you mean socialism so the trouble is that that neither socialism nor communism really works too well as an attack I think maybe it's just good for your own base but the Bas is already with you so I don't know it feels like wasted words to me there there's so many things that they could attack that going for communist just makes everybody here go well I don't I don't know I don't see that and I don't think anybody knows what Marxism is you know maybe two% of the country knows even what Marxism is so that doesn't work too well so all of those you're a liberal you're a Marxist you're a communist I don't see any of that messaging being effective whereas I would see I can help the economy I can keep you on a war I can keep them from putting you in jail those feel like real things so I'd like to see more of that so one of uh you remember Trump had these so-called fake electors one of them just pleaded guilty to a single reduced charge so those cases are still ongoing so it was Lena no lorine pelo she was an Arizona 2020 uh so-called fake elector but here's what she pleaded guilty to or pleed guilty to um a single misdemeanor charge of presentment of a false instrument for filing does that sound real to you if the alternate electors um thought they had a case meaning that they believed that there was nothing illegal about registering as an alternate elector which the left would call fake electors if they didn't know that any of that was illegal they wouldn't have been aware that their documents were illegal anyway so I feel like this is a little bit of lawfare and maybe Lorraine peligrino just took the plea because it got out of all all penalties basically didn't have to go to jail didn't have to be on any kind of program so I think there was just some some kind of unsupervised release and it's just a misdemeanor so who knows if any of that actually happened was a real law but it looks like maybe the law just forces people to take the plea and get out of there so I don't know how any of that could have been illegal now we also know that ex Trump attorney J Ellis reached some kind of cooperation agreement with law enforcement so that could be interesting we'll see if anything comes out of that meanwhile another member of the so-called Squad in Congress uh lost in a primary so Squad member Corey Bush lost her primary so she will be out of Congress and she was allegedly attacked with heavy spending by pro-israel groups so so do you think that pro-israel groups um took her out it looks like it if if the money made the difference and they put in a lot of money maybe could be that she was just bad at her job and it didn't take much money there's a story that says the Harris walls team is trying to pay influencers to say good things and do interviews and stuff for Harris and there's some uh dou umentation that shows that that's the case but uh some of that may be a response to the fact that we we heard that Baron Trump young Baron Trump is the one who had some connection to that Aiden Ross guy from kick who did the 100 million views thing with Trump in the Cyber truck Etc so Baron Trump might turn into a a player you know meaning his instincts might be really good and who knows maybe he's a future present who knows um so Jessica tarlo on the five yesterday brought up the drinking bleach Oaks and she got fact checked hard by Greg Gutfeld who was there to tell her Trump never said drink any bleach nor did he say inject bleach and here's the real thing here's the funny thing she acted like she didn't know that that and I thought that she was kind of smart she just had you know different priorities and you know different political views but you would have to be kind of stupid to know that was not a hoax or to if you didn't know it was a hoax that's kind of stupid here's how you should know that's a hoax nobody would say that that's it you don't even have to research it nobody would say that do you know how I know that um well I mean basically it's it's a good test if you just say to yourself would any human ever say that and if the answer is no nobody would ever say that that's your answer you don't have to you don't have to look into it um so that was fascinating I I thought she was a lot smarter than that but she proved that she is not terribly smart if you literally if you literally believe that Trump suggested injecting bleach or drinking bleach I don't know how you explain that except low IQ I don't could could you be that hypnotized I don't know meanwhile America First legal is uh doing good stuff again so they went after that Brennan Clapper Intel community they're calling it um in which they were trying to do this whole of government approach to silence political descent so these two ex top Intel people in the United States were part of an organized Democrat program to make sure that Free Speech was limited that's a real thing it's just amazing that that's real so anyway uh America First legals after him they publicly released all the documents from that uh committee so uh and that they they obtained that in litigation so there's going to be litigation here are some updates on other things there scitec daily has a story that uh if you add dopamine to a Alzheimer's patient it almost immediately helps so Japanese researchers have discovered that dopamine treatments could alleviate Alzheimer's symptoms because it promotes production of something and uh so I guess they've uh tested in mice and they've got you know good hope that it might work in humans but they haven't tested yet now here's another one where you could have asked Scott um I believe I've told you on live stream that dopamine is implicated not just in making you happy because that's how we usually think of it but it's a it's a motion it it creates activity in your body if you don't have dopamine you'll just sit there you won't get up your brain will say I should get up you just won't do it if you don't have dopamine so um I knew from one of my smartest friends a while ago that dopamine could be treated with a I'm sorry that Alzheimer's could be treated with a dopamine like treatment that's what L Doopa is lopa is has you know an existing treatment for Alzheimer's because they thought dopamine would help so this is new research and maybe they got a deeper understanding of it but yeah it's dopamine dopamine is what the Alzheimer's people need anyway so I was thinking of Parkinson's actually I think I was I was uh I was conflating Parkinson's with Alzheimer's in my bad explanation to what's happening but I do think that generally speaking uh dopamine is C is sort of a necessary component for all of your functioning so I'll I'll broaden that and try to correct what I just said wrong because I was think I was thinking of Parkinson's when I said L Doopa but if you think that your muscles need um dopamine is it any surprise that your brain does I I feel like you could have just guessed that without doing this study anyway here's a Venezuela update the madur regime is trying to Jail the opposition leaders of course I guess that's what happens when he win happened in the United States so why wouldn't it happen in Venezuela uh Hamas has picked a new Chief because the somebody and maybe it was Israel uh assassinated the head of Hamas so now the new head is their uh head of their Terror group previously so you've heard of him y Yaya sinir so they took the worst terrorist leader within Hamas and promoted him to be the actual head of humas because that guy got assassinated now let's talk peace huh have you seen any of the uh interviews with Palestinians after October I've seen a number of uh interviews on the street kind of thing where somebody will say all right uh was October 7th Justified and every person I saw interviewed everyone said oh yeah totally justified and then they would be asked do you think a two-state solution could work and every one of them says no no no there's no two-state solution there's a one-state solution and their one state solution is Israel goes away now am I getting accurate information meaning these Street interviews are they intentionally editing out the Palestinians who say something like yeah we just need our two states and we can live next to each other and everything will be fine we just need to stop fighting you know we'll we'll try to we'll try to get the Hamas people to settle down a little bit we'll work on that on our side maybe you could work on you know your side and we'll get together nothing like that now so I have a question whether I'm being brainwashed because it would be a good brainwashing technique to do all these people in the street interviews and just Ed edit out anybody who was for peace and then you would get the impression that there would be no point in even talking to the Palestinians because they only want to destroy Israel now it might be true you know maybe it's like 85 % of the PO I'm just guessing but what if 85% of the population wants nothing except the destruction of Israel I think that could be the case but I wouldn't say it based on all the interviews because you know they're not reliable but I do think that the brainwashing among the Palestinians is probably strong enough and comprehensive enough that there's nobody in the public who wants peace they wish they weren't being shot at and they wish they could do what they want and they wish Israel didn't exist and all that but I don't think they want peace I don't see any movement to it and if anybody wants to convince me that the Palestinians want peace it would be really useful for somebody on that side you know a pro Palestinian journalist to go over there and show me some interviews of just ordinary people stopped in the streets who say yes please we want to end fighting and have a two-state solution that's you know living in peace next to each other I don't know that they exist do you is is there anybody watching who's had uh let's say enough connection with Palestinians who are in the area who can tell me am I wrong is there not a single person in the entire Community who wants peace without destroying Israel I don't know that's a pretty big question isn't why are we even talking about a peace deal if we don't know the answer to the question is anybody in favor of peace is there even one person in the Palestinian areas in favor of Peace haven't seen one yet I I assume they exist and I assume that I would be subject to being brainwashed by never seeing one so I got a real question about the brainwashing on that point I'd love to know what what the real opinion of the Palestinian people is over there but I can tell you that if Hamas is picking uh the sinir guy as their new leader they have decided that uh October 7th worked and that more terrorism is more better for them so they're certainly not looking for peace you you don't put this guy in charge and say you know we'll put the the our best terrorist in charge because Israel is going to kill that guy Israel has said in no uncertain terms we're going to kill that guy do you think if he showed up to negotiate they wouldn't kill him I think if he shows up for a negotiation they could drop a bomb on him because they've said unambiguously we are going to kill that guy for sure there there's no way around it we're killing that guy so even if he showed up for some State sanction thing they' probably just kill him I think they've got a case for it anyway and then there's a story that uh some guy got caught allegedly trying to arrange assassination attempts in the United States that would include Trump and it would be Iran's revenge for Trump taking out Solomon a and the question I have about this bill maluan is reporting on this Fox News and the question I have is I don't trust this story because the last thing I want to hear after all that sketchy social um Secret Service protection of trump the last thing I want to hear is oh there's another country trying to kill Trump so so if we say that enough and we really do some things that make it look like another country is trying to kill Trump if something happened to Trump well what would the first thing you would look at would be these other countries so I'm a little concerned that we're being brainwashed about the Iranians trying to assassinate Trump I'm not saying it's not true I'm just saying there might be a little brainwashing involved on that well meanwhile Iraq's Parliament is taking the first step to lower the legal age of marriage from for girls from 15 wow the legal age of marriage for a girl in Iraq is 15 uh but they're looking to lower that to uh nine nine huh so that would be compatible with Sharia law I guess so uh good job Americans for taking over Iraq and and uh that didn't work out quite the way anybody hoped and the last good news is did you ever wonder why we don't make more electricity and of waves in the ocean you know the ocean is continually going up and down and back and forth why can't we get electricity from that thing well it turns out uh there's a megawatt scale wave project that's might be coming to realization according to the new Atlas uh Eco wave so what they do is they put these uh big floaty things in the water and as the waves bounce them up and down the float the there's it's connected to some levers that create some electricity so that's cool I would think that uh you might have the same problem as the windmills you know the windmills seem to be killing whales so I'd watch out for the whales because it's going to be loud because it's mechanical and it puts a loud mechanical thing in the ocean isn't that what the problem with the windmills was because it was loud and it was in the ocean that caused the I don't know the sonar of the whales to go crazy something like that all right we talked about garm lunar powered yeah I guess it would be in a in a sense it would be a little bit lunar powered but that's that's not the only reason they're waves so it's not so much the uh the tide it doesn't work on the tide it just sits out in the ocean because the ocean is just bouncing up and down with waves so it bounces the mechanical thing up and down all right ladies and gentlemen that's all I've got for you today it was amazing thanks for joining I got to go do some other stuff and uh see if I can get insurance from my house today I might not be able to all right um I'm going to say something privately to the uh people on locals and uh I'm going say bye to the rest of you on X and Rumble and You.

Tube thanks for joining see you tomorrow all right locals coming to you privately right now e e e e e e

[Music]

what a show we got

today stock market's

recovering the news is fun and

funny oh it's going to be

[Music]

good good morning everybody and welcome

to the highlight of human civilization

it's called coffee with Scott Adams and

if you'd like to take this experience up

to levels that no human can understand

with their tiny shiny human brains all

you need for that is a copper mug or a

glass of tankered shell or steain a

canteen jugg or flask a vessel of any

kind fill it with your favorite liquid I

like coffee and join me now for the

unparallel pleasure the dopamine of the

day the thing that makes everything

better it's called the simultaneous SI

and happens now

go oh delightful

delightful okay people how about a

little uh news update and then we'll get

into vice presidential pick and all the

stuff about politics well the New York

Post has a story that there's a new

theory about how the pyramids got built

and maybe they used the apparently there

was a lot of water in that area back in

the pyramid building days there were

rivers and canals and they may have used

the rivers and canals to uh Power the

building of the pyramid so they may have

been harnessing the the water power to

help them lift the heavy blocks I'm not

sure exactly how they harnessed it but

if I were building a pyramid let me tell

you how I would do it I would start with

uh build bu a canal where I could float

all the big rocks so if you if you

wrapped enough wood around them I think

they'd all float so you float your big

rocks from the Quarry right up to the

pyramid but now you got to get the rock

up to the top of the pyramid how do you

do it well I don't know but the way I'd

do it is I'd have the center of the

pyramid always empty like there's a big

column in the middle of it and I would I

would have an underground

um Canal so that I could move the things

into the move those uh move those big

blocks that are floating on wood into

the middle of the pyramid and then I

would close off the place that the block

came from and I would fill the column

with water and it would float those Big

Blocks all the way up to the top of the

pyramid whatever has been built so far

and then you just take it off and put it

where you want it so you could actually

float the the block the blocks to the

Top If You sealed off the column and

allowed the pyramid just to be a big

column of water and you just put the

water in there so maybe but there could

have been other mechanical ways they

harnessed the water power

to there are a new scientist who claims

that you can use AI to detect

intelligence sexual preference and

political leaning just by looking at

faces

do you believe that do you believe that

you can tell with high level of accuracy

somebody's intelligence sexual

preference and political leaning just by

their face how many believe that you

could not every time but that you could

usually tell by their

face I

do if you can't tell those things by

looking at people's faces there's

something wrong with you you're you're

missing some kind of social skill yes of

course you can tell those things it

takes you about all of one second to

tell somebody's general intelligence by

looking at

them you know it's true now sexuality if

they're not hiding it it's usually easy

to tell if they're hiding it's hard of

course and uh political leanings weirdly

yes weirdly yes you can tell people's

political leanings but that's not the

fun part here's the fun

part it can detect

lies now I haven't seen anybody do it

yet

but I guarantee that if humans can do it

and you've seen me do it a million times

right the the the Tells for lying are

very clear I was watching who was it the

other day uh Chris Murphy supporting who

supports Harris Democrat um I was

watching him with the the sound off and

when he gets the lying part his eyebrows

go way up and his eyes get wide and then

he delivers the lie that he knows is a

lie and you know it's a lie but if he

opens his eyes really hard maybe he can

make you believe the lie that he knows

is a lie and you know is a

lie they're really

obvious so yes AI will be will be able

to determine who's lying and I don't

think we're ready for that do you think

we're ready for that because it's going

to be pretty accurate except for the

people who really practice their lies

those would be hard to

detect anyway um science has also

determined that there's a uh key brain

chemical that uh determines whether you

choose to exercise or eat some unhealthy

snacks that's pretty specific so in rats

anyway they can tell if the rat will

want to do physical activity or just

indulge in a treat based on how much of

this one brain chemical is there

something called or rexen now they

haven't tried this on human beings but

the thinking is that they could change

your desire to exercise versus snacking

based on how much you change this

chemical composition in the

person but do you know what the real

story is it's yet more proof that we

don't have free will if you had Free

Will why would it matter how much of

this chemical you had in your brain

because your free will would just say I

choose to exercise or it might say I

choose to eat an unhealthy

snack but if you have free will how

could it possibly be affected by a

chemical in your brain no you don't have

free will Free Will has always been the

most persistent illusion in all of

humanity and we imagine we have free

will because it allows us to not go

crazy I guess but no you don't have any

free

will yeah I think I first realized that

I don't know how many decades ago but

when um scientists said you know what I

think some people are born with a

tendency to be gay to which I saidwell

wouldn't that mean they don't have free

will and then science said you know what

turns out that people who become addicts

and alcoholics are

genetically different in other words

there's some genetic inclination to

addiction to which I said well I thought

they could just choose to be

addicted they got that Free Will don't

they and they eventually realize that

every anything we attribute to free will

will eventually be identified as a

chemical State and then you'll realize

it doesn't exist and then you'll have to

deal with that so I'm getting you ready

decades in advance you're

welcome all

right another thing the science found

out is that your moral values could

change with the seasons so the

seasonality and this has been studied a

UBC study has revealed that regular

seasonal shifts and people's uh their

regular seasonal shifts and moral values

huh let's say if your moral values can

shift based on I don't know sunlight and

diet and

temperature that sounds a little like

you don't have free

will huh you might notice eventually

that 100% of science is all in the same

direction on free will every bit of it

every single thing that they discover

about

humans reduces what you could imagine

was their free

will it has always been an illusion

hypnotist learned that in day one in day

one the hypnotist learn that we imagine

free will but we're just program

machines basically you can't really even

be a hypnotist unless you understand

that Free Will is

fake um you might be amazed to find that

there's a new study that says no amount

of drinking alcohol is good for you huh

who told you that first

me 20 years ago for the first time

probably uh but yes there's no amount of

alcohol that's good for you and there's

new study that says that it is a

carcinogen and your odds of getting

every basically every kind of cancer

goes way up if you've had any alcohol at

all so any amount of alcohol increases

substantially your risk of uh

cancer so don't say I didn't warn you

here's another one there's a teen that's

suing meta so that would be Instagram

and and Facebook for uh5 billion for

being addicted by Instagram so it's a

13-year-old New York girl and she's

filed this suit it's a class action suit

so it' be on behalf of all the other

people as well and it argues that meta

implemented addictive features uh the

like counts and the story despite

knowing they could harm teens mental

health um and it used manipulative

tactics now what part of this is not

common

knowledge would you say it's common

knowledge that the social media

platforms use science to figure out what

is most addictive well yes yeah yes of

course so nobody's questioning that

basic fact right it's really the it's

the DNA of all social media that it's

addictive so if you know it's

addictive and then secondly the claim is

that metan knew it was addictive and

therefore harmful to teens's mental

health do you think do you think that

they can prove in the lawsuit that meta

was aware of the effects it would have

on Mental Health I think so I think they

can do that and then I say to myself

okay but is this really an important

lawsuit or is it just somebody's taking

run at some free money and you'll never

hear about it again well it turns out

that the lawyer representing the minor

is famous lawyer David

boy now if you haven't heard that name

it's because you're not a enough of a

legal geek to know that there's some

names that are associated with big cases

he's one of those names that's often

associated with big cases and he's one

enough that he can be on big cases so it

could be really big deal

what would happen if social media had to

remove their addictive

qualities well what would be left but it

also asks a bigger question aren't all

products

addictive even if you're not trying to

make them addictive everybody who makes

a product of any kind that would cause

you to spend your time doing one thing

versus

another there's some kind of attractive

addictive quality if you're going to use

it more than once so

on one hand I'm kind of fascinated and

interested that somebody might be be

able to make a case out of it on the

other hand there's definitely a uh

unintentional effect that could come

from

that like I'm you know I'm looking at

basically everything in my room and I

think well I mean I'm addicted to my

coffee I'm addicted to creating these

live streams I mean I get such a a kick

out of doing this every morning

that I'm addicted chocolate yeah

chocolate's addicted food's addictive so

I don't know how far you can take this

um lack of free will I can addict you

thing because if you prove that nobody

has free will well then your whole legal

system is in trouble so we have to at

least pretend we have free

will all right there's a report that uh

Elon Musk is going to host Donald Trump

on the xplat form doing as spaces this

does not indicate that Trump is coming

back to X that would be a whole separate

conversation which I don't think is

happening but my guess is that Trump uh

contractually or at least ethically

can't leave truth social because if he

left truth social all the other

stockholders would get

nailed and I don't think he can do that

ethically but he may also have a

contractual agreement that he can go

back to X because that would be bad for

the platform so he's got uh billions of

dollars at stake in not going back to X

so I wouldn't expect it and it doesn't

seem to make much difference because all

of everything he says on Truth gets

picked up on X

anyway anyway the other uh musk news is

that the xplatform and Linda yako if I'm

saying her name right the uh head of x

uh I've announced going after the

GM I forget what the letters stand for

but that's the big group of people who

allegedly were behind some

anti-competitive Behavior maybe even

Rico it could be so bad in which they

organized boycots of advertisers to

suppress Free Speech say x and musk and

yakar youo now is that something that

really happened was there an

organization that organized to suppress

free speech

yes that is easily approvable public

knowledge they they were an entity we

know all the people we know what they

did for a living we know that they did

organize to take down X we know why it

was because they didn't like the Free

Speech they would say it's

disinformation but of course that's free

speech so and Rumble has uh Rumble CEO

says they've joined in on this um this

could be a really big deal because I

don't see how they could

lose they they have the goods I mean

it's basically public information at

this point so how do they lose that

we'll see but the important thing is

that musk decided to stop trying to play

nice and he's just going to sue a out of

business and just just take take the

piss out of them some people are

wondering why the ADL was not included

in this maybe they'll be included later

but the ADL is part of the uh censorship

B Behavior bad actor

world so uh if if you weren't aware of

how bad the ADL is you should

be I'm sure they've done some good good

things in the past I wouldn't discount

that but at the moment they're more of a

Democrat you know uh attack dog kind of

organization all right let's talk about

the new VP choice for Harris uh Tim

Walls so he got introduced at a big

event and we'll talk about all the

things but the first speaker was Josh

Shapiro who many people including me

believed was already picked to be the VP

choice that turned out to be fake news

which I fell for so if you're keeping

track and you should keep track of how

many times I fall for fake

news but also keep track of how many

times other people fall for it now I I

don't remember remember what language I

used when I talked about it but I talked

about it like it was sort of a done deal

but you know not confirmed officially I

went too far I should have said this is

not a confirmed thing but somebody's

making this claim and here's why so I

think I failed you on detecting that

so I I present myself as good

at detecting but that one slip

past my

filter so you should first of all hold

that against me

like

literally but you should also look at

the totality of things I predict and

call on and just see how the

total record is one of the claims I

would never make is that I'm always

right in my detection nobody

would make that claim the best you can

do is you know better than other people

I guess you know if you could do it

better than other people you're amazing

I don't know if I do it better than

other people you can be the judge but I

missed that one

so keep that put that on my permanent

bad

record all right so here's what I had

heard about joshiro was say he was a

great orator and he would have been a

stronger um stronger vice

president that he was not chosen and we

have a little disagreement about why uh

some people say it's because he was a

Jewish and the

anti-semitic um population within the

Democrat party made that a problem and

uh as van Jones points out the

anti-Semitism is marbled in to the

Democrat Party which by the way is a

fantastic choice of

words so van Jones so van Jones uh you

know said the anti-Semitism is marbled

in and they need to work on that you

know they're going to have to figure out

how to deal with that I love the honesty

of that um but but and then I think

uh other people you know other

Republicans Etc are saying that they

think that's the reason that he was not

picked is that he's

Jewish

um but then uh the uh let's see the

David Axel rods want us to believe the

real reason he wasn't chosen is that

when he met with Harris he was a little

bit too Alpha and too much I think they

use the term Main character energy

meaning he looks too much like he should

be considered as a future president

because he has too much skill so that he

it would be an uncomfortable fit with

Harris who's maybe not the strongest

political figure we've ever seen and

that maybe he asked for too much power

you know these are all rumored things

that we can't confirm and uh maybe that

it just didn't seem like the right fit

so it could have been a combination of

uh just knowing that the the marbled

anti-Semitism wasn't going to work out

for him and maybe also knowing that he

wasn't quite the right personality fit

and maybe you save him for a future

presidential run which I think would be

the smart play now I had never heard

Josh Shapiro speak and I'd heard

somebody

say in something I completely

dismissed somebody told me he speaks

like

Obama do you know what my reaction to

that was sure

yeah okay yeah he talks like

Obama that that this uh this Jewish guy

from

Pennsylvania is going to sound like

Barack

Obama and I'm supposed to believe

that and so I listen to him talk and I'm

sitting here at home

saying uh he doesn't just talk like

Obama you know he has the The Hope and

change kind of rhetoric you know in that

in that en category I thought that when

people said he sounds like

Obama there was more of a A

vibe and I even thought that the vibe

was a little overselling it it's like no

he doesn't have a he's not gonna have a

Obama Vibe I was so wrong it's not the

vibe he does an impression of Obama he

does an actual verbal

impression where if you were listening

at home and nobody told you it was Josh

Shapiro you would actually think it was

Obama's voice is an actual impression of

Obama now that do you think he's aware

of

that I I wonder I mean it could be that

he's just a big fan and he was

influenced and you know maybe picked up

some of the techniques and went too far

and it just sounded a little too much

like

Obama but it's so strange to hear him do

an actual impression of Obama now if it

sounds like I'm criticizing that

you're hearing it wrong I'm going to

compliment him on that let me tell you

my secret for becoming a famous

cartoonist if you've never heard me say

this before you know people would ask

early in my career what's the secret of

how you develop this popular cartoon and

I would say honestly I would do my best

job I could of copying good

cartoonists but I would be so bad at an

as an artist that when I tried to copy

other cartoonist

you couldn't tell I was copying them

because I wasn't good at copying but

because I took something from those

other cartoonists when I tried to copy

them and maybe combined a few of them

that I liked into my copying it looked

original yeah if you look at the dilber

characters and then you look at Sergio

Aragon's work in Mad Magazine he would

draw the little Mexican guys with the

Mexican hats in the margins of Mad

Magazine when when I was a kid a million

years ago if you look at the far side

the characters have no necks like dilber

characters yeah I was just copying those

two guys basically Gary Larson and

Sergio aragones but if you look at

Dilbert you'd say what it doesn't look

like you copied anything it's because

I'm a bad copier so being a bad copier

of somebody who is extraordinary is a

really smart thing to do so I'm not

criticizing in Shapiro

whatsoever if he can if he can do an

impression of Obama and he can nail it

and people would like to Obama say I

like what he's saying I don't know why I

like it it's reminding me of something

but it makes me feel good it's brilliant

so I would really worry about Shapiro if

you're a conservative and you're worried

about future elections he does have the

goods he absolutely has the goods even

though he's

copying perfectly acceptable technique I

I don't have anything bad to say about

that anyway uh he was a clear Superior

choice I can see why he was a little too

strong um I favor the combination

explanation it probably had something to

do with anti-Semitism and it probably

had something to do with he's too strong

a character probably both so so then uh

KL Harris did her long introduction then

she introduced to wals and here's what I

saw

I thought both of them looked

drunk now I I can't confirm I mean I

don't know that they bibed anything but

they acted

drunk they they did the Laughing

uncontrollably about nothing that was

especially

funny and the weird thing is that

wals tried to paste and copy K Harris

now that's a bad

idea so when K Harris is is on stage and

he's standing behind her waiting to be

introduced she goes into a cackle it

looked drunk to me

like and then and then uh her vice

president pick standing behind her

walls he imitates her cackle and he does

this completely unnatural looking over

laugh in the background like you go what

is wrong with him is that his normal

laugh or is he actually CAU C in it

looked like he was just pacing her you

know matching her so he was matching her

energy so she went into drunk cackling

he went into drunk cackling it was the

weirdest thing to see so then she slurs

slurs her slurs away foodish speech like

that to me it sounded

drunk um and then the weird thing is

that while she was talking after he did

an impression of K Harris cackling he he

goes into a spontaneous impression of

Joe Biden's vacant brain dead look did

you see it I have to take my glasses off

to do it but I'm going to give you an

impression of a face that he settled

into while KL Harris was talking that he

didn't even look like a living human

being what the hell was that all right

here's the

face what is that

his his mouth just like you know went

open like Hillary Clinton looking at the

balloon drop but with the the Dead face

that uh Biden has I mean I swear to God

it looked like he was channeling Biden

up there looking like he was had

Dementia or something and then he

snapped out of it when when he gave his

talk he was actually very good so if I'm

going to judge him as a public speaker

A+ good good good good public speaker

and I wouldn't I wouldn't discount his

his capability as a politician very

strong but weird weird as

hell

um so that so we've got Shapiro Ben or

Josh Shapiro who is channeling Obama

then you've got Tim wals who's

channeling Harris and then he's back

there channeling Biden you really don't

know what you're getting do you

there's no way to know what you're

getting because they just seem to be

copying each other and pretending and

playing some kind of weird characters

and of course her policies have all

changed you know Harris has reversed her

policies so you don't know her policies

her personality you don't know if she's

drunk or sober you haven't heard her

talk and answer questions yeah the the

key is the less you know about them the

better they'll

do um then we did learn that wals is a

giant liar which makes him perfect for

campaign

he you he just lied a b bunch of

about JD Vance now the whole JD Vance

lie about having sex with a couch that's

not based on any real thing that that he

ever said or did uh well as far as we

know but do you think that um wal is not

aware that that's fake do you think he's

not aware well I think he's aware and

and I think that um both sides do this

it's what I call recreational beliefs

meaning there's some stuff that you just

throw to your base because they want to

pretend they believe it you know Trump

does the same thing and I would say

that's a recreational belief so if you

get yourself all caught up and trying to

debunk it like that's not true you're

lying about that couch well you're sort

of being pulled into their trick because

if you're talking about whether he did

or did not f a couch you're not really

promoting your

side so it's basically draining your

energy away into something ridiculous

that doesn't matter and they don't

believe so debunking it doesn't make any

difference

anyway all

right

um he's being sold by the uh the left as

having Midwestern folksy values so

they're all trying to paint them as this

Midwestern

he's the most ordinary not left kind of

guy but of course he has a number of

views and policies that are really left

so he does cover a span he's apparently

okay with the NRA or let me say it a

different way the NRA actually gave him

a good vote for being pro uh gun so he's

a gun owner he's been in the

military um looks like he's a hunter I

think

so he's good on guns and he's got that

Midwestern stuff but he's got a lot of

stuff we'll talk about that's not so

Midwestern ordinary

stuff all right um to me the funniest

thing last night was watching the what

I'll call the anti-white pundits mostly

on CNN trying to say how excited they

were about this old white

guy cuz I don't think they were excited

about an old white guy but they had had

to act like they were and watching them

struggle to come up with words that kind

of were

supportive but didn't really reveal you

know kind of hiding what their real

feelings were so it was really funny

watching them try to navigate

that anyway um and then some some are

saying that wals was selected so they

could get the white male

vote all right I'd like to talk to my

white male viewers

here how many people think that they

would vote for commel Harris because she

picked a white guy to be vice

president is there even one person in

the entire United States who would say

you know I didn't know who to vote for

but because I'm racist this is not me

I'm I'm doing an impression of somebody

else because of a person might say that

because they're

racist they they're really happy that KL

Harris has a white white man picked as

her vice president so in order to feel

better the alleged racists would vote

for the brown

woman so they could have a vice

president who was like them there are

zero white people who would do that

there's not a single I don't think one I

don't think you could get one person in

the United States who would say you know

I'm a white man and I was a little

uncomfortable with k Harris but now that

she's got a vice president who agrees

with her on

everything now I I'm convinced I'm going

to go for that package so I don't know

is there something wrong with the

pundits or are white men especially

completely misunderstood in this country

who would really think that that would

change anybody's

vote it's kind of jaw-dropping that that

that's even a possible

conversation anyway no he's not going to

change anybody's vote because he's white

he not lose some votes but it's not

going to gain him

any all right

so um so we're going to be struggling

over the question of whether he's super

lefty or middle of the road the

Democrats want to paint him as middle of

the

road uh I think he insists he's a

moderate

directly insist that all right but here

are some of the things he's been accused

of I don't know how many of these are

true some of these may be on a context

we'll learn later but these are the

attacks that are coming against them

that he waited three days before

deploying the deploying the National

Guard to quash the BLM riots so he is

being accused of being a little too

favorable to the riers and not having

the right empathy for his own State when

he could have stopped it sooner but of

course of course he'd have an argument

you know maybe the bringing in the

military would have caused more trouble

I don't know he has some argument for

that but uh the people who live there

are not too happy that for three days

they had to endure the rioting when he

could have stopped as sooner they

think apparently he created a covid

snitch line so that again you might find

that the contexts for all these are a

little bit

lacking uh cuz these are accusations so

don't assume any of these are true or

completely in context but it's just what

the attacks are so you had a covid

snitch line they say so you could turn

in your neighbor for being not

vaccinated I don't even know if I

believe that at

all I mean it sounds like something

somebody would have done but so that

sounds

terrible um some say he's doubling down

on drugs and surgeries for kids and

teens yeah so he would be a little Pro

too much prot transitioning for children

that would be a a complaint about him uh

he has allegedly got a DUI when he was

30 and part of his excuse was that he

lost his Hearing in the military so he

didn't hear the

siren I don't think anybody believes

that or he didn't see it or something

um then the the worst one is that he was

in the National Guard for years

but when the Iraq war broke out he

suddenly decided that was a good time to

retire claiming that he had always plan

to do it about then and run for politics

but the people who did not retire and

stayed in and got deployed to Iraq are

saying something more along the lines of

you freaking turd uh you have no loyalty

you know we all got deployed you left

and again is there some more context to

that that I don't know

maybe maybe I would say for all of these

all of these attacks you should ask

yourself am I missing any context these

might not all be

true and let's see he us pro-abortion

without restrictions which makes

conservatives say that he's going to let

babies born alive and let them die after

they're alive I think there might be

some context to that

missing uh but I don't like get into the

abortion question because I think that's

for women to work out not for

me all right apparently he created Timol

created a Dei Council as soon as he got

into the daily wire is saying this as

soon as he got into office saying that

America was systemically racist and he

pushed the uh diversity equity and

inclusion thing really

far and uh to me of course that's

completely

disqualifying completely

disqualifying

uh yeah we'll talk about that I'm seeing

a comment about me on

there um then there's this weird video

of after he gave his speech that his

wife came on stage this is Tim ws and

she comes up to him and how do you greet

your wife when you're a political

candidate who's just been shoes to the

world and you're standing on stage and

she comes up and everybody's clapping

and celebrating what would be the

typical way you'd greet your

wife well I'm no politician but I would

think something like a kiss on the lips

you know unless there was some maybe

maybe some lipstick issue going on there

maybe at least on the side of the face

uh a hug you real deep hug something

like that uh he chose a handshake

he shook hands with his

wife then she went in for the

hug and and he gave her the no naughty

bits hug if you if you ever hug somebody

who definitely didn't want your

sexuality to be part of the

hug and and they just do the the leanin

hug where the only part that's touching

is the top of your chests it's like not

even breasts it's just like the top of

your chest touches a little a little bit

but your your groin area is 2 feet apart

because you're both leaning in that's

how that's how he hugged his wife after

he shook her

hand what the hell is going on

there I don't know all right the other

big thing is that he's uh he's big on

China um oh he also signed a bill

redefining the term sexual

orientation to include pedophiles

so what that means is that uh there was

a bill in his state to prohibit

discrimination based on sexual

orientation but under his administration

they included sexual orientation to

include pedos so that you could not

discriminate against somebody for being

a

pedophile all right

okay anyway um now I I'm just going to

say that loud he gives

me a feeling that I don't have any

evidence

for I just get a feeling from him now I

heard from other people that they got

the same

Vibe and I don't have any you know

information that would suggest that any

of this is true I just say he gives me

kind of a kind of a

Vibe so he's been a teacher and a and a

coach so he's chosen careers that put

him in contact with

children and uh he just has a Vibe about

him so that's that's my only statement

is he has a Vibe I will note

that um it seems like the Deep State

really really prefers people they can

blackmail now again I don't have any

evidence of that and I don't have

evidence that he has anything he could

be blackmailed for none

whatsoever but keep keep an eye on that

because it just seems like a weird

coincidence that so many people in

politics look like well that's exactly

the list of people I would think would

be most black mailable and yet they seem

to have these prominent roles so I don't

know I just keep an eye on it um now wal

also has this weird China connection

he's allegedly been to China 30 times I

don't know if that's confirmed he uh

worked there so he worked there for a

time um teaching I guess around

children and he honeymooned there who

honeymoons in China if you've been there

dozens of

times does that make sense does that

sound like your romantic honeymoon

destination well I mean he's got a

strong connection to China so maybe it

made s

St but here's the thing we can know for

sure we know that wall has a strong

connection to China I'll say connection

because he's been there so many times

and he's worked there strong connection

and then he set up some kind of a

student Exchange program when he was in

America to so Americans and I think

Americans can go

there so there's that so he loves he

seems to have some strong connection to

China and you would think that China

would really appreciate that wouldn't

you if you were China wouldn't you love

to have an American vice president who

could become president someday wouldn't

you love that he had a strong connection

to your country well I think you would I

mean that would be a lot safer than

somebody who

didn't and we also know that China

controls Tik

Tock we also know that Tik Tok has

something called a heat

button which if you push it it makes

something Trend more obviously so you

can basically control the brains of

Americans Young Americans mostly by any

little tweak to Tik Tock and we know it

literally brainwashes people you know

you can see on X people are being uh

well on the meta on The Meta platform

there's a lawsuit because it's addictive

addictive and persuasive are pretty

closely related if there's some

information Source that's addictive I

can tell you in advance it's persuasive

Scott there's a thing that's addictive

everybody can't stop looking at it do

you think it's

persuasive

yes yes obviously super super persuasive

I don't have to study it if you're

addicted to it it's persuasive there's

no way around that there's no way

there's no way you could be addicted to

it and not be persuading you that's not

a

thing

so we have no information that would

suggest that China has told Tik Tock to

push any

buttons we just know that they have a

gigantic National interest in it in you

know controlling thoughts in America we

know they have the

ability because they can simply tell

them to push the button now let me

describe it the way I described it in

the man cave the other

day the CEO of Tik Tock says no they

don't tell me what to do that might be

true

that it might be true that they don't

tell them anything directly about what

to do but everybody knows what to do

indirectly don't they is there anybody

who works at Tik Tok who doesn't know

what China as a country would prefer to

see more of versus what they'd like to

see less of of course they know so if

there were people who just worked at Tik

Tok who had any control over the

algorithm they don't need to be told

what to do they just know what to do but

if I were China here's how I'd be

controlling Tik Tock I would say to the

CEO hey CEO we don't want to control you

do whatever you want but we'd like you

to meet all the leaders of China so you

really really know what they look like

you know we want to be kind of close to

you so that might be

enough but even if the CEO wants to have

deniability no they never told me to do

anything I've never anything for him

which would be good to to keep that

deniability here's what I would do if I

were Chinese intelligence

service I would make sure that I became

friends with the top engineers at Tik

Tok I would have lunch with them I would

give them uh favors I would connect them

with people that could help them and I

would make sure that the

engineers knew that doing what Chinese

intelligence wants is really good for

them and if they don't do what Chinese

intelligence wants it's really bad for

them and then Chinese intelligence has

dinner with their favorite engineer from

Tik Tock and says you know there's these

people running for office in

America one of them really likes China

he's been here 30 times it'd be great

for China if that guy got elected do you

hear me

engineer uh yeah I hear you're saying

this guy's good for China right and uh

do you still control the algorithm well

yeah I mean I could I just have to push

that button would anybody know if you

push the

button well if I push the actual button

on the user interface yes it would be

logged but if I just do it with code

within the system with a little tweak

it'd be the same as the heat button but

it wouldn't be logged and nobody would

ever be able to prove I did it huh well

it sure would be good if something like

that

happened so

if you imagine that Tik Tok is not

controlled at a detailed level by China

I don't know it feels

naive so we have a situation where the

polls we know are going to be close on

Election

Day and they will be close enough that

let's say a 2% swing would certainly

determine the race because remember 2%

is not just added to one group it's

subtracted from the other so a 2% swing

is a a 4% differ you get that so could

Tik Tock cause a 2% swing in votes yeah

easily easily and not just by Tik Tok

because Tik Tok content gets onto other

services Etc so yes so we've actually

given the vote to

China just let that sink

in China can move the election 2% with

Tik Tock guaranteed there's no there's

no question that they could do that all

they have to do as want to and then Tik

Tok will do it I assume because Tik Tok

doesn't want to you know deal with

Chinese intelligence hating them so if

American if American social media except

for X um folded like you know a cheap

chair when American FBI and CIA wanted

it to do stuff what do you think happens

in

China you know if the CIA wants you to

do stuff you're going to feel like

you're really to do it even if they

don't threaten you but what happens if

Chinese intelligence asks you to do it

and you're a Chinese owned company or

controlled you're really really going to

think you need to do it so China

basically has the vote now so the

Chinese vote will determine who the uh

president is so good on

that well here's a fun recreational

belief getting back to science a little

bit and the nature of reality so

somebody called

not somebody called this is his actual

name somebody

called somebody with a name J Anderson

from the Project

Unity is talking about some experiment

in which they put plants in a darkened

room where the there would be a light

source that would randomly go to

different quadrants and it was

completely randomized so it' just be a

plant put in one corner but it wouldn't

get light at all

except randomly as that light would be

lit up in different places but mostly

the light was where there was no plant

because there was a room with mostly

empty but one little plant what they

found was allegedly remember this is a

recreational belief I can't prove it's

real allegedly the randomized light

would start in a statistically

measurable way favoring the plant with

no human involvement in other words

random stuff starts becoming less random

if there's a living thing in the

mix and the idea is that even plants

might be able to collapse

reality so you know the experiments uh

like schro Schrodinger's cat Etc so that

quantum physics says you need an

observer or it might be a device that's

measuring something but if you don't

measure it or observe

it the reality stays in the super impo

superposition of neither yes nor no or

up nor down has to be observed and then

it becomes

reality well

apparently there's some suggestion that

a plant can do

that now here's how this fits into my

model of the world being a simulation if

the world is a simulation can you

control it and I think you can by having

a clear idea of what it is you want

which is one of the explanations for

Elon

Musk I think Elon Musk always has a very

clear idea of what he wants and he

collapses reality in that

direction and I think the clearer your

idea and the harder you think it the

more likely it's going to collapse in

your direction reality that is now my

life as I've told you many times is so

weird so

insanely unlikely

but it also followed a path that I

determined when I was six years old when

I was six years old I said I'm going to

become a famous

cartoonist and I never I never altered

from wanting it but there was a period

of my life I didn't think it was

possible but I always wanted it and it

was always a really clear image of what

it was and what it would look like and

it happened exactly the way I met

exactly and I can't explain that and

then you know my entry into politics had

the same Oddity about it that it just

didn't look like it could have happened

on its own it looks like I'm authoring

the

simulation so maybe the plant is

authoring the

simulation and maybe you are

too maybe all of us are and that the the

act of affirmations where you really

focus on what you want and you repeat it

or write it down 15 times a day that all

that does is make sure that you have a

clear view of what you want like a plant

has a clear desire for sun there's no

ambiguity about what the plant wants if

wanting is a thing right it wants more

light I wanted to be a cartoonist Elon

Musk wanted to make an electric car

wanted to go to

Mars all right there's a former NASA

scientist who's doing a bunch of

experiments to find out if we do live in

a simulation Thomas Campbell

so he's designed

experiments to find out if our reality

is more like a video game and see Vicky

ver on X is reporting on this and he's

got uh say his experiments include a new

spin on the double slit

experiment so I don't know the details

but allegedly he's got a way to test

whether we live in a

simulation how do you think that's going

to

go I have no idea how that's going to go

but the the idea that we live in a

simulation just keeps getting stronger

and stronger and that we don't have free

will in the normal

sense um well here's my final evidence

that we live in a

simulation you ready for

this this really happened so the vice

presidential pick is Tim

Walls you know that so this created a

situation where I swear this is true

it puts president Trump or Donald Trump

ex president Trump in the position of

opposing

walls come

on Trump the most famous builda wall guy

in the

world has to run against a wall or walls

he's opposing walls come on how did that

happen on its

own how about musk is suing a bunch of

companies in that advertising space

where I I mentioned that garm so A bunch

of advertisers are part of that one of

the advertisers that's

mentioned uh that he's specifically

suing through X is the Mars company they

make candy Mars Bars and

stuff so Elon Musk is suing

Mars you tell me we're not living in the

simulation Trump is Trump is running

against

walls Elon Musk is suing

Mars and the assassination attempt

against

Trump involved somebody named cheel

trying to stop somebody named Crooks and

you don't trust either of

them how how is this

real I mean

seriously th this just all happened by

itself

I don't know I'm having a real hard time

believing any of this is happening

accidentally because it looks exactly

like a dream I might have it's way like

a dream I might

have anyway there's a whole bunch of new

allegations about the Georgia 2020

election and I don't want to get you

know Kraken meaning to get ahead of

myself and say it's been proven there's

a bunch of election irregularities that

have been proven it's the Kraken cuz I

think the Kraken was always a

trap I I think that if there's real

election

irregularity the way to hide it is to

come up with a fake Kraken give somebody

important like Sydney Powell to believe

it have her say it in public and then

when it all falls apart you can say

everything else was a kraken

too so to me the Kraken always looked

like an intelligence play to destroy the

people were too close to the real

problem if there is

one but you should know that uh there's

a big video of a whole bunch of citizens

doing a public event in which they made

many claims of detected fraud or

irregularities in the Georgia election I

don't have an opinion about

the um quality of any of that evidence

because again you don't want to fall for

a

kraken but there's a lot of it and it

sure sounds persuasive but remember the

Kraken sounded persuasive at one time

too so there's tons of evidence we just

don't know the quality of it it's hard

to say independently then I saw a post

by

George uh he goes by he's he's had an

account beisy tweets good follow but it

just goes by the name George anyway he

says the Georgia state election board

has passed a new rule allowing observers

inside tabulation centers during this

upcoming

election

[Music]

so that wasn't a thing before are you

saying that we didn't have observers in

the tabulation centers and that

something could have gone wrong in the

tabulation centers and there were no

observers but now we do have observers

or at least they'll be legal

huh well that's interesting do you think

the Republicans are going to find

anything as they are more carefully

watching this

election

maybe there's a new lawsuit America

First

legal has got a lawsuit to sue Maricopa

County Arizona for refusing to remove

illegal aliens from their voter roles

out of the election now why in the world

would they refuse to do

that the only reason I can think of is

that they want to use illegal votes to

get their way

why else would they refuse to do it if

they had a list of all the people who

were not legal voters and they had a

list of all the people on their voting

roles it's not the biggest job in the

world to subtract you know one list from

another list programmatically but they

have so maybe there's more to the

context of this but they

refused and uh they're they're blatantly

defying their own state law because the

state law mandates them to purge

ineligible voters and they're just going

to keep the illegal aliens apparently on

the

roles so in other words it looks like

exactly they are planning to cheat in

Arizona we know how they're planning to

cheat they're showing you that they're

not going to change it they're going to

disobey their own law and it looks a lot

like they're planning to steal the

election don't know for sure but it sure

looks like

it well here's the good news Lara Trump

um she said uh that they do have pole

Watchers pole workers and legal experts

will be everywhere votes are cast

encountered and she says do you want to

help so if you'd like to be part of the

Watcher group uh the URL to go to would

be protect thee. comom so any of you who

want to be like onsite and watching for

irregularities I think uh Lara's team

will probably offer some guidance or

training there and it's called

protectthe

vote.com so here's

my here's my take on

this I

think Republicans are going to uncover

massive fraud only because they know

where to look for it and they'll find it

I mean I think we can expect they'll

find just all kinds of stuff the

whatever was happening in Georgia

whether it was rigged or not I don't

have proof either way

I think there's good evidence to show

that things were deleted they shouldn't

have been

deleted and that you know there's a lack

of forthcoming this in some cases so

there's something going on let's just

say that if you can't if you can't smell

the smoke of some erection election

erection election

irregularities I don't think you're

paying

attention I don't think you're paying

attention there's something deeply wrong

with our elction

they are not

auditable which is all you need to know

they're not fully auditable so when

people say something got audited or

double checked or counted they're

usually looking at a very some very

narrow thing that wouldn't tell you at

all whether the election was rigged or

not it would just tell you if that very

narrow thing was done right so for

example they could recount they could

recount mailin votes and then they would

call that an audit but what if half of

the mill in votes were from people

ineligible well they wouldn't check if

they were eligible they would just

recount them and say look we counted

them right the first time second count

matches I guess we're good nobody found

any fraud and then the legal system

would say wait wait wait we did find

some fraud and they take it to the

courts and the courts say well it's too

late or too little or you don't have a

standing we don't want to deal with

it but if uh if Laura Trump has done

what I think she has done

she has trained the Watchers to really

find the good stuff to know where to

look if they do find the good stuff or

even if they alleg they found the good

stuff there's no way the election is

going to get certified so I'm going to

double down on my uh election prediction

that there won't be one there will be

voting but I don't believe that the

country is uh sufficiently organized and

honest enough to produce a result that

we could even

verify so somehow we're going to have to

pick a president but I think the vote

will be ignored no matter which way it

goes I guess if the Democrats get their

way they're more likely to try to push

ahead but I don't know I think the

election will be so non-credible

probably both

ways that we're just going to have to

figure out what to

do and all right so let me talk about

the messaging from Harris and then Trump

all right so the Democrats have pushing

the Trump's going to steal your

democracy which I don't think anybody

understood so Harris quite smartly uh

tried to redefine that in a recent

interview in which he said well you know

rather than thinking about it as

stealing your

democracy uh there would be more

accurate to think of it as stealing your

freedoms that Trump would try to take

your

freedoms so now you might ask what

freedoms what freedom is Trump trying to

take and here are the actual answers

because Harris has you know now listed

the

freedoms so one is the freedom control

your own bodies when which he means

birth control and

abortion Trump's view is he doesn't want

to have anything to do with that stuff

so Trump's official policy is I don't

want to be involved in making any laws

about anything I don't want to stop

birth control of any kind the morning

after pill or anything else and I don't

want to be involved in decisions about

abortion I want the states to do that

now given that every state has at least

half of the men in favor of

abortion right it's it's even more than

that usually but at least half of the

men are in favor of abortion that means

that if women are in favor of it by

majority there's a 100% chance they'll

get

it voting still sort of matters so women

have complete control in the states they

just have to organize and convince each

other so women will you stop pretending

that men have anything to do with this

convince women if if women by let's say

80% majority wanted abortion in their

states and 50% of the men were on that

side too

they could stop anybody from getting

elected anybody they could stop their

funding that that would be such an

overwhelming advantage on one of the top

issues that they could kind of get

anything they wanted it won't happen

right

away so if Democrats are complaining

that the end of row verse Wade created a

situation where a third of the states I

guess um can't get the abortions that

they want I would say for the people who

wanted those abortions that's very bad

in the short run I think you have to

admit that no matter where you are on

the topic but in the long run women have

complete control of their bodies because

they have complete control of the

elections they just have to be on the

same side if women are not in the same

side why are you complaining to the rest

of us it's definitely women have to

decide

first and then maybe try to convince the

rest of us but if women can't

decide um although I think women are

like 2/3 four for abortion in the United

States so my argument about that is that

women have full control of their own

bodies they just haven't executed on

that

control um haris says you want the

freedom to love openly and whoever you

want openly and with pride to which I

say which freedom is

that that's not a freedom you want do

you want anybody to be able to express

any form of love

I think you'd want to protect the

children a little better wouldn't you

what about

beastiality now here I'm not

comparing lgbtq to beastiality so don't

don't try to do that to me I'm not these

are not similar things not similar I'm

just saying the

statement can we can we allow everybody

to love who they want with pride if

somebody wants to have sex with farm

animals should I respect it again I'm

not comparing that to being gay this

these are not comparable things I'm just

saying this is a pretty big

statement and I would say the answer to

that is conservatives mostly just want

to be left alone conservatives don't

care what you do behind your closed

door they might think it's a

sin but they're not going to try to stop

you from doing it it's your business

conservatives want to be left alone but

they also want to leave you alone behind

closed

doors so that one just seems

dumb and I don't think conservatives

want to be forced to celebrate anybody

else's love choices and I don't think

conservatives want to be told that

anybody should have pride about who they

love how about you just love who you

love and you could be proud about it but

why should I be proud of

it why am I proud of your gay

kid I I might like your gay kid I might

have complete respect for every human

being and all their different choices

because we're all infinitely different I

I'll definitely have that but why do I

have to be proud about it why is anybody

proud about it how about it just is it

just is you don't have to be proud about

it you don't have to be mean about it

you don't have to try to stop it how

about it just is and everybody's

different

and we just have to live in that world

where everybody's different and maybe if

we just left each other alone a little

bit more that'd be

great so no I think that's dumb um she

says also freedom from gun violence okay

that's a made up and stupid right um and

first of all nothing that the left is

doing is compatible with reducing

violence the left wants to defund the

police they supported riots they don't

want cash bail they want open board

orders they're pushing Dei and every

other kind of racial division there's no

evidence no

evidence that the left wants to reduce

violence it looks like they want to

increase it so that's a dumb argument

and it also ignores the fact that guns

can protect you from a

dictatorship they also talk about

freedom to have access to a

ballot okay we're still waiting for the

first human being ever to say I'd like

to vote but I've been prevented from

doing

it none we we haven't met the alleged

black Citizen who can't get an ID to

vote none not a single black person ever

in an interview or on TV or anybody

you've ever met or anybody you talk to

any of your friends any of your

co-workers not a single black person has

ever said you know what I'd love to vote

but I can't figure out how to get an ID

no

and yet they're selling that like it's a

thing

none

anyway so I think those are ridiculous

madeup rights it's the whole thing is

just complete garbage doesn't look like

anything that professionals came up with

you know I sometimes say hey this looks

like professional persuasion that

doesn't look professional that looks

like people who are writing some kind of

college essay they said all right write

a college essay on how um Trump is uh

let's say stealing your freedoms and

then you go in and you're like all right

academically can I make an argument that

he's stealing my freedoms by making

everything the opposite of what it is

and ignoring the context over here yeah

it just seemed like some weird

academic thing it's not persuasive it's

just kind of dumb but maybe it works for

Democrats I don't know

well um one of the

so-called oh here's the let's talk about

Trump messaging so Trump said that the

Harris walls ticket will turn America

communist immediately I don't think the

Communist attack lands at

all because every time I hear it even

even I you know I'm on Trump's side but

when I hear him call the other side

communist I think what in what way

do they do they want the government to

control all the means of

production like do I not understand what

a communist is do they want a

dictator I I don't understand it at all

now if they had said

socialism then that's a problem too

because when I hear socialism I say you

mean like every modern country where

there are some programs to take care of

the people who can't take care of

themselves you mean socialism so the

trouble is that that neither socialism

nor communism really works too well as

an attack I think maybe it's just good

for your own base but the Bas is already

with you so I don't know it feels like

wasted words to me there there's so many

things that they could

attack that going for communist just

makes everybody here go well I don't I

don't know I don't see

that and I don't think anybody knows

what Marxism is you know maybe two% of

the country knows even what Marxism is

so that doesn't work too well so all of

those you're a liberal you're a Marxist

you're a

communist I don't see any of that

messaging being

effective whereas I would see I can help

the economy I can keep you on a

war I can keep them from putting you in

jail those feel like real things so I'd

like to see more of

that so one of uh you remember Trump had

these so-called fake electors one of

them just pleaded guilty to a single

reduced charge so those cases are still

ongoing so it was Lena no lorine pelo

she was an Arizona 2020 uh so-called

fake elector but here's what she pleaded

guilty to or pleed guilty to um a single

misdemeanor charge of presentment of a

false instrument for

filing does that sound real to you if

the alternate

electors um thought they had a case

meaning that they believed that there

was nothing illegal about registering as

an alternate elector which the left

would call fake electors if they didn't

know that any of that was illegal they

wouldn't have been aware that their

documents were illegal

anyway so I feel like this is a little

bit of lawfare and maybe Lorraine

peligrino just took the plea

because it got out of all all penalties

basically didn't have to go to jail

didn't have to be on any kind of program

so I think there was just some some kind

of unsupervised release and it's just a

misdemeanor so who knows if any of that

actually happened was a real law but it

looks like maybe the law just forces

people to take the plea and get out of

there so I don't know how any of that

could have been illegal now we also know

that ex Trump attorney J Ellis reached

some kind of cooperation agreement with

law

enforcement so that could be interesting

we'll see if anything comes out of

that meanwhile another member of the

so-called Squad in Congress uh lost in a

primary so Squad member Corey Bush lost

her primary so she will be out of

Congress and she was allegedly attacked

with heavy spending by pro-israel

groups so so do you think that

pro-israel

groups um took her

out it looks like it if if the money

made the difference and they put in a

lot of money

maybe could be that she was just bad at

her job and it didn't take much

money there's a story that says the

Harris walls team is trying to pay

influencers to say good things and do

interviews and stuff for Harris and

there's some uh dou umentation that

shows that that's the case but uh some

of that may be a response to the fact

that we we heard that Baron Trump young

Baron Trump is the one who had some

connection to that Aiden Ross guy from

kick who did the 100 million views thing

with Trump in the Cyber truck Etc so

Baron Trump might turn into a a player

you know meaning his instincts might be

really good and who knows maybe he's a

future

present who

knows um so Jessica tarlo on the five

yesterday brought up the drinking bleach

Oaks and she got fact checked hard by

Greg Gutfeld who was there to tell her

Trump never said drink any

bleach nor did he say inject bleach and

here's the real thing here's the funny

thing she acted like she didn't know

that

that and I thought that she was kind of

smart she just had you know different

priorities and you know different

political views but you would have to be

kind of stupid to know that was not a

hoax or to if you didn't know it was a

hoax that's kind of stupid here's how

you should know that's a

hoax nobody would say

that that's it you don't even have to

research it nobody would say that do you

know how I know that

um well I mean basically it's it's a

good test if you just say to yourself

would any human ever say

that and if the answer is no nobody

would ever say

that that's your answer you don't have

to you don't have to look into

it

um so that was fascinating I I thought

she was a lot smarter than that but she

proved that she

is not terribly smart if you literally

if you literally believe that Trump

suggested injecting bleach or drinking

bleach I don't know how you explain that

except low IQ I don't could could you be

that

hypnotized I don't know meanwhile

America First legal is uh doing good

stuff again so they went after that

Brennan Clapper Intel community they're

calling it um in which they were trying

to do this whole of government approach

to silence political descent so these

two ex top Intel people in the United

States were part of an organized

Democrat program to make sure that Free

Speech was limited that's a real thing

it's just

amazing that that's

real so anyway uh America First legals

after him

they publicly released all the documents

from that uh committee so uh and that

they they obtained that in litigation so

there's going to be

litigation here are some updates on

other things there scitec daily has a

story that uh if you add dopamine to a

Alzheimer's patient it almost

immediately helps so Japanese

researchers have discovered that

dopamine treatments could alleviate

Alzheimer's symptoms

because it promotes production of

something and

uh so I guess they've uh tested in mice

and they've got you know good hope that

it might work in humans but they haven't

tested yet

now here's another one where you could

have asked

Scott um I believe I've told you on live

stream that dopamine is implicated not

just in making you happy because that's

how we usually think of it

but it's a it's a

motion it it creates activity in your

body if you don't have dopamine you'll

just sit there you won't get up your

brain will say I should get up you just

won't do it if you don't have dopamine

so um I knew from one of my smartest

friends a while ago that dopamine could

be treated with a I'm sorry that

Alzheimer's could be treated with a

dopamine like treatment that's what L

Doopa is lopa is has you know an

existing treatment for

Alzheimer's because they thought

dopamine would help so this is new

research and maybe they got a deeper

understanding of it but yeah it's

dopamine dopamine is what the

Alzheimer's people

need anyway so I was thinking of

Parkinson's actually I think I was I was

uh I was conflating Parkinson's with

Alzheimer's in my bad explanation to

what's happening but I do think that

generally speaking uh dopamine is C is

sort of a necessary component for all of

your

functioning so I'll I'll broaden that

and try to correct what I just said

wrong because I was think I was thinking

of Parkinson's when I said L Doopa but

if you think that your muscles need um

dopamine is it any surprise that your

brain

does I I feel like you could have just

guessed that without doing this

study anyway here's a Venezuela update

the madur regime is trying to Jail the

opposition leaders of course I guess

that's what happens when he win happened

in the United States so why wouldn't it

happen in

Venezuela uh Hamas has picked a new

Chief because the somebody and maybe it

was Israel uh assassinated the head of

Hamas so now the new head is their

uh head of their Terror group previously

so you've heard of him

y Yaya

sinir so they took the worst terrorist

leader within Hamas and promoted him to

be the actual head of humas because that

guy got

assassinated

now let's talk peace

huh have you seen any of the uh

interviews with Palestinians after

October

I've seen a number of uh interviews on

the street kind of thing where somebody

will say all right uh was October 7th

Justified and every person I saw

interviewed everyone said oh yeah

totally

justified and then they would be asked

do you think a two-state solution could

work and every one of them says no no no

there's no two-state solution there's a

one-state solution

and their one state solution is Israel

goes away

now am I getting accurate information

meaning these Street interviews are they

intentionally editing out the

Palestinians who say something like yeah

we just need our two states and we can

live next to each other and everything

will be fine we just need to stop

fighting you know we'll we'll try to

we'll try to get the Hamas people to

settle down a little bit we'll work on

that on our side maybe you could work on

you know your side and we'll get

together nothing like

that now so I have a question whether

I'm being

brainwashed because it would be a good

brainwashing technique to do all these

people in the street interviews and just

Ed edit out anybody who was for peace

and then you would get the impression

that there would be no point in even

talking to the Palestinians because they

only want to destroy

Israel now it might be true you know

maybe it's like 85 % of the PO I'm just

guessing but what if 85% of the

population wants nothing except the

destruction of

Israel I think that could be the case

but I wouldn't say it based on all the

interviews because you know they're not

reliable but I do think that the

brainwashing among the Palestinians is

probably strong enough and comprehensive

enough that there's nobody in the public

who wants peace they wish they weren't

being shot at and they wish they could

do what they want and they wish Israel

didn't exist and all that but I don't

think they want

peace I don't see any movement to it and

if anybody wants to convince me that the

Palestinians want peace it would be

really useful for somebody on that side

you know a pro Palestinian journalist to

go over there and show me some

interviews of just ordinary people

stopped in the streets who say yes

please we want to end fighting and have

a two-state solution that's you know

living in peace next to each other I

don't know that they

exist do you is is there anybody

watching who's had uh let's say enough

connection with Palestinians who are in

the area who can tell me am I wrong is

there not a single person in the entire

Community who wants peace without

destroying

Israel I don't know that's a pretty big

question isn't

why are we even talking about a peace

deal if we don't know the answer to the

question is anybody in favor of peace is

there even one person in the Palestinian

areas in favor of

Peace haven't seen one yet I I assume

they exist and I assume that I would be

subject to being brainwashed by never

seeing

one so I got a real question about the

brainwashing on that point I'd love to

know what what the real opinion of the

Palestinian people is over

there but I can tell you that if Hamas

is picking uh the sinir guy as their new

leader they have decided that uh October

7th worked and that more terrorism is

more better for them so they're

certainly not looking for peace you you

don't put this guy in charge and say you

know we'll put the the our best

terrorist in charge because Israel is

going to kill that guy Israel has said

in no uncertain terms we're going to

kill that guy do you think if he showed

up to negotiate they wouldn't kill him I

think if he shows up for a negotiation

they could drop a bomb on him because

they've said unambiguously we are going

to kill that guy for

sure there there's no way around it

we're killing that guy so even if he

showed up for some State sanction thing

they' probably just kill him I think

they've got a case for it

anyway and then there's a story that uh

some guy got caught allegedly trying to

arrange assassination attempts in the

United States that would include Trump

and it would be Iran's revenge for Trump

taking out Solomon a and the question I

have about this bill maluan is reporting

on this Fox News and the question I have

is I don't trust this story because the

last thing I want to hear after all that

sketchy social um Secret Service

protection of trump the last thing I

want to hear is oh there's another

country trying to kill Trump so so if we

say that enough and we really do some

things that make it look like another

country is trying to kill Trump if

something happened to Trump well what

would the first thing you would look at

would be these other countries so I'm a

little concerned that we're being

brainwashed about the Iranians trying to

assassinate Trump I'm not saying it's

not

true I'm just saying there might be a

little brainwashing involved on

that well meanwhile Iraq's Parliament is

taking the first step to lower the legal

age of marriage from for girls from

15 wow the legal age of marriage for a

girl in Iraq is

15 uh but they're looking to lower that

to uh nine

nine huh so that would be compatible

with Sharia law I guess so uh good job

Americans for taking over Iraq and and

uh that didn't work out quite the way

anybody

hoped and the last good news is did you

ever wonder why we don't make more

electricity and of waves in the ocean

you know the ocean is continually going

up and down and back and forth why can't

we get electricity from that thing well

it turns out uh there's a megawatt scale

wave project that's might be coming to

realization according to the new Atlas

uh Eco wave so what they do is they put

these uh big floaty things in the water

and as the waves bounce them up and down

the float the there's it's connected to

some levers that create some

electricity so that's cool I would think

that uh you might have the same problem

as the windmills you know the windmills

seem to be killing whales so I'd watch

out for the whales because it's going to

be loud because it's mechanical and it

puts a loud mechanical thing in the

ocean isn't that what the problem with

the windmills was because it was loud

and it was in the ocean that caused the

I don't know the sonar of the whales to

go crazy something like

that all right we talked about

garm lunar powered yeah I guess it would

be in a in a sense it would be a little

bit lunar powered but that's that's not

the only reason they're waves so it's

not so much the uh the tide it doesn't

work on the tide it just sits out in the

ocean because the ocean is just bouncing

up and down with waves so it bounces the

mechanical thing up and down all right

ladies and gentlemen that's all I've got

for you today it was amazing thanks for

joining I got to go do some other stuff

and uh see if I can get insurance from

my house

today I might not be able to all right

um I'm going to say something privately

to the uh people on

locals and uh I'm going say bye to the

rest of you on X and Rumble and YouTube

thanks for joining see you

tomorrow all right locals coming to you

privately right

now

e

e

e

e

e e