r own bodies they just haven't executed on that control.

Harris says you want the freedom to love openly and whoever you want openly and with pride to which I say which freedom is that? That's not a freedom you want. Do you want anybody to be able to express any form of love? I think you'd want to protect the children a little better wouldn't you? What about bestiality? Now here I'm not comparing LGBTQ to bestiality so don't try to do that to me. I'm not. These are not similar things. Not similar. I'm just saying the statement can we allow everybody to love who they want with pride? If somebody wants to have sex with farm animals should I respect it? Again I'm not comparing that to being gay. These are not comparable things. I'm just saying this is a pretty big statement and I would say the answer to that is conservatives mostly just want to be left alone. Conservatives don't care what you do behind your closed door. They might think it's a sin but they're not going to try to stop you from doing it. It's your business. Conservatives want to be left alone but they also want to leave you alone behind closed doors. So that one just seems dumb.

And I don't think conservatives want to be forced to celebrate anybody else's love choices. And I don't think conservatives want to be told that anybody should have pride about who they love. How about you just love who you love and you could be proud about it but why should I be proud of it? Why am I proud of your gay kid? I might like your gay kid. I might have complete respect for every human being and all their different choices because we're all infinitely different. I'll definitely have that. But why do I have to be proud about it? Why is anybody proud about it? How about it just is. It just is. You don't have to be proud about it. You don't have to be mean about it. You don't have to try to stop it. How about it just is and everybody's different and we just have to live in that world where everybody's different and maybe if we just left each other alone a little bit more that'd be great. So no I think that's dumb.

She says also freedom from gun violence. Okay that's a made up and stupid right. And first of all nothing that the left is doing is compatible with reducing violence. The left wants to defund the police. They supported riots. They don't want cash bail. They want open borders. They're pushing DEI and every other kind of racial division. There's no evidence no evidence that the left wants to reduce violence. It looks like they want to increase it. So that's a dumb argument. And it also ignores the fact that guns can protect you from a dictatorship.

They also talk about freedom to have access to a ballot. Okay we're still waiting for the first human being ever to say I'd like to vote but I've been prevented from doing it. None. We haven't met the alleged Black citizen who can't get an ID to vote. None. Not a single Black person ever in an interview or on TV or anybody you've ever met or anybody you talk to any of your friends any of your co-workers not a single Black person has ever said you know what I'd love to vote but I can't figure out how to get an ID. No. And yet they're selling that like it's a thing. None anyway. So I think those are ridiculous made-up rights. It's the whole thing is just complete garbage. Doesn't look like anything that professionals came up with. You know I sometimes say hey this looks like professional persuasion. That doesn't look professional. That looks like people who are writing some kind of college essay. They said all right write a college essay on how Trump is let's say stealing your freedoms and then you go in and you're like all right academically can I make an argument that he's stealing my freedoms by making everything the opposite of what it is and ignoring the context over here? Yeah it just seemed like some weird academic thing. It's not persuasive. It's just kind of dumb. But maybe it works for Democrats. I don't know.

Well one of the so-called — oh here's the let's talk about Trump messaging. So Trump said that the Harris Walz ticket will turn America communist immediately. I don't think the communist attack lands at all because every time I hear it even I you know I'm on Trump's side but when I hear him call the other side communist I think what in what way? Do they want the government to control all the means of production? Like do I not understand what a communist is? Do they want a dictator? I don't understand it at all. Now if they had said socialism then that's a problem too because when I hear socialism I say you mean like every modern country where there are some programs to take care of the people who can't take care of themselves? You mean socialism? So the trouble is that neither socialism nor communism really works too well as an attack. I think maybe it's just good for your own base but the base is already with you so I don't know it feels like wasted words to me. There are so many things that they could attack that going for communist just makes everybody here go well I don't know I don't see that. And I don't think anybody knows what Marxism is. You know maybe 2% of the country knows even what Marxism is. So that doesn't work too well. So all of those you're a liberal you're a Marxist you're a communist I don't see any of that messaging being effective. Whereas I would see I can help the economy I can keep you out of a war I can keep them from putting you in jail those feel like real things. So I'd like to see more of that.

So one of you remember Trump had these so-called fake electors. One of them just pleaded guilty to a single reduced charge. So those cases are still ongoing. So it was Lorraine Pellegrino. She was an Arizona 2020 so-called fake elector. But here's what she pleaded guilty to. A single misdemeanor charge of presentment of a false instrument for filing. Does that sound real to you? If the alternate electors thought they had a case meaning that they believed that there was nothing illegal about registering as an alternate elector which the left would call fake electors if they didn't know that any of that was illegal they wouldn't have been aware that their documents were illegal anyway. So I feel like this is a little bit of lawfare and maybe Lorraine Pellegrino just took the plea because it got her out of all penalties basically didn't have to go to jail didn't have to be on any kind of program. So I think there was just some kind of unsupervised release and it's just a misdemeanor. So who knows if any of that actually happened was a real law but it looks like maybe the law just forces people to take the plea and get out of there. So I don't know how any of that could have been illegal.

Now we also know that ex-Trump attorney Jenna Ellis reached some kind of cooperation agreement with law enforcement so that could be interesting. We'll see if anything comes out of that. Meanwhile another member of the so-called Squad in Congress lost in a primary. So Squad member Cori Bush lost her primary so she will be out of Congress. And she was allegedly attacked with heavy spending by pro-Israel groups. So do you think that pro-Israel groups took her out? It looks like it. If the money made the difference and they put in a lot of money maybe. Could be that she was just bad at her job and it didn't take much money.

There's a story that says the Harris Walz team is trying to pay influencers to say good things and do interviews and stuff for Harris and there's some documentation that shows that that's the case. But some of that may be a response to the fact that we heard that Baron Trump young Baron Trump is the one who had some connection to that Aiden Ross guy from Kick who did the 100 million views thing with Trump in the Cybertruck etc. So Baron Trump might turn into a player you know meaning his instincts might be really good and who knows maybe he's a future president who knows.

So Jessica Tarlov on The Five yesterday brought up the drinking bleach hoax and