was, but the community note to it just noted that he's a well-known liar. So the actual community note wasn't just that he was saying something that wasn't true. It said he was a well-known, famous liar who does it for clicks. Now I'm paraphrasing, but it said basically that. Now as soon as I refreshed it, the community note changed to something less attacking of his character. But for a moment the community note had settled on yeah, he's just a famous liar, so you shouldn't pay attention to him. If I contributed even 1% by making people understand that a Rupar is literally a fake post or edit, if I contributed even 1% to that, I'm proud.

All right. I love the fake news talking about the use of force to overtake Greenland. So I guess the Pentagon was asked if there was any kind of plan to invade Greenland. But what's funny is that whoever was talking, some kind of Pentagon spokesperson, said that they didn't know of any plan. It was short of a no. So instead of saying no, there's no plan to use the military or even a plan to, what would it look like if he used the military? Instead the spokesperson said I'm not aware of one. Would the spokesperson be aware of the secret attack plans? I feel like you wouldn't tell the spokesperson because if you told them they could accidentally tip somebody off. So the spokesperson never knows the secret attack plans, do they? Because if they do, that feels like a mistake to me. But anyway.

Well, the only thing I want to add to this is that