Episode 2715 CWSA 01/09/25
LA Fires and what we know and lots more ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Well, there you are. You're here. I'm here. All right, we're going to find our comments and get them going so I can see what the local people are saying to me, and then we
View segment →will blow your mind with the best show ever. Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization, probably the best day you're going to ever have. But if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains, all y…
View segment →at makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now. Go! Sensational. Best sip of the day. Well, of course I'm going to be talking about the LA fires, but I'll wait just a minute for people to stream in before that. I would like to note, do any of you remember, I can't…
View segment →PT last night to digest a big legal document that I was asked to review. And I thought to myself, oh, perfect application for AI. I'm going to upload the document, and then I will query it to say, okay, is this handled? You know, what about this? What's it say about this? And it would summarize it f…
View segment →r four over, and then it clarifies that it's a total of four. It's not four at a time. It's a total of four. So I spent something like 45 minutes of my day finding out that AI can't do the simplest freaking thing. So I don't know. They say it's going to replace everything and do everything, but I do…
View segment →war. So I'm guilty of probably, I don't know the specifics, but I think I probably reposted some fake news yesterday because there was so much speculation and not quite accurate. So I want to talk about the things we think we know and put them in context. If you haven't done this yet, I recommend it…
View segment →ld have been had by your insurance kicking in and at least paying for what you lost, that would be half as big. But it wouldn't be just a change of you being half as mad. It's the difference between, and here's where I have to be careful, it's the difference between people feeling bad and people fee…
View segment →ten say I don't know. I don't know how much people are contributing to it. I see both sides. I don't think any of them are believable from my point of view because I can't tell. But I can tell you for sure that if you think the models are predicting the future, you have not looked into it very much.…
View segment →urbo? How are we going to survive it? How are we going to fix the things that need to get fixed? We're already paying the highest taxes, and it feels like the lowest level of service in return. So now if you think we're just going to rebuild, you don't know California. That might be just empty land…
View segment →d because repetition is the number one tool of persuasion. And even more importantly, it's the number one tool of brainwashing. Brainwashing requires you to hear the same exact message over and over and over and over again until your brain just uncritically says, well, it must be true. I keep hearin…
View segment →nama. And then they're like, all right, what are we saying about Panama? Panama. Wait, he's talking about Canada now. What do we say about Canada? Wait, what did he say about the smelt? Wait, New Scum. He's calling him New Scum. A hundred executive orders. They can't repeat often enough. He took awa…
View segment →ke you can't. And also everything that Trump says is too interesting to ignore. It doesn't matter what he says. It's always too interesting to ignore. What? Greenland? What? So yes, it's intentional. Yes, it's brilliant in a way that we don't even deserve. Like we don't even deserve that level of ca…
View segment →it, and just because it was multiple pages it just couldn't do it. So I think that probably the companies have now wised up that what they thought was going to be this instant replacement of employees with machines, it might still happen but not in 2025. So in 2025 they're like we're going to need h…
View segment →was, but the community note to it just noted that he's a well-known liar. So the actual community note wasn't just that he was saying something that wasn't true. It said he was a well-known, famous liar who does it for clicks. Now I'm paraphrasing, but it said basically that. Now as soon as I refres…
View segment →why would the Pentagon need a plan? The entire country is 56,000 people, mostly in one place, and they seem to be fairly pro-MAGA, pro-American. And if it were up to them and not Denmark who owns them, if it were just up to the people in Greenland, it's kind of looking like they might be okay with t…
View segment →ow. And I also don't know if I'd like it since I've never experienced it. You know, the different amount of light at a different time of day. I've never experienced it. So how would I even have an opinion on that? Maybe I'd like it a little bit more in the morning but dislike it more at night. But w…
View segment →here's a lot of bad behavior that I don't know if it's criminal. It's just really, really bad and unethical behavior. So if they get a preemptive pardon, we don't have to watch the trial and talk about it. But also it would label them forever as felons because who gets a preemptive pardon? I would l…
View segment →day. Thank you for watching, ladies and gentlemen. You continue to be the thing that keeps me alive because I love connecting with all of you in real time. All right, I'm going to say hi to the Locals people and everybody else. Have a terrific day as best you can unless you're in Southern Californi…
View segment →Well, there you are. You're here. I'm here. All right, we're going to find our comments and get them going so I can see what the local people are saying to me, and then we will blow your mind with the best show ever.
Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization, probably the best day you're going to ever have. But if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains, all you need for that is a coffee mug or glass, a tankard, chalice or stein, a canteen, jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine of the day. The thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.
Go! Sensational. Best sip of the day.
Well, of course I'm going to be talking about the LA fires, but I'll wait just a minute for people to stream in before that. I would like to note, do any of you remember, I can't remember how long ago it was, so we're going to test your long-term memory. It was a long time ago, but there were these two terror attacks, one in New Orleans and one in Vegas. Any of that sound familiar? It was so long ago, right?
Trump is doing it again. He's doing that thing where time is completely distorted. So when the Vegas terrorism thing was the headline story, I said to myself, oh, this is going to be in the news for a while. So I'm going to do a Dilbert comic in which Dilbert's boss's secretary suggests that he takes a vacation in Vegas because he didn't know where to go on his vacation. So she suggests that he buy a Cybertruck and drive it to Vegas and stay at the Trump Hotel. And well, anyway, you'd have to see the comic. It's pretty darn funny. But it's running today only for the subscribers. You'd have to be subscribing on X or Locals to see it. But you know, I was prepping it to publish it this morning, and I thought, oh my God, that feels so long ago. So long ago. So Trump time distortion happening again.
All right, just one more thing, then we'll talk about the fires. I tried to use ChatGPT last night to digest a big legal document that I was asked to review. And I thought to myself, oh, perfect application for AI. I'm going to upload the document, and then I will query it to say, okay, is this handled? You know, what about this? What's it say about this? And it would summarize it for me, and I'd save a bunch of time. I was so happy to be in the age of AI.
So I took my PDF file and I uploaded it, and it said no, we can't handle the PDF file. And I said, in 2025 the advanced intelligence, the most important technology in the world, can't read a PDF file? But it said, you know, JPEG it could read. So I thought, all right, all right. Well, so I just changed it to a JPEG file, and I upload it, and it fails. And it says it can only take, when it goes to JPEG, it turns the document into each of its individual pages as one file apiece. But I thought, well, no problem. I'll just drag all of the pages in. It'll figure out the page numbers. Good to go.
And then I try to drag all the pages in, and it says can only handle four pages. And I think, okay, no problem, no problem. I'll just do four at a time because they're only, you know, 20-some pages. It's not going to take all day. So I drag four over. Good. So I drag another four over, and then it clarifies that it's a total of four. It's not four at a time. It's a total of four. So I spent something like 45 minutes of my day finding out that AI can't do the simplest freaking thing. So I don't know. They say it's going to replace everything and do everything, but I don't know.
All right, let's talk about the LA fires. It's all horrible. You know, if you're new to my live stream, I live in Northern California, and you might say to yourself, well, Northern California, that's so far away from Southern California that you're probably not much impacted. Well, I'm not impacted directly by the fire. That's not a risk where I am. But if you live in California, you end up having a lot of friends in other parts of California. So I'm very impacted. And I had to cancel the man cave last night because there was just too many people who needed help and too many people I had to check on. And it was both family and friends. And it was a big weight.
So just not being in the direct fire is better than being in the fire. But let me tell you, the other residents of California, we're taking it in the gut. This is like being punched all day long. And five people dead, apparently, which is a gigantic tragedy. I suppose you could say something like, could have been worse. But five people is five people. One of them reportedly had stayed behind with his hose and was trying to save his house. And I always wondered how smart or dumb that strategy was, because there are a number of people who apparently did in fact save their houses because somebody stayed, you know, neighbor or they stayed with a hose. But one of them died. So if you're going to stay with a hose, just know, I don't know what the odds are of you dying in this sort of massive fire situation, but it might be like 20%. You know, I mean, it's crazy high. But people do what they have to do. If it's your entire life and you're not insured, which was the case in many cases, I guess you do what you got to do.
Anyway, so speaking of do what you got to do, I heard Greg Gutfeld on The Five yesterday requesting that people consider opening up their homes to other people. This one's not like a lot of different disasters. The sheer number of people who are displaced in a fairly populated area is kind of crazy, and they're not going to go back soon. So a lot of people are opening houses, donating money, trying to help in every possible way they can. So it's pretty much an all-hands-on-deck situation here. So if you don't see me putting in as much work, could you please understand that this isn't the week that my mind's on work. We're trying to keep people alive and help as we can.
So apparently there's, I think there's still zero containment. But the Santa Ana winds that made it so bad should be dying down by the end of today. So I'm hoping that we're going to see something like some containment now. I hate to say it, but probably the only thing that will bring this fire under control is burning everything that's burnable until there's just no fuel left. It's just the ocean. So I don't know what they're going to do. But Elon Musk has announced he's going to donate free Starlink terminals to the affected area in LA. I think that's maybe today or tomorrow he's going to do that.
X always makes me feel like the world is so small. So the richest, most interesting guy in the world right now is of course in every topic, and he's in this topic in a productive way. And then you see in the comments, when he says he's going to donate them, you see his brother Kimbal saying, you know, thanks brother. So he must be in LA and he must be affected. So even Kimbal Musk is in the mix. A lot of celebrities. We'll talk about some of those.
All right, the biggest macro story is the fog of war. So I'm guilty of probably, I don't know the specifics, but I think I probably reposted some fake news yesterday because there was so much speculation and not quite accurate. So I want to talk about the things we think we know and put them in context. If you haven't done this yet, I recommend it highly. If you're not watching one of the fake news networks like CNN talking about the context of how we got to this situation in California, you're not really hearing the other side. And this is one of those things where there's a fog of war. But on top of it, two completely different versions of what happened have already emerged. No surprise. No surprise. But you really need to hear the alternative explanations of what happened. It's going to blow your mind that any of it could be a little bit explained.
Now when I say a little bit explained, my macro theory is that there's massive incompetence. There needs to be some kind of addressing that. I don't know what that looks like. So there's massive incompetence. But some of the accusations clearly don't fly, and I'll tell you which ones they are, because I feel like we want to be mad, but it's such wasted energy to be mad at the wrong things. There's plenty of things to really be mad at.
Now I will remind you, well we'll get to that. So here are some of the things that people accused the LA government and management of doing. So first of all, the reports were that the fire hydrants either didn't have water or had no water pressure. Now there's two versions. If the problem is they didn't have water because there was no stored water there, there is some evidence that there was a water reservoir that was not filled. But I'd like to know more about whether it was possible to fill it, because maybe there was no water to put in it. And I don't know whose fault that would be. So all of these things that look like they're simple, they've all got some bigger story behind them, which doesn't make it any good or right. It's just that you should know the context. It's never as simple as the posts on X.
So there, it's possible, well there definitely was low water pressure in some places, and there definitely were hydrants not producing water. Some were. So we do have reports of some working hydrants, some not. Possibly or even maybe probably the reason the water pressure was insufficient is that there were so many hydrants being used at the same time, attempted, and the entire place had been destroyed. So there were a lot of open fountains like water being wasted just in homes. So if the area was served by the same water source, be it the hydrant or inside the house, if the house has broken pipes and the water is spewing everywhere, and everybody's trying to use water at the same time to put out the fire, there's not going to be enough water pressure or maybe even water. So water and water pressure were both a problem.
It's not entirely clear that either of those were some direct mistake that you could put on some particular person. They're all complicated. There's a question of forest management. Trump has been on it for years, literally years. He's been saying that California is not managing its forests like places like Austria, where they don't have this kind of fire. And managing the forest means partly removing the underbrush, the really, really flammable stuff. Because the trees can do a much better job of surviving if it's just going tree to tree. It's not going to go as fast as if there's this underbrush that's just ready to go. Because trees, the living trees, are a little bit wet, so they'll slow things down. But the dead underbrush, it's just going to be traveling like crazy.
So the forest management thing is a real thing. It's really important. It's really not done well. But I don't know if that had a causation in this case, because most of what I saw burning were residential homes. And there's at least one report that I don't think is confirmed that somebody said the fire started in somebody's backyard and then spread up a hill. If it started in somebody's backyard and spread up a hill, which is not confirmed, not confirmed. It's just something I saw. A fireman on the scene who was working it said if it was set by somebody, we heard reports that, which are fake. These are fake reports. Somebody, and oh that's one of the fake ones that I think I reposted. So that's bad on me. That's just a mistake. I should not have been trusting that kind of information that early in the story.
All right, so that's just an unforced error on my part, believing that story that some homeless person set it, which did not happen. That's on me. That's just an error. I should have said, some reports say it, but we don't know. That would have been the right answer. So we still don't know. But I can tell you that I don't see a direct link from forest management to this particular fire. I do see a gigantic risk if our forests are not well managed, and that appears to be the case.
So we don't know about the water reservoir thing. There are a whole bunch of questions about whether water resources have been managed correctly for years. It doesn't look like it. It looks like there are enough allegations of things that could have solved the problem. I guess years ago there was some big plan to capture the water runoff and make it available for fires, but that didn't get passed. Some people will say it's because of the Democrats. Other people will say, well, you know, we tried to get this bipartisan bill to have more water, but the Republicans said no for some reason. So I don't know. But I would say the one thing that I'm confident about is I'm confident that California has completely mismanaged its water resources. Would that have made a difference in this specific case? Maybe not.
There's a video of Joe Rogan in 2024 in the summer, which is just six months ago, in which he was saying he talked to a fireman. So six months before this fire in LA, a fireman said we've been lucky so far. If we get the wind at the same time as a fire, all of LA is going to burn. This is from a professional fireman who said there's no way around it. You're not going to be able to stop it if the fire starts at the same time as the high wind, which is exactly what happened. There is no defense. So if you say to me, if only we had more water, we could defend it, I say to you, maybe a little, but it probably would have still taken out most of the area. Maybe you could save some houses, but it would have taken out most of the area.
So the bigger problem was it was a known problem that was not directly addressed. So is it a problem that forests are not managed? It's a big one. Maybe not directly a factor in this fire. Is the water management a problem? Yes, poorly done. Was it directly a problem in this fire? Yes. If your house burned down because the fire hydrant didn't work, you're probably going to say, why didn't you account for a fire this big or something like that. But maybe it couldn't have been stopped. Maybe the fireman in 2024 was exactly right, and there just wasn't anything you could do.
The mayor, Karen Bass, she happened to be in Ghana for some government thing that she thought was interesting. And I'm not sure that anything is different because the mayor was in a different country. Mayors travel, and even though there's no reason they should have been doing some international work, I mean, she could have been on vacation. There are lots of reasons people are out of town. I doubt that her absence had any impact on the emergency response. But in emergencies, you want your leaders to act capable and have empathy and be on hand and tell you everything they know, give you some hope that they could get this under control. So I don't think she did a good job on anything, but probably didn't make any difference to any house that burned or didn't burn.
Then I've got to spend a moment on this. There's a lot of accusations that this is caused by DEI. And I'm going to make some suggestions about this. So I'll talk about DEI after I give the list of other things that people are saying. I don't think you can pin it on one person and say that's a DEI hire, or even more than one person. But more on that in a moment.
So let's see. There's something about the smelt fish. Smelt. Is it a smelt fish or is it just a smelt? Apparently Trump calls it an extinct fish. I don't think it's extinct, which is the whole point of trying to preserve it. If it were extinct, we wouldn't be worrying about it. But it's funny that he calls it an extinct fish. But apparently there was some movement to provide more water for LA, but it didn't work because it would have been bad for these rare smelt, the Delta smelt. Well, let me tell you what else smelt about this situation. Everything. So I don't know. I think that smelt fish is going to be one of those two movies on one screen. I think CNN's going to tell you, oh, that was a bipartisan thing, or Republicans should have said yes, or there's going to be another story to that. I don't think it's as clean as we traded smelt for human beings. Although in some ways it looks exactly like that. But probably there's a little extra context on that one.
And then the part that is definitely true is that the insurance policy caps that California tried to put on fire insurance policies caused a shortage of fire insurance policies. Because the fire insurance people said, no thanks. If we can't make money, we don't want to be in your state. So they pulled out.
So what makes this particular situation go from tragic to, how do I say this without being cancelled? All right, I'm going to speak as indirectly as I can, and you can piece it together. If an ordinary tragedy happens, you get into tragedy mode. You're trying to help people. You're feeling sad. You're feeling impacted. You're basically just feeling terrible but trying to do what you can. If it's just a tragedy, if it's a tragedy which would have been had by your insurance kicking in and at least paying for what you lost, that would be half as big. But it wouldn't be just a change of you being half as mad. It's the difference between, and here's where I have to be careful, it's the difference between people feeling bad and people feeling homicidal. Was that indirect enough?
We're looking at the government of California, and I can tell you from personal experience my emotions, I'm trying to keep under control. And if you're seeing a lot of Californians talking in ways that you think are unusually calm given the situation, like James Woods, you saw him acting completely calm that the house he loved and just rebuilt and remodeled was lost, and he had no insurance. Now he has better resources maybe than other people, but he broke down on an interview. So don't mistake how strong people are acting with how they're feeling on the inside. This feels like we got raped. That's what it feels like. It doesn't feel like a tragedy happened. It feels like we got raped. All of us. Even if you're not directly affected. Do you know what this is going to do to the possibility of getting insurance anywhere in the state? This just made the entire state unlivable. They're going to have to tax the bejesus out of us to pay for whatever this cost. The level of economic destruction, I don't even think you can calculate it. It's bigger than anything that's ever happened in the country.
And so I feel a sense of rage that makes me in revenge homicidal head instead of recovery from an event head. I want to be just in the helpful recovery mode. But man, when they give you the double tap, you know, one in the chest, one in the head. One in the chest was the bad fire management. The one in the head was you don't have insurance because we changed the rules in an obvious way, in a way that obviously would make insurance go away and not be available. You do that. I don't think the, let me say it in the way that I heard it stated. I'm not going to attribute this, but without attribution, I heard yesterday a Californian who was directly affected say of one of the leading politicians who's getting a lot of blame, again I won't be specific, and the advice was, I wouldn't show yourself in public now. That advice I think was well intended as a security thing. You need to know that people feel homicidal. They don't feel just hurt. This is not like other things. The level of incompetence apparently is so extreme that it doesn't feel like an accident. It feels intentional. It wasn't intentional, but it feels like it. It feels like people just raped us because they didn't give a shit.
So if you think we're going to get over this, I doubt it. I doubt it. I don't think we're going to get over this. And you didn't have to be in the fire zone to not get over it. I'm not getting over this. This is the wakeup call. It's the tap on the shoulder. It says, you know all that complaining you did? Complaining is nothing. Complaining is nothing at this point. Pretty serious action, and I hope it's not the homicidal kind, is required. And I do believe that people of character are going to act really differently. And some of them will be sacrificing their personal fortunes. Some will be sacrificing their reputations. But the risk-reward equation just changed completely. Once you realize you can't live in this state the way it is, then you're going to take a bigger risk to change it. You know, if you're just like, ah, I don't like it, but next year is going to be a lot like this year, you're just going to get on with your life. But now it's an existential risk just to be managed by incompetence. It's an existential risk of incompetence.
Now I will remind you, as I was reminded just moments ago before the show started, that it was a while ago that I warned that DEI would cause massive institutional and corporate and government incompetence, and it would be really, really obvious, and it could destroy everything we love. Now when people mentioned that on TV, such as the amazing Scott Jennings, he got into that conversation on CNN. It went completely off the rails, and it was a, I'm going to call it a rare communication mistake by Scott Jennings. You know, when I talk about him usually it's like, oh my God, he just explained things so well among this panel of Democrats, and he won that day, and I'll be forwarding it around. So in general he's the best we have. If you're looking at who's the best communicator who's not Trump himself, it might be Scott Jennings. He's really, really impressive. But on the DEI stuff, total fail.
Now I think it's easy to correct, and I would expect he will. Here's the correction. And I posted this. I hope he sees it. But accusing people, specific people, if what you're doing is accusing specific people of being DEI hires, we don't have that kind of information. You know, we could tell that they're in a certain demographic group, but you can't tell that that's the problem. You can't look at a specific case and say, oh, if Karen Bass had been a white guy, everything would be fine. Now that might be that she's a DEI hire, and then that's the whole story, and the police chief is a DEI hire, and you've got everything you need. It might be. But we don't have that kind of information.
So when Scott Jennings brought up the DEI element, he had a couple of black female panelists who just ate him up. And what they did is they do the thing where they say, why are you saying that black women can't do a good job? Nobody says that. That has absolutely nothing to do with the DEI conversation. The DEI conversation is not about the capability of any particular group. It's not a capability. It's a system incentive design problem. That you could replace anybody in this equation and you get the same bad outcome. So nobody's saying that there's something special about black women not being able to do stuff. I'm not aware of anybody who has that opinion. It's more about the system.
And let me explain that a little bit better. So the first point is that as soon as you apply it to any individual, you're on thin ice. You don't have the proof of that unless you worked with that person every day. You probably don't know if they're doing a good or bad job. You know, sometimes there are other variables that make stuff impossible. But here's what you can say. You can say number one that leaders focus on what is easiest to measure. That probably is the number one most important thing you need to know about management. That managers manage to things that can be tracked. Why do they do that? Because when they get their bonuses and their awards and their raises, it's going to be based on what can be measured. What is easier to measure than diversity improvement? It's easy. What are you? I'm a woman. Got it. What are you? I identify as black. Got it. Right? Easy to count, easy to keep track, easy to see how it changed from what it was to where it is.
If you give any manager that situation where it's easy to know if you did it right, or at least if you hit the goal, I won't say right, but you hit the goal, they're going to manage that, and they're going to let other things lapse because it won't affect their pay. For example, suppose several years ago the people in charge had decided to do a big water management improvement. How long would it take to get that approved, to get it built, to see if it worked? And then even when you built it, you wouldn't know if it worked. You would only know that there weren't any fires lately. You wouldn't know that it worked. So if you've got this big, ambiguous but way more important thing to do, the water management is way more important than other things, but it takes a long time. You can't tell what any one person did to make it happen. It's really hard to be held responsible for that. So if you're a manager, you go for what can be measured easily. You focus on it. That's where your pay depends.
Then on top of that, the second thing you need to know is that every major company is trying to improve their diversity at the same time. And I would argue even the companies that may have renounced their DEI efforts, the individual managers are still going to be hiring with a DEI goal. You don't need a DEI program because those same managers are still going to be bragging if they get more diversity. You could give up the entire incentive system, but if one of the people says, well, I diversified my department, and the other manager that they're competing against for the top job says, oh, I do some long-term things that are really smart, but how did it turn out? Well, we won't know because lots of people involved. It could take years. If it doesn't work, it might not be my fault. It could be the legislation.
So anyway, if you have every company trying to do it at the same time, even if it's not part of an organized program, you're going to run out of your target demographics. And here's the important thing to know. You could switch out the target demographics and replace it with any other group, and it's the same. That's why it's not a racist observation. For example, let's say your DEI program was you had to hire more Irish people or Irish Americans, and that's it. How's that going to work out? You're going to maximize Irish Americans. Now there are a lot of Irish Americans, but if everybody suddenly said, oh God, I got to get myself an Irish guy, you would run out of highly qualified Irish Americans on day two. On day one, all the smart ones with a good resume have already been hired. We got an Irish guy. Yes, it's going to look good on my resume.
So when Scott Jennings on CNN allows his panelists to argue that black women can do any job, nobody's disagreeing with that. The right qualified person of any demographic can do pretty much any job. And the thing that you have to understand is you can replace that target demographic with anybody. You could take black women out of the conversation entirely, put Irish men. Same problem. If you're managing to the number of Irish men on your staff, you're in trouble. You're going to have massive incompetence. If you fast forward 20 years, and here we are, we are in a position of massive incompetence. Is it the cause of any specific demographic group? Can't tell. The only thing you can know for sure is that this was a guaranteed outcome. That the design of the incentive system and the natural limitation of any demographic group to have unlimited people in it is all you needed to know on paper. It couldn't have worked. And that's why it's so important to reverse it and reverse our thinking about it.
So Scott Jennings, I hope you make that correction. The first thing you should say is it's not about any individual. It's about a system design. If you have incentives that make people do the wrong thing, they'll do the wrong thing. And that's where we are.
Now some of the worst takes on this. Bernie Sanders weighs in while people are running for their lives and posts this: 80,000 people told to evacuate. I think it's twice that now since he posted it. 80,000 people told to evacuate. He said blazes 0% contained. And so far I'm thinking, oh, this is Bernie being helpful. He's telling us how bad it is, and then he's going to hit us with what we should do about it. He says eight months since the area has seen rain. Okay, that did make it worse. The scale, the damage and loss is unimaginable. Thank you for recognizing how bad this is. And then he said climate change is real, not a hoax. Donald Trump must treat this like the existential crisis it is, meaning climate change.
Well, you could imagine how I felt when I read that. Have I mentioned that we Californians don't feel like we went through a tragedy? We feel like we got raped by politicians. So Bernie, burning you indirectly, and the fact that California was focusing on your little pet project, climate change, which I believe is mostly freaking fake because it only applies to people who think the news is real and science is not corrupt. If you think the news is real and science is not completely corrupted by money, you might believe that this climate change has been proven by all the smart people to be a danger. Now it might be a danger. I often say I don't know. I don't know how much people are contributing to it. I see both sides. I don't think any of them are believable from my point of view because I can't tell. But I can tell you for sure that if you think the models are predicting the future, you have not looked into it very much. If you think we can measure the temperature of the earth over decades, you haven't looked into it. And I find that I can't even have a conversation with somebody who thinks all of that climate alarm part is true. You can't even talk to them because they've been so hypnotized. They think the news is real. The news is not real about anything important. The news could have a correct fact now and then, but the narrative is never real. Narratives are always motivated. They're not real. If you believe the news is even trying to be real, you can't be reached. You have to first understand that they're not trying to tell you the truth. It's just not their business model.
And if you think that anybody under any circumstances can take all these weird hidden variables and gigantic variables and hard-to-measure variables and put them into a complicated model and tell you the temperature in 10 years, how do I begin to tell you how impossible that is? That's not something that the smart people figured out. That is a pure hoax, the models part. Now what I'm not calling a hoax is I don't know if it's getting warmer. I don't know if people are involved. I just know that nobody else knows. I know for sure that nobody else knows.
So but my problem with Bernie is not that he believes in climate change, and I'm pretty sure that he's wrong, at least in terms of the alarm part of it. My part is you need to be able to read the room a little bit better. You don't talk to rape victims about wearing a condom. You know what I mean? You don't talk to rape victims about wearing a condom. You know, maybe you should have had a condom with you. No, you were just making it worse.
So my first reaction was I was just going to go nuclear, and I had every F-bomb, and I was ready to go. And my fingers hit the keyboard, and I said I'm not going to make it worse because that was just a pure emotional reaction. So instead I reposted this. I said, Senator Sanders, as a Californian, I respectfully ask for you to delete this post. No Californian thinks climate change dried up the fire hydrants and cancelled fire insurance. Now whether my take is factually correct that the fire hydrants were a problem that somehow was undermanaged or that the cancelled fire insurance, that's certainly a fact. But then I told him to read the room. Two million people agreed with me, which is very unusual for a post on X to get two million views. That means people really agreed. Not every person, but it means a lot of people agreed with my take that he was not reading the room.
And I would like to add a few things. If the problem with the LA fire were caused by climate change, the whole world would be on fire by now, right? I'm pretty sure that climate change is not limited to LA. We would see basically everything on fire if climate change caused fire, if droughts caused fire. Everything that's having a slightly under normal year, which is what LA is. LA is in what I think they call it a moderate drought, meaning it's barely a drought, and it's not outside of the historical norm whatsoever. Not at all.
So anyway, who else was bad? Then Joe Biden with his defective brain and oppressor talked about the fire, but nobody remembers that. All they remember is he had the bad judgment to say, quote, the good news is that I became a grandpa. Wow. Wow. Between Sanders and Biden not being able to read the room, do they understand that California's a blue state or was?
Let's see. According to the New York Post, I think Molly Hemingway flagged this, that Governor Newsom is launching his Trump resistance plan this week. So Newsom wants to tell you how much he's resisting Trump, which looks like the problem, not the solution, this week, doesn't it? Because now we have on video Trump saying all the right things about fire prevention in California. You've blocked the water. You're not doing forest management. Turns out those were the right answers. Those were the right answers. Of course he's against DEI. Again, we don't know that that caused this problem, but it's the right overarching theme. So Trump was as right about this situation and on time because he said it way before it happened. He was right and he was on time. And it looks like California completely screwed the pooch in every dimension. At least it looks that way. We don't know that that's true.
But let me talk about the future of California politics because everything has a political element to it. And here's how Trump posted it. He said on one of his posts, some truth, I think he said the governor New Scum, as he calls him, chose to save the extinct fish instead of sending water to Southern California to fight apocalyptic wildfires. Now this is another example of how good Trump is in messaging, to take this big complicated situation and just turn it into New Scum chose an extinct fish over saving the lives of Californians. It's an oversimplification, and I don't even know if the fish part is really a valid claim because if you turn on CNN they're going to say, well, but you know it's Republicans' fault too and blah blah blah. I don't know what they say, but there's more context to it. However, as a political messaging thing, the brilliance of the summary is what Trump does better than anybody. Nobody does that well. He's the best ever at summarizing. Nobody summarizes better than he does.
Adam Carolla, who apparently is one of the more famous people being displaced, he looked like he was in a hotel room and he did a video, and he was explaining something that you might not fully understand outside of California. Do you know how hard it is to build something in California? All of these people who think, well, I'll get my insurance check or maybe I had some extra money and I'm going to rebuild. So they're going to go to the city and say, here's my plan. Oh my God, they're just entering hell. I won't go into the details, but let me just tell you this. Getting a California entity, any city really, to approve a building of anything is pretty much a nightmare. The house I'm in right now, I had built, but I think it took 18 months just to get approval, something like that. Now these are people who just think, well, it should be easy because I'm just going to build back the house I had with slight variety. It's not going to be easy. You're going to spend a year not getting the permit, and then good luck finding a contractor because everybody in your whole city is trying to hire the contractor who knows how to build stuff. You're not going to have a contractor. You're not going to be able to get insurance. You're not going to be able to pay for it with the insurance you don't have. You're not going to be able to get a permit.
I don't believe the country and maybe even Californians have absorbed how bad this is. You're seeing something closer to the beginning of the problem than the end, as bad as it was. And we don't, I don't think we can fully appreciate the economic disruption to the state. Who's going to pay for the recovery? I don't think the federal government is going to pay for it all. Is this raising my California taxes again from the highest taxes to the highest taxes on turbo? How are we going to survive it? How are we going to fix the things that need to get fixed? We're already paying the highest taxes, and it feels like the lowest level of service in return. So now if you think we're just going to rebuild, you don't know California. That might be just empty land for the rest of my life. I don't know that it's, I just don't see a path where that quickly gets fixed. I don't know.
Here's what I think. I think this has been such a black eye for the management of the state that for the first time recently I can say it's possible to have a Republican governor. Now it would take a special character. It would take a Reagan-type character who was a Republican. And I don't know anybody in the state who would fit that Reaganesque thing and would also have experience managing something. Because you don't want somebody who's never managed anything because the state is as much management as politics. So it's not exactly like other jobs. You need to manage. So we need a DeSantis-type of governor. So if somebody like DeSantis became available to run for governor, it's the best time now.
Other people are going to say, Scott, Scott, Scott, I think you don't realize that the blue team has California all wrapped up. And no, no, nobody but a Democrat could win. And it's not just because of the voters. It's because the Democrat machine controls too much, and they can rig any vote to go the way they want because they just control too much. Now that might be true. However, I think that the opening is now if it's ever going to happen. I saw some people suggest this, that maybe a smart independent like Nicole Shanahan would be a possibility. Now I like everything about Nicole Shanahan, but I don't know that she has exactly the right background for managing because whoever takes this job has to dig into the whole water thing, the forest thing. Yeah, it's really a management thing. So as high quality and as much as I would trust Nicole Shanahan, I like everything about her basically. I don't know if she has the exact background that fits this slot. But maybe somebody will emerge. And then as people have noted, the legislature would probably still stay blue, and so even the governor couldn't get anything done.
So I saw some, related to this, I saw a Bill Maher video, and he was talking to Stephen A. Smith, and Maher said this that really caught my attention. He said, quote, I've been out with every type of celebrity, you know, meaning just having fun. And he says they don't say the things they say to me to other celebrities. There it is. Now you probably said to yourself, Scott, you can't get a Republican governor because the state is filled with so many Democrat voters. You're never going to get over the hump. I don't think they're Democrats. I think they're literally pretending to be Democrats. I think that every one of these people who may have been seeming like political enemies are now seeing that the thing we need to get together on is common sense stuff. I don't believe there's a Democrat who wanted less forest management. Well, there's some crazy ones who want to preserve everything natural, but not really. I don't think there's any Democrats who say I'm sure glad we didn't have enough water. Right? I don't think there are any Democrats who said sure is a good thing there were not enough escape routes from a place that is an obvious fire risk. These are all so clearly and cleanly common sense issues that I don't think anybody's going to give a shit about the smelt going forward. Try stopping us from fixing the state because of a smelt. Yeah, because I don't think that works anymore.
So of course I'm speaking for my own little bubble because I'm very influenced by how I personally feel about this, which is some intense feelings in many directions. I'm pretty sure that this is the wakeup call that tells everybody in the South, you know, the Republicans don't hate you. You get that right? We really, I'm going to say we because I caucus with the Republicans even though I'm a Democrat by registration. I think maybe it will be a little better understood that Trump was on California's side, and whatever the Democrats running things were doing may have been for their own benefit or may have been just pure incompetence. We don't know what it was, but we know that Trump had exactly the right solution at exactly the right time early. And we know that the Democrats failed just in performance. The exact reasons hard to know, but they certainly failed.
Hunter Biden's rental burned up. And the thing that bothered me the most about that was that it was a rental. It's bad enough if you're the landlord for Hunter Biden. Because remember, we heard the story that he had rented someplace and didn't pay in the past, a different place. But he had been renting a place and didn't pay the rent. And then he used the Secret Service to keep the landlord from getting to him to ask for the rent. That is like the most effed up thing you're going to hear. He didn't pay the rent, and he used his Secret Service protection to make sure that nobody would come bug him to get the rent. That actually happened. Was it Sean Maguire, I think, was the landlord there? So he's, I don't think he's in that house anymore. But I just feel sorry, doubly sorry for whoever owned it because they lost their house that was a rental, but also they had Hunter Biden as a resident. I mean, I don't know if you could even clean it after that.
Chrissy Teigen and John Legend and their kids are in a hotel. Henry Winkler said some angry, drunk-looking things. He's affected. I have mixed feelings talking about the celebrities involved. On one hand, I don't think this is a story about celebrities, and so it's just gross and icky that they're even part of the story. Like why do we care about them more? Does it matter more to you that Henry Winkler is safe than Henry Winkler's not-famous neighbor? I mean, there's something creepy about it. But at the same time, the politics of it is that these are, some of them are conservative, but a number of other ones are outspoken Democrats. And I would love to know how Chrissy Teigen and John Legend feel about their team after losing their house to their team. Does that change how you feel? What else could? I mean, if you're going to change somebody's mind, having a debate with them, maybe, usually not. Having really good points, yeah, might work, but probably not. Really being good at persuasion, it might help, but probably not. People are pretty set in their ways. You burn down somebody's house, you have their attention. Everybody who lost the house is now open to a better argument. A lot of minds open up. So I think California is in play.
Anyway, in related but other news, because we can't spend all our time talking about this. It's just too hard. Trump is, as other people have noted, flooding the zone. So he's completely controlling the news. Even the fire, which you would think is not directly a Trump topic, he's still the top of the news because he said the right things and did the right things, and it stands in contrast to what happened. So not only that, but apparently there's a report from Steph Knight, I think she's from Axios, saying that there's some knowledge that Trump plans to flood the zone with a hundred executive orders like his first day or first week or something. Now so we've got Trump talking about Greenland, Panama, Canada. He's talking about the fire. He might have a hundred executive orders. Every day three new things. This is the only way to defeat the fake news.
And you know, he's always done this thing where he keeps the Overton window, so to speak, keeps the action going, and it keeps the attention on him. But I think I just realized the other hidden benefit of this. As we've often said, Republicans can be right and they can be wrong. They can have wrong facts and often do. They might believe in some conspiracy theories that don't prove out. But that's normal, sort of normal human beings. On the Democrat side, there's an organized hoax creation machine for the Democrats. They'll create a hoax about the other side, and then they'll use their news, their media, and their talking heads to say the same things over and over again. Right? How many times have you seen that? Well, he's a convicted felon. You know, that's just the talking point. And if they say convicted felon a million times, it's going to stick in your head because repetition is the number one tool of persuasion. And even more importantly, it's the number one tool of brainwashing. Brainwashing requires you to hear the same exact message over and over and over and over again until your brain just uncritically says, well, it must be true. I keep hearing it. Which doesn't make sense, but your brain will process it that way.
So what Trump has done is he's removed from the fake news the ability to repeat any of their messages often enough for them to stick. Because they start going on with he wants to send the military into Greenland, and then they repeat that. We got them. We got them. Because nobody's going to be in favor of sending the military in, although some are. So they repeat that. And then the next thing you know he's talking about Panama. And then they're like, all right, what are we saying about Panama? Panama. Wait, he's talking about Canada now. What do we say about Canada? Wait, what did he say about the smelt? Wait, New Scum. He's calling him New Scum. A hundred executive orders. They can't repeat often enough. He took away from them their number one persuasion trick: repetition.
Now is this intentional? Do you think that he intentionally said if I just take away all of their oxygen, they'll never be able to repeat anything enough to stick? The answer is yes. Yes, this is absolutely intentional. Now that doesn't mean it's only Trump who knows this. He's working with Stephen Miller and a bunch of brilliant people. The brilliant people can see this clear as day. So yes, it's not an accident. They're going to have a hundred executive orders, and he's talking about things that make your hair just catch on fire. Like you can't. And also everything that Trump says is too interesting to ignore. It doesn't matter what he says. It's always too interesting to ignore. What? Greenland? What? So yes, it's intentional. Yes, it's brilliant in a way that we don't even deserve. Like we don't even deserve that level of capability. And when he shows you the competence level that he brings, just the messaging competence level that he brought to his campaign, the competence level in which he's taking things that people said are ridiculous things to do, such as using the old Twitter or now posting things that are like geopolitical, hugely important things. He makes that work. When you watch somebody who is just an extreme example of competence with his team, he doesn't do everything alone, but I think people are going to notice. Competence is hard to ignore if you just keep at it. And he is.
Well, in other news, if there's any good news at all, the employment for this coming year looks like a little better than people expected. That hasn't happened yet, but the thinking is that in surveys big companies are showing much more optimism and more prediction that they'll do serious hiring. Apparently the reason there was less hiring than there might have been is that big companies said, oh, we better wait to see if AI is going to take all the jobs. And now they've waited, and like my example where I started the show where I said I tried to get AI to do any simple thing, just look at a document and summarize it, and just because it was multiple pages it just couldn't do it. So I think that probably the companies have now wised up that what they thought was going to be this instant replacement of employees with machines, it might still happen but not in 2025. So in 2025 they're like we're going to need human bodies because we can tell them to look at the whole contract, not just four pages, and quit. So it could be that at least in the short run a little bump and improvement in employment.
I just, this is just an aside because I'm amused by it, but do you remember Aaron Rupar? He's the reason that I came up with the phrase a Rupar for a description of a video that's been edited to change its meaning. Because he did a number of those, and it looked like he knew he was doing it. You couldn't tell because you can't read his mind, but it looked like, I feel like he knows he took that out of context. And then I saw he made some claim, I think it was yesterday. It doesn't matter what the claim was, but the community note to it just noted that he's a well-known liar. So the actual community note wasn't just that he was saying something that wasn't true. It said he was a well-known, famous liar who does it for clicks. Now I'm paraphrasing, but it said basically that. Now as soon as I refreshed it, the community note changed to something less attacking of his character. But for a moment the community note had settled on yeah, he's just a famous liar, so you shouldn't pay attention to him. If I contributed even 1% by making people understand that a Rupar is literally a fake post or edit, if I contributed even 1% to that, I'm proud.
All right. I love the fake news talking about the use of force to overtake Greenland. So I guess the Pentagon was asked if there was any kind of plan to invade Greenland. But what's funny is that whoever was talking, some kind of Pentagon spokesperson, said that they didn't know of any plan. It was short of a no. So instead of saying no, there's no plan to use the military or even a plan to, what would it look like if he used the military? Instead the spokesperson said I'm not aware of one. Would the spokesperson be aware of the secret attack plans? I feel like you wouldn't tell the spokesperson because if you told them they could accidentally tip somebody off. So the spokesperson never knows the secret attack plans, do they? Because if they do, that feels like a mistake to me. But anyway.
Well, the only thing I want to add to this is that why would the Pentagon need a plan? The entire country is 56,000 people, mostly in one place, and they seem to be fairly pro-MAGA, pro-American. And if it were up to them and not Denmark who owns them, if it were just up to the people in Greenland, it's kind of looking like they might be okay with this idea. But I think it's funny that anybody would ask the Pentagon if they have a conquest plan for Greenland when all they really needed was Don Jr. and Charlie Kirk to fly over there and take some selfies. Now to be fair, Don Jr. and Charlie Kirk taking selfies with the locals is not enough to conquer a country. It's not enough. They might have to go back two or three more times and take more selfies. That should be enough. I think three to four trips of Don Jr. and Charlie Kirk taking selfies, the whole island surrenders. Then we just have to work on a deal with Denmark. So no military needed. Just Don and Charlie.
All right. Senator Rick Scott has introduced some legislation to stop the changing of the clocks twice a year. I keep wanting to have an opinion on that, but I don't. And I'm going to admit why. Because I don't know what change they're talking about. It's too hard for me to figure out the whole hour backwards, hour forwards. But if they standardize it, which one are they standardizing on? Because I never know which one is which. Which one's the base case? I don't know. And I also don't know if I'd like it since I've never experienced it. You know, the different amount of light at a different time of day. I've never experienced it. So how would I even have an opinion on that? Maybe I'd like it a little bit more in the morning but dislike it more at night. But what's the net? No. So if it's expensive, and I know it cuts down on productivity when the time changes, I don't see a reason to change the time. So I'm in favor of changing it, but I don't have any idea what that looks like like in my actual life. So but just in terms of economics, it makes sense.
Britain is threatening to cut ties, security ties with the US unless Trump stops working with Elon Musk, according to the National Pulse, William Upton. To which I say Great Britain is threatening to cut ties with us? Okay. Can you remind me what are all the military advantages we're getting from protecting them? What trade? You know, what products are you getting from England from their manufacturing base? How much do we need England or the UK or Great Britain? How much do we need them? I don't know. Sounds like a pretty bad threat. Bad threat to me. And I don't think there's any chance they're going to cut ties.
Biden is considering, according to the Post Millennial, Hayden Cunningham is writing that Biden's thinking about preemptive pardons for Liz Cheney and Anthony Fauci. So Liz Cheney for the corrupt so-called insurrection committee. Do you have a problem with that? Yeah, this one's an interesting one because I think I don't know if any charges would ever be brought up because there's a lot of bad behavior that I don't know if it's criminal. It's just really, really bad and unethical behavior. So if they get a preemptive pardon, we don't have to watch the trial and talk about it. But also it would label them forever as felons because who gets a preemptive pardon? I would like to ask the following question. In the history of pardons, how many times has a completely innocent person got a preemptive pardon? Is there even one time that's ever happened where somebody who was legitimately innocent got a preemptive pardon? Can you think of any time that's ever happened? No. You give a preemptive pardon to somebody you know is damn guilty.
So now to be fair, they might be more worried about some illegitimate lawfare being used against them. And if that's the only thing they're thinking, well, you know, if they think there was no real crime, maybe. But the way we're going to read it is that they've just declared themselves guilty if they accept a preemptive pardon for something they didn't do. I'm not going to believe they didn't do it. I'm just going to believe, oh, you know, you're dirty, you lucky guy and lucky woman.
All right. The Mexican president, what's her name? Claudia Sheinbaum. I will never get tired of saying this. The Mexican president Claudia Sheinbaum. I'm going to say it another time because it's funny. So the Mexican president Claudia Sheinbaum, the Jewish woman. I just love that that she, you know, I have to give Mexico credit because you think of Mexico as, you know, they're going to be kind of a patriarchy, you presume. If most of the residents are Mexican, they're going to vote for somebody who's as Mexican as possible. But they elected Claudia Sheinbaum, and I give them credit for that. If she does a good job, good work.
Anyway, so she's responding to Trump saying that he wants the gulf to be called the Gulf of America instead of the Gulf of Mexico. And she's shooting back, and she says the US should be called America Mexicana. Let's see how long it takes me to forget her framing. One, two, three. Wait, what did she say? What did she call it? Do you see how special Trump is? Trump says extinct fish once, and I'll remember it for the rest of my life. The Mexican president, as capable as she probably is, I imagine she's very good in general to get where she got, but she tries to match him. He's like, ah, how about, I got it, I'm going to zing you. How about we call it America Mexicana? Why isn't everybody clapping? Clap please. The difference in persuasion and communication skill is just so striking. Like you don't realize how good Trump is at the what I'll call the little stuff, you know, just the ordinary communication. You don't realize how good he is until you see somebody else try it, and then they just do a total face plant. I had to read it again. America Mexicana? No, that's not a good try.
Well, Russia's introducing these land robot tank things. It looks like a little miniature tank, and it could have wheels or tracks, but it's loaded with all kinds of weapons. And they're going to make a bunch of them, they say, and send them at Ukraine. Here's my question. Can Russia manufacture? Now I know they have manufacturing, and I know they make weapons, and this is a weapon. But if their outcome of the war depends on making a lot of these robots that they've never made before, how good are they going to be? Now it could be that even if Russia is not a massively good manufacturing company, it could be that they put their best people in the military stuff, which would make sense. And maybe this is good work, and maybe they can crank them out like crazy. But the thing I'd be looking for is whether they can manufacture well enough to put working models in the field that make a difference.
Now the other thing is that even the ground robots like these, the ones on wheels or running dogs or whatever, they will soon be programmed to swarm just like the drones in the air. So if you organize the drones so that they operate as one and they swarm, there's almost no defense. But likewise if you were on the front line and you're a human being and you get swarmed by these robots, you're going to be in a lot of trouble. The robots on the ground, because it probably takes a little bit of planning and work and strange execution to even take out one of them. If six of them are bearing down on you, you've got to run, and it will run faster than you. So it's going to get real interesting in Ukraine. I would look to see if they can manufacture well and quickly.
Well, I'm going to do something that you don't like. I'm going to defend Dan Crenshaw. Dan Crenshaw is often reported for having very high, relative to other people, really good gains on his stock picks. So there's another story today mentioning that he's a top five investor among Congress. You're like, top five? Did he do that because of insider information? And the implication is that it's because he has insider information so that he and other members who trade are just beating people because they're inside information. And it was pointing out that he had a high percentage gain. So if you look at his gain, I think it was over 40% for the year or something, that would put him in the top five.
Now what do I teach you about spotting fake news? If you know the percentage of gain he made but they don't tell you the dollar amount, is it real news or fake news? The answer is it's fake news. If they told you both the percentage and the dollar amount, it might be real. If they told you only the dollar amount without the percentage, that would be fake. And if they told you the percentage without the dollar amount, which is what they did, that's fake. So the first thing you need to know is that you got abused when you read the story. You got abused. Somebody's trying to pull one over on you.
Turns out his portfolio is not very big. He's not a rich guy. And he said directly that one of the few ways that he can get ahead and still afford to be in Congress, because it doesn't pay that much relative to the cost of being there, that he absolutely needs to augment his income, and he does it by trading. Now how did you rule out the possibility that he told you he needs it, he told you he focuses on it? That's different than most of the people in Congress. Most of the people in Congress don't need it. A lot of them are rich. I don't know what percentage, but a lot of them are rich. And some of them are not concentrating on it. They're concentrating on other things. He's concentrating on it. If you knew his educational background, it's really good. Do you know how much formal education he's had plus the military? I don't think people understand how academically trained he is. So you've got somebody who's got higher academic training than most of Congress. Unlike Congress, he's really paying attention, which means he's learning how to do it right. And there's very little dollar amount. So if he had one good pick, he would have had that gain.
How do you know that the reason he's up is some kind of secret insider information? What if, and this is not in the story, this should be in the story, what if he bought stock in Nvidia? Do you know who bought stock in Nvidia? I did, and a lot of my followers did because I mentioned it once in a while as sort of a unique situation. So most of my followers probably had the same return he did because if the only thing you did was buy the one most obvious stock, Nvidia, you would beat all the other members of Congress. Is that what happened? If he had just bought Tesla, he would have beat most of the members of Congress. If he had just invested in one of the atomic stocks that I mentioned that I'm not going to mention today, he would have beat everybody. It only took one. Just one good stock in his whole portfolio is up 40%. So if you see a story that says he did better than the other people in Congress and therefore the implication is that he broke some law or did something not, he wouldn't break a law because it's legal for them to use to be insider traders. That if you believe that it was like some secret unethical thing he did to get those gains, there's no evidence of that in the story. There's no evidence of it in the story.
Now if there is evidence of any bad behavior or you know it wouldn't be illegal so I guess it wouldn't even be necessarily unethical but you wouldn't like it, you're going to have to give me a lot more than he did a good job. Because if your complaint about the guy is he's good at investing, that just pisses me off. That just pisses me off because that's punishing somebody for competence. And that might be the only thing that's happening.
Now again, let me be very clear. I don't know if there's any valid insider trading that helped his returns. I don't know. But what I do know is you don't know. You don't know. So if you're going to go from he's a good investor to he did something sketchy that you hate, that's a leap I can't support. And it pisses me off when somebody does a good job and there's no evidence that he did it unethically that we criticize him for competence and for making it affordable to do the job for the people.
Now before you give me a hard time because I know you want to, you're going to say but Scott, what about those other unrelated things that we don't like about his policies? Fine. I'm not arguing that. If you don't think he's doing the job you want, I'm not even in that conversation. I don't know enough frankly about him. But my, and I'll also tell you just for full disclosure that I have had conversations with him because I did his podcast a while ago. So I've interacted with him at least on a Zoom kind of a way. And he's a really nice guy. I don't know if you know that, but he's a really nice guy. And so I'm influenced by that. And then I see him being attacked for something that if there's any basis to this, nobody's revealing it. So let's calm down on that. You're certainly makes sense to go after him for the other stuff. But let me sum that up with a little bit of context.
Sometimes you wonder what's it like to be a public figure such as Dan Crenshaw and such as me. What's it like to be a public figure? Well, like Dan Crenshaw, one thing I have in common with him is that I've had several scandals in my career. Some of them you haven't heard of or you forgot about because they're so long. One of the things that all of my scandals have in common is that none of them have actually happened. None of them happened. For example, let's say I'm being criticized for being an H1B supporter. So that's late. That didn't happen. Not once. No. I have said we need to bring in only the best people who make sense. But the H1B process apparently doesn't do that. So I've never said it does that. I've never said I was in favor of it. And it's the biggest thing I'm being criticized for.
Let's see. I'm also being criticized for recommending that people get vaccinated during the pandemic, which never happened. And I forcefully always said the opposite very frequently. Probably said it over and over again. I'm not your doctor. I'm not telling you to get it. I'm not telling you not to get it. It's a personal decision. Opposite, literally the opposite of what I'm blamed for.
Do you remember, some of you might remember the thing that first derailed my career. This was years ago where I had an argument where I predicted that evolution, the theory of evolution, would be debunked in my lifetime. And that it would be debunked not necessarily in classic ways, but it would be debunked because we would understand the nature of reality so differently that evolution would stop making sense. And that happened. That's called the simulation. Now you could argue that the simulation is not real, but the argument is it's a trillion to one likely that it is. And if we're a simulation, then the past is actually created on demand. Now I could be right about that or I could be wrong about that, and I don't know. But what I will tell you is that 100% of the pushback to my opinion was based on stuff I didn't say. So again this major thing, I probably lost, I bet I lost 30% of the Dilbert fans over this, something I was right about, at least in terms of knowing that some rethinking of reality would cause us to rethink evolution. That was one hell of a good prediction. I mean that was a crazy good prediction. Like beyond. If it's right, and I think it is, then does anybody remember, this will be a good test. How many of you remember the sock puppet scandal about me? The accusation was that I sock puppeted, which is a very specific act. Do anybody remember that? Which never happened. It never happened.
Now did I go online with a fake identity and have what I thought was a hilarious conversation with somebody who wanted to argue about the intelligence of Scott Adams? Yes, I did. Why did I do it? I was just debunking some hoaxes that were told about me. One of the hoaxes was that I was a Holocaust denier. Do you see the pattern yet? I'm not a Holocaust denier, but the public had decided I was. You see the pattern, right? 100% of all of my scandals never happened. None of them. Not a single one.
So when I look at Dan Crenshaw and you see this about his investing, do you think that's real? You just heard my resume. All of the claims against me are fake. We add a context to the point that they're reversed. So I don't know the truth about the Dan Crenshaw investment stuff. But with what I know, if I had to place a bet, especially knowing that people have been watching his investments really closely because this is sort of an evergreen thing that they say about him, you don't have one example. You can't give us one example of a company that he had special knowledge about and that's the reason he made money. Because if you've got even one example, you better lead with that. How about he made this investment with insider information on this company, and here's the name of the company, and that caused him to have a 40% gain. You tell me that and you have my attention. Then I'm going to say, oh, still legal, completely legal, but I'd say maybe we should look at changing that law.
So just put it in context. Most stories like this one, the investment one, they don't play out. They're fake. So again, I'm not defending Dan Crenshaw for any other opinions. They might be excellent. They might not be. But that's not my topic today.
Thank you for watching, ladies and gentlemen. You continue to be the thing that keeps me alive because I love connecting with all of you in real time. All right, I'm going to say hi to the Locals people and everybody else. Have a terrific day as best you can unless you're in Southern California, and then we'll see what we can do for you. And Locals, I'm coming at you privately in 30 seconds.
well there you are you're here I'm here um all right we're going to find our comments and get them going so I can see what the local people are saying to me and then we will blow your mind with the best show ever good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization probably the best day you're going to ever have but if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand when they're tiny shiny human brains all you need for that is a CER marug or glass a tanker chel or Stein a canteen Jugger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee join me now for the unparallel pleasure of the dope of meend of the day thing makes everything better it's called the simultaneous Sip and it happens now go Sensational best SIP of the day well of course I'm going to be talking about the LA fires but I I'll wait just a minute for people to stream in before that I would like to note do any of you remember I can't remember how long ago it was so we're going to test you longterm memory it was a long time ago but there were these two Terror attacks One in New Orleans and one in Vegas any of that sound familiar it was so long ago right uh Trump is doing it again he's doing that thing where time is completely disted it so when the Vegas terrorism thing was the headline story I said to myself o this is going to be in the news for a while so I'm going to do a a Dilbert comic in which uh Dilbert's uh boss's secretary uh suggests that he takes a a vacation in Vegas because he didn't know where to go on his vacation so she she suggests she suggests that he buy a cyber truck and drive it to Vegas and stay at the Trump Hotel and well anyway you'd have to see the comic it's pretty darn funny but it's it's running today only for the subscribers you you'd have to be subscribing on X or locals to see it but you know I was prepping it to uh publish it this morning and I thought oh my God that feels so long ago so long ago so Trump time just Distortion happening again all right just one more thing then we'll talk about the fires I tried to use chat GPT last night to to digest a big legal document that I was asked to review and I thought to myself oh perfect application for AI I'm going to upload the document and then I will query it uh to say okay is this handled you know what about this what's to say about this and it would summarize it for me and I'd save bunch of time I was so happy to be in the age of AI so I took my PDF file and I uploaded it and it said no we can't handle the PDF file and I said in 2025 the advanced intelligence the most important technology in the world can't read a PDF file but it said you know jpeg it could read so I thought all right all right well so I just change it to a JPEG file and I upload it and it fails and it says uh it can only take when when it goes to jpeg it turns the document into each of its individual Pages as one file a piece but I thought well no problem I'll just drag all of the pages in it'll figure out the page numbers good to go and then I I try to drag all the pages in and it says can only handle four pages and I think okay no problem no problem I'll just do four at a time because they're only you know 20 some pages it's not going to take all day so I drag four over good so I drag another four over and then it clarifies that it's a total of four it's not four at a time it's a total of four so I spent something like 45 minutes of my day finding out that AI can't do the simplest freaking thing so so I don't know they say they say it's going to replace everything and do everything but I don't know all right let's talk about the LA fires um it's all horrible um you know if if you're new to my live stream I live in Northern California and you might say to yourself well Northern California that's so far away from Southern California that you're probably not much impacted well I'm not impacted directly by the fire that's not a risk where I am but if you live in California you end up having a lot of friends in other parts of California so I'm very impacted and uh I had to cancel the man cave last night because there was just too many people who needed help and too many people I had to check on and you it was both both family and friends and uh it was uh it was a big weight so just not being in the direct fire is better than being in the fire but let me tell you the other the other residents of California we're taking it in the we're taking it in the gut this is this is like being punched all day long and uh five people dead apparently which you know is a gigantic tragedy I suppose I suppose you know you could say something like could have been worse but five people as five people one of them reportedly had stayed behind with his hose and was trying to save his house and I always wondered how smart or dumb that strategy was because there are a number of people who apparently did in fact save their houses because somebody stayed you know neighbor or they stayed with a hose but one of them died so if you're going to stay with a hose just know I don't know what the odds are of you dying in this sort of massive fire situation but it might be like 20% you know I mean it's crazy high but people do what they have to do if it's if it's your entire life and you're not insured which was the case in many cases I guess you do what you got to do anyway um so speaking of do what you want to do I heard uh Greg geld on the five yesterday um requesting that people consider opening up their homes to other people th this one's not like a lot of uh different disasters the sheer number of people who are displaced in in a fairly populated area is kind of crazy and they're not going to go back soon so a lot of people are opening houses uh donating money trying to help in every possible way they can so it's pretty much it's an all hands on deck situation here so if if you don't see me putting in as much work could you please understand that this isn't the week that my mind's on work right we're we're trying to keep people alive and and help as we can um so apparently there's I think there's still zero containment but the Santa an winds that made us so bad should be dying down by the end of today so I'm hoping that we're going to see something like some containment now I hate to say it but probably the only thing that will bring this fire under control is burning everything that's burnable until there's just no fuel left it's just the ocean so I don't know what they're what they're going to do but um Elon Musk has uh announced he's going to donate free startling terminals to the affected area in LA uh I think that's maybe today or tomorrow he's going to do that um X always makes me feel like the world is so small so you know the the richest most interesting guy in the world right now uh is of course in every topic and he's in this topic in a productive way and then you see in the comments when he says he's going to donate them you see his brother Kimble saying you know thanks brother so he must be in LA and he must be a fected so even Kimble Kimble musk is in the mix a lot of celebrities we'll talk about some of those all right the the biggest macro story is the fog of War so uh I'm guilty of probably I don't know the specifics but I think I probably reposted some fake news yesterday because there was so much speculation and not quite accurate so I want to talk about the things we think we now and put them in context if you haven't done this yet I recommend it highly if you're not watching one of the fake news networks like CNN talking about the context of how we got to this situation in California you're not really hearing the other side and this is one of those things where there's a fog of War but on top of it two completely different versions of what happened is have already emerged no surprise no surprise but you really need to hear the the alternative explanations of what happened it's it's going to it's going to blow your mind that any of it could be a little bit explained now when I say a little bit explained my macro theory is that there's massive incompetence there needs to be some kind of some kind of uh addressing that I don't know what that looks like so there's massive incompetent um but some of the accusations clearly don't fly and I'll tell you which ones they are because I feel like we want to be mad but it's such wasted energy to be mad at the wrong things there's plenty of things to really be mad at now I will remind you uh well we'll get to that so here here are some of the things that people accused the LA you know government and management of doing uh so first of all the reports were that the fire hydrants either didn't have water or had no water pressure now there's two versions that if the problem is they didn't have water because there was no stored water there there is some some evidence that there was a water reservoir that was not filled but I'd Le I'd like to know more about whether it was possible to fill it because maybe there was no water to put in it and I don't know whose fault that would be so these all of these things that look like they're simple they've all got some bigger story behind them which doesn't make any good or right it's just that you should know the context it's it's never as simple as you know the posts on X so there it's possible uh well there definitely was a low water pressure in some places and there definitely were high fire hydrogen not producing water some were so we do have reports of some working hydrants some not possibly or even maybe probably the reason the water pressure was insufficient is that there were so many hydrons being used at the same time attempted and the entire Place had been destroyed so there were a lot of open Fountain like um water being wasted just in homes so the it if the area was served by the same water source be at the High hant or inside the house if the house has broken pipes and the water is spewing everywhere and everybody's trying to use water at the same time to put out the fire is not going to be enough water pressure or maybe even water so water and water pressure were both a problem um it's not entirely clear that either of those were some direct mistake that you could put on some particular person they're all complicated there's a question of forest management you know U Trump has been on it for years literally years he's been saying that California is not managing its Forest like places like Austria where they don't have this kind of fire and managing the forest means partly removing the underbrush you know the really really flammable stuff because the trees can do a much better job of surviving if if if it's just going tree to tree it's not going to go as fast as if there's this underbrush that's just ready to go CU trees are the living trees are a little bit wet so they'll they'll slow things down but the dead underbrush you know it's just it's going to be traveling like crazy so the forest management thing is a real thing it's really important it's really not done well but I don't know if that had a causation in this case because most of what I saw burning were residential homes uh and and there's at least one report that I don't think is confirmed that somebody said the fire started in somebody's backyard and then spread up a hill if it started in somebody's backyard and spread up a hill which is not confirmed not confirmed it's just something I saw a fireman on the scene who was working it said um if it was set by somebody we heard reports that uh which are fake these are fake reports somebody and oh that's that's one of the fake ones that I think I reposted so that's bad on me that's just a mistake I should not have been trusting that kind of information that early in the story all right so that's just on my that's just an unforced error so on my part believing that story that some homeless person said it which did not happen um that's on me that that's just an error I should have said sub reports it but we don't know that would have been the right answer so we still don't know but I can tell you that I don't see a direct link from forest management to this particular fire I do see a gigantic risk if our fires are if our forests are not well managed and that appears to be the case um so we don't know about the water reservoir thing uh there are a whole bunch of questions about uh you whether Water Resources have been managed correctly for years it doesn't look like it it it looks like there are enough allegations of things that could have solved the problem I guess years ago there was some big plan to you know capture the water runoff and make it available for fires but that didn't get passed somebody say some people will say it's because of the Democrats um other people will say well you know we tried to get this bipartisan Bill to have more water but the Republicans said no for some reason so I don't know but I would say the one thing that I'm confident about is I'm confident that California has completely mismanaged its water resources would that have made a difference in this specific case maybe not there's a video of uh Joe Rogan in 2024 in the summer which is you know just six months ago in which he was saying he talk to a fireman so 6 months before this fire in La a fireman said uh we've been lucky so far if we get the wind at the same time as a fire all of La is going to burn this is from a professional firemen who said there's no way around it you're not going to be able to stop it if if the fire starts at the same time as the high wind which is exactly what happened there is no defense so if you say to me if only we had more water we could defend it I say to you maybe a little but it probably would have still taken out most of the area you maybe you could save some houses but it would have taken out most of the area so the bigger problem was it was a known problem that was not directly addressed so is it a problem that forests are not managed it's a big one maybe not directly factor in this fire is the Water Management a problem yes poorly done was it directly uh a problem in this fire yes if your house burned down because the fire Hy the fire hydrant didn't work you're probably going to say why didn't you count on a fire that's this big or something like that but um maybe it couldn't have been stopped you maybe the firemen and 2024 was exactly right and there just wasn't anything you could do um the mayor Karen bass is it she happened to be in Ghana for some some uh government thing that she thought was interesting and uh uh I'm not sure that anything is different because the um the mayor was in a different country you know may mayor's travel and even though there's no reason they should have been doing some International work I mean she could have been on vacation I there are lots of reasons of people around town I I doubt that her absence had any impact on the emergency response but in emergencies you want your leaders to act capable and you know have empathy and be on hand and you know tell you everything they know you know give you some hope that they could get this under control so I don't think she did a good job on anything but probably didn't have any make any difference to any house that burned or didn't burn then I've got to spend a a moment on this that there's a lot of accusations that this is caused by Dei and um I'm going to make some suggestions about this so I'm going to talk I'll talk about Dei after I give the list of other things that people are saying I I don't think you can pin it on one person and say that's a d I higher or even more than one person but more on that moment um so let's see uh there's something about the Smelt fish smelt is it a Smelt fish or is just a smelt apparently Trump calls it an extinct fish I don't think it's extinct which is the whole point of trying to preserve it if it were extinct we wouldn't be worrying about it but it's funny that he calls it extinct an extinct fish um but apparently there was some there was some movement to provide more water for uh LA but it didn't work because it would have been bad for these rare smelt the Delta smelt well let me tell you what else smelt about this situation everything so I don't know I I think that smelt fish is going to be one of those those two movies on one on one uh screen I think CNN's going to tell you oh that was a bipartisan thing or Republicans should have said yes or there there's going to be another story to that I don't think it's as clean as uh we traded smelt for human for human beings although in some ways it looks exactly like that but probably there's a little extra context on that one and then the part that is definitely true is that the insurance policy caps that California tried to put on insurance fire insurance policies um caused a shortage of fire insurance policies because the the fire insurance people said um no thanks if we can't make money we don't want to be in your state so they pull down so what makes this particular situation go from tragic to how do I say this without being cancelled all right I'm I'm going to speak as indirectly as I can and you can piece it together if an ordinary tragedy happens you you get into tragedy mode you're like trying to help people you're feeling sad you're feeling impacted you're basically just feeling terrible but trying to do what you can if it's just a tragedy if it's a tragedy which would have been had by your insurance kicking in and at least paying for what you lost that would be half as big but it wouldn't be just a change of you being half as mad it's the difference between and here's where I have to be careful it's the difference between people feeling bad and people feeling homicidal was that indirect enough we're looking at the government of C California and I can tell you from personal experience my my emotions I'm trying to keep under control and if you're seeing a lot of Californians talking in ways that you think are unusually calm given the situation like James Woods you saw him acting completely calm that the house he loved and just rebuilt and remodeled was lost and he had no insurance now he has better resources maybe than other people but he broke down on an interview so don't mistake how strong people are acting with how they're feeling on the inside this feels like we got raped that's what it feels like it doesn't feel like a tragedy happened it feels like we got raped all of us even if you if even even if you're not directly affected do you know what this is going to do to the possibility of getting Insurance anywhere in the state this just made the entire state unlivable they're going to have to tax the beesus of us to pay for whatever this costed the the level of economic destruction I don't even think you can calculate it it it's bigger than anything that's ever happened in the country and so I feel a sense of Rage that makes me in Revenge homicidal head instead of recovery from an event head I want to be I want to be just in the helpful recovery mode but man when they give you they give you the double tap you know one in the chest one in the head one in the chest was the bad fire management the one in the head was you don't have insurance because we changed the rules in an obvious way in a way that obviously would make insurance go away and not be available you do that I don't think the res uh uh let me say it in the way that um I Heard It stated I'm not going to attribute this but without attribution I heard yesterday a Californian who was directly affected say of one of the leading politicians who's getting a lot of blame again I won't be specific and the and the advice was I wouldn't show yourself in public now that advice I think was well intended as a security thing you need to know that people feel homicidal they don't feel just hurt this is not like other things the the level of incompetence apparently is so extreme that it doesn't feel like an accident if feels intentional it wasn't intentional but it feels like it it feels like people just raped us because I didn't give a so if you think we're going to get over this I doubt it I doubt it I don't think we're going to get over this and you didn't have to be in the fire zone to not get over it I'm not getting over this the this is the wakeup call it's the tap on the shoulder it says you know all that complaining you did complaining is nothing complaining is nothing at this point pretty serious action and I hope it's not the homicidal kind is required and I do believe that you know people of character are going to act really differently and some of them will be sacrificing their personal fortunes some will be sacrificing their reputations but the risk reward equation just changed completely once you realize you can't live in this state the way it is then you're going to take a bigger risk to change it you know if you're just like ah I don't like it but next year is going to be a lot like this year you know you're just going to get on with your life but now it's an existential risk just to be managed by incompetence it's an existential risk of incompetence now I will remind you as I was reminded just moments ago before the show started that it was a while ago that I warned that Dei would cause massive institutional and corporate and government incompetence and it would be really really obvious and it could destroy everything we love now when people mentioned that on TV such as the amazing Scott Jennings he got into that conversation on CNN it went completely off the rail and it was a I'm going to call it a rare a rare communication Mistake by Scott Jennings um you know when I talk about him usually it's like oh my God he just he just explained things so well uh among this panel of Democrats and you know he won that day and you know I'll be forwarding around so in general he he's the best we have if you're looking at like who who's the best Communicator who's not Trump himself it might be Scott jenx he's really really impressive but on the Dei stuff total fail now I think it's easy to correct and I would expect he will here's the correction um and I I posted this I hope he sees it but accusing people specific people if what you're doing is is accusing specific people of being Dei hires we don't have that kind of information you know we could tell that they're in a certain demographic group but you can't tell that the that's the problem you can't look at a specific case and say oh if if Karen bass had been a white guy everything would be fine now that might it might be that she's a Dei hire and then that's the whole story and the police chief is Dei hire and and you've got everything you need it might be but we don't have that kind of information so when Scott Jennings brought up the Dei element He had a couple of black female panelists who just ate him up and what they did is they do the thing where where they say why are you saying that black women can't do a good job nobody says that that has nothing that has absolutely nothing to do with the Dei conversation the Dei conversation is not about the capability of one any particular group it's not a capability it's a system incentive design problem that you could replace you could replace anybody in this equation and you get the same bad outcome so nobody's saying that there's something special about black women not being able to do stuff I I'm not aware of anybody who has that opinion it's more about the system and let me explain that a little bit better so the first point is that as soon as you apply it to any individual you're on thin ice you don't have the proof of that unless you worked with that person every day you probably don't know if they're doing a good or bad job you know sometimes there are other variables that makes stuff impossible but here's what you can say you can say number one that leaders focus on what is easiest to measure that probably is the number one most important thing you need to know about management that managers man to things that can be tracked why do they do that because when they get their bonuses and their Awards and their raises it's going to be based on what can be measured what is easier to measure than diversity Improvement it's easy uh what are you I'm a woman got it what are you I identify as black got it right easy to count easy to keep track easy to see how it changed from what it was to where it is if you give any manager that situation where it's easy to know what you know if you did it right or at least if you hit the goal I won't say right but you hit the goal they're going to manage that and they're going to let other things lapse because they it won't affect their pay for example suppose several years ago the people in charge had decided to to do a big water management Improvement how long would it take to get that approved to get it built to see if it worked and then even when you built it you wouldn't know if it worked you would only know that there weren't any fires lately you wouldn't know that it worked so if you got this big ambiguous but way more important thing to do the water management is way more important than other things but it takes a long time you can't tell what any one person did to make it happen it's really hard to get you know to to be held responsible for that so if you're a manager you go for what can be measured easily you focus on it that's where your pay depends then on top of that the second thing you need to know is that every major company is trying to improve their diversity at the same time and I would argue even the companies that may have uh renounced their Dei efforts the individual managers are still going to be hiring with a Dei goal you don't need you don't need a Dei program because those same managers are still going to be bragging if they get more diversity you you could you could get away with give up the entire incentive system but if one of the people says well I you know I Diversified my department and the other manager that they're competing against for the top job says oh I uh I do some long-term things that are really smart but how' it turn out well we won't know because lots of people involved could take years if it doesn't work it might not be my fault it could be the legislation right so anyway so if you have every company trying to do it at the same time even if it's not part of a organized program you're going to run out of your target demographics and here's the important thing to know you could switch out the target demographics and replace it with any other group and it's the same that's why it's not a racist observation for example let's say your Dei program was you had to hire more Irish people or Irish Americans and that's it how's that going to work out you're going to maximize Irish American now there are a lot of Irish Americans but if everybody suddenly said oh God I got to get get myself an Irish Irish guy you would run out of Highly qualified Irish Americans on day two on day one all the all the Smart Ones with a good resume have already been hired we got a we got an Irish guy yes it's going to look good on my resume so if you're when Scott Jennings on CNN allows his panelists to argue you know that black black women can do any job nobody's disagreeing with that that the right qualified person of any demographic can do pretty much any job and the and the thing that you have to understand is you can replace that Target demographic with anybody you you could take black women out of the conversation entirely put Irish men Irish men same same problem if you're managing to the number of Irish men on your staff you're in trouble you're going to you're going to have massive incompetence if you fast forward 20 years and here we are we are in a position of massive massive incompetence is it the cause of any specific demographic group can't tell the only thing you can know for sure is that this was a guaranteed outcome that the design of the incentive system and the natural limitation of any demographic group group to have you know unlimited people in it is all you needed to know on paper it couldn't have worked and that's why it's so important to reverse it and reverse our thinking about it so Scott Jennings I hope you make that correction the first thing you should say is it's not about any individual it's about a system design if you have incentives that make people do the wrong thing they'll do the wrong thing and that's where we are now some of the worst takes on this Bernie Sanders weighs in while people are running for their lives and posts this 80,000 people told to evacuate I think it's twice that now since he posted it 80,000 people told to evacuate he said blazes 0% contained and so far I'm thinking oh this is Bernie being helpful he's he's telling us how bad it is and then he's going to hit us with what we should do about it he says eight months since the area has been has seen rain okay that did make it worse the scale the damage and loss is unimaginable thank you for you know recognizing how bad this is and then he said climate change is real not a hoax Donald Trump must treat this like the existential crisis it is meaning climate change well you could imagine how I felt when I read that have I mentioned that we Californians don't feel like we went through a tragedy we feel like we got raped by you by politicians you know so Burnie burning you know indirectly and the fact that California was focusing on your little Pet Project the climate change which I believe is mostly freaking fake because it only applies to people who think the news news is real and science is not corrupt if you think the news is real and science is not completely corrupted by money you might believe that this climate change has been proven by all the smart people to be a danger now it might be a danger I often say I don't know I I don't know how much people are contributing to it um I I see both sides I don't think any of them are believable from my point of view because I can't tell but I can tell you for sure that if you think the models are predicting the future you have not looked into it very much if you think we can measure the temperature of the earth over decades you haven't looked into it and I find that I can't even have a conversation with somebody who thinks all of that climate uh the alarm part is true you can't even talk to them because they've been so hypnotized they think the news is real the news is not real about anything important the news could have a correct fact now and then but the narrative is never real narratives are always motivated they're not they're not real if you believe the news is even trying to be real you can't be reached you you have to first understand that they're not trying to tell you the truth it's just not it's not their business model and if you think that anybody under any circumstances can take all these weird hidden variables and gigantic variables and hard to measure variables and put them into a complicated model and tell you the temperature in 10 years how do I begin to tell you how impossible that is that's not something that the smart people figured out that is a pure hoax the models part now what I'm not calling the hoax is I don't know if it's getting warmer I don't know if people are involved I just know that nobody else knows I know for sure that nobody else knows so but my problem with Bernie is not that he believes in climate change and I'm pretty sure that he's wrong uh at least in terms of the alarm part of it my part is you need to be able to read the room a little bit better you don't talk to rape victims about wearing a condom you know what I mean you don't talk to rape victims about wearing a condom you know maybe maybe you should had a cond with you no you were just making it worse so my first reaction was I was just going to go nuclear and I had every fbom and like like I was ready to go and my fingers hit the keyboard and I said I'm not going to make it worse because that was just a pure emotional reaction um so instead I reposted this I said Senator Sanders as a California I respectfully ask for you to delete this post no California thinks climate change dried up the fire hydrants and canel fire insurance now whether my take is you know factually correct that that the fire hydrant were a problem that somehow was undermanaged or that the canceled well the canceled fire Insurance um that's certainly uh a fact but um and then I told to read The Room 2 million people agreed with me which is very unusual for a post on X to get 2 million views that means people really agreed not every person but it means a lot of people agreed with my take that he was not reading the room and I would like to add a few things if the problem with the LA fire were caused by climate change the whole world would be on fire by now right I'm pretty sure that the climate change is not limited to La we would see basically everything on fire if climate changes cause fire if droughts caused fire everything that's having a slightly under normal year which is what La is la is in what I think they call it a moderate drought meaning it's barely a drought and it's not outside of the historical Norm whatsoever not at all um so anyway um who else was bad then Joe Biden with his defective brain and oppressor talked about the fire but nobody remembers that all they remember is he had the bad judgment to say quote the good news is that I became a Grandpa wow wow between Sanders and Biden not being able to read the room do they understand that California's a blue state or was um let's see according to the New York Post I think Molly Hemingway flagged this that uh uh Governor Newsome is launching his Trump resistance plan this week so so Nome wants to tell you how much he's resisting Trump which looks like the problem not the solution this week doesn't it cuz now we have we have on video Trump saying all the right things about fire prevention in California you've blocked the water you you block you're not doing Forest management turns out those were the right answers those were the right answers of course he's against Dei again we don't know that that caused this problem but it's the right you know overarching theme so Trump was as right about this situation and on time because he said it way before it happened he was right and he was on time and it looks like California completely screwed the pooch on in every Dimension at least it looks that way we don't know that that's true but let me talk about the future of California politics because everything has a political element to it um and here's how Trump posted it he said uh on his one of his posts some truth I I think he said the governor new scum as he calls him chose to save the extinct fish instead of sending water to Southern California to fight apocalyptic wildfires now this is another example of how good Trump is in messaging to take this big complicated situation and just turn it into new scum chosen extinct fish over saving the lives of Californians it's an oversimplification and I don't even know if the fish part is really a valid I don't even know if that's a valid claim because if you turn on CNN they're going to say well but you know it's Republican's fault too and blah blah blah I don't know what they say but but there's more context to it however as a political messaging thing the the Brilliance of the summary is what Trump does better than anybody nobody does that well he he's the best ever as summarized nobody summarizes better than he does um Adam Cora who apparently is one of the more famous people being displaced he looked like he was in a hotel room and he did a video and he he was explaining something that you might not fully understand outside of California do you know how hard it is to build something in California all of these people who think well I'll get my insurance check or maybe I had some extra money and I'm going to rebuild so they're going to go to the sity and say Here's my plan oh my God they're just entering hell um I won't go into the details but let me let me just tell you this getting a California entity any any City really to approve a building of anything is pretty much a nightmare the the house I'm in right now I you know had built but I think it took 18 months just to get approval something something like that now these are people who just think well it should be easy because I'm just going to build back the house I had you know with slight variety it's not going to be easy you you're going to spend a year not getting the permit and then good luck finding a contractor because everybody in your whole city is trying to hire the contractor who knows how to build stuff you're not going to have a contractor you're not going to be able to get insurance you're not going to be able to pay for it with the insurance you don't have you're not going to be able to get a permit I don't believe the the country and maybe even Californians have absorbed how bad this is you're seeing something closer to the beginning of the problem than the end as bad as it was and we don't I don't think we can fully appreciate the economic disruption to the state who's going to pay for the recovery I don't think the federal government is going to pay for it all is this raise my California taxes again from the highest taxes to the highest taxes on Turbo how are we going to survive it how are we going to fix the things that need to get fixed we're we're already paying the highest taxes and it feels like the lowest level of service in return so now if you think we're just going to rebuild you don't know California that might be just empty land for the rest of my life like I I don't know that it's I just don't see a path where that quickly gets fixed I don't know um here's what I think I think this has been such a black eye for the management of the state that for the first time recently I can say it's possible to have a republican Governor now it would take a special character it would take a Reagan type character who was a rep rep and I don't know anybody in the state who would fit that you know reaganesque um thing um and would also have experience managing something because you you don't want somebody who's never managed anything because the state is you know as much management as politics so it's not exactly like other jobs you need to manage so we need a you know disantis type of Governor so if somebody like D santis became available to run for governor it's the best time now other people are going to say Scott Scott Scott I think you don't realize that the the The Blue Team um has California all wrapped up and no no nobody but a Democrat could win and it's not just because of the voters it's because the Democrat machine controls too much and they can rig any vote to go the way they want because they just control too much now that might be true however I think that uh the opening is now if it's ever going to happen uh I saw some people suggest this that maybe a smart independent like Nicole Shanahan would be a possibility now I like everything about Nicole Shanahan but I don't know that she has exactly the right background for managing because whoever takes his job has to like dig into you know the whole water thing the forest thing yeah it's it's really a management thing so as a high quality and as much as I would trust Nicole shanan I like everything about her basically um I don't know if she has the exact background that that fits this slot um but maybe somebody will emerge and then as people have noted the legislature would probably still stay blue and so even the governor couldn't get anything done um so I saw some related to this I saw Bill Mah video and he was talking to Stephen A Smith and Mar said this that really caught my attention he said quote I've been out with every type of celebrity you know meaning just having fun and he says they don't say the things they say to me to other celebrities there it is now you probably said to yourself Scott you can't get a republican Governor because the state is Phil Phil so many Democrat voters you're you're never going to get over the hump I don't think they're Democrats I think they're literally pretending to be Democrats I think that the I think that every one of these people who may have been seeming like political enemies are now seeing that the thing we need to you know get together on is common sense stuff I don't believe there's Democrat who wanted less Forest management well there's some crazy ones who you know want to preserve everything natural but not really I don't think there's any Democrats who say I'm sure glad we didn't have enough water right I don't think there are any Democrats who said uh sure is a good thing there were not enough escape routs from a place that is an obvious fire risk these are all so clearly and cleanly Common Sense issues that I don't think anybody's going to give a about the smelt going forward try try to try stopping us from fixing the state because of a smelt yeah because I don't think that works anymore so of course I'm speaking for my own little bubble because you know I'm very influenced by how I personally feel about this which is some intense feelings uh in many directions I'm pretty sure that this is the wakeup call that tells everybody in the South you know the the Republicans don't hate you you get that right we really I'm going to say we because I caucus with the Republicans even though I'm uh I'm a Democrat by um registration um I think I think maybe it will be a little better understood that Trump was on California's side and whatever the Democrats running things were doing may have been for their own benefit or may have been just pure incompetence we don't know what it was but we know that Trump had exactly the right solution in exactly the right time early and we know that the Democrats failed just in performance the exact reasons hard to know but they certainly failed um Hunter Biden's rental burned up and I I think the M the thing that bothered me the most about that was that it was a rental like it's it's bad enough if you're the landlord for Hunter Biden CU remember uh we heard the story that he had rented someplace and didn't pay in the past a different place but he had been renting a place and didn't pay the rent and then he used the Secret Service to keep the landlord from getting to him to ask for the rent that is like the most effed up thing you're going to hear he didn't pay the rent and he used his secret service protection to make sure that nobody would come bug him to get the rent that actually happened was it Shan Maguire I think was the landlord there uh so he's I don't think he's in that house anymore but uh I just feel sorry doubly sorry for the whoever owned it because they lost their house that was rental but also they had Hunter Biden as as a resident I mean I don't know if you could even cleaned it after that Christy tan and John Legend and their kids are in a hotel Henry winklers said some angry drunk looking things he's he's affected um I have mixed feelings talking about the celebrities involved on one hand I don't think this is a story about celebrities and so it's just gross and icky that they're even part of the story like why do we care about them more does it matter more to you that Henry Winkler is safe than Henry Winkler's not famous neighbor I mean there so there's something creepy about it but at the same time the politics of it is that these are the some of them are some of them are conservative but number of other ones are outspoken Democrats and I would love to know how Chrissy Teegan and John Legend feel about their team after losing their house to their team do does that change how you feel what else could I mean is see if you're going to change somebody's mind having a debate with them H maybe usually not having really good points yeah might work but probably not really being good at persuasion it might help but probably not people are pretty set in their ways you burn down somebody's house you have their attention everybody who lost the house is now open to a better argument a lot of Minds open up so I think I think uh California is in play anyway in related but other news because we can't spend all our time talking about this it's just it's just too hard um Trump is as other people have noted flooding the zone so he's completely controlling the news uh even the fire which you would think you know is not directly a trump topic he's still the top of the news because he said the right things and did the right things and it stands in contrast to what happened so not only that but apparently he's uh there's a report from Steph Knight I think she's a axios um saying that uh there's some knowledge that Trump plans to flood the Zone with a 100 executive orders uh like his first day or first week or something now so we've got Trump talking about you know Greenland Panama Canada he's talking about the fire um he might have a hundred executive orders every day three new things this is the only way to defeat the fake news and you know he's always done this thing where he he keeps the Overton window so to speak keeps the action going and it keeps the attention on him but I think I just realized the other hidden benefit of this you know as we've often said Republicans can be right and they can be wrong they can have wrong facts um and often do they might believe in some conspiracy theories that don't prove out but that's normal sort of normal human beings on the Democrat side there's an organized hoax creation you know machine for the Democrats they'll create a hoax about the other side and then they'll use their news their media and their Talking Heads to say the same things over and over again right how many times have you seen that well he's a he's a convicted felon you know that's just the talking point and if they say convicted felon a million times it's going to stick in your head because repetition is the number one tool of persuasion and even more importantly it's the number one tool of brainwashing brainwashing requires you to hear the same exact message over and over and over and over again until your brain just uncritically says well it must be true I keep hearing it which doesn't make sense but your brain will process it that way so what Trump has done is he's removed from the fake news the ability to repeat any of their messages often enough for them to stick because they start going on with he wants to send the military into Greenland and then they repeat that L we got them we got them because nobody's going to be in favor of you know sending the military in although some are so they repeat that and then the next thing you know he's talking about Panama and then they're like all right what are we saying about Panama uh Panama uh wait he's talking about Canada now what what do we say about Canada wait what did he say about the smelt wait new scum he's calling him new scum 100 executive orders they can't repeat often enough he took away from them their number one persuasion trick repetition now is this intentional do you think that he intentionally said if I just take away all of their oxygen they'll never be able to repeat anything enough to stick the answer is yes yes this is absolutely intentional now that doesn't mean it's only Trump who knows this he's working with Steven Miller and you know a bunch of brilliant people right the brilliant people can see this clear as they so yes it's not an accident they going to have a 100 executive orders and he's talking about things that make your hair just catch on fire like you can't and also everything that Trump says is too interesting to ignore it doesn't matter what he says it's always too interesting to ignore he's what Greenland what so yes is intentional yes is brilliant in a way that we don't even deserve like we don't even deserve that level of capability and and when he shows you the competence level that he brings just a message the competence level that he brought to his campaign the competence level in which he's taking things that people said are ridiculous things to do such as you know using the old Twitter or now posting things that are like geopolitical you know hugely important things he makes that work when you watch somebody who is just an extreme example of competence with his team right he doesn't do everything alone but I think people are going to notice competence is hard to ignore if you just keep at it and he is well in other news if there's any good news at all the employment for this coming year looks like a little better than people expected that hasn't happened yet but the thinking is that um in surveys big companies are showing much more optimism and more um more uh let's say prediction that they'll do serious hiring apparently the reason there was less hiring than there might have been is that big companies said oh we better wait to see if AI is going to take all the jobs and now they've waited and like my example where I started the show where I said I tried to get AI to do any simple thing just look at a document and summarize it and just because it was multiple Pages it just couldn't do it so I think that probably the companies have now wised up that what they thought was going to be this instant replacement of employees with machines it might still happen but not in 2025 so in 2025 they're like uh we're going to need human bodies because we can tell them to look at the whole contract not just four pages and quit so it could be that at least in the short run a little little bump and Improvement in employment um I just this is just an as side because I'm amused by it but do you remember Aaron rupar uh he's the reason that I came up with the phrase a rupar for a description of a video that's been edited to change his meaning because he did a number of those and it looked like he knew he was doing it you couldn't tell because you can't read his mind but it looked like I feel like he knows he took that out of context and uh then I saw he he made some claim uh I think it was yesterday it doesn't matter what the claim was but the Community note to it uh just noted that he's a well-known liar so the actual Community note wasn't just that he was saying something that wasn't true it's said he was a well he was a well-known famous liar who does it for clicks now I'm paraphrasing but it said basically that uh now as soon as I refreshed it the community note changed to something less less attacking of his character but for moment the community notes has settled on yeah he's just a famous liar so you shouldn't pay attention to him if if I contributed even 1% by making people understand that a rupar is literally a you know a fake post or edit if I contributed even 1% to that I'm proud all right um I love I love the fake news talking about the uh the use of force to overtake Greenland so I guess the Pentagon was asked if there was any kind of plan to invade Greenland but what's funny is that the whoever was talking some kind of Pentagon spokesperson uh said that they didn't know of any plan it was short of a no so instead of saying no there's no plan to use the military uh or or even a plan to what would look like if he used the military instead the spokesperson said I'm not aware of one would the spokesperson be aware of the secret attack plans I feel like you wouldn't tell the spokesperson because if you told them they could accidentally tip somebody off so the spokesperson never knows the secret attack plans do they because if they do that feels like a mistake to me but anyway well the only thing I want to add to this is that why would the Pentagon need a plan the entire country is 56,000 people mostly in one place uh and they seem to be fairly pro- Maga pro-american and if it were up to them and not Denmark who owns them if it were just up to the people in Greenland it's kind of looking like they might be okay with this idea but I think it's funny that anybody would ask the Pentagon if they have a if they have a conquest plan for Greenland when all they really needed was Don Jr and Charlie Kirk to fly over there and take some selfies now to be fair Don Jr and Charlie Kirk taking selfies with the locals is not enough to conquer a country it's not enough they might have to go back two or three more times and take more selfies that should be enough I think three to four trips of Don J and Charlie Kirk taking selfies the whole island surrenders then we just have to you know work on a deal with Denmark so no no military needed just Don and Charlie all right uh Senator Rick Scott has introduced a uh some legislation to stop the changing of the clocks twice a year I keep wanting to have an opinion on that but I don't and I'm going to admit why because I don't know what change they're talking about it's too hard for me to figure out the whole hour hour backwards hour forwards but if they standardize it which one are they standardizing on because I never know which one is which one's the base case I don't know and and I also don't know if I'd like it since I've never experienced it you know the the different amount of light at a different time of day I've never experienced it so how would I even have an opinion on that maybe I'd like it a little bit more in the morning but dislike it at more at night but what's the net know so if it's expensive and I know it cuts down on a productivity when the time changes I I don't see a reason to change the time so I'm in favor of changing it but I don't have any idea what that looks like like in my actual life so but just in terms of economics it makes sense um Britain is threatened to cut ties security ties with the US unless uh Trump stops working with Elon Musk according to the National pulse William Upton to which I say Great Britain is threatening to cut ties with us okay the uh can you remind me uh what are all the military advantages we're getting from protecting them what trade you know what products are you getting from England from their manufacturing base how much do we need England or the UK or Great Britain how much do we need them I don't know sounds like a pretty bad threat bad threat to me and I don't think there's any chance they're going to cut ties Biden is considering according to the post millennial Hayden Cunningham is writing that Biden's thinking about preemptive pardons for Liz Cheney and Anthony fouchi so Liz Chene for the corrupt um Insurrection so-called Insurrection committee um do you have a problem with that yeah this one's an interesting one because I think I don't know if any charges would ever be brought up because there's a lot of bad behavior that I don't know if it's criminal it's just really really bad and unethical Behavior so if they get a preemptive pardon we don't have to watch the trial and talk about it but also it would label them forever as felons because who gets a preemptive pardon I would like to ask the following question in the history of Pardons how many times as a completely innocent person got a preemptive pardon is there even one time that's ever happened where somebody who was legitimately innocent got a preemptive pardon can you think of any time that's ever happened no you give a preemptive pardon to somebody you know is damn guilty so now they to be fair they might be more worried about some illegitimate lawfare being used against them and if that's the only thing they're thinking well you know if they if they if you think there was no real crime maybe but the way we're going to read it is that they've just they just they just declared themselves guilty if they accept a preemptive pardon for something they didn't do I'm not going to believe they didn't do it I'm just going to believe oh you know you're dirty you lucky you lucky guy and lucky woman um all right the Mexican president what's her name Claudia Shin bomb I will never get tired of saying this the Mexican president Claudia Shin Bal I'm going to say it another time because it's funny so the Mexican president Claudia Shin balb the Jewish woman I just love that that she you know uh I have to give Mexico credit because you think of Mexico as you know they're going to be kind of a patriarchy you presume if it's if most of the residents are Mexican they're going to vote for you know somebody who's as Mexican as possible uh but they elected they elected Claudia shine bomb and I give them credit for that if she does a good job good work um anyway so she's responding to Trump saying that he wants the gulf to be called the Gulf of America instead of the Gulf of Mexico go and she's shooting back and she says the US the US should be called America Mexicana uh let's see how long it takes me to forget her framing one two three wait what did she say what did she call it do you see how special Trump is Trump says extinct fish once and I'll remember it for the rest of my life the Mexican president as capable as she probably is I imagine she's very good in general to get where she got but she tries to match him he's like ah how about I got it I'm G to Zing you how about we call it America Mexicana why isn't everybody clapping clap please the the difference in Persuasion and communication skill is just so striking like you don't realize how good Trump is at the what I'll call the little stuff you know just the ordinary communication you don't realize how good he is until you see somebody else try it and then and they just do a total face plant I had to read it again America Mexicana no that's not a good try well Russia's introducing these uh land robot tank things it looks like a little miniature tank and it could have wheels or tracks but it's got loaded with all kinds of weapons and they're going to make a bunch of them they say and send them at Ukraine um here's my question can Russia manufacture now I know they have manufacturing and I know they make weapons and this is a weapon but if they if their uh outcome of the war depends on making a lot of these robots that they've never made before how good are they going to be now it could be that you know even if Russia is not a massively good uh Manufacturing Company it could be that they put their best people in the military stuff which would make sense and uh maybe this is maybe it's good work and maybe they're they can crank them out like crazy but the thing I'd be looking for is whether they can manufacture well enough to put working models in the field that make a difference now the other thing is that even the ground robots like these the ones on wheels or running dogs or whatever they will soon be programmed to swarm just like the drones in the air so if you if you organize the drones so that they operate as one and they swarm there's almost no defense but likewise if you were in you know if you were on the front line and you're a human being and you get swarmed by these robots you're going to be in a lot of trouble the robots on the ground because it probably takes a little bit of planning and work and strange execution to even take out one of them if six of them are bearing down on you you you got to run and it will run faster than you so it's going to get real interesting thing in Ukraine I I would look to see if they can manufacture well and quickly well I'm going to do something that you don't like uh I'm going to defend uh U khaw so Dan kensaw uh is often reported for having very high relative to other people uh really good gains on his stock picks so there's another story today mentioning that he's a top five investor among Congress you're like H top five did he do that because of Insider information and the implication is that it's because he has Insider information so that he and other members who trade are just beaten people because they're inside information and it was poting out that he had a high percentage gain so if you look at his gain I think it was over 40% for the year or something that that would put him in the top five now now what do I teach you about spotting fake news if you know the percentage of gain he made but they don't tell you the dollar amount is it real news or fake news the answer is it's fake news if they told you both the percentage and the dollar amount it might be real if they told you only the dollar amount without the percentage that would be fake and if they told you the percentage without the dollar amount which is what they did that's fake so the first thing you need to know is that you got abused when you read the story you got abused somebody's trying to pull one over on you turns out his portfolio is not very big he's not a rich guy and he said directly that one of the few ways that he can get ahead and still afford to be in Congress because it doesn't pay that much relative to the cost of being there that uh he absolutely needs to you know augment his income and he does it by trading now how did you how did you rule out the possibilities at it he told you he needs it he told you he focuses on it that's different than most of the people in Congress most of the people in Congress don't need it a lot of them are rich I don't know what percentage but a lot of them are rich and some of them are not concentrating on it you know they're concentrating on other things he's concentrating on it if you knew his educational background it's really good do you know how much like formal education he's had Plus the military I don't think people understand how academically trained he is so you got somebody who's got higher academic training than most of Congress unlike Congress he's really paying attention which means he's learning how to do it right and there's very little dollar amount so if some so if he had one good pick he he would had that gain how do you know that the reason he's he's up is some kind of secret ins information what if and this is not in the story this should be in the story what if he bought stock in Nvidia do you know who bought stock in Nvidia I did and and a lot of my followers did because I mentioned it you know as sort of once ever you know kind of a unique situation so most of my most of my followers probably had the same return he did cuz if the only thing you did was buy the one most obvious stock Nvidia you would you would beat all the other members of Congress is that what happened if he had just bought Tesla he would have beat most of the members of Congress if he had just invested in you know one of the uh Atomic stocks that I mentioned that I'm not going to mention today he would have beat everybody it only took one just one one good stock in his whole port portfolio is up 40% so if you see a story that says he did better than the other people in Congress and therefore the implication is that he broke some law or did something not he wouldn't break a law because it's legal for them to use to be inside of Traitor that if you believe that it was like some secret unethical thing he did to get those gains there's no evidence of that in the story there's no evidence of it in the story now if there is evidence of any bad behavior or you know it wouldn't be illegal so I guess it wouldn't even be necessarily unethical but you wouldn't like it you're G you're going to have to give me a lot more than he did a good job because if you're complaint about the guy is he's good at investing that just pisses me off that just pisses me off because that's punishing somebody for competence and that might be the only anything that's happening now again let me be very clear I don't know if there's any you know valid insider trading that that helped his returns I don't know but what I do know is you don't know you don't know so if you're going to go from he's a good investor to he did something sketchy that you hate that's a leap I can't support and it pisses me off when somebody does a good job and there's no evidence that he did it unethically that we we crit criticize him for competence and for making it affordable to do the job of the people now before you give me a hard time because I know you want to you're going to say but but Scott what about those other unrelated things that we don't like about his policies fine I'm not arguing that if you don't think he's doing the job you want I'm not even in that conversation I I don't know enough frankly about him but um my my and I'll also tell you just for full disclosure that uh I have had conversations with him because I did his podcast a while ago so I've interacted with him at least on you know a zoom kind of a way and he's a really nice guy I don't know if you know that but he's a really nice guy and so I'm influenced by that and then I see him being attacked for something that if there's any basis to this nobody's nobody's revealing it so let's let's uh let's calm down on that you're certainly makes sense to go after him for the other stuff but let let me sum that up with a little bit of a context um sometimes you wonder what's it like to be a public figure such as Dan kensaw and such as me what's it like to be a public figure well like like Dan crenchaw one thing I have in common with him is that I've had several scandals in my career some of them you haven't heard of or you forgot about because they're so long one of the things that all of my scandals have in common is that none of them have actually happened none of them happened for example uh let's say uh I'm being criticized for being an H1B supporter so that's that's late that didn't happen not once no I have said we need to bring in you know only the best people who make sense but the H1B process apparently doesn't do that so I've never said it does that I've never said I was in favor of it and it's the biggest thing I'm being criticized for let's see I'm also being criticized for recommending that people get vaccinated during the pandemic which never happened and I forcefully always said the opposite very frequently probably said it over and over again I'm not your doctor I'm not telling you to get it I'm not telling you not to get it it's a personal decision opposite literally the opposite of what I'm blamed for do you remember um some of you might remember the thing that first derailed my career this was years ago where I had an argument where I predicted that Evolution the theory of evolution would would be debunked in my lifetime and that it would de be debunked not necessarily in in a let's say in classic ways but it would be debunked because we would understand the nature of reality so differently that Evolution would stop making sense and that happened that's called the simulation now you could argue that the simulation is not real but the argument is it's a trillion to one likely that it is and if we're a simulation then the past is actually created on demand now I could be right about that right I could be right about that or I could be wrong about that and I don't know but what I will tell you is that 100% of the push back to my opinion was based on stuff I didn't say so again this this major thing I probably lost I bet I lost 30% of the dilber fans over this something I was right about at least in terms of knowing that some some rethinking of reality would cause us to rethink Evolution that was one hell of a good prediction I mean that was a crazy good prediction like Beyond if it's right and I think it is um then does anybody remember this will be a good test how many of you remember the sock puppet um see Scandal about me the accusation was that I I sock puppeted which is a very specific act do you anybody remember that which never happened it never happened now did I go online with a uh fake identity and have what I thought was a hilarious conversation with somebody who wanted to argue about the intelligence of Scott Adams yes I did why did I do it I was just debunking some hoaxes that were told about me one of the hoaxes was that I was a holocaust denier do you see the pattern yet I'm not a holocaust Den but the public had decided I was you see the pattern right 100% of all of my scandals never happened none of them not a single one so when I look at and let me give you some others I'm also called a uh climate denier like I did I science that's not happening that's not real um and then what about my cancellation my cancellation happened almost entirely for political reasons because there's not a single Republican who's canceled me and and 100% of the people who have heard me explain the situation in detail because you know the drama never gets you the detail 100% have not disagreed with my Point nobody there are people who didn't understand the point and there are people who said it made me mad which I acknowledge and there are people who said you shouldn't have said it that's their opinion but what they think I did and said didn't happen I was complaining Against Racism and I was accused of being a racist no I'm complaining about racists I'm anti-racist the entire rant was Against Racism and I got accused of being racist now so here's the context so you look at Dan khaw and you see this about his investing do you think that's real you just you just heard my resume all of the all of the claims against me are fake we add a context to the point that they're reversed so I don't know the truth about the Dan crena investment stuff but if but with what I know if I had to place a bet especially knowing that people have been watching his Investments really closely because this is you know it's sort of an evergreen thing that they say about him you don't have one example you can't give us one example of a company that he had special knowledge about and that's the reason he made money because if you've got even one example you better lead with that how about he made this investment with Insider information on this company and here's the name of the company and that caused him to have a 40% gain you tell me that and you have my attention then I'm going to say oh still legal completely legal but I'd say you maybe we should look at change in that law so just put it in context most stories like this one you know the the investment one they'll they don't play out they're they're fake so again I'm not defending Dan CAW for any other opinions they might be excellent they might not be but that's not my topic today thank you for watching ladies and gentlemen uh you continue to be the thing that keeps me alive because I love connecting with all of you in real time all right I'm going to say hi to the locals people and everybody else uh have a terrific day as best you can unless you're in Southern California and then we'll see what we can do for you and locals I'm coming at you privately in 30 second e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e
well there you are you're here I'm
here
um all
right we're going to find our comments
and get them going so I can see what the
local people are saying to
me and then we will blow your mind with
the best show ever
[Music]
good morning everybody and welcome to
the highlight of human
civilization probably the best day
you're going to ever have but if you'd
like to take this experience up to
levels that nobody can even understand
when they're tiny shiny human brains all
you need for that is a CER marug or
glass a tanker chel or Stein a canteen
Jugger flask a vessel of any kind fill
it with your favorite liquid I like
coffee join me now for the unparallel
pleasure of the dope of meend of the day
thing makes everything better it's
called the simultaneous Sip and it
happens now
go
Sensational best SIP of the day well of
course I'm going to be talking about the
LA fires but I I'll wait just a minute
for people to stream in before that I
would like to note
do any of you remember I can't remember
how long ago it was so we're going to
test you longterm memory it was a long
time ago but there were these two Terror
attacks One in New Orleans and one in
Vegas any of that sound familiar it was
so long
ago
right uh Trump is doing it again he's
doing that thing where time is
completely disted it so when the Vegas
terrorism thing was the headline story I
said to myself o this is going to be in
the news for a while so I'm going to do
a a Dilbert comic in which uh Dilbert's
uh boss's
secretary uh suggests that he takes a a
vacation in Vegas because he didn't know
where to go on his vacation so she she
suggests she suggests that he buy a
cyber truck and
drive it to Vegas and stay at the Trump
Hotel and well anyway you'd have to see
the comic it's pretty darn funny but
it's it's running today only for the
subscribers you you'd have to be
subscribing on X or locals to see it but
you know I was prepping it to uh publish
it this morning and I thought oh my God
that feels so long
ago so long ago so Trump time just
Distortion happening again all right
just one more thing then we'll talk
about the fires I tried to use chat GPT
last night to to digest a big legal
document that I was asked to review and
I thought to myself oh perfect
application for AI I'm going to upload
the document and then I will query it uh
to say okay is this handled you know
what about this what's to say about this
and it would summarize it for me and I'd
save bunch of
time I was so happy to be in the age of
AI so I took my PDF file and I uploaded
it and it said no we can't handle the
PDF file and I said in
2025 the advanced
intelligence the most important
technology in the
world can't read a PDF
file but it said you know jpeg it could
read so I thought all right all right
well so I just change it to a JPEG file
and I upload it and it fails and it says
uh it can only take when when it goes to
jpeg it turns the document into each of
its individual Pages as one file a piece
but I thought well no problem I'll just
drag all of the pages in it'll figure
out the page numbers good to go and then
I I try to drag all the pages in and it
says can only handle four pages and I
think okay no problem no problem I'll
just do four at a
time because they're only you know 20
some pages it's not going to take all
day so I drag four over good so I drag
another four over and then it clarifies
that it's a total of four it's not four
at a time it's a total of four so I
spent something like 45 minutes of my
day finding out that AI can't do the
simplest freaking thing so
so I don't know they say they say it's
going to replace everything and do
everything but I don't know all right
let's talk about the LA
fires um it's all horrible um you know
if if you're new to my live stream I
live in Northern California and you
might say to yourself well Northern
California that's so far away from
Southern California that you're probably
not much impacted well I'm not impacted
directly by the fire that's not a risk
where I am but if you live in California
you end up having a lot of friends in
other parts of
California so I'm very impacted and uh I
had to cancel the man cave last night
because there was just too many people
who needed help and too many people I
had to check on and you it was both both
family and friends and uh it was uh it
was a big weight so just not being in
the direct fire is better than being in
the fire but let me tell you the other
the other residents of California we're
taking it in the we're taking it in the
gut this is this is like being punched
all day
long and uh five people dead apparently
which you know is a gigantic tragedy I
suppose I suppose you know you could say
something like could have been worse but
five people as five people one of them
reportedly had stayed behind with his
hose and was trying to save his house
and I always wondered how smart or dumb
that strategy was because there are a
number of people who apparently did in
fact save their houses because somebody
stayed you know neighbor or they stayed
with a hose but one of them
died so if you're going to stay with a
hose just know I don't know what the
odds are of you dying in this sort of
massive fire situation but it might be
like 20% you know I mean it's crazy
high but people do what they have to do
if it's if it's your entire life and
you're not insured which was the case in
many cases I guess you do what you got
to
do anyway
um so speaking of do what you want to do
I heard uh Greg geld on the five
yesterday um requesting that people
consider opening up their homes to other
people th this one's not like a lot of
uh different disasters the sheer number
of people who are displaced in in a
fairly populated area is kind of crazy
and they're not going to go back soon so
a lot of people are opening houses uh
donating money trying to help in every
possible way they can so it's pretty
much it's an all hands on deck situation
here so if if you don't see
me putting in as much
work could you please understand that
this isn't the week that my mind's on
work right we're we're trying to keep
people alive and and help as we can
um so apparently there's I think there's
still zero
containment but the Santa an winds that
made us so bad should be dying down by
the end of today so I'm hoping
that we're going to see something like
some containment now I hate to say it
but probably the only thing that will
bring this fire under control is burning
everything that's burnable until there's
just no fuel left it's just the ocean so
I don't know what they're what they're
going to do but
um Elon Musk has uh announced he's going
to donate free startling terminals to
the affected area in LA
uh I think that's maybe today or
tomorrow he's going to do that um X
always makes me feel like the world is
so
small so you know the the richest most
interesting guy in the world right now
uh is of course in every topic and he's
in this topic in a productive way and
then you see in the comments when he
says he's going to donate them you see
his brother Kimble saying you know
thanks brother so he must be in LA and
he must be a fected so even Kimble
Kimble musk is in the
mix a lot of celebrities we'll talk
about some of those all right the the
biggest macro story is the fog of
War so uh I'm guilty of probably I don't
know the specifics but I think I
probably reposted some fake news
yesterday because there was so much
speculation and not quite accurate so I
want to talk about the things we think
we now and put them in context if you
haven't done this yet I recommend it
highly if you're not watching one of the
fake news networks like CNN talking
about the context of how we got to this
situation in California you're not
really hearing the other side and this
is one of those things where there's a
fog of War but on top of it two
completely different versions of what
happened is have already emerged no
surprise no surprise
but you really need to hear the the
alternative explanations of what
happened it's it's going to it's going
to blow your mind that any of it could
be a little bit explained now when I say
a little bit explained my macro theory
is that there's massive
incompetence there needs to be some kind
of some kind of uh addressing that I
don't know what that looks like so
there's massive incompetent
um but some of the accusations clearly
don't fly and I'll tell you which ones
they are because I feel like we want to
be mad but it's such wasted energy to be
mad at the wrong things there's plenty
of things to really be mad at now I will
remind
you uh well we'll get to that so here
here are some of the things that people
accused the
LA you know government and management of
doing uh so first of all the reports
were that
the fire hydrants either didn't have
water or had no water
pressure now there's two versions that
if the problem is they didn't have water
because there was no stored water there
there is some some evidence that there
was a water reservoir that was not
filled but I'd Le I'd like to know more
about whether it was possible to fill it
because maybe there was no water to put
in it and I don't know whose fault that
would be so these all of these things
that look like they're simple they've
all got some bigger story behind them
which doesn't make any good or right
it's just that you should know the
context it's it's never as simple as you
know the posts on
X so there it's possible uh well there
definitely was a low water pressure in
some places and there definitely were
high fire hydrogen not producing water
some were so we do have reports of some
working hydrants some not possibly or
even maybe probably the reason the water
pressure was insufficient is that there
were so many hydrons being used at the
same time attempted and the entire Place
had been destroyed so there were a lot
of open Fountain like um water being
wasted just in homes so the it if the
area was served by the same water
source be at the High hant or inside the
house if the house has broken pipes and
the water is spewing everywhere and
everybody's trying to use water at the
same time to put out the fire is not
going to be enough water pressure or
maybe even water so water and water
pressure were both a
problem um it's not entirely clear that
either of those were some direct mistake
that you could put on some particular
person they're all complicated there's a
question of forest management you know U
Trump has been on it for years literally
years he's been saying that California
is not managing its Forest like places
like Austria where they don't have this
kind of fire and managing the forest
means partly removing the underbrush you
know the really really flammable stuff
because the trees can do a much better
job of
surviving if if if it's just going tree
to tree it's not going to go
as fast as if there's this underbrush
that's just ready to go CU trees are the
living trees are a little bit wet so
they'll they'll slow things down but the
dead underbrush you know it's just it's
going to be traveling like crazy so the
forest management thing is a real thing
it's really important it's really not
done well but I don't know if that had a
causation in this
case because most of what I saw burning
were residential homes
uh and and there's at least one report
that I don't think is confirmed that
somebody said the fire started in
somebody's backyard and then spread up a
hill if it started in somebody's
backyard and spread up a hill which is
not confirmed not confirmed it's just
something I saw a fireman on the scene
who was working it said um if it was set
by somebody we heard reports that uh
which are fake these are fake reports
somebody and oh that's that's one of the
fake ones that I think I reposted so
that's bad on me that's just a mistake I
should not have been trusting that kind
of information that early in the story
all right so that's just on my that's
just an unforced error so on my part
believing that story that some homeless
person said it which did not
happen um that's on me that that's just
an error I should have said sub reports
it but we don't know that would have
been the right answer so we still don't
know but I can tell you that I don't see
a direct link from forest management to
this particular fire I do see a gigantic
risk if our fires are if our forests are
not well managed and that appears to be
the
case um so we don't know about the water
reservoir thing uh there are a whole
bunch of questions about
uh you whether Water Resources have been
managed correctly for years it doesn't
look like it it it looks like there are
enough allegations of things that could
have solved the problem I guess years
ago there was some big plan to you know
capture the water runoff and make it
available for fires but that didn't get
passed somebody say some people will say
it's because of the Democrats um other
people will say well you know we tried
to get this bipartisan Bill to have more
water but the Republicans said no for
some reason so I don't know but I would
say the one thing that I'm confident
about is I'm confident that California
has completely mismanaged its water
resources would that have made a
difference in this specific
case maybe not there's a video of uh Joe
Rogan in 2024 in the summer which is you
know just six months ago in which he was
saying he talk to a fireman
so 6 months before this fire in La a
fireman
said uh we've been lucky so far if we
get the wind at the same time as a fire
all of La is going to burn this is from
a professional firemen who said there's
no way around it you're not going to be
able to stop it if if the fire starts at
the same time as the high wind which is
exactly what happened there is no
defense so if you say to me if only we
had more water we could defend it I say
to you maybe a
little but it probably would have still
taken out most of the area you maybe you
could save some houses but it would have
taken out most of the area so the bigger
problem was it was a known problem that
was not directly
addressed so is it a problem that
forests are not managed it's a big one
maybe not
directly factor in this fire is the
Water Management a problem yes poorly
done
was it
directly uh a problem in this fire yes
if your house burned down because the
fire Hy the fire hydrant didn't work
you're probably going to
say why didn't you count on a fire
that's this big or something like that
but um maybe it couldn't have been
stopped you maybe the firemen and 2024
was exactly right and there just wasn't
anything you could do
um the
mayor Karen bass is it she happened to
be in Ghana for
some some uh government thing that she
thought was interesting and uh uh I'm
not sure that anything is different
because the um the mayor was in a
different country you know may mayor's
travel and even though there's no reason
they should have been doing some
International work I mean she could have
been on vacation
I there are lots of reasons of people
around town I I doubt that her absence
had any impact on the emergency
response but in emergencies you want
your leaders to act capable and you know
have empathy and be on hand and you know
tell you everything they know you know
give you some hope that they could get
this under control so I don't think she
did a good job on
anything but probably didn't have any
make any difference to any house that
burned or didn't
burn
then I've got to spend a a moment on
this that there's a lot of accusations
that this is caused by
Dei
and
um I'm going to make some suggestions
about this so I'm going to talk I'll
talk about Dei after I give the list of
other things that people are saying I I
don't think you can pin it on one person
and say that's a d I higher or even more
than one person but more on that
moment
um so let's see uh there's something
about the Smelt fish smelt is it a Smelt
fish or is just a smelt apparently Trump
calls it an extinct
fish I don't think it's extinct which is
the whole point of trying to preserve it
if it were extinct we wouldn't be
worrying about it but it's funny that he
calls it extinct an extinct
fish um but apparently there was
some there was some movement to provide
more water for uh LA but it didn't work
because it would have been bad for these
rare smelt the Delta
smelt well let me tell you what else
smelt about this
situation everything so I don't know I I
think that smelt fish is going to be one
of those those two movies on one on one
uh screen I think CNN's going to tell
you oh that was a bipartisan thing or
Republicans should have said yes or
there there's going to be another story
to that I don't think it's as clean
as uh we traded smelt for human for
human
beings although in some ways it looks
exactly like that but probably there's a
little extra context on that
one and then the part that is definitely
true is that the insurance policy caps
that California tried to put on
insurance fire insurance policies um
caused a shortage of fire insurance
policies because the the fire insurance
people said um no thanks if we can't
make money we don't want to be in your
state so they pull down so what makes
this particular situation go from tragic
to
how do I say this without being
cancelled all right I'm I'm going to
speak as indirectly as I can and you can
piece it
together if an ordinary tragedy happens
you you get into tragedy mode you're
like trying to help people you're
feeling sad you're feeling impacted
you're basically just feeling terrible
but trying to do what you can if it's
just a
tragedy if it's a tragedy which would
have been had
by your insurance kicking in and at
least paying for what you
lost that would be half as big but it
wouldn't be just a change of you being
half as
mad it's the difference between and
here's where I have to be
careful it's the difference between
people feeling bad and people feeling
homicidal was that indirect enough we're
looking at the government of C
California and I can tell you from
personal
experience my my emotions I'm trying to
keep under control and if you're seeing
a lot of Californians talking in ways
that you think are unusually calm given
the situation like James Woods you saw
him acting completely calm that the
house he loved and just rebuilt and
remodeled was lost and he had no
insurance now he has better resources
maybe than other people but he broke
down on an interview so don't
mistake how strong people are acting
with how they're feeling on the inside
this
feels like we got
raped that's what it feels like it
doesn't feel like a tragedy happened it
feels like we got
raped all of us even if you if even even
if you're not directly affected
do you know what this is going to do to
the possibility of getting Insurance
anywhere in the state this just made the
entire state unlivable they're going to
have to tax the beesus of us to pay for
whatever this costed the the level of
economic destruction I don't even think
you can calculate it it it's bigger than
anything that's ever happened in the
country and so I feel a sense of
Rage that makes me in Revenge homicidal
head instead of recovery from an event
head I want to be I want to be just in
the helpful recovery mode but man when
they give you they give you the double
tap you know one in the chest one in the
head one in the chest was the bad fire
management the one in the head was you
don't have insurance because we changed
the rules in an obvious way in a way
that obviously would make insurance go
away and not be available you do that I
don't think the res uh uh let me say it
in the way
that um I Heard It stated I'm not going
to attribute this but without
attribution I heard yesterday a
Californian who was directly affected
say of one of the leading politicians
who's getting a lot of blame again I
won't be specific and the and the advice
was I wouldn't show yourself in
public now that advice I think was well
intended as a security thing you need to
know that people feel
homicidal they don't feel just hurt this
is not like other things the the level
of incompetence apparently is so extreme
that it doesn't feel like an
accident if feels intentional it wasn't
intentional but it feels like it it
feels like people just raped us because
I didn't give a
so if you think we're going to get
over this I doubt it I doubt it I don't
think we're going to get over this and
you didn't have to be in the fire zone
to not get over it I'm not getting over
this the this is the wakeup call it's
the tap on the shoulder it says you know
all that complaining you did complaining
is
nothing complaining is
nothing at this point pretty serious
action and I hope it's not the homicidal
kind is required and I do believe that
you know people of character are going
to act really differently and some of
them will be sacrificing their personal
fortunes some will be sacrificing their
reputations but the risk reward equation
just changed completely once you realize
you can't live in this state the way it
is then you're going to take a bigger
risk to change it you know if you're
just like ah I don't like it but next
year is going to be a lot like this
year you know you're just going to get
on with your life but now it's an
existential risk just to be managed by
incompetence it's an existential risk of
incompetence now I will remind you as I
was reminded just moments ago before the
show started that it was a while ago
that I warned that
Dei would cause massive institutional
and corporate and government
incompetence and it would be really
really obvious and it could destroy
everything we
love now when people mentioned that on
TV such as the amazing Scott Jennings he
got into that conversation on CNN it
went completely off the rail and it was
a I'm going to call it a rare a rare
communication Mistake by Scott Jennings
um you know when I talk about him
usually it's like oh my God he just he
just explained things so well uh among
this panel of Democrats and you know he
won that day and you know I'll be
forwarding around so in general he he's
the best we
have if you're looking at like who who's
the best Communicator who's not Trump
himself it might be Scott jenx he's
really really impressive but on the Dei
stuff total fail now I think it's easy
to correct and I would expect he will
here's the
correction um and I I posted this I hope
he sees it but accusing people specific
people if what you're doing is is
accusing specific people of being Dei
hires we don't have that kind of
information you know we could tell that
they're in a certain demographic group
but you can't tell that the that's the
problem you can't look at a specific
case and say oh if if Karen bass had
been a white guy everything would be
fine now that
might it might be that she's a Dei hire
and then that's the whole story and the
police chief is Dei hire and and you've
got everything you need it might be but
we don't have that kind of information
so when Scott Jennings brought up the
Dei element He had a couple of black
female panelists who just ate him up and
what they did is they do the thing where
where they say why are you saying that
black women can't do a good job nobody
says that that has nothing that has
absolutely nothing to do with the Dei
conversation the Dei conversation is not
about the capability of one any
particular group it's not a capability
it's a system incentive design
problem that you could replace you could
replace anybody in this equation and you
get the same bad outcome so nobody's
saying that there's something special
about black
women not being able to do stuff I I'm
not aware of anybody who has that
opinion it's more about the system and
let me explain that a little bit
better so the first point is that as
soon as you apply it to any
individual you're on thin ice you don't
have the proof of that unless you worked
with that person every day you probably
don't know if they're doing a good or
bad job you know sometimes there are
other variables that makes stuff
impossible but here's what you can say
you can say number one that leaders
focus on what is easiest to measure that
probably is the number one most
important thing you need to know about
management that managers man to things
that can be tracked why do they do that
because when they get their bonuses and
their Awards and their
raises it's going to be based on what
can be measured what is easier to
measure than diversity
Improvement it's easy uh what are you
I'm a woman got
it what are you I identify as black got
it right easy to count easy to keep
track easy to see how it changed from
what it was to where it is if you give
any manager that situation where it's
easy to know what you know if you did it
right or at least if you hit the goal I
won't say right but you hit the goal
they're going to manage that and they're
going to let other things
lapse because they it won't affect their
pay for example suppose several years
ago the people in charge had decided to
to do a big water management
Improvement how long would it take to
get that approved to get it built to see
if it worked and then even when you
built it you wouldn't know if it worked
you would only know that there weren't
any fires lately you wouldn't know that
it worked so if you got this big
ambiguous but way more important thing
to do the water management is way more
important than other things but it takes
a long time you can't tell what any one
person did to make it happen it's really
hard to get you know to to be held
responsible for that so if you're a
manager you go for what can be measured
easily you focus on it that's where your
pay depends then on top of that the
second thing you need to know is that
every major company is trying to improve
their diversity at the same time and I
would argue even the companies that may
have uh renounced their Dei efforts the
individual managers are still going to
be hiring with a Dei goal you don't need
you don't need a Dei
program because those same managers are
still going to be bragging if they get
more diversity you you could you could
get away with give up the entire
incentive system but if one of the
people says well I you know I
Diversified my department and the other
manager that they're competing against
for the top job says oh I uh I do some
long-term things that are really smart
but how' it turn out well we won't know
because lots of people involved could
take years if it doesn't work it might
not be my fault it could be the
legislation
right
so anyway so if you have every company
trying to do it at the same time even if
it's not part of a organized program
you're going to run out of your target
demographics and here's the important
thing to know you could switch out the
target demographics and replace it with
any other group and it's the same that's
why it's not a racist observation for
example let's say your Dei program was
you had to hire more Irish people or
Irish
Americans and that's
it how's that going to work out you're
going to maximize Irish American now
there are a lot of Irish Americans but
if everybody suddenly said oh God I got
to get get myself an Irish Irish guy you
would run out of Highly qualified Irish
Americans on day
two on day one all the all the Smart
Ones with a good resume have already
been hired we got a we got an Irish guy
yes it's going to look good on my
resume so if you're when Scott Jennings
on CNN allows his panelists to argue you
know that black black women can do any
job nobody's disagreeing with that that
the right qualified person of any
demographic can do pretty much any
job and the and the thing that you have
to understand is you can replace that
Target demographic with
anybody you you could take black women
out of the conversation entirely put
Irish men Irish men same same problem if
you're managing to the number of Irish
men on your staff you're in trouble
you're going to you're going to have
massive incompetence if you fast forward
20 years and here we are we are in a
position of massive massive incompetence
is it the cause of any specific
demographic
group can't tell the only thing you can
know for
sure is that this was a guaranteed
outcome that the design of the incentive
system and the natural limitation of any
demographic group group to have you know
unlimited people in it is all you needed
to know on paper it couldn't have worked
and that's why it's so important to
reverse it and reverse our thinking
about
it
so Scott Jennings I hope you make that
correction the first thing you should
say is it's not about any individual
it's about a system design if you have
incentives that make people do the wrong
thing they'll do the wrong thing and
that's where we
are now some of the worst takes on this
Bernie Sanders weighs in while people
are running for their lives and posts
this 80,000 people told to evacuate I
think it's twice that now since he
posted it 80,000 people told to evacuate
he said blazes 0% contained and so far
I'm thinking oh this is Bernie being
helpful he's he's telling us how bad it
is and then he's going to hit us with
what we should do about it he says eight
months since the area has been has seen
rain
okay that did make it worse the scale
the damage and loss is
unimaginable thank you for you know
recognizing how bad this is and then he
said climate change is real not a
hoax Donald Trump must treat this like
the existential crisis it is meaning
climate
change well you could
imagine how I felt when I read that have
I mentioned that we Californians don't
feel like we went through a tragedy we
feel like we got raped by
you by politicians you know so Burnie
burning you know
indirectly and the fact that California
was focusing on your little Pet Project
the climate change which I believe is
mostly freaking fake because it only
applies to people who think the news
news is real and science is not corrupt
if you think the news is real and
science is not completely corrupted by
money you might believe that this
climate change has been proven by all
the smart people to be a danger now it
might be a danger I often say I don't
know I I don't know how much people are
contributing to it um I I see both sides
I don't think any of them are believable
from my point of view because I can't
tell but I can tell you for sure that if
you think the models are predicting the
future you have not looked into it very
much if you think we can measure the
temperature of the earth over decades
you haven't looked into it and I find
that I can't even have a conversation
with somebody who thinks all of that
climate uh the alarm part is true you
can't even talk to them because they've
been so hypnotized they think the news
is real the news is not real about
anything important
the news could have a correct fact now
and
then but the narrative is never real
narratives are always motivated they're
not they're not real if you believe the
news is even trying to be real you can't
be reached you you have to first
understand that they're not trying to
tell you the truth it's just not it's
not their business
model and if you think that anybody
under any circumstances can take all
these weird hidden variables and
gigantic variables and hard to measure
variables and put them into a
complicated model and tell you the
temperature in 10
years how do I begin to tell you how
impossible that is that's not something
that the smart people figured out that
is a pure hoax the models part now what
I'm not calling the hoax is I don't know
if it's getting warmer I don't know if
people are involved I just know that
nobody else knows I know for sure that
nobody else
knows so but my problem with Bernie is
not that he believes in climate change
and I'm pretty sure that he's wrong uh
at least in terms of the alarm part of
it my part is you need to be able to
read the room a little bit better you
don't talk to rape victims about wearing
a condom you know what I mean you don't
talk to rape victims about wearing a
condom you know maybe maybe you should
had a cond with you no you were just
making it worse so my first reaction was
I was just going to go nuclear and I had
every fbom and like like I was ready to
go and my fingers hit the keyboard and I
said I'm not going to make it
worse because that was just a pure
emotional
reaction um so instead I reposted this I
said Senator Sanders as a California I
respectfully ask for you to delete this
post no California thinks climate change
dried up the fire hydrants and canel
fire
insurance now whether my take is you
know factually correct that that the
fire hydrant were a problem that somehow
was undermanaged or that the canceled
well the canceled fire Insurance um
that's certainly uh a fact
but um and then I told to read The Room
2 million people agreed with me which is
very unusual for a post on X to get 2
million views that means people really
agreed not every person but it means a
lot of people agreed with my take that
he was not reading the room and I would
like to add a few things if the problem
with the LA fire were caused by climate
change the whole world would be on fire
by now right I'm pretty sure that the
climate change is not limited to La we
would see basically everything on fire
if climate changes cause fire if
droughts caused fire everything that's
having a slightly under normal year
which is what La is la is in what I
think they call it a moderate drought
meaning it's barely a drought and it's
not outside of the historical Norm
whatsoever not at
all
um so
anyway um who else was bad then Joe
Biden with his defective brain and
oppressor talked about the fire but
nobody remembers that all they remember
is he had the bad judgment to say quote
the good news is that I became a
Grandpa
wow wow between Sanders and Biden not
being able to read the room do they
understand that California's a blue
state or
was
um let's see according to the New York
Post I think Molly Hemingway flagged
this that uh uh Governor Newsome is
launching his Trump resistance plan this
week so so Nome wants to tell you how
much he's resisting Trump which looks
like the problem not the solution this
week doesn't it cuz now we have we have
on video Trump saying all the right
things about fire prevention in
California you've blocked the
water you you block you're not doing
Forest
management turns out those were the
right answers those were the right
answers of course he's against Dei again
we don't know that that caused this
problem but it's the right you know
overarching theme so Trump was as right
about this situation and on time because
he said it way before it happened he was
right and he was on
time and it looks like California
completely screwed the pooch on in every
Dimension at least it looks that way we
don't know that that's true but let me
talk about the future of California
politics because everything has a
political element to it
um and here's how Trump posted it he
said uh on his one of his posts some
truth I I think he said the governor new
scum as he calls him chose to save the
extinct fish instead of sending water to
Southern California to fight apocalyptic
wildfires now this is another example of
how good Trump is in
messaging to take this big complicated
situation and just turn it into new scum
chosen extinct fish over saving the
lives of
Californians it's an oversimplification
and I don't even know if the fish part
is really a valid I don't even know if
that's a valid claim because if you turn
on CNN they're going to say well but you
know it's Republican's fault too and
blah blah blah I don't know what they
say but but there's more context to it
however as a political messaging thing
the the Brilliance of the summary is
what Trump does better than anybody
nobody does that well he he's the best
ever as summarized
nobody summarizes better than he
does um Adam Cora who apparently is one
of the more famous people being
displaced he looked like he was in a
hotel room and he did a video and he he
was explaining something that you might
not fully understand outside of
California do you know how hard it is to
build something in California all of
these people who think well I'll get my
insurance check or maybe I had some
extra money and I'm going to rebuild so
they're going to go to the sity and say
Here's my plan oh my God they're just
entering hell um I won't go into the
details but let me let me just tell you
this getting a California entity any any
City really to approve a building of
anything is pretty much a nightmare the
the house I'm in right now I you know
had built but I think it
took 18 months just to get
approval something something like that
now these are people who just think well
it should be easy because I'm just going
to build back the house I had you know
with slight
variety it's not going to be easy you
you're going to spend a year not getting
the permit and then good luck finding a
contractor because everybody in your
whole city is trying to hire the
contractor who knows how to build stuff
you're not going to have a contractor
you're not going to be able to get
insurance you're not going to be able to
pay for it with the insurance you don't
have you're not going to be able to get
a
permit I don't
believe the the country and maybe even
Californians have absorbed how bad this
is you're seeing something closer to the
beginning of the problem than the end as
bad as it was and we don't I don't think
we can fully appreciate the economic
disruption to the state who's going to
pay for the recovery I don't think the
federal government is going to pay for
it all is this raise my California taxes
again from the highest taxes to the
highest taxes on
Turbo how are we going to survive it how
are we going to fix the things that need
to get fixed we're we're already paying
the highest taxes and it feels like the
lowest level of service in
return so now if you think we're just
going to rebuild you don't know
California that might be just empty
land for the rest of my life like I I
don't know that it's I just don't see a
path where that quickly gets
fixed I don't know
um here's what I think I think this has
been such a black eye for the management
of the state that for the first time
recently I can say it's possible to have
a republican Governor now it would take
a special character it would take a
Reagan type character who was a rep
rep and I don't know anybody in the
state who would fit that you know
reaganesque
um thing um and would also have
experience managing something because
you you don't want somebody who's never
managed anything because the state is
you know as much management as politics
so it's not exactly like other jobs you
need to manage so we need a you know
disantis type of Governor so if somebody
like D santis became available to run
for
governor it's the best time now other
people are going to say Scott Scott
Scott I think you don't realize that the
the The Blue Team um has California all
wrapped up and no no nobody but a
Democrat could win and it's not just
because of the voters it's because the
Democrat machine controls too much and
they can rig any vote to go the way they
want because they just control too much
now that might be true
however I think that uh the opening is
now if it's ever going to happen uh I
saw some people suggest this that maybe
a smart independent like Nicole Shanahan
would be a possibility now I like
everything about Nicole Shanahan but I
don't know that she has exactly the
right background for managing because
whoever takes his job has to like dig
into you know the whole water thing the
forest thing yeah it's it's really a
management thing
so as a high quality and as much as I
would trust Nicole shanan I like
everything about her basically um I
don't know if she has the exact
background that that fits this
slot um but maybe somebody will
emerge and then as people have noted the
legislature would probably still stay
blue and so even the governor couldn't
get anything
done
um so I saw some related to this I saw
Bill Mah video and he was talking to
Stephen A Smith and Mar said this that
really caught my attention he said quote
I've been out with every type of
celebrity you know meaning just having
fun and he says they don't say the
things they say to me to other
celebrities there it
is now you probably said to yourself
Scott you can't get a republican
Governor because the state is Phil Phil
so many Democrat voters you're you're
never going to get over the hump I don't
think they're
Democrats I think they're literally
pretending to be Democrats I think that
the I think that every one of these
people who may have been seeming like
political enemies are now seeing that
the thing we need to you know get
together on is common sense stuff I
don't believe there's Democrat who
wanted less Forest management well
there's some crazy ones who you know
want to preserve everything natural but
not
really I don't think there's any
Democrats who say I'm sure glad we
didn't have enough
water right I don't think there are any
Democrats who said uh sure is a good
thing there were not enough escape routs
from a place that is an obvious fire
risk these are all so clearly and
cleanly Common Sense issues that I don't
think anybody's going to give a
about the smelt
going
forward try try to try stopping us from
fixing the state because of a
smelt yeah
because I don't think that works anymore
so of course I'm speaking for my own
little bubble because you know I'm very
influenced by how I personally feel
about this which is some intense
feelings uh in many
directions I'm pretty sure that this is
the wakeup call that tells everybody in
the South you know the the Republicans
don't hate you you get that right we
really I'm going to say we because I
caucus with the Republicans even though
I'm uh I'm a Democrat by um
registration um I
think I think maybe it will be a little
better understood that Trump was on
California's side and whatever the
Democrats running things were
doing may have been for their own
benefit or may have been just pure
incompetence we don't know what it was
but we know that Trump had exactly the
right solution in exactly the right time
early and we know that the Democrats
failed just in performance the exact
reasons hard to know but they certainly
failed
um Hunter Biden's rental burned up and I
I think the M the thing that bothered me
the most about that was that it was a
rental like it's it's bad enough if
you're the landlord for Hunter
Biden CU remember uh we heard the story
that he had rented someplace and didn't
pay in the past a different place but he
had been renting a place and didn't pay
the rent and then he used the Secret
Service to keep the landlord from
getting to him to ask for the rent that
is like the most effed up thing you're
going to hear he didn't pay the
rent and he used his secret service
protection to make sure that nobody
would come bug him to get the
rent that actually happened was it Shan
Maguire I think was the landlord there
uh so he's I don't think he's in that
house anymore but uh I just feel sorry
doubly sorry for the whoever owned it
because they lost their house that was
rental but also they had Hunter Biden as
as a resident I mean I don't know if you
could even cleaned it after that Christy
tan and John Legend and their kids are
in a hotel Henry winklers said some
angry drunk looking things he's he's
affected
um I have mixed feelings talking about
the celebrities
involved on one hand I don't think this
is a story about celebrities and so it's
just gross and icky that they're even
part of the story like why do we care
about them more does it matter more to
you that Henry Winkler is safe than
Henry Winkler's not famous
neighbor I mean there so there's
something creepy about it but at the
same time the politics of it is that
these are the some of them are some of
them are conservative but number of
other ones are outspoken Democrats and I
would love to know how Chrissy Teegan
and John Legend feel about their
team after losing their house to their
team do does that change how you
feel what else could I mean is see if
you're going to change somebody's mind
having a debate with them H maybe
usually not having really good
points yeah might work but probably not
really being good at persuasion it might
help but probably not people are pretty
set in their ways you burn down
somebody's
house you have their
attention everybody who lost the house
is now open to a better argument a lot
of Minds open up
so I think I think uh California is in
play anyway in related but other news
because we can't spend all our time
talking about this it's just it's just
too hard um Trump is as other people
have noted flooding the zone so he's
completely controlling the news uh even
the fire which you would think you know
is not directly a trump topic he's still
the top of the news because he said the
right things and did the right things
and it stands in contrast to what
happened so not only that but apparently
he's uh there's a report from Steph
Knight I think she's a
axios um saying that uh there's some
knowledge that Trump plans to flood the
Zone with a 100 executive
orders uh like his first day or first
week or something
now so we've got Trump talking about you
know Greenland Panama Canada he's
talking about the fire um he might have
a hundred executive orders every day
three new
things this is the only way to defeat
the fake
news and you know he's always done this
thing where he he keeps the Overton
window so to speak keeps the action
going and it keeps the attention on
him but I think I just realized the
other hidden benefit of
this you know as we've often said
Republicans can be right and they can be
wrong they can have wrong
facts um and often do they might believe
in some conspiracy theories that don't
prove out but that's normal sort of
normal human
beings on the Democrat side there's an
organized hoax creation you know machine
for the Democrats they'll create a hoax
about the other side and then they'll
use their news their media and their
Talking Heads to say the same things
over and over
again right how many times have you seen
that well he's a he's a convicted felon
you know that's just the talking point
and if they say convicted felon a
million times it's going to stick in
your head because repetition is the
number one tool of
persuasion and even more importantly
it's the number one tool of
brainwashing brainwashing requires you
to hear the same exact message over and
over and over and over again until your
brain just uncritically says well it
must be true I keep hearing it which
doesn't make sense but your brain will
process it that way so what Trump has
done is he's removed from the fake news
the ability to repeat any of their
messages often enough for them to stick
because they start going on with he
wants to send the military into
Greenland and then they repeat that L we
got them we got them because nobody's
going to be in favor of you know sending
the military in although some are so
they repeat that and then the next thing
you know he's talking about Panama and
then they're like all right what are we
saying about Panama uh Panama uh wait
he's talking about Canada now what what
do we say about Canada wait what did he
say about the smelt
wait new scum he's calling him new scum
100 executive
orders they can't repeat often enough he
took away from them their number one
persuasion trick
repetition now is this
intentional do you think that he
intentionally said if I just take away
all of their oxygen they'll never be
able to repeat anything enough to
stick the answer is
yes yes this is absolutely intentional
now that doesn't mean it's only Trump
who knows this he's working with Steven
Miller and you know a bunch of brilliant
people right the brilliant people can
see this clear as they so yes it's not
an accident they going to have a 100
executive orders and he's talking about
things that make your hair just catch on
fire like you can't and also everything
that Trump says is too interesting to
ignore it doesn't matter what he says
it's always too interesting to ignore
he's what Greenland
what so yes is intentional yes is
brilliant in a way that we don't even
deserve like we don't even deserve that
level of capability and and when he
shows you the competence level that he
brings just a message
the competence level that he brought to
his
campaign the competence level in which
he's taking things that people said are
ridiculous things to do such as you know
using the old Twitter or now posting
things that are like geopolitical you
know hugely important things he makes
that work when you watch somebody who is
just an extreme example of competence
with his team right he doesn't do
everything alone but
I think people are going to notice
competence is hard to ignore if you just
keep at it and he
is well in other news if there's any
good news at all the employment for this
coming year looks like a little better
than people expected that hasn't
happened yet but the thinking is that um
in surveys big companies are showing
much more optimism and more um more uh
let's say prediction that they'll do
serious hiring apparently the reason
there was less hiring than there might
have been is that big companies said oh
we better wait to see if AI is going to
take all the jobs and now they've waited
and like my example where I started the
show where I said I tried to get AI to
do any simple thing just look at a
document and summarize it and just
because it was multiple Pages it just
couldn't do it so I think that probably
the companies have now wised up that
what they thought was going to be this
instant replacement of employees with
machines it might still happen but not
in
2025 so in 2025 they're like uh we're
going to need human bodies because we
can tell them to look at the whole
contract not just four pages and
quit so it could be that at least in the
short run a little little bump and
Improvement in
employment um I just this is just an as
side because I'm amused by it
but do you remember Aaron
rupar uh he's the reason that I came up
with the phrase a rupar for a
description of a video that's been
edited to change his meaning because he
did a number of those and it looked like
he knew he was doing it you couldn't
tell because you can't read his mind but
it looked like I feel like he knows he
took that out of context and uh then I
saw he he made some claim uh I think it
was yesterday it doesn't matter what the
claim was but the Community note to it
uh just noted that he's a well-known
liar so the actual Community note wasn't
just that he was saying something that
wasn't true it's said he was a well he
was a well-known famous liar who does it
for
clicks now I'm paraphrasing but it said
basically that uh now as soon as I
refreshed it the community note changed
to something less less attacking of his
character but for
moment the community notes has settled
on yeah he's just a famous liar so you
shouldn't pay attention to
him if if I contributed even
1% by making people understand that a
rupar is literally a you know a fake
post or edit if I contributed even 1% to
that I'm
proud all
right
um I love I love the fake news talking
about the uh the use of force to
overtake Greenland so I guess the
Pentagon was asked if there was any kind
of plan to invade Greenland but what's
funny is that the whoever was talking
some kind of Pentagon spokesperson uh
said that they didn't know of any
plan it was short of a
no so instead of saying no there's no
plan to use the military uh or or even a
plan to what would look like if he used
the military instead the spokesperson
said I'm not aware of
one would the spokesperson be aware of
the secret attack
plans I feel like you wouldn't tell the
spokesperson because if you told them
they could accidentally tip somebody off
so the spokesperson never knows the
secret attack plans do they because if
they do that feels like a mistake to me
but anyway well the only thing I want to
add to this is that why would the
Pentagon need a
plan the entire country is 56,000 people
mostly in one
place uh and they seem to be fairly pro-
Maga pro-american and if it were up to
them and not Denmark who owns them if it
were just up to the people in
Greenland it's kind of looking like they
might be okay with this idea but I think
it's funny that anybody would ask the
Pentagon if they have a if they have a
conquest plan for Greenland when all
they really needed was Don Jr and
Charlie Kirk to fly over there and take
some selfies now to be fair Don Jr and
Charlie Kirk taking selfies with the
locals is not enough to conquer a
country it's not enough they might have
to go back two or three more times and
take more selfies that should be enough
I think three to four trips of Don J and
Charlie Kirk taking
selfies the whole island surrenders then
we just have to you know work on a deal
with Denmark so no no military needed
just Don and
Charlie all right uh Senator Rick Scott
has introduced a uh some legislation to
stop the changing of the clocks twice a
year I keep wanting to have an opinion
on that but I don't and I'm going to
admit why because I don't know what
change they're talking
about it's too hard for me to figure out
the
whole hour hour backwards hour forwards
but if they standardize it which one are
they standardizing on because I never
know which one is which one's the base
case I don't know and and I also don't
know if I'd like it since I've never
experienced it you know the the
different amount of light at a different
time of day I've never experienced it so
how would I even have an opinion on that
maybe I'd like it a little bit more in
the morning but dislike it at more at
night but what's the net know so if it's
expensive and I know it cuts down on a
productivity when the time
changes I I don't see a reason to change
the time so I'm in favor of changing it
but I don't have any idea what that
looks like like in my actual life so but
just in terms of economics it makes
sense um Britain is threatened to cut
ties security ties with the US unless uh
Trump stops working with Elon Musk
according to the National pulse William
Upton to which I
say Great Britain is threatening to cut
ties with
us
okay the uh can you remind me uh
what are all the military advantages
we're getting from protecting
them what trade you know what products
are you getting from England from their
manufacturing
base how much do we need
England or the UK or Great Britain how
much do we need them I don't know sounds
like a pretty bad threat bad threat to
me and I don't think there's any chance
they're going to cut
ties Biden is considering according to
the post millennial Hayden Cunningham is
writing that Biden's thinking about
preemptive pardons for Liz Cheney and
Anthony
fouchi so Liz Chene for the corrupt um
Insurrection so-called Insurrection
committee
um do you have a problem with
that yeah this one's an interesting one
because I think I don't know if any
charges would ever be brought up because
there's a lot of bad behavior that I
don't know if it's criminal it's just
really really bad and unethical Behavior
so if they get a preemptive pardon we
don't have to watch the trial and talk
about it but also it would label them
forever as
felons because who gets a preemptive
pardon I would like to ask the following
question in the history of
Pardons how many times as a completely
innocent person got a preemptive
pardon is there even one time that's
ever happened where somebody who was
legitimately innocent got a preemptive
pardon can you think of any time that's
ever happened no you give a preemptive
pardon to somebody you know is damn
guilty so now they to be fair they might
be more worried about some illegitimate
lawfare being used against them and if
that's the only thing they're thinking
well
you know if they if they if you think
there was no real
crime maybe but the way we're going to
read it is that they've just they just
they just declared themselves guilty if
they accept a preemptive pardon for
something they didn't
do I'm not going to believe they didn't
do it I'm just going to believe oh you
know you're dirty you lucky you lucky
guy and lucky
woman um
all right the Mexican
president what's her name Claudia Shin
bomb I will never get tired of saying
this the Mexican president Claudia Shin
Bal I'm going to say it another time
because it's funny so the Mexican
president Claudia Shin balb the Jewish
woman I just love that that she you know
uh I have to give Mexico credit
because you think of Mexico as you know
they're going to be kind of a
patriarchy you presume if it's if most
of the residents are Mexican they're
going to vote for you know somebody
who's as Mexican as possible uh but they
elected they elected Claudia shine bomb
and I give them credit for that if she
does a good
job good work um anyway so she's
responding to Trump saying that he wants
the gulf to be called the Gulf of
America instead of the Gulf of Mexico go
and she's shooting back and she says the
US the US should be called America
Mexicana uh let's see how long it takes
me to forget her
framing one two
three wait what did she say what did she
call
it do you see how special Trump
is Trump says extinct fish once and I'll
remember it for the rest of my
life the Mexican president as capable as
she probably is I imagine she's very
good in
general to get where she got but she
tries to match him he's like ah how
about I got it I'm G to Zing you how
about we call it America
Mexicana why isn't everybody clapping
clap please
the the difference in Persuasion and
communication skill is just so
striking like you don't realize how good
Trump is at the what I'll call the
little stuff you know just the ordinary
communication you don't realize how good
he is until you see somebody else try it
and then and they just do a total face
plant I had to read it again America
Mexicana no that's not a good try
well Russia's introducing these uh land
robot tank things it looks like a little
miniature tank and it could have wheels
or tracks but it's got loaded with all
kinds of weapons and they're going to
make a bunch of them they say and send
them at
Ukraine um here's my question can Russia
manufacture now I know they have
manufacturing and I know they make
weapons and this is a weapon but
if they if their uh outcome of the war
depends on making a lot of these robots
that they've never made before how good
are they going to be now it could be
that you know even if Russia is not a
massively good uh Manufacturing Company
it could be that they put their best
people in the military stuff which would
make sense and uh maybe this is maybe
it's good work and maybe they're they
can crank them out like crazy but the
thing I'd be looking for
is whether they can
manufacture well enough to put working
models in the field that make a
difference now the other thing is that
even the ground robots like these the
ones on wheels or running dogs or
whatever they will soon be programmed to
swarm just like the drones in the air so
if you if you organize the drones so
that they operate as one and they swarm
there's almost no defense but likewise
if you were in you know if you were on
the front line and you're a human being
and you get swarmed by these robots
you're going to be in a lot of trouble
the robots on the ground
because it probably takes a little bit
of planning and work and strange
execution to even take out one of them
if six of them are bearing down on
you you you got to run and it will run
faster than you so it's going to get
real interesting thing in Ukraine I I
would look to see if they can
manufacture well and
quickly well I'm going to do something
that you don't like uh I'm going to
defend uh U
khaw so Dan
kensaw uh is often reported for having
very high relative to other people uh
really good gains on his stock picks so
there's another story today mentioning
that he's a top five investor among
Congress you're like H top five did he
do that because of Insider information
and the implication is that it's because
he has Insider information so that he
and other members who trade are just
beaten people because they're inside
information and it was poting out that
he had a high percentage
gain so if you look at his gain I think
it was over 40% for the year or
something that that would put him in the
top five now now what do I teach you
about spotting fake news if you know the
percentage of gain he made but they
don't tell you the dollar amount is it
real news or fake news the answer is
it's fake news if they told you both the
percentage and the dollar amount it
might be real if they told you only the
dollar amount without the percentage
that would be fake and if they told you
the percentage without the dollar amount
which is what they did that's fake so
the first thing you need to know is that
you got abused when you read the story
you got abused somebody's trying to pull
one over on you turns out his portfolio
is not very big he's not a rich guy and
he said directly that one of the few
ways that he can get ahead and still
afford to be in Congress because it
doesn't pay that much relative to the
cost of being there that uh he
absolutely needs to you know augment his
income and he does it by trading now how
did you how did you rule out the
possibilities at it he told you he needs
it he told you he focuses on it that's
different than most of the people in
Congress most of the people in Congress
don't need it a lot of them are rich I
don't know what percentage but a lot of
them are rich and some of them are not
concentrating on it you know they're
concentrating on other things he's
concentrating on it if you knew his
educational background it's really good
do you know how much like formal
education he's had Plus the
military I don't think people understand
how academically trained he is so you
got somebody who's got higher academic
training than most of Congress unlike
Congress he's really paying attention
which means he's learning how to do it
right and there's very little dollar
amount so if some so if he had one good
pick he he would had that gain how do
you know that the reason he's he's up is
some kind of secret ins
information what if and this is not in
the story this should be in the story
what if he bought stock in
Nvidia do you know who bought stock in
Nvidia I
did and and a lot of my followers did
because I mentioned it you know as sort
of once ever you know kind of a unique
situation so most of my most of my
followers probably had the same return
he did cuz if the only thing you did was
buy the one most obvious stock
Nvidia you would you would beat all the
other members of Congress is that what
happened if he had just bought
Tesla he would have beat most of the
members of Congress if he had just
invested in you know one of the uh
Atomic stocks that I mentioned that I'm
not going to mention today he would have
beat everybody it only took one just one
one good stock in his whole port
portfolio is up 40% so if you see a
story that says he did better than the
other people in Congress and therefore
the implication is that he broke some
law or did something not he wouldn't
break a law because it's legal for them
to use to be inside of Traitor that if
you believe that it was like some secret
unethical thing he did to get those
gains there's no evidence of that in the
story there's no evidence of it in the
story now if there is evidence of any
bad behavior or you know it wouldn't be
illegal so I guess it wouldn't even be
necessarily unethical but you wouldn't
like it you're G you're going to have to
give me a lot more than he did a good
job because if you're complaint about
the guy is he's good at
investing that just pisses me off that
just pisses me off because that's
punishing somebody for
competence and that might be the only
anything that's happening now again let
me be very clear I don't know if there's
any you know valid insider trading that
that helped his returns I don't know but
what I do know is you don't know you
don't know so if you're going to go from
he's a good investor to he did something
sketchy that you hate that's a leap I
can't support and it pisses me off when
somebody does a good job and there's no
evidence that he did it
unethically that we we crit criticize
him for
competence and for making it affordable
to do the job of the
people now before you give me a hard
time because I know you want to you're
going to say but but Scott what about
those other unrelated things that we
don't like about his
policies fine I'm not arguing
that if you don't think he's doing the
job you
want I'm not even in that conversation I
I don't know enough frankly about him
but um my my and I'll also tell you just
for full disclosure that uh I have had
conversations with him because I did his
podcast a while ago so I've interacted
with him at least on you know a zoom
kind of a way and he's a really nice
guy I don't know if you know that but
he's a really nice guy and so I'm
influenced by that and then I see him
being attacked for something that if
there's any basis to this nobody's
nobody's revealing it so let's let's
uh let's calm down on that you're
certainly makes sense to go after him
for the other stuff but let let me sum
that up with a little bit of a
context um sometimes you wonder what's
it like to be a public figure such as
Dan kensaw and such as me what's it like
to be a public
figure well like like Dan crenchaw one
thing I have in common with him is that
I've had several scandals in my career
some of them you haven't heard of or you
forgot about because they're so long one
of the things that all of my scandals
have in common is that none of them have
actually
happened none of them happened for
example uh let's say uh I'm being
criticized for being an H1B
supporter so that's that's late
that didn't happen not once no I have
said we need to bring in you know only
the best people who make sense but the
H1B process apparently doesn't do that
so I've never said it does that I've
never said I was in favor of it and it's
the biggest thing I'm being criticized
for let's see I'm also being criticized
for recommending that people get
vaccinated during the pandemic which
never happened and I
forcefully always said the opposite very
frequently probably said it over and
over again I'm not your doctor I'm not
telling you to get it I'm not telling
you not to get it it's a personal
decision opposite literally the opposite
of what I'm blamed for do you remember
um some of you might remember the thing
that first derailed my career this was
years ago where I had an argument where
I predicted that Evolution the theory of
evolution would would be debunked in my
lifetime and that it would de be
debunked not
necessarily in in a let's say in classic
ways but it would be debunked because we
would understand the nature of reality
so differently that Evolution would stop
making sense and that happened that's
called the simulation now you could
argue that the simulation is not real
but the argument is it's a trillion to
one likely that it is and if we're a
simulation then the past is actually
created on
demand now I could be right about that
right I could be right about that or I
could be wrong about that and I don't
know but what I will tell you is that
100% of the push back to my
opinion was based on stuff I didn't say
so again this this major thing I
probably lost I bet I lost 30% of the
dilber fans
over this something I was right about at
least in terms of knowing that some some
rethinking of reality would cause us to
rethink Evolution that was one hell of a
good prediction I mean that was a crazy
good prediction like
Beyond if it's right and I think it
is um then does anybody remember this
will be a good test how many of you
remember the sock
puppet um see Scandal about me the
accusation was that I I sock puppeted
which is a very specific act do you
anybody remember that which never
happened it never happened now did I go
online with a uh fake identity and have
what I thought was a hilarious
conversation with somebody who wanted to
argue about the intelligence of Scott
Adams yes I
did why did I do it
I was just debunking some hoaxes that
were told about me one of the hoaxes was
that I was a holocaust denier do you see
the pattern yet I'm not a holocaust
Den but the public had decided I was you
see the pattern right 100% of all of my
scandals never happened none of them not
a single one so when I look at and let
me give you some others I'm also called
a uh climate denier like I did I science
that's not
happening that's not real um and then
what about my
cancellation my cancellation happened
almost entirely for political reasons
because there's not a single Republican
who's canceled me and and 100% of the
people who have heard me explain the
situation in detail because you know the
drama never gets you the detail 100%
have not disagreed with my Point nobody
there are people who didn't understand
the point and there are people who said
it made me mad which I acknowledge and
there are people who said you shouldn't
have said it that's their opinion but
what they think I did and said didn't
happen I was complaining Against
Racism and I was accused of being a
racist no I'm complaining about
racists I'm anti-racist the entire rant
was Against
Racism and I got accused of being racist
now so here's the context so you look at
Dan khaw and you see this about
his investing do you think that's real
you just you just heard my resume all of
the all of the claims against me are
fake we add a context to the point that
they're
reversed so I don't know the truth about
the Dan crena investment stuff but if
but with what I know if I had to place a
bet especially knowing that people have
been watching his Investments really
closely because this is you know it's
sort of an evergreen thing that they say
about him you don't have one example you
can't give us one example of a company
that he had special knowledge about and
that's the reason he made money because
if you've got even one example you
better lead with that how about he made
this investment with Insider information
on this company and here's the name of
the company and that caused him to have
a 40% gain you tell me that and you have
my attention then I'm going to say oh
still legal completely legal but I'd say
you maybe we should look at change in
that
law so just put it in context most
stories like this one you know the the
investment one they'll they don't play
out they're they're fake
so again I'm not defending Dan CAW for
any other opinions they might be
excellent they might not be
but that's not my topic today thank you
for watching ladies and gentlemen uh you
continue to be the thing that keeps me
alive because I love connecting with all
of you in real time all right I'm going
to say hi to the locals people and
everybody else uh have a terrific day as
best you can unless you're in Southern
California and then we'll see what we
can do for you and locals I'm coming at
you privately in 30
second
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e e