Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive May 24, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #2715 Segments
NewsReaction AI & Technology

Back to episode — Episode 2715 CWSA 01/09/25

Context —

why would the Pentagon need a plan? The entire country is 56,000 people, mostly in one place, and they seem to be fairly pro-MAGA, pro-American. And if it were up to them and not Denmark who owns them, if it were just up to the people in Greenland, it's kind of looking like they might be okay with this idea. But I think it's funny that anybody would ask the Pentagon if they have a conquest plan fo…

← Previous segment →

ow. And I also don't know if I'd like it since I've never experienced it. You know, the different amount of light at a different time of day. I've never experienced it. So how would I even have an opinion on that? Maybe I'd like it a little bit more in the morning but dislike it more at night. But what's the net? No. So if it's expensive, and I know it cuts down on productivity when the time changes, I don't see a reason to change the time. So I'm in favor of changing it, but I don't have any idea what that looks like like in my actual life. So but just in terms of economics, it makes sense.

Britain is threatening to cut ties, security ties with the US unless Trump stops working with Elon Musk, according to the National Pulse, William Upton. To which I say Great Britain is threatening to cut ties with us? Okay. Can you remind me what are all the military advantages we're getting from protecting them? What trade? You know, what products are you getting from England from their manufacturing base? How much do we need England or the UK or Great Britain? How much do we need them? I don't know. Sounds like a pretty bad threat. Bad threat to me. And I don't think there's any chance they're going to cut ties.

Biden is considering, according to the Post Millennial, Hayden Cunningham is writing that Biden's thinking about preemptive pardons for Liz Cheney and Anthony Fauci. So Liz Cheney for the corrupt so-called insurrection committee. Do you have a problem with that? Yeah, this one's an interesting one because I think I don't know if any charges would ever be brought up because t

Context —

here's a lot of bad behavior that I don't know if it's criminal. It's just really, really bad and unethical behavior. So if they get a preemptive pardon, we don't have to watch the trial and talk about it. But also it would label them forever as felons because who gets a preemptive pardon? I would like to ask the following question. In the history of pardons, how many times has a completely innoce…

Next segment → →