Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive May 24, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #2763 Segments
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

Back to episode — Episode 2763 CWSA 02/27/25

Context —

ht be true. It might be hyperbole. It might be wishful thinking. We don't know yet. But I don't think Trump knows either. But we don't know what DOGE will look like a year from now. But that little bit of clarity of when they think they can get it done, that changes everything for me. It really does. It just reframes it as, oh, this is the preparation year where we learn everything about how every…

← Previous segment →

o successful in turning the other panelists into clowns that it looks like there's a lion sitting at the table and CNN is like, I got you new sheep. Delicious. And then we watch him just chow down on the new sheep.

So the latest one, I think they got the new stupidest one they've ever had on the panel. So the new stupid guy is warning you, just wait until Trump steals our democracy. Now I'm paraphrasing, but they literally are relying on the fact that he hasn't done anything yet. Because Scott Jennings says, what would be an example of him stealing your democracy? And they don't have anything. But the best that the new stupid guy, the new sheep, said was he's going to steal it in the future. In the future you'll feel dumb after he steals our democracy. And then Scott Jennings slays him and eats him in front of the camera. I'm starting to wonder if it's intentional. It makes me wonder if the producers say to themselves, all right, we seem to get a lot of crossover viewers who are just watching only to watch Scott Jennings slay the sheep. And so maybe they're thinking they don't want somebody who might be a fair fight, you know, somebody who could actually make a good argument. You know, one of the good lawyers, for example. They have a million lawyers, right? I would say that probably 100% of the guests that CNN could have on who have degrees or experience, let's say as lawyers, would not look like any of the sheep the

Context —

y're putting on. The people that they're putting on just don't even know how to put a coherent argument together. So even if you allow that it's a difference of political opinion, the lawyers do a pretty good job in defending themselves because they're experts. But they're just putting on people who don't have any skill and just letting Jennings slaughter them. So maybe it's intentional. It would…

Next segment → →