Episode 2763 CWSA 02/27/25
Trump and Musk and Ukraine and the Epstein files ane more fun ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure
The stock market isn't too happy today. Big surprise. I always expected it would have to pull back a little bit. Surprising nobody. Well, let's get ready for a show. Let me get my comments working. Come on, baby. All right, everything's working this morning, including me. I need my first jolt thoug…
View segment →you can take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny human brains, all you need for that is a cup, mug, or a glass, or a tankard, or a chalice, or a canteen, or a thermos, or a flask, or a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And…
View segment →—just look at my profile and subscribe—or you can get it on Locals, you would know that Dilbert's CEO is trying to do a DOGE project on his own company, trying to reduce expenses, and he's trying to do it with a scalpel, not a chainsaw. Now, not a real scalpel, but you know, figuratively. It's not w…
View segment →heap. Okay, well, Tesla was granted a patent on some of the self-driving car technology. But what the patent spotters spotted is that it's kind of a broad patent, which means that other self-driving cars seem like they would likely violate the patent. So here's just sort of generally what the paten…
View segment →right kind of patent for negotiating, versus maybe you want to keep it as a moat. It's very interesting just knowing that this exists and that the patent was granted. Well, you're all excited about Epstein Island reveal day, right? Has it happened yet? Do we have a timing yet for when the Epstein f…
View segment →thing and just thought, okay, you know, I'll take some of the offers, but I won't do this one. You know, I'm not going to be in a room alone with somebody underage, for example. So I expect nothing. So my prediction is nothing. We'll see. Meanwhile, Rubio cut over $60 billion in waste from the Stat…
View segment →ht be true. It might be hyperbole. It might be wishful thinking. We don't know yet. But I don't think Trump knows either. But we don't know what DOGE will look like a year from now. But that little bit of clarity of when they think they can get it done, that changes everything for me. It really does…
View segment →o successful in turning the other panelists into clowns that it looks like there's a lion sitting at the table and CNN is like, I got you new sheep. Delicious. And then we watch him just chow down on the new sheep. So the latest one, I think they got the new stupidest one they've ever had on the pa…
View segment →y're putting on. The people that they're putting on just don't even know how to put a coherent argument together. So even if you allow that it's a difference of political opinion, the lawyers do a pretty good job in defending themselves because they're experts. But they're just putting on people who…
View segment →best in the business, and doesn't have any of that nervous energy. Or when he does, he makes it work. So it's possible that Newsom is just new and he'll figure it out. But wow, hard to watch at the moment. All right. Agricultural Secretary Brooke Rollins has a billion-dollar plan to lower egg price…
View segment →m. So now introducing a new cast of characters, and I think the Trump administration is the best ever. Maybe that's all it takes. Maybe you just needed smarter people. But we'll find out. Anyway, you probably all saw video from the big, well-attended and publicized cabinet meeting that Trump had. H…
View segment →edible group of people. I don't think that such a talented team has actually ever been assembled. I think it's literally the best cabinet the country has ever had. And I think the country should be incredibly appreciative of the people in this room. Now I agree with that 100%. I've never seen a mor…
View segment →out what the cause of it is, but it's a really big thing. And what it is is there are a whole bunch of individual or independent superstars who have just entered the fight—not right away, some over time—but really special analysts and voices. The Libs of TikTok started out as just mocking weird lib…
View segment →o my posts, just mine, several times this year. I don't know the exact number but let's say a handful of times just since the beginning of the year. And other people as well. And so he becomes the person who gets to say, I think 30 million more people should see this idea or this person. And it's in…
View segment →ere's my favorite story. I like to have at least one story that I can really sink my teeth in. And here's an example that clarifies my last point. I'm going to give you a spin on something. Oh, we used to use that word, right? A spin. I'm going to call it a reframe. I'm going to reframe something. A…
View segment →total message for weeks and weeks and weeks? Right? Right. Now here's the fun part. This is where the Dilbert filter comes in. They're doing massive reorganization and cost cutting at MSNBC at the same time they're DOGEing themselves, at the same time they're criticizing Elon Musk's DOGE. Now here'…
View segment →uffington Post and Reuters and some foreign press from the cabinet meeting. Now imagine working for the Huffington Post and your organization has spent 10 years just absolutely defecating on every Republican that has ever lived and especially on Trump. And then they would be insulted that they're re…
View segment →d of instinct to connect everything that doesn't need to be connected. And so somehow he's trying to put together the price of eggs with the democracy being stolen around. And as Scott Jennings proved on the CNN panel, they don't really have examples of anybody losing their democracy. So the democra…
View segment →s and Representative Kat Cammack, they're introducing a bill to defund NPR because it's a liberal propaganda network, they say. Now I don't know if that means NPR would go out of business or where they just have less funding, but I don't care about the NPR part of the story. Maybe it'll work, maybe…
View segment →onable amount of time in my opinion. And even Van Jones, who had worked on that process of allowing people to get out of jail earlier, he was praising Trump for picking Alice Marie Johnson as the pardon czar. Now I appreciate that. Now again I'm not telling you that Van Jones turned Republican or th…
View segment →'s the only thing they have to bargain with or keep an attack away. So I do think there's a really good chance that at some point Israel will bury everything that they have with giant bombs. So we'll see how that works out. I've got a feeling that Netanyahu is enjoying winning and he's never going…
View segment →l had not done everything that it's done so far, which is pretty darn impressive if you're just looking from a military perspective, you can make up your own mind about who's right and who's wrong in this and I don't even have an opinion. My opinion on the whole situation is that in the Middle East…
View segment →at go with that because I think a lot of the money that we give to Israel for military stuff is really money that they have to spend on our own military industrial complex. So maybe that's more of a US problem, you know, something we need to work out on our end whether that still makes sense for us…
View segment →The stock market isn't too happy today. Big surprise. I always expected it would have to pull back a little bit. Surprising nobody.
Well, let's get ready for a show. Let me get my comments working. Come on, baby. All right, everything's working this morning, including me. I need my first jolt though. Oh, there we go. That's good.
Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and you've never had a better time. But if you'd like to see if you can take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny human brains, all you need for that is a cup, mug, or a glass, or a tankard, or a chalice, or a canteen, or a thermos, or a flask, or a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine at the end of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.
Go. Exquisite.
Let me see if I can fix my glare. Glare a little bit. Worse. Worse. Better. All right, glare fixed.
Well, if you're subscribing to the Dilbert comic, which continues every day, and you can get it on the X platform—just look at my profile and subscribe—or you can get it on Locals, you would know that Dilbert's CEO is trying to do a DOGE project on his own company, trying to reduce expenses, and he's trying to do it with a scalpel, not a chainsaw. Now, not a real scalpel, but you know, figuratively. It's not working out. Yeah, it's not working out that well. But you'd have to subscribe to know what went wrong.
Now here's some news that is a really big deal to me. It won't mean anything to the rest of you. The rest of you won't care about this a bit. But this is transformative to my actual daily experience. So Amazon is finally coming up with an AI version of its digital assistant, whose name I will not say so I don't activate yours at home, but Alexa. And as you know, I've been hooked on that product for a long time. I have one in most of my rooms that matter, including this one. And so my daily life involves walking around, and then when I have a question I just say it out loud. You know, I just ask my digital device as I'm walking through the room. You know, what time is it? What's the weather? What will the weather be at this time? Where's my package? You know, I always have some kind of little question, sometimes math, you know, some fact. But it's not great compared to AI, and it doesn't always recognize what you're asking, whereas AI will be way better at recognizing what you're saying.
So my great dream had been that my experience would be like a Starship captain in my own house, and that I could literally ask anything or even have a conversation with my computer just by talking, and it would just hear me and talk back. And it looks like that's going to be available in a month or so. $19.99 per month. $19.99. Wow, I'm so glad it's not $20, because at $20 I would have said, huh, you know, that's a little pricey. But $19.99? I don't know. Am I being manipulated? That seems so cheap.
Okay, well, Tesla was granted a patent on some of the self-driving car technology. But what the patent spotters spotted is that it's kind of a broad patent, which means that other self-driving cars seem like they would likely violate the patent. So here's just sort of generally what the patent claim is. I won't read it all, but it's basically a system with processors that look at objects and use a visual to figure out how to maneuver around, etc. And it makes me wonder, is the reason that Tesla got this patent so that they can have a competitive moat and own the self-driving car world? Or—and this would be actually not surprising—could it be because I think Tesla has a history of giving away their patents or making them available to all? This one's a big one. I mean, this is the patent of all patents. If they can control essentially the idea of training your car with lots of visual images and then using sensors to predict where the other objects are, that's kind of the entire game. So unless somebody uses, I don't know, only lidar or some other technology, which seems unlikely at this point, would they just own the entire category for as long as the patent is on?
Maybe the other possibility is that it's a defensive patent, meaning that the other car companies might intentionally or accidentally be violating this patent, but Tesla could be accidentally violating someone else's patent, because there are so many patents on so many things that you can't make a product like a new self-driving car without almost guaranteed you're violating, you know, a dozen patents you didn't even know existed. And then those patent people can come after you and they can pester you forever. But if they're a car company, you can say, well, would you like to trade patents? And stay out of court. Now, I don't know if this is the right kind of patent for negotiating, versus maybe you want to keep it as a moat. It's very interesting just knowing that this exists and that the patent was granted.
Well, you're all excited about Epstein Island reveal day, right? Has it happened yet? Do we have a timing yet for when the Epstein files—a small portion of them, just a tiny little sliver of them—will be released? Has that been announced yet? Here's what I expect. The first release will be underwhelming and it will not indicate any crimes by anybody. That's what I think. Oh, noon. So noon East Coast. Okay, that'll be fun.
So here's my prediction. So this is based on the real world, right? So in the real world, I don't think you're going to see the good stuff ever. I don't think it'll ever come out. I do think that since the administration has made such a big deal about transparency, they had to release something. They couldn't release nothing. So I think they're going to release the things that are kind of similar to what we already knew, but maybe it gives you a little detail about who flew on the flights. And if you only knew who flew on the flights, would you know who committed any terrible crimes? No. Because I don't believe that 100% of the people who went to the island, or 100% of the people who got in his plane, or 100% of the people who visited him in one of his homes—I don't think 100% of them committed crimes. I don't even know what percentage. I would think, yeah, I don't know if it's 10% or 90%, but you cannot assume if somebody took a flight that they committed a crime. You could assume that almost all of them were targets and Epstein was trying to get them in a bad situation, but that doesn't mean they all accepted that. You know, there were a lot of sophisticated people who probably could see through the whole thing and just thought, okay, you know, I'll take some of the offers, but I won't do this one. You know, I'm not going to be in a room alone with somebody underage, for example. So I expect nothing. So my prediction is nothing. We'll see.
Meanwhile, Rubio cut over $60 billion in waste from the State Department and USAID, according to the Daily Wire. But the first question you have to ask is, is this new, or is this just because he absorbed USAID and those cuts really are coming mostly from USAID? I think that's probably true. So this looks like it overlaps what we already knew, but now we're calling it the State Department instead of USAID. And they didn't cut 100% of USAID. There's a few things he thought were critical to keep.
But here's why I don't do a lot of reporting on the dollar amounts. I don't trust the news to make sure that they're counting everything once and that they're counting it correctly. Didn't Trump say yesterday that he's looking for a balanced budget by maybe next year? Now that's what I wanted to hear. That's what I wanted to hear. I think the hardest budget to balance would be your first one, because you know, you don't have that much time. You just got into office. You're looking for waste, but they're still arguing over it and there's still court cases. And just because you've identified it doesn't mean it's really going to stay cut. So it doesn't surprise me if you're going to need one year of, damn it, we're going to run up the debt a little bit more, but we didn't have enough runway. Like we didn't have enough preparation because we just got into office.
So knowing that his own target—Trump's—is to look for a balanced budget by the next budget, one year from now, that would be acceptable. In fact, I would consider that amazing. You know, if you could get it done by the second year, nobody's going to look at the first year and say the first year was a failure. Like history will look at that and say you got that done by the second year. That'll be incredible. I would be so impressed if they balance the budget by the second year. And just knowing that that's how they're looking at it changes everything for me. Because you know how much I was bitching about, you know, how could you possibly insult us by talking non-stop about cutting costs and then giving us a budget that doesn't do that? How could you insult us that much? But all I needed to hear was that we're targeting next year to hit that target. Now that might be true. It might be hyperbole. It might be wishful thinking. We don't know yet. But I don't think Trump knows either. But we don't know what DOGE will look like a year from now. But that little bit of clarity of when they think they can get it done, that changes everything for me. It really does. It just reframes it as, oh, this is the preparation year where we learn everything about how everything works, you know, the stuff we didn't know. And then next year is the execution. Perfect. If you can get it done in two years, I'm not going to bitch about the first year.
But you know, I think everybody on social media has been laughing about this next story. So Jake Tapper has a book out with co-author Alex Thompson called Original Sin, and it's all about how all the bad people kept the secret of Joe Biden's mental decline. Yeah, all those bad people. Now you know why this is funny, because it's Jake Tapper and CNN. And CNN and most people are saying Jake Tapper were very much kind of not talking about the obvious degradation of Biden. Now I think what CNN and maybe Jake Tapper need to do is reframe it from the news was lying to you the entire time—which is what I believe to be true. The reason I believe that is everybody could see that Biden was degraded. I called it out in 2019. There were probably, I don't know, 50 public figures who called it out in public around 2019. That doesn't look like a brain that's working. What's it going to look like in four years? And accurately we predicted it.
And so the reframe that the news business needs and Jake Tapper needs is that the news business could not have possibly deduced this without the insiders telling them. So he talks to all the insiders, I guess 200 or something, quite a few. And then they get the story of what was really happening behind the scenes, which by the way is interesting enough that I recommend the book. I haven't read it, but if you'd like to know how ugly it was behind the scenes, I think it's probably a good source if they really talked to that many insiders who were willing to talk, because you know the administration is over. So I'll bet you that the book is actually fascinating and I recommend it. But you can't overlook the fact that it's an attempt to rewrite history a little bit. Not a little bit. A lot. Yeah, the poor press. How could they have possibly known without those insiders telling them?
Anyway, there's yet another clip of Scott Jennings on a CNN panel, speaking of CNN. And I swear to God, he keeps chewing up the guests in the panel that are the anti-Trumpers who are all crazy. But now what I watch, it's like they're finding new sheep to feed to the lion. And Jennings has been so successful in turning the other panelists into clowns that it looks like there's a lion sitting at the table and CNN is like, I got you new sheep. Delicious. And then we watch him just chow down on the new sheep.
So the latest one, I think they got the new stupidest one they've ever had on the panel. So the new stupid guy is warning you, just wait until Trump steals our democracy. Now I'm paraphrasing, but they literally are relying on the fact that he hasn't done anything yet. Because Scott Jennings says, what would be an example of him stealing your democracy? And they don't have anything. But the best that the new stupid guy, the new sheep, said was he's going to steal it in the future. In the future you'll feel dumb after he steals our democracy. And then Scott Jennings slays him and eats him in front of the camera. I'm starting to wonder if it's intentional. It makes me wonder if the producers say to themselves, all right, we seem to get a lot of crossover viewers who are just watching only to watch Scott Jennings slay the sheep. And so maybe they're thinking they don't want somebody who might be a fair fight, you know, somebody who could actually make a good argument. You know, one of the good lawyers, for example. They have a million lawyers, right? I would say that probably 100% of the guests that CNN could have on who have degrees or experience, let's say as lawyers, would not look like any of the sheep they're putting on. The people that they're putting on just don't even know how to put a coherent argument together. So even if you allow that it's a difference of political opinion, the lawyers do a pretty good job in defending themselves because they're experts. But they're just putting on people who don't have any skill and just letting Jennings slaughter them. So maybe it's intentional. It would be kind of clever. I'll bet the shows with Jennings do well relative to what they've had on that time period before.
Meanwhile, Gavin Newsom has introduced his own podcast. Now of course he's being widely mocked because we like mocking him no matter what he does. But I watched it for about three minutes and here's my update. He's not the new Joe Rogan. Yeah, I'm pretty sure he's not the new Joe Rogan. He is hard to listen to and it's because there's something wrong with his energy. Did anybody watch it? It's his energy. Now I'm not going to make an accusation I can't back up. I will just say that if you were to look at his behavior, he looks like he's on something, you know what I mean? And I'm not judging because a lot of people are on a lot of things and sometimes me. So it's not a judgment. But as an observer, if I see somebody talking in a relaxed way like any of the All-In Pod, you know, sort of joking and relaxed, or Rogan joking and relaxed, that's who I want to spend time with. But you look at Newsom and he's got this energy that's a little bit too much energy for sitting in a chair. And it feels like he's just got too much and it's trying to get out of him and it just makes me a little nervous because of all the energy. And I say to myself, did you have a lot of coffee? Is it a caffeine thing? I hope it's just caffeine. It looks like you got really strong coffee there. And I can't get past it. So if he can't find some way to relax, I don't know how many people can watch that. But he might be able to get that. You know, as I've often said, I remember watching Conan O'Brien when he first got a nighttime show. And the first several months of Conan, he had that same problem—not from any drugs as far as I know—but he just seemed nervous. And you can't really watch a nervous person. It just makes you nervous. But over time he picked up all the right skills, got comfortable with it, became one of the best in the business, and doesn't have any of that nervous energy. Or when he does, he makes it work. So it's possible that Newsom is just new and he'll figure it out. But wow, hard to watch at the moment.
All right. Agricultural Secretary Brooke Rollins has a billion-dollar plan to lower egg prices. A billion-dollar plan to lower egg prices. What costs a billion dollars? I don't know the details of the plan, but there's some thought that they'll do a little less culling of the chickens, you know, killing them because they have some bird flu, and a little more maybe letting them build up immunity and whatever else. But a billion dollars—if you just gave a direct subsidy to the eggs of a billion dollars, you know, economically that would be a bad idea. But how much would that lower the price of eggs per person? Probably not that much. We eat a lot of eggs anyway. It doesn't seem like egg prices should be a multi-year problem, does it? Because you can basically create a new chicken in just like weeks, and then it's only a few weeks until the new chicken can lay eggs. So in what world can the United States not solve the chicken shortage in six months? What was going wrong?
So this would be a good test of the Trump administration in my opinion. What went wrong is competence. There must have been a competence problem. So now introducing a new cast of characters, and I think the Trump administration is the best ever. Maybe that's all it takes. Maybe you just needed smarter people. But we'll find out.
Anyway, you probably all saw video from the big, well-attended and publicized cabinet meeting that Trump had. He had all his cabinet people in one room and Elon Musk was not at the table because he's not a cabinet member, but he was in the outside chairs and he got a chance to speak. And the press was there and they asked a bunch of questions and it was great transparency and it was a great show and it was great TV. It looked like The Apprentice on steroids. Trump knows how to put on a show. So the one thing I always say about him is he understands the value of the show. You know, his critics will say, hey, he's just a TV guy, you know, and all he cares about is how things look and stuff. Well, obviously he's full of substance. So he's got more substance than any president ever had in his second term. It's pretty obvious, especially with the EOs. But he also has that extra skill. You know, his skill stack, Trump's skill stack, includes how to put on a TV show, you know, where to light it, what the room should look like, whether or not the camera should be there. He knows that stuff. And you've seen him direct things when they do the little video before the interview starts. You know, he'll be asking questions like, is that light good? Maybe you should move this over there. And he's usually right. By the way, if you get interviewed a lot, you end up doing that. I've been interviewed I don't know how many hundreds of times and photographed in photo shoots many hundreds of times. And you end up being the director of your own photo shoot. So I can't tell you how many times after I became extremely experienced in the process, the photographer would come in and say something like, all right, let's look at the house and I'll figure out where to photograph you and what positions. And I'll say, all right, here's this big Dilbert cutout. And they'll be, yes, yes, we'll put that big Dilbert cutout in there. And like, yeah, just like every other photographer, just like 100% of the other photographers, they got to put that Dilbert cutout in there. And then I'll say, well, you know, you should probably get some photos of me at my drawing tablet so they can see what it looks like when I'm creating the cartoon. The photographer will be like, yes, yes, that's exactly right. Yeah, put you at the desk. And then I'll arrange the desk and I'll be like, okay, we're going to cheat the monitor in this direction. It'll look good on camera. And if you close those blinds, you'll have the blackout and then I can use the ring light over here. And the photographer will be, yes, yes, that's exactly right. So it's definitely a thing that if you get photographed enough and you're in enough videos and you're in the public enough, you end up being your own director because you know what works. So you just become an active partner with the production crew and they like it. They don't have to do what you say because it's still their production, but they definitely take the good suggestions.
Anyway, so he puts on this great show, which was great TV, great stuff, and it was transparent. It made you think that you could ask any questions and the press could ask any questions. And there's one event where a reporter asked Elon Musk—because Musk got up and spoke a little bit—he asked Elon Musk if anyone in the room, meaning the cabinet members mostly, if anyone in the room wasn't happy about his work on DOGE. Now of course that's a messed-up, stupid, are-you-still-beating-your-spouse kind of question. It's just sort of a troublemaking question, right? It's not even pretending to be useful for the public. Do you think the public really cared about which cabinet members were on board with DOGE? Oh no, what if the head of the Interior is not fully on board? We don't care. It's just a troublemaking question to try to sow some division.
Well, Trump being Trump and knowing everything about public appearances and everything about a show, Trump interrupts and he takes the question. So it wasn't directed to Trump, but he's smart enough and quick enough that he knew where to take this. He's so good at the moment. His understanding of a moment is unparalleled, Trump's. And he goes, basically, I'll take this. He goes to the room. He goes, anybody unhappy with Elon? If you are, we'll throw them out of here. So he turns it into a joke, which is perfect. Do you remember the first debate when he was first running for office, the Rosie O'Donnell question? Did he answer the question? No. It was a troublemaking question. He turned it into a joke and the joke became the viral video. So he did it again and the joke became the viral video and nobody gave a flying fig about the question. All they cared is that he put on a better show than the reporter did. That's it. He just put on a better show and then he got all the attention and the reporter looked like a clown.
But it gets better. So everybody laughs and they clap, so they look like they're agreeing with Trump. And then Musk was still standing for his part because he was the center of attention for just that moment. And he said this. He said, President Trump has put together, I think, the best cabinet ever. Literally. And I do not give false praise. This is an incredible group of people. I don't think that such a talented team has actually ever been assembled. I think it's literally the best cabinet the country has ever had. And I think the country should be incredibly appreciative of the people in this room.
Now I agree with that 100%. I've never seen a more—I'm going to say I don't even know if capable is the right word—but people I trust. Let's put it that way. So there's some people who don't have as much experience as you'd expect for that job, but I definitely trust them. And I trust them to be fast learners and I trust them to be on point. I trust them to have their priorities straight. I trust them to root out DEI. I trust them to get rid of the bad eggs. I trust them to cut expenses and I trust them to make adjustments quickly when they make mistakes. So my level of trust is just through the roof. I mean this is a seriously powerful group of people. It's very impressive.
But that's not what I wanted to talk about. There's this one thing that Musk said in that which is this sentence. He said, and I do not give false praise. And you know, then he praised them. Now think about that superpower that he has. Imagine if Trump said, I don't give false praise. You would kind of laugh, wouldn't you? Because Trump basically praises everybody who's on his team and insults everybody who isn't. So most people in the public do give false praise. They just care if you're on their team. That's it. But when I heard this, when Musk said, I do not give false praise, I thought to myself, oh my God, how many people have earned that? That's a superpower. The superpower is that he can say something of this magnitude—that it's the best group of people ever assembled for this sort of thing—and you say to yourself, he actually means that. That's like a legitimate opinion with no hyperbole. And that's what I think. I think that is a no-hyperbole, legitimate, actually his opinion. And that he has the credibility built over a lifetime. You don't get that overnight. Where he can say this sentence, and I do not give false praise, nobody is going to laugh at that. Nobody. The press didn't pick it up, right? The press didn't say, oh yeah, he says he doesn't give false praise but look at this compilation clip of all the false praise he gave before. Nope. There's no compilation clip of that because he doesn't give false praise. It's just literally true. What a superpower. What a superpower to be able to say that in public and have nobody question you about it. That's really remarkable.
I saw a post on X from the Libs of TikTok and it was a summary of all the things that came out of the meeting. I won't read the whole summary because some of them you've heard before, but it was the most useful news that I saw about the meeting because it was just really tight and long. It was a long list but it was a tight bullet point: did this, did this, did this, did this. And I thought to myself, there's something happening in the pro-Trump world that I can't figure out what the cause of it is, but it's a really big thing. And what it is is there are a whole bunch of individual or independent superstars who have just entered the fight—not right away, some over time—but really special analysts and voices.
The Libs of TikTok started out as just mocking weird liberal stuff on TikTok. That was it. That was the whole game. But now has completely transformed because you can't just mock people on TikTok all day long and expect much out of that. But now Libs of TikTok is transformed into what today was the best summary I've seen of the news. It's the best summary. Now there's a reason that the Libs of TikTok can do the best summary. It's because the news needs to sell advertising, so they can't do summaries. They have to write a lot and then they fit a lot of advertising on that page because there's a lot of text there. Or they have to have a TV show where it goes for half an hour so they can fit in lots of commercials. But Libs of TikTok can just say here's 12 things you need to know. Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom. So it's like filling a space that was absolutely useful and additive and really good work. So you should follow Libs of TikTok.
But the other ones in the same space are Data Republican, who just came out of nowhere and turns out to—I may have this story wrong because I just saw hints of it before I went live—but did Data Republican, who if you don't know who that is you really just need to look it up on X, an amazing data analyst who is just doing amazing work with the DOGE discoveries and putting them in context and letting us know who's connected to who and where the money's flowing and what people are connected to other people. The real stuff, the stuff that really helps you understand it because the surface stuff doesn't help. Oh, USAID spent $60 billion. Okay, is that good or bad? Who got it? Was there a reason for it? But then you get to the Data Republican level and suddenly everything becomes brightly clear. Everything has a clean edge and you understand it for the first time. And I think Data Republican is building some kind of tool that would let you see who's connected to what. You know, I always tell you that what happened won't tell you anything. You have to know who happened. You got to know the players or you don't know anything. So I always use Norm Eisen as my example. And I'm not going to give away what my opinion is of his work, but if you see Norm Eisen attached to any story you need to go a little deeper.
Yeah, so sorry, Libs of TikTok is run by a—wait, let me get the name right—Chaya Raichik. So just to give credit. But then I would add Mike Benz, who seemed to come out of nowhere and be the best explainer of how the real world works in terms of our funding and the intelligence people and what we're trying to do with other countries and all the dirty tricks. Then you've got a Michael Shellenberger who comes out of nowhere and suddenly he's putting everything in context from nuclear energy to all the bad behavior in the government. And probably the best—I think Shellenberger is the best independent journalist at the moment. I think he's the best in the business. And I could go on, right? I can name a bunch of other people. I'm going to put myself on the list. So my own little domain is reframing things, helping you look at it in a different way and putting the Dilbert filter on things so you know, okay, in the real world, you know, sort of a Dilbert world, what would it really look like? So that's something I can add that is a little bit unique. And then I add the persuasion filter so you can look at things from a persuasion view as opposed to a policy view.
Now there's nobody on the Democrat side who does what Data Republican does, Mike Benz does, Shellenberger does, or I do. And again that's just four examples, or Libs of TikTok even. The fact that such effective people just rose up and there's this whole independent reporting network—because I can name another 12 people who are doing a great job of identifying the stories you need and bringing them up and adding just the right amount of summary so that we can understand them quickly and then move on to the next story. Unbelievably strong independent reporting, independent analysis, independent data, independent history. How about Victor Davis Hanson? Who's the Victor Davis Hanson on the Democrat side? They've got a bunch of historians that are just obviously just liars. And then we've got Victor Davis Hanson, who's like probably the best I've ever seen in that kind of work. And they've got literally just historians they use, in my opinion they use them as professional liars. They don't even seem like they're being serious.
And then on top of that, on top of that, Elon Musk gets to be sort of a kingmaker on X. And I think it was yesterday, maybe the day before, I made a comment on one of the posts, doesn't matter which one it is, something political. I think it was a post on—there was a survey that said 75% of Democrats didn't think that the border was open intentionally. And I made some comment on it, reposted it, and then Elon Musk, he made a comment on it too. So it was on my post. And the last I checked that had over 30 million views. Now what do you think that does to an individual voice on X? If you just get a little tap on the shoulder from Elon Musk, you get 30 million views.
If you watch Elon Musk's posts, you'll see that he has a little constellation of—I don't know how many people, I'm going to say several dozen. So there's several dozen people that he's identified as voices he wants to look at every day. So I think he's boosted or replied to my posts, just mine, several times this year. I don't know the exact number but let's say a handful of times just since the beginning of the year. And other people as well. And so he becomes the person who gets to say, I think 30 million more people should see this idea or this person. And it's incredibly powerful. Do the Democrats have anything like that where one of them can make some other strong player who's way below them in power and can just boost their message right to the top? I don't know. I'm not sure they can do it.
And then we talk about the podcast world where the conservative world has created an unbelievably good podcasting environment or architecture or platform. And they're all independents. Like of course Joe Rogan's the standard, right? But then the All-In Pod just bursts on the scene—I don't know, was it a year or two ago? The All-In Pod just had such smart, insightful people that it just went bang. And they don't lean completely right, but that's part of their value, that you can see both sides. And then you look at the Megyn Kelly show. The Megyn Kelly show in my opinion is probably one of the greatest podcast successes ever because it has all the production quality, has the very best on-air personality you're ever going to see, and every bit of it is interesting. Like I probably consume five or six reels from just Megyn Kelly's show every day and they're always good and everything she says is worth listening to.
Now do they have that? Maybe they have some podcasts that are doing well okay in terms of viewership, but I don't think they have as many superstars. It feels like the political right just absolutely owned podcasting because they had to, because they were shut out from most of the major media or the major media would look like enemies. So yeah, the success of individuals just saying, you know, I got to take control of this. Here's what it is. I feel like when there's a successful Democrat-leaning show of any sort, whether it's a podcast or whether it's on a traditional platform, it feels like it's coming from the top. As in, hey, we need a Joe Rogan. Who's our best person? And then somebody gets pulled in like Gavin Newsom or something. And it's artificial. It's just somebody trying to do the thing that was the missing thing. I don't think a single one of the people I mentioned who are podcasters on the right—I don't think a single one of them said I have to fill a spot, there's an empty spot, I have to fill it. I think every one of them said, what can I do that's additive? What can I do that's additive? And then within the constraints of a media that doesn't allow everybody to do everything, and podcasting was it, and they just said I could add to this and then they did.
So there is something beautiful and magical about what's happening with so many strong voices on the right that I'm just so impressed. And I don't know what's causing it. The only thing I could think of is that right-leaning people feel that their destiny is in their own hands. That's the best I can come up with. Because if you think your destiny is in your own hands, you say, what can I do? How can I help? But also how can I monetize it, which is perfectly fair. That's our system. And I think the people on the left are like, who's going to tell me what I should do to win so our team wins? I mean it's something completely different driving them. So I don't think it's an accident that the most talented people are all on the same side. There's something behind it.
All right, here's my favorite story. I like to have at least one story that I can really sink my teeth in. And here's an example that clarifies my last point. I'm going to give you a spin on something. Oh, we used to use that word, right? A spin. I'm going to call it a reframe. I'm going to reframe something. And when you see it you're going to laugh because you didn't see it already. You ready for this?
What is MSNBC's main thrust of their commentary for weeks and weeks? The answer is anti-DOGE. Oh, DOGE is causing chaos. DOGE is not communicating enough with people. DOGE is causing a fall-off in morale. DOGE is causing confusion and flight and people are leaving and we don't know if all the work will get done. Right now, first of all, can you confirm that that's MSNBC's almost total message for weeks and weeks and weeks? Right? Right. Now here's the fun part. This is where the Dilbert filter comes in. They're doing massive reorganization and cost cutting at MSNBC at the same time they're DOGEing themselves, at the same time they're criticizing Elon Musk's DOGE.
Now here's the fun part. They say that the real DOGE is causing chaos. Morale is bad. There's confusion. The communication is not sufficient. Let me ask you this. If you could find one of their fired staff members who just got fired in this big reorganization, what do you think they would say about how MSNBC is handling their own little DOGE? Do you think they'd say, you know, unlike the government, they communicated so well, they led with empathy, there was no chaos whatsoever, and the morale was still high even while we were getting fired? What do you think? And so I challenge the independent voices: see if you can find even one staff member who got fired or doesn't know where they're going to end up. Now if they're still with the company they're not going to talk. But if you can find somebody that is fired who's a little bit disgruntled, why don't you ask them if their experience is exactly what Rachel Maddow is criticizing the big DOGE of doing? Because it is. So they're exactly in the middle of their own little DOGE. Because if you've lived in the real world for a minute and a half, you know that nobody can do as extensive changes as MSNBC is trying to do. They're getting rid of—they just cut Rachel Maddow's staff after she complained about them being racist. Do you think there's any chaos? Do you think the morale is just terrific, that they're so happy that the staff got cut? Well, this couldn't be more perfect. So that's my challenge. Find me that staff member because they're going to have something to say about the MSNBC firings.
Meanwhile, the White House has ejected—according to the Post Millennial, Hayden Cunningham is writing—that the White House is ejecting the Huffington Post and Reuters and some foreign press from the cabinet meeting. Now imagine working for the Huffington Post and your organization has spent 10 years just absolutely defecating on every Republican that has ever lived and especially on Trump. And then they would be insulted that they're rejected? Yeah, what did they expect? If you're a non-stop right-crapping group, of course you're going to have a little pushback. So yeah, it's perfect.
All right, here's another great one. Governor JB Pritzker, he was on MSNBC and I saw a post about it on X and I thought, oh that's fake, because there was a quote attributed to him that looked like obviously made up because nobody could be that stupid. But it came from a source that didn't look like it was a joke. So I thought, hmm, could this possibly be something that actually came out of his mouth? So I had to play the video to find out if the quote in the post was actually real. It's real. Here's what he actually said. I promise I'm not making this up. Quote from JB Pritzker: The prices at the grocery store are going up because democracy is being taken away.
Oh my goodness. Oh my goodness. They can't stop with the intersectionality stuff. You know, the intersectionality is, okay you might be Black but what if you're also gay? You know, that's two things. And I feel like there's some kind of instinct to connect everything that doesn't need to be connected. And so somehow he's trying to put together the price of eggs with the democracy being stolen around. And as Scott Jennings proved on the CNN panel, they don't really have examples of anybody losing their democracy. So the democracy has not yet been stolen. I guess they're waiting for that any minute. Uh-oh, they took my democracy when I wasn't paying attention. But yeah, once that democracy goes away, well there's your price of eggs. Your price of eggs is going to go right through the roof.
Now seriously, is there anyone smart left on the left? Anyone? I did hear that Jon Stewart offered to Elon Musk to do an interview and I guess Elon said yes with a couple of conditions: it's unedited and it's on X. Now I don't know if Stewart has agreed to that because he might want to do it for his own podcast, but he might do it. And at least Jon Stewart is capable of understanding an argument on each side. Now he might not embrace it but he's capable of understanding it and then even repeating it back. So that could be the most interesting conversation of the entire year. I am so down for that. You haven't seen anybody on the right interview Musk who could actually ask good questions, could actually accept that some things are good and some things are bad, could accept that maybe his intention is not to destroy the country or just make money. You know, just get rid of the crazy stuff. Because here's what I don't think Jon Stewart will ever say. I don't think he'll say, Elon Musk, you're stealing my democracy. What do you say about that? I don't think he's going to ask that question because it's a dumbass question and obviously he knows that. So wow, I'm there for that. I'd love to see that conversation.
Anyway, Trump and Zelensky are supposed to meet on Friday for the big mineral deal. I think I'm going to not hold my breath that the mineral deal is going to go off smoothly, but at the moment it looks like they have a mineral deal. I'm going to wait a little bit on the details because I think we're still in fog of war and there might be some last-minute tweaks to it. But the basic idea is that we would be partners in some kind of a mineral exploration deal. They would make some money, we would make some money. Allegedly both sides have backed down on something. So Ukraine backed down on security guarantees because presumably they thought it was good enough that America would have a big financial interest in the country and that might be enough to incentivize America to protect its own interests, which would protect Ukraine at the same time. So it could be that they don't need it to be explicit if it's sort of built into the business model, I guess.
Let's see what else. And then the US is not going to try to claw back $500 billion from their natural resources. They're just going to split the money in what looks like a better deal. And apparently there's some bigger picture things that they've not told us about. So there might be some non-mineral related stuff.
Now here's what I think is the amazing part of this story. While we're watching one of the greatest things I've ever seen any leader ever do is happening and I don't see anybody calling it out as directly as I'm going to call it out. We don't know if this is going to work yet, right? So it's too early to say the mineral deal is a spectacular success, but it looks good at the moment. It looks like it has a pretty good chance of working. But here's my take. If Trump succeeds in reframing a hot war into a series of business deals that are good for everybody, in the history of leadership that will be the greatest thing anybody ever did if it holds. Now I'm not naive. Putin is Putin. We know that we can't predict or trust what he does. We know that people with the best of intentions, maybe things don't work out. We know that implementation might matter as much as having a good idea. So if it's not implemented properly it doesn't work. A million things could go wrong. I get it. I get it. You don't have to tell me that it could go wrong. I get it.
But just think about this. He's on the verge of maybe reframing an actual hot war into a business deal. And so far all sides have entered his frame. They've all entered his frame. Nobody else can do that. You're seeing a once-in-a-thousand-years set of talent from Trump and the people that he's hired to help him. This is so unprecedented. And I haven't seen anybody report it the way I just described it. Have you? Have you seen anybody describe it the way I did? Everybody knows the fact, but has anybody described this as the greatest reframe maybe in history? Like who ever did anything even close to this? If you can turn a hot war into a business deal where everybody wins and it sticks. And of course I'll say it again, we don't know if it'll work. We don't know if it'll stick. We don't know if Putin will just use it as a delaying tactic until he does worse things maybe. But it definitely has a chance of working and more than a good chance. He's got a solid chance of working. Incredible. Incredible.
Anyway, this is also incredible. So Senator Jim Banks and Representative Kat Cammack, they're introducing a bill to defund NPR because it's a liberal propaganda network, they say. Now I don't know if that means NPR would go out of business or where they just have less funding, but I don't care about the NPR part of the story. Maybe it'll work, maybe it won't. Here's the bigger picture. Trump has created a situation in which everyone in the government in every way—from Congress to every one of the cabinet positions to all of his appointments—they're competing to see who can do the best job of reducing costs. Did I just tell you that Trump reframing a hot war into a business deal is the greatest thing anybody ever did in history? If Trump pulls off reframing government as a competition among peers to see who can cut the government cost the most—standing ovation. Standing ovation.
Now to be clear and to be fair, I'm not excited about the cost cutting yet. I think there's going to be a whole bunch of, we thought we could cut that but we didn't get as much. You know, where people will argue about whether the numbers are accurate. And even though DOGE is showing exactly what they're doing and they publish it, so there's a lot of messiness to come. But the hard part, the hard part was the reframe. He turned it from a bunch of people just pursuing their own self-interest in the government—what was the old model—into literally they're publicly competing to see who can cut the most fat and waste and fraud out of their own departments or their own domains. When have you ever seen that? Never. Never. You've never seen it. It's never been done in the history of the whole freaking world. It's never been done and you're watching it being done right in front of you.
Have I ever mentioned there are some things that America can do that nobody can come close? I have plenty of criticism for my own country as a patriot. You know, I love it of course. And we're not perfect. We make a lot of false starts. We've done a lot of things we wish maybe we hadn't done, etc. But there are just some things nobody else can do. Europe can't do that. China can't do that. Japan can't do that. Name a country that can do that. Even when Milei did it, I don't know that he got everybody to compete. I think maybe he just took the chainsaw. I could be wrong. He might have actually pulled that off in Argentina. But this is incredible. If you think of it in terms of the reframe, then suddenly it goes from just a thing they're trying to do to, holy cow, are you kidding me? He pulled off that, making them compete to see who can cut the cost the most. Unbelievable. Wow.
Let's compare that to the main focus under the prior administration. So the main focus, the thing that gets you attention, the thing that will get you the most praise from the president is how you cut costs and made it work. What would have been the same kind of focus, different focus, but what would have been the Biden focus? I'm not making this up. This was the Biden focus. It was you got promoted if you cared the most about people's genitalia, what color the genitalia is, and what is being done with it. That was the Biden focus. How'd that work out for you? Did the country get really better, a lot better, when the focus was genitalia, what color it was and what it was being used for? That was your government. We actually lived through that. I mean just think about that. We went from caring about your genitalia and everybody else's I guess and how it all fit together to competing to reduce waste and fraud in the government. Talk about the golden age. Oh my God.
Meanwhile, case in point, Lee Zeldin of the EPA plans to cut 65% of it. In other words, he's competing. He's publicly competing to see how much he can cut in his own domain. Unbelievably so good.
Over at HUD, the housing group there, HUD, according to Just the News, HUD Secretary Scott Turner announced yesterday I guess they're going to terminate some rules that had been terminated under the Trump first term but then Biden put them back in place. And I guess it was a rule—I'm just going to paraphrase because it gets a little technical. The rule was we can't build a house for you unless your genitalia is the right color and it's being used for the right things. Okay, I'm probably exaggerating a little bit but that's basically what it was. It was sort of DEI in housing. So the federal government put restrictions on what you could and could not do because it had to be diverse and inclusive and it created a whole bunch of obstacles to building anything. So it probably just made the cost of housing go up because it created a situation where a lot of people would say, I don't even know how to satisfy all those rules so I'm not even going to bother. So getting rid of burdensome rules doesn't mean that you're getting rid of diversity, doesn't mean that you're getting rid of anything you wanted. It just means that if the states want to put those rules on themselves I guess they can. But he's just saying that the federal government isn't going to prevent you from building homes. How great is that? The federal government is not going to prevent you from building homes. Thank you. I just want the federal government not to prevent me because the states will do a good job of making sure my home doesn't fall down on its own, you know, that it's safe, it's built in a place I can insure it. I mean all working out in the states. So that's good.
Meanwhile there's a new Trump pardon czar. So somebody to help him decide who to pardon. And who he picked was Alice Marie Johnson, who you might remember was pardoned or did she come out during the First Step thing? I think she was just pardoned, right? And she was a famous pardon and she's a Black woman who I think was involved in some drug stuff way long ago but was in jail for what was an unreasonable amount of time in my opinion. And even Van Jones, who had worked on that process of allowing people to get out of jail earlier, he was praising Trump for picking Alice Marie Johnson as the pardon czar. Now I appreciate that. Now again I'm not telling you that Van Jones turned Republican or that everything he says next you're going to agree with. So it's not about that. It's just you know it's like a little flower growing out of the sidewalk. You know if you hear somebody on the left say, okay I can't even argue with that one, that's just a good idea.
There's an AI-created video of what Gaza would look like if Trump got to redevelop it. And I guess Trump actually reposted it on Truth. But what's funny is it shows a giant golden statue of Trump in what would be a Gaza that looks like a seaside luxury resort. Perfect situation. And then I think there's a part of it shows him lounging side topless with Benjamin Netanyahu, which I didn't see that part but that's funny. There's something with Elon Musk there. And the fact that Trump reposted it when it shows a giant golden statue of Trump, again it's just something that Trump can do. You know Biden couldn't do that. Like nobody else could do that. He's the only one who could repost that and you would understand it's just a mild troll. It's just a little mild troll. Hey, does this bother you? Do you want to complain about it? Go ahead. That would be fine. It's just a little mild troll. Love it.
Well, The Hill is reporting that the IAEA, the International Atomic Energy Agency, says Iran's going to be trying to accelerate its process for being able to make a nuclear weapon. Do you think they had to research that story? Let's see, how else could they have gotten that story without doing research? Oh here's an idea. They could have asked me. Hey Scott, do you think Iran is working harder to build a nuclear weapon? Yes. Yes. Well are you sure that they're not moving in the other direction? Checking my brain. It's the only thing they have left to protect themselves. No, they're accelerating. But is it possible that they just say they're accelerating but maybe they don't even have the capability to get it done? Yeah that's possible. That's possible. Did you really need to research that? I mean what do you think they're doing? Of course they are. They have nothing left. It's the only thing they have to bargain with or keep an attack away. So I do think there's a really good chance that at some point Israel will bury everything that they have with giant bombs. So we'll see how that works out.
I've got a feeling that Netanyahu is enjoying winning and he's never going to have a better chance for total victory. You know how they talk about total victory and you thought—not you but some people thought—oh and then when they're done with their total victory they'll build a two-state solution and move all the Palestinians and Hamas back into Gaza and they'll live happily ever after. Does that sound like total victory to you? No. No. There was never any intention because total victory is about the clearest statement of intention you could ever make. Total victory.
Now take that to what's going to happen with Iran. Do you think that Israel would say well we got total victory when all Iran is doing is building back its capability to do it to them again through their proxies? Nope. Let me explain it again. Total victory. Total victory. Total victory means that Iran can't do nuclear weapons one way or another. They're not going to stop until Iran has no nuclear program. How do I know that for sure? Well can the reporters ask me? Scott, what do you think Israel plans to do? Let's see. What does total mean? Does total mean we stop halfway and let them rebuild? Wait, wait, no. Total. Total. Okay I got it. Total victory. It means that they're going to destroy the nuclear program whatever it takes. Whatever it takes. Whatever it takes. Guaranteed. I think we've clearly left the domain of maybe. I think maybe's over now. There is a possibility that Iran will get that message too because someone could explain to them, do you know what total means? Have you heard of total? Yeah, total means they're going to solve the problem once and it's not coming back. And this would be the time to talk. And if there is some way that you can reach a non-military agreement and not develop nuclear weapons, you know we can talk about that because that would still be total and it would be the easiest way to get there. But now if you're wondering if Israel is bluffing, they're not. Total is total and they could not be more clear about it. So that's the beauty of being credible too.
If Israel had not done everything that it's done so far, which is pretty darn impressive if you're just looking from a military perspective, you can make up your own mind about who's right and who's wrong in this and I don't even have an opinion. My opinion on the whole situation is that in the Middle East the strongest person gets what they want. Why would I need more of an opinion than that? That covers everything. Whoever is strongest is going to go get what they want. That's it. Everything else is just blah blah blah blah blah. Do you support Israel? What's the difference? What's the difference? Is that going to make a difference? No. If they can get it and they have the strength to do it they're going to go get it. And if that ever changed—and I don't see how it would happen soon—but if something changed where the Palestinians suddenly got all the power, what do you think they would do? You know exactly what they would do and I wouldn't be for it. I would just be saying well I told you, whoever has the strength gets what they want. So that's the entire story. You don't have to be more complicated than that.
All right, ladies and gentlemen, that's everything I have on the topics of the day. Thank you for joining. You're all wonderful. I will see you again tomorrow, same time, same place. Yeah, Scott supports genocide of course you say that. No, I support understanding what the words total and victory mean. What happens after that? It's not—I won't say it's not my concern. It's just that having an opinion on it wouldn't make any difference so I just don't bother. So no I do not support Israel just reflexively no matter what they do. Nothing like that. They have to be a good ally to us and that's all I care about. And I would like to spend less money and I would like them to spend more of their money. But you know there are lots of variables that go with that because I think a lot of the money that we give to Israel for military stuff is really money that they have to spend on our own military industrial complex. So maybe that's more of a US problem, you know, something we need to work out on our end whether that still makes sense for us as a country. But I only care how Israel is treating us. That's it.
All right, I'm going to talk to the Locals people privately, the subscribers, and the rest of you I'll see you tomorrow, same time, same place. Hope you enjoyed the show.
the stock market isn't too happy today big surprise I do I always expected it would have to pull back a little bit surprising nobody well let's get ready for a show let me get my comments working come on baby all right everything's working this morning including me I need my first stol though oh there we go that's good good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams and you've never had a better time but if you'd like to see if you can take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny sh tiny human brains all you need for that is a cup mugger a glass of tanker chal Ste a canteen suer flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure of the dopamine the end of the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous Sip and it happens now go Exquisite let me see if I can fix my glare glare a little bit worse worse better all right glare fixed well if you're subscribing to the Dilbert comic which continues every day and you can get it on the xplatform just look at my profile and subscribe or you can get it on locals you would know that Dilbert's CEO is trying to do a doge project on his own company trying to reduce expenses and he's trying to do it with a scalpel with a scalpel not a chainsaw now not a real scalpel but you know figuratively um it's not working out yeah it's not working out that well but you'd have to subscribe to know what went wrong now here's some news that is a really big deal to me it it won't mean anything to the rest of you the rest of you won't care about this a bit but this is transformative to my actually daily experience so Amazon is finally coming up with a an AI version of its digital assistant whose name I will not say so I don't activate yours at home but Alexa and you know as you know I've been hooked on that product for a long time I have one in most of my rooms that matter including this one and so my daily life involves walking around and then when I have a question I just say it out loud you know I I just ask my digital device as I'm walking through the room you know what time is it what's the weather what what will the weather be at this time where's my package you know I always have some kind of little question sometimes math you know some some fact but it's not great compared to Ai and it doesn't always recognize what you're asking whereas AI will be you know way better at recognizing what you're saying so my great dream had been that my experience would be like a Starship captain in my own house and that I could literally ask anything or even have a conversation with my computer just by talking and it would just hear me and talk back and it looks like that's going to be available in a month or so 19 1999 per month1 1999 wow I'm so glad it's not $20 cuz at $20 I would have said H you know that's a little pricey but in 1999 I I don't know am I being manipulated that seems so cheap okay well Tesla was granted a patent on some of the self-driving car technology but what the patent spotters spotted is that it's kind of a broad pattern which means that other self-driving cars seems like they would likely violate the patent so here's just sort of generally what the patent claim is um I won't won't read it all but it's basically a system with processors that look at objects and use a visual to figure out how to maneuver around Etc and it makes me wonder is the reason that Tesla got this patent so that they can you have a competitive remote and own the self-driving car world or and this would be actually not surprising could be because I think Tesla has a history of giving away their patents or making making them available to all this one's a big one I mean this is the patent of all patents if if they can control essentially the idea of training your car with lots of visual images and then using sensors to predict where the other objects are that's kind of the entire game so unless somebody uses I don't know only lar or some other technology which seems unlikely at this point would they just own the entire category for as long as the patent is on maybe the other possibility is that it's a defensive patent meaning that uh the other car companies might intentionally or accidentally be violating this pattern but Tesla could be accidentally VI VI ating someone else's patent because there are so many patents on so many things that you you can't make a product like a new self-driving car without almost guaranteed you're violating you know a dozen patents you didn't even know existed and then those patent people can come after you and they can pester you forever but if they're a car company you can say wellow would you like to trade patents and stay on a court now I don't know if this is the right kind of patent for for dealing you know negotiating versus maybe you want to keep it as a moat it's very interesting just just knowing that this exists and that the patent was granted well you're all excited about Epstein Island reveal day right has it happened yet do we have a timing yet for when the epin files a small portion of them just a tiny little sliver of them will be r does it has that been announced yet here's what I expect the first release will be underwhelming and it will not indicate any Crimes by anybody that's what I think oh noon so noon East Coast okay that'll be fun so here's my prediction so this it's based on the real world right so in the real world I don't think you're going to see the good stuff ever I don't think it'll ever come out I do think that since the Administration has made such a big deal about transparency they had to release something they couldn't release nothing so I think they're going to release the things that are kind of similar to what we already knew but maybe it gives you a little detail about who flew on the flights and if you only knew who flew on the flights would you know who committed any terrible crimes no because I don't believe that 100% of the people who went to the island or 100% of the people who got in his plane or 100% of the people who visited him and his one of his homes I don't think a 100% of them committed crimes I don't even know what percentage I would think yeah I don't know if it's 10% or 90% but you cannot assume if somebody took a flight that they committed a crime you could assume that almost all of them were targets and abtin was trying to get them in a bad situation but that doesn't mean they all accepted that you know there there were a lot of sophisticated people who probably could see through the whole thing and just thought okay you know I'll take some of the some of the offers but I won't do this one you know I'm not going to be in a room alone with somebody underage for example so I expect nothing so my my prediction is nothing we'll see meanwhile uh Rubio cut over $60 billion in waste from the state department and usaid according to the Daily wire but the first question you have to ask is is this new or is this just because he absorbed us Aid and those cuts really are coming mostly from usad I think that's probably true so this looks like it overlaps what we already knew but now we're calling it The State Department instead of usaid and they didn't cut 100% of usad there's a few things he thought were critical to keep but here's why I don't do a lot of reporting on the dollar amounts I don't trust the news to make sure that they're counting everything once and that they're counting it correctly didn't uh I think Trump said yesterday that he's looking for a balanced budget by maybe next year now that's what I wanted to hear that's what I wanted to hear I think the hardest budget to balance would be your first one because you know you don't have that much time you just got into office you're you're looking for Waste but they're still arguing over it and there's still core cases and just because you've identified it doesn't mean it's really going to stay cut so it doesn't surprise me if you're going to need one year of damn it we're going to run up the data a little bit more but we didn't have enough Runway like we didn't have enough preparation because we just got into office so knowing that the that his own Target Trump's is to look for a balanced budget by the next budget one year from now that would be acceptable in fact I would consider that amazing you know if you could get it done by the second year nobody's going to look at the first year and say the first year was a failure like history will look at that and say you got that done by the second year that that'll be incredible I I would be so impressed if they balance the budget by the second year and just knowing that that's that's how they're looking at it changes everything for me because you know how much I was bitching about um you know how could you possibly insult Us by talking Non-Stop about cutting costs and then giving us a budget that doesn't do that how could you insult us that much but all I needed to hear was that we're targeting next year to hit that Target now that might be true it might be hyperbole might be wishful thinking we don't know yet but I don't think Trump knows either but we don't know what Doge will look like a year from now but that little bit of clarity of of when they think they can get it done that changes everything for me it really does it just reframes it as oh this is the preparation year where we learn everything about how everything works you know the stuff we didn't know and then next year is the execution uh perfect if you can get it done in two years I'm not going to about the first year but um you know I think everybody on social media's been laughing about this next story so Jake Tapper has a book out with co-author Alex Thompson called called Original Sin and it's all about how all the bad people kept the secret of Joe Biden's mental decline yeah all those bad people now you know why this is funny because it's Jake Tapper and CNN and CNN and most people are saying Jake Tapper were um very much very much uh kind of not talking about the obvious degradation of Biden now I think what CNN and maybe Jake Tapper need to do is reframe it from the news was lying to you the entire time which is what I believe to be true the reason I believe that is everybody could see that Biden was degraded uh I called it out in 2019 there probably I don't know 50 Public figures who called him out in public around 2019 uh that doesn't look like a brain that's working what's it going to look like in four years and accurately we predicted it and so the thought that so the the reframe that the news business needs and Jake Tapper needs is that the news business could not have possibly deduced this without The Insider is telling them so he so he talks to all the Insiders I guess 200 or something quite quite a few and then they get the story of what was really happening behind the scenes which by the way is interesting enough that I recommend the book I haven't read it but if you'd like to know how ugly it was behind the scenes I think it's probably a good source if they really talk to that many insiders who were willing to talk because you know the administration is over so I'll bet you that the book is actually fascinating and I recommend it but I you can't you can't Overlook the fact that it's an attempt to rewrite history a little bit not a little bit a lot yeah the poor press how could they have possibly known without those insiders telling them anyway there's yet another clip of Scott Jennings on a CNN panel speaking of CNN and I swear to God uh he keeps chewing up the you know the the guests in the panel that are the anti-trumpers who are all crazy but now what I watch it it's like they're they're finding new sheep to feed to the lion and Jennings is has been so successful in turning the other panelists into clowns that it looks like just there's a lion sitting at the table and CNN is like I got you new sheep m delicious and then we watch him just Chow Down on the new sheep um so the the latest one I think they got the new the new stupidest one they've ever had on the panel so that the new stupid guy is warning you just wait until Trump steals our democracy now I'm paraphrasing but they literally are relying on the fact that he hasn't done anything yet because Scott Jennings says what would be an example of him stealing your democracy and they don't have anything but the best that the new stupid guy the new sheep said was he's going to steal it in the future in the future you'll feel dumb after he steals our democracy and then Scott Jennings slays him and eats him in front of the camera I'm starting to wonder if it's intentional uh it makes me wonder if the producers say to themselves all right we we seem to get a lot of crossover viewers who are just watching just only watching to watch Scott Jennings slay the SL of the sheep and so maybe they're thinking they don't want somebody who might be a fair fight you know somebody who could actually make a good argument you know one of the good lawyers for example they they have a million lawyers right I I would say that probably 100% of the guests the CNN could have on who have degrees or experience let's say as lawyers would not look like any of the sheep they're putting on the people that're putting on just don't even know how to put a coherent argument together so even even if you allow that you know it's a difference of political opinion the lawyers do a pretty good job in defending themselves because they're experts but they're just putting on people who don't have any skill and and just letting Jennings just slaughter them so maybe it's intentional it would be kind of clever I'll bet I'll bet the shows with Jennings do well relative to what they've had on that time period before meanwhile Gavin Nome has introduced his own podcast now of course he's being widely mocked because we like mocking him no matter what he does but uh I watched it for about three minutes and uh here's my update um he's not the new Joe Rogan yeah I'm pretty sure he's not the new Joe roken he is hard to listen to and it's because there's something wrong with his energy did anybody watch it it's his energy now I'm not going to make an accusation I can't back up I will just say that if you were to look at his behavior he looks like he's on something you know what I mean and I'm not judging because a lot of people are wrong a lot of things and sometimes me um so it's not a judgment but if as a as a worker not a work as an observer um if I see somebody talking you in a relaxed way like uh any of the all-in Pod um you know sort of joking and relaxed or Rogan joking and relaxed that's who I want to spend time with but you but you look at uh at newsum and he's he's got this energy that's a little bit too much energy for sitting in a chair and it feels like he's just got too much and is trying to get out of him and it just makes me a little nervous because of all the energy and I say to myself did you have a lot of coffee is a caffeine CU I hope it's just caffeine CU it looks like you got really strong C coffee there and I can't get past it so if he if he can't find some way to relax I I don't know how many people can watch that but but he might be able to get that you know as I've often said I remember watch watching Conan O'Brien when he first got a a nighttime show and the first I don't know first several months of Conan he had that same problem not from any drugs as far as I know but he just seemed nervous and you can't really watch a nervous person it just makes you nervous but over time he you know picked up all the right skills got comfortable with it became you know one of the best in the business and doesn't have any of that nervous energy or or when he does he makes it work so so it's possible that Nome is just knew and he'll figure it out but wow hard to watch at the moment all right um agricultural secretary Brook Rollins has a billion dollar plan to lower egg prices a billion dollar plan to lower egg prices what costs a billion dollars I don't know the details of the plan but there's some thought that they'll do a little less culling of the chickens you know killing them because they have some bird flu and a little more maybe letting them build up immunity and whatever else but uh a billion dollars if you just gave a direct subsidy to the eggs of a billion dollars you know economically that would be a bad idea a but how much would that lower the price of eggs per person probably not that much we eat a lot of eggs anyway it doesn't seem like egg prices should be a multi-year problem does it because you could you can basically create a new chicken in just like weeks and then it's only a few weeks until the new chicken can have can lay eggs so in what world can the United States not sold the chicken shortage in 6 months what what was going wrong so this would be a good test of the uh Trump Administration in my opinion what went wrong is competence there must have been a competence problem so now introducing a new cast of characters and the I think the Trump Administration is the best ever um maybe that's all it takes maybe you just needed smarter people but we'll find out anyway you probably all saw video from the uh big well attended and publicized cabinet meeting that chump had he had all his cabinet people in one room and Elon Musk was not at the table because he's not a Cabinet member but he was in the outside chairs and he got a chance to speak and the Press was there and they asked a bunch of questions and it was great transparency and it was a great show and it was great TV it looked like The Apprentice on steroids Trump knows how to put on a show so the the one thing I always say about him is he understands the value of the show you know his critics will say hey he's just a TV guy you know and all he cares about is how things look and stuff well obviously he's full of substance so he's got more substance than any president's ever had in his second term is pretty obvious especially with the EOS but he also has that extra skill you know his skill stack Trump skill stack includes how to put it on a TV show you know where to where to light it what the room should look like whether or not the camera should be there he knows that stuff and you you've seen him direct things when they do the little video before the interview starts you know he'll be asking questions like you know is that light good you know maybe you should move this over there and he's usually right on by the way if you get interviewed a lot you end up doing that you know I've I've been interviewed I don't know many hundreds of times and and photographed and photo shoots many hundreds of times and you end up you end up being the director of your own photo shoot so I can't tell you how many times um after I became you know extremely experienced in the process the photographer would come in and say something like all right H let's look at the house and I'll figure out where to photograph you and you know what positions and then I'll say all right uh here's this big dilber cutout uh and it'll be yes yes we'll put that big dilber cut out and like yeah just like every other photographer just like 100% of the other photographers they got to put that Dilbert cut down in there uh and then I'll say well you know you should probably get some photos of me at my drawing my drawing tablet you know so they can see what it looks like when I'm creating the cartoon the photographer will be like yes yes that's exactly right yeah put you at the desk and then I'll arrange the desk and I'll be like okay we're going to we're going to cheat the monitor in this direction it it'll look good on camera and if you close those blinds you you'll have the black out and then I can use the uh I can use the ring cameras over here and the photographer will be yes yes that's that's exactly right so it's definitely a thing that if you get photographed enough and you're in enough videos and you're in the public enough you end up being your own director because you know what works so you just become an active partner with the with the production crew and they like it they like it they don't have to do what you say because it's still their production but they definitely take the good the good suggestions they do anyway so he puts on this great show which was great TV great stuff and it was transparent it it made you think you know that you could ask any questions and the Press could ask any questions and there's one there's one event where a reporter asked asked um he asked Elon Musk because musk got up and uh spoke a little bit he asked Elon Musk if anyone in the room meaning the cabinet members mostly if anyone in the room wasn't happy about his work on Doge now of course that's a messed up stupid are you still beating your spouse kind of question you know is it's just sort of a troublemaking question right it's it's not even pretending to be useful for the public do you think the public really cared about which cabinet members were on board with Doge oh oh no what if the what if the head of the Interior is not fully on board what we don't care it's just it's just a troublemaking question to try to sew some division well Trump being Trump and knowing everything about public appearances and everything about a show Trump interrupts and he takes the question so it wasn't directed to Trump but he's smart enough and quick enough that he knew where to take this he he's so good at the moment his understanding of a moment is unparalleled trums and he goes he goes uh basically I'll take this he goes to the room he goes anybody unhappy with Elon if you are we'll we'll throw them out of here so he turns it into a joke which is perfect do you remember remember the first uh debate when he was first running for office the Rosie O'Donnell question did he answer the question no it was a troublemaking question he turned it into a joke and the joke became the the viral video so he did it again and the joke became the viral video and nobody gave a Flying Fig about the question all they cared is that he put on a better show than the reporter did that's it he just put on a better show and then he got all the attention and the reporter looked like a clown but it gets better uh so everybody laughs and they laugh and they clap so they look like they're agreeing agreeing with Trump and then musk was still standing you know for his part because he was he was the center of attention for just that moment and he said this he said president Trump has put together I think the best cabinet ever literally and I do not give false praise this is an incredible group of people I don't think that such a talented team has actually ever been assembled I think it's literally the best cabinet the country has ever had and I think the country should be incredibly appreciative of the people in this room now I agree with that 100% I've never seen a more um I'm going to say I I don't even know if capable is the right answer but um people I trust let's put it that way so there there's some people who don't have as much experience as you'd expect for that job but I definitely trust them and I trust them to be fast Learners and I trust them to be on point uh I trust them to have their priorities straight I trust them to root out Dei I trust them to get rid of the the bad eggs I trust them to cut expenses and I trust them to make adjustments quickly when they make mistakes so my level of trust is just through the roof I mean this is this is a seriously powerful group of people it's very impressive but that's not what I wanted to talk about uh there's this one thing that uh musk said in that which is this sentence he said and I do not give false praise and you know then he praise them now think about that superpower that he has imagine if Trump said I don't give false praise you would kind of laugh wouldn't you because Trump basically Praises everybody who's on his team and and insults everybody who isn't so most people most people in the public do give false praise they just care if you're on their team that's it but when I heard this when mus said I don't give false praise I thought to myself oh my God how many people have earned that that's a superpower the superpower is that he can say something of this magnitude that it's the best group of people ever assembled for this sort of thing and you say to yourself he actually means that that's like a legitimate opinion with no Hyperbole and that's what I think I think that is a no hyperbole legitimate actually his opinion and that he has the credit ability built over a lifetime you don't get that you don't get that overnight where he can say this sentence and I do not give false praise nobody is going to laugh at that nobody the Press didn't pick it up right the Press didn't say oh yeah he says he doesn't give false praise but look at this compilation clip of all the false praise he gave before nope there's no compilation clip of that because he doesn't give false praise it's just l ly true what a superpower what a superpower to be able to say that in public and have nobody question you about it that's it's really remarkable um I saw a post on next from the libs of Tik Tock and it was a summary of all the things that came out of the meeting I won't read the whole summary because some of them you've heard before but it was the most useful news that I saw about the the meeting because it was just really tight and long it was a long list but it was a tight bullet point did this did this did this did this and I thought to myself there's something happening in the prot Trump World that I can't figure out what the cause of it is but it's a really big thing and what it is is there are a whole bunch of um individual or independent superstars who have just entered the fight not right away you know some over over time but really special uh analysts and voices the libs of Tik Tok started out as just mocking weird liberal stuff on Tik Tok that was it that that was the whole game but now has completely transformed because you know it's sort of you can't just mock people on Tik Tok all day long and expect much out of that but now Libs of Tik Tok is transformed into what today was the best summary I've seen of the news it's the best summary now there's a reason that the libs of Tik Tok can do the best summary it's because the news needs to sell advertising so they can't do summaries they have to write a lot and then they fit a lot of advertising on that page because there's a lot of text there or they have to have a TV show where it goes for half an hour so they can fit in lots of commercials but Libs of Tik Tok can just say here's a 12 things you need to know boom boom boom boom boom boom boom so it's it's like filling a space that was absolutely useful and additive and really good work so you should follow lips of Tik do but the other ones in the same space are data Republican who just came out of nowhere and turns out to uh I may have this story wrong because I just saw hints of it before I went live but did data Republican who if you don't know who that is you really just need to look it up on X um an amazing data analyst who just is just doing amazing work with the Doge uh discoveries and putting them in context and letting us know who's connected to who and where the money's flowing and you know what people are connected to other people the the real stuff the stuff that really really helps you understand it because the surface stuff doesn't help oh usaid spend $60 billion okay is that good or bad who got it was there a reason for it but then you get to the data Republican level and suddenly everything becomes bright brightly you know clear uh everything has a clean Edge and you understand it for the first time and I think data Republican is building some kind of tool that would let you see who's connected to what you know I always tell you that what happened won't tell you anything you have to know who who happened you you got to know the players or you don't know anything so you know I always use Norm Eisen as my example and I'm not going to I'm not going to give away what my opinion is of his work but if you see Norm Eisen attached to any story you need to go a little deeper yeah so sorry Libs of tikto is run by a uh wait let me get the name right Chia Chia raek so just to give credit but then I would add Mike Ben who seemed to come out of nowhere and be the best explainer of how the real world Works in terms of our funding and uh the intelligence people and what we're trying to do with other countries and all the dirty tricks then you got a Michael shellenberger who comes out of nowhere and suddenly he's putting everything in context from nuclear energy to all the bad behavior in the government and probably the best I think shellenberger is the best independent journalist at the moment I think he's the best in the business um and I could go on right I can name a bunch of other people I I'm going to put myself on the list so my own little domain is reframing things helping you look at it in a different way and putting the dilber filter on things so you know okay in the real world you know sort of a dilbur world what would it really look like so that's something I can add that is a little bit unique and then I add the persuasion filter so you can look at things from a persuasion view as opposed to a policy view now there's nobody on the Democrat side who does what data Republican does Mike Ben does Sheldon Berger does or I do and and again that's just four examples or livs of Tik Tok even the the fact that such um effective people just rose up and there's this whole independent reporting Network because I can name another 12 people who are doing a great job of identifying the stories you need and and bringing them up and adding just the right amount of summary so that we can understand them quickly and then move on to the next story unbelievably strong independent reporting independent analysis independent data independent history how about Victor Davis Hansen who who's the Victor Davis Hansen on the Democrat side they've got a bunch of historians that are just obviously just liars and then we've got Victor Davis Hansen who who's like probably the best the best I've ever seen in that kind of work and they've got literally just historians they use in my opinion they use them as professional Liars they they don't even seem like they're being serious so and then on top of that on top of that uh Elon Musk gets to be sort of a king maker on x and uh I think it was yesterday maybe the day before I uh made a comment on you know one of the posts doesn't matter which one it is something political I think it was a post on uh there was a survey that said 75% of Democrats uh didn't think that the Border was open intentionally and I made some comment on it reposted it and then uh Elon uh musk he uh he he made a comment on it too so it was on on my post and the last I checked that over 30 million views now what do you think that does to an individual voice on X if if you just get a little tap on the shoulder from from Elon Musk you get 30 million views now um if you watch Elon musk's post you'll see that he has he has a little constellation of I don't know how many people I'm going to say several dozen so there's several dozen people that he's identified as voices he wants to look at every day so um I think he's boosted or replied to my posts just mine um several times this year I don't know the exact number but let's say a handful of times just since the beginning of the year and other people as well and so he becomes the the person who gets to say I think a million you know 30 million more people should see this idea or this person and it's incredibly powerful do do the Democrats have anything like that where one of them can make some other strong player who's way way below them in let's say you know power and can just boost their message right to the top I don't know I'm not sure they can do it and then we talk about the podcast world where the conservative world has created an unbelievably good podcasting uh what would you call environment or architecture or platform and they're all Independents like like you know of course Joe Rogan's the standard right but then the all-in Pod just bursts on the scene I don't know was it year or two ago the all in pod just had such smart um insightful people that it just went bang and you know they they don't lean completely right but that's part of their value that uh that you can see both sides and then you look at the Megan Kelly show the Megan Kelly show in my opinion is probably one of the greatest podcast successes ever because it has all the production quality has you know the very best onair personality you're ever going to see and every bit of it um is interesting like I probably consume I don't know five or six reals from just Megan Kelly show every day and they're always good and everything she says is worth listening to now do they have that you know maybe a maybe uh maybe they have some podcasts that are doing a well okay in terms of um viewership but I don't think think they have as many superstars it it feels like the political the political right just absolutely owned podcasting because they had to because they they were shut out from most of the major Media or you know there were the major media would look like enemies so yeah the the success of individuals just saying you know I got to take control of this here's what it is I I feel like when there's a successful Democrat leading leaning show of any sort whether it's a podcast or whether it's um you know on a on a traditional platform it feels like it's coming from the top as in hey we need a Joe Rogan who's our best person and then somebody gets pulled in like you know Gavin Nome or something and it's artificial it's just somebody trying to do the thing that was the missing thing I don't think a single one of the people I mentioned who are podcasters on the right I don't think a single one of them said I have to fill a spot there's an empty spot I have to fill it I think every one of them said what can I do that's additive what can I do that's additive and then within the constraints of you know a media that doesn't allow everybody to do everything and podcasting was it and they just said I could add to this and then they did so there is something beautiful and magical about what's happening on to so many strong voices on the right that I'm just so impressed and I don't know what's causing it the the only thing I could think of is that right leaning people feel that their Destiny is in their own hands that's the best I can come up with because if you think your destiny is in your own hand you say what can I do how can I help but also how can I monetize it which is perfectly Fair that's our system and I think the people on the left are like uh who's going to tell me what I should do to win so our team wins I mean it's something completely different driving them so I don't think it's an accident that the most talented people are all on the same side there's something behind it all right here's my favorite story I I like to have at least one story that I can really sink my teeth in and here's an example that that clarifies my last point I'm going to give you a spin on something oh we used to use that word right a spin I'm going to call it a reframe I'm going to reframe something and when you see it you're going to laugh because you didn't see it already you ready for this what is msnbc's main thrust of their commentary for weeks and weeks the answer is anti-d Doge oh doge is causing chaos doge is not communicating enough with people doge is causing a fall off in uh morale doge is causing confusion and flight and people are leaving and we don't know if all the work will get done right now first of all can you confirm that that's MSNBC is almost their total message for weeks and weeks and weeks right right now here's the fun part this is where the Dilbert filter comes in they're doing massive reorganization and cost cutting at MSNBC at the same time they're doging themselves at the same time they're criticizing Elon Musk Doge now here's the fun part they say that the real doge is causing chaos Morel is bad there's confusion the communication is not sufficient let me ask you this if you could find one of their fired staff members who just got fired in this big reorganization what do you think they would say about how MSNBC is handling their own little Doge do you think they'd say you know unlike the government they communicated so well they LED with empathy uh there was no chaos whatsoever and the morale was still high even while we were getting fired what do you think and so I challenge the independent the independent voices see if you can find even one staff member who got fired or doesn't know where they're going to end up now if they're still with the company they're not going to talk but if you can find somebody that is fired who's a little bit disgruntled why don't you ask them if their experience is exactly exactly exactly what Rachel madow is criticizing the big Doge of doing because it is so they're IM they're exactly in the middle of their own little Doge that you know because if you've lived in the real world for a minute and a half you know that nobody can do as extensive changes as MSNBC is trying to do with you know they're they're getting rid of they they just cut Rachel madow staff after she complained about them being racist do you think there's any chaos do you think the morale is just terrific that they're so happy that the staff got cut well this couldn't be more perfect so that's my challenge find me that staff member because they're going to have something to say about the MSNBC firings meanwhile the White House has ejected according the post Millennium Hayden Cunningham is writing uh that the White House is ejecting the huffling post and Reuters and some Foreign Press from the cabinet meeting now imagine working for the Huffington Post and your organization has spent 10 years just absolutely defecating on every Republican that has ever lived and especially especially on Trump and and then they would be insulted that they're rejected yeah what what did they expect I if you're non-stop you know right crapping group of course you're going to have a little push back so yeah it's perfect all right here's another great one um governor priter JB pritsker he was on MSNBC and um I saw a a post about it on X and I thought oh that's fake because there was a quote attributed to him that looked like you know obviously made up because nobody could be that stupid but it came from a source that didn't look like it was a joke so I thought hm could this possibly be something that actually came out of his mouth so I had to play the video to find out if the quote there was in the the post was actually real it's real here's what he actually said I promise I'm not making this up quote from JB pritsker the prices at the grocery store are going up because democracy is being taken away oh my goodness oh my goodness they can't stop with the intersection ality stuff you know the intersectionality is um okay you might be black but what if you're also gay you know that's two things um and I feel like there there's some kind of instinct to connect everything that doesn't need to be connected and so somehow he's trying to put together the price of eggs with the the Democracy being stolen around and and as uh Scott Jennings proved on the CNN panel uh they don't really have examples of anybody losing their democracy so the democracy has not yet been stolen I guess they're waiting for that any minute uhoh they took my democracy when I wasn't paying attention um but yeah once that democracy goes away well there's your price of eggs your price of eggs is going to go right through the roof now seriously is there anyone smart left on the left anyone I I did hear that John at an offer to Elon Musk to do an interview and I guess Elon said yes um with a couple of conditions is unedited and it's on X now I don't know if Stuart has agreed to that because he might want to do it for his own podcast but he might he might do it and um at least John Stewart is capable of understanding an argument on each side now he might not embrace it but he's capable of understanding it and then even repeating it back so that could be the most interesting conversation of the entire year I am so down for that you you haven't seen anybody on the right interview musk who could actually ask good questions could actually accept that some things are good and some things are bad could accept that maybe his intention is not to destroy the country or just make money you know just get rid of the crazy stuff because here's what I don't think John Stewart will ever say I don't think he'll say Elon Musk uh you're stealing my democracy what do you say about that I don't think he's going to ask that question because it's a dumbass question and obviously he knows that so wow I'm there for that I'd love to see that conversation anyway Trump and zinsky are supposed to meet on Friday for the big mineral deal I I think I'm going to not hold my breath that the mineral deal is going to go off smoothly but at the moment it looks like they have a mineral deal um I'm going to wait a little bit on the details because I think we're still in fog of war and there might be some last minute tweaks to it but the basic idea is that we would be partners in some kind of a mineral exploration deal they would make some money we would make some money um allegedly both sides have backed down on something so uh Ukraine backed down on security guarantees because presumably they thought it was good enough that that America would have a big financial interest in the country and that might be enough to incentivize America to protect its own interests which would protect Ukraine at the same time so it could be that they don't need it to be explicit if it's sort of built into the business model I guess um let's see what else and then uh then the US uh is not going to try to claw back 500 billion from their natural resources they're just going to split the money and what looks like a better deal and uh apparently there's some bigger picture things that they've not told us about so so there might be some non-mineral related stuff now here's here's what I think is the amazing part of this story while we're watching one of the greatest things I've ever seen any leader ever do is happening and I don't see anybody calling it out as directly as I'm going to call it out we don't know if this is going to work yet right so it's too too early to say the you know the mineral deal is a spectacular success but it looks good at the moment it looks looks like it has a pretty good chance of working um but here's my take if Trump succeeds in reframing a hot War into a series of business deals that are good for everybody in the history of leadership that will be the greatest thing anybody ever did if it holds now I'm not naive Putin is Putin we know that we can't predict or trust what he does we know that people with the best of intentions you know maybe things don't work out we know that implementation might matter as much as having a good idea so if it's not implemented properly it doesn't work a million things could go wrong I get it I get it you don't have to tell me that it could go wrong I get it but just think about this he's on the verge of maybe reframing an actual Hot War into a business deal and so far all sides have entered his frame they've all entered his frame nobody else can do that you're you're seeing a Once In A Thousand Years set of talent from Trump and and the people that he's he's hired to help him this is so unprecedented and unprecedented that and and I haven't seen anybody report it the way I just described it have you have you seen anybody describe it the way I did every Everybody Knows the fact but has anybody described this as the greatest reframe maybe in history like who ever did anything even close to this if you can turn a hot War into a business deal where everybody wins and it sticks and of course I'll say it again we don't know if it'll work we don't know if it'll stick we don't know if Putin will just use it as you know a delaying tactic until he does worse things maybe but it defin has a chance of working and and more than a good chance he got a solid chance of working incredible incredible anyway this is also incredible so Senator Jim Banks and representative cat kamik they're introducing a bill to defund NPR because it's a liberal propaganda Network they say now I don't know if that means NPR would go out a business where they just have less funding but um I don't care about the NPR part of the story maybe it'll work maybe it won't here's the bigger picture Trump has created a situation in which everyone in the government in every every way from Congress to every one of the um the cabinet positions to all of his appointments they're competing to see who can do the best job of reducing costs did I just tell you that Trump reframing a hot War into a business deal is the greatest thing anybody ever did in history if Trump pulls off reframing governments as a competition among peers to see who can cut the government cost the most Standing Ovation standing evation now to be clear to be clear and to be fair uh I'm not excited about the cost cutting yet I I think there's going to be a whole bunch of we thought we could cut that but we didn't get as much you know where people will argue about whether the numbers are accurate and even though even though doge is showing exactly what they're doing and they publish it so there's a lot of messiness to come but the hard part the hard part was the reframe he turned it from a bunch of people just I don't know what pursuing their own self-interest in the government what was the old model into literally their publicly competing publicly competing to see who can cut the most fat and waste and fraud out of their own their own departments or their own domains when would when have you ever seen that never never you've never seen it it's never been done in the history of the whole freaking world it's never been done and you're watching it being done right in front of you have I ever mentioned there are some things that America can do that nobody can come close you know I I have I have plenty of criticism for my own country as a patriot you know I love it of course uh and you know we're not perfect you know we we make a lot of false starts we've done a lot of things we wish maybe we hadn't done Etc but there are just some things nobody else can do Europe can't do that China can't do that Japan can't do that name a country that can do that even when melee did it I don't know that he got everybody to compete I I think maybe he just took the chainsaw I could be wrong might have he might have actually pulled that off in Argentina but this is incredible if if you think of it in terms of the reframe then suddenly it goes from just a thing they're trying to do to Holy Cow are you kidding me he pulled off that making them compete to see who can cut the cost the most unbelievable wow let's compare that to the main focus under the prior Administration so the main focus the thing that gets you attention the thing that will get you the uh the most praise from the president is how you cut costs and made it work what would have been the same kind of focus different Focus but what what would have been the Biden Focus I'm not making this up this was the Biden focus it was uh it was you got promoted if you cared the most about people's genitalia what color the genitalia is and what is being done with it that was the Biden Focus how' that work out for you did the country get really better A lot better when the focus was uh genitalia what color it was and what it was being used for that was your government we actually live through that I mean just think about that we went from caring about your genitalia and everybody else's I guess and how it all fit together to competing to reduce waste and fraud in the government talk about the Golden Age oh my God meanwhile uh you know case in point Lee zeldon of the EPA plans to cut 65% of it in other words he's competing he's publicly competing to see how much he can cut in his own domain unbelievable so good uh over at HUD the housing housing group there HUD um according to just the news HUD secretary Scott Turner announced yesterday I guess um they're going to terminate some rules that uh had been terminated under the Trump first term but then Biden put him back in place and I guess it was a rule I'm I'm just going to paraphrase because it gets a little technical the rule was we can't build a house for you unless your genitalia is the right color and uh it's being used for the right things okay I'm probably exaggerating a little bit but that's basically what it was it was sort of Dei in housing so the federal government put restrictions on what you could and could not do because it had to be diversity in inclusive and it created a whole bunch of obstacles to building anything so it probably just made the cost of housing go up because it it created a situation where a lot of people would say uh I don't even know how to satisfy all those rules so I'm not even going to bother so getting rid of burdensome rules doesn't mean that you're getting rid of diversity doesn't mean that you're getting rid of anything you wanted it just means that if the state States want to put those if the states want to put those I know some kind of rules on themselves I guess they can but he's just saying that the federal government isn't going to prevent you from building h Homes how great is that the federal government is not going to prevent you from Building Homes thank you I just want the federal government not to prevent me because the state will do a good job of making sure my home doesn't fall down on its own you know that it's safe it's built in a place I can ensure I mean all working out in the state so that's good um meanwhile there's a new Trump trump picked a pardon are a pardon are so somebody to help him decide who to Pardon and who he picked was Alice Marie Johnson who you might remember was um pardoned or did she come out during the the first step thing were I think she was just pardoned right and she was a famous pardon and she's a a black woman who I think uh was involved in some drug stuff way long ago but was in jail for what was an unreasonable amount of time in my opinion and uh even van Jones who had worked on that Pro that that process of you know allowing people to get out of jail earlier um he was praising Trump for picking uh Alice Marie Johnson as The gons are now I appreciate that now again I'm not telling you that van Jones turned Republican uh or that everything he says next you're going to agree with so it's not about that it's just you know it's like a little uh flower growing out of the sidewalk you know if if you hear somebody on the left say okay I can't even argue with that one that's just a good idea um there's a uh AI created a video of what Gaza would look like if Trump got to redevelop it and I guess Trump actually reposted it on Truth um but uh what's funny is uh it shows a giant golden statue of trump in in what what would be a Gaza that looks like a you know a Seaside luxury resort perfect situation and then I think there's a part of it shows him lounging side topless with uh Benjamin Netanyahu which I didn't see that part but that's funny there something with Elon Musk there and the fact that Trump reposted it when it shows a giant golden statue of trump again it's just something that Trump can do you know Biden couldn't do that like nobody else could do that he's the only one who could repost that and you would understand it's just a mild troll it's just a little mild troll hey does this bother you do you want to complain about it go ahead that would be fine it's just a little mild troll love it well the hill is reporting that uh the iaea the international atomic energy agency says Iran's going to be uh trying to accelerate its uh its process for being able to make a nuclear weapon um do you think they had to research that story let's see how else could they have gotten that story without doing research oh here's an idea they could have asked me hey Scott do you think Iran is working harder to build a nuclear weapon um yes yes well are you sure that they're not moving in the other direction um checking my brain um it's the only thing they have left to protect themselves uh no they're accelerating but is it possible that they just say they're accelerating but maybe they don't have even the capability to to get it done uh yeah that's possible that's possible did you really need to research that I mean what do you think they're doing of course they are they have nothing left it's the only thing they have to bargain with or or keep an attack away so I do think there's a really good chance that uh at some point Israel will bury everything that they have with giant bombs so we'll see how that works out um I got a feeling that Netanyahu is enjoying winning and he's never going to have a better chance for total victory you know how they talk about total Victory and you thought not you but some people thought oh and then when they're done with their total Victory they'll build a two-state solution and move all the uh all the Palestinians and Hamas back into Gaza and they'll live happily ever after does that sound like total Victory to you no no there was never any intention because total Victory is about the clearest statement of intention you could ever make total Victory now take that to what's going to happen with Iran do you think that uh Israel would would say well we got total Victory when all Iran is doing is building back his capability to do it to him again through their proxies nope let me explain it again total Victory total Victory total victory means that Iran can't do nuclear weapons one way or another they're not going to stop until Iran has no nuclear program how do I know that for sure well uh can the reporters ask me Scott what do you think Israel plans to do let's see what does total mean does total mean we stop halfway and let them rebuild wait wait no total total okay I got it total Victory it means that they're going to destroy the nuclear program whatever it takes whatever it takes whatever it takes guaranteed I I think we've clearly left the domain of maybe I think maybe's over now there is a possibility that Iran will get that message to because someone could explain to them do you know what total means have you heard of total yeah total means they're going to solve the problem once and it's not coming back and this would be the time to talk and if there is some way that you can reach a non-military agreement and not develop nuclear weapons you know we can talk about that because that would still be total and it would be the easiest way to get there but now if you're wondering if Israel is bluffing they're not total is total and they they could not be more clear about it so that's the beauty of being credible too if Israel had not done everything that it's done so far which is pretty darn impressive if you're just looking from from a military perspective you you can make up your own mind about who's who's right and who's wrong in this and I don't even have an opinion my opinion on the whole situation is that in the Middle East the strongest person gets what they want I why would I need more of an opinion than that that covers everything whoever is strongest is going to go get what they want that's it everything else is just blah blah blah blah blah blah do you support Israel what's the difference what's the difference is that going to make a difference no if they can get it and they have the strength to do it they're going to go get it and and if that ever changed and for I don't see how it would happen soon but if something changed where the uh Palestinians suddenly got all the power what do you think they would do you know exactly what they would do and I wouldn't be for it I would just be saying well I told you whoever Has the strength gets what they want so that's the entire story you don't have to be more complicated than that all right ladies and gentlemen that's everything I have on the topics of the day thank you for joining you're all wonderful um I will see you again tomorrow same time same place yeah Scott supports genocide of course you say that no I support understanding what the words total and victory mean what happens after that not it's I w't say it's not my concern it's just that having an opinion on it wouldn't make any difference so I just don't bother so no I do not support Israel just you know reflexively no matter what they do nothing like that they they have to they have to be a good Ally to us and that's all I care about and I would like to spend less money and I would like them to spend more of their money but you know there are lots of lots of variables that go with that because I think a lot of the money that we give to Israel for military stuff is really money that they have to spend on our own military industrial complex so maybe that's more of a US problem you know something we need to work out on our end whether that still makes sense for us as a country but uh I only care how Israel is treating us that's it all right I'm going to talk to the locals people privately the subscribers and the rest of you I'll see you tomorrow same time same place hope you enjoyed the show e e e for
the stock market isn't too happy today
big
surprise I do I always expected it would
have to pull back a little bit
surprising
nobody well let's get ready for a
show let me get my comments
working come on
baby all right everything's working this
morning including me
I need my first stol
though oh there we go that's
good good morning everybody and welcome
to the highlight of human civilization
it's called coffee with Scott Adams and
you've never had a better time but if
you'd like to see if you can take this
experience up to levels that nobody can
even understand with their tiny sh tiny
human brains all you need for that is a
cup mugger a glass of tanker chal Ste a
canteen suer flask a vessel of any kind
fill it with your favorite liquid I like
coffee and join me now for the
unparallel pleasure of the dopamine the
end of the day the thing that makes
everything better it's called the
simultaneous Sip and it happens now
go Exquisite let me see if I can fix my
glare glare a little bit worse worse
better all right glare
fixed well if you're subscribing to the
Dilbert comic which continues every day
and you can get it on the
xplatform just look at my profile and
subscribe or you can get it on locals
you would know that Dilbert's
CEO is trying to do a doge project on
his own company trying to reduce
expenses and he's trying to do it with a
scalpel with a
scalpel not a chainsaw now not a real
scalpel but you know
figuratively um it's not working out
yeah it's not working out that well but
you'd have to subscribe to know what
went wrong now here's some news that is
a really big deal to
me it it won't mean anything to the rest
of you the rest of you won't care about
this a bit but this is
transformative to my actually daily
experience
so Amazon is finally coming up with a an
AI version of its digital assistant
whose name I will not say so I don't
activate yours at home but
Alexa and you know as you know I've been
hooked on that product for a long time I
have one in most of my rooms that matter
including this one and so my daily life
involves walking around and then when I
have a question I just say it out loud
you know I I just ask my digital device
as I'm walking through the room you know
what time is it what's the weather what
what will the weather be at this time
where's my package you know I always
have some kind of little question
sometimes math you know some some fact
but it's not great compared to Ai and it
doesn't always recognize what you're
asking whereas AI will be you know way
better at recognizing what you're saying
so my great dream
had been that my experience would be
like a Starship captain in my own house
and that I could literally ask anything
or even have a conversation with my
computer just by talking and it would
just hear me and talk back and it looks
like that's going to be available in a
month or so 19 1999 per month1
1999 wow I'm so glad it's not $20
cuz at $20 I would have said H you know
that's a little pricey but in 1999 I I
don't know am I being manipulated that
seems so
cheap
okay well Tesla was granted a patent on
some of the self-driving car technology
but what the patent spotters
spotted is that it's kind of a broad
pattern which means that other
self-driving cars seems like they would
likely violate the patent so here's just
sort of generally what the patent claim
is um I won't won't read it all but it's
basically a system with processors that
look at objects and use a visual to
figure out how to maneuver around Etc
and it makes me wonder is the reason
that Tesla got this patent so that they
can you have a competitive remote and
own the self-driving car world or and
this would be actually not surprising
could be because I think Tesla has a
history of giving away their patents or
making making them available to all this
one's a big one I mean this is the
patent of all patents if if they can
control essentially the idea of training
your car with lots of visual images and
then using sensors to predict where the
other objects are
that's kind of the entire game so unless
somebody uses I don't know only lar or
some other technology which seems
unlikely at this point would they just
own the entire category for as long as
the patent is on maybe the other
possibility is that it's a defensive
patent meaning that uh the other car
companies might intentionally or
accidentally be violating this pattern
but Tesla could be accidentally VI VI
ating someone else's patent because
there are so many patents on so many
things that you you can't make a product
like a new self-driving car without
almost guaranteed you're violating you
know a dozen patents you didn't even
know existed and then those patent
people can come after you and they can
pester you forever but if they're a car
company you can say wellow would you
like to trade patents and stay on a
court now I don't know if this is the
right kind of patent for for dealing you
know negotiating versus maybe you want
to keep it as a moat it's very
interesting just just knowing that this
exists and that the patent was
granted well you're all excited about
Epstein Island reveal day
right has it happened yet do we have a
timing yet for when the epin
files a small portion of them just a
tiny little sliver of them will be r
does it has that been announced yet
here's what I
expect the first release will be
underwhelming and it will not indicate
any Crimes by anybody that's what I
think oh noon so noon East
Coast okay that'll be fun so here's my
prediction so this it's based on the
real world right so in the real world
I don't think you're going to see the
good stuff ever I don't think it'll ever
come out I do think that since the
Administration has made such a big deal
about transparency they had to release
something they couldn't release
nothing so I think they're going to
release the things that are kind of
similar to what we already knew but
maybe it gives you a little detail about
who flew on the
flights and if you only knew who flew on
the flights
would you know who committed any
terrible crimes no because I don't
believe that 100% of the people who went
to the island or 100% of the people who
got in his plane or 100% of the people
who visited him and his one of his homes
I don't think a 100% of them committed
crimes I don't even know what percentage
I would think yeah I don't know if it's
10% or
90% but you cannot assume if somebody
took a
flight that they committed a crime you
could
assume that almost all of them were
targets and abtin was trying to get them
in a bad situation but that doesn't mean
they all accepted that you know there
there were a lot of sophisticated people
who probably could see through the whole
thing and just thought okay you know
I'll take some of the some of the offers
but I won't do this one you know I'm not
going to be in a room alone with
somebody underage for example so
I expect nothing so my my prediction is
nothing we'll see meanwhile uh Rubio cut
over $60 billion in waste from the state
department and usaid according to the
Daily wire but the first question you
have to ask is is this
new or is this just because he absorbed
us Aid and those cuts really are coming
mostly from usad I think that's probably
true so this looks like it overlaps what
we already knew but now we're calling it
The State Department instead of
usaid and they didn't cut 100% of usad
there's a few things he thought were
critical to
keep but here's why I don't do a lot of
reporting on the dollar
amounts I don't trust the
news to make sure that they're counting
everything once and that they're
counting it
correctly didn't uh I think Trump said
yesterday that he's looking for a
balanced budget by maybe next
year now that's what I wanted to hear
that's what I wanted to hear I think the
hardest budget to balance would be your
first one because you know you don't
have that much time you just got into
office you're you're looking for Waste
but they're still arguing over it and
there's still core cases and just
because you've identified it doesn't
mean it's really going to stay cut so
it doesn't surprise me if you're going
to need one year of damn it we're going
to run up the data a little bit more but
we didn't have enough Runway like we
didn't have enough preparation because
we just got into office so knowing that
the that his own Target Trump's is to
look for a balanced budget by the next
budget one year from now that would be
acceptable in fact I would consider that
amazing you know if you could get it
done by the second year nobody's going
to look at the first year and say the
first year was a failure like history
will look at that and say you got that
done by the second year that that'll be
incredible I I would be so
impressed if they balance the budget by
the second year and just knowing that
that's that's how they're looking at it
changes everything for me because you
know how much I was bitching about um
you know how could you possibly insult
Us by talking Non-Stop about cutting
costs and then giving us a budget that
doesn't do that how could you insult us
that much but all I needed to hear was
that we're targeting next year to hit
that Target now that might be true it
might be hyperbole might be wishful
thinking we don't know yet but I don't
think Trump knows either but we don't
know what Doge will look like a year
from
now but that little bit of clarity of of
when they think they can get it done
that changes everything for me it really
does it just reframes it as oh this is
the preparation year where we learn
everything about how everything works
you know the stuff we didn't know and
then next year is the
execution uh perfect if you can get it
done in two years I'm not going to
about the first year but um you know I
think everybody on social media's been
laughing about this next story so Jake
Tapper has a book out with co-author
Alex Thompson called called Original Sin
and it's all about how all the bad
people kept the secret of Joe Biden's
mental
decline yeah all those bad
people now you know why this is funny
because it's Jake Tapper and CNN and CNN
and most people are saying Jake Tapper
were um very much
very much uh kind of not talking about
the obvious degradation of Biden now I
think what CNN and maybe Jake Tapper
need to do is reframe it from the news
was lying to you the entire time which
is what I believe to be true the reason
I believe that is everybody could see
that Biden was
degraded uh I called it out in
2019 there
probably I don't know 50 Public figures
who called him out in public around 2019
uh that doesn't look like a brain that's
working what's it going to look like in
four years and accurately we predicted
it and so the thought that so the the
reframe that the news business needs and
Jake Tapper needs is that the news
business could not have possibly deduced
this without The Insider is telling them
so he so he talks to all the Insiders I
guess 200 or something quite quite a few
and then they get the story of what was
really happening behind the scenes which
by the way is interesting enough that I
recommend the book I haven't read it but
if you'd like to know how ugly it was
behind the scenes I think it's probably
a good source if they really talk to
that many insiders who were willing to
talk because you know the administration
is over
so I'll bet you that the book is
actually fascinating and I recommend it
but I you can't you can't Overlook the
fact that it's an attempt to rewrite
history a little bit not a little bit a
lot yeah the poor press how could they
have possibly known without those
insiders telling
them anyway there's yet another clip of
Scott Jennings on a CNN panel speaking
of
CNN and I swear to God
uh he keeps chewing up the you know the
the guests in the panel that are the
anti-trumpers who are all crazy but now
what I watch it it's like they're
they're finding new sheep to feed to the
lion and Jennings is has been so
successful in turning the other
panelists into clowns that it looks like
just there's a lion sitting at the table
and CNN is like I got you new sheep m
delicious and then we watch him just
Chow Down on the new
sheep um
so the the latest one I think they got
the new the new stupidest one they've
ever had on the panel so that the new
stupid guy is warning you just wait
until Trump steals our democracy now I'm
paraphrasing but they literally are
relying on the fact that he hasn't done
anything yet because Scott Jennings says
what would be an example of him stealing
your
democracy and they don't have anything
but the best that the new stupid guy the
new sheep said
was he's going to steal it in the future
in the future you'll feel dumb after he
steals our
democracy and then Scott Jennings slays
him and eats him in front of the
camera I'm starting to wonder if it's
intentional uh it makes me wonder if the
producers say to themselves all right we
we seem to get a lot of crossover
viewers who are just watching just only
watching to watch Scott Jennings slay
the SL of the sheep and so maybe they're
thinking they don't want somebody who
might be a fair fight you know somebody
who could actually make a good argument
you know one of the good lawyers for
example they they have a million lawyers
right I I would say that probably 100%
of the guests the CNN could have on who
have degrees or experience let's say as
lawyers would not look like any of the
sheep they're putting on the people
that're putting on just don't even know
how to put a coherent argument together
so even even if you allow that you know
it's a difference of political opinion
the lawyers do a pretty good job in
defending themselves because they're
experts but they're just putting on
people who don't have any skill and and
just letting Jennings just slaughter
them so maybe it's intentional
it would be kind of clever I'll bet I'll
bet the shows with Jennings do well
relative to what they've had on that
time period before meanwhile Gavin Nome
has introduced his own
podcast now of course he's being widely
mocked because we like mocking him no
matter what he does but uh I watched it
for about three
minutes and uh here's my
update um he's not the new Joe Rogan
yeah
I'm pretty sure he's not the new Joe
roken he is hard to listen to and it's
because there's something wrong with his
energy did anybody watch it it's his
energy now I'm not going to make an
accusation I can't back up I will just
say that if you were to look at his
behavior he looks like he's on something
you know what I mean and I'm not judging
because a lot of people are wrong a lot
of things and sometimes me um so it's
not a judgment but if as a as a worker
not a work as an
observer um if I see somebody talking
you in a relaxed way like uh any of the
all-in Pod um you know sort of joking
and relaxed or Rogan joking and relaxed
that's who I want to spend time with but
you but you look at uh at newsum and
he's he's got this energy that's a
little bit too much energy for sitting
in a chair and it feels like he's just
got too much and is trying to get out of
him and it just makes me a little
nervous because of all the energy and I
say to myself did you have a lot of
coffee is a caffeine CU I hope it's just
caffeine CU it looks like you got really
strong C coffee
there and I can't get past it so if he
if he can't find some way to
relax I I don't know how many people can
watch that but but he might be able to
get that you know as I've often said I
remember watch watching Conan O'Brien
when he first got a a nighttime show and
the first I don't know first several
months of Conan he had that same problem
not from any drugs as far as I know but
he just seemed
nervous and you can't really watch a
nervous person it just makes you nervous
but over
time he you know picked up all the right
skills got comfortable with it became
you know one of the best in the business
and doesn't have any of that nervous
energy or or when he does he makes it
work so so it's possible that Nome is
just knew and he'll figure it out but
wow hard to watch at the
moment all right um agricultural
secretary Brook Rollins has a billion
dollar plan to lower egg prices a
billion dollar plan to lower egg
prices what costs a billion dollars I
don't know the details of the plan but
there's some thought that they'll do a
little less culling of the chickens you
know killing them because they have some
bird flu and a little more maybe letting
them build up immunity and whatever else
but uh a billion
dollars if you just gave a direct
subsidy to the eggs of a billion dollars
you know economically that would be a
bad idea a but how much would that lower
the price of eggs per person probably
not that much we eat a lot of eggs
anyway it doesn't seem like egg prices
should be a multi-year problem does
it because you could you can basically
create a new chicken in just like weeks
and then it's only a few weeks until the
new chicken can have can lay
eggs so in what world can the United
States not sold the chicken shortage in
6 months what what was going wrong so
this would be a good test of the uh
Trump Administration in my opinion what
went wrong is competence there must have
been a competence problem so now
introducing a new cast of characters and
the I think the Trump Administration is
the best ever um maybe that's all it
takes maybe you just needed smarter
people but we'll find
out anyway you probably all saw video
from the uh big well attended and
publicized cabinet meeting that chump
had he had all his cabinet people in one
room and Elon Musk was not at the table
because he's not a Cabinet member but he
was in the outside chairs and he got a
chance to speak and the Press was there
and they asked a bunch of questions and
it was great transparency and it was a
great show and it was great TV it looked
like The Apprentice on steroids Trump
knows how to put on a show
so the the one thing I always say about
him is he understands the value of the
show you know his critics will say hey
he's just a TV guy you know and all he
cares about is how things look and stuff
well obviously he's full of substance so
he's got more substance than any
president's ever had in his second term
is pretty obvious especially with the
EOS but he also has that extra skill you
know his skill stack Trump
skill stack includes how to put it on a
TV show you know where to where to light
it what the room should look like
whether or not the camera should be
there he knows that stuff and you you've
seen him direct things when they do the
little video before the interview starts
you know he'll be asking questions like
you know is that light good you know
maybe you should move this over there
and he's usually right on by the way if
you get interviewed a lot you end up
doing that you know I've I've been
interviewed I don't know many hundreds
of times and and photographed and photo
shoots many hundreds of times and you
end up you end up being the director of
your own photo shoot so I can't tell you
how many times um after I became you
know extremely experienced in the
process the photographer would come in
and say something like all right H let's
look at the house and I'll figure out
where to photograph you and you know
what positions and then I'll say all
right uh here's this big dilber cutout
uh and it'll be yes yes we'll put that
big dilber cut out and like yeah just
like every other
photographer just like 100% of the other
photographers they got to put that
Dilbert cut down in there uh and then
I'll say well you know you should
probably get some photos of me at my
drawing my drawing tablet you know so
they can see what it looks like when I'm
creating the cartoon the photographer
will be like yes yes that's exactly
right yeah put you at the desk and then
I'll arrange the desk and I'll be like
okay we're going to we're going to cheat
the monitor in this direction it it'll
look good on camera and if you close
those blinds you you'll have the black
out and then I can use the uh I can use
the ring cameras over here and the
photographer will be yes yes that's
that's exactly
right so it's definitely a thing that if
you get photographed enough and you're
in enough videos and you're in the
public enough you end up being your own
director because you know what works so
you just become an active partner with
the with the production crew and they
like it they like it they don't have to
do what you say because it's still their
production but they definitely take the
good the good suggestions they
do anyway so he puts on this great show
which was great TV great stuff and it
was transparent it it made you think you
know that you could ask any questions
and the Press could ask any questions
and there's one there's one event where
a reporter asked asked um he asked Elon
Musk because musk got up and uh spoke a
little bit he asked Elon Musk if anyone
in the room meaning the cabinet members
mostly if anyone in the room wasn't
happy about his work on
Doge now of course that's a messed up
stupid are you still beating your spouse
kind of question you know is it's just
sort of a troublemaking question right
it's it's not even pretending to be
useful for the public do you think the
public really cared about which cabinet
members were on board with
Doge oh oh no what if the what if the
head of the Interior is not fully on
board what we don't care it's just it's
just a troublemaking question to try to
sew some division well Trump being Trump
and knowing everything about public
appearances and everything about a show
Trump interrupts and he takes the
question
so it wasn't directed to Trump but he's
smart enough and quick enough that he
knew where to take this he he's so good
at the moment his understanding of a
moment is unparalleled trums and he goes
he goes uh basically I'll take this he
goes to the room he goes anybody unhappy
with Elon if you are we'll we'll throw
them out of
here so he turns it into a joke which is
perfect do you remember remember the
first uh debate when he was first
running for office the Rosie O'Donnell
question did he answer the question no
it was a troublemaking question he
turned it into a joke and the joke
became the the viral video so he did it
again and the joke became the viral
video and nobody gave a Flying Fig about
the question all they cared is that he
put on a better show than the reporter
did
that's it he just put on a better show
and then he got all the attention and
the reporter looked like a
clown but it gets better uh so everybody
laughs and they laugh and they clap so
they look like they're agreeing agreeing
with Trump and then musk was still
standing you know for his part because
he was he was the center of attention
for just that moment and he said this he
said president Trump has put together I
think the best cabinet ever literally
and I do not give false praise this is
an incredible group of people I don't
think that such a talented team has
actually ever been assembled I think
it's literally the best cabinet the
country has ever had and I think the
country should be incredibly
appreciative of the people in this room
now I agree with that 100% I've never
seen a
more um I'm going to
say I I don't even know if capable is
the right
answer but
um people I trust let's put it that way
so there there's some people who don't
have as much experience as you'd expect
for that job but I definitely trust them
and I trust them to be fast Learners and
I trust them to be on point uh I trust
them to have their priorities straight I
trust them to root out Dei I trust them
to get rid of the the bad eggs I trust
them to cut expenses and I trust them to
make adjustments quickly when they make
mistakes so my level of trust is just
through the roof I mean this is this is
a
seriously powerful group of people it's
very impressive but that's not what I
wanted to talk
about uh there's this one thing that uh
musk said in that which is this sentence
he said and I do not give false
praise and you know then he praise them
now think about that superpower that he
has imagine if Trump said I don't give
false praise you would kind of laugh
wouldn't you because Trump basically
Praises everybody who's on his team and
and insults everybody who isn't so most
people most people in the public do give
false praise they just care if you're on
their team that's it but when I heard
this when mus said I don't give false
praise I thought to myself oh my God how
many people have earned that that's a
superpower the superpower is that he can
say something of this magnitude that
it's the best group of people ever
assembled for this sort of thing and you
say to yourself he actually means that
that's like a legitimate opinion with no
Hyperbole and that's what I think I
think that is a no hyperbole legitimate
actually his opinion and that he has the
credit ability built over a lifetime you
don't get that you don't get that
overnight where he can say this sentence
and I do not give false praise nobody is
going to laugh at that nobody the Press
didn't pick it up right the Press didn't
say oh yeah he says he doesn't give
false praise but look at this
compilation clip of all the false praise
he gave before nope there's no
compilation clip of that because he
doesn't give false
praise it's just l ly true what a
superpower what a superpower to be able
to say that in public and have nobody
question you about it that's it's really
remarkable um I saw a post on next from
the libs of Tik Tock and it was a
summary of all the things that came out
of the meeting I won't read the whole
summary because some of them you've
heard before but it was the most useful
news that I saw about the the meeting
because it was just really tight and
long it was a long list but it was a
tight bullet point did this did this did
this did this and I thought to myself
there's something
happening in the prot Trump World that I
can't figure out what the cause of it is
but it's a really big thing and what it
is is there are a whole bunch of um
individual or independent
superstars who have just entered the
fight not right away you know some over
over time but really special uh analysts
and voices the libs of Tik Tok started
out as just mocking weird liberal stuff
on Tik Tok that was it that that was the
whole game but now has completely
transformed because you know it's sort
of you can't just mock people on Tik Tok
all day long and expect much out of that
but now Libs of Tik Tok is transformed
into what today was the best summary
I've seen of the news it's the best
summary now there's a reason that the
libs of Tik Tok can do the best summary
it's because the news needs to sell
advertising so they can't do summaries
they have to write a lot and then they
fit a lot of advertising on that page
because there's a lot of text there or
they have to have a TV show where it
goes for half an hour so they can fit in
lots of commercials but Libs of Tik Tok
can just say here's a 12 things you need
to know boom boom boom boom boom boom
boom so it's it's like filling a space
that was absolutely
useful and additive and really good work
so you should follow lips of Tik do but
the other ones in the same space are
data Republican who just came out of
nowhere and turns out to uh I may have
this story wrong because I just saw
hints of it before I went live but did
data Republican who if you don't know
who that is you really just need to look
it up on X um an amazing data analyst
who just is just doing amazing work with
the Doge uh discoveries and putting them
in context and letting us know who's
connected to who and where the money's
flowing and you know what people are
connected to other people the the real
stuff the stuff that really really helps
you understand it because the surface
stuff doesn't help oh usaid
spend $60
billion okay is that good or bad who got
it was there a reason for it but then
you get to the data Republican level and
suddenly everything becomes bright
brightly you know clear uh everything
has a clean Edge and you understand it
for the first
time and I think data Republican is
building some kind of tool that would
let you see who's connected to
what you know I always tell you that
what happened won't tell you anything
you have to know who who happened you
you got to know the players or you don't
know
anything so you know I always use Norm
Eisen as my example and I'm not going to
I'm not going to give away what my
opinion is of his work but if you see
Norm Eisen attached to any
story you need to go a little
deeper yeah so
sorry Libs of tikto is run by a uh wait
let me get the name right
Chia Chia
raek so just to give credit but then I
would add Mike Ben who seemed to come
out of nowhere and be the best explainer
of how the real world Works in terms of
our funding and uh the intelligence
people and what we're trying to do with
other countries and all the dirty tricks
then you got a Michael shellenberger who
comes out of nowhere and
suddenly he's putting everything in
context from nuclear energy to all the
bad behavior in the government and
probably the best I think shellenberger
is the best independent journalist at
the moment I think he's the best in the
business um and I could go on right I
can name a bunch of other people I I'm
going to put myself on the list so my
own little domain is reframing things
helping you look at it in a different
way and putting the dilber filter on
things so you know okay in the real
world you know sort of a dilbur world
what would it really look like so that's
something I can add that is a little bit
unique and then I add the persuasion
filter so you can look at things from a
persuasion view as opposed to a policy
view now there's nobody on the Democrat
side who does what data Republican does
Mike Ben does Sheldon Berger does or I
do and and again that's just four
examples or livs of Tik Tok
even the the fact that such um effective
people just rose up and there's this
whole independent reporting Network
because I can name another 12 people who
are doing a great job of identifying the
stories you need and and bringing them
up and adding just the right amount of
summary so that we can understand them
quickly and then move on to the next
story
unbelievably strong independent
reporting independent analysis
independent data independent history how
about Victor Davis Hansen who who's the
Victor Davis Hansen on the Democrat side
they've got a bunch of historians that
are just obviously just
liars and then we've got Victor Davis
Hansen who who's like probably the best
the best I've ever seen in that kind of
work and they've got literally just
historians they use in my opinion they
use them as professional Liars they they
don't even seem like they're being
serious so and then on top of that on
top of
that uh Elon Musk gets to be sort of a
king maker on x
and uh I think it was yesterday maybe
the day
before I uh made a comment on you know
one of the posts doesn't matter which
one it is something political I think it
was a post
on uh there was a survey that said 75%
of
Democrats uh didn't think that the
Border was open
intentionally and I made some comment on
it reposted it and then uh Elon uh musk
he uh he
he made a comment on it too so it was on
on my post and the last I checked that
over 30 million
views now what do you think that does to
an individual voice on X if if you just
get a little tap on the shoulder from
from Elon Musk you get 30 million views
now um if you watch Elon musk's post
you'll see that he has he has a little
constellation of I don't know how many
people I'm going to say several dozen so
there's several dozen people that he's
identified as voices he wants to look at
every day
so um I think he's boosted or replied to
my posts just mine um several times this
year I don't know the exact number but
let's say a handful of times just since
the beginning of the year and other
people as well and so he becomes the the
person who gets to say I think a million
you know 30 million more people should
see this idea or this person and it's
incredibly powerful do do the Democrats
have anything like that where one of
them can make some other strong player
who's way way below them in let's say
you know power and can just boost their
message right to the top I don't know
I'm not sure they can do it and then we
talk about the podcast
world where the conservative world has
created an
unbelievably good
podcasting uh what would you call
environment or architecture or platform
and they're all
Independents like like you know of
course Joe Rogan's the standard right
but then the all-in Pod just bursts on
the scene I don't know was it year or
two ago the all in pod just had such
smart um insightful people that it just
went bang and you know they they don't
lean completely right but that's part of
their value that uh that you can see
both sides and then you look at the
Megan Kelly show the Megan Kelly show in
my opinion is probably one of the
greatest podcast successes ever because
it has all the production quality has
you know the very best onair personality
you're ever going to see and every bit
of it um is interesting like I probably
consume I don't know five or six reals
from just Megan Kelly show every day and
they're always good and everything she
says is worth listening to now do they
have that you know maybe a maybe uh
maybe they have some podcasts that are
doing a well okay in terms of um
viewership but I don't think think they
have as many superstars it it feels like
the political the political right just
absolutely owned podcasting because they
had to because they they were shut out
from most of the major Media or you know
there were the major media would look
like
enemies so yeah the the success of
individuals just saying you know I got
to take control of
this here's what it is I I feel like
when there's a successful Democrat
leading leaning show of any sort whether
it's a podcast or whether it's um you
know on a on a traditional platform it
feels like it's coming from the top as
in hey we need a Joe Rogan who's our
best person and then somebody gets
pulled in like you know Gavin Nome or
something and it's artificial it's just
somebody trying to do the thing that was
the missing thing I don't think a single
one of the people I mentioned who are
podcasters on the right I don't think a
single one of them said I have to fill a
spot there's an empty spot I have to
fill it I think every one of them said
what can I do that's
additive what can I do that's additive
and then within the constraints of you
know a media that doesn't allow
everybody to do
everything and podcasting was it and
they just said I could add to this and
then they
did so there is something beautiful and
magical about what's happening on to so
many strong voices on the right that I'm
just so impressed and I don't know
what's causing it the the only thing I
could think of is that right leaning
people feel that their Destiny is in
their own hands that's the best I can
come up with because if you think your
destiny is in your own hand you say what
can I do how can I help but also how can
I monetize it which is perfectly Fair
that's our system and I think the people
on the left are like uh who's going to
tell me what I should do to win so our
team wins I mean it's something
completely different driving them so I
don't think it's an accident that the
most talented people are all on the same
side there's something behind
it all right here's my favorite story I
I like to have at least one story that I
can really sink my teeth in and here's
an example that that clarifies my last
point I'm going to give you a spin on
something oh we used to use that word
right a spin I'm going to call it a
reframe I'm going to reframe something
and when you see it you're going to
laugh because you didn't see it already
you ready for this what is msnbc's main
thrust of their
commentary for weeks and weeks the
answer is anti-d Doge oh doge is causing
chaos doge is not communicating enough
with people doge is causing a fall off
in uh morale doge is causing confusion
and flight and people are leaving and we
don't know if all the work will get done
right now first of all can you
confirm that that's MSNBC is almost
their total message for weeks and weeks
and weeks right
right now here's the fun part this is
where the Dilbert filter comes
in they're doing massive reorganization
and cost cutting at
MSNBC at the same
time they're doging themselves at the
same time they're criticizing Elon Musk
Doge now here's the fun part they say
that the real doge is causing chaos
Morel is bad there's confusion the
communication is not
sufficient let me ask you this if you
could find one of their fired staff
members who just got fired in this big
reorganization what do you think they
would say about how MSNBC is handling
their own little Doge do you think
they'd say you know unlike the
government they communicated so well
they LED with empathy
uh there was no chaos whatsoever and the
morale was still high even while we were
getting
fired what do you think and so I
challenge the independent the
independent voices see if you can
find even one staff member who got fired
or doesn't know where they're going to
end up now if they're still with the
company they're not going to talk but if
you can find somebody that is fired
who's a little bit disgruntled
why don't you ask them if their
experience is
exactly exactly
exactly what Rachel madow is criticizing
the big Doge of doing because it
is so they're IM they're exactly in the
middle of their own little Doge that you
know because if you've lived in the real
world for a minute and a half you know
that nobody can do as extensive changes
as MSNBC is trying to do with you know
they're they're getting rid of they they
just cut Rachel madow
staff after she complained about them
being
racist do you think there's any
chaos do you think the morale is just
terrific that they're so happy that the
staff got
cut well this couldn't be more perfect
so that's my challenge find me that
staff member
because they're going to have something
to say about the
MSNBC firings meanwhile the White House
has ejected according the post
Millennium Hayden Cunningham is writing
uh that the White House is ejecting the
huffling post and Reuters and some
Foreign Press from the cabinet
meeting
now imagine working for the Huffington
Post and your organization has spent 10
years just absolutely
defecating on every Republican that has
ever lived and
especially especially on Trump and and
then they would be insulted that they're
rejected yeah what what did they
expect I if you're
non-stop you know right crapping group
of course you're going to have a little
push back so yeah it's perfect all right
here's another great one um governor
priter JB
pritsker he was on
MSNBC and um I saw a a post about it on
X and I thought oh that's fake because
there was a quote attributed to him that
looked like you know obviously made up
because nobody could be that stupid but
it came from a source that didn't look
like it was a joke so I thought hm could
this possibly be something that actually
came out of his mouth so I had to play
the video to find out if the quote there
was in the the post was actually real
it's real here's what he actually
said I promise I'm not making this up
quote from JB pritsker the prices at the
grocery store are going up because
democracy is being taken
away oh my
goodness oh my
goodness they can't stop with the
intersection ality stuff you know the
intersectionality is um okay you might
be black but what if you're also gay you
know that's two things um and I feel
like there there's some kind of instinct
to connect everything that doesn't need
to be connected and so somehow he's
trying to put together the price of eggs
with the the Democracy being stolen
around and and as uh Scott Jennings
proved on the CNN panel uh they don't
really have examples of anybody losing
their democracy so the democracy has not
yet been stolen I guess they're waiting
for that any minute uhoh they took my
democracy when I wasn't paying attention
um but yeah once that democracy goes
away well there's your price of eggs
your price of eggs is going to go right
through the roof now
seriously is there anyone smart left on
the left
anyone I I did hear that John at an
offer to Elon Musk to do an interview
and I guess Elon said yes um with a
couple of conditions is unedited and
it's on X now I don't know if Stuart has
agreed to that because he might want to
do it for his own podcast but he might
he might do
it
and um at least John Stewart is capable
of understanding an argument on each
side now he might not embrace it but
he's capable of understanding it and
then even repeating it back so that
could be the most interesting
conversation of the entire year I am so
down for that you you haven't seen
anybody on the right interview musk who
could actually ask good questions could
actually accept that some things are
good and some things are bad could
accept that maybe his intention is not
to destroy the country or just make
money you know just get rid of the crazy
stuff
because here's what I don't think John
Stewart will ever say I don't think
he'll say Elon Musk uh you're stealing
my democracy what do you say about that
I don't think he's going to ask that
question because it's a dumbass question
and obviously he knows that so wow I'm
there for that I'd love to see that
conversation anyway Trump and zinsky are
supposed to meet on Friday for the big
mineral deal I I think I'm going to not
hold my breath
that the mineral deal is going to go off
smoothly but at the moment it looks like
they have a mineral deal um I'm going to
wait a little bit on the details because
I think we're still in fog of war and
there might be some last minute tweaks
to it but the basic idea is that we
would be partners in some kind of a
mineral exploration deal they would make
some money we would make some money um
allegedly both sides have backed down on
something so uh Ukraine backed down on
security
guarantees because presumably they
thought it was good enough that that
America would have a big financial
interest in the country and that might
be enough to incentivize America to
protect its own interests which would
protect Ukraine at the same time so it
could be that they don't need it to be
explicit if it's sort of built into the
business model I guess um let's see what
else and then uh then the US uh is not
going to try to claw back 500 billion
from their natural resources they're
just going to split the money and what
looks like
a better deal and uh apparently there's
some bigger picture things that they've
not told us about so so there might be
some non-mineral related
stuff now here's here's what I think is
the amazing part of this
story while we're watching
one of the greatest things I've ever
seen any leader ever do is happening and
I don't see anybody calling it out as
directly as I'm going to call it
out we don't know if this is going to
work yet right so it's too too early to
say the you know the mineral deal is a
spectacular success but it looks good at
the moment it looks looks like it has a
pretty good chance of working um but
here's my take if Trump succeeds in
reframing a hot War into a series of
business deals that are good for
everybody in the history of
leadership that will be the greatest
thing anybody ever did if it holds now
I'm not naive Putin is Putin we know
that we can't predict or trust what he
does we know that people with the best
of intentions you know maybe things
don't work out we know that
implementation might matter as much as
having a good idea so if it's not
implemented properly it doesn't work a
million things could go wrong I get it I
get it you don't have to tell me that it
could go wrong I get
it but just think about this he's on the
verge of
maybe reframing an actual Hot War into a
business
deal and so far all sides have entered
his
frame they've all entered his frame
nobody else can do
that you're you're seeing a Once In A
Thousand
Years set of
talent from Trump and and the people
that he's he's hired to help him this is
so
unprecedented and
unprecedented that and and I haven't
seen anybody report it the way I just
described it have you have you seen
anybody describe it the way I did every
Everybody Knows the fact
but has anybody described this as the
greatest
reframe maybe in history like who ever
did anything even close to this if you
can turn a hot War into a business deal
where everybody wins and it sticks and
of course I'll say it again we don't
know if it'll work we don't know if
it'll stick we don't know if Putin will
just use it as you know a delaying
tactic until he does worse things
maybe but it defin has a chance of
working and and more than a good chance
he got a solid chance of working
incredible
incredible anyway this is also
incredible so Senator Jim Banks and
representative cat kamik they're
introducing a bill to defund NPR because
it's a liberal propaganda Network they
say now I don't know if that means NPR
would go out a business where they just
have less funding but um I don't care
about the NPR part of the story maybe
it'll work maybe it won't here's the
bigger
picture
Trump has created a situation in which
everyone in the government in every
every way from Congress to every one of
the um the cabinet positions to all of
his
appointments they're competing to see
who can do the best job of reducing
costs
did I just tell you that Trump reframing
a hot War into a business deal is the
greatest thing anybody ever did in
history if Trump pulls off reframing
governments as a competition among peers
to see who can cut the government cost
the
most Standing
Ovation standing evation
[Applause]
now to be
clear to be clear and to be fair uh I'm
not excited about the cost cutting
yet I I think there's going to be a
whole bunch of we thought we could cut
that but we didn't get as much you know
where people will argue about whether
the numbers are accurate and even though
even though doge is showing exactly what
they're doing and they publish it so
there's a lot of messiness to come but
the hard
part the hard
part was the
reframe he turned it from a bunch of
people just I don't know what pursuing
their own self-interest in the
government what was the old model into
literally their publicly
competing publicly competing to see who
can cut the most fat and waste and fraud
out of their own their own departments
or their own
domains when would when have you ever
seen that
never never you've never seen it it's
never been done in the history of the
whole freaking world it's never been
done and you're watching it being done
right in front of
you have I ever mentioned there are some
things that America can do that nobody
can come
close you know I I have I have plenty of
criticism for my own country as a
patriot you know I love it of course
uh and you know we're not perfect you
know we we make a lot of false starts
we've done a lot of things we wish maybe
we hadn't done Etc but there are just
some things nobody else can do Europe
can't do that China can't do that Japan
can't do that name a country that can do
that even when melee did it I don't know
that he got everybody to
compete I I think maybe he just took the
chainsaw I could be wrong might have he
might have actually pulled that off in
Argentina but this is
incredible if if you think of it in
terms of the
reframe then suddenly it goes from just
a thing they're trying to do to
Holy Cow are you kidding me he pulled
off that making them compete to see who
can cut the cost the most
unbelievable
wow let's compare that to the main focus
under the prior
Administration so the main focus the
thing that gets you attention the thing
that will get you the uh the most praise
from the president is how you cut costs
and made it work what would have been
the same kind of focus different Focus
but what what would have been the Biden
Focus I'm not making this up this was
the Biden
focus it was
uh it was you got promoted if you cared
the most about people's
genitalia what color the genitalia is
and what is being done with
it that was the Biden Focus how' that
work out for you did the country get
really better A lot better when the
focus was uh
genitalia what color it was and what it
was being used for that was your
government we actually live through
that I mean just think about that we
went from caring about your
genitalia and everybody else's I guess
and how it all fit together to competing
to reduce waste and fraud in the
government talk about the Golden
Age oh my
God meanwhile uh you know case in point
Lee zeldon of the EPA plans to cut 65%
of it in other words he's competing
he's publicly competing to see how much
he can cut in his own domain
unbelievable so
good uh over at HUD the housing housing
group there HUD um according to just the
news HUD secretary Scott Turner
announced yesterday I guess um they're
going to terminate some rules that uh
had been terminated under the Trump
first term but then Biden put him back
in place and I guess it was a rule I'm
I'm just going to paraphrase because it
gets a little technical the rule was we
can't build a house for you unless your
genitalia is the right color and uh it's
being used for the right
things okay I'm probably exaggerating a
little bit but that's basically what it
was it was sort of Dei in housing so the
federal
government put restrictions on what you
could and could not do because it had to
be diversity in inclusive and it created
a whole bunch of obstacles to building
anything so it probably just made the
cost of housing go up because it it
created a situation where a lot of
people would say uh I don't even know
how to satisfy all those rules so I'm
not even going to bother so getting rid
of burdensome rules doesn't mean that
you're getting rid of diversity doesn't
mean that you're getting rid of anything
you wanted it just means that if the
state States want to put those if the
states want to put those I know some
kind of rules on themselves I guess they
can but he's just saying that the
federal government isn't going to
prevent you from building h Homes how
great is that the federal government is
not going to prevent you from Building
Homes thank you I just want the federal
government not to prevent me because the
state will do a good job of making sure
my home doesn't fall down on its own you
know that it's safe it's built in a
place I can ensure I mean all working
out in the
state so that's good
um meanwhile there's a new Trump trump
picked a pardon are a pardon are so
somebody to help him decide who to
Pardon and who he picked was Alice Marie
Johnson who you might remember was um
pardoned or did she come out during the
the first step thing were I think she
was just pardoned right and she was a
famous pardon and she's a a black woman
who I think uh was involved in some drug
stuff way long ago but was in jail for
what was an unreasonable amount of time
in my opinion and uh even van Jones who
had worked on that Pro that that process
of you know allowing people to get out
of jail earlier um he was praising Trump
for picking uh Alice Marie Johnson as
The gons are now I appreciate that now
again I'm not telling you that van Jones
turned Republican uh or that everything
he says next you're going to agree with
so it's not about that it's just you
know it's like a little uh flower
growing out of the sidewalk you know if
if you hear somebody on the left say
okay I can't even argue with that one
that's just a good
idea um there's a uh AI
created a video of what Gaza would look
like if Trump got to redevelop it and I
guess Trump actually reposted it on
Truth um but uh what's funny is uh it
shows a giant golden statue of trump in
in what what would be a Gaza that looks
like a you know a Seaside luxury resort
perfect situation and then I think
there's a part of it shows him lounging
side topless with uh Benjamin
Netanyahu which I didn't see that part
but that's funny there something with
Elon Musk there and the fact that Trump
reposted it when it shows a giant golden
statue of
trump again it's just something that
Trump can do you know Biden couldn't do
that like nobody else could do that he's
the only one who could repost that and
you would understand it's just a mild
troll it's just a little mild troll hey
does this bother
you do you want to complain about it go
ahead that would be fine it's just a
little mild troll love
it well the hill is reporting that uh
the iaea the international atomic energy
agency says Iran's going to be uh trying
to accelerate its uh its process for
being able to make a nuclear
weapon um do you think they had to
research that
story let's see how else could they have
gotten that story without doing research
oh here's an idea they could have asked
me hey Scott do you think Iran is
working harder to build a nuclear
weapon
um yes
yes well are you sure that they're not
moving in the other direction
um checking my
brain um it's the only thing they have
left to protect
themselves uh no they're
accelerating but is it possible that
they just say they're accelerating but
maybe they don't have even the
capability to to get it done uh yeah
that's possible that's possible did you
really need to research that I mean what
do you think they're
doing of course they are they have
nothing left
it's the only thing they have to bargain
with or or keep an attack
away so I do think there's a really good
chance that uh at some point Israel will
bury everything that they have with
giant bombs so we'll see how that works
out um I got a feeling that Netanyahu is
enjoying
winning and he's never going to have a
better
chance for total victory
you know how they talk about total
Victory and you thought not you but some
people thought oh and then when they're
done with their total Victory they'll
build a two-state solution and move all
the uh all the Palestinians and Hamas
back into Gaza and they'll live happily
ever after does that sound like total
Victory to you no no there was never any
intention because total Victory is about
the clearest statement of intention you
could ever make total Victory now take
that to what's going to happen with
Iran do you
think that uh Israel would would say
well we got total Victory when all Iran
is doing is building back his capability
to do it to him again through their
proxies
nope let me explain it again total
Victory total Victory total victory
means that Iran can't do nuclear weapons
one way or
another they're not going to stop until
Iran has no nuclear
program how do I know that for sure well
uh can the reporters ask me Scott what
do you think Israel plans to do let's
see what does total mean does total mean
we stop halfway and let them rebuild
wait wait no total total okay I got it
total Victory it means that they're
going to destroy the nuclear program
whatever it takes whatever it takes
whatever it
takes
guaranteed I I think we've clearly left
the domain of maybe I think maybe's over
now there is a
possibility that Iran will get that
message to because someone could explain
to them do you know what total means
have you heard of total yeah total means
they're going to solve the problem once
and it's not coming
back and this would be the time to
talk and if there is some way that you
can reach a non-military agreement and
not develop nuclear weapons you know we
can talk about that because that would
still be total and it would be the
easiest way to get
there but now if you're wondering if
Israel is
bluffing they're
not total is total and they they could
not be more clear about it so that's the
beauty of being credible too if Israel
had not done everything that it's done
so far which is pretty darn impressive
if you're just looking from from a
military perspective you you can make up
your own mind about who's who's right
and who's wrong in this and I don't even
have an opinion my opinion on the whole
situation is that in the Middle East the
strongest person gets what they
want I why would I need more of an
opinion than that that covers everything
whoever is strongest is going to go get
what they want that's it everything else
is just blah blah blah blah blah blah do
you support Israel what's the
difference what's the difference is that
going to make a difference no if they
can get it and they have the strength to
do it they're going to go get it and and
if that ever changed and for I don't see
how it would happen soon but if
something changed where the
uh Palestinians suddenly got all the
power what do you think they would do
you know exactly what they would do and
I wouldn't be for it I would just be
saying well I told you whoever Has the
strength gets what they want so that's
the entire story you don't have to be
more complicated than
that all right ladies and gentlemen
that's everything I have on the topics
of the day thank you for joining you're
all wonderful um I will see you again
tomorrow same time same place
yeah Scott supports
genocide of course you say that no I
support understanding what the words
total and victory mean what happens
after
that
not it's I w't say it's not my concern
it's just that having an opinion on it
wouldn't make any difference so I just
don't
bother so no I do not support
Israel just you know reflexively no
matter what they do nothing like that
they they have to they have to be a good
Ally to us and that's all I care about
and I would like to spend less money and
I would like them to spend more of their
money but you know there are lots of
lots of variables that go with that
because I think a lot of the money that
we give to Israel for military stuff is
really money that they have to spend on
our own military industrial complex so
maybe that's more of a US problem
you know something we need to work out
on our end whether that still makes
sense for us as a country but uh I only
care how Israel is treating
us that's
it all right I'm going to talk to the
locals people privately the subscribers
and the rest of you I'll see you
tomorrow same time same
place hope you enjoyed the
show
e
e
e for