Episode 1267 Scott Adams - Trump Presidential Library, Traveling With Restrictions, Fake News
Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com Content: ----------- - Boot on neck of Trump supporters - President Trump's Presidential Library - Is Gamestop a shift in culture? - Kevin Clinesmith's light sentence - China collecting Americans DNA - Jen Psaki, Biden's press secretary ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Hey everybody. Good morning. How are you? Well, it's nice to be home. It was nice to be on vacation, but it's nice to be home too. And I get to finally be with all of you. I apologize for oversleeping by three hours. I guess every now and then I should have a full night's sleep, and my body decided…
View segment →njoy the simultaneous sip. What do you need? Well, you need a cup or mug, glass or tankard, beer stein, a canteen, jug or flask of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the opening end of the day. The thing that makes everything bet…
View segment →. Here it goes. Go. Yeah, just as good as I told you, right? Yeah, you were thinking it's not going to be that good, is it? But it was. Once again, how about that? Well, let me start by telling you how hard it is to travel during the age of coronavirus. Most of you know I was just on my coronaviru…
View segment →o be controlled, where normal life is messy, right? But if it's designed to be controlled, maybe they can do it better than your normal messy life. Right? That's what I think. So I don't have a feeling of whether we can tell that closing businesses helps or hurts. So we don't have science, because…
View segment →crucify him. Let me say that again so you won't think I chose that word accidentally. If the Democrats thought that Trump was a problem before they decided to crucify him, and then he went silent for a while, how many days? And the only problem is if you thought that the so-called insurrection was a…
View segment →just needs to be awesome. I would mostly look forward to how they named the restrooms, because I think Adam Schiff needs to be part of that. Or at least you know the new green new toilets have two buttons depending on what your business was. You got the little button for number one and big button fo…
View segment →ou. And you decide what's right and then act on it. That's all we're going to ask of you as citizens. You just decide what's right. Now I don't know how that would turn out. Maybe that wouldn't work out. But I feel like that's where we should on this. Joe Biden should be asking people like me becau…
View segment →his feels like the kind of story that's a story because Trump is no longer in office. You know something is going to fill the news cycle no matter what. You take out Trump and there's this giant empty spot that has to be filled. I don't know. This story isn't interesting to me but it's capturing the…
View segment →he context of the Trump energy or populist gaining momentum will, while Trump is sort of absent from it at the moment, this is the sort of thing that's adding energy to that. Because this seems so blatantly, I hate to say unfair but that's how people will register it. You know the world, there's no…
View segment →e orders unless you were a dictator. Now apparently that was completely taken out of context and it was right. It was taken out of context. So how is that different from every CNN story about Trump? Pretty much all of the news about Trump was just stuff taken out of context but they didn't call it o…
View segment →t legal? Does anybody have any idea why that's legal? I can't think of any reason why that should be legal if we can't do it in their country. Now if they opened up and said hey let's just make it the same, you can do whatever we do there you can do here, but that's not going to happen. If we can't…
View segment →It just seems stupid. Are you having the same impression I have with Joe Biden's spokesperson Jen? Here's my take on her. Day one, oh she seems pretty capable. You know she seems bright and looked like a perfect choice for the job really. I thought it was a good choice although I feel like they sho…
View segment →conferences and she only answered cleverly, oh are you eager to see him is that what you're saying? And the reporter said sure. And then she didn't answer the question. Don't you think it's going to be more and more of a story the longer Biden goes without opening himself up to unfriendly questions?…
View segment →t you can observe that there are people who look otherwise normal who got all the wrong religion. People thinking you're reincarnating, well unless you believe that in which case it would be right. But if other people believed it you don't, that's crazy. So you have religions in which there are peo…
View segment →his is a better shirt today. I feel like this shirt. And that belief is more like that. That we pick the belief that sort of gives us some benefits, makes us feel good, makes us feel connected, whatever. And that we don't actually say are these beliefs based on science or truth? Can I prove it? Am I…
View segment →m only for subscribers. And some other micro lessons that will be on there this week. And somebody says if aliens were real we'd have seen photos by now. Yeah given that all we have is we have cameras in every pocket in the civilized world yeah I think we would have a picture of an alien by now. I…
View segment →I think I did, did I not do a micro lesson on that already? If not I will. And I will talk to you tomorrow. All right. YouTubers, sorry I was not streaming on YouTube while I was out of the country. The button disappeared. So there's some things you just can't do outside the country and for some re…
View segment →on I didn't have that option. Yes I am back in California. All right just looking at your comments. All right that's all we got for today and I will talk to you tomorrow.
View segment →Hey everybody. Good morning. How are you? Well, it's nice to be home. It was nice to be on vacation, but it's nice to be home too. And I get to finally be with all of you.
I apologize for oversleeping by three hours. I guess every now and then I should have a full night's sleep, and my body decided that today was the day. One of the problems with not sleeping much, because I hate sleeping, is that every now and then when I don't set my alarm clock, I'll oversleep by three hours. Typically I wake up at 3:00 or 4:00 in the morning, and I'm done. I just don't like sleep. Don't recommend being like me. Don't be like me. Instead, be like this: be a person who knows how to enjoy the simultaneous sip.
What do you need? Well, you need a cup or mug, glass or tankard, beer stein, a canteen, jug or flask of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the opening end of the day. The thing that makes everything better. The thing you've been waiting for. The thing that was late. It's called the simultaneous sip. And man, is it going to be good when you finally get it. Here it goes. Go.
Yeah, just as good as I told you, right? Yeah, you were thinking it's not going to be that good, is it? But it was. Once again, how about that?
Well, let me start by telling you how hard it is to travel during the age of coronavirus. Most of you know I was just on my coronavirus-delayed honeymoon. It took us months to figure out how we could do this safely and make it work. And thanks to my wonderful wife Christina, who is a genius at making stuff work, she figured out how to get us to the other side of the world safely and back. It was kind of amazing.
The basic thing you need to know is that it's masks all the way. We went to Bora Bora, which is in French Polynesia by Tahiti. Just sort of leave California and head toward New Zealand, but before you get to New Zealand you stop, and that's where Bora Bora is. And so we spent a week there. It was the most amazing week.
So here are the things you need to know, the highlights. It was a high-end resort. It was the Four Seasons in Bora Bora. Could not have been better. Just, it's impossible. There isn't any possible way this trip could have been better. Once you get there, getting there is hard, but once you get there it's amazing. Best scenery, feeling, service you've ever seen.
The other thing that's amazing is that the resort, I don't know if they're going to last, because their business was no more than, I don't think there were more than 30 people at the entire resort, which is built to handle hundreds. I don't know how many hundreds, but I think 300 or so. And there were maybe 30 of us there. So entire swimming pools, beaches with zero people except us. So as a honeymoon it couldn't have been better. Like, I'll never experience anything like this in my life again, because it was a top-level experience with no other people for all practical purposes.
So I worry a great deal about the future of their business, but man, it could not have been better. If you get a chance to go before the crowds pick up.
Here's the risk profile. We got tested once before we flew, so we had to have a result. Now I suppose we had a little bit of exposure theoretically before we flew, but once on the plane, at least I've seen studies that say that the planes are so good with their filtration these days that your odds of getting it on a plane are actually really, really low. People wear masks, but of course they fall asleep and their masks fall off them. So I would say masking is pretty good on the plane if you think that makes any difference. I'll talk about that in a minute.
So I wasn't worried about the plane. And once you get there there are no people, and the staff is all masked and they do good social distancing, etc. So they won't even clean your room if they think you're going to be around it for a while. So everything was done really, really well. I think the Four Seasons did everything that they could possibly do.
And then you get another test while you're there. So you have to do one before you fly there, once a few days after you've been there, and then once right before you come back. And we did that the same day. Now you've got to coordinate all this in a foreign country, right? So you've got to find a place in Tahiti that will give you a test that you'll get a result the same day so you can fly later that day.
Do you know how worried I was that that wasn't going to work? And you know, you've got four hours to get your test and it doesn't come, and you think to yourself, I'm in a foreign country and I can't fly home without this test. And they said it'd be here by now and it's not. You know, you're checking your email, you're thinking they wrote down a code wrong or something. You'll never get home.
Now of course these are silly traveler worries, because it's not likely that a place that's a tourist destination has not figured out how to get the tourist home. That's the part I always forget, is that I'm not the first person who ever had to figure this out. Obviously they have a system. So the hotel works with you, and the hotel will tell you where to get the test, and they'll make sure that you can get a cab there and back, and it's all very civilized and easy.
But boy, I'll tell you that the distance they push that swab down your nose in Tahiti, that set a record. I mean, the American tests were bad enough, but the Tahiti test, they really went for some spelunking for depth there. I think they tickled my brain a little bit.
But the bottom line is, if I had to judge how safe I was, and this is the bottom line of this, how safe I was traveling from the coronavirus versus how safe I would have been just staying home and socially distancing the normal but imperfect amount that we all do, I feel like I was safer on the road. I don't know if you could measure that in any way, but if I looked at all the testing that I did and all the other people did, I ended up on an island in the middle of the Pacific without anybody who had either not been there two weeks without an infection already, or they got tested within the day that they arrived. So it actually probably safer than just normal life and probably a lot safer. It probably wasn't even close.
Without an actual scientific way to measure that I can't be sure, so I'm only giving you a sense of it. I'm not giving you a scientific opinion. It felt way safer than just staying home. And that's a big credit to the system that has adjusted that much to make that possible.
So the traveling, I would say traveling with a mask is hard, especially if you have to try to sleep on the plane, because it's a long flight. We had a four-hour delay followed by a seven-hour flight on the way there. If you had in the travel time and the taxi time and everything else, you know, 12 hours in a mask, it's a long day. But a lot of people who have just regular jobs are doing that every day, so I'm not going to complain about it. So it was all good.
So here's a question that people keep asking me. I have apparently spoken differently about how we should look at business closures, the lockdowns, versus wearing masks. And it's actually a fair question. In one case I say that the business closures, the forced closures, do not have scientific backing to suggest that they work. Would you agree with that? That we don't really have scientific backing to suggest that closing businesses as opposed to keeping them open with all the right restrictions, we don't have evidence which one of those makes a difference.
Now I just told you I did a very complicated, extensive travel, and I did feel safer. I don't know, but it felt safer than normal life because it was so designed to be controlled, where normal life is messy, right? But if it's designed to be controlled, maybe they can do it better than your normal messy life. Right? That's what I think.
So I don't have a feeling of whether we can tell that closing businesses helps or hurts. So we don't have science, because it's hard to measure and it's kind of too early to even know if you did. So what do you do? You don't have science, but common sense kind of can point in both directions, can it? You could make a case that social distancing would be better served with business closures, but then how do you factor in the fact that it wouldn't be normal business? It would be opened under certain careful restrictions. Would that make it safer than normal life? It might. Who knows?
So I would say business closures are unproven scientifically. And so there you should really pause to see if you want to do that, because we know the cost of it could be gigantic in terms of extra poverty and all the things that that causes.
But I say the opposite or something very different about masks. And people have pointed out that looks like an inconsistency. Why is it that I say I can't make a determination about whether closing businesses make sense, but my common sense of it, which is largely an illusion, common sense is an illusion, but my feeling of it, having observed it up close, my feeling of it is it's a mistake to close businesses. There might be some exceptions, like possibly a gym, but no, even a gym, they would do good procedures. So I would say anybody who is willing to open up and do careful procedures, my logical, just experienced brain that sees the world says probably opening businesses would be a better way forward.
And California is starting to open up a little bit starting this week, so that's good. But I don't say that with masks.
Now masks also have this problem that we don't know exactly what masks are doing in the context of the coronavirus. We know they've been measured in different contexts for different purposes in the past. We know that the experts overwhelmingly say you should use masks. We know that other people point to other studies and say no, these studies show masks don't make a difference.
So why is it that I would have a different opinion about masks, in which I say you should go ahead and wear them, take the recommendation of the experts, whereas the business opening stuff I'm a little squishier on, and it looks like maybe we should just open the businesses and not do that? Why do I make that difference?
And the difference is this. Here at first some context. You live in a life in a world in which you don't have scientific studies for almost anything you do. You don't know that waking up a little early will make your life better or worse. You don't know that this meal you ate is the smart one or not smart one. You don't know much about anything. You don't know the house you might buy, the job you might take, the commute you choose. Almost everything you're doing all day long is stuff that nobody studied. You've just lived in the world long enough where you say, I think this looks like a better choice than this, but there's no way to know. You just got to take your shot.
Masks are a little like that. And there's a rule that I use that I apply to just about everything, which is that friction pretty much always works. Now I'll leave a little wiggle room because I'm sure there's some case where it doesn't. But if you've lived long enough you see that wherever friction is applied or wherever it's removed, it has exactly the predictable impact. If you tax something, people will do less of it. If you build a wall, it'll be harder for people to get over it. Won't stop it, but it'll be harder, might reduce it. If you restrict anything, you get less of it.
And with my living in the world without the science, just living in the world, I say hey, if the problem is stuff shooting into your mouth, and we know that that's far bigger problem than what you're touching, that seems to be the common understanding, if it's stuff that's shooting out of your mouth and you can put some friction on that thing, does it stop every bit of the virus? No, no we know it doesn't stop all of the virus. But we do know that the amount of the viral load makes a big difference in what the outcomes are.
So as long as we know that the degree of viral load makes a big difference, and common sense and living in the world says well this mask probably limits some of that, does it stop all of it? No. Nobody thinks that. Nobody thinks a mask stops a virus. Nobody thinks that. There's no expert who thinks that. They think it might slow it down, might add a little friction.
Now do you need to do a scientific study in every situation in your life in which somebody's applying or taking away friction to know what kind of effect that will have? You would be right 99 percent of the time if you just said that friction is a real thing and wherever it is added you get less of a thing, wherever it's subtracted you get more of a thing. That's it.
Now could I be completely wrong? Could we learn someday in the future that masking was more bad than good? Absolutely you could totally learn that. So if you think I'm telling you I know with my great brain certainty 100 percent that masks are definitely the reason, I don't think that's knowable. And anybody who has that opinion I would respect that.
But I do think that if you're doing a risk management assessment, given how high the stakes are, I would say it's a good risk. And that the consensus of experts is still solidly pro-mask. If you see a growing number of experts who tell you masks don't work, I would take that seriously. But right now I don't see that. I see people who are not experts looking at studies they don't understand, which are usually on slightly different things, you know, whether it works in a surgery setting, etc., for different kinds of diseases.
I would wait for a pretty big consensus of experts to say they don't work before I would even consider that they don't work. And we don't have anything like that. Now if you've seen actual medical experts, a consensus, not a rando doctor person, but actual growing consensus of doctors saying masks don't do anything, I would take that seriously. But that doesn't exist.
And you got to ask yourself why, right? Because there are people on every side of everything. You don't have enough doctors to form sort of a movement away from masks. You don't. That means something. You should take that seriously.
Now does that mean the experts are right? No. But since it matches with my common sense, if you want to call it that, it's always an illusion, then I'm willing to take that as a reasonable risk to wear the masks.
Here's the funniest, scariest thing in the world. There's some reporting that Trump is getting stronger by being out of the news. I think everybody has made the same observation that Trump, if he just stopped talking for a while as president, if he had just stopped talking for a while, that his popularity would have gone through the roof if he just stopped being a little bit as Trumpy as he is. Now that's a ridiculous thing to hope for, because the whole point of electing Trump is that he wasn't going to change. He wouldn't have even been elected in the first place if people thought he was going to be a different person when he took office, right? That's part of what you expected, that Trump is Trump.
That said, he sort of involuntarily forced into some silence after his term ended. And the less he talks, I feel like the more popular he's going to get, because you've got this big populist energy, if you will, that suddenly became leaderless. What happens when you have this much energy, let's say the populist, whatever the Trump movement was, you have that much energy and then the leader goes silent? What happens? Does the energy just dissipate? Well I guess the people on the left hoped that would happen. Does it transfer to another leader? It could. But who is that? Don't you think we'd know by now who is the natural inheritor of the energy that the Trump movement or the populist movement created? I don't know.
I mean there are some good Republican candidates for 2024. Some of them more Trump-like than others. But there's not really a natural, you know, there's not a name where everyone of you would say, well what about X? Not really, right? Yeah, Matt Gaetz I think is his own person. I don't see him as exactly a Trump clone. But he would be at least in terms of the populist policies would be very close to that. So yeah, Ted Cruz has some problems politically at the moment because he's being branded as being part of the insurrection.
So here's the interesting part. If you thought that Trump was a problem before, the Democrats decide to crucify him. Let me say that again so you won't think I chose that word accidentally. If the Democrats thought that Trump was a problem before they decided to crucify him, and then he went silent for a while, how many days? And the only problem is if you thought that the so-called insurrection was a problem, wait till you see the resurrection, because the resurrection's going to be a bigger problem if you're a Democrat.
Now I'm not going to predict that Trump, after having been legally and politically crucified, would go away effectively as if dead for a while while the movement that he led grows in his absence, grows. If he were to return, it's a big problem. Now I predicted he won't. I predicted that he would not be politically viable because he wouldn't be able to get the same people who supported him the same way before. And I'm going to stick with that. I'm going to stick with my prediction that he will not run for office again. So I'm going to stick with that.
But if you wanted to guarantee that he did run for office and win, just keep doing what you're doing. Because every time you hear somebody who is associated with Trump get taken down, at first you say, oh okay, that's a special case. That's somebody who did something illegal and of course the law is the law so I understand that one. Oh there's another one. Oh it's somebody, okay well okay they did something else. Yeah I guess that was pretty bad so I guess that's a special case. You know they were a Trump supporter but that's a special, well there's another one. There's another one and then there's three more.
Every time you hear another Trump supporter being taken down it starts with yeah those I guess they had to do that they broke some laws. And then it starts to be people taken down for things they may or may not have thought. People being taken down for signing up for to have a Parler and Gab account. That just happened. That was just in the news. Somebody got fired for simply having an account on Parler and Gab. That's it. That was the entire accusation. They had an account in an alternative social media platform.
Every time you hear about that stuff it feels as if the people who associated with it and all that populist energy might be picking up power. It's exactly what the Democrats don't want to happen. But I think they're doing it as aggressively as they possibly could. And it's building up this sort of resentment, revenge energy. You don't want to build up too much resentment revenge energy. And that's what the Democrats are doing. Because it's the more revenge they put into the system, the more it's going to come back. Wouldn't you agree?
We have a system in which the more revenge you put into it, the more is coming back. There's no way around it. The Republicans are not going to sit there for four years of revenge being taken out upon them without an equal and opposite reaction. It just, there isn't any way that can happen. And so the Democrats are creating a situation for Trump's resurrection that is the one you don't want. That's the one you don't want.
And I don't even think I want that one because that's going to be too much energy and not exactly the right place, right? That's too much energy. And they have a real problem here. This is a real problem.
I'm still going to stick with my, like I said, my prediction that he won't run for office again. But man are they making it dangerous. They are really making it dangerous. Because if they don't take the boot off our neck pretty soon, let me put it this way. I don't know if this is a Republican quality. I don't identify Republican as, you know, I don't identify even conservative as, you know. But I have this quality and I think it might be common to the right. So I might have this in common, which is I am really, really flexible. Really flexible until I'm not. And I can't even tell you where the not kicks in because I'm always surprised in my normal life. You know I'm exactly the same, not just my political opinions but the way I live my in-person life. Very flexible, very, very flexible until I'm not. And when I'm not it just falls off a cliff. When I'm not, it's absolute. There's no negotiation once I hit a certain point. And I scare people because I don't have any warning before that happens.
I worry that that's what's happening with the political right, which is they're flexible. They're taking it all. All right, all right, we gave it to you pretty hard when Trump was in charge. You know, okay, all right, a little slap, a little slap. We had that coming. We said some bad things too. Okay, another little slap. You turn the other cheek. Yeah, not looking for trouble. Okay that's three. That's three. I'm going to shake that off. That's four. That's four. Still okay. Holding it down. Don't want any trouble. That's five.
You know where this is going, right? There is a psychological atomic bomb that's being created by the actions, the revenge actions of the left, that they can push a little bit. You know they could get away with that. And even people on the right I think at some level you're saying yeah elections have consequences. I wish our side won. Yeah we gave it to them pretty hard. It's a political game. They're giving it back a little bit. But there is a limit. There is a limit. And if they reach that limit they're going to get a leader of the populist movement that they didn't want. Could be Trump again. That would be a big problem. Could be Trump again, a big problem for the left anyway. But it'll be somebody else. And you don't want it to be me, that's for sure. You don't want it to be me.
All right. The funniest story in the news is the talk about the Trump Library. Somebody wrote an article, an opinion piece in the Washington Post saying that Trump should not have a presidential library. He should not have a library. Come on. Well Joel Pollak called that out and wrote about it. And here's just something that Joel wrote in Breitbart. He said the paper, who's talking about the Washington Post, he said the paper whose motto is democracy dies in darkness presented an argument Thursday by an art and architecture critic Philip Kennicott about why the history of the Trump administration should in fact be shrouded in darkness. Kennicott wrote Trump must never have an official presidential library and Congress should move quickly to make sure he never will.
Well game on. Not only, as Joel points out, not only should Trump have a presidential library but it needs to be the best one, at least in terms of popularity. It needs to be the best one. And the best way to do this would be to make it commercial. Would you not pay a small entry fee to see a properly designed Trump presidential museum? Oh yeah you would. Yeah you would. You'd pay for that if he did it right, right? If it's just a boring museum where you walk through and see some photos and stuff you're not going to, you don't care about that too much. But if he made it funny.
Imagine if you will, as Joel points out, one wing being the Russia collusion mental hospital wing. Imagine going into a Trump museum and you go into one room and it's nothing but a bunch of videos playing in a loop of Adam Schiff and other Republicans making accusations of the Russia collusion hoax. You could have one room for every hoax. You could have the fine people hoax room. You could have the drinking bleach hoax room. But you could also have the CNN fake news room where it's an entire exhibit of only the fake news that just was on CNN. It'd be clips and examples and then the debunk of all, you know you'd have the fake news and then the debunk of it, why it's wrong. And then kids could go learn there and as a school outing you could go and you could learn how the news is all made up. You tell me you wouldn't buy a ticket to that. You would buy a ticket to that.
Now add in an animatronics, not animatronics, let's say a deep fake Trump who can, who actually has some AI built in so it can interact with you. It's like a 3D hologram of Trump but it's actually programmed with, I guess Google and some other companies now have some AI that's whole next level. So by the time it gets built maybe some of that will be available where it can really, really understand the context of conversation. Then you build a hologram Trump who can speak back to you basically using tweets or things he said before so he matches them to your content. But it's Trump's actual words. He'd be saying what he tweeted or what he said in public at some point. You could totally build that. You wouldn't want to see that? You wouldn't want to go up and talk and have a conversation with deep fake holographic Trump? You would do that. You would do that.
All right so yeah Trump needs a presidential library and it needs to be commercial. It needs to be huge, hugely popular. I mean and it just needs to be awesome. I would mostly look forward to how they named the restrooms, because I think Adam Schiff needs to be part of that. Or at least you know the new green new toilets have two buttons depending on what your business was. You got the little button for number one and big button for number two. Well I think the big button should be named Adam Schiff and the little button should be whatever. But then there should also be, I'd like to see a Stormy Daniels interactive exhibit sort of like a ride. Well you could use your imagination there. I don't have to fill in the blanks.
All right. This is a predictable problem. Apparently there were a bunch of vaccinations available in Washington Heights, a part of New York City which has high minority population, I think mostly Hispanic if I'm correct. And a bunch of white people came in and got those shots. So they were available for people over 65 and a bunch of old white people went in there and took those shots so they weren't available for other people.
Now wouldn't it be better that maybe we didn't divide our health care by race? I don't know how this could possibly go well. You know I said this before I think on a tweet. I'm completely on board with the fact that African-American citizens should get some priority because they have worse outcomes. I get that. But there's such a big difference between asking me personally if I would mind waiting, you know waiting for other people to go ahead, in which case I'll say yeah I will. You know that's a good argument. Some other people should go ahead of me. I mean we're all doing that, right? Everybody's saying if you're over 80 you go first. If you're doing frontline healthcare you should go first, etc. So I don't have any problem with the concept of as a citizen of letting other people go first. And black citizens would be at the top of my list because they have worse outcomes. So of course yeah I'm completely on board with that.
But what happens when your government tells you that's the rule? That's different, isn't it? If you ask me personally I'm fine with it. But if you tell me it's the law that my race will determine my health care outcomes, at least in this way, I've got a problem with that. I just don't feel that that's where the government should be getting involved.
But if you ask me voluntarily, you know if even let's say Joe Biden who is legally acknowledged as my president, I don't have to agree with him politically, if he simply said look the only way this is going to work is for you citizens to step up and make some sacrifice. You know who you are. Don't get your shots first. I'd say let us work that out. Because there are people whose psychological condition is such that they probably need to get it sooner because they can't deal with things psychologically, right? Or they don't have the ability to socially isolate as well as I can. If I can socially isolate better than 95 percent of the world and I think that's actually true in my case, shouldn't I wait a little bit longer? Makes perfect sense to me. You just have to ask.
One of the things that's I think deeply missing in this country is just asking. When was the last time somebody did that? When was the last time your leaders said look I don't want this to be a law because it's a bad precedent. I don't want to make it a law that white people go last for shots. It's just not a good precedent. But I will tell you, you know what the risks are and I want you to act like good citizens. I want you to do what's right. Use your conscience. Look at your own risk and reward. Nobody can make that decision for you. And you decide what's right and then act on it. That's all we're going to ask of you as citizens. You just decide what's right.
Now I don't know how that would turn out. Maybe that wouldn't work out. But I feel like that's where we should on this. Joe Biden should be asking people like me because I'm sort of out in the bubble. I'm not old enough that I can get into the shots but I could make an argument about comorbidity. I've got asthma so maybe I should be at the top of the line. But I wouldn't mind waiting because I can socially isolate better than most people. So special case. I'll wait a little bit.
All right. Just ask. So that's a direct request to Joe Biden. Just ask. Seriously, just ask. I think a lot of people would be willing to help out.
So I guess we have to talk about GameStop. And I guess I have a different opinion about this whole GameStop stuff. I'm watching it with the same level of entertainment you are. I also don't care if the billionaire hedge fund people lose some money. I don't know how that works for the people who invested with them. I feel as though there are ordinary investors who would get it in the shorts no matter what happens. But that's true of the stock market in general. So I watch it with amusement.
But here's what I'm not seeing that other people are seeing. That it's some kind of a, it's marking some kind of a shift or it's telling us something about the larger society or the little people versus the rich. I don't see any of that. I just see sort of a one-off thing that somebody discovered they could do. It grew in popularity. Of course part of that is the political climate and our history of the rich people getting richer, etc. But to me it doesn't feel like the beginning of some kind of giant shift in culture or change or anything. It just feels like a thing that happened. I don't see it having a large carryover.
Now as I saw in the comments apparently a lot of Chinese youth are getting into this as well. I would imagine that this will result in some kind of rule change because otherwise these large group of organized investors will destroy the market for gain because you could pretty much target any company and manipulate it in this way. And apparently it's legal. You know hedge funds are not that different. But I guess this only works as a legal process if not too many people do it. So that might be the long-term change, is that if the hedge funds have been doing it and now other people can organize to do it, there's too much of it. And if there's too much of it then maybe it has to be regulated away if there's some way to do that. I don't know if it's even practical. But so they might break this opportunity for the hedge funds. Maybe. We probably not.
So my best guess about where this all comes out is it just becomes a news story that fades away. Maybe there's a rule change that stops it later. But I see it more as a prank than anything else. And of course there are the sub stories about I guess the SEC said it was going to review how some of the brokerage firms acted when they stopped trading, which disadvantaged the little investor. So that has to be looked into. But it looks like the legal system or the government regulation system will look into it. So I don't know that there's as much there as other people are thinking.
It feels like this feels like the kind of story that's a story because Trump is no longer in office. You know something is going to fill the news cycle no matter what. You take out Trump and there's this giant empty spot that has to be filled. I don't know. This story isn't interesting to me but it's capturing the imagination.
Who do you think would be the natural leader of the populist movement if let's say if Trump does not resurrect? Who would be the natural leader? Give me some names. Now I heard Matt Gaetz. I've heard, well who do you think, who would even qualify to take that role? Yeah you know there wouldn't be a better president than me on some level but I would never want that job so it's never going to happen. The only thing that would make me a good president, I probably had more bad qualities than good so don't vote for me for president. But the one good thing I would bring is I wouldn't feel the need to lie to you. Maybe if you take the job suddenly you have all kinds of reasons to lie but I wouldn't really feel the need to because I don't think there's anything I couldn't explain in a way. I just wouldn't need to. But it would be the worst job in the world so I wouldn't want it.
All right. In the news, FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith, you heard of him on the Russia collusion hoax business. He forged an email in Carter Page's FISA process. And he forged an email. Just think about that. A US attorney forged an email, ruined the life of this Carter Page guy for all practical purposes. His professional career just got napped. And all he received for that was 12 months probation, 400 hours of community service, and a $100 fine.
Now I don't know what is typical for what kind of a sentence you get for that kind of a crime. I suppose they probably say something along the lines of no prior crimes. Maybe they argued he thought he had a good reason. I'm not sure that should make a difference. Maybe they just said this is similar to other crimes.
Oh I'm seeing people say Tulsi Gabbard, Rand Paul for a populist leader. Maybe so. But what do you think of this? 12 months of probation, no jail time for throwing the entire country and people's specific lives into horrible situation. I feel as if this is not even close to appropriate. If you forge something in the role of a government professional, especially an FBI attorney, that's got to mean something. That's different from a regular crime, right? Can you treat a government action against a citizen the same as you could just do citizen-to-citizen crimes? I feel as if he's being sentenced as if this were just a regular white collar crime. This was not a regular white collar crime. This almost destroyed the whole freaking country and it destroyed some people's lives for sure. This should have been five to 10 years. That feels about right to me. Five to 10 years. Wouldn't you say if you were just going to compare it to other crimes that you're aware of? Five to 10 years. Completely inappropriate.
And this is the sort of thing that in the context of the Trump energy or populist gaining momentum will, while Trump is sort of absent from it at the moment, this is the sort of thing that's adding energy to that. Because this seems so blatantly, I hate to say unfair but that's how people will register it. You know the world, there's no such thing as fairness, but people will register this as unfair.
In other news, Black Lives Matter movement has been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize, which is interesting for a movement which many would consider a racist movement. Now obviously its intention is to be anti-racist but in application it became an overt racist movement I would say. Now that is not to say that the people in it are bad people. But in terms of just how it evolved and what it turned into, I would say that it turned from an anti-racism thing into just a completely racist movement. Even though the goals of it of course most people would agree with, of all that Black Lives Matter of course.
So I think the Nobel Peace Prize has become just ridiculous at this point. I mean yeah it always has been ridiculous but it went to a new level of ridiculousness I suppose. We say that every year.
Funniest thing I'm seeing lately in the news is, do you remember Daniel Dale who I guess works for CNN as their fact checker? So during the Trump administration he would come on and fact check Trump and say everything that Trump said was wrong. And now he's in the role of defending Biden for things taken out of context about Biden. So he claims that this was taken out of context. That when Biden was talking about executive orders, you know he said something along the lines of you shouldn't do a lot of executive orders unless you were a dictator. Now apparently that was completely taken out of context and it was right. It was taken out of context. So how is that different from every CNN story about Trump? Pretty much all of the news about Trump was just stuff taken out of context but they didn't call it out. Now Daniel Dale will have to call out all the times that Biden is taken out of context. So he went from a cool job where you get to criticize Trump all the time into a way less cool job where he's got to defend Biden for things that Biden maybe should have said a little more clearly or added as a better context or something. So poor Daniel Dale, his job just got demoted to Biden apologist.
Apparently China had this clever scheme. One of the big companies was offering to build test labs in this country and the accusation here is that that would have allowed them to collect a bunch of DNA from Americans. And that China is in the process of collecting as much American DNA as they can. Now I can't think, there probably a whole bunch of ways you can misuse DNA and of course the scariest one is any kind of a weapon that would be DNA specific, which we do worry could be possible. I think it might be possible actually. So that's a pretty dangerous thing.
But here's the question that this asks, that this raises. Why is it in the year 2021 Chinese companies have something close to free rein in the United States? They I'm sure they have restrictions but Chinese companies can do business in the United States in a way that American companies can't do business in China. Now you can do some kinds of business but it's not anywhere close to equal. Why do we let that happen? Why in the world would we let our rival China do something closer to unrestricted business in our country with this kind of risk? You know if they put any technology into your company you've got a risk that they're stealing your secrets through the technology. If they do any kind of medical thing you've got a risk that they're going to steal your DNA. If you do any kind of other thing there's going to be some other risk. Every time the Chinese are buying into this country it opens up some kind of a risk. Why do we let them do business here? Why is that legal? Does anybody have any idea why that's legal? I can't think of any reason why that should be legal if we can't do it in their country.
Now if they opened up and said hey let's just make it the same, you can do whatever we do there you can do here, but that's not going to happen. If we can't do business in their country they should not be able to do business in our country. They should be the same. And why is that even controversial? Who's on the other side of that argument? Is there somebody in the United States who says yeah yeah we really do want the Chinese to be putting their money into our economy? Are they putting so much in that we would go into a depression if they stop investing? I don't know. I guess I need to know more about that. But I've never heard a reason why China should do business with us when we can't do the same kind of business with them. If there is an argument for that I'd love to hear it but I think it's just stupid from a security perspective. It just seems stupid.
Are you having the same impression I have with Joe Biden's spokesperson Jen? Here's my take on her. Day one, oh she seems pretty capable. You know she seems bright and looked like a perfect choice for the job really. I thought it was a good choice although I feel like they should have chosen a woman of color. But you know she looked very capable and qualified and she had a good background and etc.
But as time goes by, do you know some personalities, the more you see them the less you like them. But there are others, the more you see them the more you like them. You know some people don't, they don't wear well if you know what I mean. There's something about Jen Psaki who is let's say whatever is the opposite of Dana Perino. I'll just pick her as my example. The more you see of Dana Perino who had been spokesperson under Bush, the more you see of her the more you like her. She just has one of those personalities. The more you see the more you like. That's why she's you know has a lot of time on Fox News. The public likes seeing her.
But the more I see of Jen, and this has nothing to do with being a Democrat, has nothing to do with being a woman, right? So if you're looking for any isms I don't think it has anything to do with any of that. She just has a personality that the more you see of it the less you like it. Am I right? And the reason I use Dana Perino as my opposite example is because she doesn't have that. And I would say Kayleigh McEnany even if you hated how she treated the press she's also one of those personalities where the more you see of her the more you like her. And that's just not true of everybody. The more you see of Adam Schiff the less you like him, right?
Now could it be that I'm being biased simply by political leanings and I'm thinking to myself no I'm just agreeing with people I want to agree with and I'm just having some bias about people who might have a different opinion from me? Could be. I mean it might be that that's all that's happening here. But I put the question out to you. It seems like there's something about her that a little bit lasts a long time if you know what I mean. Are you, is anybody getting that same vibe? Very capable, very smart, but a little bit of her goes a long way. And I don't know if that's going to be a factor going forward.
But the story related to this is that when she was asked whether they're going to see Joe Biden some more for these press conferences and she only answered cleverly, oh are you eager to see him is that what you're saying? And the reporter said sure. And then she didn't answer the question. Don't you think it's going to be more and more of a story the longer Biden goes without opening himself up to unfriendly questions? Because the whole point of these presidential press conference things is that it opens you up to unfriendly questions. Is Biden going to avoid unfriendly questions for four years? Can he get away with that? Probably can.
Here's something I recommend to you on CNN. I've said this before but while I criticize CNN's news coverage quite a bit, CNN as a network does some non-news programming that often is really good. Some, a lot of the CNN specials they're just about say a certain topic, they're quite well done. And I recommend them quite often. They've got one coming up that's being teased. I think Anderson Cooper is running this. And they're talking to some Q supporters to sort of dig down and figure out what's up with the Q believers. And there's a teaser where Anderson Cooper is talking to a completely rational looking guy. A guy who you'd say to yourself, and first of all he looked like he might have a, I'm guessing, no I don't want to guess somebody's ethnicity but I'll say he's the person he was talking to is not a typical white bread looking guy let's just say that. But I won't guess what his ethnic background is. But that makes it interesting too because you're imagining the Q believers as a bunch of super white people but here was one that Anderson was talking to who was not in that category. And said that he believed that at one point that Anderson Cooper ate babies. He said that to Anderson Cooper. And then he apologized for thinking that Anderson Cooper ate babies. And then he went on to say other things he believed about Q being working with interdimensional blue birdlike creatures. What? And here's the amazing thing. The guy he interviewed looked like a completely normal smart person who could operate in the world and do just about anything. A very capable reasonable looking person. And that person looked right in the camera and said to Anderson Cooper yeah I believed you ate babies. Sorry, blue avians is what I guess the Q people call it now.
What do you make of this? Do you say to yourself well that's a crazy person? Or do you say to yourself there are lots of crazy people? Do you imagine that the Q people are mentally weak? Do you think that the Q people are extra gullible? Do you think that the Q people have some kind of strange mental defect that makes them believe these things whereas you do not?
Here's the bad news people. They're completely normal. That's the bad news. The bad news is the people who believe that Q, the stories that Anderson Cooper was eating babies, the people who believe that, completely normal or at least average or typical or routine human beings.
How do I know that? You're not going to like this. I probably lose a few followers in the next few minutes. Because people believe every religion. No matter what religion you have, which I think we can agree, can we stipulate something that whatever religion you have is the true one? Let's just agree with that. Now I don't know what your religion is. They're probably different. But just say that the one you have, that's the right one, okay? But now that you know that you have the right religion, lucky you. You could have gotten it wrong but you didn't. You got the right one. That means that there are billions of regular people who got the wrong religion.
Do you know what you would believe if you got the wrong religion? It might involve magical sounding stuff a little bit for the wrong religion. Now your religion is the right one so lucky for you you're smart and wise and you don't fall for gullible stuff but yours is the good one. But you can observe that there are people who look otherwise normal who got all the wrong religion. People thinking you're reincarnating, well unless you believe that in which case it would be right. But if other people believed it you don't, that's crazy.
So you have religions in which there are people walking on water and resurrecting. Maybe that's the real one. But you got other ones in which somebody's riding a flying horse to heaven. Maybe that's the real one and maybe the other one's not. Some people believe in reincarnation as I said. Some people believe in heaven. Some people believe there's nothing there. One thing you can say for sure is that regular normal human beings with completely functional brains will believe anything. It's actually just built into our nature. We will believe anything.
But here's the only thing I want to add to that. Because on some level you do that, right? The thing I want to add to that is that the way humans believe is almost like choosing what clothes you're going to wear I think. And you can see it with this person who was talking to Anderson Cooper, the ex-Q believer. The way he spoke of it was almost like a lifestyle choice to adopt a set of beliefs. Because adopting that set of beliefs had some benefits. Maybe it made you part of a group. Maybe it made you interested. Maybe it was intellectually stimulating. But whatever the reason was it was just a choice.
And I would submit to you that people choose their filter or the set of things they believe based on what just feels good. The same way you decide well I'll wear this shirt or this other shirt when you get dressed. How do you make that decision which shirt to put on? You say well I like this one. This is a better shirt today. I feel like this shirt. And that belief is more like that. That we pick the belief that sort of gives us some benefits, makes us feel good, makes us feel connected, whatever. And that we don't actually say are these beliefs based on science or truth? Can I prove it? Am I being gullible? What about those other people? Why do they believe something different? It's nothing like that. It's simply a lifestyle choice to buy into a set of beliefs and then treat them as though they're true even on some level knowing that you just made a choice to treat them as true as opposed to them being objectively true anyway.
You should watch the Q special. I think you're actually going to learn a lot about how completely normal people can choose to believe something crazy.
I'll give you an example of that. When I watch one of my favorite shows is about ancient astronauts and ancient aliens allegedly have building the pyramids and allegedly interacting with lots of different early cultures. Speaking of which I'll show you a picture if I can do this on camera. So in Tahiti they've got all of these, let's see if I can do this, if I can hold it just right you can see it. There's a little totem looking picture all over the place in Tahiti where it looks like an alien, like this big eyed alien thing. And they're all over the place as if the early Tahitians had had contact with an alien race and that now they're building them into all their imagery. And I thought to myself well maybe they just liked creating creatures that looked identically to how we would imagine an alien looks. It's just a coincidence. Maybe that's what's going on.
But when I watch those shows I suspend my critical thinking and I allow myself to live in a reality in which the aliens did come down and taught people how to build pyramids and those are why the cave drawings look like advanced aliens with spaceships sometimes. Now when I do that, when I accept that reality for the point of entertaining myself by watching this, am I really accepting it as an actual reality or am I accepting it as an entertainment reality? And I feel like it's different. My inner sense of it is that if you put a gun to my head and said all right now you're going to have to bet with your real money or we're going to kill you if you're wrong. You have to bet. Did the aliens teach the early people how to build the pyramids? All right you got to put your real money on it now. I'd bet against it. I'd bet against it. And I wouldn't feel too unsafe when I did. I'd feel confident that I could bet against the aliens having built the pyramids or helped on that.
But when I watch those shows I like to accept it as true because it makes it more fun. So I find that I can wear reality like a shirt. I can just put on my alien astronaut shirt and I can just wear it for a while and then I can just take it off. And if somebody says now you have to bet your real money I'd say oh real money, real money, okay let me take off the shirt.
Once you learn that people can change their religion basically like they can change a shirt because it's more of a lifestyle decision, it's not based on what you really think is true in many cases, once you realize that distinction it starts explaining a lot of what you see. That people are adopting a belief that just feels good and they will and they can lose that belief if there's something that makes it stop feeling good. And the Q stuff you know had this business in the Capitol which was an event that made it stop feeling good. And the moment it stopped feeling good there were some people such as this guy talking to Anderson Cooper who said okay it doesn't feel good anymore. Now I'll change my belief.
All right. Who killed more people, the CCP or Q? Well that's easy.
All right that's about all I got now. I'm just looking at your comments. People love the ancient alien stuff. It just captures your imagination. All right. Was it a good honeymoon? Yes it was. Yes it was. I'd show you some pictures but you'd feel bad.
All right I'm going to put together some of my best, I think I've had some time to plan, micro lessons on how to program your brain. Now it's my favorite topic, how to reprogram your brain. But I've got another take on it that I think will be useful that will be on the Locals platform only for subscribers. And some other micro lessons that will be on there this week.
And somebody says if aliens were real we'd have seen photos by now. Yeah given that all we have is we have cameras in every pocket in the civilized world yeah I think we would have a picture of an alien by now. I think so yeah.
Locals is a platform in which subscribers can subscribe to my content that you don't see otherwise. So I have the stuff that you do see but I add useful content that you wouldn't see otherwise.
I'd like to know how to sleep. I think I did, did I not do a micro lesson on that already? If not I will. And I will talk to you tomorrow. All right.
YouTubers, sorry I was not streaming on YouTube while I was out of the country. The button disappeared. So there's some things you just can't do outside the country and for some reason I didn't have that option.
Yes I am back in California. All right just looking at your comments. All right that's all we got for today and I will talk to you tomorrow.
hey everybody good morning how are you well it's nice to be home it was nice to be on vacation but it's nice to be home too and I get to finally be with all of you I apologize for oversleeping by 3 hours I guess every now and then I should have a full night sleep and my body decided that today was the day one of the problems with not sleeping much because I hate sleeping is that every now and then when I don't set my alarm clock I'll oversleep by three hours typically I I wake up 3:00 4: in the morning and and I'm done I just don't like sleep don't recommend being like me don't be like me instead be like this be a person who knows how to enjoy the simultaneous sip what he needs well you need a cup or mug glass of tanker Cher Stein a canteen Jugger flask of V of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee join me now for the unparallel pleasure of the open me and headend of the day the thing that makes everything better the thing you've been waiting for the thing that was late it's called the simultaneous Sip and man is it going to be good when you finally get it here it goes go yeah just as good as I told you right yeah you were thinking it's not going to going to be that good is it but it was once again how about that well let me start by telling you um how hard it is to travel during the age of Corona virus most of you know I was uh just on my Corona virus delayed honeymoon took us months to figure out how we could do this safely and and make it work and thanks to my wonderful wife Christina who is a uh genius at making stuff work she figured out how to get us to the other side of the world safely and back it was kind of amazing uh the the basic thing you need to know is that it's masks all the way we went to uh borab Bora which is in French Polynesia by Tahiti just sort of Leave California and head toward New Zealand but before you get to New Zealand you stop and uh that's where boror is and so we SP a week there it was most amazing week so here are the things you need to know the highlights um it was a high-end Resort it was the Four Seasons in Bora Bora could not have been better just it's impossible there isn't any possible way this trip could have been better once you get there getting there is hard but once you get there it's amazing best scenery feeling service you've ever seen the other thing that's amazing is that the uh the resort I don't know if they're going to last because their business was no more than I don't think there were more than 30 people at the entire Resort which is built to handle hundreds I don't know how many hundreds but I think 300 or so and there were maybe 30 of us there so entire swimming pools beaches with zero people except us so as a as a honeymoon it couldn't have been better like I'll never experience anything like this in my life again because it was a you know a top level experience with no other people for in a practical sense so I worry a great deal about the future of their business but uh man it could not have been better if you get a chance to go before the crowds pick up here's the risk profile we got tested once before we flew so we had to have a result now you I suppose we had a little bit of exposure theoretically before we flew but once on the plane uh at least I've seen studies that say that the planes are so good with their filtration these days that your odds of getting it on a plane are actually really really low uh people wear masks but of course they fall asleep and their masks fall off them so I would say masking is pretty good on the plane if you think that makes any difference I'll talk about that in a minute um so I wasn't worried about the plane and once you get there there are no people and the staff is all masked and they they do good social distancing Etc so they won't even clean your room if they think you're going to be around it for a while so so everything was done really really well I think the four seasons did everything that they could possibly do and then you get another test while you're there so you have to do one before you fly there once a few days after you've been there and then once right before you come back and we did that the same day now you've got to coordinate all this in a foreign country right so you've got to find a place in Tahiti that will give you a test that you'll get a result the same day so you can fly later that day do you know how worried I was that that wasn't going to work and and you know you've got four hours to get your test and it doesn't come and you think to yourself uh I'm in a foreign country and I can't fly home without this test and they said it'd be here by now and it's not you know you're checking your email you're thinking they got they wrote down a code wrong or something you'll never get home now of course of course these are silly traveler worries because it it's not likely that a place that's a tourist destination has not figured out how to get the tourist home that's the part I always forget is that I'm not the first person who ever had to figure this out obviously they have a system so the hotel works with you and the hotel will tell you where to get the test and they'll make sure that you can get a cab there and back and it's all very civilized and easy but boy I'll tell you that the distance they push that that swab down your nose in Tahiti that set a record I mean the American tests were bad enough but the Tahiti test they really went for some spelunking for depth there I think they tickled my brain a little bit but the bottom line is if if I had to judge how safe I was and this is the bottom line of this how safe I was traveling from the Corona virus versus how safe I would have been just staying home and socially distancing the you know the the normal but imperfect amount that we all do I feel like I was safer on on the road I don't know if you could measure that in any way but if I looked at all the testing that I did and all the other people did I ended up on an island in the middle of the Pacific without anybody who had either not been there two weeks without an infection already or or they got tested within you know the day that they they arrived so it actually probably safer than just normal life and probably a lot safer it probably wasn't even close you know without an actual scientific way to measure that I can't be sure so I'm only giving you a a sense of it I'm not giving you a scientific opinion it felt way safer than just staying home and that's that's a big credit to the system that's that has adjusted that much to to make that possible so the traveling I would say traveling with a mask is hard especially if you have to try to sleep sleep on the plane cuz it's a long flight we had a 4-Hour delay followed by a 7-hour flight on the way there if you had in the travel time and the taxi time and everything else you know 12 hours in a mask it's a long day but a lot of people who have just regular jobs are doing that every day so um not going to complain about it so it was all good so here's a question that people keep asking me I have uh apparently spoken differently about how we should look at business Clos Downs the lockdowns versus wearing masks and it's actually a fair question in one case I say that the business closures the forced closures do not have scientific backing to suggest that they work would you agree with that that we don't really have scientific backing to suggest that closing businesses as opposed to keeping them open with all the right restrictions we don't have evidence which one of those makes a difference now I just told you I did a a very complicated extensive you know travel and I did feel safer I don't know but it felt safer than normal life because it was so you know designed to be controlled where normal life is messy right but if it's designed to be controlled maybe they can do it better than your normal messy life right that's what I think so um I don't have a feeling of whether we can tell that closing businesses helps or hurts so we don't have science because it's it's hard to measure and it's kind of too early for to even know if you did so what do you do you don't have science but Common Sense kind of can point in both directions can it you could make a case that social distancing would be better served with business closures but then how do you factor in the fact that it wouldn't be normal business it would be opened under you know certain careful restriction would that make it safer than normal life it might who knows so I would say business closures are unproven scientifically and so there you should really you should really pause to see if you want to do that because we know the cost of it could be gigantic in terms of extra poverty and all the things that that causes but I say the opposite or something very different about masks and people would pointed out that looks like an inconsistency why is it that I say I can't make a determination about whether closing businesses make sense but my common sense of it which is largely an illusion common sense is an illusion but my my feeling of it having observed it up close my feeling of it is it's a mistake to close businesses there might be some exceptions like uh possibly a gym but no even a gym they would do good procedures so I was say anybody who is willing to open up and do careful procedures my my logical just experienced brain that sees the world says probably opening businesses would be a better you know Way Forward um and and California is starting to open up a little bit uh starting this week so that's good but I don't say that with masks now masks also have this problem that um we don't know exactly what masks are doing in the context of the Corona virus we know they've been measured in different contexts for different purposes in you know in the past we know that the experts overwhelmingly say you should use bks we know that uh other people point to other studies and say no these studies show masks don't make a difference so why is it that I would have a different opinion about masks in which I say you should go ahead and wear them take the recommendation of the experts whereas the business opening stuff I'm a little squishier on and I and it looks like maybe we should just open the businesses and not do that why why do I make that difference and the difference is this here at first some context you live in a life in a world in which you don't have scientific studies for almost anything you do you don't know that waking up a little early will make your life better or worse you don't know that this meal you ate is the smart one or not smart one you don't know if you know you don't know much about anything you don't know the house she might buy the job you might take the commute you choose almost everything you're doing all day long is stuff that nobody studied you've just lived in the world long enough where you say I think this looks like a better choice than this but there's no way to know you just got to take your shot masks are a little like that and there's a rule that I use that I apply to just about everything which is that friction pretty much always works now I'll leave I'll leave a little wiggle room because I'm sure there's some case where it doesn't but if you've lived long enough you see that wherever friction is applied or wherever it's removed it has exactly the predictable impact if you tax something people will do less of it if you build a wall it'll be harder for people to get over it won't stop it but it'll be harder might reduce it if you restrict anything you get less of it and with my living in the world without the science just living in the world I say hey if the problem is stuff shooting into your mouth and we know that that's far bigger problem than what you're touching that seems to be you know the common understanding if it's stuff that's shooting out of your mouth and you can put some friction on that thing does it stop every bit of the virus no no we know it doesn't stop all of the virus but we do know that the amount of the viral load makes a big difference in what the outcomes are so as long as we know that the degree of viral load makes a big difference and we and Common Sense and living in the world says well this mask probably limits some of that does it stop all of it no nobody thinks that nobody thinks a mask stops a virus nobody thinks that there's no expert who thinks that they think it might slow it down might add a little friction now do you need to do a scientific study in every situation in your life in which somebody's applying or taking away friction to know what kind of effect that will have you would be right 99% of the time if you just said that friction is a real thing and wherever it is added you get less of a thing wherever it's subtracted you get you get more of a thing that's it now could I be completely wrong could we look learn someday in the future that masking was more bad than good absolutely you could totally learn that so if you think I'm telling you I'm know I know with my Great Brain certainty 100% that you know masks are definitely the reason I don't think that's knowable and anybody who has that opinion I would respect that but I do think that if you're doing a risk management assessment given the how high the stakes are I would say it's a good risk and that the consensus of experts uh is still solidly prask if you see a growing number of experts who tell you masth don't work I would take that seriously but right now I don't see that I see people who are not experts looking at studies they don't understand which are usually on slightly different things you know what whether it works in a let's say a surgery setting etc for different different kinds of uh diseases uh I would wait for the a pretty big consensus of experts to say they don't work before I would even consider that they don't work and we don't have anything like that now if you've seen actual medical experts a consensus not a rando doctor person but actual growing consensus of doctors saying masks don't do anything I would take that seriously but that doesn't exist and you got to ask yourself why right because cuz there are people on every side of everything you don't have you you don't have enough doctors to form sort of a sort of a movement away from mask you don't that means something you should you should take that seriously now does that mean the ma that the experts are right no but since it matches with my uh common sense if you want to call it that it's always an illusion then I'm willing to take that as a reasonable risk to wear the masks here's the funniest uh scariest thing in the world there's some reporting that Trump is getting stronger by being out of the news the we've I think everybody has made the same observation that Trump if he just stopped talking for a while as president if he had just stopped talking for a while that his popularity would have gone through the roof if he just stopped being a little little bit as trumpy as he is now that's a ridiculous thing to hope for because the whole point of electing Trump is that he wasn't going to change he he wouldn't have even been elected in the first place if people thought he was going to be a different person when he took office right that's part of what you expected that Trump is Trump excuse me that said um he sort of uh let's say inv voluntarily forced into some silence after his office his term ended and the less he talks I feel like the more popular he's going to get because you've got this big populist energy if you will that suddenly became leaderless what happens when you have this much energy let's say the populist whatever the Trump movement was you have that much energy and then the leader goes silent what happens does the energy just dissipate well I guess the the people on the left hope that would happen does it transfer to another leader it could but who is that don't you think we' know by now who is the who is the natural inheritor of the energy that the Trump movement or the populist movement created I don't know we I mean there are some good Republican C Cate potentials for 1994 some of them more more trump-like than others but there's not really a natural you know there's not a name where every one of you would say well what about X not really right yeah Matt Gates I think is his own is his own person I don't see him as exactly a trump clone uh but but he would be at least in terms of the populist um policies would be very close to that so a yeah Ted gruz Cruz has some problems politically at the moment because he's being branded as being part of the Insurrection so here's the interesting part if you thought that Trump was a problem before the Democrats decide to crucify him let me say that again so you won't think I chose that word accidentally if the Democrats thought that Trump was a problem before they decided to crucify him and then he went silent for a while how many days and the only problem is if you thought that the so-called Insurrection was a problem where till you see the resurrection cuz the resurrection's going to be a bigger problem if you're a Democrat now I'm not going to predict that Trump after having been legally and politically crucified would go away effectively as if dead for a while while the movement that he led grows in his absence grows if he were to return it's a big problem now I predicted he won't that IID predicted that he would not be politically viable because he wouldn't be able to get the same people who supported him the same way before and I'm going to stick with that I'm going to stick with my prediction that he will not run for office again so I'm going to stick with that but if you wanted to guarantee that he did run for office and win just keep doing what you're doing because every time you hear somebody who is associated with Trump get taken down at first you say oh okay that's a special case that's somebody who did something illegal and of course the law is the law so I understand that one oh there's another one oh it's somebody okay well okay they did something else yeah I guess that was pretty bad so I guess that's a special case you know they were Trump supporter but that's a special well there's another one there's another one in head there's three more every time you hear another Trump supporter being taken down it starts with yeah those I guess they had to do that they broke some laws and then it starts to be people taken down for things they may or may not have thought people being taken down for signing up for to have a parl and gab account that just happened that was just in the news somebody got fired for simply having an account on parl parlor and uh Gab that's it that was the entire accusation they had an account in a alternative social media platform every time you hear about that stuff it feels as if the people who associated with it and all that populist energy might be picking up power it's exactly what the Democrats don't want to happen but I think they're doing it as aggressively as they possibly could and it's building up this sort of resentment Rev VY energy you don't want to build up too much resentment Revenge energy and that's what the de Democrats are doing because it's the more Revenge they put into the system the more it's going to come back wouldn't you agree we have a system in which the more Revenge you put into it the more is coming back that's there's no way around it the the Republicans are not going to sit there for four years of Revenge being taken out upon them without an equal and opposite reaction it just there isn't any way that can happen and so the Democrats are creating a situation for Trump's resurrection that is the one you don't want that's the one you don't want and I don't even think I want that one because that's going to be too much energy and not exactly the right place right that's too much energy and they they have a real problem here this is a real problem I'm still going to stick with my like I said my uh prediction that he won't run for office again but man are they making it dangerous they are really making it dangerous because if they don't if they don't take the boot off our neck pretty soon let me put it this way I don't know if this is a a a republican quality um I don't identify Republican as you know I don't identify even conservative as you know um but I have this quality and I I think it might be common to the right so I might have this in common which is I am really really flexible really flexible until I'm knocked and I can't even I can't even tell you where the knot kicks in because I'm always surprised in my normal life you know I'm exactly the same not just my political opinions but the way I live my in-person life very flexible very very flexible until I'm not and when I'm not it it just falls off a a cliff when when I'm not it's absolute there's no negotiation once I hit a certain point and I I scare people because I don't have any warning before that happens I worry that that's what's happen in with the political right which is they're flexible they're taking it all right all right we we gave it to you pretty hard when Trump was in charge you know okay all right a little slap a little slap we had that coming we said some bad things too okay another little slap I you turn the other cheek yeah not looking for trouble okay that's three that's three um I'm going to I'm going to shake that off that's four that's four um still okay holding it down don't want any trouble that's five you know where this is going right there there is a psychological atomic bomb that's being created by the actions the Revenge actions of the left that they can push a little bit you know they could get away with that and even people on the right I think at some level you're saying yeah elections have consequences I wish I wish our side won yeah we gave it to them pretty hard it's a it's a political game they're giving it back a little bit but there is a limit there is a limit and if they reach that limit they're going to get a leader of the populist movement that they didn't want could be Trump again that would be a big problem could be Trump again a big problem for the left anyway but it'll be somebody else and you don't want it to be me that's for sure you don't want it to be me all right the funniest story in the news is the uh talk about the Trump Library somebody wrote an article in the an opinion piece in the Washington Post saying that Trump should not have a uh Presidential Library he should not have a library come on well Joel Pollock uh called that out and and wrote about it and here here's just something that Joel wrote in Breitbart he said the paper who's talking about the Washington Post he said the paper whose motto is democracy dies in darkness presented an argument Thursday by an art and architecture critic Philip kenot about why the history of the Trump Administration should in fact be shrouded in darkness kenot wrote Trump must never have an official Presidential Library and Congress should move quickly to make sure he never will well game on not only as as Joel points out not only should Trump have a Presidential Library but it needs to be the best one at least in terms of popularity it needs to be the best one and the best way to do this would to be make it commercial would you not pay a small entry fee to see a properly designed Trump Presidential Museum oh yeah you would yeah you would you'd pay for that if he did it right right if it's just a boring Museum where you walk through and see some photos and stuff you're not going to you don't care about that too much but if he made it funny imagine if you will as Joel points out uh One Wing being the uh the Russia collusion mental hospital Wing imagine going into a trump Museum and you go into one room and it's nothing but a bunch of videos playing in a loop of uh Adam Schiff and other Republicans making accusations of the uh political uh of the uh Russia collusion hoax you could have one room for every hoax you could have the fine people hoax room you could have the drinking bleach hoax room but you could also have the CNN fake news room where it's an an entire exhibit of only the fake news that just was on CNN it' be clips and examples and then then the debunk of all you know you'd have the fake news and then the debunk of it why it's wrong and then kids could go learn there and and as a school outing you could go and you could learn how the news is all made up you tell me you wouldn't buy a ticket to that you would buy a ticket to that now add in an anim animatronics not animatronics let's say a a deep fake Trump who can who actually has some AI built in so it can interact with you it's like a a 3D hologram of trump but it's actually programmed with I guess Google and some other companies now have some AI That's whole Next Level so by the time it gets built maybe some of that will be available where I can really really understand the context of conversation then you build a hologram Trump who can speak back to you basically using tweets or things he said before so he matches them to your content but it's Trump's actual words he'd be saying what he tweeted or what he said in public some point you could totally build that you wouldn't want to see that you wouldn't want to go up and talk and have a conversation with uh deep fake holographic Trump you would do that you would do that all right so yeah Trump needs a Presidential Library and it needs to be commercial it needs to be huge hugely popular I mean and it just needs to be awesome I would mostly look forward to how they were named the restrooms uh cuz I think Adam Schiff needs to be part of that uh you or at least you know the uh the new green new toilets have two buttons depending on what your business was you you got the little button for you know number one and big button for number two well I think the big button should be named uh Adam Schiff and the little button should be whatever but then there should also be a I'd like to see a Stormy Daniels interactive exhibit sort of like a ride well you could use your imagination there I don't have to fill in the blanks all right um this is a predictable problem apparently there were a bunch of vaccinations available in Washington Heights a part of New York City which has high minority population I think mostly Hispanic if I'm correct and a bunch of white people came in and got those shots so they were available for people over 65 and a bunch of old white people went in there and and took those shots so they weren't available for other people now wouldn't it be better that maybe we didn't divide our health care by race I don't know how this could possibly go well you know I said this before I think on a tweet um I'm completely on board with the fact that African-American citizens should get some priority because they have worse outcomes I get that but there's such a big difference between asking me personally if I would mind waiting you know waiting for other people to go ahead in which case I'll say yeah I will you know that's a good argument some other people should go go ahead of me I mean we're all doing that right everybody's saying if you're over 80 you go first if you're if you're uh you know doing Frontline Healthcare you should go first Etc so I don't have any problem with the concept of as a citizen of letting other people go first and that and black citizens would be at the top of my list because they have worse outcomes so of course yeah I'm I'm completely on board with that but what happens when your government tells you that's the rule that's different isn't it if you ask me personally I'm fine with it but if you tell me it's the law that my race will determine my health care outcomes at least in this way I've got a problem with that I just don't feel that that's where the government should be getting involved but if you ask me voluntarily you know if if even let's say Joe Biden who is legally acknowledged as my president uh I don't have to agree with him politically if he simply said look the only way this is going to work is for you is for you citizens to um stay step up and make some sacrifice you know who you are don't get your shots first I'd say let us work that out because there are people whose psychological condition is such that they probably need to get it sooner because they can't deal with things psychologically right or they don't have the ability to socially isolate as well as I can if I can socially isolate better than 95% of the world and I think that's actually true in my case shouldn't I wait a little bit longer makes perfect sense to me you just have to ask the one of the things that's I think deeply missing in this country is just asking when was the last time somebody did that when was the last time your leaders said look I don't want this to be a law because it's a bad precedent I don't want to make it a law that you know white people go last for shots it's just not a good precedent but I will tell you you know what the risks are and I want you to act like good citizens I want you to do what's right use your conscience look at your own risk and reward nobody can make that decision for you and you decide what's right and then act on it that's all we're going to ask of you as Citizens you just decide what's right now I don't know how that would turn out maybe maybe that wouldn't work out but I feel like that's where we should on this we Joe Biden should be asking people like me because I'm sort of out in the bubble I'm not old enough that I can get get into the shots but I could make an argument about comorbidity I've got asthma so maybe I should be at the top of the line but I wouldn't mind waiting because I can socially isolate better than most people so special case I'll wait a little bit all right um just ask so that's a that's a direct a direct re quest to Joe Biden just ask seriously just ask I think a lot of people would be willing to help out um so I guess we have to talk about Game.
Stop and I guess I have a different opinion about this whole Game.
Stop stuff I'm watching it with the same level of entertainment you are uh I also don't care if the billionaire hedge fund people lose some money I don't know how that works for the people who invested with them I feel as though there're ordinary investors who would get it in the shorts no matter what happens but that's true of this the stock market in general so so I watch it with Amusement but here's what I'm not seeing that other people are seeing that it's some kind of a um it's marking some kind of a shift or it's telling us something about the larger society or or the little people versus the rich I don't see any of that I just see sort of a a one-off thing that somebody discovered they could do it grew in popularity of course part of that is you know the political climate and our history of uh the rich people getting richer Etc but to me it doesn't feel like the beginning of some kind of giant shift in culture or change or anything it just feels like a thing that happened I I don't see it having a large uh carryover now as I saw in the comments uh apparently a lot of Chinese youth are getting into this as well I would imagine that this will result in some kind of rule change because otherwise these large group of organized investors will uh destroy the market for gain because pretty you could pretty much Target any company and manipulate it in this way and apparently it's legal you know hedge funds are not that different but I guess this only works as a legal process if not too many people do it so that might be the long-term change is that if the hedphones have been doing it and now other people can organize to do it there's too much of it and if there's too much of it then maybe it has to be regulated away if there's some way to do that I don't know if it's even practical but uh so they might break break this opportunity for the hedge funds maybe we probably not so my my best guess about where this all comes out is it just becomes a new story that Fades away maybe there's a rule change that stops IT later um but I see it more as a prank than anything else and you know there's and of course there the sub stories about uh I guess the SEC said it was going to review how some of the brokerage firms acted when they stopped trading uh which disadvantaged the little investor so that has to be looked into but the it looks like the legal system or the government regulation system will look into it so I don't know that there's as much there as other people are thinking it feels like this feels like the kind of story that's a story because Trump is no longer in office you know something is going to fill the new cycle no matter what you take out Trump and there's this giant empty spot that has to be filled I don't know this story isn't interesting to me but um it's capturing the imagination who do you think would who do you think would be the natural leader of the populist movement if let's say if Trump does not resurrect who would be the natural leader give me some names now I heard you know Matt Gates uh I've heard uh well who who do you think who would even qualify to take that role you yeah you know there wouldn't be a better president than me on some level but I would never want that job so it's never going to happen the the only the only thing that would make me a good president I probably had more bad qualities than good so don't don't vote for me for president um but the one good thing I would bring is I wouldn't feel the need to lie to you maybe if you take the job suddenly you have all kinds of reasons to lie but I wouldn't really feel the need to because I don't think there's anything I couldn't explain in a way I just wouldn't need to so um but it would be the worst job in the world so I wouldn't want it all right in the news uh FBI Attorney Kevin Klein Smith you heard of him on the Russia collusion hoax business he forged an he forged email in cter Page's Visa Pro his fisa process and he he forged an email just think about that us attorney forged an email ruined the life of this Carter page guy for all practical purposes his his professional career just got knapped and all he rece received for that was a 12 months probation 400 hours of community service and $100 fin now I don't know what is typical for what kind of a uh sentence you get for that kind of a crime I suppose they probably say something along the lines of no prior crimes uh maybe they argued he thought he had a good reason I'm not sure that should make a difference uh maybe they just said this is similar to similar to other crimes oh I'm seeing people say Tulsi gabard ran Paul uh for a populist leader um maybe so so but what do you think of this 12 months of probation no jail time for throwing the entire country and people's specific lives into horrible situation I feel as if this is not even close to appropriate if you forge something in the role of a government professional especially an FBI attorney that's got to mean something that's different from a regular crime right can you treat a government action against a citizen the same as you could just do citizen to Citizen crimes I feel as if he's being sentenced as if this were just a regular white color crime this was not a regular white color crime this almost destroyed the whole freaking country and it destroyed some people's lives for sure this should have been 5 to 10 years that feels about right to me 5 to 10 years wouldn't you say if you were just going to compare it to other crimes that you're aware of 5 to 10 years completely inappropriate um and this is the sort of thing that in the context of the Trump energy or populist gaining momentum will while Trump is sort of absent from it at the moment this is the sort of thing that's adding energy to that cuz this seems so blatantly uh I hate to say unfair but that's how people will register you know the world there's no such thing as fairness but people will register this as unfair in other news black lives matter movement has been uh nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize which is interesting for a movement which many would consider a racist movement now obviously its intention is to be anti-racist but in in application it became a overt racist movement I would say now that is not to say that the people in it are bad people but in terms of just how it evolved and what it turned into I would say that it turned from an anti-racism thing into just a completely racist movement uh even though the the goals of it of course most people would agree with of all that uh black lives matter of course so um I I think the the Nobel Peace Prize has become just ridiculous at this point I mean yeah it always has been ridiculous but it went to a new level of ridiculousness I suppose we say that every year um funniest thing I'm seeing lately in the news is do you remember Daniel Dale who I guess works for CNN as their fact Checker so during the Trump Administration he would come on and fact check Trump and say everything that Trump said was was wrong and now he's uh he's in the role of Defending Biden for things taken out of context about Biden so he claims that this was taken out of context that when that when Biden was talking about executive orders you know he said something along the lines of you shouldn't do a lot of executive orders unless you were a dictator now apparently that was completely taken out of context and it was right it was taken out of context so how is that different from every CNN story about Trump pretty much all of the news about Trump was just stuff taken out of context but they didn't didn't call it out now Daniel Dale will have to call out all the times that Biden is taken out of context so he went from a cool job where you get to criticize Trump all the time into a way less cool job where he's got to defend Biden for things that Biden maybe should have said a little more clearly or added as a better context or something so poor Daniel Dale his job just got demoted to Biden apologizer apologist I mean um apparently China had this clever scheme to uh one of the big companies was offering to build test labs in this country and the accusation here is that that would have allowed them to collect a bunch of DNA from Americans and that China is in the process of collecting as much American DNA as they can now I can't think there probably a whole bunch of ways you can misuse DNA and of course the scariest one is any kind of a weapon that would be DNA specific uh which we do worry could be possible I think it might be possible actually so that's pretty dangerous thing but here's the question that this asks that this raises why is it in the year 2021 Chinese companies have something close to free reign in the United States they I'm sure they have restrictions but Chinese companies can do business in the United States in a way that American companies can't do business in China now you can do some kinds of business but it's not anywhere close to equal why do we let that happen why in the world would we let our our rival China do something closer to unrestricted business in our country with this kind of risk you know if they put if they put any technology into your company you've got a risk that they're stealing your SE Secrets through the technology if they do any kind of medical thing you've got a risk that they're going to steal your DNA if you do any kind of other thing there's going to be some other risk every time the Chinese are buying into this country it opens up some kind of a risk why do we let them do business here why is that legal does anybody have any idea why that's legal I can't think of any reason why that should be legal if we can't do it in their country now if they opened up and said hey let's just make it the same you can do you can do whatever whatever we do there you can do here but that's not going to happen if we can't do business in their country they should not be able to do business in our country they should be the same and why is that even controversial who's on the other side of that argument is there somebody in the United States who says yeah yeah we really do want the Chinese to be putting their money in into our into our economy are they putting so much in that we would be we go into a depression if they stop investing I don't know I guess I need to know more about that but I've never heard a reason why China should do business with us when we can't do the same kind of business with them if there is an argument for that I'd love to hear it but I think it's just stupid from a security perspective it just seems stupid um are you having the same impression I have with uh Joe Biden's spokesperson Jen here's my take on her day one oh she seems pretty capable you know she seems bright and uh look like a perfect choice for the job really I I thought it was a good choice although I feel like they should have chosen a uh a woman of color um but you know she she looked very capable and qualified and she had a good background and Etc But as time goes by do you know some personalities the more you see them the less you like them but there are others the more you see them the more you like them you know some people don't they don't wear well if you know what I mean there's something about Jen basaki who is let's say whatever is the opposite of Dana Pino I'll just pick her as my example the more you see of Dana Perino who had been spokesperson under a bush the more you see of her the more you like her she just has one of those personalities the more you see the more you like that's why she's you know has a lot of time on Fox News the public likes seeing her but the more I see of Jen and this has nothing to do with being a Democrat has nothing to do with being a woman right so if you're looking for any isms I don't think it has anything to do with any of that she just has a personality that the more you see of it the less you like it am I right and and the reason I use you know Dana Pino as my opposite example is because she doesn't have that and I would say Kaylee Mc.
An even if you hated how she treated the Press she's also one of those personalities where the more you see of her the more you like her and that's just not true of everybody the more you see of Adam Schiff the less you like him right now could it be that I'm being biased simply by political leanings and I'm thinking to myself no I'm just agreeing with people I want to agree with and I'm just having some bias about people who might have a different opinion from me could be I mean it might be it might be that that's all that's happening here but I put the question out to you it seems like there's something about her that a little bit lasts a long time if you know what I mean are are you is anybody getting that same Vibe very capable very smart but a little bit of her goes a long way and I don't know if that's going to be a factor going forward um but the story related to this is that uh when she was asked whether they're going to see Joe Biden some more for these press conferences and she only answered cleverly oh are you eager to see him is that what you're saying and the reporter said sure and then she didn't answer the question don't you think it's going to be more and more of a story the longer Biden goes without uh opening himself up to unfriendly questions because the whole point of the these uh presidential press conference things is that it opens you up to unfriendly questions is Biden going to avoid unfriendly questions for four years can he get away with that probably can um here's something I recommend to you on CNN uh I've said this before but while I criticize CNN's uh news coverage quite a bit CNN as a network does some non- news programming that often is really good some a lot of the CNN specials they're just just about say a certain topic they're quite well done uh and I recommend them quite often they've got one coming up that's being teased I think Anderson Cooper is running this and uh they're talking to some Q supporters to sort of dig down and figure out what's up with it with the Q Believers and there's a a teaser where Anderson Cooper is talking to a completely rational looking guy a guy who you'd say to yourself and first of all uh he looked like he might have a I'm guessing no I don't want to guess somebody's ethnicity but I'll say he's the person he was talking to is not a uh typical uh white Bred looking guy let's just say that but I won't guess what his ethnic background is but that makes it interesting too because you're Imagining the CU Believers as a bunch of you know super white people but here was one that Anderson was talking to who was not in that category and said that he believed that at one point that Anderson Cooper eight babies he said that to Anderson Cooper and then he apologized for thinking that Anderson Cooper ate babies and then he went on to say other things he believed about uh cubing working with interdimensional uh blue birdlike creatures what what and here's the amazing thing the guy he's he interviewed look like a completely normal smart person who could operate in the world and do just about anything a very capable reasonable looking person and that person looked right in the camera and said to Anderson Cooper yeah I believed you ate babies sorry blue avens is what I guess the Q people call it now what do you make of this do you say yourself well that's a crazy person or do you say to yourself there's there are lots of crazy people do you imagine that the Q people are mentally weak do you think that the Q people are extra gullible do you think that the Q people uh have some kind of strange mental defect that makes them believe these things whereas you do not here's the bad news people they're completely normal that's the bad news the bad news is the people who believe that Q uh the stories that Anderson Cooper was eating babies the people who believe that completely normal or at least average or typical or routine human beings how do I know that you're not going to like this I probably lose a few followers in the next few minutes because people believe every religion no matter what religion you have which I think we can agree can we can we stipulate something that whatever religion you have is the true one let's just agree with that now I don't know what your religion is they're probably different but just say that the one you have that's the right one okay but now that you know that you have the right religion lucky you you could have you could have gotten it wrong but you didn't you got the right one that means that there are billions of regular people who got the wrong religion do you know what you would believe if you got the wrong religion it might involve magical sounding stuff a little bit for the wrong Reas religion now your religion is the right one so lucky for you uh you're smart and wise and you don't fall for gullible stuff but yours is the good one but you can observe that there are people who look otherwise normal who got all the wrong religion people thinking you're reincarnating well unless you believe that in which case it would be right but if other people believed it you don't that's crazy um so you have religions in which there people walking on order and resurrecting maybe that's the real one but you got other ones in which somebody's writing a flying horse to Heaven maybe that's the real one and maybe the the other one's not some people believe in reincarnation as I said some people believe in heaven some people believe there's nothing there one thing you can say for sure is that regular normal human beings with completely functional brains will believe anything it's actually just built into our nature we will believe anything but here's the only thing I want to add to that because on some level you do that right the thing I want to add to that is that the way humans believe is almost like choosing what clothes you're going to wear I think that and you can see it with this uh this person who was talking to Anderson Cooper the the exq believer he the way he spoke of it was almost like a lifestyle choice to adopt a set of beliefs because adopting that set of beliefs had some benefits maybe it made you part of a group maybe it made you interested maybe it was intellectually stimulating but whatever the reason was it was just a choice and I would submit to you that people choose their their filter or the the set of things they believe based on what just feels good the same way you decide well I'll wear this shirt or this other shirt when you get dressed how do you make that decision which shirt to put on say well I like this one this is a better shirt today I feel like this shirt and that belief is more like that that we pick the belief that sort of gives us some benefits makes us feel good makes us feel connected whatever and that we don't actually say are these beliefs based on science or truth can I prove it am I being G what about those other people why do they believe something different it's nothing like that it's simply a lifestyle choice to buy into a set of beliefs and then treat them as though they're true even on some level knowing that you just made a choice to treat them as true as opposed to them being objectively true anyway you should watch the Q special I think you're actually going to learn a lot about how completely normal people can choose choose to believe something crazy I'll give you an example of that when I watch the uh uh one of my favorite shows is about uh ancient astronauts and ancient aliens uh allegedly have you know building the pyramids and allegedly interacting with lots of uh lots of different early cultures speaking of which I'll show you a picture if I can do this on camera so in uh Tahiti they've got all of these let's see if I can do this if I can hold it just right you can see it there's a little totem looking picture all over the place in Tahiti where it looks like an alien like the this big eyed alien thing and they're all over the place as if the early tahitians had had contact with an alien race and that now they're building them into all their their imagery and I thought to myself well maybe they just liked you know creating a AR creatures that looked identically to how we would imagine an alien looks it's just a coincidence maybe maybe that's what's going on but when I watch those shows I suspend my critical thinking and I allow myself to live in a reality in which the aliens did come down and taught people how to build pyramids and those are why the cave drawings look like Advanced aliens with spaceships sometimes now do what when I do that when I accept that reality for the point of entertaining myself by watching this am I really accepting it as an actual reality or am I accepting it as an entertainment reality and I feel like it's different my my inner sense of it is that if you put a gun to my head and said all right now you're going to have to bet with your real money or or we're going to you know kill you if you're wrong you have to bet did the aliens teach the early people how to build the pyramids all right you got to put your real money on it now I'd bet against it I'd bet against it and I wouldn't feel too unsafe when I did I'd feel confident that I could bet against the aliens having built the pyramids or helped on that but when I watch those shows I like to accept it as true because it makes it more fun so I find that I can wear reality like a shirt I can just put on my alien astronaut shirt and I can just wear it for a while and then I can just take it off and if somebody says now you have to bet your real money I'd say Oh Real Money real money okay let me take off the shirt once you learn that people can change their their religion basically like they can change a shirt because it's more of a lifestyle decision it's not based on what you really think is true in many cases once you realize that distinction it starts explaining a lot of what you see that people are adopting a belief that just feels good and they will and they can lose that belief if there's something that makes it stop feeling good and the Q stuff you know had this business in the capital which was an event that made it stop feeling good and the moment it stopped feeling good there were some people such as this guy talking to Anderson Cooper who said okay it doesn't feel good anymore now I'll change my belief all right um who killed more people the CCP or Q well that's easy all right uh that's about all I got now um I'm just looking at your comments people love the ancient alien stuff it just captures your imagination all right was it a good honeymoon yes it was yes it was um I'd show you some pictures but you'd feel bad all right I'm going to put together some uh some some of my best I think I've had some time to plan micro lessons on how to program your brain now it's my favorite topic how to reprogram your brain but I've got another take on it that I think will be useful that will be on the locals platform only for subscribers and some other micro lessons that be on there this week and uh somebody says if aliens were real we'd have seen photos by now yeah given that all we have is uh we have cameras in every pocket in the Civilized world yeah I think we would have a picture of an alien by now I think so yeah locals is a platform um in which subscribers can subscribe to my content That You Don't See otherwise so I have the the stuff that you do see but I add I add useful content that you wouldn't see otherwise I'd like to know how to sleep um I think I did did I not do a micro lesson on that already if not I will and I will talk to you tomorrow all right You.
Tubers sorry I uh was not streaming on You.
Tube while I was out of the country the the button disappeared so there's some things you just can't do outside the country and for some reason that I didn't have that option um yes I am back in California all right uh just looking at your comments all right that's all we got for today and I will talk to you tomorrow
[Applause]
hey
everybody good morning how are
you well it's nice to be home it was
nice to be on vacation but it's nice to
be home too and I get to finally be with
all of you I apologize for oversleeping
by 3
hours I guess every now and then I
should have a full night sleep and my
body decided that today was the day one
of the problems with not sleeping much
because I hate sleeping is that every
now and then when I don't set my alarm
clock I'll oversleep by three
hours typically I I wake up 3:00 4: in
the morning and and I'm done I just
don't like sleep don't recommend being
like me don't be like me instead be like
this be a person who knows how to enjoy
the simultaneous sip what he needs well
you need a cup or mug glass of tanker
Cher Stein a canteen Jugger flask of V
of any kind fill it with your favorite
liquid I like coffee join me now for the
unparallel pleasure of the open me and
headend of the day the thing that makes
everything better the thing you've been
waiting for the thing that was late it's
called the simultaneous Sip and man is
it going to be good when you finally get
it here it goes
go yeah just as good as I told you right
yeah you were thinking it's not going to
going to be that good is it but it was
once again how about that well let me
start by telling you um how hard it is
to travel during the age of Corona virus
most of you know I was uh just on my
Corona virus delayed honeymoon took us
months to figure out how we could do
this safely and and make it work and
thanks to my wonderful wife Christina
who is a uh genius at making stuff work
she figured out how to get us to the
other side of the world safely and back
it was kind of amazing uh the the basic
thing you need to know is that it's
masks all the way we went to uh borab
Bora which is in French Polynesia by
Tahiti just sort of Leave California and
head toward New Zealand but before you
get to New
Zealand you stop and uh that's where
boror
is and so we SP a week there it was most
amazing week so here are the things you
need to know the highlights um it was a
high-end Resort it was the Four Seasons
in Bora Bora could not have been better
just it's impossible there isn't any
possible way this trip could have been
better once you get there getting there
is hard but once you get there it's
amazing best scenery feeling service
you've ever
seen the other thing that's amazing is
that the uh the resort I don't know if
they're going to last because their
business was no more than I don't think
there were more than 30 people at the
entire Resort which is built to handle
hundreds I don't know how many hundreds
but I think 300 or so and there were
maybe 30 of us there so entire swimming
pools beaches with zero people except us
so as a as a honeymoon it couldn't have
been better like I'll never experience
anything like this in my life again
because
it was a you know a top level experience
with no other people for in a practical
sense so I worry a great deal about the
future of their business but uh man it
could not have been better if you get a
chance to go before the crowds pick up
here's the risk profile we got tested
once before we flew so we had to have a
result now you I suppose we had a little
bit of exposure theoretically before we
flew
but once on the plane uh at least I've
seen studies that say that the planes
are so good with their filtration these
days that your odds of getting it on a
plane are actually really really
low uh people wear masks but of course
they fall asleep and their masks fall
off them so I would say masking is
pretty good on the plane if you think
that makes any difference I'll talk
about that in a minute um so I wasn't
worried about the plane and once you get
there there are no people and the staff
is all masked and they they do good
social distancing Etc so they won't even
clean your room if they think you're
going to be around it for a while so so
everything was done really really well I
think the four seasons did everything
that they could possibly do and then you
get another test while you're there so
you have to do one before you fly there
once a few days after you've been there
and then once right before you come back
and we did that the same day now you've
got to coordinate all this in a foreign
country right so you've got to find a
place in Tahiti that will give you a
test that you'll get a result the same
day so you can fly later that day do you
know how worried I was that that wasn't
going to work and and you know you've
got four hours to get your test and it
doesn't come and you think to yourself
uh I'm in a foreign country and I can't
fly home without this test and they said
it'd be here by now and it's not you
know you're checking your email you're
thinking they got they wrote down a code
wrong or something you'll never get home
now of course of course these are silly
traveler worries because it it's not
likely that a place that's a tourist
destination has not figured out how to
get the tourist
home that's the part I always forget is
that I'm not the first person who ever
had to figure this out obviously they
have a system so the hotel works with
you and the hotel will tell you where to
get the test and they'll make sure that
you can get a cab there and back and
it's all very civilized and easy but boy
I'll tell you that the distance they
push that that swab down your nose in
Tahiti that set a record I mean the
American tests were bad enough but the
Tahiti test they really went for some
spelunking for depth there I think they
tickled my brain a little bit but the
bottom line is if if I had to judge how
safe I was and this is the bottom line
of this how safe I was traveling from
the Corona virus versus how safe I would
have been just staying home and socially
distancing the you know the the normal
but imperfect amount that we all do I
feel like I was safer on on the road I
don't know if you could measure that in
any way but if I looked at all the
testing that I did and all the other
people did I ended up on an island in
the middle of the Pacific without
anybody who had either not been there
two weeks without an infection already
or or they got tested within you know
the day that they they arrived so it
actually probably safer than just normal
life and probably a lot safer it
probably wasn't even close you know
without an actual scientific way to
measure that I can't be sure so I'm only
giving you a a sense of it I'm not
giving you a scientific opinion it felt
way safer than just staying home and
that's that's a big credit to the system
that's that has adjusted that much to to
make that possible so the traveling I
would say traveling with a mask is hard
especially if you have to try to sleep
sleep on the plane cuz it's a long
flight we had a 4-Hour delay followed by
a 7-hour flight on the way there if you
had in the travel time and the taxi time
and everything else you know 12 hours in
a mask it's a long day but a lot of
people who have just regular jobs are
doing that every day so um not going to
complain about it so it was all good so
here's a question that people keep
asking me I have uh apparently spoken
differently about how we should look at
business Clos Downs the lockdowns versus
wearing masks and it's actually a fair
question in one case I say that the
business closures the forced closures do
not have scientific backing to suggest
that they work would you agree with that
that we don't really have scientific
backing to suggest that closing
businesses as opposed to keeping them
open with all the right restrictions we
don't have evidence which one of those
makes a difference now I just told you I
did a a very complicated extensive you
know travel and I did feel safer I don't
know but it felt safer than normal life
because it was so you know designed to
be controlled where normal life is messy
right but if it's designed to be
controlled maybe they can do it better
than your normal messy life right that's
what I think
so um I don't have a feeling of whether
we can tell that closing businesses
helps or hurts so we don't have science
because it's it's hard to measure and
it's kind of too early for to even know
if you
did so what do you do you don't have
science but Common Sense kind of can
point in both directions can it you
could make a case that social distancing
would be better served with business
closures but then how do you factor in
the fact that it wouldn't be normal
business it would be opened under you
know certain careful restriction
would that make it safer than normal
life it might who knows so I would say
business closures are unproven
scientifically and so there you should
really you should really pause to see if
you want to do that because we know the
cost of it could be gigantic in terms of
extra poverty and all the things that
that
causes but I say the opposite or
something very different about masks and
people would pointed out that looks like
an
inconsistency why is it that I say I
can't make a determination about whether
closing businesses make sense but my
common sense of it which is largely an
illusion common sense is an illusion but
my my feeling of it having observed it
up close my feeling of it is it's a
mistake to close
businesses there might be some
exceptions like uh possibly a gym but no
even a gym they would do good procedures
so I was say anybody who is willing to
open up and do careful procedures my my
logical just experienced brain that sees
the world says probably opening
businesses would be a better you know
Way Forward um and and California is
starting to open up a little bit uh
starting this week so that's good but I
don't say that with masks now masks also
have this problem that um we don't know
exactly what masks are doing in the
context of the Corona virus we know
they've been measured in different
contexts for different purposes in you
know in the past we know that the
experts overwhelmingly say you should
use bks we know that uh other people
point to other studies and say no these
studies show masks don't make a
difference so why is it that I would
have a different opinion about masks in
which I say you should go ahead and wear
them take the recommendation of the
experts whereas the business opening
stuff I'm a little squishier on and I
and it looks like maybe we should just
open the businesses and not do that why
why do I make that difference and the
difference is this here at first some
context you live in a life in a world in
which you don't have scientific studies
for almost anything you do you don't
know that waking up a little early will
make your life better or worse you don't
know that this meal you ate is the smart
one or not smart one you don't know if
you know you don't know much about
anything you don't know the house she
might buy the job you might take the
commute you choose almost everything
you're doing all day long is stuff that
nobody studied you've just lived in the
world long enough where you say I think
this looks like a better choice than
this but there's no way to know you just
got to take your
shot masks are a little like that and
there's a rule that I use that I apply
to just about everything which is that
friction pretty much always works now
I'll leave I'll leave a little wiggle
room because I'm sure there's some case
where it doesn't but if you've lived
long enough you see that wherever
friction is applied or wherever it's
removed it has exactly the predictable
impact if you tax something people will
do less of it if you build a wall it'll
be harder for people to get over it
won't stop it but it'll be harder might
reduce it if you restrict anything you
get less of it and with my living in the
world without the science just living in
the world I say hey if the problem is
stuff shooting into your mouth and we
know that that's far bigger problem than
what you're touching that seems to be
you know the common understanding if
it's stuff that's shooting out of your
mouth and you can put some friction on
that thing does it stop every bit of the
virus no no we know it doesn't stop all
of the virus but we do know that the
amount of the viral load makes a big
difference in what the outcomes are so
as long as we know that the degree of
viral load makes a big difference and we
and Common Sense and living in the world
says well this mask probably limits some
of that does it stop all of it no nobody
thinks that nobody thinks a mask stops a
virus nobody thinks that there's no
expert who thinks that they think it
might slow it down might add a little
friction
now do you need to do a scientific study
in every situation in your life in which
somebody's applying or taking away
friction to know what kind of effect
that will have you would be right 99% of
the time if you just said that friction
is a real thing and wherever it is added
you get less of a thing wherever it's
subtracted you get you get more of a
thing that's it now could I be
completely wrong could we look learn
someday in the future that masking was
more bad than good absolutely you could
totally learn that so if you think I'm
telling you I'm know I know with my
Great Brain certainty 100% that you know
masks are definitely the reason I don't
think that's knowable and anybody who
has that opinion I would respect that
but I do think that if you're doing a
risk management assessment given the how
high the stakes
are I would say it's a good risk and
that the consensus of experts uh is
still solidly prask if you see a growing
number of experts who tell you masth
don't work I would take that seriously
but right now I don't see that I see
people who are not experts looking at
studies they don't understand which are
usually on slightly different things you
know what whether it works in a let's
say a surgery setting etc for different
different kinds of uh diseases
uh I would wait for the a pretty big
consensus of experts to say they don't
work before I would even consider that
they don't work and we don't have
anything like that now if you've seen
actual medical experts a consensus not a
rando doctor person but actual growing
consensus of doctors saying masks don't
do anything I would take that seriously
but that doesn't exist and you got to
ask yourself why right because cuz there
are people on every side of everything
you don't have you you don't have enough
doctors to form sort of a sort of a
movement away from mask you don't that
means something you should you should
take that seriously now does that mean
the ma that the experts are right no but
since it matches with my uh common sense
if you want to call it that it's always
an illusion then I'm willing to take
that as a reasonable risk to wear the
masks here's the funniest uh scariest
thing in the
world there's some reporting that Trump
is getting
stronger by being out of the news the
we've I think everybody has made the
same observation that Trump if he just
stopped talking for a while as president
if he had just stopped talking for a
while that his popularity would have
gone through the roof if he just stopped
being a little little bit as trumpy as
he is now that's a ridiculous thing to
hope for because the whole point of
electing Trump is that he wasn't going
to
change he he wouldn't have even been
elected in the first place if people
thought he was going to be a different
person when he took office right that's
part of what you expected that Trump is
Trump excuse me that said um he sort of
uh let's say inv voluntarily forced into
some silence after his office his term
ended and the less he talks I feel like
the more popular he's going to get
because you've got this big populist
energy if you will that suddenly became
leaderless what happens when you have
this much energy let's say the populist
whatever the Trump movement was you have
that much energy and then the leader
goes silent what happens
does the energy just
dissipate well I guess the the people on
the left hope that would happen does it
transfer to another
leader it could but who is that don't
you think we' know by now who is the who
is the natural inheritor of the energy
that the Trump movement or the populist
movement created I don't know we I mean
there are some good Republican C Cate
potentials for 1994 some of them more
more trump-like than others but there's
not really a natural you know there's
not a name where every one of you would
say well what about
X not really right yeah Matt Gates I
think is his own is his own person I
don't see him as exactly a trump
clone uh but but he would be at least in
terms of the populist um policies would
be very close to that so a yeah Ted gruz
Cruz has some problems politically at
the moment because he's being branded as
being part of the
Insurrection so here's the interesting
part if you thought that Trump was a
problem before the Democrats decide to
crucify
him let me say that again so you won't
think I chose that word
accidentally if the Democrats thought
that Trump was a problem before they
decided to crucify
him and then he went silent for a while
how many
days and the only problem is if you
thought that the so-called Insurrection
was a
problem where till you see the
resurrection cuz the resurrection's
going to be a bigger problem if you're a
Democrat now I'm not going to
predict that Trump after having been
legally and politically
crucified would go away effectively as
if dead for a
while while the movement that he led
grows in his absence
grows if he were to
return it's a big problem
now I predicted he won't that IID
predicted that he would not be
politically viable because he wouldn't
be able to get the same people who
supported him the same way before and
I'm going to stick with that I'm going
to stick with my prediction that he will
not run for office again so I'm going to
stick with that but if you wanted to
guarantee that he did run for office and
win just keep doing what you're doing
because every time you hear somebody who
is associated with Trump get taken
down at first you say oh okay that's a
special case that's somebody who did
something illegal and of course the law
is the law so I understand that one oh
there's another one oh it's somebody
okay well okay they did something else
yeah I guess that was pretty bad so I
guess that's a special case you know
they were Trump supporter but that's a
special well there's another one there's
another one in head there's three more
every time you hear another Trump
supporter being taken down it starts
with yeah those I guess they had to do
that they broke some laws and then it
starts to be people taken down for
things they may or may not have thought
people being taken down for signing up
for to have a parl and gab account that
just happened that was just in the news
somebody got fired for simply having an
account on parl parlor and uh Gab that's
it that was the entire accusation they
had an account in a alternative social
media
platform every time you hear about that
stuff it feels as if the people who
associated with it and all that populist
energy might be picking up power it's
exactly what the Democrats don't want to
happen but I think they're doing it as
aggressively as they possibly could and
it's building up this sort of resentment
Rev VY
energy you don't want to build up too
much resentment Revenge energy and
that's what the de Democrats are doing
because it's the more Revenge they put
into the system the more it's going to
come back wouldn't you agree we have a
system in which the more Revenge you put
into it the more is coming back that's
there's no way around it the the
Republicans are not going to sit there
for four years of Revenge being taken
out upon them without an equal and
opposite reaction it just there isn't
any way that can happen and
so the Democrats are creating a
situation for Trump's
resurrection that is the one you don't
want that's the one you don't want and I
don't even think I want that one because
that's going to be too much
energy and not exactly the right place
right that's too much energy and
they they have a real problem here this
is a real problem I'm still going to
stick with my like I said my uh
prediction that he won't run for office
again but man are they making it
dangerous they are really making it
dangerous because if they don't if they
don't take the boot off our neck pretty
soon let me put it this way I don't know
if this is
a a a republican quality um I don't
identify Republican as you know I don't
identify even conservative as you know
um but I have this quality and I I think
it might be common to the right so I
might have this in common which is I am
really really
flexible really
flexible until I'm
knocked and I can't even I can't even
tell you where the knot kicks in because
I'm always surprised in my normal life
you know I'm exactly the same not just
my political opinions but the way I live
my in-person life very
flexible very very flexible until I'm
not and when I'm not it it just falls
off a a
cliff when when I'm not it's
absolute there's no negotiation once I
hit a certain point and I I scare people
because I don't have any warning before
that happens I worry that that's what's
happen in with the political right which
is they're flexible they're taking it
all right all right we we gave it to you
pretty hard when Trump was in charge you
know okay all right a little slap a
little slap we had that coming we said
some bad things too okay another little
slap I you turn the other cheek yeah not
looking for trouble okay that's three
that's three um I'm going to I'm going
to shake that off that's four that's
four um still okay holding it down don't
want any trouble that's
five you know where this is going
right there there is a
psychological atomic bomb that's being
created by the actions the Revenge
actions of the left that they can push a
little bit you know they could get away
with that and even people on the right I
think at some level you're saying yeah
elections have consequences I wish I
wish our side won yeah we gave it to
them pretty hard it's a it's a political
game they're giving it back a little bit
but there is a
limit there is a
limit and if they reach that
limit they're going to get a leader of
the populist movement that they didn't
want could be Trump again that would be
a big problem could be Trump again a big
problem for the left anyway
but it'll be somebody else and you don't
want it to be me that's for
sure you don't want it to be me all
right the funniest story in the news is
the uh talk about the Trump Library
somebody wrote an article in the an
opinion piece in the Washington Post
saying that Trump should not have a uh
Presidential
Library he should not have a
library come on well Joel Pollock uh
called that out and and wrote about it
and here here's just something that Joel
wrote in Breitbart he said the paper
who's talking about the Washington Post
he said the paper whose motto is
democracy dies in darkness presented an
argument Thursday by an art and
architecture critic Philip kenot about
why the history of the Trump
Administration should in fact be
shrouded in darkness kenot wrote Trump
must never have an official Presidential
Library and Congress should move quickly
to make sure he never will well
game
on not only as as Joel points out not
only should Trump have a Presidential
Library but it needs to be the best one
at least in terms of popularity it needs
to be the best one and the best way to
do this would to be make it
commercial would you not pay a small
entry fee to see a properly designed
Trump Presidential Museum oh yeah you
would yeah you would you'd pay for that
if he did it right right if it's just a
boring Museum where you walk through and
see some photos and stuff you're not
going to you don't care about that too
much but if he made it
funny imagine if you will as Joel points
out uh One Wing being the uh the Russia
collusion mental hospital
Wing imagine going into a trump Museum
and you go into one room and it's
nothing but a bunch of videos playing in
a loop of uh Adam Schiff and other
Republicans making accusations of the uh
political uh of the uh Russia collusion
hoax you could have one room for every
hoax you could have the fine people hoax
room you could have the drinking bleach
hoax room but you could also have the
CNN fake news room where it's an an
entire exhibit of only the fake news
that just was on CNN it' be clips and
examples and then then the debunk of all
you know you'd have the fake news and
then the debunk of it why it's wrong and
then kids could go learn there and and
as a school outing you could go and you
could learn how the news is all made
up you tell me you wouldn't buy a ticket
to that you would buy a ticket to that
now add in an anim animatronics not
animatronics let's say a a deep fake
Trump who can who actually has some AI
built in so it can interact with you
it's like a a 3D hologram of trump but
it's actually programmed with I guess
Google and some other companies now have
some AI That's whole Next Level so by
the time it gets built maybe some of
that will be available where I can
really really understand the context of
conversation then you build a hologram
Trump who can speak back to you
basically using tweets or things he said
before so he matches them to your
content but it's Trump's actual words
he'd be saying what he tweeted or what
he said in public some point you could
totally build that you wouldn't want to
see that you wouldn't want to go up and
talk and have a conversation with uh
deep
fake holographic Trump you would do that
you would do that all
right so yeah Trump needs a Presidential
Library and it needs to be commercial it
needs to be huge hugely popular I mean
and it just needs to be awesome I would
mostly look forward to how they were
named the
restrooms uh cuz I think Adam Schiff
needs to be part of that uh you or at
least you know the uh the new green new
toilets have two buttons depending on
what your business was you you got the
little button for you know number one
and big button for number two well I
think the big button should be named uh
Adam Schiff and the little button should
be whatever but then there should also
be a I'd like to see a Stormy Daniels
interactive
exhibit sort of like a
ride well you could use your imagination
there I don't have to fill in the blanks
all
right um this is a predictable problem
apparently there were a bunch of
vaccinations available in Washington
Heights a part of New York City which
has high minority population I think
mostly Hispanic if I'm correct and a
bunch of white people came in and got
those shots so they were available for
people over 65 and a bunch of old white
people went in there and and took those
shots so they weren't available for
other people
now wouldn't it be
better that maybe we didn't divide our
health care by
race I don't know how this could
possibly go
well you know I said this before I think
on a tweet um I'm completely on board
with the fact that African-American
citizens should get some priority
because they have worse outcomes I get
that but there's such a big difference
between asking me personally if I would
mind waiting you know waiting for other
people to go ahead in which case I'll
say yeah I will you know that's a good
argument some other people should go go
ahead of me I mean we're all doing that
right everybody's saying if you're over
80 you go first if you're if you're uh
you know doing Frontline Healthcare you
should go first Etc so I don't have any
problem with the concept of as a citizen
of letting other people go first and
that and black citizens would be at the
top of my list because they have worse
outcomes so of course yeah I'm I'm
completely on board with that but what
happens when your government tells you
that's the rule that's different isn't
it if you ask me personally I'm fine
with it but if you tell me it's the law
that my race will determine my health
care outcomes at least in this way I've
got a problem with that I just don't
feel that that's where the government
should be getting involved but if you
ask me voluntarily you know if if even
let's say Joe Biden who is
legally acknowledged as my president uh
I don't have to agree with him
politically if he simply said look the
only way this is going to work is for
you is for you citizens to um stay step
up and make some sacrifice you know who
you are don't get your shots first I'd
say let us work that out because there
are people whose psychological condition
is such that they probably need to get
it sooner because they can't deal with
things
psychologically right or they don't have
the ability to socially isolate as well
as I can if I can socially isolate
better than 95% of the world and I think
that's actually true in my case
shouldn't I wait a little bit longer
makes perfect sense to me you just have
to ask the one of the things that's I
think deeply missing in this country is
just
asking when was the last time somebody
did that when was the last time your
leaders said look I don't want this to
be a law because it's a bad precedent I
don't want to make it a law that you
know white people go last for shots it's
just not a good precedent but I will
tell you
you know what the risks are and I want
you to act like good citizens I want you
to do what's right use your conscience
look at your own risk and reward nobody
can make that decision for you and you
decide what's right and then act on it
that's all we're going to ask of you as
Citizens you just decide what's right
now I don't know how that would turn out
maybe maybe that wouldn't work out but I
feel like that's where we should on this
we Joe Biden should be asking people
like me because I'm sort of out in the
bubble I'm not old enough that I can get
get into the shots but I could make an
argument about comorbidity I've got
asthma so maybe I should be at the top
of the line but I wouldn't mind waiting
because I can socially isolate better
than most people so special case I'll
wait a little bit all
right um just ask so that's a that's a
direct a direct re quest to Joe Biden
just ask seriously just ask I think a
lot of people would be willing to help
out
um so I guess we have to talk about
GameStop and I guess I have a different
opinion about this whole GameStop stuff
I'm watching it with the same level of
entertainment you are uh I also don't
care if the billionaire hedge fund
people lose some money I don't know how
that works for the people who invested
with them I feel as though there're
ordinary investors who would get it in
the shorts no matter what happens but
that's true of this the stock market in
general so so I watch it with Amusement
but here's what I'm not seeing that
other people are seeing that it's some
kind of a um it's marking some kind of a
shift or it's telling us something about
the larger society or or the little
people versus the rich I don't see any
of that I just see
sort of a a one-off thing that somebody
discovered they could do it grew in
popularity of course part of that is you
know the political climate and our
history of uh the rich people getting
richer
Etc but to me it doesn't feel like the
beginning of some kind of giant shift in
culture or change or anything it just
feels
like a thing that happened I I don't see
it having a
large uh carryover
now as I saw in the comments uh
apparently a lot of Chinese youth are
getting into this as well I would
imagine that this will result in some
kind of rule change because otherwise
these large group of organized investors
will uh destroy the market for gain
because pretty you could pretty much
Target any company and manipulate it in
this way and apparently it's
legal you know hedge funds are not that
different
but I guess this only works as a legal
process if not too many people do it so
that might be the long-term change is
that if the hedphones have been doing it
and now other people can organize to do
it there's too much of it and if there's
too much of it then maybe it has to be
regulated away if there's some way to do
that I don't know if it's even practical
but uh so they might break break this
opportunity for the hedge funds maybe we
probably not so my my best guess about
where this all comes out is it just
becomes a new story that Fades away
maybe there's a rule change that stops
IT later
um but I see it more as a prank than
anything else and you know there's and
of course there the sub stories about uh
I guess the SEC said it was going to
review how some of the brokerage firms
acted when they stopped trading uh which
disadvantaged the little investor so
that has to be looked into but the it
looks like the legal system or the
government regulation system will look
into it so I don't know that there's as
much there as other people are thinking
it feels like this feels like the kind
of story that's a story because Trump is
no longer in office you know something
is going to fill the new cycle no matter
what you take out Trump and there's this
giant empty spot that has to be
filled I don't know this story isn't
interesting to me but um it's capturing
the imagination
who do you think would who do you think
would be the natural leader of the
populist movement if let's say if Trump
does not resurrect who would be the
natural leader give me some names now I
heard you know Matt Gates uh I've heard
uh well who who do you think who would
even
qualify to take that
role you yeah you know there wouldn't be
a better president than me on some level
but I would never want that job so it's
never going to happen the the only the
only thing that would make me a good
president I probably had more bad
qualities than good so don't don't vote
for me for president um but the one good
thing I would bring is I wouldn't feel
the need to lie to
you maybe if you take the job suddenly
you have all kinds of reasons to lie but
I wouldn't really feel the need to
because I don't think there's anything I
couldn't explain in a way
I just wouldn't need
to so um but it would be the worst job
in the world so I wouldn't want it all
right in the news uh FBI Attorney Kevin
Klein Smith you heard of him on the
Russia collusion hoax business he forged
an he forged email in cter Page's Visa
Pro his fisa process and he he forged an
email just think about that us attorney
forged an email ruined the life of this
Carter page guy for all practical
purposes his his professional career
just got knapped and all he rece
received for that was a 12 months
probation 400 hours of community service
and $100
fin
now I don't know what is typical for
what kind of a uh sentence you get for
that kind of a crime I suppose they
probably say something along the lines
of no prior
crimes uh maybe they argued he thought
he had a good reason I'm not sure that
should make a
difference uh maybe they just said this
is similar to similar to other crimes oh
I'm seeing people say Tulsi gabard ran
Paul uh for a populist leader um maybe
so so but what do you think of this 12
months of probation no jail time for
throwing the entire country and people's
specific lives into horrible
situation I feel as if this is not even
close to
appropriate if you forge something in
the role of a government professional
especially an FBI attorney that's got to
mean something that's different from a
regular crime right
can you treat a government action
against a
citizen the same as you could just do
citizen to Citizen crimes I feel as if
he's being sentenced as if this were
just a regular white
color
crime this was not a regular white color
crime this almost destroyed the whole
freaking country and it destroyed some
people's lives for sure this should have
been 5 to 10 years
that feels about right to me 5 to 10
years wouldn't you say if you were just
going to compare it to other crimes that
you're aware of 5 to 10
years completely
inappropriate um and this is the sort of
thing that in the context of the Trump
energy or populist gaining momentum will
while Trump is sort of absent from it at
the moment this is the sort of thing
that's adding energy to that cuz this
seems so
blatantly uh I hate to say unfair but
that's how people will register you know
the world there's no such thing as
fairness but people will register this
as
unfair in other news black lives matter
movement has been uh nominated for a
Nobel Peace
Prize which is interesting for a
movement which many would consider a
racist movement now obviously its
intention is to be anti-racist but in in
application it became a overt racist
movement I would say now that is not to
say that the people in it are bad people
but in terms of just how it evolved and
what it turned into I would say that it
turned from an anti-racism thing into
just a completely racist movement uh
even though the the goals of it of
course most people would agree with of
all that uh black lives matter of
course so
um I I think the the Nobel Peace Prize
has become just ridiculous at this point
I mean yeah it always has been
ridiculous but it went to a new level of
ridiculousness I suppose we say that
every year um funniest thing I'm seeing
lately in the news is do you remember
Daniel Dale who I guess works for CNN as
their fact Checker so during the Trump
Administration he would come on and fact
check Trump and say everything that
Trump said was was wrong and now he's uh
he's in the role of Defending Biden for
things taken out of context about
Biden so he claims that this was taken
out of context that when that when Biden
was talking about executive orders you
know he said something along the lines
of you shouldn't do a lot of executive
orders unless you were a dictator now
apparently that was completely taken out
of context and it was right it was taken
out of context so how is that different
from every CNN story about Trump pretty
much all of the news about Trump was
just stuff taken out of context but they
didn't didn't call it out now Daniel
Dale will have to call out all the times
that Biden is taken out of context so he
went from a cool job where you get to
criticize Trump all the time into a way
less cool job where he's got to defend
Biden for things that Biden maybe should
have said a little more clearly or added
as a better context or something so poor
Daniel Dale his job just got demoted to
Biden apologizer apologist I
mean
um apparently China had this clever
scheme to uh one of the big companies
was offering to build test labs in this
country and the accusation here is that
that would have allowed them to collect
a bunch of DNA from Americans and that
China is in the process of collecting as
much American DNA as they
can now I can't think there probably a
whole bunch of ways you can misuse DNA
and of course the scariest one is any
kind of a weapon that would be DNA
specific uh which we do worry could be
possible I think it might be possible
actually so that's pretty dangerous
thing but here's the question that this
asks that this raises why is it in the
year
2021 Chinese companies have something
close to free reign in the United States
they I'm sure they have restrictions but
Chinese companies can do business in the
United States in a way that American
companies can't do business in China now
you can do some kinds of business but
it's not anywhere close to equal why do
we let that
happen why in the world would we let our
our rival China do something closer to
unrestricted business in our country
with this kind of risk
you know if they put if they put any
technology into your company you've got
a risk that they're stealing your SE
Secrets through the technology if they
do any kind of medical thing you've got
a risk that they're going to steal your
DNA if you do any kind of other thing
there's going to be some other risk
every time the Chinese are buying into
this country it opens up some kind of a
risk why do we let them do business here
why is that
legal does anybody have any idea why
that's legal
I can't think of any reason why that
should be legal if we can't do it in
their country now if they opened up and
said hey let's just make it the same you
can do you can do whatever whatever we
do there you can do here but that's not
going to happen if we can't do business
in their country they should not be able
to do business in our country they
should be the same and why is that even
controversial who's on the other side of
that argument is there somebody in the
United States who says yeah yeah we
really do want the Chinese to be putting
their money in into our into our
economy are they putting so much in that
we would be we go into a depression if
they stop investing I don't know I guess
I need to know more about that but I've
never heard a reason why China should do
business with us when we can't do the
same kind of business with them if there
is an argument for that I'd love to hear
it but I think it's just stupid from a
security perspective it just seems
stupid
um are you having the same impression I
have with uh Joe Biden's spokesperson
Jen
here's my take on her day one oh
she seems pretty capable you know she
seems bright and uh look like a perfect
choice for the job really I I thought it
was a good choice although I feel like
they should have chosen a uh a woman of
color um
but you know she she looked very capable
and qualified and she had a good
background and Etc But as time goes by
do you know some personalities the more
you see them the less you like them but
there are others the more you see them
the more you like them you know some
people don't they don't wear well if you
know what I mean there's something about
Jen
basaki who is let's say whatever is the
opposite of Dana Pino I'll just pick her
as my example the more you see of Dana
Perino who had been spokesperson under a
bush the more you see of her the more
you like
her she just has one of those
personalities the more you see the more
you like that's why she's you know has a
lot of time on Fox News the public likes
seeing her but the more I see of Jen
and this has nothing to do with
being a Democrat has nothing to do with
being a woman right so if you're looking
for any isms I don't think it has
anything to do with any of that she just
has a
personality that the more you see of it
the less you like it am I right and and
the reason I use you know Dana Pino as
my opposite example is because she
doesn't have that and I would say Kaylee
McAn even if you hated how she treated
the
Press she's also one of those
personalities where the more you see of
her the more you like her and that's
just not true of everybody the more you
see of Adam Schiff the less you like him
right now could it be that I'm being
biased simply by political leanings and
I'm thinking to myself no I'm just
agreeing with people I want to agree
with and I'm just having some bias about
people who might have a different
opinion from me could be I mean it might
be it might be that that's all that's
happening here but I put the question
out to you it seems like there's
something about her that a little bit
lasts a long time if you know what I
mean are are you is anybody getting that
same Vibe very capable very smart but a
little bit of her goes a long way and I
don't know if that's going to be a
factor going
forward um but the story related to this
is that uh when she was asked whether
they're going to see Joe Biden some more
for these press conferences and she only
answered cleverly oh are you eager to
see him is that what you're saying and
the reporter said
sure and then she didn't answer the
question don't you think it's going to
be more and more of a story the longer
Biden goes without uh opening himself up
to unfriendly questions because the
whole point of the these uh presidential
press conference things is that it opens
you up to unfriendly questions
is Biden going to avoid unfriendly
questions for four years can he get away
with that probably can um here's
something I recommend to you on
CNN uh I've said this before but while I
criticize CNN's uh news coverage quite a
bit CNN as a network does some non- news
programming that often is really good
some a lot of the CNN specials they're
just just about say a certain topic
they're quite well done uh and I
recommend them quite
often they've got one coming up that's
being teased I think Anderson Cooper is
running this and uh they're talking to
some Q supporters to sort of dig down
and figure out what's up with it with
the Q Believers and there's a a teaser
where Anderson Cooper is talking to a
completely rational looking guy a guy
who you'd say to yourself and first of
all uh he looked like he might have a
I'm guessing no I don't want to guess
somebody's ethnicity but I'll say he's
the person he was talking to is not a uh
typical uh white Bred looking guy let's
just say that but I won't guess what his
ethnic background is but that makes it
interesting too because you're Imagining
the CU Believers as a bunch of you know
super white people but here was one that
Anderson was talking to who was not in
that category and said that he believed
that at one point that Anderson Cooper
eight
babies he said that to Anderson Cooper
and then he apologized for thinking that
Anderson Cooper ate
babies and then he went on to say other
things he believed about uh cubing
working with
interdimensional uh blue birdlike
creatures
what
what and here's the amazing thing the
guy he's he interviewed look like a
completely normal smart person who could
operate in the world and do just about
anything a very
capable reasonable looking person and
that person looked right in the camera
and said to Anderson Cooper yeah I
believed you ate babies
sorry blue avens is what I guess the Q
people call it
now what do you make of this do you say
yourself well that's a crazy
person or do you say to yourself there's
there are lots of crazy people do you
imagine that the Q people
are mentally
weak do you think that the Q people are
extra
gullible do you think that the Q
people uh have some kind of strange
mental defect that makes them believe
these things whereas you do not here's
the bad news
people they're completely
normal that's the bad
news the bad news is the people who
believe that Q uh the stories that
Anderson Cooper was eating babies the
people who believe that completely
normal or at least average or typical or
routine human beings how do I know that
you're not going to like this
I probably lose a few followers in the
next few
minutes because people believe every
religion no matter what religion you
have which I think we can agree can we
can we stipulate something that whatever
religion you have is the true
one let's just agree with that now I
don't know what your religion is they're
probably different but just say that the
one you have
that's the right one okay but now that
you know that you have the right
religion lucky you you could have you
could have gotten it wrong but you
didn't you got the right one that means
that there are billions of regular
people who got the wrong
religion do you know what you would
believe if you got the wrong
religion it might involve magical
sounding stuff a little bit for the
wrong Reas religion now your religion is
the right
one so lucky for you uh you're smart and
wise and you don't fall for gullible
stuff but yours is the good one but you
can observe that there are people who
look otherwise
normal who got all the wrong religion
people thinking you're
reincarnating well unless you believe
that in which case it would be
right but if other people believed it
you don't that's
crazy um so you have religions in which
there people walking on order and
resurrecting maybe that's the real one
but you got other ones in which
somebody's writing a flying horse to
Heaven maybe that's the real one and
maybe the the other one's
not some people believe in reincarnation
as I said some people believe in heaven
some people believe there's nothing
there one thing you can say for
sure is that regular normal human beings
with completely functional brains will
believe anything it's actually just
built into our nature we will believe
anything but here's the only thing I
want to add to that because on some
level you do that right the thing I want
to add to that is that the way humans
believe is almost like choosing what
clothes you're going to
wear I think that and you can see it
with this uh this person who was talking
to Anderson Cooper the the exq believer
he the way he spoke of it was almost
like a lifestyle choice to adopt a set
of
beliefs because adopting that set of
beliefs had some benefits maybe it made
you part of a group maybe it made you
interested maybe it was intellectually
stimulating but whatever the reason was
it was just a
choice and I would submit to you that
people choose their their filter or the
the set of things they believe based on
what just feels good
the same way you decide well I'll wear
this shirt or this other shirt when you
get dressed how do you make that
decision which shirt to put on say well
I like this one this is a better shirt
today I feel like this shirt and that
belief is more like that that we pick
the belief that sort of gives us some
benefits makes us feel good makes us
feel connected whatever and that we
don't actually say are these beliefs
based on science or truth can I prove it
am I being G
what about those other people why do
they believe something different it's
nothing like that it's simply a
lifestyle choice to buy into a set of
beliefs and then treat them as though
they're true even on some level knowing
that you just made a choice to treat
them as true as opposed to them being
objectively
true anyway you should watch the Q
special I think you're actually going to
learn a lot about how completely normal
people can choose choose to believe
something crazy I'll give you an example
of
that when I watch the uh uh one of my
favorite shows is about uh ancient
astronauts and ancient aliens uh
allegedly have you know building the
pyramids and allegedly interacting with
lots of uh lots of different early
cultures speaking of which I'll show you
a picture if I can do this on camera so
in uh Tahiti they've got all of these
let's see if I can do this if I can hold
it just right you can see it there's a
little totem looking picture all over
the place in Tahiti where it looks like
an
alien like the this big eyed alien thing
and they're all over the place as if the
early tahitians had had contact with an
alien race and that now they're building
them into all their their imagery and I
thought to myself well maybe they just
liked you know creating a AR creatures
that looked identically to how we would
imagine an alien looks it's just a
coincidence
maybe maybe that's what's going on but
when I watch those
shows I suspend my critical thinking and
I allow myself to live in a reality in
which the aliens did come down and
taught people how to build pyramids and
those are why the cave drawings look
like Advanced aliens with spaceships
sometimes now do what when I do that
when I accept that reality for the point
of entertaining myself by watching this
am I really accepting it as an actual
reality or am I accepting it as an
entertainment
reality and I feel like it's
different my my inner sense of it is
that if you put a gun to my head and
said all right now you're going to have
to bet with your real money or or we're
going to you know kill you if you're
wrong you have to bet did the aliens
teach the early people how to build the
pyramids all right you got to put your
real money on it now I'd bet against
[Laughter]
it I'd bet against it and I wouldn't
feel too unsafe when I did I'd feel
confident that I could bet against the
aliens having built the pyramids or
helped on that but when I watch those
shows I like to accept it as true
because it makes it more fun so I find
that I can wear reality like a shirt I
can just put on my alien astronaut shirt
and I can just wear it for a while and
then I can just take it off and if
somebody says now you have to bet your
real money I'd say Oh Real Money real
money okay let me take off the
shirt once you learn that people can
change their their religion basically
like they can change a shirt because
it's more of a lifestyle decision it's
not based on what you really think is
true in many cases once you realize that
distinction it starts explaining a lot
of what you see that people are adopting
a
belief that just feels good and they
will and they can lose that belief if
there's something that makes it stop
feeling good and the Q stuff you know
had this business in the capital which
was an event that made it stop feeling
good and the moment it stopped feeling
good there were some people such as this
guy talking to Anderson Cooper who said
okay it doesn't feel good anymore now
I'll change my
belief all right um who killed more
people the CCP or Q well that's
easy all right uh that's about all I got
now
um I'm just looking at your comments
people love the ancient alien stuff it
just captures your
imagination all right
was it a good honeymoon yes it was yes
it was um I'd show you some pictures but
you'd feel bad all right I'm going to
put together some uh some some of my
best I think I've had some time to plan
micro lessons on how to program your
brain now it's my favorite topic how to
reprogram your brain but I've got
another take on it that I think will be
useful that will be on the locals
platform only for subscribers and some
other micro
lessons that be on there this week
and uh somebody says if aliens were real
we'd have seen photos by now yeah given
that all we have is uh we have cameras
in every pocket in the Civilized world
yeah I think we would have a picture of
an alien by now I think so yeah locals
is a platform um in which subscribers
can subscribe to my content That You
Don't See otherwise so I have the the
stuff that you do see but I add I add
useful content that you wouldn't see
otherwise I'd like to know how to sleep
um I think I did did I not do a micro
lesson on that already if not I will and
I will talk to you
tomorrow all right YouTubers sorry I uh
was not streaming on YouTube while I was
out of the country the the button
disappeared so there's some things you
just can't do outside the country and
for some reason that I didn't have that
option
um yes I am back in
California all right
uh just looking at your comments all
right that's all we got for today and I
will talk to you tomorrow