Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive July 10, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #2177

Episode 2177 Scott Adams - Most Of The Summer News Is Fake & That means Fun Mocking & Sipping Coffee

Episode #2177 Jul 22, 2023 1:10:32 25,498 views

Mocking summer news while sipping coffee

Opening General Commentary

Good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. And if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that I don't think anybody can even imagine, well all you need is a mug or a glass, a tankard, a chalice, a stein, a jug or flask, vessel, libation, and

View segment →
SimultaneousSip General Commentary

fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip and it happens now. Go. Ah ye

View segment →
MainContent AI & Technology

s. Let's go private over here. Well there's a lot of fun things to talk about. And let's see, first of all there's an AI-created clip of South Park. So AI wrote, directed, and animated a little South Park episode. I saw a tweet saying that this was looking like the beginning of the end of humans cr…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

the least like you if they get hurt. I hate to say it but it's just the way we're all wired. The more somebody's like you the more they are you in your mind and the more you care about them. And AI is the most unlike you that it could be. It just doesn't matter. Stuff that looks like you. If you ha…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

e to say he's maybe one of the bravest people who's ever worked in government. I mean he's a brave mofo. I'd just like to take a moment to acknowledge that when people take these jobs it's not always for the power. Sometimes they're patriots. Rand Paul as far as I can tell isn't doing it for the mon…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

. You're like I'll bet you couldn't find one person who would back that. Oh yeah in private. Oh yeah you should see what she says in private. And I said the same thing about myself when I got canceled. The first thing that happens when you get canceled, you all know this, they look through your ent…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

dy. Yet that's the way we play it. We act as if there's somebody who actually has that opinion. Have you ever met anybody who had the opinion that you couldn't have a qualified black vice president? It's not even a thing. Literally you couldn't find one functioning brain that would have that opinion…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

g the Republicans would be done. So we would have a situation where Trump would be the Nazi but also possibly a convicted felon, potentially facing jail time if his appeal failed, right? So you assume if he got convicted there would be an appeal so that he would still become president. There's nothi…

View segment →
MainContent Health & Biohacking

process. One in which you can't trust that unless you better get some cameras in there so the public can protect itself. Get some cameras in there. We want some cameras now. Does the person who's accused of a crime usually ask for the cameras? Yes or no? The person who's the defendant, when does th…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

Gates and they have problems with them. He says further evidence of this is that there are two states in India one that used hydroxychloroquine I think it was. Some people had lots of vaccinations and there's a country in Africa I forget which one where they have a lot of problems with chloroquine a…

View segment →
MainContent General Commentary

it good or bad that Fox News did not put restrictions on charitable giving? It's good. It's good. It's not bad that the outcomes in this case would be sub-optimal to most people or some people at least. The satanic temple people you know be objectionable to most people but it doesn't really matter.…

View segment →
MainContent Confirmation Bias

y inappropriate but there we are. All right lately there's been a bunch of stories about DEI professionals who have been fired or quit or downsized whatever and they usually show their picture. Have you noticed anything common or similar about the photos of the people working in that field? Actuall…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

ng through your selfies you realize that you can't find one that doesn't have crazy eyes what's your best play? I did a poll on this on Twitter. I gave people two choices. If all of your selfies have crazy eyes your two choices are hide all of your photos or become a DEI professional because appare…

View segment →
Closing General Commentary

ants but I just wouldn't trust him if he's not. Yeah so you could have, there's a downside. Duh there's a downside to drugs. So he could get addicted. It could be really bad later in his life. He could die even. Overdose. You know he could have some. It's like all bad. I get it. But in terms of the…

View segment →

Good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. And if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that I don't think anybody can even imagine, well all you need is a mug or a glass, a tankard, a chalice, a stein, a jug or flask, vessel, libation, and fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip and it happens now.

Go. Ah yes. Let's go private over here.

Well there's a lot of fun things to talk about. And let's see, first of all there's an AI-created clip of South Park. So AI wrote, directed, and animated a little South Park episode. I saw a tweet saying that this was looking like the beginning of the end of humans creating. Well I didn't say it that way but it looked like the beginning of one person being able to create an animated series. Just tell it what topic and create a little show for you.

However I watched that little show just to see how good an AI was and it can't write. It can't write at all. I consider it ad agency quality writing. Now if you're a professional writer that's like the deepest insult because ad agencies are the worst writers. Have you seen a commercial? They don't hire humorists to write the commercial. If you're an ad agency you think you use skills so people who studied some advertising think they can write jokes. So that's why all of your insurance commercials are so lame.

I've got a good idea for a joke. How about I don't know, let me think, come up with something original. Original. I'm working for the ad agency. Something nobody's seen on a commercial. I've got it. We're going to make a white male look like an idiot. Has anybody done that yet on an insurance commercial? I feel like that'll be groundbreaking. A dull white male who's incompetent in everything. I think that will be shocking and amazing. People will be talking about it. They could go viral. That's what ad agencies think. What has everybody already done before that wasn't good and maybe we should do some more of that.

So the writing is terrible. Now AI of course can never write South Park for an obvious reason. Do you know the obvious reason? Because the only thing that makes South Park funny is that it's inappropriate. That's all. That's the whole joke. I mean you're extremely clever and well written and yeah it's a national treasure so South Park is amazing but it wouldn't be funny if they could never be inappropriate. So AI only can be appropriate and South Park is only funny if it's inappropriate. How could it ever solve that? It has nothing to do with how good AI could be. It's limited by humans to never be good. It's designed to be bad. It's actually designed not to be funny.

So here's the other thing that I'm going to add that you just won't see anywhere else as far as I know. This is just my own personal theory that I've never seen anybody else say. Part of what makes you enjoy humor writing is imagining that the people who wrote it or in some cases performed it are going to get in trouble. Now you don't think of it that way but if you don't feel danger for the writer or the presenter then it doesn't really trigger you. It doesn't become viral. It doesn't become anything. It's the sense of danger of a human being that makes it interesting to us, right?

Because if you said to me, "Hey Scott, there's something dangerous happening to a toaster a block away," I'd say, "What?" "Yeah there's something to a toaster a block away." And I'd say, "Is it my toaster?" "No, a toaster." "Well it's somebody's good toaster. They're rooting." "No it's not even really a new toaster. It's actually a broken toaster that somebody's abusing." Would you care? No, because it's a toaster. You wouldn't care at all.

So when AI writes something even if it could say something at the moment it can, but you could easily imagine they could teach it to do that. If they taught it to be dangerous you would say to yourself, "So what? There's a toaster in danger." So AI is putting itself in danger by just repeating some patterns that we take as provocative but nobody's in danger.

Yeah you'll never want to watch AI art because you'll know it didn't come from a person. Because the amazing thing about art is that a human made it. If you've ever been confused and thought that the amazing thing about art is that you enjoy looking at it, do you think that? Do you think the reason that you look at the great masters, the Da Vincis, you think it's because you like how the picture looks? Literally nobody likes how those pictures look. You wouldn't buy that photo if it were not made by Da Vinci. It's the fact that a human made it. That's the entire art. It's not art without that. It's not the picture. It has no value.

Even the greatest artists in the world, you know the Jackson Pollocks, depending on the impressionists, it doesn't even matter what genre you're in. The only thing that makes it art is that a human being made it. And if you don't think that's going to be true for music as well then I don't think you understand music either. Music is interesting because your brain says, "Wow, people made that. I would like to meet those people." That's it.

If you're the greatest composition and song that took any trick that you could make a hit song and put it all in one song so it had everything but you knew AI made it, you'd listen to it once. You'd say, "Oh that was actually a pretty good song the AI made." There you'd never be interested again because it wasn't from a human. People are interested in themselves, period. If you don't understand that then you don't understand really anything about why people are about to care about themselves and that's the end of the analysis.

Now you say, "Scott, Scott that's crazy. They care about their family." That's caring about themselves. Their family is just an extension of themselves, right? If somebody in your family dies that hurts you, right? They're not just separate entities although they're also that. They are you, right? When you see somebody who looks like you getting hurt that's you. That's you. The reason you care less, it's terrible to say it, you care less if somebody looks the least like you if they get hurt. I hate to say it but it's just the way we're all wired. The more somebody's like you the more they are you in your mind and the more you care about them. And AI is the most unlike you that it could be. It just doesn't matter.

Stuff that looks like you. If you had a photograph, a photograph of a person, would you like love it and want to fall in love with it? No it's just a photograph. It's just an image. So I think all of the technologists are missing maybe the biggest part of what AI is trying to master. The biggest part is that we will never be interested in a machine's work. We will use AI to do functional stuff that makes things faster, you know does things faster, basically just better or faster, more convenient. That would be great but no it's not going to do art. It's not going to do art because it can't under any condition. You can't do it because you never wanted to look at the picture and you never wanted to hear the song if you don't understand that. And you never wanted to hear the joke. You don't care about the joke, the song, or the picture. You care that a human made them and you wonder about the human. You put yourself in position. You know you couldn't make those things. They impress you. You want to meet that. But without that understanding the whole field of AI, at least the art-related part of it, is just absurd. It's just demonstrations of things that will never be real. But AI still has lots of useful purposes but I don't think art right away is going to be part of that.

All right. So Rand Paul's office in Kentucky was destroyed by a fire. I don't know if they figured out the cause of that yet. Do we know if that was arson? Is there a climate change? All right you got me. I was not expecting to laugh at that. Climate change. That was kind of perfect. That's like the old joke about typing. The comments showed up. I think it was the timing of the comment. It was just like the moment I said climate change. All right that was pretty funny. It wasn't climate change but I'm seeing the comments. We don't know what it was, right?

So is there some suggestion that it might have been intentional? Is that still a possibility or not? Well I'd like to say that Rand Paul, he seems unkillable. So far he survived a mass shooting during the softball game. He was a survivor. He survived being attacked, viciously attacked by his neighbor. Survived that. And sort of survived COVID somehow. Somehow he survived COVID. I'm not even sure he ever double masked and somehow he lived anyway. But now his office is destroyed by fire. You have to ask yourself, you know, and of course there were coincidental things. He was going to go after Fauci and he doesn't like the war in Ukraine. So there's always a reason. There's always a political reason. That would be true of most of the prominent senators at any time.

I would just like to say he's maybe one of the bravest people who's ever worked in government. I mean he's a brave mofo. I'd just like to take a moment to acknowledge that when people take these jobs it's not always for the power. Sometimes they're patriots. Rand Paul as far as I can tell isn't doing it for the money. As far as I can tell I don't see any indications to that. And he takes difficult stands which I believe are completely principle driven even when I don't agree with them. When I disagree with them generally he'll state his principle and I'll go, "Okay well that's consistent." So even when I don't like his opinions I like his opinions. Can you say that about everybody? You can't.

I would say it about RFK Jr. When I don't like his opinions or don't agree with him still totally respected because he shows his work, right? He says it's this study. This is why I believe it. That's all I'll ask of anybody. I don't ask you to be right all the time. That would be unreasonable. So Rand Paul's in my sort of highest level of government credibility. He puts his life on the line, doesn't walk away, doesn't appear to be lying about anything. Can you even think of a time he was accused of lying? I don't think he's even been ever accused. It doesn't seem to be part of his deal. He's just trying to make something better it looks like to me. So just kudos to one politician who while I don't agree with everything he says, that's not really mentioning Thomas Massie who is somebody I also often call out for extra respect because of the rational approach he's bringing. Again not somebody I'll agree with every time but he always brings the goods, always brings the argument, right? And it's never silly. It's never stupid. Sometimes you just don't agree. Priority is different or something but smart people, good patriots. I'm glad we have them.

All right let's talk about summer news. You know what summer news is? It's the kind that's mostly made up just so we have something to talk about in the summer. Well along those lines are probably drunken vice president. I'll just say probably because she acts like she's drunk in public but that's all I know for sure, right? I don't know if she is. I just know she acts like a drunk. And if you're not asking the question is she actually drunk I believe you're not doing your job as a good citizen, as a citizen who's you know has any interest in the country. I feel like it's a fair question. Are you drunk right now?

In fact in 2023 it's the most reasonable question you can ask. As soon as you get into a disagreement on social media I've taught you this before. If a troll comes after you in the comments and you're sure they're just, it's like they don't want to understand, they're probably drunk. Like actually literally if you looked at the population of the planet at any given time from the afternoon to the evening what percentage of people who drive by you on the highway are drunk? Probably 10 percent. Probably 10. What percentage of people on social media are the ones who are the terrible trolls? No different. It's probably not a coincidence you know that the amount of alcoholics, the amount of trolls seems to be similar. So it won't bother you as much to see a troll comment if you just say to yourself probably drunk. You wouldn't be wrong a lot.

But drug Kamala Harris was railing about the state of Florida allegedly having in their new curriculum something that is insulting to black people and anybody who cares about black people because it said, quote, let's see how she, I want to see how she paraphrased it. She said quote, "Just yesterday in the state of Florida they decided middle school students will be taught that enslaved people benefited from slavery." Now do you think that that was true? Do you need me to do an extended explanation of why that didn't happen? Why Florida isn't actually teaching people that slavery was sometimes good? Do I need to get into any of the details or will you stipulate that it's obvious on the surface that nothing like that happened? You know nothing like that happened, right?

All right so here's the closest thing that did happen. So this is summer news. This is somebody misinterpreting something in a really obvious way like a real obvious misinterpretation and then getting really angry about it. So first comes the misinterpretation and then there's the mock anger. Do you think she's really angry? Do you think she woke up and thought oh I'm so angry about this? No no she's not angry and nobody who's talking about it cares. It's just summer news. It's just something to talk about.

Here here's the actual statement from part of the curriculum I guess. It says quote instruction, so I guess the teachers are being instructed how to teach the history. Instruction includes how slaves develop skills in which in some instances could be applied for their personal benefit. So slaves developing skills that could be applied for their personal benefit turned into why is Florida saying that slavery was good for slaves?

Do you know what this personal benefit means in context if you keep it in context? Do you know what personal benefit means? It means, I'll give you an example. This is my understanding. It means that if you were a slave working in the field which you can imagine would be among the worst of these slave jobs, if you could figure out a way to let's say learn how to repair wagons or to shoe a horse, put horseshoes on a horse, probably better work. So that would be a case where a slave could go from the worst thing you could possibly do to something a little less worse. Still a slave. Nobody thinks that. Literally nobody thinks that and Kamala Harris doesn't think it. Nobody who agrees with her and claps like say a lot, none of them believe it. They might act like they believe it. They might argue with you with stern looks but they don't believe it. This is just summer news.

How about that Jason Aldean song that people are calling racist? How many of them do you think actually believe there's something in the song that's racist? Probably nobody. No I've said that even I like got the vibe but when you look at it you're looking for the racist stuff it's just clearly not there. But I can see why it's provocative. So if somebody said hey the media has primed us to have a bad reaction to material that's a good take. That's a good take. But if you say it was racist and yet there's not a single image you could point to that would back that or song or there's nothing in the words or the imagery that would suggest that this is just summer news.

If you got even a little bit worked up about the Jason Aldean situation you were getting worked up by drunken trolls and people who just need something to talk about. None of this stuff is real. It just isn't.

All right I told you that I agreed to talk to Roseanne on her upcoming podcast. I was thinking about Roseanne the other day so thinking about what she got canceled for and I don't need to go into the specifics because you probably remember them anyway. But do you think that in the real world there's even one person who believed honestly that Roseanne was bigoted? I think they accused her of being anti-semitic and at one point of offending a black woman that she didn't know was black. Nobody. But you couldn't find one person in the entire world and certainly nobody knows her. You're like I'll bet you couldn't find one person who would back that. Oh yeah in private. Oh yeah you should see what she says in private.

And I said the same thing about myself when I got canceled. The first thing that happens when you get canceled, you all know this, they look through your entire history to find out all the supporting bad things you did that for some reason nobody noticed until now. And when you sum them all up, oh my God this new thing must really be indicative of your nature. Did you notice that there was none of that for her? None of that for me? None. You don't think that people poured over everything we did as soon as we got canceled? Of course they did. And what did they find? Decades of the opposite. Decades. Decades of consistently being the opposite of the accusation. And still that fact doesn't alter the story. Don't you think the story should be well after 40 years of being this way there was this one thing that people thought might invalidate that 40 years? None of this is real. There's nobody who cares about Roseanne's opinion or mine.

Do you think there's anybody who woke up and it's like you know I was gonna have a good day but there was this cartoonist who said that thing that I took out of context and now I can't have a good day? No nobody cares about my opinion. They use the opinions of famous people as just a focus point to put their own views into it. So it's never about the person. They're just a conduit for people's opinions and that's about it. Don't take any of it seriously unless you get canceled and then you all know this.

All right so as you know Vivek Ramaswamy is getting a lot of attention for a great campaign. A lot of people who like Trump probably are liking him as well. Maybe not as much, right? Maybe they still prefer Trump but the Venn diagram of people who think you know they like Trump's vibe or at least what he's offering policy wise they're liking Vivek for similar reasons. But if you want to hear the best reason, yeah this might be the moment when I went from liking Vivek a lot to loving him. I think I've crossed over to some kind of man love.

All right here's what he tweeted after there was yet another embarrassing Kamala Harris video. So Vivek tweets that Kamala Harris makes the most powerful case I'll see in my lifetime against race and gender quotas in government if only she knew it. Wow. I don't think has anybody except Trump ever said something that direct. That's really direct. Yeah standing ovation right now.

This tweet didn't make much of an impact when he did it. Was it two days ago? Can you imagine in any other world that two days ago he could say this? That Kamala Harris is the best argument in his whole lifetime against race and gender quotas in government. He said it as directly as you could say it. You know why there was no controversy or pushback? Everybody agreed. Yeah.

Now Trump made the arms a little bigger so now you can play inside his space, right? So because Trump is so brutally frank on his opinions it just made it acceptable that you can play within those realms. He's already created. So I don't think Vivek could have said this I don't know six years ago. I think it would be the end of his career but today you can say it not only because it's obviously true but because our conversation has been broadened so you can now say that and you can actually just go on with your life.

Now I'd like to endorse that so I can say it too. Kamala Harris is obviously a diversity hire. Obviously. Now that doesn't mean that all diversity hires are going to be incapable like she is. Literally nobody thinks that. But some, but surely in our weird world where you protect everybody you know pretend to have opinions somebody's going to pretend that I think that if you're a minority hire you could not be qualified. Literally nobody believes that. Literally nobody. Yet that's the way we play it. We act as if there's somebody who actually has that opinion. Have you ever met anybody who had the opinion that you couldn't have a qualified black vice president? It's not even a thing. Literally you couldn't find one functioning brain that would have that opinion. Nobody.

But can you say that Kamala Harris is somewhat obviously not qualified? Yeah you could say that. It's pretty obvious to everybody. I'm sure the Democrats see it as well as we do. I mean the honest ones. So kudos to Vivek for being so direct. This fits perfectly in his policy preferences to get rid of all hiring preferences so it's right on target. And again he's just killing it. He's killing it.

Now the most dickish thing you can say in these situations I'm going to say it anyway because you know all the candidates are running for first place. Nobody's running to be a vice president, right? But it has to be said he would be perfect for Trump. He would be perfect. My microphone is plugged in so if you're hearing it low there's some problem on your end. The YouTube sound is actually better than the other sound.

All right so Trump did a little video about Biden basically. He's saying that Biden is sleepwalking us into World War III and it's all because of a country that gave the Bidens millions of dollars. Now I gotta say again that Trump is the best at simple framing. We've never seen this before. Like a lot of people are good and smart and good at framing. You know Vivek is great at it but this is just like otherworldly, right? It's just he gets right to like that feeling you feel. Like he skips all the intellectual stuff. It goes right at that thing you're feeling in your chest. This is exactly what I feel in my chest that we've got a president who's sleepwalking us into World War III for the benefit of a country that gave him millions of dollars through Burisma primarily. That's exactly what it feels like.

And so Trump is saying the exact thing you're thinking as you're thinking it. Damn he's just so good at that. Just take a moment to appreciate. And again you know I'm not going to be slobbering all over Trump's entire package so to speak. That was poorly worded. I'm going to try to call this as objectively as I can, right? So I'm going to say good things about anybody who's doing good things including Biden if he does some good things. But you can't beat Trump for simple framing.

All right there's a story. My favorite summer story so far is that Hunter Biden went to visit his lawyer and of course wherever he goes the paparazzi are there. And so his lawyer comes out on his balcony and smokes a bong and the photographers are getting a picture of the lawyer smoking a bong while Hunter's inside doing God knows what. Do you know what the funniest part of the story was? This is my favorite part of the story. The press said they didn't know what was in the bong.

Well nobody asked me to be an expert witness in this case but I volunteer. If you'd like you could interview me to see what my feelings are about what was in the bong. In fact I'll ask Dale to do just that. Dale could you interview me and ask me what's in that bong? Well we see it's a bong but we don't have any information whatsoever about the content of what he's smoking. It was a bong. And see no there's not really a second thing you smoke out of a bong. Not really. I mean maybe it's happened once but I don't think it was lettuce. Yeah I don't think he was looking through the ingredients in his kitchen. He was like paprika? I wonder. No I don't think that happened.

Would this be a story if he'd had a glass of wine on the balcony? If he'd been photographed with a glass of wine with dinner nobody would care. Is marijuana illegal in California where this alleged bonging happened? Totally legal. Totally legal. It's a nonsense. And just a personal note if I were Hunter Biden's lawyer I don't know how I would do it without doing bongs. I mean I think there's a way but it's not obvious to me. So yeah it's just personal.

So the boxes trial. The Mar-a-Lago boxes of secrets. Now you remember all the secrets that are in the boxes, right? Do I have to go over it again? All the secrets that they've told us are in the boxes. Oh wait nobody has told us there's anything in the boxes. No nothing at all. We don't have a single piece of information that there's even one thing in a box that anybody would care about. I'm not saying there isn't but isn't that interesting that nobody can even give us a for instance? How about just a for instance? Well we can't but I will tell you there was a detailed battle plan for Iran. Okay don't need to tell me the battle plan. That would be cool but just there's something like that in the box. Anything. Just anything. What's your worst one? You don't even have to tell me everything in the box. Just pick your worst thing. Nuclear secrets? Is it the nuclear secrets? I don't know but the timing is exact.

But generally speaking the Republicans would be done. So we would have a situation where Trump would be the Nazi but also possibly a convicted felon, potentially facing jail time if his appeal failed, right? So you assume if he got convicted there would be an appeal so that he would still become president. There's nothing that would stop him from being president, right? Even if he got convicted. If he were out on bail or he's appealing it. I mean it's not like he's a flight risk, right? Is Trump a flight risk? Where can he hide? He's the least flight risky guy of all time. You wouldn't even need bail would you? I don't think you would. You just say all right everybody's keeping an eye on you.

Well this is my first exposure to the details of this story but can somebody answer this question? Doesn't this give him perfect timing to use the prosecution as part of his campaign to say the government is corrupt and trying to rig the election by taking him out? So wouldn't it help him in the election? At the same time he could just pardon himself after it's done. I would vote for him just to pardon himself. I would. I would vote for him just to pardon himself. Policies? I would just vote for him to pardon himself. That would be the end because I don't see the prosecution as being something that would have happened with another person. I'm not saying he did or did not commit any technical violations. It might have been in fact probably. I just don't think they rise to the level of response.

So I think so far it looks like it could work in his favor because they're never going to tell you what's in the boxes. They're just going to wave their hands. Dangerous boxes. And eventually the longer you go without hearing what's in the box the less likely you think there's anything you care about. Yeah there might be some secrets but do they matter? Does anybody care? I doubt it.

All right Trump has said that there are a lot of passionate voters out there, more passionate than ever, and things would be quote very dangerous if he went to prison. Now I'd like to show you the faces of the people on CNN when they heard Trump say the most obvious thing in the world that it could be dangerous if one of the leading candidates is put in jail on charges that don't look credible. Now CNN decided that that was a threat. So I'd like to show you CNN face when he said it. Oh is that a threat? I love CNN face. I don't think MSNBC is quite the same way but CNN always does the face. You know when I say Joy Reid or any of the people on MSNBC they're on right it seems like versions of their own face but on CNN it's like they're actors who have to act extra disgusted. Like the Jake Tapper face. And then Trump walked to a helicopter you know like they're farting and crying at the same time. So MSNBC has dumb face maybe anyway.

Yeah so they're trying to turn Trump into a dangerous insurrectionist because he pointed out the most obvious and well-known fact in the world that if you illegitimately jail a major political character people might protest. I don't know that might surprise you.

All right Trump's lawyer, his new lawyer, cleverly and smartly is demanding cameras in the courtroom. Can we give a hand for Trump's new lawyer? Cameras in the courtroom. Now should there be cameras in the courtroom? I don't know that's not the point. The point is if you're a new lawyer and you're going to be presenting your case as it's a ridiculous case and it's political, oh yeah whether or not you get cameras is also a second question but the first thing you should say is cameras. Because he just reframed the situation. His new lawyer just successfully framed the situation as an illegitimate government process. One in which you can't trust that unless you better get some cameras in there so the public can protect itself. Get some cameras in there. We want some cameras now.

Does the person who's accused of a crime usually ask for the cameras? Yes or no? The person who's the defendant, when does the defendant ask for cameras? I've never heard of it. Have you? Have you ever heard of it? It's a baller play. Imagine being so confident of your case. Now this is what he would portray. We don't know if he's confident. We know he's portraying confidence. Just to, that's a good lawyer. So first step we see in the public, the innocent man wants cameras in the courtroom. Perfect. Good job.

All right by the way his new attorney is named John Lauro. Normally I wouldn't even care what his lawyer's name is but he's a good lawyer so maybe you should know his name so far anyway. That's a good move.

All right so President Biden has overruled the Pentagon for choosing a new member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. So they recommended some gentleman I don't know his name but Biden picked Admiral Lisa Franchetti to lead the Navy. So she'd be the first woman if she's confirmed to be a Pentagon service chief and the first female member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. So the Pentagon wanted somebody else. So does that sound like a diversity hire to anybody? Just asking. Does anybody interpret this as she's clearly not the person for the job? Yeah.

Now I feel bad for her. Would she be, she's admiral. She's not a rear admiral. I'm not sure what a rear admiral is but it's probably lucky she isn't one. But it could be that she's actually the best person for the job. I wouldn't rule it out. It's possible. You know maybe Biden is really good at hiring. Maybe she's the best one for the job but nobody's going to believe it. Should you hire people for your Joint Chiefs of Staff if the public assumes that they're unqualified? Now pretend that they think she is but nobody really believes that do they privately? You think somebody privately would say yeah I think they focused on picking the right person? I doubt it. I doubt anybody would think that.

And again this is terribly unfair if it turned out that Admiral Franchetti is actually really great. They're terribly unfair. And did I create the situation? I'm just reading the news. He created the situation where he very overtly and with nothing hidden chose somebody based on gender primarily.

Let me ask you an even more provocative question. Do you think women should be heads of any military service? I want to see if anybody says yes. Somebody says yes if they're gay. Okay that's not fair. All right almost everybody's saying no. Now is that just because you're a conservative? I see one yes. Is that because you're a conservative group or do you think this would be a general feeling? I mean I don't think it would not be among the progressives. I feel the military is the one place where the mission has to be first. I guess that's easy to say and it doesn't look like they're doing that.

So not only is Biden sleepwalking us into World War III but he's consciously, intentionally, and publicly making sure that we don't have the best people running the military. That's what it looks like. Would anybody disagree with that characterization that he's moving us close to war? That part I think you agree. I mean I'm not sure war will happen with Russia but clearly we're creeping that direction at the same time he's degrading the most important part which would be the decision-making and maybe even the trust. I don't know how you could be more incompetent more obviously and more publicly. It would be hard to imagine anybody starting or looking to crawl toward a war that could destroy all civilization while simultaneously promoting somebody who's clearly even according to the Pentagon not the right person.

So apparently we care about making women happy more than we care about defending even the country. Actually the priority is clear. So how in the world could he win re-election? It's just mind-boggling. Like if you just look at the objective facts it just doesn't look like it's possible but yeah we also don't trust the election so anything's possible.

Well I hesitate to bring up this next story but it's a big headline lately so I was a big sigh. RFK Jr. says that ivermectin totally works because there are 99 studies that show it does and that only a few studies that say it doesn't work and they were funded by Bill Gates and they have problems with them. He says further evidence of this is that there are two states in India one that used hydroxychloroquine I think it was. Some people had lots of vaccinations and there's a country in Africa I forget which one where they have a lot of problems with chloroquine and they did well without vaccinations.

Do you like his facts? Did those sound pretty credible? Do you think there's 99 studies that show it works and only a few that show it doesn't? And that Bill Gates funded them and that there are clear examples in the real world of where either hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin because you can just see it. You can see the area worked and you know there are they didn't use they didn't get the good result. Do you think that's true?

All right yes and no are the wrong answers. Yeah yes and no were both the wrong answers. There's no such thing as reliable data about this. There's no such thing. Bill Gates doesn't have reliable data. RFK Jr. doesn't have reliable data. I'm pretty sure that these 99 studies were observational and retrospective or very very small and flawed and that when somebody did a meta study where they sort of sum up all the studies you know they got some kind of an opinion but meta studies are basically astrology. It's not even science. I've said that argument too many times to do it again but it's basically what assumptions you make when you do the analysis the outcome. So it's not a science at all. You pick some assumptions and you're kind of done. It's just what assumptions you picked. So there's nothing about science that should flow from your assumption. It should flow from tests. If it flows directly from your assumptions well I assume this big test over here this is biasing the results. I assume that's worse than some of these little ones so I'll take this one out. It's not a science. It's somebody's assumption about things.

So I would say that RFK Jr.'s take on this would be the same as anybody's take who believed data or what data was accurate and what data was not. It's just not a thing. There's nobody you can look at any data and know anything about it about ivermectin because the topic itself is too politicized. You would just assume that it's distorted by money somehow one way or the other. So I'm not going to say that it works or it doesn't work. I'm going to stick with my opinion from the very beginning. I don't believe the data that says it works or that it doesn't work. I don't believe either one and I don't believe that we have any business.

Now actually let me amend that. We might actually have good data but you might never see it and you wouldn't know what was the good data versus the bad data. So anybody who has something like certainty that's the only wrong opinion. If you said to yourself you know I've looked at these studies I gotta say I'm leaning in RFK Jr.'s direction. I'm leaning in that direction. Perfectly reasonable. Do you get that? And if you said you were leaning the other direction perfectly reasonable. But leaning is as far as you can get, right? We're so far from actually knowing that it's the knowing that bothers me. And so I think RFK Jr. would be more solid if he said that I don't like any of the studies but there are enough studies that show that it was positive that wouldn't it be good to know for sure? Something like that. But the certainty I think is a little off-putting to me because I think that the data supports it. Certainly it might support leaning in one direction or the other.

All right Blaze Media which is no good friend to Fox News I guess broke the story that there's a match donation. Fox News so if you give some to your church I guess they'll match it. You give some money to this or that they'll match it. But apparently there was no limit on at least if it was a charitable entity that you could give to. So they found out that some people are giving to a satanic temple, something called the Trevor Project that must be bad for conservatives, Planned Parenthood the conservatives don't always like, and what else? Southern Law Center which is amazing.

Now is this a real story or is this a summer story? The details are probably right. I mean I would guess somebody did screenshots and it seems like it's well documented so I would say the facts are probably right. Probably right. Do you care? Do you care that there was some troll or even maybe just one person at Fox News who was literally a member of the satanic temple or thought it would be funny and gave a hundred dollars to it just to see if Fox News would match it? None of it matters. Fox News can give its money anywhere it wants. In this case it said we'll match it please want to give it and then they didn't put restrictions on them. Is that good or bad? Is it good or bad that Fox News did not put restrictions on charitable giving? It's good. It's good. It's not bad that the outcomes in this case would be sub-optimal to most people or some people at least. The satanic temple people you know be objectionable to most people but it doesn't really matter. That double donation from Fox News you're probably talking about two hundred dollars. Do you think you're talking about millions? You know that it would have been a flag if there was even one donation to any of these entities.

So am I angry that there's somebody at Fox News who's donating to Planned Parenthood? No. All that tells me is that Fox News is willing to hire people who have different opinions than some of them do. How is that even a problem? Now I get that there are customers and most of the hosts would be on one side of that issue but the fact that they're willing to hire you if you're on the other side of that issue is not a weakness. Does that feel like a weakness? It's totally a strength. So I'm going to back Fox News on this. I think Blaze Media is a little over their competitive skis. It's just a summer story again. It's a summersity. Nobody cares. Literally nobody cares.

All right here's another one. Did you know that DEI which had been diversity equity and inclusion now has an A at the end. They're sort of going the LGBTQ plus direction where you keep having to add letters. So they've added A to the end for accessibility. So that's DEIA anyway. The Wall Street Journal editorial board was talking about California community colleges are required to take into consideration you know the principles of DEI. And here are the bullet points from The Wall Street Journal of these specific things that these community colleges should do.

All right this is how seriously they take it. So the bullet points are promotes and incorporates DEI and anti-racist pedagogy. Pedagogy. Literally have never said that word out loud. Do you know why I've never said pedagogy? Pedagogy. Do you know I have never said that out loud? Because it's a douchebag word and I'm not a douchebag. Well maybe I am but I don't use that word. I had to correct myself. Maybe I am. I'm a bit of a douchebag but never use that word. Who are you writing for? Do you think that half of the readers of The Wall Street Journal know what that means? Pedagogy. They're probably no more than half. I'd guess 25 percent anyway.

So they're gonna promote and incorporate it. So promoting and incorporating so far so good, right? Because we knew that was happening. Promoting and incorporating. But let's see if it goes further. Develops and influences a pedagogy or a curriculum that promotes a race conscious and intersectional lens. That's bad. A race conscious teaching that should be exactly what you don't do. So that should be illegal but it so that would be illegal in Florida, right? The thing that's being recommended or actually required, the thing that's being required in California is literally illegal in Florida. Is that true? Is required here and illegal there? Can you think of any other law that's required in one state and illegal in another? Give me another example. Required in one state and illegal in another. Go.

Now guns are not required. Looting. Abortion is not required. Well I suppose it would be required to offer. You might be right about that. Income tax. Well you know state tax that's reaching. License to drive. No it's required everywhere. Pre-arranged crapping. Photo ID. It's not illegal to have photo ID. It's not illegal to put on a seat belt. It's not. Pot is not required anywhere. Yeah there's no other example is there, right? There are lots of examples of things that are legal in one and not legal in another but you can't come up with an example of something that is required, government required in one state and government illegal in another state. I want to see if you now voter ID. If you walk into the voter ID place and show your ID nobody's going to arrest you if it's not required. I think this is unique. That is required in one state and illegal in another but that should tell you something.

Contributes to DEI and anti-racism research and scholarship. Contributes to it. You have to contribute to the research and scholarship. What's that mean? You have to contribute to it like financially or you have to work toward it? A big deal. Advocates for and advances it. Most of these bullet points are just saying you got to work on it in different ways. I assume these bullet points were written by an unqualified person. Participates in a continuous cycle of self-assessment of one's growth and commitment to DEI and an acknowledgment of any internalized personal biases and racial superiority or inferiority. It's literally just mind control.

Based on this I would recommend that nobody go to college in California. Like you should just skip community college. This is the most absurdly inappropriate thing you could ever put in a college. Absurdly inappropriate but there we are.

All right lately there's been a bunch of stories about DEI professionals who have been fired or quit or downsized whatever and they usually show their picture. Have you noticed anything common or similar about the photos of the people working in that field? Actually a lot of them are white. Yeah yeah your first impression was it's going to be people of color but now there's actually a healthy number of them are white women. Mostly women. Have they all been women? Not all of them. Ninety percent. It's like 90 women isn't it? Yeah 90 women but that's not what I'm going for. You're talking about body weight? No I don't think the body weight. I haven't seen anybody overweight who's doing that job. In fact they all look normal weight. No it's not that. It's crazy faces. Crazy eyes. They are people with crazy eyes and crazy smiles. And the first few times I saw it I thought well that's just my imagination playing tricks with me or maybe it's just a coincidence but the more stories I see and the more of those pictures I'm starting to think it's like some other issues we talk about whereas it's mental illness that's just been systemized. It's systemic mental illness.

So we're fighting systemic racism which I believe is a real thing and important with systemic craziness. We're actually hiring the craziest people to work on an important issue. Now do you believe that you can tell if somebody is batshit crazy by looking at them? How many of you think you can tell by looking at them if somebody's crazy? As we evolved so that we can tell if somebody is sick or crazy or lying. Not every time but where we've evolved and need that skill you can spot them right away. And the DEI photos look like pictures of very unhealthy people, mentally unhealthy people.

Now so I'm just going to say it has nothing to do with race or gender. They do look like disturbed people who were drawn to a profession partly because of whatever is bothering them. That's what it looks like. Now I can't read minds. I have no poll information. There's no science behind it but I'm tired of ignoring it. I mean if every time I see pictures of DEI people and they look crazy how am I going to, how long do I have to ignore that? When can I point it out? Are we there? I mean I can do it. You can probably because I got free speech in a way you do not. So I asked myself if you were looking through all your photos you're looking for a good profile picture and as you're scrolling through your selfies you realize that you can't find one that doesn't have crazy eyes what's your best play?

I did a poll on this on Twitter. I gave people two choices. If all of your selfies have crazy eyes your two choices are hide all of your photos or become a DEI professional because apparently that's the one place where a crazy eye photo is perfectly acceptable. Oh yeah we'll hire this one. All right 88 said become a DEI professional and 12 said hide their photos.

All right here's an Ukraine update. Fairly early on in the Ukraine situation a lot of people were pro-Ukraine. They put their Ukrainian flags in their profiles and stuff. It was still literally fog of war. Things were just developing. Ukraine was an ally. Russia was not. You know so it made sense if the US and NATO were going in on a side that people would kind of take the side of the leaders. But a lot of time has transpired. We see now that so far we've not got a good result. The latest thinking is that nobody's going to do any counter-offensive or offensive to walk on land mines until the end of time and basically keep their borders the way they are.

So under these situations and the times going by and what we've learned about the Bidens taking money from Burisma allegedly etc. can we conclude that if you still have a Ukraine flag in your profile and you're not actually Ukrainian there's probably something wrong with you and probably you're deeply brainwashed? And somebody said today on Twitter you've heard it before but you know that they don't take seriously a thing that's said by anybody with a Ukraine flag in the profile. Now when people started saying that my first reaction was well that's a little bigoted or I don't know stereotyped or that's a little crazy but standing from today's perspective with what we know about the whole situation and lots of time has transpired and it doesn't look like we're getting any closer to a result kind of embarrassing to have that. And if you still have that in your profile I swear to God I can't take you seriously because it's almost like a tattoo on your forehead. This has brainwashed me. Brainwash me please. Hello could I please be brainwashed a little bit? Do believe whatever you're telling me as long as it costs a lot of money to buy a lot of weapons. The most important thing is we're buying weapons. Lots and lots of weapons. So that's what the Ukraine flag to me just looks like you're lost.

And again I think that you could be a reasonable person and have nuanced and different views on whether we should or should not be helping Ukraine. I think a reasonable person could be on either side of that even if I strongly disagree. Reasonable people are on both sides. But I wouldn't believe anybody was reasonable if they had a Ukraine flag in their profile. The first thing I think is oh I can't talk to you. But I'm sure there are equal things that people say about other people same kind of thing. That's just where I am at it that I can't take anybody seriously with that flag.

All right well the latest on the Ukraine situation is they're completely bogged down. The counter-offensive is not working. Russia is in no risk whatsoever of folding or falling apart. There are more stories about internal dissension and people being rounded up and all that stuff. I'm sure that's true but we haven't seen progression lately. And I don't think Russia is in trouble of any kind of coup. Does anybody think Russia actually is falling apart? As long as they have money they're not falling apart. Putin's firmly in control it looks like.

What's that? Elijah Wood talking about Zelensky's addiction? Is that on the news? It's not on serious drugs then I'd have to question his capability. If he's not at least on meth or some version of it, Adderall or something, if he's not on a performance-enhancing upper then he's the wrong person for the job. I'm just going to say that directly. I don't care how illegal those drugs are. If the guy who's in charge of saving your country isn't getting the energy he needs he better go get it. I just assume anybody in this situation is on some kind of meth or Adderall or some version of it. Don't you? You say cocaine but I don't know. Meth would be smarter in his case. I don't know if he's snorting anything but I would say for sure a person in that situation I would if I were him I would be on some kind of stimulant because there's no way he's ever going to go to sleep thinking he did enough work. Remember his life and death. You don't want somebody to say you know I'm going to get a good eight hours of sleep tonight. That's the last thing you want to hear from your war leader.

You know what I want to hear from my war leader? I've been up for three days. I'm still doing well. I don't feel like I need any sleep yet. And I say to myself okay well you're on meth. And then the second thing I say to myself is thank God I've got a leader who's awake. Do you want a sleepy Joe making your war decisions? Well yeah we'll send you some bombs.

Foreign. Good for him. Just means he loves his country and he doesn't want to sleep through a war. But I don't recommend drugs to you because keep in mind that if he's doing drugs and I just assume he is, I mean he would be smart enough to be on stimulants but I just wouldn't trust him if he's not. Yeah so you could have, there's a downside. Duh there's a downside to drugs. So he could get addicted. It could be really bad later in his life. He could die even. Overdose. You know he could have some. It's like all bad. I get it. But in terms of the risk reward I doubt anybody in this situation would not be on stimulants. Probably it's probably pretty common.

All right that's all ladies and gentlemen for YouTube. I'm gonna say bye to YouTube. Thanks for joining the best live stream of all time.

foreign good morning everybody and welcome to the high light of human civilization and uh if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that I don't think anybody can even imagine well all you need is a mug or a glass a tank of Chelsea style and the canteen Joker flask vessel levitic eye and fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee enjoy being now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dope means of the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous Sip and it happens now go ah yes let's go private over here well there's a lot of fun things to talk about um and uh let's see first of all there's an AI created clip of South Park so AI wrote directed and animated a little South Park episode I saw Brian romelli tweet saying that this was you know looking like the beginning of the end of Hughes creating well I didn't say it that way but it looked like the beginning of one person being able to create an animated series just tell it what topic and create some crease a little show for you however I watched that little show just to see how good a y a I was and uh it can't write it can't write at all right yeah I I consider it Ad Agency quality writing now if you're a professional writer that's like the deepest insult because ad agencies are the worst writers have you seen a commercial they don't hire humorists to write the commercial if you're an AJ Ad Agency you think you use skills so people who studied some I don't know advertising think they can write jokes so that's why all of your insurance commercials are so lame uh I've got a good idea for a joke how about I don't know let me think uh come up with something original original I'm working for the Ad Agency something nobody's seen on a commercial I've got it we're going to make a white male look like an idiot has anybody done that yet on an insurance commercial I feel like that'll be groundbreaking adult white male who's incompetent in everything I think that will be shocking and amazing uh people will be talking about it they could go viral that's what Ad Agency I think the ad agencies think what is everybody already done before that wasn't good and maybe we should do some more of that so the writing is terrible now ai of course can never write South Park for an obvious reason do you know the obvious reason because the only thing that makes South Park funny is that it's inappropriate that's all that's the whole joke I mean you're extremely clever and well written and yeah it's a it's a national treasure so South Park is amazing but it wouldn't be funny if they if they could never be inappropriate so so AI only can be appropriate and South Park is only funny if it's inappropriate how could it ever solve that it has nothing to do with how good AI could be it's limited by humans to never be good it's designed to be bad is actually designed not to be funny so that here's the other thing that I'm going to add that you just you won't see anywhere else as far as I know this is just my own personal theory that I've never seen anybody else say part of what makes you enjoy humor writing is imagining that the people who wrote it or in some cases performed it are going to get in trouble now you don't think of it that way but if you don't feel danger for the writer or the presenter then it doesn't it doesn't really uh trigger you it doesn't become viral it doesn't become anything it's the sense of danger of a human being that makes it interesting to us right because if you said to me you Scott there's something dangerous happening to a toaster a block away I'd say what yeah there's something to a toaster a block away and I'd say is it my toaster no a toaster well it's somebody's good toaster they're rooting no it's it's not even really a new toaster it's actually a broken toaster that somebody's abusing would you care no because it's a toaster you wouldn't care at all so when AI writes something even if it could say something at the moment it can but you could easily imagine you know they could teach it to do that if they taught it to be dangerous you would say to yourself so what there's a toaster in danger so AI is putting itself in danger by just repeating some patterns that we we take as provocative but nobody's in danger yeah you'll never want to watch AI art because you'll know it didn't come from a person because the amazing thing about art is that a human made it if you've ever been confused and thought that the amazing thing about art is that you enjoy looking at it do you think that do you think the reason that you look at the great Masters The Da Vinci's you think it's because you like how the picture looks literally nobody likes how those pictures look you you would you wouldn't buy that photo if it were if it were not made by da Vinci it's the fact that a human made it that's the entire art it's not art without that it's not the picture has no value even the greatest artists in the world you know the the Jackson Pollux you know depending the impressionist it doesn't even matter what what genre you're in the only thing that makes it art is that a human being made it and if you don't think that's going to be true for music as well that I don't think you understand music either music is interesting because your brain says wow people made that I would like to meet with those people that's it if you're the greatest composition and song that took any trick that you could make a hit song and put it all in one song so it had everything but you knew I ate it you'd listen to it once you say oh that was actually a pretty good song the AI made there you'd never be interested again because it because it wasn't from a human people are interested in themselves period if you don't understand that then then you don't understand really anything about your people about to care about themselves and that's that's the end of the analysis now you say Scott Scott that's crazy they care about their that's caring about themselves their family is just an extension of themselves right if somebody in your family dies that hurts you right they're not just separate entities although they're also that they are you right when you see somebody who looks like you getting hurt that's you that's you the reason you care less it's terrible to say it you care less if somebody looks the least like you if they get hurt I hate to say it but it's just the way we're all wired the more somebody's like you the more they are you in your mind and the more you care about them and a is the the most unlike you that it could be it just doesn't matter stuff that looks like you if you had a photograph a photograph of a person would you like love it and want to fall in love with it no it's just a photograph it's just an image so I think all of the technologists are missing the maybe the biggest part of what AI is trying to master the biggest part is that we will never be interested in a machine's work we will use AI to do functional stuff that makes things faster you know does things faster basically just you know better or faster more convenient that would be great but no it's not going to do art it's not going to do art because it can't under any condition you can't do it because you never wanted to look at the picture and you never wanted to hear the song if if you don't understand that and you never wanted to hear the joke you don't care about the joke the song or the picture you care that a human made them and you wonder about the human you put yourself in position you know you couldn't make those things they impress you you want to make that's but without that understanding the whole field of AI at least the art related part of it is just absurd it's just demonstrations of things that will never be real but AI still has lots of useful purposes but I don't think art right away is going to be part of that all right um so Rand Paul's office in Kentucky was destroyed by a fire I don't know if they figure out the cause of that yet do we know if that was arson is there a climate change all right you got me I was not expecting to laugh at that climate change that was kind of perfect that's like the old joke about typing the the comments showed up I think it was the timing of the comment it was just like the moment I said climate change all right that was pretty funny uh it wasn't climate change but I'm seeing the comments we don't know what it was right so there's is there some suggestion that it might have been intentional is that still there's still a possibility or not well I'd like to say that um Rand Paul he seems unkillable so so far he survived a mass shooting right during the softball game he was a Survivor that he survived being attacked by his viciously attacked by his neighbor survive that and sort of survive coven somehow somehow we survived covet I'm not I don't even think he ever double massed and somehow he lived anyway but um and now his office is destroyed by fire you have to ask yourself you know and of course there were coincidental things he was going to go after fauci and he doesn't like the war in Ukraine so there's always a reason there's always a political race that would be true of most of the prominent Senators at any time I would just like to say he's the maybe one of the bravest people who's ever worked in government I mean he's a brave mofo I I just like I'd just like to take a moment acknowledge that when people take these jobs it's not always for the power sometimes they're Patriots Rand Paul as far as I can tell isn't doing it for the money as far as I can tell I don't see any indications to that and he takes difficult stands which I believe are completely um principle driven even when I don't agree with them when I disagree with them generally he'll State his principle and I'll go okay well that's consistent so even even when I don't like his opinions I like his opinions can you say that about everybody you can't I would say it about RFK Jr when I don't like his opinions or don't agree with him still totally respected because he shows his work right he says it's this study this is why I believe it that's all I'll ask of anybody I don't ask you to be right all the time that would be unreasonable so Rand Paul's in my you know sort of highest level of government credibility he puts his life on the line doesn't walk away doesn't appear to be lying about anything can you even think of a time he was accused of blind I don't think he's even been ever accused it's like it doesn't seem to be part of his deal he's just trying to make something better it looks like to me so just uh kudos to one politician who while I don't agree with everything he says that's not really mentioning Thomas Massey who is somebody I also often call out for uh extra respect because of the rational the rational approach he's bringing again now somebody I'll agree with every time but he always brings the goods always brings the argument right and that it's never silly it's never stupid sometimes you just don't agree priority is different or something but smart people good Patriots I'm glad we have them all right let's talk about summer news you know what summer news is it's the kind that's mostly made up just so we have something to talk about in the summer well along that those lines uh are probably drunken vice president I'll just say probably because she acts like she's drunk in public but that's all I know for sure right I don't know she is I just know she acts like a drunk and if you're not asking the question is she actually drunk I I believe you're not doing your job as a good citizen as a citizen who's you know has any interest in the company country I feel like it's a fair question are you drunk right now in fact in 2023 it's the most it's the most reasonable question you can ask as soon as you get into a disagreement on social media I've taught you this before If a troll comes after you in the comments and you're sure they're just it's like they they don't want to understand they're probably drunk like actually literally if you looked at you know the population of the planet at any given time from the afternoon to the evening what percentage of people who drive by you on the highway are drunk probably 10 percent probably 10 what percentage of people on social media are the ones who are the terrible trolls no different it's probably not a coincidence you know that that the the amount of Alcoholics of the amount of trolls seems to be similar so it won't bother you as much to see a troll a comment if you just say to yourself probably drunk you wouldn't be wrong a lot but uh drug Kamala Harris was railing about the State of Florida allegedly having in their new curriculum something that is insulting to black people and anybody who cares about black people because it said quote uh let's see how is she I want to see how she paraphrased it um she said quote just yesterday in the State of Florida they decided middle school students will be taught that enslaved people benefited from slavery now do you do you think that that was true do you need me to do an extended explanation of why that didn't happen why why Florida isn't actually teaching people that slavery was sometimes good do I need to get into any of the details or will you stipulate that it's obvious on the surface that nothing like that happened you know nothing like that happened right all right so here's the closest thing that did happen so this is summer news this is somebody misinterpreting something in a really obvious way like a real obvious misinterpretation and then getting really angry about it so first comes the misinterpretation and then there's the mock anger do you think she's really angry do you think she woke up and thought oh I'm so angry about this no no she's not angry and nobody who's talking about it cares it's just summer news it's just something to talk about here here's the actual statement from part of the curriculum I guess uh it says quote instruction um so I guess the teachers are being instructed how to teach the history instruction includes house slaves develop skills in which in some instances could be applied for their personal benefit so slaves developing skills that could be applied for their personal benefit turned into uh why is Florida saying that the slavery was good for slaves do you know what this personal benefit means in context if you keep it in context do you know what personal benefit means it means I'll give you an example this is my understanding it means that if you were a slave working in the field which you can imagine would be you know among the worst of these slave jobs if you could figure out a way to let's say learn how to repair wagons right or to shoe a horse right put horseshoes on a horse probably better work so that would be a case where a slave could go from the worst thing you could possibly do do something a little less worse still a Slave nobody thinks that literally nobody thinks that and Kamala Harris doesn't think it nobody who agrees with her in claps like say a lot none of them believe it they might act like they believe it they might argue with you yeah with Stern looks but they don't believe it this is just summer news how about that Jason Aldean song that people are calling her a racist how many of them do you think actually believe there's some in the song that's racist probably nobody no I've said that even I like got the vibe but when you look at it you're looking for the racist stuff it's just clearly not there but I can see why it's provocative so if somebody said hey the media has primed us to have a bad reaction material that's that's a good take that's a good take but if you say it was racist and yet there's not a single image you could point to that would back that or song or there's nothing in the in the words or the imagery that would suggest that this is just summer news if you got even a little bit worked up about the Jason Aldean situation you were getting worked up by drunken trolls and people who just need something to talk about none of this stuff is real it just isn't all right I told you that I agreed to talk to Roseanne on her upcoming part podcast I was thinking about Roseanne the other day so thinking about what she got canceled for and I don't I don't need to you know go into this specifics because you probably remember them anyway but do you think that in the real world there's even one person who believed honestly the Roseanne was bigoted I I think they accused her being anti-semitic and at one point of uh offending a black woman that she didn't know was black nobody oh but you couldn't find one person in the entire world and certainly nobody knows her you're like I'll bet you couldn't find one person who would back that oh yeah in private oh yeah you should see what she says in private and I said the same thing about myself when I got canceled the first thing that happens when you get canceled you all know this they look through your entire history to find out all the supporting bad things you did that for some reason nobody noticed until now and when you sum them all up oh my God this new thing must really be indicative of your nature did you notice that there was none of that for her none of that for me none you don't you don't think that people poured over everything we did as soon as we got canceled of course they did and what they find Decades of the opposite decades Decades of consistently being the opposite of the accusation and still that fact doesn't the or the story don't you think the poor the story should be well after 40 years of being this way there was this one thing that people thought might invalidate that 40 years none of this is real there's nobody who cares about Roseanne's opinion or mine do you think there's anybody who woke up and it's like you know I was gonna have a good day but there was this cartoonist who said that thing that I took out of context and now I can't have a good day no nobody cares about my opinion they they use the opinions of famous people as just a focus point to put their own views into it so it's never about the person they're just a conduit for people's opinions and that's about it don't take any of it seriously unless you get canceled in anyone all right um so as you know Vivek ramaswamy is getting a lot of attention for a great campaign a lot of people who like Trump probably are liking him as well maybe not as much right maybe they still prefer Trump but the the Venn diagram of people who think you know they like Trump's Vibe or at least what he's offering policy wise they're liking the fake for similar reasons but if you want if you want to hear the best reason yeah this this might be the moment when I went from uh liking Vivek a lot to loving him I think I've crossed over to some kind of man love all right here's what he tweeted after there was yet another embarrassing Kamala Harris video so Vivek tweets that Kamala Harris makes the most powerful case I'll see in my lifetime against race and gender quotas and government if only she knew it wow I don't think has anybody accept Trump ever said something that Direct that's really direct yeah Standing Ovation right now this this tweet didn't make a much of a impact when he did it was it two days ago can you imagine in any other world that two days ago he could say this that Carmel Harris is a the best argument in his whole lifetime against race and gender quotas in government he said it as directly as you could say it you know why there was no controversy or pushback everybody agreed yeah now Trump trump made the arms a little bigger so now you can play inside his space right so because Trump is so brutally you know Frank on his opinions it just made it acceptable that you can play Within those Realms he's he's already created so I don't think Vivek could have said this I don't know six years ago I think it would be the end of his career but today you can say it not only because it's obviously true but because our conversation has been broadened so you can now say that and you can actually just go on with your life now I'd like to endorse that so I can say it too a couple errors is obviously a diversity higher obviously obviously now that doesn't mean that all diversity hires are going to be incapable like she is literally nobody thinks that but some but surely in our you know weird world where you protect everybody you know pretend to have opinions somebody's going to pretend that I think that if you're a minority hire you could not be qualified literally nobody believes that literally nobody yet that's the way we play it we act as if there's somebody who actually has that opinion have you ever met anybody who had the opinion that you couldn't have a qualified black vice president it's not even a thing literally you couldn't find one functioning brain that would have that opinion nobody but can you say the Kamala Harris is somewhat obviously not qualified yeah you could say that it's pretty obvious to everybody I'm sure I'm sure the Democrats see it as well as we do I mean the honest ones so kudos to Vivek for being so direct this fits perfectly in his uh in his policy preferences to get rid of all hiring preferences so it's right on Target and again he's just killing it he's killing it now um the most dickish thing you can say in these situations I'm going to say it anyway because you know all the candidates are running for first place nobody's running to be a vice president right but it has to be said he would be perfect for Trump you would be perfect uh my microphone is plugged in so if you're hearing it low there's some problem on your end the You.

Tube Sound is actually better than the other sound all right um so Trump was uh did a little video about Biden basically he's saying that Biden is a sleepover sleepwalking us into World War III and it's all because of a country that gave the bidens millions of dollars now I gotta say again the Trump is the best as simple framing we've never seen this before like a lot a lot of people are good in smart and good at framing you know if they're fake is great at it but this is just like other world Leaf right it's just he gets right to like that feeling you feel like he skips all the intellectual stuff it goes right at that thing you're feeling in your chest this is exactly what I feel in my chest that we've got a president who's sleepwalking us into World War III for the benefit of a country that gave him millions of dollars through Barista primarily that's exactly what it feels like and so so Trump is that the exact thing you're thinking as you're thinking it damn he's just so good at that just take a moment to appreciate and again you know I'm not I'm not going to be slobbering all over Trump's you know entire package so to speak that was poorly worded uh I'm gonna I'm gonna try to call um you know the I'm going to call this races objectively as I can right so I'm going to say good things about anybody who's doing good things including Biden if he does some good things all right uh but you can't beat Trump for simple framing all right there's a story my favorite summer story so far is that Hunter Biden went to visit his lawyer and of course wherever he goes that Paparazzi are there and so his lawyer his lawyer comes out on his balcony and smokes a bond in the photographers are getting a picture of the lawyer smoking a bong well a whole Hunter's inside doing God knows what do you know what the funniest part of the story was this is my favorite part of the story the Press said they didn't know what was in the bong well um nobody asked me to be an extra witness in this case but I volunteer uh if you'd like you could interview me to see what my feelings are about what was in the bong in fact I'll ask Dale to do just that Dale could you interview me and ask me what's in that bong well we see it's a bong but uh we don't have any information whatsoever about the content of what he's smoking it was a bong and scene no there's not really a second thing you smoke out of a bong not really I mean maybe it's happened once but I don't think it was lettuce yeah I don't think he was looking through through the ingredients in his kitchen he was like paprika I wonder I wonder no I don't think that happened smoked a bomb would uh would this be a story if he'd had a glass of wine on the balcony anybody if if he'd been photographed with a glass wine with dinner nobody would care is marijuana illegal in California where this alleged bonging happened totally legal totally legal it's a nonsense and uh just a personal note if I were Hunter Biden's lawyer I don't know how I would do it without doing bongs I mean I think there's a way but it's not obvious to me so yeah it's just personal um so the Box trial the Mar-A-Lago boxes oh secrets now you remember all the secrets that are in the boxes right do I do I have to go over it again all the secrets that they've told us are in the boxes oh wait nobody has told us there's anything in the boxes no nothing at all we don't have a single piece of information that there's even one thing in a box that anybody would care about I'm not saying there isn't but isn't that interesting then nobody can even give us a for instance how about just a for instance well we can't but I will tell you there was a detailed battle plan for Iran okay don't need to tell me the battle plan that would be cool but just there's something like that in the Box anything just anything what's your worst one you don't even have to tell me everything in the Box just pick your worst thing nuclear secrets is it the nuclear secrets I don't know but the timing is exact but generally speaking the Republicans would be done so we would have a situation where Trump would be the Nazi but also possibly a convicted felon uh potentially facing jail time if his appeal failed right so you assume if he got convicted there would be an appeal so that he would still become president there's nothing that would stop him from being president right even if he got convicted If he if he were out on Bell or he's appealing it I mean it's not like he's a Flight Risk right is Trump a Flight Risk where can he hide he's the least flight risky guy of all time you wouldn't even need bail would you I don't think you would you just say all right we everybody's keeping an eye on you well um so this is my first exposure to the details of this story but can somebody answer this question doesn't this give him perfect timing to use the prosecution as part of his campaign to to say the government is corrupt and trying to rig the election by taking him out so wouldn't it help him in the election at the same time he could just pardon himself after it's done I would vote for him just to Pardon himself I would I would vote for him just to Pardon himself policies I just vote for him to Pardon himself that would be the end because I don't see the prosecution as being something that would have happened with another person I'm not saying he did or did not commit any technical violations it might have been in fact probably I just don't think they rise to the level the you know response so I think I think so far it looks like it could work in his favor because they're never going to tell you what's in the boxes they're just going to wave their hands dangerous boxes and eventually the longer you go without hearing what's in the box the less likely you think there's anything you care about yeah there might be some secrets but do they matter does anybody care I doubt it all right Trump has said that there are a lot of passionate voters out there more passionate than ever and things would be quote things quote would be very dangerous if you went to prison now I'd like to show you the faces of the people on CNN when they heard Trump say the most obvious thing in the world that it could be dangerous if one of the leading candidates is put in jail on charges that don't look credible now CNN decided that that was a threat so I'd like to show you CNN face when he said it oh is that uh uh a threat I love CNN face I don't think MSNBC is quite the same way but CNN always does the face you know when I say you Joy read or uh any of the people in MSNBC their own right it seems like you know versions of their own face but on CNN it's like they're actors who have to act extra disgusting disgusted like the Jake Tapper face and then Trump walked to a helicopter you know like like they're they're and fart and cloth at the same time so MSNBC has dumb face Maybe anyway um yeah so that trying to turn Trump into a dangerous insurrectionist because he pointed out the most obvious and well-known fact in the world that if you illegitimately jail a major political character people might protest I don't know that might surprise you all right uh Trump's lawyer his new lawyer cleverly and smartly is demanding uh cameras in the courtroom can we give a hand for Trump's new lawyer or play that right cameras in the courtroom now should there be cameras in the courtroom I don't know that's not the point the point is if you're a new lawyer and you and you're going to be presenting your case as it's a it's a ridiculous case and it's political oh yeah whether or not you get cameras is also a second question but the first thing you should say is cameras because he just reframed the situation his new lawyer just successfully framed the situation as an illegitimate government process one in which you can't trust that unless you better get some cameras in there so the public can protect itself get some cameras in there we want some cameras now does the person who's accused of a crime usually asks for the cameras yes or no the person who's the defendant when does the defendant ask for cameras I've never heard of it have you have you ever heard of it it's a baller play imagine imagine being so confident of your case now that this is what he would portray we don't know if he's confident we know he's portraying a confidence just to this uh that's a good lawyer so first step you know the first step we see in the public bullseye the innocent man wants cameras in in the courtroom perfect good job all right uh let's see uh by the way his new attorney is named John lauro normally I wouldn't even care what his lawyer's name is but he's a good lawyer so maybe you should know his name so far anyway that's a good movie all right um so President Biden has overruled the Pentagon for choosing his uh a new member of The Joint Chief staff so they recommended some gentleman I don't know his name uh but Biden picked Admiral Lisa francetti to lead the Navy so she'd be the first woman if she's confirmed to be a pentagon Service Chief and the first female member of The Joint Chiefs of Staff um so uh the Pentagon wanted somebody else so uh does that sound like a diversity hire to anybody just asking does anybody interpret this as she's clearly not the person for the job yeah uh now I feel bad for um for would she be she's Admiral she's not a rear Admiral I'm not sure what a rear Admiral is but it's probably lucky she isn't one but um it could be that she's actually the best person for the job I wouldn't rule it out it's possible you know maybe Biden is really good at hiring maybe she's the best one for the job but nobody's going to believe it should you hire people for your Joint Chiefs and staff if the public ly assumes that they're unqualified now pretend that they think she is but nobody really believes that do they privately you said you think somebody privately would say yeah I think I think they focused on picking the right person I doubt it I doubt anybody would think that and again this is terribly unfair if it turned out that Admiral franchetti is actually really great they're terribly unfair and did I create the situation I'm just reading the news he created the situation where he very overtly and with nothing hidden chose somebody based on gender primarily let me ask you an even more provocative question do you think women should be heads of any military service I want to see if anybody says yes somebody says yes if they're gay okay that's not fair all right uh almost everybody's saying no now is that just because you're a concern I see one yes is that because you're a conservative group or do you think this would be a general feeling I mean I don't think would not be among the progressives I feel the military is the one place where the mission has to be first I guess that's easy to say and it doesn't look like they're doing that so not only is Biden you you know sleepwalking us into World War III but he's consciously intentionally and publicly making sure that we don't have the best people running the military that's what it looks like would anybody disagree with that characterization that he's moving Us close to war that part I think you agree I mean I'm not sure war will happen with Russia but clearly we're you know creeping that direction at the same time he's degrading the most important part which would be the decision-making and maybe even maybe even the trust I don't know how you could be more incompetent more obviously and more publicly it would be hard to imagine anybody starting you know or looking to crawl toward a war that could destroy all civilization while simultaneously promoting somebody who's clearly even according to the Pentagon not not the right person yeah so um apparently we care about making women happier happy more than we care about defending even the country it actually the priority is clear so how in the world could he win re-election it's just mind-boggling like if you just look at the objective facts it just doesn't look like as possible but yeah we also don't trust the election so anything's possible well I hesitate to bring up this next story but it's a big headline lately so I was a big sigh RFK JR says that Ivermectin totally works because there are 99 studies that show it doesn't the Show does and that only a few studies that say it doesn't work and they were funded by Bill Gates and they have problems with them he says further evidence of this is that there are two states in India one that used uh hydroxychloroquine I think it was did some people had lots of vaccinations and there's a country in Africa I forget which one where they have a lot of problems fireworks chloroquine and they did well without vaccinations uh do you like his facts did those sound pretty credible do you think there's 99 studies the show works and only a few of the show don't it don't it doesn't um and that Bill Gates funded them and that there are clear examples in the real world of where either hydroxychloroquine or I've I've worked because you can just see it you can see the area worked and you know there are they didn't use they didn't get the good result do you think that's true all right yes and no are the wrong answers yeah yes and no we're both the wrong answers there's no such thing as reliable data about this there's no such thing Bill Gates doesn't have reliable data RFK Junior doesn't have reliable data I'm pretty sure that these 99 studies were um observational and retrospective or very very small and flawed and that when somebody did a meta a meta study where they sort of sum up all the studies you know they got some kind of an opinion but meta studies are basically astrology it's not even science I I've said that argument too many times to do it again but is basically what assumptions you make when you do the analysis the outcome so it's not a science at all you pick some assumptions and you're kind of done it's just what assumptions you picked so there's nothing about science that should flow from your assumption right issue from tests if it flows directly from your assumptions well I assume this big test over here this biasing the results I assume that's worse than some of these little ones so I'll take this one out it's not a science it's somebody's assumption about things so um I would say that RFK Juniors take on this would be the same as anybody's take who believed data or what data was accurate and what data was not it's just not a thing there's nobody you can look at any data and know anything about it about ivermected because the the topic itself is too politicize you would just assume that it's distorted by money somehow one word so I'm not going to say that it works or it doesn't work I'm going to stick with my opinion from the very beginning I don't believe the data that says it works or that it doesn't work I don't believe either one and I don't believe that we have any business now actually let me amend that we might actually have good data but you might never see it and you wouldn't know what was the good data versus the bad data so anybody who has something like certainty that's the only wrong opinion if you said to yourself you know I've Loved These studies I gotta say I'm I'm leaning in RFK RK Juniors direction I'm leaning in that direction perfectly reasonable do you get that and if you said you were leaning the other direction perfectly reasonable but leaving is as far as you can get right we're so far from actually knowing that it's the knowing that bothers me and so I think RFK Jr would be more solid if he said that I don't like any of the studies but there's another there are enough studies that show that it was positive that wouldn't it be good to know for sure something like that but the certainty I think is a little off-putting to me because I think that the day supports it certainly it might support leading in One Direction or the other all right uh Blaze media which is no good friend to Fox News I guess um the broken story that there's a matched donation Fox News so if you give some your I know your church I guess they'll match it you give some money to this or that they'll match it but um apparently there was no limit on at least if it was a charitable uh entity that you could give to so they found out that some people are giving to a satanic temple something called the Trevor Project that must be bad for conservatives Planned Parenthood the conservatives don't always like uh and what else Southern Southern Law Center which is amazing now is this a real story or is this a summer story the details are probably right I mean I would guess I somebody somebody did you know screenshots and you know it it seems like it's well documented so I would say the facts of probably right probably right do you care do you care that there was some troll uh or even maybe just one person that Fox News who was literally a member of the satanic temple or thought it would be funny and gave a hundred dollars to him just to see if Fox News would match it none of it matters Fox News can give us money anywhere it wants in this case it said we'll give it please want to give it and then they didn't put restrictions on them is that good or bad is it good or bad that Fox News did not put restrictions on charitable giving it's good it's good it's not bad that the outcomes in this case would be sub-optimal to you know most people or some people at least the satanic temple people you know be objectionable to most people but it doesn't really matter that double donation from Fox News you're probably talking about two hundred dollars do you think you're talking about Millions you know that it would have been a flag if there was even one donation to any of these entities so and am I angry that there's somebody at Fox News who's donating to Planned Parenthood no all that tells me is that Fox News is willing to hire people who have different opinions than some of them do how is that even a problem now I get that there are customers and most of the hosts would be out of one side of that issue but the fact that they're willing to hire you if you're on the other side of that issue is not a weakness does that feel like a weakness it's totally a strike so I'm going to back Fox News on this I think Blaze media is a little over there competitive skis it's just a summer again it's a summersity nobody cares literally nobody cares all right here's another one uh did you know that d d e i which had been diversity equity and inclusion now as an a at the end they're sort of going the lgbtq plus Direction where you keep having to adolescence so they've added a to the end for accessibility so that's uh d-e-i-a anyway the Wall Street Journal editorial board was talking about a uh let's say uh there's California community colleges are required to take into consideration you know the principles of Dei and you're the bullet points from The Wall Street Journal of these specific things that these community colleges should do all right this is how seriously they take it so the bullet points are promotes and incorporates Dei and anti-racist pedagogy pedagogy literally have never said that word out loud do you know why I've never said pedagogy pedagogy do you know I have never said that out loud because it's a douchebag word and I'm not a douchebag well maybe I am but I don't use that word I had to correct myself maybe I am I'm a bit of a douchebag but never use that word who are you writing for do you think that half of the readers of the Wall Street Journal know what that means pedagogy pedagogy they're probably no more than half I'd guess 25 percent anyway so they're gonna let's say promote and incorporate it so promoting and incorporating so far so good right because we knew that was happening promoting and incorporating but let's see if it goes further develops and influence a pedagogy okay you and or a curriculum they're and or curriculum uh that promotes are race conscious and intersectional lens um that's bad a race conscious teaching that should be exactly what you don't do so that should be illegal but it so that would be illegal in Florida right the thing that's being recommended or actually required the thing that's being required in California is literally illegal in Florida is that true is required here and illegal there can you think of any other any other law that's required in one state and illegal in another give me another example required in one statement illegal in another go now guns are not required looting abortion is not required well I suppose it'd be required to offer you might be right about that income tax well you know state tax uh that's that's reaching license to drive now it's required everywhere pre-arrange crapping photo ID it's not illegal to have photo ID it's not illegal to put on a seat belt it's not pot is not required anywhere yeah there's no other example is there right there are lots of examples of things that are legal in one and not legal another but you can't come up with an example of something that is required government required in one state and government illegal in another state I want to see if you now voter ID if you walk into the voter ID place and show your ID nobody's going to arrest you if it's not required I think this is unique that is required in one state and illegal in another but that should tell you something all right um contributes to Dei and anti-racism research and scholarship contributes to it you have to contribute to the in to the research and scholarship what's that mean you have to contribute to it like financially or you have to work toward it a big deal advocates for and advances it most of these bullet points are just saying you got to work on it in different ways I assume these bullet points were written by a unqualified person uh participates in a continuous cycle of self-assessment of one's growth and commitment to Dei an acknowledgment of any internalized personal biases and racial superiority or inferiority it's literally just mind control based on this I would recommend that nobody go to college in California like you should just skip Community College this is the most absurdly inappropriate thing you could ever put in a college absurdly inappropriate but there we are all right um lately there's been a bunch of stories about Dei professionals who have been fired or quit or downsized whatever and they usually show their picture have you noticed anything common or similar about the photos of the people working in that field actually a lot of them are white yeah yeah your your first impression was it's going to be you know people of color but now there's actually you know a healthy number of them are white um women mostly women have have they all been women not all of them ninety percent it's like 90 women isn't it yeah 90 women but that's not what I'm going for you're you're talking about body weight no I don't think the body weight I haven't seen anybody overweight who's doing that job in fact they all look normal weights me no it's not that it's crazy faces crazy eyes they they are people with crazy eyes and crazy smiles and the first the first few times I saw it I thought well that's just my imagination playing tricks with me or or maybe it's uh I don't know you know maybe it's just a coincidence but the more stories I see and the more of those pictures I'm starting to think it's like some other issues we talk about whereas it's mental illness that's just been systemized it's systemic mental illness so we're we're fighting systemic racism which I believe is a real thing and important with systemic craziness we're actually hiring the craziest people to work on an important issue now do you believe that you can tell if somebody is batshit Crazy by looking at them how many of you think you can tell by looking at them if somebody's crazy as as we evolved so that we can tell if somebody is sick or crazy or lying not every time but where we've evolved and need that skill you can spot them right away and the Dei photos look like pictures of very unhealthy people mentally unhealthy people now so I'm just going to say it has nothing to do with race or gender they do look like Disturbed to people who were drawn to they were drawn to a profession partly because of whatever is bothering that's what it looks like now I can't read minds you know I have no poll information there's no science behind it but I don't I'm tired of ignoring it I mean if if every time I see pictures of Dei people and they look crazy how am I gonna how long do I do I have to ignore that when can I point it out are we there I mean I can do it you can probably because I got free speech in a way you do not so I asked myself if if you were looking through all your photos you're looking for a good profile picture and as you're scrolling through your selfies you realize that you can't find one that doesn't have crazy eyes what's your best play I did a poll on this on Twitter I gave people two choices if all of your selfies have crazy eyes your two choices are uh hide all of your photos or become a Dei professional because apparently that's the one place where a crazy eye photo is perfectly acceptable oh yeah we'll hire this one all right uh 88 said become a Dei professional and 12 said hi dear photos all right uh here's an up Ukraine update fairly early on in the Ukraine situation a lot of people were pro-ukraine they put their Ukrainian flags and their profiles and stuff it was still literally fog of War things were just developing Ukraine was an ally Russia was not you know so it made sense if the US and NATO were going in on a side that people would kind of take the side of the leaders but a lot of time has transpired we see now that so far we've not got a good result the latest thinking is that nobody's going to do any counter-offensive or offensive to walk on land mines until the end of time and basically keep their borders the way they are so under these situations and the times going by and what we've learned about the bidens taking money from barisma allegedly Etc can we conclude that if you still have a Ukraine flag in your profile and you're not actually Ukrainian there's probably something wrong with you and probably you're deeply brainwashed and somebody said today on Twitter you've heard it before but you know that they don't take seriously a thing that's said by anybody with a Ukraine flag in the profile now when people started saying that my first reaction was well that's a little that's a little bigoted or I don't know stereotyped or that's a little crazy but standing from today's perspective with what we know about the whole situation and lots of time has transpired and it doesn't look like we're getting any closer to a result kind of embarrassing to have that and if you still have that in your profile I swear to God I can't take you seriously because it's almost like a tattoo on your forehead this has brainwash me brainwash me please hello could I please be brainwashed a little bit do believe whatever you're telling me as long as it costs a lot of money to buy a lot of weapons the most important thing is we're buying weapons lots of lots of weapons so that's what the Ukraine flag to me just looks like you're lost and again I I think that you could be a reasonable person and have nuanced and different views on you know whether we should or should not be helping Ukraine I think a reasonable person could be on either side of that even if I you know strongly disagree reasonable people are on both sides uh but I wouldn't believe anybody was reasonable if they had a Ukraine flag in their profile the first thing I think is oh I can't talk to you but I'm sure that I'm sure there are you know equal things that people say about other people same kind of thing that's just where I am at it that I can't take anybody seriously with that flag all right well the latest on the Ukraine situation is they're completely bogged down the counter-offensive is not working Russia is in no risk whatsoever folding or falling apart there are more stories about um internal dissension and people being rounded up and all that stuff I'm sure that's true but uh we haven't seen progression lately uh and I don't think Russia is in trouble of of any kind of coup does anybody think Russia actually is falling apart as long as they have money they're not falling apart yeah Putin's firmly in control it looks like what's that uh Elijah Wood talking about zelinski's addiction is that on the news it's not on serious drugs then I'd have to question his capability if he's not at least on math or some version of it Adderall or something if he's not on a if he's not on a performance in the end saying upper then he's the wrong person for the job I'm just going to say that directly I don't care how illegal those drugs are if the guy who's in charge of saving your country isn't uh you know getting the energy he needs he better go get it I just assume anybody in this situation is on some kind of meth or Adderall or some version of it don't you you say cocaine but I don't know you know meth would be smarter in his case I don't know if he's snorting anything but I would say for sure a person in that situation I would if I were him I would be on some kind of stimulant because there's no way he's ever going to go to sleep thinking he did enough work remember his life and death you don't want somebody to say you know I'm going to get a good eight hours of sleep tonight that's the last thing you want to hear from your War leader you know what I want to hear from my War leader I've been up for three days I'm still doing well don't I don't feel like I need any sleep yet and I say to myself okay well you're on math and then the second thing I say to myself is thank God I've got leaders awake do you want a sleepy Joe making your award decisions well uh yeah we'll send you some bombs uh foreign good for him just means he loves his country and he doesn't want to sleep through a war but I don't recommend drugs to you because keep in mind that if he's doing drugs and I just assume he is I mean he would be smart enough to be on stimulants but I just wouldn't trust him if he's not yeah so you could have you there's a downside duh there's a downside to drugs so he could get addicted it could be really bad later in his life he could die even overdose you know he could have um if he did too much he could have some it's like like all bad I get it but in terms of the risk reward I doubt anybody in this situation would not be on stimulants probably it's probably pretty common all right that's all ladies and gentlemen for uh You.

Tube I'm gonna say bye to You.

Tube thanks for joining the best live stream of all time

foreign

good morning everybody and welcome to

the high light

of human civilization

and uh if you'd like to take your

experience up to levels that I don't

think anybody can even imagine

well all you need is a mug or a glass a

tank of Chelsea style and the canteen

Joker flask vessel levitic eye and fill

it with your favorite liquid I like

coffee enjoy being now for the

unparalleled pleasure of the dope means

of the day the thing that makes

everything better it's called the

simultaneous Sip and it happens now go

ah

yes let's go private over here

well there's a

lot of fun things to talk about

um

and uh let's see first of all there's an

AI created clip of South Park

so AI wrote

directed

and animated a little South Park episode

I saw Brian romelli tweet saying that

this was you know looking like the

beginning of the end of Hughes creating

well I didn't say it that way but it

looked like the beginning of one person

being able to create an animated series

just tell it what topic and create some

crease a little show for you

however

I watched that little show

just to see how good a y a I was and

uh it can't write

it can't write at all

right yeah I I consider it Ad Agency

quality writing

now if you're a professional writer

that's like the deepest insult

because ad agencies are the worst

writers

have you seen a commercial

they don't hire humorists to write the

commercial

if you're an AJ Ad Agency you think you

use skills so people who studied some I

don't know advertising think they can

write jokes

so that's why all of your insurance

commercials are so lame

uh I've got a good idea for a joke how

about I don't know let me think uh come

up with something original original I'm

working for the Ad Agency something

nobody's seen on a commercial

I've got it

we're going to make a white male look

like an idiot has anybody done that yet

on an insurance commercial

I feel like that'll be groundbreaking

adult white male who's incompetent in

everything I think that will be shocking

and amazing uh people will be talking

about it they could go viral

that's what Ad Agency I think

the ad agencies think what is everybody

already done before that wasn't good and

maybe we should do some more of that

so the writing is terrible now ai of

course can never write South Park for an

obvious reason

do you know the obvious reason

because the only thing that makes South

Park

funny is that it's inappropriate

that's all that's the whole joke I mean

you're extremely clever and well written

and yeah it's a it's a national treasure

so South Park is amazing

but it wouldn't be funny if they if they

could never be inappropriate

so so AI only can be appropriate

and South Park is only funny if it's

inappropriate how could it ever solve

that it has nothing to do with how good

AI could be it's limited by humans to

never be good it's designed to be bad

is actually designed not to be funny

so

that here's the other thing that I'm

going to add that you just you won't see

anywhere else

as far as I know this is just my own

personal theory that I've never seen

anybody else say

part of what makes you enjoy

humor writing

is imagining that the people who wrote

it

or in some cases performed it are going

to get in trouble

now you don't think of it that way but

if you don't feel danger for the writer

or the presenter

then it doesn't it doesn't really uh

trigger you it doesn't become viral it

doesn't become anything

it's the sense of danger of a human

being that makes it interesting to us

right because if you said to me you

Scott there's something dangerous

happening to a toaster

a block away

I'd say what yeah there's something to a

toaster a block away and I'd say is it

my toaster

no a toaster

well it's somebody's good toaster

they're rooting no it's it's not even

really a new toaster it's actually a

broken toaster that somebody's abusing

would you care

no because it's a toaster you wouldn't

care at all so when AI writes something

even if it could say something

at the moment it can but you could

easily imagine you know they could teach

it to do that if they taught it to be

dangerous

you would say to yourself so what

there's a toaster in danger

so AI is putting itself in danger by

just repeating some patterns

that we we take as provocative but

nobody's in danger

yeah you'll never want to watch AI art

because you'll know it didn't come from

a person

because the amazing thing about art is

that a human made it

if you've ever been confused and thought

that the amazing thing about art is that

you enjoy looking at it

do you think that do you think the

reason that you look at the great

Masters The Da Vinci's you think it's

because you like how the picture looks

literally nobody likes how those

pictures look

you you would you wouldn't buy that

photo if it were if it were not made by

da Vinci

it's the fact that a human made it

that's the entire art

it's not art without that it's not the

picture has no value

even the greatest artists in the world

you know the the Jackson Pollux you know

depending the impressionist it doesn't

even matter what what genre you're in

the only thing that makes it art

is that a human being made it

and if you don't think that's going to

be true for music as well

that I don't think you understand music

either

music is interesting because your brain

says wow people made that I would like

to meet with those people

that's it

if you're the greatest composition and

song that took any trick that you could

make a hit song and put it all in one

song so it had everything

but you knew I ate it

you'd listen to it once

you say oh that was actually a pretty

good song the AI made there you'd never

be interested again

because it because it wasn't from a

human

people are interested in themselves

period

if you don't understand that then then

you don't understand really anything

about your people about to care about

themselves and that's that's the end of

the analysis now you say Scott Scott

that's crazy they care about their

that's caring about themselves

their family is just an extension of

themselves right if somebody in your

family dies that hurts you right they're

not just separate entities although

they're also that they are you

right when you see somebody who looks

like you getting hurt that's you

that's you the reason you care less

it's terrible to say it you care less if

somebody looks the least like you

if they get hurt I hate to say it but

it's just the way we're all wired the

more somebody's like you the more they

are you in your mind and the more you

care about them

and a is the the most unlike you that it

could be it just doesn't matter stuff

that looks like you if you had a

photograph

a photograph of a person

would you like love it and want to fall

in love with it no it's just a

photograph it's just an image

so

I think all of the technologists

are missing the maybe the biggest part

of what AI is trying to master

the biggest part is that we will never

be interested in a machine's work

we will use AI to do functional stuff

that makes things faster you know does

things faster basically just you know

better or faster more convenient that

would be great

but no it's not going to do art

it's not going to do art because it

can't

under any condition you can't do it

because you never wanted to look at the

picture and you never wanted to hear the

song

if if you don't understand that and you

never wanted to hear the joke

you don't care about the joke the song

or the picture you care that a human

made them and you wonder about the human

you put yourself in position you know

you couldn't make those things they

impress you you want to make

that's

but without that understanding the whole

field of AI at least the art related

part of it is just absurd it's just

demonstrations of things that will never

be real

but AI still has lots of useful purposes

but I don't think art right away is

going to be part of that

all right

um

so Rand Paul's office in Kentucky was

destroyed by a fire I don't know if they

figure out the cause of that yet

do we know if that was arson

is there a climate change

all right you got me I was not expecting

to laugh at that

climate change

that was kind of perfect

that's like the old joke about typing

the the comments showed up I think it

was the timing of the comment it was

just like the moment I said climate

change

all right that was pretty funny uh it

wasn't climate change but I'm seeing the

comments we don't know what it was right

so there's is there some suggestion that

it might have been intentional

is that still there's still a

possibility or not

well I'd like to say that

um Rand Paul

he seems unkillable

so so far he survived a mass shooting

right during the softball game he was a

Survivor that he survived being attacked

by his viciously attacked by his

neighbor

survive that

and sort of survive coven somehow

somehow we survived covet

I'm not I don't even think he ever

double massed and somehow he lived

anyway but

um and now his office is

destroyed by fire

you have to ask yourself

you know and of course there were

coincidental things he was going to go

after fauci and he doesn't like the war

in Ukraine so there's always a reason

there's always a political race that

would be true of most of the prominent

Senators at any time

I would just like to say he's the maybe

one of the bravest people who's ever

worked in government

I mean he's a brave mofo I I just like

I'd just like to take a moment

acknowledge

that when people take these jobs it's

not always for the power

sometimes they're Patriots

Rand Paul as far as I can tell

isn't doing it for the money

as far as I can tell I don't see any

indications to that and he takes

difficult stands

which I believe are completely

um principle driven even when I don't

agree with them when I disagree with

them

generally he'll State his principle and

I'll go

okay well that's consistent

so even even when I don't like his

opinions I like his opinions

can you say that about everybody

you can't I would say it about RFK Jr

when I don't like his opinions or don't

agree with him

still totally respected because he shows

his work

right he says it's this study this is

why I believe it

that's all I'll ask of anybody I don't

ask you to be right all the time that

would be unreasonable so Rand Paul's in

my

you know sort of highest level of

government credibility

he puts his life on the line

doesn't walk away

doesn't appear to be lying about

anything

can you even think of a time he was

accused of blind I don't think he's even

been ever accused

it's like it doesn't seem to be part of

his deal he's just trying to make

something better it looks like to me

so just uh kudos to one

politician who while I don't agree with

everything he says that's not really

mentioning Thomas Massey who is somebody

I also often call out for uh extra

respect

because of the rational the rational

approach he's bringing again now

somebody I'll agree with every time

but he always brings the goods

always brings the argument right and

that it's never silly it's never stupid

sometimes you just don't agree priority

is different or something but smart

people good Patriots

I'm glad we have them all right let's

talk about summer news

you know what summer news is it's the

kind that's mostly made up just so we

have something to talk about in the

summer

well along that those lines uh are

probably drunken vice president I'll

just say probably because she acts like

she's drunk in public

but that's all I know for sure

right I don't know she is

I just know she acts like a drunk and if

you're not asking the question is she

actually drunk

I I believe you're not doing your job as

a good citizen as a citizen who's you

know has any interest in the company

country

I feel like it's a fair question

are you drunk right now

in fact in 2023 it's the most it's the

most reasonable question you can ask

as soon as you get into a disagreement

on social media I've taught you this

before

If a troll comes after you in the

comments and you're sure they're just

it's like they they don't want to

understand

they're probably drunk like actually

literally

if you looked at you know the population

of the planet at any given time from the

afternoon to the evening what percentage

of people who drive by you on the

highway are drunk

probably 10 percent

probably 10 what percentage of people on

social media are the ones who are the

terrible trolls

no different

it's probably not a coincidence

you know that that the the amount of

Alcoholics of the amount of trolls seems

to be similar

so it won't bother you as much to see a

troll a comment if you just say to

yourself

probably drunk

you wouldn't be wrong a lot

but uh drug Kamala Harris was railing

about the State of Florida allegedly

having in their new curriculum something

that is insulting to black people and

anybody who cares about black people

because it said quote uh let's see how

is she I want to see how she paraphrased

it

um

she said quote just yesterday in the

State of Florida they decided middle

school students will be taught that

enslaved people benefited from slavery

now do you do you think that that was

true

do you need me to do an extended

explanation

of why that didn't happen

why why Florida isn't actually teaching

people that slavery was sometimes good

do I need to get into any of the details

or will you stipulate that it's obvious

on the surface that nothing like that

happened

you know nothing like that happened

right

all right so here's the closest thing

that did happen

so this is summer news this is somebody

misinterpreting something in a really

obvious way like a real obvious

misinterpretation and then getting

really angry about it

so first comes the misinterpretation and

then there's the mock anger do you think

she's really angry

do you think she woke up and thought oh

I'm so angry about this

no no she's not angry and nobody who's

talking about it cares

it's just summer news it's just

something to talk about here here's the

actual statement

from part of the curriculum I guess

uh it says quote instruction

um so I guess the teachers are being

instructed how to teach the history

instruction includes house slaves

develop skills in which in some

instances could be applied for their

personal benefit

so slaves developing skills that could

be applied for their personal benefit

turned into uh why is Florida saying

that

the slavery was good for slaves do you

know what this personal benefit means in

context

if you keep it in context do you know

what personal benefit means

it means I'll give you an example

this is my understanding it means that

if you were a slave working in the field

which you can imagine would be you know

among the worst of these slave jobs if

you could figure out a way to let's say

learn how to repair wagons

right or to shoe a horse right put

horseshoes on a horse

probably better work

so that would be a case where a slave

could go from the worst thing you could

possibly do do something a little less

worse still a Slave

nobody thinks that literally nobody

thinks that and Kamala Harris doesn't

think it nobody who agrees with her in

claps like say a lot

none of them believe it

they might act like they believe it they

might argue with you yeah with Stern

looks but they don't believe it this is

just summer news

how about that Jason Aldean song that

people are calling her a racist

how many of them do you think actually

believe there's some in the song that's

racist

probably nobody

no I've said that even I like got the

vibe but when you look at it you're

looking for the racist stuff it's just

clearly not there

but I can see why it's provocative

so if somebody said hey the media has

primed us to have a bad reaction

material that's that's a good take

that's a good take but if you say it was

racist and yet there's not a single

image you could point to that would back

that or song or there's nothing in the

in the words or the imagery that would

suggest that

this is just summer news

if you got even a little bit worked up

about the Jason Aldean situation you

were getting worked up

by drunken trolls and people who just

need something to talk about none of

this stuff is real

it just isn't

all right

I told you that I agreed to talk to

Roseanne on her upcoming part podcast I

was thinking about Roseanne the other

day so thinking about what she got

canceled for and I don't I don't need to

you know go into this specifics because

you probably remember them anyway but do

you think that in the real world there's

even one person

who believed honestly

the Roseanne was bigoted I I think they

accused her being anti-semitic and at

one point of uh offending a black woman

that she didn't know was black

nobody oh but you couldn't find one

person in the entire world and certainly

nobody knows her you're like I'll bet

you couldn't find one person who would

back that oh yeah in private oh yeah you

should see what she says in private and

I said the same thing about myself when

I got canceled

the first thing that happens when you

get canceled you all know this they look

through your entire history

to find out all the supporting bad

things you did that for some reason

nobody noticed until now and when you

sum them all up oh my God this new thing

must really be indicative of your nature

did you notice that there was none of

that for her

none of that for me

none you don't you don't think that

people poured over everything we did as

soon as we got canceled of course they

did and what they find

Decades of the opposite

decades Decades of consistently being

the opposite of the accusation

and still

that fact doesn't the or the story don't

you think the poor the story should be

well after 40 years of being this way

there was this one thing that people

thought might invalidate that 40 years

none of this is real

there's nobody who cares about

Roseanne's opinion

or mine

do you think there's anybody who woke up

and it's like you know I was gonna have

a good day

but there was this cartoonist

who said that thing that I took out of

context and now I can't have a good day

no nobody cares about my opinion they

they use the opinions of famous people

as just a focus point to put their own

views into it

so it's never about the person they're

just a conduit for people's opinions and

that's about it

don't take any of it seriously unless

you get canceled in anyone all right

um so as you know Vivek ramaswamy is

getting a lot of attention for a great

campaign a lot of people who

like Trump

probably are liking him as well maybe

not as much right maybe they still

prefer Trump but the the Venn diagram of

people who think you know they like

Trump's Vibe or at least what he's

offering policy wise they're liking the

fake for similar reasons

but if you want if you want to hear the

best reason

yeah this this might be the moment when

I went from uh liking Vivek a lot

to loving him

I think I've crossed over to some kind

of man love

all right here's what he tweeted after

there was yet another embarrassing

Kamala Harris video

so Vivek tweets

that Kamala Harris makes the most

powerful case I'll see in my lifetime

against race and gender quotas and

government if only she knew it

wow I don't think

has anybody accept Trump ever said

something that Direct

that's really direct yeah Standing

Ovation right now this this tweet

didn't make a much of a impact when he

did it was it two days ago

can you imagine in any other world that

two days ago he could say this

that Carmel Harris is a the best

argument in his whole lifetime against

race and gender quotas in government

he said it as directly as you could say

it you know why there was no controversy

or pushback

everybody agreed

yeah now Trump trump made the arms a

little bigger so now you can play inside

his space right so because Trump is so

brutally you know Frank on his opinions

it just made it acceptable that you can

play Within those Realms he's he's

already created so I don't think Vivek

could have said this I don't know

six years ago

I think it would be the end of his

career

but today you can say it not only

because it's obviously true but because

our conversation has been broadened so

you can now say that and you can

actually just go on with your life now

I'd like to endorse that

so I can say it too

a couple errors is obviously a diversity

higher

obviously

obviously

now that doesn't mean that all diversity

hires are going to be incapable like she

is

literally nobody thinks that

but some but surely in our you know

weird world where you protect everybody

you know pretend to have opinions

somebody's going to pretend

that I think that if you're a minority

hire you could not be qualified

literally nobody believes that

literally nobody yet that's the way we

play it we act as if there's somebody

who actually has that opinion

have you ever met anybody who had the

opinion that you couldn't have a

qualified black vice president it's not

even a thing literally you couldn't find

one functioning brain that would have

that opinion nobody

but can you say the Kamala Harris is

somewhat obviously not qualified yeah

you could say that it's pretty obvious

to everybody I'm sure I'm sure the

Democrats see it as well as we do I mean

the honest ones

so kudos to Vivek for being so direct

this fits perfectly in his uh

in his policy preferences to get rid of

all hiring preferences so it's right on

Target and again he's just killing it

he's killing it

now um

the most dickish thing you can say in

these situations I'm going to say it

anyway

because you know all the candidates are

running for first place nobody's running

to be a vice president right

but it has to be said

he would be perfect for Trump

you would be perfect

uh my microphone is plugged in so if

you're hearing it low there's some

problem on your end

the YouTube Sound is actually

better

than the other sound all right

um

so Trump was uh did a little video about

Biden basically he's saying that Biden

is a sleepover sleepwalking us into

World War III

and it's all because of a country that

gave the bidens millions of dollars

now I gotta say again

the Trump is the best

as simple framing

we've never seen this before

like a lot a lot of people are good in

smart and good at framing you know if

they're fake is great at it but this is

just like other world Leaf right it's

just he gets right to like that feeling

you feel

like he skips all the intellectual stuff

it goes right at that thing you're

feeling in your chest

this is exactly what I feel in my chest

that we've got a president who's

sleepwalking us into World War III

for the benefit of a country that gave

him millions of dollars through Barista

primarily

that's exactly what it feels like and so

so Trump is that the exact thing you're

thinking as you're thinking it

damn

he's just so good at that

just take a moment to appreciate

and again you know I'm not I'm not going

to be slobbering all over Trump's

you know entire package so to speak that

was poorly worded uh I'm gonna I'm gonna

try to call

um you know the

I'm going to call this races objectively

as I can right so I'm going to say good

things about anybody who's doing good

things including Biden if he does some

good things

all right uh but you can't beat Trump

for simple framing

all right there's a story

my favorite summer story so far is that

Hunter Biden went to visit his lawyer

and of course wherever he goes that

Paparazzi are there and so his lawyer

his lawyer comes out on his balcony and

smokes a bond in the photographers are

getting a picture of the lawyer smoking

a bong well a whole Hunter's inside

doing God knows what

do you know what the funniest part of

the story was this is my favorite part

of the story

the Press said they didn't know what was

in the bong

well

um

nobody asked me to be an extra witness

in this case

but I volunteer

uh

if you'd like you could interview me to

see what my feelings are about what was

in the bong in fact I'll ask Dale to do

just that

Dale

could you interview me and ask me what's

in that bong

well we see it's a bong but uh we don't

have any information whatsoever about

the content

of what he's smoking

it was a bong

and scene

no there's not really a second thing you

smoke out of a bong

[Laughter]

not really I mean maybe it's happened

once but I don't think it was lettuce

yeah I don't think he was looking

through through the ingredients in his

kitchen he was like

paprika

I wonder

I wonder

no I don't think that happened

smoked a bomb

would uh would this be a story if he'd

had a glass of wine on the balcony

anybody if if he'd been photographed

with a glass wine with dinner

nobody would care

is marijuana illegal in California where

this alleged bonging happened totally

legal

totally legal

it's a nonsense

and uh just a personal note

if I were Hunter Biden's lawyer I don't

know how I would do it without doing

bongs

I mean I think there's a way but it's

not obvious to me

so

yeah it's just personal

um so the Box trial the Mar-A-Lago boxes

oh secrets

now you remember all the secrets that

are in the boxes right do I do I have to

go over it again

all the secrets that they've told us are

in the boxes

oh wait

nobody has told us there's anything in

the boxes

no nothing at all we don't have a single

piece of information that there's even

one thing in a box that anybody would

care about

I'm not saying there isn't but isn't

that interesting then nobody can even

give us a for instance

how about just a for instance well we

can't

but I will tell you there was a detailed

battle plan for Iran

okay don't need to tell me the battle

plan

that would be cool but just there's

something like that in the Box

anything just anything what's your worst

one you don't even have to tell me

everything in the Box just pick your

worst thing nuclear secrets is it the

nuclear secrets

I don't know

but the timing is exact but generally

speaking the Republicans would be done

so we would have a situation where Trump

would be the Nazi but also possibly a

convicted felon

uh potentially facing jail time

if his appeal failed right so you assume

if he got convicted there would be an

appeal

so that he would

still become president

there's nothing that would stop him from

being president right even if he got

convicted

If he if he were out on Bell

or he's appealing it

I mean it's not like he's a Flight Risk

right is Trump a Flight Risk where can

he hide he's the least flight risky guy

of all time you wouldn't even need bail

would you

I don't think you would you just say all

right we everybody's keeping an eye on

you

well

um

so this is my first exposure to the

details of this story but can somebody

answer this question

doesn't this give him perfect timing

to use the prosecution as part of his

campaign to to say the government is

corrupt and trying to rig the election

by taking him out so wouldn't it help

him in the election

at the same time he could just pardon

himself after it's done

I would vote for him just to Pardon

himself

I would

I would vote for him just to Pardon

himself

policies

I just vote for him to Pardon himself

that would be the end because I don't

see the prosecution as being something

that would have happened with another

person

I'm not saying he did or did not commit

any technical violations it might have

been

in fact probably I just don't think they

rise to the level

the you know response so

I think I think so far it looks like it

could work in his favor

because they're never going to tell you

what's in the boxes

they're just going to wave their hands

dangerous boxes and eventually the

longer you go without hearing what's in

the box the less likely you think

there's anything you care about

yeah there might be some secrets

but do they matter

does anybody care

I doubt it

all right Trump has said

that there are a lot of passionate

voters out there more passionate than

ever and things would be quote things

quote would be very dangerous if you

went to prison

now I'd like to show you the faces of

the people on CNN when they heard Trump

say the most obvious thing in the world

that it could be dangerous

if one of the leading candidates is put

in jail on charges that don't look

credible

now

CNN decided that that was a threat so

I'd like to show you CNN face

when he said it

oh

is that uh uh

a threat

I love CNN face

I don't think MSNBC is quite the same

way but CNN always does the face

you know when I say you Joy read or uh

any of the people in MSNBC

their own

right

it seems like you know versions of their

own face but on CNN it's like they're

actors who have to act extra disgusting

disgusted

like the Jake Tapper face

and then Trump

walked to a helicopter

you know like like they're they're

and fart and cloth at the same time

so

MSNBC has dumb face

Maybe

anyway

um yeah so that trying to turn Trump

into a dangerous insurrectionist because

he pointed out the most obvious and

well-known fact in the world that if you

illegitimately jail a major political

character

people might protest

I don't know that might surprise you

all right uh Trump's lawyer his new

lawyer cleverly and smartly is demanding

uh cameras in the courtroom

can we give a hand for Trump's new

lawyer or play that right cameras in the

courtroom

now

should there be cameras in the courtroom

I don't know

that's not the point

the point is if you're a new lawyer and

you and you're going to be presenting

your case as it's a it's a ridiculous

case and it's political oh yeah whether

or not you get cameras

is also a second question but the first

thing you should say

is cameras

because he just reframed the situation

his new lawyer just successfully framed

the situation as an illegitimate

government process one in which you

can't trust that unless you better get

some cameras in there so the public can

protect itself get some cameras in there

we want some cameras

now does the person who's accused of a

crime usually asks for the cameras

yes or no the person who's the defendant

when does the defendant ask for cameras

I've never heard of it have you have you

ever heard of it

it's a baller play

imagine imagine being so confident of

your case now that this is what he would

portray we don't know if he's confident

we know he's portraying a confidence

just

to this uh that's a good lawyer so first

step you know the first step we see in

the public

bullseye

the innocent man wants cameras in in the

courtroom

perfect

good job

all right uh let's see uh by the way his

new attorney is named John lauro

normally I wouldn't even care what his

lawyer's name is but he's a good lawyer

so maybe you should know his name

so far anyway that's a good movie all

right um

so President Biden has overruled the

Pentagon

for choosing his

uh

a new member of The Joint Chief staff

so they recommended some gentleman I

don't know his name uh but Biden picked

Admiral Lisa francetti to lead the Navy

so she'd be the first woman if she's

confirmed to be a pentagon Service Chief

and the first female member of The Joint

Chiefs of Staff

um

so uh

the Pentagon wanted somebody else so uh

does that sound like a diversity hire to

anybody

just asking

does anybody interpret this as she's

clearly not the person for the job

yeah

uh

now

I feel bad for

um

for would she be

she's Admiral she's not a rear Admiral

I'm not sure what a rear Admiral is but

it's probably lucky she isn't one but um

it could be that she's actually the best

person for the job I wouldn't rule it

out it's possible

you know maybe Biden is really good at

hiring maybe she's the best one for the

job but nobody's going to believe it

should you hire

people for your Joint Chiefs and staff

if the public

ly assumes that they're unqualified

now

pretend that they think she is but

nobody really believes that do they

privately

you said you think somebody privately

would say yeah I think I think they

focused on picking the right person I

doubt it I doubt anybody would think

that and again this is terribly unfair

if it turned out that Admiral franchetti

is actually really great

they're terribly unfair

and

did I create the situation

I'm just reading the news

he created the situation where he very

overtly and with nothing hidden chose

somebody based on gender primarily

let me ask you an even more provocative

question do you think women should be

heads of any military service

I want to see if anybody says yes

somebody says yes if they're gay okay

that's not fair

all right uh

almost everybody's saying no now is that

just because you're a concern I see one

yes is that because you're a

conservative group

or do you think this would be a general

feeling

I mean I don't think

would not be among the progressives

I feel the military is the one place

where the mission has to be first

I guess that's easy to say and it

doesn't look like they're doing that

so not only is Biden you you know

sleepwalking us into World War III

but he's consciously

intentionally

and publicly making sure that we don't

have the best people running the

military

that's what it looks like

would anybody disagree with that

characterization that he's moving Us

close to war

that part I think you agree I mean I'm

not sure war will happen with Russia but

clearly we're you know creeping that

direction

at the same time he's degrading the most

important part which would be the

decision-making and maybe even maybe

even the trust

I don't know how you could be more

incompetent more obviously and more

publicly

it would be hard to imagine

anybody starting you know or looking to

crawl toward a war that could destroy

all civilization while simultaneously

promoting somebody who's clearly

even according to the Pentagon

not not the right person

yeah

so

um apparently we care about making women

happier happy more than we care about

defending even the country

it actually the priority is clear

so

how in the world could he win

re-election

it's just mind-boggling like if you just

look at the objective facts it just

doesn't look like as possible

but yeah we also don't trust the

election so anything's possible

well I hesitate to bring up this next

story but it's a big headline lately so

I was a big sigh

RFK JR says that Ivermectin totally

works because there are 99 studies that

show it doesn't the Show does and that

only a few studies that say it doesn't

work and they were funded by Bill Gates

and they have problems with them

he says further evidence of this is that

there are two states in India one that

used uh hydroxychloroquine I think it

was did

some people had lots of vaccinations

and there's a country in Africa I forget

which one where they have a lot of

problems fireworks chloroquine and they

did well

without vaccinations

uh do you like his facts did those sound

pretty credible do you think there's 99

studies the show works and only a few of

the show don't

it don't it doesn't

um and that Bill Gates funded them

and that there are clear examples in the

real world

of where either hydroxychloroquine or

I've I've worked because you can just

see it you can see the area worked and

you know there are they didn't use they

didn't get the good result do you think

that's true

all right yes and no are the wrong

answers

yeah yes and no we're both the wrong

answers

there's no such thing as reliable data

about this there's no such thing Bill

Gates doesn't have reliable data

RFK Junior doesn't have reliable data

I'm pretty sure that these 99 studies

were

um

observational and retrospective or very

very small and flawed

and that when somebody did a meta a meta

study where they sort of sum up all the

studies

you know they got some kind of an

opinion but meta studies are basically

astrology it's not even science

I I've said that argument too many times

to do it again but is basically what

assumptions you make when you do the

analysis the outcome so it's not a

science at all you pick some assumptions

and you're kind of done it's just what

assumptions you picked

so there's nothing about science

that should flow from your assumption

right issue from tests if it flows

directly from your assumptions well I

assume this big test over here this

biasing the results I assume that's

worse than some of these little ones so

I'll take this one out

it's not a science it's somebody's

assumption about things

so

um

I would say that RFK Juniors take on

this

would be the same as anybody's take who

believed data or

what data was accurate and what data was

not it's just not a thing

there's nobody you can look at any data

and know anything about it about

ivermected

because the the topic itself is too

politicize

you would just assume that it's

distorted by money somehow

one word

so I'm not going to say that it works or

it doesn't work I'm going to stick with

my opinion from the very beginning

I don't believe the data that says it

works or that it doesn't work I don't

believe either one and I don't believe

that we have any

business now actually let me amend that

we might actually have good data but you

might never see it and you wouldn't know

what was the good data versus the bad

data so anybody who has something like

certainty

that's the only wrong opinion

if you said to yourself you know I've

Loved These studies I gotta say I'm I'm

leaning in RFK RK Juniors direction I'm

leaning in that direction

perfectly reasonable

do you get that

and if you said you were leaning the

other direction perfectly reasonable

but leaving is as far as you can get

right we're so far from actually knowing

that it's the knowing that bothers me

and so I think RFK Jr would be more

solid

if he said that I don't like any of the

studies but there's another there are

enough studies that show that it was

positive that wouldn't it be good to

know for sure something like that

but the certainty I think is a little

off-putting to me because I think that

the day supports it certainly

it might support leading in One

Direction or the other

all right uh Blaze media

which is no good friend to Fox News I

guess

um the broken story that there's a

matched donation

Fox News so if you give some your I know

your church I guess they'll match it you

give some money to this or that they'll

match it but

um apparently there was no limit

on at least if it was a charitable uh

entity that you could give to

so they found out that some people are

giving to a satanic temple something

called the Trevor Project that must be

bad for conservatives Planned Parenthood

the conservatives don't always like

uh and what else Southern Southern Law

Center which is amazing

now

is this a real story

or is this a summer story

the details are probably right I mean I

would guess I somebody somebody did

you know screenshots and you know it it

seems like it's well documented so I

would say the facts of

probably right

probably right

do you care

do you care that there was some troll

uh or even maybe just one person that

Fox News who was literally a member of

the satanic temple or thought it would

be funny

and gave a hundred dollars to him just

to see if Fox News would match it

none of it matters

Fox News can give us money anywhere it

wants in this case it said we'll give it

please want to give it and then they

didn't put restrictions on them is that

good or bad

is it good or bad that Fox News did not

put restrictions on charitable giving

it's good it's good it's not bad

that the outcomes in this case would be

sub-optimal

to you know most people or some people

at least the satanic temple people you

know be objectionable to most people

but it doesn't really matter that double

donation from Fox News

you're probably talking about two

hundred dollars

do you think you're talking about

Millions you know that it would have

been a flag if there was even one

donation to any of these entities

so

and

am I angry that there's somebody at Fox

News who's donating to Planned

Parenthood

no

all that tells me is that Fox News is

willing to hire people

who have different opinions than some of

them do

how is that even a problem

now I get that there are customers and

most of the hosts would be out of one

side of that issue

but the fact that they're willing to

hire you if you're on the other side of

that issue is not a weakness

does that feel like a weakness

it's totally a strike so I'm going to

back Fox News on this I think Blaze

media is a little over there

competitive skis it's just a summer

again it's a summersity nobody cares

literally nobody cares

all right here's another one uh did you

know that d d e i

which had been diversity equity and

inclusion now as an a at the end

they're sort of going the lgbtq plus

Direction where you keep having to

adolescence so they've added a to the

end for accessibility

so that's uh d-e-i-a

anyway the Wall Street Journal editorial

board was talking about a

uh let's say

uh there's California community colleges

are required to take into consideration

you know the principles of Dei

and you're the bullet points from The

Wall Street Journal of these specific

things that these community colleges

should do

all right this is how seriously they

take it so the bullet points are

promotes and incorporates Dei and

anti-racist pedagogy

pedagogy

literally have never said that word out

loud do you know why I've never said

pedagogy pedagogy do you know I have

never said that out loud

because it's a douchebag word

and I'm not a douchebag well

maybe I am but I don't use that word

I had to correct myself maybe I am I'm a

bit of a douchebag but

never use that word

who are you writing for do you think

that half of the readers of the Wall

Street Journal know what that means

pedagogy pedagogy

they're probably no more than half

I'd guess 25 percent

anyway

so they're gonna let's say promote and

incorporate it so promoting and

incorporating so far so good right

because we knew that was happening

promoting and incorporating but let's

see if it goes further develops and

influence a pedagogy okay you and

or a curriculum they're and or

curriculum

uh that promotes are race conscious and

intersectional lens

um that's bad a race conscious teaching

that should be exactly what you don't do

so that should be illegal but it so that

would be illegal in Florida right

the thing that's being recommended or

actually required the thing that's being

required in California

is literally illegal in Florida is that

true is required here and illegal there

can you think of any other any other law

that's required in one state and illegal

in another

give me another example required in one

statement illegal in another go

now guns are not required

looting

abortion is not required

well I suppose it'd be required to offer

you might be right about that

income tax well you know state tax uh

that's that's reaching license to drive

now it's required everywhere

pre-arrange crapping photo ID it's not

illegal to have photo ID

it's not illegal to put on a seat belt

it's not

pot is not required anywhere yeah

there's no other example is there

right there are lots of examples of

things that are legal in one and not

legal another but you can't come up with

an example of something that is required

government required in one state and

government illegal in another state I

want to see if you now voter ID

if you walk into the voter ID place and

show your ID nobody's going to arrest

you if it's not required

I think this is unique

that is required in one state and

illegal in another

but that should tell you something

all right um

contributes to Dei and anti-racism

research and scholarship contributes to

it

you have to contribute to the in to the

research and scholarship

what's that mean

you have to contribute to it like

financially

or you have to work toward it

a big deal advocates for and advances it

most of these bullet points are just

saying you got to work on it in

different ways

I assume these bullet points were

written by a unqualified person

uh

participates in a continuous cycle of

self-assessment of one's growth and

commitment to Dei an acknowledgment of

any internalized personal biases and

racial superiority or inferiority it's

literally just mind control

based on this I would recommend that

nobody go to college in California

like you should just skip Community

College

this is the most absurdly

inappropriate thing you could ever put

in a college absurdly inappropriate

but there we are all right

um

lately there's been a bunch of stories

about Dei professionals

who have been fired or quit or downsized

whatever and they usually show their

picture

have you noticed anything

common or similar about the photos of

the people working in that field

actually a lot of them are white yeah

yeah your your first impression was it's

going to be you know people of color but

now there's actually you know a healthy

number of them are white

um women mostly women

have have they all been women

not all of them ninety percent

it's like 90 women isn't it

yeah 90 women but that's not what I'm

going for you're you're talking about

body weight no I don't think the body

weight I haven't seen anybody overweight

who's doing that job in fact they all

look normal weights me no it's not that

it's crazy faces crazy eyes

they they are people with crazy eyes

and crazy smiles

and the first the first few times I saw

it I thought well that's just my

imagination

playing tricks with me or or maybe it's

uh

I don't know you know maybe it's just a

coincidence

but the more stories I see and the more

of those pictures

I'm starting to think it's like some

other issues we talk about

whereas it's mental illness

that's just been systemized

it's systemic mental illness

so we're we're fighting systemic racism

which I believe is a real thing and

important

with systemic craziness we're actually

hiring the craziest people to work on

an important issue

now do you believe that you can tell if

somebody is batshit Crazy by looking at

them

how many of you think you can tell by

looking at them if somebody's crazy

as as we evolved so that we can tell if

somebody is sick or crazy or lying not

every time

but where we've evolved and need that

skill

you can spot them right away

and the Dei photos look like pictures of

very unhealthy people mentally unhealthy

people

now so I'm just going to say it

has nothing to do with race or gender

they do look like Disturbed to people

who were drawn to they were drawn to a

profession

partly because of whatever is bothering

that's what it looks like now I can't

read minds you know I have no poll

information there's no science behind it

but

I don't I'm tired of ignoring it I mean

if if every time I see pictures of Dei

people and they look crazy

how am I gonna how long do I do I have

to ignore that

when can I point it out are we there

I mean I can do it you can probably

because I got free speech in a way you

do not

so I asked myself if if you were looking

through all your photos you're looking

for a good profile picture and as you're

scrolling through your selfies

you realize that you can't find one that

doesn't have crazy eyes

what's your best play I did a poll on

this on Twitter I gave people two

choices if all of your selfies have

crazy eyes

your two choices are

uh hide all of your photos

or become a Dei professional because

apparently that's the one place where a

crazy eye photo is perfectly acceptable

oh yeah

we'll hire this one

all right uh 88 said become a Dei

professional and 12 said hi dear photos

all right uh here's an up Ukraine update

fairly early on

in the Ukraine situation a lot of people

were pro-ukraine they put their

Ukrainian flags and their profiles and

stuff

it was still literally fog of War things

were just developing

Ukraine was an ally Russia was not you

know so it made sense if the US and NATO

were going in on a side that people

would kind of take the side of the

leaders

but a lot of time has transpired

we see now that so far we've not got a

good result the latest thinking is that

nobody's going to do any

counter-offensive or offensive

to walk on land mines until the end of

time and basically keep their borders

the way they are

so

under these situations and the times

going by and what we've learned about

the bidens taking money from barisma

allegedly

Etc

can we conclude that if you still have a

Ukraine flag in your profile and you're

not actually Ukrainian

there's probably something wrong with

you

and probably you're deeply brainwashed

and somebody said today on Twitter

you've heard it before but you know that

they don't take seriously a thing that's

said by anybody with a Ukraine flag in

the profile

now when people started saying that

my first reaction was well that's a

little

that's a little bigoted or I don't know

stereotyped or that's a little crazy

but

standing from today's perspective

with what we know about the whole

situation and lots of time has

transpired and it doesn't look like

we're getting any closer to a result

kind of embarrassing to have that

and if you still have that in your

profile I swear to God I can't take you

seriously

because it's almost like a tattoo on

your forehead this has brainwash me

brainwash me please

hello could I please be brainwashed a

little bit do believe whatever you're

telling me as long as it costs a lot of

money to buy a lot of weapons

the most important thing is we're buying

weapons lots of lots of weapons

so that's what the Ukraine flag to me

just looks like you're lost

and again I I think that you could be a

reasonable person and have nuanced and

different views on you know whether we

should or should not be helping Ukraine

I think a reasonable person could be on

either side of that

even if I you know strongly disagree

reasonable people are on both sides

uh but I wouldn't believe anybody was

reasonable if they had a Ukraine flag in

their profile the first thing I think is

oh I can't talk to you

but I'm sure that I'm sure there are you

know equal things that people say about

other people

same kind of thing that's just where I

am at it

that I can't take anybody seriously with

that flag

all right well the latest on the Ukraine

situation is they're completely bogged

down the counter-offensive is not

working Russia is in no risk whatsoever

folding or falling apart there are more

stories about

um

internal dissension and people being

rounded up and all that stuff I'm sure

that's true

but uh

we haven't seen progression lately

uh and I don't think Russia is in

trouble of of any kind of coup does

anybody think Russia actually is falling

apart

as long as they have money they're not

falling apart

yeah Putin's firmly in control it looks

like

what's that

uh

Elijah Wood talking about

zelinski's addiction is that on the news

it's not on serious drugs

then I'd have to question his capability

if he's not at least on math

or some version of it

Adderall or something if he's not on a

if he's not on a performance in the end

saying upper

then he's the wrong person for the job

I'm just going to say that directly I

don't care how illegal those drugs are

if the guy who's in charge of saving

your country

isn't uh you know getting the energy he

needs he better go get it

I just assume anybody in this situation

is on some kind of meth or Adderall or

some version of it

don't you

you say cocaine but I don't know

you know meth would be smarter in his

case

I don't know if he's snorting anything

but I would say for sure a person in

that situation I would if I were him I

would be on some kind of stimulant

because there's no way he's ever going

to go to sleep thinking he did enough

work

remember his life and death

you don't want somebody to say you know

I'm going to get a good eight hours of

sleep tonight

that's the last thing you want to hear

from your War leader you know what I

want to hear from my War leader I've

been up for three days I'm still doing

well

don't I don't feel like I need any sleep

yet

and I say to myself okay well you're on

math

and then the second thing I say to

myself is thank God

I've got leaders awake

do you want a sleepy Joe making your

award decisions

well uh yeah we'll send you some bombs

uh foreign

good for him

just means he loves his country and he

doesn't want to sleep through a war

but I don't recommend drugs to you

because keep in mind that if he's doing

drugs and I just assume he is I mean he

would be smart enough to be on

stimulants

but

I just wouldn't trust him if he's not

yeah so you could have you there's a

downside

duh there's a downside to drugs so he

could get addicted it could be really

bad later in his life he could die even

overdose you know he could have um if he

did too much he could have some it's

like like all bad I get it but in terms

of the risk reward I doubt anybody in

this situation would not be on

stimulants probably

it's probably pretty common

all right that's all ladies and

gentlemen

for uh YouTube I'm gonna say bye to

YouTube thanks for joining the best live

stream of all time