Episode 2448 CWSA 04/18/24
The news is delightful and weird today. Come sip. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Good morning everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. I'm pretty sure you've never seen a better thing in your entire life. And if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody could even understand with their
View segment →tiny human brains, all you need for that is a cup, a mug, or a glass, a tankard, a chalice, a jug or flask, vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's c…
View segment →g to happen now. Ah. Well, everything's perfect now. Speaking of coffee, there's a new study that says it's good for your liver. Well, they should have asked me because I could have told you coffee is good for your whole body, every single part. It's good for your teeth, your hair, your bile. It's…
View segment →king I'd say my mind is right where I'd want it to be at this age. And that has everything to do with the fact that I push it. So every single day I'm doing something intellectually that's a little bit harder than what I can do easily. So it probably works. I recommend it. Last night in the man cav…
View segment →e necessary, to author the simulation. So another way to say it is you'll understand it once you get there. If you do, once you understand that free will isn't real, then you enter a world in which it seems like you can control your simulation or your environment just by what you want and what you…
View segment →people aren't catching on that it's intentionally offensive. So they're reacting as though they don't know that they're the marketing. Anyway, ESPN's Stephen A. Smith, is it Stefan? I never know. Is it Stefan or Stephen? That name always confuses me. It can go either way, right? Stefan. I don't kno…
View segment →e. I think the odds are one in three at the moment. It has nothing to do with polling. It has everything to do with the outside sources. I think the odds of Biden simply surviving and the election is rigged and he wins in a rigged election is about one out of three. I think the odds of Trump survivi…
View segment →l kinds. But if you ask me would that be the right play to put them all in jail even at the risk of massive disruption to the economy, massive disruption to life as we know it? Yes that's totally worth it because the alternative is much worse. Much worse. All right. Colonel accuses senior officers…
View segment →Good morning everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. I'm pretty sure you've never seen a better thing in your entire life. And if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody could even understand with their tiny human brains, all you need for that is a cup, a mug, or a glass, a tankard, a chalice, a jug or flask, vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip. It's going to happen now.
Ah. Well, everything's perfect now.
Speaking of coffee, there's a new study that says it's good for your liver. Well, they should have asked me because I could have told you coffee is good for your whole body, every single part. It's good for your teeth, your hair, your bile. It's good for the things that are just passing through. Coffee is there. Anything it can do good for your liver. Well, there's a study also that says that mentally stimulating work can stave off dementia, and that's why I'm here. I'm here for the medical benefits.
Now, it would be financially possible for me to retire and sit around doing what? Pottering? What would I do if I were retired? This is my favorite thing I do. I mean, your favorite thing intellectually, let's say. And I definitely feel, so I'll give you this as sort of a beacon for you who are younger. I actually feel that at my current age I'm the sharpest I've ever been, but not entirely. Meaning that I know I learned things faster when I was younger and maybe, you know, maybe a little more creative or something. I'm not sure. But maybe. But I can tell that if you were to just compare my ability to understand and navigate the world today to any time earlier in my life, it's definitely better. So I can tell you at my current age I don't feel like I'm losing. I don't think I've lost a step. The energy is definitely down. Definitely not as much work all day. Don't need to sleep as much. But generally speaking I'd say my mind is right where I'd want it to be at this age. And that has everything to do with the fact that I push it. So every single day I'm doing something intellectually that's a little bit harder than what I can do easily. So it probably works. I recommend it.
Last night in the man cave I broke some brains. You may know I'm not going to talk about free will or argue it here because everybody's bored with that. But I'm going to tell you just something that happened when the topic came up in the man cave last night. That's a private live stream for the subscribers of my Scott Adams Locals group. And what I told them was they can't learn to author the simulation until they lose their illusion of free will. And people said, what? How does that even make sense? What does free will have to do with managing the simulation if we are in a simulation? What's any of that even mean? How's it connected?
Well, here's how it's connected. If you believe you have free will, you're living in an illusion. And if you're living in an illusion, you can't control your reality because you don't know what it is. You have to understand your reality before you can author it. And free will is one of our most persistent illusions. Now you might say to me, but Scott, that's not making sense because if you're authoring your environment, that sounds a lot like having free will. So you're saying I have to understand I don't have free will to actually author the environment, which would be like having free will. Like, how does that even make sense?
Here's how it makes sense. When you learn you don't have free will, that becomes a permanent part of the structure of your brain. I think you all understand that everything you learn becomes a physical structure in your brain because if it weren't physical you wouldn't have the memory. Everything you know, everything you learn, everything you remember is physical. It's physically in your brain. If that part of your brain got damaged, that part would be gone. So if I teach you hypothetically that free will is not real, that too becomes a permanent structure in your brain. And it's that permanent structure, along with some others that are necessary, to author the simulation.
So another way to say it is you'll understand it once you get there. If you do, once you understand that free will isn't real, then you enter a world in which it seems like you can control your simulation or your environment just by what you want and what you focus on. Will that be free will? It will feel like it. You will feel like it and you will have a better experience of life. But it won't be free will. And you'll understand that.
All right, there's allegedly a cyber attack that looks like a pretty big one in the United States. Chuck Kesto is talking about this. A number of states have a complete failure of their 911 system right now. And there's some indication that it might be an attack, maybe a line cut or some other kind of cyber thing. Does it seem to you that that might be Iran? Is it possible that's an Iranian reaction and they're just giving us a warning shot? Maybe. I don't know. So we have to suspect the worst because we've let in so many terrorists into the country. Who knows what they're up to?
But if I were planning some major thing in the United States, cutting all of our 911 services would be a really good terrorist way to scare the hell out of us. Because if you could imagine cutting the 911 service before a terrorist attack, that would be pretty messed up. But it would also speak to state actors because it's sort of too big of a play for an individual terrorist. So if something happened that looked like an Iranian terrorist attack in the United States, and if it happened after this alleged rumor of 911 going down, that would look like a pretty sophisticated attack. Which even if we couldn't identify who did it, we would probably suspect a state actor because of the complexity.
Now this is all speculation. Yeah, I'm not even entirely sure there's really a 911 problem. So wait for confirmation for any of that. That's not yet confirmed I think.
Well, James O'Keefe of O'Keefe Media Group has another scoop. And by the way, I just want to give you a little warning that in the Dilbert Reborn comic that you can see only if you're a subscriber on X platform, see my profile for the link, or on ScottAdamsLocals.com, you'd see the Dilbert Reborn comic and it will soon feature Wally dating James O'Keefe. He doesn't know it because James O'Keefe will be undercover. But Wally is going to give up too much information to James O'Keefe. That's coming. I haven't drawn it yet but it's coming.
Anyway, so O'Keefe has another scoop. Talked to somebody inside the Biden administration who believes that maybe the real power in the administration is the chief of staff, Jeff Zients. He's accordingly the second most powerful person in Washington. I guess that would mean that Biden is the most powerful, but that Biden is basically a puppet and says whatever Zients tells him to say. And Zients used to be a Facebook board member. So everything's connected. And you can't get anything done unless you get the chief of staff sign off. Is that really that different than every other presidency? Isn't it generally true that if you want to get the president to agree with you about anything, first you have to sell the chief of staff? Isn't that business as usual? I thought that's the job of a chief of staff, is to make sure that everything goes through that person and gets filtered before the president even sees it anyway.
So maybe it's much worse under Biden. It seems like it might be. But then there's also indication from the same source that Hillary Clinton is still deeply involved advising. And that maybe she and Obama still have a much bigger influence because they have connections to the people who work in the administration. I think that's true. So I would say that this scoop fits almost exactly what I thought was true, which makes me worry about it a little bit because it's a little bit too on the nose, you know? Didn't you assume that there was probably one person, and maybe the chief of staff, who was running things? And then maybe Obama and Hillary were advising from the outside. So maybe it's exactly what it looks like.
Tucker Carlson had an ex-CIA guy on, Pedro Israel Orta. He worked for the CIA during the Trump administration. And they said that the CIA didn't even want to recognize him as president. They didn't even want to put his picture up in their offices for a long time. It became controversial to even have his picture in your office. Now, do you think that the CIA is on the same side as the president? Not in that case. Nope. Nope. It doesn't look like it. It looks like the CIA has its own agenda.
All right, here's a story that I'm going to laugh at this every time I see it because you're going to see this story in a hundred more forms and a hundred more places. And every time I laugh at what's left out. Here's a story from Politico that Trump is gaining with young people and especially young men. So Trump has almost closed the gap with young men. And basically it's a whole story about all the groups like people of color, etc., who are moving toward Trump. But then it says that Biden still has a strong hold among other groups such as white women and black voters and some other group.
Now here's what's missing with the story. The headline is always that they're about dead even in the national polling. You know, they're within a few points no matter depending on the poll. And yet every substory is about a major group that's moving toward Trump. And there's never a story, I believe not one, in which anybody was moving toward Biden. So look for this in the stories. The story will be this group has massively shifted toward Trump. But they'll never mention anybody who's moved toward Biden. And yet the total number stays the same. How is that possible, you know?
And at a certain point it's possible because if Trump is catching up, they make sense as part of the catching up story. But they've been dead even for a long time, haven't they? If they're dead even for a long time and one of them keeps gaining in subcategories that are really big ones, how can they stay even at the top line? There's definitely something wrong here, right? Am I the only one noticing that the top line doesn't change when all the bottom lines change? How's that? It's not possible unless there's something unreported. So unless there's some group that's moving toward Biden that we're not being told about. And I don't think that's the case. Do you? Have you heard of any story of any demographic moving toward Biden? I've only heard that he has a commanding lead in some group or another. But I've never heard that they're increasing the lead. Yeah, there's something very wrong with everything we're being told about these numbers. Something very wrong. Very suspicious.
Well, here's the weirdest story. I don't even know what to think about this. But Jim Brewer was on Roseanne's podcast. And Jim Brewer had worked with Dave Chappelle at one point. And here's what he says. This is what Jim Brewer says. So we all know the story about Dave Chappelle had his popular TV show and then instead of taking a big offer to renew it, he just disappeared and went to Africa for a while. And everybody said, what's wrong with him? Is he crazy? What's going on? And Jim Brewer says that Dave Chappelle told him in private that an elite group of people came to him and sat him down to quote correct him. And that that was a phrase used, to correct him. And then he suddenly went to, he vanished and went to Africa. And that when he came back he was different.
Do you think that an elite group of people sat him down to talk to him and correct him? And that that was such a dangerous situation that he had to leave the country? How many of you believe that's true? I don't believe that's true. Yeah, I'm going to say no on this one. I won't say it's impossible. But until you hear it from Chappelle, you should probably treat it like it's not true. If Chappelle says it, I'm definitely going to pay attention.
Now you should. Now obviously if this is true he wouldn't say it, right? Because the whole story is he would never tell you because it's too dangerous, whatever it is, whoever this group is and whatever it is they wanted. But does anybody even have a theory for why anybody would have wanted to stop Dave Chappelle? What the hell was Dave Chappelle saying that was so dangerous? Or what was he doing that was so dangerous? Was he outing anybody? Did he was he outing a pedophile ring? Or was there anything he did that was controversial that I'm not aware of? So I'm going to say I don't believe that story. That'll be my take. That's my current take. I give it a 75-25, 75% chance no, 25% chance maybe there's something there. But I don't know who that elite group is for sure.
All right. On the X platform, Christopher F. Rant tells us that it looks like Midjourney, the AI program that does movie-like clips, may have scraped images from major TV, film, and streaming studios. And then some examples were shown where it looks like AI is creating images that appear to be clearly cribbed from real movies and TV. You maybe changed a little bit but clearly came from that inspiration. To which I say, what did we think was happening? How else would it train? If you're training a thing to know how to make a movie the way that people would expect a movie to look, what did you think they were training it on? Do you think they were training it to make movies by showing it people? That wouldn't teach you how to make a movie. You would have to look at movies. Of course it looked at movies. How in the world do you think it didn't?
But isn't that exactly how a human director works? A human writer, a human movie maker can't do the job without looking at a whole bunch of movies first. His movies are formulaic. Even the scenes, even the visuals are formula, right? There are only so many angles that you shoot a scene. And once you've seen them, that's all there is. So there isn't any other way you could have trained AI to make a movie other than making it look at movies.
But the real question is, if it looks at a movie and then tweaks it enough, isn't that new art? So let's say it looks at a movie scene where it was blocked a certain way. It's like, oh there's a tracking scene and it shows the star walking through a crowd. And then the tracking shot goes from above. So you know you could imagine that it would use the same schemes and techniques but change the characters and change the movie and change the lighting and everything. It would be a new scene.
But this is part of a larger topic which I like to bring up, which is if anything can stop AI, it'll be lawyers. Because lawyers are just going to be all over AI. In fact, the only way that AI could survive in my opinion is that it was created by a company that became so big so quickly it would have infinite assets to fight the legal battles. If you were a startup in your garage, let's say Brian really comes up with his own AI model, it wouldn't be hard to stop Brian. You just need one person. All you need to do too is lawfare him out of business. And you know he would give up. But you can't really lawfare a multi-billion dollar company. So if AI had not become somewhat instantly a multi-billion dollar asset, it would have been killed in its crib by lawyers. But at this point it's bigger than lawyers. It's sort of the Uber method. The Uber shouldn't have been able to work because it couldn't really compete with taxis because it was illegal. It was just against the law. But they became so big so fast that the lawyers didn't have time to catch what was going on. And then they had so much money that they could fight lawyers and beat them because they had more money and more lawyers. So look for that situation. There are some businesses that you just can't do if you start small. You almost have to start big. That's what Uber and AI both did. They started big. All right, so keep an eye on that.
There's more science that says that hugging can ease your pain, anxiety, and depression. Let's add to the science that you could have skipped by asking Scott. Scott, we were thinking of putting a whole bunch of money into studying hugging to see if it makes you feel better. Well, you don't have to do that because I could tell you it definitely does. Oh, thank you. You just saved us a lot of money, Scott. So really if you were to compare the entire field of science to just asking me for my opinion, it'd be about a wash. I don't get them all right, but neither does science. Science is about a 50% proposition at best. You know, papers that are peer reviewed and accepted are only right about 50% of the time. How often am I right? Well, on most of the lifestyle stuff I'm right almost every time. Almost every time.
For example, will there be a study coming up that shows our food supply is not healthy for you? Yes, there will. Even today there was another study showing that there's all too many things in your food supply. Do you think I could have told you that? Yes, I could have. 100% right. Do you think they'll find out that alcohol is bad for you in any amount? Yes. And I could have told you that because I did 20 years ago. So yeah, hugs are good for you. Surprise.
All right. Again, the funniest story, which I'm going to keep telling you about even if you don't like it, is Brian and his new Orifice AI device. Now it's a sex toy. And the funny part is what the public is responding to. So it's becoming sort of a public battle where people are so mad about trying to be living in a world where men would be using these devices. Now here's what's hilarious. I forgot that the name of the product is Orifice. He actually named the product Orifice. And it's a partial replacement for women, like human women. It's just called Orifice. And here's the funny part. It's so insulting. It's so amazingly insulting that he's building a company to replace some portion of human women with a hole. Now I'm not saying that's a fair characterization. All right, so I'm not giving you my opinion on women here. That has nothing to do with this conversation. I'm just saying what could be funnier than launching a product to replace much of human women with a hole and then you name it. You name the product after the hole.
Or at least when women make a sex toy, the most popular sex toy for women is called the Womanizer. The Womanizer sounds like it was created possibly by a woman or at least women were involved in the marketing and naming of it. Because there it's like woman. Yeah, womanizer. Yes, go ladies. You don't need men. That when they're replacing men they're like, yeah, go ladies. Go ladies. You don't need men. You can do it yourself with a womanizer. Yeah, you're more woman than you've ever been. You're womanizing now. But then when a man creates a sex toy, it's a hole. I'm going to be laughing all day about this anyway.
So if you're wondering, can somebody replace human women at least in terms of men's sexual appetites? How many human women can be replaced by a hole? And I'd say about 40% already and raising. And here's the funniest one. There was some angry woman. I saw this the other day. There was an angry woman who was attacking Brian for his product, the Orifice, and just gave him a whole bunch of trouble for it. And saying he was basically going to replace women. And Brian AI's response was, and I quote, you should have been nicer to me in high school. So he invented a replacement for women. It's called the hole or orifice.
All right. I'm just saying the whole thing is so funny because it's so offensive intentionally that people aren't catching on that it's intentionally offensive. So they're reacting as though they don't know that they're the marketing.
Anyway, ESPN's Stephen A. Smith, is it Stefan? I never know. Is it Stefan or Stephen? That name always confuses me. It can go either way, right? Stefan. I don't know. So Stefan or Stephen A. Smith says that the people going after Trump with lawfare are a bunch of cowards. And that all you're doing is showing that you're scared you can't beat him on the issues. Everything you do shows me you can't beat him. He says it's giving fodder to the argument that the election is rigged. I'm being told it's Steven, so we'll say Stephen A. Smith. So he's completely right. He's completely right. If your argument is that the elections were not rigged, then trying to rig it with lawfare right in front of the entire world while you're arguing that the election wasn't rigged, but you're rigging it right now. I mean legally. Legally, because the lawfare stuff is not itself illegal. It should be because it's being used illegally, but probably won't be actually prosecuted in any way. But yes, he's completely right. If you're going to rig the election right in front of the entire republic, everybody can see it. We all know that the lawfare is about the election. It's not about anybody having broken any laws that anybody cares about. Nobody cares about Stormy. Nobody cares about his phone call. Nobody cares about the loans he made to banks that were very happy to do business with him. Nobody cares about any of it. Nobody cares about his documents at Mar-a-Lago. Not really. I mean not real people. Nobody really cares. So it's obvious that it's all political. And yeah, he's right.
But here's what I would have to say about Stephen A. Smith. And I apologize to him for getting his name inaccurate at first. That's what a leader looks like. I always say that Black America doesn't have a leader. Now they do have people who are prominent, but they're really not good at it. You know, they're not good at it. Like Obama's good at it. And Obama, sort of love him or hate him, he was real good at the leadership stuff, right? You don't have to like where he led, but leader, definitely a leader. And I would say this: Stephen A. Smith has that leadership thing. And it feels like he is suffering from the Spider-Man curse. You know, the Spider-Man curse: with great power comes great responsibility. I can't read minds. But when I see somebody as capable as Stephen A. Smith, and when I hear him talking the way he's talking about the big issues, it feels like he just realized that he's the one who knows how to do it. He actually knows how to show leadership. So he's modeling it. It's actually very impressive.
So if he someday runs for office, and don't fool yourself, I don't think he's a Trump Republican, is he? He's just showing you that he can see the whole court, which is really rare. And then having seen the whole court, he tells you what to do about it. That makes sense. Also very rare. Very rare. So yeah, he's got the real deal. If he ever ran for office, I would definitely like his chances. I would like his chances if he ran for office. That doesn't mean I'm going to agree with him on policy. But wow, he's capable. Anyway, I like to see capable people do well.
Tim Pool tells us that his Timcast IRL show, three of his older shows from three years ago just got strikes against them. There were shows with Michael Malice, Joe Rogan, and Real Alex Jones. Now do you think that that's about something Timcast did? Or they're just trying to suppress those three other people? Now we know that there's been some move to suppress pro-Trump voices. But I'm wondering, is this a move mostly against Timcast? Because I'm trying to think, is Timcast the last serious independent voice that hasn't been taken down by the bad guys? It seems to me like it would be obvious that Tim would get targeted by the bad guys to be taken down for some lawfare or social media reason or some hoax or get canceled or something. I would imagine that there's like a whole team of people working on just putting Tim Pool out of business. Do you think that's true? Do you think there's an actual team like professionals being paid by somebody to look at ways to put him out of business? I think yes. Yeah, I think yes. There are people who are paid from somebody, could be the CIA, could be just Democrats, to put him out of business. That's what it looks like.
So here's another story. I guess Dubai has been doing some cloud seeding and maybe they went overboard and caused a bunch of flooding. Do you think they can actually geoengineer the atmosphere and make it rain where they wanted to? I don't know. I have mixed feelings about it. On one hand I think it's inevitable. We'll definitely be managing the atmosphere eventually. On the other hand I think maybe we're not ready. So we might destroy the world trying to make it better. So I think it's going to happen. It has to happen. It's inevitable. But it's dangerous. So we'll keep an eye on that.
Zuby is talking about the obesity rates on X. He gave that little chart of what the obesity was. Let me show you the rate. So this is from 1975 to current and then projected. So 1975 there was a 12% US adult obesity rate. 12%. You've seen all those old pictures of people in New York City in the 30s or whatever it is and it looks like 100% of them are thin. But 12% by 1975, that sounds about right. You know, I was there. That feels about right. 12%. 1985 it was 15%. Not much difference. So in 10 years a little bit crept up. By 1998 it was up to 25%. 2014 it was up to 35%. And by this year it's up to 42% adult obesity. 42%. And it's projected by 2031 it will reach 50%.
Now I'm here to tell you it's much worse than that because it's not evenly distributed. There are states and regions where the obesity rate is really close to 100%. I remember visiting the facility where my ailing father was on his last weeks of life. And it was a medical facility. And I remember sitting in his room for hours because I went to visit. It wasn't much to do because he was mostly just sleeping at that time. And I would just watch the people walk by in the hallway. And I started to notice, say, wow there's some big people that work here. And then I said to myself, what was the last time I saw somebody who wasn't gigantic? And I just sat there and watched people walk by his room in the hallway. And I just said, obese or not obese, they're all obese. All of them. Upstate New York. Every one of them was obese. I think there were a few 18-year-olds who weren't. Some people had part-time jobs and stuff. But every adult over 30 was a big old barrel-sized person.
So if you go to LA for example, if you're in the Hollywood area, you won't see the obesity. If you go to New York City and walk down the street in Manhattan, not a ton of obesity. If you fly in an airplane, you know you always hear the complaints about the big person in the seat next to you, but it's kind of rare. Beyond a certain size people just don't fly. I mean they do, so you hear the story, but it's rare. So airports are more thin people than large. There are some cities that are more thin people. And if you take them out of the mix, out of the average, yeah your obesity is probably 75% below a certain income level. Now it's also related to income. I would bet that below $100,000 a year I'll bet it's close to 75% obese. That's my guess.
Anyway, so did you know that one of the most influential people in American politics is an 88-year-old Swiss guy? That's something I learned today. You know we all hear about George Soros putting so much money into things and influencing them. Well apparently there's like a George Soros Jr. whose name I never heard, Hansjörg Wyss, who's 88. And he's a billionaire who's been putting in hundreds of millions of dollars into American stuff, similar to the Soros kind of activities. And to the point where he's one of the most important people in the country. He's not even in the country. He's a Swiss guy.
So the GOP is trying to crack down on this loophole that lets foreign donors put all this what they call the dark money into US elections. Anybody who thought our elections are determined by the will of the people, do you feel silly that you ever believed that? This is the stuff. There are like 15 to 20 effects that determine completely who gets to become president and what the law is. And none of them are the will of the people. It's all just different stuff. It's just money and lawfare and how they rig the system. Rig meaning the laws about how to vote. Yeah. We haven't lived in anything like a republic in a maybe ever. I don't know.
Delta Airlines is eliminating college degree requirements for all positions including pilots. Well, you know there's nothing that makes me want to fly an airplane more than knowing that they've lowered the standards for the pilots. Now on one hand I do agree that you should just pick good people whether they have a college degree or not. But I do think it's rather useful to have that standard. It does reduce the number of people who are not qualified from slipping through. So I would say that's not a good sign for America. Every time we lower a standard it's always for some good reason to increase diversity or something. But I don't think we get enough benefit for what it costs generally speaking.
So you heard the story about those 28 Google employees who occupied one of the executive offices. And they were mad because Israel was still, Google was still doing business with the Israeli government. And what did Google do? It fired all of them. So it fired all of them. Now are you surprised because you think, oh Google is so liberal and blah blah blah. Well I wouldn't be surprised. No. I think Google just did what everybody would do in that situation. So they violated their internal standards and that was good enough to fire them. So good for Google. I don't think that it fixed anything because Google apparently is completely rotted. Their employees are rotted from the inside. They're all woke mentally ill people for the most part.
Speaking of that, the NPR CEO, Ms. Maher, we find out more about her. Apparently she was a member of the Atlantic Council and the WEF. And she gave a speech at the Carnegie Endowment. That's a group. Now if you've been following Mike Benz, you would know that at least the Atlantic Council and the Carnegie Endowment are just straight up CIA entities basically. They're just intelligence entities. So it would seem that Ms. Maher is very deeply embedded with the intelligence part of the world. And she was in charge of Wikipedia. So she was the head of all knowledge for Wikipedia and then the head of NPR. And so the person who is in charge of telling us what's real is basically CIA adjacent. So just like you think.
But she's getting some pushback from, well what do these three people have in common? Gad Saad, Elon Musk, and Vivek Ramaswamy. So all three of them are criticizing NPR CEO Maher. What do those three have in common? Three of the smartest people in the world at least in terms of politics and philosophy and stuff, right? So if all three of them are piling on, you know, plus Chris Rufo, a lot of smart people, right? So the smart people have taken the following stand. Because in a speech I guess it was to the Carnegie Endowment, NPR CEO said that she believes that truth is subjective or a distraction from the pursuit or from getting things done. That the truth is subjective and a distraction. And I'm paraphrasing a little bit but this is pretty close. And it can get in the way of the pursuit of truth. I'm sorry, the pursuit of truth can get in the way of getting things done.
So Gad Saad said, quote, truth is subjective, unquote, is precisely the key tenet of postmodernism. This is why I refer to it as the granddaddy of all parasitic idea pathogens. Well that's a lot of smart words in one sentence there. I will have to hire somebody to explain to me in my sixth grade world what that means. I think I understand.
All right. Elon Musk said, now imagine if this is programmed explicitly or implicitly into super powerful AI. It could end civilization. And he says now no need to imagine. It is already programmed into Google Gemini and OpenAI ChatGPT. So that would be talking about the idea that truth is subjective and it can get in the way of getting things done.
Vivek along the same lines said that he quoted the CEO of NPR saying, quote, our reverence for the truth might be a distraction getting in the way of finding common ground and getting things done. And says this gets to the heart of the cultural divide in the modern West. Whether you believe truth is a priority or a hindrance. Do you agree with all three of these people, Gad Saad, Elon Musk, and that this downgrading of truth in favor of getting stuff done is the problem? And that it's basically an existential problem if you throw AI in the mix. Everybody agree with that?
All right. I just agree with all three of them vigorously, as hard as I can. She's completely right. And you see it every day. Yeah, let me give you an example. Abortion. Abortion. Take the abortion thing. We have different opinions which cannot be reconciled. Do you know why they can't be reconciled? Because we'll never agree on what's true. Is it true that it's murder or is that not true? Or killing a human. I guess not murder. And so the argument is over what's true. Is it true that you're taking a human life? Now that can't be solved. Would you agree that can't be solved realistically? Realistically one of those is right you think and one of them is wrong you think. But it can't be solved. So what do you do when you have a problem that can't be solved? You make do. You do what you can do.
So what do we do as a nation when we can't decide what's true? We compromise and we just work it out. We just find some middle ground where the people who don't get what they want are not willing to stage a revolution. That's a perfect example of what she's saying. We're not going to agree what's true. But if we stop there we'd never get anything done because we do have to kind of move past, let's say, abortion. And I would say that's just an example. I would say every one of our big issues have the same issue. What's true? We don't agree on and never will. So if you allowed yourself to never try to fix anything until you found out what's true, you would never fix anything. She's completely right. It is 100% true that if you think that you know the truth and the other people don't, you're probably part of the problem. You might be right but you could also be part of the problem if you insist that the other people agree with you before you can move forward. In the real world people don't agree what's true. But often we can find a way to work together, right?
So she's 100% right. Reality is completely subjective. How many of you believe that free will is real and how many of you believe it's not? How are you ever going to solve that? One of the most basic questions of your reality is free will real. We're never going to agree with that. But can we find a way to move on? Yes we can. But I don't believe in free will and some of you do. So what would we do about the legal system if you took my point of view? There's no free will. How would you punish anybody? How would you have a justice system if nobody's really responsible for anything? Well I'll tell you how. Since I believe there's no free will but I also need to move forward somehow, I mean I need to live in the real world, I say all right I agree with you. You can't really build a system unless you punish people. So I accept a system where people who really couldn't help what they did are punished. Right? Because I can't think of a better way.
So there's a perfect example where we'll never agree what's true, free will or no free will. But we can figure out a way to make the world work. And I think I could come up with a hundred different examples where she's completely right. We'll never agree what's true but we can figure out how to take a step forward. So here's your real problem. Your real problem is that you don't agree with her about what's true. That's the real problem. The real problem is not that she understands the truth is what we imagine it is. She's 100% right about that. The part that you don't like is that her truth is different from yours. If she said everything you agreed with and then said truth is subjective, we have to figure out a way forward, you wouldn't have a problem with it. You wouldn't suppose she said, well you know we know the truth is that these fetuses are real life humans and that killing them is immoral. That's our truth. But we have to move forward somehow so we're going to compromise with the people who disagree with what's true. That framing would make you okay with it. So what's really the problem is you don't like her opinions, not that she thinks opinions are subjective.
So do I think she's part of the problem? Yes. Yeah, she's a big part of the problem. She is not just specifically part of the problem but she represents, as a number of people were saying today on X, she represents a whole infection of people who have a certain point of view which I find destructive. Right? But the fact that I find it destructive and I think that's true, does that matter? Nope. What will matter is who wins the election and you know who has power. That will matter. So I'm working on who wins the election and who has power because I can't change what's true to somebody else.
All right. This is why you watch my show by the way. I remind you that these uncomfortable things where I'm completely on the other side from you, that's why you watch. Because you're not going to see it anywhere else. I mean if you get a steady stream of Republicans are awesome, you're not getting smarter. You need somebody to tell you when your side is getting off the track a little bit, right? That's the useful thing. The useful thing is finding out when your own team is wrong because you always think the other team's wrong.
All right. Here's the story. I just read that Florida has banned a bunch of books. It was in the news. Is it true? You tell me. Is it a true story that Florida banned, I don't know, a few thousand books? True? No it's not true. No that's not true. Nope. It's in the news. But what is true is that they removed them from where children can see them. There are no banned books for adults in Florida. That's not a thing. There are no banned books in Florida. But both of these are treated as the truth. So NPR CEO is completely right. You can disagree whether there's a book ban in Florida. I say there's not. Other people say there is. But can we, despite having a different understanding of what's real, figure out how to go forward? Yeah. Yeah. DeSantis just has laws apparently can move those books to the non-child library places and then everybody's fine. So yeah, you don't need to know what's true. You just need to know how to handle it.
Speaking of what's true, Joe Biden has a new story about his uncle being eaten by cannibals which apparently does not pass the fact checking according to Jonathan Turley. But apparently he was in Pittsburgh doing some campaign stuff. He told the story of how his uncle Bosey in World War II was a hell of an athlete. For some reason you need to know he was a hell of an athlete. And then he flew those single engine planes. It turns out he didn't fly. He wasn't a flyer. He wasn't a pilot. And the plane he was in was not a single engine. Jonathan Turley looked into that. And he was over a war zone and I guess it actually went down for mechanical problems. It wasn't shot down as Biden says. And they never found the body because there used to be, there were a lot of cannibals for real in that part of New Guinea. So he's saying that they never found the body so that you know maybe the cannibals got him. But there was a member of the crew who did survive. And the member of the crew who did survive said watched the other crew members not being able to get out of the plane as it went into the water. So no, the cannibals did not eat his uncle. His uncle was a really good athlete who couldn't get out of an airplane that crashed in the water.
So do we need to know the truth about his uncle who was or was not eaten by cannibals? No we don't. The truth is completely irrelevant because you know it's just campaign talk and it doesn't matter anyway. So no, the truth doesn't matter. Doesn't matter a bit on that story.
Well the Kennedy family apparently, many members will appear in a big group with Biden to endorse him. Which basically is a slap in the face to their family member RFK Jr. who is running against Biden. You know who wishes their relatives had been eaten by cannibals? RFK Jr. But not only that, if cannibals ate his relatives they would be eating a better diet than the American diet. Am I right? Better diet than the American diet. At least it'd be good protein. No additives. So no I'm not recommending that cannibals eat the Kennedy family. But if they did they'd be healthier than the normal fast food diet.
I would like to give a shout out to my family, my remaining family members. I won't name them but I sure appreciate my family. Do you know what my family would never do? They would never do this. If I ran for president, my very small family group left, but my family members never would have gathered together to endorse the other guy. You know they might have sat it out. They might have said no comment if they thought the other guy was the good one to be president. But no they would not have traveled to Washington to stand with the competitor and endorse him. I hate to tell you, RFK, but your family sucks. Your family sucks. Like this is the minimum. The minimum requirement for your family not to suck is to not endorse the other guy in an election. It's not like RFK Jr. is a criminal. It's not like he has bad intentions for the country. It's not like his policies are some crazy. He's a genuine, legitimate, serious person with a serious resume running against a brain dead piece of shit to try to save the country and try to save you all, you Kennedy children, from eating that's killing you and putting stuff in your body that you shouldn't be putting in your body. And that's why you want the other guy to win. He's just trying to save children. I mean he could be wrong about some stuff. There would be no real shame in that because everybody's wrong about stuff. But really your family is going to throw you under the bus in public in this situation? I'll just say it straight out. I really like RFK Jr. I think he's great for the country. Win or lose, I think he's great for the country. But these family members suck. I mean they just suck. There's just no way around it. This is just terrible family behavior.
Speaking of RFK Jr., he's saying again unambiguously on another podcast that the CIA is guilty of murdering his uncle JFK. He says the evidence is so abundant and so definitive that if he took the case to a jury he would win in front of almost any jury. And he says it's because JFK defied the military industrial complex. They wanted to attack Cuba and JFK didn't. And they didn't like him ending the war in Vietnam which he also tried to do. So that all does make sense to me. You know the Kennedy assassination, the official story was always a little sketchy right from the beginning. You're like really? I don't know. It seems a little sketchy. There was some mighty good shooting from that guy from that upstairs. I don't know. Did he really care that much that he did that? I don't know. Never really totally made sense. But this does. Every part of the CIA killed him makes sense to me. Now I don't know what's true and what isn't. But every part of the story makes sense. It all fits together perfectly and it matches everything we know about everything.
All right. So I don't see how those same people can allow RFK Jr. to become president. So he is in mortal danger. You know there is a scenario in which RFK Jr. becomes president. Let me just say it out loud. If the CIA takes out Trump and then Biden collapses just from natural causes, RFK Jr. could be the next president. In fact I'd give him at least a one-third chance. I think the odds are one in three at the moment. It has nothing to do with polling. It has everything to do with the outside sources. I think the odds of Biden simply surviving and the election is rigged and he wins in a rigged election is about one out of three. I think the odds of Trump surviving any assassination attempts and also getting a big enough victory that they can't cheat their way through it, one in three. No matter what the polling says. One in three or best. And the odds of RFK Jr. making it all the way to the presidency is about one in three also. Because I think the odds of Biden collapsing are pretty good. And I think the odds of the CIA taking Trump out with lawfare or something worse is pretty good. Good as in bad. So my current estimate is they each have a one in three chance of being president. And none of it has to do with the will of the people. Let me say it again. They each have a one in three chance and none of it has to do with voters. Because we don't live in that system anymore. If we ever did. It will be entirely determined by the capability of the people in the back rooms and the health of the current president. And that's probably all that will matter. If the people in the back rooms do a good job, well they get everything they want. It's probably Biden.
All right. There are a whole bunch of new sanctions being put on Iran because of the attack on Israel. Let me mention the sanctions because there are a whole bunch of them. There's the vague one. There's the one I don't know about. There's a well there's a complicated one. There's a well there's one that seems to not really affect anything but maybe a couple of guys. There's one that I don't know. It looks like it could make some difference but I don't really understand it. There's one that, okay they don't even tell you what they are. Do you believe that we have an infinite number of sanctions that we can whip out anytime we want? Is that the way it works? It's not like there are three sanctions that can make a difference and then there are a million sanctions that you could do but they're not really going to make a difference. I feel like it's more of that, don't you? Like there's a strong 80-20 situation that might be like a 99-1 where there might be a few sanctions that if you could get them to stick would really move the needle. And then there's probably a whole bunch of other ones where some rich guy goes, what you mean I can't dock my yacht at Washington DC? Well I'll just dock it somewhere else. Is that okay? That's perfectly okay. Okay I guess I got sanctioned. You know I feel like the sanctions are just because if they weren't they would tell us what they were and they would tell us whether they could make any difference. But no the news just says oh lots of sanctions, more sanctions. Oh I'll put some more sanctions on. How about we put some sanctions on. You should reelect me because of all my sanctions I put on. 53 sanctions. If 53 sanctions is not enough I could put on 50 more that will be unspecified and vague and you couldn't even tell if they make a difference. But if 100 sanctions isn't enough I could put 200 sanctions on. I could put 300 sanctions on. I'll put more sanctions on. That's the state of your news.
Biden tells Israel not to attack Israel. Sounds like I'm making that up but he said quote I made it clear to Israelis don't move on hia. H would be a city in Israel yeah. H. What do you mean Rafa actually. I don't think the misspeaking is as big a deal as others do. I don't think that's really the big sign he's losing it because I think maybe he always did that and Trump misspeaks and I misspeak and you know I misspeak twice a day. I don't think that's the biggest thing but they're funny stories.
Babylon Bee reports that Biden campaign has a new slogan. You know they tried a number of things. Build back better. No malarkey. None of those really felt like they captured the spirit of what's going on. But as the Babylon Bee reports the new slogan seems to really capture it perfectly. The new slogan is death to America. If you're not familiar, the Babylon Bee is a satirical news outfit. And what I mean by satirical and what I mean by parody is it looks exactly like the real news. No real difference.
All right. There's a story that a prosecutor in California, the California DA, dropped this so-called bombshell election data case because it might help Trump. So there's some whistleblower. So apparently there was some case about somebody involved with the electronic part of the elections had sent some data over to China. Some American election data sent it to servers in China. Now I don't know all the details of that story but the reporting is that the only reason they didn't prosecute is because it would have made a story for Trump to talk about politically. Maybe. I'm willing to believe that.
CBS News is reporting that some members of Congress who led the investigation, the January 6 committee people, that they've already told their family they've talked to their families about their safety and the risk of their arrest if Trump wins the second term. Do you think the January 6 committee is at risk of imprisonment if Trump wins the second term? Do you think they risk imprisonment for investigating him the way they did? Yes. Every one of them belongs in prison. And it's really obvious. Really obvious. You want some evidence? Well turns out you came to the right place. Here's some evidence that the January 6 people belong in jail.
There is a National Guard captain who's testifying to Congress and he says quote I can say unequivocally that the inspector general's review, that's the review of January 6 and all that stuff, is riddled with inaccuracies, misstatements, and perhaps false flags and narratives regarding how critical Pentagon senior officials responded when our republic was under great stress. So his claim is that the president of the United States had pre-authorized the deployment of 10,000 National Guard troops just in case things got out of hand. Now do you remember any part of the January 6 proceedings in which the public was informed that the person they said was trying to conquer the country had been in certainly, verifiably, documented, no question about it, had tried to get 10,000 National Guard people there to prevent any kind of violence? Now that's true beyond any doubt I think. And that would make the entire January 6 narrative that Trump was trying to conquer the country look ridiculous because he authorized 10,000 people to prevent something happening at the Capitol.
Do you know why those 10,000 were not sent in the end? Well according to the whistleblower is because the Pentagon delayed dispatching them over the concerns for the optics. The optics. What do you think would be the concern for the optics? Now it doesn't matter what they were thinking, does it? It doesn't matter if they were thinking something that was good for the country or bad for the country. What matters is the military is the one who left the government unprotected. Let me say it again. The US military intentionally and fully understanding the danger decided at the management level to leave the members of Congress unprotected.
Now smart people say the only reason you would do that is to make a case against Trump. No I'm not sure that's the only reason because you know regular incompetence and miscommunication and stupidity and you know it's a complicated world. But it certainly tracks like it fits the facts. I don't know if it's true but it fits the facts that the military was part of a larger operation to make sure that Trump was squashed forever and couldn't come back. But whether or not the military was thinking of a way to protect the republic or to just get Trump, that is irrelevant to the fact that we have conclusive multiple witnesses and documentation that President Trump was trying to protect the Capitol and he was prevented from doing that by his own military. Which is called what? An insurrection? What is it called when the military refuses an order from the commander-in-chief because doing the order would be good for the country and the commander-in-chief? I don't know. To me it looks like a coup. Looks like treason.
So to me it looks like the January 6 committee was covering up their own coup and that they should, that they're guilty of insurrection. And that it would be easy to prove because all you have to do is prove that the people who knew they could be protected chose the other path. And then they sold that other path as Trump's fault when it was 100% their own doing. If there's no crime in that then you might as well just open the jails. It's the most criminal act that I've seen since that video of the dead guy at the bank. Have y'all seen that? I think it was in Brazil or somewhere. Somebody wheeled a dead guy into a bank and pretended he was just sleepy to try to get him to sign a loan. Put the pen in his hand and holding up the hat. That the guy's just dead. He's literally just dead and he's sitting in front of the banker. And it makes you wonder what the banker is thinking. Should I check if he's alive because he looks dead? And he must have been fresh because he didn't have rigor mortis. Like he must have died within like an hour before he got to the bank because his head still was flopping around. So that was pretty terrible anyway. Not as terrible as the January 6 stuff.
So yes I believe that if Trump gets in office there's probably a whole bunch of people who need to go to jail over Ukraine and the pandemic and January 6. Not to mention whatever we might find out about elections themselves. So and I think it has to happen. You could imagine a time when I would have said you know I don't think that the president should throw in jail the other team because it's a bad look. Not if they do this. If the reason you're throwing them in jail is that they tried to throw you in jail on made up charges then yes. If you win you can put them all in jail. I think that has to be the rule. In fact we should encourage that not discourage it. If the thing you're putting your opponent in jail for is that they tried to put you in jail for nothing and got caught, absolutely they all belong in jail. Every one of them. So I'm down for that. And if that destroys the country and creates massive riots, I'm down for that. I'm down for that. Yeah. If all of like business shut down for months because it was wild, let's say protests in the street and violence and let's say even hundreds of people got killed, I'm down for that. Yeah. I don't want anybody to get killed and I'm against violence of all kinds. But if you ask me would that be the right play to put them all in jail even at the risk of massive disruption to the economy, massive disruption to life as we know it? Yes that's totally worth it because the alternative is much worse. Much worse.
All right. Colonel accuses senior officers blatantly lying to Congress about, yeah. I think Mark Milley has got a lot of explaining to do.
All right ladies and gentlemen that's all I've got for you today. I'm going to say bye to the other platforms and then I give some extra time to the local subscribers. So goodbye to X for now. See you tomorrow. YouTube and Rumble. And hello to Locals only.
stalling so everybody can get here oh good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams I'm pretty sure you've never seen a better thing in your entire life and if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody could even understand with their tiny human brains all you need for that is a cup marar a glass of tank of chin candy jger flask vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure the dopamine end of the day the thing makes everything better it's called the simultaneous sipping it's going to happen now go oh well everything's perfect now speaking of coffee there's new study that says it's good for your liver well should have asked me because I could have told you coffee is good for your whole body every single part it's good for your your teeth your hair your bile it's good for the things that are just passing through coffee is there anything I can do good for your liver well there's a study also that says that mentally stimulating work can Stave off dementia and that's why I'm here I'm here for the medical benefits now it would be financially possible for me to retire and sit around doing what potting what would I do if I were retired this is my favorite thing I do I mean your favorite thing intellectually let's say um and I definitely feel so I'll give you this as sort of a a beacon for you who who are younger I actually feel that at my current age I'm the sharpest I've ever been but not entirely meaning that I know I learned things faster when I was younger and maybe you know maybe a little more creative or something I'm not sure but maybe um but I can tell that if you were to just compare my ability to understand and navigate the world today to any time earlier in my life it's definitely better so I can tell you at my current age I don't feel like I'm losing I don't think I've lost a step the energy is definitely down definitely not not as much work all day don't need to sleep energy but generally speaking I'd say my mind is is right where I'd want it to be at this age and that has everything to do with the fact that I uh I push it so I'm every single day I'm doing something intellectually that's a little bit harder than what I can do easily so it's probably works I recommend it last night in the man cave I broke some brains um you may know I'm not going to talk about free will or argue it here because everybody's bored with that but I'm going to tell you just something that happened when the topic came up in the man cave last night that's a private live stream for the subscribers of my Scott Adams locals group and what I told them was they can't learn to author the simulation until they lose their illusion of Free Will and people said what how does that even make sense what what does free will have to do with you know managing the simulation if we are in a simulation what's any of that even mean how's it connected well here's how it's connected if you believe you have free will you're living in an illusion and if you're living in an illusion you can't control your reality because you don't know what it is you have to understand your reality before you can author it and Free Will is one of our most persistent Illusions now you might say to me but Scott that's not making sense because if you're authoring your environment that that sounds a lot like having free will so you're saying I have to say I have to understand I don't have free will to actually author the environment which would be like having free will like how does that even make sense here's how it makes sense when you learn you don't have free will that becomes a p a permanent part of the structure of your brain I think you all understand that everything you learn becomes a physical structure in your brain because if it weren't physical you wouldn't have the memory everything you know everything you learn everything you remember is physical it's physically in your brain if that part of your brain got damaged that part would be gone so when I if I teach you hypothetically that Free Will is not real that too becomes a permanent structure in your brain and it's that permanent structure along with some others that are necessary to author the simulation so another way to say it is you'll understand it once you get there if you do what once you understand that Free Will isn't real then you enter a world in which it seems like you can control your simulation or your environment just by what you want and what you focus on will that be free will it will feel like it you will feel like it and you will have a better experience of life but it won't be free will and you'll understand that all right there's a allegedly a Cyber attack that looks like a pretty big one in the United States Chuck kesto is talking about this a number of states have a complete failure of their 911 system right now and there's some indication that it might be an attack maybe a line cut or some other kind of cyber thing does it seem to you that that might be Iran is it possible that's an Iranian reaction and they're just giving us a warning shot maybe I don't know so we have to suspect the worst because we've let in so many terrorists into the country who knows what they're up to but if I were planning some major thing in the United States um cutting all of our 911 services would be a really good terrorist way to scare the hell lot of us CU if you could imagine cutting the 911 service before a terrorist attack that would be pretty messed up but would also speak to State actors because it's sort of too big of a play for an individual terrorist so if something happened that looked like an Iranian terrorist attack in the United States and if it happened after this alleged rumors of 911 going down that would look like a pretty sophisticated attack which even if we couldn't identify who did it we would probably suspect a state actor because of the complexity now this is all speculation there yeah I'm not even entirely sure there's really a 911 problem so wait for confirmation for any of that that's uh that's not yet confirmed I think well James O'Keefe of O'Keefe Media Group has another scoop and by the way I just want to give you a uh a little warning that in the Dilbert reborn comic that you can see only if you're a subscriber on xplatform see my profile for the link or on Scott Adams locals.com you'd see the Dilbert reborn comic and it will soon feature uh Wall-E uh dating James o'keef he doesn't know it because James o'keef will be under undercover but uh Wally is going to give up too much information to James o'keef that's coming I haven't drawn it yet but it's coming anyway so Keef has another scoop talk to somebody inside the Biden Administration who believes that maybe the real power in the administration is the chief of staff Jeff Zs he's a accordingly he's the second most powerful person in Washington I guess that would mean that Biden is the most powerful but that Biden is basically a puppet and says whatever Z tells him to say and Z used to be a Facebook board member so everything's connected and uh you you can't get anything done unless you get the chief of staff sign off is that that is that really that different than every other presidency isn't it generally true that if you want to get the president to agree with you about anything first you have to sell the chief of staff isn't that business as usual I I thought that's of the job of a chief of staff is to make sure that uh everything goes through that person and you know gets filtered before the president even sees it anyway so may maybe it's much worse under Biden it seems like it might be but then there's also indication from the same source that Hillary Clinton is still deeply involved advising and that yeah maybe she and B and Obama still have a much bigger influence because they have connections to the people work in the administration I think that's true so I would say that this scoop fits almost exactly what I thought was true which makes me worry about it a little bit because it's a little bit too on the nose you know didn't you assume that there was probably one person and maybe the chief of staff who was running things and then maybe Obama and uh and Hillary were you know advising from the outside so maybe it's exactly what it looks like talk Carlson had a uh ex CIA guy on uh Pedro Israel orta he worked for the CIA during the Trump Administration and they said that the CIA didn't even want to recognize him as president they didn't even want to put his picture up in their offices for a long time it became controversial to even have his picture in your office now do you think that the CIA a is on the same side as the president not in that case nope nope it doesn't look like it it looks like the CIA has its own agenda all right here's a story that I I'm I'm going to laugh at this every time I see it because you're going to see this story in a hundred more forms and 100 more places and every time I laugh at what's left out here's a story from Politico uh um that uh Trump is gaining with young people and especially young men so Trump has almost closed the Gap with young men um and basically it's a whole story about all the groups like uh people of color Etc who are um moving toward Trump but then it says that Biden still has a strong hold among you know other groups such as uh White women and uh black voters um and some other group now here's what's missing with the story the headline is always that they're about dead even in the National polling you know they're within a few points no matter depending on the poll and yet every substory is about a major group that's moving toward Trump and there's never a story I believe not one in which anybody was moving toward Biden so look for this in the stories the story will be this group has massively shifted toward Trump but they'll never mention anybody who's moved toward Biden and yet the total number stays the same how is that possible you know and at a certain point it's possible be because if Trump is catching up they make sense as part of the catching up story but they've been dead even for a long time haven't they if they're dead even for a long time and one of them keeps gaining in subcategories that are really big ones how can they stay even at the Top Line there there's definitely something wrong here right am I the only one noticing that the Top Line doesn't change when all the bottom line changes how's that it's not possible uh unless there's something unreported so unless there's some group that's moving toward Biden that we're not being told about and I don't think that's the case do you have you heard of any story of any demographic moving toward Biden I've only heard that he has a commanding lead in some group or another but I've never heard that they're increasing the lead yeah there's something very wrong with everything we're being told about these numbers something very wrong very suspicious well here's the weirdest story I don't even know what to think about this but Jim Brewer was on uh Roseanne's podcast and Jim Brewer had worked with Dave Chappelle at one point and here's what he says this is what Jim Brewer says so we all know the story about Dave Chappelle had his popular TV show and then he instead of taking a big offer to renew it he just disappeared Ed and went to Africa for a while and everybody said what's wrong with him is he crazy what's going on and Jim Brewer says that uh that Dave Chappelle told him in private that an elite group of people came to him and sat him down to quote correct him and that that was a phrase used to correct him and and then he suddenly went to he vanished and went to Africa and that when he came back he was different do you do you think that an elite group of people sat him down to talk to him and correct him and that that was so such a dangerous situation that he had to leave the country how many of you believe that's true I don't believe that's true yeah I'm going to say no on this one yeah I won't I will say it's impossible but until you hear it from uh Chappelle you should probably treat it like it's not true if Chappelle says it I'm definitely going to pay attention now you should now obviously if this is true he wouldn't say it right because the whole story is he he would never tell you because it's too dangerous whatever it is whoever this group is and whatever it is they wanted but does anybody even have a theory for why anybody would have wanted to stop Dave Chappelle what what the hell was Dave Chappelle saying that was so dangerous or what was he doing that was so dangerous was he outing anybody did he was he outing a ped ring or was there anything he did that was controversial that I'm not aware of it so I'm going to say I don't believe that story that'll be my take that's my current take I give it a 7525 75% chance no 25% chance maybe there's something there but I don't know who that Elite group is for sure all right uh on the xplatform Christopher Frant tells us that uh it looks like mid Journey the AI program that does movie like um Clips may have scraped images from major TV film and streaming Studios and then some examples were shown where it looks like AI is creating images that appear to be clearly cribbed from real movies and TV you maybe changed a little bit but clearly came from that inspiration to which I say what did we think was happening how else would it train if you're training a thing to know how to make a movie you know the way that people would expect a movie to look what did you think they were trading it on do you think they were trading it to make movies by showing it people that wouldn't teach you how to make a movie you would have to look at movies of course it looked at Movies how in the world do you think it didn't but isn't that exactly how a human director works a human writer a human Movie Maker can't do the job without looking at a whole bunch of movies first his movies are formulaic even the scenes even the visuals are formula right there are only so many angles that you shoot you can shoot as seen and once you've seen them that's all there is so there isn't any other way you could have trained AI to make a movie other than making it look at movies but the real question is if it looks at a movie and then tweaks it enough isn't that new art so let's say it looks at a movie scene where it was blocked down a certain way it's like oh there's a tracking scene and it shows the star walking through a crowd and then the then the tracking shot goes from above so you know you could imagine that it would use the same let's say schemes and techniques but change the characters and change the movie and change the lighting and everything it would be it would be a new scene so um but this is part of a larger topic which I like to bring up which is if anything can stop AI it'll be lawyers because lawyers are just going to be all over AI in fact the only way that AI could survive in my opinion is that it was created by a company that became so big so quickly it would have infinite assets to to fight the legal battles if you were a startup in your garage you let's say Brian relli comes up with his own AI model it wouldn't be hard to stop Brian you just one person all you need to do too is law fair am man of business and you know he would give up but you can't really law fair am a business a mult multi-billion dollar company so if AI had not become somewhat instantly a multi-billion dollar asset it would been killed in his crib by lawyers but at this point it's bigger than lawyers uh it's sort of the Uber method the Uber um shouldn't have been able to work because it couldn't really compete with taxis because it was illegal it was just against the law but they became so big so fast that the lawyers didn't have time to like catch what was going on and then they had so much money that they could fight lawyers and beat them because they had more money and more lawyers so look for that situation there there's some businesses that you just can't do if you start small you almost have to start big that's what Uber and and AI both did they started big all right so keep an eye on that there more science that says that hugging can ease your pain anxiety and depression U let's add to the science that you could have skipped by asking Scott Scott we were thinking of putting a whole bunch of money into studying hugging to see if it makes you feel better well you don't have to do that because I could tell you it definitely does oh thank you you just saved us a lot of money Scott so really if you were to compare um the entire field of science to just asking me for my opinion it'd be about a wash I don't get them all right but neither does science science is about a 50% proposition at best you know papers that are peer reviewed and accepted are only right about 50% of the time how often am I right well on most of the lifestyle stuff I'm right almost every time almost every time for example will there be a study coming up that shows our food supply is not healthy for you yes there will even today there was another study showing that there's all too many things in your food supply do you think I could have told you that yes I could have 100% right do you think they find out that alcohol is bad for you in any amount yes and I could have told you that because I did 20 years ago so yeah hugs are good for you surprise all right again the funniest story which I'm going to keep telling you about even if you don't like it is bri.
and his new orifice AI device now it's a sextoy and the funny part is what the the public is responding to so it's becoming sort of a you know a public least onx a uh public battle where people are so mad about uh trying to you know being living in a world where men would be using these devices now here's what's hilarious I forgot that the name of the product is orifice he actually named the product orifice and it's a and it's a partial replacement for women like human women it's just called orifice and here's the funny part it's so insulting it's so amazingly insulting that he's building a company to replace some portion of human women with a hole now I'm not saying that's a fair characterization all right so I'm not giving you my opinion on women here that has nothing to do with this conversation I'm just saying what could be funnier than launching a product to replace much of human women with a hole and then you name it you name the product after the whole or a this you at least at least when women make a Sex to toy yeah the most popular sex toy for women is called the womanizer the womanizer sounds like it was created possibly by woman or at least women were involved in the marketing and naming of it because there it's like woman yeah womanizer yes go ladies you don't need men that when they're replacing men they're like yeah go ladies go ladies you don't need men you can do it yourself with a womanizer yeah you're more woman than you've ever been you're womanizing now but but then when a man creates a sex story it's a hole I'm could to be laughing all day about this anyway so if you're if you're wondering can somebody replace human women at least in terms of men's sexual appetites uh how many human women can be replaced by a hole and I'd say about 40% already and and raising and here's here's the funniest one there some angry woman I saw this the other day there was an angry woman who was attacking bri.
a uh for his product the orifice and uh just gave him a whole bunch of trouble for it and and uh he saying he was basically going to replace women and bride.
ai's response was and I quote you should have been nicer to me in high school so he invented a replacement for women it's called the hole or orice all right I'm I I'm just saying the whole thing is so funny because it's so offensive intentionally that people aren't catching on that it's intentionally offensive so so they're reacting they're reacting as though they don't know that they're the marketing anyway ESPN's uh uh stepen is it Stefan I never know is it Stefan asith is he a Stefan or a Steven that name always confuses me it can go either way right Stefan I don't know so Stefan or Steven A Smith um says that the the people going after Trump with lawfare are a bunch of cowards and that all you're doing is showing that you're scared you can't beat him on the issues everything you do shows me you can't beat him he says it's giving fodder to the argument that the election is rigged Ste I'm being told it's Steven so we'll say Stephen A Smith so he's he's completely right he's completely right I if your argument is that that the elections were not rigged then trying to rig it with lawfare right in front of the entire world while you're arguing that the election wasn't rigged but you're rigging it right now I mean Legally Legally because the law fair stuff is not itself illegal he should be because it's being used illegally but probably won't be you know actually prosecuted in anyway but uh yes he's completely right if you're going to rig the election right in front of the entire Republic everybody can see it we all know that the law fair is about the election it's not about anybody having broken any laws that anybody cares about nobody cares about stormmy nobody nobody cares about his phone call nobody cares about the loans he made to banks that were very happy to do business with him nobody cares about any of it nobody cares about his documents at Mar Lago not really I mean not real people nobody really cares so it's obvious that it's all political and uh yeah he's right but here's what I I would have to say about Stephen A Smith and I apologize to him for getting his name uh inaccurate at first um that's what a leader looks like I I always say that uh Black America doesn't have a leader now they do have you know people who are prominent but they're really not good at it you know they're not good at it like Obama's good at it and Obama's you know sort of in the sidelines lover hate Obama he was real good at the leadership stuff right you don't have to like where he led but leader definitely a leader and I would say this Stephen A Smith has that leadership thing I'm not and it feels like he he is suffering from the Spider-Man curse you know the Spider-Man curse uh with great power comes great responsibility I can't read mins but when I see somebody as capable as Stephen A Smith and when I hear him talking the way he's talking about the big issues it feels like he just realized that he's the one who knows how to do it he actually knows how to show leadership so he's modeling it it's actually very impressive so if he if he someday runs for office um and don't fool yourself I don't think he's a trump Republican is he he's just showing you that he can see the whole Court which is really rare and then having seen the whole Court he tells you what to do about it that makes sense also very rare very rare so yeah he's got the real deal if he ever ran for office I would definitely like chances I would like his chances if he ran for office that doesn't mean I'm going to agree with him on policy but wow he's capable anyway I like to see capable people do well Tim Po tells us that his timcast IRL show um three of his older shows from three years ago just got uh strikes against them there were shows with Michael malis Joe Rogan and real Alex Jones now do you think that that's about something Tim kcast did or they're just trying to suppress those three other people now we know that they've you know there's been some move to suppress you know Pro Trump voices but I'm wondering is this a move mostly against timcast because I'm trying to think is timcast the last um serious independent voice that hasn't been taken down by the bad guys it it seems to me like the um it would be obvious that Tim would get targeted by the bad guys to be taken down for some you know lawfare or social media reason or some hoax or get cancelled or something I would imagine that there's like a whole team of people working on just putting Tim pool on a business do you think that's true do you think there's an actual team like professionals being paid by somebody to look at ways to put them out of business I think yes yeah I think yes there are people who's who who are paid from somebody could be the CIA could be just Democrats um to put them out of business that's what it looks like so here's another story uh there's I guess Dubai has been doing some cloud seeding and maybe they went overboard and caused a bunch of flooding do you think they can actually uh geoengineer the atmosphere and Make It Rain where they wanted to I don't know I have mixed feelings about it on one hand I think it's inevitable we'll definitely be managing the atmosphere eventually and the other hand I think maybe we're not ready so we might you know destroy the world trying to make it better so I think it's going to happen it has to happen it's inevitable um but it's dangerous so we'll keep an eye on that zubie is talking about the Obesity rates uh on aent he gave that little chart of what the Obesity was let me let me show you the rate so this is from 1975 to uh current and then projected so 1975 there was a 12% us adult obesity rate 12% you've seen all those old pictures of people in New York City in the 30s or whatever it is and it looks like 100% of them are thin um but 12% by 1975 that sounds about right you know I was there that feels about right 12% 1985 it was 15 not much difference so in 10 years a little bit of creeped up crept up by 1998 it was up to 25 2020 2014 it was up to 35 and by this year it's up to 42% adult obesity 42% and it's projected by that by 2031 it will reach 50% now I'm here to tell you it's much worse than that because it's not evenly distributed there are states and regions where the obesity rate is really close to 100% I remember visiting um the facility where my ailing father was you know on his uh on his last uh weeks of life and it was a medical facility you know and uh I remember sit in his room for hours because I went to visit it wasn't much to do because he was mostly just you know sleeping at that time and I would just watch the people walk by in the hallway and I started to notice say wow there's some you know big people that work here and then I said to myself what was the last time I saw somebody wasn't gigantic and and I just sat there and watched people walk by his room in the hallway and I just said obese or not obese they're all obese all of them Upstate New York every one of them was obese I think there were a few you know maybe 18 year olds who weren't you know some people had you know part-time jobs and stuff but every adult over 30 was a big old Barrel siiz person so if you go to La for example if you're in the Hollywood area you'll you won't see the Obesity if you go to New York City and walk down the street in Manhattan not a not a ton of obesity if you fly in an airplane you know you always hear the complaints about the the big person in the seat next to you but it's kind of rare uh beyond beyond a certain size people just don't fly I mean they do so hear the story but it's rare uh so airports are more thin people than large there are some cities that are more thin people and if you take them out of the mix out of the average um yeah your your obesity is probably 75% below a certain income level now it's also related to income I would bet that below below $100,000 a year I'll bet it's close to 75% OBC that's my guess um anyway so did you know that one of the most influential people in American politics is an 88-year-old Swiss guy that's something I learned today you know we all hear about George Soros putting so much money into things and influence them well apparently there's like a George Soros Jr whose name I never heard uh hun joro whis 88 and he's a this billionaire who's been putting in hundreds of of millions of dollars into American stuff similar to the Soros kind of activities and to the point where he's one of the most important people in the country he's not even in the country he's a Swiss guy so the GOP is trying to crack down in this loophole that lets foreign donors put all this what they call the dark money into US elections anybody who thought our elections are determined by the will of the people do you feel silly that you ever believe that it's this is the stuff there there are like 15 to 20 effects that determine completely who gets to become president and what the law is and none of them are the will of the people it's all just different stuff it's just money and lawfare and you know how they rig the system rig meaning the the laws about how to vote yeah yeah we haven't lived in anything like a republic in a maybe ever I don't know Delta Airlines is eliminating uh college degree requirements for all positions including Pilots well you know there's nothing that makes me want to fly an airplane more than knowing that they've lowered the standards for the pilots now on one hand I do agree that you should just pick good people whether they have a college degree or not but I do think it's a rather useful to have that standard it it does it does reduce the number of people who are you know not qualified from slipping through so I would say that's not a good sign for America every time we lower a standard uh it's always for some good reason to increase diversity or something but I don't think we get enough benefit for what it costs generally speaking so you heard the story about those 28 Google employees who who occupied a SE uh one of the Executive offices and they were mad because Israel was still um the Google was still doing business with the Israeli government and what did Google do it fired all of them so it fired all of them now are you surprised because you think oh Google is so liberal and blah blah blah well um I wouldn't be surprised no I think Google just did what every would do in that situation so they violated their internal standards and that was good enough to fire them so good for Google I don't think that it uh it fixed anything because Google app apparently is completely rotted um their employees are rotted from the inside they're all they're all woke um mentally ill people for the most part speaking of that the uh NPR CEO uh Ms.
Mar marah um we find out more about her apparently she was a member of the Atlantic Council and the WF and she gave a speech at the Carnegie endowment that's a group now if you've been following Mike Ben you would know that at least the Atlantic Council and the carnegi analment are just straight up CIA entities basically they're just intelligence entities so it would seem that Miss Mah is very deeply embedded with the intelligence part of the world and she was in charge of uh Wikipedia so she was the head of you know all knowledge for Wikipedia and then the head of NPR and so the person who is in charge of telling us what's Real uh is a basically CIA adjacent so just like you think but she's getting some uh some push back from well what what do these three people have in common Gad sad Elon Musk and V ramaswami so all three of them are criticizing NPR CEO Mar uh what do those three have in common three of the smartest people in the world at least in terms of politics and philosophy and stuff right so if all three of them are you know piling on you know plus Chris rufo a lot of smart people right so the smart people have taken the following stand because in a speech I guess it was to the Carnegie endowment uh nprc CEO said that she believes that truth is subjective um or or a distraction from the pursuit or from getting things done that the truth is subjective and and a distraction and I'm paraphrasing a little bit but this is pretty close uh and the and it can get in the way of the pursuit of truth I'm sorry The Pursuit Of Truth can get in the way of getting things done so Gad sad said uh quote truth is subjective uh unquote is precisely the key tenant of postmodernism this is why I refer to it as the granddaddy of all parasitic idea pathogens well that's a lot of smart words in one sentence theread I I will have to hire somebody to explain to me in my sixth grade world what that means I think I understand all right Elon mus said now imagine if this is programmed explicitly or implicitly into super powerful AI it could end civilization and he says now no need to imagine it is already programmed into Google Gemini and open AI chat GPT so that would be talking about the idea that truth is subjective and it can get in the way of getting things done V along the same lines said that uh um he qued to the CEO CEO of NPR saying quote our reverence for the truth might be a distraction getting in the way of finding common ground and getting things done and says this gets to the heart of the cultural divide in the modern West whether you believe truth is a priority or a hindrance do you agree with all three of these people Gad sad El mus and that this this uh downgrading of Truth in favor of getting stuff done is the problem and that it's a basically an existential problem if you throw a AI in the mix everybody agree with that all right I just agree with all three of them vigorously as hard as I can she's completely right and you see it every day yeah let me give you an example abortion abortion take the abortion thing we have uh different opinions which cannot be reconciled do you know why they can't be reconciled because we'll never agree on what's true is it true that it's murder or is that not true or killing killing a human I guess not murder and so the argument is over what's true is it true that you're taking a human life now that can't be solved would you would you agree that can't be solved in realistically realistically one of those is right you think and one of them is wrong you think and but it can't be solved so what do you do when you have a problem that can't be solved you make do you do what you can do so what do we do as a nation when we can't decide what's true we compromise and we we just work it out we just find some Middle Ground where where the people who don't get what they want are not willing to Stage a revolution that's a perfect example what she's saying we're not going to agree what's true but if we stop there we'd never get anything done because we do have to kind of move past let's say abortion and I would say that's just an example I would say every one of our big issues have the same same issue what's true we don't agree on and never will so if you allowed yourself to never try to fix anything until you found out what's true you would never fix anything she's completely right it is 100% true that if you think that you know the truth and the other people don't you're probably part of the problem you might be right but you could also be part of the problem if you insist that the other people agree with you before you can move forward in the real world people don't agree what true but often we can find a way to work together right so so um she's 100% right um reality is completely subjective how many of you believe that Free Will is real and how many of you believe it's not how are you ever going to solve that one of the most basic questions of your reality is Free Will real we're never going to agree with that but can we find a way to move on yes we can but uh I don't believe in Free Will and some of you do so what would we do about the legal system if you know if you if you took my point of view there's no free will how would you punish anybody how would you have a how would you have a justice system if nobody's really responsible for anything well I'll tell you how um since I believe there's no free will but I also need to move forward somehow I mean I need to live in the real world I say all right I agree with you you can't really build a system unless you punish people so I accept a system where people who really couldn't help what they did are punished right because I can't think of a better way so there's a perfect example where we'll never agree what's true free will or no free will but we can figure out a way to make the world work and I think I could come up with a hundred different examples where she's completely right we'll never agree what's true but we can figure out how to take a step forward so here's your real problem your real problem is that you don't agree with her about what's true that's the real problem the real problem is not that she understands the truth is what we imagin it is she's 100% right about that the the part that you don't like is that her truth is different from yours if she said everything you agreed with and then said truth is subjective we have to figure out a way forward you wouldn't have a problem with it you wouldn't suppos she said uh well you know we we know the truth is that these fetuses are real life humans and that killing them is immoral that's our truth but we have to move forward somehow so we're going to compromise with the people who disagree with what's true that framing would make you okay with it so what's really the problem is you don't like her opinions not that she thinks opinions are subjective so do I think she's part of the problem yes yeah she's a big part of the problem she she is not just specifically part of the problem but she represents as a number of people say were saying today on X she represents a whole infection of people who have a certain point of view which I find destructive right but the fact that I find it destructive and I think that's true does that matter nope what will matter is who wins the election and you know who has power that will matter so I'm working on who wins the election and who has power because I can't change what's true to somebody else all right um this is why you watch my show by the way I remind you that these uncomfortable things where I'm completely on the other side from you that's why you watch because you're not going to see it anywhere else I mean if you get a steady stream of uh Republicans are awesome you're not getting smarter you need somebody to to tell you when your side is getting off the track a little bit right that's the useful thing the useful thing is finding out when your own team is wrong because you always think the other team's wrong all right um all let me here's the story um I just read that Florida is banned a bunch of books it was in the news is it true you tell me is it a true story that Florida banned um I know a few thousand books true no it's not true no that's not true NOP it's in the news but what is true is that they um they removed them from from where children can see them there's no there are no banned books for adults in Florida that's not a thing there are no ban books in Florida but both of these are treated as the truth so NPR CEO is completely right you can disagree whether there's a book ban in Florida I say there's not other people say there is but can we despite having a different understanding of what's real figure out how to go forward yeah yeah disantis just um you has laws apparently can move those books to the non-child library places and then everybody's fine so yeah you don't need to know what true you just need to know how to handle it speaking of what's true Joe Biden has a new story about his uncle being eaten by cannibals which apparently does not pass the fact checking according to Jonathan Turley but apparently he was in Pittsburgh doing some campaign stuff he told the story of how uh his uncle boie in World War II uh was uh let's see he was a hell of an athlete some for some reason you need to know he was a hell of an athlete um and then he he flew those single engine planes it turns out he didn't fly he he wasn't a flyer he wasn't a pilot and the plane he was in was not a single engine Jonathan trly uh looked into that and he was over a war zone and I guess it it actually went down for mechanical problems it wasn't shot down as Biden says and they never found the body because there there used to be there were a lot of cannibals for real and that part of New Guinea so he's saying that they never found the body so that you know maybe the cannibals got him but there was a member of the crew who did survive and the member of the crew who did survive said watched the other crew members not being able to get out of the plane as it went into the water so no the cannibals did not eat his uncle his uncle was a really good athlete who couldn't get out of an airplane that crashed in the water so so do we need to know the truth about his uncle who was or was not eaten by cannibals no we don't the truth is completely irrelevant because you know it's just campaign talk and it doesn't matter anyway so no the truth doesn't matter doesn't matter a bit on that story well the K the Kennedy family apparently many members will appear in a big group uh with Biden to endorse him and which basically is a slap in the face to their family member RFK Jr who is running against Biden you know who wishes their relatives had been eaten by cannibals RFK Jr but not only that if cannibals ate his relatives uh they would be eating a better diet than the American diet am I right better diet than the American diet at least it' be good protein no additives so no I'm not recommending that cannibals eat the Kennedy family but if they did they'd be healthier than the normal fast food diet um I would like to uh give a shout out to my family my remaining family members uh I won't name them but I sure appreciate my family do you know what my family would never do they would never do this if I ran for president my my you know I have a very small family group left but my family members never would have gathered together to endorse the other guy you know they might might have sat it out they might have said no comment if they thought the other guy was the the good one for to be president but no they would not have traveled to Washington to to stand with the competitor and endorse him I hate to tell you R okay but your family sucks your family sucks like this is the minimum the minimum requirement for your family not to suck is to endorse the other guy in an election it's not like RF junior is a criminal it's not like he has bad intentions for the country it's not like his policies are some crazy he's a genuine legitimate serious person with a serious resume running against a brain dead piece of to try to save the country and try to save you all you Kennedy children from eating that's killing you and putting stuff in your body that you shouldn't be putting in your body and that's why you want the other guy to win he he's just trying to save children I mean he could be wrong about some stuff mean there would be no no real shame in that because everybody's wrong about stuff but really your family is going to throw you under the bus in public in this situation I'll just say it straight out I I really like RFK Jr.
I think he's great for the country you know win or win or lose I think he's great for the country but the these family members suck I mean they just suck there's just no way around it this is just terrible family Behavior speaking of RFK Jr you saying again unambiguously on another podcast uh that uh the CIA is guilty of murdering his uncle JFK he says the evidence is so abundant and so definitive um that if he took the case to a jury he would win in front of almost any jury and he says it's because JFK defied the military industrial complex they wanted to you know attack Cuba and JFK didn't and they didn't like him ending the war in Vietnam which he also tried to do so that all does make sense to me you know the the Kennedy assassination the official story was always a little sketchy right from the beginning you're like really I don't know it seems a little sketchy there was some mighty good shooting from that guy from that upstairs I don't know did he really care that one guy he cared so much that he did that I don't know never really totally made sense but this does uh every part of the the CIA killed him makes sense to me now I don't know what's true and what isn't but every part of the story makes sense it all fits together perfectly and it matches everything we know about everything all right um so I don't see how those same people can allow RFK Jr to become president so he is in Mortal danger you know there is a scenario in which RFK Jr becomes president uh let me just say it out loud if the CIA takes out Trump and then Biden collapses just from natural causes RFK JR could be the next president in fact I'd give him at least a one-third chance I think the odds are one3 13 13d at the moment it has nothing to do with polling has everything to do with the outside sources I think the odds of uh Biden simply surviving and the election is rigged and he wins in a rigged election is about one out of three I think the odds of uh Trump surviving any assassination attempts and also getting a big enough victory that they can't cheat their way to through it one and three no matter what the polling says one and three are best and the odds of RFK Jr making it all the way to presidency is about one in three also because I think the odds of Biden collapsing are pretty good and I think the odds of the CIA taking Trump out if it with lawfare or something worse is pretty good good as in bad so I my my current estimate is they each have a one and three chance of being president and none of it has to do with the will of the people let me say it again they each have a one and three chance and none of it has to do with voters because we don't live in that system anymore if we ever did it will be entirely determined by the capability uh of the people in the back rooms and the health of the current president and that's probably all that will matter if the people in the back rooms do a good job well they get everything they want it's probably Biden all right um there are a whole bunch of new sanctions being put on Iran because of the attack on Israel um Let me let me mention the sanctions because there a whole bunch of them there's the uh the the vague one there's the the one I don't know about there's a well there's a complicated one there's a well there's one that seems to not really affect anything but maybe a couple of guys there's a one that I don't know it looks like it could make some difference but I don't really understand it there's one that okay they don't even tell you what they are do you believe that we have an infinite number of sanctions that we can whip out anytime we want is that the way it works it it's not like there are three sanctions that can make a difference and then there are a million sanctions that you could do but they're not really going to make a difference I feel like it's more of that don't you like there's a strong 8020 situation that might be like a 991 where there might be a few sanctions that if you could get them to stick would really move the needle and then there's probably a whole bunch of other ones where some rich guy goes wa you mean I can't dock My Yacht at Washington DC well I'll just dock is somewhere else is that okay that's perfectly okay okay okay I guess I got sanctioned you know I I feel like the sanctions are just because if they weren't they would tell us what they were and they would tell us whether they could make any difference but no the news just says oh lots of sanctions more sanctions oh I'll put some more sanctions on how about we put some sanctions on I you should reelect me because of all my sanctions I put on 50 53 sanctions if if 50 three sanctions is not enough I could put on 50 more that will be unspecified and vague and you couldn't even tell if they make a difference but if if a 100 sanctions isn't enough I could put 200 sanctions on I could put 300 sanctions on I'll put more sanctions on that's the state of your news uh Biden tells Israel not to attack Israel sounds like I'm making that up but uh he said quote I made it clear to Israelis don't move on hia H would be a a city in Israel yeah H what do you mean Rafa actually um I don't think the the misspeaking is as big a deal as others do uh I don't think that's really the the big sign he losing it because I think maybe he always did that and Trump misspeaks and I misspeak and you know I I misspeak twice a day I don't I don't think that's the biggest thing but they're funny stories Babylon B reports that Biden campaign has a new slogan you know they tried a number of things build back better no Malarkey none of those really none of them really felt like they captur the spirit of what's going on but as the Babylon B reports the new SL seems to really capture it perfectly the new slogan is death to America if you're not familiar The Babylon B is a satirical news outfit and what I mean by satirical and what I mean by parody is it looks exactly like the real news no real difference all right um uh there's a story that a prosecutor in California the California da uh dropped this uh so-called bombshell election data case because it might help Trump so there's some whistleblower so apparently there was some case about somebody involved with the electronic part of the elections had sent some data over to China some American election data sent it to servers in China now I don't know all the details of that story but the reporting is that the only reason they didn't prosecute is because it would have made a story for Trump to talk about politically maybe uh I'm willing to believe that CBS News is reporting that some members of Congress who led the investigation the the January 6 uh committee people that uh they've already told their family they've talked to their families about their safety and the risk of their arrest if Trump wins the second term do you think the January 6 commit is at risk of imprisonment if Trump wins the second term do you think they risk of imprisonment for investigating him the way they did yes every one of them belongs in prison and it's really obvious really obvious you want some evidence Well turns out came to the right place here's some evidence that the January 6 people belong in jail there is a National Guard Captain who's testifying to Congress and he says quote I can say unequivocably that the inspector General's review that's the review of January 6 and all that stuff is riddled with inaccuracies misstatements and perhaps false flags and narratives regarding how critical Pentagon senior officials responded when our Republic was under great stress so his claim is that the um president of the United States had pre-authorized the deployment of 10,000 National Guard troops just in case things got in a hand now do you remember any part of the January 6 um proceedings in which the public was informed that the person they said was trying to conquer the country had been in certainly verifiably um documented no question about it had tried to get 10,000 National Guard people there to prevent any kind of violence now that's true Beyond any doubt I think and that would make the entire January 6 narrative that Trump was trying to conquer the country look ridiculous because he' authorized 10,000 people to prevent something happening at the capital do you know why those 10,000 were not sent in the end well according to the Whistleblower is because the uh Pentagon uh delayed dispatching them over the concerns for the Optics the Optics what do you think would be the concern for the Optics now it doesn't matter what they were thinking does it it doesn't matter if they were thinking something that was good for the country or bad for the country what matters is the military is the one who left the government unprotected let me say it again the US military intentionally and fully understanding the danger decided at the management level to leave the members of Congress unprotected now smart people say the only reason you would do that is to make a case against Trump no I'm not sure that's the only reason because you know regular incompetence and miscommunication and stupidity and you know it's a complicated world but it certainly tracks like it fits the facts I don't know if it's true but it fits the facts that the the military was part of a larger operation to make sure that Trump was uh squashed forever and couldn't come back but whether or not the the military was thinking um of a way to protect the republic or to just get Trump that is irrelevant to the fact that we have conclusive multiple Witnesses and documentation that President Trump was trying to protect the capital and he was prevented from doing that by his own military which is called what an Insurrection what what it called when the military refuses an order from the commander-in-chief because doing the order would be good for the country and the commander-in-chief I don't know to me it looks like a coup looks like treason so to me it looks like the January 6 committee was covering up their own coup and that they should that they're guilty of insurrection and that it would be easy to prove because all you have to do is prove that the people who knew they could be protected chose the other path and then they sold that other path as Trump's fault when it was 100% their own doing if if there's no crime in that then you might as well just open the jails it's the most criminal act that I've seen since that video of the Dead Guy at the bank have yall seen that I think it was in Brazil or somewhere somebody wheeled a dead guy into a bank and pretended he was just sleepy to try to get him to sign a loan put the pen in his hand and holding up the hat that that is the guy's just dead he's literally just dead and he's sitting in front of the banker and it makes you wonder what the banker is thinking should I check if he's alive because he looks dead and he must have been fresh because he didn't have rigor mortise like he must have died within like an hour before he got to the bank CU he was still his head still was FL around so that was pretty terrible anyway not as terrible as the January 6th stuff so yes I believe that if Trump gets an office there's probably a whole bunch of people who need to go to jail over Ukraine and the pandemic in January 6 not to mention whatever we might find out about elections themselves so and and I think it has to happen you know uh you could imagine a time when I would have said you know I don't think that the President should throw in jail the other team because it's a bad look not if they do this if the reason you're throwing them in jail is that they tried to throw you in jail on madeup charges then yes if you win you can put them all in jail I I think that has to be the the rule in fact we should we should encourage that not discourage it if if the thing you're putting your opponent in jail for is that they tried to put you in jail for nothing and got caught absolutely they all belong in jail every one of them so I'm I'm down for that and if that uh if that destroys the country and creates massive riots I'm down for that I'm down for that yeah if if uh all of like business shut down for months because it was wild um uh let's say protests in the street and violence and and Le let's say even hundreds of people got killed I'm down for that yeah I don't want anybody to K get killed and I'm against violence of all kinds but if you ask me would that be the right play to put them all in jail even at the risk of massive disruption to the economy massive disruption to Life as we know it yes that's totally worth it because the alternative is much worse much worse all right uh Colonel accuses senior officers blatantly lying to Congress about yeah um yep I think Mark Millie I think Mark Millie is got a lot of explaining to do all right ladies and Gent gentlemen that's all I've got for you today I'm going to say bye to the other platforms and then I give some extra time to the local subscribers so goodbye to X for now see you tomorrow uh You.
Tube and Rumble and hello to locals only e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e for
stalling so everybody can get
here
[Music]
oh good morning everybody and welcome to
the highlight of human civilization it's
called coffee with Scott Adams I'm
pretty sure you've never seen a better
thing in your entire life and if you'd
like to take this experience up to
levels that nobody could even understand
with their tiny human brains all you
need for that is a cup marar a glass of
tank of chin candy jger flask vessel of
any kind fill it with your favorite
liquid I like coffee and join me now for
the unparalleled pleasure the dopamine
end of the day the thing makes
everything better it's called the
simultaneous sipping it's going to
happen now go
oh well everything's perfect
now speaking of coffee there's new study
that says it's good for your
liver well should have asked me because
I could have told you coffee is good for
your whole body every single part it's
good for your your teeth your hair your
bile it's good for the things that are
just passing through coffee is there
anything I can do good for your
liver well there's a study also that
says that mentally stimulating work can
Stave off
dementia and that's why I'm here I'm
here for the medical benefits now it
would be financially possible for me to
retire and sit around doing what
potting what would I do if I were
retired this is my favorite thing I do I
mean your favorite thing intellectually
let's say um and I definitely
feel so I'll give you this as sort of a
a beacon for you who who are
younger I actually feel that at my
current age I'm the sharpest I've ever
been but not entirely meaning that I
know I learned things faster when I was
younger and maybe you know maybe a
little more creative or something I'm
not sure but maybe um but I can tell
that if you were to just compare my
ability to understand and navigate the
world today to any time earlier in my
life it's definitely better so I can
tell you at my current age I don't feel
like I'm losing I don't think I've lost
a step the energy is definitely down
definitely not not as much work all day
don't need to sleep energy but generally
speaking I'd say my mind is is right
where I'd want it to be at this age and
that has everything to do with the fact
that I uh I push it so I'm every single
day I'm doing something intellectually
that's a little bit harder than what I
can do easily so it's probably works I
recommend it last night in the man cave
I broke some brains um you may know I'm
not going to talk about free will or
argue it here because everybody's bored
with that but I'm going to tell you just
something that happened when the topic
came up in the man cave last night
that's a private live stream for the
subscribers of my Scott Adams locals
group and what I told them was they
can't learn to author the
simulation until they lose their
illusion of Free Will and people said
what how does that even make sense what
what does free will have to do with you
know managing the simulation if we are
in a simulation what's any of that even
mean how's it connected well here's how
it's
connected if you believe you have free
will you're living in an
illusion and if you're living in an
illusion you can't control your reality
because you don't know what it
is you have to understand your reality
before you can author it and Free Will
is one of our most persistent
Illusions now you might say to me but
Scott that's not making sense because if
you're authoring your environment that
that sounds a lot like having free will
so you're saying I have to say I have to
understand I don't have free
will to actually author the environment
which would be like having free will
like how does that even make sense
here's how it makes
sense when you learn you don't have free
will that becomes a p a permanent part
of the structure of your brain I think
you all understand that everything you
learn becomes a physical structure in
your brain because if it weren't
physical you wouldn't have the memory
everything you know everything you learn
everything you remember is physical it's
physically in your brain if that part of
your brain got damaged that part would
be
gone so when I if I teach you
hypothetically that Free Will is not
real that too becomes a permanent
structure in your brain and it's that
permanent structure along with some
others that are necessary to author the
simulation so another way to say it is
you'll understand it once you get there
if you do what once you understand that
Free Will isn't real then you enter a
world in which it seems like you can
control your simulation or your
environment just by what you want and
what you focus
on will that be free will it will feel
like
it you will feel like it and you will
have a better experience of
life but it won't be free will and
you'll understand that all right there's
a allegedly a Cyber attack that looks
like a pretty big one in the United
States Chuck kesto is talking about this
a number of states have a complete
failure of their 911 system right now
and there's some indication that it
might be an attack maybe a line cut or
some other kind of cyber thing does it
seem to you that that might be
Iran is it possible that's an Iranian
reaction and they're just giving us a
warning
shot maybe I don't know so we have to
suspect the worst because we've let in
so many terrorists into the country who
knows what they're up to but if I were
planning some major thing in the United
States um cutting all of our 911
services would be a really good
terrorist way to scare the hell lot of
us CU if you could imagine cutting the
911 service before a terrorist
attack that would be pretty messed up
but would also speak to State actors
because it's sort of too big of a play
for an individual
terrorist so if something happened that
looked like an Iranian terrorist attack
in the United States and if it happened
after this alleged rumors of 911 going
down that would look like a pretty
sophisticated attack which even if we
couldn't identify who did it we would
probably suspect a state actor because
of the
complexity now this is all speculation
there yeah I'm not even entirely sure
there's really a 911 problem so wait for
confirmation for any of that that's uh
that's not yet confirmed I
think well James O'Keefe of O'Keefe
Media Group has another scoop and by the
way I just want to give you a uh a
little warning that in the Dilbert
reborn comic that you can see only if
you're a subscriber on xplatform see my
profile for the link or on Scott Adams
locals.com you'd see the Dilbert reborn
comic and it will soon feature uh
Wall-E uh dating James o'keef he doesn't
know it because James o'keef will be
under
undercover but uh Wally is going to give
up too much information to James o'keef
that's coming I haven't drawn it yet but
it's coming anyway so Keef has another
scoop talk to somebody inside the Biden
Administration who believes that maybe
the real power in the administration is
the chief of staff Jeff
Zs he's a accordingly he's the second
most powerful person in Washington I
guess that would mean that Biden is the
most powerful but that Biden is
basically a puppet and says whatever Z
tells him to say
and Z used to be a Facebook board
member so everything's connected and uh
you you can't get anything done unless
you get the chief of staff sign off is
that that is that really that different
than every other
presidency isn't it generally true that
if you want to get the president to
agree with you about anything first you
have to sell the chief of
staff isn't that business as usual I I
thought that's of the job of a chief of
staff is to make sure that uh everything
goes through that person and you know
gets filtered before the president even
sees it anyway so may maybe it's much
worse under Biden it seems like it might
be but then there's also indication from
the same source that Hillary Clinton is
still deeply involved
advising and that yeah maybe she and B
and Obama still have a much bigger
influence because they have connections
to the people work in the administration
I think that's true so I would say that
this
scoop fits almost exactly what I thought
was
true which makes me worry about it a
little bit because it's a little bit too
on the nose you know didn't you assume
that there was probably one person and
maybe the chief of staff who was running
things and then maybe Obama and uh and
Hillary were you know advising from the
outside
so maybe it's exactly what it looks like
talk Carlson had a uh ex CIA guy on uh
Pedro Israel
orta he worked for the CIA during the
Trump Administration and they said that
the CIA didn't even want to recognize
him as president they didn't even want
to put his picture up in their offices
for a long
time it became controversial to even
have his picture in your
office now do you think that the CIA a
is on the same side as the
president not in that case
nope nope it doesn't look like
it it looks like the CIA has its own
agenda all right here's a story that I
I'm I'm going to laugh at this every
time I see it because you're going to
see this story in a hundred more forms
and 100 more places and every time I
laugh at what's left out here's a story
from
Politico uh
um that uh Trump is gaining with young
people and especially young men so Trump
has almost closed the Gap with young men
um and basically it's a whole story
about all the groups like uh people of
color Etc who are um moving toward Trump
but then it says that Biden still has a
strong hold among you know other groups
such as uh White women and uh black
voters um and some other group now
here's what's missing with the
story the headline is always that
they're about dead even in the National
polling you know they're within a few
points no matter depending on the
poll and yet every substory is about a
major group that's moving toward
Trump and there's never a story I
believe not one in which anybody was
moving toward Biden so look for this in
the stories the story will be this group
has massively shifted toward
Trump but they'll never mention anybody
who's moved toward
Biden and yet the total number stays the
same how is that
possible you know and at a certain point
it's possible be because if Trump is
catching up they make sense as part of
the catching up story but they've been
dead even for a long time haven't they
if they're dead even for a long time and
one of them keeps gaining in
subcategories that are really big ones
how can they stay even at the Top
Line there there's definitely something
wrong here
right am I the only one noticing that
the Top Line doesn't change when all the
bottom line changes how's that it's not
possible uh unless there's something
unreported so unless there's some group
that's moving toward
Biden that we're not being told about
and I don't think that's the case do you
have you heard of any story of any
demographic moving toward Biden I've
only heard that he has a commanding lead
in some group or another but I've never
heard that they're increasing the
lead yeah there's something very wrong
with everything we're being told about
these numbers
something very wrong very
suspicious well here's the weirdest
story I don't even know what to think
about this but Jim Brewer was on uh
Roseanne's podcast and Jim Brewer had
worked with Dave Chappelle at one point
and here's what he says this is what Jim
Brewer says so we all know the story
about Dave Chappelle had his popular TV
show and then he instead of taking a big
offer to renew it he just disappeared Ed
and went to Africa for a while and
everybody said what's wrong with him is
he crazy what's going on and Jim Brewer
says
that uh that Dave Chappelle told him in
private that an elite group of people
came to him and sat him down to quote
correct him and that that was a phrase
used to correct
him and and then he suddenly went to he
vanished and went to
Africa and that when he came back he was
different do you do you think that an
elite group of
people sat him down to talk to him and
correct him and that that was so such a
dangerous situation that he had to leave
the
country how many of you believe that's
true I don't believe that's
true yeah I'm going to say no on this
one yeah I won't I will say it's
impossible but until you hear it from uh
Chappelle you should probably treat it
like it's not true if Chappelle says it
I'm definitely going to pay attention
now you should now obviously if this is
true he wouldn't say it right because
the whole story is he he would never
tell you because it's too dangerous
whatever it is whoever this group is and
whatever it is they wanted but does
anybody even have a theory for why
anybody would have wanted to stop Dave
Chappelle what what the hell was Dave
Chappelle saying that was so dangerous
or what was he doing that was so
dangerous was he outing anybody did he
was he outing a ped ring
or was there anything he did that was
controversial that I'm not aware of
it so I'm going to say I don't believe
that
story that'll be my take that's my
current take I give it a 7525
75% chance no 25% chance maybe there's
something there but I don't know who
that Elite group is for sure all
right uh on the xplatform Christopher
Frant tells us that uh it looks like mid
Journey the AI program that does movie
like um Clips may have scraped images
from major TV film and streaming Studios
and then some examples were shown where
it looks like AI is creating images that
appear to be clearly cribbed from real
movies and TV you maybe changed a little
bit but clearly came from that
inspiration to which I say what did we
think was
happening how else would it train if
you're training a thing to know how to
make a movie you know the way that
people would expect a movie to look what
did you think they were trading it on do
you think they were trading it to make
movies by showing it
people that wouldn't teach you how to
make a movie you would have to look at
movies of course it looked at
Movies how in the world do you think it
didn't but isn't that exactly how a
human director works a human writer a
human Movie Maker can't do the job
without looking at a whole bunch of
movies first his movies are formulaic
even the scenes even the visuals are
formula right there are only so many
angles that you shoot you can shoot as
seen and once you've seen them that's
all there is so there isn't any other
way you could have trained AI to make a
movie other than making it look at
movies but the real question is if it
looks at a movie and then tweaks it
enough isn't that new
art so let's say it looks at a movie
scene where it was blocked down a
certain way it's like oh there's a
tracking scene and it shows the star
walking through a crowd and then the
then the tracking shot goes from above
so you know you could
imagine that it would use the same let's
say schemes and techniques but change
the characters and change the movie and
change the lighting and everything it
would be it would be a new
scene so um but this is part of a larger
topic which I like to bring up which is
if anything can stop AI it'll be
lawyers because lawyers are just going
to be all over AI in fact the only way
that AI could survive in my opinion
is that it was created by a company that
became so big so quickly it would have
infinite assets to to fight the legal
battles if you were a startup in your
garage you let's say Brian relli comes
up with his own AI
model it wouldn't be hard to stop
Brian you just one person all you need
to do too is law fair am man of business
and you know he would give up but you
can't really law fair am a business a
mult multi-billion dollar company so if
AI had not become somewhat instantly a
multi-billion dollar asset it would been
killed in his crib by lawyers but at
this point it's bigger than
lawyers uh it's sort of the Uber method
the Uber um shouldn't have been able to
work because it couldn't really compete
with taxis because it was illegal it was
just against the law but they became so
big so fast that the lawyers didn't have
time to like catch what was going on and
then they had so much money that they
could fight lawyers and beat them
because they had more money and more
lawyers so look for that situation there
there's some businesses that you just
can't do if you start small you almost
have to start big that's what Uber and
and AI both did they started big all
right so keep an eye on that there more
science that says that hugging can ease
your pain anxiety and depression U let's
add to the science that you could have
skipped by asking
Scott Scott we were thinking of putting
a whole bunch of money into studying
hugging to see if it makes you feel
better well you don't have to do that
because I could tell you it definitely
does oh thank you you just saved us a
lot of money Scott so really if you were
to compare um the entire field of
science to just asking me for my opinion
it'd be about a wash
I don't get them all right but neither
does science science is about a 50%
proposition at best you know papers that
are peer reviewed and accepted are only
right about 50% of the time how often am
I right well on most of the lifestyle
stuff I'm right almost every time almost
every time for example will there be a
study coming up that shows our food
supply is not healthy for you yes there
will even today there was another study
showing that there's all too many things
in your food supply do you think I could
have told you that yes I could have 100%
right do you think they find out that
alcohol is bad for you in any amount yes
and I could have told you that because I
did 20 years ago so yeah hugs are good
for you
surprise all right again the funniest
story which I'm going to keep telling
you about even if you don't like it is
bri. and his new orifice AI device now
it's a
sextoy and the funny part is what the
the public is responding to so it's
becoming sort of a you know a public
least onx a uh public battle where
people are so mad about uh trying to you
know being living in a world where men
would be using these devices now here's
what's hilarious I forgot that the name
of the product is
orifice he actually named the product
orifice and it's
a and it's a partial replacement for
women like human women it's just called
orifice and here's the funny part it's
so
insulting it's so amazingly
insulting that he's building a company
to replace some portion of human women
with a
hole now I'm not saying that's a fair
characterization all right so I'm not
giving you my opinion on women here that
has nothing to do with this conversation
I'm just saying what could be funnier
than launching a product to replace much
of human women with a
hole and then you name it you name the
product after the
whole or a
this you at least at least when women
make a Sex to
toy yeah the most popular sex toy for
women is called the
womanizer the
womanizer sounds like it was created
possibly by woman or at least women were
involved in the marketing and naming of
it because there it's like woman yeah
womanizer yes go ladies you don't need
men
that when they're replacing men they're
like yeah go ladies go ladies you don't
need men you can do it yourself with a
womanizer yeah you're more woman than
you've ever been you're womanizing now
but but then when a man creates a sex
story it's a
[Laughter]
hole I'm could to be laughing all day
about this anyway so if you're if you're
wondering can somebody replace human
women at least in terms of men's sexual
appetites uh how many human women can be
replaced by a
hole and I'd say about 40% already and
and
raising and here's here's the funniest
one there some angry woman I saw this
the other day there was an angry woman
who was attacking bri. a uh for his
product the
orifice and uh just gave him a whole
bunch of trouble for it and and uh he
saying he was basically going to replace
women and bride. ai's response
was and I
quote you should have been nicer to me
in high
school so he invented a replacement for
women it's called the
hole or
orice all
right I'm
I I'm just saying the whole thing is so
funny because it's so offensive
intentionally that people aren't
catching on that it's intentionally
offensive so so they're reacting they're
reacting as though they don't know that
they're the
marketing anyway ESPN's uh uh stepen is
it Stefan I never know is it Stefan
asith is he a Stefan or a
Steven that name always confuses me it
can go either way right
Stefan I don't know so Stefan or Steven
A Smith um says that the the people
going after Trump with lawfare are a
bunch of cowards and that all you're
doing is showing that you're scared you
can't beat him on the
issues everything you do shows me you
can't beat
him he says it's giving fodder to the
argument that the election is
rigged Ste I'm being told it's Steven
so we'll say Stephen A
Smith so he's he's completely
right he's completely right I if your
argument is that that the elections were
not rigged then trying to rig it with
lawfare right in front of the entire
world while you're arguing that the
election wasn't rigged but you're
rigging it right now I mean Legally
Legally because the law fair stuff is
not itself illegal he should be because
it's being used illegally but probably
won't be you know actually prosecuted in
anyway but uh yes he's completely right
if you're going to rig the election
right in front of the entire
Republic everybody can see it we all
know that the law fair is about the
election it's not about anybody having
broken any laws that anybody cares about
nobody cares about stormmy nobody nobody
cares about his phone
call nobody cares about the loans he
made to banks that were very happy to do
business with him nobody cares about any
of it nobody cares about his documents
at Mar Lago not really I mean not real
people nobody really cares so it's
obvious that it's all political and uh
yeah he's right but here's what I I
would have to say about Stephen A Smith
and I apologize to him for getting his
name uh inaccurate at first um that's
what a leader looks like
I I always say that uh Black America
doesn't have a
leader now they do have you know people
who are prominent but they're really not
good at it you know they're not good at
it like Obama's good at it and Obama's
you know sort of in the sidelines lover
hate
Obama he was real good at the leadership
stuff right you don't have to like where
he led but leader definitely a leader
and I would say this Stephen A Smith has
that leadership thing I'm not and it
feels like he he is suffering from the
Spider-Man
curse you know the Spider-Man curse uh
with great power comes great
responsibility I can't read mins but
when I see somebody as capable as
Stephen A Smith and when I hear him
talking the way he's talking about the
big issues it feels like he just
realized that he's the one who knows how
to do it he actually knows how to show
leadership so he's modeling it
it's actually very impressive so if he
if he someday runs for
office um and don't fool yourself I
don't think he's a trump Republican is
he he's just showing you that he can see
the whole Court which is really rare and
then having seen the whole Court he
tells you what to do about it that makes
sense also very rare very rare so yeah
he's got the real deal if he ever ran
for office I would definitely like
chances I would like his chances if he
ran for office that doesn't mean I'm
going to agree with him on policy but
wow he's capable anyway I like to see
capable people do
well Tim Po tells us that his timcast
IRL show um three of his older shows
from three years ago just got uh strikes
against them there were shows with
Michael malis Joe Rogan and real Alex
Jones now do you think that that's about
something Tim kcast did or they're just
trying to suppress those three other
people now we know that they've you know
there's been some move to suppress you
know Pro Trump voices but I'm wondering
is this a move mostly against
timcast because I'm trying to think is
timcast the last um serious independent
voice that hasn't been taken down by the
bad
guys it it seems to me like the um it
would be obvious that Tim would get
targeted by the bad guys to be taken
down for some you know lawfare or social
media reason or some hoax or get
cancelled or something I would imagine
that there's like a whole team of people
working on just putting Tim pool on a
business do you think that's true do you
think there's an actual team like
professionals being paid by somebody to
look at ways to put them out of
business I think yes yeah I think yes
there are people who's who who are paid
from somebody could be the CIA could be
just Democrats um to put them out of
business that's what it looks
like so here's another story uh there's
I guess Dubai has been doing some cloud
seeding and maybe they went overboard
and caused a bunch of
flooding do you think they can actually
uh geoengineer the atmosphere and Make
It Rain where they wanted
to I don't know I have mixed feelings
about
it on one hand I think it's inevitable
we'll definitely be managing the
atmosphere eventually and the other hand
I think maybe we're not ready so we
might you know destroy the world trying
to make it
better so I think it's going to happen
it has to happen it's
inevitable um but it's dangerous
so we'll keep an eye on that zubie is
talking about the Obesity
rates uh on aent he gave that little
chart of what the Obesity was let me let
me show you the rate so this is from
1975 to uh current and then projected so
1975 there was a 12% us adult obesity
rate 12% you've seen all those old
pictures of people in New York City in
the 30s or whatever it is and it looks
like 100% of them are
thin
um but 12% by 1975 that sounds about
right you know I was there that feels
about right 12% 1985 it was 15 not much
difference so in 10 years a little bit
of creeped up crept up by 1998 it was up
to 25 2020 2014 it was up to 35 and by
this year it's up to
42% adult obesity
42% and it's projected by that by 2031
it will reach
50% now I'm here to tell you it's much
worse than
that because it's not evenly
distributed there are states and regions
where the obesity rate is really close
to
100% I remember visiting um the facility
where my ailing father was you know on
his uh on his last uh weeks of life and
it was a medical facility you know and
uh I remember sit in his room for hours
because I went to visit it wasn't much
to do because he was mostly just you
know sleeping at that time and I would
just watch the people walk by in the
hallway and I started to notice say wow
there's some you know big people that
work here and then I said to myself what
was the last time I saw somebody wasn't
gigantic and and I just sat there and
watched people walk by his room in the
hallway and I just said obese or not
obese they're all obese all of them
Upstate New York every one of them was
obese I think there were a few you know
maybe 18 year olds who weren't you know
some people had you know part-time jobs
and stuff but every adult over
30 was a big old Barrel siiz person so
if you go to La for example if you're in
the Hollywood area
you'll you won't see the
Obesity if you go to New York City and
walk down the street in Manhattan not a
not a ton of obesity if you fly in an
airplane you know you always hear the
complaints about the the big person in
the seat next to you but it's kind of
rare uh beyond beyond a certain size
people just don't fly I mean they do so
hear the story but it's rare uh so
airports are
more thin people than large there are
some cities that are more thin people
and if you take them out of the mix out
of the
average um yeah your your obesity is
probably 75% below a certain income
level now it's also related to income I
would bet that
below below $100,000 a year I'll bet
it's close to 75%
OBC that's my
guess um anyway
so did you know that one of the most
influential people in American politics
is an 88-year-old Swiss
guy that's something I learned today you
know we all hear about George Soros
putting so much money into things and
influence them well apparently there's
like a George Soros Jr whose name I
never heard uh hun joro whis 88 and he's
a this billionaire who's been putting in
hundreds of of millions of dollars into
American stuff similar to the Soros kind
of activities and to the point where
he's one of the most important people in
the country he's not even in the country
he's a Swiss guy so the GOP is trying to
crack down in this loophole that lets
foreign donors put all this what they
call the dark money into US
elections anybody who thought our
elections are determined by the will of
the people do you feel silly
that you ever believe that it's this is
the stuff there there are like 15 to 20
effects that determine completely who
gets to become president and what the
law is and none of them are the will of
the people it's all just different stuff
it's just money and lawfare and you know
how they rig the system rig meaning the
the laws about how to
vote yeah yeah we haven't lived in
anything like a republic in a maybe ever
I don't know
Delta Airlines is eliminating uh college
degree requirements for all positions
including
Pilots well you know there's nothing
that makes me want to fly an airplane
more than knowing that they've lowered
the standards for the
pilots now on one hand I do agree that
you should just pick good people whether
they have a college degree or not but I
do think it's a
rather useful to have that standard it
it does it does reduce the number of
people who are you know not qualified
from slipping
through so I would say that's not a good
sign for
America every time we lower a
standard uh it's always for some good
reason to increase diversity or
something but I don't think we get
enough benefit for what it costs
generally
speaking so you heard the story about
those 28 Google employees who who
occupied a SE uh one of the Executive
offices and they were mad because Israel
was still um the Google was still doing
business with the Israeli
government and what did Google do it
fired all of them so it fired all of
them now are you
surprised because you think oh Google is
so liberal and blah blah blah
well um I wouldn't be surprised no I
think Google just did what every would
do in that
situation so they violated their
internal standards and that was good
enough to fire them so good for Google I
don't think that it uh it fixed anything
because Google app apparently is
completely
rotted um their employees are rotted
from the inside they're all they're all
woke um mentally ill people for the most
part speaking of that the uh NPR
CEO uh Ms Mar marah
um we find out more about her apparently
she was a member of the Atlantic Council
and the
WF and she gave a speech at the Carnegie
endowment that's a group now if you've
been following Mike Ben you would know
that at least the Atlantic Council and
the carnegi analment are just straight
up CIA
entities basically they're just
intelligence entities so it would seem
that Miss Mah is very deeply embedded
with the intelligence part of the world
and she was in charge of uh Wikipedia so
she was the head of you know all
knowledge for
Wikipedia and then the head of
NPR and so the person who is in charge
of telling us what's
Real uh is a basically CIA
adjacent so just like you think but
she's getting some uh some push back
from well what what do these three
people have in common Gad sad Elon Musk
and V ramaswami so all three of them are
criticizing NPR CEO Mar uh what do those
three have in
common three of the smartest people in
the world at least in terms of politics
and philosophy and stuff right so if all
three of them are you know piling on you
know plus Chris rufo a lot of smart
people right so the smart people have
taken the following
stand because in a speech I guess it was
to the Carnegie endowment uh nprc CEO
said that she believes that truth is
subjective um or or a distraction from
the pursuit or from getting things
done that the truth is subjective and
and a
distraction and I'm paraphrasing a
little bit but this is pretty close uh
and the and it can get in the way of the
pursuit of truth I'm sorry The Pursuit
Of Truth can get in the way of getting
things done so Gad sad said uh quote
truth is
subjective uh unquote is precisely the
key tenant of
postmodernism this is why I refer to it
as the granddaddy of all parasitic idea
pathogens well that's a lot of smart
words in one sentence
theread I I will have to hire somebody
to explain to me in my sixth grade world
what that means I think I understand all
right Elon mus
said now imagine if this is programmed
explicitly or implicitly into super
powerful AI it could end
civilization and he says now no need to
imagine it is already programmed into
Google Gemini and open AI chat
GPT so that would be talking about the
idea that truth is subjective and it can
get in the way of getting things
done
V along the same
lines said that
uh um he qued to the CEO CEO of NPR
saying quote our reverence for the truth
might be a distraction getting in the
way of finding common ground and getting
things
done and says this gets to the heart of
the cultural divide in the modern West
whether you believe truth is a priority
or a
hindrance do you agree with all three of
these people Gad sad El mus
and that this this uh downgrading of
Truth in favor of getting stuff
done is the
problem and that it's a basically an
existential problem if you throw a AI in
the mix everybody agree with that all
right I just agree with all three of
them
vigorously as hard as I can she's
completely
right and you see it every
day yeah let me give you an
example
abortion abortion take the abortion
thing we have uh different opinions
which cannot be reconciled do you know
why they can't be
reconciled because we'll never agree on
what's true
is it true that it's murder or is that
not true or killing killing a human I
guess not
murder and so the argument is over
what's true is it true that you're
taking a human
life now that can't be
solved would you would you agree that
can't be solved in
realistically realistically one of those
is right you think and one of them is
wrong you think
and but it can't be
solved so what do you do when you have a
problem that can't be
solved you make do you do what you can
do so what do we do as a nation when we
can't decide what's
true we
compromise and we we just work it out we
just find some Middle Ground where where
the people who don't get what they want
are not willing to Stage a
revolution that's a perfect example what
she's saying we're not going to agree
what's true but if we stop there we'd
never get anything done because we do
have to kind of move past let's say
abortion and I would say that's just an
example I would say every one of our big
issues have the same same issue what's
true we don't agree on and never will so
if you allowed yourself to never try to
fix anything until you found out what's
true you would never fix anything she's
completely right it is 100% true that if
you think that you know the truth and
the other people don't you're probably
part of the problem you might be right
but you could also be part of the
problem if you insist that the other
people agree with you before you can
move
forward in the real world people don't
agree what true but often we can find a
way to work
together right so so um she's 100% right
um reality is completely subjective how
many of you believe that Free Will is
real and how many of you believe it's
not how are you ever going to solve that
one of the most basic questions of your
reality is Free Will real we're never
going to agree with that but can we find
a way to move on yes we can but uh I
don't believe in Free Will and some of
you do
so what would we do about the legal
system if you know if you if you took my
point of view there's no free will how
would you punish anybody how would you
have a how would you have a justice
system if nobody's really responsible
for anything well I'll tell you how um
since I believe there's no free will but
I also need to move forward somehow I
mean I need to live in the real world I
say all right I agree with you you can't
really build a system unless you punish
people
so I accept a system where people who
really couldn't help what they did are
punished right because I can't think of
a better way so there's a perfect
example where we'll never agree what's
true free will or no free will but we
can figure out a way to make the world
work and I think I could come up with a
hundred different examples where she's
completely right we'll never agree
what's true but we can figure out how to
take a step forward
so here's your real problem your real
problem is that you don't agree with her
about what's true that's the real
problem the real problem is not that she
understands the truth is what we imagin
it is she's 100% right about that the
the part that you don't like is that her
truth is different from
yours if she said everything you agreed
with and then said truth is subjective
we have to figure out a way forward you
wouldn't have a problem with it you
wouldn't suppos she said uh well you
know we we know the truth is that these
fetuses are real life humans and that
killing them is immoral that's our truth
but we have to move forward somehow so
we're going to compromise with the
people who disagree with what's
true that framing would make you okay
with it so what's really the problem is
you don't like her opinions
not that she thinks opinions are
subjective so do I think she's part of
the problem
yes yeah she's a big part of the problem
she she is not just specifically part of
the problem but she represents as a
number of people say were saying today
on X she represents a whole infection of
people who have a certain point of view
which I find
destructive right but the fact that I
find it destructive and I think that's
true does that matter nope what will
matter is who wins the election and you
know who has power that will matter so
I'm working on who wins the election and
who has power because I can't change
what's true to somebody
else all
right um this is why you watch my show
by the way I remind you that these
uncomfortable things where I'm
completely on the other side from you
that's why you watch because you're not
going to see it anywhere else I mean if
you get a steady stream of uh
Republicans are awesome you're not
getting smarter you need somebody to to
tell you when your side is getting off
the track a little bit right that's the
useful thing the useful thing is finding
out when your own team is wrong because
you always think the other team's
wrong all right um all let me here's the
story um I just read that Florida is
banned a bunch of
books it was in the news is it
true you tell me is it a true story that
Florida banned um I know a few thousand
books true no it's not true no that's
not
true NOP it's in the
news but what is true is that they um
they removed them from from where
children can see
them there's no there are no banned
books for adults in Florida that's not a
thing there are no ban books in
Florida but both of these are treated as
the
truth so NPR CEO is completely right you
can disagree whether there's a book ban
in Florida I say there's not other
people say there is but can we despite
having a different understanding of
what's real figure out how to go forward
yeah
yeah disantis just um you has laws
apparently can move those books to the
non-child library places and then
everybody's fine so yeah you don't need
to know what true you just need to know
how to handle it speaking of what's
true Joe Biden has a new story about his
uncle being eaten by
cannibals which apparently does not pass
the fact checking according to Jonathan
Turley but apparently he was in
Pittsburgh doing some campaign stuff he
told the story of how uh his uncle boie
in World War II uh was uh let's see he
was a hell of an athlete some for some
reason you need to know he was a hell of
an athlete um and then he he flew those
single engine planes it turns out he
didn't fly he he wasn't a flyer he
wasn't a pilot and the plane he was in
was not a single engine Jonathan trly uh
looked into that and he was over a war
zone and I guess it it actually went
down for mechanical problems it wasn't
shot down as Biden says and they never
found the body because there there used
to be there were a lot of cannibals for
real and that part of New
Guinea so he's saying that they never
found the body so that you know maybe
the cannibals got
him but there was a member of the crew
who did survive and the member of the
crew who did survive said watched the
other crew members not being able to get
out of the plane as it went into the
water so no the cannibals did not eat
his
uncle his uncle was a really good
athlete who couldn't get out of an
airplane that crashed in the
water
so so do we need to know the truth about
his uncle who was or was not eaten by
cannibals no we don't the truth is
completely irrelevant because you know
it's just campaign talk and it doesn't
matter anyway so no the truth doesn't
matter doesn't matter a bit on that
story well the K the Kennedy family
apparently many members will appear in a
big group uh with Biden to endorse him
and which basically is a slap in the
face to their family member RFK Jr who
is running against
Biden you know who wishes their
relatives had been eaten by
cannibals RFK Jr but not only that if
cannibals ate his
relatives uh they would be eating a
better diet than the American diet am I
right better diet than the American diet
at least it' be good protein no
additives so no I'm not recommending
that cannibals eat the Kennedy family
but if they did they'd be healthier than
the normal fast food
diet um I would like to uh give a shout
out to my family my remaining family
members uh I won't name them but I sure
appreciate my
family do you know what my family would
never do they would never do
this if I ran for president my my you
know I have a very small family group
left but my family members never would
have gathered together to endorse the
other guy you know they might might have
sat it out they might have said no
comment if they thought the other guy
was the the good one for to be president
but
no they would not have traveled to
Washington to to stand with the
competitor and endorse
him I hate to tell you R okay but your
family sucks your family
sucks like this is the minimum the
minimum requirement for your family not
to suck is to endorse the other guy in
an election it's not like RF junior is a
criminal it's not like he has bad
intentions for the country it's not like
his policies are some crazy
he's a genuine
legitimate serious person with a serious
resume running against a brain dead
piece of to try to save the country
and try to save you all you Kennedy
children from eating that's killing
you and putting stuff in your body that
you shouldn't be putting in your body
and that's why you want the other guy to
win he he's just trying to save
children I mean he could be wrong about
some stuff mean there would be no no
real shame in that because everybody's
wrong about stuff but really your
family is going to throw you under the
bus in
public in this
situation I'll just say it straight out
I I really like RFK Jr I think he's
great for the country you know win or
win or lose I think he's great for the
country but the these family members
suck I mean they just suck there's just
no way around it this is just terrible
family
Behavior speaking of RFK Jr you saying
again unambiguously on another podcast
uh that uh the CIA is guilty of
murdering his uncle JFK he says the
evidence is so abundant and so
definitive um that if he took the case
to a jury he would win in front of
almost any
jury and he says it's because JFK defied
the military industrial complex they
wanted to you know attack Cuba and JFK
didn't and they didn't like him ending
the war in Vietnam which he also tried
to
do so that all does make sense to
me you know the the Kennedy
assassination the official story was
always a little sketchy
right from the beginning you're like
really I don't know it seems a little
sketchy there was some mighty good
shooting from that guy from that
upstairs I don't know did he really care
that one guy he cared so much that he
did that I don't know never really
totally made sense but this does uh
every part of the the CIA killed him
makes sense to me now I don't know
what's true and what isn't but every
part of the story makes sense it all
fits together perfectly and it matches
everything we know about
everything all right
um so I don't see how those same people
can allow RFK Jr to become president so
he is in Mortal danger you know there is
a scenario in which RFK Jr becomes
president uh let me just say it out loud
if the CIA takes out
Trump and then Biden collapses just from
natural
causes RFK JR could be the next
president in fact I'd give him at least
a one-third chance I think the odds are
one3 13 13d at the moment it has nothing
to do with polling has everything to do
with the outside sources I think the
odds of uh Biden simply
surviving and the election is rigged and
he wins in a rigged election is about
one out of three I think the odds of uh
Trump surviving any assassination
attempts and also getting a big enough
victory that they can't cheat their way
to through it one and three no matter
what the polling says one and three are
best and the odds of RFK Jr making it
all the way to presidency is about one
in three also because I think the odds
of Biden collapsing are pretty good and
I think the odds of the CIA taking Trump
out if it with lawfare or something
worse is pretty good good as in bad
so I my my current estimate is they each
have a one and three chance of being
president and none of it has to do with
the will of the people let me say it
again they each have a one and three
chance and none of it has to do with
voters because we don't live in that
system anymore if we ever did it will be
entirely determined by the capability uh
of the people in the back rooms and the
health of the current president and
that's probably all that will matter
if the people in the back rooms do a
good job well they get everything they
want it's probably
Biden all
right um there are a whole bunch of new
sanctions being put on Iran because of
the attack on Israel um Let me let me
mention the sanctions because there a
whole bunch of them there's the uh the
the vague one there's the the one I
don't know about there's a well there's
a complicated one there's a well there's
one that
seems to not really affect anything but
maybe a couple of guys there's a one
that I don't know it looks like it could
make some difference but I don't really
understand it there's one that okay they
don't even tell you what they
are do you believe that we have an
infinite number of sanctions that we can
whip out anytime we
want is that the way it works it it's
not like there are three sanctions that
can make a difference and then there are
a million sanctions that you could do
but they're not really going to make a
difference I feel like it's more of that
don't you like there's a strong 8020
situation that might be like a
991 where there might be a few sanctions
that if you could get them to stick
would really move the needle and then
there's probably a whole bunch of other
ones where some rich guy goes wa you
mean I can't dock My Yacht at Washington
DC well I'll just dock is somewhere else
is that okay that's perfectly okay
okay okay I guess I got
sanctioned you know I I feel like the
sanctions are just because if
they weren't they would tell us what
they were and they would tell us whether
they could make any difference but no
the news just says oh lots of sanctions
more sanctions oh I'll put some more
sanctions on how about we put some
sanctions on I you should reelect me
because of all my sanctions I put on 50
53 sanctions if if 50 three sanctions is
not enough I could put on 50 more that
will be unspecified and vague and you
couldn't even tell if they make a
difference but if if a 100 sanctions
isn't enough I could put 200 sanctions
on I could put 300 sanctions on I'll put
more sanctions
on that's the state of your
news uh Biden tells Israel not to attack
Israel
sounds like I'm making that
up but uh he said quote I made it clear
to Israelis don't move on
hia H would be a a city in
Israel yeah
H what do you mean
Rafa actually um I don't think the the
misspeaking is as big a deal as others
do uh I don't think that's really the
the big sign he losing it because I
think maybe he always did that and Trump
misspeaks and I misspeak and you know I
I misspeak twice a day I don't I don't
think that's the biggest thing but
they're funny stories Babylon B reports
that Biden campaign has a new slogan you
know they tried a number of things build
back better no Malarkey none of those
really none of them really felt like
they captur the spirit of what's going
on but as the Babylon B reports the new
SL seems to really capture it perfectly
the new slogan is death to
America if you're not familiar The
Babylon B is a satirical news outfit and
what I mean by satirical and what I mean
by parody is it looks exactly like the
real news no real
difference all right um uh there's a
story that a prosecutor in California
the California da uh dropped this uh
so-called bombshell election data case
because it might help
Trump so there's some whistleblower so
apparently there was some case about
somebody involved with the electronic
part of the
elections had sent some data over to
China some American election data sent
it to servers in China now I don't know
all the details of that story but the
reporting is that the only reason they
didn't prosecute is because it would
have made a story for Trump to talk
about
politically
maybe uh I'm willing to believe that CBS
News is reporting that some members of
Congress who led the investigation the
the January 6 uh committee people that
uh they've already told their family
they've talked to their families about
their safety and the risk of their
arrest if Trump wins the second term do
you think the January 6 commit
is at risk of imprisonment if Trump wins
the second term do you think they risk
of imprisonment for investigating him
the way they
did yes every one of them belongs in
prison and it's really
obvious really obvious you want some
evidence
Well turns out came to the right place
here's some evidence that the January 6
people belong in jail
there is a National Guard Captain who's
testifying to Congress and he says quote
I can say unequivocably that the
inspector General's
review that's the review of January 6
and all that stuff is riddled with
inaccuracies misstatements and perhaps
false flags and narratives regarding how
critical Pentagon senior officials
responded when our Republic was under
great
stress so his claim is that the um
president of the United States had
pre-authorized the deployment of 10,000
National Guard troops just in case
things got in a hand now do you remember
any part of the January 6 um proceedings
in which the public was informed that
the person they said was trying to
conquer the country had been in
certainly
verifiably um documented no question
about it had tried to get 10,000
National Guard people there to prevent
any kind of
violence now that's true Beyond any
doubt I
think and that would make the entire
January 6 narrative that Trump was
trying to conquer the country look
ridiculous because he' authorized 10,000
people to
prevent something happening at the
capital do you know why those 10,000
were not sent
in the
end well according to the Whistleblower
is because the uh Pentagon uh delayed
dispatching them over the concerns for
the
Optics the Optics what do you think
would be the concern for the
Optics now it doesn't matter what they
were thinking does it it doesn't matter
if they were thinking something that was
good for the country or bad for the
country what matters is the military is
the one who left the government
unprotected let me say it
again the US military intentionally and
fully understanding the
danger decided at the management level
to leave the members of Congress
unprotected
now smart people say the only reason you
would do that is to make a case against
Trump
no I'm not sure that's the only reason
because you know regular incompetence
and miscommunication and stupidity and
you know it's a complicated
world but it certainly
tracks like it fits the facts I don't
know if it's true but it fits the
facts that the the military was part of
a larger operation to make sure that
Trump was uh squashed forever and
couldn't come
back but whether or not the the military
was thinking um of a way to protect the
republic or to just get Trump that is
irrelevant to the fact that we have
conclusive multiple Witnesses and
documentation that President Trump was
trying to protect the capital and he was
prevented from doing that by his own
military which is called
what an
Insurrection what what it called when
the military refuses an order from the
commander-in-chief because doing the
order would be good for the country and
the
commander-in-chief I don't know to me it
looks like a coup looks like treason so
to me it looks like the January 6
committee was covering up their own
coup and that they should that they're
guilty of
insurrection and that it would be easy
to prove because all you have to do is
prove that the people who knew they
could be protected chose the other path
and then they sold that other path as
Trump's fault when it was 100% their own
doing if if there's no crime in that
then you might as well just open the
jails it's the most criminal act that
I've seen since that video of the Dead
Guy at the bank have yall seen that I
think it was in Brazil or somewhere
somebody wheeled a dead guy into a bank
and pretended he was just sleepy to try
to get him to sign a loan
put the pen in his hand
and holding up the hat that that is the
guy's just dead he's literally just
dead and he's sitting in front of the
banker and it makes you wonder what the
banker is
thinking should I check if he's alive
because he looks
dead and he must have been fresh because
he didn't have rigor mortise like he
must have died within like an hour
before he got to the bank CU he was
still his head still was FL
around so that was pretty terrible
anyway not as terrible as the January
6th stuff so yes I believe that if Trump
gets an office there's probably a whole
bunch of people who need to go to jail
over
Ukraine and the
pandemic in January
6 not to mention whatever we might find
out about elections
themselves so and and I think it has to
happen you know uh you could imagine a
time when I would have said you know I
don't think that the President should
throw in jail the other team because
it's a bad
look not if they do
this if the reason you're throwing them
in jail is that they tried to throw you
in jail on madeup charges then yes if
you win you can put them all in jail I I
think that has to be the the rule in
fact we should we should encourage that
not discourage it if if the thing you're
putting your opponent in jail for is
that they tried to put you in jail for
nothing and got
caught
absolutely they all belong in jail every
one of
them so I'm I'm down for that and if
that uh if that destroys the country and
creates massive riots I'm down for that
I'm down for that yeah if if uh all of
like business shut down for months
because it was wild um uh let's say
protests in the street and violence and
and Le let's say even hundreds of people
got
killed I'm down for that yeah I don't
want anybody to K get killed and I'm
against violence of all kinds but if you
ask me would that be the right play to
put them all in jail even at the risk of
massive disruption to the economy
massive disruption to Life as we know it
yes that's totally worth it because the
alternative is much worse much
worse all
right uh Colonel accuses senior officers
blatantly lying to Congress about
yeah
um yep I think Mark
Millie I think Mark Millie is got a lot
of explaining to do all right ladies and
Gent gentlemen that's all I've got for
you today I'm going to say bye to the
other platforms and then I give some
extra time to the local subscribers so
goodbye to X for now see you tomorrow uh
YouTube and Rumble and hello
to locals
only
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e for