Episode 281 Scott Adams - Kanye, Jon Stewart, Trump’s Latest Ad and the Coming Insanity
Kanye pulling back from politics and Republicans CNN reports opinions as factual news Don Lemon came out as a racist who has a problem with white men Jon Stewart…oh oh…their only smart guy just came back Fun Prediction: If midterms go like everything else… It’ll be a photo finish with an ambiguous ending The President, is doing rally after rally with huge happy crowds High energy crowd Happy crowd Positive messages and having fun Confident Prediction: IF the Democrats take the house THEN President Trump will become even stronger President Trump gets the visuals right Has Q gone away? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I fund my Periscopes and podcasts via audience micro-donations on Patreon. I prefer this method over accepting advertisements or working for a "boss" somewhere because it keeps my voice independent. No one owns me, and that is rare. I'm trying in my own way to make the world a better place, and your contributions help me stay inspired to do that. See all of my Periscope videos here… https://www.pscp.tv/ScottAdamsSays/1nAKERDOwylGL Find my WhenHub Interface app here… https://interface.whenhub.com
Pom pom pom pom pom pom pom. Hey everybody, come on in here. You know what time it is. Yes, I was flying yesterday and I did not get to do my Periscope. I missed it. I hope you missed me a little bit. So is it time for the simultaneous sip? I believe it is. I believe it is.
View segment →Do you have your cup, your mug, your vessel, your glass, your stein, your container? Does it have the liquid of your choice? I like coffee. Join me for the simultaneous sip.
View segment →Yes, my voice is all better. Those of you who heard me losing my voice the other day, it's because I... I don't, you know, it's weird, but most of the talking I do in any 24-hour day is right here on Periscope. So you're used to seeing me talking, but 90 percent of my day is just sitting in front of…
View segment →I missed a day so I'm a little behind on the news, but most of you know that Kanye is pulling back from politics because he says he did not design the Blexit t-shirt and hat and logo. So he is, because there was a suggestion that he was the designer, he wanted to pull back because he felt used. Now…
View segment →All right, let's talk about the campaign ad that President Trump is running that CNN has labeled on their top left of their page. So as I've taught you, the top left of a news page is the news that the news organization has judged is the most important news. All right, so CNN's most important news…
View segment →All right. Now I'm gonna make a fun prediction for the midterms and it's primarily because I don't think anybody's made this prediction. So the people are saying the Senate is probably gonna go Republican. So I'll go with that. I'll just go with the experts on that. So if I'm right or wrong about th…
View segment →All right. Has anybody heard from Q lately? Did Q just go away after Jack Posobiec essentially laid bare their entire history? Has Q gone away? I haven't heard about them lately. It feels to me it's W now. And did I have anything to do with that? I mean Jack had the most to do with it but Scott, you…
View segment →All right, I've said enough. I've got nothing left. I'm gonna go look at that video and I'll talk to you all later.
View segment →Pom pom pom pom pom pom pom. Hey everybody, come on in here. You know what time it is. Yes, I was flying yesterday and I did not get to do my Periscope. I missed it. I hope you missed me a little bit. So is it time for the simultaneous sip? I believe it is. I believe it is. Do you have your cup, your mug, your vessel, your glass, your stein, your container? Does it have the liquid of your choice? I like coffee. Join me for the simultaneous sip.
Yes, my voice is all better. Those of you who heard me losing my voice the other day, it's because I... I don't, you know, it's weird, but most of the talking I do in any 24-hour day is right here on Periscope. So you're used to seeing me talking, but 90 percent of my day is just sitting in front of my computer thinking, hanging out with Christina. We don't do a lot of talking.
All right. As you know I've been on my book tour for my book *Win Bigly*, which is now out in paperback. If you don't like to read it in English you could read it in whatever this is, or Korean, or German, or whatever this is. Yes, you have many choices. I think that was either Chinese or Japanese, I'm not sure. But *Win Bigly* is doing great with the paperback now. So those of you who have been waiting for the lower price, it's here.
And you know what time of year it is. It's time for your 2019 calendar. All right, if you don't have your Dilbert calendar it's time to get it. Enough about that. Let's talk about the important news of the day. You know, the really big stuff, such as Kanye West.
I missed a day so I'm a little behind on the news, but most of you know that Kanye is pulling back from politics because he says he did not design the Blexit t-shirt and hat and logo. So he is, because there was a suggestion that he was the designer, he wanted to pull back because he felt used.
Now my take on this is that it would be very unlikely if Candace or anybody else intentionally said, "Hey, let's just claim that Kanye designed this and it's his." So I don't think anybody did that. It just sounds like a miscommunication. So the actual event is less important than the bigger picture.
Were any of you surprised that Kanye pivoted away from Republicans? Think about what he said he wants to do. He wants to run for president in 2024. If Kanye really wanted to run for president in 2024, how long should he keep being more friendly with Republicans than Democrats? Well, not too long. He'd be better to sort of pivot over to the Democrats because that's the only party he could get elected in.
So as popular as Kanye is with Republicans, he's popular because of really his style, the fact that he's willing to embrace President Trump. So he's popular for reasons that don't have anything to do with policy. On a policy level it feels to me he's going to be more likely leaning Democrat. So there's no way he would run as a Republican.
But what is the very strongest package you could create going into a presidential election? Well, you saw President Trump do it. He used to be a Democrat, used to be a Democrat, now he's a Republican. You saw Mike Bloomberg do it. Used to be a Republican and then he became a Democrat.
To my mind the strongest positioning, the strongest setting the table for becoming president, is that you used to be on the other side, or at the very least you used to be really friendly with the other side. Because what do people care about most when they're voting for president? Are you on my side? Can you understand my side? Have you ever had an appreciation for my side?
It's one thing that you don't agree with me. You know, it's routine that somebody doesn't agree with you. Somebody says, Reagan did. Reagan also switched. Was Reagan a Democrat? He was, right? He also switched. Because what that does is that allows the other team to say, "Well I don't love everything about your policies but I still like you. And if I still like you, maybe more than I like the one running from my own party, this time I'm gonna go over and vote the other side."
So somebody says, so he was pacing us in a sense. Yes, in a sense he was pacing the Republicans because he was agreeing with them in their support for President Trump as a person and not damning him as a crazy racist and stuff like that.
And he was also... so just to be clear I don't want to make sure that I'm not putting any opinions into Kanye's. His opinions are just for him to express. So if I've said that accidentally, I think I got close to saying that. You know, we'll pull that back a little bit. We don't know what he's thinking. We can only observe what's happening.
Okay, so what's happening is he's doing exactly what you would do if you were really smart and planning to run for president in 2024. So what you've seen this week was consistent with being brilliant if you plan to run for president in 2024.
Now here's the other element. It would also be consistent with not wanting to run for president in 2024, because in either case he wants to demonstrate his independence of thought. So he can be pro-President Trump as a person and wanting him to look good as a leader because he represents the country. So that's essentially what Kanye said. But he can also, you know, he's a free thinker and he doesn't have to stay in any camp longer than he wants to.
So I like that about him. I would say that my opinion of Kanye went up a little bit because it is the time to pivot. He needs to live in the community that is primarily anti-Trump. So for practical reasons, for professional reasons, for personal reasons, and even if someday he runs for president, political reasons, it was important for him to show some independence, which he just demonstrated in a graphic way.
Now the actual source of the dispute, if you could call it that, I'm not sure dispute is really the right word, but that I think there was a miscommunication about the logo, probably is not the important part of the story. Probably not.
All right, let's talk about the campaign ad that President Trump is running that CNN has labeled on their top left of their page. So as I've taught you, the top left of a news page is the news that the news organization has judged is the most important news.
All right, so CNN's most important news just a few days before the midterm is "Trump campaign releases racist ad." Now here's the thing. That's an opinion. It's purely an opinion that it's a racist ad, and they're actually reporting it like it's news. And then they don't show the ad.
So it's the most important news that the ad is racist and they don't show it. At least I didn't see it. Right below that, what is the second most important thing on the CNN news? You're gonna love this. The second most important thing, so it's the top left of the page, the second one down, it's "Don Lemon says this is Trump's ad and here are the facts."
So in other words Don Lemon, who just came out as a racist, he literally just came out on TV publicly as a racist who's got a problem with white men. That really happened. It sounds like I'm exaggerating but please, if you think that sounded like even a little bit of an exaggeration, just Google "Don Lemon white man." You'll see the video in which he says that the real problem in this country... yeah, you should really hear it in his own words because I don't want to accidentally mischaracterize it.
But his essence is he has a problem with white men as the problem in this country. Now I'm not gonna fact-check that. I'm just saying that he said that. And by the standards of this country that would be racist as I understand what the word means. You know, with someone who's biased against a particular race or gender. In this case too, because he made it male.
So he's talking against Trump's ad. The CNN has labeled as racist. The ad itself, if you haven't seen it I'm not going to play it, but the ad itself shows a cop killer who I guess must have come from south of the border. And he's the cop killer in court being, I guess he just got convicted for killing two cops, and he's laughing and saying that he wished he'd killed more. And it's translated from Spanish so you can tell that he wasn't born in this country.
Now it's just one guy. And then it shows other criminal types in the caravan, etc. Now is it racist to show one guy who accurately did come across the border and then killed two cops? Is it racist? Can facts ever be racist? I guess that's the question I would ask you. Can facts ever be racist?
I guess they could, depending on how you organize them, right? If you organize them so you left out other facts and it created a misleading narrative. Well I didn't see anywhere in the ad this suggested that everyone in the caravan was a cop-killer. That wasn't there. In fact I would think any reasonable adult looking at that ad would say, "Oh there are some bad people in this group and we don't know how many."
I don't know how you could come to any other conclusion except that some of them coming across the border, whether it's in the caravan or just the general immigration, that some number of them are committing bad crimes. Is that racist? I get how they take it.
Now they're comparing it of course to the Willie Horton ad back in the George Bush era. And I don't remember exactly the Willie Horton ad itself but the sense of it was that Willie Horton was an African-American man who had committed some kind of crime. He got out I think on some kind of early release and then he killed somebody. I think that's the basic idea there.
And I don't remember the ad itself but I guess it had more racial, you know, it was trying a little bit harder to make a racial case. But I'm not sure that that applies so much when you're not talking about domestic actors and you're not talking about necessarily one country. You're talking about a whole region. You're talking about crime that's coming in. Nobody doubts crime is coming in. They just disagree about how much of it or how much it matters.
But it's interesting that CNN reports as news their opinion. Have you seen anything like that before? Who reports as news something that's clearly an opinion even if the opinion is right? It doesn't even matter whether the opinion is true or false. I'm saying that how do you report that as news? It's very much an opinion.
All right. The other amazing and funny thing is, did you all see the Jon Stewart interview? So Jon Stewart was from *The Daily Show*, as you all know. He sort of disappeared from the news and he came back and he essentially was saying that Trump is triggering the media and that the members of the media are taking it personally. And because they're taking it personally they're falling into his trap and overreacting and putting all the attention on what he wants.
And I read this article. I just saw for the first time an article. See if you had the same reaction I did. My reaction was this... sorry, I know you loved it when I cleared my throat on Periscope. I had the same reaction to Jon Stewart's comment, which is, uh-oh, their only smart guy came back. Did you have that impression?
It feels like he's the only person who understands what's going on who's also a Democrat. I guess I think he would classify himself as a Democrat. Have you heard anyone on the entire anti-Trump, the Democrat side, have you heard anyone say what Jon Stewart just said, which is so obviously true and matters and frames it correctly and could possibly help them recover from their Trump derangement syndrome?
And here's the best part. Jon Stewart is not suffering from Trump derangement syndrome. He's actually looking at it from the outside. He's on the inside of the political bubble and yet he gave you a view of what it looks like from the outside. How many people on the left have the intellectual capability to do what Jon Stewart, who is a political comedian I guess for a living or was, that's pretty unusual.
All right, so credit where credit is due. Jon Stewart just completely accurately framed the problem on the left. And I don't know if they can hear it. That's the other interesting thing. So it became viral, which means that got a lot of attention because it was unique. It's because it was from him. Things he does is more interesting. He gave us a new look at something that we were used to seeing the old looks. But his take on it was that the media is taking it personally and that that's causing a lot of their problems. Is that they're falling into Trump's trap because they take it personally.
And I think it was brilliant and you got to give him credit. Oh, you know, somebody, Michael Moore. Okay, I will give you Michael Moore as another person who does seem to understand what's going on from both the inside and the outside. I'll give you Michael Moore as well. But I think Jon Stewart is at a higher level of credibility because Michael Moore understands things. He understands Trump better than I think almost anybody on the left. That would be true, which I think too is credit because Michael Moore understands a certain segment of the population that Trump also understands.
So I think whatever you want to say in Michael Moore's politics, etc., he certainly understands this topic. Bill Maher. Somebody saying Bill Maher. Now I think Bill Maher is in the Trump derangement syndrome category on this topic. He seems to be taking it personally. I believe there's actually some bad blood between Bill Maher and Trump in the past. There was some kind of interaction they had that wasn't good.
So those are your big stories. Let's see what else is happening on CNN that a week before the event they think. Bob Woodward on Trump: "We are being had. He's doing things to distract us from policies." So Bob Woodward is sort of agreeing with Jon Stewart that Trump is having his way.
By the way, did you see the clip? Oh I hope you saw the clip of when Trump announced he wanted to end birthright citizenship with an executive order. And of course the experts, I think 90 percent or 95 percent or 99 percent of the experts are saying you can't do that. But see, you then realized that it was a distraction from other issues and that it was a positive distraction.
In other words, if Trump was successful distracting people and making them think about birthright citizenship, it was a real good last thought going into the midterm election. And they knew they were being had and they couldn't stop talking about it.
If you haven't seen that clip of the CNN hosts saying he's just tricking us to make us talk about this, and then the host would say, "But we're talking about it. It's working. We can't not talk about it. But he's tricking us. We know he's tricking us and it's working and we're still doing it. But it's the news. What are we gonna do?" It was freaking hilarious because they were so unhappy. They were so unhappy talking about the news because the news is what the president says. It's just always what the president says because he's the president. After they had to report it. Well boy did they not want to report that.
It was one of the funniest things you will ever see to watch them essentially sabotaging themselves on live TV because it's not the message they want out there.
All right. Now I'm gonna make a fun prediction for the midterms and it's primarily because I don't think anybody's made this prediction. So the people are saying the Senate is probably gonna go Republican. So I'll go with that. I'll just go with the experts on that. So if I'm right or wrong about the Senate, don't put that on my permanent record because I'm just gonna agree with the experts on this. I don't have any special kind of insight on it.
But in the House, the House we imagine is supposed to go to the Democrats. That's what the experts have been saying. Some people are saying, well you know maybe there's some hidden Trump supporters, etc.
I was on Maria Bartiromo's show yesterday morning and I made this prediction for the midterms, and they'll talk about the House race in particular. If the midterms and the House race goes the way everything else has gone in the Trump era, what will be the outcome? Let's see if you can guess it. What will be the outcome of the House race if it goes like everything else? Let's see if anybody else comes to the same answer.
It's gonna take me a while for you to... somebody sent a surprise. I'd say no, not quite. So it might be a surprise but you're almost there. Here's the answer. It's going to be a photo finish with an ambiguous ending.
So if it's like everything else we won't know who won on Election Day. Here's what I mean by that. Listen, let's say it comes down to a majority of one, one, two, three. So one of the sides wins by a majority of just one or two or three representatives. If it's just that close, what do you think people are going to say? They're gonna say recount. They're gonna say there's something that happened in that district that's fishy. "Wait a minute, how come there were more votes in that area than there are people? Wait a minute, why was one of those polling places closed early? Wait a minute, why are some of the votes missing? Wait a minute, did Russia have anything to do with the election in this area?"
So this is, I'm gonna categorize this as a fun prediction. All right, meaning that I don't have a ton of confidence in it. So when I get this one wrong and you put it on my permanent record, just know that I didn't have a lot of confidence in it. But for fun, if it's like everything else it's going to be something like a tie in the sense that it will go one way or the other but there will be something ambiguous, some gray area, some dispute. So it won't feel like it's done. That's my prediction.
So my prediction is an ambiguous photo finish with different photos for different finishes, just like everything else. Can there be a tie? Well there, I don't mean a tie literally but I mean the result was so close that the ambiguity would make the difference between which way it went. So that's essentially a tie.
Because if you think about it, the primary. So Trump wins the primary but he has to go to the convention and there's still talk that they're going to try to take it away from him, right? So you think Trump wins the nomination but you're not really quite sure because they might take it away from him. Then he wins the presidency but now there's all this question about Russia stuff and you know it's like, well we're not gonna let you stay president. So it's sort of ambiguous.
Then he goes for the Supreme Court nomination for Kavanaugh and it's like, well he's easily gonna get in. Well maybe not. Well he's in but maybe we'll claw him back somehow. So it's just one thing after another that you think is done that isn't done.
Now I've also made the following prediction. In the year 2018 does any adult have an expectation of privacy in the digital domain? In other words, does any adult believe that they have actual privacy, meaning that no one can ever find out what they're doing on email or text or answering a poll? Do people think that they have privacy when they answer a poll? Most probably think they have enough, right?
Most people think, well I don't care if I have privacy or not. I'm voting this way or voting that way. I'm just telling you my reasons. I don't care if anybody knows that. But some people, maybe 5 percent, maybe 5 percent will say to themselves there's no such thing as privacy and there's no way my life is better if people find out. And I'm a Trump supporter.
So there's a very high likelihood that something like 5 percent of the people answering polls are just flat-out lying. They're lying just in case, just in case they really don't have any privacy and just in case they got on a list somewhere where somebody would hunt them down and kill them for being a Trump supporter.
Now I'm not saying that any of those risks are real. I'm saying that if you have a hundred people and all hundred people believe that this is no longer really a thing, I mean not if the government really wants to find out who you are, some of them I think might lie. And the other factor is turnout.
I've predicted what I call a jaw-dropping Republican turnout. Now it might also be that the Democrats will have incredible turnout so I don't have any kind of a prediction on the Democrat side. I suspect it'll be high. But on the Republican side it's really gonna be high. It could be a record-setting.
So that's my prediction, is jaw-dropping, surprisingly big. And here are a few of the reasons. Unlike some midterms, I'm no historian so I don't know if it's all, but most midterms are usually not just about the president. But this president is special in which everything is about Trump. So even if it shouldn't be about him, if it's not about him it's still about him.
I think two-thirds of the people voting have said it's sort of a vote that's about the president in their minds. So with that many people who think it's about the president and you've got a president with 90 percent support on his own side, and what matters most is how many of his own side goes to vote, how many of them are actually activated to stand up.
Have we ever seen a situation in which a president with this much persuasion power, at the height of his popularity within his own poll, has gone out and showed you a tremendous amount of energy of his own? This is very important. Make sure that you take away this point more than anything else I said today.
The president, by going to rally, rally, rally, rally, is demonstrating his own level of energy. What does he need voters to do? He needs them to model him. He needs them to pace him. He needs the voter to ramp up to his level of energy because that's what gets you off the couch.
He's bringing these record-breaking political crowds into an arena and he's showing you how much fun they're having together. Do you remember all of the video of all the Democrats who are in big crowds having fun together? I don't. I've seen pictures of Biden talking and you know that there's a crowd there. I've seen pictures of Kamala Harris and there aren't many people in the audience.
So the Democrats are either small groups or unhappy groups or angry groups. In my view, if you were to characterize all of the Democratic get-togethers, whether it's the street protests or going to talk to one of their political leaders, they're either angry or there are not many of them. Right? That's sort of the vibe.
Trump is showing us one image after another of enormous Republican crowds. And what's the one characteristic that all of the Trump crowds have in common? Happy. Happy, high-energy, happy. And they like to win. Take those three things: high energy, happy, they love the collective feel of it, they love being part of something. This is very important.
The Trump people really feel part of something that's positive. They can feel the love with each other, etc. So there's this enormous high-energy positive thing which is being modeled directly on the leader that they have a 90 percent approval of, President Trump.
His ability, and here's the bigger point I'm getting to: President Trump, the most influential person in a hundred years, just has directly asked the people who like him best to actually go vote. Now all politicians ask you to go vote but you've never seen it done like this before. You've never seen him model it, move your energy up, make you part of a group, make it the most fun thing you did this year. You went to that event.
But other people are watching and saying I wish I was in that crowd. That looks like it would be fun to be there live, etc. He's created this whole feeling of what it's like to vote for him and it's all positive. It's high-energy and it's great. And it's especially would be entertaining if the Republicans came from behind again because it would be another surprise win. It would be like the best day they've ever had.
I mean you can put yourself into that future, can't you? Imagine that you voted. Let's say you're a Trump supporter, you voted Republican. Can't you imagine what it feels like watching the results come in and then feeling of victory? It would feel amazing.
So I think Trump's persuasion on turnout will be the best you've ever seen. The Democrats of course are highly incentivized but their incentive is by anger. They've got some fear, they've got some anger. It's a whole bunch of negativity. Does negativity get you to go somewhere?
And by the way, who is asking the Democrats to vote? Think about it. You know who is asking Republicans to vote? President Trump, 90 percent support, most influential person of all time. Who on the Democrat side is asking them to vote? Because the ask matters. It's not enough to just get people in the mood to vote. You have to directly close the sale. You have to say here's what I need, do this now.
All the Republicans are doing that. They're of course saying get out and vote. They're making a big deal about it. But it's all distributed across people who have various levels of approval within the Democrats. Like no matter who it is on the Democrat side it's gonna be somebody who only has 40 percent and a high-level approval within the group, etc. So they don't really have a spokesperson who has any kind of persuasive quality whatsoever to get them out there.
But still they're very motivated. I think they'll do fine in terms of turnout. All right, so there you have my predictions. It's gonna be a fun election night.
I'm also going to go on record as saying that if the Democrats do take the House that President Trump will get stronger not weaker. So remember that. So there's a prediction that I'm confident of. It's sort of an if-then prediction. So if the Democrats take the House the President Trump will get stronger not weaker.
And the reason is that he's uniquely qualified and capable of working with both sides. If he doesn't need to work with both sides because he has a narrow majority of Republicans he's maybe not going to try so hard. And the Democrats will try harder to resist.
But if the Democrats had some power, meaning they had the House, they would have to play a little bit productively. If you have no power you don't have to be productive. If you do have power you kind of have to be productive. And that means working with the president who's not on your side.
So it seems to me that both immigration reform and health care are two areas in which the only way something is going to get done is if both sides agree with it a little bit and both sides are unhappy. The only way you get health care and the only way you get immigration is if both sides are unhappy. And the only way you get both sides unhappy is with a deal that both sides have some responsibility, both sides have some power.
So Trump has two ways to win in this election. One way to win is if he gets full stronger Republican control. The other way to win is if he doesn't. Yeah, I'm sure he has a very strong preference to do it the straight way and just get more Republicans in. That would be a first choice. But he does have two ways to win.
That has a lot to do with what's left, right? He's sort of done good things for the economy. He's done good things for North Korea, etc. You know the list.
But now let me make another point. I've said that one of the things that Trump does right all the time and his opponents do wrong all the time is Trump gets the visuals right. So he's talking about immigration at the same time that there's this great visual thing, the caravan itself. And then the wall itself is visual. And then he shows a picture of a cop-killer on his commercial and that's visual.
So Trump is visual, visual, visual, visual. And he picks also a topic that can be visual. What do the Democrats have? Health care. Now imagine your picture of health care. You can't do it, right? Imagine health care. What am I seeing? A doctor? You don't. There's nothing. You can't imagine health care. It's a concept. People just don't get activated by concepts. You can imagine maybe you're writing the check or something but that's as close as you can get.
Imagine, let's say, what else? Let's say climate change. Climate change, you can show weather but I'm not sure people are quite connecting all the dots. Climate change doesn't have a good visual either. Or at least they're not taking advantage of it. And partly is because they're scientifically trapped in their own scientific bias.
The Democrats would say that climate change is settled science from their point of view. That the scientists, the consensus is on their side. And so they would not want to be anti-science to sell the fact that they're pro-science. So it wouldn't make sense. And one of the things that they really can't really do is show anecdotes. You don't prove science by showing that there was a hurricane that time because there were hurricanes in all times.
So they do have a visual they could use but they can't really use it because their brand is we're trying to stick to the facts. They don't want to depart from the facts on climate science. That would be problematic.
All right. Has anybody heard from Q lately? Did Q just go away after Jack Posobiec essentially laid bare their entire history? Has Q gone away? I haven't heard about them lately. It feels to me it's W now. And did I have anything to do with that? I mean Jack had the most to do with it but Scott, you have all that, yeah it seems to me that Q went away.
All right, so I'm going to claim victory on correctly identifying Q as not a deep state actor. I haven't seen a Trump hospital video now. That did, so people are saying that Jack killed it. Yeah, I mean Jack had the goods on him so whatever people think about him that changed would have come through Jack's work. But it helps always to have other voices that are on the same side so that you could say, "Oh other people think that too."
Is *Win Bigly* going paperback? Yes, thanks for asking. *Win Bigly* came out in paperback yesterday or day before. So you can get your *Win Bigly* paperback.
So I don't know what happened to Q but we don't hear from that much anymore. Trump hospital video is epic. Let's see if I can find that right now. Well I won't do that while you're waiting. Oh, Q disappeared 30 days before the election somebody said. So it might be that Q needs to stay quiet to keep off the radar for a little while. That would not be the wrong thing to do.
You were wrong about Jack Posobiec. All right. Q was compromised back in April. Did I arrest anybody last night? Oh, so we had a good time last night. Christina came over. We had lots of trick-or-treaters. It was very fun. Yeah, there's a new chapter. Somebody says is there a new chapter in the Kindle? I don't think the Kindle version has a new chapter. I believe we just put that in the soft cover. But the new chapter is an update on my predictions so you can see what I got right.
*Win Bigly* has always been on Kindle, yes. If you're talking about the video where he's visiting after the synagogue attack, I haven't seen that yet.
All right, I've said enough. I've got nothing left. I'm gonna go look at that video and I'll talk to you all later.
but the pom pom pom pom pom pom pom hey everybody come on in here you know what time it is yes I was flying yesterday and I did not get to do my periscope I missed it I hope you missed me a little bit so is it time for the simultaneous imp I believe it is I believe it is do you have your cup your mug your vessel your glass your Stein your container does it have the liquid of your choice I like coffee join me for the simultaneous end yes my voice is all better those of you who heard me losing my voice the other day it's because I I don't you know it's weird but most of the talking I do in any 24-hour day is right here on periscope so you're used to seeing me talking but 90% of my day is just sitting in front of my computer thinking hanging out with Christina we don't do a lot of talking all right as you know I've been on my book tour for my book when basically now out in paperback if you don't like to read it in English you could read it in whatever this is or Korean or German or whatever this is yes you have many choices I think that was either Chinese or Japanese I'm not sure but when Bigley is doing great with some paperback now so those of you have been waiting for the lower price it's here and you know what time of year it is it's time for your 2019 calendar all right if you don't have your Dilbert calendar it's time to get it enough about that let's talk about the important news of the day you know the really big stuff such as Kanye West I missed a day so a little behind on the news but most of you know that Kanye is pulling back from politics because he says he did not he did not I hope to design the blex it t-shirt and hat and logo so he is because there was a I guess a suggestion that he was the designer he wanted to pull back because he felt used now my take on this is that it's very it would be very unlikely if Candace or anybody else intentionally said hey let's just claim that Kanye designed this and it's his so I don't think anybody did that it just sounds like a miscommunication so the the actual event is less important than the bigger picture were any of you surprised that Kanye pivoted away from Republicans to think about what he said he wants to do he wants to run for president 2024 if Kanye really wanted to run for president in 2020 for how long should he keep being more friendly with Republicans than Democrats well not too long he'd be better sort of pivot over to the the Democrats because that's the only party he could get elected in so as popular as Kanye is with Republicans he's popular because of really his style his you know the fact that he's willing to embrace you know president Trump so he's popular for reasons that don't have anything to do with policy on a policy level it feels to me he's going to be more likely leaning Democrat so there's no way he would run as a Republican but what is the very strongest package you could create going into a presidential election well you saw President Trump do it he used to be a Democrat used to be a Democrat now he's a Republican you saw Mike Bloomberg do a'right used to be a Republican and then he became a Democrat to my mind the strongest the strongest positioning the strongest setting the table for becoming president is that you used to be on the other side or at the very least you used to be really friendly with the other side because what do people what is the thing that people care about most of them they're voting for president are you on my side can you understand my side have you ever had an appreciation from my side it's one thing that you don't agree with me you know it's it's routine that somebody doesn't agree with you somebody says Reagan did Reagan also switch was Reagan a Democrat he was right he also switched because what that does is that allows the other team to say well I don't love everything about your policies but I still like you and if I still like you maybe more than I like the one running from my own party yeah this time I'm gonna go over and vote the other side so somebody says so he was pacing us in a sense yes in a sense he was pacing the Republicans because he was agreeing with them in their support of for president Trump as a person and you know and not damning him as a crazy racist and stuff like that and he was also so just to be clear I don't I don't want to I want to make sure that I'm not putting any opinions into Kanye his opinions are just for him to express so if I've said that accidentally I think I got close to saying that you know we'll pull that back a little bit we don't know what he's thinking we can only observe what's happening okay so what's happening is he's doing exactly what you would do if you were really smart and planning to run for president in 2024 so what you've seen this week was consistent with being brilliant if you plan to run for president in 2024 now here's the here's the other element it would also be consistent with not wanting to run for president in 2024 because in either case he wants to demonstrate his independence of thought so he can be Pro President Trump as a person and as a you know wanting to him to look good as a leader because he represents the country so that's essentially what Kanye said but he can also you know he's a free thinker and he doesn't have to stay in any camp longer than he wants to so I like that about I would say that my my opinion of Kanye went up a little bit because it is the time to pivot he needs to live in the community that is primarily you know anti-trump so for practical reasons for professional reasons for personal reasons and even if someday he runs for president political reasons it was important for him to show some independence which he just demonstrated in a graphic way now the actual source of the dispute if you could call it that I'm not sure dispute is really the right word but that I think there was a miscommunication about the logo probably is not the important part of the story probably not all right let's talk about the campaign ad the president Trump is running that CNN is labeled on their top left of their page so as I've taught you the top left of a news page is the news that the news organization has judged is the most important news all right so CNN's most important news just a few days before the midterm is Trump campaign releases racist ad now here's the thing that's of opinion the it's purely an opinion that it's a racist ad and they're actually reporting it like it's news and then they don't show the ad so it's the most important but the most important news is that the ad is racist and they don't show it at least yeah I didn't see it right below that what is the second most important thing on the CNN news you're gonna love this the second most important thing so it's the top left of the page the second one down it's a Don Lemon says this is Trump's ad and here are the facts so in other words Don Lemon who just came out as a racist he literally just came out on TV publicly as a racist who's got a problem with white men that really happened I'm it sounds like I'm exaggerating but please you know if he if you think that sounded like even a little bit of an exaggeration just Google Don Lemon white man you know you'll see the video in which he says that the real problem in this country yeah you should really hear it in his own words because I don't want to accidentally mischaracterize it but his essence is he has a problem with white men as the problem in this country now I'm not gonna fact-check that I'm just saying that he said that and by the standards of this country that would be racist as I understand what the word means you know with someone who's biased against a particular race or gender in this case - because he made made it male so he's talking against Trump's ad the CNN has labeled as racist the ad itself if you haven't seen it I'm not going to play it but the ad itself is shows a cop killer who I guess is a must have come from south of the border and he's the cop killers in court being I guess he just got convicted for killing two cops and he's laughing and saying that he wished he'd killed more and it's translated from Spanish so you can tell that he's you know wasn't born in this country now it's just one guy and then it shows yeah other criminal types in the the caravan etc now is it racist to show one guy who accurately did come across the border and then killed two cops is it racist can facts ever be racist I guess that's the question I would ask you can facts ever be racist nice I could I guess they couldn't be depending on how you organize them right if you organize them so you left out on other facts and it created a misleading narrative well I didn't see anywhere in the ad this suggested that everyone in the caravan was a cop-killer that wasn't there in fact I would think any reasonable adult looking at that ad would say oh there are some bad people in this group and we don't know how many I don't know how you could come to any other conclusion except that some of them coming across the border whether it's in the caravan or just the general immigration that some number of them are committing bad crimes is that racist i I I get I get how they take it now they're comparing it of course to the Willie Horton ad back in the George Bush era and I don't remember exactly the Willie Horton had itself but the the the sense of it was that Willie Horton was an african-american man who had committed some kind of crime he got out I think I'm some kind of early release and then he killed somebody I think that's the basic idea there and I don't remember the ad itself but I guess I had more racial you know it was trying a little bit harder to make a racial case but I'm not sure that that applies so much when you're not talking about you're not talking about domestic actors and you're not talking about necessarily one country you know you're talking about a whole region you're talking about crime that's coming in nobody doubts crime is coming in they just you know they disagree about how much of it or how much it matters but it's it's interesting that CNN reports as News their opinion have you have you seen anything like that before who who reports who reports as news something that's clearly of opinion even if the opinion is right I it doesn't even matter whether the pendant is true or false I'm saying that how do you report that as news it's very much an opinion all right the other amazing and funny thing is did you all see the Jon Stewart interview so Jon Stewart was from The Daily Show as you all know he sort of disappeared from the news and he came back and he essentially was saying that Trump is triggering the media and that the members of the media are taking it personally and because they're taking it personally they're falling into his trap and overreacting and putting all the attention on what he wants and I read this article I just saw for the first time and my article see if you had see if you had the same reaction I did my reaction was this sorry I know you loved it when I cleared my throat on periscope I had the same reaction to Jon Stewart's comment which is uh-oh they're only smart guy came back did you have that impression it feels like he's the only person who understands what's going on who's also a Democrat I guess I think you would he would classify himself as a Democrat have you heard anyone on the entire anti Trump the Democrat side have you heard anyone say what Jon Stewart just said which is so obviously true and matters and frames it correctly and could possibly help them you know recover from their Trump derangement syndrome and here's the best part John Stewart is not suffering from Trump derangement syndrome he's actually looking at it from the outside he's on the inside of you know the political bubble and yet he gave you a view of what it looks like from the outside how many people on the Left have the intellectual capability to do what John Stewart who is you know a political comedian I guess for a living or was that's pretty it's pretty unusual alright so credit where credit is due John Stewart just completely accurately framed the problem on the left and I don't know if they can hear it that's the other interesting thing so it became viral which means that got a lot of attention because it was unique it's because it was from him things he does is more interesting you know he gave us a new look as something that we were used to seeing the old looks but his his take on it was that the media is taking it personally and that they've and that that's causing you know a lot of their their problems is that they're falling into his they're falling into Trump's trap because they take it personally and I think it was brilliant and you got to give him credit oh you know somebody Michael Moore okay I will give you Michael Moore as another person who does seem to understand what's going on from both the inside and the outside I'll give you Michael Moore as well but I think Jon Stewart is another higher level of credibility because Michael Moore understands things he understands Trump better than I think almost anybody on the left that would be true which I think too is credit because Michael Moore understands a certain segment of the population that Trump also understands so I think whatever you want to say in Michael Moore's politics etc he certainly understands this topic Bill Maher somebody saying Bill Maher now I think Bill Maher in the trunk range Minh syndrome category on this topic he seems to be taking it personally I believe there's actually some bad blood between Bill Maher and Trump in the past there was some kind of interaction they had that wasn't good so so those are your big stories let's see what else is happening on CNN that a week before the event they think better Bob Woodward on Trump we are being had he's doing things to distract us from policies so Bob Woodward is sort of agreeing with Jon Stewart that Trump is having his way by the way did you see the clip oh I hope you saw the clip of when what was it that Trump did oh when Trump announced he wanted to end birthright the birthright citizenship with an executive order and of course the experts I think you know 90% or 95% or 99% of the experts are saying you can't do that but see you then realized that it was a distraction from other issues and that it was a positive distraction in other words if if Trump was successful distracting people and making them think about birthright citizenship it was a real good last of thought going into the midterm election and they knew they were being had and they couldn't stop talking about it if you haven't seen that clip of the CNN hosts saying he's just tricking us to make us talk about this and then the coast would say but we're talking about it it's working we can't not talk about it but he's tricking us we know he's tricking us and it's working and we're still doing it but it's the news what are we gonna do it was it was frickin hilarious because they were so unhappy they were so unhappy talking about the news because the news is what the president says it's just always what the president says because he's the president after they had to report it well boy did they don't want to report that it was one of the funniest things you will ever see to watch them essentially sabotaging themselves on live TV because it's not the message they want out there all right now I'm gonna make I'm gonna make a fun prediction for the midterms and it's primarily because I don't think anybody's made this prediction so the people are saying the Senate is probably gonna go Republican so I'll go with that I'll just go with the experts on that so if I'm right or wrong about the Senate you know don't don't put that on my permanent record because I'm just gonna agree with the experts on this I don't have any special kind of insight on it but in the house the house we imagine is supposed to go to to the Democrats that's what the experts have been saying some people are saying well you know maybe these the there's some hidden Trump supporters etc.
I was on Maria Bartiromo --is about a Ramos show yesterday morning and I made this this prediction if the midterms and they'll talk about the house race in particular if the midterms and the house race goes the way everything else is gone in the Trump era what will be the outcome let's see if you can guess it what will be the outcome of the house race if it goes like everything else let's see if anybody else comes to the same answer it's gonna take me a while for you to uh somebody sent a surprise I'd say no not quite so it might be a surprise but there you're you're almost there here's the answer it's going to be a a photo finish with an ambiguous ending so if it's like everything else we won't know who on Election Day here's what I mean by that listen let's say it comes down to a majority of one one two three so so one of the sides wins by a majority of just one or two or three representatives yeah so if it's just that close what do you think people are going to say they're gonna say recount they're gonna say there's something that happened in that district that's fishy wait a minute how come there were more votes in that area than there are people wait a minute why was why was one of those polling places closed early wait a minute why are some of the votes missing wait a minute did Russia have anything to do with the election in this area so this is I'm gonna categorize this as a fun prediction all right meaning that I don't have a ton of confidence in it so when I get this one wrong and you put it on my permanent record just know that I didn't have a lot of confidence in it but for fun if it's like everything else it's going to be something like a tie in the sense that it will go one way or the other but there will be something ambiguous some some gray area some dispute so it won't feel like it's done that's my that is my prediction so my prediction is an ambiguous photo finish with different photos four different finishes just like everything else can there be a tie well there I don't mean a tie literally but I mean the result was so close that the ambiguity would make the difference between which way it went so that's essentially a tie yeah because if you think about it the primary so Trump wins the primary but he has to go to the convention and they're still talk that they're going to try to take it away from them right so you think Trump wins under the the denomination but you're you're not really quite sure because they might take it away from then he wins the presidency but now there's all this question about Russia stuff and you know it's like well we're not gonna let you stay president so it's sort of ambiguous then he goes for the Supreme Court nomination for a Kavanagh and it's like well he's easily gonna get in well maybe not well he's in but maybe we'll maybe we'll claw him back somehow so it's just one thing after another that you think is done that isn't done now I've also made the following prediction and he goes like this in the year 2018 does any adult have a an expectation of privacy in the digital domain in other words does any adult believe that they have actual privacy meaning that no one can ever find out what they're doing on email or text or answering a poll do people think that they have privacy when they answer a phone call a poll most probably think they have enough right most people think well I don't care if I have privacy or not I'm voting for this way or voting for that way I'm just telling you my reasons I don't care if anybody knows that but some people maybe 5% maybe 5% will say to themselves there's no such thing as privacy and there's no way my life is better if people find out and I'm a trump supporter so there's a very high likelihood that something like 5% of the people answering polls are just flat-out lying they're lying just in case just in case they really don't have any privacy and just in case they got on a list somewhere where somebody would hunt them down and kill them for being a trump supporter now I'm not saying that any of those risks are real I'm saying that if you have you know a hundred people and all hundred people have them believe that this is no longer really a thing I mean not if the government really wants to find out who you are some of them I think might luck and the other factor is turnout I've predicted the what I call a jaw-dropping Republican turnout now it might also be that the the Democrats will have incredible turnout so I don't have any kind of a prediction on the Democrat side I suspect it'll be high but on the Republican side it's really gonna be high it could be a record-setting so that's my prediction is jaw-dropping surprisingly big and here are a few of the reasons unlike unlike some midterms I'm no historian so I don't know if it's all but most midterms midterms are usually not just about the president but this president is special in which everything is about Trump so even if it shouldn't be about him if it's not about him it's still about him I think two-thirds of the people voting have said it's sort of a it's sort of a vote that's about the president in their minds so with that many people who think it's about the president and you've got a president with ninety percent support 90 percent support on his own side and what matters most is how many of his own side goes to vote how many of them are actually activated to stand up have we ever seen a situation in which a president with this much persuasion power at the height of his popularity within his own poll has gone out and showed you a tremendous amount of energy of his own this is very important make sure that you take away this point more than anything else I said today the president by going to rally rally rally rally is demonstrating his own level of energy what does he need voters to do he needs them to model him he needs them to pace him he needs the voter to ramp up to his level of energy because that's what gets you off the couch he's bringing these your record-breaking political crowds into an arena and he's showing you how much fun they're having together do you remember all of the all of the video of all the Democrats who are in big crowds having fun together I don't I don't I've seen your pictures of Biden you know talking and you know that there's a crowd there I've seen pictures of you know Kamala Harris and they're not many people in the audience so the Democrats are either small groups or unhappy groups or angry groups in my room that if you were to characterize all of the Democratic get-togethers whether it's the street protests or the you know going to talk to one of their political leaders they're either angry or there are not many of them right that's sort of the vibe Trump is showing us one image after another of enormous Republican crowds and what's the one characteristic that all of the Trump crowds have in common happy happy high-energy happy and they like to win take those three things high energy happy they love they love the the the collective feel of it they love being part of something this is very important the the Trump people really feel part of something that's positive they can feel the love with each other etc so there's this enormous high energy positive thing which is being modeled directly on the leader that they have a 90% approval of President Trump his ability and here's the the bigger point I'm getting to President Trump the most influential person in a hundred years just has directly asked the people who like him best to actually go vote now all politicians ask you to go vote but you've never seen it done like this before you've never seen him model it move your energy up make you part of a group make it the most fun fun thing you did you know this year you went to that event but other people are watching and saying I wish I was in that crowd that looks like would be funny to be there live etc he's created this whole feeling of what it's like to vote for him and it's all positive it's high-energy and it's great and it's you know and it's especially would be entertaining if the Republicans came from behind again because it would be another surprise win it would be like the best day they've ever had I mean you can you can put yourself into that future can you can't you imagine that you voted let's say you're a trump supporter you voted Republican can't you imagine what it feels like watching the results come in and then feeling of victory it would feel amazing so I think Trump's persuasion on turnout will be the best you've ever seen the Democrats of course are highly incentive but their incentive by anger they've got yeah they got some fear they've got some anger you know they've got it's a bench it's a whole bunch of negativity does negativity get you to go somewhere and by the way who is asking the Democrats to vote think about it you know who is asking Republicans to vote President Trump 90% support most influential person of all time who on the Democrat side is asking them to vote because the ask matters it's not enough to just get people in the mood to vote you have to directly to close the sale you have to say here's what I need do this now all the Republicans are doing that they're of course saying their vote you know going sign them they're making a big deal about it but it's all distributed across people who have various levels of approval within the Democrats like no matter who it is on the Democrat side it's gonna be somebody who only has you know forty percent and you know a high-level approval within the group etc so they don't really have a spokesperson who has any kind of persuasive quality whatsoever to get them out there but still they're very motivated I think they'll do fine in terms of turnout alright so there you have my predictions it's gonna be a fun election night I I'm also going to go on record as saying that if the Democrats do take the house that President Trump will give stronger not weaker so remember that so so there's a prediction that I'm confident of it's sort of an if-then prediction so if the if the Democrats take the house the president Trump will get stronger not weaker and the reason is that he's uniquely qualified and capable of working with both sides if he doesn't need to work with both sides because he has a narrow majority of Republicans he's maybe not going to try so hard and the the Democrats will try harder to resist but if the Democrats had some power meaning they had the house they would have to play a little bit productively if you have no power you don't have to be productive if you do have power you kind of have to be productive and that means working with the president who's not on your side so it seems to me that both immigration reform and health care are two areas in which the only way something is going to get done is if both sides agree with it a little bit and both sides are unhappy the only way you get health care and the only way you get immigration is if both sides are unhappy and the only way you get to both sides are unhappy is with the deal that both sides have some responsibility both sides have some power so Trump has two ways to win in this election one way to win is if he gets full stronger Republican control the other way to win is if he doesn't yeah I'm sure he has a very strong preference to to do it the you know the straight way and you know just get more Republicans in that what that would be a first choice but he does have two ways to win that has a lot to do with what's left right he's sort of done good things for the economy he's done good things for North Korea etc you know the list but now let me make another point I've said that one of the things that Trump does right all the time and his opponents do wrong all the time his Trump gets the visuals right so he's talking about immigration at the same time that there's this great us a great bonus a powerful visual thing the caravan itself and then the wall itself is visual and then he shows a picture of a cop-killer on his commercial and that's visual so Trump is visual visual visual visual and he picks also a topic that can be visual what do the the Democrats have health care now imagine your picture of health care you can't do it right imagine health care I know what am I seeing that a doctor you don't there's no there's nothing you can't imagine health care it's a concept people just don't get activated by concepts yeah you can imagine maybe you're writing the check or something about that's as close as you can get imagine let's say what else let's say climate change climate change you can show weather but I'm not sure people are quite connecting all the dots you know climate change doesn't have a good visual either or at least they're not taking advantage of it and part of it partly is because they're they're scientifically you know that they're trapped in their own scientific bias the the Democrats would say that climate change is you know settled science from their point of view that this scientists the consensus is on their side and so they would not want to be anti science to sell the fact that their pro science so it wouldn't make sense and one of the things that they really can't really do is show anecdotes you don't prove science by showing that there was a hurricane that time because there were hurricanes in all times so they they do have a visual they could use but they can't really use it because their brand is we're trying to stick to the facts you know they don't want to depart from the facts on climate science that would be problematic all right has anybody heard from cue lately did Hugh just go away after Jack pasaba k-- essentially laid bare their entire history has Q going away I haven't heard about them lately it feels to me it's W now and did I have anything to do with that I mean Jack had the most to do with it but Scott you have all that roam yeah it seems to me that Hugh went away all right so I'm going to claim victory on correctly identifying Q as not a deep state actor I haven't seen a trump hospital video now that did so people are saying that Jack killed it yeah I mean Jack had the the goods on him so whatever people think about him that changed would have come through Jack's work alright but it helps always to have other voices that are on the same the same side so that you could say oh other people think that do is win Bigley going paper backing yes thanks for asking when Bigley came out in paperback yesterday or day before so you can get your wooden Bigley paper back so I don't know what happened to queue but we don't hear from that much anymore trump hospital video is epic let's see if I can find that right now well I won't do that while you're waiting oak you disappeared thirty days before the election somebody said so it might be that queue needs to stay quiet to keep off the radar for a little while that wouldn't that would not be the wrong thing to do you were wrong about Jack buh all right Q was compromised back in April did I arrest anybody last night oh so we had a good time last night Kristina came over we had lots of trick-or-treaters it was very fun yeah there's a new chapter Oh somebody says is there a new chapter in the Kindle I don't think the Kindle version has a new chapter I believe we just put that in the soft cover but the the new chapter is an update on my predictions so you can see what I got right around when Bigley is has always been on Kindle yes if you're talking about the video where he's visiting after the synagogue the attack I haven't seen that yet all right I've said enough I've got nothing left I'm gonna go look at that video and I'll talk to you all later
but the pom pom pom pom pom pom pom hey
everybody come on in here you know what
time it is
yes I was flying yesterday and I did not
get to do my periscope I missed it I
hope you missed me a little bit so is it
time for the simultaneous imp I believe
it is I believe it is do you have your
cup your mug your vessel your glass your
Stein your container does it have the
liquid of your choice I like coffee join
me for the simultaneous end yes my voice
is all better those of you who heard me
losing my voice the other day it's
because I I don't you know it's weird
but most of the talking I do in any
24-hour day is right here on periscope
so you're used to seeing me talking but
90% of my day is just sitting in front
of my computer thinking hanging out with
Christina we don't do a lot of talking
all right as you know I've been on my
book tour for my book when basically now
out in paperback if you don't like to
read it in English you could read it in
whatever this is or Korean or German or
whatever this is yes you have many
choices I think that was either Chinese
or Japanese I'm not sure but when Bigley
is doing great with some paperback now
so those of you have been waiting for
the lower price it's here and you know
what time of year it is it's time for
your 2019 calendar all right if you
don't have your Dilbert calendar it's
time to get it enough about that let's
talk about the important news of the day
you know the really big stuff such as
Kanye West
I missed a day so
a little behind on the news but most of
you know that Kanye is pulling back from
politics because he says he did not he
did not I hope to design the blex it
t-shirt and hat and logo so he is
because there was a I guess a suggestion
that he was the designer he wanted to
pull back because he felt used now my
take on this is that it's very it would
be very unlikely
if Candace or anybody else intentionally
said hey let's just claim that Kanye
designed this and it's his so I don't
think anybody did that it just sounds
like a miscommunication so the the
actual event is less important than the
bigger picture were any of you surprised
that Kanye pivoted away from Republicans
to think about what he said he wants to
do he wants to run for president 2024 if
Kanye really wanted to run for president
in 2020 for how long should he keep
being more friendly with Republicans
than Democrats well not too long he'd be
better sort of pivot over to the the
Democrats because that's the only party
he could get elected in so as popular as
Kanye is with Republicans he's popular
because of really his style his you know
the fact that he's willing to embrace
you know president Trump so he's popular
for reasons that don't have anything to
do with policy on a policy level it
feels to me he's going to be more likely
leaning Democrat so there's no way he
would run as a Republican but what is
the very strongest package you could
create going into a presidential
election well you saw President Trump do
it he used to be a Democrat used to be a
Democrat now he's a Republican
you saw Mike Bloomberg do a'right used
to be a Republican and then he became a
Democrat to my mind the strongest the
strongest positioning the strongest
setting the table for becoming president
is that you used to be on the other side
or at the very least you used to be
really friendly with the other side
because what do people what is the thing
that people care about most of them
they're voting for president are you on
my side can you understand my side have
you ever had an appreciation from my
side it's one thing that you don't agree
with me you know it's it's routine that
somebody doesn't agree with you
somebody says Reagan did Reagan also
switch was Reagan a Democrat he was
right he also switched because what that
does is that allows the other team to
say well I don't love everything about
your policies but I still like you and
if I still like you maybe more than I
like the one running from my own party
yeah this time I'm gonna go over and
vote the other side so somebody says so
he was pacing us in a sense yes in a
sense he was pacing the Republicans
because he was agreeing with them in
their support of for president Trump as
a person and you know and not damning
him as a crazy racist and stuff like
that and he was also so just to be clear
I don't I don't want to I want to make
sure that I'm not putting any opinions
into Kanye his opinions are just for him
to express so if I've said that
accidentally I think I got close to
saying that you know we'll pull that
back a little bit we don't know what
he's thinking we can only observe what's
happening okay
so what's happening is he's doing
exactly what you would do if you were
really smart and planning to run for
president in 2024 so what you've seen
this week was consistent with being
brilliant
if you plan to run for president in 2024
now here's the here's the other element
it would also be consistent with not
wanting to run for president in 2024
because in either case he wants to
demonstrate his independence of thought
so he can be Pro President Trump as a
person and as a you know wanting to him
to look good as a leader because he
represents the country so that's
essentially what Kanye said but he can
also you know he's a free thinker and he
doesn't have to stay in any camp longer
than he wants to so I like that about I
would say that my my opinion of Kanye
went up a little bit
because it is the time to pivot he needs
to live in the community that is
primarily you know anti-trump so for
practical reasons for professional
reasons for personal reasons and even if
someday he runs for president political
reasons it was important for him to show
some independence which he just
demonstrated in a graphic way now the
actual source of the dispute if you
could call it that I'm not sure dispute
is really the right word but that I
think there was a miscommunication about
the logo probably is not the important
part of the story
probably not all right let's talk about
the campaign ad the president Trump is
running that CNN is labeled on their top
left of their page so as I've taught you
the top left of a news page is the news
that the news organization has judged is
the most important news all right so
CNN's most important news just a few
days before the midterm is Trump
campaign releases racist ad now here's
the thing that's of opinion the it's
purely an opinion that it's a racist ad
and they're actually reporting it like
it's news
and then they don't show the ad so it's
the most important but the most
important news is that the ad is racist
and they don't show it at least yeah I
didn't see it right below that what is
the second most important thing on the
CNN news you're gonna love this the
second most important thing so it's the
top left of the page the second one down
it's a Don Lemon says this is Trump's ad
and here are the facts so in other words
Don Lemon who just came out as a racist
he literally just came out on TV
publicly as a racist who's got a problem
with white men that really happened I'm
it sounds like I'm exaggerating but
please you know if he if you think that
sounded like even a little bit of an
exaggeration just Google Don Lemon white
man you know you'll see the video in
which he says that the real problem in
this country yeah you should really hear
it in his own words because I don't want
to accidentally mischaracterize it but
his essence is he has a problem with
white men as the problem in this country
now I'm not gonna fact-check that I'm
just saying that he said that and by the
standards of this country that would be
racist as I understand what the word
means you know with someone who's biased
against a particular race or gender in
this case - because he made made it male
so he's talking against Trump's ad the
CNN has labeled as racist the ad itself
if you haven't seen it I'm not going to
play it but the ad itself is shows a cop
killer who I guess is a must have come
from south of the border and he's the
cop killers in court being I guess he
just got convicted for killing two cops
and he's laughing and saying that he
wished he'd killed more and it's
translated from Spanish so you can tell
that he's you know wasn't born in this
country now it's just one guy and then
it shows yeah other criminal types in
the the caravan etc now is it racist to
show one guy who accurately did come
across the border and then killed two
cops is it racist can facts ever be
racist I guess that's the question I
would ask you can facts ever be racist
nice I could I guess they couldn't be
depending on how you organize them right
if you organize them so you left out on
other facts and it created a misleading
narrative well I didn't see anywhere in
the ad this suggested that everyone in
the caravan was a cop-killer that wasn't
there in fact I would think any
reasonable adult looking at that ad
would say oh there are some bad people
in this group
and we don't know how many I don't know
how you could come to any other
conclusion except that some of them
coming across the border whether it's in
the caravan or just the general
immigration that some number of them are
committing bad crimes is that racist
i I I get I get how they take it now
they're comparing it of course to the
Willie Horton ad back in the George Bush
era and I don't remember exactly the
Willie Horton had itself but the the the
sense of it was that Willie Horton was
an african-american man who had
committed some kind of crime he got out
I think I'm some kind of early release
and then he killed somebody I think
that's the basic idea there and I don't
remember the ad itself but I guess I had
more racial you know it was trying a
little bit harder to make a racial case
but I'm not sure that that applies so
much when you're not talking about
you're not talking about domestic actors
and you're not talking about necessarily
one country you know you're talking
about a whole region you're talking
about crime that's coming in nobody
doubts crime is coming in they just you
know they
disagree about how much of it or how
much it matters but it's it's
interesting that CNN reports as News
their opinion have you have you seen
anything like that before
who who reports who reports as news
something that's clearly of opinion even
if the opinion is right I it doesn't
even matter whether the pendant is true
or false I'm saying that how do you
report that as news it's very much an
opinion all right the other amazing and
funny thing is did you all see the Jon
Stewart interview so Jon Stewart was
from The Daily Show as you all know he
sort of disappeared from the news and he
came back and he essentially was saying
that Trump is triggering the media and
that the members of the media are taking
it personally and because they're taking
it personally they're falling into his
trap and overreacting and putting all
the attention on what he wants and I
read this article I just saw for the
first time and my article see if you had
see if you had the same reaction I did
my reaction was this sorry I know you
loved it when I cleared my throat on
periscope I had the same reaction to Jon
Stewart's comment which is uh-oh they're
only smart guy came back did you have
that impression it feels like he's the
only person who understands what's going
on who's also a Democrat I guess I think
you would he would classify himself as a
Democrat have you heard anyone on the
entire anti Trump the Democrat side have
you heard anyone say what Jon Stewart
just said which is so obviously true and
matters and frames it correctly
and could possibly help them you know
recover from their Trump derangement
syndrome and here's the best part
John Stewart is not suffering from Trump
derangement syndrome he's actually
looking at it from the outside he's on
the inside of you know the political
bubble and yet he gave you a view of
what it looks like from the outside how
many people on the Left have the
intellectual capability to do what John
Stewart who is you know a political
comedian I guess for a living or was
that's pretty it's pretty unusual
alright so credit where credit is due
John Stewart just completely accurately
framed the problem on the left and I
don't know if they can hear it that's
the other interesting thing so it became
viral which means that got a lot of
attention because it was unique it's
because it was from him things he does
is more interesting you know he gave us
a new look as something that we were
used to seeing the old looks but his his
take on it was that the media is taking
it personally and that they've and that
that's causing you know a lot of their
their problems is that they're falling
into his they're falling into Trump's
trap because they take it personally and
I think it was brilliant and you got to
give him credit oh you know somebody
Michael Moore okay I will give you
Michael Moore as another person who does
seem to understand what's going on from
both the inside and the outside
I'll give you Michael Moore as well but
I think Jon Stewart is another higher
level of credibility because Michael
Moore understands things he understands
Trump better than I think almost anybody
on the left that would be true which I
think too is credit because Michael
Moore understands a certain segment of
the population that Trump also
understands so I think whatever you want
to say in Michael Moore's politics etc
he certainly understands this topic
Bill Maher somebody saying Bill Maher
now I think Bill Maher
in the trunk range Minh syndrome
category on this topic he seems to be
taking it personally I believe there's
actually some bad blood between Bill
Maher and Trump in the past there was
some kind of interaction they had that
wasn't good so so those are your big
stories let's see what else is happening
on CNN that a week before the event they
think better Bob Woodward on Trump we
are being had he's doing things to
distract us from policies so Bob
Woodward is sort of agreeing with Jon
Stewart
that Trump is having his way by the way
did you see the clip oh I hope you saw
the clip of when what was it that Trump
did oh when Trump announced he wanted to
end birthright the birthright
citizenship with an executive order and
of course the experts I think you know
90% or 95% or 99% of the experts are
saying you can't do that but see you
then realized that it was a distraction
from other issues and that it was a
positive distraction in other words if
if Trump was successful distracting
people and making them think about
birthright citizenship it was a real
good last of thought going into the
midterm election and they knew they were
being had and they couldn't stop talking
about it if you haven't seen that clip
of the CNN hosts saying he's just
tricking us to make us talk about this
and then the coast would say but we're
talking about it it's working we can't
not talk about it but he's tricking us
we know he's tricking us and it's
working and we're still doing it but
it's the news what are we gonna do it
was it was frickin hilarious
because they were so unhappy they were
so unhappy talking about the news
because the news is what the president
says
it's just always what the president says
because he's the president after they
had to report it well boy did they don't
want to report that it was one of the
funniest things you will ever see
to watch them essentially sabotaging
themselves on live TV because it's not
the message they want out there all
right now I'm gonna make I'm gonna make
a fun prediction for the midterms and
it's primarily because I don't think
anybody's made this prediction so the
people are saying the Senate is probably
gonna go Republican so I'll go with that
I'll just go with the experts on that so
if I'm right or wrong about the Senate
you know don't don't put that on my
permanent record because I'm just gonna
agree with the experts on this I don't
have any special kind of insight on it
but in the house the house we imagine is
supposed to go to to the Democrats
that's what the experts have been saying
some people are saying well you know
maybe these the there's some hidden
Trump supporters etc I was on Maria
Bartiromo --is about a Ramos show
yesterday morning and I made this this
prediction if the midterms and they'll
talk about the house race in particular
if the midterms and the house race goes
the way everything else is gone
in the Trump era what will be the
outcome let's see if you can guess it
what will be the outcome of the house
race if it goes like everything else
let's see if anybody else comes to the
same answer it's gonna take me a while
for you to uh somebody sent a surprise
I'd say no not quite
so it might be a surprise but there
you're you're almost there here's the
answer it's going to be a a photo finish
with an ambiguous ending so if it's like
everything else we won't know who
on Election Day here's what I mean by
that
listen let's say it comes down to a
majority of one one two three so so one
of the sides wins by a majority of just
one or two or three representatives yeah
so if it's just that close what do you
think people are going to say they're
gonna say recount they're gonna say
there's something that happened in that
district that's fishy wait a minute how
come there were more votes in that area
than there are people wait a minute why
was why was one of those polling places
closed early wait a minute why are some
of the votes missing wait a minute
did Russia have anything to do with the
election in this area so this is I'm
gonna categorize this as a fun
prediction all right
meaning that I don't have a ton of
confidence in it so when I get this one
wrong and you put it on my permanent
record just know that I didn't have a
lot of confidence in it but for fun if
it's like everything else it's going to
be something like a tie in the sense
that it will go one way or the other
but there will be something ambiguous
some some gray area some dispute so it
won't feel like it's done that's my that
is my prediction so my prediction is an
ambiguous photo finish with different
photos four different finishes just like
everything else can there be a tie well
there I don't mean a tie literally but I
mean the result was so close that the
ambiguity would make the difference
between which way it went so that's
essentially a tie
yeah because if you think about it the
primary so Trump wins the primary but he
has to go to the convention and they're
still talk that they're going to try to
take it away from them
right so you think Trump wins under the
the denomination but you're you're not
really quite sure because they might
take it away from then he wins the
presidency but now there's all this
question about Russia stuff and you know
it's like well we're not gonna let you
stay president so it's sort of ambiguous
then he goes for the Supreme Court
nomination for a Kavanagh and it's like
well he's easily gonna get in well maybe
not well he's in but maybe we'll maybe
we'll claw him back somehow so it's just
one thing after another that you think
is done that isn't done now I've also
made the following prediction and he
goes like this in the year 2018 does any
adult have a an expectation of privacy
in the digital domain in other words
does any adult believe that they have
actual privacy meaning that no one can
ever find out what they're doing on
email or text or answering a poll do
people think that they have privacy when
they answer a phone call a poll most
probably think they have enough right
most people think well I don't care if I
have privacy or not I'm voting for this
way or voting for that way I'm just
telling you my reasons I don't care if
anybody knows that but some people maybe
5% maybe 5% will say to themselves
there's no such thing as privacy and
there's no way my life is better if
people find out and I'm a trump
supporter so there's a very high
likelihood that something like 5% of the
people answering polls are just flat-out
lying they're lying just in case just in
case they really don't have any privacy
and just in case they got on a list
somewhere where somebody would hunt them
down and kill them for being a trump
supporter now I'm not saying that any of
those risks are real I'm saying that if
you have you know a hundred people and
all hundred people have them believe
that
this is no longer really a thing I mean
not if the government really wants to
find out who you are some of them I
think might luck and the other factor is
turnout I've predicted the what I call a
jaw-dropping Republican turnout now it
might also be that the the Democrats
will have incredible turnout so I don't
have any kind of a prediction on the
Democrat side I suspect it'll be high
but on the Republican side it's really
gonna be high it could be a
record-setting so that's my prediction
is jaw-dropping surprisingly big and
here are a few of the reasons unlike
unlike some midterms I'm no historian so
I don't know if it's all but most
midterms midterms are usually not just
about the president but this president
is special in which everything is about
Trump so even if it shouldn't be about
him if it's not about him it's still
about him I think two-thirds of the
people voting have said it's sort of a
it's sort of a vote that's about the
president in their minds so with that
many people who think it's about the
president and you've got a president
with ninety percent support 90 percent
support on his own side and what matters
most is how many of his own side goes to
vote how many of them are actually
activated to stand up have we ever seen
a situation in which a president with
this much persuasion power at the height
of his popularity within his own poll
has gone out and showed you a tremendous
amount of energy of his own this is very
important make sure that you take away
this point more than anything else I
said today the president by going to
rally rally rally rally is demonstrating
his own level of energy what does he
need voters to do he needs them to model
him he needs them to pace him he needs
the voter
to ramp up to his level of energy
because that's what gets you off the
couch he's bringing these your
record-breaking political crowds into an
arena and he's showing you how much fun
they're having together do you remember
all of the all of the video of all the
Democrats who are in big crowds having
fun together
I don't I don't I've seen your pictures
of Biden you know talking and you know
that there's a crowd there I've seen
pictures of you know Kamala Harris and
they're not many people in the audience
so the Democrats are either small groups
or unhappy groups or angry groups in my
room that if you were to characterize
all of the Democratic get-togethers
whether it's the street protests or the
you know going to talk to one of their
political leaders they're either angry
or there are not many of them right
that's sort of the vibe Trump is showing
us one image after another of enormous
Republican crowds and what's the one
characteristic that all of the Trump
crowds have in common
happy happy high-energy happy and they
like to win take those three things
high energy happy they love they love
the the the collective feel of it they
love being part of something this is
very important the the Trump people
really feel part of something that's
positive they can feel the love with
each other etc so there's this enormous
high energy positive thing which is
being modeled directly on the leader
that they have a 90% approval of
President Trump his ability and here's
the the bigger point I'm getting to
President Trump the most influential
person in a hundred years
just has directly asked the people who
like him best to actually go vote now
all politicians ask you to go vote but
you've never seen it done like this
before you've never seen him model it
move your energy up make you part of a
group make it the most fun fun thing you
did you know this year you went to that
event but other people are watching and
saying I wish I was in that crowd that
looks like would be funny to be there
live etc he's created this whole feeling
of what it's like to vote for him and
it's all positive it's high-energy and
it's great and it's you know and it's
especially would be entertaining if the
Republicans came from behind again
because it would be another surprise win
it would be like the best day they've
ever had I mean you can you can put
yourself into that future can you can't
you imagine that you voted let's say
you're a trump supporter you voted
Republican can't you imagine what it
feels like watching the results come in
and then feeling of victory it would
feel amazing so I think Trump's
persuasion on turnout will be the best
you've ever seen the Democrats of course
are highly incentive but their incentive
by anger they've got yeah they got some
fear they've got some anger you know
they've got it's a bench it's a whole
bunch of negativity does negativity get
you to go somewhere and by the way who
is asking the Democrats to vote think
about it you know who is asking
Republicans to vote President Trump
90% support most influential person of
all time who on the Democrat side is
asking them to vote because the ask
matters it's not enough to just get
people in the mood to vote you have to
directly to close the sale you have to
say here's what I need do this now all
the Republicans are doing that they're
of course saying their vote you know
going sign them they're making a big
deal about it but it's all distributed
across people who have various levels of
approval within the Democrats like no
matter who it is on the Democrat side
it's gonna be somebody who only has you
know forty percent and you know a
high-level approval within the group etc
so they don't really have a spokesperson
who has any kind of persuasive quality
whatsoever
to get them out there but still they're
very motivated I think they'll do fine
in terms of turnout alright so there you
have my predictions it's gonna be a fun
election night I I'm also going to go on
record as saying that if the Democrats
do take the house that President Trump
will give stronger not weaker so
remember that so so there's a prediction
that I'm confident of it's sort of an
if-then prediction so if the if the
Democrats take the house the president
Trump will get stronger not weaker and
the reason is that he's uniquely
qualified and capable of working with
both sides if he doesn't need to work
with both sides because he has a narrow
majority of Republicans he's maybe not
going to try so hard and the the
Democrats will try harder to resist but
if the Democrats had some power meaning
they had the house they would have to
play a little bit productively if you
have no power you don't have to be
productive if you do have power you kind
of have to be productive and that means
working with the president who's not on
your side so it seems to me that both
immigration reform and health care are
two areas in which the only way
something is going to get done is if
both sides agree with it a little bit
and both sides are unhappy the only way
you get health care and the only way you
get immigration is if both sides are
unhappy and the only way you get to both
sides are unhappy is with the deal that
both sides have some responsibility both
sides have some power so Trump has two
ways to win in this election one way to
win is if he gets full stronger
Republican control the other way to win
is if he doesn't yeah I'm sure he has a
very strong preference to to do it the
you know the straight way and you know
just get more Republicans in that what
that would be a first choice but he does
have two ways to win that has a lot to
do with what's left right he's sort of
done good things for the economy he's
done good things for North Korea etc you
know the list but now let me make
another point I've said that one of the
things that Trump does right all the
time and his opponents do wrong all the
time his Trump gets the visuals right so
he's talking about immigration at the
same time that there's this great us a
great bonus a powerful visual thing the
caravan itself and then the wall itself
is visual and then he shows a picture of
a cop-killer on his commercial and
that's visual so Trump is visual visual
visual visual and he picks also a topic
that can be visual what do the the
Democrats have health care now imagine
your picture of health care you can't do
it right imagine health care I know what
am I seeing that a doctor you don't
there's no there's nothing you can't
imagine health care it's a concept
people just don't get activated by
concepts yeah you can imagine maybe
you're writing the check or something
about that's as close as you can get
imagine let's say what else let's say
climate change climate change you can
show weather but I'm not sure people are
quite connecting all the dots you know
climate change doesn't have a good
visual either or at least they're not
taking advantage of it and part of it
partly is because they're they're
scientifically you know that they're
trapped in their own scientific bias the
the Democrats would say that climate
change is you know settled science from
their point of view that this
scientists the consensus is on their
side and so they would not want to be
anti science to sell the fact that their
pro science so it wouldn't make sense
and one of the things that they really
can't really do is show anecdotes you
don't prove science by showing that
there was a hurricane that time because
there were hurricanes in all times
so they they do have a visual they could
use but they can't really use it because
their brand is we're trying to stick to
the facts you know they don't want to
depart from the facts on climate science
that would be problematic all right
has anybody heard from cue lately did
Hugh just go away after Jack pasaba k--
essentially laid bare their entire
history has Q going away I haven't heard
about them lately it feels to me it's W
now and did I have anything to do with
that I mean Jack had the most to do with
it but Scott you have all that roam yeah
it seems to me that Hugh went away all
right so I'm going to claim victory on
correctly identifying Q as not a deep
state actor I haven't seen a trump
hospital video now
that did so people are saying that Jack
killed it yeah I mean Jack had the the
goods on him so whatever people think
about him that changed would have come
through Jack's work alright but it helps
always to have other voices that are on
the same the same side so that you could
say oh other people think that do is win
Bigley going paper backing yes thanks
for asking when Bigley came out in
paperback yesterday or day before so you
can get your wooden Bigley paper back so
I don't know what happened to queue but
we don't hear from that much anymore
trump hospital video is epic let's see
if I can find that right now
well I won't do that while you're
waiting oak you disappeared thirty days
before the election somebody said so it
might be that queue needs to stay quiet
to keep off the radar for a little while
that wouldn't that would not be the
wrong thing to do
you were wrong about Jack buh all right
Q was compromised back in April did I
arrest anybody last night oh so we had a
good time last night
Kristina came over we had lots of
trick-or-treaters it was very fun yeah
there's a new chapter
Oh somebody says is there a new chapter
in the Kindle I don't think the Kindle
version has a new chapter I believe we
just put that in the soft cover but the
the new chapter is an update on my
predictions so you can see what I got
right around when Bigley is has always
been on Kindle yes if you're talking
about the video where he's visiting
after the synagogue the attack I haven't
seen that yet all right I've said enough
I've got nothing left
I'm gonna go look at that video and I'll
talk to you all later