Episode 2713 CWSA 01/07/25
Don Jr. invades Greenland, Musk persuades other countries, oh my. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
We're going to have a show. I think. Let me get your comments working here. Perfect. Perfecto. Well, if you're listening to this and not viewing it, you don't know that there's a Dilbert comic that's up on the screen. I hope you see it. Dilbert is training his Elbonian replacement, and the boss say…
View segment →here they can never understand it in Greenland and Panama and those other places we're going to conquer, all you need for that is a cup or mug or a glass or tankard, a chalice or stein, a can or jug or flask, vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. Join me now for the u…
View segment →ront of you. Now, I don't know if they can do it with photorealistic stuff. They did it with an animation. So you look at the table, and sitting on the table apparently is a little character that's dancing right in front of you as a 3D object. Kind of amazing. I didn't think that was going to come.…
View segment →showed a company that would be the reconstituted Enron creating a nuclear egg, you know, something you could hold in your arms. There would be a nuclear power plant for your personal home. It was just like a big egg, and the commercial for it was really well done. It had specifications and how to us…
View segment →And if the only thing you know is that you're seeing both sides, you don't know if you're the person they're trying to influence. And maybe you're not. So maybe you're just seeing regular content. But there's no way that they're going to keep their finger off the button if it's so easy to move the p…
View segment →is the case. Obviously it was a lie. Unbelievable. Just unbelievable. Then Biden is going to release 11 Yemeni detainees from Guantanamo. In other words, people with suspected terrorist tendencies. Two of them were, I think, Osama bin Laden's bodyguards. But the Biden administration is assuring us…
View segment →t point of view is less censorship and better processes for the censorship. So he described what he's going to do, which is remarkable. Now, as I'm talking about this, I know exactly what you're going to be thinking. You're going to say to me, Scott, but what about all the terrible, terrible things…
View segment →ork. But once it's in the Wall Street Journal, that's the thing that every business has to pay attention to. You can't ignore the Wall Street Journal if you're in a business. So it kind of raised Starbuck's profile, and it raised it in the context of he's winning like crazy. That's how you want to b…
View segment →the UK. All right, how I'm going to go with this: Andrew Tate's running for prime minister. Anything else you need to know? But it gets better. Now, first of all, I do know that you don't run for prime minister. So before you jump in and say, Scott, you don't understand the system. They, you know,…
View segment →. I know you want to, but the government's preventing you. Now we're going to protect the country. We're going to keep out the bad elements, etc. Now, I'm assuming and get rid of the grooming gangs and stuff like that. Now, what's interesting is that Tate allegedly has converted to Islam. So is it…
View segment →d something in their past like that. But remember, the Democrats have the KKK in their past. But if you hold it against them today, that would be just stupid. And I see people doing it, and I just always bristle when I see that. It's like that was a long time ago. If they're not currently supporting…
View segment →up some things that Biden couldn't wrap up, any questions about who is the best president ever and who was the worst will be answered. And I think that's going to happen. I saw the amuse account on X pointing out that Soros prosecutors, the people that Soros funded, those prosecutors, 40% of the ho…
View segment →ation. That's convenient. And the other was found by a plainclothes fed, really. So the two people, one was found by a plainclothes fed, and the other was planted by somebody with some connections to the intel world. Okay. Both bombs sat in plain sight undetected for 15 hours or more until both were…
View segment →top speeds of 101 miles per hour, and it's super aerodynamic. So that's a big deal. The more competition there is in that space, the better. And there's a study that says that video conferencing, where you see yourself on the screen like on, I'm seeing myself, I'm talking to you, but the picture on…
View segment →o keep it. I don't know. But it's so just pleasant to think about. Wouldn't it be nice to just add to the country? It's just a good feeling. All right, that's all I got. I'm going to go talk to the locals people privately for a moment. Wow, yeah, Greg Gutfeld's back. The main cast of The Five is ba…
View segment →We're going to have a show. I think. Let me get your comments working here. Perfect. Perfecto.
Well, if you're listening to this and not viewing it, you don't know that there's a Dilbert comic that's up on the screen. I hope you see it. Dilbert is training his Elbonian replacement, and the boss says to Dilbert, "Good news. After you train your Elbonian replacement, I'll be reducing payroll expenses while being more diverse. It's a twofer." And Dilbert says, "Will you be treating him like a slave?" And the boss says, "Oh, right. It's a threefer." So always, always up on the current trends.
All right, let's see if I can change that screen back to me. There we go. How good-looking I am. Well, you may wonder if I drink enough coffee, will it cause a reduction in my OCD? Well, yes, it will. All right, let's make this official.
Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and I don't think you've ever had a better time. But if you'd like to take this experience up to levels where they can never understand it in Greenland and Panama and those other places we're going to conquer, all you need for that is a cup or mug or a glass or tankard, a chalice or stein, a can or jug or flask, vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now. Excelsior!
So I've got lots of tech news and a bunch of political news. I'm going to save most of the tech news until after the political stuff, but there are a couple of cool things. CES, the technology show, is happening right now for 2025, and one of the things that's being introduced is a 3D projector. Now, not the kind that projects on a flat screen and gives it the appearance of being 3D. It actually creates the 3D hologram and can put it on your table and have it dance in front of you. Now, I don't know if they can do it with photorealistic stuff. They did it with an animation. So you look at the table, and sitting on the table apparently is a little character that's dancing right in front of you as a 3D object. Kind of amazing. I didn't think that was going to come.
Well, I did a little deeper dive on quantum computing because I was trying to understand. I've told you this before. When I hear people explain how it works or why it works, it sounds like word salad. And I thought to myself, hmm, I guess maybe it's because I don't have the technology background, but if I did, I'd understand that word salad. And I went deeper and deeper, and I'm quite sure that nobody knows why it works. I'm fairly positive. And you've heard things like, I think Joe Rogan said this the other day, that quantum computing works because it accesses the infinity of other dimensions. Nothing like that's happening there. There's nothing like accessing other dimensions. That's not happening. We don't know what is happening, but there's no indication it's accessing another dimension, if there is one. What is it even?
So the things they say are things like, well, you know, this probability wave interferes with another one, and between the two of them they can predict the future without using any logic or any calculation. They just see the future. And that future they see could be like the solution to a difficult math problem. And I say to myself, really? You just interfere a couple of probabilities and then you can see the future? So what quantum computing is alleging to do is literally see the future or peer into the past, I guess, too. None of this is really possible as far as I know. So I thought to myself, it must be me, right? It's just because I don't understand the field. And I've now seen two experts who do understand it kind of suggest that nobody understands it, and we don't know if it could ever even be commercial in a big way. I mean, it might have some niche specific things it can do, but it's never going to be a general computer. So forget about having your own quantum computer. It doesn't look like that's going to happen.
But Nvidia just created a personal AI supercomputer, and it's only this little box, which if you wanted to work on AI, if I understand it right, it would be like a data center in a tiny little box. So if you were working with AI, instead of having to access a data center, you can access this little box on your desk, and apparently you have full AI capability. So I don't know the ins and outs and the pluses and minuses of doing that versus having access to the actual full data center, but it's got 200 billion parameters, and it looks like a big deal.
And then they also have a secret chip that's going to go in humanoid robots. So with all those new introductions, I guess the stock for Nvidia would be, and it's down. I don't know, maybe people expected more. Seemed pretty impressive to me. I think Nvidia is worth well over three trillion dollars now, and they're talking about things that look like it would have a big impact on Tesla. Because if they put these humanoid chips in robots, does Tesla buy some of those chips, or do they have their own chips for the robots? So I don't know. Who's smart enough to know if any of these Nvidia things have any impact on Tesla's future? But I don't know. We'll see.
In The Guardian, they're saying that virtual employees could come this year. In other words, an AI agent that can take instructions and act like a person and get things done. I'm going to go contrary. I'm going to say it won't happen. And that's based on my experience where I tried to create, over the summer, I tried a lot. I worked pretty hard on it, trying to create an AI agent that could just answer some questions on my Dilbert.com web page. And what I learned is it doesn't look like it's possible. And here's the problem with the current AI, which would be different from the future versions, which are AGI. But the one that uses a large language model and just uses patterns, it can't answer the questions reliably because it hallucinates, and you can't stop it.
Even if you have a database and you say, "AI, do you see this database?" "Yes, I can read it." "Can you tell me something that's on the page?" "Yes, here it is." You go, "Okay, you can definitely read the data. Here's my instructions. When I ask you a question, only look at this database, which is just a document, and only answer from that." "Okay, got it." And then you ask a question, it'll just make something up without even looking at the document. So that was an uncommercial product. There was actually a launched commercial product that as far as I can tell doesn't work. And I don't think there was any competitor, so there was nobody who had figured out how to make it stop hallucinating. And as far as I know, it might not be possible because the large language models don't just follow rules. They've got a whole different mechanism. I don't think you could make that reliable. I think by its nature it's unreliable, and I don't know that you could tweak it, fix it, patch it. I don't think you can get there from here. So that's why they need the AGI. That would be a whole different technology that we haven't seen yet. I don't think it's invented. But I guess Sam Altman thinks we're getting close and it could happen pretty soon.
But I'm going to go contrarian and say the current AI is not going to create an employee that you can rely on. So I'm contrarian there.
All right, so there were at least two things that were fake news that I reposted yesterday without knowing they were fake news. Now, how much worse is this going to get? How many times am I going to get fooled by something that really looks real? It didn't make much difference. One of them was a parody that showed a company that would be the reconstituted Enron creating a nuclear egg, you know, something you could hold in your arms. There would be a nuclear power plant for your personal home. It was just like a big egg, and the commercial for it was really well done. It had specifications and how to use it and everything. But it was parody. It wasn't labeled clearly as parody, though. So I looked at it, and I'm looking for the parody part. I didn't see parody. So I reposted it, thought, but I asked at least. I was at least aware enough to say, is this real, when I reposted it. But if it was real, it'd be a big deal. It wasn't real. It's not real. So I think that they cheated. The rules on X is that it must be clearly labeled. It was labeled, but I think the whole "clearly" part maybe is in question.
Meanwhile, there's a new study, according to Just the News. Stephen Richards is writing that a new study says that TikTok suppresses anti-China content. So it has both anti- and pro-China content, but it suppresses the anti and promotes the other. Now, is there anybody, you know, who's been telling you this for years? Is there anybody who said, you know, that China has got their finger on this and there's no way that this is all objective? I talked to a TikTok user the other day, and I mentioned it was going to be banned unless an American buys it. And I said it's because it could be persuasive in a way we don't like. And the person I talked to said, but you don't understand. You don't use TikTok. If you did, you know that I see both sides of every story. And I said, do you? How do you know? Well, because I see both sides. Now, I think that's true. I think both sides of every story are in fact on TikTok. But the problem is which one do you see the most and who sees it?
As I explained to the TikTok user, who shall remain anonymous, I said, what if there are some people using TikTok that TikTok can tell for sure they cannot be influenced, meaning that you're a hard Democrat or you're a hard Republican, you're not going anywhere. But do you think that TikTok can identify people who are on the fence? Because everything depends on the people on the fence, the independents. Do you think it can identify an independent? And if it did, do you think the independent would get exactly as much content as you're seeing? So the thing is that you can't tell if persuasion is happening. You just see what you see. And if the only thing you know is that you're seeing both sides, you don't know if you're the person they're trying to influence. And maybe you're not. So maybe you're just seeing regular content. But there's no way that they're going to keep their finger off the button if it's so easy to move the persuasion needle.
So anyway, this is not peer-reviewed yet, but it will be. So maybe it's not valid. We'll see what the peer review says. But I think it's just so obvious. You could have just asked me. You didn't have to do the study. Do you think China will use this to influence the world? Duh. Duh. So China did make a weapon of mass persuasion. And Kevin O'Leary seems to be one of the people who's part of a group looking to buy it so that TikTok could stay in business but become an American thing with American data and American control. I don't know if that's going to happen, but we'll see.
All right. The Washington Post is reporting, according to the New York Post is reporting about the Washington Post, that Trump is talking about scaling back his tariff threats and making them more about specific industries instead of making them broad. Now, here's my question. Why is the Washington Post working against the interests of the United States? One hundred percent of the people watching the story know that Trump is using tariffs for negotiation. Everybody knows it. Do you think the Washington Post doesn't know that he's using it for negotiations? So the main thing that you do if you're negotiating is you come in with your hardest offer, the toughest one, so that you can negotiate from that should you need to. So Trump has been consistent. Oh yeah, we're going to tariff everything from Canada if we have to, or everything from China. I don't know if he says that, but he acts like the tariff is just going to be wonderful and great and good for the country. And then the smart people say, but it's like he doesn't understand tariffs. He doesn't know that the American company pays for it, not the foreign company shipping in. To which I say, settle down. It's for negotiating. He doesn't have to say your version in order for this to work. He has to pretend that he wants tariffs so badly and they're so good that the more tariffs he has, the happier he's going to be, and then go into the negotiation.
But the Washington Post is trying to kneecap him. They're broadcasting to the world that he doesn't mean his starting position. What are they trying to accomplish? Is that just trying to ruin the country? Are they just an anti-American entity, and they decide what to write about based on how bad it is for America? Now, I don't think that's the case, but it looks like it. Why does it look like it? I guess they want to attack Trump in any way they can. So there's still a resistance publication. They're nowhere near the middle. And they think this is somehow advancing the interests of who? And then of course you have to ask the question, what would tariffs do to Amazon.com? Probably not good for business. So this is the kind of reporting that even though I'm sure it's accurate, I don't think it's inaccurate, but this is the sort of thing you should brush over as in some people say that it's a negotiating position. That's not telling anybody anything. But if you say it's a negotiating position and he's already saying that he's not going to stick with it, well, that's not reporting. That's just ruining his negotiating position. That's like getting in the story. So very unhappy about that.
Well, yesterday the Democrats, who have been saying for eight years that Trump is Hitler, they were quite proud of their peaceful transfer of power to Hitler. Do you think that anybody in their base has noticed that they called him Hitler for eight years, said he's the biggest risk to America, and then they're acting proud that they rolled over and gave him the win to protect democracy? That's right. The Democrat message is Trump is Hitler, and we're going to protect democracy by peacefully putting him into power. Does anybody on their side see that? Is it just us? Are we the only ones who see that nothing they did makes sense unless the primary thing they've been telling you for eight years was known to be a lie when they said it, which is the case. Obviously it was a lie. Unbelievable. Just unbelievable.
Then Biden is going to release 11 Yemeni detainees from Guantanamo. In other words, people with suspected terrorist tendencies. Two of them were, I think, Osama bin Laden's bodyguards. But the Biden administration is assuring us that they've been either rehabilitated or vetted and checked out, and they just want to send them to Oman. To which I say, oh man, how is that a good idea? Now, if he said we're just doing it to save money, then at least I could say, well, seems like a dangerous thing, but at least it saves money. But they're not really saying that. Does this look like a prank? It looks like somebody sat down and said, all right, what's the worst thing we could do? Well, let's do something that's just so indefensible that it'll just be funny. Like why is it that his actual policies are indistinguishable from what I would call a practical joke? That would be a good practical joke. Oh, we're going to free a bunch of terrorists. Why? It's just the power the president has. I know, but why? Well, we're going to release 11 of them to Oman. But why? Well, we checked them out, and we think this is a good play. But what do you know that we don't know? Unless you've put internal bombs in them so they blow up when they reach Oman. How is this good for America? It looks like a joke.
Meanwhile, CNN's Harry Enten did a survey and asked people what their biggest memories of Trump were from prior administration. And apparently the January 6 event, only 5% of the people surveyed said that was their biggest memory of Trump. Now, this poll is ridiculous. So if you thought, oh, that's telling me something, the whole world has moved on, no. The question was, you know, what's the first thing you remember? And Trump is somebody who reminds you of a hundred things. So if you ask a poll and you say what's the biggest one and they don't pick January 6, I don't think that means they don't care about it. I mean, I don't think people do care about it that much, but I don't think this poll is useful. What's interesting is that CNN would feature it because it has the, I think it's a biased, absurd poll with no credibility whatsoever. But it's on CNN, and it's unambiguously pro-Trump, meaning that the country doesn't care about the thing that they've been reporting on for four years. The country doesn't care, was CNN's reporting, which would be consistent with their decline in ratings. So forget about the accuracy of the poll. Just look at the fact that it was on CNN at all. That's kind of interesting.
Apparently, speaking of pranking, the Biden Department of Justice is going to bring 200 more people up on charges for January 6. And not this January 6, the original. Now, the Gateway Pundit is reporting this. Why in the world would they do that? Don't they know that they're just going to be granted clemency or pardon? Like it just again, this one looks like, okay, that's a prank, right? That like you're not serious, are you? You're actually going to charge 200 more, spend all that money and all that time to ruin their lives when you know they're going to be released. How in the world does that make sense? Like none of it looks real. It just doesn't look like real people made these decisions. It looks like a bad dream or a prank or practical joke or something.
Well, one of the big fun stories today is that Mark Zuckerberg did a video in which he says he's going to radically change how Facebook is censoring. And he seems to have gone to full Trump. He said that the Trump election was sort of a cultural pivot point. So he starts out by saying directly that the mood of the country is very clearly MAGA-looking and that he wants to adapt to it. Now, these are my words, not his exact words, but very clearly he was saying we live in a world in which Trump won the majority, and Facebook would be better off as a company if it started to be more compatible with that point of view. Now, that point of view is less censorship and better processes for the censorship. So he described what he's going to do, which is remarkable.
Now, as I'm talking about this, I know exactly what you're going to be thinking. You're going to say to me, Scott, but what about all the terrible, terrible things he did in the past with Facebook, banning people and censoring and all that? Those are true things that I don't care about because I don't live in the past. If I lived in the past, I would care about it. Now you might say, but Scott, what took him so long? To which I say everything good takes too long. I'm not going to judge him for taking too long. I'm going to be happy if it's a good idea. So I think, and I'll tell you more details, but I think he is right on point. It's one of the most brilliant CEO moves you'll ever see. He is so smart. And again, I know that you're going to say, but I'm so mad at him, I can't get over it. I get it. I get it. You don't like what he did in the past, and I'm not defending it. I'm just saying that the moves he's making now probably are exactly what he says, and they're good.
Listen to this. He's going to get rid of fact-checking. He's going to get rid of the fact-checkers because they're biased. What does that sound like? That's MAGA. That's pure MAGA. The fact-checkers are fake, and you have to get rid of them. So he's getting rid of them. Do you know what he's going to replace fact-checking with? He's going to copy Community Notes from X. And he says that's what he's going to do. I'm going to basically copy X and use Community Notes because it works. So Musk went first. Community Notes is quite successful, I would say. And Zuckerberg noticed, and so he's copying. Now, it's not easy to be a social media network and say, you see my competitor? I'm just going to copy that because it was a good idea. That's what Zuckerberg can do. It's just brilliant.
But there's more. They're going to get rid of the automated censoring and only consider censoring in some situations where somebody's being reported. So there'll still be things censored, the worst violent stuff, the usual stuff, but it won't be automated. You'll have to report it. Now, do you approve of that? Yes, you do, because you want humans to decide whether humans can or cannot. So you don't want the algorithm deciding. So yeah, that's good. He says explicitly that the new process is going to let a lot more inappropriate stuff on the platform, but that the principle of free speech is more important. Do you have a problem with that? No, that's America. He just described a perfect MAGA opinion about free speech. It's messy, it's violent sometimes, it's dangerous, but it's free speech, and the alternative is worse.
Now, here's the one that will blow your mind. The moderation, the human moderators, apparently they're in California. What's going to happen if your moderators live in California? Well, it's all going to be liberal opinions of what should be allowed and what should not. So here's what he's doing. He's moving the moderation from California to Texas. Let that sink in for a moment. He's moving the moderation from California because they're too biased to Texas. Does that sound like MAGA? Yeah, it sounds like exactly what you would have done. It's exactly what you would have done. You would have moved it to Texas. And he says he's going to, this might be the real money shot here, he says he's going to work with Trump to influence or pressure other countries to not try to put Facebook, Meta in a bind. And that's smart. So he's completely aware that he needs the Trump administration and the government of the United States to back him and threaten other countries. Say, look, if you're going to censor us over there and that has an impact on our American company, we're going to tariff you or we're going to stop protecting you or something. So I love this. Other countries probably had back doors and everything else, and you want to get rid of that, I think.
So a lot of people said, is Zuckerberg just chasing the money? And this is not his own philosophical opinion. He's just knows he has to do it to chase money. To which I say, so? Why is that bad? He's the head of a major commercial enterprise. He's not allowed to chase money? Chasing money means being compatible with the country you're serving. So I don't care. I don't care if that's his only motivation. If it's his only motivation and he can clearly say that getting out of that censorship business is good for business, working with Trump productively is good for business, supporting systems that would give you more free speech is good for business, if the only thing he wanted to do is make money, I would say good job. Excellent. That you nailed it. If you just want to make money, I'm completely supportive of that.
Now, some of you might say, but Scott, it's a trick because he did all those things in the past to buy us a system. It's pretty transparent. He's either going to do these things he said or he's not. I mean, that moderation will either move to Texas or it won't. The automated system will either catch things or it won't. We can watch. It's all transparent. I think it's brilliant because he was in a tough place, and I think he's completely cognizant of the way Facebook and maybe even his personal donations to try to fix the elections, fix as in improve, he probably knows that that was a huge mistake and that it distorted the system in a way that the system wasn't built to be distorted. So to me it looks like he thought he was doing the right thing and thought he was working with the government of the time productively as he saw it, I guess. And now he knows that those are all mistakes. And so he's doing a really hard pivot. Hard as in it's hard to explain it. It's hard to, especially to his own company. Imagine how much trouble he's getting from his own employees today. Do you know how hard that would be to go against all your liberal employees and just do a pure MAGA version of the service?
Now, when I say pure MAGA, I want to be really careful with my words. He's not saying I want to be right-wing. When I say pure MAGA, I mean just compatible with the Constitution, and that's it. We just want free speech. So if he gives us that, pretty happy. We'll see. I mean, I agree with you that the jury's out. He has to perform. But everything about his history suggests he knows how to perform. All right, so all good.
The Wall Street Journal is talking about the success of Robby Starbuck. And I guess he's got a staff of people who have now got 15 public companies to change or abandon their DEI and LGBTQ policies. And what's interesting about this is you already knew Robby Starbuck was having a lot of success there. What's different is that it's now a big article in the Wall Street Journal. Do you know how big that is? Like every major corporation has somebody paying attention to the Wall Street Journal. So it's one thing when Robby Starbuck is bragging on X that things are working, and he has a right to brag, by the way. He's doing amazing work. But once it's in the Wall Street Journal, that's the thing that every business has to pay attention to. You can't ignore the Wall Street Journal if you're in a business. So it kind of raised Starbuck's profile, and it raised it in the context of he's winning like crazy. That's how you want to be elevated. Because if he's winning like crazy and it's creating a pattern in your brain that these big corporations that you figure are no dumber than you are are making this change, then the 16th, 17th, and 18th corporation that he talks to, he's going to say I got 15 in a row. Do you think that's an accident? No. Because if you say no, the Wall Street Journal has already lifted my visibility. People like me with big accounts are backing him hard. We're in trouble.
So he's very cleverly assembled a set of supporters on X that are enormous, just big accounts who are willing to say yeah, do more of that. So he isn't using his own power. He's doing such good work on behalf of people who have big accounts in the rest of the country. I would say that we want to back him. We want to see more of it. So he's built a perfect little machine to roll over the DEI excesses. Perfect. It's all good news.
Well, you want me to talk about Don Jr. He recently just landed in Greenland maybe an hour ago. And it does seem that this trip, he's with Charlie Kirk and a few other people, and it does seem that the intention of the trip is to set the groundwork for a deal to buy it. That's like a real thing. And this again, I hate to be gushing about smart people doing smart things, but can you even think of a smarter way for Trump to approach this than to have Don Jr. of all people visit personally and interact with the residents? Now, have you seen the early pictures? The residents of Greenland are pretty happy that Don Jr.'s there. Now, for one thing, they probably don't get a lot of celebrity excitement, so they got that going for them. But they don't seem like liberals. I don't know much about Greenland, but from the little bit I've seen, they seem like working-class people who want to be left alone. Does that sound like anything you've heard of before? Working-class people who just want the government to leave them alone.
I've got a feeling that there's a lot of smartness behind Trump's idea of buying Greenland. That he might know that the population is just ready to be seduced. And if Trump himself went there, you would agree that would be the wrong move, right? At this point he's not even sworn in, so it would definitely be the wrong move for Trump himself to go. But who would be more perfect to basically seduce the blue-collar people who probably like outdoorsy things? They're probably just like Don Jr. It's probably just a bunch of Greenland Don Jrs. And he lands in the middle of it. And I think here's what I think he's going to do. First of all, he takes this wild idea and he turns it concrete because there's a real person who really matters who's really there. Like it's not conceptual. So Trump has already turned it from conceptual to it's underway. It's amazing the level of his persuasive instincts. They're just crazy. I mean, I've never seen anything this good, honestly.
So I ask you again, is there anybody on the planet who would have been a better choice to send to Greenland today? Answer: no. Best one on the planet for what the intention is. Is it likely that Don Jr. will touch a lot of people, meaning that a lot of people will know he's there, see him, interact with him? Yes. There are only 56,000 people in the whole country of Greenland. My little town is twice that size. He's going to be able to reach, touch, have some impact on a healthy little chunk of that. And it's probably enough to make them all get serious about it. Now, I think that the only thing required for Greenland to say yes is for the Greenland people to feel good about Trump. How are you going to feel when he sends his son out to hang out with you? You're going to feel good about it. You're going to feel like, oh, this Don Jr. is like a regular guy. Don Jr. does the best job of being a rich guy acting like a regular guy. Now, I don't think he's acting exactly. I think that's his actual personality. He's perfect for this job. Just perfect. I love everything about this.
Anyway, let's talk about these other countries. Oh, and just one last thing about Greenland. I'm sure it would be good for Denmark to sell Greenland because they can't afford to protect it. And it will be important to protect it going forward because the ice melting above it and Russia and China are going to be having their ships around there. And it's got resources that people care about, rare earth materials, minerals, etc. So Denmark would not want to admit it because they'd rather stay in a negotiating mode and say no, no, there's no way we'd ever sell this. But they would be better off. I don't think they're getting a lot of international prestige for being colonizers of Greenland. Do the people in Denmark wake up and say I feel good about my country because of our control of Greenland? There's nothing in it for them except expense. Yeah, they're just paying for what's there. So it's good for Denmark. It's probably good for Greenland, almost certainly, and it could be good for the United States and definitely good for Canada to have us protecting on both sides so that would put Canada between Greenland and Alaska. If you can tell me that there would be a safer place on Earth than being between our two assets of the United States, it's a pretty good situation. So I don't know if the deal is going to happen, but it is in everyone's interest somewhat unambiguously, like clearly obviously in everybody's interest. I think he's going to get it done. I think this will be amazing.
Meanwhile, Trump also has talked about Canada becoming a state. And he keeps joking about it but not really, which is fascinating. Now, here's what I think. It sounded like just a Trumpian joke to make fun of Trudeau for being like a governor instead of a leader of the country. But given what's happening in Canada, I don't think the United States can take a chance that a caliphate forms on our northern border. And that's what's happening now. You might say, Scott, Scott, there are so few Muslims in Canada. That's you're crazy. To which I say that's how it happens. It happens with too few. That's the whole way it happens. You have too few, and then you say, well, a few more wouldn't matter. A few more, well, no problem so far, so why not have a few more? And so far no problem. Stop being racist. Let's get a few more. At some point when you reach around 10% of the population, the radicals within that group will come to control the moderates because radicals are willing to die for what they want. The moderates are not. They're just trying to get along. So the most extreme people in any group tend to rise to control of it, right? It's just natural. It has nothing to do with Islam. It's just the natural way anything works. The people who are willing to die for it literally are going to be in charge or die trying.
So I don't think we can take a chance that Canada is heading really hard toward getting that 10% population, which could easily turn into the seeds of a caliphate. And we could have an Islamic country on our northern border. That's no good because of the compatibility with the systems. So the other thing is that if you put into the mix that you might want to buy Canada or have them merge with us, I guess not buy it, it makes the Greenland thing seem more normal. Somebody was pointing out that Trump is ruining the Overton window or something. So he's got so many things going on that you don't know where to stop to criticize them. You're just whipped from one topic to another. So I love the fact that you simultaneously talking about Panama Canal, Canada, and Greenland. That's just so Trumpy and perfect to be talking about all of them at the same time. It's very strategically smart because even if he just wants one of them to happen or two of them, it's good to throw Canada in the mix.
So as you know, Trudeau is stepping down. I saw it. Eventually he announced it. And I saw Scott Jennings, the Republican guy that they have on CNN, who does a great job. And he said that the removal or the leaving or the quitting of Trudeau, you could draw a direct line from the Canadian truckers situation. Do you think that's true? Do you think that the evil that he put on the Canadian truckers for protesting, canceling their banking and just, my god, do you think that that was sort of the thing that pushed Canada over the line and even eventually led to Trudeau having to step down? Do you think there is a straight line? I think there is. Obviously it took more than that, but yeah, I think the truckers kind of got it done. So congratulations, Canadian truckers. BJ, take a bow. I know he's listening.
All right, so should we talk about Elon Musk angering Canada or angering Britain or angering Germany or angering France? Where would you like me to start? So after Elon Musk becomes the determinant factor, maybe for why Trump gets elected, he seems to change his focus or for at least some of his time on other countries. And so let's just run through the list of who is made mad recently.
So up in Canada, there's a report, we don't know if it's true. Some Musk asked for a fact check on it. But allegedly some Islamists in Canada are holding a conference, which again is not confirmed, it's just being reported, on how to defeat all non-Muslim nations and create a global caliphate. Now, they're pretty far away from having enough power to do that sort of thing, but the way it starts is with a first meeting to talk about it. So Elon's looking at that with one eyebrow up like the rest of us should be. And of course he's accused of racism. So Canada has that problem that we've kind of solved in the United States, and I'll call it the Andrew Breitbart solution. It goes like this. You wanting to close the border, you're a racist, you're racist, you're racist. And then as Andrew Breitbart teaches, you say so. Well, but you're racist, you're racist, you're racist. So yeah. And I don't think that's literally what's happening, but I don't think that anybody wants to be a racist, and they're not. They're not racist. They're just not interested in your opinion. That's the win. The win is to not be interested. So yeah, yep, yep, that's true. So but Canada still thinks that if they complain about somebody being a racist, that the person they complain about will have to change their ways and apologize and get in line. To which Elon Musk does not say, but may indeed be thinking, so that's what Canada needs. Just two letters. So yeah, yeah, that this would be terribly bad for one group. Everything is so. You'll get there.
The other fake news that I sent around yesterday accidentally was a video of Trudeau resigning in a bar watching it. And as it happened, the bar erupted in wild cheers. That was actually a fake video. The bar was real, but they were reacting to a sporting event. But somebody put Trudeau on the TV screen, and it made it look like they were celebrating his stepping down. But that was fake news.
All right, so you think things are bad in the UK? If I had to describe to you how bad things are going in the UK, what would be the fewest words that I could use to describe how bad it is over there? Well, I'll see if I can do it. The fewest words to describe how bad things are in the UK. All right, how I'm going to go with this: Andrew Tate's running for prime minister. Anything else you need to know? But it gets better.
Now, first of all, I do know that you don't run for prime minister. So before you jump in and say, Scott, you don't understand the system. They, you know, the prime minister is selected by the other elected people to be their leader, blah blah blah. I don't care. He says he's running for prime minister, which presumably he knows he needs to get into the government and then be part of a party that has enough support to make him the prime minister. So I'm not worried about the details. Now, Andrew Tate is serious about it. But he also says whether he wins or loses, he can sort of force the conversation to be about the things they need to talk about, and he can bring attention to the worst parts of their system.
And now I'm going to say something that will shock you because you're not going to be ready for this. Remember in 2015 when I was one of the first people in the country besides, you know, Ann Coulter to say that you don't understand Trump. He's not like normal people. He has this persuasion skill stack that will eviscerate anything he comes in contact with that challenges him until he has hollowed out the Republican Party and become president. Now, of course everybody laughed at me and said you're so stupid because he's just a crazy clown and he doesn't have any government experience. So I can tell you one thing. A crazy clown with, oh, and he also has lots of scandals like probably did things with women that you don't like. Does that sound familiar? Well, you may know that there was some press coverage that Andrew Tate had at least for some number of years, I don't know if he still does, an actual hypnotist who was in his inner circle. An actual hypnotist, like not somebody who just read up on it. When you saw his popularity rise, did it seem to you like it was unnatural? Like how in the world did he pull that off and become the number one thing on a lot of internet? And the answer is he has the talent stack.
Now, you don't have to like him. I don't like him. Right, so you might know I have a little history with him, and we're not friends. I don't endorse him. I don't think I want him to be the prime minister of Great Britain. But nonetheless, if you were looking at it as just a talent story, does he have the talent to break through the system? And the answer is yes. The answer is yes because he has the ability to mobilize males. And if he gets enough of them, he's just Trump. It's a Trump strategy. The men in Great Britain are completely underserved and know it. They just don't have any politician who's willing to say, men, you're underserved. Let's change that. If Andrew Tate gets enough traction that the men of Great Britain hear him say that or some version of men, you're completely underserved, I'm going to help you protect the country. I know you want to, but the government's preventing you. Now we're going to protect the country. We're going to keep out the bad elements, etc. Now, I'm assuming and get rid of the grooming gangs and stuff like that.
Now, what's interesting is that Tate allegedly has converted to Islam. So is it possible he would get some Muslim support as long as he's said some version of, you know, I'm Muslim too, but you guys are crazy. We're not going to make a caliphate. That's crazy. I'm going to prevent you from trying to form a caliphate. I'm going to prevent you from trying to create your own society within England. I'm going to stop it. And I'm one of you. I'm one of you, and I'm going to stop it. That'd be pretty strong, right? You know, Trump went from Democrat to Republican. Is it a stretch that Tate went to Islam and then he could control, not control, but he would be influential potentially with other Islamic citizens and with men? We already know he has a superpower because men kind of like his audacious. They like the whole act.
So here's the thing I'm going to warn you about. I wouldn't bet that he will become prominent in the UK political system. I would bet against it. I would bet against it. However, if you think it's crazy or you think he doesn't have the talent, you're wrong. He has the talent. He does have the talent. He has the talent to just hollow out their entire government and wear it like a suit like Trump did. Exactly like Trump did. So if you don't think there's a path, there's a path. There's a path. I would bet against it, but there's a path.
All right. The only defense that they could have against his persuasive abilities would be the legal system. Just put him in jail. And of course control of the media so the media never gives him any attention. So that might work. I don't know if it's enough. Didn't work in America.
Let's see. So Musk did a poll on X. He said you want a response to this: America should liberate the people of Britain from their tyrannical government. 58% of people said yes. I have no idea how serious he is about that. I don't think it's serious. I think he's just sort of making a point and trolling them a little bit. But now the UK prime minister, that Keir Starmer, who needs a name I can pronounce, I demand he change his name, is accusing Musk of spreading misinformation, blah blah blah. They're all mad.
And then other countries like France. So Macron in France is complaining that Musk is interfering with other countries. So what did Musk say when Macron said in public that Musk was interfering with other countries? Musk says, oh, like the time Starmer called real Donald Trump a racist and said the British government should do everything to stop him? That happened. Good point. Or how about when Starmer sent British Labour Party members to campaign in the US against President Trump? Was that interfering? And those aren't even the good ones. You want a good one? Have you heard of something called the Steele dossier where an ex-intelligence person from the UK came up with this whole fake thing? Yeah, an ex-intelligence person from the UK. There's no ex-intelligence people. That was just Great Britain interfering with the United States. That's what that was.
And then my funniest part was this. A British politician named Ed Davey, he went on X to speak his mind. He said, quote, "People have had enough of Elon Musk interfering with our country's democracy when he clearly knows nothing about Britain. It's time to summon the US ambassador to ask why an incoming US official is suggesting the UK government should be overthrown." So there's nothing funnier than a person saying that Elon Musk doesn't understand their complicated situation because, you know, that's not been his domain. To which I say, really? Elon Musk doesn't understand a complicated thing and doesn't have the ability to get up to speed really quickly? Because I mean, how could he? Come on, listen to Jordan Peterson's book. I probably won't.
All right, so nothing's funnier than telling Elon Musk he can't handle a complicated situation. And Elon said in response, said, what exactly do I fail to understand about your failure to stop the mass rape of little girls in Britain, you sniveling cretin? Okay, that covers it. No, nothing else to say. But the audacity of the sniveling cretin Ed Davey to imagine that his world is the complicated kind that somebody like Elon Musk could possibly not understand. Like, oh, well, we don't understand the complications of why you're allowing these horrific crimes. Yeah, maybe he doesn't know the nuance. I swear every time somebody says that Elon Musk is dumb or doesn't understand something, I just shake my head. It's like, have you watched anything he's done for the last 30 years? Anyway, it's literally all he does. The reason he's world famous is he enters domains in which he knows nothing about and almost immediately is the best one in the domain. Like that's literally what he does.
All right. And Keir Starmer said he's considering cutting ties with the US unless Donald Trump distances himself from Elon Musk. To which I say it's about time. Yeah, why don't we cut our diplomatic ties? I'm totally okay with that. I think if the UK is really threatening free speech in America, and Elon is in America and he has free speech, if they're going to attack the United States because of free speech of anybody, doesn't matter if he's part of the government, elected, not elected, advisor, citizen, recent citizen, it doesn't matter. He gets to say anything he wants within certain decency standards. So now if Great Britain is trying to squelch the free speech of anybody in America, we should cut ties. We've done it before. Yeah, we should cut ties.
Then of course Musk has been advocating, I think, for what they call the far-right alternative party in Germany, the AfD. Now, the part of the story you need to understand is that when Musk says the quote far-right party in Germany is the one that would do a better job, it's not far-right. So that's just something the news says. If you looked at their policies, it would sort of look like MAGA. That's my understanding. Now, unlike Elon, I don't know a lot about Germany, so I'm not going to pretend to. But I don't think it's true that there's some kind of extremist group. I do think maybe they had something in their past like that. But remember, the Democrats have the KKK in their past. But if you hold it against them today, that would be just stupid. And I see people doing it, and I just always bristle when I see that. It's like that was a long time ago. If they're not currently supporting the KKK and they couldn't be further from it, then it doesn't really matter what they did in the past.
All right, then there's, let's see, Emmanuel Macron is directly accusing Musk of interfering with elections, including Germany. And I guess that's all I need to say about that one.
Meanwhile, you heard that we've already talked about this. Biden banned offshore oil drilling before he leaves office, and only in certain places that there isn't a lot of drilling right now. So I don't know how big a deal it is in the real world, but it looks like he was just trying to kneecap Trump so Trump couldn't allow drilling there. But here's the weird part. All the experts are saying it's irreversible, that Trump doesn't have any way to back out of it. And it has to do with a previous court ruling called Chevron deference. I'm going to get all this wrong because this is not my expertise, the law. But as best I understand it, there was some prior situation that went to the Supreme Court in which an agency of the government had made a ruling that we should do something this way. And somebody else said no, you can't do it that way. We're going to stop you or reverse it. And then the Supreme Court said we're not going to reverse an agency's opinion unless you've got a really strong reason that that is beyond just we have a different opinion. And so as long as it's just a difference of opinion of how things should be and nothing more than that, the courts won't touch it based on precedent.
Now, so that would suggest that the ruling is made. If Trump wanted to overturn it, you imagine the courts would be involved. But the smart people say but you won't win, and it could take years to get through. But here's my take. Nothing's irreversible. There's nothing that you can't cancel or reverse. That's not a thing. It might be that it's hard. It might be that somebody didn't yet figure out how to do it. It might be that you have to be messy and take some hits to get it done. It might be that you have to do something that's never been done. Maybe you have to take some penalties. But I think you can reverse anything that's a decision that the country made. So I'll just give you some examples. So if the reason it's staying is because an agency has ruled on it, then Trump simply has to give a better reason that's not just a better opinion but like really overwhelmingly unique situation. This really needs to be reversed. He could probably do that. I don't know. Could probably come up with an argument of why it needs to be reversed. But it might take a few years to do it. So I don't even know if it's worth doing, but we'll see.
Trump did say he would reverse all the executive orders from Biden. But we wonder if that one's going to be an exception because if he reverses the executive order, the courts won't accept it. So we'll see.
The Wall Street Journal is reporting how Iran has pulled pretty much everything of their assets out of Syria. And if you didn't know, that's a really big deal because Syria was sort of their land bridge to Hezbollah and their ability to equip and fund their proxies. So now Iran has no air defenses. Israel's taking out their air defenses. They've lost Syria, which means that they can't reinforce Hezbollah at least in any efficient way. And Hezbollah has been beaten back at the moment, and Hamas is just annihilated. And apparently Iran spent billions of dollars to get Syria up and running as their proxy base station, and they lost all that.
Now, I would agree that this is the perfect setup for Trump to get some kind of a deal. I don't think I've ever seen a better setup. Trump is coming in exactly at the time when we can make deals, and there's a way to do it. It almost seems like a God-inspired kind of thing. It's like really, all these things need to be handled from Ukraine to Iran. It needs to be handled with deals. And the best, most famous, I won't say best, but the most famous dealmaker in the world is coming into office at exactly the time everything's just perfectly set up to make a deal. When have we ever seen that before? It's like weirdly great. It's like almost too good to be true. Everything from Greenland to Ukraine, it's just all things that he can make a deal on, and it looks all doable. It's weird. It's going to make you think that Biden was even worse than you already think. Because if Trump comes in and immediately wraps up some things that Biden couldn't wrap up, any questions about who is the best president ever and who was the worst will be answered. And I think that's going to happen.
I saw the amuse account on X pointing out that Soros prosecutors, the people that Soros funded, those prosecutors, 40% of the homicides in the US take place in districts with Soros-funded prosecutors. Now, some of that is because he funded the ones in urban areas, so there's going to be more murder. But that's a lot. But 75% of those districts, the ones that are Soros districts, 75% of them stopped reporting murder statistics to the FBI in 2021. So that doesn't look like a coincidence, does it? So when Elon Musk said, he said it a while ago and he's reinforced it, that in his opinion Soros hates humanity, and that is how you explain all of his seemingly charitable actions that apparently are designed to destroy the world. I don't know what he's thinking when he's doing it, but if you looked at the outcome, you'd say, well, I mean, there's no way you would do all of those things unless you had a unified theory to destroy the world because they just seem so obviously unproductive. So I love that we're shining a light on it, and I think that gives you a chance to reverse it. So we'll see.
Well, there's an update on the pipe bomber. So you remember the original January 6. There were reports and videos of somebody planting pipe bombs in two different places. And there have been lots of sketchy accusations and information that makes it look like it was part of a maybe an FBI op or at least a government op. Here's what we know. Liz Wheeler is reporting on this. So there's a new House report about that January 6 pipe bomber, and it's shocking. So apparently, this is from Liz Wheeler, FBI tracked the phone data and they narrowed it down to 186 phone numbers. So remember, the bomber has, caught. So they narrowed it down to 186 phone numbers, and then they narrowed it down further to one. Now, we're talking about one of the pipe bombs by the bench. So the FBI narrowed down the possible suspects based on the phone he had with him to one person. So obviously that person got picked up. And you know what they did after they narrowed it down to just one person? So basically they knew who it was. Here's what they did. They suddenly dropped the case without explaining it. What? And then today there's a new video of a different angle of the guy who planted the bomb. Why is that now just available? There's a reason that we just found out there's a different camera angle. And then surprisingly, it looks like the eyes of the person seem to be digitally blocked out. Now, I'm not 100% sure that it isn't just shadow or something, but if you could see the eyes, then something you might have some way to identify them better. So everything about this is sketchy.
Apparently the FBI agent in charge had told Congress that the telecom company data was corrupted. But when the telecom companies were approached, they said nothing was corrupted. We gave them everything. So it appears the FBI lied to Congress, knew who it was, and dropped the investigation. So that's the allegation. And now the FBI and other agencies are stonewalling Congress about why the investigation that was supposed to be about this really big problem just sort of stopped without an explanation. Good question.
And the two people who found the pipe bombs on January 6 were, quote, a woman carrying a basket of laundry who is actually, as Liz says, a swamp creature who works for an intel-connected organization where she works on quote disinformation. That's convenient. And the other was found by a plainclothes fed, really. So the two people, one was found by a plainclothes fed, and the other was planted by somebody with some connections to the intel world. Okay. Both bombs sat in plain sight undetected for 15 hours or more until both were found independently within 15 minutes of each other. Obviously the order went out to pretend you found the bomb. And also that happened within 15 minutes of the breach of the Capitol. So it's all timed to be exactly what it looks like, some kind of an op.
Further, the frame rate of the one video that the FBI released was 1.2 frames per second. There's no such thing as a video camera that is only 1.2 frames per second. You couldn't buy one if you tried. There's not an old one. There's not a new one. So it's obviously digitally altered for some reason. So this can't be the original video. It's some kind of modified version. And who would have done that? Well, usual suspects. I don't know if we're close to solving this, but I'm willing to say it's exactly what it looked like. It looked like a government, I don't know which part of the government, plot to make the January Sixers look like real insurrectionists because apparently they were very rude by not bringing weapons. So if they could make something blow up, then they could say, well, they're all part of this bombing thing, and then they all have to be killed or something. So I'm willing, I think what we know so far is enough for me to say, oh, that was a government op. Now, I could change my mind if there's new information, but I'd say it's obvious at this point.
Anyway, Jack Posobiec is pitching an idea of having a Victims of 46 Foundation, a charity for the people who suffered under Biden. He was president number 46. And it could exist for the January Sixers and the pro-lifers and the people who were kicked out of the military for the vaccine denial and other stuff. I guess that would be good for the people who are the victims, but it's also good framing. So if you see it as persuasion, yeah, if you knew that we needed a recovery fund from American citizens who suffered the Biden administration, that's a pretty strong message. Like just the fact that this is even considered or it's a thing kind of reframes everything as Biden being evil instead of just a normal different party was in charge.
Meanwhile, Toyota wants 2,000 people to go live in its brand-new city for inventors. It's going to be at the base of Mount Fuji, and it's going to be all the people who are technologists for AI and space rockets and cars and everything. If they put them in one place, they can cross-pollinate and get more done, I guess. So basically they'd be creating like a little Silicon Valley artificially. I think that's worth a try. Now, you might say why does Toyota do that? And the thinking is that Toyota is going to transfer from just making cars, which might be something that in the self-driving car day, if you don't have one, you're not really in business anymore. So there's some kind of general mobility company now. So this all makes sense in some way.
Meanwhile, EPA, according to Interesting Engineering and Christopher McFadden, there are, so there's an electric car company. So they've been trying to build this thing for 10 years, and now they've got a version that's getting close. And it's got a 1,000-mile solar-powered battery, and you can get top speeds of 101 miles per hour, and it's super aerodynamic. So that's a big deal. The more competition there is in that space, the better.
And there's a study that says that video conferencing, where you see yourself on the screen like on, I'm seeing myself, I'm talking to you, but the picture on the screen is the same thing you're seeing, like a Zoom call, you know, you see yourself. And the study finds, according to the Boston University School of Medicine, that the pandemic caused people to use Zoom more and Google Meetings and stuff. And that people feel bad about themselves when they see themselves all the time on screen because it would be like looking in a mirror all day. And if you don't like how you look, it's really getting impressed on you that you don't look the way you want. And it's apparently making some people have some mental illness about their body image.
Now, here's what I noticed. It feels to me like every time there's a technical innovation in society, there's some demographic of society that is made crazy by it. Like actually get mental illness because of something about it. Like your phones make a lot of people go crazy, not everybody. And there's some dispute about whether that's even true. But don't you think it's always the women? No, sometimes it's men. But who's having all the body image problems because they're looking at themselves on Zoom? I mean, I have the same feeling when I play back my recordings, and when I'm looking at myself, I think, oh, I should, I wish I didn't have that or I wish that was different. But it doesn't really make me sad because I have a mirror. I've seen myself. I know exactly what the pluses and the minuses of me are. So it seems like it's again the young female demographic. If you force them to use Snapchat or Instagram or just Zoom, they're going to be focusing on what they look like, and it's going to give them a little mental illness problem.
So that, ladies and gentlemen, is all I wanted to talk about today. There is just so much going on, and weirdly most of it's positive. It's weirdly positive. The Greenland thing just gives us, it's such a palate cleanser, isn't it? Like when we're talking about other things, it's like there's some horrible crime involved or there's some big unsolvable problem or somebody hates somebody. But Greenland is probably a bunch of people who just are fine with the United States, wouldn't mind, probably think they'd come out ahead if they were part of the United States. We think it'd be a good idea. Nobody's really against it. Denmark will resist because that's negotiation or maybe they really want to keep it. I don't know. But it's so just pleasant to think about. Wouldn't it be nice to just add to the country? It's just a good feeling.
All right, that's all I got. I'm going to go talk to the locals people privately for a moment. Wow, yeah, Greg Gutfeld's back. The main cast of The Five is back, and everything's good now. All right, locals, I'm coming at you. Everybody else will see you tomorrow. Thanks for joining. In 30 seconds we'll be...
we're going to have a show I think let me get your comments working here perfect Perfecto well if you're listening to this and not viewing it you don't know that there's a Dilbert comic that's up on the screen I hope you see it uh and Dilbert he's training his elbonian replacement and the boss says to Dilbert good news after you train your elbonian replacement I'll be reducing payroll expenses while being more diverse it's a twofer and dber says will you be treating him like a slave and the boss says oh right it's a ther so always always up on the current trends all right let's see if I can change that screen back to me there we go how goodlooking I am well you may Wonder uh if I drink enough coffee will it cause a reduction in my OCD well yes I will all right let's make this official good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams and I don't think you've ever had a better time but if you'd like to take this experience up to levels where they can never understand it in Greenland and Panama and those other places we're going to conquer all you need for that is a cuper muger a glass of tanker chal ofstein a Canen Jugger flask vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee join me now for the unparallel pleasure the dopamine end of the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous Sip and it happens now exceler well so I've got lots of tech news and a bunch of bunch of political news uh Al I'm going to say most of the tech news too after the political stuff but there a couple of cool things uh CES the the technology show is happening right now for 2025 and one of the things that's being introduced is a 3D projector now not the kind that projects on a flat screen and it gives it you know the appearance of being 3D it actually creates the 3D holograph and can put it on your table and have a dance in front of you now I don't know if they can do it with photo realistic stuff they did it with an animation so you look at the table and and sitting on the table apparently is a little character that's dancing right in front of you in uh as a 3D object kind of amazing I didn't think that was going to come well I did a little uh deeper dive on Quantum Computing because I was trying to understand I've told you this before uh when I hear people explain how it works or why it works it sounds like word salad and I thought to myself H I guess maybe it's because I don't have the technology background but if I did I'd understand that word salad and I went deeper and deeper and I'm I'm quite sure that nobody knows why it works I'm fairly positive and you've heard things like I think Joe Rogan said this the other day the quantum Computing works because it accesses the Infinity of other dimensions nothing like that's happening there there's nothing like accessing other dimensions that's not happening uh we don't know what is happening but there's no indication it's accessing another dimension if there is one what is it even so the the things they say are things like well you know the this probability wave uh interferes with another one and between the two of them they can predict the future without using any logic or any calculation they just see the future and and that future they see could be like the solution to a difficult you know uh problem like a math problem or and I say to myself really you just interfere a couple of probabilities and then you can see the future so what Quantum Computing is alleging to do is literally see the future or or to peer into the past I guess too none of this is really possible as far as I know so I thought to myself it must be me right there just because I don't understand the field and I've now seen two experts who do understand it kind of suggest that nobody understands it and we don't know if it could ever even be commercial in a in a big way I mean it might have some Niche you know specific things it can do but it's never going to be a general computer um so forget about having your own quantum computer it doesn't look like that's going to happen but Nvidia just created a three 3,000 personal AI supercomputer and it's uh it's only this little box which if you wanted to work on AI if if I understand it right it would be like a um a data center in a tiny little box so if you were working with AI instead of having to access a data center you can access this little box on your desk and apparently you have like full AI capability so I don't know the ins and outs and the pluses and minuses of doing that versus having access to the uh actual full data center but it's got 200 billion parameters and it looks like a big deal and then they also they also have a secret chip that's going to go in humanoid robots so uh with all those new introductions I guess the stock for NVIDIA would be and it's down I don't know maybe people expected more seemed pretty impressive to me I think Nvidia is over worth well over3 trillion dollar now and you know they're they're talking about things that looks like it would have a big impact on Tesla because um if they put these humanoid chips and robots does Tesla buy some of those chips or do they have their own chips for the robots so I don't know who's smart enough to know if any of these Nvidia things have any impact on Tesla's future but I don't know we'll see um in the guardian they're saying that virtual employees could come this year in other words a a AI agent that can take instructions and act like a person and get things done I'm GNA go contrary I'm going to say it won't happen and that's based on my experience where I tried to create over the summer I tried a lot I I worked pretty hard on it trying to create a AI agent that could just answer some questions on my dilbert.com web page and what I learned is it doesn't look like it's possible and here's the problem with the current AI which which would be different from the future versions which are AGI but the one that uses a large language model and just use patterns it can't answer the questions reliably because it hallucinates and you can't stop it and even if you have a database and you say AI uh do you see this database yes I can read it can you tell me something that's on the page yes here it is you go okay you can definitely read the data here's my instructions when I ask you a question only look at this database which is just a document and and only answer from that okay got it and then you ask a question it'll just make something up without even looking at the document so that was UN commercial product there was actually a launched commercial product that as far as I can tell doesn't work and I don't think there was any competitor so there was nobody who had figured out how to make it stop hallucinating and as far as I know it might not be possible because the large language models don't just follow rules they've got a whole different you know mechanism I don't think you could make that reliable I think bi its nature it's unreliable and I don't know that you could tweak it fix it patch it I don't think you can get there from here so that's why they need the AGI that would be a whole different technology that we haven't seen yet I don't think it's invented but I guess they Sam mman thinks are getting close and it could happen pretty soon um but I'm going to go contrarian and say the current AI is not going to create an employee that you can rely on uh so I'm contrarian there all right so there were at least two things that were fake news that I reposted yesterday without knowing there were fake news now how much worse is this going to get how many times am I going to get fooled by something that really looks real um it didn't make much difference one of them was um a parody that showed a company that would be the reconstituted Enron creating a nuclear egg you know something you could hold in your arms there would be a nuclear power plant for your personal home it was just like a big egg and the commercial for it was really well done it had specifications and how to use it and everything uh but it was parody it wasn't labeled clearly parody though so I looked at it and I'm looking for the parody part I didn't I didn't see parody so I reposted it thought but I asked at least I was at least I was aware enough to say is this real when I reposted it but if it was real it' be a big deal it wasn't real it's not real so I think that they cheated um the rules on X is that it must be clearly labeled it was labeled but I think the whole clearly part you maybe is in question meanwhile there's a new study according to just the news Stephen Richards is writing that new study says that Tik Tok suppresses anti-china content so it has both anti and pro-china content but it suppresses the anti and promotes the other now is there anybody you know who's been telling you this for years is there anybody who said uh uh you know the that China is got their finger on this and there's no way that this is all you know objective I I talked to a Tik Tock user the other day and I I mentioned it was going to be you know it would be banned unless an American buys it and and I said it's because you know it could be persuasive in a way we don't like and the person I talk to said but you don't understand you don't use Tik Tok if you did you know that I see both sides of every story and I said do you how do you know well because I see both sides sides now I think that's true I think both sides of every story are in fact on Tik Tok but the problem is which one do you see the most and who sees it and as I explained to the Tik Tok user who she'll remain anonymous I said uh what if what if there are some people using Tik Tok that Tik Tok can tell for sure they cannot be influenced meaning that you're a hard Democrat or you're hard Republican you're not going anywhere but do you think that Tik Tok can identify people who are on the fence cuz everything depends on the people on the fence The Independents do you think it can identify an independent and if it did do you think the independent would get exactly as much you know content as you're seeing so the thing is that you can't tell if persuasion is happening you just see what you see and if the only thing you knows that you're seeing both sides you don't know if you're the person they're trying to influence and maybe you're not so maybe you're just seeing regular content but uh there's no way that they're going to keep their finger off the button if it's so easy to move the you know persuasion needle so anyway this it's not peer reviewed yet but it will be so maybe it's not valid we'll see what the peer review says but I think it's just so obvious you know you could have just asked me you didn't have have to do the study do you think China will use this to influence the world duh duh so China did make a weapon of mass persuasion and uh Kevin o seems to be one of the people who part of a group looking to buy it so it would stay Tik Tock could stay in business but become an American thing with American data and American control I don't know if that's going to happen but we'll see all right um oh so the Washington Post is reporting uh according to the New York Post is reporting about the Washington Post um that Trump uh is talking about scaling back his tariff threats and making them more about specific Industries instead of making them broad now here's my question why is the Washington Post working against the interests of the United States 100% of the people watching the story know that Trump is using tariffs for negotiation everybody knows it do you think the Washington Post doesn't know that he's using it for negotiations so the main thing that you do if you're negotiating is you come in with your hardest offer you know the the toughest one so that you can negotiate from that should you need to so Trump has been consistent oh yeah we're we're going to tariff everything from Canada if we have to or everything from China I don't know if he says that but but he acts like the Tariff is just going to be wonderful and great and good for the country and and then the smart people say but but it's like he doesn't understand tariffs he doesn't know that the American company pays for it not the you know not the foreign company shipping in to which I say settle down it's for negotiating he doesn't have to he doesn't have to say your version in order for this to work he has to pretend I'll say pretend that he wants tariffs so badly and they're so good that the more tariffs he has the happier he's going to be and then go into the negotiation but the Washington Post is trying to kneecap him they they're broadcasting to the world that he doesn't mean his his starting position what are they trying to accomplish is that just trying to ruin the country are they just is just an anti-American entity and they they decide what to write about based on how bad it is for America now I don't think that's the case but it looks like it why why does it look like it I guess they they want to attack Trump in any way they can so there's still a resistance publication they're nowhere near the middle and they think this is somehow what what advancing the interests of who who and then of course you have to ask the question what would tariffs do to amazon.com probably not good for business so this is a kind of reporting that um even though it's uh I'm sure it's accurate I don't think it's inaccurate but this is the sort of thing you should brush over as in some people say that you know it's a negotiating position that's not telling anybody anything but if you say it's a negotiating position and he's already saying that he's not going to stick with it well that's not reporting that's just ruining his negotiating position that's like getting in the story so very unhappy about that well yesterday the Democrats um who have been saying for eight years that Trump is Hiller uh they were quite proud of their peaceful transfer of power to Hiller do you think that anybody in their base has noticed that they called him Hitler for eight years said he's the biggest risk to America and then they're acting proud that they rolled over and gave him the win to protect democracy that's right the Democrat message is Trump is Hitler and we're going to protect democracy by peacefully putting him into power um does anybody on their side see that is it just us are we the only ones who see that nothing they did makes sense unless unless the primary thing they've been telling you for eight years was known to be a lie when they said it which is the case obviously it was a lie unbelievable just unbelievable then Biden is going to release 11 yemeni detainees from guano moay in other words people with suspected terrorist Tendencies two of them were I think uh Osama Bin Laden's bodyguards but the Biden Administration is assuring us that they've been either rehabilitated or vetted and checked down and they just want to send them to Oman to which I say om man how is that a good idea now if he said we're just doing it to save money then at least I could say well seems like a dangerous thing but at least it say his money but they're not really saying that does this it looks like a prank it it looks like somebody sat down and say all right what's the worst thing we could do well let's let's do something that's just like so indefensible that it'll just be funny like why is it that his actual policies are indistinguishable from what I would call a practical joke like that would be a good practical joke oh we're going to free a bunch of terrorists why it's just the power the president has I I know but but why well we're going to release 11 them to Oman but why well we checked them out and uh you know we think this is a good play but what do you know that we don't know unless you've put internal bombs in them so they blow up when they reach Oman how is this good for America it's it's it looks like a joke meanwhile CNN's Harry enton um did a survey and asked people what their biggest memories of trump were from prior Administration and apparently the January 6 event um only 5% of the people surveyed said that was their biggest memory of trump now this poll is ridiculous so if you thought oh that's telling me something the whole world has moved on no the question was you know what's the first thing you remember and Trump is somebody who reminds you of a hundred things so if you ask a poll and you say What's the the biggest one and they don't pick January 6 I don't think that means they don't care about it I mean I don't think people do care about it that much but I don't think this poll is useful what's interesting is that CNN would feature it because it it has the it I I think it's a you know biased absurd poll with no no credibility whatsoever but it's on CNN and it's unambiguously Pro Trump meaning that the country doesn't care about the thing that they've been reporting on for a for what four years the country doesn't care was CNN's reporting which would be consistent with their you know decline in ratings so forget about the accuracy of the poll just look at the fact that it was on CNN at all that's kind of interesting apparently speaking of pranking the Biden Department of Justice is going to bring 200 more uh people up on charges for January 6 and not this January 6 you know the original now the Gateway pundits reporting this why in the world would they do that don't they know that they're just going to be granted clemency or pardon like it just again this one looks like okay that's a prank right that like you're not serious are you you're you're actually going to charge 200 more spend all that money and all that time to ruin their lives when you know they're going to be released how in the world does that make sense like none of it looks real it just doesn't look like real people made these decisions it looks like a bad dream or a prank or practical joke or something well one of the big fun stories today is that Mark Zuckerberg did a video in which he says he's quite radically going to change how Facebook um sleta is censoring and he seems to have gone to full Trump um he said that the Trump election was sort of a cultural pivot point so he starts out by saying directly that the mood of the country is very clearly you know magal looking and that he wants to adapt to it now these are my words not his exact words but very clearly he was saying you know we live in a in a world in which Trump won the majority and Facebook would be better off as a company if it started to be more compatible with that point of view now that point of view is less censorship and you know better processes for the censorship so he described what he's going to do which is remarkable now as I'm talking about this I know exactly what you're going to be thinking you're going to say to me Scott but what about all the terrible terrible things he did in the past with Facebook you know Banning people and censoring and all that those are true things that I don't care about because I don't live in the past if I lived in the past I would care about it now you might say but but Scott what took him so long to which I say everything good takes too long I'm not going to judge him for taking too long I'm going to be happy if it's a good idea so I think and I I'll tell you more details but I think he is right on point it's one of the most brilliant CEO moves you'll ever see he is so smart and again I know that you're going to say but but I'm so mad at him I can't get over it I get it I get it you don't like what he did in the past and I'm not defending it I'm just saying that the moves he's making now probably are exactly what he says and they're good listen to this um he's going to get rid of fact checking he's going to get rid of the fact Checkers because they're biased what does that sound like that's Mega that's that's pure Mega the fact Checkers are fake and you have to get so he's getting rid of them do you know what he's going to replace fact checking with he's going to copy Community notes from X and he says that's what he's going to do I'm going to basically copy X and use Community notes because it works so musk went first Community notes is quite successful I would say and um Zuckerberg noticed and so he's copying now it's not easy to be a social media Network and say um you see my kind of a competitor I'm just going to copy that because it was a good idea that that's what Zuckerberg can do like it's just brilliant but there's more um they're going to get rid of the automated sensoring and only consider sensing some situations where somebody's being reported so there'll still be things censored you know the the worst violent stuff you know the usual stuff but uh it won't be automated you'll have to report it now do you approve of that yes you do because you want humans to decide whether humans can can or cannot do so you don't want the algorithm deciding so yeah that's good um he says explicitly that the new process is going to let a lot more inappropriate stuff on the platform but that the principle of free speech is more important do you have a problem with that no that's that's America he just described a perfect Mega opinion about Free Speech it's messy it's violent sometimes it's dangerous but it's free speech and the alternative is worse now here's the one that will blow your mind the the moderation the human moderators apparently they're they're in California what's going to happen if your moderators live in California well it's all going to be liberal opinions of what should be allowed and what should not so here's what he's doing he's moving the moderation from California to Texas let that sink in for a moment he's moving the moderation from California because they're too biased to Texas does that sound like magga yeah it sounds like exactly what you would have done it's exactly what you would have done you would have moved it to Texas and he says he's going to this is this might be the the real money shot here he says he's going to work with Trump um to i' say influence or pressure other countries to not um try to put Facebook meta and a business and that's smart so he's completely aware that he needs the Trump Administration and the government of the United States to back him and and threaten other countries say look if you're going to censor us over there and that hasn't impact on our American company we're going to terar you or we're going to you know stop prot protecting you or something so I love this um so other some other countries probably had back doors and everything else and you want to get rid of that I think so a lot of people said is Zuckerberg just chasing the money and and this is not his own philosophical opinion he's just knows he has to do it to chase money to which I say so so well what why is that bad he's the head of a major uh commercial Enterprise he's not allowed to chase money chasing money means being compatible with the country you're serving so I don't care I don't care if that's his only motivation if it's his only motivation and he can clearly say that getting out of that censorship business is good for business working with Trump productively is good for business um supporting systems that would give you more free speech is good for business if the only thing he wanted to do is make money I would say good job excellent that you you nailed it if you just want to make money I'm completely supportive of that now some of you might say but but Scott it's a trick because he did all those things in the past to buy us a system it's pretty transparent he's either going to do these things he said or he's not I mean that moderation will either move to Texas or it won't you know the the automated the automated system will either catch things or it won't we can watch it's all transparent I I think it's brilliant because he was in a tough place and I think he's completely cognizant of the way Facebook and maybe even his personal donations to try to fix the elections uh fix as in improve um he probably knows that that was a huge mistake and that it distorted the system in a way that the syst system wasn't built to be distorted so to me it looks like he thought he was doing the right thing and thought he was working with the government of the time productively as he saw it I guess and now he knows that those are all mistakes and so he's doing a really hard pivot hard as in it's hard to explain it it's hard to you know especially to his own company imagine imagine how much trouble he's getting from his own employees today do you know how hard that would be to go against all your liberal employees and just do a pure mega version of of the service now when I say pure magga I want to be really careful with my words he's not saying I want to be right-wing when I say pure magga I mean just compatible with the Constitution and that's it it just we just want free speech so if he gives us that pretty happy we'll see I mean I agree with you that the jury's out he he has to perform but everything about his history suggest he knows how to perform all right so all good Wall Street Journal is talking about the success of Robbie Starbuck and I guess he's got a staff of people who are who have got now how many 15 public companies to change or abandon their Dei and lgbtq policies and what's interesting about this is you already knew Robbie Starbuck was having a lot of success there what's different is that it's now a big article in the Wall Street Journal do you know how big that is like every major corporation has somebody paying attention to the Wall Street Journal so it's one thing when you know Robbie Starbuck is bragging on X that things are working and he has a right to brag by the way he's doing amazing work um but once it's in the Wall Street Journal that's the thing that every business has to pay attention to you can't ignore the Wall Street Journal if you're in a business so it kind of It kind of raised Starbucks profile and it raised it in the context of he's winning like crazy that's how you want to be elevated because if he's winning like crazy and it's creating the uh creating a pattern in your brain that these big corporations that you figure is are no dumber than you are are making this change then the 16th 17th and 18th corporation that he talks to he's going to say I got 15 in a row do you think that's an accident no because if you say no uh the Wall Street Journal has already lifted my you know my visibility people like me with big accounts are uh backing him hard um we're in trouble so he is so he's very very cleverly assembled a set of supporters on X that are enormous you know just big accounts who are willing to say yeah do more of that so he he isn't using uh his own power he's doing such good work on behalf of people who have big accounts in the rest of the country I would say that uh we want to back him we want to see more of it so he's he's built a perfect little machine to R over the the Dei excesses perfect it's all good news Well you want me to talk about Don Jr uh recently just landed in Greenland maybe an hour ago and um it does seem that this trip he's with Charlie Kirk and some few other people and it does seem that the intention of the trip is to set the ground workor for a deal to buy it that's like a real thing and this again I I hate to be gushing about smart people doing smart things but can you even think of a smarter way for Trump to approach this than to have Don Jr of all people of all people Don Jr visit personally and interact with the residents now have you seen the early pictures the residents of Greenland are pretty happy that Don Jr's there now for one thing they probably don't get a lot of you know celebrity excitement so they got that going for them but they don't seem like liberals I don't know much about Greenland but you know from the little bit I've seen they seem like working class people who want to be left alone does that sound like anything you've heard of before Working Class People who just want the government to leave them alone I've got a feeling that there's a lot of smartness behind Trump's idea of buying Greenland that he might know that the population is just ready to be um seduced and if if Trump himself went there you would agree that would be the wrong move right at this point he's not even sworn in so it would it would definitely be the wrong move for Trump himself to go but who would be more perfect to basically seduce the the the blue color color people who probably like outdoorsy things they're probably just like Don Jr it's probably just a bunch of Greenland Don jors and he lands in the middle of it and I think he's here's what I think he's going to do first of all he takes this wild idea and he turns it concrete because there's a real person who really matters who's really there like it's not conceptual so Trump has already turned it from conceptual to its underway it's amazing the the the level of his persuasive um instincts are just crazy I mean I've never seen anything this good honestly so I ask you again is there anybody on the planet who would have been a better choice to send to Greenland today answer no best one on the planet for what I for what the intention is um is it likely that Don Jr will touch a lot of people meaning that a lot of people will know he's there see him interact with him yes there are only 56,000 people in the whole country of Greenland my my little town is twice that size he's going to be able to reach touch have some impact on a healthy little chunk of that and it's probably enough to make them all get serious about it now I think that the only thing required for Greenland to say yes is for the Greenland people to feel good about Trump how are you going to feel when he sends his son out to hang out with you you're going to feel good about it you're going to feel like oh this this Don Jr is like a regular guy Don Jr does the best job of being a rich guy acting like a regular guy now I don't think he's acting exactly I I think that's his actual personality um he's perfect for this job just perfect I love everything about this anyway um let's talk about these other countries um oh and just one last thing about Greenland I'm sure it would be good for Denmark to sell Greenland because they can't afford to protect it and it will be important to protect it going forward because the because the ice melting above it and Russia and China are going to be having their ships around there and it's got resources that people care about you know Rare Earth material minerals Etc so Denmark would not want to admit it because you know they'd rather stay in a negotiating mode and say no no there's no way we'd ever sell this but they would be better off I don't think they're getting a lot of uh International Prestige for being colonizers of Greenland are do they do the people in Denmark wake up and say ah feel good about my country because of our control of Greenland there's nothing in it for Greenland except expense yeah they're just paying for what's there so it's good it's good for Denmark it's probably good for Greenland almost certainly and it could be good for the United States and definitely good for Canada to have us protecting on both sides so that would put Canada between Greenland and Alaska if you can if you can tell me that there would be a safer place on Earth than being between our you know two assets of the United States it's a pretty good situation so I don't know if the deal is going to happen but it is in everyone's interest somewhat unambiguously like clearly obviously in everybody's interest I think he's going to get it done I think this will be amazing um meanwhile Trump also has talks about Canada becoming a state and he keeps he keeps joking about it but not really um which is fascinating now here's what I think you know it it sounded like just a you know a trumpian joke to make fun of Trudeau for being like a governor instead of a leader of the country but given what's happening in Canada I don't think we I don't think the United States can take a chance that a calipat forms on our northern border and that's what's happening now you might say Scott Scott there are so few uh Muslims in Canada that's you're crazy to which I say that's how it happens it happens with too few that's that's the whole way it happens you have too few and then you say well a few more wouldn't matter few more well no problem so far so why not have a few more and so far no problem stop being racist let's get a few more as some point when you reach around 10% of the population the radicals Within that group will come to control the moderates because radicals are willing to die for what they want the moderates are not they're just trying to get along so that the the most extreme people in any group tend to rise to control of it right it's just natural it's has nothing to do with Islam it's just the Natural Way anything works the the most the people are willing to die for it literally are going to be in charge um or die trying so I don't think we can take a chance that Canada is heading really hard toward getting that 10% population which could easily turn into the seeds of a caliphate and we could have we could have an Islamic country in our northern border that's no good because of the compatibility with the systems so so um the other thing is that if you put into the mix that you might want to buy can Canada or have them merge with us I guess not buy it it makes the Greenland thing seem more normal you know somebody was pointing out that that Trump is ruining the uh what is it the Overton window or something uh so he's got so many things going on that you don't know where to stop to criticize them you're you're just like whipped from one topic to another so I love the fact that you Sim simultaneously talking about uh Panama Canal Canada and Greenland it that's just so trumpy and perfect to be talking about all of them at the same time it's very strategically smart because even if he just wants one of them to happen or two of them it's good to throw Canada in the mix so as you know Trudeau is stepping down I saw it um eventually he announced it and I saw um Scott Jennings the Republican guy that they have on CNN who does a great job and he said that the the removal or the leaving or the quitting of uh Trudeau uh you could draw a direct line from the Canadian truckers situation do you think that's true do you think that the evil that he put on the Canadian truckers for protesting you know canceling their Banking and you know just my god do you think that that was sort of the the thing that pushed Canada over the line and even eventually led to Trudeau having to step down do you think there is a straight line I think there is obviously it took more than that but yeah I I think the the trucker kind of got it done so congratulations Canadian truckers BJ um Take a Bow I know he's listening all right um so should we talk about Elon Musk angering Canada or angering Britain or uh let's see angering Germany or angering France where would you like me to start so after Elon Musk becomes the you know determinant factor maybe for why Trump gets elected he seems to change you know change his Focus or for at least some of his time on other countries and so let's just run through the list of who who is made mad recently um so up in Canada there's a report we don't know if it's true some musk asked for a fact check on it but uh allegedly some islamists in Canada are holding a uh conference which again is not confirmed it's just being reported uh on how to defeat All non-muslim Nations and create a global caliphate now they're pretty far away from having enough power to do that sort of thing but the way it starts is with a first meeting to talk about it so so elon's looking at that with a one eyebrow up like the rest of us should be um and of course he's accused of racism so so Canada has the that problem that we've kind of solved in the United States and I'll call it the Andrew Breitbart solution it goes like this you wanting to close the border you're a racist you're racist you're racist and then as Andrew Breitbart teaches you say so well but you're racist you're racist you're racist so yeah and I don't think that's literally what's happening but and I don't think that anybody wants to be a racist and they're not they're not they're racist they're just not interested in your opinion that's the win the win is to not be interested so yeah yep yep that's true so but Canada still thinks that if they complain about somebody being a racist that that the person they complain about will have to change their ways and apologize and get in line to which Elon Musk does not say but may indeed be thinking so that's what that's what Canada needs just two letters so yeah yeah that this would be terribly bad for one group everything is so you'll get there um the other fake news that I sent around yesterday accidentally was a video of Trudeau resigning uh in a bar watching it and as it happened the bar erupted in Wild cheers that that was actually a fake video the bar was real but they were reacting to a sporting event but somebody put Trudeau on the TV screen and it made it look like they were they were celebrating his his stepping down but that was fake news um all right so you think things are bad in the UK If I had to describe to you how bad things are going in the UK what would be the fewest words that I could use to describe how bad it is over there well I'll see if I can do it the fewest words to describe how bad things are in the UK all right how I'm going to go with this Andrew Tate's running for prime minister um anything else you need to know but it gets better now first of all I do know that you don't run for prime minister so before you jump in and say Scott you don't understand the system they you know the prime minister is selected by the other elected people to be their leader blah blah blah I don't care he he says he's running for prime minister which presumably he knows he needs to get into the government and then be part of a party that has enough support to make him the prime minister so I'm not worried about the details now uh Andrew Tate is serious you serious about it now but he also says whether he wins or loses he can sort of force the conversation to be about the things they need to talk about and he can bring attention to the worst parts of their system and he can now I'm going to say something that will shock you because you're not going to be ready for this remember in 2015 when I was the one of the first people in the country besides you know Anne Coulter to say that uh you don't understand Trump's like not like normal people he has this persuasion skill stack that will eviscerate anything he comes in contact with that challenges him until he has hollowed out the Republican party and become president now of course everybody laughed at me and said you're so stupid because he's just a crazy clown and he doesn't have any government experience so I can tell you one thing a crazy clown with oh oh and he also has like lots of you know scandals like probably did things with women that you don't like does that sound familiar well you may know that there was some press coverage that Andrew Tate had um at least for some number of years I don't know if he's still does uh an actual hypnotist who was in his inner circle an actual hypnotist like not somebody who just read up on it when you saw his popularity rise did it seem to you like it was unnatural like how in the world did he pull that off and become like the the number one thing on a lot of uh internet and the answer is he he has the talent stack now you don't have to like him I don't like him right so you might know I have a little history with him and we're not friends I don't endorse him I don't think I want him to be the Prime Minister of Great Britain but nonetheless if you were looking at it as just a talent a talent story does he have the talent to break through the system and the answer is yes the answer is yes because he has the ability to mobilize males and if he gets enough of them he's just Trump it's a trump strategy the the men in Great Britain are completely underserved and know it they just don't have any politician who's willing to say men you're underserved let's change that if Andrew Tate gets enough traction that the men of Great Britain hear him say that or some version of men you're completely underserved I'm going to help you protect the country I know you want to but the government's preventing you now we're going to protect the country we're going to keep out you know the bad elements Etc now I'm assuming and you know get rid of the grooming gangs and stuff like that now what's interesting is that t allegedly is converted to Islam so is it possible he would get some Muslim support as long as he's said some version of you know I'm Muslim too but you guys are crazy you know we're not going to make a caliphate that's crazy I'm going to prevent you from trying to form a caliphate I'm going to prevent you from trying to create your own Society within England I'm going to stop it and I'm one of you I'm one you and I'm going to stop it that'd be pretty strong right you know Trump went from Democrat to Republican is it a stretch that take went to Islam and then he could control not control but he would be influential potentially with other Islamic citizens and with men we already know he has a superow because men kind of like his you know audacious they like the whole Act so here's the thing I'm going to warn you about I wouldn't bet that he will become prominent in um the UK political system I would bet against it I would bet against it however if you think it's crazy or you think he doesn't have the talent you're wrong he has the talent he does have the talent he has the talent to to just hollow out their entire government and wear it like a suit like Trump did exactly like Trump did so if you don't think there's a path there's a path there's a path I would bet against it but there's a path um all right the only the only defense that they could have against his persuasive abilities would be the legal system just put them in jail and of course control of the media so the media never gives him any attention so that might work I don't know if it's enough didn't work in America um let's see uh so so musk did a poll on X he said uh you wanted to response to this America should Liberate the people of Britain from their tyrannical government 58% people said yes I have no idea how serious he is about that I don't think it's serious I I think he's just you sort of making a point and trolling them a little bit uh but but now the UK prime minister that care Kier starmer who needs a name I can pronounce I demand he changed his name uh is accusing musk of spreading misinformation blah blah blah they're all mad and then other countries like uh France so macron and France um is uh complaining that uh musk is interfering with other countries so what did musk say when macron um said in public that musk was interfering with other countries musk says oh like the time Stormer called uh real Donald Trump a racist and said the British government should do everything to stop him that happened good point or how about when Storer sent British labor party members to campaign in the US against President Trump was that interfering and those aren't even the good ones you want a good one have you heard of something called the steel dossier where an ex intelligence person from the UK came up with this whole fake thing yeah an X intelligence person from the UK there's no X intelligence people that was just the Great Britain interfering with with the United States that's what that was um and then my funniest part was this a a British politician named ed Davy he went on X to speak his mind he said quote people have had enough of Elon Musk interfering with our country's democracy when he clearly knows nothing about Britain it's time to summon the US ambassador to ask why an incoming Us official is suggesting the UK government should be overthrown um so there's nothing funnier than a person saying that Elon Musk doesn't understand their complicated situation because you know that not that's not been his domain to which I say really Elon Musk doesn't understand a complicated thing and doesn't have the ability to get up to speed really quickly cuz I mean how could he come on listen to Jordan Peterson's book I probably won't all right so nothing's funnier than telling Elon Musk he can't handle a complicated situation and Elon said in response said what exactly do I fail to understand about your failure to stop the Mass rape of little girls in Britain you sniveling cron okay that covers it no nothing else to say but but the audacity of the sniveling creedon Ed Davy to imagine that his world is the complicated kind that somebody who somebody like Elon Musk could possibly understand like oh well we don't understand the complications of why you're allowing these horrific crimes yeah maybe he doesn't know the Nuance I swear every time somebody says that Elon Musk is dumb or doesn't understand something I just shake my head it's like have you watched anything he's done for the last 30 years anyway it's literally all he does the reason he's world famous is he enters domains in which he knows nothing about and almost immediately is the best one in the domain like that's literally what he does all right um and uh car starmer said he's considering cutting ties with the US unless Donald Trump distan himself from Elon Musk to which I say it's about time yeah why why don't we cut our diplomatic um cut our diplomatic ties I'm totally okay with that I I I think if if the UK is really threatening free speech in America in America and Elon is in America and he has free speech if they're going to attack United States because of free speech of anybody doesn't matter if he's part of the government elected not elected advisor citizen recent you know recent citizen it doesn't matter he gets to say anything he wants you know within within certain decency standards um so now if Great Britain is trying to squelch the free speech of anybody in America we should cut ties we've done it before yeah we should cut ties um then of course mus is uh has been advocating I think for the what they call the farri alternative party in Germany the afd now the story part of the story you need to understand is that when musk says the quote far right party in Germany is is the one that would do a better job it's not far right so that's just something the news says if you looked at their far right it would sort of look like Maga you know that that's my understanding now uh unlike Elon I don't know a lot about Germany so I'm not going to pretend to but uh I don't think it's true that there's some kind of extremist group I do think maybe they had something in their past like that but remember the Democrats have the KKK in their past but if you hold it against them today that would be just stupid and I see people doing it and I I just always bristle when I see that it's like that was a long time ago if they're not currently if they're not currently supporting the KKK and they couldn't be further from it then it doesn't really matter what they did in the past all right then there's a let's see um uh he's so Emanuel macron is directly accusing musk of interfering with elections including Germany and I guess that's all I need to say about that one um meanwhile you heard that uh we've already talked about this Biden banned offshore oil drilling before he leaves office and only in certain places that there isn't a lot of drilling right now um so I don't know how big a deal it is in the in the real world but uh it looks like he was just trying to kneecap Trump so Trump couldn't allow drilling there um but here's the weird part all the experts are saying it's it's irreversible that Trump doesn't have any way to back out of it and has to do with h a previous Court ruling called Chevron deference I'm going to get all this wrong because this is you know not my expertise the law but as best I understand it there was some prior situation that went to the Supreme Court in which an agency of the government had made a ruling that we should do something this way and somebody else said no you can't do it that way we're going to stop you or reverse it and then the Supreme Court said we're not going to reverse an agency's opinion unless you've got a really strong reason that that is beyond just we have a different opinion and so as long as it's just a difference of opinion of how things should be and nothing more than that the courts won't touch it based on precedent now so that would suggest that the ruling is made if Trump wanted to overturn it you imagine the courts would be involved but the smart people say but you won't win and and it could take years to to get through but here's my take nothing's your reever there's nothing that you can't cancel in reverse that that's not a thing it might be that it's hard it might be that somebody didn't yet figure out how to do it it might be that you have to be messy and you know take some hits to get it done it might be that you have to do something that's never been done maybe you have to you know take some penalties but I think you can reverse anything that's a decision that the country made so I'll just give you some examples so if um if the reason it's staying is because an agency is ruled on it then Trump simply has to give a better reason that's not just better opinion but like really overwhelmingly you know unique situation this really needs to be reversed he could probably do that I don't know could probably come up with an argument of why it needs to be reversed but it might take a few years to do it so I don't even know if it's worth doing but um we'll see um Trump did say he would reverse all the executive orders from Biden but we wonder if that one's going to be an exception because if he reverses the executive order the courts won't accept it so we'll see um Wall Street Journal is reporting how Iran has pulled pretty much everything of their assets out of Syria and if he didn't know that's a really big deal because Syria was sort of their um their land bridge to Hezbollah and their ability to um equip and fund their proxies so now Iran has no air air defenses Israel's taking out their air defenses they've lost Syria which means that they can't reinforce Hezbollah at least in any efficient way and Hezbollah has been beaten back at the moment and Hamas is you know just annihilated and um apparently Iran spent spend billions of dollars to get Syria you know up and running as their like proxy base station and they lost all that now I would agree that this is the perfect setup for Trump to get some kind of a deal then I don't think I've ever seen a better setup Trump is coming in exactly at the time when we can make deals and there's a way to do it it it almost seems like you know God inspired kind of thing it's like really uh all these things need to be handled you know from Ukraine to Iran it needs to be handled with deals and the best you know well most famous I won't say best but the most famous dealmaker in the world's coming into office at exactly the time everything's just perfectly set up to make a deal when have we ever seen that before it's like weirdly great it's like almost too good to be true everything from Greenland to Ukraine it's just all things that he can make a deal on and it looks all it looks all doable it's weird it's going to make you think that Biden was even worse than you already think because if Trump comes in and immediately wraps up some things that Biden couldn't wrap up you any questions about who is the best president ever and who was the worst will be answered and I think that's going to happen uh I saw the amuse account on X pointing out that Soros prosecutors the people people that Soros funded those prosecutors um 40% of the H homicides in the US take place in districts with Soros funded prosecutors now some of that is because you know he funded the ones in urban area so there's going to be more murder but uh that's a lot but 75% of those districts the the ones that are Soros districts 75% of them stopped reporting murder statistics to the FBI in 2021 so that doesn't look like a coincidence does it so when Elon Musk said he said it a while ago and he's reinforced it that in his opinion Soros hates humanity and that is how you explain all of his seemingly charitable actions that apparently are designed to destroy the world um I don't know what we don't know what he's thinking when he's doing it but if you looked at the outcome you'd say well I mean there's no way you would do all of those things unless you had a unified theory to destroy the world because they they just seem so obviously unproductive um so I love that we're shining a light on it and and I think that gives you a chance to reverse it so we'll see well there's a update on the pipe bomber so you remember the original January 6 there were reports and videos of somebody planting pipe bombs in two different places and there have been lots of sketchy accusations and and information that makes it look like it was part of a maybe an FBI op or at least a government op here's what we know Liz wheeler is reporting on this so there's a new house report about that January 6 pipe bomber and it's shocking so apparently the this is this is from Liz wheeler um FBI tracked the phone data and they narrowed it down to 186 phone numbers so remember the the bomber has caught so they narrowed it down to 186 bomb numbers and then they narrowed it down further to uh one now we're talking about one of the pipe bombs by the bench so the FBI narrowed down the possible suspects based on the phone he had with them to one person so obviously that person got picked up and no you know what they did after they narrowed it down to just one person so basically they knew who it was here's what they did they uh suddenly dropped the case without explaining it what and and then today there's a new video of of a different angle of the guy who planted the bomb why is that now just available there's a reason that we just found out there's a different camera angle and then surprisingly the it looks like the eyes of the per seem to be um digitally blocked out now I'm not 100% sure that it isn't just Shadow or something but if you could see the eyes then something you know you might have some way to identify them better so everything about this is sketchy um apparently the FBI agent in charge had told Congress that the Telecom company data was corrupted but when the the telecom companies were approached they said nothing was corrupted we gave them everything so it appears the FBI lied to Congress knew who it was and dropped the investigation so that's that's the allegation and now there's Stone the FBI and other agencies are stonewalling Congress uh about why the investigation that was supposed to be about this really big problem just sort of stopped without an explanation good question um and the two people who found the pipe bombs on January 6 were quote a woman carrying a basket of laundry who is actually as Liz says a swamp creature who works for an Intel connected organization where she works on quote disinformation that's convenient and the other was found by a plain closed fed really so the two people so one was found by plain closed fed and the other was placed by somebody with some connections to the Intel World okay um both bombs sat in plain sight undetected for 15 hours or more until both were found independently within 15 minutes of each obviously the order went out to pretend you found the bomb um and also that happened within 15 minutes of the breach of the capital so it's all timed to be exactly what it looks like a some kind of an OP uh further the frame rate of the one video that the FBI released um was one 1.2 frames per second there's no such thing as a video camera that is only 1.2 frames per second that you couldn't buy one if you tried it there's not an old one there's not a new one so it's obviously digitally altered for some reason so this can't be the original video it's some kind of modified version and who would have done that well Usual Suspects um I don't know if we're close to solving this but uh I'm willing to say it's exactly what it looked like it looked like a government I don't know which part of the government plot to make the January Sixers look like real insurrectionists because apparently they were very rude by not bringing weapons so if they could make something blow up then they could say well you know they're all part of this this bombing thing and then they all have to be killed or something so um I'm willing I I think what we know so far is enough for me to say oh that was a government Al uh now I could change my mind if there's new information but I'd say it's obvious at this point anyway Jack bobic is pitching an idea of having a victims of 46 Foundation a charity um for the people who suffered under Biden he was president number 46 and it could exist for the January Sixers and the pro-lifers and the people were kicked out of the military for the vaccine denial and other stuff um I guess that would that would be good for the people who are the victims but it's also good framing so if you see it as persuasion yeah if you knew that we needed a Recovery Fund from American citizens who suffer the Biden Administration that's a pretty strong message like just just the fact that this is even considered or it's a thing um kind of reframes everything as Biden being evil instead of just a normal you know different party was in charge meanwhile Toyota wants 2,000 people to go live in its brand new city for inventors it's going to be at the base of Mount Fuji and it's going to be all the people who are technologists for AI and space rockets and cars and everything if they put them in one place they can cross-pollinate and get more down I guess so basically they'd be creating like a little Silicon Valley um artificially I think that's worth a try now you might say why does Toyota do that um and the thinking is that Toyota is going to transfer from just making cars which might be something that in the self-driving car day you know if you don't have one you're not really in business anymore so there there's some kind of General Mobility company now so this all makes sense in some way meanwhile EPA a according to interesting engineering in Christopher mcfaden um there are so there're a uh electric car company so they've been trying to build this thing for 10 years and now they've got a a version that's getting close and it's got a th000 m solar powerered battery and you can get top speeds of 101 miles per hour and it's super aerodynamic um so that's a big deal you know the the more competition there is in that space the better and there's a study that says that video conferencing where you see yourself on the screen like on I'm seeing myself I'm talking to you but the picture on the screen is is the same thing you're seeing um like a zoom call you know you see yourself and the study finds according to the Boston University of school of medicine that uh the pandemic caused people to use zoom more and Google meetings and stuff and that uh people want they feel bad about themselves when they see themselves all the time on screen because it would be like looking in a mirror all day and if if you don't like how you look it's it's really getting you know impressed on you that you don't look the way you look um and it's uh apparently is making some people have some mental illness about their you know body body image now here's what I noticed it feels to me like every time there's a technical innovation in society there's some demographic of society that is made Crazy by it like actually get mental illness because of something about it like your phones make a lot of people go crazy not everybody and there's some there's some dispute about whether that's even true but don't you think it's always the woman no sometimes it's men but who's having all the who's having all the body image problems because they're looking at themselves on Zoom I mean I I have the same feeling when I play back you know my recordings and when I'm looking at myself I think oh I should you know I wish I didn't have that or I wish that was different but it doesn't really make me sad CU I have a mirror I I've seen myself I know I know exactly what the pluses and the minuses of me are so it seems like it's again it's the the young female demographic if you force them to use Snapchat or Instagram or just zoom they're going to be focusing on what they look like and it's going to give them a little mental illness problem so that ladies and gentlemen is all I wanted to talk about today there is just so much going on and weirdly most of it's positive it's weirdly positive the the Greenland thing just gives us it's such a pallet cleanser isn't it like when we're talking about other things it's like there's some horrible crime involved or there's some big unsolvable problem or somebody hates somebody but Greenland is probably a bunch of people who just are fine with the United States wouldn't mind probably think they'd come out ahead if they were part of the United States we think it'd be a good idea nobody's really against it you know Denmark will resist because that's negotiation or maybe they really want to keep it I don't know but it's so just Pleasant to think about wouldn't it be nice to just you add to the country it's just a good feeling all right that's all I got I'm going to go talk to the locals people privately for a moment um wow yeah Greg gutfeld's back the main cast of the the five is back and uh everything's good now all right um locals I'm coming at you everybody else will see you tomorrow thanks for joining in 30 seconds we'll be e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e
we're going to have a
show I think let me get your comments
working
here
perfect
Perfecto well if you're listening to
this and not viewing it you don't know
that there's a Dilbert comic that's up
on the screen I hope you see
it uh and Dilbert he's training his
elbonian replacement and the boss says
to Dilbert good news after you train
your elbonian replacement I'll be
reducing payroll expenses while being
more diverse it's a twofer and dber says
will you be treating him like a slave
and the boss says oh right it's a
ther so always always up on the current
trends all right let's see if I can
change that screen back to me there we
go how goodlooking I
am well you may Wonder uh if I drink
enough coffee
will it cause a reduction in my OCD well
yes I
[Music]
will all right let's make this official
good morning everybody and welcome to
the highlight of human civilization it's
called coffee with Scott Adams and I
don't think you've ever had a better
time but if you'd like to take this
experience up to levels where they can
never understand it in Greenland and
Panama and those other places we're
going to conquer all you need for that
is a cuper muger a glass of tanker chal
ofstein a Canen Jugger flask vessel of
any kind fill it with your favorite
liquid I like coffee join me now for the
unparallel pleasure the dopamine end of
the day the thing that makes everything
better it's called the simultaneous Sip
and it happens
now exceler
well so I've got lots of tech news and a
bunch of bunch of political news uh Al
I'm going to say most of the tech news
too after the political stuff but there
a couple of cool things uh CES the the
technology show is happening right now
for 2025 and one of the things that's
being introduced is a 3D
projector now not the kind that projects
on a flat screen and it gives it you
know the appearance of being 3D it
actually creates the 3D holograph and
can put it on your table and have a
dance in front of
you now I don't know if they can do it
with photo realistic stuff they did it
with an animation so you look at the
table and and sitting on the
table apparently is a little character
that's dancing right in front of you in
uh as a 3D object kind of amazing I
didn't think that was going to
come well I did a little uh deeper dive
on Quantum Computing because I was
trying to understand I've told you this
before uh when I hear people explain how
it works or why it works it sounds like
word salad and I thought to myself H I
guess maybe it's because I don't have
the technology background but if I did
I'd understand that word salad and I
went deeper and deeper and I'm I'm quite
sure that nobody knows why it works
I'm fairly positive and you've heard
things like I think Joe Rogan said this
the other
day the quantum Computing works because
it accesses the Infinity of other
dimensions nothing like that's happening
there there's nothing like accessing
other
dimensions that's not happening uh we
don't know what is happening but there's
no indication it's accessing another
dimension if there is one what is it
even so the the things they say are
things like well you know the this
probability wave uh interferes with
another one and between the two of them
they can predict the future without
using any logic or any
calculation they just see the
future and and that future they see
could be like the solution to a
difficult you know uh problem like a
math problem or and I say to
myself really you just interfere a
couple of probabilities and then you can
see the
future so what Quantum Computing
is alleging to do is literally see the
future or or to peer into the past I
guess too none of this is really
possible as far as I know so I thought
to myself it must be me right there just
because I don't understand the field and
I've now seen two experts who do
understand it kind of suggest that
nobody understands it and we don't know
if it could ever even be commercial in a
in a big way I mean it might have some
Niche you know specific things it can do
but it's never going to be a general
computer um so forget about having your
own quantum computer it doesn't look
like that's going to happen but Nvidia
just created a three 3,000 personal AI
supercomputer and it's uh it's only this
little
box which if you wanted to work on AI if
if I understand it right it would be
like a um a data center in a tiny little
box so if you were working with AI
instead of having to access a data
center you can access this little box on
your desk and apparently you have like
full AI
capability so I don't know the ins and
outs and the pluses and minuses of doing
that versus having access to the uh
actual full data center but it's got 200
billion parameters and it looks like a
big deal and then they also they also
have a secret chip that's going to go in
humanoid
robots so uh with all those new
introductions I guess the stock for
NVIDIA would
be and it's
down I don't know maybe people expected
more seemed pretty impressive to me I
think Nvidia is over worth well over3
trillion dollar now and you know they're
they're talking about things that looks
like it would have a big impact on
Tesla because um if they put these
humanoid chips and
robots does Tesla buy some of those
chips or do they have their own chips
for the robots so I don't know who's
smart enough to know if any of these
Nvidia things have any impact on Tesla's
future but I don't know we'll see um in
the guardian they're saying that virtual
employees could come this year in other
words a a AI agent that can take
instructions and act like a person and
get things done I'm GNA go contrary I'm
going to say it won't happen and that's
based on my experience where I tried to
create over the summer I tried a lot I I
worked pretty hard on it trying to
create a
AI agent that could just answer some
questions on my dilbert.com web page and
what I learned is it doesn't look like
it's possible and here's the problem
with the current
AI which which would be different from
the future versions which are AGI but
the one that uses a large language model
and just use patterns it can't answer
the questions reliably because it
hallucinates and you can't stop it and
even if you have a database and you say
AI uh do you see this database yes I can
read it can you tell me something that's
on the page yes here it is you go okay
you can definitely read the data here's
my instructions when I ask you a
question only look at this database
which is just a document and and only
answer from that okay got it and then
you ask a question it'll just make
something up without even looking at the
document
so that was UN commercial
product there was actually a launched
commercial product that as far as I can
tell doesn't work and I don't think
there was any competitor so there was
nobody who had figured out how to make
it stop hallucinating and as far as I
know it might not be
possible because the large language
models don't just follow rules they've
got a whole different you know mechanism
I don't think you could make that
reliable I think bi its nature it's
unreliable and I don't know that you
could tweak it fix it patch it I don't
think you can get there from here so
that's why they need the AGI that would
be a whole different technology that we
haven't seen yet I don't think it's
invented but I guess they Sam mman
thinks are getting close and it could
happen pretty soon um but I'm going to
go contrarian and say the current AI is
not going to create an employee that you
can rely
on uh so I'm contrarian there all right
so there were at least two things that
were fake news that I reposted yesterday
without knowing there were fake
news now how much worse is this going to
get how many times am I going to get
fooled by something that really looks
real
um it didn't make much difference one of
them was um a parody that showed a
company that would be the reconstituted
Enron creating a nuclear egg
you know something you could hold in
your arms there would be a nuclear power
plant for your personal home it was just
like a big egg and the commercial for it
was really well done it had
specifications and how to use it and
everything uh but it was
parody it wasn't labeled clearly parody
though so I looked at it and I'm looking
for the parody part I didn't I didn't
see parody so I reposted it thought but
I asked at least I was at least I was
aware enough to say is this real when I
reposted it but if it was real it' be a
big deal it wasn't real it's not
real so I think that they
cheated um the rules on X is that it
must be clearly labeled it was labeled
but I think the whole clearly part you
maybe is in question meanwhile there's a
new study according to just the news
Stephen Richards is writing that new
study says that Tik Tok suppresses
anti-china
content so it has both anti and
pro-china content but it suppresses the
anti and promotes the other now is there
anybody you know who's been telling you
this for
years is there anybody who said uh uh
you know the that China is got their
finger on this and there's no way that
this is all you know
objective I I talked to a Tik Tock user
the other day and I I mentioned it was
going to be you know it would be banned
unless an American buys it and and I
said it's because you know it could be
persuasive in a way we don't like and
the person I talk to said but you don't
understand you don't use Tik Tok if you
did you know that I see both sides of
every story and I said do you how do you
know well because I see both sides sides
now I think that's true I think both
sides of every story are in fact on Tik
Tok but the problem is which one do you
see the most and who sees
it and as I explained to the Tik Tok
user who she'll remain
anonymous I said uh what if what if
there are some people using Tik Tok that
Tik Tok can tell for sure they cannot be
influenced meaning that you're a hard
Democrat or you're hard Republican
you're not going anywhere but do you
think that Tik Tok can identify people
who are on the fence cuz everything
depends on the people on the fence The
Independents do you think it can
identify an independent and if it did do
you think the independent would get
exactly as
much you know content as you're
seeing so the thing is that you can't
tell if persuasion is happening you just
see what you see and if the only thing
you knows that you're seeing both sides
you don't know if you're the person
they're trying to influence and maybe
you're not so maybe you're just seeing
regular content but uh there's no way
that they're going to keep their finger
off the button if it's so easy to move
the you know persuasion needle so anyway
this it's not peer reviewed yet but it
will be so maybe it's not valid we'll
see what the peer review says but I
think it's just so
obvious you know you could have just
asked me you didn't have have to do the
study do you think China will use this
to influence the
world
duh
duh so China did make a weapon of mass
persuasion and uh Kevin o seems to be
one of the people who part of a group
looking to buy it so it would stay Tik
Tock could stay in business but become
an American thing with American data and
American control I don't know if that's
going to happen but we'll
see all right
um oh so the Washington Post is
reporting uh according to the New York
Post is reporting about the Washington
Post um that Trump uh is talking about
scaling back his tariff
threats and making them more about
specific Industries instead of making
them broad now here's my
question why is the Washington Post
working against the interests of the
United
States 100% of the people watching the
story know that Trump is using tariffs
for negotiation everybody knows it do
you think the Washington Post doesn't
know that he's using it for
negotiations so the main thing that you
do if you're negotiating is you come in
with your hardest offer you know the the
toughest one so that you can negotiate
from that should you need to
so Trump has been consistent oh yeah
we're we're going to tariff everything
from Canada if we have to or everything
from China I don't know if he says that
but but he acts like the Tariff is just
going to be wonderful and great and good
for the country and and then the smart
people say but but it's like he doesn't
understand tariffs he doesn't know that
the American company pays for it not the
you know not the foreign company
shipping in to which I say settle down
it's for negotiating
he doesn't have to he doesn't have to
say your version in order for this to
work he has to
pretend I'll say pretend that he wants
tariffs so badly and they're so good
that the more tariffs he has the happier
he's going to be and then go into the
negotiation but the Washington Post is
trying to kneecap him they they're
broadcasting to the world that he
doesn't mean his his starting
position what are they trying to
accomplish
is that just trying to ruin the country
are they just is just an anti-American
entity and they they decide what to
write about based on how bad it is for
America now I don't think that's the
case but it looks like it why why does
it look like it I guess they they want
to attack Trump in any way they can so
there's still a resistance publication
they're nowhere near the middle and they
think this is somehow what what
advancing the interests of who who and
then of course you have to ask the
question what would tariffs do to
amazon.com probably not good for
business so this is a kind of reporting
that um even though it's uh I'm sure
it's accurate I don't think it's
inaccurate but this is the sort of thing
you should brush over as in some people
say that you know it's a negotiating
position that's not telling anybody
anything but if you say it's a
negotiating position and he's already
saying that he's not going to stick with
it well that's not reporting that's just
ruining his negotiating position that's
like getting in the story so very
unhappy about that well yesterday the
Democrats um who have been saying for
eight years that Trump is Hiller uh they
were quite proud of their peaceful
transfer of power to Hiller
do you think that anybody in their base
has noticed that they called him Hitler
for eight years said he's the biggest
risk to America and then they're acting
proud that they rolled over and gave him
the win to protect
democracy that's right the Democrat
message is Trump is Hitler and we're
going to protect democracy by peacefully
putting him into power
um does anybody on their side see
that is it just us are we the only ones
who see that nothing they did makes
sense
unless unless the primary thing they've
been telling you for eight years was
known to be a lie when they said it
which is the case obviously it was a
lie
unbelievable just
unbelievable then Biden is going to
release 11 yemeni detainees from guano
moay in other words people with
suspected terrorist Tendencies two of
them were I think uh Osama Bin Laden's
bodyguards but the Biden Administration
is assuring us that they've been either
rehabilitated or vetted and checked down
and they just want to send them to
Oman to which I say om man
how is that a good idea now if he said
we're just doing it to save money then
at least I could say well seems like a
dangerous thing but at least it say his
money but they're not really saying
that does this it looks like a
prank it it looks like somebody sat down
and say all right what's the worst thing
we could do well let's let's do
something that's just like so
indefensible that it'll just be
funny like why is it that his actual
policies are indistinguishable from what
I would call a practical
joke like that would be a good practical
joke oh we're going to free a bunch of
terrorists
why it's just the power the president
has I I know but but
why well we're going to release 11 them
to Oman but
why well we checked them out and uh you
know we think this is a good play but
what do you know that we don't
know unless you've put internal bombs in
them so they blow up when they reach
Oman how is this good for
America it's it's it looks like a joke
meanwhile CNN's Harry enton um did a
survey and asked people what their
biggest memories of trump were from
prior Administration
and apparently the January 6 event um
only 5% of the people surveyed said that
was their biggest memory of trump now
this poll is
ridiculous so if you thought oh that's
telling me something the whole world has
moved on
no the question was you know what's the
first thing you remember and Trump is
somebody who reminds you of a hundred
things so if you ask a poll and you say
What's the the biggest one and they
don't pick January 6 I don't think that
means they don't care about it I mean I
don't think people do care about it that
much but I don't think this poll is
useful what's interesting is that CNN
would feature
it because it it has the it I I think
it's a you know biased absurd poll with
no no credibility whatsoever but it's on
CNN and it's unambiguously Pro Trump
meaning that the country doesn't care
about the thing that they've been
reporting on for a for what four years
the country doesn't care was CNN's
reporting which would be consistent with
their you know decline in
ratings so forget about the accuracy of
the poll just look at the fact that it
was on CNN at all that's kind of
interesting apparently speaking of
pranking the Biden Department of Justice
is going to bring 200 more uh people up
on charges for January 6
and not this January 6 you know the
original now the Gateway pundits
reporting this why in the world would
they do
that don't they know that they're just
going to be granted clemency or pardon
like it just again this one looks like
okay that's a prank right that like
you're not serious are you you're you're
actually going to charge 200 more spend
all that money and all that time to ruin
their lives when you know they're going
to be
released how in the world does that make
sense like none of it looks real it just
doesn't look like real people made these
decisions it looks like a bad dream or a
prank or practical joke or
something well one of the big fun
stories today is that Mark Zuckerberg
did a video in which he says he's quite
radically going to change how Facebook
um sleta
is
censoring and he seems to have gone to
full
Trump um he said that the Trump election
was sort of a cultural pivot
point so he starts out by saying
directly that the mood of the country is
very clearly you know magal looking and
that he wants to adapt to it now these
are my words not his exact words but
very clearly he was saying you know we
live in a in a world in which Trump won
the
majority and Facebook would be better
off as a company if it started to be
more compatible with that point of view
now that point of view is less
censorship and you know better processes
for the censorship so he described what
he's going to do which is remarkable now
as I'm talking about this I know exactly
what you're going to be thinking you're
going to say to me Scott but what about
all the terrible terrible things he did
in the past with Facebook you know
Banning people and censoring and all
that those are true things that I don't
care about because I don't live in the
past if I lived in the past I would care
about it now you might say but but Scott
what took him so long to which I say
everything good takes too long I'm not
going to judge him for taking too long
I'm going to be happy if it's a good
idea so I think and I I'll tell you more
details but I think he is right on point
it's one of the most brilliant CEO moves
you'll ever see he is so smart and again
I know that you're going to say but but
I'm so mad at him I can't get over it I
get it I get it you don't like what he
did in the past and I'm not defending it
I'm just saying that the moves he's
making now probably are exactly what he
says and they're good listen to this
um he's going to get rid of fact
checking he's going to get rid of the
fact Checkers because they're biased
what does that sound like that's Mega
that's that's pure Mega the fact
Checkers are fake and you have to get so
he's getting rid of them do you know
what he's going to replace fact checking
with he's going to copy Community notes
from X and he says that's what he's
going to do I'm going to basically copy
X and use Community notes because it
works
so musk went first Community notes is
quite successful I would say
and um Zuckerberg noticed and so he's
copying now it's not easy to be a social
media Network and say um you see my kind
of a competitor I'm just going to copy
that because it was a good
idea that that's what Zuckerberg can do
like it's just brilliant but there's
more
um they're going to get rid of the
automated sensoring and only consider
sensing some situations where somebody's
being reported so there'll still be
things censored you know the the worst
violent stuff you know the usual stuff
but uh it won't be automated you'll have
to report it
now do you approve of that yes you do
because you want humans to decide
whether humans can can or cannot do so
you don't want the algorithm deciding so
yeah that's good
um he says explicitly that the new
process is going to let a lot more
inappropriate stuff on the platform but
that the principle of free speech is
more important do you have a problem
with that no that's that's America he
just described a perfect Mega opinion
about Free Speech it's messy it's
violent sometimes it's dangerous but
it's free speech and the alternative is
worse
now here's the one that will blow your
mind the the moderation the human
moderators apparently they're they're in
California what's going to happen if
your moderators live in California well
it's all going to be liberal opinions of
what should be allowed and what should
not so here's what he's
doing he's moving the moderation from
California to
Texas let that sink in for a moment he's
moving the moderation from California
because they're too biased to
Texas does that sound like
magga
yeah it sounds like exactly what you
would have done it's exactly what you
would have done you would have moved it
to
Texas and he says he's going to this is
this might be the the real money shot
here he says he's going to work with
Trump um to i' say influence or pressure
other countries to not um try to put
Facebook meta and a
business
and that's smart so he's completely
aware that he needs the Trump
Administration and the government of the
United States to back him and and
threaten other countries say look if
you're going to censor us over there and
that hasn't impact on our American
company we're going to terar you or
we're going to you know stop prot
protecting you or something
so I love
this um so other some other countries
probably had back doors and everything
else and you want to get rid of that I
think
so a lot of people said is Zuckerberg
just chasing the money and and this is
not his own philosophical opinion he's
just knows he has to do it to chase
money to which I say
so so well what why is that bad he's the
head of a major uh commercial Enterprise
he's not allowed to chase
money chasing money means being
compatible with the country you're
serving so I don't care I don't care if
that's his only motivation if it's his
only motivation and he can clearly say
that getting out of that censorship
business is good for business working
with Trump productively is good for
business um supporting systems that
would give you more free speech is good
for business if the only thing he wanted
to do is make money I would say good job
excellent that you you nailed it if you
just want to make money I'm completely
supportive of that now some of you might
say but but Scott it's a trick because
he did all those things in the past to
buy us a
system it's pretty transparent he's
either going to do these things he said
or he's not I mean that moderation will
either move to Texas or it won't you
know the the automated the automated
system will either catch things or it
won't we can watch it's all transparent
I I think it's
brilliant because he was in a tough
place and I think he's completely
cognizant of the way Facebook and maybe
even his personal donations to try to
fix the elections uh fix as in improve
um he probably knows that that was a
huge mistake and that it distorted the
system in a way that the syst system
wasn't built to be distorted so to me it
looks like he thought he was doing the
right thing and thought he was working
with the government of the time
productively as he saw it I guess and
now he knows that those are all mistakes
and so he's doing a really hard pivot
hard as in it's hard to explain it it's
hard
to you know especially to his own
company imagine imagine how much trouble
he's getting from his own employees
today do you know how hard that would be
to go against all your liberal employees
and just do a pure mega version of of
the
service now when I say pure magga I want
to be really careful with my words he's
not saying I want to be right-wing when
I say pure magga I mean just compatible
with the Constitution and that's it it
just we just want free speech so if he
gives us that pretty happy we'll see I
mean I agree with you that the jury's
out he he has to perform but everything
about his history suggest he knows how
to
perform all right so all
good Wall Street Journal is talking
about the success of Robbie Starbuck and
I guess he's got a staff of people who
are who have got now how many 15 public
companies to change or abandon their Dei
and lgbtq
policies and what's interesting about
this is you already knew Robbie Starbuck
was having a lot of success there what's
different is that it's now a big article
in the Wall Street
Journal do you know how big that
is like every major
corporation has somebody paying
attention to the Wall Street Journal so
it's one thing when you know Robbie
Starbuck is bragging on X that things
are working and he has a right to brag
by the way he's doing amazing work um
but once it's in the Wall Street Journal
that's the thing that every business has
to pay attention to you can't ignore the
Wall Street Journal if you're in a
business so it kind of It kind of raised
Starbucks profile and it raised it in
the context of he's winning like
crazy that's how you want to be
elevated because if he's winning like
crazy and it's creating the uh creating
a pattern in your brain that these big
corporations that you figure is are no
dumber than you are are making this
change then the 16th 17th and 18th
corporation that he talks to he's going
to say I got 15 in a row do you think
that's an
accident no because if you say
no uh the Wall Street Journal has
already lifted my you know my visibility
people like me with big accounts are uh
backing him hard um we're in trouble so
he is so he's very very cleverly
assembled a set of supporters on X that
are enormous you know just big accounts
who are willing to say yeah do more of
that so he he isn't using uh his own
power he's doing such good work on
behalf of people who have big accounts
in the rest of the country I would say
that uh we want to back him we want to
see more of it so he's he's built a
perfect little machine to R over the the
Dei excesses perfect it's all good news
Well you want me to talk about Don Jr uh
recently just landed in Greenland maybe
an hour ago and um it does seem that
this trip he's with Charlie Kirk and
some few other people and it does seem
that the intention of the trip is to set
the ground workor for a deal to buy it
that's like a real thing and
this again I I hate to be gushing about
smart people doing smart things but can
you even think of a smarter way for
Trump to approach this than to have Don
Jr of all people of all people Don Jr
visit personally and interact with the
residents now have you seen the early
pictures the residents of
Greenland are pretty happy that Don Jr's
there now for one thing they probably
don't get a lot of you know celebrity
excitement so they got that going for
them but they don't seem like
liberals I don't know much about
Greenland but you know from the little
bit I've seen they seem like working
class people who want to be left alone
does that sound like anything you've
heard of before Working Class People who
just want the government to leave them
alone I've got a feeling that there's a
lot of smartness behind
Trump's idea of buying Greenland that he
might know that the population is just
ready to
be um
seduced and if if Trump himself went
there you would agree that would be the
wrong move
right at this point he's not even sworn
in so it would it would definitely be
the wrong move for Trump himself to go
but who would be more
perfect to basically seduce the the the
blue color color people who probably
like outdoorsy things they're probably
just like Don Jr it's probably just a
bunch of Greenland Don jors and he lands
in the middle of it and I think he's
here's what I think he's going to
do first of all he takes this wild idea
and he turns it concrete because there's
a real person who really matters who's
really there like it's not conceptual so
Trump has already turned it from
conceptual to its
underway it's amazing the the the level
of his
persuasive um instincts are just crazy I
mean I've never seen anything this good
honestly so I ask you again is there
anybody on the planet who would have
been a better choice to send to
Greenland today answer no best one on
the planet for what I for what the
intention is um is it likely that Don Jr
will touch a lot of people meaning that
a lot of people will know he's there see
him interact with him yes there are only
56,000 people in the whole country of
Greenland my my little town is twice
that
size he's going to be able to reach
touch have some impact on a healthy
little chunk of that and it's probably
enough to make them all get serious
about it now I think that the only thing
required for Greenland to say yes is for
the Greenland people to feel good about
Trump how are you going to feel when he
sends his son out to hang out with you
you're going to feel good about it
you're going to feel like oh this this
Don Jr is like a regular guy Don Jr does
the best job of being a rich guy acting
like a regular guy now I don't think
he's acting exactly I I think that's his
actual personality um he's perfect for
this job just perfect I love everything
about this anyway um let's talk about
these other
countries um oh and just one last thing
about Greenland I'm sure it would be
good for Denmark to sell Greenland
because they can't afford to protect it
and it will be important to protect it
going forward because the because the
ice melting above it and Russia and
China are going to be having their ships
around there and it's got resources that
people care about you know Rare Earth
material minerals Etc
so Denmark would not want to admit it
because you know they'd rather stay in a
negotiating mode and say no no there's
no way we'd ever sell this but they
would be better off I don't think
they're getting a lot of uh
International Prestige for being
colonizers of
Greenland are do they do the people in
Denmark wake up and say ah feel good
about my country because of our control
of Greenland there's nothing in it for
Greenland except expense yeah they're
just paying for what's there so it's
good it's good for Denmark it's probably
good for
Greenland almost certainly and it could
be good for the United States and
definitely good for
Canada to have us protecting on both
sides so that would put Canada between
Greenland and
Alaska if you can if you can tell me
that there would be a safer place on
Earth than being between our you know
two assets of the United States it's a
pretty good situation so I don't know if
the deal is going to happen but it is in
everyone's interest somewhat
unambiguously like clearly obviously in
everybody's interest I think he's going
to get it done I think this will be
amazing um meanwhile Trump also has
talks about Canada becoming a state and
he keeps he keeps joking about it but
not really
um which is fascinating now here's what
I think you know it it sounded like just
a you know a trumpian joke to make fun
of Trudeau for being like a governor
instead of a leader of the country but
given what's happening in Canada I don't
think we I don't think the United States
can take a chance that a calipat forms
on our northern border and that's what's
happening now you might say Scott Scott
there are so few uh Muslims in Canada
that's you're crazy to which I say
that's how it happens it happens with
too few that's that's the whole way it
happens you have too few and then you
say well a few more wouldn't matter few
more well no problem so far so why not
have a few more and so far no problem
stop being racist let's get a few more
as some point when you reach around 10%
of the population the radicals Within
that group will come to control the
moderates because radicals are willing
to die for what they want the moderates
are not they're just trying to get along
so that the the most extreme people in
any group tend to rise to control of it
right it's just natural it's has nothing
to do with Islam it's just the Natural
Way anything works the the most the
people are willing to die for it
literally are going to be in
charge um or die trying so I don't think
we can take a chance that Canada is
heading really hard toward getting that
10% population which could easily turn
into the seeds of a caliphate and we
could have we could have an Islamic
country in our northern border that's no
good because of the compatibility with
the systems
so so
um the other thing is that if you put
into the mix that you might want to buy
can Canada or have them merge with us I
guess not buy it it makes the Greenland
thing seem more
normal you know somebody was pointing
out that that Trump is ruining the uh
what is it the Overton window or
something uh so he's got so many things
going on that you don't know where to
stop to criticize them you're you're
just like whipped from one topic to
another so I love the fact that you Sim
simultaneously talking about uh Panama
Canal Canada and Greenland
it that's just so trumpy and perfect to
be talking about all of them at the same
time it's very strategically smart
because even if he just wants one of
them to happen or two of them it's good
to throw Canada in the mix so as you
know Trudeau is stepping down I saw it
um eventually he announced it and I saw
um Scott Jennings the Republican guy
that they have on CNN who does a great
job
and he said that the the removal or the
leaving or the quitting of uh
Trudeau uh you could draw a direct line
from the Canadian truckers
situation do you think that's true do
you think that the evil that he put on
the Canadian truckers for protesting you
know canceling their Banking and you
know just my god do you think that that
was sort of the the thing that pushed
Canada over the line and even eventually
led to Trudeau having to step
down do you think there is a straight
line I think there is obviously it took
more than that but yeah I I think the
the trucker kind of got it done so
congratulations Canadian truckers
BJ um Take a
Bow I know he's listening all right
um so should we talk about Elon Musk
angering Canada or angering
Britain or uh let's see angering Germany
or angering France where would you like
me to
start so after Elon Musk becomes the you
know determinant factor maybe for why
Trump gets elected he seems to change
you know change his Focus or for at
least some of his time on other
countries
and so let's just run through the list
of who who is made mad
recently um so up in Canada there's a
report we don't know if it's true some
musk asked for a fact check on it but uh
allegedly some islamists in Canada are
holding a uh conference which again is
not confirmed it's just being reported
uh on how to defeat All non-muslim
Nations and create a global
caliphate now they're pretty far away
from having enough power to do that sort
of thing but the way it starts is with a
first meeting to talk about it so so
elon's looking at that with a one
eyebrow up like the rest of us should
be
um and of course he's accused of
racism so so Canada has the that problem
that we've kind of solved in the United
States and I'll call it the Andrew
Breitbart solution
it goes like this you wanting to close
the border you're a racist you're racist
you're
racist and then as Andrew Breitbart
teaches you say
so well but you're racist you're racist
you're
racist
so yeah and I don't think that's
literally what's happening but and I
don't think that anybody wants to be a
racist and they're not they're not
they're racist they're just not
interested in your
opinion that's the win the win is to not
be interested
so yeah yep yep that's true so but
Canada still thinks that if they
complain about somebody being a racist
that that the person they complain about
will have to change their ways and
apologize and get in
line to which Elon Musk does not say but
may indeed be thinking
so that's what that's what Canada needs
just two letters so yeah yeah that this
would be terribly bad for one
group everything is
so you'll get
there um the other fake news that I sent
around yesterday accidentally was a
video of Trudeau resigning uh in a bar
watching it and as it happened the bar
erupted in Wild cheers that that was
actually a fake video the bar was real
but they were reacting to a sporting
event but somebody put Trudeau on the TV
screen and it made it look like they
were they were celebrating his his
stepping down but that was fake news
um all right so you think things are bad
in the
UK If I had to describe to you how bad
things are going in the UK what would be
the fewest words that I could use to
describe how bad it is over there well
I'll see if I can do it the fewest words
to describe how bad things are in the UK
all right how I'm going to go with this
Andrew Tate's running for prime
minister um anything else you need to
know but it gets better now first of all
I do know that you don't run for prime
minister so before you jump in and say
Scott you don't understand the system
they you know the prime minister is
selected by the other elected people to
be their leader blah blah blah I don't
care he he says he's running for prime
minister which presumably he knows he
needs to get into the government and
then be part of a party that has enough
support to make him the prime minister
so I'm not worried about the details now
uh Andrew Tate is serious you serious
about it now but he also says whether he
wins or loses he can sort of force the
conversation to be about the things they
need to talk about and he can bring
attention to the worst parts of their
system and he can now I'm going to say
something that will shock you because
you're not going to be ready for this
remember in 2015 when I was the one of
the first people in the country besides
you know Anne Coulter to say that uh you
don't understand Trump's like not like
normal people he has this persuasion
skill stack that will eviscerate
anything he comes in contact with that
challenges him until he has hollowed out
the Republican party and become
president now of course everybody
laughed at me and said you're so stupid
because he's just a crazy clown and he
doesn't have any government experience
so I can tell you one thing a crazy
clown with oh oh and he also has like
lots of you know scandals like probably
did things with women that you don't
like does that sound familiar well you
may know that there was some press
coverage that Andrew Tate had um at
least for some number of years I don't
know if he's still does uh an actual
hypnotist who was in his inner circle an
actual
hypnotist like not somebody who just
read up on
it when you saw his popularity rise did
it seem to you like it was
unnatural like how in the world did he
pull that off and become like the the
number one thing on a lot of uh internet
and the answer is he he has the talent
stack now you don't have to like him I
don't like him right so you might know I
have a little history with him and we're
not friends I don't endorse him I don't
think I want him to be the Prime
Minister of Great
Britain but nonetheless if you were
looking at it as just a
talent a talent story does he have the
talent to break through the system and
the answer is yes the answer is yes
because he has the ability to mobilize
males and if he gets enough of them he's
just Trump it's a trump strategy the the
men in Great Britain are completely
underserved and know it they just don't
have any politician who's willing to say
men you're underserved
let's change that if Andrew Tate gets
enough traction that the men of Great
Britain hear him say that or some
version of men you're completely
underserved I'm going to help you
protect the country I know you want to
but the government's preventing you now
we're going to protect the country we're
going to keep out you know the bad
elements Etc now I'm assuming and you
know get rid of the grooming gangs and
stuff like that now what's interesting
is that t allegedly is converted to
Islam
so is it possible he would get some
Muslim
support as long as he's said some
version of you know I'm Muslim too but
you guys are crazy you know we're not
going to make a caliphate that's crazy
I'm going to prevent you from trying to
form a caliphate I'm going to prevent
you from trying to create your own
Society within England I'm going to stop
it and I'm one of you I'm one you and
I'm going to stop
it that'd be pretty strong right you
know Trump went from Democrat to
Republican is it a stretch that take
went to Islam and then he could control
not control but he would be influential
potentially with other Islamic citizens
and with men we already know he has a
superow because men kind of like his you
know audacious they like the whole Act
so here's the thing I'm going to warn
you about I wouldn't bet that he will
become prominent in um the UK political
system I would bet against it I would
bet against
it however if you think it's crazy or
you think he doesn't have the talent
you're wrong he has the talent he does
have the talent he has the talent to to
just hollow out their entire government
and wear it like a suit
like Trump did exactly like Trump did so
if you don't think there's a path
there's a path there's a path I would
bet against it but there's a
path
um all right the only the only defense
that they could have against his
persuasive abilities would be the legal
system just put them in jail and of
course control of the media so the media
never gives him any attention so that
might work I don't know if it's
enough didn't work in
America
um let's see uh so so musk did a poll on
X he said uh you wanted to response to
this America should Liberate the people
of Britain from their tyrannical
government 58% people said
yes I have no idea how serious he is
about that I don't think it's serious I
I think he's just you sort of making a
point and trolling them a little bit uh
but but now the UK prime minister that
care Kier starmer who needs a name I can
pronounce I demand he changed his name
uh is accusing musk of spreading
misinformation blah blah blah they're
all mad and then other countries like uh
France so macron and France
um is uh complaining that uh musk is
interfering with other
countries so what did musk say when
macron um said in public that musk was
interfering with other countries musk
says oh like the time Stormer called uh
real Donald Trump a racist and said the
British government should do everything
to stop
him that
happened good point or how about when
Storer sent British labor party members
to campaign in the US against President
Trump was that
interfering and those aren't even the
good ones you want a good one have you
heard of something called the steel
dossier where an ex intelligence person
from the UK came up with this whole fake
thing yeah an X intelligence person from
the UK there's no X intelligence
people that was just the Great Britain
interfering with with the United States
that's what that
was
um and then my funniest
part was this a a British politician
named ed Davy he went on X to speak his
mind he said quote people have had
enough of Elon Musk interfering with our
country's democracy when he clearly
knows nothing about
Britain it's time to summon the US
ambassador to ask why an incoming Us
official is suggesting the UK government
should be
overthrown
um so there's nothing
funnier than a person saying that Elon
Musk doesn't understand their
complicated
situation because you know that not
that's not been his
domain to which I
say really Elon
Musk doesn't understand a complicated
thing and doesn't have the ability to
get up to speed really quickly cuz I
mean how could
he come
on listen to Jordan Peterson's book I
probably won't all right so nothing's
funnier than telling Elon Musk he can't
handle a complicated situation and Elon
said in response said what exactly do I
fail to understand about your failure to
stop the Mass rape of little girls in
Britain you sniveling
cron
okay that covers it no nothing else to
say but but the audacity of the
sniveling creedon Ed Davy to imagine
that his world is the complicated kind
that somebody who somebody like Elon
Musk could possibly understand like oh
well we don't understand the
complications of why you're allowing
these horrific crimes yeah maybe he
doesn't know the
Nuance I swear every time somebody says
that Elon Musk is dumb or doesn't
understand something I just shake my
head it's like have you watched anything
he's done for the last 30
years anyway it's literally all he does
the reason he's world famous is he
enters domains in which he knows nothing
about and almost immediately is the best
one in the domain like that's literally
what he does all right um and uh car
starmer said he's considering cutting
ties with the US unless Donald Trump
distan himself from Elon Musk to which I
say it's about time yeah why why don't
we cut our diplomatic um cut our
diplomatic ties I'm totally okay with
that I I I think if if the UK is really
threatening free speech in America in
America and Elon is in America and he
has free speech if they're going to
attack United States because of free
speech of anybody doesn't matter if he's
part of the government elected not
elected advisor citizen recent you know
recent citizen it doesn't matter he gets
to say anything he wants you know within
within certain decency standards um so
now if Great Britain is trying to
squelch the free speech of anybody in
America we should cut
ties we've done it
before yeah we should cut
ties um then of course mus is uh has
been advocating I think for the what
they call the farri alternative party in
Germany the afd now the story part of
the story you need to understand is that
when musk says the quote far right party
in Germany is is the one that would do a
better job it's not far
right so that's just something the news
says if you looked at their far right it
would sort of look like Maga you know
that that's my understanding now uh
unlike Elon I don't know a lot about
Germany so I'm not going to pretend to
but uh I don't think it's true that
there's some kind of extremist group I
do think maybe they had something in
their past like that but remember the
Democrats have the KKK in their past but
if you hold it against them today that
would be just stupid and I see people
doing it and I I just always bristle
when I see that it's like that was a
long time ago if they're not currently
if they're not currently supporting the
KKK and they couldn't be further from it
then it doesn't really matter what they
did in the
past all right then there's a let's see
um uh he's so Emanuel macron is directly
accusing musk of interfering with
elections including
Germany and I guess that's all I need to
say about that one um meanwhile you
heard that uh we've already talked about
this Biden banned offshore oil drilling
before he leaves office and only in
certain places that there isn't a lot of
drilling right now um so I don't know
how big a deal it is in the in the real
world but uh
it looks like he was just trying to
kneecap Trump so Trump couldn't allow
drilling there um but here's the weird
part all the experts are saying it's
it's
irreversible that Trump doesn't have any
way to back out of it and has to do with
h a previous Court ruling called Chevron
deference I'm going to get all this
wrong because this is you know not my
expertise the law but as best I
understand it there was some prior
situation that went to the Supreme Court
in which an agency of the government had
made a ruling that we should do
something this way and somebody else
said no you can't do it that way we're
going to stop you or reverse it and then
the Supreme Court said we're not going
to reverse an agency's
opinion unless you've got a really
strong reason that that is beyond just
we have a different
opinion and so as long as it's just a
difference of opinion of how things
should be and nothing more than that the
courts won't touch it based on precedent
now so that would suggest that the
ruling is made if Trump wanted to
overturn it you imagine the courts would
be involved but the smart people say but
you won't win and and it could take
years to to get through but here's my
take nothing's your reever there's
nothing that you can't cancel in reverse
that that's not a thing it might be that
it's hard it might be that somebody
didn't yet figure out how to do it it
might be that you have to be messy and
you know take some hits to get it done
it might be that you have to do
something that's never been done maybe
you have to you know take some
penalties but I think you can reverse
anything that's a decision that the
country
made so I'll just give you some examples
so if um
if the reason it's staying is because an
agency is ruled on it then Trump simply
has to give a better reason that's not
just better opinion but like really
overwhelmingly you know unique situation
this really needs to be
reversed he could probably do
that I don't know could probably come up
with an argument of why it needs to be
reversed but it might take a few years
to do it so I don't even know if it's
worth doing but um we'll see
um Trump did say he would reverse all
the executive orders from Biden but we
wonder if that one's going to be an
exception because if he reverses the
executive order the courts won't accept
it so we'll see um Wall Street Journal
is reporting how Iran has pulled pretty
much everything of their assets out of
Syria and if he didn't know that's a
really big deal because Syria was sort
of their um their land bridge to
Hezbollah and their ability to
um equip and fund their proxies so now
Iran has no air air defenses Israel's
taking out their air defenses they've
lost
Syria which means that they can't
reinforce Hezbollah at least in any
efficient way and Hezbollah has been
beaten back at the moment and Hamas is
you know just
annihilated and um apparently Iran spent
spend billions of dollars to get Syria
you know up and running as their like
proxy base station and they lost all
that now I would
agree that this is the perfect setup for
Trump to get some kind of a deal then I
don't think I've ever seen a better
setup Trump is coming in exactly at the
time when we can make deals and there's
a way to do it it it almost seems like
you know God inspired kind of thing it's
like really uh all these things need to
be handled you know from Ukraine to Iran
it needs to be handled with deals and
the best you know well most famous I
won't say best but the most famous
dealmaker in the world's coming into
office at exactly the time everything's
just perfectly set up to make a
deal when have we ever seen that
before it's like weirdly great it's like
almost too good to be
true everything from Greenland to
Ukraine it's just all things that he can
make a deal on and it looks all it looks
all doable it's weird it's going to make
you think that Biden was even worse than
you already think because if Trump comes
in and immediately wraps up some things
that Biden couldn't wrap
up you any questions about who is the
best president ever and who was the
worst will be answered and I think
that's going to
happen uh I saw the amuse account on X
pointing out that Soros prosecutors the
people people that Soros funded those
prosecutors um 40% of the H homicides in
the US take place in districts with
Soros funded prosecutors now some of
that is because you know he funded the
ones in urban area so there's going to
be more murder but uh that's a lot but
75% of those
districts the the ones that are Soros
districts 75% of them stopped reporting
murder statistics to the FBI in 2021
so that doesn't look like a coincidence
does it so when Elon Musk said he said
it a while ago and he's reinforced it
that in his opinion Soros hates humanity
and that is how you explain all of his
seemingly charitable actions that
apparently are designed to destroy the
world um I don't know what we don't know
what he's thinking when he's doing it
but if you looked at the outcome you'd
say well I mean there's no way you would
do all of those things
unless you had a unified theory to
destroy the world because they they just
seem so obviously
unproductive um
so I love that we're shining a light on
it and and I think that gives you a
chance to reverse it so we'll see well
there's a update on the pipe bomber so
you remember the original January 6
there were reports and videos of
somebody planting pipe bombs in two
different places and there have been
lots of sketchy accusations and and
information that makes it look like it
was part of a maybe an FBI op or at
least a government op here's what we
know Liz wheeler is reporting on this so
there's a new house report about that
January 6 pipe bomber and it's shocking
so apparently the this is this is from
Liz wheeler um FBI tracked the phone
data and they narrowed it down to 186
phone
numbers so remember the the bomber has
caught so they narrowed it down to 186
bomb
numbers and then they narrowed it down
further to uh one now we're talking
about one of the pipe bombs by the
bench so the
FBI narrowed down the possible suspects
based on the phone he had with them to
one
person so
obviously that person got picked up and
no you know what they did after they
narrowed it down to just one person so
basically they knew who it
was here's what they did they uh
suddenly dropped the
case without explaining
it what and and then today there's a new
video of of a different angle of the guy
who planted the bomb why is that now
just available there's a reason that we
just found out there's a different
camera angle
and then
surprisingly the it looks like the eyes
of the per seem to be um
digitally blocked out now I'm not 100%
sure that it isn't just Shadow or
something but if you could see the eyes
then something you know you might have
some way to identify them better so
everything about this is
sketchy um apparently the FBI agent in
charge had told Congress that the
Telecom company data was
corrupted but when the the telecom
companies were approached they said
nothing was corrupted we gave them
everything so it appears the FBI lied to
Congress knew who it was and dropped the
investigation so that's that's the
allegation and now there's Stone the FBI
and other agencies are stonewalling
Congress
uh about why the investigation that was
supposed to be about this really big
problem just sort of stopped without an
explanation good
question um and the two people who found
the pipe bombs on January 6 were quote a
woman carrying a basket of laundry who
is actually as Liz says a swamp creature
who works for an Intel connected
organization where she works on quote
disinformation that's convenient and the
other was found by a plain closed fed
really so the two people so one was
found by plain closed fed and the other
was placed by somebody with some
connections to the Intel World
okay um both bombs sat in plain sight
undetected for 15 hours or more until
both were found independently within 15
minutes of
each obviously the order went out to
pretend you found the bomb
um and also that happened within 15
minutes of the breach of the
capital
so it's all timed to be exactly what it
looks like a some kind of an
OP uh further the frame rate of the one
video that the FBI
released um was one 1.2 frames per
second there's no such thing as a video
camera that is only 1.2 frames per
second
that you couldn't buy one if you tried
it there's not an old one there's not a
new one so it's obviously digitally
altered for some reason so this can't be
the original video it's some kind of
modified version and who would have done
that well Usual
Suspects
um I don't know if we're close to
solving this but uh I'm willing to say
it's exactly what it looked like it
looked like a government I don't know
which part of the government plot to
make the January Sixers look like real
insurrectionists because apparently they
were very rude by not bringing weapons
so if they could make something blow up
then they could say well you know
they're all part of this this bombing
thing and then they all have to be
killed or
something so um I'm willing I I think
what we know so far is enough for me to
say oh that was a government Al uh now I
could change my mind if there's new
information but I'd say it's obvious at
this
point anyway Jack bobic is pitching an
idea of having a victims of 46
Foundation a
charity um for the people who suffered
under Biden he was president number
46 and it could exist for the January
Sixers and the pro-lifers and the people
were kicked out of the military for the
vaccine denial and other
stuff um
I guess that would that would be good
for the people who are the
victims but it's also good framing so if
you see it as persuasion yeah if you
knew that we needed a Recovery Fund from
American citizens who suffer the Biden
Administration that's a pretty strong
message like just just the fact that
this is even considered or it's a
thing um kind of reframes everything as
Biden being evil instead of just a
normal you know different party was in
charge meanwhile Toyota wants 2,000
people to go live in its brand new city
for inventors it's going to be at the
base of Mount Fuji and it's going to be
all the people who are technologists for
AI and space rockets and cars and
everything if they put them in one place
they can cross-pollinate and get more
down I guess so basically they'd be
creating like a little Silicon Valley um
artificially I think that's worth a try
now you might say why does Toyota do
that um and the thinking is that Toyota
is going to transfer from just making
cars which might be something that in
the self-driving car day you know if you
don't have one you're not really in
business anymore so there there's some
kind of General Mobility company now so
this all makes sense in some way
meanwhile EPA a according to interesting
engineering in Christopher mcfaden um
there are so there're a uh electric car
company so they've been trying to build
this thing for 10 years and now they've
got a a version that's getting close and
it's got a th000 m solar powerered
battery and you can get top speeds of
101 miles per hour and it's super
aerodynamic um so that's a big deal you
know the the more competition there is
in that space the
better and there's a study that says
that video conferencing where you see
yourself on the screen like on I'm
seeing myself I'm talking to you but the
picture on the screen is is the same
thing you're seeing um like a zoom call
you know you see yourself and the study
finds according to the Boston University
of school of medicine that uh the
pandemic caused people to use zoom more
and Google meetings and stuff and that
uh people want they feel bad about
themselves when they see themselves all
the time on screen because it would be
like looking in a mirror all day and if
if you don't like how you look it's it's
really getting you know impressed on you
that you don't look the way you look um
and it's uh apparently is making some
people have some mental illness about
their you know body body
image now here's what I noticed it feels
to me like every time there's a
technical innovation in society there's
some demographic of society that is made
Crazy by it like actually get mental
illness because of something about it
like your phones make a lot of people go
crazy not everybody and there's some
there's some dispute about whether
that's even true but don't you think
it's always the woman no sometimes it's
men but who's having all the who's
having all the body image problems
because they're looking at themselves on
Zoom I mean I I have the same feeling
when I play back you know my recordings
and when I'm looking at myself I think
oh I should you know I wish I didn't
have that or I wish that was different
but it doesn't really make me
sad CU I have a mirror I I've seen
myself I know I know exactly what the
pluses and the minuses of me are so it
seems like it's again it's the the young
female
demographic if you force them to use
Snapchat or Instagram or just
zoom they're going to be focusing on
what they look like and it's going to
give them a little mental illness
problem so that ladies and gentlemen
is all I wanted to talk about today
there is just so much going on and
weirdly most of it's positive it's
weirdly positive the the Greenland thing
just gives us it's such a pallet
cleanser isn't it like when we're
talking about other things it's like
there's some horrible crime involved or
there's some big unsolvable problem or
somebody hates somebody but Greenland is
probably a bunch of people who just are
fine with the United States
wouldn't mind probably think they'd come
out ahead if they were part of the
United States we think it'd be a good
idea nobody's really against it you know
Denmark will resist because that's
negotiation or maybe they really want to
keep it I don't know but it's so just
Pleasant to think about wouldn't it be
nice to just you add to the country it's
just a good feeling all right that's all
I got I'm going to go talk to the locals
people privately for a moment
um wow yeah Greg gutfeld's back the main
cast of the the five is back and uh
everything's good
now all right um locals I'm coming at
you everybody else will see you tomorrow
thanks for
joining in 30 seconds we'll
be
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e e