Episode 2733 CWSA 01/28/25
Trump, water in LA, cartels, and lots more fun ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
The stock market is flattened out, trying to figure out what's true and what isn't. But I'll tell you what's true soon as we get going. First, let me see if I've got all my comments working. And I do. There we go. Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's cal…
View segment →e this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny, shiny human brains, all you need for that is a coffee mug, a tankard, a chalice, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of…
View segment →p. It happens now. Spectacular. Oh, it just keeps getting better. Well, let's talk about the people who wasted money on research. Number one, the Daily Mail is reporting that according to new research, people who are attractive get paid 11% more. As if my followers didn't know that already. So I h…
View segment →ta is quitting, apparently because they moved him to the midnight slot, which is what you do when you're trying to get somebody to quit on their own, because I think it's cheaper if they quit. So that plan worked. So Acosta's out now. He had been the dumbest guy, or I don't know if he's the dumbest.…
View segment →er and could be stars. But it seems to me that the CNN hosts, none of them have an audience. If they were to leave, I think they would all turn into Don Lemon. And you would find that it was CNN that made them famous and successful. I mean, if successful is the right word. Whereas at Fox, the talent…
View segment →s the Trumpy thing that anybody ever said from Trump. The Trumpy thing is making fun of CNN and then saying that CNN complimented him, but he can't confirm it because nobody watches CNN. Now that is just genuinely funny. All right, speaking of fake news, there's a story today that's either two sepa…
View segment →re not really going to be well served as a public. And I worry that that's going to happen. One will say it happened and one will just say it didn't happen, and then we'll just go to the next topic and we'll never know what happened. And we'll just keep our individual views of that forever maybe. B…
View segment →n give him 12 million dollars a year, which Costco does, and he's a good guy. If you put any white man in that job, they're going to say, wait a minute, let me see if I understand this. If I just pretend I'm really big on DEI, you're going to give me 12 million dollars a year? Yes. Suppose I didn't…
View segment →e doesn't tell you what it was trained on. The data that it was trained on is not something we have access to. So what if they just trained it on a bunch of pro-China propaganda, you know, plus all the generic stuff in the world, so that it was essentially a brainwashing tool? How do we know? Well,…
View segment →w I guess you could say, well, it could be individuals. Really? Maybe. But why would the individuals want to take out this great free new product? I don't know. Sounds like us. So as you know, there's an accusation that the whistleblower for OpenAI was murdered. Now if it's true that controlling AI…
View segment →dreds for a few days. But only 600 people crossed illegally on Sunday. That's like a ridiculously low number. Now turns out that closing the border wasn't that hard, just like Trump said. Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Trump Justice Department fired more than a dozen lawyers that were wo…
View segment →ilitary for as long as possible. Maybe then the American political system will talk us out of doing it. So I don't know if I believe that, but we're going to find out. There were some shots exchanged just yesterday, I think, but that might have been a one-off. We'll see. Yeah, sounds like BS. All r…
View segment →ivately for a few minutes, the people who are behind the subscription paywall. And I'm going to change all this soon, okay? And we'll do the closing sip as soon as I've hit the we'll be private button. Takes about 30 seconds. If you're on YouTube or X or Rumble, thanks for joining. I'm going private…
View segment →The stock market is flattened out, trying to figure out what's true and what isn't. But I'll tell you what's true soon as we get going. First, let me see if I've got all my comments working. And I do. There we go.
Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. It's the best thing that ever happened to you. But if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny, shiny human brains, all you need for that is a coffee mug, a tankard, a chalice, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip. It happens now.
Spectacular. Oh, it just keeps getting better.
Well, let's talk about the people who wasted money on research. Number one, the Daily Mail is reporting that according to new research, people who are attractive get paid 11% more. As if my followers didn't know that already. So I hope you're all enjoying your 11% extra pay, because let's face it, you are the sexiest, best-looking group of people on the entire planet. So it's a little bit unfair, but I think they could have saved a little bit of time and money by just asking me. Just ask Scott, "Hey Scott, do you think attractive people make more money?" Yes. "Do you think men who are taller make more money?" Yes. You don't have to do that one either. I know all the answers to these.
How about another one? According to an X post, Vladimir something writes that anger might enhance creative performance. Again, just ask me. Really, you could just ask me. Yes, anger generates more creative performance. I'm getting a little mad at this right now, and look how much better I'm doing. Yeah, anger. When I started the Dilbert comic, there was a direct correlation between how much something bothered me and how funny I could make it. 100% perfect correlation. And in fact, I developed the humor concept that you can't make it a joke about something that doesn't bother you. You just can't do it. You could try, but it would just be, oh, seat belts. Well, actually seat belts are pretty good. So just ask me next time.
All right. According to the Daily Mail, this one sounds like I made it up, but I didn't make this up. More than half of dating app users plan to abstain from masturbating this year. But the article warns there could be all kinds of risks. Apparently it makes your penis and/or your clitoris shrink if you don't work it out. Yeah, it'll shrink. And it's good for your prostate if you're a guy, and it's good for your cardio. And I know a lot of people just replace their cardio routine with masturbating. You just do it a little more aggressively, and it's all about the same.
However, I think that the real reason for the lack of masturbating is that people don't look as good to each other as they used to. Have you noticed that? It's not just me, right? Part of it is I think, you know, I'm at a certain age where I don't have really contact with young people, so I'm pretty much seeing people my age and, you know, 50 and over. But it does seem like people are way less attractive in the general public. If you want to see somebody attractive, let's say female, you end up looking at some, you know, weird OnlyFans situation, and then you're like, maybe, yuck, down by that. So yeah, I could totally see why people would just be less aroused. Testosterone would be lower. And I'm sure for the women, you know, half of the men look like they're just women. So yeah, I can see why people would just be giving up.
According to the Post Millennial, now here's one of these things where you think it couldn't be true what people are claiming, and then you see this stat. 15% of women in federal prison were born men. So they're trans. 15% of women's prisons are biological males. Now that makes sense, because biological males tend to be the ones who create the most crimes. So if you've got enough trans, you're going to be filling your prisons with them, because men are just more likely to commit crimes. So yeah, 15%. Now that's something that Trump is ending, right? I think he's going to change that.
Imagine if you went through all the trouble of going trans so you could get into a women's prison, and then they pull you back into a men's prison. You would feel so good about yourself. You're like, yes, I beat the system. Yeah, they can put me in prison, but they're going to have to put me in the women's prison because I put on a dress. Then Trump's like, okay, take your dress to the men's prison. Oh, that could work out entirely differently.
Well, CNN is getting rid of what's his name, Jim Acosta. So Jim Acosta is quitting, apparently because they moved him to the midnight slot, which is what you do when you're trying to get somebody to quit on their own, because I think it's cheaper if they quit. So that plan worked. So Acosta's out now. He had been the dumbest guy, or I don't know if he's the dumbest. Let's say he was the one who seemed least interested in the truth. But they have this new dumb person, Catherine Rampell, who's on the panels with Scott Jennings and some other people. And she's quite a piece of work. It feels like CNN's just trying to put their business completely out of business. Like here's somebody you would only let on TV if you were trying to destroy your own business model. I mean, just incredible.
So she's sort of a seething TDS, that old racist kind of a panelist. And she went on a five-minute rant about how Elon Musk is clearly some kind of a racist Nazi because of all the little hints, all the little hints, including the fact that twice he's raised his hand above his waist. Oh, I didn't know that. Apparently twice one of his hands has been higher than his waist. Well, I guess I'm going to have to rethink everything here. I thought he wasn't a Nazi, but now that I know his hand has gone up twice above his waist, I'm rethinking everything.
But wait, there's more. There's more. So part of her evidence is that the actual Nazis in Germany, I guess, said it was a salute. Oh no. Oh no. The actual Nazis said it's a salute. In other words, CNN is using Nazis as their source of truth. Why would you use Nazis as your source, as your fact checkers? Did they replace Daniel Dale? I'd like to see Daniel Dale fact check that. Huh. If the Nazis say it's a salute, it must be a salute. It's not because the Nazis want to draw attention to themselves and act exactly like people that they're more popular than they are. No, it's not opportunistic at all.
Let me tell you the proper way to respond to that. When somebody says, but the Nazis say it's a salute, what you want to do is you would say, why do you think they think it's a Nazi salute? It's because they watched CNN. Where else would they learn that that was a Nazi salute? They didn't make it up on their own. Do you think they go around all day long, and every time somebody puts their arm in the air, they're like, yep, yep, there's another one, Nazi salute? No. The reason they're targeting Elon Musk is because CNN told them it's a Nazi salute. And then they look at the Nazis as the source. No, CNN, you're the source. The Nazis never even would have thought about it, because there's not a single Nazi that thinks that touching your heart and saying my heart goes out to you is a Sieg Heil. Not one. You can't find one Nazi that thinks that's the case. But you can find Nazis that watch CNN, can't you?
And do you think they watched Fox News? No, they weren't watching Fox News, because Fox News said this is ridiculous. It's obviously not a Nazi salute. So where are they getting their information? They're getting it from CNN. So CNN is the choice of news for the Nazis, which I think has to mean something, doesn't it? I mean, connect the dots, right? If the Nazis are getting their information from CNN, that would sort of suggest that CNN are Nazis, right? I'm just seeing how stupid I could be, see if I can get a job on the panel.
Anyway, and the fact that Netanyahu says absolutely he's not a Nazi. You know, he's a big friend of Israel. He came and he toured the Holocaust sites. You'd think that would be enough. I'd like to suggest the standard for knowing if somebody's a Nazi. Now, you couldn't use this as an absolute, but I think if the head of Israel says in public this is ridiculous, he's a friend of Israel, that should sort of settle it, don't you think? Because who's better at spotting Nazis, the actual head of Israel or a panelist on CNN? I don't know. I think Israel's got that down.
Scott Jennings warned that she went so far that she might want to lawyer up because it was just such obvious defamation. Now, I'm no expert on defamation, but suppose she did get sued for suggesting with her five minutes of evidence that Musk must be a Nazi. Suppose he sued her. What would be the defense? She would have to either say she wasn't trying to suggest he's a Nazi, which of course was the entire point of her entire thing. That would be ridiculous. Or she'd have to say I'm too stupid to know it's not true. So she'd actually have to, her defense would have to be that she says things that are not true and she knows it and didn't mean it. Like it would be a ridiculous defense because it's so obviously intentional and so obvious what her intention is. I don't know. I'm not sure if the lawsuit is worth that.
But then Abby Phillip, who's the host for that same panel, she's the CNN host, she gives Musk a hard time, I think separately, for saying that Germany needs to move past their guilt. So here's how she reframed "move past your guilt." She says, is forgetting the Holocaust. Did Elon Musk say we should forget the Holocaust? Again, he literally just toured the Holocaust sites with Netanyahu. Who else has done that? Who's actually toured the Holocaust sites with Netanyahu? That's as far as you can get from forgetting the Holocaust. So this is so disgustingly stupid and petty and weak that I'm going to guess that Abby Phillip will be the next one that CNN gets rid of, because their credibility is really tanking with that particular host. I mean, that's just unforgivable, really.
Anyway, Jim Acosta's out, as I said. He's quit CNN. But at least he has that Don Lemon career path ahead of him. What? No.
All right, I've got a question for you. I'm going to make a generalization. I don't think the generalization holds for every case, but it might. It goes like this. When a Fox News host leaves Fox News, they can get a big audience because they were a celebrity. Say Tucker Carlson. Now, Hannity is not planning to leave, but suppose he did. If Hannity left Fox News tomorrow, don't you think he'd have a huge podcast? He would, because he's a star. How about Gutfeld? He's not going anywhere because he's got two of his shows on Fox News. But what if he did? He would bring with him a gigantic audience because he's a star. And you could go right down the line. Jesse Watters, blah blah blah. Stars, stars, stars.
But here's what I noticed this morning. The stars make Fox News. That's what makes it the better show. Yeah, they also have better producers. I always say that their production skills are just amazing. So good. But they have lots of stars. And part of being good at producing is making sure you selected people with personality and character and could be stars. But it seems to me that the CNN hosts, none of them have an audience. If they were to leave, I think they would all turn into Don Lemon. And you would find that it was CNN that made them famous and successful. I mean, if successful is the right word. Whereas at Fox, the talent made the network. At CNN, the network makes the talent well known. It seems opposite. Is that a fair generalization? Might be too far, but you know, there's so many obvious examples of it.
Anyway, Rachel Maddow says that they made a difficult decision for what she calls a news organization. So she calls MSNBC, her employer, a news organization. Okay. And while she's lying about it being a news organization, she says she doesn't want them, that the network has decided not to air all of the Trump speeches because of all the things he might say that are untrue. And she said that in the context of claiming they're a news organization.
Now, if you were underinformed, if you look at the design of it, it doesn't look like it's designed to be news. It looks like it's designed as propaganda that's supposed to look like it's also news. Now, you could argue that maybe some other entities are the same, but it's the one that's most obviously not really news. It's most obviously just some kind of Intel-driven, government-Democrat-driven propaganda machine that just happens to be in the news domain.
Then over at The View, Senator Fetterman went on The View and just slapped them down on this lawfare stuff. According to Fox News, he said the judicial system gets weaponized and targeted political enemies for political gain. So he was saying that the New York charges, all 34 felony counts, which is what the Democrats like to say, Fetterman just swept away all 34 felony counts by saying obviously just lawfare. There's no way they would have taken anybody else to court for that. Basically just on her head on live TV and walked away. I'm just liking Fetterman now.
Some people are saying, hey, you know, maybe he'll turn into a Republican because he's got some skills that seem to go both ways. But as he pointed out, he's got a number of policies that wouldn't be compatible with Republicans. So he's not going to change. But my smartest Democrat friend, who I often mention, I've been wanting to catch up with him because I thought surely by now, surely by now a normal smart person watching the news would realize that Trump is doing what the public wants him to do by quite a big majority. He's the most popular he's ever been, and things are happening that look good. So I was expecting, oh, this is going to be good next time I see him. Oh my God, or hear from him. I'm going to have my victory lap and I won't even have to say a thing. I won't even have to make my argument. I'll just be like, told you so.
Instead, I got an email saying that he was planning ahead to the next race and which Democrat, and he gave a list of them, which Democrat did we think was going to be the best candidate. And he said that once Trump has completely embarrassed and destroyed the country, that we'll be ready for a Pete Buttigieg. And I said, seriously, Pete Buttigieg? That would be your strongest guy? That almost sounds like a joke. I mean, really, of all the people in the world. And then he said, but maybe he can't get elected because he's gay. And then I said, well, how many Republicans were going to vote for him? It wouldn't matter if he was gay or not gay. No Republicans going to vote for him. So aren't you saying that the Democrats are anti-gay? I think he just called his own party anti-gay, because all he has to do is get all the Democrat votes, right? Aren't there more Democrats than, oh, maybe that changed. Actually, I don't know that. I thought there were more Democrats than Republicans, but did that change? Did it change this season? Anyway.
But when you see that other world and you get a peek at it, you think they really don't have anything. Because if a smart, well-informed person on that side, and again he's very smart, if we were to compare IQs, I think he'd beat me. But wow, Pete Buttigieg? Really? Yeah, forget about the gay part. And I've never talked to anybody who cared about that. But how can he possibly win? I don't know. Maybe I'm wrong. Could be that I'm the one who's being silly.
AOC was trying her best to come up with something that she could say that doesn't sound dumb about Trump. But this is the best she came up with. She said the norms are starting to embrace Trump. The norms are embracing him. Why would you form that sentence? Let me fix that sentence. Trump has popular policies. Trump is doing popular things. People like it. That's the way you say that. Here's the way you say it if you're just being weird. The norms are embracing Trump. That's sort of like saying the car ran over somebody and the knife stabbed somebody and the gun killed somebody. I really think it's the person doing the thing. It's not the thing doing the person, is it? Did the norms form into some kind of amorphous gaseous entity and did it then embrace Trump? Oh, the norms are embracing you. No, it's just words. What the hell.
The Democrats are so lost. So lost. It's just crazy. The best they have is word salad. And I think the Nazis watch CNN, believe he's a Nazi.
So Trump gave a speech yesterday to a Republican group, and he was on the stage for most of the time with Mike Johnson and Steve Scalise. And I just had a moment while I was watching that. Do you realize that of those three, Scalise, Trump, and Johnson, two out of three Republican leaders have been shot? Two out of three of the top Republican leaders have been shot. I mean, my mind is boggled. Like really? Shot? Two out of three? Like I don't even have a comment on that, but that's the world we live in. God.
One of the things Trump did that is vexing if you're a supporter, as I am, but it's also so on point with what he does, he starts by teasing that, you know, he can't run for a third term, but you know, maybe he can. You know, he needs to check that out. Now, I think he's kidding, but whether he's kidding or not, you know that's what the bad guys are going to pick up on, and they're going to be running around in a circle saying that you want a third term. I think he does that intentionally, right? Because he doesn't have the ability to be uninteresting. Trump is genetically interesting. Everything he does is a little bit interesting. And so he's just giving a talk, and he throws out the reddest of all red meat. I might run for a third term. You know, never leave office. I think he's just trolling and keeping them talking about the least important thing that's not real in any way. But wow.
Trump said he was talking about CNN at the same speech, and Trump says they say we had the greatest first week in presidential history. Even CNN is saying this guy is amazing. I said, did CNN really say that? But nobody watches, so nobody was able to confirm. That's the Trumpy thing that anybody ever said from Trump. The Trumpy thing is making fun of CNN and then saying that CNN complimented him, but he can't confirm it because nobody watches CNN. Now that is just genuinely funny.
All right, speaking of fake news, there's a story today that's either two separate stories or fake news or too complicated for us to understand. So I woke up to see that Trump has said the US military just entered the great state of California. And according to Trump, under emergency powers, they turned on the water flowing abundantly from the Pacific Northwest and beyond. The days of putting fake environmental argument over people are over. Enjoy the water, California.
All right, so he's drawing a picture where all you had to do was send in the smart people to turn on the spigot, and then all of LA's California water problems would be solved. So California wouldn't do it because of some environmental thing. So we send somebody in to turn on the water, and we're all fixed. Now, does that sound true to you when you read that? Do you say, oh yeah, there's nothing else I need to know about that story? Did that just hit the bull's eye for you?
All right, so here's a reporter for I think it's the LA paper saying that military did not enter California. No, I think it was somebody from the water district or something. The military did not enter California. The federal government restarted federal water pumps after they were offline for maintenance for three days. State water supplies in Southern California remain plentiful.
All right, so Trump says there's not enough water. California says water is plentiful. Trump says he created a whole new flow of water. The state says no, they just turned on some things that were down for maintenance for three days. So basically nothing. So was it nothing or was it something? And I still don't know. But I will refer you to a long thread on California water situation from Joel Pollak. You can see that in my feed or you can see it in his feed on X. And here's the situation. The water situation in California is complicated. It's complicated not only because there's a whole bunch of different aqueducts and sources and different things going to different places, but there's also a history. So there's a history of what was and what they had to change and what was an environmental change and what was the natural situation with the weather when it rained and when it didn't. And you'd kind of have to know it all to know what's true and what isn't.
I don't know at all what I do know is it's complicated enough that I have no idea what happened. I don't think Trump gave California more water. I don't think that happened. But I'm just guessing because the story is too complicated. So what will be interesting is to see how CNN and other places handle it. Because if this just turns into two movies where Fox News says Trump turned on all the water and everything's fixed, and then CNN says nothing happened, we're not really going to be well served as a public. And I worry that that's going to happen. One will say it happened and one will just say it didn't happen, and then we'll just go to the next topic and we'll never know what happened. And we'll just keep our individual views of that forever maybe.
But let's talk about Karen Bass, the mayor of LA, who is getting a lot of heat for her handling of the situation. You know what she announced today? That they would hire a consultant to help rebuild. A consultant. Do you know what that is? Do you know what happens when the mayor says we're going to hire a consultant to make recommendations about our gazillion dollars that it will take to build things? I don't know how to interpret that except that it's a crime in progress. My understanding of local governments, at least for the bigger cities, is that they're all corrupt. And they're corrupt in a specific way that's easy to do and is common to all local government, which is once you're the one who's in charge of where the money goes, or even hiring the person who decides where the money goes, that's always a pay-for-play. In other words, there's some kickback going to the mayor every time. Now it might not be obvious. Could be indirect. Could be something that she cares about, something else. But in every case, I expect if the mayor appoints the consultant who's going to make these decisions, that's just a rigged political money-making process that has nothing to do with what's good for the public.
I thought that when Trump was going to put a special master in charge of making sure the money from the federal government didn't get wasted, I was hoping we would avoid exactly this. Karen Bass deciding who a consultant would be. There's nothing that's a bigger red signal. Basically that's saying they're not going to fix it. That's saying they're going to steal it. If you tell me I got a consultant to figure out how to do it, I just hear you stole it. You're not even planning to do anything but steal it. And there's a lot of money involved, so of course they're going to steal it if they can.
So I don't have a specific detailed accusation about Karen Bass. It's my assumption that everybody in those jobs is stealing, and they're doing it one way or another. And it's just the most normal thing in the world. And it's why all of our cities are crap, because the people in charge are always stealing, as far as I can tell. Now, you're a consultant. Well, a consultant for a business is very different than a consultant to a city. If the mayor picks the consultant, that's just a gigantic signal for something bad. If a company picks a consultant, well, it just depends how good the consultant is. It's entirely just, you know, did you get what you paid for? But the city stuff is just all in the context of corruption. I think that's just my belief. I don't have any proof of it, but I just assume it. The reason I assume it is it's such an easy crime to get away with that over time the people who want to do that crime are the people who are going to try the hardest for those jobs. So they would succeed anyway.
Rand Paul is going to investigate 14 agencies that had something to do with the COVID origin story. So he thinks that that's a good time to find that out. That COVID origin story is just so weird because I really thought everybody knew it was the lab from early on. And now we're pretending like we're just learning it was the lab. There's something I don't even understand about that. I thought we all knew that for years. Weird.
Meanwhile, New York Magazine did what we call a Rupar edit on their cover. So I did a story about a gathering of young Republicans and conservatives, I guess, a bunch of partying conservatives. And they commented that a photo that showed the crowd, at least a close-up of the crowd, didn't have any, they were all white. So New York Magazine runs a photo and says seems like they're all white. Their very own photo had several black attendees that they cropped out. They literally cropped the black people out and then said there's no black people. It gets better. Guess who hosted? Guess who hosted the event? It was hosted by CJ Pearson, who is a young black conservative. The thing was hosted by a young, well-known black guy. And there were black people in attendance, of course. So that's your media for you.
Meanwhile, Robby Starbuck is saying that on X, 19 attorney generals just sent a letter to Costco warning that DEI policies are illegal because it discriminates on race. 19 attorney generals just went after Costco. Is that enough? What would happen if the other attorney generals weighed in on the other side and said, oh, that's not bad, DEI is good? Because that would be the blue states versus red state situation.
Well, here's what I think. So the first thing I do is look up who is the CEO of Costco, and it's a white guy. It's a white guy. Have I warned you about white guys? White guys are pretty much the source of all DEI. Now some of you can say no, no, it's white women, white women, because they're the ones in the, they're more white women in DEI jobs. So you'd say it's white women. To which I say no, that's a trick by the white men. That's just a white man trick. They hire women for those jobs and minorities for those jobs so that you'll think DEI is caused by the women or the minorities who are in the DEI jobs. No, it's the CEO. It's the CEO covering his big fat ass so that you think you can give him 12 million dollars a year, which Costco does, and he's a good guy. If you put any white man in that job, they're going to say, wait a minute, let me see if I understand this. If I just pretend I'm really big on DEI, you're going to give me 12 million dollars a year? Yes. Suppose I didn't pretend that? Like, well, I know it'd be hard to say that you should be in that job because I'm pretty sure we like that stuff. Yeah. So the problem is always white men covering their ass.
As I've said before, I've been deeply discriminated against for gender and race in my career. You know, first at a bank, then at the phone company, and then in TV work. But every time a white man was behind it who was covering his own fat ass. Every time. So I've never been discriminated against by anybody except white guys who were covering their ass. So 19 attorney generals just went after a white guy covering his ass. Let's see who wins. I'm going to bet on the attorneys general.
Well, Mike Lee, based Mike Lee, has an interesting idea to handle the cartels. Have you ever heard of, there's a constitutional component, I guess, that allows something called letters of marque, spelled M A R Q U E. And these haven't been used in a hundred years or so. But what it was is when the US government wanted to take care of something like, let's say pirates, they didn't like pirates, they could hire their own pirates to kill the other pirates. Or they could hire basically a private army. They could give them authority to act on behalf of the United States just by being real bastards against something that we didn't like. And the people who got the letter of marque could keep the booty. So if they took out a pirate, they could just keep it, and that would be their profit. So that's why people would say yes to it.
So it hasn't been used in a long time. But Mike Lee is suggesting that what if we did use it against the cartels? Suppose we said if you wanted to form a private militia, now it would have to be authorized, not on your own, right? You would have to go to the government and the government would have to issue an actual letter of marque, you know, an official act that would authorize you to take out the cartels and keep their money. Do you think there would be anybody who would be willing to take that? I mean, you know, I've never been a special forces person, but if I were retired special forces and I thought I could get a big payday and I wasn't afraid of that kind of stuff, I don't know. It might be able to raise a private militia. I wouldn't do this until the normal way of doing business failed completely, but it's kind of interesting. I wouldn't rule it out. I think it's too soon to try it because we should just do more normal stuff first. But let's see.
All right, well, it's been 24 hours since that DeepSeek AI hit the world. And yesterday the OpenAI stock, or actually Nvidia stock, dropped about 16, 17%, which is really big because it's a trillion, trillions of dollar company. And people thought, oh no, it's the end of the United States AI industry. And I think I told you yesterday, not so fast. It'll probably take a hit because people are processing the news. So if you're still processing the news of this ultra cheap competitor in AI that comes out of China that's actually open source, it doesn't even cost anything. So my caution was that it'll probably take a hit, but by the end of the year the stock would probably recover and be ahead of it. Now it looks like it flattened out today, so we may have already hit the bottom.
But here's what I predicted, and you can already see it coming true. What I predicted was that the US would start seeing issues with it, and those issues would allow the government to have cover for degrading this as a product that can really be used. So here's what I mean. Question number one, how would we know if it was trained on propaganda? The source code is open, so you can see all the source code, but the source code doesn't tell you what it was trained on. The data that it was trained on is not something we have access to. So what if they just trained it on a bunch of pro-China propaganda, you know, plus all the generic stuff in the world, so that it was essentially a brainwashing tool? How do we know? Well, the only way we'd know is by asking it questions that would get to that very point. And it turns out people are asking that question. And sure enough, so Joshua Harley was asking it some questions. And if you ask it some questions about China that it doesn't want to answer, it actually starts to answer them and then goes into racism while you watch. I can't talk about that. So it does know some bad stuff about China, such as the Uyghurs, let's say. But it will start to write it, and then it will, whoops, which means that they've got some kind of safety valve on there that makes it change its mind. I don't know if you could find that safety valve in the code. Where else would it be? So that's an open question.
So we've got the issue. And then Joshua Harley also asked it if it used any or how it was created. And it said that it was created with these Nvidia GPUs. Now that's DeepSeek itself saying it was created using these chips that it should not have legal access to. So the question I have is, is that real? Did China really allow it to say that it uses stolen technology?
Here's what I think. This is just a presumption. What I think is that it could be that DeepSeek hallucinated the use of those chips, because that would be a good hallucination. Because if it knows that there's no way it could be AI unless it had had some of those chips involved, wouldn't it just make the connection on its own? So let me say it more to the point. If what DeepSeek knows is only what it was trained on, why in the world would China train it on secret data that says they stole some GPUs from Nvidia or got them in some illicit way? How in the world would DeepSeek even have access to that to train on it? So I wonder if it found that in its training and China didn't know how to, that it had to get rid of that. Or did it just assume that there's no other way it could exist unless some Nvidia GPUs were involved? So you really can't tell if it really thought that or it just assumed that. So that's interesting.
So we don't know if it's a propaganda machine. We can see evidence that it is hiding what we would think is the truth. We don't know if it's hallucinating. And it's also should be noted that most people who use it in the long run will use the version that's connected to China so they can collect your personal information again. Now a lot of the news about DeepSeek was that so exciting you could run it on a local computer. But the local one will never be as good as the one that's connected all the time. So we're going to get all excited about the local one, which basically will be a toy, you know, just maybe another user interface. But the real one, the one people would use if they just go to their browser because they don't want to figure out how to load it on their personal computer, will be connected. So again, it's a way for China to collect all kinds of information on its users.
So that, and then we find out that there's this huge cyber attack on DeepSeek. Now who would do that? Who would do a major cyber attack on DeepSeek? Well, first of all, they'd have to have a lot of skill. Let's say, could it be China? Well, no, it's China's product, so they wouldn't attack it. Could it be Russia? No, it doesn't seem like something Russia would do. Why would they? Iran? No. Israel? No. Europe? No, they don't, they're barely in AI. So who would do such a thing? I can only think of us. If it's not the United States, it should be. Because if it's true that our biggest AI companies are, and it looks like it's confirmed, are going to be in bed with the CIA, the CIA can't let China destroy the AI industry in the United States. There's probably no limit to what the CIA would do to make sure that the US is dominant in AI. So the first thing the CIA would do if they're doing their job and if they're in bed with AI is they would look to destroy DeepSeek. So if I had to guess who's doing a major cyber attack, probably us. I mean, can you come up with a better idea? Do you think the Sri Lankans just decided to go to war? Like who else would it be? Africa? What, Greenland? Greenland decided to kind of assert itself? I mean, honestly, who else would it be?
Now I guess you could say, well, it could be individuals. Really? Maybe. But why would the individuals want to take out this great free new product? I don't know. Sounds like us.
So as you know, there's an accusation that the whistleblower for OpenAI was murdered. Now if it's true that controlling AI in the world is an existential, most important thing for our country, and it might be, might be the most important thing, would the CIA kill an American citizen to guarantee American dominance? Probably yes. That doesn't mean they did, but wouldn't that be sort of on point? Killing one person to save the country. Again, not saying that they did, but I kind of feel like that's their job. I hate to say it. If they're trying to keep the country safe and the whistleblower would have taken down our most important AI asset, it feels like we would have killed them. We meaning somebody associated with our government. And the same with DeepSeek.
So what I expect and what I predicted is that our government will try to degrade access to or even the product itself. So I think we will probably see a massive campaign to say it's too dangerous like TikTok or something. And somehow it will be banned eventually, unless we just outcompete it, which is also possible. We might just outcompete it. So Grok 3 is launching this week, which is 10 times the computing power. And pretty soon voice mode is coming so you can talk to Grok. And Grok's got the, I think the most impressive data center, which should give it either now or soon the most impressive AI. So I feel like even if AI is free like you can get a free DeepSeek, I'm still going to take the one that's better if it's, you know, say $20 a month. I think I'm always going to want the one that's better. So we'll see. I think America is going to be way more competitive than we thought for 24 hours when that free one dropped.
Deportations up to 12,200 on Sunday. And so I guess Trump wanted that number to get up. It was only in the lower hundreds for a few days. But only 600 people crossed illegally on Sunday. That's like a ridiculously low number. Now turns out that closing the border wasn't that hard, just like Trump said.
Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Trump Justice Department fired more than a dozen lawyers that were working with Jack Smith's prosecutions of the president. Now I'm completely in favor of that. I think that if you were a prosecutor and you willingly take an assignment that is clearly lawfare and the person you're trying to lawfare gets into office, you're fired. You're very fired. And that's the way it should be. Because if you're going to cross that line and lawfare somebody because you can, when they get in power, they're going to fire your ass. And I am so on board for that because that's what we need. That's good for the country. It's good for the country that the bad guys know that there's a price, and the price is their jobs. And if you want to think, oh, I'm just being a lawyer, just doing what I'm told, no, you better think about it next time. You better think it through because Trump's coming for you if you came for him. And I'm absolutely on board with that. You got to rebalance the power structure. You got to make sure there's a deterrent for bad behavior.
Nvidia is up 0.5%. Yeah, so I think that might have been a one-day scare. And a lot of people are trying to get into Nvidia at a good entry price. So I think there was a ton of money on the sidelines thinking, well, I kind of want to own Nvidia, but it seems to just go up too much every day and I haven't bought it yet. And then it looks like it's a good price. So all right.
So you might know that Scott Bessent got confirmed. So he's going to be the treasury secretary. And he's helping Trump push the idea of tariffs as opposed to income tax. Now I wanted to run some numbers. So I used Perplexity AI, which got different numbers than, so I'll tell you both. So I thought to myself, is that really something that could happen? Like how much do we collect in taxes or how much is the budget, I guess? How much is the budget? And then how much would we have to charge in tariffs to replace all of our income tax? And so I did a quick calculation, and it looks like if Trump put a 20% tariff on every single thing that comes into the country, it would be 5 to 10% of what we need to cover the budget. 20% tariff on every single import, every single one, would only be 5 to 10% of what we need to cover the current budget.
Now the current budget is probably twice what it should be. I'm not sure we can ever reduce that. But let's say that goes down 30%. You know, let's say DOGE is just wildly successful. You're still not even close. So I don't really understand the whole tariff instead of income tax. Is that really based on something real? The numbers don't look like they could possibly add up. But I would like to be corrected about that. So if I'm wrong about that, you let me know.
The good news about tariffs is it encourages local production because it would therefore give some cost advantages to doing things locally. So that's good. But I don't think that's enough of a boost to make it make sense. What might make sense is tariffs at the same time as other things.
According to Anna Giaritelli for the Washington Examiner, there are two law enforcement officers who have said that the Mexican cartel has put a green light to open fire on US federal enforcement at the border. Do you believe that? I'm not sure I could totally trust some law enforcement people who said they heard it. So I don't know if they have good sources. But do you believe the cartel just said it's war, just open fire? We're going to have to wait and see. It doesn't feel like the right play. You know, as much as you want to hate the cartels, they do act like a well-oiled machine, unfortunately. And would it make sense for them to escalate before they had to? Seems like they should try to avoid all contact with the US military for as long as possible. Maybe then the American political system will talk us out of doing it. So I don't know if I believe that, but we're going to find out. There were some shots exchanged just yesterday, I think, but that might have been a one-off. We'll see.
Yeah, sounds like BS. All right, yeah, if you say it's BS, there's a lag in the comments, so you're going to have to tell me the topic so I know which one of my topics is BS. So Nvidia chips. In the research paper, DeepSeek's engineers said they used the older chips, not the best ones, and 2,000 of them. All right, all right.
So ladies and gentlemen, that's what I had for today's topic. Is there anything I missed? I thought I'd zoom through it and get you back to work. All right. I'm going to talk to the Locals people privately for a few minutes, the people who are behind the subscription paywall. And I'm going to change all this soon, okay? And we'll do the closing sip as soon as I've hit the we'll be private button. Takes about 30 seconds. If you're on YouTube or X or Rumble, thanks for joining. I'm going private with just the Locals people now, and I'll see you tomorrow.
the stock market is flattened out trying to figure out what's true and what isn't but I'll tell you what's true soon as we get going first let me see if I've got all my comments working and I do there we go good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams it's the best thing that ever happened to you but if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains all you need for that is a c Mar glass a tanker chel a Cen Jer flask vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite a liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure the dopamine hit of the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous sip it happens now spectacular oh it just keeps getting better well let's talk about the people who wasted money on Research number one The Daily Mail is reporting that according to new research SE Arch people who are attractive get paid 11% more as if my followers didn't know that already so I hope you're all enjoying your 11% extra pay because let's face it you are the sexiest best looking group of people on the entire planet so it it's a little bit unfair but I think they could have saved a little bit of time and money by just asking me just ask Scott hey Scott do you think Attractive people make more money yes do you think people who are men who are taller make more money yes you don't have to do that one either I know all the answers to these how about another one according to SAI post Vladimir hry writes that Anor might enhance creative performance again just ask me really you could just ask me yes and anger creates you know generates more creative performance I'm getting a little mad at this right now and look how much better I'm doing yeah anger when I started the dillberg comic uh there was a direct correlation between how much something bothered me and how funny I could make it 100% perfect correlation and in fact I I developed the uh the humor concept that you can't make it a joke about something that doesn't bother you you just can't do it you could try but it would just be oh seat belts well actually seat belts are pretty good so just ask me next time all right uh according to the Daily Mail this one sounds like I made it up but I didn't make this up more than half of dating app users plan to abstain from masturbating this year but uh but the article warrants there could be all kinds of risks apparently it makes your penis and Andor your clitoris shrink if you don't work it out yeah it'll shrink um and it's you good for your prostate if you're a guy and it's good for your cardio and I know a lot of people just replace their cardio routine with masturbating you just do it a little more aggressively and it's all about the same um however um I think that the real reason for the lack of masturbating is that people don't look as good to each other as they used to have you how many of you have noticed that it's not just me right now part of it is I think you know I'm at a certain age where I don't have really contact with young people so I'm pretty much seeing people my age and you know 50 and over but uh it does seem like people are way less attractive in the general public if if you want if you want to see somebody attractive let's say female you know you end up looking at some you know weird uh only fans situation and you and and then you're like maybe yuck down by that so yeah I could totally see why people would just be less aroused testosterone would be lower and I'm sure for the women you know half of the men look like look like they're just women so so yeah I can see why people just be giving up according to the post millennial now here's one of these things where you think it couldn't be true what people are claiming and then you see this stat 15% of women in federal prison were born men so they're trans 15% of women's prisons are biological males now to make sense because because biological males tend to be the ones who create the most crimes so if you've got enough trans you're going to be filling your prisons with because men are just more likely to commit crimes so yeah 15% now that's something that Trump is ending right I think he's yeah he's going to change that imagine if you went all through all the trouble of going trans so you could get into a women's prison and then they then they pull you back in a Men's prison you would be like you would feel so good about yourself you're like yes I beat the system yeah they can put me in prison but they're going to have to put me in the woman's prison because I put on a dress then Trump's like okay take your dress to The Men's prison oh that that could work out entirely differently well CNN's uh is getting rid of uh uh what's his name Jim Masta so Jim Masta is quitting apparently because they moved him to the midnight slot which is what you do when you you're trying to get somebody to quit on their own because I think it's cheaper if they quit so that worked that plan worked so cost is out now he he had been the dumbest guy or I I I don't know if he's the dumbest let's say he was the one who seemed least interested in the truth but they have this uh new dumb person uh C Katherine rampel who's on the panels with Scott Jennings and some other people and she's quite a quite a piece of work it feels like CNN's just trying to put their business completely out of business like here here's somebody you would only let on TV if you were trying to destroy your own business model I mean just incredible so she's sort of a shaking TDS that old racist kind of a kind of a panelist and uh she was she went on a 5 minute rant about how Elon Musk is clearly some kind of a racist Nazi because of all the all the little hints all the little hints uh including the fact that twice he's raised his hand above his waist oh I didn't know that apparently twice one of his hands has been higher than his waist W I guess I'm going to have to rethink everything here I thought he wasn't a Nazi but now that I know his hand is gone up twice above his waist I'm rethinking everything but wait there's more there's more so part of her evidence is that the actual Nazis in Germany I guess uh said it was a salute oh no oh no the actual Nazis said it's a salute in another words CNN is using Nazis as their source of Truth why would you use Nazis as your source of as your fact Checkers did they replace replace Daniel Dale I'd like to see Daniel Dale fact check that huh if the Nazis say it's a salute it must be a salute it's not because the Nazis want to draw attention to themselves and act exactly like people that they're more popular than they are no it's not opportunistic at all let me tell you the proper way to respond to that when somebody says but but the Nazis say it's a salute what you want to do is uh you would say why do you think they think it's a Nazi salute it's because they watched CNN where else would they learn that that was a Nazi salute they didn't make it up on their own do you think they go around all day long and every time somebody puts their arm in the air they're like yep yep there's another one Nazi salute no the reason they're targeting Elon Musk is because CNN told them it's a Nazi salute and then they look at then they look at the Nazis as the source no CNN you're the source the Nazis never even would have thought about it because there's not a single Nazi that thinks that touching your heart and saying my heart goes out to you is see K not one you can't find one Nazi that thinks that's that's the case but you can find Nazis that watch CNN can't you and and do you think they watched Fox News no they weren't watching Fox News because Fox News said this is ridiculous it's obviously not a Nazi slute so where are they getting their information they're getting it from CNN so CNN is the choice of news for the Nazis which I think has to mean something does doesn't it I mean connect the dots right if if the Nazis are getting their information from CNN that would sort of suggest the CNN or Nazis right I'm just seeing how stupid I could be see if I can get a job on the panel anyway uh and the fact that Netanyahu says absolutely he's not a Nazi you know he he's a big friend of Israel he came and he toured the Holocaust sites You' think that would be enough I'd like to suggest the standard for knowing if somebody's a Nazi now you you couldn't use this as an absolute but I think if if the head of Israel says in public this is ridiculous he's a friend of Israel that should sort of settle it don't you think be because who's better at spotting Nazis the you know the actual head of Israel or a panelist on CNN I don't know I think Israel's got that down Scott Jennings warned that she went so far that she might want to lawyer up because it was just such um such obvious defamation now I don't I'm no expert on defamation but suppose she did get sued for suggesting with her five minutes of evidence that musk must be a Nazi suppose he's suit her what would be what would be the defense she would have to she would have to either say she wasn't trying to suggest he's Nazi which of course was the entire point of her you know entire thing that would be ridiculous or she'd have to say I'm too stupid to know it's not true so she'd actually have to her defense would have to be that she says things that are not true and she knows it and didn't mean it like it it would be a ridiculous defense because it's so obviously intentional and so obvious what her intention is I don't know I'm not sure if the lawsuit is is worth that but uh then Abby Phillip who's you the host for that same panel she's the CNN host um she gives a musk a hard time I think separately for saying that Germany needs to move past their guilt so here's how she reframed move past your guilt she says is forgetting the Holocaust did did Elon Musk say we should forget the Holocaust again he literally just toured the Holocaust sites with Netanyahu who else has done that who's actually toured the Holocaust sites with Netanyahu that that's as far as you can get from Forgetting the Holocaust so this is this is so disgustingly stupid and Petty and weak that I'm going to guess that Abby philli will be the next one that CNN gets rid of because their credibility is really tanking with it with that particular host I mean that's just unforgivable really anyway Jim acosta's out as I said he's quit CNN but at least he has that Don Lemon career path ahead of him what no all right I've got a question for you I'm going to make a generalization I don't think the generalization holds for every case but it might it goes like this when a Fox News host uh leaves Fox News they can get a big audience because they were a celebrity say Tucker Carlson um now uh Hannity is not planning to leave but suppose he did if hanity left Fox News tomorrow don't you think he'd have a huge podcast he would because he's a star um how about geld he's not going anywhere because he's got two his shows on Fox news but what if he did he he would bring with him a gigantic audience because is a star and you could you know Go Right Down the Line Jesse Waters blah blah blah blah blah stars stars stars but here here's what I noticed this morning the stars make Fox News that that's what makes it the better show yeah they also have better producers I always say that their production their production skills are just amazing so good um but they have lots of stars and and part of part of being good at producing is making sure you selected people with personality and character and could be stars but it seems to me that the CNN hosts none of them have an audience if they were to leave I think they would all turn into Don Lemon and you would find that it was CNN that made them famous and and successful I mean if successful is the right word whereas uh at Fox the the talent made the network at CNN the network makes the talent well known it seems opposite is is that a fair a fair generalization might be too far but you know there's so many obvious examples of it anyway MSNBC Rachel Mano says that uh they made a difficult decision for what she calls a news organization so she calls MSNBC her employer a news organization okay and uh while she's lying about it being a news organization she says she doesn't want them uh that the network has decided not to air all of the Trump speeches because of all the things he might say that are untrue and she said that in the context of claiming they're a news organization now if you were underinformative if you look at the design of it it doesn't look like it's designed to be news it looks like it's designed as propaganda that's supposed to look like it's also news now you could argue that maybe the some other entities are the same but it's the one that's most obviously not really news it's most obviously obviously just some kind of Intel driven government Democrat driven propaganda machine that just happens to be in the slight in the news domain then over at the The View uh Senator fedman went on The View and uh just slapped him down on this lawfare stuff according to Fox News uh he said the judicial system gets weaponized and targeted political enemies for political gain so he was saying that the New York charges all 34 uh 34 felony counts which is what the Democrats like to say Federman just swept away all 34 felony counts by saying obviously just lawfare there's no way they would have taken anybody else to court for that basically just on her head on live TV and walked away I'm just liking Federman now some people are saying hey you know maybe he'll turn into a republican because he's he's got some uh skills that seem to go both ways but as he pointed out um he's got a number of policies that wouldn't be compatible with uh Republicans so he's not going to change but uh my my smartest Democrat friend who I often mention I've been wanting to catch up with him because I thought surely by now surely by now a normal smart person watching the news would realize that Trump is doing what the public wants him to do by quite a big majority he's the most popular he's ever been and things are happen that looked good so I was expecting oh this is going to be good next time I see him oh my God or hear from him I'm going to i g to have my Victory lap and I won't even have to say a thing I won't even have to make my argument I'll be just like told you see instead I got an email saying that he was planning ahead to the next race and which Democrat and he gave a list of them which Democrat did we think was going to be the best candidate and he said that you know once Trump has completely embarrassed and destroyed the country that we'll be ready for a p Buddha judge and I said seriously be Buddha that would be your strongest guy that almost sounds like a joke I mean really of all the people in the world and and then he said but maybe he can't get elected because he's gay and then I said well how many Republicans were going to vote for him it it wouldn't matter if he was gay or not gay no Republicans going to vote for him so aren't you saying that the Democrats are anti-gay I think he just called his own party anti-gay because all he has to do is get all the Democrat votes right aren't there more Democrats than oh maybe that changed actually I don't know that I thought there were more Democrats than Republicans but did that change did it change this this season anyway but but when you when you see that other world and you get a peek at it you think they really don't have anything because if a smart well-informed person on that side and again he's very smart if if we were to compare IQs I think I think he'd beat me but wow Pete Buddha judge really yeah forget about the gay part and I don't I've never talked to anybody who cared about that but how can he possibly win I don't know maybe I'm wrong could be the I'm the one who's being silly uh AOC was trying her best to come up with something that she could say that doesn't sound dumb about Trump butth this is the best she came up with she said the Norms are starting to embrace Trump the Norms are embracing him why would you form that sentence let let me fix that sentence Trump has popular policies Trump is doing popular things people like it that's the way you say that here's the way you say it if you're just being weird the Norms are embracing Trump that's sort of like saying the car ran over somebody and the knife stabbed somebody and the the gun killed somebody I I really think it's the person doing the thing it's not the thing doing the person is it did did the Norms form into some kind of a morphous gaseous entity and did it did it then Embrace Trump oh the Norms are embracing you no it's just words what the hell the the Democrats are so lost so lost it's just crazy the best they have is word salad and uh I think the uh the Nazis watch CNN believe he's a Nazi so Trump gave a speech yesterday to a republican group and he was on the stage for most of the time with h Mike Johnson and Steve scales and I just had a moment while I was watching that do you realize that of those three scalise Trump and Johnson two out of three Republican leaders have been shot two out of three of the top Republican leaders have been shot I mean I like I'm my mind is boggled like really shot two out of three like I don't even have a comment on that but that's that's the world we live in God um one of the things Trump did that is it's it's vexing if you're a supporter uh as I am but it's also so on point with what what he does he starts by teasing that you know he can't run for a third term but you know maybe maybe he can you know he needs to check that out now I think he's kidding but whether he's kidding or not you know that that's what the the bad guys are going to pick up on and they're going to be running around in a circle saying that you want a third term I think I think he does that intentionally right because he doesn't have the ability to be uninteresting Trump is genetically interesting everything he does is a little bit interesting and so he's just giving a talk and he throws out the the reddest of all red meat I might run for a third term you know never leave office I think he's just trolling and and keeping them talking about the least important thing that's you know not real in any way but but wow um Trump said uh he was talking about CNN at the same speech and Trump says uh they say we had the greatest first week in presidential history even CNN is saying this guy is amazing I said did CNN really say that but nobody watches so nobody was able to confirm that's the trumpi thing that anybody ever said from Trump the trumpi thing is making fun of CNN and then then saying the CNN complimented him but he can't confirm it because nobody watches CNN now that is just genuinely funny all right there's speaking of fake news there's a story today that's either two separate stories or fake news or too too complicated for us to understand so I woke up to see that uh the that Trump has said the US military just entered the great state of California and according to Trump under emergency Powers they turned on the water flowing abundantly from the Pacific Northwest and Beyond the the days of putting fake environmental argument over people are over enjoy the Water California all right so he's drawing a picture where all you had to do was send in the smart people to turn on the spigot and then all of LA's California water problems would be solved so California wouldn't do it because of some environmental thing so we send somebody in to turn on the water and we're all fixed now now does that sound true to you when you read that do you say oh yeah there's nothing else I need to know about that story did that did that just hit the Bull's Eye for you all right so here's a reporter for uh I think it's the LA uh paper um saying that military did not enter Cali California no I think it was somebody from the water district or something the military did not enter California the federal government restarted Federal water pumps after they offline for maintenance for three days state water supplies in Southern California remain plentiful all right so Trump says there's not enough water California says water is plentiful Trump says he he created whole new flow of water the state says no they just turned on some things that were down for maintenance for 3 days so basically nothing so was it nothing or was it something and I still don't know but I will refer you to a long thread on California water situation from Joel Pollock you can see that in my feed or you can see it in his feed um on X and here's the situation the the water situation in California is complicated it's complicated not only because there's a whole bunch of different aqueducts and sources and you know different things going to different places but there's also a history so there's a history of what was and what they had to change and what was an environmental change and you know what was the natural situation with the weather when it rained and when it didn't and you'd kind of have to know it all to know what's true and what isn't I don't know at all what I do know is it's complicated enough that I have no idea what happened I don't think Trump gave California more water I don't think that happened but I'm just guessing because the story is too complicated so what will be interesting is to see how CNN and other places uh handle it because if this just turns into two movies where Fox News says uh says Trump turned on all the water and everything's fixed and then seeing says nothing happened we're not really going to be well served as a public and I worry that that's going to happen one will say it happened and one will just say it didn't happen and then we'll just go to the next topic and we'll never know what happened and we'll just keep our individual views of that forever maybe but uh let's talk about uh Karen Bass the mayor of La who is getting a lot of heat for her handling of the situation you know what she announced today that they would hire a consultant to help rebuild a consultant do you know what that is do you know what happens when the mayor says we're going to hire a consultant to make recommendations about our gazillion dollars that it will take to build things I don't know how to interpret that except that it's a crime in progress my understanding of local governments at least for the bigger cities is that they're they're all corrupt and they're corrupt in a specific way that's easy to do and is common to all local government which is once you're the one who's in charge of where the money goes or even hiring the person who decides where the money goes that that's always a pay for play in other words there's some Kickback going to the mayor every time now it might not be obvious could be indirect could be something that she cares about something else but in every case I expect if the mayor appoints the consultant who's going to make these decisions that's just a rigged political money-making process that has nothing to do with what's good for the public I thought that when Trump was going to put a special master in charge of you know making sure the money from the federal government didn't get wasted I was hoping we would avoid exactly this Karen bass deciding who a consultant would be there's nothing that's a bigger red signal basically that's saying they're not going to fix it that's saying they're going to steal it if if you tell me I got a consultant to figure out how to do it I just hear you stole it you not even planning to do anything but steal it and there's a lot of money involved so of course they're going to steal it if they can so I don't have a specific detailed accusation about Karen bass it's my assumption that everybody in those jobs is Ste and they're doing it one way or another and it's just the most normal thing in the world and it's why all of our cities are crap because the people in charge are always stealing as far as I can tell now you're a consultant well a consultant for a business is very different than a consultant to to a city if the mayor Pi picks the consultant that's just a gigantic signal for something bad if a company picks a consultant well it just depends how good the consultant is I me it's entirely just a you know did you get what you paid for but the the city stuff is just all in the context of corruption I think that's just my belief I don't have any proof of it but I just assume it the reason I assume it is it's such an easy crime to get away with that over time the people who want to do that crime are the people who are going to try the hardest for those jobs so they and they would succeed anyway Rand Paul's going to um investigate 14 agencies that had something to do with the co over the co origin story so he thinks that that's a good time to find that out uh that that Co origin story is just so weird because I really thought everybody knew it was the lab from early on and now we're pretending like we're just learning it was the lab there's something I don't even understand about that I thought we all knew that for years weird uh meanwhile New York Magazine did a what we call a rupar edit on their cover so I did a story about a gathering of young Republicans and conservatives I guess bunch of partying conservatives and they commented that a photo that showed the crowd at least a closeup of the crowd uh didn't have any they they were all white so New York Magazine runs a photo and says seems like they're all white their very own photo had uh several black attendees that they cropped out they literally cropped the black people out and then said there's no no black people it gets better guess who hosted guess who hosted the event it was hosted by CJ Pearson who is a young black conservative the thing was hosted by a young well-known black guy uh and and there were black people in attendance of course so that's that's your media for you meanwhile uh Robbie Starbuck is saying that uh on X 19 attorney generals just sent a letter to Costco warning that Dei policies are illegal because it discriminates on Race 19 attorney generals just went after Costco is that enough what would happen if the other attorney generals waigh in on the other side and said oh that's not that's not bad Dei is good because that would be the blue States versus Red State situation well um here's what I think so the first thing I do is look up who is the CEO of of Costco and it's a white guy it's a white guy have I have I warned you about white guys white guys are pretty much the source of all Dei now some some of you can say no no it's it's white women white women because they're the ones in the they're more white women in Dei jobs so you'd say it's white women to which I say no that's a trick by the white men that's just a white man trick they hire women for those jobs and minorities for those jobs so that you'll think Dei is caused by the women or the minorities who are in the de I jobs no it's the CEO it's the CEO covering his big fat ass so that you think you can give him 12 million dollar a year which Costco does and he's a good guy if you put any white man in that job and they're going to say wait a minute let me see if I understand this if I just pretend I'm really big on Dei you're going to give me $12 million a year yes suppose I didn't pretend that like thei well I know it'd be hard to hard to say that you should be in that job because I'm pretty sure we like that stuff yeah so the problem is always white men covering their ass H as I've said before I've been deeply discriminated against for gender and race in my career you know first at a bank then at the phone company and then in TV work but every time a white man was behind it who was covering his own fat ass every time so I've never been discriminated against by anybody except white guys were covering their ass so 19 attorney generals just went after a white guy covering his ass let's see who wins I'm going to bet on the Attorneys General well Mike Lee based Mike Lee has a uh interesting idea to handle the cartels have you ever heard of there's a constitutional um constitutional component I guess that allows something called letters of Mark spelled m a r quu e and these haven't been used in a 100 years or so but what it was is when the US government wanted to take care of something like let's say Pirates they didn't like Pirates they could hire their own Pirates to kill the other Pirates or they could hire basically a private army they could they could give them Authority to act on behalf of the United States just by being real bastards against something that we didn't like so and the and the people who got the letter of Mark could keep the booty so if they took out a pirate they could just keep it and that would be their profet so that's why that's why people would say yes to it so it hasn't been used in a long time but uh Mike Le suggesting that what if we did use it against the cartels suppose we said if you wanted to form a private militia now it would have to be it would have to be authorized not not on your own right you would have to go to the government and the government would have to issue an actual letter of Mark you know an official act that would authorize you to take out the cartels and keep their money do do you think do you think uh that there would be anybody who willing to take that I mean you know I've never been a special forces person but if I were retired Special Forces and I thought I could get a big payday and I wasn't afraid of that kind of stuff I don't know I don't know it might be able to raise private militia um I wouldn't do this until the the normal way of doing business failed completely but it's kind of interesting I wouldn't rule it out I think it's too soon to try it because we should just do more normal stuff first but let's see all right well it's been 24 hours since that deep seek AI hit hit the uh world and yesterday the open AI stock um or actually Nidia stock dropped about 16 17% which is really big because it's you trillion trillions of dollar company and people thought oh no it's the end of the United States AI industry and I think I told you yesterday not so fast you it'll probably take a hit because people are processing the news so if you're still processing the news of this Ultra cheap competitor and AI that comes out of China that's actually open source it doesn't even cost anything so if so my caution was that it'll probably take a hit but by the end of the year the stock would probably recover and be ahead of it now it looks like it flat flattened out today so we may have already hit the bottom but here's what I predicted and uh you can already see it coming true what I predicted was is that the US would start seeing issues with it and those issues would allow the government to have cover for degrading this as a product that can really be used so here's what I mean question number one how would we know if it was trained on propaganda the the source code is open so you can see all the source code but the source code doesn't tell you what it was trained on the data that was trained on is is not something we have access to so what if they just trained it on a bunch of pro-china propaganda you know plus all the generic stuff in the world so that it was essentially a brainwashing tool how do we know well the only way we' know is by asking a questions that would get to that very point and it turns out people are asking that question um and sure enough uh so Joshua Harley was asking us some questions and if he ask us some questions about China that it doesn't want to answer it actually starts to answer them and into racism while you watch I can't talk about that so it does know you know some bad stuff about china such as the Wagers let's say but and it will start to write it and then it will whoops which means that they've got some kind of safety valve on there that makes it change its mind I don't know if you could find that safety valve in the code where else would it be so that's an open question um so so we've got the issue um and then then Joshua Hartley also asked it if it used any or how how it was created and it said that it was created with these Nvidia gpus now that's that's deep seek itself saying it was created using these chips that it should not have legal access to so the question I have is is that real did did China really allow it to say that it uses stolen technology here's what I think this just a just a presumption what I think is that um it could be that deep seek hallucinated the use of those chips because that would be a good hallucination because if it knows that there's no way it could be AI unless it had had some uh some of those ships involved wouldn't it just make the connection on its own so so let me say it more to the point more to the point if what if what uh deep seek knows is only what it was trained on why in the world would China train it on secret data that says they stole some gpus from Nvidia or got them in some illicit way how in the world how in the world would deep sea even have access to that to train on it so I wonder if it if it found that in its training and China didn't know how to that it had to get rid of that uh or did it just assume that there's no other way it could exist unless some Nvidia gpus were involved so you really can't tell if it really thought that or it just assumed that so that's interesting so we don't know if it's a propaganda machine we we can see evidence that it it is hiding what we would think is the truth um we don't know if it's hallucinating and it's it's also should be noted that most people who use it in the long run will use the version that's connected to China so they can connect your they they can collect your personal information again now a lot of the news about deep seek was that so exciting you could run it on a local computer but the local one will never be as good as the one that's connected all the time so we're going to get all excited about the local one which basically will be a toy you know just maybe another user interface but the real one the one people would use if they just go to their browser because they don't want to figure out how to load it on their personal computer will be connected so again it's a way for China to collect all kinds of information on its users so the that and then we find out that there's this huge Cyber attack on deep seek now who would do that who would do a major Cyber attack on deep sea well first of all they'd have to have a lot of skill let's say could it be China well no it's it's China's product so they wouldn't attack it could it be Russia no it doesn't seem like something Russia would do why would they Iran no Israel no Europe no they don't they're barely in AI so who who would do such a thing I I can only think of us if it's not the United States it should be because if it's true that our biggest AI companies are and it looks like it's confirmed are going to be in bed with the CIA the CIA can't let China destroy the AI industry in the United States there 's probably no limit to what the CIA would do to make sure that the US is dominant in AI so the first thing the CIA would do if they're doing their job and if they're you know in bed with AI is they would look to destroy deep seek so if I had to guess who's doing a major Cyber attack probably us I mean can you come up with a better idea do you think the Sri Lankans just decided to go to war like who else would it be Africa what Greenland Greenland decided to kind of assert itself I mean honestly who else would it be now I guess you could say well it could be individuals really maybe but why would the individuals want to take out this great free new product I don't know sounds like us so as you know there's an ACC accusation that The Whistleblower for open AI was murdered now if it's true that controlling AI in the world is an existential most important thing for our country and it might be might be the most important thing would the CIA kill an American citizen to guarantee American dominance probably yes that doesn't mean they did but wouldn't that be sort of on point killing one person to save the country again not saying that they did but I kind of feel like that's their job I hate to say it if they're trying to keep the country safe and The Whistleblower would have taken down our most important AI asset it feels like we would have killed them we meaning somebody associated with our government and the same with deep seek so what I expect and what I predicted is that our government will try to degrade access to or even the product itself so I think we will probably see a massive campaign to say it's too dangerous like Tik Tok or something and somehow it will be banned eventually unless unless we just out compete it which is also possible we might just out compete it so grock 3 is launching this week which is 10 times the computing power and pretty soon voice mode is coming so you can talk to grock and grock's got the I think the most impressive uh data center which should give it either now or soon the most impressive AI so I feel like even if AI is free like you can get a free uh deep seek I'm still going to take the one that's better if it's you know say $20 a month I think I'm always going to want the one that's better so we'll see I think America is going to be way more competitive than we thought for 24 hours when that free one dropped deportations up to 12200 uh on Sunday and so the I guess Trump wanted that number to get up it was only it was only in the lower hundreds for a few days um but only 600 people crossed illegally on Sunday that's like a that's a ridiculously low number now turns out that closing the Border wasn't that hard just like Trump said Wall Street Journal is reporting that uh the Trump justice department uh fired more than a dozen lawyers that were working with Jack Smiths to prosecutions of the president now I'm completely in favor of that I I think that if you were a prosecutor and you willingly take an assignment that is clearly lawfare and the person you're trying to laware gets into office you're fired you're very fired and that's the way it should be because if you're going to cross that line and lawfare somebody because you can when they get in power they're going to fire your ass and I am so on board for that because that's what we need that's good for the country it's good for the country that the bad guys know that there's a price and the price is their jobs and if you want if if you want to think oh I'm just being a lawyer just doing what I'm told no you better think about it next time you better think it through because Trump's coming for you if you came for him and I'm I'm absolutely on board with that you got to rebalance the power structure you got to make sure there's a deterrent for bad behavior uh Invidia is up to an half percent yeah so so I think that might have been a one- day Scare and a lot of people are trying to get into Nvidia at a good entry price so I think there were I think there was a ton of money on the side Sidelines thinking well I kind of want to own Nvidia but it seems to just go up too much every day and I haven't bought it yet and then it looks like it's a good price so all right so you might know that uh Scott bessent got confirmed so he's going to be the treasury secretary and uh he's helping Trump push the idea of tariffs as opposed to income tax now I wanted to run some numbers so I used perplexity AI which got different numbers than so I'll tell you both um so I thought to myself is that really something that could happen like how much do we collect in taxes or how much is the budget I guess how much is the budget and then how much would we have to charge in tariffs to replace all of our income tax and and so I did a quick calculation and it looks like if Trump put a 20% tariff on every single thing that comes into the country it would be 5 to 10% of what we need to cover the budget 20% tariff on every single import every single one would only be 5 to 10% of what we need to cover the current budget now the current budget is probably twice what it should be I'm not sure we can ever reduce that but let's say that goes down 30% you know let's say doge is just wildly successful you're still not even close so I don't really understand uh the whole tariff instead of income tax is that is that really based on Something Real the numbers don't look like they could possibly add up but I I would like to be corrected about that so if I'm wrong about that you let me know um the good news about tariffs is it LO it encourages local production because it would give therefore it would give a some cost advantages to doing things locally um so that's good but I don't think that that's enough of a boost to make it make sense what might make sense is uh tariffs at the same time as other things uh according to uh Ann uh garelli for the Washington examiner uh there are two law enforcement officers who have said that the Mexican cartel uh has put a green light to open fire on US Federal enforcement at the border do you believe that um I'm not sure I could totally trust you know some law enforcement people who said they heard it so I don't know if they have good sources but do you believe the cartel just said it's War just open fire we're going to have to wait and see it doesn't feel like the right play you know as much as you want to hate the cartels they do act like a well oiled machine unfortunately and would it make sense for them to escalate before they had to seems like they should try to avoid all contact with the US Military uh for as long as possible to to May because maybe then the American political system will talk you know talk us out of doing it so I don't know if I believe that but we're going to find out there there were some uh shots exchanged just yesterday I think but that might have been a one-off we'll see yeah sound like BS all right yeah if you say it's BS there's a lag in the comments so you're going to have to tell me the topic so I know which one of which one of my topics is BS so Nidia chips in the research paper deep seeks engineers said they used the older chips not the best ones and 2,000 of them all right all right so ladies and gentlemen that's what I had for to today's topic is there anything I missed I thought I'd Zoom through it and get back get you back to work all right uh I'm going to talk to the uh locals people privately for a few minutes subscription uh the the people who are behind the subscription pay wall and uh I'm going to change all this soon okay and we'll do the closing zip as soon as uh I've hit the willbe private button takes about 30 seconds if you're on uh You.
Tube or X or Rumble thanks for joining I'm going private with just the locals people now and I'll see you tomorrow e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e
the stock market is flattened out trying
to figure out what's true and what isn't
but I'll tell you what's true soon as we
get going first let me see if I've got
all my comments
working and I
do there we go
[Music]
good morning everybody and welcome to
the highlight of human civilization it's
called coffee with Scott Adams it's the
best thing that ever happened to you but
if you'd like to take this experience up
to levels that nobody can even
understand with their tiny shiny human
brains all you need for that is a c Mar
glass a tanker chel a Cen Jer flask
vessel of any kind fill it with your
favorite a liquid I like coffee and join
me now for the unparallel pleasure the
dopamine hit of the day the thing that
makes everything better it's called the
simultaneous sip it happens
now
spectacular oh it just keeps getting
better well let's talk about the people
who wasted money on Research number one
The Daily Mail is reporting that
according to new research SE Arch people
who are attractive get paid 11%
more as if my followers didn't know that
already so I hope you're all enjoying
your 11% extra pay because let's face it
you are the sexiest best looking group
of people on the entire planet so it
it's a little bit unfair but I think
they could have saved a little bit of
time and money by just asking me just
ask Scott hey Scott do you think
Attractive people make more money yes do
you think people who are men who are
taller make more money
yes you don't have to do that one either
I know all the answers to these how
about another
one according to SAI post Vladimir hry
writes that Anor might enhance creative
performance
again just ask me really you could just
ask me yes and anger creates you know
generates more creative performance I'm
getting a little mad at this right now
and look how much better I'm doing yeah
anger when I started the dillberg comic
uh there was a direct correlation
between how much something bothered me
and how funny I could make it 100%
perfect
correlation and in fact I I developed
the uh the humor concept that you can't
make it a joke about something that
doesn't bother you you just can't do it
you could try but it would just be oh
seat belts well actually seat belts are
pretty
good so just ask me next
time all right
uh according to the Daily
Mail this one sounds like I made it up
but I didn't make this up more than half
of dating app users plan to abstain from
masturbating this year
but uh but the article warrants there
could be all kinds of risks apparently
it makes your penis and Andor your
clitoris
shrink if you don't work it
out yeah it'll shrink um and it's you
good for your prostate if you're a guy
and it's good for your cardio
and I know a lot of people just replace
their cardio routine with masturbating
you just do it a little more
aggressively and it's all about the same
um
however um I think that the real reason
for the lack of
masturbating is that people don't look
as good to each other as they used
to have you how many of you have noticed
that it's not just me right now part of
it is I think you know I'm at a certain
age where I don't have really contact
with young people so I'm pretty much
seeing people my age and you know 50 and
over but uh it does seem like people are
way less attractive in the general
public if if you want if you want to see
somebody attractive let's say female you
know you end up looking at some you know
weird uh only fans situation and you and
and then you're like maybe yuck down by
that so yeah I could totally see why
people would just be less aroused
testosterone would be lower and I'm sure
for the women you know half of the men
look like look like they're just women
so so yeah I can see why people just be
giving
up according to the post millennial now
here's one of these things where you
think it couldn't be true what people
are claiming and then you see this stat
15% of women in federal prison were born
men so they're
trans
15% of women's prisons are biological
males now to make sense because because
biological males tend to be the ones who
create the most crimes so if you've got
enough trans you're going to be filling
your prisons with because men are just
more likely to commit crimes so yeah 15%
now that's something that Trump is
ending right I think he's yeah he's
going to change
that imagine if you went all through all
the trouble of going trans so you could
get into a women's prison and then they
then they pull you back in a Men's
prison you would be like you would feel
so good about yourself you're like yes I
beat the system yeah they can put me in
prison but they're going to have to put
me in the woman's prison because I put
on a dress then Trump's like okay take
your dress to The Men's prison oh that
that could work out entirely
differently well CNN's uh is getting rid
of
uh uh what's his name Jim Masta so Jim
Masta is quitting apparently because
they moved him to the midnight slot
which is what you do when you you're
trying to get somebody to quit on their
own because I think it's cheaper if they
quit so that worked that plan worked so
cost is out now he he had been the
dumbest guy or I I I don't know if he's
the dumbest let's say he was the one who
seemed least interested in the
truth but they have this uh new dumb
person uh C Katherine rampel who's on
the panels with Scott Jennings and some
other people and she's quite a quite a
piece of work it feels like CNN's just
trying to put their business completely
out of business like here here's
somebody you would only let on TV if you
were trying to destroy your own business
model I mean just incredible so she's
sort of a shaking TDS that old racist
kind of a kind of a panelist and uh she
was she went on a 5 minute rant about
how Elon Musk is clearly some kind of a
racist Nazi because of all the all the
little hints all the little hints uh
including the fact that twice he's
raised his hand above his waist oh I
didn't know that apparently twice one of
his hands has been higher than his waist
W I guess I'm going to have to rethink
everything here I thought he wasn't a
Nazi but now that I know his hand is
gone up twice above his waist I'm
rethinking
everything but wait there's more there's
more so part of her evidence is that the
actual Nazis in Germany I guess uh said
it was a salute oh no oh no the actual
Nazis said it's a salute in another
words
CNN is using Nazis as their source of
Truth why would you use Nazis as your
source of as your fact Checkers did they
replace replace Daniel Dale I'd like to
see Daniel Dale fact check that huh if
the Nazis say it's a salute it must be a
salute it's not because the Nazis want
to draw attention to themselves and act
exactly like people that they're more
popular than they are no it's not
opportunistic at
all let me tell you the proper way to
respond to that when somebody says but
but the Nazis say it's a
salute what you want to do is
uh you would say why do you think they
think it's a Nazi
salute it's because they watched
CNN where else would they learn that
that was a Nazi salute
they didn't make it up on their own do
you think they go around all day long
and every time somebody puts their arm
in the air they're like yep yep there's
another one Nazi salute no the reason
they're targeting Elon Musk is because
CNN told them it's a Nazi salute and
then they look at then they look at the
Nazis as the source no CNN you're the
source the Nazis never even would have
thought about it because there's not a
single Nazi that thinks that touching
your heart and saying my heart goes out
to you is see K not one you can't find
one Nazi that thinks that's that's the
case but you can find Nazis that watch
CNN can't you and and do you think they
watched Fox News no they weren't
watching Fox News because Fox News said
this is ridiculous it's obviously not a
Nazi slute so where are they getting
their information they're getting it
from CNN so CNN is the choice of news
for the Nazis which I think has to mean
something does doesn't it I mean connect
the dots right if if the Nazis are
getting their information from CNN that
would sort of suggest the CNN or Nazis
right I'm just seeing how stupid I could
be see if I can get a job on the
panel
anyway uh and the fact that
Netanyahu says absolutely he's not a
Nazi you know he he's a big friend of
Israel he came and he toured the
Holocaust sites You' think that would be
enough I'd like to suggest the
standard for knowing if somebody's a
Nazi now you you couldn't use this as an
absolute but I think if if the head of
Israel says in public this is ridiculous
he's a friend of Israel that should sort
of settle it don't you
think be because who's better at
spotting
Nazis the you know the actual
head of Israel or a panelist on CNN I
don't know I think Israel's got that
down Scott Jennings warned that she went
so far that she might want to lawyer up
because it was just such um such obvious
defamation now I don't I'm no expert on
defamation but suppose she did get
sued for suggesting with her five
minutes of evidence that musk must be a
Nazi suppose he's suit her what would be
what would be the
defense she would have to she would have
to either say she wasn't trying to
suggest he's Nazi which of course was
the entire point of her you know entire
thing that would be ridiculous or she'd
have to say I'm too stupid to know it's
not true so she'd actually have to her
defense would have to be that she says
things that are not true and she knows
it and didn't mean
it like it it would be a ridiculous
defense because it's so obviously
intentional and so obvious what her
intention
is I don't know I'm not sure if the
lawsuit is is worth that but uh then
Abby Phillip who's you the host for that
same panel she's the CNN host um she
gives a musk a hard time I think
separately for saying that Germany needs
to move past their
guilt so here's how she reframed move
past your
guilt she says is forgetting the
Holocaust did did Elon Musk say we
should forget the Holocaust again he
literally just toured the Holocaust
sites with
Netanyahu who else has done that who's
actually toured the Holocaust sites with
Netanyahu that that's as far as you can
get from Forgetting the Holocaust so
this is this is
so disgustingly stupid and Petty and
weak that I'm going to guess that Abby
philli will be the next one that CNN
gets rid of because their credibility is
really tanking with it with that
particular host I mean that's just
unforgivable really
anyway Jim acosta's out as I said he's
quit CNN but at least he has that Don
Lemon career path ahead of
him what
no all right I've got a question for you
I'm going to make a
generalization I don't think the
generalization holds for every case but
it might it goes like this when a Fox
News
host uh leaves Fox News
they can get a big audience because they
were a celebrity say Tucker
Carlson um now uh Hannity is not
planning to leave but suppose he did if
hanity left Fox News tomorrow don't you
think he'd have a huge podcast he would
because he's a
star um how about geld he's not going
anywhere because he's got two his shows
on Fox news but what if he
did he he would bring with him a
gigantic audience because is a star and
you could you know Go Right Down the
Line Jesse Waters blah blah blah blah
blah stars stars stars but here here's
what I noticed this
morning the stars make Fox
News that that's what makes it the
better show yeah they also have better
producers I always say that their
production their production skills are
just amazing so good um but they have
lots of stars and and part of part of
being good at producing
is making sure you selected people with
personality and character and could be
stars but it seems to me that the CNN
hosts none of them have an audience if
they were to leave I think they would
all turn into Don Lemon and you would
find that it was CNN that made them
famous and and successful I mean if
successful is the right word whereas uh
at Fox the the talent made the network
at CNN the network
makes the talent well known it seems
opposite is is that a fair a fair
generalization might be too far but you
know there's so many obvious examples of
it anyway MSNBC Rachel Mano says that uh
they made a difficult decision for what
she calls a news
organization so she calls MSNBC her
employer a news organization
okay and uh while she's lying about it
being a news organization she says she
doesn't want them uh that the network
has decided not to air all of the Trump
speeches because of all the things he
might say that are
untrue and she said that in the context
of claiming they're a news organization
now if you were underinformative
if you look at the design of it it
doesn't look like it's designed to be
news it looks like it's designed as
propaganda that's supposed to look like
it's also news now you could argue that
maybe the some other entities are the
same but it's the one that's most
obviously not really news it's most
obviously obviously just some kind of
Intel driven government Democrat driven
propaganda machine that just happens to
be in the slight in the news
domain then over at the The View uh
Senator fedman went on The View and uh
just slapped him down on this lawfare
stuff according to Fox News uh he said
the judicial system gets weaponized and
targeted political enemies for political
gain so he was saying that the New York
charges all
34 uh 34 felony counts which is what the
Democrats like to say Federman just
swept away all 34 felony counts by
saying obviously just lawfare there's no
way they would have taken anybody else
to court for that basically just on
her head on live TV and walked
away I'm just liking Federman now some
people are saying hey you know maybe
he'll turn into a republican because
he's he's got some uh skills that seem
to go both ways but as he pointed out um
he's got a number of policies that
wouldn't be compatible
with uh Republicans so he's not going to
change but uh my my smartest Democrat
friend who I often mention I've been
wanting to catch up with him because I
thought surely by now surely by now a
normal smart person watching the news
would realize that Trump is doing what
the public wants him to do by quite a
big majority he's the most popular he's
ever been and things are happen that
looked good so I was expecting oh this
is going to be good next time I see him
oh my God or hear from him I'm going to
i g to have my Victory lap and I won't
even have to say a thing I won't even
have to make my argument I'll be just
like told you
see instead I got an email saying that
he was planning ahead to the next race
and which Democrat and he gave a list of
them which Democrat did we think was
going to be the best candidate and he
said that you know once Trump has
completely embarrassed and destroyed the
country that we'll be ready for a p
Buddha
judge and I said seriously be
Buddha that would be your strongest
guy that almost sounds like a
joke I mean really of all the people in
the
world and and then he said but maybe he
can't get elected because he's gay
and then I said well how many
Republicans were going to vote for him
it it wouldn't matter if he was gay or
not gay no Republicans going to vote for
him so aren't you saying that the
Democrats
are
anti-gay I think he just called his own
party anti-gay because all he has to do
is get all the Democrat votes right
aren't there more Democrats than oh
maybe that changed actually I don't know
that I thought there were more Democrats
than Republicans but did that change did
it change this this
season anyway but but when you when you
see that other world and you get a peek
at it you think they really don't have
anything because if a smart
well-informed person on that side and
again he's very smart if if we were to
compare IQs I think I think he'd beat me
but wow Pete Buddha judge really yeah
forget about the gay part and I don't
I've never talked to anybody who cared
about that but how can he possibly win I
don't know maybe I'm wrong could be the
I'm the one who's being
silly uh AOC was trying her best to come
up with something that she could say
that doesn't sound dumb about Trump
butth this is the best she came up with
she said the Norms are starting to
embrace Trump the Norms are embracing
him why would you form that sentence let
let me fix that sentence Trump has
popular
policies Trump is doing popular things
people like it that's the way you say
that here's the way you say it if you're
just being weird the Norms are embracing
Trump that's sort of like saying the car
ran over somebody and the knife stabbed
somebody and the the gun killed
somebody I I really think it's the
person doing the thing it's not the
thing doing the person is it did did the
Norms form into some kind of a morphous
gaseous entity and did it did it then
Embrace Trump oh the Norms are embracing
you no it's just words what the
hell the the Democrats are so lost so
lost it's just crazy the best they have
is word salad and uh I think the uh the
Nazis watch CNN believe he's a
Nazi so Trump gave a speech yesterday to
a republican group
and he was on the stage for most of the
time with h Mike Johnson and Steve
scales and I just had a moment while I
was watching
that do you realize that of those three
scalise Trump and
Johnson two out of three Republican
leaders have been
shot two out of
three of the top Republican leaders have
been shot
I
mean I like I'm my mind is
boggled like
really
shot two out of
three like I don't even have a comment
on
that but that's that's the world we live
in
God
um one of the things Trump did that is
it's it's vexing if you're a supporter
uh as I am but it's also so on point
with what what he does he starts by
teasing that you know he can't run for a
third term but you know maybe maybe he
can you know he needs to check that
out now I think he's
kidding but whether he's kidding or
not you know that that's what the the
bad guys are going to pick up on and
they're going to be running around in a
circle saying that you want a third term
I think I think he does that
intentionally right because he doesn't
have the ability to be uninteresting
Trump is genetically interesting
everything he does is a little bit
interesting and so he's just giving a
talk and he throws out the the reddest
of all red meat I might run for a third
term you know never leave
office I think he's just trolling and
and keeping them talking about the least
important thing that's you know not real
in any way but but
wow
um Trump said uh he was talking about
CNN at the same speech and Trump says uh
they say we had the greatest first week
in presidential history even CNN is
saying this guy is amazing I said did
CNN really say that but nobody watches
so nobody was able to
[Laughter]
confirm that's the trumpi thing that
anybody ever said from Trump
the trumpi thing is making fun of CNN
and then then saying the CNN
complimented him but he can't confirm it
because nobody watches
[Laughter]
CNN now that is just genuinely funny all
right there's speaking of fake news
there's a story today that's either two
separate stories or fake news or too too
complicated for us to understand so I
woke up to see that
uh the that Trump has said the US
military just entered the great state of
California and according to Trump under
emergency Powers they turned on the
water flowing abundantly from the
Pacific Northwest and Beyond the the
days of putting fake environmental
argument over people are over enjoy the
Water California all right so he's
drawing a picture where all you had to
do was send in the smart people to turn
on the spigot and then all of LA's
California water problems would be
solved so California wouldn't do it
because of some environmental thing so
we send somebody in to turn on the water
and we're all fixed now now does that
sound true to you when you read that do
you say oh yeah there's nothing else I
need to know about that story did that
did that just hit the Bull's Eye for you
all right so here's a reporter for uh I
think it's the LA uh
paper um saying that military did not
enter Cali California no I think it was
somebody from the water district or
something the military did not enter
California the federal government
restarted Federal water pumps after they
offline for maintenance for three days
state water supplies in Southern
California remain plentiful all right so
Trump says there's not enough water
California says water is
plentiful Trump says he he created whole
new flow of
water the state says no they just turned
on some things that were down for
maintenance for 3 days so basically
nothing so was it
nothing or was it
something and I still don't know but I
will refer you to a long thread on
California water situation from Joel
Pollock you can see that in my feed or
you can see it in his feed um on X and
here's the situation the the water
situation in California is complicated
it's complicated not only because
there's a whole bunch of different
aqueducts and sources and you know
different things going to different
places but there's also a history so
there's a history of what was and what
they had to change and what was an
environmental change and you know what
was the natural situation with the
weather when it rained and when it
didn't and you'd kind of have to know it
all to know what's true and what
isn't I don't know at all what I do know
is it's complicated enough that I have
no idea what happened I don't think
Trump gave California more water I don't
think that
happened but I'm just guessing because
the story is too complicated so what
will be interesting is to see how CNN
and other places uh handle it because if
this just turns into two movies where
Fox News says uh says Trump turned on
all the water and everything's fixed and
then seeing says nothing
happened we're not really going to be
well served as a public and I worry that
that's going to happen one will say it
happened and one will just say it didn't
happen and then we'll just go to the
next topic and we'll never know what
happened and we'll just keep our
individual views of that forever maybe
but uh let's talk about uh Karen Bass
the mayor of La who is getting a lot of
heat for her handling of the situation
you know what she announced today
that they would hire a
consultant to help
rebuild a
consultant do you know what that
is do you know what happens when the
mayor says we're going to hire a
consultant to make recommendations about
our gazillion dollars that it will take
to build
things I don't know how to interpret
that except that it's a crime in
progress my understanding of local
governments at least for the bigger
cities is that they're they're all
corrupt and they're corrupt in a
specific way that's easy to do and is
common to all local government which is
once you're the one who's in charge of
where the money goes or even hiring the
person who decides where the money goes
that that's always a pay for play in
other words there's some Kickback going
to the mayor every time now it might not
be obvious could be indirect could be
something that she cares about something
else but in every case I expect if the
mayor appoints the consultant who's
going to make these decisions that's
just a rigged political money-making
process that has nothing to do with
what's good for the public I thought
that when Trump was going to put a
special master in charge of you know
making sure the money from the federal
government didn't get wasted I was
hoping we would avoid exactly this Karen
bass deciding who a consultant would be
there's nothing that's a bigger red
signal basically that's saying they're
not going to fix it that's saying
they're going to steal it if if you tell
me I got a consultant to figure out how
to do it I just hear you stole it you
not even planning to do anything but
steal it and there's a lot of money
involved so of course they're going to
steal it if they can so I don't have a
specific detailed accusation about Karen
bass it's my assumption that everybody
in those jobs is Ste
and they're doing it one way or another
and it's just the most normal thing in
the world and it's why all of our cities
are crap because the people in charge
are always
stealing as far as I can
tell now you're a consultant well a
consultant for a business is very
different than a consultant to to a city
if the mayor Pi picks the consultant
that's just a gigantic signal for
something bad
if a company picks a consultant well it
just depends how good the consultant is
I me it's entirely just a you know did
you get what you paid for but the the
city stuff is just all in the context of
corruption I think that's just my belief
I don't have any proof of it but I just
assume it the reason I assume it is it's
such an easy crime to get away with that
over time the people who want to do that
crime are the people who are going to
try the hardest for those jobs
so they and they would succeed anyway
Rand Paul's going to um investigate 14
agencies that had something to do with
the co over the co origin
story so he thinks that that's a good
time to find that out uh that that Co
origin
story is just so weird because I really
thought everybody knew it was the lab
from early on and now we're pretending
like we're just learning it was the lab
there's something I don't even
understand about that I thought we all
knew that for years
weird uh meanwhile New York Magazine did
a what we call a rupar edit on their
cover so I did a story about a gathering
of young
Republicans and conservatives I guess
bunch of partying conservatives and they
commented that a photo that showed the
crowd at least a closeup of the crowd uh
didn't have any they they were all
white so New York Magazine runs a
photo and says seems like they're all
white their very own
photo had uh several black attendees
that they cropped out they literally
cropped the black people out and then
said there's no no black
people it gets
better guess who hosted guess who hosted
the
event it was hosted by CJ Pearson who is
a young black
conservative the thing was hosted by a
young well-known black guy uh and and
there were black people in attendance of
course so that's that's your media for
you meanwhile uh Robbie Starbuck is
saying that uh on X 19 attorney generals
just sent a letter to Costco warning
that Dei policies are illegal because it
discriminates on Race 19 attorney
generals just went after
Costco is that
enough what would happen if the other
attorney generals waigh in on the other
side and said oh that's not that's not
bad Dei is good because that would be
the blue States versus Red State
situation well um here's what I think so
the first thing I do is look up who is
the CEO of of Costco and it's a white
guy it's a white guy have I have I
warned you about white
guys white guys are pretty much the
source of all Dei now some some of you
can say no no it's it's white women
white women because they're the ones in
the they're more white women in Dei jobs
so you'd say it's white women to which I
say no that's a trick by the white men
that's just a white man trick they hire
women for those jobs and minorities for
those jobs so that you'll think Dei is
caused by the women or the minorities
who are in the de I jobs no it's the CEO
it's the CEO covering his big fat ass so
that you think you can give him 12
million dollar a year which Costco does
and he's a good guy if you put any white
man in that job and they're going to say
wait a minute let me see if I understand
this if I just pretend I'm really big on
Dei you're going to give me $12 million
a year yes suppose I didn't
pretend that like thei well I know it'd
be hard to hard to say that you should
be in that job
because I'm pretty sure we like that
stuff yeah so the problem is always
white men covering their ass H as I've
said before I've been deeply
discriminated against for gender and
race in my career you know first at a
bank then at the phone company and then
in TV work but every
time a white man was behind it who was
covering his own fat ass every time so
I've never been discriminated against by
anybody except white guys were
covering their ass so 19 attorney
generals just went after a white
guy covering his ass let's see who wins
I'm going to bet on the Attorneys
General well Mike Lee based Mike Lee has
a uh interesting idea to handle the
cartels have you ever heard of there's a
constitutional
um constitutional component I guess that
allows something called letters of Mark
spelled m a r quu e and these haven't
been used in a 100 years or so but what
it was is when the US government wanted
to take care of something like let's say
Pirates they didn't like Pirates they
could hire their own Pirates to kill the
other Pirates or they could hire
basically a private army they could they
could give them Authority to act on
behalf of the United States just by
being real bastards against something
that we didn't like so and the and the
people who got the letter of Mark could
keep the booty so if they took out a
pirate they could just keep it and that
would be their profet so that's why
that's why people would say yes to it so
it hasn't been used in a long time but
uh Mike Le suggesting that what if we
did use it against the cartels suppose
we said
if you wanted to form a private militia
now it would have to be it would have to
be authorized not not on your own right
you would have to go to the government
and the government would have to issue
an actual letter of Mark you know an
official act that would authorize you to
take out the cartels and keep their
money do do you think do you think uh
that there would be anybody who willing
to take that I mean you know I've never
been a special forces
person but if I were retired Special
Forces and I thought I could get a big
payday and I wasn't afraid of that kind
of
stuff I don't know I don't know it might
be able to raise private militia um I
wouldn't do this until the the normal
way of doing business failed completely
but it's kind of interesting I wouldn't
rule it out I think it's too soon to try
it because we should just do more normal
stuff first but let's
see all right well it's been 24 hours
since that deep seek AI hit hit the uh
world and yesterday the open AI stock um
or actually Nidia stock dropped about 16
17% which is really big because it's you
trillion trillions of dollar company and
people thought oh no it's the end of the
United States AI industry and I think I
told you yesterday not so fast you it'll
probably take a hit because people are
processing the news so if you're still
processing the news of this Ultra cheap
competitor and AI that comes out of
China that's actually open source it
doesn't even cost anything so
if so my caution was that it'll probably
take a hit but by the end of the year
the stock would probably recover and be
ahead of it now it looks like it flat
flattened out
today so we may have already hit the
bottom but here's what I
predicted and uh you can already see it
coming true what I predicted was is that
the
US would start seeing issues with it and
those issues would allow the government
to have cover for degrading this as a
product that can really be used so
here's what I
mean question number one how would we
know if it was trained on propaganda the
the source code is open so you can see
all the source code but the source code
doesn't tell you what it was trained on
the data that was trained on is is not
something we have access to so what if
they just trained it on a bunch of
pro-china propaganda you know plus all
the generic stuff in the world so that
it was essentially a brainwashing
tool how do we
know well the only way we' know is by
asking a questions that would get to
that very point and it turns out people
are asking that
question um and sure enough uh so Joshua
Harley was asking us some questions and
if he ask us some questions about China
that it doesn't want to answer it
actually starts to answer them and into
racism while you watch I can't talk
about that so it does know
you know some bad stuff about china such
as the Wagers let's say but and it will
start to write it and then it will
whoops which means that they've got some
kind of safety valve on there that makes
it change its mind I don't know if you
could find that safety valve in the
code where else would it be so that's an
open
question um so so we've got the issue um
and then
then Joshua Hartley also asked it if it
used any or how how it was created and
it said that it was created with these
Nvidia
gpus now that's that's deep seek itself
saying it was created using these chips
that it should not have legal access
to so the question I have is is that
real did did China really allow it to
say that it uses stolen
technology here's what I think this just
a just a
presumption what I think is that um it
could be that deep seek hallucinated the
use of those chips because that would be
a good
hallucination because if it knows that
there's no way it could be AI unless it
had had some uh some of those ships
involved wouldn't it just make the
connection on its own so so let me say
it more to the point more to the point
if what if what uh deep seek knows is
only what it was trained on why in the
world would China train it on secret
data that says they stole some gpus from
Nvidia or got them in some illicit way
how in the
world how in the world would deep sea
even have access to that to train on it
so I wonder if it if it found that in
its training and China didn't know how
to that it had to get rid of that uh or
did it just assume that there's no other
way it could exist unless some Nvidia
gpus were involved so you really can't
tell if it really thought that or it
just assumed that so that's interesting
so we don't know if it's a propaganda
machine we we can see evidence that it
it is hiding what we would think is the
truth um we don't know if it's
hallucinating
and it's it's also should be noted that
most people who use it in the long run
will use the version that's connected to
China so they can connect your they they
can collect your personal information
again now a lot of the news about deep
seek was that so exciting you could run
it on a local computer
but the local one will never be as good
as the one that's connected all the
time so we're going to get all excited
about the local one which basically will
be a toy you know just maybe another
user interface but the real one the one
people would use if they just go to
their browser because they don't want to
figure out how to load it on their
personal computer will be
connected so again it's a way for China
to collect all kinds of information on
its
users so the that and then we find out
that there's this huge Cyber attack on
deep
seek now who would do that who would do
a major Cyber attack on deep sea well
first of all they'd have to have a lot
of skill let's say could it be China
well no it's it's China's product so
they wouldn't attack it could it be
Russia no it doesn't seem like something
Russia would do why would they Iran no
Israel no
Europe no they don't they're barely in
AI so who who would do such a
thing I I can only think of us if it's
not the United States it should be
because if it's true that our biggest AI
companies are and it looks like it's
confirmed are going to be in bed with
the CIA the CIA can't let China destroy
the AI industry in the United
States there 's probably no limit to
what the CIA would do to make sure that
the US is dominant in AI so the first
thing the CIA would do if they're doing
their job and if they're you know in bed
with AI is they would look to destroy
deep seek so if I had to guess who's
doing a major Cyber
attack probably
us I mean can you come up with a better
idea do you think the Sri Lankans just
decided to go to
war like who else would it be
Africa what Greenland Greenland decided
to kind of assert itself I mean honestly
who else would it be now I guess you
could say well it could be
individuals
really maybe but why would the
individuals want to take out this great
free new product I don't know sounds
like us
so as you know there's an ACC accusation
that The Whistleblower for open AI was
murdered now if it's true that
controlling AI in the world is an
existential most important thing for our
country and it might be might be the
most important
thing would the CIA kill an American
citizen to guarantee American
dominance probably yes that doesn't mean
they did but wouldn't that be sort of on
point
killing one person to save the country
again not saying that they
did but I kind of feel like that's their
job I hate to say it if they're trying
to keep the country
safe and The Whistleblower would have
taken down our most important AI
asset it feels like we would have killed
them we meaning somebody associated with
our government and the same with deep
seek so what I expect and what I
predicted is that our government will
try to degrade access to or even the
product itself so I think we will
probably see a massive campaign to say
it's too dangerous like Tik Tok or
something and somehow it will be banned
eventually unless unless we just out
compete it which is also possible we
might just out compete it so grock 3 is
launching this week which is 10 times
the computing power and pretty soon
voice mode is coming so you can talk to
grock and grock's got the I think the
most impressive uh data center which
should give it either now or soon the
most impressive AI so I feel like even
if AI is free like you can get a free uh
deep seek I'm still going to take the
one that's
better if it's you know say $20 a
month I think I'm always going to want
the one that's better
so we'll see I think America is going to
be way more competitive than we thought
for 24 hours when that free one dropped
deportations up to 12200 uh on Sunday
and so the I guess Trump wanted that
number to get up it was only it was only
in the lower hundreds for a few days um
but only 600 people crossed illegally on
Sunday that's like a that's a
ridiculously low number now turns out
that closing the Border wasn't that hard
just like Trump
said Wall Street Journal is reporting
that uh the Trump justice department uh
fired more than a dozen lawyers that
were working with Jack Smiths to
prosecutions of the president now I'm
completely in favor of that I I think
that if you were a prosecutor and you
willingly take an
assignment that is clearly lawfare
and the person you're trying to laware
gets into office you're
fired you're very fired and that's the
way it should be because if you're going
to cross that line and lawfare somebody
because you can when they get in power
they're going to fire your ass and I am
so on board for that because that's what
we need that's good for the country it's
good for the country that the bad guys
know that there's a price and the price
is their jobs and if you want if if you
want to think oh I'm just being a lawyer
just doing what I'm told no you better
think about it next time you better
think it through because Trump's coming
for you if you came for him and I'm I'm
absolutely on board with that you got to
rebalance the power structure you got to
make sure there's a deterrent for bad
behavior uh Invidia is up to an half
percent yeah so so I think that might
have been a one- day Scare and a lot of
people are trying to get into Nvidia at
a good entry price so I think there were
I think there was a ton of money on the
side Sidelines thinking well I kind of
want to own
Nvidia but it seems to just go up too
much every day and I haven't bought it
yet and then it looks like it's a good
price
so all right so you might know that uh
Scott bessent got confirmed so he's
going to be the treasury
secretary and uh he's helping Trump push
the idea of tariffs as opposed to income
tax now I wanted to run some numbers so
I used perplexity AI which got different
numbers than so I'll tell you both
um so I thought to myself is that really
something that could happen like how
much do we collect in
taxes or how much is the budget I guess
how much is the
budget and
then how much would we have to charge in
tariffs to replace all of our income tax
and and so I did a quick calculation and
it looks like if Trump put a 20% tariff
on every single thing that comes into
the country it would be 5 to 10% of what
we need to cover the
budget 20% tariff on every single import
every single one would only be 5 to 10%
of what we need to cover the current
budget now the current budget is
probably twice what it should be I'm not
sure we can ever reduce that but let's
say that goes down 30% you know let's
say doge is just wildly successful
you're still not even close so I don't
really
understand uh the whole tariff instead
of income tax is that is that really
based on Something
Real the numbers don't look like they
could possibly add up but I I would like
to be corrected about that so if I'm
wrong about that you let me know
um the good news about tariffs is it LO
it encourages local production because
it would give therefore it would give a
some cost advantages to doing things
locally um so that's good but I don't
think that that's enough of a boost to
make it make sense what might make sense
is uh tariffs at the same time as other
things uh according to uh Ann
uh garelli for the Washington
examiner uh there are two law
enforcement officers who have said that
the Mexican
cartel uh has put a green light to open
fire on US Federal enforcement at the
border do you believe
that um I'm not sure I could totally
trust you know some law enforcement
people who said they heard it so I don't
know if they have good sources but do
you believe the
cartel just said it's War just open
fire we're going to have to wait and see
it doesn't feel like the right play you
know as much as you want to hate the
cartels they do act like a well oiled
machine
unfortunately and would it make sense
for them to escalate before they had to
seems like they should try to avoid all
contact with the US Military
uh for as long as
possible to to May because maybe then
the American political system will talk
you know talk us out of doing it so I
don't know if I believe that but we're
going to find out there there were some
uh shots exchanged just yesterday I
think but that might have been a one-off
we'll
see yeah sound like
BS all right yeah if you say it's BS
there's a lag in the comments so you're
going to have to tell me the topic so I
know which one of which one of my topics
is
BS so Nidia chips in the research paper
deep seeks engineers said they used the
older chips not the best ones and 2,000
of them all
right all right so ladies and
gentlemen that's what I had for to
today's topic is there anything I missed
I thought I'd Zoom through it and get
back get you back to
work all right uh I'm going to talk to
the uh locals people privately for a few
minutes
subscription uh the the people who are
behind the subscription pay wall
and uh I'm going to change all this soon
okay and we'll do the closing zip as
soon as uh I've hit the willbe private
button takes about 30 seconds if you're
on uh YouTube or X or Rumble thanks for
joining I'm going private with just the
locals people now and I'll see you
tomorrow
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e e