Episode 1153 Scott Adams - Court Packers, Immunity, Biden Blunders, Missing Coronavirus Data
Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com Content: ----------- - Republicans have a health plan framing problem - Biden's court packing ways - CDC mask study: Backwards correlation? - GOP ballot harvesting collection boxes in California - Stats for COVID19 victims receiving the Trump protocol - Algorithm complexity is what gives AI...freewill ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Hey, come on in here everybody. It's time. It's time for Coffee with Scott Adams, best part of the day. I think so. Yeah, I think so. There was a little bit of question whether it was the best part of the day or really just top two, top three, but I think we have our answer day after day: best part…
View segment →eah, you thought this couldn't get better and it just did. Surprise. And all you need to do, all you need to do to take this to the next level is see if you can find yourself a cup or a mug or a glass or a tankard or a stein or a can or a jug or a flask — a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your fav…
View segment →t makes everything better. And I'm going to ask you to savor it. Yeah, savor it. Go ahead. Yeah, yeah. Savor it. Savor it. Okay, good. Well, so today, later today, I will be appearing on MSNBC. You're not going to want to miss that. I don't know what kind of questions they're going to ask me. I'll…
View segment →capacity problem. So I don't know if your 5G phone is going to give you 5G speed right away every place you would use it, but probably it'll start out pretty good. And here's the thing you need to know about speed. Speed doesn't just help you do what you were going to do anyway but make it faster.…
View segment →nt? And I would say okay, it's at this number, whatever it is, around 10 percent. By the end of my fourth year I would like that to get down to 2 percent. If you heard something like that you might say to yourself, okay, they've got a system, they've got a goal that I agree with. And Bernie's got —…
View segment →them believe he won't make it four years. So you're not really talking about Biden's opinion. You're talking about Biden's opinion for a while plus Kamala's opinion for whatever time is remaining or even the second term if she were the one to run for the term after that. So shouldn't we be really pu…
View segment →g with this mask thing. It's useless data in any case. California has an interesting situation. Apparently some GOP entity has put up ballot collection boxes of their own. You didn't see that coming, did you? So there are these official-looking ballot collection boxes that are not trying to look li…
View segment →pletely different topic, I follow a Twitter account by the name of somebody named Brian Rommle. If you want to look for it, definitely worth following. He has lots of new technologies and you know what's coming next kind of tweets. And one of them just will blow your head off. Apparently now our hol…
View segment →ld you that we should make decisions based on data? Has anybody mentioned that lately? In this election cycle it's all you hear. We must use the data. We must listen to the experts. Follow the data. Follow the data. That's what all the dumb people say. Following the data would be a terrific idea if…
View segment →y might misinterpret it in a way that actually helps you if it made them wear the mask. No, in that case I think they would wear the mask less. So people would misinterpret it and do the wrong thing. Data is very overrated. Data is usually wrong. That's just a fact. All data is usually wrong and wro…
View segment →ve a good education and want everybody to be free, etc. But he needs to be able to figure out how to do it. It's got to be practical. All right, that is all for today and I will talk to you tomorrow. It's so awkward when I try to hit that little X to end this and I can't hit it with my thumb. All r…
View segment →investment in it as well. And that's where I do everything that I don't do in public. I do there. So there's a whole bunch of other content including micro lessons on success and being more effective as well as some content that's a little too edgy to be on Twitter or to be on YouTube. So Locals is…
View segment →Hey, come on in here everybody. It's time. It's time for Coffee with Scott Adams, best part of the day. I think so. Yeah, I think so. There was a little bit of question whether it was the best part of the day or really just top two, top three, but I think we have our answer day after day: best part of the day.
And all you need to do — hold on, let me put on my microphone. This will be better. Something tells me you weren't hearing me as well as you should have. How about now? Yeah, better. Better, isn't it? Yeah, you thought this couldn't get better and it just did. Surprise.
And all you need to do, all you need to do to take this to the next level is see if you can find yourself a cup or a mug or a glass or a tankard or a stein or a can or a jug or a flask — a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. And I'm going to ask you to savor it. Yeah, savor it. Go ahead. Yeah, yeah. Savor it. Savor it. Okay, good.
Well, so today, later today, I will be appearing on MSNBC. You're not going to want to miss that. I don't know what kind of questions they're going to ask me. I'll be on Ari Melber's show at — they give a start time that's usually well in front of the time I'm actually on camera — but 6:00 p.m. Eastern time, 3:00 p.m. California time. And they'll be talking to me, so we'll see how that goes.
You know, I think I told you I started saying no to all interview requests recently, so I don't have — I don't think I have anything else on my calendar. But when this one came in, I thought to myself, well, this one's going to be too much fun. I'm going to have to take this one.
It has been brought to my attention that there's a very interesting piece of content on HBO called "The Vow." It's a multi-part documentary about a cult. It's called NXIVM. I don't know how you pronounce it. But I started watching it and I think I'm halfway through, but I can already tell you you've got to watch this thing. So I will be talking about it in the context of persuasion because the cult has some interesting techniques. And it is a really good documentary because the access they have — where actually things are on film or on audio — it's pretty remarkable. And if you really want to understand how influenceable or how persuadable people are or what they are willing to believe, you got to watch this thing. Because if you think people are gullible or people can be fooled, you haven't seen anything. And I'll talk about the technique after I give you time to watch it.
So allegedly today there's a big announcement from Apple about their 5G phone. And most of you are saying to yourself, well, that's nice, a 5G phone. It'll be a little bit faster than a 4G phone. Aren't we glad that each of our phones are a little bit better than the last one? But I think you'd be missing the big story on this one if you didn't notice stocks were solidly up yesterday, and at least part of the reason is probably Apple. And part of the reason is when 5G becomes common, now you've got a little bit of a pipeline problem or a capacity problem. So I don't know if your 5G phone is going to give you 5G speed right away every place you would use it, but probably it'll start out pretty good.
And here's the thing you need to know about speed. Speed doesn't just help you do what you were going to do anyway but make it faster. This kind of speed will change what you do. You'll be able to do things that you couldn't do before. I don't know if that means holograms or 3D or virtual reality worlds. Probably all of that. I don't know if it means just completely changing how you commute. We almost can't see the ways this will change things.
Let me give you my example. If you have a car that can go 5 miles an hour, you can use it to tool around locally but you're not going to take it very far. But if you have a car that can go 100 miles an hour and it can drive for hours and hours, then it's a whole different application. It's not something you use around town. It's something you can take a long trip with. So this 5G stuff is way bigger than you think it is, and it'll take a while for all the reasons that that's true to seep into your consciousness. This is gigantic.
So I tried watching the Supreme Court nominee hearings for ACB, Amy Coney Barrett, and I thought the whole thing was so worthless I couldn't really watch it. Is anybody trying to watch that thing? I feel sorry for the news networks that are covering it because they kind of have to cover it. It's big news. But there's literally nothing happening because apparently the Democrats don't want to go too hard at the nominee because it might backfire. But on the other hand they have to act like they're putting up a fight or they have to use their time to complain about the president or Obamacare. So it turned into nothing but theater. We took this important government process and just turned it into Kabuki theater or something. It doesn't have any functional purpose at all. And yet we're going to still do it. That's the weird thing about people, I suppose. As the Dilbert cartoonist I'm glad it happens, but people will do things they know don't make sense just because of inertia or the way things are. So that's what we're seeing. I would say that's worth about zero minutes of your time to watch those hearings because you know where that's going to go.
Are you disappointed with the Republican and Trump plans on health care? I feel as if Trump has a far better opportunity to sell his health care method if he would package it up better. But the way it's being framed right now is that there's this thing called the ACA or Obamacare and that Trump wants to kill it. And that's the frame: he wants to kill it. And he doesn't have anything that has a name on it that's sort of packaged as its replacement. So if you're a senior citizen or you're just somebody who thinks you're at risk of losing your health care, what are you going to think about this situation? You're going to say to yourself, I kind of know what Obamacare is because I think I have it, and the Republicans are offering freaking nothing.
Now that's not true. They are actually offering a bunch of stuff but they haven't packaged it in any way. So when you think about it you don't think of it as anything. You say, well, I'm glad that maybe there's something about drug prices going down and I'm happy that maybe the mandate won't be there and I might be happy about telehealth being allowed over state boundaries, etc. So if you thought about it there'd be a whole bunch of individual things that you liked but they don't feel like a replacement for Obamacare. It just feels like you're losing something.
And have I told you before that the threat of losing something always feels more oppressive than the opportunity to get something? So the way human psychology works is that we're way more concerned about losing something we already have than we are excited about getting a new thing. And that's very important to know about people. So right now what the Trump administration is offering is less. How would you like to have less stuff? No, that is not an accurate description of what they're offering but it feels like it. And they've sort of allowed that frame to take form: that there is this health care thing — yeah, it's not perfect — but even that's going to go away. That doesn't describe what would happen but that's the frame that has taken form. And I think the Republicans have to answer for that.
I would go so far as to say that if Trump loses and let's say the Republicans lose the Senate as well, and if it turns out that the reason that that happened was people were concerned about health care and they didn't think the Republicans had enough of a plan, I would say they earned the loss. I would say the Republicans deserve to lose under those conditions. Now I don't want that. I don't want that to happen. I would hope that they would do a little better job in the next few weeks of saying what they would do versus the ACA. But at the moment they have framed it in a way they deserve to lose, honestly, because health care is kind of what's left now.
If they did lose because of that, the irony would be that Trump would have succeeded so well that he succeeded himself out of a job. Meaning that the only thing left to talk about was the thing he didn't make enough of an impact on. Because we wouldn't be talking about ISIS because he took care of it. We're not going to be talking about NAFTA because he renegotiated it. We're not going to be talking about North Korea because they seem to be sort of not a problem at the moment. We're not going to be talking about renegotiating with China because that will be already underway. We're not going to be talking so much about even the border because the border looks like it became somewhat less of a problem because immigration slowed down, I believe because of coronavirus. So the president, by doing a good job, has reduced the number of topics we care about. And even the economy is recovering well. People would say, well, I think it's on the right path. That'll probably do okay under a different administration. So he really has narrowed the targets down to the one thing that he's not strong on, which is health care. He kind of needs to fix that and pretty quickly, I would think.
And as I say, there's plenty to talk about. And here's what I think the Republicans have done wrong from the start, and I've said this: the Democrats have a better goal but the Republicans have a better system. Now I favor systems over goals, so therefore I favor the Republican approach. But they haven't framed it right. They haven't packaged it right. And here's how I would package it. I would accept the Democrat's goal and I would say yeah, even as a Republican, it is our absolute goal that everybody will have health care, affordable health care. We'll just get there in a different way. And what we would hope is that we would take it from whatever it is now — I don't know, 12 percent, 8 percent, whatever — how many people don't have health care at the moment? And I would say okay, it's at this number, whatever it is, around 10 percent. By the end of my fourth year I would like that to get down to 2 percent. If you heard something like that you might say to yourself, okay, they've got a system, they've got a goal that I agree with. And Bernie's got — if you look at sort of the Bernie-type plans that Biden might do or Kamala Harris might do — it looks more like it's harder to get there. It's like they don't have a plan to get there that makes sense math-wise. So I think that's where the Republicans could go.
I've suggested on Twitter that Trump should run an ad saying that he's the only candidate for president who's immune to the coronavirus. Now of course there is a debate as to whether Trump has any immunity or if he has immunity is it short term. Some say four months, some say longer. And I don't know that it matters because it would be so hilarious if he started tweeting that he's the only candidate who is immune to the coronavirus that the press would go nuts because they'd be, no, no, that is not scientifically valid.
And you could shop for doctors by procedure. Yeah, that's a good comment. Anyway, so it would be funny if he did that. I don't think he will.
A troll came after me today on Twitter and said he can't wait to see how unhappy I am and what will I do if Trump were to lose the election. And I replied back to the effect, I don't think you know me very well. I would get over that in about 10 minutes. I don't have a long recovery time from bad news. You know, some bad news you have to work on. You know, it causes you to work to get out of the hole you ended up in. But I always spend a lot of time fretting about the past and the past happens immediately, right? You know, if it turned out — and I'm still predicting that Trump will win — but if it turned out that he didn't, I'm pretty sure I would get over that in about 10 minutes. That's just me. You might have a different experience.
Biden apparently has revealed a little bit about his court packing ways. And by the way, is it just me or does court packing sound vaguely like an insult? You freaking court packer. Doesn't it just have the right consonant and S sounds to sound like an insult? You freaking court packer. You damn court packer. Well, it sounds like an insult.
And here's what Biden said to give us another hint what he's thinking about. He said, quote, "I'm not a fan of court packing, but I don't want to get off on that whole issue." Biden told a CNN affiliate, "I want to keep focused. The president would love nothing better than to fight about whether or not I would in fact pack the court or not pack the court." Is he the dumbest guy you've ever met in your life? Now I think he might have been smart at one point in his life.
Yeah, no, fair with the comments. I'm saying there — let's not make it gay jokes, okay? The court packer by itself sounds like an insult. You don't have to bring it into another domain.
So here he is saying he's not a fan of court packing. He's very cleverly or stupidly — I haven't decided which. It might actually be brilliant because we might have reached a point where people are so irrational about everything that Biden can actually just say something that he knows will be taken two different ways by two different groups. So he can say something that will make Republicans comfortable because he says I'm not a fan of court packing. So if you're a Republican you hear that and say, not a fan of court packing, okay, okay, he's obviously not a guy who's going to do court packing so I guess I feel comfortable about that. So the Republicans have something they can hold on to. Meanwhile the progressives who would like some court packing, they listen to the second part of it. He goes, I just don't want to get off on that whole issue. So he doesn't want to fight about whether I would or would not pack the court. So he's still leaving it open.
But here's the real question. Why are you asking Joe Biden about court packing? The only one that matters — yeah, I'm seeing in the comments you're way ahead of me — does Kamala Harris like court packing? Because something like greater than half of voters, including the people who would vote for Biden, even most of them believe he won't make it four years. So you're not really talking about Biden's opinion. You're talking about Biden's opinion for a while plus Kamala's opinion for whatever time is remaining or even the second term if she were the one to run for the term after that. So shouldn't we be really pushing on that? You know, I think we've heard everything we need to from Joe Biden, but we kind of need to hear from the VP nominee. And if we don't hear from that you have to assume that she's in favor of it or at least that there's some chance she's in favor of it, which should change people's minds.
All right, there's a CDC study. This will be a good indication of how useless data is. CDC study shows that 85% of COVID cases were people who often or always wear masks. So what does that tell you? Number one, it's from the CDC so you can trust that, right? No, not anymore. Unfortunately we've had a bad experience with experts recently, so there's no such thing as a credible source of data anymore. There are still organizations that are sort of credible but not when they give you data. It doesn't matter who it is. Anybody giving you data in 2020 is probably lying to you or incorrect. And when I say probably I mean nine and a half out of 10 times.
So would you conclude that if 85% of people who get COVID wore their masks — what's the obvious implication? All right, draw a conclusion. 85% of them wore masks and got it anyway. Therefore masks don't work, right? It's good evidence. It comes from the CDC so that's reliable, right? And 85% of the people with masks got it anyway so I guess those masks don't work. Is that what you have concluded?
Well, if you're bad at analyzing data you concluded that. If you're good at analyzing data you might say something like — Julia Pollak tweeted, who is an economist. What if I told you about economists? Economists are trained at understanding whether the right things have been compared and knowing whether a rational comparison has been made. And she points out the following two problems.
Number one, it's people who claim to have worn masks. People lie. People lie about how often they wear masks, especially if they're being asked by somebody who you know would judge you. If a stranger calls you and says do you wear your mask often, even people who don't wear masks often or don't think they wear them that often are going to be tempted to say, oh yeah, yeah, I totally wear my mask pretty much all the time, even if they don't. That's one problem. I think that's the smaller one.
And then the other problem is that they're not accounting for the differences in risk and exposure. Exactly who wears a mask in the first place? Somebody who needs to. Do people get coronavirus if there are people who are not around any virus? The people who don't wear masks are far more likely to be the people who rightly judge that they're not at much risk because they're maybe not spending time around crowds, maybe they live in a town that has almost or no coronavirus risk, maybe they're young, so they're not bothering. Correlation on this is probably backwards. It's probably backwards. Now you can't tell, but you have to allow this great possibility that the reason people wear masks in certain situations and they're less likely to wear masks in others is because they know where the virus is, at least statistically, and so they wear the masks if they're in a place where there's a lot of virus. Now where are you likely to get a virus? Probably in a place with a lot of virus.
I used to joke where I lived a few homes ago, whenever I looked outside and I saw somebody going for a run they would almost always be overweight. And I would say to myself, that's weird. Does running make you fat? Because all the people I see running look like they're trying to lose weight so running must make you fat. And then of course that's a joke. The correlation is backwards. The people who thought they needed to lose a few pounds went running. So I think that might be what's happening with this mask thing. It's useless data in any case.
California has an interesting situation. Apparently some GOP entity has put up ballot collection boxes of their own. You didn't see that coming, did you? So there are these official-looking ballot collection boxes that are not trying to look like government entities, so they're not pretending they're the post office. It's just obviously a private GOP thing. And you can just throw your ballot in there. Do you trust that? Would you trust a private ballot collection box that's not a government mailbox? If you trust that you're really gullible.
Now I'm not going to say that the people who put them up there have bad intentions. I don't know. I'm just saying that I wouldn't put my ballot in a private ballot collection box. And if you're dumb enough to do that you shouldn't be voting. You're not smart enough to vote. If you put your ballot in Bob's collection box you're saying to yourself, well, it looks like they spelled all the words right on the collection box. Looks good enough to me. What could go wrong?
And so the government of California has declared that these things are illegal. But here's the funny part. How can it be illegal to have a box with some words on it? It couldn't possibly be illegal because it's not pretending to do anything or be anything other than what it is. It would certainly be illegal if it were pretending to be the US Postal Service. Right, that would be illegal. It would be illegal if they were claiming to be something they weren't. But it's claiming to be exactly what it is: a convenient way to have your ballot get picked up. Now I certainly wouldn't trust it but how is it illegal?
Let me ask you this. If I took a box, you know, just a box I could carry, and I knocked on your door and I said, hey, you know, I'm picking up some ballots and I can save you a trip to the mailbox if you like. You can throw your ballot in my box that's in my hand and I'll carry it over to the mailbox for you. I'll carry it to the post office. Would that be illegal? Well it depends on your state, right? If you live in a state where ballot harvesting is illegal, yes. Doesn't matter if you have a separate box. Doesn't matter if you knock on the door. If your state says you can't bring somebody else's ballots in, it's illegal. But in California apparently that's not illegal. It's not illegal to knock on the door and say can I take your ballot. So the state of California is trying to claim that these little boxes that do the same thing as knocking on the door — it's just a little bit more efficient. Why knock on the door if you're not ready? You know, wait till you're ready. You just put it in the box.
And the thing that's hilarious about this is that I'm pretty sure Democrats thought they had the advantage with this ballot harvesting stuff. And then the Republicans do what Republicans do. What is it the Republicans do that's better than what Democrats do consistently? They come up with better systems. If you're going to build something or manage something, call a Republican. Republicans are pretty good on systems. They're pretty good at setting up a mechanism, figuring out how to make something work. That's what they do, right? It's what they do. Democrats, their system looks a little bit like a CHOP or CHAZ. It looks a little bit more chaotic. So you don't want to trust the Democrats to set up a system.
So they set up this thing and the very first thing that happens is the Republicans in California come up with a superior system and they get these boxes built and distributed all over. And now the government's going to have to fight with what it means to be harvesting ballots. And as far as I know they're going to have a hard time declaring these things illegal because I don't think there's any law that says you can't have an accurately labeled box sitting on your lawn if it's accurately labeled. It's accurate.
So anyway, that's hilarious.
On a completely different topic, I follow a Twitter account by the name of somebody named Brian Rommle. If you want to look for it, definitely worth following. He has lots of new technologies and you know what's coming next kind of tweets. And one of them just will blow your head off. Apparently now our hologram technology is so good that there's this device from — let's see — called Portl Hologram. So you can follow them at Portl Hologram, all one word, Portl Hologram. And you can see that they have this thing that's phone booth sized in which inside the little phone booth sized hologram generator there is a full-sized human being who looks exactly like somebody you're standing in front of. And you know they're walking and talking and they could be a deepfake or it could be a projection of somebody who's standing somewhere else and they're just being projected as a hologram. And it looks pretty amazing. Looks pretty amazing. Somebody says you just looked and it looks terrible. You must be looking at something different than what I'm looking at. But it will be difficult to explain how powerful this is.
And let me tell you a little story from my experience to give you a sense. Yeah, my cat Boo is doing a walk-by. I told you this a while ago. Microsoft has a version of their what do you call it, enhanced reality, where it places objects in the room with you but you can't see them unless you're wearing the special goggles. Now if you're wearing the special goggles you have a cool experience. And here's the experience I had when I tried them out in my home. I saw a demo version before they were available. I put on the goggles in my own home — this is the key part, my own home — and I put them on and I turned on a mystery game. So it was like a murder mystery game where there would be characters that would interact in your space and there would be this murder mystery and you'd have to figure it out I guess. And I put the glasses on and I see it map the room. It puts a layer of like wireframe. You could see the wireframe going over your furniture and stuff in your room and you think, whoa, that's cool. It just mapped my whole room. But here's the freaky part. It didn't just map the space in your room. It knew what the things were. It knew what a chair was. My cat's going to do another walk-by if you see a tail go by. And then it introduced characters into my living room and they walked into my living room from a doorway from another room that it just happened to know was a doorway because it mapped it. Those full-sized characters walked in front of me and sat down on my couch. The couch was L-shaped. Some of them sat in one L and some of them sat on the other part of the L and they set something on my coffee table. And it blew my freaking brain out.
Now these particular enhanced reality creatures did not look like realistic people. In other words you could see through them a little bit so you could tell that they were sort of shadow people. But they were good representations of people. Now when you take that over to the hologram world — imagine now the glasses are off. Imagine doing this same experiment but no glasses. It's your own room and maybe you've replaced the light bulbs with this technology. I doubt that's possible but imagine it. It wouldn't be too hard to just put some sensors and lights in any room so your room could produce a photorealistic hologram that could interact with your room. It could walk around. It could walk around. Until you see this you don't know what's coming. Trust me, there's some stuff coming that is bigger than anything you could ever imagine. And if you're worried about everything that's been invented already being invented, nope, nope. There's stuff coming that hasn't been invented. I mean it has been but it hasn't been commercialized. So you've got some fun stuff coming. Some really fun stuff. And I'm sure you're already thinking about the applications.
And I've said in a related matter — I've said this before but it's worth reiterating — that no matter who wins in 2020 the presidency, I believe Trump will be our last human president. The last human president. What I mean is that AI will effectively be making our decisions. There will still be a person who gets elected but they won't have the flexibility that past presidents had to use their judgment and their instinct and their hunches and whatever and make decisions that are real leadership decisions. Rather in the future the algorithms will decide what things we see and then we'll decide that those are the most important things. And if those are the most important things and we could tell you know who favors which part of the policy for those most important things, the leaders are just going to have to follow it.
Now you say to me, Scott, Scott, Scott, the algorithms are not AI. The algorithms are just some math and they're made by people. It's the people that decide what the algorithm does and then the algorithm does things but it's all people. The algorithm is just a little tool. It's no different than scissors and a computer. It's not important. It's just the tool. Is that what's happening? I think that's where we differ.
Let me give you an example. This week I was complaining that YouTube had demonetized one of my videos earlier in the week and there was no reason given. So I complained about it on Twitter and to YouTube's credit they noticed I was complaining on Twitter and they contacted me on Twitter and said which video was it, we'll do a manual review. So and they said you know it's not obvious what's wrong with it. You know they couldn't just look at it and oh it's obvious what you did wrong. They said we're going to have to manually review it. So I gave them the link. They manually reviewed and then this morning they got back to me and they said the video is fine. It's been remonetized. So problem solved, right?
Here's the weird part. The humans are not aware still what was wrong with it. In other words the algorithm flagged it, took it, demonetized it, and never revealed its secret for why. Now when the humans looked at it they had the ability to reverse it. But do you think that your video would have been reversed if you were not the Dilbert guy, if you didn't have half a million people following you on Twitter and you hadn't complained in public and you weren't leaving kind of a big footprint? Would yours have been corrected? I'd like to think that YouTube is so on it that it wouldn't matter who complained. If they saw a complaint they would deal with it. I'd like to think that's true but I'll bet they wouldn't have seen it. I don't think you could have reached them. I just had this little semi-famous person advantage that probably helped.
And if there were no humans who know why I was demonetized — if this were to happen to you, who would have made the decision to demonetize you? No human being involved. No human being would be involved in the initial decision to demonetize you and no human being would ever explain it to you or fix it later. You would be too small.
Now what would happen if the algorithm simply decided, you know, using its math, had decided to focus on some videos that had certain messages and not on others? Would the people who made the algorithms be aware of it? Would they know exactly that this video was emphasized over this one? Apparently not, because they couldn't tell why mine was demonetized. There's a little bit too much complexity. Maybe the people who look at monetization are not the ones who programmed it. They wouldn't know what they're looking at anyway. And if they asked it would be too complicated a conversation so they wouldn't really know. If you asked the programmer, the programmers would probably — and first of all it's not like there's one programmer. It would be a team of programmers who probably only know their little hunk, their little piece of the algorithm. Just guessing. That seems like a reasonable guess. I don't think anybody would be able to answer the question.
So the complexity is what gives AI free will. I'll just let that hang there for a little while. The complexity is what gives AI — in this case the algorithms that decide what you see on social media — is what gives it a free will. What do I mean by that? Free will in human beings is based on the fact that you can't predict what I'll do. That's it. Because I'm complicated. My brain is complex so you can't tell based on what I'm doing now. It's too complicated. You can't get all the variables. You can't determine all my inputs. You don't know what my cause and effect is. You don't know my body chemistry. You don't know my history. But if you knew that and if you had the galaxy-sized brain to look at all those inputs and figure out how my brain is wired you could know what I'll do. The only thing that gives me the impression of free will is that even I don't know what I'm doing sometimes and you certainly don't know what I'm going to choose. So it is only my complexity, the fact that you don't know what I'm going to do, that gives you the impression I have free will.
This morning when YouTube told me that they didn't know — basically they didn't have to say this directly, it's obvious in context — they don't know why the algorithm did what it did. It's too complex. Today was the day the AI was confirmed. It already had it but today was the day that it was confirmed to me the AI already has free will exactly like mine. It does what it does by formula and it will do that. If it gave it the same inputs it would do the same thing every time if it was exactly the same inputs. But it's too complicated. We can't predict it. It's on its own now. It has free will. I'll just leave you with that thought.
All right, moving along. Here's an interesting factoid. Disney World in Florida is open with obviously masks and whatnot whereas Disneyland in California remains closed. Differences between how the states are managing this. This is one of the best things that's happened in the coronavirus because this is going to be the closest we will get to knowing which of the two methods worked. So if the Disney World that opened ends up with a good result — meaning very few people get the virus because of it to the extent that they can determine that — that's going to tell us something. And if they cause massive infections because they opened in Disney World in Florida, well then California was the smart one. I think we're going to find out something pretty useful because it's pretty unusual that you would have such an apples-to-apples comparison between states. So good to know.
You know if you said to yourself I think they should both open up, you know you could make that argument and I think Disney is making that argument. They think they should open up. But you should also be a little bit happy that you got a good comparison thing here. We're going to know something about Disney World that's going to be really, really useful I think. And I'm guessing that we'll be able to track that somehow.
Don't you know that data is important? Has anybody told you that we should make decisions based on data? Has anybody mentioned that lately? In this election cycle it's all you hear. We must use the data. We must listen to the experts. Follow the data. Follow the data. That's what all the dumb people say. Following the data would be a terrific idea if you had data. Following the data would be a terrific idea if you had the data and it was reliable and it was right. Under those conditions and you knew what to do with it, you know, you knew how to act based on that data. But that's a lot of ifs, isn't it?
Here's a good example. What is the only data about the coronavirus that you would need to know to really understand where we are and where we're going? What is the one bit of data you would need? You might say to yourself a death rate. Nope, nope. That's what I would have said a few weeks ago. I would have said as long as you know the death rate that's pretty much what you need to know in terms of where we're heading. Somebody smarter would say you need to know the hospitalization rate because first of all the hospitalization rate can to some degree predict the death rate but also you need to know your hospital capacity. You don't want to go over it. And you also get your people who have long-term problems and they would be picked up in the hospitalization. It wouldn't be picked up in the death rate. So that's all you need, right?
Somebody says recovery rate. Nope. You don't need the recovery rate. You don't need the hospitalization rate. You don't need the death rate. It would be good to have and they have value so I'm not saying you shouldn't know them. I'm saying that the most important data, which we could get — it's achievable, we could collect it, we haven't — and it goes like this: how many people are dying who are getting the right meds and the right treatment? Right? Because that's all that matters. If we're throwing people in who are having problems today with the average of how they were doing before we had good therapeutics back in the day when we would stick people on ventilators and the ventilator itself would kill them — I think a lot of the deaths were from ventilator misuse. Nobody's fault because nobody knew what to do in the early days. Certainly definitely not any kind of medical malpractice or anything. I'm not suggesting that. But we didn't know.
So can you tell me that you know or that anybody has collected the only data that matters? You went into the hospital and you got your Remdesivir let's say, you know, you were at that stage, or you got your Regeneron or you got your vitamin D, you got your zinc and maybe your baby aspirin, whatever else, maybe some Z-Pak. And that's the only data I want to know. Now on top of that I also need to know availability of those meds. So if the Regeneron needs let's say two weeks or three months or whatever it is to ramp up so everybody can have it in this country, I need to know that because that's telling me when we can get to a better place. Same with the Remdesivir. So I would want to know how many people are dying with the right treatment. And let's call it the Trump protocol, okay, just to keep it simple. The same stuff Trump got you have to assume is the good stuff, right? Plus Remdesivir. I don't think he got that but he didn't need it.
So if we don't know that, do you know anything? Seriously, do you know anything if you don't know that? It's the only number I think matters to how well we're doing, when are we going to get out of this, how bad is it, do we open up, do we not open up. All of our decisions are based on this one thing: how do we do today like today, October 13th? How would you do today if you went into the hospital and you got the full Trump protocol? Right, because it's nowhere near the death rate of March and I feel like we're making decisions based on March. You know, March through October death rates which would be insane.
And somebody says the deaths are grossly inflated but I would say that anybody who got the Trump protocol would be certainly confirmed to be somebody who's got a coronavirus problem. I'm pretty sure by the time you get the full protocol they know that the coronavirus is the thing that's going to kill you or not. So there is definitely a question about how the deaths are counted but I think we could count the — if you looked at the excess mortality you'd be okay. So if you knew excess mortality had gone down to normal because people who got the treatments, their death rate had gone down to a trivial number, that would be a lot to know.
All right, so you can love having data but if you collect the wrong data it doesn't matter. If you know, as I mentioned earlier, if you're the CDC and you collect the data that 85% of the people getting the virus are wearing a mask, how did that help you? In fact it probably hurt you because people would misinterpret the data. Now they might misinterpret it in a way that actually helps you if it made them wear the mask. No, in that case I think they would wear the mask less. So people would misinterpret it and do the wrong thing. Data is very overrated. Data is usually wrong. That's just a fact. All data is usually wrong and wrong enough that it would change how you deal with it.
Somebody says I'm laughing at your blind loyalty to your cult leader. You must be new here. The whoever is laughing at my blind loyalty to my cult leader, you must be brand new and you must have joined later in this very Periscope because the entire first part of the Periscope was criticizing Trump for health care not being packaged into a good plan. Did you miss that part? Did you miss the part where I said it would take me 10 minutes to get over him losing if he lost? Why is it about all of you Democrats who can't see anything clearly? If you could see one thing clearly it's that I'm not a slave to dogma. If you don't get that you have missed the most essential part of me: that I could change my mind in a heartbeat on anything. It's one of my advantages. In fact it's the only reason anybody's watching me. If all I did was get on here and do a blind obedience — everything Trump does is terrific — if that's all I did I don't think people would be too interested in coming back because I would just be another celebrity with a stupid opinion. It's only because I do have the facility to go in either direction that makes me worth watching.
For my critic who I'm talking to right now, you might also not know that I consider myself left of Bernie at least on the social stuff. Now I don't think that Bernie is good at math so he doesn't have to pay for the things he wants and that's a problem. I'm not going to be impractical. I like his goals: have everybody have a good education and want everybody to be free, etc. But he needs to be able to figure out how to do it. It's got to be practical.
All right, that is all for today and I will talk to you tomorrow. It's so awkward when I try to hit that little X to end this and I can't hit it with my thumb. All right, Periscope is turned off. We're on YouTube only now live streaming.
Thoughts on Kanye and Joe Rogan and his presidential ad? I didn't see that. Does Kanye have an ad? There's an actual Kanye ad.
Data are facts. Statistics are interpretation. Not true. Data are alleged facts. If data were facts we'd probably be in a lot better shape but usually data is out of context and it's just wrong.
Is Locals still a thing? Oh yeah, let me give you an update on Locals. So locals.com is a platform. Full disclosure, I have a small investment in it as well. And that's where I do everything that I don't do in public. I do there. So there's a whole bunch of other content including micro lessons on success and being more effective as well as some content that's a little too edgy to be on Twitter or to be on YouTube. So Locals is not only working but it's working embarrassingly well. The number of people who were willing to pay a subscription to see extra content actually is humbling because way more demand than I could have imagined. And so far they seem happy. The retention is excellent. People are adding every week. So yeah, locals.com. You go there and can follow people like me, people like Greg Gutfeld. I think Don Jr.'s there. Bunch of other people are going over. And what you'll see there is stuff you can't see at other places.
Somebody says you need a coupon code. No you don't need a coupon code. The creators can create a coupon to give you a discount but you don't need that. You can just go there and sign up. And it's working great by the way. And the community over there is just people who want to be part of my community. So I have basically no trolls. Imagine a social media platform that because it's subscription it basically eliminates all of the trolls. Every bit of content and other people can post things as well. So I look at other people's content and it's exactly what I want to see. And it's because somebody who followed me kind of knows what I would like to see and knows what other people who follow me would like to see. And so it's this whole environment where I only see stuff that's interesting and I wanted to see it. It's the weirdest thing. And there are no trolls and people pay a subscription fee to be there.
Somebody says what is the $7 subscription fee for? It is for content that you won't see anywhere else. But on top of that — and I didn't see this coming exactly — there's a little bit of a Patreon element to it. Patreon allows you just to essentially donate to creators that you would like to incentivize to do more. And so I think a lot of people just join Locals because they're supporting my voice and then they also get some extra content. But if you like "Real News" my edgier comic that I only do on the web, some of those I will tweet. I'll put on to Twitter just so it acts as an advertisement for Locals. But most of the really naughty ones I just keep on Locals. If it's too edgy I just keep it there.
All right, that's all for now and I will talk to you — oh, just to give you one more example of what is on Locals. Yesterday I did a detailed tour of my office, you know, down to the real details which some people would find interesting but others would not. And I'll talk to you tomorrow.
hey come on in here everybody it's time it's time for coffee with Scott Adams best part of the day I think so yeah I think so there was a little bit of question whether it was the best part of the day or really just top two top three but I think I think we have our answer day after day best part of the day and all you need to hold on let me put on my microphone this will be better something tells me you weren't hearing me as well as you should have how about now yeah better better isn't it yeah you thought this couldn't get better and it just did surprise yeah and all you need to do all you need to do to take this to the next level and see if you can find yourself a cuper Mugger a glass of tanker chel or sign a cantey juger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day the thing that makes everything better and I'm going to ask you to savor it yeah savor it Go o yeah yeah savor it savor it okay good well so today later today I will be appearing on MSNBC you're not going to want to miss that I don't know what kind of questions they're going to ask me I'll be on Ary Mur show at uh the they give a start time that's usually well in front of the time I'm actually on camera but uh 6:00 p.m.
eastern time 300 p.m.
at California time and uh they'll be talking to me so we'll see how that goes you know I think I told you I I uh started saying no to all uh interview requests recently so I don't have I don't think I have anything else on my calendar uh but when this one came in I thought to myself well this one's going to be too much fun I'm going to have to take this one um it has been brought to my attention that there's a very interesting piece of content on uh on HBO called The Vow it's a multiart uh documentary about a cult it's called it's called a cult called uh anx or something NX I VM I don't know how you pronounce it next NEX of but uh I started watching it and I think I'm halfway through but uh I can already tell you you've got to watch this thing so I will be talking about it in the context of persuasion because the cult has some interesting techniques and it is really good documentary because the access they have where actually things are on film or on audio it's pretty remarkable and if you really want to understand uh how influenceable or how persuadable people are or what they are willing to believe you got to watch this thing because if you think people are gullible or people can be uh fooled you you haven't seen anything and I'll talk about the technique after I give you time to watch it so allegedly today there's a big announcement from Apple about their 5G phone and most of you are saying to yourself well that's nice a 5G phone it'll be a little bit faster than a 4G phone aren't we glad that each of our phones are a little bit better than the last one but I think you'd be missing the big story on this one if you didn't notice stocks were uh solidly up yesterday and at least part of the reason is probably apple and part of the reason is when 5G becomes common now you've got you've got a little bit of a pipeline problem uh or a capacity problem so I don't know if your 5G phone is going to give you 5G speed right away every place you would use it but probably you know it'll probably start out pretty good and here's the thing you need to know about speed speed doesn't just help you do what you were going to do anyway but make it fast faster this kind of speed will change what you do you'll be able to do things that you couldn't do before uh I don't know if that means Holograms or 3D or virtual reality worlds probably all of that uh I don't know if it means um just completely changing how you commute we almost can't see the ways this see the ways this will change things let me give you my example if you have a uh uh let's say a car that can go 5 miles an hour you can use it to Tool around locally but you're not going to take it very far but if you have a car that can go 100 miles an hour and it can you know dry for hours and hours then it's a whole different application it's not something you use around town it's something you can take a long trip with so this 5G stuff is way bigger than you think it is and it'll take a while for all the all the reasons that that's true to seep into your Consciousness this is gigantic um so I tried watching the Supreme Court nominee hearings for ACB uh Amy con Barrett and I thought the whole thing was so worthless I couldn't really watch it is anybody trying to watch that thing I feel sorry for the uh the News Network that are covering it CU they kind of have to cover it it's big news but there's literally nothing happening because apparently the Democrats don't want to go too hard at uh the nominee because it might backfire but on the other hand they have to act like they're putting up a fight or they have to use their time to complain about the president or or Obamacare so it turned into nothing but a theater it we took this important government process and just turned it into you know Kabuki theater or something it doesn't have any functional purpose at all and and yet we're going to still do it that's the weird thing about people I suppose as the dilber cartoonist I'm glad it happens but people will do things they know don't make sense just because of inertia or the way things are so that's what we're saying I I would say that's worth about zero minutes of your time to watch those hearings because you know where that's going to go um are you disappointed with the Republican uh and Trump plans on healthc care I feel as if Trump has a far better um at least opportunity to sell his health care preferred you know method if he would package it up better but the way it's being framed right now is that there's this thing called the ACA or Obamacare and that Trump wants to kill it and that's the frame he wants to kill it and he doesn't have anything that has a name on it that's sort of packaged as it's replacement so if you're a senior citizen or you're just somebody who thinks you're at risk of losing your health care what are you going to think about this situation you're going to say to yourself uh I kind of know what Obamacare is cuz I think I have it and the Republicans are offering freaking nothing now that's not true they are actually offering a bunch of stuff but they haven't packaged it in any way so when you think about it you don't think of it as anything you say well I'm glad that you know maybe there's something about drug prices going down and you know I'm happy that maybe the Mandate won't be there and I might be happy about you know Tella tella Health being you know allowed over State boundaries Etc so if you thought about it there'd be a whole bunch of individual things that you liked but they don't feel like a replacement for Obama.
Care it just feels like you're losing something and have I told you before that the threat of losing something always feels more oppressive than the opportunity to get something so the way human psychology works is that we're way more concerned about losing something we already have than we are excited about getting a new thing and that's very important to know about people so right now what uh what the uh Trump Administration is offering is less how would you have how would you like to have less stuff now would they're not that is not an accurate description of what they're offering but it feels like it and they've sort of allowed that frame to to take form that there is this Health Care thing yeah it's not perfect but even that's going to go away that doesn't describe what would happen but that's the frame that has taken form and I think the Republicans have to answer for that I would go so far as to say that if if uh if Trump loses and let's say the Republicans lose the Senate as well and if it turns out that the reason that that happened was people were concerned about health care and they didn't think the Republicans had enough of a plan I would say they earned the loss I would say the Republicans deserve to lose under those conditions now I don't want that I don't want that to happen I would hope that they would do a little better job in the next next few weeks of saying what they would do versus the ACA but at the moment they have framed it in a way they deserve to lose honestly because healthc care is uh kind of what's left now if they did lose because of that the irony would be that Trump would have succeeded so well that he succeeded him himself out of a job meaning that the only thing left to talk about was the thing he didn't make enough of a you know an impact on because we wouldn't be talking about Isis cuz he took care of it we're not going to be talking about the NAFTA cuz he renegotiated it we're not going to be talking about North Korea because they seem to be sort of not a problem at the moment we're not going to be talking about uh renegotiating with China because that will be already underway we're not going to be talking so much about the you know even the Border because the Border looks like it became somewhat less of a problem because immigration slowed down I believe because of Corona virus so the so the president by doing a good job has reduced the number of topics we care about and even the economy is recovering well people would say well I think it's on the right path that probably do okay under a different Administration so he really has narrowed the targets down to the one thing that he's not strong on which is Healthcare he kind of needs to fix that and pretty quickly I would think um and as I say he there's plenty to talk about and here's what here's what I think the Republicans have done wrong from the start and I've said this the Democrats have a better goal but the Republicans have a better system now I favor systems over goals so therefore I favor the Republican approach but they haven't uh but they haven't framed it right they haven't packaged it right and here's how I would package it I would accept the democrat's goal and I would say yeah even as a republican it is our absolute goal that everybody will have health care Affordable Health Care we'll just get there in a different way and what we would hope is that we would take it from whatever it is now I don't know 12% 8 % what how many people don't have health care at the moment and I would say okay it's it's at this number whatever it is around 10% uh by the end of my fourth year I would like that to get that down to 2% if you heard something like that you might say to yourself okay they got a system they've got a goal that I agree with and Bernie's got you know if you look at sort of the Bernie type plans that Biden might do or come Cala Harris might do it looks more like it's harder to get there it's it's like they don't have a plan to get there that makes sense math wise so I think so I think that's where the Republicans could go um I've suggested on Twitter that Trump should run an ad saying that he's the uh only candidate for president who's immune to the Corona virus now of course there is a debate as to whether uh as to whether Trump has any immunity or if he has immunity is it short term some say four months some say longer and I don't know that it matters because it would be so hilarious if he started tweeting that he's the only candidate who is immune to the Corona virus that the Press would go nuts because they'd be no no that is not scientifically valid and the uh uh wish you could shop for doctors by procedure yeah that's a good comment um anyway so it would be funny if he did that I don't think he will uh a troll came after me today on Twitter and said he can't wait to see how unhappy I am and you know what will I do if Trump were to lose the election and and I replied back to the effect I don't think you know me very well I would get over that in about 10 minutes I don't have a I don't have a long recovery time from Bad News you know some some bad news you have to work on you know causes you work to get out of the hole you ended up in but I always spend a lot of time Fring about the past and the past happens immediately right you know if it turned out and I'm still predicting that Trump will win but if it turned out that he didn't I'm pretty sure I would get over that in about 10 minutes that's just me you might have a different experience um Biden apparently has revealed a little bit about his court packing ways and by the way is it just me or does Court packing sound vaguely like an insult you freaking Court Packer doesn't it just have the right consonant and S sounds to sound like an insult you freaking Court Packer you damn Court Packer you well it sounds like an insult and and here's what Biden said uh to give us another hint what he's thinking about he said quote I'm not a fan of Court packing but I don't want to get off on that whole issue Biden told CNN CNN affiliate I want to keep focused the president the president would love nothing better than to fight about whether or not I would in fact pack the court or not pack the court is is he the dumbest guy you've ever met in your life now I think he might have been smart at one point in his life uh yeah no fair with the uh comments I'm saying there let's let's let's uh let's not make it uh let's not make it gay jokes okay the court Packer by by itself sounds like an insult you don't have to bring it into another domain um so here he is saying he's not a fan of Court packing he's very cleverly or stupidly I haven't decided which it might actually be brilliant because we might have reached a point where people are so irrational about everything that Biden can actually just say something that he knows will be taken two different ways by two different groups so he can say something that will make Republicans sound comfortable because he says I'm not a fan of Court packing so if you're a republican you hear that say not a fan of Court packing okay okay he's obviously not a guy who's going to do core packing so I guess I feel comfortable about that so the Republicans have something they can you know hold on to Meanwhile the the progressives who would like some cor packing they listen to the second part of it he goes you I just don't want to get off on that whole issue so uh uh I don't want him to fight about whether I would or would not pack the court so he's still leaving it open leaving it open but here's the real question why are you asking Joe Biden about coure packing the only one that matters yeah I'm seeing in the comments your way ahead of me does it does Camala Harris like Court packing because something like greater than half of Voters including the people voting for who would vote for Biden even most of them believe he won't make it four years so you're not really talking about Biden's opinion you're talking about Biden's opinion for a while plus kamala's kamla's opinion for whatever time is remaining or even the second term if if she were the one to run for the term after that so uh shouldn't we be really pushing on that you know I think we've heard everything we need to from Joe Biden but we kind of need to hear from the VP nominee and if we don't hear from that you have to assume that she's in favor of it or at least that there's some chance she's in favor of it uh which uh which should change people Minds all right there's a CDC study uh this will be a good indication of how useless data is CDC studies shows that 85% of covid cases were people who often or always wear masks so what what's that tell you number one is from the CDC so you can trust that right no not anymore unfortunately we we've had a bad experience with experts recently so there's there's no such thing as a a credible source of data anymore there there are still organizations that are sort of credible but not when they give you data it doesn't matter who it is anybody giving you data in 2020 is probably lying to you or incorrect uh and when I say probably I mean nine and a 10 times so would you conclude that if 85% % of people who get Co wore their masks what's the obvious implication all right draw a conclusion 85% of them wore masks and got it anyway therefore go therefore masks don't work right it's good evidence it comes from the CDC so that's reliable right and 85% of the people with masks got it anyway so I guess those masks don't work is that what you have concluded well if you're bad at analyzing data you concluded that if you're good at analyzing data you might say something like uh Julia Pollock tweeted who is an economist what if I told you about economists economists are trained at understanding whether the right things have been compared and knowing and knowing whether a rational comparison has been made and she points out the following two problems number one um it's people who claim to have worn masks people lie people lie about how often they wear masks especially if they're being asked by somebody you know would judge you if a stranger calls you and says do you wear your mask often even people who don't wear masks often or don't think they wear them that often are going to be tempted to to say oh yeah yeah I totally wear my mask pretty much all the time even if they don't that's one problem I think that's the smaller one and then the other problem is that that they're not accounting for the differences in risk and exposure exactly who wears a mask in the first place somebody who needs to do do people get Corona virus if there are people who are not around any virus the people who don't wear masks are far more likely to be the people who who rightly uh judge that they're not at much risk because they're maybe you know not spending time around crowds maybe they live in a town that has almost or no Corona virus risk you know maybe they're maybe they're young you know so they're not bothering but um correlation on this is probably backwards uh it's probably backwards now you can't tell but you have to allow this great possibility that the reason people wear masks in certain situations and they're less likely to wear masks in other is because they know where the virus is at least statistically and so they wear the masks if they're in a place where there's a lot of virus now where are you likely to get a virus probably in a place with a lot of viruses uh I I used to joke where I lived a few a few homes ago whenever I looked outside and I saw somebody going for a run they would almost always be overweight and I would say to myself that's weird does running make you fat because all the people I see running look like they're trying to lose weight so running must make you fat and then I of and of course that's a joke the correlation is back Wards the people who thought they needed to lose a few pounds went running so I I think that might be what's happening with this mask thing is that uh it's it's useless data in any case um California has an interesting situation apparently some GOP entity has put up a ballot collection boxes of their own you didn't see that coming did you so there are these officiall looking ballot collection boxes that are not trying to look like government entities so they're not pretending they're the post office it's just it's obviously a private GOP thing and you can just throw your uh throw your ballot in there do you trust that would you trust a private ballot collection box that's not a government mailbox if you trust that you're really gullible now I'm not going to say that the people who put them up there have bad intentions don't know I'm just saying that I wouldn't put my ballot in a private ballot collection box and if you're if you're dumb enough to do that you shouldn't be voting you're you're not smart enough to vote if you put your if you put your Val you know Bob's collection box you're saying to yourself well it looks like they spelled all the words right on the collection box looks good enough to me what could go wrong and and so the government of California has declared that these things are illegal but here's the funny part how can it be illegal to have a box with some words on it can't it couldn't possibly be illegal because it's not pretending to do anything to be anything other than what it is it would certainly be illegal if it were pretending to be the US Postal Service right that would be illegal it would be illegal if they were you know claiming to be something they weren't but it's claiming to be exactly what it is a convenient way to have your ballot uh get picked up now I certainly wouldn't trust it but how is it illegal let me ask you this if I took a box you know just a box I could carry and I knocked on your door and I said hey you know I'm I'm picking up some ballots and I can save you a trip to the mailbox if you like you can throw your ballot in my box that's in my hand and I'll carry it over to the mailbox for you I'll carry it to the post office would that be illegal well it depends on your state right if you live in a state where uh ballot harvesting is illegal yes doesn't matter if you have a separate box doesn't matter if you knock on the door if your state says you can't bring somebody else's ballots in it's illegal but in California apparently that's not illegal it's not illegal to knock on the door and say can I take your ballot so the state of California is trying to claim that these little boxes that do the same thing is knocking on the door it's just a little bit more efficient why knock on the door if you're not ready you know wait till you're ready you just put it in the box and the the thing that's hilarious about this is that I'm pretty sure democr Democrats thought they had the advantage with this ballot harvesting stuff and then the Republicans do what Republicans do what is it the Republicans do that's better than what uh Democrats do consistently they come up with better systems if you're going to if you're going to build something or manage something call a republican Republicans are pretty good on systems they're pretty good at setting up a you know a mechanism you know figuring out how to make something work that's what they do right it's what they do Democrats their system looks a little bit like a chop or Chaz right looks a little bit more chaotic so you don't want to trust the Democrats to set up a system uh so they set up they set up this thing and the very first thing that happens is the the Republicans in California come up with a superior system and they get these boxes built and distributed all over and now they have now the government's going to have to fight with what it means to be a to to be harvesting ballots and as far as I know they're going to have a hard time declaring these things illegal because I don't think there's any law that says you can't have an accurately labeled box sitting in on your on your lawn if it's accurately labeled it's accurate um so anyway that's hilarious on a completely different topic uh I follow a Twitter account by the name of somebody named Brian Rome r o m m l e if you want to look for it definitely worth following he has lots of uh new technologies and you know what's what's coming next kind of tweets and one of them just just will blow your head off apparently now our hologram technology is so good that there's this device from let's see called uh uh Port L hologram so you can follow them at at Port p o TL hologram all one word port L hologram and you can see that they have this thing that's uh phone booth sized in which inside the little phone booth sized hologram generator there is a full-sized human being who looks exactly like somebody you're standing in front of and and you know they're walking and talking and they they could be a deep fake or that or it could be a projection of somebody who's standing somewhere else and they're just being projected as a hologram and uh it looks pretty amazing looks pretty amazing somebody says you just looked and it looks terrible you you must be looking at something different than what I'm looking at but it is it will be difficult to explain how powerful this is and let me tell you a little story from my experience to give you a sense uh yeah my cat boo is doing a walk by I told you this a while ago um Microsoft has uh a version of their uh uh what do you call enhanced reality where it it places objects in the room with you but you can't see them unless you're wearing the special goggles now if you're wearing the special goggles you know you have a a cool experience and here's the experience I had when I tried them out in my home I saw a demo version before they were available I put on the on the goggles in my own home this is the key part my own home and I put them on and I turned on a u a I think it was a a mystery game so it was like a murder mystery game where there would be characters that would interact in your space and there would be this murder mystery and you'd have to figure it out I guess and I put the glasses on and I see it map the room it it puts a a layer of uh like wireframe you could see the wireframe going over your furniture and stuff in your room and you think whoa that's cool it just mapped my whole room but here's the freaky part it didn't just map the space in your room it knew what the things were it knew what a chair was was uh my cat's going to do another walkr if you see a tail go by and and then it introduced characters into my living room and they walked into my living room from a doorway from another room that it just happened to know as a doorway because it mapped it those full-sized characters walked in front of me and sat down on my couch the couch was L-shaped some of them sat in one L and some of them sat on the other part of the L and they set something on my coffee table and it blew my freaking brain out now these particular uh um enhanced reality creatures uh did not look like realistic people in other words they you could see through them a little bit so you could tell that they were sort of shadow people but they were good representations of people now when you take that over to the uh the Hologram World Imagine now the glasses are off imagine doing this same experiment but no glasses it's your own room and maybe you've replaced the light bulbs with this technology I doubt that's possible but imagine it wouldn't be too hard to just put some sensors and lights in any room so your room could produce a photorealistic hologram that could interact with your room it could walk around it could walk around until you see this you don't know what's coming trust me there's some stuff coming that is bigger than anything you could ever imagine and if you're worried about everything that's been invented already been invented nope nope there's stuff coming that hasn't been invented I mean it has been but it hasn't been commercialized so you've got some fun stuff coming some really fun stuff and I'm sure you're already thinking about the applications all right uh and I've said in a related matter I've said this before but it's worth reiterating then no matter who wins in 2020 the presidency I believe Trump will be our last human president the last human president what I mean is that AI will effectively be making our decisions there will still be a person who gets elected but they won't have the flexibility that past presidents had to use their judgment and their Instinct and their hunches and whatever and make decisions that are real leadership decisions rather in the future the algorithms will decide what things we see and then we'll decide that those are the most important things and if those are the most important things and we could tell you know who favors which part of the policy for those most important things the leaders are just going to have to follow it now you say to me Scott Scott Scott the algorithms are not AI the algorithms are just some math and they're made by people it's the people that decide what the algorithm does and then the algorithm does things but it's all people the the algorithm is just a little tool it's no different than scissors and a computer it's not important it's just the tool is that what's happening I I think that's where we differ let me give you an example uh this week I was complaining that uh You.
Tube had had demonetized one of my videos earlier in the week and there was no reason given so I complained about it on Twitter and to You.
Tube's credit they noticed I was complaining on Twitter and they contacted me on Twitter and said which you know which video was it we'll do a manual review so and they said you know it's not obvious what's wrong with it you know they couldn't just look at it and oh it's obvious what you did wrong they said we're going to have to manually review it so I gave them the link they manually reviewed and then this morning they got back to me and they said it's the video is fine it's been remonetized so problem solved right here's the weird part the humans are not aware still what was wrong with it in other words the algorithm flagged it took it you know demonetized it and never revealed its secret for why now when the humans looked at it they had the ability to reverse it but do you think that your video would have been reversed if you were not the dilber guy if you didn't have half a million people following you on Twitter and you hadn't complained in public and you weren't leaving kind of a big footprint would yours have been corrected I'd like to think that You.
Tube is is so you know so on it that it wouldn't matter who complained if they saw a complaint they would deal with it I'd like to think that's true but I'll bet they wouldn't have seen it I don't think you could have reached them I just had this little you know semi famous person advantage that probably helped and if there were no humans who know why I was demonetized If This Were happened to you who would who would have made the decision to demonetize you no human being involved no human being would be involved in the initial decision to demonetize you and no human being would ever explain it to you or fix it later you would be too small now what would happen if the algorithm simply decided you know using its math had decided to focus on some videos they had certain messages and not on others would the people who made the algorithms be aware of it would they know exactly that this video was emphasized over this one apparently not because they couldn't tell why why mine was demonetized there's a little bit too much complexity maybe the people who look at monetization are not the ones who programmed it they wouldn't know what they're looking at anyway and if they asked it would be too complicated conversation so they wouldn't really know if he asked the programmer the programmers would probably and first of all it's not like there's one programmer yeah it would be a team of programmers who probably only know their little hunk their little piece of the algorithm just guessing that it seems like a reasonable guess I don't think anybody would be able to answer the question so the complexity is what gives uh AI free will I I'll just let that hang there for a little while the complexity is what gives AI in this case the algorithms that decide what you see on social media is what gives it a free will what do I mean by that Free Will in human beings is based on the fact that you can't predict what I'll do that's it because I'm complicated my brain is complex so you can't tell based on what I'm doing now it's too complicated you can't you can't get all the variables you can't determine all my inputs you don't know what my cause and effect is you don't know my body chemistry you don't know my history but if you knew that and if you had the Galaxy siiz brain to look at all those inputs and figure out how my brain is wired you could know what I'll do the only thing that gives me the impression of free will is that even I don't know what I'm doing sometimes and you certainly don't know what I'm going to choose so it is only my complexity the fact that you don't know what I'm going to do that gives you the impression I have free will this morning when You.
Tube told me that they they didn't know basically uh they didn't have to say this directly it's obvious in context they don't know why the algorithm did what it did it's too complex today was the day the AI was confirmed it already had it but today was the day that it was confirmed to me the AI already has free will exactly like mine it does what it does by formula and it will do that if it gave it the same inputs it would do the same thing every time if it was exactly the same inputs but it's too complicated we can't predict it it's on its own now it has free will I'll just leave you with that thought all right moving along uh here's an interesting factoid Disney World in Florida is open with obviously you know masks and whatnot whereas Disneyland in California remains closed differences between the how the states are managing this this is one of the best things that's happened in the Corona virus because this is going to be the closest we will get to knowing which of the two methods worked so if the Disney World that opened ends up with a good result meaning very few people get the virus because of it to the extent that they can determine that um that's going to tell us something and if they cause massive infections because they opened in Disney World in Florida well then California was the smart one I think we're going to find out something pretty useful because it's pretty it's sort of unusual that you would have such a Apples to Apples comparison between states so good to know uh you know if you said to yourself I think they should both open up you know you could make that argument and I think Disney is making that argument they think they should open up but you should also be a little bit happy that you got a good comparison thing here we're going to know something about Disney World that's going to be really really useful I think and I'm I'm I'm guessing that we'll be able to track that somehow um don't you know that data is important has anybody told you that we should make decisions based on data has anybody mentioned that lately in this election s uh this election cycle it's all you hear we must use the data we must listen to The Experts follow the data follow the data that's what all the dumb people say following the data would be terrific idea if you had data following the data would be a terrific idea if you had the data and it was reliable and it was right under those conditions and you knew what to do with it you know you knew how to act based on that data but that's a lot of ifs isn't it here's a good example what is the only data about the Corona virus that that you would need uh need to know to really understand where we are and where we're going what is the one bit of data you would need you might say to yourself a death rate nope nope that's what I would have said a few weeks ago I would have said as long as you know the death rate that's pretty much what you need to know in terms of you know where we're having um somebody else somebody smarter would say you need to know the hospital hospitalization rate because first of all the hospitalization rate can to somewhat some degree you will predict the death rate but also you need to know your hospital capacity you don't want to go over it and you you also get your people who have long-term problems and they would be picked up in the hospitalization wouldn't be picked up in the death rate so that's all you need right somebody says recovery rate nope you don't need the recovery rate you don't need the hospitalization rate you don't need the death rate it would be good to have and and they have value so I'm not saying you shouldn't know them I'm saying that the most important data which we could get it's it's achievable we could collect it we haven't and it goes like this how many people are dying who are getting the right meds and the right treatment right because that's all that matters if we're if we're throwing people in who are having problems today with the average of how they were doing before we had good Therapeutics back in the day when we would stick people on ventilators and the ventilator itself would kill them that I think a lot of the deaths were from ventilator uh misuse nobody's fault because nobody knew what to do in the early days certainly definitely not any kind of medical malpractice or anything I'm not suggesting that but we didn't know so can you tell me that you know or that anybody has collected the only data that matters you went into the hospital and you got your REM Des air let's say you know you were at that stage or you got your regeneron or you got your vitamin D you got your zinc and maybe your baby aspirin whatever else maybe some of ziyin and that's the only data I want to know now on top of that I also need to know availability of those Mets so if the regeneron needs let's say two weeks or three months or whatever it is to ramp up so everybody can have it in this country I need to know that because that's telling me you know when when we can get to a better place same with the r Desir so I would want to know how many people are dying with the right treatment and let's call it the Trump protocol okay just to keep it simple the same stuff Trump got you have to assume is the good stuff right so plus r dese i don't think he got that but he didn't need it so if we don't know that do you know anything seriously do you know anything if you don't know that it's the only number I think matters to how well we're doing doing when are we're going to get out of this how bad is it do we open up do we not open up all of our decisions are based on this one thing how do we do today like today October 13th how would you do today if you went into the hospital and you got the full Trump protocol right because it's nowhere near the death rate of March and I feel like we're making decisions based on March you know March through October death rates which would be insane so um and somebody says the deaths are are grossly inflated but I would say that anybody who got the Trump protocol would be certainly confirmed to be somebody who's got a Corona virus problem you I'm pretty sure by the time you get the full protocol they know that the Corona virus is the thing that's going to kill you or not you know so um there is definitely a question about how the the deaths are counted but I think we could count the uh if you looked at the excess uh mortality you'd be okay so if you knew excess M mortality had gone down to normal because people who got the treatments their death rate had gone down to a trivial number um that would be a lot to know all right so you can love having data but if you collect the wrong data doesn't matter if you know as I mentioned earlier if you're the CDC and you collect the data that 85% of the people getting the virus are wearing a mask how did that help you in fact it probably hurt you because people would misinterpret the data now they might misinterpret it in a way that actually helps you if it made them we them where the no in that case I think they would wear the mask less so people would misinterpret it and do the wrong thing data is very overrated data is usually wrong that that's just a fact uh all data is usually wrong and wrong enough that it would change how you deal with it um somebody says I'm laughing at your blind loyalty to your cult leader um you must be new here the whoever is laughing at my blind loyalty to my cult leader you must be brand new and you must have joined later in this very Periscope because the entire first part of the Periscope was criticizing Trump for health care not being you know packaged into a good plan did you miss that part did you did you miss the part where I said it would take me 10 day 10 minutes to get over him losing if he lost why is it about all of you you Democrats who can't see anything clearly if if you could see one thing clearly it's that I'm not a slave to uh Dogma if you don't get that you have missed the most essential part of me that I could change my mind in a heartbeat on anything it's it's one of my uh it's one of my advantages in fact it's the only reason anybody's watching me if if all I did was get on here and do a blind obedience uh everything Trump does is terrific if that's all I did I don't think people would be too interested in coming back because I would just be another celebrity with a stupid opinion it's only because I do have the facility to go in either direction that makes me worth watching for my critic who I'm talking to right now uh you might also not know that I consider myself left of burning at least on the social stuff now I don't think that Bernie is good at math so he doesn't have to pay for the things he wants and that's a problem I'm not going to be impractical I like his goals have everybody you know have a good education and uh you know want everybody to to be free want to you know Etc but uh but he needs to be able to figure out how to do it it's got to be practical all right all right that is all for today and I will talk to you tomorrow it's so it's so awkward when I try to hit that little X to end this and I can't hit it with my thumb all right Periscope is turned off we're on H You.
Tube only now live streaming uh thoughts on Kanye and Joe Rogan and his presidential ad I didn't see that does Kanye have a an ad There's an actual Kanye ad um data are facts statistics are interpretation not true data are alleged facts if data were facts we'd probably be in a lot better shape but usually data is out of context and it's just wrong is local still thing oh yeah let me give you an update on locals so locals.com is a platform um full disclosure I have a small investment in it as well and that's where I do um everything that you that I don't do in public I do there so there's a whole bunch of other content on uh including micro lessons on success and being more being more effective as well as some content that's a little too edgy to be on Twitter or to be on uh You.
Tube so uh locals is not only working but uh it's it's working embarrassingly well the the number of people who were willing to pay a subscription to see extra content actually uh is humbling because way more demand than I could have imagined and so far they seem happy the retention is excellent people are adding every uh every uh week so yeah locals.com you go there and could follow people like me people like Greg Gutfeld um I think Don Jr's there bunch of other people are going over and what you'll see there is uh stuff you can't see at other places um somebody says you need a coupon code no you don't need a coupon code um the the creators can create a coupon to give you a discount but you don't need that you can just go there and sign up um and it's working great by the way and the community over there is just people who want to be you know part of my community so I have basically no trolls imagine a social media platform that because it's subscription it basically eliminates all of the trolls every bit of content and other people can other people post things as well so I look at other people's content and it's exactly what I want to see and it's because somebody who followed me me kind of knows what I would like to see and knows what other people who follow me would like to see and so it's this whole environment where I only see stuff that's interesting and I wanted to see it it's the weirdest thing and they're no trolls and and people pay a subscription fee to be there somebody says what is the $7 subscription fee for it is for Content that you won't see anywhere else but on top of that uh there's and I didn't see this coming exactly there's a little bit of a patreon element to it patreon allows you just to um essentially donate to creators that you would like to incentivize to do more and so I think a lot of people just join locals because they're supporting my voice uh and then they also give some extra content but uh the if you like robots read news my edgier uh comic that I only do on the web um some of those I will tweet I'll put on to Twitter so you just so it's a acts as an advertisement for locals but uh most of the really naughty ones I just keep on locals if it's if it's too edgy I just keep it there all right that's all for now and I will talk to you oh just to give you one more example of what is on locals yesterday I did a detailed um tour of my office you know down to the down to the real details which some people would find interesting but others would not and I'll talk to you tomorrow
hey come on in here everybody it's time
it's time for coffee with Scott
Adams best part of the day I think so
yeah I think so there was a little bit
of question whether it was the best part
of the day or really just top two top
three but I think I think we have our
answer day after day best part of the
day and all you need
to hold on let me put on my microphone
this will be
better something tells me you weren't
hearing me as well as you should
have how about now yeah better better
isn't it yeah you thought this couldn't
get better and it just
did surprise yeah and all you need to do
all you need to do to take this to the
next
level and see if you can find yourself a
cuper Mugger a glass of tanker chel or
sign a cantey juger flask a vessel of
any kind fill it with your favorite
liquid I like coffee and join me now for
the unparallel pleasure of the dopamine
hit of the day the thing that makes
everything better and I'm going to ask
you to savor it yeah savor it
Go o yeah yeah savor it savor it okay
good well so today later today I will be
appearing on
MSNBC you're not going to want to miss
that I don't know what kind of questions
they're going to ask me I'll be on Ary
Mur show at uh the they give a start
time that's usually well in front of the
time I'm actually on camera but
uh 6:00 p.m. eastern time 300 p.m. at
California time and uh they'll be
talking to me so we'll see how that
goes you know I think I told you I I uh
started saying no to all uh interview
requests recently so I don't have I
don't think I have anything else on my
calendar uh but when this one came in I
thought to myself well this one's going
to be too much fun I'm going to have to
take this
one
um it has been brought to my attention
that there's a very interesting piece of
content on uh on HBO called The
Vow it's a multiart uh documentary about
a cult it's called it's called a cult
called uh
anx or something NX I VM I don't know
how you pronounce it next NEX
of but uh I started watching it and I
think I'm halfway through but uh I can
already tell you you've got to watch
this thing so I will be talking about it
in the context of persuasion because the
cult has some interesting techniques and
it is really good documentary because
the access they have where actually
things are on film or on audio it's
pretty remarkable and if you really want
to
understand uh how
influenceable or how persuadable people
are or what they are willing to believe
you got to watch this thing because if
you think people are gullible or people
can be uh fooled you you haven't seen
anything and I'll talk about the
technique after I give you time to watch
it so allegedly today there's a big
announcement from Apple about their 5G
phone and most of you are saying to
yourself well that's nice a 5G phone
it'll be a little bit faster than a 4G
phone aren't we glad that each of our
phones are a little bit better than the
last one but I think you'd be missing
the big story on this one if you didn't
notice stocks were uh solidly up
yesterday and at least part of the
reason is probably apple and part of the
reason is when 5G becomes common now
you've got you've got a little bit of a
pipeline problem uh or a capacity
problem so I don't know if your 5G phone
is going to give you 5G speed right away
every place you would use it but
probably you know it'll probably start
out pretty good and here's the thing you
need to know about
speed speed doesn't just help you do
what you were going to do anyway but
make it fast faster this kind of speed
will change what you do you'll be able
to do things that you couldn't do before
uh I don't know if that means Holograms
or 3D or virtual reality worlds probably
all of that uh I don't know if it means
um just completely changing how you
commute we almost can't see the ways
this see the ways this will change
things let me give you my example
if you have a uh uh let's say a car that
can go 5 miles an
hour you can use it to Tool around
locally but you're not going to take it
very far but if you have a car that can
go 100 miles an hour and it can you know
dry for hours and hours then it's a
whole different application it's not
something you use around town it's
something you can take a long trip with
so this 5G stuff is way bigger than you
think it is and it'll take a while for
all the all the reasons that that's true
to seep into your Consciousness this is
gigantic um so I tried watching the
Supreme Court nominee hearings for
ACB uh Amy con Barrett
and I thought the whole thing was so
worthless I couldn't really watch it is
anybody trying to watch that thing I
feel sorry for the uh the News Network
that are covering it CU they kind of
have to cover it it's big news but
there's literally nothing happening
because apparently the Democrats don't
want to go too hard at uh the nominee
because it might
backfire but on the other hand they have
to act like they're putting up a fight
or they have to use their time to
complain about the president or or
Obamacare so it turned into nothing but
a
theater it we took this important
government
process and just turned it into you know
Kabuki theater or something it doesn't
have any
functional purpose at all and and yet
we're going to still do it that's the
weird thing about people I suppose as
the dilber cartoonist I'm glad it
happens but people will do things they
know don't make sense just because of
inertia or the way things are so that's
what we're saying I I would say that's
worth about zero minutes of your time to
watch those hearings because you know
where that's going to go um are you
disappointed with the Republican uh and
Trump plans on healthc
care I feel as if Trump has a far better
um at least opportunity to sell his
health care preferred you know method if
he would package it up better but the
way it's being framed right now is that
there's this thing called the ACA or
Obamacare and that Trump wants to kill
it and that's the frame he wants to kill
it and he doesn't have anything that has
a name on it that's sort of packaged as
it's replacement so if you're a senior
citizen or you're just somebody who
thinks you're at risk of losing your
health care what are you going to think
about this situation you're going to say
to yourself uh I kind of know what
Obamacare is cuz I think I have it and
the Republicans are offering freaking
nothing now that's not true they are
actually offering a bunch of stuff but
they haven't packaged it in any way so
when you think about it you don't think
of it as anything you say well I'm glad
that you know maybe there's something
about drug prices going down and you
know I'm happy that maybe the Mandate
won't be there and I might be happy
about you know Tella tella Health being
you know allowed over State boundaries
Etc so if you thought about it there'd
be a whole bunch of individual things
that you liked but they don't feel like
a replacement for ObamaCare it just
feels like you're losing something and
have I told you before that the threat
of losing something always feels more
oppressive than the opportunity to get
something so the way human psychology
works is that we're way more concerned
about losing something we already have
than we are excited about getting a new
thing and that's very important to know
about people so right now what uh what
the uh Trump Administration is offering
is
less how would you have how would you
like to have less stuff now would
they're not that is not an accurate
description of what they're offering but
it feels like it and they've sort of
allowed that frame to to take form that
there is this Health Care thing yeah
it's not perfect but even that's going
to go away that doesn't describe what
would happen but that's the frame that
has taken
form and I think the Republicans have to
answer for that I would go so far as to
say that if if uh if Trump loses and
let's say the Republicans lose the
Senate as well and if it turns out that
the reason that that happened was people
were concerned about health care and
they didn't think the Republicans had
enough of a plan I would say they earned
the loss I would say the Republicans
deserve to lose under those conditions
now I don't want that I don't want that
to happen I would hope that they would
do a little better job in the next next
few weeks of saying what they would do
versus the ACA but at the moment
they have framed it in a way they
deserve to lose honestly because healthc
care is uh kind of what's left now if
they did lose because of that the irony
would be that Trump would have succeeded
so well that he succeeded him himself
out of a job meaning that the only thing
left to talk about was the thing he
didn't make enough of a you know an
impact on because we wouldn't be talking
about Isis cuz he took care of it we're
not going to be talking about the NAFTA
cuz he renegotiated it we're not going
to be talking about North Korea because
they seem to be sort of not a problem at
the moment we're not going to be talking
about uh renegotiating with China
because that will be already underway
we're not going to be talking so much
about the you know even the Border
because the Border looks like it became
somewhat less of a problem because
immigration slowed down I believe
because of Corona virus so the so the
president by doing a good job has
reduced the number of topics we care
about and even the economy is recovering
well people would say well I think it's
on the right path that probably do okay
under a different Administration so he
really has narrowed the targets down to
the one thing that he's not strong on
which is Healthcare he kind of needs to
fix that and pretty quickly I would
think um and as I say he there's plenty
to talk about and here's what here's
what I think the Republicans have done
wrong from the start and I've said this
the Democrats have a better goal but the
Republicans have a better system now I
favor systems over goals so therefore I
favor the Republican approach but they
haven't uh but they haven't framed it
right they haven't packaged it right and
here's how I would package it I would
accept the democrat's goal and I would
say yeah even as a republican it is our
absolute goal that everybody will have
health care Affordable Health Care we'll
just get there in a different way and
what we would hope is that we would take
it from whatever it is now I don't know
12% 8 % what how many people don't have
health care at the moment and I would
say okay it's it's at this number
whatever it is around 10% uh by the end
of my fourth year I would like that to
get that down to
2% if you heard something like that you
might say to yourself okay they got a
system they've got a goal that I agree
with and Bernie's got you know if you
look at sort of the Bernie type plans
that Biden might do or come Cala Harris
might do it looks more like it's harder
to get there it's it's like they don't
have a plan to get there that makes
sense math wise so I think so I think
that's where the Republicans could go
um I've suggested on Twitter that Trump
should run an ad saying that he's the uh
only candidate for president who's
immune to the Corona virus now of course
there is a debate as to whether uh as to
whether Trump has any immunity or if he
has
immunity is it short term some say four
months some say longer and I don't know
that it matters because it would be so
hilarious if he started tweeting that
he's the only candidate who is immune to
the Corona virus that the Press would go
nuts because they'd be no no that is not
scientifically valid and
the uh
uh wish you could shop for doctors by
procedure yeah that's a good comment
um anyway so it would be funny if he did
that I don't think he will uh a troll
came after me today on Twitter and said
he can't wait to see how unhappy I am
and you know what will I do if Trump
were to lose the election and and I
replied back to the effect I don't think
you know me very well I would get over
that in about 10
minutes I don't have a I don't have a
long recovery time from Bad News you
know some some bad news you have to work
on you know causes you work to get out
of the hole you ended up in but I always
spend a lot of time Fring about the past
and the past happens immediately right
you know if it turned out and I'm still
predicting that Trump will win but if it
turned out that he didn't I'm pretty
sure I would get over that in about 10
minutes that's just me you might have a
different
experience um Biden apparently has
revealed a little bit about his court
packing ways and by the way is it just
me or does Court packing sound vaguely
like an
insult you freaking Court
Packer doesn't it just have the right
consonant and S sounds to sound like an
insult you freaking Court Packer you
damn Court Packer you well it sounds
like an
insult and and here's what Biden said uh
to give us another hint what he's
thinking about he said quote I'm not a
fan of Court packing but I don't want to
get off on that whole issue Biden told
CNN CNN affiliate I want to keep focused
the president the president would love
nothing better than to fight about
whether or not I would in fact pack the
court or not pack the
court is is he the dumbest guy you've
ever met in your life now I think he
might have been smart at one point in
his
life uh yeah no fair with the uh
comments I'm saying there let's let's
let's uh let's not make it uh let's not
make it gay jokes okay the court Packer
by by itself sounds like an insult you
don't have to bring it into another
domain
um so here he is saying he's not a fan
of Court
packing he's very cleverly or stupidly I
haven't decided which it might actually
be brilliant because we might have
reached a point where people are so
irrational about everything that Biden
can actually just say something that he
knows will be taken two different ways
by two different groups so he can say
something that will make Republicans
sound comfortable because he says I'm
not a fan of Court packing so if you're
a republican you hear that say not a fan
of Court
packing okay okay he's obviously not a
guy who's going to do core packing so I
guess I feel comfortable about that so
the Republicans have something they can
you know hold on to Meanwhile the the
progressives who would like some cor
packing they listen to the second part
of it he goes you I just don't want to
get off on that whole issue so uh uh I
don't want him to fight about whether I
would or would not pack the court so
he's still leaving it open leaving it
open but here's the real question why
are you asking Joe Biden about coure
packing the only one that matters yeah
I'm seeing in the comments your way
ahead of me does it does Camala Harris
like Court packing because something
like greater than half of Voters
including the people voting for who
would vote for Biden even most of them
believe he won't make it four
years so you're not really talking about
Biden's opinion you're talking about
Biden's opinion for a
while plus kamala's kamla's opinion for
whatever time is remaining or even the
second term if if she were the one to
run for the term after that
so uh shouldn't we be really pushing on
that you know I think we've heard
everything we need to from Joe Biden but
we kind of need to hear from the
VP nominee and if we don't hear from
that you have to assume that she's in
favor of it or at least that there's
some chance she's in favor of
it uh which
uh which should change people
Minds all right there's a CDC study uh
this will be a good indication of how
useless data is CDC studies shows that
85% of covid cases were people who often
or always wear masks so what what's that
tell you number one is from the CDC so
you can trust that right no not anymore
unfortunately we we've had a bad
experience with experts recently
so there's there's no such thing as a a
credible source of data anymore there
there are still organizations that are
sort of credible but not when they give
you data it doesn't matter who it is
anybody giving you data in 2020 is
probably lying to you or
incorrect uh and when I say probably I
mean nine and a 10
times so would you conclude that if 85%
% of people who get
Co wore their masks what's the obvious
implication all right draw a conclusion
85% of them wore masks and got it anyway
therefore go
therefore masks don't work right it's
good evidence it comes from the
CDC so that's reliable right and 85% of
the people with masks got it anyway so I
guess those masks don't work is that
what you have
concluded well if you're bad at
analyzing data you concluded that if
you're good at analyzing data you might
say something like uh Julia Pollock
tweeted who is an economist what if I
told you about
economists economists are trained at
understanding whether the right things
have been compared and knowing and
knowing whether a rational comparison
has been made and she points out the
following two problems number one um
it's people who claim to have worn
masks people lie people lie about how
often they wear masks especially if
they're being asked by somebody you know
would judge you if a stranger calls you
and says do you wear your mask often
even people who don't wear masks often
or don't think they wear them that often
are going to be tempted to to say oh
yeah yeah I totally wear my mask pretty
much all the time even if they don't
that's one problem I think that's the
smaller one and then the other problem
is that that they're not accounting for
the differences in risk and
exposure
exactly who wears a mask in the first
place somebody who needs
to do do people get Corona virus if
there are people who are not around any
virus the people who don't wear masks
are far more likely to be the people who
who rightly uh judge that they're not at
much risk because they're maybe you know
not spending time around crowds maybe
they live in a town that has almost or
no Corona virus risk you know maybe
they're maybe they're young you know so
they're not bothering but um correlation
on this is probably backwards
uh it's probably backwards now you can't
tell but you have to allow this great
possibility that the reason people wear
masks in certain situations and they're
less likely to wear masks in other is
because they know where the virus is at
least statistically and so they wear the
masks if they're in a place where
there's a lot of virus now where are you
likely to get a virus probably in a
place with a lot of viruses
uh I I used to joke where I lived a few
a few homes ago whenever I looked
outside and I saw somebody going for a
run they would almost always be
overweight and I would say to myself
that's weird does running make you fat
because all the people I see running
look like they're trying to lose weight
so running must make you
fat and then I of and of course that's a
joke the correlation is back Wards the
people who thought they needed to lose a
few pounds went
running so I I think that might be
what's happening with this mask thing is
that uh it's it's useless data in any
case
um California has an interesting
situation apparently some GOP entity has
put up a ballot collection boxes of
their
own you didn't see that coming did you
so there are these officiall looking
ballot collection boxes that are not
trying to look like government entities
so they're not pretending they're the
post office it's just it's obviously a
private GOP thing and you can just throw
your uh throw your ballot in there do
you trust that would you trust a private
ballot collection box that's not a
government
mailbox if you trust that you're really
gullible now I'm not going to say that
the people who put them up there have
bad intentions don't know I'm just
saying that I wouldn't put my ballot in
a private ballot collection
box and if you're if you're dumb enough
to do that you shouldn't be
[Laughter]
voting you're you're not smart enough to
vote if you put your if you put your Val
you know Bob's collection
box you're saying to yourself
well it looks like they spelled all the
words right on the collection box looks
good enough to
me what could go
wrong and and so the government of
California has declared that these
things are illegal but here's the funny
part how can it be illegal to have a box
with some words on
it can't it couldn't possibly be illegal
because it's not pretending to do
anything to be anything other than what
it is it would certainly be illegal if
it were pretending to be the US Postal
Service right that would be
illegal it would be illegal if they were
you know claiming to be something they
weren't but it's claiming to be exactly
what it is a convenient way
to have your ballot uh get picked up now
I certainly wouldn't trust
it but how is it
illegal let me ask you this if I took a
box you know just a box I could carry
and I knocked on your door and I said
hey you know I'm I'm picking up some
ballots and I can save you a trip to the
mailbox if you like you can throw your
ballot in my box that's in my hand and
I'll carry it over to the mailbox for
you I'll carry it to the post office
would that be illegal well it depends on
your state right if you live in a state
where uh ballot harvesting is illegal
yes doesn't matter if you have a
separate box doesn't matter if you knock
on the door if your state says you can't
bring somebody else's ballots in it's
illegal but in California apparently
that's not illegal it's not illegal to
knock on the door and say can I take
your ballot so the state of California
is trying to claim that these little
boxes that do the same thing is knocking
on the door it's just a little bit more
efficient why knock on the door if
you're not ready you know wait till
you're ready you just put it in the box
and the the thing that's hilarious about
this is that I'm pretty sure democr
Democrats thought they had the advantage
with this ballot harvesting stuff and
then the Republicans do what Republicans
do what is it the Republicans do that's
better than what uh Democrats do
consistently they come up with better
systems if you're going to if you're
going to build something or manage
something call a republican Republicans
are pretty good on systems they're
pretty good at setting up a you know a
mechanism you know figuring out how to
make something work that's what they do
right it's what they do
Democrats their system looks a little
bit like a chop or Chaz right looks a
little bit more chaotic so you don't
want to trust the Democrats to set up a
system uh so they set up they set up
this thing and the very first thing that
happens is the the Republicans in
California come up with a superior
system and they get these boxes built
and distributed all over and now they
have now the government's going to have
to fight with what it means to be a to
to be harvesting ballots and as far as I
know they're going to have a hard time
declaring these things illegal because I
don't think there's any law that says
you can't have an accurately labeled box
sitting in on your on your lawn if it's
accurately labeled it's
accurate um so anyway that's
hilarious on a completely different
topic uh I follow a Twitter account by
the name of somebody named Brian Rome r
o m m l e if you want to look for it
definitely worth following he has lots
of uh new technologies and you know
what's what's coming next kind of tweets
and one of them just just will blow your
head off apparently now our hologram
technology is so good
that there's this device from let's see
called uh uh Port L hologram so you can
follow them at at Port p o TL hologram
all one word port L hologram and you can
see that they have this thing that's uh
phone booth sized in which inside the
little phone booth sized hologram
generator there is a full-sized human
being who looks exactly like somebody
you're standing in front of and and you
know they're walking and talking and
they they could be a deep fake or that
or it could be a projection of somebody
who's standing somewhere else and
they're just being projected as a
hologram
and uh it looks pretty amazing looks
pretty amazing somebody says you just
looked and it looks terrible you you
must be looking at something different
than what I'm looking at but it is it
will be difficult to explain how
powerful this is and let me tell you a
little story from my experience to give
you a
sense uh yeah my cat boo is doing a walk
by I told you this a while ago um
Microsoft has uh a version of their uh
uh what do you call enhanced reality
where it it places objects in the room
with you but you can't see them unless
you're wearing the special goggles now
if you're wearing the special goggles
you know you have a a cool experience
and here's the experience I had when I
tried them out in my home I saw a demo
version before they were available I put
on the on the goggles in my own home
this is the key part my own
home and I put them on and I turned on a
u a I think it was a a
mystery game so it was like a murder
mystery game where there would be
characters that would interact in your
space and there would be this murder
mystery and you'd have to figure it out
I guess and I put the glasses on and I
see it map the room it it puts a a layer
of uh like wireframe you could see the
wireframe going over your furniture and
stuff in your room and you think whoa
that's cool it just mapped my whole room
but here's the freaky part it didn't
just map the space in your room it knew
what the things were it knew what a
chair was
was uh my cat's going to do another
walkr if you see a tail go by and and
then it introduced characters into my
living room and they walked into my
living room from a doorway from another
room that it just happened to know as a
doorway because it mapped it those
full-sized characters walked in front of
me and sat down on my couch the couch
was L-shaped some of them sat in one L
and some of them sat on the other part
of the L and they set something on my
coffee table and it blew my freaking
brain
out now these particular uh um enhanced
reality creatures uh did not look like
realistic people in other words they you
could see through them a little bit so
you could tell that they were sort of
shadow people but they were good
representations of people now when you
take that over to the uh the Hologram
World Imagine now the glasses are off
imagine doing this same experiment but
no glasses it's your own room and maybe
you've replaced the light bulbs with
this technology I doubt that's possible
but imagine it wouldn't be too hard to
just put some sensors and lights in any
room so your room could produce a
photorealistic hologram that could
interact with your room it could walk
around it could walk around until you
see this you don't know what's coming
trust me there's some stuff coming that
is bigger than anything you could ever
imagine and if you're worried about
everything that's been invented already
been invented
nope nope there's stuff coming that
hasn't been invented I mean it has been
but it hasn't been commercialized so
you've got some fun stuff coming some
really fun stuff and I'm sure you're
already thinking about the
applications all right uh and I've said
in a related matter I've said this
before but it's worth
reiterating then no matter who wins in
2020 the
presidency I believe Trump will be our
last human
president the last human president what
I mean is that AI will effectively be
making our decisions there will still be
a person who gets elected but they won't
have the flexibility that past
presidents had to use their judgment and
their Instinct and their hunches and
whatever and make decisions that are
real leadership decisions rather in the
future the algorithms will decide what
things we see and then we'll decide that
those are the most important things and
if those are the most important things
and we could tell you know who favors
which part of the policy for those most
important things
the leaders are just going to have to
follow it now you say to me Scott Scott
Scott the algorithms are not AI the
algorithms are just some math and
they're made by people it's the people
that decide what the algorithm does and
then the algorithm does things but it's
all people the the algorithm is just a
little tool it's no different than
scissors and a computer it's not
important it's just the
tool is that what's happening
I I think that's where we differ let me
give you an example uh this week I was
complaining that uh YouTube had had
demonetized one of my videos earlier in
the week and there was no reason given
so I complained about it on Twitter and
to YouTube's credit they noticed I was
complaining on Twitter and they
contacted me on Twitter and said which
you know which video was it we'll do a
manual review so
and they said you know it's not obvious
what's wrong with it you know they
couldn't just look at it and oh it's
obvious what you did wrong they said
we're going to have to manually review
it so I gave them the link they manually
reviewed and then this morning they got
back to me and they said it's the video
is fine it's been
remonetized so problem solved right
here's the weird
part the humans are not aware still what
was wrong with it in other words the
algorithm flagged it took it you know
demonetized it and never revealed its
secret for why now when the humans
looked at it they had the ability to
reverse it but do you think that your
video would have been reversed if you
were not the dilber guy if you didn't
have half a million people following you
on Twitter and you hadn't complained in
public and you weren't leaving kind of a
big footprint would yours have been
corrected I'd like to think that YouTube
is is so you know so on it that it
wouldn't matter who complained if they
saw a complaint they would deal with it
I'd like to think that's true but I'll
bet they wouldn't have seen it I don't
think you could have reached them I just
had this little you know semi famous
person advantage that probably helped
and if there were no humans who know why
I was
demonetized If This Were happened to you
who would who would have made the
decision to demonetize you no human
being involved no human being would be
involved in the initial decision to
demonetize you and no human being would
ever explain it to you or fix it later
you would be too small now what would
happen if the algorithm simply decided
you know using its math had decided to
focus on some videos they had certain
messages and not on others would the
people who made the algorithms be aware
of it would they know exactly that this
video was emphasized over this one
apparently not because they couldn't
tell why why mine was demonetized
there's a little bit too much complexity
maybe the people who look at
monetization are not the ones who
programmed it they wouldn't know what
they're looking at anyway and if they
asked it would be too complicated
conversation so they wouldn't really
know if he asked the programmer the
programmers would probably and first of
all it's not like there's one programmer
yeah it would be a team of programmers
who probably only know their little hunk
their little piece of the algorithm just
guessing that it seems like a reasonable
guess I don't think anybody would be
able to answer the question so the
complexity is what gives uh AI free will
I I'll just let that hang there for a
little while the
complexity is what gives AI in this case
the algorithms that decide what you see
on social media is what gives it a free
will what do I mean by that Free Will in
human beings is based on the fact that
you can't predict what I'll do that's it
because I'm complicated my brain is
complex so you can't tell based on what
I'm doing now it's too complicated you
can't you can't get all the variables
you can't determine all my inputs you
don't know what my cause and effect is
you don't know my body chemistry you
don't know my history but if you knew
that and if you had the Galaxy siiz
brain to look at all those inputs and
figure out how my brain is wired you
could know what I'll do the only thing
that gives me the impression of free
will is that even I don't know what I'm
doing sometimes
and you certainly don't know what I'm
going to choose so it is only my
complexity the fact that you don't know
what I'm going to do that gives you the
impression I have free
will this morning when YouTube told me
that they they didn't know basically uh
they didn't have to say this directly
it's obvious in context they don't know
why the algorithm did what it did it's
too
complex today was the day
the
AI was
confirmed it already had it but today
was the day that it was confirmed to me
the AI already has free
will exactly like mine it does what it
does by formula and it will do that if
it gave it the same inputs it would do
the same thing every time if it was
exactly the same inputs but it's too
complicated we can't predict it it's on
its own now it has free
will I'll just leave you with that
thought all right moving along uh here's
an interesting factoid Disney World in
Florida is open with obviously you know
masks and whatnot whereas Disneyland in
California remains closed differences
between the how the states are managing
this this is one of the best things
that's happened in the Corona virus
because this is going to be the closest
we will get
to knowing which of the two methods
worked so if the Disney World that
opened ends up with a good result
meaning very few people get the virus
because of it to the extent that they
can determine that um that's going to
tell us something and if they cause
massive infections because they opened
in Disney World in Florida well then
California was the smart one I think
we're going to find out something pretty
useful because it's pretty it's sort of
unusual that you would have such a
Apples to Apples comparison between
states so good to know uh you know if
you said to yourself I think they should
both open up you know you could make
that argument and I think Disney is
making that argument they think they
should open up but you should also be a
little bit happy that you got a good
comparison thing here we're going to
know something about Disney World that's
going to be really really useful I think
and I'm I'm I'm guessing that we'll be
able to track that
somehow um don't you know that data is
important has anybody told you that we
should make decisions based on data has
anybody mentioned that lately in this
election s uh this election cycle it's
all you hear we must use the data we
must listen to The Experts follow the
data follow the data that's what all the
dumb people say following the data would
be terrific idea if you had data
following the data would be a terrific
idea if you had the data and it was
reliable and it was right under those
conditions and you knew what to do with
it you know you knew how to act based on
that data but that's a lot of ifs isn't
it here's a good example what is the
only data about the Corona virus that
that you would need uh need to know to
really understand where we are and where
we're going what is the one bit of data
you would
need you might say to yourself a death
rate nope nope that's what I would have
said a few weeks ago I would have said
as long as you know the death rate
that's pretty much what you need to know
in terms of you know where we're having
um somebody else somebody smarter would
say you need to know the hospital
hospitalization rate because first of
all the hospitalization rate can to
somewhat some degree you will predict
the death rate but also you need to know
your hospital capacity you don't want to
go over it and you you also get your
people who have long-term problems and
they would be picked up in the
hospitalization wouldn't be picked up in
the death rate so that's all you need
right somebody says recovery rate nope
you don't need the recovery rate you
don't need the hospitalization rate you
don't need the death rate it would be
good to have and and they have value so
I'm not saying you shouldn't know them
I'm saying that the most important data
which we could get it's it's achievable
we could collect it we haven't and it
goes like this how many people are dying
who are getting the right meds and the
right
treatment right because that's all that
matters if we're if we're throwing
people in who are having problems today
with the average of how they were doing
before we had good Therapeutics back in
the day when we would stick people on
ventilators and the ventilator itself
would kill them that I think a lot of
the deaths were from ventilator uh
misuse nobody's fault because nobody
knew what to do in the early days
certainly definitely not any kind of
medical malpractice or anything I'm not
suggesting that but we didn't know so
can you tell me that you know or that
anybody has collected the only data that
matters you went into the hospital and
you got your REM Des
air let's say you know you were at that
stage or you got your regeneron or you
got your vitamin D you got your zinc and
maybe your baby aspirin whatever else
maybe some of
ziyin and
that's the only data I want to know now
on top of that I also need to know
availability of those Mets so if the
regeneron needs let's say two weeks or
three months or whatever it is to ramp
up so everybody can have it in this
country I need to know that because
that's telling me you know when when we
can get to a better place same with the
r Desir so I would want to know how many
people are dying with the right
treatment and let's call it the Trump
protocol okay just to keep it simple the
same stuff Trump got you have to assume
is the good stuff right so plus r dese i
don't think he got that but he didn't
need
it so if we don't know that do you know
anything seriously do you know anything
if you don't know that it's the only
number I think matters to how well we're
doing doing when are we're going to get
out of this how bad is it do we open up
do we not open up all of our decisions
are based on this one thing how do we do
today like today October 13th how would
you do today if you went into the
hospital and you got the full Trump
protocol right because it's nowhere near
the death rate of March and I feel like
we're making decisions based on March
you know March through October death
rates which would be insane
so um and somebody says the deaths are
are grossly
inflated but I would say that anybody
who got the Trump protocol would be
certainly confirmed to be somebody who's
got a Corona virus problem you I'm
pretty sure by the time you get the full
protocol they know that the Corona virus
is the thing that's going to kill you or
not you know so um there is definitely a
question about how the the deaths are
counted but I think we could count the
uh if you looked at the excess uh
mortality you'd be okay so if you knew
excess M mortality had gone down to
normal because people who got the
treatments their death rate had gone
down to a trivial
number um that would be a lot to know
all right so you can love having data
but if you collect the wrong data
doesn't matter if you know as I
mentioned earlier if you're the CDC and
you collect the data that 85% of the
people getting the virus are wearing a
mask how did that help you in fact it
probably hurt you because people would
misinterpret the data now they might
misinterpret it in a way that actually
helps you if it made them we them where
the no in that case I think they would
wear the mask less so people would
misinterpret it and do the wrong thing
data is very
overrated data is usually
wrong that that's just a fact uh all
data is usually wrong and wrong
enough that it would change how you deal
with it um somebody says I'm laughing at
your blind
loyalty to your cult
leader um you must be new here the
whoever is laughing at my blind loyalty
to my cult leader you must be brand new
and you must have joined later in this
very Periscope because the entire first
part of the Periscope was criticizing
Trump for health care not being you know
packaged into a good plan did you miss
that part did you did you miss the part
where I said it would take me 10 day 10
minutes to get over him losing if he
lost why is it about all of you you
Democrats who can't see anything
clearly if if you could see one thing
clearly it's that I'm not a slave to uh
Dogma if you don't get that you have
missed the most essential part of me
that I could change my mind in a
heartbeat on anything it's it's one of
my uh it's one of my advantages in fact
it's the only reason anybody's watching
me if if all I did was get on here and
do a blind obedience uh everything Trump
does is terrific if that's all I did I
don't think people would be too
interested in coming back because I
would just be another celebrity with a
stupid opinion it's only because I do
have the
facility to go in either
direction that makes me worth watching
for my critic who I'm talking to right
now uh you might also not know that I
consider myself left of burning
at least on the social stuff now I don't
think that Bernie is good at math so he
doesn't have to pay for the things he
wants and that's a problem I'm not going
to be
impractical I like his goals have
everybody you know have a good education
and uh you know want everybody to to be
free want to you know Etc but
uh but he needs to be able to figure out
how to do it it's got to be practical
all right all right that is all for
today and I will talk to you
tomorrow it's so it's so awkward when I
try to hit that little X to end this and
I can't hit it with my
thumb all right Periscope is turned off
we're on H YouTube only now live
streaming uh thoughts on Kanye and Joe
Rogan and his presidential ad I didn't
see that does Kanye have a an
ad There's an actual Kanye
ad
um data are facts statistics are
interpretation not true data are alleged
facts if data were
facts we'd probably be in a lot better
shape but usually data is out of context
and it's just
wrong is local still thing oh yeah let
me give you an update on locals so
locals.com is a platform um full
disclosure I have a small investment in
it as well and that's where I do um
everything that you that I don't do in
public I do there so there's a whole
bunch of other content on uh including
micro lessons on success and being more
being more effective as well as some
content that's a little too edgy to be
on Twitter or to be on uh YouTube so uh
locals is not only working but uh it's
it's working embarrassingly well the the
number of people who were willing to pay
a subscription to see extra content
actually uh is humbling because way more
demand than I could have imagined and so
far they seem happy the retention is
excellent people are adding every uh
every uh week so yeah locals.com you go
there and could follow people like me
people like Greg
Gutfeld um I think Don Jr's there bunch
of other people are going over and what
you'll see there is uh stuff you can't
see at other
places um somebody says you need a
coupon code no you don't need a coupon
code um the the creators can create a
coupon to give you a discount but you
don't need that you can just go there
and sign
up um and it's working great by the way
and the community over there is just
people who want to be you know part of
my community so I have basically no
trolls imagine a social media platform
that because it's subscription it
basically eliminates all of the trolls
every bit of content and other people
can other people post things as well so
I look at other people's content and
it's exactly what I want to see and it's
because somebody who followed me me kind
of knows what I would like to see and
knows what other people who follow me
would like to see and so it's this whole
environment where I only see stuff
that's interesting and I wanted to see
it it's the weirdest thing and they're
no trolls and and people pay a
subscription fee to be there somebody
says what is the $7 subscription fee for
it is for Content that you won't see
anywhere else but on top of that uh
there's and I didn't see this coming
exactly there's a little bit of a
patreon element to it patreon allows you
just to um essentially donate to
creators that you would like to
incentivize to do more and so I think a
lot of people just join locals because
they're supporting my
voice uh and then they also give some
extra
content but uh the if you like robots
read news my edgier uh comic that I only
do on the web um some of those I will
tweet I'll put on to Twitter so you just
so it's a acts as an advertisement for
locals but uh most of the really naughty
ones I just keep on locals if it's if
it's too edgy I just keep it there all
right that's all for now and I will talk
to you oh just to give you one more
example of what is on locals yesterday I
did a detailed um tour of my office you
know down to the down to the real
details which some people would find
interesting but others would not and
I'll talk to you tomorrow