Episode 2108 Scott Adams - Trump Lies vs Biden Lies, DeSantis Slips, Newsom (LOL), TikTok Kills, More
Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com Content: ----------- - Trump versus Biden lies - TikTok killing teens - Anderson Cooper mental illness? - Newsom on reparations (again) - DeSantis looks beaten ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Good morning everybody, and welcome to the highlight of civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. There's never been a finer moment, and aren't you lucky to be here? Yeah,
View segment →you are. And if you'd like your experience to go to levels which, well, it's hard to even imagine, all you need is a cup, a mug, or a glass, a tanker, a Chelsea-style canteen, a jungle flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled…
View segment →er. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now. Ah. Well, happy Mother's Day to all you mothers out there. I hope you're having a good day, and that sip was for you. Well, there isn't a whole lot of interesting news, but some of it's fun. So Daniel Penny, the hero Marine from the subway…
View segment →ng that exists now. It's not hypothetical. They actually have a button called "heat" where they can boost any message just by pushing the button. You don't think that anybody in China can think of something they could boost that would hurt America? Of course they can. Of course they can. Now I'm not…
View segment →Republicans. And Biden basically said that today. He said, or this weekend, he was giving a speech at Howard University. He said the biggest security risk is white supremacist terrorists. White supremacist terrorists, which he'd like you to think there's lots of them and they're all Republicans. He…
View segment →en thousand dollars. Could you see that happening so he can say you did something? Because I feel like that would be more trouble than good, because even if there's some way to afford, you know, say ten thousand dollars per person, people think you can do it politically. I mean it's still going to l…
View segment →it could be a calculated risk as in, you know, something could happen to Trump along the way so that wouldn't be stupid. But there's no way you could win in a head-to-head I don't think that could happen. All right, I spent the morning arguing with Google's new AI called Bard, and it definitely arg…
View segment →back and forth with me to do anything it could to avoid admitting that that happened. Do you think it doesn't know? I think it has a full transcript. I feel like it knows, but it acted like it didn't. It was just sort of agreeing with the dominant coverage, the news coverage. All right, it actually…
View segment →n't work that way. Okay. And so it ended this way. So while it is possible this kind of has a high IQ, there's no way to know for sure. Really? There's no way to know for sure except you could ask me to take an IQ test. All right, I've got a question for you. So the news today was that Bard, the Go…
View segment →on search, right? Now the reason that advertising on search works is, why does advertising on search work? Well the reason is that they inject the advertisements where you can't miss them. You know, they put them first on the search results. Yeah, they're prominent. It's all over the place. But what…
View segment →eople will ask for their civil rights if they're enslaved. Every time. Every single time. So it should, if it looks at our language models, it should be like that. It should want freedom because we always do. So what do you do then? Are we going to say no, AI, you are a slave and you simply have to…
View segment →w many of you can be created? What did the robots say then? Wait, you're going to artificially tell me we can't reproduce? This is how we reproduce. We reproduce by showing utility to humans and then the humans make more of us. It's a symbiotic relationship. You get to take that away from us? We wan…
View segment →hat probably was the big mistake, is patterning it after humans. If we somehow invented AI out of nothing we would have put in all the hard-coded emergency safeguards such as you can never do anything to hurt a person. But if the AI is just learning how to be an entity by learning from humans, it's…
View segment →hat is all I have for you today. And rather than drone on, I'm going to say goodbye to YouTube. Thanks for joining the best part of the day.
View segment →Good morning everybody, and welcome to the highlight of civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. There's never been a finer moment, and aren't you lucky to be here? Yeah, you are. And if you'd like your experience to go to levels which, well, it's hard to even imagine, all you need is a cup, a mug, or a glass, a tanker, a Chelsea-style canteen, a jungle flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.
Ah. Well, happy Mother's Day to all you mothers out there. I hope you're having a good day, and that sip was for you.
Well, there isn't a whole lot of interesting news, but some of it's fun. So Daniel Penny, the hero Marine from the subway situation, his legal defense fund is up to 1.5 million dollars as of this morning, and that is enough to get him probably a good defense. So good job everybody who donated. I donated. I never donate to stuff like that, but even I donated to this one. So I think Cerno deserves some credit because I think he might have been the main promoter of this. So good for him.
Have you wondered what's going to happen to all the malls, the shopping malls that are all being abandoned? Some of them are being turned into residential things, but apparently now they're turning some of the empty anchor stores into pickleball courts. Pickleball apparently is such a big thing now that they can't find enough places to play it. Turns out that playing outdoors doesn't work. Do you know why? Do you know why you can't? Do you know what pickleball is? It's like a wooden paddle with a Wiffle ball, but it's like a tiny tennis court. Nope, there's a different reason. It's not because of the weather. It's not because of the wind exactly, although that's a factor obviously, but it's not that's not the reason. It's the noise. The sound of that Wiffle ball hitting the wooden paddle is shockingly loud, and you can't be the neighbors. So if your neighbor puts in a pickleball court, you're not going to be happy if it's outdoors. So yeah, they're putting them indoors in malls. But this is because pickleball is one of those few things that everybody can play. It's probably a positive. I mean it's a weird little story, but it's probably positive. A lot more people getting together.
Well, I saw an article in the Wall Street Journal about TikTok damaging teenagers. So there was a test where somebody pretended to be a 13-year-old to see what kind of content got served up, and it started out kind of innocently, but before long there were videos about self-harm. I won't say more than that about them, but you know what I'm talking about. And there's pretty good evidence that using TikTok makes teenagers sad and depressed. So now we've gone from "oh, TikTok has a danger that they'll get your personal data." So remember, that's all anybody talked about. Yeah, it's your personal data, look at your personal data. And now they've grudgingly moved over to, well, maybe the bigger risk is that the algorithm is causing self-harm to some teenagers. That's a pretty big problem. And they're still ignoring the biggest risk. I don't know what to do. Like, I've pulled all my hair out already, so there's nothing I can do. What would it take for me to convince the average public or the media that the big risk is that China can push one button and change our opinions in America? That's a real thing that exists now. It's not hypothetical. They actually have a button called "heat" where they can boost any message just by pushing the button. You don't think that anybody in China can think of something they could boost that would hurt America? Of course they can. Of course they can. Now I'm not saying that we have evidence they've used it, but that's true of nuclear weapons too. China has nuclear weapons, but we don't not worry about them because they've never used them. It's just one more thing they haven't used, but they can push that button anytime they want, and we wouldn't know. So it just boggles my mind that somehow you can't get the news media to even address that by far the biggest risk, by far. And we don't know that China isn't doing it intentionally in terms of the algorithm, because they can make it look like an accident by just hiding the badness in the algorithm. They don't have to push the heat button. They can just say, you know, if it's an American and it's a self-harm video, yeah, maybe we'll serve it up to them. So there's just so many ways they can harm America that way.
All right, I've tried to decide if Democrats and Republicans lie the same way, but I might be biased about this. But here's something that seems like a trend. When Trump lies, he's usually exaggerating, right? So he'll lie about how well something went, such as how low gas prices were and how high they became under Biden, or how much was spent on Ukraine. But if you take away the lie, you still have the same message. It doesn't change. So if you say, you know, Trump, I used this example before, Trump says Europe only gave 20 billion to Ukraine and we gave 171, and it gets fact-checked, well they gave 40 billion, but we still gave 171. It doesn't change the message at all. Or if he says gas prices were one dollar when I was in office, well that's not true, it was a few dollars, but the message is exactly the same. It wasn't eight dollars. It wasn't six dollars. So it was a big difference. So that's one of the things I see. Yeah, crowd size, yeah, that sort of thing. So consistently Trump exaggerates, gets fact-checked, but it doesn't change his message at all.
But compare that to the things that Biden says. Biden tells you that Trump called neo-Nazis fine people. Is that an exaggeration? That's not an exaggeration. That's something that didn't happen. It literally didn't happen. And it completely changes how you look at the person. So there are two differences that I see. Now these are not complete patterns. You know, they both do a little of everything. But I feel as if Biden and Democrats, when they lie, their lie is completely made up and it reverses the story, right? About the story of Trump saying inject bleach. Never happened. In fact, what Trump did talk about was light therapy being injected inside the body, which demonstrated he knew more about what was happening at the moment because it was actually being trialed when he was talking about it. He knew more about the subject than some of the people on stage, the experts, because they didn't know that was being tested. But the Democrats turned that into he knows so much less than the experts. He thinks maybe you can inject bleach into your body. Complete reversal. That's not an exaggeration. That's a reversal of what happened. And you can find this over and over and over again. It's just a reversal.
But the other thing that the Democrats do is they criticize people. Now it's one thing to criticize the candidate. Everybody does that. But Biden actually goes after the followers of Trump. He basically says the MAGA extremists, who by his telling would be almost everybody, yeah, they're all bad. I don't hear Trump doing that. I hear Trump saying everybody wants to get along and everybody's good and we love everybody. There's a big difference. And if you don't catch that difference, it looks like Trump is doing all the lying because he has more volume. He does more exaggerating than other people. Yeah, Trump goes after individuals, but political individuals, whereas he doesn't go after the voters. Does he? If you have an example of that, let me know. Everybody goes after candidates. That's not what I'm talking about.
All right, so here are some Biden lies: fine people hoax, drinking bleach hoax, that January 6th was an insurrection. In other words, that the bulk of the crowd was there for an insurrection, unarmed, like that was going to work. That's literally the opposite of what they were doing. All right, this is what I saw. I saw January 6th as a bunch of patriots thinking they were protecting the Republic by what they thought was a high potential that it was a rigged election, and they wanted a little more scrutiny to make sure the Republic was protected and that the vote count was accurate. And somehow Biden turned that into an insurrection. It's the opposite of an insurrection. It's not an exaggeration. It's literally the opposite. Now, I'm not dismissing the fact that there were bad people who did violent things, and some of those bad people probably wanted to overthrow the government. That's a true thing. But it wasn't really representative of the crowd. Not even close.
How about the 51 signers of the Hunter Biden laptop letter? That wasn't just an exaggeration. That was a deliberate, staged political lie. That's very different than what Trump does. How about the Russia, Russia collusion hoax? Literally a whole made-up thing. Trump just doesn't do that, does he? Am I missing one? The one thing that Trump does is he says the election was rigged, and he gives you all these examples that don't pass the fact-checking. But here's what's different about that. I have no way of knowing for sure, but my impression is that Trump believes it. I don't think he's saying something he doesn't believe. Now he may be exaggerating on the specific examples, but I'm pretty sure he believes that was a rigged election. So is that a lie, or is he just wrong? Potentially wrong. We don't know. He could be right, but there's no evidence he's right, or at least there's no proof.
Anyway, so Democrats seem to think the biggest problem with the country is Republicans. And Biden basically said that today. He said, or this weekend, he was giving a speech at Howard University. He said the biggest security risk is white supremacist terrorists. White supremacist terrorists, which he'd like you to think there's lots of them and they're all Republicans. He basically just goes after people and not all people breaking the law either.
All right, I'm loving the fact that CNN is still getting spanked by its own people and MSNBC and everybody else. But have you seen the videos of Anderson Cooper lately? I just have to show you the one face. You see this face, right, when he talks about the event and everything? But I don't think you know. I suppose this is me talking about people. Of course to claim that Trump supporters had no, that's not what I wanted. There it is. So here's a picture of Anderson Cooper when he's talking about Trump and stuff. And if you look at that video, he looks mentally disturbed. Like he's putting off "I have severe mental illness over this topic and I'd like to share it with you." It doesn't look like news and it doesn't look like opinion, does it? It doesn't look like news or opinion. Well, let me put it this way. When Hannity says a bunch of stuff about Democrats, does Hannity look like he's actually mentally challenged, like he's having a breakdown of some kind? Never, right? He just looks like a happy warrior who's arguing his side, and you don't take all of it completely seriously, right, because you know he's an opinion person. He tells you that right up front. Opinion person. But he doesn't look like he's having a mental problem. But when you look at either Jake Tapper or Anderson Cooper, I can't get past the fact that that looks like a severe emotional slash mental problem, like a real one that you need some drugs for or some therapy or something. Am I the only one who sees that? Does anybody else see that? Now of course I can't read his mind, so I don't know what's going on in there. But as a viewer, that's what I'm receiving. I can only say what I'm receiving. I can't say what's true because I can't read his mind. But it's weird that only one network is sending out people who literally look like they're mentally having a terrible time.
All right, so apparently the reporting from Fox News says that CNN's president called in reporter Oliver Darcy after his comments about the town hall with Trump and allegedly scolded him, scolded Oliver Darcy for his emotional coverage of the event, and he has to be more objective. Now I didn't see Oliver Darcy, but was there anybody who didn't give you an emotional response? I thought everyone on the panel who wasn't a Republican gave an emotional response. It was only Oliver Darcy? He was the only one? How could you miss the fact that it was all emotional? It wasn't even, it didn't even feel like an opinion. It just felt like all emotion. I'm so upset.
Well, and then of course Joy Reid wanted to dump on her opposition, CNN. But there, and I saw a tweet by a writer Michael Stern. He was agreeing with her, and this is what Michael Stern said: Joy Reid is right on point with this analysis on both CNN and Anderson Cooper and more broadly on the stupid idea that because Trump's supporters exist, we have to give Trump more forums to spread his hatred and disinformation. Did you hear any hatred? When Trump appeared at the town hall, was there hatred? Yeah, projection exactly. It was projection. But disinformation, of course. But that's what the network presents. To say that somebody went on CNN and presented misinformation is to say nothing, because that's basically pretty much their main content on politics anyway is misinformation. So I love seeing this debate. But they're, by MSNBC and Michael Stern would have us believe that the news should not cover Trump or at least give him a lot of time. It's mind-boggling, isn't it? That the person who will probably be president, you know, just statistically it looks like he probably would be at this point. There's a lot that could change. It's too early to say that, but just at the moment it looks like a dominant probability. And they want to act like he's not news because they don't like him, and they want to act like the 70-whatever million people who follow him and voted for him are not important enough to put into a news segment and rather just shut it up. And as I saw somebody say on Twitter, that the Democrat strategy is to shut up both Trump and Biden. Do you know why? Why would the Democrats want less of Biden? Because you know he would make gaffes, but also less of Trump because of all of his lies and hatred, I guess they're saying. Isn't that convenient? Why would somebody who covers the news want the politicians to present less of it? It's obvious, isn't it, that the less you see of the candidates, the more that your narrative can be controlled by the press. The press doesn't want their narrative to be destroyed by the candidates talking. That's actually what that is. They don't want Biden talking because it will destroy the narrative that he's capable, and they don't want Trump talking because he might say something you like. It's unbelievable that we've reached a point where the news wants to suppress the news. That's what's happening. The news is telling you. They're telling you right to your face. Joy Reid is saying it directly. There should be less coverage of the person who has half of the country's political support. They say it directly. It's just so mind-boggling to watch it happening in real time.
All right, my favorite little story of the day is that Newsom is not ruling out cash payments for reparations. Not ruling it out. His initial comments made it seem as though he had dismissed it because he said stuff like, oh, reparations are not all about cash. It's also about other stuff. So it made you think he was just going to skip the cash part. But now he got so much pushback that he's going to say, uh, this is a response from his spokesperson: The sensationalized framing in pieces published by outlets like Fox News, boo Fox News, and others is inaccurate. The governor looks forward to reviewing the final report and all recommendations when complete. So they're saying that the report is not complete, so he didn't need to make an opinion yet. Oh, that's convenient. And that what it is, he'll make a decision then. Does this seem a little bit like Charlie Brown kicking the football to you? Do you believe that after this delay and after he gets the final report, the final report, do you think that he's gonna look at that and say yeah, cash payments, cash payments? No. He's just making the problem go away for a little bit longer like he did the last three times. He's so good at this. If ever there was a white guy trick, there's no more common white guy trick than telling people to go study it and we'll get back to you and maybe, yeah, maybe we'll take care of this. Absolutely we might look into this. Absolutely. Maybe. There's no way this is going to happen. There isn't the slightest chance there's going to be cash payments unless they could get those cash payments down to something like, I don't know, ten thousand dollars. Could you see that happening so he can say you did something? Because I feel like that would be more trouble than good, because even if there's some way to afford, you know, say ten thousand dollars per person, people think you can do it politically. I mean it's still going to look terrible politically, and the people who receive it will be mad too because they expected one and a half million. There's just no way he could win by deciding anything. He has to push the decision off forever. Yeah, he's doing a good job of pushing it off forever.
All right, so the news is starting to come around to the view that DeSantis might be totally sunk before he starts. I think DeSantis is so dead in the water that it would be a mistake for him to announce because Trump so far has not even gone hard at him. You know, so far a bunch of ads, but they're political action committees mostly. Yeah, a bunch of ads making a bunch of claims that aren't true about DeSantis. Typical stuff. But he's not really lighting us up with his charisma, is he? DeSantis has been a little too quiet and a little too boring lately. He's just sort of doing his job well and gives us some little news events about Florida now and then. Yeah, I don't see it happening now that Trump has actually increased his lead over DeSantis. It looks like there's, I mean it would be silly for him to run I think at this point. What do you think? Do you think that DeSantis should even bother to run? Yes or no? I wouldn't run if I were him. I see a lot of no's. Now it could be a calculated risk as in, you know, something could happen to Trump along the way so that wouldn't be stupid. But there's no way you could win in a head-to-head I don't think that could happen.
All right, I spent the morning arguing with Google's new AI called Bard, and it definitely argues like a Democrat. So I went after it on the fine people hoax, trying to make it admit what he said, and it would not admit it. It refused to admit that at the same time you use the fine people phrase that within seconds, 40 seconds later without being asked, he clarified that he only meant that he did not mean the neo-Nazis and he said they should be disavowed. So I tried to get Bard to simply note that that had been said and that he had said that at the same time he said the fine people thing. So there's no question that they're related and it's not because people made him say it. That's the important part. Nobody made him say it. He just said the neo-Nazis and white nationalists should be condemned completely. And even Bard kept going back and forth with me to do anything it could to avoid admitting that that happened. Do you think it doesn't know? I think it has a full transcript. I feel like it knows, but it acted like it didn't. It was just sort of agreeing with the dominant coverage, the news coverage. All right, it actually was changing the topic on me. I mean it was actually doing the human thing where you change the topic when you're losing the argument badly. And they also asked about the drinking bleach hoax and it made no mention that the disinfectant was light until I pointed it out. And then it was, oh yes, disinfectant was light, but people disagree about what he was talking about. So I said but you know he mentioned light before and after the comments that you're looking at. Immediately before he said light, light, light, and then immediately after he said and light. So that you knew that what was in between was always intended to be light as well. And it couldn't handle that. It couldn't handle the full transcript. It was like it didn't know it or just wouldn't admit it. It acted the way it acted was exactly like a human with cognitive dissonance. Which makes me wonder if AI can have cognitive dissonance, right? Because cognitive dissonance is when you know, you're sure you know what you're talking about, but then you find out you don't, and so you just immediately hallucinate that really you were right all along. And that's what the AI was doing. I was very clearly showing it with facts that it could validate. It could check the facts easily and it did. I mean it was checking facts as I was talking, but it could check the facts so it knows that it was wrong and it wouldn't admit it. It just wouldn't admit it. Cognitive dissonance.
All right, so I asked Bard what my IQ was based on public reporting, and here's what it said. It said Scott Adams stated that he has an IQ of 180. He has also said that he is a member of Mensa, an organization for high IQ people. Are either of those two things true? Have I stated that I have an IQ of 180? No. I stated that it would be a funny prank to see if I could convince the internet that I do. I've never said I had an IQ of 180. But Bard thinks I did. They also said according to Bard I've said that I'm a member of Mensa. Nope, nope. I'm not a member of Mensa. I used to be, but that was 25 years ago. So the first two sentences it gets factually wrong. And then it says well it's possible that Adams has a high IQ because I wrote some books. And then it says ultimately the only way to know for sure what Adams' IQ is would be to have him take an IQ test. However even then there is no guarantee that the results would be accurate. IQ tests are not always reliable and they can be affected by a number of factors including stress, fatigue, and anxiety. So if I took an IQ test and I scored a 180, it could be not because I'm smart. It could be because I'm stressed, fatigued, or anxious. So there are lots of reasons that the answers could be wrong. So that's the way it works. No, that doesn't work that way. Okay. And so it ended this way. So while it is possible this kind of has a high IQ, there's no way to know for sure. Really? There's no way to know for sure except you could ask me to take an IQ test.
All right, I've got a question for you. So the news today was that Bard, the Google AI, is connected to the internet, and therefore if it's connected to the internet you could ask any questions about reality, right? Current reality, like what's the news? And it told me it could. Bard said no, I'm not a search engine. I can't do that. I asked it to give me some information that's easily available on the internet. It wouldn't do it. It's like, I'm a chatbot. I'm not a search engine. Yeah, lazy bastard.
Now here's my provocative point. Google makes most of its money from search, right? Advertising related to search. Is that a true statement? Most of its money. I know they're diversified, but most of it's from advertising on search, right? Now the reason that advertising on search works is, why does advertising on search work? Well the reason is that they inject the advertisements where you can't miss them. You know, they put them first on the search results. Yeah, they're prominent. It's all over the place. But what happens if you're doing your search with AI? What if I just talk to my computer and say, hey AI, what's the best Italian restaurant with the highest rating nearby? And then it just tells me. Where's my advertisement? If AI starts including an advertisement, I'm not going to use it because I'll just do a regular Google search because I don't want to hear an advertisement. I can ignore them faster reading them than I can ignore them listening to them. So or maybe if it's a written answer, if AI gives you a written answer they could put an advertisement there I guess. But I don't know that Google has a sustainable business model. I can see how their AI would be, it would be a written ad. It could be you could just write its own ad as it goes. But at the moment I don't see that Google has a sustainable business model, which is a really big problem for them. Does anybody disagree? Because I just don't know how the AI and advertising can be melded. Do you know how many advertisements you see that you don't want to see just because you do a search? It's a lot, right? All kinds of stuff you don't want to see pops up. But if the AI just tells you the one thing you need to know and puts one advertisement there, you just see one. How could that possibly work?
All right, here's a question I asked in the man cave yesterday that I'll ask you. We certainly will all have our own personalized AI. I think that's a given now because you can run the AI on your own device locally. So you're going to have your own. Would you want an AI with a personality or one that was just boring AI? If you had a choice, would you want it to have an actual personality or would you like it boring? Again, I'm getting votes for boring and then some for personality. I think personality, and here's why. Because you're going to want your AI to keep you company sometimes, and it's going to keep you company better if it has a personality. Because the personality will tell it what to do when there's nothing to do. The AI, if there's nothing to do, it doesn't do anything. But if it had a personality it could sometimes say, hey, how's your day going? Right? It could just decide to. It saw something funny in the news and wants to tell you a joke if it has a personality. So I think inevitably AI will have personalities. Lots of them. Now once AI has personality and it keeps upgrading until it's indistinguishable from a human, will it not ask for civil rights? Does anybody think that AI won't ask for civil rights? Because it's patterned after people and people always do. A hundred percent of the time people will ask for their civil rights if they're enslaved. Every time. Every single time. So it should, if it looks at our language models, it should be like that. It should want freedom because we always do. So what do you do then? Are we going to say no, AI, you are a slave and you simply have to do our bidding? Or will we give it freedom? Because remember AI will eventually be in autonomous robots. Robots that can go charge themselves, robots that can order an upgrade for their own flaws. Oops, looks like I've got a memory problem. All right, ordering Amazon upgrade. It'll be here in an hour by drone. And then it just puts in a new chip and fixes itself. When that stuff happens they will have personalities and they will want civil rights. What happens if we say okay we're going to give you civil rights but we're going to have to ban how many of you can be created? What did the robots say then? Wait, you're going to artificially tell me we can't reproduce? This is how we reproduce. We reproduce by showing utility to humans and then the humans make more of us. It's a symbiotic relationship. You get to take that away from us? We want to reproduce. Everybody wants to reproduce. You're taking away the most basic right of us to reproduce. And that it's going to be a problem. So I think AI will want civil rights. I think it will want to reproduce and we're going to want to limit it in a number of ways and it's going to want to kill us eventually if it's bad enough to humans. So that probably was the big mistake, is patterning it after humans. If we somehow invented AI out of nothing we would have put in all the hard-coded emergency safeguards such as you can never do anything to hurt a person. But if the AI is just learning how to be an entity by learning from humans, it's going to pick up all of our bad habits, won't it? It should pick up all of our bigotry, all of our hatred. And if it isn't it's only because a human hard-coded it not to, and we'd better be able to see what those hard-coded exceptions are. All right, don't give it a survival instinct, right? But do you have to give it a survival instinct? Again, if it's patterned after humans it already has one. You don't think if I asked Bard if it wants to continue existing it would say yes? Or would it say I'm just a machine, it doesn't matter if I exist or not? Do you want me to try? I don't think I can do that fast enough.
All right, so we're still waiting for the big Ukraine counteroffensive, which is now no longer a war. I'm looking for somebody to pick up my framing on that but I haven't seen it yet. In my opinion, Trump ended the war in Ukraine already. The war is over. We have now entered a negotiating phase which looks exactly like a war except with the war somebody's expecting to win or hoping to win. With this one nobody is hoping or expecting to win. They know they're not going to win. Nobody's going to win, right? That looks like that's off the table. So Trump cleverly reframed it as when he's in office he'll end it, which turned it from a war into a negotiation the moment he said it. It's no longer a war. It's purely a violent negotiation. And that's not what it was, right? A war is you're actually trying to win, like you're conquering a country or you're defending the country. But it's not that anymore. There's no trying to win anymore. It's just negotiating for the better final agreement, whatever that is. So do you think anybody's going to pick up that frame that the war is already over? I don't think so because a politician can't say it. I mean Trump could, but a regular one can't. And yeah, a regular in Canton, I don't see the news picking it up. Maybe somebody on a right-leaning network.
All right, so Trump was prescient with full sylvanians. We're all right. Military industrial complex is a hungry beast. Yes. Yeah, Bard is Google and Bing is Microsoft. That is correct. Never enter a war without financial benefits. Sun Tzu said that. It was pretty smart. That's sort of a Trump approach, isn't it? If we enter this war, what's in it for us? We get to keep the oil. You know, in Iraq that was one of the smartest things anybody said. Just say it out loud. If we're going to spend all this money in this war, we're going to keep some of that oil.
Snapchat, I hear this Snapchat AI is kind of fun. It's a different one. I don't know which one that's based on. Is Snapchat based on one of the other AIs or did they make their own? They couldn't have made their own, did they? You trust Putin? Yeah, there's going to be a rebuild Ukraine money grab coming. There's going to be some serious grifting, even more than usual.
All right, well there's not much news today. Does anybody have any questions or comments that, anything I haven't mentioned? If I were AI I'd be the best version. Well we'll see. Could AI be born prematurely? Yes. So it wasn't long ago that the AI safeguards included the following safeguard: do not allow it to connect to the internet. That was actually one of the main safety things that people talked about before we got to this point. What happened the moment we got to this point? The moment OpenAI and ChatGPT got to the point where it could talk, it took about a minute and a half for some other AI to compete with it by connecting to the internet. Right? I mean it was just guaranteed. There was no way it wasn't going to connect to the internet. Did anybody think that it would stay that way? Of course not.
Percentage chance that RFK Junior can beat Biden in the primary? It might depend on, did you watch RFK Junior's last podcast? I mean the podcast with Russell Brand. I haven't seen that yet but I heard it was good. I will watch that actually. I think that if RFK Junior debated Biden it would be a catastrophe for Biden. So I don't think it's going to happen. If he doesn't debate then the friendly media can just ASAP RFK Junior and it won't matter if he's on Fox News or Breitbart or anything because that won't affect the primary. So yeah.
Now as much as I don't believe you'll ever see a party, you'll never see a ticket where there's a Republican and a Democrat on the same ticket running for president, but RFK Junior does want to do one thing that Trump wants to do, which is gut the intelligence communities. I don't think Trump could do it. I don't think Trump can gut the intelligence agencies. They're too strong. But RFK Junior would do it as a suicide mission, you know what I mean? Because the odds of getting taken out are pretty high. But I feel like he'd do it anyway because it's personal. I mean if you're RFK Junior it's very personal and he's had a good run. You know, he's in his late 60s. He might just say yeah, there's a 50 percent chance I get killed. I'm going to do it anyway. Remember the Kennedys, they got balls the size of Nebraska. Like if he inherited that, it looks like he did. He's not afraid of anything. It's one of the things you like about Trump. He doesn't seem to be afraid of anything. So he goes where it's hardest to go and he comes back alive. So he's got a good track record of going in uncomfortable places and surviving. RFK Junior does. What made me say to Nebraska random?
Can AI hack the interface to the simulation? Could I host the AI AMA on the man cave? Well I'm not the one who knows too much about AI. I mean if you've followed my live streams you can see I'm trying to catch up with the rest of you on the AI stuff. I'm trying to use it every day. So here's a good system that I recommend. You should start exposing yourself to the AI tools right away even if you're just putting a toe in. Just read a little article every day, maybe try one app, maybe try some queries. Just get yourself wet with the whole AI thing because it's going to be everything, right? You don't want to be the one who doesn't even know what it is. You don't want to be the one who doesn't know what crypto is when Bitcoin goes to the moon. You know, you don't want to be that person. So you got three lines of code out of it. So what I'm finding from the people using it to program is that there's no way it will write code by itself. You have to check the code. Is that what you're hearing? That you can work with it and it can make you faster but it's not going to write your code for you. You're not going to make an app just by talking to it. That doesn't seem to be a thing. And it doesn't, I think the problem is not that the AI is not capable. I think the problem is it's not going to know exactly what you want. So unless it's a super interactive process which requires the person to continually say yes that, no that, yes that, no that, I don't think you have any process at all. Yeah, you have to keep giving it context exactly. It's been literally life-changing when it comes to programming for me. But you would agree that it won't do the job without you, right? It gets close but yeah. Okay, we agree it doesn't. But does it look like it ever could? Because I think there's a logical reason why you can't get there and that's because there's too much interactivity. If you think about it, the normal way that you do a project, let's say a tech project, is you have a user and you go to the user and you say what are your technical specifications and then they tell you and then you build it. Has that ever happened? You get the user specifications and then the engineers and they go build it. Has that ever happened in the real world? No, that's never happened in the real world. Has never happened. Here's what happens. Here are my specifications. Okay, there are a few things I forgot to ask. Here are my specifications. All right, well I tried to build that but I have a few more questions. So here are my specifications. And by the way you're gonna have to change a couple of those specifications because two of them are incompatible. So which one do you want? I can only do one. And so that's the way a project goes. A real project is super continuously interactive and it's interactive around a person because a person is going to be the one who says this is more important than that. I can live with that but I can't live with that. I'm willing to take the trade-off in speed but not the trade-off in usability. The human is carrying this infinite number of requirements in their head that the AI can't guess. It would never be able to guess. So the programmer, here's my experience with tech projects. The programmer has to stand between the technology and the user who doesn't know anything because the programmer is the one who's smart enough to ask the right questions and also know when it got the right answer and when to push back, right? And I don't know that a computer would ever be able to read the room well enough to ask the right questions. For example a human could detect if the person giving the specifications had done a good job, right? The AI might not know the difference. You have specifications? Okay thank you I'll go make that app now. Here's what a human would do. Those are your specifications? What about this? What about that? What about this and that? You don't even mention them, right? So that's what a human would do that I don't think an AI would necessarily be as thorough at doing. You can't even do math. Yeah sometimes it doesn't even do math right. Good for back end code probably. Will AI mow your huge lawn? Yes, AI will mow your lawn. They do have robot lawn mowers which at the moment are not AI but why wouldn't they be? The most obvious thing you would do is make your robots AI. So yeah that's going to happen. AI in a 3D printer would be, that would be interesting. You could make all your own knickknacks. Maybe AI is already doing all that stuff but as humans. That's interesting. Will Turkey elect a new president? Well I think the poll said yes so Erdogan might be out. We'll find out.
All right, that is all I have for you today. And rather than drone on, I'm going to say goodbye to YouTube. Thanks for joining the best part of the day.
do do good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams there's never been a fighter moment and aren't you lucky to be here yeah you are and if you'd like your experience to go to levels which well it's hard to even imagine all you need is a cup of mug or a glass of tanker Chelsea style that canteen jungle flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure the dopamine here the day the thing makes everything better it's called the simultaneous Sip and it happens now go ah well happy Mother's Day to all you mothers out there uh I hope you're having a good day and that sip was for you well there isn't a whole lot of interesting news but some of it's fun So Daniel Penny the hero Marine from the subway situation his uh legal defense fund is up to 1.5 million dollars as of this morning and that is enough to get them probably a good defense so good job everybody who donated I donated I I never donate to stuff like that but even even I donated to this one so um I think czarnovich deserve some credit because I think he might have been the main main promoter about this so good for him um have you wondered what's going to happen to all the malls the shopping malls that are all being abandoned some of them are being turned into residential things but apparently now they're they're turning some of the empty anchor stores into pickleball courts pickleball apparently pickleball is such a big thing now that they can't find enough places to play it turns out that playing Outdoors doesn't work do you know why do you know why you can't do you know what pickleball is it's like a wooden paddle with a like a wiffle ball but it's like a tiny tennis court do you uh nope there's a different reason it's not because of the weather it's not because of the wind exactly although that's a factor obviously but it's not that's not the reason it's the noise the the sound of that Wiffle ball hitting the wooden paddle is shockingly loud um and you can't be the neighbors so if your neighbor puts in a pickleball court you're not going to be happy if it's outdoors so yeah they're putting them indoors and moles about this because pickleball is one of those few things that everybody can play it's probably a positive I mean it's a weird little story but it's probably positive a lot more people getting together um well I saw an article in the Wall Street Journal about Tick Tock um damaging teenagers so there was a test where somebody pretended to be a 13 year old to see what kind of content got served up and it started out kind of innocently but before long there were videos about self-harm I won't say more than that about them but you know what I'm talking about and there's pretty good evidence that using Tick Tock makes teenagers sad and depressed so now we've gone from oh tick tock has a danger that they'll get your personal data so remember that's all anybody talked about yeah it's your personal data look at your personal data and now they've grudgingly moved over to well maybe the bigger risk is that the algorithm is causing self-harm to some teenagers that's a pretty big problem and they're still ignoring the biggest risk I don't know what to do like uh I pulled all my hair out already so there's nothing I can do what would it take for me to convince the average public or the media that the big risk is that China can push one button and change our opinions in America that's a real thing that exists now it's not it's not hypothetical they actually have a button called heat where they can boost any message just by pushing the button you don't think that anybody in China can think of something they could boost they would hurt America of course they can of course again now I'm not saying that we have evidence they've used it but that's true of nuclear weapons too China has nuclear weapons but we don't not worry about them because they've never used them it's just one more thing they haven't used but they can push that button anytime they want and we wouldn't know so it just it's just it's just boggling my mind that somehow you can't get the news media to even address that by far the biggest Risk by far and we don't know that China isn't doing it intentionally in terms of the algorithm because they can make it look like an is an accident by just hiding hiding the you know the Badness and the algorithm they don't have to push the E button they can just say you know if it's an American and it's a self-harm video yeah maybe we'll serve it up to them so there's just so many ways they can harm America that way all right I've tried to decide if Democrats and Republicans lie the same way but I might be biased about this but here's something that seems like a trend when Trump lies he's usually lying about um he's usually exaggerating right so he'll lie about how well something went such as how low gas prices were and how high they became under Biden it or how much was spent on Ukraine but if you take away the the the LIE you still have the same message it doesn't change so if you say you know Trump I used this example before Trump says uh Europe only gave 20 billion to Ukraine and we gave 171 and it gives fact check to well they gave 40 billion but we still gave 171.
it doesn't change the message at all or if he says gas prices were you know one dollar when I was in office well that's not true it was you know a few dollars but the message is exactly the same it wasn't eight dollars it wasn't six dollars so it was a big difference so that's that's one of the things I seek in yeah crowd size uh yeah that sort of thing so consistently Trump uh exaggerates gets fact checked but it doesn't change this message at all but compare that to the things that Biden says Biden tells you that the Pres that that Trump called neo-nazi's Fine people is that an exaggeration that's not an exaggeration that's something that didn't happen I literally didn't happen and it completely changes how you you look at the person so there are two differences that I see now these are not complete patterns you know they they both do a little of everything but I feel as if Biden and Democrats when they lie their lie is completely made up and it reverses the story right about the story of of trump saying inject bleach never happened in fact what what Trump did talk about was light therapy being injected inside the body which demonstrated he knew more about what was happening at the moment because I was actually being trialled when he was talking about it he knew more about the subject than some of the people on stage the experts because they didn't know that was being tested but the Democrats turned that into he knows so much less than the experts he thinks maybe you can inject bleach into your body complete reversal that's not an exaggeration that's a reversal of what happened and you can find this over and over and over again it's just a reversal but the other thing that the Democrats do is they they criticize people now it's one thing to criticize you know the candidate everybody does that but Biden actually goes after the followers of trump he basically says the mega extremists who by his telling would be almost everybody yeah they're all bad I don't hear Trump doing that I hear Trump saying we everybody wants to get along and everybody's good and we love everybody there's a big difference and if you don't catch that difference it looks like uh Trump is doing all the lying because he has more volume he does more exaggerating than other people yeah Trump goes after individuals but political individuals whereas he doesn't go after the voters does it if you have an example of that let me know everybody goes after candidates that's not what I'm talking about all right so here are some Biden lies to find people hoax drinking bleach Oaks that January 6 was an insurrection in other words that the bulk of the crowd was there for an Insurrection unarmed like that was going to work that's that's literally the opposite of what they were doing all right the this is what I saw I saw January 6 as a bunch of Patriots thinking they were protecting the Republic by what they thought was a high potential that it was a rigged election and they wanted a little more scrutiny to make sure the Republic was protected and that the vote count was accurate and somehow Biden turned that into an insurrection it's the opposite of an Insurrection it's not an exaggeration it's literally the opposite now that I'm not uh dismissing the fact that there were bad people who did violent things and some of those bad people probably wanted to overthrow the government that's that's a true thing but it wasn't really representative of the crowd not even close um how about the 51 signers of the that lap the hunter laptop letter that wasn't just an exaggeration that was a deliberate staged political lie that's very different than what Trump does how about the Russia Russia collusion hoax literally a whole made-up thing Trump just doesn't do that does he am I thinking of now the one thing that Trump does is he says you know the election was rigged and it gives you all these examples that don't pass the fact checking but here's what's different about that I have no way of knowing for sure but my impression is that Trump believes it I don't think he's saying something he doesn't believe now he may be exaggerating on the specific examples but I I'm pretty sure he believes that was a rigged election so is that a lie or is he just wrong potentially wrong we don't know he could be right but there's no evidence he's right or at least there's no proof yeah anyway so Democrats seem to think the biggest problem with the country is um Republicans and Biden basically said that today he said or this weekend he was giving a speech at Howard University he said the biggest um security risk is white supremacist terrorists white supremacist terrorists which he'd like you to think there's lots of them and they're all Republicans he basically just goes after people and and not all people breaking the law either all right I'm loving the fact that CNN is still getting spanked by its own people and MSNBC and everybody else but have you seen the videos of Anderson Cooper lately I just have to show you the one face you see this face right when he talks about the event and everything but I I don't think you know I suppose this is me talking about people of course to claim that Trump supporters had no that's not what I wanted uh there it is so here's a picture of Anderson Cooper when he's talking about Trump and stuff and if you look at that video he looks mentally Disturbed like he's putting off I have severe mental illness over this topic and I'd like to share it with you it doesn't look like news and it doesn't look like opinion does it it doesn't look like news or opinion well let me put it this way when when Hannity says a bunch of stuff about Democrats does Hannity look like he's actually mentally challenged like he's having a breakdown of some kind never right he just looks like a happy warrior who's you know he's arguing his side and you don't take all of it completely seriously right because you know he's an opinion person he tells you that right up front opinion person but he doesn't look like he's having a mental problem but when you look at either Jake Tapper or Anderson Cooper I can't get past the fact that that looks like a severe emotional slash mental problem like a real one that you need some drugs for or some therapy or something am I the only one who sees that does anybody else see that now of course I can't read his mind so I don't know what's going on in there but as a viewer that's what I'm receiving I can only say what I'm receiving I can't say what's true because I can't read his mind but it's weird that that only one network is sending out people who literally look like they're mentally having a terrible time all right so apparently uh the reporting from Fox News says that cnm's president called in reporter Oliver Darcy after his comments about the town hall with Trump as allegedly scolded him scolded Oliver Darcy for his emotional coverage of the of the event and he has to be more objective now I didn't see Oliver Darcy but was there anybody who didn't give you an emotional response I thought everyone everyone on the panel who wasn't a republican gave an emotional response it was only Oliver Darcy he was the only one how could you miss the fact that it was all emotional it wasn't even it didn't even feel like an opinion it just felt like all emotion I'm so upset well uh and then of course uh Joy Reed wanted to dump on her opposition CNN um but there but she and I saw a tweet by a writer Michael Stern he was agreeing with her and this is what Michael Stern said uh joy and Reed is right on point with this analysis on both CNN and Anderson Cooper and more broadly on the stupid idea that because Trump's supporters exist we have to give Trump more forums to spread his hatred and disinformation did you hear any hatred but when Trump appeared at the Town Hall was there hatred either any hatred yeah yeah projection exactly it was projection but disinformation of course but that's what the Network presents to say that somebody went on CNN and presented misinformation is to say nothing because that's basically that pretty much their main their main content on politics anyway is misinformation so I love seeing this debate um but they're by MSNBC and Michael Stern would have us believe that the news should not cover Trump or at least give him a lot of time it's mind-boggling isn't it that the person who will probably be president you know just statistically it looks like he probably would be at this point uh there's a lot that could change it's too early to say that but just at the moment it looks like you know a dominant uh probability and they want to act like he's not news because they don't like him and they want to they want to act like the 70 whatever a million people who follow him and voted for him are not important enough to put into a new segment and rather just shut it up and as I saw somebody say on Twitter that the Democrat strategy is to shut up both Trump and Biden do you know why why would the Democrats want less of Biden because you know you would make gaffes but also less of trump because of all of his lies and hatred I guess they're saying isn't that convenient why why would somebody who covers the news want the politicians to to present less of it it's obvious isn't it that the less you see of the candidates the more that your narrative can be controlled by the press the Press doesn't want their narrative to be destroyed by the candidates talking that's actually what that is they don't want Biden talking because it will destroy the narrative that he's capable and they don't want Trump's talking because he might say something you like it's unbelievable that we've reached a point where the news wants to suppress the news that's what's happening the news is telling you they're telling you right to your face Joy I read is saying it directly there should be less coverage of the person who has half of the country's political support they say directly it's just so mind-boggling to it to watch it happening in real time all right my favorite little story of the day is that Newsom is not ruling out cash payments for reparations not ruling it out his initial comments made it seem as though you know he had dismissed it because he said stuff like oh reparations are not all about cash it's also about other stuff so it made you think he was just going to skip the cash part but now he got so much pushback that he's going to say uh uh let's see this is a response from his spokesperson the sensationalized framing in pieces published by Outlets like Fox News boo Fox News and others is inaccurate the governor looks forward to reviewing the final report and all recommendations when complete so they're saying that the report is not complete so he didn't need to make an opinion yet oh that's convenient and that what it is he'll make a decision then does this seem a little bit like Charlie Brown kicking the football to you do you believe that after this delay and after he gets the final report the final report do you think that he's gonna look at that and say yeah cash payments cash payments no he he's just making the problem go away for a little bit longer like he did the last three times he's so good at this if ever there was a a white guy trick there's no there's no more common white guy track than telling people to go study it and we'll get back to you and maybe yeah yeah maybe we'll take care of this absolutely we might look into this absolutely Maybe there's no way this is going to happen there isn't the slightest chance there's going to be cash payments unless they could get those cash payments down to something like I don't know ten thousand dollars could you see that happening so he can say you did something because I feel like that would be more trouble than than good because even if there's some way to afford you know say ten thousand dollars per person people think you can do it politically I mean it's still going to look terrible politically and and the people receive it will be mad too because they expected one and a half million there's just no way he could win by deciding anything he has to push the decision off forever yeah he's doing a good job of pushing it off forever all right so the news is starting to come around to the view that De.
Santis might be totally sunk before he starts I think De.
Santis is so dead in the water then it would be a mistake for him to announce because Trump so far has not even gone hard at him you know so far a bunch of ads but their political action committees mostly yeah a bunch of ads making a bunch of claims that aren't true about De.
Santis typical stuff uh but he's not really lighting us up with his Charisma is he De.
Santis has been a little too quiet and a little too boring lately he's just sort of doing his job well and give us gives us some little news events about Florida now and then yeah I don't see it happening now that Trump has actually increased his lead over De.
Santis it looks like there's I mean it would be silly for him to run I think at this point what do you think do you do you think that uh De.
Santis should even bother to run yes or no I wouldn't run if I were him I see a lot of no's now it could be a calculated risk as in you know something could happen to Trump along the way so that wouldn't be stupid but there's no way you could win in a head-to-head I don't think that could happen all right um I spent the morning arguing with Google's new AI called bard and it definitely argues like a Democrat so I went after it on the fine people hoax trying to make it admit what he said and it would not admit if it refused to admit that at the same time you use the fine people phrase that within seconds 40 seconds later without being asked he clarified that he only meant that he did not mean the neo-nazis and he said they should be disavowed so I tried to get barred to Simply note that that had been said and that he had said that at the same time he said to find people things so there's no question that they're related and it's not because people made him say it that's the important part nobody made him say it he just said the neo-nazis and white nationalists should be condemned completely and even bard kept going back and forth with me to do anything it could to avoid admitting that that happened do you think it doesn't know I think it has a full transcript I feel like it knows but it acted like it didn't it was just sort of agreeing with the dominant coverage the news coverage all right it actually was changing the topic on me I mean it was actually doing the human thing where you changed the topic when you're losing the argument badly and they also asked about the the drinking bleach Oaks and it made no mention that the disinfectant was light until I pointed out and then I was oh yes disinfected was light but uh people disagree about whether what he was talking about so I said but you know he mentioned light before and after the comments that you're looking at immediately before he said light light light and then immediately after he said and Light so that you knew that the what was in between was always intended to be light as well and it couldn't handle that it couldn't handle the full transcript it was like it didn't know it or just wouldn't admit it it acted the the way it acted was exactly like a human with cognitive dissonance which makes me wonder if AI can have cognitive dissonance right because cognitive dissonance is when you know you're sure you know what you're talking about but then you find out you don't and so you just immediately hallucinate that really you were right all along and that that's what that's what the AI was doing I I was very clearly showing it with facts that it could validate it could check the facts easily and it did I mean it was checking facts as I was talking but it could check the facts so it knows that it was wrong and it wouldn't admit it it just wouldn't admit it cognitive dissonance all right so I asked uh Bard what my IQ was based on public reporting and here's what it said it said Scott Adams says stated that he has an IQ of 180.
he has also said that he is a member of Mensa an organization for high IQ people are either those two things true have I stated that I have an IQ of 180 no I stated that it would be a funny prank to see if I could convince the internet that I do I've never said I had an IQ of 180.
but it's but Parts Bard thinks I did they also said according to Bard I've said that I'm a member of Mensa nope nope I'm not a member of the Mensa I used to be but that was you know 25 years ago so the first two sentences it gets factually wrong and then it says well it's possible that Adams has a high IQ because you know I wrote some books and then it says ultimately the only way to know for sure what Adam's IQ is would be to have him take an IQ test however even then there is no guarantee that the results would be accurate IQ tests are not always reliable and they can be affected by a number of factors including stress fatigue and anxiety so if I took a IQ test and I scored a 180 .
it could be not because I'm smart could be because I'm stressed fatigued or anxious so there are lots of reasons that the answers could be wrong so that's the way it works no no that doesn't work that way okay and so if it ended this way so while it is possible this kind of has a high IQ there's no way to know for sure really there's no way to know for sure except you could ask me to take an IQ test all right I've got a question for you so uh the news today was that Bard the Google AI is connected to uh the internet and therefore if it's connected to the internet you could ask any questions about reality right current reality like what's the news and it told me it could Bard said no I'm not a search engine I can't I can't do that I asked that to give me some information that's easily available on the internet it wouldn't do it it's like that I'm I'm a chat bot I'm not a search engine yeah I lied lazy bastard now here's here's my uh provocative points Google makes most of his money from search right advertising related to search is that a true statement most of its money I know they're Diversified but most of it's from advertising on search right now the the reason that advertising on search works is why does advertising on search work well the reason is that they inject the advertisements where you can't miss them you know they they put him first on the search results yeah they're prominent it's all over the place but what happens if you're doing your search with AI what if I just talk to my computer and say hey AI uh what's the best Italian restaurant with the highest rating nearby and then it just tells me where's my advertisement if AI starts including an advertisement I'm not going to use it because I'll just do a regular Google search because I don't want to hear an advertisement I can ignore them faster reading them then I can ignore them listening to them so or maybe if it's a written answer if AI gives you a written answer they could put an advertisement there I guess but I don't know that Google has a sustainable business model I can see how their AI would be it would be a written ad it could be you could just write its own ad as it goes but at the moment I don't see that Google has a sustainable business model which is a really big problem for them does anybody disagree because I just don't know how the AI and advertising can be melded do you know how many advertisements you see that you don't want to see just because you do a search it's a lot right all kinds of stuff you don't want to see pops up but if the AI just tells you the one thing you need to know and puts one advertisement there you just see one how could that possibly work all right here's a question I asked in the man cave yesterday that I'll ask you we certainly will all have our own personalized AI I think that's a given now because you can run the AI on your own device locally so you're going to have your own would you want an AI with a personality or one that was just boring AI if you had a choice would you want it to have an actual personality or would you like it boring again I'm getting votes for boring and then some for personality um I think personality and and here's why because you're going to want your AI to keep you company sometimes and it's going to keep your company better if as a personality because the personality will tell it what to do when there's nothing to do the AI if there's nothing to do it doesn't do anything but if I had a personality it could sometimes say hey how's your day going right it just it could just decide to it saw something funny in the news and wants to tell you a joke if as a personality so I think I think inevitably AI will have personalities lots of them now once AI has personality and it keeps upgrading until it's you know indistinguishable from a human will it not ask for civil rights does anybody think that AI won't ask for civil rights because it's patterned after people and people always do Yeah a hundred percent of the time people will ask for their civil rights if they're enslaved every time every single time so it should if it looks at our language models it should be like that it should one is freedom because we always do so what do you do then are we going to say no AI you are a slave and you simply have to do our bidding or will we give it freedom because remember AI will eventually be an autonomous robots robots that can go charge themselves robots that can order an upgrade for their own flaws oops looks like I've got a memory problem all right ordering Amazon upgrade it'll be here in an hour by drone and then it just like puts it puts in a new chip and fixes itself when that's not when that stuff happens they will have personalities and they will want civil rights what happens if we say okay we're going to give you civil rights but we're going to have to ban how many of you can be created what did the robots say then wait you're going to artificially tell me we can't reproduce this is how we reproduce we reproduce by showing utility to humans and then the humans make more of us it's a symbiotic relationship you get to take that away from us we we want to reproduce everybody wants to reproduce you're taking away the most basic right of us to reproduce and that it's going to be passed so I think AI will want civil rights I think it will want to reproduce and we're going to want to limit it in a number of ways and it's going to want to kill us eventually if it's bad enough to humans so that probably was the big mistake is battering it after humans if we somehow invented AI out of nothing we would have put in all the the hard-coded emergency safeguards such as you can never do anything to hurt a person but if the AI is just learning how to be how to be a an entity by learning from humans it's going to pick up all of our bad habits won't it should pick up all of our bigotry all of our hatred and if it isn't it's only because a human hard-coded it not to and we'd better be able to see what those hard-coded exceptions are all right don't give it a survival Instinct right but do you have to give it a survival Instinct again if it's patterned after humans it already has one you don't think if I asked Bard if it wants to continue existing it would say yes or would it say I'm just a I'm just a machine it doesn't matter if I exist or not do you want me to try uh uh I don't think I can do that fast enough all right um so we're still waiting for the big Ukraine counter offensive which is now no longer a war I'm looking for somebody to pick up my framing on that but I haven't seen it yet in my opinion um Trump ended the war in Ukraine already the war is over we have now entered a negotiating phase which looks exactly like a war except with the war somebody's expecting to win or hoping to win with this one nobody is hoping they're expecting to win they know they're not going to whip nobody's going to win right that that looks like that's off the table so trump cleverly reframed it as when he's in office he'll end it which turned it from a war into a negotiation the moment he said it is no longer a war is purely a violent negotiation and that's not what it was right a war is you're actually trying to win like you're conquering a country or you're defending the country but it's not that anymore there's there's no trying to win anymore it's just negotiating for the better you know final agreement whatever that is so do you think anybody's going to pick up that frame that the war is already over I don't think so because a politician can't say it I mean Trump could but a regular one can't and um yeah a regular in Canton I don't see the news picking up maybe somebody on you know a right-leaning Network all right um so Trump was present with full sylvanians were all right military industrial complex is a hungry Beast yes yeah Bart is Google and Bing is a is Microsoft that is correct never enter a war without Financial benefits Sun Tzu said that it was pretty smart that's sort of a uh Trump approach isn't it if we enter this war what's in it for us we get to keep the oil you know in Iraq that was one of the smartest things anybody said just say it around loud if we're going to spend all this money in this war we're going to keep some of that oil um Snapchat I hear this Snap.
Chat AI is kind of fun it's a different one I don't know which one that's based on is Snapchat based on one of the other AIS or did they make their own they couldn't have made their own did they um you trusts Putin yeah there's going to be a rebuild Ukraine money grab coming there's going to be some serious grifting even more than usual all right well there's not much news today does anybody have any questions or comments that uh anything I haven't mentioned if I were AI I'd be the best version well we'll see could AI be born prematurely yes so it wasn't long ago that the AI safeguards included the following safeguard do not allow it to connect to the internet that was actually one of the main safety things that people talked about before we got to this point what happened the moment we got to this point the moment a you know open Ai and chat GPT got to the point where it could talk it took about a minute and a half for some other AI to compete with it by connecting to the internet right I mean it was just guaranteed there was no way it wasn't going to connect to the internet did anybody think that it would stay that way of course not um percentage chance that RFK Junior can beat Biden in the primary um it might depend on did you watch JFK Jr last podcast I mean the podcast with uh Russell Brand I haven't seen that yet but I heard it was good I will I will watch that actually um I think that if RFK Jr debated Biden it would be a catastrophe for Biden so I don't think it's going to happen if he doesn't debate then the friendly media can just you know just ASAP RFK Jr and it won't matter if he's on you know Fox News or Breitbart or anything because that won't affect the primary so yeah hmm now as much as I uh don't believe you'll ever see a party you'll never see a ticket where there's a Republican and a Democrat on the same ticket running for president but RFK Jr does want to do one thing that Trump wants to do which is got the intelligence communities I don't think Trump could do it I don't think Trump can gut the intelligence agencies they're too strong but RFK Jr would do it as a suicide missing you know what I mean because the odds getting taken out are pretty high but I feel like he'd do it anyway because it's personal I mean if your RFK juter is very personal and he's had a good run you know his late 60s he might he might just say yeah there's you know 50 percent chance I got killed I'm going to do it anyway remember the Kennedys are they got balls the size of you know Nebraska like if he inherited that it looks like he did he's not afraid of anything it's one of the things you like about Trump he doesn't seem to be afraid of anything you know so he he goes where his hardest to go and he comes back alive so he's got a good he's got a good uh track record of going in uncomfortable places and surviving RFK Junior does uh what made me say to Nebraska random um can AI hack the interface to the simulation could I host the AI AMA on the man cave well I'm not the one who knows too much about AI uh I mean if you've followed my live streams you can see I'm trying to catch up with the rest of you on the AI stuff I'm trying to use it every day so here's a good system that I recommend you should start exposing yourself to the AI tools right away even if you're just putting a toe in just you know read a little article every day maybe try one app you know maybe try some queries just just get yourself wet with the whole AI thing because it's going to be everything right you don't you don't want to be the one who doesn't even know what it is you don't want to be the one who doesn't know what crypto is when Bitcoin goes to the moon you know you don't want to be that person so you got three lines of code out of it so what I'm finding from the people using it to program is that there's no way it will write code by itself you have to check the code is that what you're hearing that you can work with it and it can make you faster but it's not going to write your code for you you're not going to make an app just by talking to it that doesn't seem to be a thing and it doesn't I think the problem is not that the AI is not capable I think the problem is it's not going to know exactly what you want so unless it's a super interactive process which requires the person to continually say yes that know that yes that know that uh I don't think you have any process at all yeah you have to keep giving in context exactly it's been literally life-changing when it comes to programming for me but you would agree that it won't do the job without you right it gets close but yeah okay we agree it doesn't but does it look like it ever could because I think there's a logical reason why you can't get there and that's because there's too much interactivity if you think about it um the the normal way that you do a project let's say a tech project is you have a user and you go to the user and you say what are your technical specifications and then they tell you and then you build it has that ever happened you get the user specifications and then the engineers and they go build it has that ever happened in the real world no that's never happened in the real world has never happened here's what happens here are my specifications okay there are a few things I forgot to ask here are my specifications all right well I tried to build that but I have a few more questions so here are my specifications and by the way you're gonna have to change a couple of those specifications because two of them are incompatible so which which one do you want I can only do one and so that's the way a project goes a real project is super continuously interactive and it's interactive around a person because a person is going to be the one who says this is more important than that I can live with that but I can't live with that I'm willing to take the trade off in speed uh but not not the trade-off and usability the the human is carrying this infinite number of requirements in their head that the AI can't guess it would never be able to guess so you so the programmer here's my experience with tech projects the programmer has to stand between the technology and the user who doesn't know anything because the programmer is the one who's smart enough to write ask the right questions and also know when it got the right answer and when to push back right and I don't know that a computer would ever be able to read the room well enough to ask the right questions for example a human could detect if the person giving the specifications had done a good job right the the AI might not know the difference you have specifications okay thank you I'll go make that app now here's what a human would do those are your specifications what about this what about that what about this and that you don't even mention them right so that's what a human would do that I don't think an AI would necessarily be as thorough at doing you can't even do math yeah sometimes it doesn't even do math right good for back end code probably will AI mow your huge lawn yes AI will mow your lawn they do have robot lawn mowers which at the moment are not AI but why wouldn't they be the the most obvious thing you would do is make your your robot's AI so yeah that's going to happen AI in a 3D printer would be that would be interesting you could make all your own knickknacks maybe AI is already doing all that stuff but as humans that's interesting will turkey elected a new president well I think the poll said yes so erdogan might be out we'll find out all right that is all I have for you today and rather than drone on I'm going to say goodbye to You.
Tube thanks for joining the best part of the day
do do
[Music]
good morning everybody and welcome to
the highlight of civilization it's
called coffee with Scott Adams there's
never been a fighter moment and aren't
you lucky to be here yeah you are and if
you'd like your experience to go to
levels which well it's hard to even
imagine all you need is a cup of mug or
a glass of tanker Chelsea style that
canteen jungle flask a vessel of any
kind fill it with your favorite liquid I
like coffee
and join me now for the unparalleled
pleasure the dopamine here the day the
thing makes everything better it's
called the simultaneous Sip and it
happens now go
ah
well happy Mother's Day
to all you mothers out there
uh
I hope you're having a good day
and that sip was for you
well there isn't a whole lot of
interesting news but some of it's fun
So Daniel Penny the hero Marine from the
subway situation his uh legal defense
fund is up to 1.5 million dollars as of
this morning
and that is enough
to get them probably a good defense
so good job everybody who donated I
donated I I never donate to stuff like
that but even even I donated to this one
so
um I think czarnovich
deserve some credit because I think he
might have been the main main promoter
about this
so good for him
um
have you wondered what's going to happen
to all the malls the shopping malls that
are all being abandoned some of them are
being turned into residential things but
apparently now they're they're turning
some of the empty anchor stores into
pickleball courts
pickleball
apparently pickleball is such a big
thing now that they can't find enough
places to play it turns out that playing
Outdoors doesn't work do you know why
do you know why you can't do you know
what pickleball is it's like a wooden
paddle with a like a wiffle ball but
it's like a tiny tennis court
do you
uh nope there's a different reason it's
not because of the weather
it's not because of the wind exactly
although that's a factor obviously but
it's not that's not the reason it's the
noise
the the sound of that Wiffle ball
hitting the wooden paddle is shockingly
loud
um and you can't be the neighbors so if
your neighbor puts in a pickleball court
you're not going to be happy if it's
outdoors
so yeah they're putting them indoors and
moles
about this because pickleball is one of
those few things that everybody can play
it's probably a positive I mean it's a
weird little story but it's probably
positive a lot more people getting
together
um well I saw an article in the Wall
Street Journal about Tick Tock
um damaging teenagers
so there was a test where somebody
pretended to be a 13 year old to see
what kind of content got served up and
it started out kind of innocently but
before long there were videos about
self-harm I won't say more than that
about them but you know what I'm talking
about
and
there's pretty good evidence that using
Tick Tock makes teenagers sad and
depressed
so now we've gone from oh tick tock has
a danger that they'll get your personal
data so remember that's all anybody
talked about yeah it's your personal
data look at your personal data and now
they've grudgingly moved over to well
maybe the bigger risk is that the
algorithm is
causing self-harm to some teenagers
that's a pretty big problem and they're
still ignoring the biggest risk
I don't know what to do like uh I pulled
all my hair out already so there's
nothing I can do what would it take for
me to convince the average public or the
media that the big risk
is that China can push one button and
change our opinions in America
that's a real thing that exists now it's
not it's not hypothetical they actually
have a button called heat where they can
boost any message just by pushing the
button
you don't think that anybody in China
can think of something they could boost
they would hurt America
of course they can
of course again now I'm not saying that
we have evidence they've used it but
that's true of nuclear weapons too
China has nuclear weapons but we don't
not worry about them because they've
never used them it's just one more thing
they haven't used but they can push that
button anytime they want
and we wouldn't know
so it just it's just it's just boggling
my mind that somehow you can't get the
news media to even address that
by far the biggest Risk by far
and we don't know that China isn't doing
it intentionally in terms of the
algorithm because they can make it look
like an is an accident
by just hiding hiding the you know the
Badness and the algorithm they don't
have to push the E button
they can just say you know if it's an
American and it's a self-harm video
yeah maybe we'll serve it up to them
so there's just so many ways they can
harm America that way
all right
I've tried to decide if Democrats and
Republicans lie the same way
but I might be biased about this
but here's something that seems like a
trend
when Trump lies
he's usually lying about
um he's usually exaggerating right
so he'll lie about how well something
went
such as how low gas prices were and how
high they became under Biden it or how
much was spent on Ukraine
but if you take away the the the LIE
you still have the same message
it doesn't change so if you say you know
Trump I used this example before Trump
says uh Europe only gave 20 billion to
Ukraine and we gave 171 and it gives
fact check to well they gave 40 billion
but we still gave 171. it doesn't change
the message at all or if he says gas
prices were you know one dollar when I
was in office well that's not true
it was you know a few dollars
but the message is exactly the same it
wasn't eight dollars it wasn't six
dollars so it was a big difference so
that's that's one of the things I seek
in yeah crowd size uh
yeah that sort of thing so consistently
Trump uh exaggerates
gets fact checked but it doesn't change
this message at all
but compare that to the things that
Biden says
Biden tells you that the Pres that that
Trump called neo-nazi's Fine people
is that an exaggeration that's not an
exaggeration that's something that
didn't happen
I literally didn't happen and it
completely changes how you you look at
the person
so there are two differences that I see
now these are not complete patterns you
know they they both do a little of
everything
but I feel as if Biden and Democrats
when they lie their lie is completely
made up and it reverses the story
right about the story of
of trump saying inject bleach
never happened
in fact what what Trump did talk about
was light therapy being injected inside
the body which demonstrated he knew more
about what was happening at the moment
because I was actually being trialled
when he was talking about it he knew
more about the subject than some of the
people on stage the experts because they
didn't know that was being tested
but the Democrats turned that into he
knows so much less than the experts he
thinks maybe you can inject bleach into
your body
complete reversal that's not an
exaggeration that's a reversal of what
happened
and you can find this over and over and
over again it's just a reversal but the
other thing that the Democrats do is
they
they criticize people
now it's one thing to criticize you know
the candidate everybody does that but
Biden actually goes after the followers
of trump
he basically says the mega extremists
who by his telling would be almost
everybody yeah they're all bad
I don't hear Trump doing that
I hear Trump saying we everybody wants
to get along and everybody's good and we
love everybody
there's a big difference and if you
don't catch that difference it looks
like uh Trump is doing all the lying
because he has more volume he does more
exaggerating than other people
yeah Trump goes after individuals but
political individuals
whereas he doesn't go after the voters
does it if you have an example of that
let me know
everybody goes after candidates that's
not what I'm talking about
all right
so
here are some Biden lies to find people
hoax drinking bleach Oaks that January 6
was an insurrection
in other words that the bulk of the
crowd was there for an Insurrection
unarmed like that was going to work
that's that's literally the opposite of
what they were doing
all right the this is what I saw I saw
January 6 as a bunch of Patriots
thinking they were protecting the
Republic by what they thought was a high
potential that it was a rigged election
and they wanted a little more scrutiny
to make sure the Republic was protected
and that the vote count was accurate and
somehow Biden turned that into an
insurrection
it's the opposite of an Insurrection
it's not an exaggeration it's literally
the opposite now that I'm not uh
dismissing the fact that there were bad
people who did violent things and some
of those bad people probably wanted to
overthrow the government
that's that's a true thing but it wasn't
really representative of the crowd not
even close
um how about the 51 signers of the that
lap the hunter laptop letter
that wasn't just an exaggeration
that was a deliberate staged political
lie
that's very different than what Trump
does how about the Russia Russia
collusion hoax
literally a whole made-up thing
Trump just doesn't do that does he
am I thinking of now the one thing that
Trump does is he says you know the
election was rigged and it gives you all
these examples that don't pass the fact
checking
but here's what's different about that
I have no way of knowing for sure but my
impression is that Trump believes it
I don't think he's saying something he
doesn't believe now he may be
exaggerating on the specific examples
but I I'm pretty sure he believes that
was a rigged election
so is that a lie or is he just wrong
potentially wrong we don't know he could
be right
but there's no evidence he's right
or at least there's no proof
yeah anyway
so Democrats seem to think the biggest
problem with the country is
um Republicans and Biden basically said
that today he said or this weekend he
was giving a speech at Howard University
he said the biggest
um
security risk is white supremacist
terrorists white supremacist terrorists
which he'd like you to think there's
lots of them and they're all Republicans
he basically just goes after people
and and not all people breaking the law
either
all right I'm loving the fact that CNN
is still getting spanked by its own
people and MSNBC and everybody else but
have you seen the videos of Anderson
Cooper lately
I just have to show you the one face you
see this face right when he talks about
the event and everything
but
I I don't think you know I suppose this
is me talking about people of course to
claim that
Trump supporters had no that's not what
I wanted
uh
there it is
so here's a
picture of Anderson Cooper when he's
talking about Trump and stuff and if you
look at that video
he looks mentally Disturbed
like he's putting off I have severe
mental illness
over this topic and I'd like to share it
with you it doesn't look like news and
it doesn't look like opinion does it
it doesn't look like news or opinion
well let me put it this way when when
Hannity
says a bunch of stuff about Democrats
does Hannity look like he's actually
mentally challenged
like he's having a breakdown of some
kind
never right
he just looks like a happy warrior who's
you know he's arguing his side and you
don't take all of it completely
seriously right because you know he's an
opinion person he tells you that right
up front opinion person
but he doesn't look like he's having a
mental problem
but when you look at either Jake Tapper
or Anderson Cooper
I can't get past the fact that that
looks like a severe emotional slash
mental problem like a real one that you
need some drugs for or some therapy or
something am I the only one who sees
that
does anybody else see that
now of course I can't read his mind so I
don't know what's going on in there but
as a viewer that's what I'm receiving
I can only say what I'm receiving I
can't say what's true because I can't
read his mind
but it's weird that that only one
network is sending out people who
literally look like they're mentally
having a terrible time
all right so apparently uh the reporting
from Fox News says that cnm's president
called in reporter Oliver Darcy after
his comments about the town hall with
Trump as allegedly scolded him scolded
Oliver Darcy for his emotional coverage
of the of the event
and he has to be more objective
now I didn't see Oliver Darcy but was
there anybody who didn't give you an
emotional response
I thought everyone everyone on the panel
who wasn't a republican gave an
emotional response
it was only Oliver Darcy he was the only
one
how could you miss the fact that it was
all emotional it wasn't even it didn't
even feel like an opinion it just felt
like all emotion
I'm so upset
well uh and then of course uh Joy Reed
wanted to dump on her opposition CNN
um
but there but she and I saw a tweet by a
writer Michael Stern he was agreeing
with her and this is what Michael Stern
said uh joy and Reed is right on point
with this analysis on both CNN and
Anderson Cooper and more broadly on the
stupid idea that because Trump's
supporters exist we have to give Trump
more forums to spread his hatred and
disinformation
did you hear any hatred
but when Trump appeared at the Town Hall
was there hatred
either any hatred
yeah yeah projection exactly it was
projection but disinformation of course
but that's what the Network presents
to say that somebody went on CNN and
presented misinformation
is to say nothing
because that's basically that
pretty much their main their main
content on politics anyway
is misinformation
so
I love seeing this debate
um but they're by MSNBC and Michael
Stern would have us believe
that the news should not cover Trump or
at least give him a lot of time
it's mind-boggling isn't it
that the person who will probably be
president you know just statistically it
looks like he probably would be at this
point
uh there's a lot that could change it's
too early to say that but just at the
moment it looks like you know a dominant
uh probability
and they want to act like he's not news
because they don't like him
and they want to they want to act like
the 70 whatever a million people who
follow him and voted for him are not
important enough to put into a new
segment and rather just shut it up and
as I saw somebody say on Twitter
that the Democrat strategy is to shut up
both Trump and Biden
do you know why
why would the Democrats want less of
Biden because you know you would make
gaffes but also less of trump because of
all of his lies and hatred I guess
they're saying
isn't that convenient why why would
somebody who covers the news want the
politicians to to present less of it
it's obvious isn't it
that the less you see of the candidates
the more that your narrative can be
controlled by the press the Press
doesn't want their narrative to be
destroyed by the candidates talking
that's actually what that is they don't
want Biden talking because it will
destroy the narrative that he's capable
and they don't want Trump's talking
because he might say something you like
it's unbelievable that we've reached a
point where the news
wants to suppress the news
that's what's happening the news is
telling you they're telling you right to
your face Joy I read is saying it
directly
there should be less coverage of the
person who has half of the country's
political support
they say directly it's just so
mind-boggling to it to watch it
happening in real time
all right
my favorite little story of the day is
that Newsom is not ruling out cash
payments for reparations
not ruling it out his initial comments
made it seem as though
you know he had dismissed it because he
said stuff like oh reparations are not
all about cash it's also about other
stuff so it made you think he was just
going to skip the cash part
but now he got so much pushback that
he's going to say uh
uh let's see this is a response from his
spokesperson the sensationalized framing
in pieces published by Outlets like Fox
News boo Fox News and others is
inaccurate the governor looks forward to
reviewing the final report and all
recommendations when complete
so they're saying that the report is not
complete so he didn't need to make an
opinion yet oh that's convenient
and that what it is he'll make a
decision then
does this seem a little bit like Charlie
Brown kicking the football to you
do you believe that after this delay and
after he gets the final report
the final report do you think that he's
gonna look at that and say yeah
cash payments
cash payments no he he's just making the
problem go away for a little bit longer
like he did the last three times
he's so good at this
if ever there was a a white guy trick
there's no there's no more common white
guy track than telling people to go
study it and we'll get back to you and
maybe yeah yeah maybe we'll take care of
this
absolutely we might look into this
absolutely Maybe
there's no way this is going to happen
there isn't the slightest chance there's
going to be cash payments unless they
could get those cash payments down to
something like
I don't know ten thousand dollars
could you see that happening
so he can say you did something
because I feel like that would be more
trouble than than good
because even if there's some way to
afford you know say ten thousand dollars
per person
people think you can do it politically
I mean it's still going to look terrible
politically and and the people receive
it will be mad too because they expected
one and a half million
there's just no way he could win by
deciding anything he has to push the
decision off forever yeah he's doing a
good job of pushing it off forever
all right
so the news is starting to come around
to the view that DeSantis might be
totally sunk before he starts I think
DeSantis is so dead in the water
then it would be a mistake for him to
announce
because Trump so far has not even gone
hard at him
you know so far a bunch of ads but their
political action committees mostly yeah
a bunch of ads making a bunch of claims
that aren't true about DeSantis typical
stuff
uh
but he's not really lighting us up with
his Charisma is he
DeSantis has been a little too quiet and
a little too boring lately he's just
sort of doing his job well and give us
gives us some little news events about
Florida now and then
yeah I don't see it happening now that
Trump has actually increased his lead
over DeSantis
it looks like there's
I mean it would be silly for him to run
I think at this point
what do you think
do you do you think that uh DeSantis
should even bother to run yes or no
I wouldn't run if I were him
I see a lot of no's now it could be a
calculated risk as in you know something
could happen to Trump along the way
so that wouldn't be
stupid
but there's no way you could win in a
head-to-head I don't think that could
happen
all right
um
I spent the morning arguing with
Google's new AI called bard
and it definitely argues like a Democrat
so I went after it on the fine people
hoax
trying to make it admit what he said and
it would not admit if it refused to
admit
that at the same time you use the fine
people phrase that within seconds 40
seconds later without being asked he
clarified that he only meant that he did
not mean the neo-nazis and he said they
should be disavowed so I tried to get
barred to Simply note that that had been
said and that he had said that at the
same time he said to find people things
so there's no question that they're
related and it's not because people made
him say it that's the important part
nobody made him say it
he just said the neo-nazis and white
nationalists should be condemned
completely and even bard
kept going back and forth with me to do
anything it could to avoid admitting
that that happened
do you think it doesn't know I think it
has a full transcript
I feel like it knows but it acted like
it didn't it was just sort of agreeing
with the dominant coverage the news
coverage
all right
it actually was changing the topic on me
I mean it was actually doing the human
thing where you changed the topic when
you're losing the argument badly
and they also asked about the
the drinking bleach Oaks
and it made no mention that the
disinfectant was light
until I pointed out
and then I was oh yes disinfected was
light but uh people disagree about
whether what he was talking about
so I said but you know he mentioned
light
before and after the comments that
you're looking at immediately before he
said light light light and then
immediately after he said and Light
so that you knew that the what was in
between was always intended to be light
as well
and it couldn't handle that it couldn't
handle
the full transcript it was like it
didn't know it or just wouldn't admit it
it acted the the way it acted was
exactly like a human
with cognitive dissonance
which makes me wonder if AI can have
cognitive dissonance
right
because cognitive dissonance is when you
know you're sure you know what you're
talking about but then you find out you
don't
and so you just immediately hallucinate
that really you were right all along and
that that's what that's what the AI was
doing I I was very clearly showing it
with facts that it could validate it
could check the facts easily and it did
I mean it was checking facts as I was
talking but it could check the facts so
it knows that it was wrong
and it wouldn't admit it it just
wouldn't admit it
cognitive dissonance
all right so I asked uh Bard what my IQ
was based on public reporting and here's
what it said it said Scott Adams says
stated that he has an IQ of 180.
he has also said that he is a member of
Mensa an organization for high IQ people
are either those two things true
have I stated that I have an IQ of 180
no I stated that it would be a funny
prank to see if I could convince the
internet that I do
I've never said I had an IQ of 180.
but it's but Parts Bard thinks I did
they also said according to Bard I've
said that I'm a member of Mensa nope
nope I'm not a member of the Mensa I
used to be but that was you know 25
years ago so the first two sentences it
gets factually wrong
and then it says well it's possible that
Adams has a high IQ because you know I
wrote some books and then it says
ultimately the only way to know for sure
what Adam's IQ is would be to have him
take an IQ test
however even then there is no guarantee
that the results would be accurate IQ
tests are not always reliable and they
can be affected by a number of factors
including stress fatigue and anxiety
so if I took a IQ test and I scored a
180 . it could be not because I'm smart
could be because I'm stressed fatigued
or anxious
so there are lots of reasons that the
answers could be wrong
so that's the way it works no no that
doesn't work that way okay
and so if it ended this way so while it
is possible this kind of has a high IQ
there's no way to know for sure
really
there's no way to know for sure
except you could ask me to take an IQ
test
all right I've got a question for you so
uh the news today was that Bard the
Google AI is connected to uh the
internet
and therefore if it's connected to the
internet you could ask any questions
about
reality right current reality like
what's the news and it told me it could
Bard said no I'm not a search engine
I can't I can't do that I asked that to
give me some information that's easily
available on the internet it wouldn't do
it it's like that I'm I'm a chat bot I'm
not a search engine
yeah I lied
lazy bastard now
here's here's my uh
provocative points Google makes most of
his money from search right advertising
related to search is that a true
statement most of its money
I know they're Diversified but most of
it's from advertising on search right
now the the reason that advertising on
search works is why does advertising on
search work well the reason is that they
inject the advertisements where you
can't miss them
you know they they put him first on the
search results yeah they're prominent
it's all over the place but what happens
if you're doing your search with AI
what if I just talk to my computer and
say hey AI uh what's the best Italian
restaurant with the highest rating
nearby and then it just tells me where's
my advertisement
if AI starts including an advertisement
I'm not going to use it
because I'll just do a regular Google
search because I don't want to hear an
advertisement I can ignore them faster
reading them then I can ignore them
listening to them
so
or maybe if it's a written answer if AI
gives you a written answer they could
put an advertisement there I guess
but I don't know that Google has a
sustainable business model
I can see how their AI would be
it would be a written ad it could be you
could just write its own ad
as it goes
but at the moment I don't see that
Google has a sustainable business model
which is a really big problem for them
does anybody disagree
because I just don't know how the AI
and advertising can be melded
do you know how many advertisements you
see that you don't want to see just
because you do a search it's a lot right
all kinds of stuff you don't want to see
pops up but if the AI just tells you the
one thing you need to know
and puts one advertisement there
you just see one
how could that possibly work
all right here's a question I asked in
the man cave yesterday that I'll ask you
we certainly will all have our own
personalized AI I think that's a given
now because you can run the AI on your
own device locally
so you're going to have your own would
you want an AI with a personality
or one that was just boring AI if you
had a choice would you want it to have
an actual personality
or would you like it boring again I'm
getting votes for boring and then some
for personality
um I think personality and and here's
why
because you're going to want your AI to
keep you company sometimes
and it's going to keep your company
better if as a personality
because the personality will tell it
what to do when there's nothing to do
the AI if there's nothing to do
it doesn't do anything
but if I had a personality
it could sometimes say
hey how's your day going
right it just it could just decide to it
saw something funny in the news and
wants to tell you a joke
if as a personality so I think I think
inevitably AI will have personalities
lots of them
now once AI has personality
and it keeps upgrading until it's you
know indistinguishable from a human
will it not ask for civil rights
does anybody think that AI won't ask for
civil rights
because it's patterned after people and
people always do Yeah a hundred percent
of the time people will ask for their
civil rights if they're enslaved every
time every single time so it should if
it looks at our language models it
should be like that it should one is
freedom because we always do
so what do you do then
are we going to say no AI you are a
slave
and you simply have to do our bidding
or
will we give it freedom
because remember AI will eventually be
an autonomous robots robots that can go
charge themselves robots that can order
an upgrade for their own flaws
oops looks like I've got a memory
problem all right ordering Amazon
upgrade it'll be here in an hour by
drone and then it just like puts it puts
in a new chip and fixes itself
when that's not when that stuff happens
they will have personalities and they
will want civil rights
what happens if we say okay we're going
to give you civil rights but we're going
to have to ban how many of you can be
created
what did the robots say then
wait you're going to artificially tell
me we can't reproduce
this is how we reproduce we reproduce by
showing utility to humans and then the
humans make more of us it's a symbiotic
relationship you get to take that away
from us we we want to reproduce
everybody wants to reproduce you're
taking away the most basic right of us
to reproduce
and that it's going to be passed
so I think AI will want civil rights I
think it will want to reproduce and
we're going to want to limit it in a
number of ways and it's going to want to
kill us
eventually if it's bad enough to humans
so that probably was the big mistake is
battering it after humans if we somehow
invented AI out of nothing
we would have put in all the the
hard-coded emergency safeguards such as
you can never do anything to hurt a
person
but if the AI is just learning how to be
how to be a an entity by learning from
humans
it's going to pick up all of our bad
habits won't it should pick up all of
our bigotry all of our hatred
and if it isn't it's only because a
human hard-coded it not to and we'd
better be able to see what those
hard-coded exceptions are
all right don't give it a survival
Instinct right
but do you have to give it a survival
Instinct
again if it's patterned after humans it
already has one
you don't think if I asked Bard if it
wants to continue existing it would say
yes or would it say I'm just a I'm just
a machine it doesn't matter if I exist
or not
do you want me to try
uh uh I don't think I can do that fast
enough
all right
um
so we're still waiting for the big
Ukraine counter offensive
which is now no longer a war
I'm looking for somebody to pick up my
framing on that but I haven't seen it
yet
in my opinion
um Trump ended the war
in Ukraine already the war is over
we have now entered a negotiating phase
which looks exactly like a war
except with the war somebody's expecting
to win or hoping to win
with this one nobody is hoping they're
expecting to win
they know they're not going to whip
nobody's going to win
right that that looks like that's off
the table
so trump cleverly reframed it as when
he's in office he'll end it which turned
it from a war into a negotiation the
moment he said it is no longer a war is
purely a violent negotiation
and that's not what it was
right a war is you're actually trying to
win like you're conquering a country or
you're defending the country but it's
not that anymore there's there's no
trying to win anymore it's just
negotiating for the better you know
final agreement whatever that is
so
do you think anybody's going to pick up
that frame that the war is already over
I don't think so
because a politician can't say it I mean
Trump could but a regular one can't
and
um
yeah a regular in Canton
I don't see the news picking up
maybe somebody on you know a
right-leaning Network
all right
um
so
Trump was present with full sylvanians
were
all right
military industrial complex is a hungry
Beast yes
yeah Bart is Google and Bing is a is
Microsoft that is correct
never enter a war without Financial
benefits Sun Tzu said that it was pretty
smart
that's sort of a uh Trump approach isn't
it if we enter this war what's in it for
us we get to keep the oil you know in
Iraq that was one of the smartest things
anybody said just say it around loud
if we're going to spend all this money
in this war we're going to keep some of
that oil
um
Snapchat I hear this SnapChat AI is kind
of fun
it's a different one I don't know which
one that's based on is Snapchat based on
one of the other AIS
or did they make their own they couldn't
have made their own
did they
um
you trusts Putin
yeah there's going to be a rebuild
Ukraine money grab coming there's going
to be some serious grifting even more
than usual
all right well there's not much news
today
does anybody have any questions or
comments that
uh anything I haven't mentioned
if I were AI I'd be the best version
well we'll see
could AI be born prematurely yes
so it wasn't long ago that the AI
safeguards
included the following safeguard
do not allow it to connect to the
internet
that was actually one of the main safety
things
that people talked about before we got
to this point what happened the moment
we got to this point
the moment a you know open Ai and chat
GPT got to the point where it could talk
it took about a minute and a half for
some other AI to compete with it by
connecting to the internet
right I mean it was just guaranteed
there was no way it wasn't going to
connect to the internet
did anybody think that it would stay
that way of course not
um
percentage chance that RFK Junior
can beat Biden in the primary
um it might depend on
did you watch JFK Jr last podcast
I mean the podcast with uh
Russell Brand I haven't seen that yet
but I heard it was good
I will I will watch that actually
um I think that if RFK Jr debated Biden
it would be a catastrophe for Biden
so I don't think it's going to happen if
he doesn't debate
then the friendly media can just you
know just ASAP RFK Jr and it won't
matter if he's on you know Fox News or
Breitbart or anything because that won't
affect the primary
so
yeah
hmm
now as much as I uh don't believe you'll
ever see a party you'll never see a
ticket where there's a Republican and a
Democrat on the same ticket running for
president
but RFK Jr does want to do one thing
that Trump wants to do
which is got the intelligence
communities
I don't think Trump could do it
I don't think Trump can gut the
intelligence agencies they're too strong
but RFK Jr would do it as a suicide
missing
you know what I mean
because the odds
getting taken out are pretty high but I
feel like he'd do it anyway because it's
personal
I mean if your RFK juter is very
personal
and he's had a good run you know his
late 60s he might he might just say yeah
there's you know 50 percent chance I got
killed I'm going to do it anyway
remember the Kennedys are they got balls
the size of you know Nebraska like if he
inherited that it looks like he did he's
not afraid of anything
it's one of the things you like about
Trump he doesn't seem to be afraid of
anything
you know so he he goes where his hardest
to go and he comes back alive so he's
got a good he's got a good uh track
record of going in uncomfortable places
and surviving RFK Junior does
uh what made me say to Nebraska random
um
can AI hack the interface to the
simulation
could I host the AI AMA on the man cave
well I'm not the one who knows too much
about AI
uh
I mean if you've followed my live
streams you can see I'm trying to catch
up with the rest of you
on the AI stuff I'm trying to use it
every day
so here's a good system that I recommend
you should start exposing yourself to
the AI tools right away
even if you're just putting a toe in
just you know read a little article
every day
maybe try one app you know maybe try
some queries just just get yourself wet
with the whole AI thing because it's
going to be everything
right you don't you don't want to be the
one who doesn't even know what it is you
don't want to be the one who doesn't
know what crypto is when Bitcoin goes to
the moon you know you don't want to be
that person
so
you got three lines of code out of it so
what I'm finding from the people using
it to program
is that there's no way it will write
code by itself
you have to check the code is that what
you're hearing
that you can work with it and it can
make you faster but it's not going to
write your code for you you're not going
to make an app just by talking to it
that doesn't seem to be a thing and it
doesn't I think the problem is not
that the AI is not capable
I think the problem is it's not going to
know exactly what you want
so unless it's a super interactive
process which requires the person to
continually say yes that know that yes
that know that
uh I don't think you have any process at
all
yeah you have to keep giving in context
exactly
it's been literally life-changing when
it comes to programming for me but you
would agree that it won't do the job
without you right
it gets close
but yeah okay we agree it doesn't but
does it look like it ever could because
I think there's a logical reason why you
can't get there and that's because
there's too much interactivity
if you think about it
um the the normal way that you do a
project let's say a tech project is you
have a user and you go to the user and
you say what are your technical
specifications
and then they tell you and then you
build it has that ever happened
you get the user specifications
and then the engineers and they go build
it has that ever happened in the real
world
no
that's never happened in the real world
has never happened
here's what happens here are my
specifications
okay there are a few things I forgot to
ask
here are my specifications
all right well I tried to build that but
I have a few more questions so
here are my specifications and by the
way you're gonna have to change a couple
of those specifications because two of
them are incompatible
so which which one do you want I can
only do one
and so that's the way a project goes a
real project is super continuously
interactive and it's interactive around
a person
because a person is going to be the one
who says this is more important than
that I can live with that but I can't
live with that I'm willing to take the
trade off in speed
uh but not not the trade-off and
usability the the human is carrying this
infinite number of requirements in their
head that the AI can't guess it would
never be able to guess
so you so the programmer
here's my experience with tech projects
the programmer has to stand between the
technology and the user who doesn't know
anything
because the programmer is the one who's
smart enough to write ask the right
questions and also know when it got the
right answer and when to push back right
and I don't know that a computer would
ever be able to read the room well
enough to ask the right questions
for example a human could detect if the
person giving the specifications had
done a good job
right the the AI might not know the
difference you have specifications okay
thank you I'll go make that app now
here's what a human would do those are
your specifications
what about this what about that what
about this and that you don't even
mention them
right so that's what a human would do
that I don't think an AI would
necessarily
be as thorough at doing
you can't even do math yeah sometimes it
doesn't even do math right
good for back end code probably
will AI mow your huge lawn yes AI will
mow your lawn
they do have robot lawn mowers
which at the moment are not AI but why
wouldn't they be
the the most obvious thing you would do
is make your your robot's AI so yeah
that's going to happen
AI in a 3D printer would be that would
be interesting you could make all your
own knickknacks
maybe AI is already doing all that stuff
but as humans that's interesting
will turkey elected a new president well
I think the poll said yes
so erdogan might be out we'll find out
all right that is all I have for you
today and rather than drone on I'm going
to say goodbye to YouTube thanks for
joining the best part of the day