Episode 2376 CWSA 02/06/24

good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization oh we're going to have some fun today and it's not because the show is better than usual but it really will be it'll be better than usual it's because the news is so delightful today a lot of funny stories crazy stuff but if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that people can't even imagine with their tit human brains all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass a tankered chalis with a canteen Jugger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure the dopam mean end of the day the thing to makes everything better it's called the simultaneous sip it happens now go quite perfect better than normal above average well let me catch you up on the news uh there's a leaked video of uh musical star Drake who uh if you were to believe that the video is real appears to be pleasuring his a gigant uh male member uh while somebody surreptitiously films it now by coincidence his own phone is in front of his face so there is no part of Drake which I recognize I'd like to go on record and saying that if I see a video of allegedly Drake and the only part of it I can see are his feet and his penis I'm going to say I can't tell that's Drake now for me I would have to see a little bit of his face but apparently for just about everybody in the media seeing his exposed penis was enough to identify him which raises many questions how many people have seen Drake's dick but now that I've seen it I think I'd recognize him next time I see one so I'm glad we all caught up on that now you probably heard a story about uh Biden uh and the story was told wrong um I'll try to correct that the story was that he mixed up the names of the leader of France and that instead of saying uh mcon he accidentally referred to Mand who's been uh dead since 1996 now the way it's being reported is Biden is old and he mixed up a name and that's not not so different than things that Trump's done Trump mixed up Nancy Pelosi and K Harris or no and uh Nikki Hy look at me mixing up names it's like I'm 100 years old anyway I don't think this is a story about mixing up names I have a different Theory I believe that Biden is now so close to death and he's gone so far toward the light you know down the tunnel that's what they say you go down the tunnel toward the light I feel like he's about three qus down the tunnel and he could actually see the dead people so he didn't mention deal but I think he can see him so maybe not forgetting names so much is now about 3/4 down the tunnel and just passed the light you can see some of his old friends back there that's what I think I mean I'm just speculating but that's what it feels like well ex president Trump has offered to replace Biden for the Super Bowl interview which traditionally is the sitting president but we have a sitting president who heard the opportunity that he could speak wherever he wanted to and could say it in front of the biggest audience in all of America the Super Bowl audience and the cting president said no thanks and it's totally because he doesn't need to right no we have a sitting president who literally can't do a TV interview it's too dangerous politically that's a real thing that's happening right in front of us now there's no other explanation for it am I right has anybody offered a second reason why he might not want to do the interview which would be the biggest audience in America who's already you know at least half of them are in a good mood H I don't know I feel like they stopped trying to explain it you know it used to be well he's got covid so he's going to stay in his basement you know there was always a cover story but there's no cover story on this one is there this this is just absolutely transparent he cannot do this interview he just doesn't have the ability so Trump cleverly says that he uh he'll do the interview and he says it's quote ratings gold now wouldn't you be disappointed if you found out that Biden wasn't going to do this traditional interview because I guess there was long history of of this uh and that you'd be so disappointed if Trump didn't offer to do it and say it was ratings gold if he' only just offered to do it I'd be like and and it'd be like there's something's missing it's like I think I'll do the interview and is ratings gold there it is there it is that's the Trump we're waiting for is ratings Gold All right so there's a new censorship Scandal I mean there's so many of these government censorship scandals they're all starting to run together in my mind the the stories that I hate are there's a new twist in one of the lawfare trials against Trump oh God am I have going to have to understand which one it is and which corrupt da it is and which charges I don't want to have to figure this out again because none of us seems real it just all seems like so like you know it's like I literally I'm sifting through to find the better like it's just it's hard to talk about some of these stories but there's another big one representative Jim Jordan's posting about it and I think Mike Benz is taking a Victory lap for being uh you know the one who brought this to our attention and this is what happened apparently the National Science Foundation uh NS uh they had massive funding from the government to develop all these AI automated tools for censoring online speech as scale so the US government was massively funding an organization to suppress political speech on the other side now they don't call it that they call it suppressing misinformation but the things that we know they were suppressing were at least half of it was true you know they may have actually suppressed things that were not true as well probably but probably at least half of the important things were actually true when they suppressed them or tried to so there is a total information that our government has tried to do the very thing our our constitution says not to and the way they did it was by funding uh entities that we couldn't tell were doing it or were inside the government so they did everything they could to thwart the Constitution of the United States not for a good reason either it looks like it's completely political it doesn't look like there was any even intended National benefit at all all right let's talk about uh Comm Lis and gas lighting on the economy so I'll give you a very brief economics lesson here just how to understand when the government is talking about how the economy is doing now I've told you uh even before the pandemic I think I told you that if there's one thing you get right you'll be okay and that's employment as long as the employment numbers are good it's really hard to follow into fall into a recession you know get into a depression or anything like that so you could have a lot of things going wrong but as long as the jobs are looking good you're going to be in better shape however that rule just changed and the Biden Administration is I think taking advantage of the fact that people don't know that rule changed every other time if you said employment is good it was 85% of the whole story everything else would also just be good but uh in the face of massive unaffordability which will be the keyword unaffordability or AFF ability problem um people are taking two jobs so if people are taking two jobs because they can't afford things that's not a win but it would show up as you know jobs opening and jobs being filled and stuff like that the other thing you need to know is uh if your government does not tie what the government does to the outcome they're just bragging about somebody else's accomplishment so yes uh there lots of jobs jobs were created that will get revised down maybe but lots of jobs were created so what was the policy that Biden did to create those jobs go name the thing that Biden did that you can connect to creating a job I'm not aware of anything infrastructure Bill the the one thing that they talk about what was it uh I mean seriously what was it I'm not aware of anything that they did that would have some direct effect on jobs so why is he why is he claiming Victory on something he actually literally didn't even work on it yeah so if anything he's made it harder to get a job for white people for the Dei stuff anyway so when you hear that jobs are good is true it would have also been true under trump it will always be true that if you're coming off a pandemic you know there's going to be some depression from the pandemic that takes a few years to dig out of and you should expect you know better you know sort of a a little bump in employment and stuff like that just because you're coming out of a situation like the pandemic so first of all the numbers are weird because of the pandemic um number two it probably would have been exactly the same if you'd replaced them with any president and there's no there's no particular policy nor does she claim it the there's no claim being made that because we did this we got this outcome they're trying to make you think that he did things and they call it biomics what was it what what was the thing just name it and then connect it to the the things you say are going right and then tell me why that wouldn't have happened if any other president had been there all right um the other thing is the stock market and the GDP are up do you you know why the stock market is up and the GDP is up probably because of inflation inflation yeah the stock market is just adjusting to inflation and the GDP is just adjusting to inflation so if you have inflation those two things go up but it's not good news but how much of the public knows that if you were to do a uh you know a survey of the public how many of them could tell you that they do understand that the stock market and the gross domestic product go up just because the price of stuff goes up it's not because you're doing better I mean we might be doing better but it would go up because of the you know any price increases she also says we have the strongest economy of Any Nation now it might be true but is that telling you what you want to know wouldn't you want to know what direction is moving suppose we started with the strongest economy which we had and suppose it got weaker but everybody else you know was not doing so well so that weakness didn't put us below anybody else would you brag about that no so literally this could be bad news but it would be expressed in the same words we're doing better than other countries we were doing better than other countries before we've always been better than other countries you know economy wise so and depends how you measure it you know um I'm sure there small there probably some small country that is doing better but that's a that's a spin there um she says we have historically low black unemployment do we is the black unemployment better now than it was under Trump what do you think I I thought that Trump had the the record and then she also said that uh historically low unemployment that's just just untrue isn't it I thought Trump had I thought Trump's numbers were better but to be fair it was before the pandemic so if I'm using the you know the same Fair rules I'm using for Biden I would say that you know Trump's numbers before the pandemic you know can't be compared to really anything else but my understanding is that's the situation so let me let me summarize so she's got uh here are reasons uh strongest economy of Any Nation she's leaving out what's important which is did the gap between how strong we were and how others were shrink or grow so that's just misdirection we have historically low unemployment and historically low black unemployment rate I believe those are just lies because I think I think Trump had better numbers there uh wages have outpaced inflation I believe that's just not true am I wrong I this is not true um consumer confidence is up is that true do you think consumer confidence is up yeah I think so no I think it is I think it is not everybody but you know why consumer confidence is up the news and the politicians have been telling you for months that they think that the news has not done a good enough Job saying how great the economy is so the news that works for the Democrats decided to tell you how great the economy was over and over again until the public said oh well I didn't realize that but it must be good for other people because it doesn't look good for me but if the news says it's good for other people yeah so she's got let's see one misdirection three lies and one consumer confidence claim that's based on brainwashing that they did and that's her claim for the economy uh misdirection three lies and uh something that they they gain through propaganda that's not based on their reality and inflation helped the GDP in the stock market and there's no connection to any uh any policies so here's a question tell me if you've ever seen this asked as Steve Ducey or anybody else said uh the economy does have some good points to it as you've mentioned which policies are the ones that cause those to happen is it the open borders that help the employment numbers do so well was that the open borders that caused uh black unemployment to be low I feel like his policies should be working against all of these things it's just that they haven't worked against them long enough and hard enough so all right so Matt Gates is doing something very clever that I approve of he's introducing a resolution to get people on record uh saying that Trump did not engage in an Insurrection or Rebellion against the United States so the idea is to get members of Congress especially Republicans to go on record officially to say do you think that was an Insurrection God I love that I just love it because here's the thing you're probably thinking to yourself you know it's some kind of uh Trump loyalty test that that's how the news will say it it's a loyalty test because if you're not willing to say that you're you're uh you know orange Cheeto Jesus uh is innocent of all charges then you can't be a Republican look in right that's the way it'll be spun here's the other way to look at it this is my way to look at it this is an IQ test it's an IQ test if you think that January 6 was an Insurrection today today you're a idiot that's the end of the story and I would love to get a list of all the idiots and this is really useful because if you can get this you know into practice you know I don't know what it takes to make a resolution happen but if he could get everybody to sign up whether they they are so dumb that today they actually think that was a an Insurrection or Rebellion I do want to know them I want to know their names don't you want to know the names of somebody who would be this dumb because that's too dumb to be an elected official that should be the end of your career if you believe it at this point that should be the end of your career and if you vote for the the Border bill that should be the end of your career but that's a separate we'll get to that so yeah I love Matt Gates giving it an an IQ test to Republicans um so Nikki Haley is applied to get to Secret Service protection CNN reports now you might say to yourself does she really need Secret Service protection she might because you know there's a lot of a lot of political you know a lot of political action that could turn physical and so I'd like to see her get secret service protection but not unless JFK that or RFK does if RFK Jr doesn't get any Secret Service protection then I got to say no I got to say no you got to do them both both or none because if you're going to be this obvious about who you want to live and who you want to get shot uh that's no good yeah you're going to have to at least hide it a little bit by giving them both protection or nether of them protection but no way can you give her protection and I him I mean that would be crazy so we'll keep an eye on that they'll probably just ignore it um here on the they always accuse you of what they are doing contest so the AP has a story about how uh Trump is super sexist about Nikki Hy and here are the evidence that Trump is the sexist against Nikki Hy he called her bird brain um he said that she her dress was not so fancy and that once unrelated to uh any of the Nikki Hy stuff in 2016 he was on recorded video saying that he can just grab them by the you know what that's it that's the evidence that Trump is the sexist now let's compare that to what Nikki hilly has said out loud in public multiple times if you need to if you need to get something done call a woman she said that directly which one is sexist a normal insult that Trump uses for every single person in the world like bird brain or you know whatever he calls everybody else the most normal thing does so by insulting Nikki hilly he is treating her exactly the way he treats men and the AP said if you treat her exactly the way you treat men that's sexist and they're actually trying to sell that they're treating her the same way he treats everybody is sexist while she in front of everybody says that you should vote for her in part because she has a vagina and that gives her an advantage over men who people have penises you know knock counting trans yeah so this is such a perfect example of they always accuse you what they're doing Trump correct me if I'm wrong Trump has never once said that a woman would be less good at a job go in any domain you know maybe you know playing in the NBA or something but ever has Trump ever said that uh in his in his employment at Trump you know the company Trump has he ever said that he uh didn't think that the women could do the job nope he's actually quite famous for promoting women even way before it was fashionable is that fair to say that he was aggressively promoting women in his organization way before it was fashionable true or false I think that's just true now and and never once as he uttered a single word that you could interpret as thinking that women would have some you know lesser ability for politics or running a big organization like his own never not once but Nikki hilly says it in public more than once so this is the perfect example of they always accuse you what they're doing I don't think this one could be any more clear now does Trump say does Trump say uh offensive sounding things when he thinks nobody's listening yeah like every other person I've ever met in my life like every person I've ever met in my entire life that's just how people talk when they think nobody's listening all right so the mayorcas impeachment is going on now or impeachment attempt well we don't think that he will get impeached because it seems to be closer to something like an interpretation of policy than it does look like breaking the laws or something that would be impeachable but the aggressiveness with which he's let's say misinterpreting the policies or interpreting them in a way that is most negative to the United States is very concerning I don't understand why he would given that you could interpret you know various laws different ly why would he always pick the worst way is that a coincidence why would he pick the way that's worse for the United States when his job is to protect us and I think that alone should be impeachable if you can't explain why all the things you do are bad for the United States it ought to be impeachable I mean I get that it's not technically but I do like the fact that he's going through the process so we can all talk about him being impeachable that's something you know at Le at least it clarifies the situation for the public yeah it might not be a law but it's so bad that we think we need to run him through an impeachment process that's how bad it is because it doesn't look like no it doesn't look like incompetence no if you think this is incompetence I think that's the last possibility well Rob Riner continues to entertain he had two posts at different times uh one of them was about Trump and he said uh I don't know when but it must have been a while ago he posted uh the only reassuring thing about a pathological liar is when he says something you know it's not true and then he says there is no crisis at the border now obviously uh Trump was saying there was a crisis at the border sometime in the past and so Rob Riner wants you to know there is no crisis at the border also Rob Briner later it's uh it's simple Donald Trump and the House Republicans don't give a flying about fixing our border problems he said both of those things now do you remember when you thought he was just a serious citizen who is involved in politics and you just disagreed with him now you know that's not what's happening right you can see it now right yeah yeah you should not take him seriously as even a person with an opinion it he he posts like it's his job like he just works for the CIA your I think your working assumption is that he's just an intelligence asset it doesn't mean it's true but your your working assumption probably should be something reasonable if you think that these are reasonable opinions by just like a normal citizen it's clearly not because there's such a disconnect between what we know must be his intelligence because he's very successful with the way he talks it's such a disconnect that there's no way he's just being dumb all right there's something else going on but my assumption is it's just exactly what it looks like it looks like somebody's working for the Democrats or the CIA or something don't know that for sure it's just my working assumption now let's talk about this border bill that appears to be the worst thing anybody ever did um Kyle bass and lots of other people are weighing in on it I'll just tell you what Kyle said but you can see I don't know just dozens of other people say my god did you read what's in this bill it's the opposite of what it's trying to do which is generally the case usually our bills are labeled the opposite of what they do all right musk has been talking about that a lot that we label them the opposite so apparently part of this bill Believe It or Not would Grant May orcus the ability to Grant uh Asylum and even American citizenship at the border without review by anybody including the intelligence agencies so somebody could come in and literally be a terrorist and may orcus can say you're a citizen and that would be the end of it there would be no review that's actually in this bill yeah like like try to wrap your head around that why would that be there give me a reason why that would be there there is no reason this bill is clearly not designed to help the United States all right and and it's not not a Democrat or Republican thing this is clearly something else is going on this is in the category of something else is going on don't know what but this is not a policy disagreement if you think there's oh we're being a little inefficient you know it's a it's a or it's a it's an election year so people being a little more political that's not really what's going on I don't know what's going on but this is one of those situations where we need to stop everything until we figure out what's going on right remember when Trump said quite provocatively let's stop immigration from certain countries until we figure out what's going on his Instinct was completely right because if you don't know what's going on the first thing you need to do is find out how's that not obvious whatever is happening with this weird border bill it's it's not based on policy differences it's not based on politics and I can't even follow the money is you know I guess if they tie it to Ukraine and Israel I can follow it but if you were just look at the border part by itself it doesn't make any sense at all it doesn't make sense for Democrats or Republicans I can't imagine there would be one Democrat voter not politician voter who would be in favor of this bill if they knew what was in it is that your take on it that not even a republican not even a Democrat would if they knew what was in it because apparently the Democrats are just lying to everybody about what's in it and they're treating it like it's a solution to the Border crisis it's not it's not even in that realm it's literally making it worse it's like legitimizing keeping it as bad as it is it couldn't be worse so I think we should stop talking about it like a policy difference I feel that's we're as Citizens if we allow them to tell us that this is some kind of policy difference then we've been completely brainwashed this is not a policy difference but I don't know what it is we need to stop everything until we figure out what's going on and I mean we should not we should not consider even voting on it one way or the other we have to figure out how this happened in the first place who put this on paper I want to know what's behind this because this is I mean it looks like it's closer to treason than it is to a policy difference a policy difference would have people disagreeing on the details that's not what's going on they're not disagreeing on the details they they literally are being Bamboozled about what's in it and it's clearly designed to make things worse that's not politics that I don't even know where to follow the money for that there's something else going on they need to shut the whole system down until they figure what that is they shouldn't vote at anything they shouldn't pass a budget for anything they should shut the government down because I don't want more of this you need to stop and figure out what's wrong and then maybe figure out a way to fix it but no yeah right now the the current system would be what the current system would either be you know blackmail and threaten and bribe people to vote for this piece of garbage right that'd be the normal process or go back and create a Frankenstein 2 which will be every bit as bad as this and then come back and tell us it was fixed and hope enough people are now desperate you know they got to get that Ukraine funding they got to get that Israel funding that they'll just give up and vote for it that's what's going to happen there there either there will either be some kind of force making people vote for it because they want the other things or they'll go back and rewrite it worse you know that right it's not going to come back making sense it's not even going to come back looking like a Democrat plan at least that I'd understand you might like it you might not like it but at least shouldn't it be at least consistent with what Democrat voters would want I don't see the Democrat voters wanting open borders at least by a majority and the ones who think they want it are just not the people who should be in this conversation they're people who don't understand it or I mean they're just they're honestly their limited capacity people let me say it as directly as possible the only people who could be in favor of the current situation on the border are people have limited capacity now that's a lot of people limited capacity by that I mean the inability to see the short-term and long-term of a fairly complicated issue right immigration is simpler than some but still a little bit complicated I think that the only people who could be in favor of this are low capacity people this has nothing to do with politics um so and I would I would go further um I know this sounds like hyperbole but I would cancel the elections the presidential elections let me say that again because I'm serious and I know you won't take me S we should cancel the elections because we don't have a secure system and no matter who wins we're not going to believe it you know that no matter who wins the country won't believe it under those under that one situation you need to cancel the election I'm going to say this as many times as it takes so you know I'm serious under the specific situation that you know for sure and we do that neither side will accept the result because they won't believe the election was fair under that specific situation and on top of that a system which was designed for for corruption it's not designed to remove it right if we designed it to remove corruption the elections would be the same day no prior voting it'd be on paper there'd be no computers and everybody would look at what's happening and we'd have the result the same day we'd know how to do it so if the Democrats don't believe the system if it goes the other way and the Republicans won't believe the result if it goes not their way and we have a system which very clearly and objectively is is designed for fraud obviously I mean it's really obvious we should cancel the election until we fix it now you're saying to me but Scott that would mean Biden or k La Harris are running the country yep that's exactly what I'm saying because you're watching them disintegrate right in front of you and you might need that to understand how bad this is you might need to watch Biden try to be president while he's just literally just drooling on himself right because you know they're going to push they're going to tell you he's still okay I I want to tell them I want to see the Democrats tell you he's okay when he's just drooling on the microphone right that's what I want I do want that because I believe the Deep state will keep the country running just fine and if the worst thing is that we don't give them money for Foreign Wars because we're too incompetent and everything's shut down fine fine yeah let them work it out let them just work it out but we are not in the domain of politics anymore we're the we're in the domain of there's something wrong and we got to figure out what it is it looks like foreign influence it's either foreign influence or somebody is in charge of our country domestically that we just don't know who it is and we don't know why they're doing it if we can't explain Soros is funding every thing that's bad for the country and that the Democrats are just going give us some more of that there's something going on and I say just shut it all down we might need a constitutional convention in which we just rewrite this because we designed a system that doesn't work in modern times I think the founders were brilliant and they designed a system that worked for few hundred years but it doesn't work now and here's why I think the media brainwashing um machine got too good the the brainwashing function got too good and that's not something that the early settlers could have understood they would never have seen the mainstream media coming the internet they would have never seen you know the massive censorship machine they wouldn't have seen that so I think we need to stop cancel the election cancel this Frankenstein Bill immediately no matter what happens I don't care what happens in Israel I don't care what happens in Ukraine I literally don't because whatever happens is going to be horrible it's just going to be some different version of horrible and somebody else is going to pay for it so if you're just making me choose among the horribles great you pay for it you pay for it if it's going to be horrible no matter what you pay for it why am I funding your horrible choices you go fund your own horrible choices so cancel the election literally literally do a constitutional convention and figure out if we can come up with a system where we can still have free speech without government censorship working through the Nos and all their fake fact Checkers and the fake ADL and the fake you know fake everything um and just see if we could rewrite it and May maybe not change everything you know you don't want to throw everything away you want to keep the good stuff but we need something something that deals with whatever is happening because whatever's happening is new and not something the founders contemplated and if we keep pretending that the the problem is a policy difference we're not even in the right frame it's the wrong frame look look at this bill you tell me in all seriousness you think that the the Border bill was a case of policy disagreement that's not even close to what we're seeing it's not even in the neighborhood of of even a little bit smelling like it could be true we're in some other different domain here and I don't know what it is we're going to have to stop everything and figure it out and if that means that Trump doesn't get elected in November I'm I'm for that it's just there there's no way he's going to get elected under a current system you know that right they're either going to kill him or Drake the election I mean it doesn't look like he has a chance honestly so when I say we should cancel the election if you're thinking oh my God maybe Trump won't get elected if they can't no it probably didn't change that at all probably didn't make any difference you might see today a report about election Integrity that uh could be really interesting so there's something coming if you haven't seen it yet so I'm not I can't mention it because you might not have seen it I don't know if it's out but there's something coming today on Election Integrity in 2020 that you're going to find really interesting really really interesting and let's just say it's exactly what you thought it's exactly what you thought appeals court ruled against Trump is that new what appeal appeals court DC what they rule which which are the many things rejects his immunity bid oh yeah I expected that though didn't we all expect that the immunity bid wouldn't work I know that that's not a big surprise but I think a lot of the challenges are just to delay things until after the election oh actually that would be a problem wouldn't it if you cancel the election they have more time to get Trump well that would that would be an argument against it that would definitely be an argument against it all right um so Kelly and Conway did a uh opinion piece I think it was in the uh I forget where maybe New York Times or something doesn't matter and uh Kellan Conway said that she thinks that Trump should pick a person of color not because of you know weird diversity reasons but just because it would help help the election you know just a practical thing and she says she would narrow it down so these are the names that she's she's got in her list uh Rubio how many of you think of Marco Rubio as a person of color Marco Rubio do you do you think Marco Rubio would gain Trump even one vote because he's a person of color he wouldn't get one vote for his ethnicity would he am I wrong about that I don't think so uh anyway I guess Marco Rubio I guess would be the perfect example of the way I think we should do things I love the fact that I guess technically he'd be a person of color but I can't think of any time that Marco Rubio has ever talked about it has he I mean maybe he has but he hasn't he hasn't talked that up like oh you know vote for me I'm a person of color I mean I think he treats it like it doesn't exist which which allows me to treat it like it doesn't exist which is how I want to treat it so yeah I'm I'm going to give him credit for that all right so she mentions uh Rubio she says uh Tim Scott Byron Donald's and Ben Carson representative uh Wesley hunt never heard of him who's Wesley hunt has anybody ever heard of Representative Wesley hunt from Texas yeah Mike's brother you're funny all right and then she mentions F ramas Swami uh now let's look at her list so here's what I believe kellyan Conway is doing when somebody randomly Who's involved in politics writes a uh opinion piece you might say to yourself oh there's somebody writing an opinion piece and I'll bet it will agree with their side and all that but kellyan Conway is not your average pundit I believe and I would look for an opinion on this from you as well I believe that when she writes a piece like this that this has a function to it I believe that she's testing these names on behalf of trump to see what kind of reaction it gets does it look like like that to you that all she's doing is doing a focus group by putting it out there and letting people talk about it so in my view she would not have done this unless Trump had already narrowed it down to these exact names so I think she's signaling that it's going to be one of these and then she's seeing how you feel about it now let's look at the list let's go further Marco Rubio do you think that that is uh would help Trump to have another Florida guy I think I think Mark R Mar or Rubio is you know obviously he's a strong politician but I think he's a hard no kind of doesn't make sense yeah I just don't think he's not going to get enough he's going to get somebody who agrees with him and doesn't get any extra votes I say no on on Rubio even though he's a you know he's a solid guy uh Tim Scott another solid guy you know and he he checks the you know checks the box so everybody would at least know he's a person of color I think he's too weak um I just think he's too weak I think if you've got somebody like Trump who's a certain age you're going to look at the vice president as a they've got to have the same power level right this isn't like like um you know vice presidents of old where you didn't really need them to be as good as the top of the ticket this isn't that this is the one case where you need the vice president to be as good as the top of the ticket sort of like a Gore Clinton situation which was rare um so how about uh Byron Donalds or Tim Scott I would say that Byron Donald's is not quite seasoned enough I don't know what he's accomplished exactly although he's strong I mean his future looks right Tim Scott I just don't think he's got the gravitas like I just don't think he's like the hammer that you might need uh how about Ben Carson I think Ben's too sleepy I just don't think Ben has the fire to be a vice president and certainly not you know he's a certain age ET not B Carson uh Wesley hunt I don't know anything about him so that would be that would be a pick if you didn't want your vice president to make any difference it feels like that would be just the Larry Elder is a certain age he's over 70 I don't think you want your vice president to be over 70 that that would be a bad choice um then you get to vake here's what I think to me it's seems obvious that kellyan Conway is testing V what do you think I don't think she's even really testing the other names I think this is literally just a test of aake if you put him in a group of other uh is that Wesley hunt I feel like I may have seen him before so does it feel like and I and I think specifically she's testing v a against the black choices what do you think because the real question would be uh if if Trump if Trump picked a black running mate I think that would everybody would say okay that's you know to get some extra votes and it might actually be a strong play I could definitely see that that would be a strong play but you need somebody who's credible I think Byron Donald's just needs a little more seasoning you know we just need to see him accomplish a few more things he could be great in the future he might be terrific um and the others are a little light but when I see the the boldness with which V you know talks about what he would do when I see that he went from nowhere to make such a big dent in the election I mean for somebody who was an unknown and when you look at his success um you know business success you look at his Renaissance Man ability to understand and lots of topics I feel like this is an Easy Choice what do you think does it does it seem to you like it just jumps out as the obvious choice or am I just too I mean I am very Pro so I can't pretend I'm unbiased but it looks like an obvious choice because the others are just going to give Trump either a a nothing or a little bit I think V would have the potential to give him more than any vice president ever gave a candidate I think I think it would be a legendary combination and it would be the most confident thing that Trump could ever do you know some of you said that Trump wouldn't handle the fact that V you know is is a strong personality and he's so smart I say opposite I think you're reading Trump completely wrong I say that Trump Lov loves Brilliance like he runs toward it all the time he wants to work with it he wants to compliment it he wants to be around it he loves Brilliance there's no way he doesn't like V and VI likes him so that's the other requirement right so to me it's like a perfect combination really I I doubt it could be better in my view and it wouldn't have worked the first election because Trump wasn't already an experienced president but now that Trump is an experienced president V's perfect it just it just fits in every way um Senator Massie was uh talking about mayorcas destroying some records so apparently this whole pipe bomb situation you know the pipe bomb situation there was a fake it turns out fake fake pipe bomb uh near where K Harris was uh at the DNC headquarters on January 6 and there's lots of mystery about why we didn't know things and there's text messages that were magically destroyed that would have told us more and Massie is making the case that mayorcas was the you know the top boss when all this happened and it's a records retention violation and that maybe it should be researched now I'm not one who thinks that records retention is the biggest crime and that we need to get really tough on that whichever side it is it just doesn't excite me um but I have this question how many times have Democrats destroyed records and got away with it is is anybody keeping a record like yeah we know Hillary's emails and Hillary's phones she bleached bits and destroyed the phones but correct me if I'm wrong aren't there now several stories like that and they're all Democrats and it was all people who were caught red-handed and then they deleted the only thing that would get them in trouble yeah all of the January 6 testimony deleted the the pipe bomb text messages deleted yeah the FBI deleting stuff yeah I don't know it's sort of telling me that as a legal strategy uh you should destroy any records no matter how legally they've been requested it feel I feel like destroying records is just a smart play at this point because it keeps working anyway Tucker is in Tucker Carlson's in Moscow the word is that he's already talked to uh Putin now of course the hill uh is quoting the guardian saying that Tucker said uh why can't I root for Russia I rooting for them do you think Tucker said that do you think that the hill that quotes the guardian that quotes Tucker said why can't I root for Russia I doubt it but here's how you should analyze this so the hill makes the claim but they don't support the claim they port to the they point to the guardian so I follow the link and the guardian makes the claim and then I look for the source so I can you know see it for myself because obviously if you make a claim like Tucker Carlson said he supports Russia and there's a video right it wasn't there so the source that makes the claim doesn't have a video to show you where it came from it's the news it's the news that's a pretty big claim to not have a little bit of evidence for now I'm not saying that he didn't say those words I just don't know the context now I think at one point he said he was joking or something I don't know but um it also raises an interesting question why can't he root for Russia it's actually a pretty good question now that part he may have he may have why can't he I I asked that of myself I said all right think of all the things that Russia has done that hurt me uh now think of all the things that Ukraine has done that hurt me I feel like they're very expensive and I feel like they're the reason that Russia might be a risk to me because of Ukraine so do I think that the Ukrainian population would be bet would be worse off under Russian rule I don't know how would I even know that now obviously if Russia took over Ukraine they'd you know kill all the leaders on day one but have those leaders done a good job and would the people in Ukraine find that their economy started improving right away because I don't see the Russians complaining about their economy Am I Wrong is there a big Uprising in in Russia of people who say our economy is bad I don't think there is I think Putin has like weirdly High approval so if the guy with high approval that nobody's complaining internally about his economy wants to do the same for Ukraine which was a corrupt Basket Case what is worse for Ukraine letting Russia win I actually don't know I actually can't tell if Ukraine is better off letting their corrupt government steal other money and drive them into poverty and create Wars for no reason or would they be better off if they just said Peace they had a new leader who may also be corrupt but it couldn't be any worse than it is who doesn't start a war because it's Russia I mean he wouldn't start a war with Ukraine because they would already own it in that place um believe the original January 6 hoax that's true he's already talked about that yeah what people saw and believed during the fog of War has no it's no use for analysis yes people were had wrong opinions when we didn't know anything same with the pandemic yeah you don't complain in Russia oh we would know we would know yeah you don't complain in the newspaper in Russia but we would know you know so um it's going to be fascinating so what I would recommend is that uh Tucker actually negotiate a peace deal with Putin and Ukraine does that sound crazy well well let me ask you this who's going to do it you everybody knows it has to be done am I right 100% of the public knows that Russia and Ukraine has to talk and they have to negotiate what who else is going to do it Biden Biden's not Biden's not going to do it zalinski no no I'm completely serious I realize it would be illegal but we don't have a real government so something's got to be done now it would be very illegal for private citizen to negotiate on behalf of America but would it be wrong to suggest what a solution would look like would it be wrong for Tucker to invite zalinsky and Putin uh to be in the same room and work it out it' probably be illegal probably but if it was all transparent I wouldn't care yeah now I'm being a little bit you know just provocative I don't think that Tucker should negotiate a peace deal but who but honestly no one else is going to do it until until and if you know a trump or republican gets office no one's going to do it so if you want this thing to end you should be rooting for tuer to end it and by the way I think he could because it's not that hard to do just somebody has to be working on it just somebody has to be working on it that's it that's all that's the entire thing somebody has to be doing it because we already know what it looks like Russia's going to keep the stuff that they already got because they're they're never going to give it back so why would he even have much question about it you know there might be something about NATO blah blah blah but yeah I think T Tucker could literally negotiate peace because nobody else is doing it and everybody wants it like if everybody didn't want it then you it would be crazy to say you know some some news pundit guy could negotiate world peace that would be the dumbest thing in the world but in this very unique case where not only do both sides want it they want it desperately and they also know exactly what it would look like right Ukraine knows they're not going to get those territories back but now imagine imagine this imagine Tucker goes in he goes how about this you know I can't negotiate a peace deal but let me just ask you why you wouldn't do this why wouldn't you offer Putin why wouldn't you offer to do a referendum for the disputed areas and then decide everything based on the referendum you know make sure it's run by some third party like Switzerland or something so it's it's real but if the citizens want to be Russian how about they go where you know by majority how about they get that and if there are areas that are still disputed where the population does not want to be Russian by a majority we just go with that and then you don't you don't make the rest of Ukraine NATO because it's too provocative now did I just did I just solve the war yes yes I just solved it now all it would take is for somebody like Tucker to just put that idea in Putin's head how about this why don't you offer that a independent let's say the UN runs a referendum for who should be in charge where and no matter what you don't do any more NATO stuff because that's just going to cause the fight now you say Victoria Newland would not allow that and you're right but don't you want it on the table don't you want it on the table because if you start polling America you're going to get a 90% yes on that American voter do you think that Russia and Ukraine should end the war by polling the citizens in the disputed territories and going with what the will of the people requires we might have the world's simplest war to end except for the money launderers and the criminals who have some other motivation but you would probably need something like an 85% public preference before you could overcome whatever corruption is keeping things the way they are now it would just be too embarrassing to go against 85% of the public as well as you know the publics of the disputed territory I mean that'd be hard to go against uh Scott Mings to understand your history please this has been tried that's a terrible comment terrible comment yeah the history does not history does not um tell you what's going to happen in the future history does not repeat itself that is a myth and as soon as you believe that you can't do anything that that eliminates your ability to think oh history repeats itself so there you go yeah no everything's different everything that was true before you had a major war that exhausted both sides just doesn't apply everything that was true before U Russia had total military control of those places it's a completely different situation you know that we we didn't have a failed government where the our government couldn't really be productively involved in anything everything's different so to imagine that what would happen when everything was different is your model for today it doesn't make any sense at all that no I don't need to know that history I know a little bit of it I mean I know enough to know it doesn't matter all right um the post Millennium is reporting that uh Canada ordered their lockdowns based on fraudulent studies and by fraudulent I think it means that somebody did a study and said that uh during the Omicron wave and this is important during the Omicron wave when it was already past the most dangerous part Canada said they needed to keep the lockdown because of the unvaccinated people were causing the the spread of the Omicron the unvaccinated now the claim and I'm not saying this is true or false because I don't believe any of the science around the pandemic the claim is that the the statistics actually showed that it was the vaccinated people who were spreading the Omicron the most and therefore the policy should have been exactly the opposite and it wasn't Justified to lock everything down now the claim that the vaccinated people were spreading at the most do you believe that you do okay all right so here's what I'm not claiming I'm not claiming that the shots worked I I want you to hear me very clearly I'm not claiming that they worked no no no I'm claiming that you're believing data that came out of the pandemic and it's pretty stupid looking like if you believe this you're really gullible and by the way you might be right right you might be right but if you believed it because you heard it in the news you really got to check yourself this is not something you should have believed it might be true but don't believe it because the data the data said it here's why almost everywhere where we collect data when it matters we can choose ways to collect that that sell a story and we can choose ways to collect it they give you the wrong answer to me this looks obviously like they collected it and got the wrong answer now if you told me that there was no difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated I'd say oh well that actually sounds reasonable yeah that actually sounds reasonable but if you tell me that the people vaccinated had more spreading I'm not going to believe that like what are what are the odds that it made it more likely you're going to spread it do you think it's do you think that maybe the people who are likely to get it and get sick with it and know they had it are the people who are weak to begin with and more likely to be vaccinated you don't think there's any correlation between there's something about the people who got vaccinated such as I'm going to spend a lot of time with other people so I better get vaccinated what what do the people who didn't get vaccinated have in common they spend a little less time around other people and if and if you say that's not true I say to you how do you know how do you know if you don't know that that's true or false then what do you then how can you think that this vaccinated people are more likely to spread it this is the most ridiculous I've ever seen in my life now I'll agree with you that the vacine the so-called vaccinations didn't stop the spread certainly during Omicron it made no difference at all so I'm not supporting the science hear me clearly I'm not backing the science I'm saying that you believe the science so I'm saying that you believe the science why like why would you believe it either way if it told you that the vaccinated were more likely or if it told you the opposite why would you believe it there is no there's no data from that era that's believable and this is opposite of what makes common sense and it's also fairly opposite why this number would be wrong because there's something about the vaccinated population that is substantially different from the unvaccinated they they have a very different character I mean if the only thing you did is say City people are more likely to be vaccinated than country people is that true you tell me true or false City people more likely to be vaccinated than rural people yes or no well Republicans are more rural City people are more Democrat if that's the only thing you knew wouldn't you assume that more Democrat City people are vaccinated right now what where are you more likely to catch a a virus in the country on your Ranch or in the city where you're surrounded by infected people all day long do do you think that this study adjusted for the fact that they unvaccinated have a uh more less dense lifestyle because they're more rural people if they're Republicans now are are you hearing this for the first time that this number couldn't be trusted because there's something deeply different about the unvaccinated population yeah so don't believe anything about numbers that come out of the the pandemic they're they're all motivated numbers even if they agree with you and even if they're right even if they're right so keep in mind I'm not I'm not eliminating the possibility that it's true but you shouldn't think it's true because there was some study if you think it's true because there was a study or there somebody corrected a study from wrong to right it's like you learn nothing during the pandemic none of the data is useful at least believable none of it all right Ian Bremer and some others were talking about all of Biden's foreign policy wins uh here's here's the list of things which Biden could brag about he kept NATO strong apparently Japan and South Korea were having a tough time with each other and uh it was getting tense but uh Biden Administration got them to to talk and it seems like tensions have gone down so that's good um then also the China tariffs are still in place the other Trump tariffs so not much change there and that's considered good and then uh Biden negotiated to get China to stop sending fenel uh precursors to the United States so that's all good right right you're not going to disagree with me are you so look at all these winds then he also stopped the China from harassing American aircraft Big Win there so that's pretty strong look at this list I'll read it again he kept NATO strong he got Japan and South Korea to get together I think Ian bremmer said you know that was as substantial or somebody did that was as substantial as the uh the Abraham Accords you know what wasn't much in the news but real big deal so big win there for Biden and uh those the the fenel you know stopping stopping the fenel that's a pretty big deal and then stopping the Chinese haras so that's that's all of his big wins it's pretty good huh let's take a look at this keeping NATO strong am I wrong or did Trump get NATO its biggest funding of all time the argument here is that uh Trump kept saying is NATO useful he should keep saying that he should say that about literally everything we give money to do we still need these bases in other countries maybe but he should ask that question do we still need to give money to this or that I don't even care what this or that is maybe you should ask that question maybe you should put them on their heels and say I'm not so sure I should give you any money you tell me why I should give you some money to me that's a better way to handle things so if somebody's interpreting that Biden's got the better handle on things things by telling them by telling NATO they can have anything they want and we'll back them that feels like stupid so are we are we calling his accomplishment something that in my opinion looks just sort of stupid it's bad negotiating to say nato all good take our money NATO all good no you got to make them prove it you better you better make sure that they're doing something we want to spend their money on and you should have them on their heels all the time that's just basic leadership how about uh that Japan and South Korea thing see that that's something that no other Administration would be able to handle right how the hell hard was it to get Japan and South Korea to not start a war I don't think that was the highest level of difficulty if you're going to compare this to the Abraham Accords seriously seriously now I know know that Japan and South Korea have a you know long long history but I don't feel like the level of difficulty there was too high just sort of had to get him in the same room all right big deal uh then what about the China tariffs well literally that's something Trump did and just Biden didn't break it but then the part about he got China to agree to stop sending fenel you know that didn't happen nothing like that happened it's the same thing that Trump did and Trump said stop sending and they said oh yeah sure yeah we're trying as hard as we can yeah no nothing is happening on fentel so to imagine that you could just throw this in the story like it's as biggest accomplishment none of it's happening it's not even real and what about stopping the Chinese harassing American aircraft is that an accomplishment no because they wouldn't have even done it if Trump had been president Am I Wrong Trump would have just said once is too many just stop that and I think they would have stopped so these are the this is the weakest list of international uh you know and then it forgets that he's involved in several Wars wow anyway uh I've got a solution for the uh the Red Sea it's kind of obvious so you know the hoties around there are shooting missiles and stuff and we uh think Iran is behind all of it of course and Iran has some ship uh called the bashad that's in that area that we think is uh part of their you know their spy bad operation and that is uh giving some kind of intelligence to the hoodies to know what to shoot maybe or doing some other bad things some have called it a floating Armory so it's basically a military you know serious military ship in the Red Sea H but Iran has said that the purpose of that ship here's good news is to uh it's an anti-piracy ship so the the point of the ship is to stop all that piracy meaning the hooes so it's an anti-piracy thing so good news right it Ran's on our side yeah here we thought they had been funding the hooes and they were all happy about the missiles coming and and bothering us but no it turns out Iran says that uh they they don't like the piracy either so they got their own ship there to deal with it do you see the solution yet or do I have to connect the dots let me tell you a little story that might allow you to connect the dots do you remember once there was a a Russian Pipeline to Europe sort of a gas pipeline and then sadly it blew up it blew up well sad and then we blamed uh I believe we blamed Putin for blowing up his own pipeline well later we found out that might not have been exactly true but it makes me wonder assuming that we take Iran at its word and why wouldn't they they've never lied to us before and they say that there it's an anti-piracy thing you know who would not like that you know who would really not like an anti-piracy ship right in that red sea area the hooes and imagine if the hoties decided to fire a missile and destroy that ship I mean imagine because that was that's exactly what the hoodies do yeah that they'd want to they'd want to get back at anybody who's trying to stop their piracy and their bad intentions there so I think you know just in the same way that Putin destroyed his own pipeline we might find the hoodies attacking those Iranian ships and that would be terrible I mean that would be a tragedy so you maybe the hoodies can take out those Iranian ships and maybe that will solve the problem we've done it before no I don't think that's a good idea but it's funny because we've done it before it would be totally in character for us to to syn their ship and say I don't know it's the hoodies we're doing what we can but we can't stop every missile and we and and if you if you believe if you think that's going to happen watch for the cat on on the roof look for a story that would be a fake story that says it looks like those hoodies fired a missile at the Iranian ship but luckily an American ship intercepted the missile and shot it down because we don't want war you know yeah yeah we don't want war so we're we're going to protect that Iranian ship from those damn hooty missiles that's the way I'd play it so if you see that it sounds like we're going to protect the Iranian ship from a hoodie missile we're going to sync that ship that that would be the hint that is coming all right ladies and gentlemen again the finest live stream you've ever seen in your life thanks for joining there on the X and You.

Tube and Rumble Studios I'm using the rumble Studio free software to broadcast all at the same time and of course if you were on the locals platform you get lots of extra you get my robots read news comic which is a sensation and um by the way this has been brought to you by my book reframe your brain if you haven't seen the reviews for it they're crazy the number of people whose lives have been completely changed is reframe your brain right up there and uh it is changing lives like crazy you just read the reviews you can see for yourself so thanks for joining and I will talk to you tomorrow same place same time

[Music]

[Applause]

good morning everybody and welcome to

the highlight of human civilization oh

we're going to have some fun today and

it's not because the show is better than

usual but it really will be it'll be

better than usual it's because the news

is so delightful today a lot of funny

stories crazy stuff but if you'd like to

take this experience up to levels that

people can't even imagine with their tit

human brains all you need is a cup or a

mug or a glass a tankered chalis with a

canteen Jugger flask a vessel of any

kind fill it with your favorite liquid I

like coffee and join me now for the

unparallel pleasure the dopam mean end

of the day the thing to makes everything

better it's called the simultaneous sip

it happens now

go quite perfect better than normal

above average

well let me catch you up on the news uh

there's a leaked video of uh musical

star

Drake who uh if you were to believe that

the video is

real appears to be pleasuring his a

gigant uh male

member uh while somebody surreptitiously

films it now by coincidence his own

phone is in front of his face so there

is no part of Drake which I recognize

I'd like to go on record and saying that

if I see a video of allegedly Drake and

the only part of it I can see are his

feet and his penis I'm going to say I

can't tell that's Drake now for me I

would have to see a little bit of his

face but apparently for just about

everybody in the media seeing his

exposed penis was enough to identify

him which raises many

questions how many people have seen

Drake's

dick but now that I've seen it I think

I'd recognize him next time I see one so

I'm glad we all caught up on that now

you probably heard a story about uh

Biden uh and the story was told wrong um

I'll try to correct that the story was

that he mixed up the names of the leader

of France and that instead of saying uh

mcon he accidentally referred to Mand

who's been uh dead since

1996 now the way it's being reported is

Biden is old and he mixed up a name and

that's not not so different than things

that Trump's done Trump mixed up Nancy

Pelosi and K Harris or no and uh Nikki

Hy look at me mixing up names it's like

I'm 100 years old anyway I don't think

this is a story about mixing up names I

have a different Theory I believe that

Biden is now so close to death and he's

gone so far toward the light you know

down the tunnel that's what they say you

go down the tunnel toward the light I

feel like he's about three qus down the

tunnel and he could actually see the

dead

people so he didn't mention

deal but I think he can see him so maybe

not forgetting names so much is now

about 3/4 down the tunnel and just

passed the light you can see some of his

old friends back there that's what I

think I mean I'm just speculating but

that's what it feels

like well ex president Trump has offered

to replace Biden for the Super Bowl

interview which traditionally is the

sitting president but we have a sitting

president who heard the opportunity that

he could speak wherever he wanted to

and could say it in front of the biggest

audience in all of America the Super

Bowl audience and the cting president

said no

thanks and it's totally because he

doesn't need to

right no we have a sitting president who

literally can't do a TV

interview it's too dangerous

politically that's a real thing that's

happening right in front of us now

there's no other explanation for it am I

right has anybody offered a second

reason why he might not want to do the

interview which would be the biggest

audience in America who's already you

know at least half of them are in a good

mood H I don't know I feel like they

stopped trying to explain it you know it

used to be well he's got covid so he's

going to stay in his basement you know

there was always a cover story but

there's no cover story on this one is

there this this is just absolutely

transparent he cannot do this interview

he just doesn't have the

ability so Trump cleverly says that he

uh he'll do the interview and he says

it's quote ratings

gold now wouldn't you be

disappointed if you found out that Biden

wasn't going to do this traditional

interview because I guess there was long

history of of this uh and that you'd be

so disappointed if Trump didn't offer to

do it and say it was ratings gold if he'

only just offered to do it I'd be like

and and it'd be like there's something's

missing it's like I think I'll do the

interview

and is ratings gold there it is there it

is that's the Trump we're waiting for is

ratings

Gold All right so there's a new

censorship Scandal I mean there's so

many of these government censorship

scandals they're all starting to run

together in my mind the the stories that

I hate are there's a new twist in one of

the lawfare trials against Trump oh God

am I have going to have to understand

which one it is and which corrupt da it

is and which charges I don't

want to have to figure this out again

because none of us seems real it just

all seems like so like

you know it's like I literally I'm

sifting through to find the

better

like it's just it's hard to

talk about some of these stories but

there's another big one representative

Jim Jordan's posting about it and I

think Mike Benz is taking a Victory lap

for being uh you know the one who

brought this to our

attention and this is what happened

apparently the National Science

Foundation uh NS

uh they had massive funding from the

government to develop all these AI

automated tools for censoring online

speech as

scale so the US

government was massively funding an

organization to suppress political

speech on the other side now they don't

call it that they call it suppressing

misinformation but the things that we

know they were suppressing were at least

half of it was true you know they may

have actually suppressed things that

were not true as well probably but

probably at least half of the important

things were actually true when they

suppressed them or tried

to so there is a total information that

our government has tried to do the very

thing our our constitution says not to

and the way they did it was by funding

uh entities that we couldn't tell were

doing it or were inside the government

so they did everything they could to

thwart the Constitution of the United

States not for a good reason either it

looks like it's completely political it

doesn't look like there was any even

intended National benefit at

all all right let's talk about uh Comm

Lis and gas lighting on the economy so

I'll give you a very brief economics

lesson here just how to understand when

the government is talking about how the

economy is

doing now I've told you uh even before

the pandemic I think I told you that if

there's one thing you get right you'll

be okay and that's employment as long as

the employment numbers are good it's

really hard to follow into fall into a

recession you know get into a depression

or anything like that so you could have

a lot of things going wrong but as long

as the jobs are looking good you're

going to be in better shape however that

rule just

changed and the Biden Administration is

I think taking advantage of the fact

that people don't know that rule changed

every other time if you said employment

is good it was 85% of the whole story

everything else would also just be

good

but uh in the face of massive

unaffordability which will be the

keyword unaffordability or AFF ability

problem um people are taking two

jobs so if people are taking two jobs

because they can't afford things that's

not a win but it would show up as you

know jobs opening and jobs being filled

and stuff like that the other thing you

need to know is uh if your government

does not tie what the government does to

the outcome they're just bragging about

somebody else's accomplishment so yes uh

there lots of jobs jobs were created

that will get revised down maybe but

lots of jobs were created so what was

the policy that Biden did to create

those jobs go name the thing that Biden

did that you can connect to creating a

job I'm not aware of anything

infrastructure Bill the the one thing

that they talk about what was it uh I

mean seriously what was

it I'm not aware of anything that they

did that would have some direct effect

on jobs so why is he why is he claiming

Victory on something he actually

literally didn't even work on it

yeah so if anything he's made it harder

to get a job for white people for the

Dei stuff

anyway so when you hear that jobs are

good is true it would have also been

true under

trump it will always be true that if

you're coming off a pandemic you know

there's going to be some depression from

the pandemic that takes a few years to

dig out of and you should expect you

know better you know sort of a a little

bump in employment and stuff like that

just because you're coming out of a

situation like the pandemic so first of

all the numbers are weird because of the

pandemic um number two it probably would

have been exactly the same if you'd

replaced them with any president and

there's no there's no particular policy

nor does she claim it the there's no

claim being made that because we did

this we got this outcome they're trying

to make you think that he did

things and they call it

biomics what was it what what was the

thing just name it and then connect it

to the the things you say are going

right and then tell me why that wouldn't

have happened if any other president had

been

there all right um the other thing is

the stock market and the GDP are up do

you you know why the stock market is up

and the GDP is

up probably because of

inflation inflation yeah the stock

market is just adjusting to inflation

and the GDP is just adjusting to

inflation so if you have inflation those

two things go up but it's not good news

but how much of the public knows that if

you were to do a uh you know a survey of

the public how many of them could tell

you that they do understand that the

stock market and the gross domestic

product go up just because the price of

stuff goes up it's not because you're

doing better I mean we might be doing

better but it would go up because of the

you know any price

increases she also says we have the

strongest economy of Any Nation now it

might be true but is that telling you

what you want to know wouldn't you want

to know what direction is moving suppose

we started with the strongest economy

which we had and suppose it got

weaker but everybody else you know was

not doing so well so that weakness

didn't put us below anybody else would

you brag about that no so literally this

could be bad news but it would be

expressed in the same words we're doing

better than other countries we were

doing better than other countries before

we've always been better than other

countries you know economy wise so and

depends how you measure it you know um

I'm sure there small there probably some

small country that is doing better

but that's a that's a spin there um she

says we have historically low black

unemployment do we is the black

unemployment better now than it was

under

Trump what do you

think I I thought that Trump had the the

record and then she also said that uh

historically low

unemployment that's just just untrue

isn't it I thought Trump had I thought

Trump's numbers were better but to be

fair it was before the

pandemic so if I'm using the you know

the same Fair rules I'm using for Biden

I would say that you know Trump's

numbers before the pandemic you know

can't be compared to really anything

else but my understanding

is that's the

situation so let me let me summarize

so she's got uh here are

reasons uh strongest economy of Any

Nation she's leaving out what's

important which is did the gap between

how strong we were and how others were

shrink or grow so that's just

misdirection we have historically low

unemployment and historically low black

unemployment rate I believe those are

just lies because I think I think Trump

had better numbers there uh wages have

outpaced inflation

I believe that's just not

true am I wrong I this is not true um

consumer confidence is up is that true

do you think consumer confidence is

up yeah I think so no I think it is I

think it is not

everybody but you know why consumer

confidence is

up the news and the politicians have

been telling you for months that they

think that the news has not done a good

enough Job saying how great the economy

is so the news that works for the

Democrats decided to tell you how great

the economy was over and over again

until the public said oh well I didn't

realize that but it must be good for

other people because it doesn't look

good for me but if the news says it's

good for other people yeah so she's got

let's see one

misdirection three

lies and one consumer confidence claim

that's based on brainwashing that they

did and that's her claim for the

economy uh misdirection three lies and

uh something that they they gain through

propaganda that's not based on their

reality and inflation helped the GDP in

the stock

market and there's no connection to any

uh any policies so here's a question

tell me if you've ever seen this asked

as Steve Ducey or anybody else said uh

the economy does have some good points

to it as you've mentioned which policies

are the ones that cause those to

happen is it the open borders that help

the employment numbers do so well was

that the open borders that caused uh

black unemployment to be

low I feel like his policies should be

working against all of these things it's

just that they haven't worked against

them long enough and hard enough so all

right so Matt Gates is doing something

very clever that I approve

of he's introducing a resolution to get

people on record uh saying that Trump

did not engage in an Insurrection or

Rebellion against the United States so

the idea is to get members of

Congress especially Republicans to go on

record

officially to say do you think that was

an

Insurrection God I love that I just love

it because here's the thing you're

probably thinking to yourself you know

it's some kind of uh Trump loyalty test

that that's how the news will say it

it's a loyalty test because if you're

not willing to say that you're you're uh

you know orange Cheeto Jesus uh is

innocent of all charges then you can't

be a Republican look in right that's the

way it'll be

spun here's the other way to look at it

this is my way to look at it this is an

IQ

test it's an IQ test if you think that

January 6 was an Insurrection

today

today you're a

idiot that's the end of the story and I

would love to get a list of all the

idiots and this is really useful because

if you can get this you know into

practice you know I don't know what it

takes to make a resolution happen but if

he could get everybody to sign up

whether they they are so dumb

that today they actually think that was

a an Insurrection or Rebellion I do want

to know them I want to know their

names don't you want to know the names

of somebody who would be this dumb

because that's too dumb to be an elected

official that should be the end of your

career if you believe it at this point

that should be the end of your career

and if you vote for the the Border bill

that should be the end of your career

but that's a separate we'll get to that

so yeah I love Matt Gates giving it an

an IQ test to

Republicans um so Nikki Haley is applied

to get to Secret Service protection CNN

reports now you might say to yourself

does she really need Secret Service

protection she might because you know

there's a lot of a lot of

political you know a lot of political

action that could turn physical and so

I'd like to see her get secret service

protection but not unless JFK that or

RFK does if RFK Jr doesn't get any

Secret Service protection then I got to

say no I got to say no you got to do

them both both or none because if you're

going to be this obvious about who you

want to live and who you want to get

shot uh that's no good yeah you're going

to have to at least hide it a little bit

by giving them both protection or nether

of them protection but no way can you

give her protection and I him I mean

that would be

crazy so we'll keep an eye on

that they'll probably just ignore it um

here on the they always accuse you of

what they are doing contest so the AP

has a story about how uh Trump is super

sexist about Nikki Hy and here are the

evidence that Trump is the

sexist against Nikki Hy he called her

bird

brain um he said that she her dress was

not so

fancy and that once unrelated to uh any

of the Nikki Hy stuff in 2016 he was on

recorded video saying that he can just

grab them by the you know

what that's it that's the evidence

that Trump is the

sexist now let's compare that to what

Nikki hilly has said out loud in public

multiple

times if you need to if you need to get

something done call a

woman she said that directly which one

is sexist a normal insult that Trump

uses for every single person in the

world like bird brain or you know

whatever he calls everybody else the

most normal thing does so by insulting

Nikki hilly he is treating her exactly

the way he treats men and the AP said if

you treat her exactly the way you treat

men that's

sexist and they're actually trying to

sell that they're treating her the same

way he treats everybody is

sexist while she in front of everybody

says that you should vote for her in

part because she has a vagina and that

gives her an advantage over men who

people have penises you know knock

counting

trans yeah so this is such a perfect

example of they always accuse you what

they're doing Trump correct me if I'm

wrong Trump has never once said that a

woman would be less good at a job go in

any domain you know maybe you know

playing in the NBA or something but ever

has Trump ever said that uh in his in

his employment at Trump you know the

company Trump has he ever said that he

uh didn't think that the women could do

the job nope he's actually quite famous

for promoting women even way before it

was fashionable is that fair to say that

he was aggressively promoting women in

his

organization way before it was

fashionable true or false I think that's

just true

now and and never once as he uttered a

single word that you could interpret as

thinking that women would have some you

know lesser ability for politics or

running a big organization like his own

never not once but Nikki hilly says it

in public more than

once so this is the perfect example of

they always accuse you what they're

doing I don't think this one could be

any more clear now does Trump say does

Trump say uh offensive sounding things

when he thinks nobody's listening yeah

like every other person I've ever met in

my life like every person I've ever met

in my entire

life that's just how people talk when

they think nobody's

listening all right so the mayorcas

impeachment is going on now or

impeachment attempt well we don't think

that he will get impeached because

it seems to be closer to something like

an interpretation of policy than it does

look like breaking the laws or something

that would be impeachable but the

aggressiveness with which

he's let's say misinterpreting the

policies or interpreting them in a way

that is most negative to the United

States is very

concerning I don't understand why he

would given that you could interpret you

know various laws different ly why would

he always pick the worst

way is that a coincidence why would he

pick the way that's worse for the United

States when his job is to protect us and

I think that alone should be impeachable

if you can't explain why all the things

you do are bad for the United

States it ought to be

impeachable I mean I get that it's not

technically but I do like the fact that

he's going through the process so we can

all talk about him being impeachable

that's something you know at Le at least

it clarifies the situation for the

public yeah it might not be a law but

it's so bad that we think we need to run

him through an impeachment process

that's how bad it is because it doesn't

look like no it doesn't look like

incompetence no if you think this is

incompetence I think that's the last

possibility well Rob Riner continues to

entertain he had two posts

at different times uh one of them was

about Trump and he said uh I don't know

when but it must have been a while ago

he posted uh the only reassuring thing

about a pathological liar is when he

says something you know it's not true

and then he says there is no crisis at

the border now obviously uh Trump was

saying there was a crisis at the border

sometime in the past and so Rob Riner

wants you to know there is no crisis at

the border also Rob Briner later it's

uh it's simple Donald Trump and the

House Republicans don't give a flying

about fixing our border

problems he said both of those

things now do you remember when you

thought he was just a serious citizen

who is involved in politics and you just

disagreed with

him now you know that's not what's

happening

right you can see it now

right

yeah yeah

you should not take him seriously as

even a person with an opinion it he he

posts like it's his

job like he just works for the CIA your

I think your working assumption is that

he's just an intelligence asset it

doesn't mean it's true but your your

working assumption probably should be

something reasonable if you think that

these are reasonable opinions by just

like a normal citizen it's clearly not

because there's such a disconnect

between what we know must be his

intelligence because he's very

successful with the way he talks it's

such a disconnect that there's no way

he's just being dumb all right there's

something else going on but my

assumption is it's just exactly what it

looks like it looks like somebody's

working for the Democrats or the CIA or

something don't know that for sure it's

just my working assumption

now let's talk about this border bill

that appears to be the worst thing

anybody ever did um Kyle bass and lots

of other people are weighing in on it

I'll just tell you what Kyle said but

you can see I don't know just dozens of

other people say my god did you read

what's in this bill it's the opposite of

what it's trying to do which is

generally the case usually our bills are

labeled the opposite of what they do all

right musk has been talking about that a

lot that we label them the opposite

so apparently part of this bill Believe

It or Not would Grant May orcus the

ability to Grant uh Asylum and even

American

citizenship at the

border without

review by

anybody including the intelligence

agencies so somebody could come in and

literally be a terrorist and may orcus

can say you're a

citizen and that would be the end of it

there would be no

review that's actually in this

bill yeah like like try to wrap your

head around that why would that be there

give me a reason why that would be there

there is no

reason this bill is clearly not designed

to help the United States all right and

and it's not not a Democrat or

Republican thing this is clearly

something else is going

on this is in the category of something

else is going on don't know what but

this is not a policy

disagreement if you think there's oh

we're being a little inefficient you

know it's a it's a or it's a it's an

election year so people being a little

more political that's not really what's

going on I don't know what's going on

but this is one of those situations

where we need to stop everything until

we figure out what's going on right

remember when Trump said quite

provocatively let's stop immigration

from certain countries until we figure

out what's going on his Instinct was

completely right because if you don't

know what's going on the first thing you

need to do is find

out how's that not obvious whatever is

happening with this weird border

bill

it's it's not based on policy

differences it's not based on

politics and I can't even follow the

money is you know I guess if they tie it

to Ukraine and Israel I can follow it

but if you were just look at the border

part by itself it doesn't make any sense

at all it doesn't make sense for

Democrats or Republicans I can't imagine

there would be one Democrat voter not

politician voter who would be in favor

of this bill if they knew what was in

it is that your take on it that not even

a republican not even a Democrat would

if they knew what was in it because

apparently the Democrats are just lying

to everybody about what's in it and

they're treating it like it's a solution

to the Border crisis it's not it's not

even in that realm it's literally making

it worse it's like legitimizing keeping

it as bad as it is it couldn't be worse

so

I think we should stop talking about it

like a policy

difference I feel that's we're as

Citizens if we allow them to tell us

that this is some kind of policy

difference then we've been completely

brainwashed this is not a policy

difference but I don't know what it is

we need to stop everything until we

figure out what's going on and I mean we

should not we should not consider even

voting on it one way or the other we

have to figure out how this happened in

the first place who put this on

paper I want to know what's behind this

because this

is I mean it looks like it's closer to

treason than it is to a policy

difference a policy difference would

have people disagreeing on the details

that's not what's going on they're not

disagreeing on the details they they

literally are being Bamboozled about

what's in it and it's clearly designed

to make things

worse that's not

politics that I don't even know where to

follow the money for that there's

something else going on they need to

shut the whole system down until they

figure what that is they shouldn't vote

at anything they shouldn't pass a budget

for anything they should shut the

government down because I don't want

more of

this you need to stop and figure out

what's wrong and then maybe figure out a

way to fix it but no yeah right now the

the current system would be

what the current system would either be

you know blackmail and threaten and

bribe people to vote for this piece of

garbage right that'd be the normal

process or go back and create a

Frankenstein 2 which will be every bit

as bad as this and then come back and

tell us it was fixed and hope enough

people are now desperate you know they

got to get that Ukraine funding they got

to get that Israel funding that they'll

just give up and vote for

it that's what's going to

happen there there either there will

either be some kind of force making

people vote for it because they want the

other things or they'll go back and

rewrite it

worse you know that right it's not going

to come back making sense it's not even

going to come back looking like a

Democrat plan at least that I'd

understand you might like it you might

not like it but at least shouldn't it be

at least consistent with what Democrat

voters would want I don't see the

Democrat voters

wanting open

borders at least by a majority and the

ones who think they want it are just not

the people who should be in this

conversation they're people who don't

understand it or I mean they're just

they're honestly their limited capacity

people let me say it as directly as

possible the only people who could be in

favor of the current situation on the

border are people have limited capacity

now that's a lot of

people limited capacity by that I mean

the

inability to see the short-term and

long-term of a fairly complicated issue

right immigration is simpler than some

but still a little bit complicated I

think that the only people who could be

in favor of this are low capacity people

this has nothing to do with

politics

um so and I would I would go further um

I know this sounds like hyperbole but I

would cancel the elections the

presidential

elections let me say that again because

I'm serious and I know you won't take me

S we should cancel the elections because

we don't have a secure system and no

matter who wins we're not going to

believe it you know that no matter who

wins the country won't believe it under

those under that one situation you need

to cancel the

election I'm going to say this as many

times as it takes so you know I'm

serious under the specific situation

that you know for sure and we do that

neither side will accept the result

because they won't believe the election

was fair under that specific situation

and on top of that a system which was

designed for for corruption it's not

designed to remove it right if we

designed it to remove corruption the

elections would be the same day no prior

voting it'd be on paper there'd be no

computers and everybody would look at

what's happening and we'd have the

result the same day we'd know how to do

it so if the Democrats don't believe the

system if it goes the other way and the

Republicans won't believe the result if

it goes not their way and we have a

system which very clearly and

objectively is is designed for fraud

obviously I mean it's really obvious we

should cancel the election until we fix

it now you're saying to me but Scott

that would mean Biden or k La Harris are

running the

country

yep that's exactly what I'm

saying because you're watching them

disintegrate right in front of you and

you might need that to understand how

bad this is you might need to watch

Biden try to be president while he's

just literally just drooling on himself

right because you know they're going to

push they're going to tell you he's

still okay I I want to tell them I want

to see the Democrats tell you he's okay

when he's just drooling on the

microphone right that's what I want I do

want that because I believe the Deep

state will keep the country running just

fine and if the worst thing is that we

don't give them money for Foreign Wars

because we're too incompetent and

everything's shut down fine

fine yeah let them work it out let them

just work it

out but we are not in the domain of

politics anymore we're the we're in the

domain of there's something wrong and we

got to figure out what it is it looks

like foreign

influence it's either foreign influence

or somebody is in charge of our country

domestically that we just don't know who

it is and we don't know why they're

doing it if we can't explain

Soros is funding every thing

that's bad for the country and that the

Democrats are just going give us some

more of

that there's something going on and I

say just shut it all down we might need

a constitutional convention in which we

just rewrite this because we

designed a system that doesn't work in

modern times I think the founders were

brilliant and they designed a system

that worked for few hundred years

but it doesn't work now and here's

why I think the media

brainwashing um machine got too

good the the brainwashing function got

too good and that's not something that

the early settlers could have understood

they would never have seen the

mainstream media coming the internet

they would have never seen you know the

massive censorship machine they wouldn't

have seen that so I think we need to

stop cancel the election cancel this

Frankenstein Bill immediately no matter

what happens I don't care what happens

in Israel I don't care what happens in

Ukraine I literally don't because

whatever happens is going to be horrible

it's just going to be some different

version of horrible and somebody else is

going to pay for it so if you're just

making me choose among the horribles

great you pay for it you pay for it if

it's going to be horrible no matter what

you pay for it why am I funding

your horrible choices you go

fund your own horrible

choices so cancel the election literally

literally do a constitutional convention

and figure out if we can come up with a

system where we can still have free

speech without government censorship

working through the Nos and all their

fake fact Checkers and the fake ADL and

the fake you know fake

everything um and just see if we could

rewrite it and May maybe not change

everything you know you don't want to

throw everything away you want to keep

the good stuff but we need something

something that deals with whatever is

happening because whatever's happening

is

new and not something the founders

contemplated and if we keep pretending

that the the problem is a policy

difference we're not even in the right

frame it's the wrong

frame look look at this bill you tell me

in all seriousness you think that the

the Border

bill was a case of policy

disagreement that's not even close to

what we're seeing it's not even in the

neighborhood of of even a little bit

smelling like it could be

true we're in some other different

domain here and I don't know what it is

we're going to have to stop everything

and figure it

out and if that means that Trump doesn't

get elected in November I'm I'm for

that it's just there there's no way he's

going to get elected under a current

system you know that right they're

either going to kill him or Drake the

election I mean it doesn't look like he

has a chance honestly so when I say we

should cancel the election if you're

thinking oh my God maybe Trump won't get

elected if they can't no it probably

didn't change that at all probably

didn't make any

difference you might see today a report

about election

Integrity that

uh could be really

interesting so there's something coming

if you haven't seen it yet so I'm not I

can't mention it because you might not

have seen it I don't know if it's out

but there's something coming

today on Election Integrity in

2020 that you're going to find really

interesting really really interesting

and let's just say it's exactly what you

thought it's exactly what you thought

appeals court ruled against Trump is

that

new what appeal appeals

court DC what they rule which which are

the many

things rejects his immunity bid oh yeah

I expected that though didn't we all

expect that the immunity bid wouldn't

work I know that that's not a big

surprise but I think a lot of the

challenges are just to delay things

until after the election oh actually

that would be a problem wouldn't it if

you cancel the election they have more

time to get Trump well that would that

would be an argument against it that

would definitely be an argument against

it all

right

um

so Kelly and Conway did a uh opinion

piece I think it was in the uh I forget

where maybe New York Times or something

doesn't matter and uh Kellan Conway said

that she thinks that Trump should pick a

person of

color not because of you know weird

diversity reasons but just because it

would help help the election you know

just a practical thing and she says she

would narrow it down so these are the

names that she's she's got in her list

uh

Rubio how many of you think of Marco

Rubio as a person of

color Marco

Rubio do you do you think Marco Rubio

would gain Trump even one vote because

he's a person of

color he wouldn't get one vote for his

ethnicity would he am I wrong about

that I don't think

so

uh

anyway I guess Marco Rubio I guess would

be the perfect example of the way I

think we should do things I love the

fact that I guess technically he'd be a

person of color but I can't think of any

time that Marco Rubio has ever talked

about it has he I mean maybe he has but

he hasn't he hasn't talked that up like

oh you know vote for me I'm a person of

color I mean I think he treats it like

it doesn't exist which which allows me

to treat it like it doesn't exist which

is how I want to treat

it so yeah I'm I'm going to give him

credit for that all right so she

mentions uh Rubio she says uh Tim Scott

Byron

Donald's and Ben Carson representative

uh Wesley hunt never heard of him who's

Wesley

hunt has anybody ever heard of

Representative Wesley hunt

from

Texas

yeah Mike's brother you're funny all

right and then she mentions F ramas

Swami uh now let's look at her list so

here's what I believe kellyan Conway is

doing when somebody randomly Who's

involved in politics writes a uh opinion

piece you might say to yourself oh

there's somebody writing an opinion

piece and I'll bet it will agree with

their side and all that but kellyan

Conway is not your average

pundit I believe and I would look for an

opinion on this from you as well I

believe that when she writes a piece

like this that this has a function to it

I believe that she's testing these names

on behalf of trump to see what kind of

reaction it gets does it look like like

that to you that all she's doing is

doing a focus group by putting it out

there and letting people talk about it

so in my view she would not have done

this unless Trump had already narrowed

it down to these exact

names so I think she's

signaling that it's going to be one of

these and then she's seeing how you feel

about

it now let's look at the list let's go

further Marco Rubio do you think that

that is uh would help Trump to have

another

Florida

guy I think I think Mark R Mar or Rubio

is you know obviously he's a strong

politician but I think he's a hard

no kind of doesn't make

sense yeah I just don't think he's not

going to get enough he's going to get

somebody who agrees with him and doesn't

get any extra votes I say no on on Rubio

even though he's a you know he's a solid

guy

uh Tim Scott another solid

guy you know and he he checks the you

know checks the box so everybody would

at least know he's a person of color I

think he's too

weak um I just think he's too weak I

think if you've got somebody like Trump

who's a certain age you're going to look

at the vice president as a they've got

to have the same power level right this

isn't like like um you know vice

presidents of old where you didn't

really need them to be as good as the

top of the ticket this isn't that this

is the one case where you need the vice

president to be as good as the top of

the ticket sort of like a Gore Clinton

situation which was

rare

um so how about uh Byron Donalds or Tim

Scott I would say that Byron Donald's is

not quite seasoned

enough I don't know what he's

accomplished exactly although he's

strong I mean his future looks right Tim

Scott I just don't think he's got the

gravitas like I just don't think he's

like the hammer that you might

need uh how about Ben Carson I think

Ben's too sleepy I just don't think Ben

has the fire to be a vice president and

certainly not you know he's a certain

age ET not B Carson uh Wesley hunt I

don't know anything about him so that

would

be that would be a pick if you didn't

want your vice president to make any

difference it feels like that would be

just the Larry Elder is a certain age

he's over 70 I don't think you want your

vice president to be over 70 that that

would be a bad choice um then you get to

vake here's what I

think to me it's seems obvious that

kellyan Conway is testing V what do you

think I don't think she's even really

testing the other names I think this is

literally just a test of aake if you put

him in a group of other uh is that

Wesley

hunt I feel like I may have seen him

before so does it feel like and I and I

think specifically she's testing v a

against the black

choices what do you think because the

real question would be uh if if Trump if

Trump picked a black running mate I

think that would everybody would say

okay that's you know to get some extra

votes and it might actually be a strong

play I could definitely see that that

would be a strong

play but you need somebody who's

credible I think Byron Donald's just

needs a little more seasoning you know

we just need to see him accomplish a few

more things he could be great in the

future he might be terrific um and the

others are a little light but when I see

the the boldness with which V you know

talks about what he would do when I see

that he went from nowhere to make such a

big dent in the election I mean for

somebody who was an unknown and when you

look at his

success um you know business success you

look at his Renaissance Man ability to

understand and lots of topics I feel

like this is an Easy

Choice what do you

think does it does it seem to you like

it just jumps out as the obvious choice

or am I just too I mean I am very Pro so

I can't pretend I'm unbiased but it

looks like an obvious

choice because the others are just going

to give Trump either a a

nothing or a little

bit I think V would have the potential

to give him more than any vice president

ever gave a candidate I think I think it

would be a legendary

combination and it would be the most

confident thing that Trump could ever

do you know some of you said that Trump

wouldn't handle the fact that V you know

is is a strong personality and he's so

smart I say opposite I think you're

reading Trump completely wrong I say

that Trump Lov loves Brilliance like he

runs toward it all the time he wants to

work with it he wants to compliment it

he wants to be around it he loves

Brilliance there's no way he doesn't

like V and VI likes him so that's the

other requirement right so to me it's

like a perfect combination really I I

doubt it could be better in my view and

it wouldn't have worked the first

election because Trump wasn't already an

experienced president but now that Trump

is an experienced

president V's perfect it just it just

fits in every

way um Senator

Massie was uh talking about

mayorcas destroying some records so

apparently this whole pipe bomb

situation you know the pipe bomb

situation there was a fake it turns out

fake fake pipe bomb uh near where K

Harris was uh at the DNC headquarters on

January 6 and there's lots of mystery

about why we didn't know things and

there's text messages that were

magically destroyed that would have told

us more and Massie is making the case

that mayorcas was the you know the top

boss when all this happened and it's a

records

retention

violation and that maybe it should be

researched now I'm not one who thinks

that records retention is the biggest

crime and that we need to get really

tough on

that whichever side it is it just

doesn't excite me

um but I have this question how many

times have Democrats destroyed records

and got away with it is is anybody

keeping a

record like yeah we know Hillary's

emails and Hillary's phones she bleached

bits and destroyed the phones but

correct me if I'm wrong aren't there now

several stories like that and they're

all Democrats

and it was all people who were caught

red-handed and then they deleted the

only thing that would get them in

trouble yeah all of the January 6

testimony deleted the the pipe bomb text

messages

deleted yeah the FBI deleting

stuff

yeah I don't know it's sort of telling

me that as a legal

strategy uh you should destroy any

records no matter how legally they've

been

requested it feel I feel like destroying

records is just a smart play at this

point because it keeps

working anyway Tucker is in Tucker

Carlson's in Moscow the word is that

he's already talked to uh Putin now of

course the hill uh is quoting the

guardian saying that Tucker said uh why

can't I root for Russia I rooting for

them do you think Tucker said

that do you think that the hill that

quotes the

guardian that quotes

Tucker said why can't I root for

Russia I doubt it but here's how you

should analyze this so the hill makes

the

claim but they don't support the claim

they port to the they point to the

guardian so I follow the link and the

guardian makes the claim and then I look

for the source so I can you know see it

for myself because obviously if you make

a claim like Tucker Carlson said he

supports Russia and there's a video

right it wasn't

there so the source that makes the claim

doesn't have a

video to show you where it came from

it's the news it's the

news that's a pretty big claim to not

have a little bit of evidence for now

I'm not saying that he didn't say those

words I just don't know the

context now I think at one point he said

he was joking or something I don't

know

but um it also raises an interesting

question why can't he root for

Russia it's actually a pretty good

question now that part he may have he

may have why can't

he I I asked that of myself I said all

right think of all the things that

Russia has done that hurt

me uh now think of all the things that

Ukraine has done that hurt me I feel

like they're very

expensive and I feel like they're the

reason that Russia might be a risk to

me because of Ukraine

so do I think that the Ukrainian

population would be bet would be worse

off under Russian

rule I don't know how would I even know

that now obviously if Russia took over

Ukraine they'd you know kill all the

leaders on day one but have those

leaders done a good

job and would the people in Ukraine find

that their economy started improving

right away because I don't see the

Russians complaining about their

economy Am I Wrong is there a big

Uprising in in Russia of people who say

our economy is bad

I don't think there is I think Putin has

like weirdly High approval so if the guy

with high approval that nobody's

complaining internally about his economy

wants to do the same for Ukraine which

was a corrupt Basket

Case what is worse for Ukraine letting

Russia

win I actually don't know I actually

can't tell if Ukraine is better off

letting their corrupt government steal

other money and drive them into poverty

and create Wars for no reason or would

they be better off if they just said

Peace they had a new leader who may also

be corrupt but it couldn't be any worse

than it is who doesn't start a war

because it's

Russia I mean he wouldn't start a war

with Ukraine because they would already

own it in that

place

um believe the original January 6 hoax

that's true he's already talked about

that yeah what people saw and believed

during the fog of War has no it's no use

for analysis yes people were had wrong

opinions when we didn't know anything

same with the

pandemic yeah you don't complain in

Russia oh we would know we would know

yeah you don't complain in the newspaper

in Russia but we would know you know

so um it's going to be fascinating so

what I would recommend is that uh Tucker

actually negotiate a peace deal with

Putin and

Ukraine does that sound

crazy well well let me ask you this

who's going to do

it you everybody knows it has to be done

am I right 100% of the public knows that

Russia and Ukraine has to talk and they

have to

negotiate what who else is going to do

it

Biden Biden's not Biden's not going to

do it

zalinski no

no I'm completely serious I realize it

would be illegal but we don't have a

real government so something's got to be

done now it would be very illegal for

private citizen to negotiate on behalf

of America but would it be wrong to

suggest what a solution would look

like would it be wrong for Tucker to

invite zalinsky and Putin uh to be in

the same room and work it out it'

probably be

illegal probably but if it was all

transparent I wouldn't care yeah now I'm

being a little bit you know just

provocative I don't think that Tucker

should negotiate a peace deal but who

but honestly no one else is going to do

it until until and if you know a trump

or republican gets office no one's going

to do it so if you want this thing to

end you should be rooting for tuer to

end it and by the way I think he

could because it's not that hard to do

just somebody has to be working on

it just somebody has to be working on it

that's it that's all that's the entire

thing somebody has to be doing it

because we already know what it looks

like Russia's going to keep the stuff

that they already

got because they're they're never going

to give it back so why would he even

have much question about it you know

there might be something about NATO blah

blah blah

but yeah I think T Tucker could

literally negotiate peace because nobody

else is doing

it and everybody wants it like if

everybody didn't want it then you it

would be crazy to say you know some some

news pundit guy could negotiate world

peace that would be the dumbest thing in

the world but in this very unique

case where not only do both sides want

it they want it desperately and they

also know exactly what it would look

like right Ukraine knows they're not

going to get those territories

back but now imagine imagine this

imagine Tucker goes in he goes how about

this you know I can't negotiate a peace

deal but let me just ask you why you

wouldn't do this why wouldn't you offer

Putin why wouldn't you offer to do a

referendum for the disputed areas and

then decide everything based on the

referendum you know make sure it's run

by some third party like Switzerland or

something so it's it's real but if the

citizens want to be Russian how about

they go where you know by majority how

about they get that and if there are

areas that are still disputed where the

population does not want to be Russian

by a majority we just go with

that and then you don't you don't make

the rest of Ukraine

NATO because it's too provocative now

did I just did I just solve the war yes

yes I just solved it now all it would

take is for somebody like Tucker to just

put that idea in Putin's head how about

this why don't you offer that a

independent let's say the UN runs a

referendum for who should be in charge

where and no matter what you don't do

any more NATO stuff because that's just

going to cause the fight now you say

Victoria Newland would not allow that

and you're

right but don't you want it on the

table don't you want it on the

table because if you start polling

America you're going to get a 90% yes on

that American voter do you think that

Russia and Ukraine should end the war by

polling the citizens in the disputed

territories and going with what the will

of the people requires

we might have the world's simplest war

to

end

except for the money launderers and the

criminals who have some other motivation

but you would probably need something

like an

85% public preference before you could

overcome whatever corruption is keeping

things the way they are now it would

just be too embarrassing to go against

85% of the public as well as you know

the publics of the disputed

territory I mean that'd be hard to go

against uh Scott Mings to understand

your history please this has been tried

that's a terrible

comment terrible

comment yeah the history does not

history does not um tell you what's

going to happen in the future history

does not repeat itself that is a myth

and as soon as you believe that you

can't do anything that that eliminates

your ability to think oh history repeats

itself so there you go yeah no

everything's different everything that

was true before you had a major war that

exhausted both sides just doesn't apply

everything that was true before U Russia

had total military control of those

places it's a completely different

situation you know that we we didn't

have a failed government where the our

government couldn't really be

productively involved in anything

everything's different so to imagine

that what would happen when everything

was different is your model for today it

doesn't make any sense at

all that no I don't need to know that

history I know a little bit of it I mean

I know enough to know it doesn't matter

all right um the post Millennium is

reporting that uh Canada ordered their

lockdowns based on fraudulent studies

and by fraudulent I think it means that

somebody did a study and said that uh

during the Omicron wave and this is

important during the Omicron wave when

it was already past the most dangerous

part Canada said they needed to keep the

lockdown because of the unvaccinated

people were causing the the spread of

the Omicron the

unvaccinated now the claim and I'm not

saying this is true or false because I

don't believe any of the science around

the pandemic the claim is that the the

statistics actually showed that it was

the vaccinated people who were spreading

the Omicron the

most and therefore the policy should

have been exactly the opposite and it

wasn't Justified to lock everything down

now the claim that the vaccinated people

were spreading at the

most do you believe

that

you

do

okay all right so here's what I'm not

claiming I'm not claiming that the shots

worked I I want you to hear me very

clearly I'm not claiming that they

worked no no no I'm claiming that you're

believing data that came out of the

pandemic and it's pretty stupid looking

like if you believe this you're really

gullible and by the way you might be

right right you might be right but if

you believed it because you heard it in

the news you really got to check

yourself this is not something you

should have believed it might be

true but don't believe it because the

data the data said

it here's

why almost everywhere where we collect

data when it

matters we can choose ways to collect

that that sell a story and we can choose

ways to collect it they give you the

wrong answer to me this looks obviously

like they collected it and got the wrong

answer now if you told me that there was

no difference between vaccinated and

unvaccinated I'd say oh well that

actually sounds

reasonable yeah that actually sounds

reasonable but if you tell me that the

people vaccinated had more

spreading I'm not going to believe that

like what are what are the odds that it

made it more likely you're going to

spread it do you think it's do you think

that maybe the people who are likely to

get it and get sick with it and know

they had it are the people who are weak

to begin with and more likely to be

vaccinated you don't think there's any

correlation between there's something

about the people who got vaccinated such

as I'm going to spend a lot of time with

other people so I better get vaccinated

what what do the people who didn't get

vaccinated have in

common they spend a little less time

around other

people and if and if you say that's not

true I say to you how do you know how do

you know if you don't know that that's

true or false then what do you then how

can you think that this vaccinated

people are more likely to spread it this

is the most ridiculous I've

ever seen in my life now I'll agree with

you that the vacine the so-called

vaccinations didn't stop the spread

certainly during Omicron it made no

difference at

all so I'm not supporting the science

hear me clearly I'm not backing the

science I'm saying that you believe the

science so I'm saying that you believe

the

science

why like why would you believe

it either way if it told you that the

vaccinated were more likely or if it

told you the opposite why would you

believe it

there is no there's no data from that

era that's

believable and this is opposite of what

makes common sense and it's also fairly

opposite why this number would be wrong

because there's something about the

vaccinated population that is

substantially

different from the unvaccinated they

they have a very different character I

mean if the only thing you did is say

City people are more likely to be

vaccinated than country people is that

true you tell me

true or false City people more likely to

be vaccinated than rural people yes or

no well Republicans are more rural City

people are

more Democrat if that's the only thing

you knew wouldn't you assume that more

Democrat City people are vaccinated

right now what where are you more likely

to catch a a virus in the country on

your

Ranch or in the city where you're

surrounded by infected people all day

long do do you think that this

study adjusted for the fact that they

unvaccinated have a uh more less dense

lifestyle because they're more rural

people if they're

Republicans now are are you hearing this

for the first

time that this number couldn't be

trusted because there's something deeply

different about the unvaccinated

population

yeah

so don't believe anything about numbers

that come out of the the pandemic

they're they're all motivated numbers

even if they agree with you and even if

they're right even if they're right so

keep in mind I'm not I'm not eliminating

the possibility that it's

true but you shouldn't think it's true

because there was some

study if you think it's true because

there was a study or there somebody

corrected a study from wrong to right

it's like you learn nothing during the

pandemic none of the data is

useful at least believable none of

it all right Ian Bremer and some others

were talking about all of Biden's

foreign policy wins uh here's here's the

list of things which Biden could brag

about he kept NATO strong apparently

Japan and South Korea were having a

tough time with each other and uh it was

getting tense but uh Biden

Administration got them to to talk and

it seems like tensions have gone down so

that's good um then also the China

tariffs are still in place the other

Trump tariffs so not much change there

and that's considered good and then uh

Biden negotiated to get China to stop

sending fenel uh precursors to the

United States so that's all good

right right you're not going to disagree

with me are you so look at all these

winds then he also stopped the China

from harassing American aircraft Big Win

there so that's pretty strong look at

this list I'll read it again he kept

NATO strong he got Japan and South Korea

to get together I think Ian bremmer said

you know that was as substantial or

somebody did that was as substantial as

the uh the Abraham Accords you know what

wasn't much in the news but real big

deal so big win there for Biden and uh

those the the fenel you know stopping

stopping the fenel that's a pretty big

deal and then stopping the Chinese haras

so that's that's all of his big wins

it's pretty good huh let's take a look

at this keeping NATO

strong am I wrong or did Trump get NATO

its biggest funding of all

time the argument here is that uh Trump

kept saying is NATO

useful he should keep saying that he

should say that about literally

everything we give money to do we still

need these bases in other countries

maybe but he should ask that question do

we still need to give money to this or

that I don't even care what this or that

is maybe you should ask that question

maybe you should put them on their heels

and say I'm not so sure I should give

you any money you tell me why I should

give you some money to me that's a

better way to handle things so if

somebody's interpreting that Biden's got

the better handle on things things by

telling them by telling NATO they can

have anything they want and we'll back

them that feels like

stupid so are we are we calling his

accomplishment something that in my

opinion looks just sort of stupid it's

bad negotiating to say nato all good

take our money NATO all good no you got

to make them prove it you better you

better make sure that they're doing

something we want to spend their money

on and you should have them on their

heels all the time that's just basic

leadership how about uh that Japan and

South Korea thing see that that's

something that no other Administration

would be able to handle

right how the hell hard was it to get

Japan and South Korea to not start a war

I don't think that was the highest level

of difficulty if you're going to compare

this to the Abraham

Accords

seriously seriously now I know know that

Japan and South Korea have a you know

long long history but I don't feel like

the level of difficulty there was too

high just sort of had to get him in the

same room all

right big deal uh then what about the

China tariffs well literally that's

something Trump did and just Biden

didn't break it but then the part about

he got China to agree to stop sending

fenel you know that didn't happen

nothing like that

happened it's the same thing that Trump

did and Trump said stop sending and they

said oh yeah sure yeah we're trying as

hard as we can yeah no nothing is

happening on fentel so to imagine that

you could just throw this in the story

like it's as biggest

accomplishment none of it's happening

it's not even

real and what about stopping the Chinese

harassing American

aircraft is that an

accomplishment no because they wouldn't

have even done it if Trump had been

president Am I Wrong Trump would have

just said once is too many just stop

that and I think they would have stopped

so these are the this is the weakest

list of

international uh you know and then it

forgets that he's involved in several

Wars

wow

anyway uh I've got a solution for the uh

the Red Sea

it's kind of

obvious so you know the

hoties around there are shooting

missiles and

stuff and we uh think Iran is behind all

of it of

course and Iran has some ship uh called

the bashad that's in that area that we

think is uh part of their you know their

spy bad operation and that is uh giving

some kind of intelligence to the hoodies

to know what to shoot maybe or doing

some other bad

things some have called it a floating

Armory so it's basically a military you

know serious military ship in the Red

Sea H but Iran has said that the purpose

of that ship here's good news is to uh

it's an anti-piracy

ship so the the point of the ship is to

stop all that

piracy meaning the hooes so it's an

anti-piracy thing so good news right it

Ran's on our

side yeah here we thought they had been

funding the hooes and they were all

happy about the missiles coming and and

bothering us but no it turns out Iran

says that uh they they don't like the

piracy either so they got their own ship

there to deal with

it do you see the solution yet or do I

have to connect the dots let me tell you

a little story that might allow you to

connect the dots do you remember once

there was a a Russian Pipeline to Europe

sort of a gas pipeline and then sadly it

blew up it blew up well sad and then we

blamed uh I believe we blamed Putin for

blowing up his own

pipeline well later we found out that

might not have been exactly

true but it makes me

wonder assuming that we take Iran at its

word and why wouldn't they they've never

lied to us before and they say that

there it's an anti-piracy thing you know

who would not like that you know who

would really not like an anti-piracy

ship right in that red sea area the

hooes and imagine if the hoties decided

to fire a missile and destroy that

ship I mean imagine because that was

that's exactly what the hoodies do yeah

that they'd want to they'd want to get

back at anybody who's trying to stop

their piracy and their bad intentions

there so I think you know just in the

same way that Putin destroyed his own

pipeline we might find the hoodies

attacking those Iranian ships and that

would be terrible I mean that would be a

tragedy so you maybe the hoodies can

take out those Iranian ships and maybe

that will

solve the problem we've done it

before no I don't think that's a good

idea but it's funny because we've done

it before it would be totally in

character for us to to syn their ship

and say I don't know it's the hoodies

we're doing what we can but we can't

stop every missile and we and and if you

if you

believe if you think that's going to

happen watch for the cat on on the

roof look for a story that would be a

fake story that says it looks like those

hoodies fired a missile at the Iranian

ship but luckily an American ship

intercepted the missile and shot it down

because we don't want war you know yeah

yeah we don't want war so we're we're

going to protect that Iranian ship from

those damn hooty

missiles that's the way I'd play it so

if you see that it sounds like we're

going to protect the Iranian ship from a

hoodie missile we're going to sync that

ship that that would be the hint that is

coming all right ladies and gentlemen

again the finest live stream you've ever

seen in your life thanks for joining

there on the X and YouTube and Rumble

Studios I'm using the rumble Studio free

software to broadcast all at the same

time and of course if you were on the

locals platform you get lots of extra

you get my robots read news

comic which is a sensation and um by the

way this has been brought to you by my

book reframe your brain if you haven't

seen the reviews for it they're crazy

the number of people whose lives have

been completely changed is reframe your

brain right up there and uh it is

changing lives like crazy you just read

the reviews you can see for yourself so

thanks for joining and I will talk to

you tomorrow same place same

time