Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive May 24, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #2579

Episode 2579 CWSA 08/28/24

Episode #2579 Aug 27, 2024 1:32:00 31,062 views

Election claims, oh my. RFK Jr. makes more news, Trump hoaxes and more ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.

Opening General Commentary

Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. It's going to be extra good today, I promise. And i

View segment →
SimultaneousSip General Commentary

f you'd like to take your experience up to levels that nobody can even comprehend with their tiny, shiny human brains, all you need is a cup or mug or glass, a tankard, chalice or stein, a canteen, jar, flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now fo…

View segment →
MainContent Moist Robot Framework

at makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it's going to happen right now. Oh, I pity the beverage-less. A little bit of science, then a little bit of politics. Yeah, we'll get to the chainsaw whale head stories. You know, the important stuff. But first, there's a new study…

View segment →
NewsReaction Health & Biohacking

think. Seems like two things in conflict. I'd like to give you one factoid that you can research on your own. There's no such thing as a brain surgeon who believes in free will. I'm just going to leave that there. That's your key to unlocking the next level of awareness. You got to use the key your…

View segment →
NewsReaction Climate & Environment

that study? Oh yeah, they could have asked Scott. Next time I could save you probably several weeks and maybe tens of thousands of dollars. You just have to ask me. Scott, what do depressed people do when they're depressed? Well, they probably eat, because eating gives you a little boost. What do yo…

View segment →
NewsReaction AI & Technology

'll be happy in the short run? Yes. Will eating a lot of carbs make you happy in the long run? Everybody knows the answer to that is no, because you're going to get heavy and it's not going to be good for your brain. So yeah, you could have skipped the science there. Just ask me. Yeah, eating ice cr…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

Now, I wouldn't bet very much that this will become a big thing, but how cool is it that what at least some people think is our biggest problem, the CO2, could be our biggest solution? I've long wondered if we will have an industry where sucking CO2 out of the air and turning it into products, in t…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

aid of if it melted down. But what they would do is they would drill this ginormous 30-inch hole, 30 inches wide, a mile deep, and they would put some kind of mechanism, nuclear mechanism, a mile into your hole, so to speak. And somehow they would need no mechanical parts, just two pipes. I'm not su…

View segment →
MainContent Persuasion

do that. You know I was in charge of making sure you had the option, but I would never make them mandatory because I would not want mandatory constraints on your body. But you might. I mean you might want to do it on your own in your states, but it's out of my control. And I think you're both happy.…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

do that kind of funding and he's not going to endorse anybody. He's not going to get political. What's that sound like to you? That's a Trump endorsement. I'm sorry, it's a Trump endorsement. He's not going to spend money to help the Democrats alter elections the way they had. He said that Trump did…

View segment →
MainContent Persuasion

, you're probably looking at genius if it happens more than once. So now this little bit feels a little like genius but maybe desperation too. Because you could have them at the same time. I think it's obvious that Harris cannot win a debate against Trump and I would think that the Democrats know t…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

l right, but from these three, if Dan Bongino tells you something doesn't smell right in the domain he knows about, I'm sure listening to that. So and I think it's like the Telegram CEO story. You'll never know. I don't think there's much any chance at all that we'll ever know the truth of what happ…

View segment →
NewsReaction Economics & Finance

I think it's not only fascinating that somebody tried to transport a dead whale's head. I find it fascinating that there's a law that covers that specific situation. But even more ironic, here it comes, here it comes. Remember this was an environmental advocacy group that was going after him. So is…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

u put it all together. It's too much. You know there's some point where I say you know what my taxes are outrageous but I get that people doing well pay more. I mean the concept itself doesn't stress me too much. But at some point it's just abuse and it just feels like punishment because I don't thi…

View segment →
MainContent Persuasion

mention the pirate ship analogy and he was nice enough to credit me on that. Which by the way I don't require. I like it when my ideas get used by anybody. I don't know if I've ever told you that directly. So anybody who wants to take anything I've said and say it with or without credit I'm okay wit…

View segment →
NewsReaction Climate & Environment

ligious version of this that we don't feel complete until we can go outside in a nice environment that's outdoors. And I completely agree with humans can't be humans until they can experience a clean environment. And I would argue that maybe a lot of inner city problems might have to do with not hav…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

nswer is no one. No one. That's how you should have known it was a hoax without needing to check that the video was in fact edited. Who would stand in front of the world and say maybe you should drink bleach or inject bleach or inject a household disinfectant into your body? No one. No one. Not Trum…

View segment →
Closing General Commentary

all their models? Well probably not because you know this is one maybe one study. Maybe they need to see some more before they're convinced. But I remind you that when you have a model that has I don't know hundreds of variables or whatever there are that it doesn't take much change to even one of t…

View segment →

Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. It's going to be extra good today, I promise. And if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that nobody can even comprehend with their tiny, shiny human brains, all you need is a cup or mug or glass, a tankard, chalice or stein, a canteen, jar, flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it's going to happen right now.

Oh, I pity the beverage-less.

A little bit of science, then a little bit of politics. Yeah, we'll get to the chainsaw whale head stories. You know, the important stuff. But first, there's a new study that says you can use brain stimulation to block traumatic memories. That's right. They will find the place in your brain where your traumatic memories are stored, and they'll zap it with some stimulant and whack it. So how does that work, though? I've got questions. I'm trying to reconcile how it could be that you have free will but that it's also true that if you stimulate the brain with electricity in a certain way, it can change how you think. Seems like two things in conflict.

I'd like to give you one factoid that you can research on your own. There's no such thing as a brain surgeon who believes in free will. I'm just going to leave that there. That's your key to unlocking the next level of awareness. You got to use the key yourself. I gave you the key. Now you have the key that there's no brain surgeon who believes in free will. They have to do the rest.

Well, there is a study Science Direct is talking about that says a high-carbohydrate diet, if you have a high ratio of carbs, is associated with an increased risk of depression. Eating a lot of carbs is associated with depression? Huh. Is there any way they could have saved some money on that study? Oh yeah, they could have asked Scott. Next time I could save you probably several weeks and maybe tens of thousands of dollars. You just have to ask me. Scott, what do depressed people do when they're depressed? Well, they probably eat, because eating gives you a little boost. What do you think they eat? Well, probably something that boosts their mood pretty quickly, like a steak. Well, I mean, they might like a steak, but what would really give you a little shot of heroin in your arm, but it's not heroin? A carb. A good carb will do that.

One of the reasons I don't do carbs is it's practically a hallucinogenic thing for me. If I eat just a bunch of carbs, I would just sit there in a coma after a while, but I'd be happy at first. So does it make sense that if you eat carbs you'll be happy in the short run? Yes. Will eating a lot of carbs make you happy in the long run? Everybody knows the answer to that is no, because you're going to get heavy and it's not going to be good for your brain. So yeah, you could have skipped the science there. Just ask me. Yeah, eating ice cream makes me happy in the short run. How does it work in the long run? Not so good.

Here's what I call ironic science, and we'll get to the politics in a minute. Ironic science, where the thing you didn't see coming turns out that you can use a giant bubble of CO2 to store renewable energy, according to Clean Technica. So apparently they have this way that they can compress CO2 and then decompress it, and somehow they can store energy and then release it through the decompression. Now imagine if that becomes a real thing and that we're using excess CO2 to store electricity from green energy. Now, I wouldn't bet very much that this will become a big thing, but how cool is it that what at least some people think is our biggest problem, the CO2, could be our biggest solution?

I've long wondered if we will have an industry where sucking CO2 out of the air and turning it into products, in this case a battery, is going to be a thing. So much so that people are sucking too much CO2 out of the atmosphere. I think there might be a point when humans are, just for their own economic reasons, sucking CO2 out of the air and turning it into stuff that they can sell. Could be a problem someday.

Well, here's something cool. New Atlas is reporting that there's a new design, hasn't been tested yet. It's a startup called Deep Fission. And the idea is they would use regular nuclear energy technology, not the generation 4, you know, not the new stuff, but rather the stuff that you would be afraid of if it melted down. But what they would do is they would drill this ginormous 30-inch hole, 30 inches wide, a mile deep, and they would put some kind of mechanism, nuclear mechanism, a mile into your hole, so to speak. And somehow they would need no mechanical parts, just two pipes. I'm not sure how this works. They put some water into it, and the water heats up. The pressure of the water is enough to keep things pressurized, so you don't need mechanical pressure, just the weight of the water, because there's a mile of water. And then I guess the nuke cooks it up and then shoots it back up as, I don't know, hot water or steam or something. But the point is you could actually have nuclear power in a hole. And then if the thing melted down, you just close the hole. Yeah, because it would be below the water table, so it would never need to be continually cooled because it would be below the water table. And if anything went wrong, you just leave it there. Apparently you can just cover the hole and walk away.

Now, will that ever become a thing? I don't know. But how cool would it be if it did? We just drill gigantic holes and put non-mechanical stuff in there, things that don't need to be revised too much because it's not mechanical, and just have all kinds of power.

Well, remember that CEO of Telegram, the messaging app, got picked up in France. There's talk of, you know, he's looking at 20 years of charges that look suspicious to all of us. The French are going to extend how long they're going to hold him. Let me tell you everything about this story that you need to know. You will never know what this story is about. I don't think there's the slightest chance that you and I will ever know what this guy was up to and who wanted him arrested or any of that. Probably the real story is something you've never even heard. It could be anything.

So here's the scary part. The Telegram CEO being picked up is more proof that any government, whether a democracy or not, can arrest you, make up a bunch of charges, and hold you forever. So if you think that, oh, it's a good thing I've got this justice system and all that, you really don't. We're at a point where the government can make up any story and hold you as long as they want. And you know this has the Tate brothers written all over it, meaning maybe the Tate brothers did something that the law doesn't like, but I'm not sure that's why they were arrested. I feel like whatever the reason was, we'll never know. It's some other deep, dark reason we'll just never know. So to speculate on this story seems like a waste of time because we'd just be guessing. But the one thing that is the takeaway is that any government can arrest any person for any reason and just make up charges and keep them in jail forever. I think that's guaranteed and evident and obvious at this point. So it's a scary world.

Here's a story that shouldn't bother you a bit. Over a million ineligible voters were removed from the Texas voter logs, according to Governor Abbott, and he was bragging about his election integrity efforts. So thank goodness. Thank goodness, right? Imagine if there had been a million ineligible voters. A million. Now that doesn't mean that they would all vote, but the speculation that some people have is that the ineligible voters, maybe they get a ballot or maybe somebody pretends to be them, but that in some way somebody's voting those names without being them. But that's not something you have to worry about, is it? I mean, we would obviously know with our tight election security. You would know if a million people were going to illegally vote, or even any big number. Ten thousand. Ten thousand would move a lot of races. But you would know if 10,000 people had voted who were not legal voters, right? Because our elections are so secure. There's no way you wouldn't know that, right? And there's no Kraken that's ever been found. Am I wrong? Nobody ever found a Kraken. So there's no reason to believe that large amounts of illegal voters are voting in the United States. That'd be crazy. Crazy people who believe that. Come on, come on.

Well, here's the next story. There's a claim that there are a thousand ways to commit election fraud. Elizabeth Nickson's writing about this. So there's an engineer and data science scientist. By the way, I don't know the validity of anything that's going to be in the following story. I'm going to report that it's being reported. I can't tell you it's true, but here's a report. See if it would answer all of your remaining questions, because it would. If this is true, and I don't know that it's true, I'm not selling it as true. I'm selling it as something that's reported. If it's true, it answers all of my questions. Now that's the first time that would have ever happened, because I do say if there were massive cheating, how in the world would we not know about it? You know, how could you really get away with that? Well, here's a theory. I'm just going to read it to you, but again I'm not telling you it's true. I'm just saying, well, I got a lot of questions now.

So this engineer and data scientist, Kim Brooks, she was working on cleaning the voter rolls in Georgia. So isn't that great? We got all these volunteers who are helping, making sure the voter rolls do not include dead people or people who moved away or people who can't vote for one reason or another. So she cleaned it up, and she'd clear a name. Let's say there was a specific name. She'd clear it either because they're dead or whatever, takes it off, and then she's pretty happy it's off. It's off. But then it would be back within a month. What? She would remove it from the election log, meaning eligible to vote, and it would be gone, but then it would be back in a month. Huh.

Now remember, I'm not claiming any of these reports are true. I'm claiming that there is a report. Huh. How could that happen? How can you take it off and then it would come back? And so it says at that juncture she realized that a program within the Georgia voter registration database was methodically adding back fake names. So reportedly, again I'm not saying this is true, I'm just saying it's reported, reportedly she looked deeper. For new registrants, the culprit was principally Driver Services creating new registrations. And in this case the manufacturer was a person or persons. In other words, there was a person doing it using a program within the government office. Someone was stealing names and duplicating, even tripling that person's vote, and then forging their signature. Sometimes it was someone who just died or a teacher who had no voting record. In the case of a nurse who died in 2022 with three registrations, she was registered to vote in two counties, and all three of her voted in the 2022 election and the 2024 primary. Each signature was slightly different and even spelled different. They even in the signature they spelled their own name different, three different ways, allegedly. And again I'm not saying it's true. I'm just saying it's reported.

The operation works under AVR, or automatic voter registration, is being used to register migrants. They will not vote, but their names have been entered into the voter registration database when they apply for a driver's license, and their vote will be voted for them. I imagine that this is repeating something everyone knows. So the allegation is that's why the border is open, to get more of these non-voters illegally on the voter rolls. How many states do you think use this system, this automatic voter registration system, in which one database would be populating the other database and massively illegally, if the claim is true? How many? Well, the claim is that in 2020 there are 20 states who use the system that would allegedly, I'm just saying what is reported, I don't know what's true, allegedly take names from one system that were not eligible to vote, the driver's license databases, and put those names onto the other system. But in the case of people who were registered two or three times, there must have been something beyond just taking new people and putting them on the rolls. Must have been something beyond that.

So how many states use that system, the one that's suspected of being the culprit in these elections? 20. There were 20 states who allegedly used these systems. How many of those did Trump lose? Of 20 states that used that same system, how many did Trump lose? 18. Trump lost 18 of 20 states that use this same system, allegedly.

Now the claim is that there are these registration fraud rings, as identified in the Arabella document, I don't know what that is, in the work of Omega for America. So there must have been somebody who looked into this. And the idea is that each of these states has a dozen or more NGOs which do nothing but fill out ballots for fake registrants. And Peter Bernegger, whoever that is, his team in Wisconsin has video of NGO functionaries doing just that. What, at 1:00 a.m. early morning after election day? What? I don't know that that's confirmed. And Porter reports multiple schemes using the deceased, non-voting, and felons, blah blah blah. They steal an individual's driver's license number, Social Security, blah blah. The only thing that changed is the address and the signature. Generally they use people who don't vote. They change a street number, a county, a signature. Huh.

Well, what do you think now? Let's put this in context. All right, the first context is that when the original 2020 suspicions were coming out and there were lots of different claims, I said that whether or not any of these election rigging claims are true, the one thing you could know for sure is that at least 95% of the claims would be debunked. Was I right? Yeah, probably 95% of the claims were debunked. Some of them are not debunked but not confirmed or not found by a court or not big enough or somebody didn't have standing. So you know there's some gray area stuff, but 95% of the stuff you could check turned out to be not conclusive.

Now, so what would you say about this new claim about this one database that's feeding the other database? Is that in the 95%? Well, you don't know. But the caution is that every claim has a 95% chance of not being true. That's my claim. So this is another claim that you might say has a 95% chance of not being true. But let me tell you what's different about it. This is the first time that all of my questions could be answered, which is how could they do this at a scale and get away with it? If it's done, if there's massive cheating, how can you get away with it? Now I had been thinking it had something to do with the computer code after the vote is given, and maybe there is something like that, but I don't have any proof of that. But this would make way more sense if it's true that there are NGOs who are dedicated to putting together these fake voter lists.

That gets me to my next point. We have a world in which it would take one whistleblower, just one, to change the entire freaking world. Because America would be completely changed by one whistleblower who actually had the goods. You know, say a video or said yes, I personally did this. This is what we did to the database. If you could get just one, everything's changed. The entire power structure of the United States would be altered forever. And of course the United States affects the rest of the world in a big way. It's a world-changing event. One whistleblower. And that one whistleblower would get rich because there are going to be some big rewards.

And if I were a whistleblower, I would say how big is the reward? And they might say something like we'll give you $10,000. And then you say if you really have the goods, nope, 10,000 doesn't even get me interested. All right, we'll give you $50,000. Nope, not interested. A hundred? Nope. We'll give you a million dollars pre-tax or after-tax? Pre-tax? No. We'll give you $2 million. So after taxes, unless Harris gets selected, you'll still have a million left over. Well, now we're talking. For $1 million I will prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that I worked on a team that rigged the election and that I know where the other NGOs are doing the same thing. If that's true. Again, I don't know that it's true. It's an allegation.

So how would you like to be one of those cheaters knowing that all of your co-workers, all of your people complicit, allegedly, allegedly we don't know that that's true, every one of them could get a million dollars for turning your ass in? Oh, it's getting interesting now.

People have, I've been telling you forever that this movie, this reality we're living in that's way too much like a movie, there is something required that hasn't happened. The movie cannot be completed until the Kraken is found. Every part of this movie requires the Kraken to be found after we're sure that it can't be found. That's what an act three looks like. That's a real act three. So I'm going to double down and say that I don't believe that given the current setup, the design of our election going forward, and part of the design is now the whistleblower rewards. Right, so the whistleblower rewards are now part of the design of the system.

Here's things that you could guarantee without knowing anything. If somebody drew a system on paper and brought it to you and said all right, here's what we're going to do. We're going to give $100 no questions asked to everybody who rings your doorbell. What do you think will happen? And I'd say well once word gets out I would imagine it'd be this huge line of people ringing my doorbell. Correct? Now did you have to test it? Did you have to actually run a test? No, it would be so obvious from the design that people are going to knock on your door forever trying to get their $100. Very easy to predict.

Now let's do it with the election. If you had an election system that was super complicated and it would be really hard to know if anybody was doing anything like what was suggested, and the stakes are gigantic, I mean it's practically life and death, fortune or no fortune, I mean really, really high stakes, and it's possible, so it's possible, and the incentive to do it is through the roof. It's the biggest incentive you could ever have. If you showed me that on paper and said what do you think will happen, there's lots of ways to cheat and the benefit of doing it, the upside is gigantic. Well I would say well on paper there's going to be massive cheating. There can't really be any other way this goes.

Now we were told that there really was no way to cheat without getting caught. If that's true, well then I revise everything I've said. But we know it's not true. If anybody involved in the election wanted to have a fair election they would just say hey let's just do paper ballots and then everybody will stop bitching, right? You do the paper ballots, everybody looks at them, you can recount them if you want to. Everybody's happy. And we know exactly what to do to get to that point. We know that we want to clean the voter rolls. It's really easy to know how to do it legally. Is that what's happening? No, no. Every sign that we're seeing, especially in Georgia, there's a new movement by the Democrats to resist cleaning up the voter rolls. Why in the world would they want to resist cleaning up the voter rolls and removing ineligible voters? Only one reason. There are not two reasons for that. The only reason is that they plan to use those dead voters and ineligible voters to vote. What else? What else could it be? Give me the other reason. No. If you read the reason it'll just look like nonsense words put together. No, there's only one reason.

So on paper the design of the system pretty much guarantees massive fraud. That doesn't mean I have proof of it. It's just that the system design guarantees it. And now there's a tweak to the system design. Now the system design includes this new element that wasn't there before, which is knowing in advance that there will be a whistleblower reward and probably a big one. Because remember the whistleblower doesn't have to accept the offered award. The whistleblower can negotiate. If you had the goods, which by the way if you're a whistleblower you should negotiate. Don't take the first offer because you've got this drawing hand there. So negotiate. So if you add negotiating and whistleblowing to the current system, what does the design tell you will happen? Again I'm not being magic or guessing. I'm saying if you design a system that very clearly will give you one outcome, what are you going to get? Well you're going to get that one outcome. It's designed to give it to you.

All right, our design in 2020 almost guaranteed a rigged election because it was possible and the stakes were high. Now I don't have proof of that. I'm just saying that the design guaranteed that there would be an effort. Now we have a design that pretty much guarantees that at least one whistleblower will try to get rich. Right, it's hard to imagine that all those people who would be willing to do this illegal thing, they're all criminals. Every one of them is a criminal. Do you think you can trust a criminal not to take a million dollars to sell you out? You can't trust a criminal. So if I take this design and just fast forward it, the design should give us a result that we don't trust at the end of the election. It should create a situation where the government is not willing to certify it. That's our design.

Now I'm not saying magic will happen. I'm saying our current design guarantees it. Right, the current design guarantees rigging. It guarantees it by design. And now that we've got the whistleblowing thing with enough money behind it, that's a design that guarantees a whistleblower even if they're making it up. You know somebody's going to take a run at it. So the current design pretty much guarantees we're not going to have a result by design. Again I'm not saying if this happens or if this. No, by design we can't get a result this time because it will be evidence of massive cheating beyond the margin that would determine the outcome. So my prediction for the race is no outcome. Now what happens after that is a big black box in my head. I have no idea. Maybe redo it. I don't know. Do you keep the old president in charge long enough to fix something? Does the House pick a new president? And then nobody's happy. I mean the whole country would fall apart if they just said oh Trump's the president. So I don't know what happens, but my prediction is no election certification. So we'll see.

Kamala Harris got community noted because she said that Biden and I believe that women should make decisions about their own health care and their body, not the government. And the community note said you required health care workers and big companies in the military to get COVID vaccinations or lose their job. That is the opposite of bodily freedom.

So now I'm fantasizing that the debate happens between Harris and Trump. Harris of course is going to bring up this, you bad Republicans, you want to take away the bodily autonomy. And then Trump says well you know everything that I did was to take the decision away from me in the federal government and move it closer to the individuals in the states. And women are the majority voters in those states. So if you can convince each other what to do with your bodily autonomy, I'm sure the rest of the world would go along with it. But women, you need to decide. You need to decide what it is and I'm sure the system will support you. I know I do. Takes the whole abortion thing off the table and then you do the kill shot. But if we're talking about bodily autonomy, your team is the one who had mandatory vaccinations and I would never do that. You know I was in charge of making sure you had the option, but I would never make them mandatory because I would not want mandatory constraints on your body. But you might. I mean you might want to do it on your own in your states, but it's out of my control. And I think you're both happy. Everybody's happy that I don't have anything to control your body. Everybody good with that? It'd be a pretty strong argument.

So I fantasize about, there's new drunk Kamala video where she's talking to somebody in an airport where she looks totally sauced. I'm thinking about Jason from the All-In Pod said that there was evidence, you know it was a Dark MAGA claim that she was drinking too much and there's no evidence of it. Well I don't know if you've seen the compilation clips yet, but we add this to the evidence. However I'm going to fool you by saying this one I don't think should be part of the compilation. And the reason is it looked like she was just flying in an airport somewhere, you know either on her way or on the way back, and it wasn't official business. I have one feeling. If she's drunk giving a speech in her official capacity, if she was off duty and had a few drinks in the plane, I can't imagine that would be too different from presidents we've had before. My concern is if she can't control it enough that she can do it on her off time versus work time. Now I get that if you're president you still need to be coherent if you get the 3:00 a.m. call. But realistically we've had drinking presidents for a long time. I just want it not to be during the job. And if she was just flying around, I have a different feeling about that even if she was drunk.

Well, the author of White Fragility, one of those books that made wokeness a big thing, who is herself a white woman, has been accused of plagiarizing from minority scholars. That's the whole story. The whole story is that white people are bad. Apparently she proved it anyway.

Meta's Zuckerberg had put in a statement and he basically admitted that the Biden administration pressured them to censor COVID stuff and also the Hunter's laptop stuff and maybe some other stuff. And he said it was wrong and he wished he pushed back. And he's not going to be as political or spend his money the way he did before, you know shoring up election integrity. Though it probably worked the other way. So he's not going to do that kind of funding and he's not going to endorse anybody. He's not going to get political. What's that sound like to you? That's a Trump endorsement. I'm sorry, it's a Trump endorsement. He's not going to spend money to help the Democrats alter elections the way they had. He said that Trump did the most badass thing he'd ever seen when he did the fight fight after he got shot. He's seen that the Democrats are the enemy trying to censor him. And his entire game is free communication and they were trying to ruin the most basic thing about his platform, which is some of its honest. And I think you know Zuckerberg, he's one of those people that I love the fact that you don't have to wonder if he's being dumb. You can just rule that out. You know lots of times when you see somebody doing something that maybe isn't what you would do you say oh maybe they're dumb. You know maybe they have some clever thing I don't know about but maybe they're dumb. You don't have to worry about that. Zuckerberg isn't dumb. Like we all agree on that, right?

So I think not endorsing anybody in the current environment, you're endorsing Trump. That's what it feels like. Now I'm not going to put words in his mind and I'm not going to read his mind so I don't know that. I'm telling you how I feel. What I feel is that it's no longer necessary to oppose Hitler, you know what I mean? If you thought Trump was Hitler and the other side are the good guys, you kind of have an obligation to be against them or at least say the words even if you don't do things. But if you're not willing to say the words and you're not willing to do things, at the very least he doesn't think Trump is Hitler. That's a big deal. Because I suspect maybe he did think that because he was acting like he did anyway.

So Harris now has changed her view on having live microphones that are open during the debate. So in other words Trump's microphone would still be on while she's doing her talking and that makes interrupting possible. Why in the world would Kamala Harris want to invite Trump interrupting? Well here's what I think. Remember I keep telling you that she's got this David Plouffe guy working for her and I think he might be a genius for all this stuff because he keeps doing non-standard things that work. Such as why don't we just have her give no interviews? I mean who comes up with that idea in the first place? Like who even come up with that idea of just not having her in public? And it works. It works. So every time you see somebody come up with a very non-standard idea and then it just totally works, you're probably looking at genius if it happens more than once.

So now this little bit feels a little like genius but maybe desperation too. Because you could have them at the same time. I think it's obvious that Harris cannot win a debate against Trump and I would think that the Democrats know that. But what they could do is make Trump look like a bully. What they could do is give Kamala a whole bunch of cool one-liners to say when she gets interrupted. It's like sorry, I'm talking now. You know that thing. So I agree with the people who say that it's a trap and that Trump won easily over Biden by not having his microphone on. I think that works for Trump. When the first time I heard that the microphones would be off during the Biden thing I said to myself oh my God there's no way. There's no way Trump loses. The only way Trump can lose is being so unpleasant by interrupting that people go I don't even care what your policies are. You're just being a jerk now. I hate you. So since it's a vibe election, if Trump wants to get the right vibe he wants to visit the Vietnamese restaurant and show everybody loves him, which he did. Go to a black barber shop, see that everybody's fine with him. He hasn't done that but he should. But being the nicest Trump is really his best play. So yeah I think he would be wise to do what he was doing, which is say well you know we'd already agreed there would be no microphones. Let's stick to it. We'll see what happens.

So there was a hearing in Congress on the Trump assassination attempt and it featured three really interesting people. So you had Navy SEAL Eric Prince, who used to run his own private army for sale, and you had Dan Bongino, and a Washington Regional SWAT operator who was on site that day. Now those would be three in my opinion seemingly highly qualified voices that would tell it the way it is. You know they wouldn't make something up. And it was fascinating. So there were massive evidence of incompetence, which I call the Dilbert filter. You know every organization is incompetent at this point and probably there was a bunch of stuff that just looks like incompetence. But on top of that there were questions which don't have an answer, such as cleaning off the roof prematurely, you know kind of cremating the body before anybody knew, a whole bunch of what's up with the encrypted apps that that guy's got, how did he learn to make a bomb with a remote that's just made for that. Just a whole bunch of questions that the three of them were very clear that these are super important questions and unanswered.

So I don't know what it all means, but when the smartest people in the game tell you there's something that doesn't smell right, I would definitely trust that. Right, normally you don't trust doesn't smell right, but from these three, if Dan Bongino tells you something doesn't smell right in the domain he knows about, I'm sure listening to that. So and I think it's like the Telegram CEO story. You'll never know. I don't think there's much any chance at all that we'll ever know the truth of what happened with that guy, that Thomas Crooks assassin guy.

Well James Carville was on I think it was CNN and he was talking about RFK Jr. and he said that RFK Jr. should be locked up in a mental institution, has no business being on the street. What is that? That would be called projection and gaslighting. RFK Jr. doesn't have any mental problems. Are you kidding me? He's the most reasonable person you'll ever hear. Why would Carville have to say that? Well because he's part of a party that has a massive mental health problem. And some of us have noticed that the real problem doesn't seem to be politics. There is a massive mental health problem and the specific mental health problem appears to be related to this dark triad, you know narcissism and some other things. And what they love to do if they have that particular mental situation is to project, which is blame other people for what they are or what they're doing, and to gaslight, which is different from lying. I like to explain this a lot. Gaslighting is telling you that something you're looking at directly isn't happening. That's not just saying that yesterday when you weren't there I did something. That lie you can't tell if it's true or not. That's just a lie. But if somebody's looking at something directly and you say it's not there and it's just obviously it's there, that's gaslighting because it makes them feel like am I crazy if you pull it off. So this is gaslighting and I think that's pretty much all they have left is accusing Republicans of doing what Democrats are doing and vice versa. So that's an example of that.

Kamala Harris also once compared policing, just policing, to lynching and Jim Crow. And now she can't stop bragging about how strong she is on law enforcement. That would be gaslighting because we know for sure that she's not super strong about policing and she's telling you it's the opposite. So when you know something's true that she's not the one who is really for policing and then she tells you but I'm the one who's really for policing, that's gaslighting. All right, and it will work because Democrats don't get real news. They only see the fake news that's in their silo.

Here's some news. Well Kennedy was talking to Tucker Carlson and it made quite a bit of news here. So he said he was asked to be on the president's transition team. They would be the ones who select the people who become part of the administration. I kind of love this but I know it's going to cause some trouble within the Republican party because the Republicans are going to say wait a minute why are you picking these people who are not lifelong Republicans that we can trust? And then Kennedy will say but they're really smart and capable and they're not super political so these are the ones you want. And then the Republicans will say I don't know that one person when they were in college once said something I don't like. So I'm leaning toward this because I do think that Kennedy could be important in finding people who are brave and not political and have the right priorities. That would be kind of fun. So I don't see Kennedy being the one who does the vetting. I see him being part of a vetting system in which he might pick an ex-Democrat or a current Democrat for a few things. I wouldn't worry about that. Looks positive to me.

Tucker asked RFK Jr. if he would ever be willing, if asked, to become Trump's CIA director. I love that question. And he said yes I would. What? Yes I would. But I would never get a Senate confirmation. He said he would never get a Senate confirmation because the intelligence agencies would just force the Senate not to confirm him. Do you believe that? I do. I believe that even if you were asked to be the CIA director the CIA people would contact their Congress people they own and say don't vote for this and then they wouldn't. And there's no way they could become head of CIA. I believe that's true. I totally believe that.

Kennedy says that the reason the Democrats now hate free speech, or at least it looks like it because they're trying to suppress free speech in every possible way they can, he says it's because the party does not believe in the people and that they're making Elon Musk a villain because he's providing free speech. And he says quote if you don't believe in free speech it means because you don't trust the people. I disagree with that. I don't think that's what's going on. I don't think that the Democrat leadership even thinks about the people. I'm not even sure that's one of the variables on their top 10. I think this purely about people keeping their power and staying in their jobs and making money. I think all the free speech stuff is purely a power play. Has nothing to do with trusting the people. But I like the fact that he puts his trust in the people. I just hope that he doesn't lose sight of his practical evil sensing part of his brain anyway.

So the DNC has apparently filed a lawsuit against the Georgia election board to block their new rule. So the Democrats don't want Georgia to clean up the accuracy of their voter rolls. I mentioned that before. What would be their reason? Only one reason. There's only one reason you would vote against cleaning up your voter rolls. There's not a second reason. You all would agree there's not even a second reason that's offered because what it's probably just word soup. It's nothing that even makes sense. So there's that.

Here's something else. RFK Jr. said in the Tucker interview he was originally not interested in working with Trump but his wife Cheryl asked him to hear Trump out. Now I saw Raheem Kassam saying that on X. I haven't seen the news story itself but do you think that's true? Do you think it was Cheryl who asked him to hear Trump out? So you know weren't you wondering like how that marriage works? Weren't you? You were right. You're like how's that work? It seems like they're just too different. I don't see how in the world they can reconcile that. But if this is true, and by the way RFK Jr. has shown no propensity to lie about anything that I've seen, so the fact that he says it's true seems very likely it's true. Just the fact he's credible. If that is true then that suddenly puts his wife in a whole different frame and a positive one. Not because she might be just got a message from Zuby. That's interesting. I'll have to contact him later. So yeah anyway so it makes me think that his wife Cheryl is maybe a more complicated person than the news had indicated and more supportive and maybe more wise. But clearly she's supportive and wise if this is right and I think it is.

Nicole Shanahan, RFK Jr.'s VP running mate while he was running, put on a Venn diagram which is funny because you know Venn diagrams. But it showed a Venn diagram of Occupy Wall Street, that would be the Democrats who didn't like large corporations, and the Tea Party, which was Republicans who didn't like big government. And she says that her movement, if you can call it that, is the intersection. So the intersection of people who don't like big government and the people who don't like big corporations is when the big government and the big corporations are colluding with each other. And I thought wow that just hits it perfectly. You know you could call it fascism but then nobody knows what that word means. But if you show it in the Venn diagram you're like oh yeah the big corporations have too much power but some like that. The big government has too much power but other people are happy with that. But when you look at the intersection, when the two of them are working together, that the big corporations are bribing the government and the government's doing stuff with the big corporations that you don't like, it is when they work together that it's a problem. And that's where we can all come together. How about less of that?

Well you heard the story about RFK Jr. allegedly, I think it's true, he used a chainsaw to cut off the head of a dead whale and put it on his car and he tried to take it home and it was oozing whale juice. And I guess he had some fascination with skulls and he was going to do something to get a whale skull, which I kind of love because I mean the whale was dead and a huge whale skull, like if you could get a whale skull and clean it up and put it on a display in your house, how cool would that be? I mean seriously if you had a giant whale skull and you had some way to display it it'd be kind of cool. So I don't know what he was up to but it doesn't matter. It was just something he wanted to do.

So Axios is reporting that there's now this environmental advocacy group that wants him investigated because it might be illegal to transport a dead mammal's skull. So there must be some law that says you can't transport a marine mammal skull. Come on. Come on. Who even knew that was a law? Come on. So I think it's not only fascinating that somebody tried to transport a dead whale's head. I find it fascinating that there's a law that covers that specific situation. But even more ironic, here it comes, here it comes. Remember this was an environmental advocacy group that was going after him. So is it ironic that an environmental advocacy group would turn themselves into garbage? I don't even think you could recycle that kind of garbage. No these are garbage people because if they decided that they looked at the whole world and all of the environmental problems and they said you know what if we could solve this aquatic mammal skull transportation problem well then we'd have a better world to leave to our children wouldn't we? No they are garbage. And so the very thing that they're trying to have less of they became.

Meanwhile Harris has a tax plan that would absolutely rape the rich. Top rate for individuals would climb to 44.6 which if you add your California tax on gets well over 50%. The other rates are just through the roof. If you're a wealthy person and you're supporting Democrats you're an idiot. You're an idiot, Mark Cuban. If you support this you're an idiot. And I don't think he does. I mean I don't know what's going on with him. He's playing some kind of strategy that I don't fully understand so it's hard to judge it. But nobody's in favor of this who has money. Nobody. I don't think you could find one wealthy Democrat who would be down for this.

And let me tell you where my red line is. I pay roughly 50% in taxes. If you've never experienced that and much more if you throw on property taxes and sales tax and stuff so maybe 60% of my money goes to taxes if you put it all together. It's too much. You know there's some point where I say you know what my taxes are outrageous but I get that people doing well pay more. I mean the concept itself doesn't stress me too much. But at some point it's just abuse and it just feels like punishment because I don't think it's for the benefit of the country. It just feels like punishing people who made money. And here's my deal. I already made this money with the old rules. If you're just going to take it from me which is what this is, it's just confiscation. They're actually talking about just taking the money that you have if you have too much just take it. This is move out of the country stuff. This is literally sell the house, move to Costa Rica. I'm not going to pay more than 50% in taxes. And you know the billionaires would be crazy to stay here. Crazy. So we'll see what happens. I don't think most of it's likely to happen but it's probably a good solid 30 to 40% likely it's just horrible anyway. I would think it would bring a few more prominent Democrats to Trump because it's crazy.

Trump says he wants to create a space National Guard and build an iron dome missile system around the US. Yes we need that for sure. I think I saw Elon say it was time to start a Starfleet Academy. Literally we're going to have a Starfleet. I mean it won't be the whole world in Starfleet like the real Star Trek but yeah we need a Starfleet Academy for our space army that's coming.

Meanwhile Tulsi Gabbard apparently has endorsed Trump. I thought she had already done it so I kind of missed that story but I guess she had not officially endorsed him and now I would say that the royal flush is complete. Remember I was telling you that it feels like Trump is assembling a poker hand of a royal flush and he needed a queen. Right after I said he needed a queen Tulsi Gabbard endorses. I guess he got his queen. So now he has the full royal flush. Now you could argue you know who's the king and who's the ace. Trump's the ace of course but well maybe Trump's the king and RFK is the ace because the ace is sometimes one but sometimes 11. Well that's only if you're playing a different game. So yeah he's got a royal flush. Or the other way to look at it is his pirate ship is nearly staffed. I saw Greg Gutfeld mention the pirate ship analogy and he was nice enough to credit me on that. Which by the way I don't require. I like it when my ideas get used by anybody. I don't know if I've ever told you that directly. So anybody who wants to take anything I've said and say it with or without credit I'm okay with that. Like I'm not in it for the credit. I don't work that way. So anyway the pirate ship is about staffed.

Here what I love about the pirate ship is that it forgives a lot of rough edges because there could be a lot of people on the same team who've got their own rough edges. And if you call them pirates and you say well we're at least on this pirate ship on the same mission together it sounds a lot better than it's a whole bunch of people with flaws. So there's something about the pirate ship analogy that just totally works for me. I think it's that bad boy thing and now a bad girl because we got Tulsi on board.

I also love the framing that RFK Jr.'s done with Make America Healthy Again, Make America Great Again. You could see why the left bristled at it because they're like great again? Why are you saying it was so great back when there was slavery? Now that's not what anybody was thinking but it was easy to twist that into something bad so they did. So I personally I've never been an embracer of MAGA. I talk about it and I like the people who are part of it but I didn't like it associated with me personally. You know even though the press likes to associate me it's just I didn't like the word. I don't like how it sounds. It sounds too much like a maggot. Too easy to turn it into something negative. So I was never on board with MAGA since the beginning although I would acknowledge it became a gigantic successful branding thing. So you could argue that Trump got it right because it was so successful.

However when you hear Make America Healthy Again, oh my God does that hit. Make America Healthy Again refers to not just our systems and our election process and how we select people and what we do in the world. I mean we need way more health in our systems. But physically we're dying. We're just physically less healthy and it's a big big big problem. And I think RFK Jr. with Make America Healthy Again found a way that everybody can agree because not everybody's going to want to make America great again because they think that's moving backwards. Which by the way Kamala Harris is cleverly and again this has to be Plouffe. I guarantee you this is David Plouffe. She's saying that Trump is taking you backwards and she wants to take you forwards. How good is that as persuasion? Well it's so good that I once taught Bill Clinton how to do it. Because remember how he took, he might not know I was behind it but the idea that Bob Dole was taking you to the past because he was saying hey you know I'm the greatest generation let's get back to those old ideals. It made it easy for Clinton to say well you're taking us to the past. I'm going to take you to the future. That is always the winning play. I'll take you to the future always beats I'll take you to the past even if the past looked pretty good. Nobody wants to go back to the past. It's just nobody. So Kamala Harris once again has a perfect frame which is that they're about the future and Trump wants to make you this again guy. Oh you want to do again? You mean the past? Ah I see. So you're taking us back to when nobody can have an abortion and there were slavery and Jim Crow. Oh you want that again? Too easy to mock. But what do you do with Make America Healthy Again? Oh I'd like to go back to when we were less healthy? No that's one direction. You know even though you say again you know that we're less healthy so nobody argues that we were healthier in the past. Nobody has that feeling. So that's good.

RFK Jr. on climate change, because I know this is where a lot of Republicans are going to say wait a minute I disagree with you RFK Jr. because you're pro climate change. But I didn't know exactly what his nuanced thinking was. But here's something that would make you a little bit happier. He said Democrats have become subsumed in this carbon orthodoxy meaning that the only issue is carbon and it's the thing that they're going to measure for everything. So if you're measuring carbon that's what you'll manage to have. I told you a million times that you can only manage the things you measure. So if let's say there were three things you thought were good ideas but one of them you could measure and you did measure that's where all your attention would go because you can measure it. As soon as you can measure a thing it just sucks all the energy to it because okay you can tell if I make a difference. So he's saying that the concentration on that may be diverting from some better things you could do to just make the environment cleaner that may have nothing to do with CO2.

But then he goes further so I can't follow him on this part of the journey but I appreciate it. He said the reason that we protect the environment is because there's a spiritual connection. So it's not just the CO2 stuff. He says there's a spiritual connection and when we destroy nature we diminish our capacity to sense the divine. I love the way he put it. So in terms of poetry and verbal capability it's through the roof. It's standard Kennedy. How the hell did you say this so well stuff. So it's impressive in that way and probably hits people just what they want.

I'll give you the less religious version of this that we don't feel complete until we can go outside in a nice environment that's outdoors. And I completely agree with humans can't be humans until they can experience a clean environment. And I would argue that maybe a lot of inner city problems might have to do with not having access to nature. Let me ask you this. If I said you could never go into nature again you'd only be in an inner city that's sort of dirty and squalid what would that do to your brain? It would kill you. Yeah the best part of my day every day is even though my dog's got three good legs and one limpy one I take her to the park and I simply stand in this park under these trees. It's just the greatest park. Tiny little park. It's only just a few acres. You can see the whole park from any part of the park but it's extraordinarily nourishing. I simply stand there and I feel like these needles just went into my arm and they're giving me happiness instantly. I get out of the car I walk 10 feet and my entire body just goes and stays that way until I get back in the car and then there's some lasting benefit for that during the day. Imagine if you never had that. That would probably explain a whole bunch of people in inner cities. They just never see the beach or maybe once every three months or something. That would make you crazy. So I don't think you have to call on the divine. You could simply say that what makes a human a human and a complete human absolutely requires some kind of commune with nature on a regular basis and you can't get around it. So I'm completely with them with a tweak.

Well let me compliment President Trump. I've been wishing he would do something in a specific way for the longest time. I think I've said it a number of times and finally he did it. Now I hope you understand how powerful this is. So he was on a podcast. I wish I remember the name of the host. He's somebody who does a really good job. But he was asked about the hoax that he had once said that the military are suckers and losers. Now as you know there was one general who claims he said that. Then as Trump said there were 26 people who said it didn't happen. But if somebody says you did something and you say no I didn't are they convinced? No they're not. The argument it didn't happen it just sounds like a lie because if people want to think you did it, no I didn't. Well there's somebody who says you did and it's a general. So right. So here's how he answered it. He said who would say that? A stupid... I think he said that three times. Who would say it? Who would say that? Who would say that? And then he answered his own question. A stupid person or one who was mentally ill. That's it. That's the one. That's the one. That's the one I wanted to hear. Who would do this?

That works with the fine people hoax. Who would stand in front of the country as the president in prepared remarks at least, you know mentally prepared remarks, and say that neo-Nazis are fine people? The answer is no one. No one. That's how you should have known it was a hoax without needing to check that the video was in fact edited. Who would stand in front of the world and say maybe you should drink bleach or inject bleach or inject a household disinfectant into your body? No one. No one. Not Trump, not anybody unless they were quote stupid or mentally ill. Who would say in front of a general that soldiers were suckers and losers? No one. No one would say it. But putting it in the form of a question is the stronger form of persuasion. If you just say no one would say it is not nearly as good as who would say that? I'm just think about it. Just use your common sense. Who would ever say that in public first of all? Who would believe it? Yeah who would believe it but that even if somebody believed it who would say that? The who would say it is the one that unlocks the brain of the brainwashed. Okay you do have a good point there because it's not a statement it's a question and if you can't answer the question you're going to have to figure out why you can't answer it. Who would say that exactly?

Once you see the pattern that three of the biggest hoaxes I would argue the three most powerful hoaxes from Trump were about things that nobody would say. So yes President Trump you are powering up for this debate in a way that is making me very happy. I feel like whoever is advising Trump right now doing a good job. There's something good happening there.

All right here's a little story that is just interesting. Apparently we used to think that old trees couldn't absorb any CO2 so old growth forests weren't going to help too much for fighting climate change. But now there's new information that says that the old forests actually grow new woody biomass and do absorb. So my question is this. When you're putting together those climate models and you get wrong the fact that existing old forests can in fact absorb CO2 how much did that change your model? Did they go and revise all their models? Well probably not because you know this is one maybe one study. Maybe they need to see some more before they're convinced. But I remind you that when you have a model that has I don't know hundreds of variables or whatever there are that it doesn't take much change to even one of those variables to get a wildly wrong answer. And that's why people who have never done any kind of predicting or modeling don't really understand how bad the models are. Models are not real. They're all fake. And the way they do it is they throw away the ones that don't work this year. They add another one and then they tell you models work. Know what works is if you throw away the ones that don't work and replace them with a new one it will always look like the models are working. It's literally nothing but a trick. And the entire scientific community are idiots when it comes to any kind of magic tricks or how they get fooled. They're brilliant people. I mean it's hard to be a scientist without being brilliant but they are notoriously easy to fool in some cases because they're a little bit too literal I guess. There may be something to it but scientists tend to be easy to fool with scams.

So there's a report that the US is helping Israel hunt down the head of Hamas that Yahya Sinwar guy. The most simulation-sounding name in the world, Sinwar. And did you know that we have a technology that's this deep penetrating radar or sonar, I forget what it is, that they can map out the tunnels. So apparently the US has some kind of attach where they can actually just map the tunnels. Did you know that was true? I wish I knew about that a long time ago. So if they've got complete control of the territory which they seem to and they can map out the tunnels it's only a matter of time before they get everybody they need to get. But apparently we're doing a lot and the story is that the US wants to find Sinwar and take him out because they think that would be the administration, American administration, Biden believes that that would give Israel a reason to say the war is over. So the war doesn't have an over point. There's just sort of more of what you're doing. Like it would be hard to identify well what would be the end of the war. What's the end? And so you could sort of artificially have a fake because I've taught you that if people want to do something but they can't come up with a reason but they want to do it and that's this. People want to have an end to the war but they don't have a reason. They're going to need a reason then. The war. So from a persuasion perspective the fake because, the reason that you use to do your thing because you wanted to do it anyway but you needed something that sounded like a reason, would be that Sinwar gets captured or killed. Now in my view that makes no difference to anything because I just replace him with number two and go on. But in the fake because persuasion world it might be a strong argument that the public thinks well you got the head guy it's time to wrap things up. So I'm not entirely sure that that's what the US is thinking. It's just reported that that's what they're thinking. Maybe a lot of people thinking different things in the administration but just know that we now have the tech to pretty much capture all of those tunnels or most of them or a lot of them.

All right that's what I got for you today. That is the end of my prepared remarks. I'm going to talk privately to the wonderful, sexy, good-looking people on Locals subscribers. And for those of you on X and YouTube and Rumble, thanks for joining. And I've got lots of fun coming up in the next few weeks. I'll let you know about lots of things happening but until then I'll see you tomorrow. The rest of you but Locals hang in with me. I'm going to have an extra sip of coffee to wrap things up and then it will be Locals alone.

show we're going to have today it's going to be kind of amazing Today's show will be so good that I wish I were you so I could watch me that's how good it will be yeah good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams it's going to be extra good today I promise and if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that nobody can even comprehend with their tiny shiny human brains all you need is a cuper mug or glass a tankered chalice or Stein a canteen Jer flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure the dopamine h of the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous a sip and it's going to happen right now go oh I pity the beverag less well little bit of science then a little bit of politics yeah we'll get to the chainsaw whale head stories you know the important stuff but first there's a new study that says you can use brain stimulation to block traumatic memories that's right they will find the place in your brain where your traumatic memories are stored and they'll zap it with some stimulant and whack it so uh how does that work though I've got questions I'm trying to reconcile how could it be that you have free will but that it's also true that if you stimulate the brain with electricity in a certain way it can change how you think seems like two things in Conflict I'd like to give you one factoid that you can research on your own there's no such thing as a brain surgeon who believes in free will I'm just going to leave that there that that that's your key to unlocking the next level of awareness you got to use the key yourself I gave you the key now you have the key that there's no brain suron who believes in free will they have to do the rest well there is a study science direct is talking about a that says a high a high carbohydrate diet if you have a high ratio of carbs It's associated with an increased risk of depression hm eating a lot of carbs is associated with depression huh is there any way they could have saved some money on that study oh yeah they could have asked Scott next time next time I could save you probably several weeks and maybe tens of thousands of dollars you just ask have to ask me Scott what do depressed people do when they're depressed well they probably eat because eating gives you a little boost what do you think they eat well probably something that boosts their mood pretty quickly like a steak well I mean they might like a steak but what would really give you like a little you know like you got a little shot of heroin in your arm but it's not a heroin a carb a good carb will do that one of the reasons I don't carbs is is practically a psych you know hallucinogenic thing for me you if I if I eat uh just a bunch of carbs I would just sit there in a coma after a while but I'd be happy at first so it does it make sense that if you carbs you'll be happy in the short run yes will eating a lot of carbs make you happy in the long run everybody knows the answer to that is no because you're going to get heavy and it's not going to be good for your brain so uh yeah you could you could have skipped the science there just ask me yeah eating ice cream makes me happy in the short run how do it work in the long run not so good here is what I call ironic science and we'll get to the the politics in a minute ironic science where the thing you didn't see coming turns out that you can use a giant bubble of CO2 to store renewable energy according to clean uh clean technicia so apparently they have this way that they can compress CO2 and then uh decompress it and somehow they can store energy and then release it through the decompression now imagine if that becomes a real thing and that we're using excess CO2 to store electricity from Green energy now I wouldn't bet very much that this will become a big thing but how cool is it that what at least some people think is our biggest problem the CO2 could be our biggest solution I I've have long uh wondered if we will have a industry where sucking CO2 out of the air and turning it into products in this case a battery is going to be a thing so much so that people are sucking too much CO2 out of the atmosphere I think there might be a point when humans are for just for their own economic reasons they're sucking CO2 out of the air and turning it into stuff that they can sell could be a problem someday well here's something cool new outlas is reporting that uh um there's a new design hasn't been tested yet uh it's a startup called Deep fision and the idea is they would use regular um Nu nuclear energy technology not not the generation 4 you know not the new stuff but rather the stuff that you would be afraid of if it melted down but what they would do is they would drill this ginormous 30inch hole 30 in wide uh a mile deep and they would put some kind of mechanism nuclear mechanism a mile into your hole so to speak and somehow they would need no mechanical Parts just two pipes I'm not sure how this works they they put some water into it and the water heats up the pressure of the water is enough to keep things pressurized so you don't need mechanical pressure just the weight of the water that because there's a mile of water and then I guess the the nuke Cooks it up and then shoots it back up as I don't know hot water or steam or something but the point is you could actually have nuclear power in a hole and then if the thing melted down you just close the hole Yeah because it would be below the water table so it would never need to be you know continually cooled because it would be below the water table and if anything went wrong you just leave it there apparently you can just cover the hole and walk away now will that ever become a thing I don't know but how cool would it be if it did we just drill gigantic holes and put non-mechanical stuff in there things that you know don't need to be revised too much because it's not mechanical and just have all kinds of Power well remember that CEO of telegram the messaging app got picked up in France there's talk of you know he's got looking at 20 years of charges that look suspicious to all of us um the French are going to extend how long they're going to hold them let me tell you everything about this story that you need to know you will never know what this story is about I don't think there's the slightest chance that you and I will ever know what this guy was up to and who wanted him arrested or any of that probably the real story is something you've never even heard right it could be anything so here's the scary part the telegram CEO being picked up is more proof that any government whether a democ or not can arrest you make up a bunch of and hold you forever so if you think that oh it's good thing I've got this justice system and all that you really don't we're we're at a point where the government can make up any story and hold you as long as they want and you know this has the tape Brothers written all over it meaning you know maybe the tape brothers did something that the law doesn't like but I'm not sure that's why they were arrested I feel like why whatever the reason was we'll never know you know it's some other deep dark reason we'll just never know so to speculate on this story seems like a waste of time because we' just be guessing but the one thing that is the takeaway is that any government can arrest any person for any reason and just make up and keep them in jail forever that's I think that's guaranteed and evident and obvious at this point so it's a scary world here's a story that shouldn't bother you a bit over 1 million ineligible ineligible voters were removed from the uh Texas voter logs according to the governor Abbott and he was bragging about his election Integrity efforts so thank goodness thank goodness right imagine if there had been a million ineligible voters a million now that doesn't mean that you know they would all vote but the the speculation that some people have is that the ineligible voters maybe they get a ballot or maybe somebody pretends to be them but that in some way somebody's voting those names without being them but that's not something you have to worry about is it I mean we would obviously know with our tight election security you would know if a million people were going to you know illegally Vote or even any big number 10,000 10,000 would move a lot of races but you would know if 10,000 people had voted who were not legal voters right because our elections are so secure there there's no way you wouldn't know that right and there's no Kraken that's ever been found Am I Wrong nobody ever found a kraken so there's no reason to believe that large amounts of you know illegal voters are voting in the United States that'd be crazy crazy people who believes that come on come on well here's the next story um there's a claim that there are a thousand ways to commit election fraud um Elizabeth Nixon's writing about this so there's a engineer and data science Scientist by the way I don't know the validity of anything that's going to be in the following story I'm going to report that it's being reported I can't tell you it's true but here's a report see if it would answer all of your remaining questions because it would Mar if this is true and I don't know that it's true I'm I'm not selling it as true I'm selling it as something that's reported if it's true it answers all of my questions now that's the first time that would have ever happened because I do say if there were massive cheating how in the world would we not know about it you know how could you really get away with that well here's a theory I'm just going to read it to you but again I'm not telling you it's true I'm just saying well I got a lot of questions now so this uh engineer and data scientist Kim Brooks she was working on cleaning the voter roles in Georgia so isn't that great we got all these volunteers who are helping making sure the voter rules do not include dead people or people who moved away or people who are not can't vote for one reason or another so she uh cleaned it up and uh she'd clear a name let's say there was a specific name she'd clear it either because they're dead or whatever takes it off and then she's pretty happy it's off it's off uh but then uh it would be back within a month what she would remove it from the election the election log meaning eligible to vote and it would be gone but then it would be back in a month huh now remember I'm not claiming any of these reports are true I'm claiming that there is a report huh how could that happen how can you take it off and then it would come back and so it says at that juncture she realized that a program within the Georgia voter registration database was methodically adding back fake names H so reportedly again I'm not saying this is true I'm just saying it's reported reportedly she looked deeper for new registrant the culprit was principally Driver Services creating new registrations and in this case the manufacturer was a person or persons in other words there was a person doing it using a program within the government office someone was stealing names and duplicating even tripling that person's vote and then forging their signature sometimes it was someone who just died or a teacher who had no voting record in the case of a nurse who died in 20122 with three registrations he was registered to vote in two counties and all three of her voted in the 2022 election and the 2024 primary each signature was slightly different and even spelled different they even even in the signature they spelled their own name different three different ways allegedly and again I'm not saying it's true I'm just saying it's reported the operation Works under AVR or automatic voter registration is being used to register migrants they will not vote but their names have been entered into the voter registration database when they apply for a driver's license and their vote will be voted for them I imagine that this is uh repeating something everyone knows so the allegation is that's why the border is open to get more of these non-voters illegally on the voter roles uh how many states do you think use this this system this automatic voter registration system in which one database would be populating the other database and massively illegally if the claim is true how many well the claim is that in 20 in the year 2020 there are 20 States who use the system that would allegedly I'm just saying what is reported I don't know what's true allegedly take names from one system that were not eligible to vote the driver's license databases and put those names onto the other system but in the case of people who were registered two or three times there must have been something Beyond just taking new people and putting them on the the roles must have been something beyond that so how many states use that system the one that's suspected of being the culprit in these elections 20 there were 20 States who allegedly used these systems how many of those did Trump lose and of 20 states that used that same system how many did Trump lose 18 Trump lost 18 of 20 states that use this same system allegedly now the claim is that there are these registration fraud Rings um as identified in the Arabella document I don't know what that is uh in the work of Omega for America so there must have been somebody who looked into this and um the idea is that uh every each of these states has a dozen or more NOS which do nothing but fill out ballots for fake regist H and Peter bernegger whoever that is his team in Wisconsin has video of NGO functionaries doing just that what at 1:00 am early morning after election day what I don't know that that's confirmed um and Porter reports multiple schemes using the deceased non-voting and Felons blah blah blah they steal an individuals drivers like license number Social Security uh blah blah the only thing that changed is the address and the signature generally they use people who don't vote they change a street number a county a signature huh well what do you think now let's put this in context all right the first context is that when the original 2020 susp suspicions were coming out and there were lots of different claims I said that whether or not any of these election rigging claims are true the one thing you could know for sure is that at least 95% of the claims would be debunked was I right yeah probably 95% of the claims were debunked some of them are not debunked but not confirmed or not found by a court or not big enough or somebody didn't have a standing so you know there's some gray area stuff but 95% of the stuff you could check turned out to be you know not conclusive now does so what would you say about this new claim about this one database that's feeding the other database is that in the 95% well you don't know but the caution is that every claim has a 95% chance of not being true that's my claim so so this is another claim that you might say has a 95% chance of not being true but let me tell you what's different about it this is the first time that all of my questions could be answered which is how could they do this at a scale and get away with it if if it's done if there's massive cheating how can you get away with it now I had I had been thinking had something to do with you know the computer computer code after the vote is given and maybe there is something like that but I don't have any proof of that but this would make way more sense if it's true that there are NOS who are dedicated to putting together these fake voter lists that gets me to my next point we have a world in which it would take one whistleblower just one to change the entire freaking world because America would be completely changed by one whistleblower who actually had the goods you know say a video or you know said yes I personally did this this is what we did to the database if you could get just one Everything's changed the entire the entire power structure of the United States would be altered forever and of course the United States affects the rest of the world in a big way it's a world changing event one whistleblower and that one whistleblower would get rich because there are going to be some big rewards and if I were a whistleblower I would say how big is the reward and they might say something like we'll give you $10,000 and then you say if you really have the goods nope 10,000 ,000 doesn't even get me interested all right we'll give you $50,000 nope not interested a 100 nope we'll give you a million dollars pre-tax or after tax pre-tax no we'll give you $2 million so after taxes unless Harris gets selected uh you'll still have the million left over well now we're talking for $1 million I will prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that I worked on a team that rigged the election and that I know where the other NOS are doing the same thing if that's true again I don't know that it's true it's an allegation so how would you like to be one of those cheaters knowing that all of your co-workers all of your people complicit allegedly allegedly we don't know that that's true every one of them could get a million dollars for turning your ass in oh it's getting interesting now people have I been telling you forever that this movie this reality we're living in that's way too much like a movie there is something required that hasn't happened the movie cannot be completed until the Kraken is found every part of this movie requires the Kraken to be found after we're sure that it can't be found that's what an act three looks like that's a real act three so I'm going to double down and say that I don't believe that given the current setup the design of our election going forward and part of the design is now The Whistleblower rewards right so The Whistleblower rewards are now part of the design of the system here's things that you could guarantee without knowing anything if if somebody drew a system on paper and brought it to you and said all right here's here's what we're going to do we're g to give $100 no questions asked to everybody who Rings your doorbell what do you think will happen and I'd say well once word gets out I I would imagine it be this huge line of people people ringing my doorbell correct now did you have to test it did you have to actually run a test no it would be so obvious from the design that people are going to knock on your door forever trying to get their $300 very easy to predict now let's do it with the election if you had an election system was super complicated and it would be really hard to know if anybody was doing anything like what was suggested and the the stakes are gigantic I mean it's practically life and death fortune or no fortune I mean really really high stakes and it's possible so it's possible and the incentive to do it is through the roof it's the biggest incentive you could ever have if you if you showed me that on paper and said what do you think will happen there's lots of ways to cheat and the benefit of doing it the upside is gigant antic well I would say well on paper there's going to be massive cheating there can't really be any other way this goes now we were told that there really was no way to cheat without getting caught if that's true well then I revise everything I've said but we know it's not true if anybody involved in the election wanted to have a fair election they would just say hey let's just do paper ballots and then everybody will stop bitching right you do the paper ballots everybody looks at them you can double count them if you need not double count but you can recount them if you want to everybody's happy and and we know exactly what to do to get to that point we know that we want to clean the voter roles it's really easy to know how to do it legally is that what's happening no no every sign that we're seeing especially in Georgia there's a new Movement by the Democrats to resist cleaning up the voter roles why in the world would they want to resist cleaning up the voter roles and removing ineligible voters only one reason there are not two reasons for that the only reason is that they plan to use those dead voters and ineligible voters to vote what else what else could it be give me the other reason no if you read the reason it'll just be look like nonsense words put together no there's only one reason so on paper the design of the system pretty much guarantees massive um fraud that doesn't mean I have proof of it it's just that the system design guarantees it and now there's a tweak to the system design now the system design includes this new element that wasn't there before which is knowing in advance that there will be a whistleblower reward and probably a big one because remember the Whistleblower doesn't have to accept the offered award The Whistleblower can negotiate if you had the negotiating which by the way if you're a whistleblower you should negotiate don't take the first offer because you've got this drawing hand there so negotiate so if you add negotiating and whistleblowing to the current system what does the design tell you will happen again I'm not being magic or guessing I'm saying if you design a system that very clearly will give you one outcome what are you going to get well you going to get that one outcome it's designed to give it to you all right our design in 2020 almost guaranteed a rigged election because it was possible and the stakes were high now I don't have proof of that I'm just saying that that the design guaranteed that there would be an effort now we have a design that pretty much guarantees that at least one whistleblower will try to get rich right it's hard to imagine that all those people who would be willing to do this illegal thing they're all criminals every one of them is a criminal do you think you can trust a criminal not to take a million dollars to sell you you can't trust a criminal so if I take this design and just fast forward it the design should give us a result that we don't trust at the end of the election it should create a situation where the government is not willing to certify it that's our design now I'm not saying magic will happen I'm saying our current design guarantees it right the current design guarantees rigging it guarantees it by Design and now that we've got the whistleblowing thing with enough money behind it that's a that's a design that design guarantees a whistleblower even if they're making it up you know somebody's going to take a run at it so the current design pretty much guarantees we're not going to have a result by Design again I'm not saying if this happens or if this no by Design we can't get a result this time because it will be evidence of massive cheating beyond the margin that would determine the outcome so my prediction for the race is no outcome now what what happens after that is a big black box in my head I have no idea maybe redo it I don't know do you keep the do you keep the old president in charge long enough to fix something does does the house pick a new president and then nobody's happy I mean the whole country would fall apart if they just said oh Trump's the president so I don't know what happens but my prediction is no election no no election certification so we'll see um Harris got community noted because she said that uh Biden and I believe that women should make decisions about their own healthare and their body not the government and the community not andx said you required healthcare workers and big companies in the military to get Co vac vaccinations or lose their job that is the opposite of bodily Freedom so now I'm fantasizing that the debate happens between Harris and Trump Harris of course is going to bring up this you bad Republicans you want to take away the bodily autonomy and then Trump says well you know everything that I did was to take thec decision away from me in the federal government and move it closer to the individuals in the state and women are the majority voters in those States so if you can convince each other what to do with your bodily autonomy I'm sure the rest of the world would go along with it but women you need to decide you need to decide what it is and I'm sure the system will support you I know I do takes the whole abortion thing off the table and then you do the kill shot but if if we're talking about bodily autonomy your team is the one who had mandatory vaccinations and I would never do that you know I I was in charge of making sure you had the option but I would never make them mandatory because I would not want mandatory constraints on your body but you might I mean you might want to do it on your own in your States but it's out it's out of my control and I think you're both happy everybody's happy that I don't have anything to control your body everybody good with that it'd be a pretty strong argument so I fantasize about there's new drunk comma video where she's talking to somebody in an airport where she looks totally sosed I'm thinking about Jason from the Allin pod said that there was an Evidence you know it was a a dark Maga claim that she was uh drinking too much and there's no evidence of it well I don't know if you seen the compilation Clips yet but we add this to the evidence however I'm going to fool you by saying this one I don't think should be part of the compilation and the reason is it looked like she was just flying in an airport somewhere you know either on her way or on the way back and it wasn't official business I have one feeling if she's drunk giving a speech in her official capacity if she was off duty and had a few drinks in the plane I can't imagine that would be too different from presidents we've had before uh my my concern is if she can't control it enough that she you know she can do it on her off time versus you know work time now I get that if you're president you still need to be coherent if you get the 3:00 a.m.

call but realistically we've had drinking presidents for a long time I just want it not to be during the job and if she was is just flying around I have a different feeling about that even if even if she was drunk well the author of a white fragility one of those books that made wokeness a big thing um who is herself a white woman um has been accused of plagiarizing from Minority Scholars that's the whole story the whole story is that white people are bad apparently she proved it anyway Meto Zuckerberg had put in a statement and he basically admitted that the Biden Administration pressured them to censor Co stuff and he and also the Hunter's laptop stuff and uh maybe some other stuff and he said it was wrong and he wished he pushed back and uh he's not going to be as political or spend his money the way he did before you know Shoring up election Integrity thought but it probably worked the other way um so he's not going to do that kind of funding and he's not going to endorse anybody he's not going to get political what's that sound like to you that's a trump endorsement I'm sorry it's a trump endorsement he's not going to spend money to help the Democrats alter elections the way they had he said that Trump did the most badass thing he'd ever seen when he did the fight fight after he got shot he's seen that the Democrats are the enemy trying to censor him and his entire his entire game is free communication and they were trying to ruin most basic thing about his platform which is some of its honest and I think you know Zu Zuckerberg he's one of those people that I love the fact that you don't have to wonder if he's being dumb you can just rule that out you know lots of times when you see somebody doing something that maybe isn't what you would do you say oh my maybe they're dumb you know maybe they have some clever thing I don't know about but maybe they're dumb you don't have to worry about that Zuckerberg isn't dumb like we all agree on that right so I think not endorsing anybody in the current environment you're endorsing Trump that's what it feels like now I'm not going to put words in his mind and I'm not going to read his mind so I don't know that I'm tell you how I feel it what I feel is that is no longer necessary to oppose Hitler you know what I mean if you thought Trump was Hitler and the other side are the good guys you kind of have an obligation to to be against them or at least say the words even if you don't do things but if you're not willing to say the words and you're not willing to do things at the very least he doesn't think Trump is Hiller that's a big deal because I suspect maybe he did think that because he was acting like he did anyway uh so Harris now has changed her view on having live microphones that are open during the debate so in other words Trump's microphone would still be on while she's doing her talking and that makes interrupting possible why in the world would KL Harris want to invite Trump interrupting well here's what I think remember I keep telling you that uh that she's got this David plof guy working for her and I think he might be a genius for all this stuff because he keeps doing non-standard things that work such as why don't we just have her give no interviews I mean who comes up with that idea in the first place like who who even come up with that idea of just not having her in public and it works it works so every time you see somebody come up with a very non-standard idea and then it just totally works you're probably looking at genius if it happens more than once so now this little bit feels a little like genius but maybe desperation too because you could have them at the same time I think I think it's obvious that Harris cannot win a debate against Trump and I would think that the Democrats know that but what they could do is make Trump look like a bully what they could do is give kamla a whole bunch of cool onliners to say when she gets interrupted it's like sorry I'm talking now you know that thing so I agree with the people who say that it's a trap and that Trump uh Trump won easily over Biden by not having his microphone on uh I think that works for Trump when I when the first time I heard that the microphones would be off during the Biden thing I said to myself oh my God there's no way there's no way Trump loses the only way Trump can lose is being so unpleasant you know by interrupting that people go I don't even care what your policies are you're just being a jerk now I hate you so since it's a Vibe election if Trump wants to get the right Vibe he wants to you know visit the Vietnamese restaurant and show everybody loves him which he did go to a black barber shop see that everybody's fine with him he hasn't done that but he should but being the nicest Trump is really his best play so yeah I I think he would be wise to do what he was doing which is say well you know we'd already agreed there would be no microphones let's stick to it we'll see what happens so there was a hearing in Congress on the Trump assassination attempt and it featured three really interesting people so um you had uh Navy SEAL uh Eric prince who used to run his own private Army uh for sale and you had Dan banino and uh Ben chaer he was a Washington Regional SWAT operator who was on site that day now those would be three in my opinion seemingly highly qualified voices that would tell it the way it is you know they wouldn't make a something up and it was fascinating so there were you know massive evidence of incompetence which I call the the dilber filter you know every organization is incompetent at this point and probably there was a bunch of stuff that just looks like incompetence but on top of that you know unambiguously there was incompetence but on on top of that there were questions which don't have an answer such as cleaning off the roof prematurely you know uh kind of uh cremating the body before anybody knew you know a whole you know what what's up with the encrypted apps that that guy's got how did he learn to make a bomb with a remote that's just made for that just a whole bunch of questions that the three of them were very clear that these are super important questions and unanswered so I don't know what it all means but when the smartest people in the game tell you there's something that doesn't smell right I would definitely trust that right normally you don't you don't trust doesn't smell right but from these three if Dan banino tells you something doesn't smell right in in the domain he knows about I'm sure listening to that so and I I think it's like the telegram CEO story you'll never know I don't think there's much any chance at all that will ever know the truth of what happened with that guy that Thomas Crooks assassin guy well James Carville was on I think it was CNN and it was talking about RFK Jr and he said that RFK Jr should be locked up in a menal institution has no business being on the street what is that that would be called projection and gaslighting RFK Jr doesn't have any mental problems are you kidding me he's he's the most like reasonable person you'll ever hear why would uh car will have to say that well because he he's part of a party that has a massive mental health problem and some of us have noticed that the real problem doesn't seem to be politics there is a massive mental health problem and the specific mental health problem appears to be related to this dark Triad you know narcissism and some other things and what they love to do if they have that particular mental situation is to project which is blame other people for what they are or what they're doing and to Gaslight which is different from lying I I like to explain this a lot gaslighting is telling you that something you're looking at directly isn't happening that's not just saying that yesterday when you weren't there I did something that lie you can't tell if it's true or not that's just a lie but if somebody's looking at something directly and you say it's not there and it's just obviously it's there that's gaslighting because it makes them feel like am I crazy if you pull it off so this is gaslighting and I think that's pretty much all they have left is accusing Republicans of doing what Democrats are doing and vice versa so that's that's an example of that um KL Harris is also uh once compared policing just just policing to lynching and Jim Crow and now she can't stop bragging about how strong she is on law enforcement that would be gaslighting because we know for sure that she's not super strong about policing and she's telling you it's the opposite so when you know something's true that she's not the one who is really for policing and then she tells you but I'm the one who's really for policing that's gaslighting all right and it will work because Democrats don't get real news they only see the the fake news that's in their Silo here's some news Well Kennedy was talking to uh Tucker Carlson and it made quite a bit of news here so he said he was asked to be on the president's transition team they would be the ones who select the people who become part of the administration I kind of love this but I know it's going to cause some trouble within the Republican party because the Republicans are going to say wait a minute why are you picking these people who are not lifelong Republicans that we can trust and then Kennedy will say but but they're really smart and capable and they're not super political so these are the ones you want and then the Republicans will say I don't know that one person when they were in college once said something I don't like so I'm leaning toward this because I do think that Kennedy could be important in finding people who are brave and not political and have the right priorities that would be kind of fun so I don't see Kennedy being the one who does the vetting I see him being you know part of a vetting system in which you know he might pick a ex Democrat or a current Democrat for a few things I wouldn't worry about that looks positive to me Tucker asked RFK Jr if he would ever be willing if asked to become Trump's CIA director I love that question and he said yes I would what yes I would but I would never get a senate confirmation he said he would never get a senate confirmation because the intelligence a agencies would just force the uh the Senate not to confirm him do you believe that I do I believe that even if you were asked to be the CIA director the CIA people would contact their Congress people they own and say uh don't vote for this and then they wouldn't and there's no way they could become that of CIA I believe that's true I totally believe that um Kennedy says that the reason the Democrats now hate Free Speech or at least it looks like it because they're trying to suppress free speech in every possible way they can uh he says it's because the party does not believe in the people and that they're making Elon Musk a villain because he's providing free speech and uh and he says quote if you don't believe in free speech it means because you don't trust the people I disagree with that I don't think that's what's going on I don't think that the Democrat leadership even thinks about the people I'm not even sure that's one of the variables on their top 10 I think this purely about people keeping their power and staying in their jobs and making money I think all the free speech stuff is purely a power playay has nothing to do with trusting the people but I like the fact that k puts his trust in the people um I just hope that he doesn't lose sight of his practical you know his evil sensing um part of his brain anyway um so the DNC has apparently filed a lawsuit against the Georgia election board to block their new rule so the Democrats don't want Georgia to clean up the accuracy of their voter gos you I mentioned that before what would be their reason only one reason there's only one reason you would vote against cleaning up your voting roles there's not a second reason you all would you all agree there's not even a second reason that's offered because what it's probably just word soup it's you know nothing that even makes sense so there's that here's something else uh or K Jr said in the Tucker interview he said he was originally not interested in working with Trump but his wife Cheryl uh asked him to hear Trump out now I saw Raheem Kasam saying that an X I haven't seen the news story itself but do you think that's true do you think it was Cheryl who asked him to hear Trump out so you know weren't you wondering like how that marriage works weren't you you were right you're like how's that work it seems like they're just too different I don't see how in the world they can reconcile that but if this is true and by the way RFK Jr has shown you know no propensity to lie about anything that I've seen so the fact that he says is true seems very likely it's true just the fact he's credible if that is true then that suddenly puts his wife in a whole whole different frame and a positive one not because she might you know be a um uh just got a message from zubie that's interesting I'll have to contact him a later so uh yeah anyway so it makes me it makes me think that uh his wife Cheryl is maybe a more complicated person than the news that indicated and more supportive and maybe more wise uh but clearly she's supportive and wise if this if this is right and I think it is Nicole Shanahan you know RFK Jr's VP running mate while he was running put on a ven diagram which is funny because you know ven diagrams but it showed a ven diagram of Occupy Wall Street that would be the you know the Democrats who didn't like large corporations and the tea part which was Republicans who didn't like big government and she says that uh that her movement if you can call it that is uh the intersection so the intersection of people who don't like big government and the people who don't like big corporations is when the big government and the big corporations are colluding with each other and I thought wow that just that hits it perfectly you know you could call it fascism but then nobody knows what that word means but if you show it in the ven diagram you're like oh yeah the big corporations have too much power but some like that the big government has too much power but other people are happy with that but when you look at the intersection when the two of them are working together that the big corporations are bribing the government and the government's doing stuff with the big corporations that you don't like it is the when they work together that it's a problem and that's where we can all come together how about less of that well you heard the story about uh RFK Jr allegedly I think it's true uh he used a chainsaw to cut off the head of a dead whale and put it on his car and he tried to take it home and it was oozing whale juice uh and I guess he had some fascination with skulls and he he was going to do something to get a wh whale skull which I kind of love CU I mean the whale was dead and uh a huge whale skull like if you could you know get a whale skull and clean it up and you know put it on a display in your house how cool would that be I mean seriously if you had a giant whale SK skull and you had some way to display it it'd be kind of cool so I don't know what he was up to but it doesn't matter it was just something he wanted to do so axios is reporting that there's now this environmental advocacy group that wants some investigated because it might be illegal to transport a dead uh a Dead mammal's skull so there must be some law that says you can't transport a Marine Mammal skull come on come on who even knew that was a law come on so uh I think it's not only uh fascinating that somebody tried to transport a dead whale's head I find it fascinating that there's a law that covers that specific situation but even more ironic here it comes here it comes remember this was a environmental advocacy group that was going after him so is it ironic that an environmental advocacy group would turn themselves into garbage I don't even think you could recycle that kind of garbage no these are garbage people because if they decided that they looked at the whole world and all of the environmental problems and they said you know what if we could solve this aquatic mammal skull Transportation problem well then we'd have a better world to live to leave to our children wouldn't we no they are garbage and so the very thing that they're trying to have less of they became meanwhile Harris has a tax plan that would absolutely rape the rich uh top uh top rate for individuals would climb to 44.6 which if you add your California tax on gets uh well over 50% um the other rates are just through the roof if you're a wealthy person and you're supporting Democrats you're a idiot you're a idiot Mark Cuban if you support this you're a idiot and I don't think he does I mean I don't know what's going on with him he's playing some kind of playing some kind of strategy that I don't fully understand so it's hard to hard to judge it but nobody's in favor of this who has money nobody you I don't think you could find one wealthy Democrat who would be down for this and let me tell you where my red line is I pay roughly 50% in taxes if if you've never experienced that and much more if you throw on property taxes and sales tax and stuff so you know maybe 60% of my money goes to taxes if you put it all together um it's too much you know there's some point where I say you know what my taxes are outrageous but I get that people doing well pay more I mean that the concept itself doesn't stress me too much but at some point it's just abuse and it just feels like punishment because I don't think it's for the benefit of the country it just feels like punishing people who made money and here's my deal I already made this money with the old rules if you're just going to take it from me which is what this is It's just confiscation they're they're actually talking about just taking the money that you have if you have too much just take it um this is move out of the country stuff th this is literally sell the house move to Costa Rica I'm not going to pay more than 50% in taxes and you know the billionaires would be crazy to stay here crazy so we'll see what happens I don't I don't think most of it's likely to happen but it's probably a good solid 30 to 40% likely it's just horrible anyway I would think it would bring a few more prominent Democrats to Trump because it's crazy uh Trump says he wants to build a create a space National Guard and build an iron Dome missile system around the US yes we need that for sure um I think I saw Elon say it it was time to start a Starfleet Academy literally we're going to have a Starfleet I mean it won't be you know the whole world in Starfleet like the real Star Trek but yeah we need a Starfleet Academy for our space Army that's coming meanwhile tulsey gabard apparently is endorse jump I thought she hadd already done it so I kind of missed that story but I guess it's she had not officially endorsed him and now I would say that the uh Royal Flush is complete remember I was telling you that if feels like Trump is assembling a poker hand of a royal flush and he needed a queen right after I said he needed a queen telsey Gabbert endorses I guess he got his Queen so now he now he has the uh the full Royal Flush now you could argue you know who who's the king and who's the ace you know Trump's the Ace of course but uh well maybe maybe Trump's the king and Ark is the Ace because the ace is sometimes one but sometimes 11 well that's only in if you're if you're playing a different game so uh yeah he's got a royal flush and uh or the other way to look at it is he's his pirate ship is nearly staffed um I I saw um Greg geld mentioned the pirate ship analogy and he was nice enough to credit me on that and uh- which by the way I don't require I I like it when my ideas get used by anybody I don't know if I've ever told you that directly so anybody who wants to take anything I've said and say it with or without credit I'm okay with that like I'm I'm not in it for the credit I don't I don't work that way so anyway the pirate ship is about staffed here what I love about the pirate ship is that if forgives a lot of uh rough edges because there could be a lot of people on the same team who've got their own rough edges and if you call them Pirates and you say well we're at least on this pirate ship on the same Mission together it sounds a lot better than it's a whole bunch of people with flaws so there's something about the pirate ship analogy that just totally works for me I think it's that bad boy thing and now a bad girl because we got tulsy on board I also love the framing that RFK Jr's done um with make America healthy again make America great again you could you could see why the left bristled at it because they're like great again why are you saying it was so great back when there was slavery now that's not what anybody was thinking but it was easy to twist that into something bad so they did so I personally I've never been an embracer of magga I talk about it and I like the people who are part of it but I don't I didn't like it associated with me personally you know even though the the Press likes to associate me it's just I didn't like the word I don't like how it sounds it sounds too much like a magot too easy to turn it into something negative so I was never on board with maggus since the beginning although I would acknowledge it became a gigantic successful branding thing so you could argue that Trump got it right because it was so successful however when you hear make America healthy again oh my God is that hit make America healthy again refers to not just our our systems and our our election process and how we select people and you know what we do in the world I mean we need way more Health in our systems but physically we're dying we're just physically less healthy and it's a big big big problem and I think RFK Jr with make America healthy again found a way that everybody can agree because not everybody's going to want to make America great again because they think that's moving backwards which by the way uh KL Harris is cleverly and again this has to be plof I guarantee you this is David ploof uh she's saying that Trump is taking you backwards and she wants to take you forwards how good is that as persuasion well it's so good that I once taught Bill Clinton how to do it because remember how he took uh he he might not know I was behind it but uh the the idea that uh Bob Dole was you know taking you to the Past CU he was saying hey you know I'm the great generation let's get back to those old ideals it made it easy for Clinton to say well you're taking us to the Past I'm going to take you to the Future that is always the winning play I'll take you to the Future always beats I'll take you to the Past even if the past looked pretty good nobody wants to go back to the past it's just nobody so K Harris once again has a perfect frame which is that they're about the future and Trump wants to make you this again guy oh you want do again you mean the past ah I see so you're taking us back to when you know nobody can have an abortion and you know there were slavery and Jim Crow oh you want that again too easy to mock but what do you do with make America healthy again oh I'd like to go back to when we were less healthy no that's One Direction you know even though you say again you know that we're less healthy so nobody argues that we were healthier in the past nobody has that feeling so that's good um RFK Jr on climate change because I know this is where a lot of Republicans are going to say wait a minute I disagree with you RFK Jr because you're Pro climate change but I didn't know exactly what his nuanced thinking was but here's something that would make you a little bit happier he said Democrats have become subsumed in this carbon Orthodox uh meaning that the only issue is carbon and it's the thing that they're going to measure for everything so if you're measuring carbon that's what you'll manage to have I told you a million times that you can only manage to things you measure so if let's say there were three things you thought were good ideas but one of them you could measure and you did measure that's where all your attention would go because you can measure it as soon as you can measure a thing it just sucks all the energy to it cuz Okay you can tell if I make a difference so he's saying that the concentration on that may be diverting from some better things you could do you know to just make the environment cleaner that may have nothing to do with CO2 uh but then he goes further so I I can't follow him on this part of the journey but I appreciate it he said uh the reason that we protect the environment is because there's a spiritual connection so it's not just the CO2 stuff he says there's a spiritual connection and when we destroy nature we diminish Your Capacity to sense the Divine um uh I love the way you put it so in terms of poetry and you know verbal capability it's through the roof you know it's it's standard Kennedy how the hell did you say this so well stuff um so it's impressive in that way and probably hits people just what they want I'll give you the uh the less religious version of this that we don't feel complete until we can go outside in a nice environment that's outdoors and I completely agree with humans can't be humans until they can experience a clean environment and I would argue that maybe you know a lot of inner city um problems might have to do with not having access to Nature let me ask you this if I said you could never go into nature again you'd only be in an inner city that's sort of dirty and squalid what would that do to your brain it would kill you yeah the best part of my day every day is even though my dog's got three good legs and one limpy one uh I take care to the Park and I simply stand in this park under these trees it's a just the greatest Park tiny little Park it's only just a few Acres you can see the whole park from any part of the park but it's extraordinarily nourishing I simply stand there and I feel like like these needles just went into my arm and they're giving me like happiness instantly I get out of the car I walk 10t and my entire body just goes and stays that way until I get back in the car and then there's some you know lasting benefit for that during the day imagine if you never had that that would probably explain a whole bunch of people in inner cities never they just never see the beach you know or maybe once every you know three months or something um that would make you crazy so I don't think you have to call on the divine you could simply say that what makes a human a human and a complete human absolutely requires some kind of commune with nature on a regular basis and you can't get around it so I'm completely with them you know with a tweak well let me compliment president Trump uh I've been I've been wishing he would do something in a specific way for the longest time I think I've said it a number of times and finally he did it now I hope you understand how powerful this is so he was on a podcast I wish I remember the name of the host he's somebody who does a really good job but uh he was asked about the uh hoax that he had once said that the military are suckers and losers now as you know there was one General who claims he said that then As Trump said there were 26 people who said it didn't happen but if somebody says you did something and you say no I didn't are they convinced no they're not that the argument it didn't happen it just sounds like a lie because if people want to think you did it no I didn't well there's somebody who says you did and it's a general so right so here's how he answered it he said who would say it a stupid he I think he said that three three times who would say it you who would say that who would say that and then he answered his own question a stupid person or one who was mentally ill that's it that's the one that's the one that's the one I wanted to hear who would do this that works with the fine people hoax who would stand in front of the the country as the president in prepared remarks at least you know mentally prepared remarks and and say that neo-nazis are fine people the answer is no one no one that's how you should have known it was a hoax without needing to check that the video was in fact edited who would stand in front of the world and say maybe you should drink bleach or inject bleach or inject a household disinfectant into your body no one no one not Trump not anybody unless they were quote stupid or mentally ill who would say in front of a general that soldiers were uh suckers and losers no one no one would say it but putting it in the form of a question is the stronger form of persuasion if you just say no would say it is not nearly as good as who would say that I'm just think about it just use your common sense who would ever say that in public first of all who would believe it yeah who would believe it but that even if somebody believed it who would say that that the who would say it is the is the one that unlocks the brain of the brainwashed okay you do have a good point there because it's not a statement it's a question and if you can't answer the question you're going to have to figure out why you can't answer it who would say that exactly once you see the pattern that three of the biggest hoaxes I would argue the three most powerful hoaxes were from Trump were were about things that nobody would say so yes president Trump you are powering up for this debate in a way that is making me very happy I I feel like who again I'll say it whoever is advising Trump right now doing a good job there there's something good happening there all right here's a little story that is just interesting apparently we used to think that old trees couldn't absorb any CO2 so old growth forests weren't going to help too much for fighting climate change but now there's new information that says that the old forests actually grow new Woody biomass and do absorb so my question is this when you're putting together those climate models and you get wrong the fact that existing old forses can in fact absorb CO2 how much did that change your model did they did they go and revise all their models well probably not because you know this is one maybe one study maybe they need to see some more before they're convinced um but I I remind you that when you have a model that has you know I don't know hundreds of variables or whatever there are that it doesn't take much change to even one of those variables to get a wildly wrong answer and that's why people who have never done any kind of predicting or modeling don't really understand how bad the models are models are not real they're all fake and the way they do it is they throw the one throw away the ones that don't work this year they add another one and then they tell you models work know what works is if you throw away the ones that don't work and replace them with a new one it will always look like the models are working it's literally nothing but a trick and the entire scientific Community are idiots when it comes to any kind of magic tricks or how how they get fooled they're brilliant people I mean it's hard to be a scientist without being brilliant but they are notoriously easy to Fool in some cases because they're a little bit too literal I guess there may be something to it but scientists tend to be easy to fool with scams um so there's a report that the US is helping Israel uh hunt down the head of Hamas that y Yaya sinir guy the most simulation sounding name in the world sinir war and uh did you know that we have a we have a technology that's this deep penetrating um radar or sonar I forget what it is that they can map out the uh the tunnels so apparently the US has some kind of attch where they can actually just map the tunnels did did you know that was true I wish I knew about that a long time ago so if they've got complete control of the territory which they seem to and they can map out the tunnels it's only a matter of time before they you know get everybody they need to get but uh apparently we're doing a lot and the story is that the US wants to find senoir and take him out because they think that would be um the administration American Administration Biden uh believes that that would give Israel a reason to say the war is over so the war doesn't have an over Point there's just sort of more of what you're doing like it would be hard to identify well what would be the end of the war what's the end and so you could sort of artificially have a fake because I've taught you that if people want to do something but they they can't come up with a reason but they want to do it and that's that's this people want to have an end to the war but they don't have a reason they're going to need a reason then the war so from a persuasion perspective the fake because the reason that you use to do your thing because you wanted to do it anyway but you needed something that sounded like a reason would be that sinir gets captured or killed now in my view that makes no difference to anything because I just replace him with number two and go on but in the fake because persuasion World it might be a strong argument that the public thinks well you got the head guy it's a time to wrap things up so I'm not entirely sure that that's what the us is thinking it's just reported that that's what they're thinking maybe a lot of people thinking different things in the administration but uh just know that we now have the tech to pretty much capture all of those tunnels or most of them or a lot of them all right that's what I got for you today that is the end of my prepared remarks I'm going to talk privately to the wonderful sexy good-look people on locals subscribers and for those of you on X and You.

Tube and Rumble thanks for joining and uh I got lots of fun coming up in the next few weeks I'll let you know about lots of things happening but until then I'll see you tomorrow the rest of you but locals hang in with with me I'm going to have a extra sip of coffee to wrap things up and then it will be locals alone e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e

show we're going to have today it's

going to be kind of

amazing Today's show will be so

good that I wish I were you so I could

watch me that's how good it will be

[Music]

yeah good morning everybody and welcome

to the highlight of human civilization

it's called coffee with Scott Adams it's

going to be extra good today I promise

and if you'd like to take your

experience up to levels that nobody can

even comprehend with their tiny shiny

human brains all you need is a cuper mug

or glass a tankered chalice or Stein a

canteen Jer flask a vessel of any kind

fill it with your favorite liquid I like

coffee and join me now for the

unparallel pleasure the dopamine h of

the day the thing that makes everything

better it's called the simultaneous a

sip and it's going to happen right now

go oh I pity the beverag

less

well little bit of science then a little

bit of politics yeah we'll get to the

chainsaw whale head stories you know the

important stuff but first there's a new

study that says you can use brain

stimulation to block traumatic memories

that's right they will find the place in

your brain where your traumatic memories

are stored and they'll zap it with some

stimulant and whack

it so uh how does that work

though I've got questions I'm trying to

reconcile how could it be that you have

free will but that it's also true that

if you stimulate the brain with

electricity in a certain way it can

change how you

think seems like two things in

Conflict I'd like to give you one

factoid that you can research on your

own there's no such thing as a brain

surgeon who believes in free

will I'm just going to leave that

there that that that's your key to

unlocking the next level of awareness

you got to use the key yourself I gave

you the key now you have the key that

there's no brain suron who believes in

free

will they have to do the

rest well there is a study science

direct is talking about a that says a

high a high carbohydrate diet if you

have a high ratio of carbs It's

associated with an increased risk of

depression

hm eating a lot of carbs is associated

with

depression huh is there any way they

could have saved some money on that

study oh yeah they could have asked

Scott next time next time I could save

you probably several weeks and maybe

tens of thousands of dollars you just

ask have to ask me Scott what do

depressed people do

when they're

depressed well they probably eat because

eating gives you a little boost what do

you think they eat well probably

something that boosts their mood pretty

quickly like a steak well I mean they

might like a steak but what would really

give you like a little you know like you

got a little shot of heroin in your arm

but it's not a heroin a carb a good carb

will do that one of the reasons I don't

carbs is is practically a psych you know

hallucinogenic thing for me you if I if

I eat uh just a bunch of carbs I would

just sit there in a coma after a while

but I'd be happy at first so it does it

make sense that if you carbs you'll be

happy in the short run yes will eating a

lot of carbs make you happy in the long

run everybody knows the answer to that

is no because you're going to get heavy

and it's not going to be good for your

brain so uh yeah you could you could

have skipped the science there just ask

me yeah eating ice cream makes me happy

in the short run how do it work in the

long

run not so

good here is what I call ironic science

and we'll get to the the politics in a

minute ironic science where the thing

you didn't see coming turns out that you

can use a giant bubble of

CO2 to store renewable energy

according to clean uh clean

technicia so apparently they have this

way that they can compress

CO2 and then uh decompress it and

somehow they can store energy and then

release it through the

decompression now imagine if that

becomes a real

thing and that we're

using excess

CO2 to store

electricity from Green energy now I

wouldn't bet very much that this will

become a big thing but how cool is it

that what at least some people think is

our biggest problem the CO2 could be our

biggest

solution I I've have long uh wondered if

we will have a industry where sucking

CO2 out of the air and turning it into

products in this case a battery is going

to be a thing so much so that people are

sucking too much CO2 out of the

atmosphere I think there might be a

point when humans are for just for their

own economic reasons they're sucking CO2

out of the air and turning it into stuff

that they can

sell could be a problem

someday well here's something cool new

outlas is

reporting that uh um there's a new

design hasn't been tested yet uh it's a

startup called Deep

fision and the idea is they would use

regular um Nu nuclear energy technology

not not the generation 4 you know not

the new stuff but rather the stuff that

you would be afraid of if it melted down

but what they would do is they would

drill this ginormous 30inch hole 30 in

wide uh a mile deep and they would put

some kind of mechanism nuclear mechanism

a mile into your hole so to speak and

somehow they would need no mechanical

Parts just two pipes I'm not sure how

this works they they put some water into

it and the water heats up the pressure

of the water is enough to keep things

pressurized so you don't need mechanical

pressure just the weight of the water

that because there's a mile of water and

then I guess the the nuke Cooks it up

and then shoots it back up as I don't

know hot water or steam or

something but the point is you could

actually have nuclear power in a hole

and then if the thing melted down you

just close the

hole Yeah because it would be below the

water table so it would never need to be

you know continually cooled because it

would be below the water table and if

anything went wrong you just leave it

there apparently you can just cover the

hole and walk away now will that ever

become a thing I don't know but how cool

would it be if it did we just drill

gigantic holes and put non-mechanical

stuff in there things that you know

don't need to be revised too much

because it's not mechanical and just

have all kinds of Power well remember

that CEO of telegram the messaging app

got picked up in France there's talk of

you know he's got looking at 20 years of

charges that look suspicious to all of

us um the French are going to extend how

long they're going to hold them let me

tell you everything about this story

that you need to

know you will never know what this story

is about I don't think there's the

slightest chance that you and I will

ever know what this guy was up to and

who wanted him

arrested or any of that probably the

real story is something you've never

even heard right it could be anything so

here's the scary part the telegram CEO

being picked up is more proof that any

government whether a democ or not can

arrest you make up a bunch of

and hold you

forever so if you think that oh it's

good thing I've got this justice system

and all that you really don't we're

we're at a point where the government

can make up any story and hold you as

long as they want

and you know this has the tape Brothers

written all over it meaning you know

maybe the tape brothers did something

that the law doesn't like but I'm not

sure that's why they were

arrested I feel like why whatever the

reason was we'll never know you know

it's some other deep dark reason we'll

just never know so to speculate on this

story seems like a waste of time because

we' just be guessing but the one thing

that is the takeaway is that any

government can arrest any person for any

reason and just make up and keep

them in jail forever that's I think

that's guaranteed and evident and

obvious at this point so it's a scary

world here's a story that shouldn't

bother you a bit over 1 million

ineligible ineligible voters were

removed from the uh Texas voter

logs according to the governor

Abbott and he was bragging about his

election Integrity efforts so thank

goodness thank goodness right

imagine if there had been a million

ineligible voters a million now that

doesn't mean that you know they would

all vote but the the speculation that

some people have is that the ineligible

voters maybe they get a ballot or maybe

somebody pretends to be them but that in

some way somebody's voting those names

without being

them but that's not something you have

to worry about is it I mean we would

obviously

know with our tight election security

you would know if a million people were

going to you know illegally Vote or even

any big number 10,000 10,000 would move

a lot of races but you would know if

10,000 people had voted who were not

legal voters right because our elections

are so

secure there there's no way you wouldn't

know that

right and there's no Kraken that's ever

been

found Am I Wrong nobody ever found a

kraken so there's no reason to believe

that large amounts of you know illegal

voters are voting in the United States

that'd be crazy crazy people who

believes that come on come

on well here's the next story um there's

a claim that there are a thousand ways

to commit election fraud

um Elizabeth Nixon's writing about this

so there's a engineer and data science

Scientist by the way I don't know the

validity of anything that's going to be

in the following story I'm going to

report that it's being

reported I can't tell you it's

true but here's a

report see if it would answer all of

your remaining

questions because it would Mar

if this is true and I don't know that

it's true I'm I'm not selling it as true

I'm selling it as something that's

reported if it's true it answers all of

my

questions now that's the first time that

would have ever

happened because I do say if there were

massive cheating how in the world would

we not know about it you know how could

you really get away with that well

here's a theory I'm just going to read

it to you but again I'm not telling you

it's

true I'm just saying well I got a lot of

questions

now so this uh engineer and data

scientist Kim Brooks she was working on

cleaning the voter roles in

Georgia so isn't that great we got all

these volunteers who are helping making

sure the voter rules do not include dead

people or people who moved away or

people who are not can't vote for one

reason or another so she uh cleaned it

up and uh she'd clear a name let's say

there was a specific name she'd clear it

either because they're dead or whatever

takes it off and then she's pretty happy

it's off it's

off uh but then

uh it would be back within a

month what she would remove it from the

election the election log meaning

eligible to vote and it would be

gone but then it would be back in a

month huh now remember I'm not claiming

any of these reports are true I'm

claiming that there is a

report huh how could that happen how can

you take it off and then it would come

back and so it says at that juncture she

realized that a program within the

Georgia voter registration

database was

methodically adding

back fake

names H so reportedly again I'm not

saying this is true I'm just saying it's

reported reportedly she looked deeper

for new registrant the culprit was

principally Driver Services creating new

registrations and in this case the

manufacturer was a person or persons

in other words there was a person doing

it using a

program within the government office

someone was stealing names and

duplicating even tripling that person's

vote and then forging their

signature sometimes it was someone who

just died or a teacher who had no voting

record in the case of a nurse who died

in

20122 with three

registrations he was registered to vote

in two counties

and all three of her voted in the 2022

election and the 2024

primary each signature was slightly

different and even spelled

different they even even in the

signature they spelled their own name

different three different

ways allegedly and again I'm not saying

it's true I'm just saying it's

reported the operation Works under AVR

or automatic voter registration is being

used to register

migrants they will not vote but their

names have been

entered into the voter registration

database when they apply for a driver's

license and their vote will be voted for

them I imagine that this is uh repeating

something everyone

knows so the allegation is that's why

the border is open to get more of these

non-voters illegally on the voter

roles uh how many states do you think

use this this system this automatic

voter registration system in which one

database would be populating the other

database and massively illegally if the

claim is true how many well the claim is

that in 20 in the year 2020 there are 20

States who use the system

that would

allegedly I'm just saying what is

reported I don't know what's true

allegedly take names from one system

that were not eligible to vote the

driver's license databases and put those

names onto the other system but in the

case of people who were registered two

or three times there must have been

something Beyond just taking new people

and putting them on the the roles must

have been something beyond that so how

many states use that system the one

that's suspected of being the culprit in

these elections

20 there were 20 States who allegedly

used these

systems how many of those did Trump lose

and of 20 states that used that same

system how many did Trump

lose

18 Trump lost 18 of 20

states that use this same system

allegedly now the claim is that there

are these registration fraud

Rings um as identified in the Arabella

document I don't know what that is uh in

the work of Omega for America so there

must have been somebody who looked into

this

and um the idea is that uh every each of

these states has a dozen or more NOS

which do nothing but fill out ballots

for fake

regist

H and Peter bernegger whoever that is

his team in Wisconsin has video of NGO

functionaries doing just that

what at 1:00 am early morning after

election day what I don't know that

that's

confirmed um and Porter reports multiple

schemes using the deceased non-voting

and

Felons blah blah blah they steal an

individuals drivers like license number

Social Security uh blah blah the only

thing that changed is the address and

the

signature generally they use people who

don't vote they change a street number a

county a

signature

huh well what do you think now let's put

this in context all right the first

context is that when the original 2020

susp suspicions were coming out and

there were lots of different claims I

said that whether or not any of these

election rigging claims are true the one

thing you could know for sure is that at

least 95% of the claims would be

debunked was I right yeah probably 95%

of the claims were debunked some of them

are not debunked but not confirmed or

not found by a court or not big enough

or somebody didn't have a standing so

you know there's some gray area stuff

but 95% of the stuff you could

check turned out to be you know not

conclusive now does so what would you

say about this new claim about this one

database that's feeding the other

database is that in the

95% well you don't

know but the caution is that every claim

has a 95% chance of not being true

that's my claim so so this is another

claim that you might say has a 95%

chance of not being true but let me tell

you what's different about

it this is the first time that all of my

questions could be answered which is how

could they do this at a scale and get

away with it if if it's

done if there's massive cheating how can

you get away with it now I had I had

been thinking had something to do with

you know the computer computer code

after the vote is given and maybe there

is something like that but I don't have

any proof of that but this would make

way more

sense if it's true that there are NOS

who are dedicated to putting together

these fake voter

lists that gets me to my next

point we have a

world in which it would

take one whistleblower

just one to change the entire freaking

world because America would be

completely changed by one whistleblower

who actually had the goods you know say

a video or you know said yes I

personally did this this is what we did

to the database if you could get just

one Everything's changed the entire the

entire power structure of the United

States would be altered

forever and of course the United States

affects the rest of the world in a big

way it's a world changing

event one

whistleblower and that one

whistleblower would get rich because

there are going to be some big rewards

and if I were a whistleblower I would

say how big is the reward and they might

say something like we'll give you

$10,000 and then you say if you really

have the goods nope 10,000 ,000 doesn't

even get me interested all right we'll

give you

$50,000 nope not

interested a 100

nope we'll give you a million

dollars

pre-tax or after tax

pre-tax no we'll give you $2 million so

after taxes unless Harris gets selected

uh you'll still have the million left

over well now we're

talking for $1 million I will prove

beyond a shadow of a doubt that I worked

on a team that rigged the election and

that I know where the other NOS are

doing the same thing if that's true

again I don't know that it's true it's

an

allegation so how would you like to be

one of those

cheaters knowing that all of your

co-workers all of your people complicit

allegedly allegedly we don't know that

that's true every one of them could get

a million dollars for turning your ass

in oh it's getting interesting now

people have I been telling you

forever that this movie this reality

we're living in that's way too much like

a movie there is something required that

hasn't happened the movie cannot be

completed until

the Kraken is

found every part of this movie requires

the Kraken to be found after we're sure

that it can't be

found that's what an act three looks

like that's a real act three so I'm

going to double down and say that I

don't

believe that given the current setup the

design of our election going

forward and part of the design is now

The Whistleblower rewards right so The

Whistleblower rewards are now part of

the design of the

system here's things that you could

guarantee without knowing anything if if

somebody drew a system on paper and

brought it to you and said all right

here's here's what we're going to do

we're g to give $100 no questions asked

to everybody who Rings your

doorbell what do you think will happen

and I'd say well once word gets

out I I would imagine it be this huge

line of people people ringing my

doorbell correct now did you have to

test it did you have to actually run a

test no it would be so obvious from the

design that people are going to knock on

your door forever trying to get their

$300 very easy to predict now let's do

it with the

election if you had an election system

was super complicated and it would be

really hard to know if anybody was doing

anything like what was suggested

and the the stakes are

gigantic I mean it's practically life

and death fortune or no fortune I mean

really really high stakes and it's

possible so it's possible and the

incentive to do it is through the roof

it's the biggest incentive you could

ever

have if you if you showed me that on

paper and said what do you think will

happen there's lots of ways to

cheat and the benefit of doing it the

upside is gigant

antic well I would say well on paper

there's going to be massive cheating

there can't really be any other way this

goes now we were told that there really

was no way to cheat without getting

caught if that's true well then I revise

everything I've said but we know it's

not

true if anybody involved in the election

wanted to have a fair election they

would just say hey let's just do paper

ballots and then everybody will stop

bitching right you do the paper ballots

everybody looks at them you can double

count them if you need not double count

but you can recount them if you want to

everybody's

happy and and we know exactly what to do

to get to that point we know that we

want to clean the voter roles it's

really easy to know how to do it legally

is that what's happening no no every

sign that we're seeing especially in

Georgia there's a new Movement by the

Democrats to resist cleaning up the

voter roles why in the world would they

want to resist cleaning up the voter

roles and removing ineligible voters

only one

reason there are not two reasons for

that the only reason is that they plan

to use those dead voters and ineligible

voters to vote what else what else could

it

be give me the other reason no if you

read the reason it'll just be look like

nonsense words put together no there's

only one

reason so on

paper the design of the

system pretty much guarantees massive um

fraud that doesn't mean I have proof of

it it's just that the system design

guarantees

it

and now there's a tweak to the system

design now the system design includes

this new element that wasn't there

before which is knowing in advance that

there will be a whistleblower reward and

probably a big one because remember the

Whistleblower doesn't have to accept the

offered award The Whistleblower can

negotiate if you had the negotiating

which by the way if you're a

whistleblower you should

negotiate don't take the first offer

because you've got this drawing hand

there so

negotiate so if you add negotiating and

whistleblowing

to the current system what does the

design tell you will happen again I'm

not being magic or

guessing I'm saying if you design a

system that very clearly will give you

one outcome what are you going to get

well you going to get that one outcome

it's designed to give it to you all

right our design in 2020 almost

guaranteed a rigged election because it

was possible and the stakes were high

now I don't have proof of that I'm just

saying that that the design guaranteed

that there would be an

effort now we have a design that pretty

much guarantees that at least one

whistleblower will try to get

rich right it's hard to imagine that all

those people who would be willing to do

this illegal thing they're all criminals

every one of them is a criminal do you

think you can trust a criminal not to

take a million dollars to sell you

you can't trust a

criminal so if I take this design and

just fast forward it the design should

give us a result that we don't trust at

the end of the

election it should create a situation

where the government is not willing to

certify it that's our design now I'm not

saying magic will happen I'm saying our

current design guarantees

it right the current design guarantees

rigging it guarantees it by

Design and now that we've got the

whistleblowing thing with enough money

behind it that's a that's a design that

design guarantees a whistleblower even

if they're making it up you know

somebody's going to take a run at it so

the current design pretty much

guarantees we're not going to have a

result by

Design again I'm not saying if this

happens or if this no by Design

we can't get a result this time because

it will be evidence of massive cheating

beyond the margin that would determine

the outcome so my prediction for the

race is no outcome now what what happens

after that is a big black box in my head

I have no idea maybe redo it I don't

know do you keep the do you keep the old

president in charge long enough to fix

something does does the house pick a new

president and then nobody's happy I mean

the whole country would fall apart if

they just said oh Trump's the president

so I don't know what happens but my

prediction is no election no no election

certification so we'll

see

um Harris got community

noted because she said that uh Biden and

I believe that women should make

decisions about their own healthare and

their body not the government and the

community not andx said you required

healthcare workers and big companies in

the military to get Co vac vaccinations

or lose their job that is the opposite

of bodily Freedom so now I'm fantasizing

that the debate happens between Harris

and Trump Harris of course is going to

bring up this you bad Republicans you

want to take away the bodily autonomy

and then Trump

says well you know everything that I did

was to take thec decision away from me

in the federal government and move it

closer to the individuals in the state

and women are the majority voters in

those States so if you can convince each

other what to do with your bodily

autonomy I'm sure the rest of the world

would go along with it but women you

need to decide you need to decide what

it is and I'm sure the system will

support you I know I

do takes the whole abortion thing off

the table and then you do the kill shot

but if if we're talking about bodily

autonomy your team is the one who had

mandatory vaccinations and I would never

do that you know I I was in charge of

making sure you had the option but I

would never make them mandatory because

I would not want mandatory constraints

on your body but you might I mean you

might want to do it on your own in your

States but it's out it's out of my

control and I think you're both happy

everybody's happy that I don't have

anything to control your body everybody

good with that

it'd be a pretty strong argument so I

fantasize about there's new drunk comma

video where she's talking to somebody in

an airport where she looks totally

sosed I'm thinking about Jason from the

Allin pod said that there was an

Evidence you know it was a a dark Maga

claim that she was uh drinking too much

and there's no evidence of it well I

don't know if you seen the compilation

Clips yet but we add this to the

evidence however I'm going to fool you

by saying this one I don't think should

be part of the compilation and the

reason is it looked like she was just

flying in an airport somewhere you know

either on her way or on the way back and

it wasn't official

business I have one feeling if she's

drunk giving a speech in her official

capacity if she was off duty and had a

few drinks in the

plane I can't imagine that would be too

different from presidents we've had

before uh my my concern is if she can't

control it enough that she you know she

can do it on her off time versus you

know work time now I get that if you're

president you still need to be coherent

if you get the 3:00 a.m. call but

realistically we've had drinking

presidents for a long time I just want

it not to be during the

job and if she was is just flying around

I have a different feeling about that

even if even if she was

drunk well the author of a white

fragility one of those books that made

wokeness a big thing um who is herself a

white woman um has been accused of

plagiarizing from Minority Scholars

that's the whole

story the whole story is

that white people are bad apparently she

proved

it anyway Meto Zuckerberg had put in a

statement and he basically admitted that

the Biden Administration pressured them

to censor Co stuff and he and also the

Hunter's laptop stuff and uh maybe some

other stuff and he said it was wrong and

he wished he pushed back and uh he's not

going to be as political or spend his

money the way he did before you know

Shoring up election Integrity thought

but it probably worked the other way um

so he's not going to do that kind of

funding and he's not going to endorse

anybody he's not going to get political

what's that sound like to

you that's a trump

endorsement I'm sorry it's a trump

endorsement he's not going to spend

money to help the Democrats alter

elections the way they had he said that

Trump did the most badass thing he'd

ever seen when he did the fight fight

after he got shot he's seen that the

Democrats are the enemy trying to censor

him and his entire his entire game is

free

communication and they were trying to

ruin most basic thing about his platform

which is some of its honest

and I think you know Zu Zuckerberg he's

one of those people that I love the fact

that you don't have to wonder if he's

being dumb you can just rule that out

you know lots of times when you see

somebody doing something that maybe

isn't what you would do you say oh my

maybe they're dumb you know maybe they

have some clever thing I don't know

about but maybe they're dumb you don't

have to worry about that Zuckerberg

isn't

dumb like we all agree on that right so

I think not endorsing anybody in the

current

environment you're endorsing Trump

that's what it feels like now I'm not

going to put words in his mind and I'm

not going to read his mind so I don't

know that I'm tell you how I feel it

what I feel is that is no longer

necessary to oppose Hitler you know what

I mean if you thought Trump was Hitler

and the other side are the good guys you

kind of have an obligation to to be

against them or at least say the words

even if you don't do things but if

you're not willing to say the words and

you're not willing to do

things at the very

least he doesn't think Trump is Hiller

that's a big deal because I suspect

maybe he did think that because he was

acting like he

did anyway uh so Harris now has changed

her view on having live microphones that

are open during the debate so in other

words Trump's microphone would still be

on while she's doing her talking and

that makes interrupting possible why in

the world would KL Harris

want to invite Trump

interrupting

well here's what I think remember I keep

telling you that uh that she's got this

David plof guy working for her and I

think he might be a genius for all this

stuff because he keeps doing

non-standard things that work such as

why don't we just have her give no

interviews I mean who comes up with that

idea in the first place like who who

even come up with that idea of just not

having her in

public and it works it works so every

time you see somebody come up with a

very non-standard idea and then it just

totally works you're probably looking at

genius if it happens more than

once so now this little bit feels a

little like

genius but maybe desperation too because

you could have them at the same time

I think I think it's obvious that Harris

cannot win a debate against Trump and I

would think that the Democrats know that

but what they could do is make Trump

look like a

bully what they could do is give kamla a

whole bunch of cool onliners to say when

she gets

interrupted it's like sorry I'm talking

now you know that thing so I agree with

the people who say that it's a trap and

that Trump uh Trump won easily over

Biden by not having his microphone on uh

I think that works for Trump when I when

the first time I heard that the

microphones would be off during the

Biden thing I said to myself oh my God

there's no way there's no way Trump

loses the only way Trump can lose is

being so unpleasant you know by

interrupting that people go I don't even

care what your policies are you're just

being a jerk now I hate you so since

it's a Vibe election

if Trump wants to get the right Vibe he

wants to you know visit the Vietnamese

restaurant and show everybody loves him

which he did go to a black barber shop

see that everybody's fine with him he

hasn't done that but he should

but being the nicest Trump is really his

best play so yeah I I think he would be

wise to do what he was doing which is

say well you know we'd already agreed

there would be no microphones let's

stick to it

we'll see what

happens so there was a hearing in

Congress on the Trump assassination

attempt and it featured three really

interesting people so um you had uh Navy

SEAL uh Eric prince who used to run his

own private Army uh for sale and you had

Dan banino and uh Ben chaer he was a

Washington Regional SWAT operator who

was on site that day now those would be

three in my opinion seemingly highly

qualified voices that would tell it the

way it is you know they wouldn't make a

something up and it was fascinating so

there were you know massive evidence of

incompetence which I call the the dilber

filter you know every organization is

incompetent at this point and probably

there was a bunch of stuff that just

looks like incompetence but on top of

that you know unambiguously there was

incompetence but on on top of that there

were questions which don't have an

answer such as cleaning off the roof

prematurely you know uh kind of uh

cremating the body before anybody knew

you know a whole you know what what's up

with the encrypted apps that that guy's

got how did he learn to make a bomb with

a remote that's just made for that just

a whole bunch of

questions that the three of them were

very clear that these are super

important questions and unanswered so I

don't know what it all means but when

the smartest people in the game tell you

there's something that doesn't smell

right I would definitely trust that

right normally you don't you don't trust

doesn't smell right but from these

three if Dan banino tells you something

doesn't smell right in in the domain he

knows

about I'm sure listening to

that so and I I think it's like the

telegram CEO story you'll never know I

don't think there's much any chance at

all that will ever know the truth of

what happened with that guy that Thomas

Crooks assassin

guy well James Carville was on I think

it was CNN and it was talking about RFK

Jr and he said that RFK Jr should be

locked up in a menal institution has no

business being on the street what is

that that would be called

projection and

gaslighting RFK Jr doesn't have any

mental problems are you kidding

me he's he's the most like reasonable

person you'll ever

hear why would uh car will have to say

that well because he he's part of a

party that has a massive mental health

problem and some of us have noticed that

the real problem doesn't seem to be

politics there is a massive mental

health problem and the specific mental

health problem appears to be related to

this dark Triad you know narcissism and

some other things and what they love to

do if they have that particular mental

situation is to project which is blame

other people for what they are or what

they're doing and to Gaslight which is

different from lying I I like to explain

this a lot gaslighting is telling you

that something you're looking at

directly isn't

happening that's not just saying that

yesterday when you weren't there I did

something that lie you can't tell if

it's true or not that's just a lie but

if somebody's looking at something

directly and you say it's not there and

it's just obviously it's there that's

gaslighting because it makes them feel

like am I crazy if you pull it off so

this is gaslighting and I think that's

pretty much all they have left is

accusing Republicans of doing

what Democrats are doing and vice versa

so that's that's an example of that um

KL Harris is also uh once compared

policing just just

policing to lynching and Jim Crow and

now she can't stop bragging about how

strong she is on law enforcement that

would be

gaslighting because we know for sure

that she's not super strong about

policing and she's telling you it's the

opposite so when you know something's

true that she's not the one who is

really for policing and then she tells

you but I'm the one who's really for

policing that's

gaslighting all

right and it will work because Democrats

don't get real news they only see the

the fake news that's in their

Silo here's some news Well Kennedy was

talking to uh Tucker Carlson and it made

quite a bit of news here so he said he

was asked to be on the president's

transition team they would be the ones

who select the people who become part of

the

administration I kind of love this but I

know it's going to cause some trouble

within the Republican party because the

Republicans are going to say wait a

minute why are you picking these people

who are not lifelong Republicans that we

can trust and then Kennedy will say but

but they're really smart and capable and

they're not super political so these are

the ones you want and then the

Republicans will say I don't know

that one person when they were in

college once said something I don't like

so I'm leaning toward this because I do

think that Kennedy could be important in

finding people who are brave and not

political and have the right priorities

that would be kind of fun so I don't see

Kennedy being the one who does the

vetting I see him being you know part of

a vetting system in which you know he

might pick a ex Democrat or a current

Democrat for a few things I wouldn't

worry about that looks positive to

me Tucker asked RFK Jr if he would ever

be willing if asked to become Trump's

CIA

director I love that question and he

said yes I would

what yes I would but I would never get a

senate

confirmation he said he would never get

a senate confirmation because the

intelligence a agencies would just force

the uh the Senate not to confirm him do

you believe that I do I believe that

even if you were asked to be the CIA

director the CIA people would contact

their Congress people they own and say

uh don't vote for this and then they

wouldn't and there's no way they could

become that of CIA I believe that's true

I totally believe

that um

Kennedy says that the reason the

Democrats now hate Free

Speech or at least it looks like it

because they're trying to suppress free

speech in every possible way they can uh

he says it's because the party does not

believe in the

people and that they're making Elon Musk

a villain because he's providing free

speech and uh and he says quote if you

don't believe in free speech it means

because you don't trust the people I

disagree with that I don't think that's

what's going on I don't think that the

Democrat leadership even thinks about

the

people I'm not even sure that's one of

the variables on their top 10 I think

this purely about people keeping their

power and staying in their jobs and

making money I think all the free speech

stuff is purely a power playay has

nothing to do with trusting the people

but I like the fact that k puts his

trust in the

people um I just hope that he doesn't

lose sight of his practical you know his

evil sensing um part of his

brain anyway um so the DNC has

apparently filed a lawsuit against the

Georgia election board to block their

new rule so the Democrats don't want

Georgia to clean up the accuracy of

their voter gos you I mentioned that

before what would be their reason only

one reason there's only one reason you

would vote against cleaning up your

voting roles there's not a second reason

you all would you all

agree there's not even a second reason

that's

offered because what it's probably just

word soup it's you know nothing that

even makes

sense so there's

that here's something else uh or K Jr

said in the Tucker interview he said he

was originally not interested in working

with Trump but his wife Cheryl uh asked

him to hear Trump out now I saw Raheem

Kasam saying that an X I haven't seen

the news story itself but do you think

that's

true do you think it was Cheryl who

asked him to hear Trump

out so you know weren't you wondering

like how that marriage works

weren't you you were right you're like

how's that work it seems like they're

just too different I don't see how in

the world they can reconcile that but if

this is true and by the way RFK Jr has

shown you know no propensity to lie

about anything that I've seen so the

fact that he says is true seems very

likely it's true just the fact he's

credible if that is true then that

suddenly puts his wife in a whole whole

different frame and a positive one not

because she might you know be

a

um uh just got a message from zubie

that's interesting I'll have to contact

him a

later so

uh yeah anyway so it makes me it makes

me think that uh his wife Cheryl is

maybe a more complicated person than the

news that indicated and more supportive

and maybe more

wise uh but clearly she's supportive and

wise if this if this is right and I

think it is Nicole Shanahan you know RFK

Jr's VP running mate while he was

running put on a ven diagram which is

funny because you know ven diagrams but

it showed a ven diagram of Occupy Wall

Street that would be the you know the

Democrats who didn't like large

corporations and the tea part which was

Republicans who didn't like big

government and she says that

uh that her movement if you can call it

that is uh the

intersection so the intersection of

people who don't like big government and

the people who don't like big

corporations is when the big government

and the big corporations are colluding

with each

other and I thought wow that just that

hits it perfectly you know you could

call it fascism but then nobody knows

what that word means but if you show it

in the ven diagram you're like oh yeah

the big corporations have too much power

but some like that the big government

has too much power but other people are

happy with that but when you look at the

intersection when the two of them are

working together that the big

corporations are bribing the government

and the government's doing stuff with

the big corporations that you don't like

it is the when they work together that

it's a problem and that's where we can

all come together how about less of that

well you heard the story about uh RFK Jr

allegedly I think it's true uh he used a

chainsaw to cut off the head of a dead

whale and put it on his car and he tried

to take it home and it was oozing whale

juice uh and I guess he had some

fascination with skulls and he he was

going to do something to get a wh whale

skull which I kind of love CU I mean the

whale was dead and uh a huge whale skull

like if you could

you know get a whale skull and clean it

up and you know put it on a display in

your house how cool would that

be I mean seriously if you had a giant

whale SK skull and you had some way to

display it it'd be kind of cool so I

don't know what he was up to but it

doesn't matter it was just something he

wanted to do so axios is reporting that

there's now this environmental advocacy

group that wants some investigated

because it might be illegal to transport

a dead uh a Dead mammal's

skull so there must be some law that

says you can't transport a Marine Mammal

skull come

on come on who even knew that was a

law come

on so uh I think it's not only uh

fascinating that somebody tried to

transport a dead whale's head I find it

fascinating that there's a law that

covers that specific situation but even

more

ironic here it comes here it

comes remember this was a environmental

advocacy group that was going after him

so is it ironic that an environmental

advocacy group would turn themselves

into garbage

I don't even think you could recycle

that kind of garbage no these are

garbage people because if they decided

that they looked at the whole world and

all of the environmental problems and

they said you know what if we could

solve this aquatic mammal skull

Transportation problem well then we'd

have a better world to live to leave to

our children wouldn't we no they are

garbage

and so the very thing that they're

trying to have less of they

became meanwhile Harris has a tax plan

that would absolutely rape the rich uh

top uh top rate for individuals would

climb to

44.6 which if you add your California

tax on gets uh well over

50% um the other rates are just through

the

roof if you're a wealthy person and

you're supporting Democrats you're a

idiot you're a

idiot Mark Cuban if you support this

you're a idiot and I don't think

he does I mean I don't know what's going

on with him he's playing some kind of

playing some kind of strategy that I

don't fully understand so it's hard to

hard to judge it but nobody's in favor

of this who has money

nobody you I don't think you could find

one wealthy Democrat who would be down

for this and let me tell you where my

red line

is I pay roughly 50% in

taxes if if you've never experienced

that and much more if you throw on

property taxes and sales tax and stuff

so you know maybe 60% of my money goes

to taxes if you put it all together

um it's too much

you know there's some point where I say

you know what my taxes are outrageous

but I get that people doing well pay

more I mean that the concept itself

doesn't stress me too much but at some

point it's just abuse and it just feels

like punishment because I don't think

it's for the benefit of the country it

just feels like punishing people who

made money and here's my

deal I already made this money with the

old rules

if you're just going to take it

from me which is what this is It's just

confiscation they're they're actually

talking about just taking the money that

you have if you have too much just take

it

um this is move out of the country

stuff th this is literally sell the

house move to Costa Rica I'm not going

to pay more than 50% in taxes and you

know the billionaires would be crazy to

stay here

crazy so we'll see what happens I don't

I don't think most of it's likely to

happen but it's probably a good solid 30

to 40% likely it's just

horrible anyway I would think it would

bring a few more prominent Democrats to

Trump because it's

crazy uh Trump says he wants to build a

create a space National Guard and build

an iron Dome missile system around the

US yes we need that for sure um I think

I saw Elon say it it was time to start a

Starfleet

Academy literally we're going to have a

Starfleet I mean it won't be you know

the whole world in Starfleet like the

real Star Trek but yeah we need a

Starfleet Academy for our space Army

that's coming meanwhile tulsey gabard

apparently is endorse jump I thought she

hadd already done it so I kind of missed

that story but I guess it's she had not

officially endorsed him and now I would

say that the uh Royal Flush is

complete remember I was telling you that

if feels like Trump is assembling a

poker hand of a royal flush and he

needed a

queen right after I said he needed a

queen telsey Gabbert

endorses I guess he got his Queen so now

he now he has the uh the full Royal

Flush now you could argue you know who

who's the king and who's the ace you

know Trump's the Ace of course but uh

well maybe maybe Trump's the king and

Ark is the Ace because the ace is

sometimes one but sometimes 11 well

that's only in if you're if you're

playing a different

game so uh yeah he's got a royal

flush and uh or the other way to look at

it is he's his pirate ship is nearly

staffed um

I I saw um Greg geld mentioned the

pirate ship analogy and he was nice

enough to credit me on that and

uh- which by the way I don't

require I I like it when my ideas get

used by anybody I don't know if I've

ever told you that directly so anybody

who wants to take anything I've said and

say it with or without

credit I'm okay with that like I'm I'm

not in it for the credit I don't I don't

work that way

so anyway the pirate ship is about

staffed here what I love about the

pirate ship is that if forgives a lot of

uh rough edges because there could be a

lot of people on the same team who've

got their own rough edges and if you

call them Pirates and you say well we're

at least on this pirate ship on the same

Mission together it sounds a lot better

than it's a whole bunch of people with

flaws so there's something about the

pirate ship analogy that just totally

works for me I think it's that bad boy

thing and now a bad girl because we got

tulsy on

board I also love the framing that RFK

Jr's done um with make America healthy

again make America great again you could

you could see why the left bristled at

it because they're like great again why

are you saying it was so great back when

there was slavery now that's not what

anybody was thinking but it was easy to

twist that into something bad so they

did so I personally I've never been an

embracer of magga I talk about it and I

like the people who are part of it but I

don't I didn't like it associated with

me personally you know even though the

the Press likes to associate me it's

just I didn't like the word I don't like

how it sounds it sounds too much like a

magot too easy to turn it into something

negative so I was never on board with

maggus since the beginning although I

would acknowledge it became a

gigantic successful branding thing so

you could argue that Trump got it right

because it was so successful however

when you hear make America healthy again

oh my God is that

hit make America healthy again refers to

not just our our systems and our our

election process and how we select

people and you know what we do in the

world I mean we need way more Health in

our

systems but physically we're dying we're

just physically less healthy and it's a

big big big problem and I think RFK Jr

with make America healthy again found a

way that everybody can

agree because not everybody's going to

want to make America great again because

they think that's moving backwards which

by the way uh KL Harris is cleverly and

again this has to be plof I guarantee

you this is David ploof uh she's saying

that Trump is taking you backwards and

she wants to take you forwards how good

is that as

persuasion well it's so good that I once

taught Bill Clinton how to do it because

remember how he took uh he he might not

know I was behind it but uh the the idea

that uh Bob Dole was you know taking you

to the Past CU he was saying hey you

know I'm the great generation let's get

back to those old ideals it made it easy

for Clinton to say well you're taking us

to the Past I'm going to take you to the

Future that is always the winning play

I'll take you to the Future always beats

I'll take you to the Past even if the

past looked pretty good nobody wants to

go back to the past it's just nobody so

K Harris once again has a perfect frame

which is that they're about the future

and Trump wants to make you this again

guy oh you want do again you mean the

past ah I see so you're taking us back

to when you know nobody can have an

abortion and you know there were slavery

and Jim Crow oh you want that again too

easy to mock but what do you do with

make America healthy again oh I'd like

to go back to when we were less healthy

no that's One

Direction you know even though you say

again you know that we're less healthy

so nobody argues that we were healthier

in the past nobody has that

feeling so that's good

um RFK Jr on climate change because I

know this is where a lot of Republicans

are going to say wait a minute I

disagree with you RFK Jr because you're

Pro climate change but I didn't know

exactly what his nuanced thinking was

but here's something that would make you

a little bit happier he said Democrats

have become subsumed in this carbon

Orthodox uh meaning that the only issue

is carbon and it's the thing that

they're going to measure for everything

so if you're

measuring carbon that's what you'll

manage to have I told you a million

times that you can only manage to things

you measure so if let's say there were

three things you thought were good ideas

but one of them you could measure and

you did measure that's where all your

attention would go because you can

measure it as soon as you can measure a

thing it just sucks all the energy to it

cuz Okay you can tell if I make a

difference so he's saying that the

concentration on that may be diverting

from some better things you could do you

know to just make the environment

cleaner that may have nothing to do with

CO2 uh but then he goes further so I I

can't follow him on this part of the

journey but I appreciate it he said uh

the reason that we protect the

environment is because there's a

spiritual connection

so it's not just the CO2 stuff he says

there's a spiritual connection and when

we destroy nature we diminish Your

Capacity to sense the

Divine

[Music]

um uh I love the way you put it so in

terms of poetry and you know verbal

capability it's through the roof you

know it's it's standard Kennedy how the

hell did you say this so well stuff um

so it's impressive in that way and

probably hits people just what they want

I'll give you the uh the less religious

version of

this that we don't feel complete until

we can go outside in a nice environment

that's

outdoors and I completely agree with

humans can't be humans until they can

experience a clean

environment and I would argue that maybe

you know a lot of inner city um problems

might have to do with not having access

to

Nature let me ask you this if I said you

could never go into nature again you'd

only be in an inner city that's sort of

dirty and squalid what would that do to

your

brain it would kill

you yeah the best part of my day every

day is even though my dog's got three

good legs and one limpy one uh I take

care to the Park and I simply stand in

this park under these trees it's a just

the greatest Park tiny little Park it's

only just a few Acres you can see the

whole park from any part of the park

but it's

extraordinarily

nourishing I simply stand there and I

feel like like these needles just went

into my arm and they're giving me like

happiness instantly I get out of the car

I walk 10t and my entire body just

goes and stays that way until I get back

in the car and then there's some you

know lasting benefit for that during the

day imagine if you never had

that that would probably explain a whole

bunch of people in inner cities never

they just never see the beach you know

or maybe once every you know three

months or something um that would make

you crazy so I don't think you have to

call on the divine

you could simply say that what makes a

human a human and a complete human

absolutely requires some kind of commune

with nature on a regular basis and you

can't get around it so I'm completely

with them you know with a

tweak well let me compliment president

Trump uh I've been I've been wishing he

would do something in a specific way for

the longest time I think I've said it a

number of times

and

finally he did

it now I hope you understand how

powerful this is so he was on a podcast

I wish I remember the name of the host

he's somebody who does a really good job

but uh he was asked about the uh hoax

that he had once said that the military

are suckers and

losers now as you know there was one

General who claims he said that then As

Trump said there were 26 people who said

it didn't happen but if somebody says

you did something and you say no I

didn't are they convinced no they're not

that the argument it didn't

happen it just sounds like a lie because

if people want to think you did it no I

didn't well there's somebody who says

you did and it's a general

so right so here's how he answered

it he said who would say it a stupid he

I think he said that three three times

who would say it you who would say that

who would say that and then he answered

his own question a stupid person or one

who was mentally

ill that's

it that's the

one that's the

one that's the one I wanted to hear who

would do this that works with the fine

people hoax who would stand in front of

the the country as the president in

prepared remarks at least you know

mentally prepared remarks and and say

that neo-nazis are fine people the

answer is no one no one that's how you

should have known it was a hoax without

needing to check that the video was in

fact edited who would stand in front of

the world and say maybe you should drink

bleach or inject bleach or inject a

household disinfectant into your body

no one no one not Trump not anybody

unless they were quote stupid or

mentally

ill who would say in front of a

general that soldiers were uh suckers

and losers no one no one would say it

but putting it in the form of a question

is the stronger form of persuasion if

you just say no would say it is not

nearly as good as who would say

that I'm just think about it just use

your common sense who would ever say

that in

public first of all who would believe

it yeah who would believe it but that

even if somebody believed it who would

say

that that the who would say it is the is

the one that unlocks the brain of the

brainwashed okay you do have a good

point there because it's not a statement

it's a question and if you can't answer

the question you're going to have to

figure out why you can't answer it who

would say that exactly once you see the

pattern that three of the biggest hoaxes

I would argue the three most powerful

hoaxes were from Trump were were about

things that nobody would say so yes

president Trump you are powering up for

this debate in a way that is making me

very happy I I feel like who again I'll

say it whoever is advising Trump right

now doing a good job there there's

something good happening

there all right here's a little story

that is just interesting apparently we

used to think that old trees couldn't

absorb any CO2 so old growth forests

weren't going to help too much for

fighting climate change but now there's

new information that says that the old

forests actually grow new Woody biomass

and do absorb so my question is this

when you're putting together those

climate models and you get wrong the

fact that existing old forses can in

fact absorb CO2 how much did that change

your

model did they did they go and revise

all their models well probably not

because you know this is one maybe one

study maybe they need to see some more

before they're

convinced um

but I I remind you that when you have a

model that has you know I don't know

hundreds of variables or whatever there

are that it doesn't take much change to

even one of those variables to get a

wildly wrong answer and that's why

people who have never done any kind of

predicting or modeling don't really

understand how bad the models are

models are not

real they're all fake and the way they

do it is they throw the one throw away

the ones that don't work this year they

add another one and then they tell you

models work know what works is if you

throw away the ones that don't work and

replace them with a new one it will

always look like the models are working

it's literally nothing but a trick and

the entire scientific Community are

idiots when it comes to any kind

of magic tricks or how how they get

fooled they're brilliant people I mean

it's hard to be a scientist without

being brilliant but they are notoriously

easy to

Fool in some cases because they're a

little bit too literal I guess there may

be something to it but scientists tend

to be easy to

fool with

scams

um so there's a report that the US is

helping Israel uh hunt down the head of

Hamas that y Yaya sinir

guy the most simulation sounding name in

the world

sinir war and uh did you know that we

have a we have a technology that's this

deep penetrating um radar or sonar I

forget what it is that they can map out

the uh the

tunnels so apparently the US has some

kind of attch where they can actually

just map the tunnels

did did you know that was

true I wish I knew about that a long

time ago so if they've got complete

control of the territory which they seem

to and they can map out the tunnels it's

only a matter of time before they you

know get everybody they need to get but

uh apparently we're doing a lot and the

story is that the US wants to find

senoir and take him out because they

think that would be

um the administration American

Administration Biden uh believes that

that would give Israel a reason to say

the war is over so the war doesn't have

an over Point there's just sort of more

of what you're doing like it would be

hard to identify well what would be the

end of the

war what's the end and so you could sort

of artificially have a fake because I've

taught you that if people want to do

something but they they can't come up

with a reason but they want to do it and

that's that's this people want to have

an end to the

war but they don't have a reason they're

going to need a reason then the war so

from a persuasion perspective the fake

because the reason that you use to do

your thing because you wanted to do it

anyway but you needed something that

sounded like a reason would be that

sinir gets captured or

killed now in my view

that makes no difference to anything

because I just replace him with number

two and go on but in the fake because

persuasion

World it might be a strong argument that

the public thinks well you got the head

guy it's a time to wrap things up so I'm

not entirely sure that that's what the

us is thinking it's just reported that

that's what they're thinking maybe a lot

of people thinking different things in

the

administration but uh just know that we

now have the tech to pretty much capture

all of those tunnels or most of them or

a lot of

them all right that's what I got for you

today that is the end of my prepared

remarks I'm going to talk privately to

the wonderful

sexy good-look people on locals

subscribers and for those of you on X

and YouTube and Rumble thanks for

joining and uh I got lots of fun coming

up in the next few weeks I'll let you

know about lots of things happening but

until then I'll see you tomorrow the

rest of you but locals hang in with with

me I'm going to have a extra sip of

coffee to wrap things up and then it

will be locals

alone

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e e