Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive May 24, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #2629

Episode 2629 CWSA 10/15/24

Episode #2629 Oct 15, 2024 1:41:24 37,345 views

Today is Kamala Collapse day. Come enjoy it. Golden Age approaches. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.

Opening General Commentary

Well, we got a show to do today. Probably will be amazing. All the stars are lining up. Comments are working. No, comments are working. Yes. Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee wi

View segment →
SimultaneousSip General Commentary

th Scott Adams, and there's no better time. If you'd like to take your experience up to levels that even Tim Walz will be clapping like a seal for, in a moment when I hit play all you need for that is a cup or mug or a glass or tankard or can or jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your…

View segment →
Tangent General Commentary

sure, the top of the morning or the end of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now. Oh, so good. The only thing that could make this day better would be Tim Walz clapping like a seal. See if we can make that happen. Thank you. Thank you.…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

audio and no visual when I am so visual. Speaking of which, if you need to find merchandise for Coffee with Scott Adams that features, yes, my bald head on shirts and hoodies and mugs, just go to one of your favorite search engines and search for CWSA for Coffee with Scott Adams merchandise to buy.…

View segment →
MainContent Cognitive Reframing

l women if they work in some kind of secure military or intelligence job. Turns out that there will be a very nice Chinese woman who would be very happy to be your girlfriend, and maybe you could have long conversations about what you do at work. So here's how you know you're dating a spy: your spy…

View segment →
NewsReaction The Golden Age

ow how the movie would end and you couldn't come up with a good ending, there could be no better ending than having nobody in the entire country of Canada willing to take the job. There's no, you can't get better than that. I'm sorry, there's nothing. If he had like won his appeals and had it overtu…

View segment →
MainContent The Golden Age

ow what company made it. I didn't see that in the video. But just think about that. What would a golden age look like? Well, one way it would look like is that the deaf would be able to see sound. I mean, if you were going to say what's the golden age look like, I'd put that in there. I would also…

View segment →
MainContent AI & Technology

by one click. Seriously, one click and I've got something at my door. So when I think what's the best user interface design, I always think Amazon. So if anybody's watching from Amazon, you guys are the best. The best interface people completely for 20 years or however long Amazon's been around. Un…

View segment →
NewsReaction Health & Biohacking

xplain one thing you need to know. If there is a breakthrough medical procedure it will require one of the following things. Number one, you will lose all of your hair. It depends on the medical breakthrough. You know it's not every time you lose all of your hair but that's a common one. Another one…

View segment →
NewsReaction Health & Biohacking

s key energy pathways, blah blah blah. So it's got several ways it can work I guess. And this fenbendazole and mebendazole, they're both anti-parasitic drugs. Oh I should have said anti-parasitic. So these are three anti-parasitic drugs: ivermectin and then these other two. And they've been found to…

View segment →
MainContent The Golden Age

uldn't be able to raise money and we wouldn't be able to get anything done in the government so basically it just couldn't happen. But what if you're Google? If you're Google you tell the government what to do. If you're Google you don't need money because you have it. If you're Google you just chan…

View segment →
MainContent Talent Stack

aranteed. And of course Trump would know that. He wouldn't be trying to get away with something because he would know it the same as the banks. Everybody in business knows that. Nobody relies on your impression of your asset's value. Everybody knows that. So now the appellate court is sitting there…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

n dime sent his private jet to carry Nelson Mandela to the United States. And today Kamala Harris will be calling him a racist again because they made up some stuff. I'll tell you he might be the most misunderstood human being in the world if you look. And it's very consistent. You've heard a lot of…

View segment →
NewsReaction General Commentary

lz. Just be careful about what you see on social media. All right, how many hoaxes are there about Trump today? Let's see. Do we have how many? There's a hoax that Trump was going to use the military against his enemies. Of course that's just some weird thing taken out of context. I saw, did you se…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

thinks only Nazis use that building? It's a sort of a public building. I believe that sports teams do things in there. Maybe some of your favorite comedians have done stand-up there. How in the world do you drink so much that you go on CNN and say that having a rally in a public building where every…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

n the border because they like him best. What do we got? Is he going to visit any real estate in the next few weeks? Let's check. Yeah he'll be in this building called Madison Square Garden. Perfect. We'll say it's a Nazi facility because that's all they have. Imagine sitting around and thinking wh…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

s I'm going to embrace it like crazy like I didn't see any problems and I'm not even going to pretend to be consistent because I'm going to assume that he managed to beat the margin of cheating. I won't know that but it will be my working assumption. So yes there's something strange going on in Detr…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

rypto but this is ridiculous. Then there's a national health initiative to focus on illnesses that disproportionately impact black men. I think that would make sense but only in the context that we should be looking to fix everybody's problem. So if there's somebody whose problem that is underserve…

View segment →
Tangent Politics as Persuasion

somebody's trying to figure out who paid the trucking companies that allegedly had the fake ballots on it and it's taken two years in federal courts unsuccessfully? Is there some reason we can't know who paid the trucking companies that a whistleblower said had fake ballots in it? And you're going t…

View segment →
Closing General Commentary

ple unlikely to ever have any interaction with. So if the Jewish powers gained power and got into a better situation I say oh okay I don't see any problem with that. I've had tremendously good financial business dealings with many Jewish business people pretty much all great. I would just keep doing…

View segment →

Well, we got a show to do today. Probably will be amazing. All the stars are lining up. Comments are working. No, comments are working. Yes. Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and there's no better time.

If you'd like to take your experience up to levels that even Tim Walz will be clapping like a seal for, in a moment when I hit play all you need for that is a cup or mug or a glass or tankard or can or jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the top of the morning or the end of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.

Oh, so good. The only thing that could make this day better would be Tim Walz clapping like a seal. See if we can make that happen. Thank you. Thank you. Yeah, there we go. All right. Cringey. It's a little bit cringey, but we like it.

If you'd like to know how to do the Tim Walz, yeah, you have to lean back, you've got to put your elbows together, and you've got to clap like a seal. Lean back, elbows together. And if you'd like a lesson on pointing, the pointing is very important. Your non-pointing hand has to be limp and soft. Your pointing hand is fully mobile, but the non-pointing hand you want to be a little bit like this. And the bowing, the Tim Walz bowing and the open palms like he's surprised when he sees people. Every time he goes to a crowd he sees some people he's surprised.

If you're only listening to this and missing all of my amazing impressions, oh, I'm so sorry for you. It must be so sad sitting there with audio and no visual when I am so visual. Speaking of which, if you need to find merchandise for Coffee with Scott Adams that features, yes, my bald head on shirts and hoodies and mugs, just go to one of your favorite search engines and search for CWSA for Coffee with Scott Adams merchandise to buy. It'll pop right up.

Here are some security tips for men, courtesy of Joshua Steinman. You should follow him on X. Joshua Steinman. And apparently the following thing has happened in at least one intelligence security meeting. Somebody looked at the men in the room and said, I'm paraphrasing but said, there's nobody here who's more than a five. And a ten, if somebody wants to date you who's a ten, it's a spy.

So apparently one of the problems with the dating apps is that men who can't really pull very many beautiful women are still getting beautiful women if they work in some kind of secure military or intelligence job. Turns out that there will be a very nice Chinese woman who would be very happy to be your girlfriend, and maybe you could have long conversations about what you do at work. So here's how you know you're dating a spy: your spy is twice as good-looking as you. Now it gets complicated if you're also rich, because then you can't tell.

All right, this is the funniest story of the day, and I laughed until I cried this morning. I was sitting at my desk just crying with laughter. Now I hope this is as funny to you as it is to me. Now it's funny because it's real.

Here's the background. You might know that Jordan Peterson was in some trouble with something called the Ontario College of Psychologists. Now he's a Canadian, and this is a Canadian entity that has some kind of control over the licensing of Canadian psychologists. And if you want to remain in good standing in your profession, you've got to be good with this organization. And this organization ruled that Dr. Jordan Peterson needed to be re-educated because his social media posts were so inappropriate for someone in their profession that they needed to either take away his very license to practice or have him re-educated by a social media psychologist expert. There are a lot of those. I don't know. But he had to be re-educated.

So the first thing that Dr. Jordan Peterson did was he tried to, I believe he tried to fight the process. You know, he challenged the process, and that didn't work. So now he's a victim of the process. And he eventually decided that he would in fact accept the re-education process.

Now let me just set this up for you. It's Dr. Jordan Peterson, the most famous and possibly most capable person who's ever existed in this plane of existence for this domain of knowledge and whatnot. And now Canada's task is to find somebody who's smarter or more knowledgeable on the topics of how to communicate in the context of being a psychologist and a social media person. That's right. They're going to find somebody who's better than Jordan Peterson in his chosen field, in which he's literally the most famous and capable person you've ever seen in your life in any field, and at the same time better at social media and communicating. There's nobody better at social media and communicating.

So what do you think happened? Well, turns out in the entire nation of Canada there were zero volunteers for this job. There's nobody in Canada who takes the job. Nobody in Canada wants to be so stupid that you would embarrass yourself and have your entire professional life destroyed by teaching Jordan Peterson how to be Jordan Peterson. Like, how in the world do you even do that?

But it gets better. It gets better. I'm going to read to you what Jordan Peterson wrote when he had some clarifying questions about the process. All right, this is so deliciously fun I can't even stand it. All right, hold on. I can't read. I'm tearing up.

All right, so this is from Dr. Jordan Peterson. Let's see. He said he has some questions for the college about how the qualifications of the quote social media expert would be determined. So he asked this: "By what standards do you accredit your social media experts? Is that a regulated profession? Are these experts also versed in the complexities of clinical psychology? How else can they improve the professional activities of a psychological practitioner? Is there any concrete, published, and peer-reviewed evidence that the tender lessons they purport to provide actually produce an improvement in the behavior of those they educate? By what objective criteria are you going to measure my improvement in that regard? Are there standardized tests for such progression? How are those standards established, if they exist?"

Oh my God. Nobody in the entire country of Canada was willing to take the bait. I would like to know, I would like to now give you my impression of every person in Canada who may have once thought they were qualified for the job of educating Dr. Jordan Peterson. I now give you my impression. This is me doing an impression. You can't tell if you're listening on audio, but it's really hilarious. It's getting better. It's funnier every minute. It's getting a little bit funnier. And see, oh my goodness.

So I sure hope that Canada saves us by educating Dr. Jordan Peterson, because what if he just keeps going out there doing what he's doing? Just think of all the harm he's causing to the world, if not your own family. Oh God, please educate him.

Okay, if you could have written a script of a movie about that situation and you didn't know how the movie would end and you couldn't come up with a good ending, there could be no better ending than having nobody in the entire country of Canada willing to take the job. There's no, you can't get better than that. I'm sorry, there's nothing. If he had like won his appeals and had it overturned, ah, boring. If he'd taken a class and somebody gave it to him, icky, boring. But having nobody in the country capable of giving him a lesson, you can't beat that. You can't beat that. That's as good as it gets.

So maybe our luck is changing. What do you think?

But here's some more good news. I got a whole bunch of good news today. You're going to have so much good news today you're going to be tired of it. You'll be exhausted with the good news.

Here's some more. Saw a video of a young woman who was deaf, and she was trying out some new glasses that allow captions to appear on the glasses just for the wearer so that when she's out and listening to things she can get closed captions on personal conversations as well as movies and anything else. And you know they're kind of dorky looking, so you'd know that they were not normal glasses, but they look like they could be any design you want eventually. The first ones look a little dorky, but way better than not being able to hear in public. I saw us watching her tearfully put them on and being able to see sound in the sense of a caption was just one of the most touching things.

Now just imagine this is a real product. I don't know what company made it. I didn't see that in the video. But just think about that. What would a golden age look like? Well, one way it would look like is that the deaf would be able to see sound. I mean, if you were going to say what's the golden age look like, I'd put that in there.

I would also love to see wokeness destroyed under its own weight, you know, sort of like the Dr. Jordan Peterson story where you just let it play out instead of fixing it or opposing it. You just let it play out. I've taught you the trick of embracing the thing that you don't like. Often if there's somebody who has a terrible idea in your company or your organization or the government, if you simply follow the rules and embrace it, it'll fall apart on its own. And it looks like that's what Peterson did after first challenging it anyway.

The CEO of Rumble says that Google is burying their search results for the Dan Bongino show, and that appears to be the case. Now of course they're competing with Rumble, so you can imagine why they do it. But given that YouTube has such a dominant position and given that Google has such a dominant position, you do think that this might be some kind of a competitive problem. I don't know if it triggers any antitrust triggers or not. It triggers a trigger. Can you trigger a trigger? A little redundant.

But here is my advice. There is a competitor to Google, and if you don't like how Google and YouTube that they own, if you don't like how they're treating Rumble, you could use an app called Perplexity. Now I told you that I tried it the other day. For weeks and weeks people have been saying to me almost every day somebody says you got to try Perplexity. And I honestly just got sick of hearing it because I thought I don't really need another app in my life, right? But I tried it. I thought, you know, I'll just see what's going on here. And so I tried it. And if you use the Perplexity app for five minutes there's a good chance you will never use Google again. Because when I use Google I get a bunch of sponsored ads and then I get a bunch of things I don't trust, and it just doesn't look like it works anymore to me. But I do get a better result with Perplexity.

But Perplexity has its own little story going on right now, and I didn't know it was backed by Jeff Bezos. So Jeff Bezos, Amazon founder, is one of the backers of Perplexity. And suddenly I understand why the interface is so good. I can't say enough about how amazing Amazon is as a product. Do you ever have the feeling that you go on Amazon, you buy something, and it happens so seamlessly, and the entire process including delivery and even if you have to return something, they've made it dead easy? That Amazon is like one of the ninth wonders of the world if you think of the complexity in that product and the fact that it works so well by one click. Seriously, one click and I've got something at my door.

So when I think what's the best user interface design, I always think Amazon. So if anybody's watching from Amazon, you guys are the best. The best interface people completely for 20 years or however long Amazon's been around. Unbelievably high level of capability. Unbelievable, just mind-blowing quality of technical and user interface design. So when I see Jeff Bezos is backing this Perplexity app and when I turn it on I love the interface, I go, oh, well that makes sense. I can't imagine Jeff Bezos backing a search engine that had a bad interface. He is all about the customer experience. If you've ever heard Bezos give an interview, if you ask what's the number one thing that makes Amazon work, he'll tell you it's the obsessive focus on the customer experience. And he's willing to, and he did lose money in a cash sense for however many years because he wasn't focusing on cash. He was focusing on the customer experience. And boy did he succeed in the customer experience. Boy did he succeed. I mean nothing's perfect, but wow.

And so it seems that some of that magic is going over to Perplexity. If you use it once it'll be hard not to use it forever. Honestly, it's that good.

However, somebody asked me but is it full of wokeness? Yes, yeah, it can't be not full of wokeness because it's searching based on what's in the real world and the real world is full of wokeness. Now I did a test this morning in which I asked it, I did the you could call it the Gell-Mann Amnesia test. So Gell-Mann is the physicist who famously noticed that when a story was about something he knew he could tell the story was fake or just wrong. And if it was something he didn't know he couldn't tell the difference so he thought it was probably right. So I asked both Perplexity and Google a story about myself in which I can guarantee I know the correct story because literally it's myself. And they both got it wrong. They both had the wrong context, the wrong frame for it. And it was one of the most important things about me. Yeah, I don't need to get into it today, but completely wrong. It was the most fundamental thing that somebody would mention if they talked about me. Wrong, wrong to the point of being close to the opposite of right. You know, it wasn't just sort of misleading. It was about as bad as it could have been. And it's both of them because they're both reading public information and stuff like that.

I asked Perplexity a question about me, a separate question about me before I did this one, and it used as its source Gawker. Gawker. Now if you know anything about the media outlet, Gawker is like, let's see, if it were possible for a piece of shit to shit itself so that the turd itself could defecate and create like a sub-turd, that's what Gawker is. Gawker is so far from being any kind of independent useful source it's like a turd of a turd. It's like two levels away from being useful. And they used it as the only source to answer a question about me. Literally my political enemies used as a source.

So let me be as clear as possible. The search results from any search engine are pretty close to useless at this point in the world if it has to do with people. If it has to do with maybe a fact, you know, is Starbucks open on Columbus Day that I call Indigenous Day because I'm not a racist like you, well great, yeah it does that great. But as soon as it's a story about any human being it's completely up. So there's no such thing as searching accurately for information about people. You should just give up on that. That's never going to happen.

And anyway the Wall Street Journal also says Perplexity is getting in some legal trouble with the New York Times because it looks like the Times says that they're summarizing the Times stories without permission or something like that. I did ask Perplexity if it could see the contents of my books because if Jeff Bezos is backing a search engine the first question I have is do you have access to the contents of my books? Now I have mixed feelings about it. On one hand I kind of like it, you know, because my books are most of them are non-fiction so I would love if somebody could just Google like the main idea in my book and it would pop up. But you can't do that. That would be useful. And even though I maybe wouldn't like it as an author it would certainly be useful. But it looks like books are kind of walled off. So it can answer questions about what people said about my books in the public domain but it can't actually say in this chapter you said that.

Well here's a new medical breakthrough that might be gigantic. Apparently if you mix Ozempic with this other technology according to Newsmax Health you can get rid of the need for insulin if you're a diabetic. If you have type 2 diabetes you can completely get rid of insulin. Now this is a very small trial, only 14 people, but 12 of them no longer needed insulin. If you get 12 out of 14 who don't need insulin when you're done, you could say I need a bigger trial and you're right. But holy what? 12 out of 14 don't need insulin.

Now here's something that you need to know about new medical procedures. Can I educate you? Some of you are young so you've not had many medical procedures. But let me explain one thing you need to know. If there is a breakthrough medical procedure it will require one of the following things. Number one, you will lose all of your hair. It depends on the medical breakthrough. You know it's not every time you lose all of your hair but that's a common one. Another one is this will totally cure your problem but you'll never have sex again or be interested in it. Oh it'll totally cure your other problem though. The other thing that they'll do is sometimes they'll say this will totally fix your problem but it will require shoving a large object way up your ass. That's the other one.

So generally speaking it's either going to make you too tired to function, you're going to lose your hair, you'll lose your dick, or something really large will be shoved way up your ass. However if you're willing to put up with those four things they can cure just about anything. And so this new thing that gets you out of your need for insulin involves sticking something way up your ass I think and then zapping it electrically in your something in your inner guts. So it's an endoscope. Now I think it could mean it goes down your throat but given that it's shooting the top of your intestines I think it's going up your butt. However it's only once. It's only once. I don't know if they put you to sleep or you just enjoy the experience. But imagine if you could go into the doctor's office, maybe they put you to sleep, maybe they don't, I don't know. They zap you for a few minutes. There's no recovery. There's no recovery. You just walk out and the Ozempic I assume is just so you don't overeat. And then you're done.

Is this possible? Is it possible that type 2 diabetes just got fixed with a five-minute procedure? It's possible. Now I'm not going to say that this is real. You know 14 people is not nearly enough. You don't know the side effects. You know you got to do the big test. But maybe. But maybe.

All right, here's another one. The first peer-reviewed protocol on cancer using ivermectin and another kind of antiviral thing called fenbendazole. And there's one like it that's similar. So Dr. Makis says he's already seeing incredible successes with these repurposed drugs he's using in his practice. And he says ivermectin targets cancer cells by disrupting their mitochondrial function just the way you'd expect it to I suppose, leading to cell death of the cancer. It also blocks key energy pathways, blah blah blah. So it's got several ways it can work I guess. And this fenbendazole and mebendazole, they're both anti-parasitic drugs. Oh I should have said anti-parasitic. So these are three anti-parasitic drugs: ivermectin and then these other two. And they've been found to halt cancer cell growth, interfere with glucose metabolism, trigger apoptosis in some preclinical trials. And he says remarkably three patients with stage four genitourinary cancers were treated with high doses of the fenbendazole 1,000 milligrams three times a week for several months and experienced complete remission. Complete remission.

Now this is well short of a clinical trial but today's theme is the golden age. Is it possible that cancer just got cured with existing drugs they have low or no side effects? Is type 2 diabetes cured? Is Ozempic curing obesity? Is RFK Jr. going to fix our food supply within a couple years? Are we on the edge of curing cancer? Did we just shoot a gigantic rocket into the air and catch it with two loving arms in a gigantic mechanized device as we're preparing to go to Mars? Are these all things happening? Did the polls just turn and did we find that Kamala Harris is unlikely to win and instead the pirate ship of amazing people might come into power? Is it possible that a doom loop of overspending would be cured by the only person we trust to do it which is Elon Musk? And he's already ramping up in case Trump wins and he would be in charge of reducing or increasing the efficiency of the government by reducing the waste. And that would basically put us back on the path to fiscal confidence.

I hate to get you all excited but everything is going our way.

Here's some more. Google just made a deal to buy the first private mini nuclear reactor. So there's a company called California Kairos Power and apparently they can, they haven't made any yet I don't think but they're going to make them. And by 2030 they'll have at least one and by 2035 maybe more. And so our biggest companies, the ones that you can trust to push our government for approval, if you and I decided to build a nuclear power plant we would run up against the government's bureaucracy and we wouldn't be able to raise money and we wouldn't be able to get anything done in the government so basically it just couldn't happen. But what if you're Google? If you're Google you tell the government what to do. If you're Google you don't need money because you have it. If you're Google you just change the whole world, change your search results, make everybody suddenly like nuclear. If you went to Google and you checked their search results about the downside of nuclear energy do you think it says as many negative things about nuclear energy risks as it used to? I don't know but I'd be real surprised.

So keep in mind Google is who tells people what to think. Literally Google results tell people what to think. And we've seen it. It can change your election results etc. If Google is building its own or buying its own nuclear energy plant, what will Google who tells people what to think tell them what to think about nuclear power? Best thing ever. Not only best thing ever but required for survival. You're going to need it for AI and if you don't have AI your country is going to be defeated by the countries that do. So it's not only a good idea it's essential. Golden age.

If Google is all in, America's all in. There is no such thing as America disagreeing with Google because Google tells America what to think. That's just the way it works. Now the media if it wanted to disagree could put up a good fight. So if the media wanted to disagree with Google and say no we think this nuclear power is a bad idea, well they'd be going up against Google. Do you think they want to do that? Nope. How about do they want to go up against Microsoft who is also looking for its own nuclear energy plant? Nope. Do they want to go up against Oracle? Well Oracle is a little different but they don't. So our most important companies have just told the rest of America nuclear energy is not just good it's essential. It's coming fast and we can't get enough of it.

Do you remember in 2015, 2016, really all through the first years of the Trump administration almost every day I came on social media and said everybody who thinks these nuclear energy things are a bad idea you're thinking of the old technology. You don't know that the new technologies are safe. They figured out how to store the waste and even reuse it in some cases. Everything solved. We need nuclear. You better go fast. Here it is. Golden age.

Yeah it wouldn't be the golden age unless you saw all the big American companies go down hard in favor of nuclear energy. It's how hard they're going at it that's the thing. It's not that they oh we're mildly interested in it. No they're committed. They're all in. The biggest companies, the most powerful. Guaranteed it's coming.

Now I'm going to give you another prediction that goes like this. You can predict the outcome of any nation in the world based on their nuclear program. That's it. If you look at the United States we started late. I wish we'd started earlier but we're really good fast followers so I don't think it's going to hurt us too much that we didn't do something 10 years ago because that would have been 10 years ago's technology. If we're starting to go hard today with many nuclear plants and Gen 4 in some cases and the best technology that we have and getting rid of some maybe some regulations as appropriate, lots of experimenting with nuclear fuels that are better etc. And to its credit the Energy Department in America, let me say this unambiguously, so over two administrations the Department of Energy in the United States has been quite pro-nuclear power and has done very, as far as I can tell, really important work in making it possible to test newer nuclear processes. So if you think it's just like another bureaucracy the Department of Energy they might be superstars. They seem to have quietly done as far as I can tell a whole bunch of correct things in the last several years across two administrations. And that counts. That counts because it means it's administration robust. It's not going to be destroyed by getting the wrong president in. It's still going to look good no matter who's in. So good job on Department of Energy at least pushing nuclear stuff.

But if you look at Great Britain they're about ready to phase out the last of their nuclear energy. It doesn't look like they're going to go hard to get new ones. And any country in Europe that you see phasing out their nuclear power I would say you're seeing the end of them as an important country. I think Britain doesn't have a chance of really surviving into the modern era without nuclear power. So if that's the way they're going you're seeing the end of an empire. If that's what they want that's what they want.

Anyway, did you know that the appeals court, unless they've already ruled I don't think they have, they were looking into the case of the half a billion dollars or whatever it was that Trump was supposed to pay because he allegedly defrauded banks by allegedly overvaluing the price of his or the value of his assets. Now what did I tell you on day one of that story? On day one of that story I said whoa whoa whoa the people in the media are idiots and they don't know anything about business and everything you're seeing about this story is based on idiots not knowing anything about business. Because if you're not an idiot and you know about business you knew that there was nothing wrong with that story. In other words you knew that there was no reason that there should have been a legal process against Trump. Did he overvalue his assets? Doesn't matter. That's what I told you. Because I was a banker. If you're a banker, and literally I was a lending officer, I was approving loans for lenders. I was actually not the lending officer. I was in the back office that approved the loans made by the lending officer. So I was sort of, I don't want to say superior to them but I had to make sure it was okay. So I had to know what a loan is and how it works and whether they can repay. I had to know as much or more than the lenders to do my job.

And here's what I know. The bank doesn't take your word for anything. That's what I knew. In the normal course of things your lender tells you a bunch of lies and then you say can you back that up and if they can't you go okay well that was a lie. And when they can you rely on the document not what they said. There is no scenario in which a bank ever ever relies on what a lender says or what a borrower says. Ever. It's never happened. Never should happen. Never can happen. Never will happen. And yet they're pretending that the Trump situation was the one time they relied on the statements of the borrower. No. They have a whole process in which they go out and they check the value of things on their own because they have to because that's their job. And so the banks were happy with the loans because they checked it out. Trump has always paid back his loans so he's good to do business with. They made money. He made money. Nobody even once concerned themselves with the fact that there was a big difference between what the banks thought was the value and what Trump said was the value. It had no impact in the real world and the systems in the real world, the banking loaning systems, guaranteed that it wouldn't be a problem. Guaranteed. And of course Trump would know that. He wouldn't be trying to get away with something because he would know it the same as the banks. Everybody in business knows that. Nobody relies on your impression of your asset's value. Everybody knows that.

So now the appellate court is sitting there just excoriating the attorneys who brought this case and won. They actually won in the most absurd case. They won. Nobody was damaged. Nobody had a complaint. And the people who were allegedly damaged would be happy to do business with them again because they just made money and had a good experience. And so the appellate judges who are not obviously Soros-picked people are just saying has this ever happened in the history of the world that you brought a case where there were no victims and everybody was happy and everybody understood the process and everybody understood the process gave them no risk whatsoever in this transaction? And the lawyers are just blah blah blah blah. They have nothing. So I don't think it's been ruled on yet but I don't think there's any doubt how it will be ruled if you're judging from what questions are being asked and the comments of the appellate court. Trump's going to get his half billion back. I don't think he paid it but yeah I think that just goes away. I would love to see it go away before election day because the number of Democrat idiots who challenged me on social media that this was a horrible crime and Trump should be in jail for it or at least pay half a billion dollars for it, will any of them come back and say oh you know it turns out that being a lending officer might give you some experience and knowledge about being a lending officer? Yes it does. Turns out it does.

I've told you many times that understanding economics, and I put banking under that category, and persuasion are the two most predictive skills. If you understand everything about money and I've got a background in economics and MBA and lots of business experience and you understand persuasion you can often predict the future better than chance. So that's how I predicted that Trump would win in 2016. It's also how I predicted that the appellate courts if they were honest would throw this out while laughing at it. Right? So watch this pattern. The pattern is that people who understand money and business and who understand persuasion are really good at predicting. If you see somebody who knows both of those things that's what I call a talent stack where you've intelligently combined things that work well together. That person is going to guess the future better than other people. It's just those two skills are future-oriented skills. That's how they work.

Anyway so that's more good news.

New York Post is reporting that there's a Brooklyn-based company that manages some apartments in the suburbs of Denver and they say that the fake news is fake news and that these Venezuelan gangs have in fact taken over their apartments. Now taking over might be a phrase with some ambiguity to it but let's just say they can't get rid of them and if they want to beat up one of their employees apparently they do and they don't necessarily pay rent. And so for all practical purposes quote gangs have taken control of several of our properties in Aurora, Colorado. Can we put this to rest? Yeah. Are we done about the question of whether it's true? The company that owns the buildings says they're taking over and not one, multiple buildings. And this is just one management company who's saying on the record, saying in public, showing you a picture of their employee who was beat up by the gang for I think trying to expel them or something. Can we agree that the news was always fake when it said that this was fake? That the gangs have in fact taken over the buildings. Can we now say true? Or is there some made-up Brooklyn-based company? If there's really a Brooklyn-based company that owns buildings and they say that the gangs are controlling them not the people whose job it is to control them, aren't we done arguing whether it's real? I think we're done. And then if you know what is real then you can deal with it. Pretending it wasn't real was the problem. It's not that you can't know how to expel people from a building for doing illegal things if you have to.

Here's a story you never heard. This is on the George account on X. Did you know that years ago when Nelson Mandela got out of prison he wanted to arrange a trip to the United States and for whatever reason the government of the United States couldn't arrange appropriate transportation. I don't know what's beyond that. But so Donald Trump offered his private plane. So Donald Trump on his own dime sent his private jet to carry Nelson Mandela to the United States. And today Kamala Harris will be calling him a racist again because they made up some stuff. I'll tell you he might be the most misunderstood human being in the world if you look. And it's very consistent. You've heard a lot of anecdotes about him paying off mortgages and helping people in trouble and stopping his car when somebody was being mugged and you know flying Nelson Mandela. Somebody said that he attended Michael Jackson's trial every day because Michael Jackson was friends with his family. Like the Trump kids used to hang out with Michael Jackson to like play video games and they were buddies. They lived in the same building in the Trump Tower at least for a while. So it's just amazing what kind of caricature the news will create of somebody.

I'd like to circle back to social media. I mentioned this without details a few times that there is a horrible sounding rumor about Tim Walz that I didn't detail because I said if it's not true I don't want to put it out there. My best current updated information is it's all made up. It looks like it's all made up. There's only one individual who's pushing it. It's not somebody who has credibility. It's not being picked up by any other entity either pro or anti-Walz. Nobody's touching it. I'm going to call it fake. So if you see online a story, and again I don't even want to give the details because I think it's terribly unfair to Walz, he does give me a creepy vibe and that's a fact so I'll say that because it's a fact about how he makes me feel but it's not a fact about anything he's done. If you're talking about specific inappropriate acts of some kind you're really going to have to bring me some proof. All right? I'm not going to buy that based on a vibe. So be careful. Be careful out there. Tim Walz. Just be careful about what you see on social media.

All right, how many hoaxes are there about Trump today? Let's see. Do we have how many? There's a hoax that Trump was going to use the military against his enemies. Of course that's just some weird thing taken out of context. I saw, did you see Jake Tapper talking to James Carville last night? Now here again I'm not going to make a claim of fact because I don't know the fact. I'll make a claim of how I'm responding to something. I watched it and Carville looked obviously drunk and the things he said didn't make a big sense. It looked like just a really drunk guy talking. And so I don't know if he was drunk. I just know that he sure acted drunk. And here's one of the things he said that Trump isn't hiding it anymore that he's a Nazi. What? What are you talking about? And he said it's because Trump's going to do a rally in Madison Square Garden and therefore obviously Nazi. What? Trump does rallies all the time as do all politicians. Why would Trump's one rally be a Hitler rally? Well that's what Jake Tapper asked Carville because it's not obvious to him either. Jake Tapper had the same impression apparently. What exactly are you seeing about this Madison Square Garden rally? And he says well in 1939 some Nazis had a rally in that building. Now I don't even think it's the same building. I believe the building has been rebuilt like three times since then. But I would like to point out that building's been used before. Does Carville drink so much that he thinks only Nazis use that building? It's a sort of a public building. I believe that sports teams do things in there. Maybe some of your favorite comedians have done stand-up there. How in the world do you drink so much that you go on CNN and say that having a rally in a public building where everybody has rallies and events is proof? It's not just like an indication but it's like and then that's proof. That's proof he's a Nazi. That is some batshit crazy stuff right there.

And then his other evidence was that Trump said he wanted to use the military against his enemies which you don't even have to research that to know that didn't happen. That's so dumb that if you spend five minutes following politics you go didn't happen. That's some weird out-of-context thing. Of course it is some weird out-of-context thing. So there were two more that were just like crazy ones. They sound like desperation. I think it's pretty obvious that the Harris team knows that they're in a doom loop. You know they're circling the drain at this point their campaign. So they're just flailing like oh well maybe the building he's in is a Nazi building. Can we go with that? Can we go with the building's a Nazi building? Well how about you go after his economic policies? Well that would be bad because the public likes Trump's economic policy. Well you could go after his policies about the Ukraine war and the Middle East. No because people like him better on that. Well okay so not the economics and that war but how about the border? Yeah oh no we can't go after Trump on the border because they like him best. What do we got? Is he going to visit any real estate in the next few weeks? Let's check. Yeah he'll be in this building called Madison Square Garden. Perfect. We'll say it's a Nazi facility because that's all they have.

Imagine sitting around and thinking where will we put our limited resources today because everything is limited. We'll put our limited resources into this new hoax about using the military and the hoax about this building being where only Nazis gather. That is a lot of giving up right there. That you know if you could come up with different words for we surrender it would look like that. Oh I get it you're surrendering now. So are you done with the race? No we're going to take it to election day. But it sounds like you're giving up. Oh no we're fighting as hard as we can about real estate being Nazi indications. No you're not. No you're not fighting anymore. You have given up.

The Kamala collapse is today. Today is the middle of, wait today is the day that we all knew that the fake polls would start to catch up. We all knew that she couldn't keep this going. We all knew that if she came out of her closet and spoke to real people she would be destroyed. And now she's trying to make a case that Trump is the one hiding. So Kamala is saying in her speeches that Trump is not doing any interviews and refused to do a debate with her. Now obviously doing another debate doesn't help Trump. I mean maybe something could go wrong but there's nothing left to go right. And here's the thing. Trump has been talking to podcasters. Kamala Harris says he's not doing interviews with the major media. Why would he do an interview with the major media who is literally just basically the Kamala Harris campaign? She's really saying can you do an interview with the fake news who basically is an extension of my campaign? If you don't do an interview with the fake news that will only use your quotes out of context and edit you to make you look stupid the same way they edited me to make me look smart. If you don't do the dumbest thing you could ever do as a politician, talk to the main media who's going to malign you and make you look like you're some kind of a Nazi at Madison Square Garden, if you don't do that you must be weak and unconfident.

Okay here's what's really happening. Trump has realized that if he goes on Joe Rogan which he might do soon or on any of these podcasts that have huge male audiences that he is scooping up male support like a vacuum cleaner on ants. Every time he goes on a podcast he's not being accused of being a racist. He's showing himself in his very most relaxed basic favorable light and he can go from one to the other, get gigantic audiences that you'll never get of young men on any of these big platforms. You'll never get the bad treatment and it's a 100% winning strategy especially if he closes it out with Joe Rogan.

And it gets better. There is rumor, not confirmed, not confirmed, that both Trump and Harris at different times will do Joe Rogan before the election. Are you having the same feeling about that that I am? Kamala Harris has only done interviews with friendlies. Now she's going to do one with Bret Baier on Fox News but he would be the friendliest on Fox News. Now friendly meaning that he's not an opinion person and he does a great job of avoiding opinion. It's got to be the hardest job in the world. Imagine how hard it would be to do what Bret Baier does, talk about the news on Fox News and not just bias it because all of your co-workers are opinion people. So he does a great job of that. I'm always impressed when I see him work. So that's the safest thing she could do. But I think Bret Baier is going to tear her apart and not because he's biased but because she has some things to answer for that she has not answered for. And I don't think she's, that Bret Baier is going to let her just talk over him and run out the clock. I think he's going to make her answer and she's going to look like an idiot because we've seen her work enough and I don't say that lightly. She seems like an idiot and that's a separate question.

But imagine them on Joe Rogan. Imagine Joe Rogan asking anything he wants to Trump. How do you think that'll go? Pretty well. Pretty well. Now imagine, and by the way I would expect that Joe Rogan would ask both of them hard questions. I think Rogan would not want to do a softball interview with Trump. I think he'd want to come with some fun because it is entertainment but he's going to come with some hard questions. I think Rogan would make him explain January 6 in the way nobody's ever done it. I'm just guessing but I think he would hold him to some high standards. That's what I suspect because he wouldn't be afraid of them. That's what you need. So Rogan would not be afraid to ask the hard question and put him in a spot. And you know that's not the same for everybody else. But he would destroy Kamala Harris just by asking questions. All he'd have to do is say people wonder about this. Give me an answer. No that's not the answer to the question. It'd be destroyed anyway.

I also saw that Harris was talking about Trump not releasing his medical records. Apparently she released her medical records. Now Trump hasn't since 2013 I guess. But Trump has asked that Kamala Harris take a cognitive test. I would like to double down on that by saying she should also take a drug test. A drug test. So Kamala Harris tells us that her doctor gave her a clean bill of health. Did he? I don't remember seeing the drug test. Did you? Did you see the cognitive test? I didn't. So Kamala Harris has not tested the two things that we have a question about. When I look at her in public I do not say oh she looks like somebody who would be at health risk in the future. I don't say that. I'm not even really super interested in what her doctor says about her body because it looks like her body's fine. She's young enough, vital enough. She's been doing a full campaign. There's nothing about the campaign that suggests her body doesn't work. I'm fine that she has a good body and superior in body to Trump. Trump's got a little extra weight although it looks like he's losing weight and Trump's far older. So if she wants to compete on who's got a better body yeah yeah I'll give that to her. I'll give her the win on body. But it's not her body that runs the country. It's her brain. And if I don't know what drugs she's ingesting while it looks like she is and I don't know her cognitive ability when I can't explain why she's acting so much dumber than she used to act I kind of need to know those answers. I'm very curious about whether she's had a hit to her cognitive ability because it looks like it. I don't know why but it sure looks like it. Something's going on there.

So she's pushing that and she was pushing it. I was watching the rally and she slipped from politician mode into wife mode and I guess there's no nicer way to say it. Politician mode is most of what she says and most of what she has said you know like I will give you this policy. Yeah politician. But when she was talking about the health differences she slipped into wife like just nagging. Just the vibe. And oh my God did it turn me off. Like you know I hate to sound too sexist but the truth is that both men and women have a mode that if they use that mode it's a turnoff to somebody right? If Trump gets a little too braggy women just go I'm out. What are you doing? I cannot listen to one more second of you bragging about yourself. Right? That's the male version. The female version is if you get that attitude oh he doesn't want to give us his health records. I can't do an impression of it but oh my God when either of them get out of political mode and get into that mode total turnoff. Total turnoff.

All right, is it too soon to say we know the 2024 election is rigged? The amuse account points out that Detroit reports that 40% of the mail-in ballots have already been returned. Really? So this is on a long list of cities in Detroit and Detroit the place that you'd expect to be the worst managed biggest place that there would be a problem seems to have lapped the other cities in how many ballots have been returned early. So the other cities are in that 26 to 38% range but the star is exactly the city you'd expect to be the number one recipient of mail-in ballots if the cheat was on. It's already obvious.

People now I don't have a factual basis to say that cheating is going on and here it is but already we have one statistic that would make me not trust the election if the result were Harris won. Already if you're asking me do I accept the election of 2020? No I'm out. Or 2024 I'm out. I'm already out. I don't trust the result already. So I've already seen enough about this election that I don't trust it. Now if Trump wins I'm going to embrace it like crazy like I didn't see any problems and I'm not even going to pretend to be consistent because I'm going to assume that he managed to beat the margin of cheating. I won't know that but it will be my working assumption. So yes there's something strange going on in Detroit and I'm hoping that somebody's going to ask somebody this question this week. And the question is Kamala Harris, and by the way this would be a good question for Bret Baier and it would be a good question even better for Joe Rogan. Kamala Harris if the election result shows that Trump wins and you see that there are some historically out of balance results in other words there's some areas that voted for him in numbers that couldn't possibly be true based on historical patterns would you accept and certify the result based on what you're seeing? Well no. Nope. Get back to the point. If you see obvious things that are out of whack will you accept the election? Well in 2020. Well not talking about 2020. Get back to the question. Will you accept it if it looks out of whack to you? Well it's not going to look out of whack. No that's not the question. If it looks out of whack like Republicans say 2020 looked out of whack if it just looks out of whack are you going to accept it? Well you and there's your election. There's your election. If she can't answer that question and she can't it's their biggest claim that you won't leave office and blah blah blah.

Are here some more warning signs. Oh by the way Christopher Rufo has found that one of Harris's books she copied five passages which we call plagiarism. New York Times tried to slap him down because the New York Times wants her to win in my opinion. So they tried to minimize it by saying oh they just had were like five little areas you know five little areas that were copies. Ah nothing. They admitted it was plagiarism but then they said that noticing the plagiarism is racist. Yeah so that's the New York Times. That would be the standard bearer of news is that if you notice somebody plagiarized and you prove it and you show the sections so nobody can doubt your claims you my friends are being a racist according to the New York Times. All right great job Christopher Rufo.

Well more on the Kamala collapse. Harry Enten as CNN said that there are a lot of warning signs now going off. He says that if the GOP is ahead in party identification pretty much they're guaranteed to win. Now party identification means that you signed up to be a Republican or you signed up to be a Democrat. Generally speaking Democrats have more people signed up and when they have more people signed up by a goodly amount they win. Anytime it's close Republicans win. But right now Republicans are ahead. So Republicans this is according to Harry Enten CNN Republicans right now are doing even better than the average when they win. So think about that. So the average number of people who identify as Republicans will give you a Republican win. If it hits the average it's above that. These signs are pointing to a landslide. They're pretty clearly pointing to a landslide.

Now what happens if all these signs are pointing toward Trump but in the last hours of the election counting he loses? Are you going to accept that election? I'm not. Yeah let me say as clearly as possible if all of these signs are pointing toward a win and at the last minute there's a bunch of mail-in votes that counted I'm not accepting the election. Let me say that as clearly as I can and publicly. This is a public statement. If all the indicators or many of them indicate a strong win by Trump and in the last minute the mail-in votes look suspicious I do not accept that result. I want to make that clear. Yeah you're going to have to. The results are going to have to match the signals. If on Election Day the signals are all you they changed and they're all glaring that you know based on historical patterns Harris is going to win and then she does win I'm not going to question you know whether any specific votes were in line or around a line even if something is found but is smish. I'm going to say you know everything indicated she was going to win let's just move on. But it's got to work both ways. If everything's indicating that Trump is going to win and then the bellwethers go weird and the last minute accounting goes weird nope. No that's a hard no on accepting that result.

All right Rasmussen is asking people are you better off than you were before Biden was in office and by a 16-point margin most voters say no. When you've got that kind of a result it is nearly impossible for the incumbent to win. Here again another glaring sign that Trump's going to win. So Trump has a lead on the three biggest issues you know then abortion is its own thing but the three biggest issues he's well ahead which is the wars the economy and the border. He's ahead on are you better off and party identification. He's ahead and the polls say he's ahead in depending on which polls and they haven't all caught up to the current situation yet but he's ahead in like six out of seven swing states. Now let's say things stay the same and we go into the election and these are the things we know and then he loses by 10 million votes. You going to accept that? I think it depends how those votes come in and what it looks like. Like if it looked like it was organic maybe maybe but all right.

Heraldo just said he's endorsing Harris and that's because of January 6th. And the reason that Heraldo says he cannot endorse Trump even though they've been personal friends for a long time is that Trump did not acknowledge that he lost in 2020. Can you believe that that's his reason? He went public with it with a long post on it. It's because Trump won't accept that he lost in 2020 and that's the one reason that's the unacceptable reason.

So I responded to Heraldo and people like my response so much I think I will read it to you. Oh and Heraldo said that if you accept Trump's statements that he won in 2020 that makes you part of what they call the big lie. So Democrats branded January 6 and the claim that 2020 was rigged as the big lie. Now the big lie is sort of trying to make you think of Nazism because the Nazis try to push the big lie so that comes from Nazism. So Heraldo wants to note that Trump would be a big old terrible person for his lie and if you were to accept his lie you're part of the Nazi-like people who would accept the big lie.

Okay so here's what I said in a long post to Heraldo that people liked a lot. I said Heraldo no one knows who won in 2020 or any other prior elections. Our system is designed intentionally to not be fully auditable. We know the design is intentional because that's how design works. If a design persists for decades despite the ability to change it then the design is intentional. Did JFK win fair and square? Historians disagree. You can know for sure that no court has ruled the 2020 election was invalid but you also know courts are not the tool for that job. How would they know if an election got hacked without detection? After years of the press demonizing Trump as the next Hitler every thinking person knows the incentive to cheat him out of the victory in 2020 was through the roof. We also know state actors can hack any system usually without detection. Sometimes it requires an insider which is no hurdle for state actors including our own. We also know that if someone found a non-electronic way to cheat we would not necessarily catch it and it appears the mail-in ballot situation is easily gamed. Whenever a system can be gamed and the incentives to do so are sky high we observe that such gaming happens in every domain every time. For although I can't enter the dreamscape in which everything in our country is corrupt and broken except our election systems speaking as a hypnotist and a longtime observer of your usually well thought down opinions this opinion does not seem to be derived from reason. So that's my take. It is not derived from reason. Whatever is driving this it's not because he thought it through. Now most of us are not operating from reason we just rationalize after the fact but sometimes it's a little more obvious than others.

All right here's some and I told you that Harris has a new plan for black men because she's losing with black men. Not losing totally but she's losing support from black men. She wants to give a million forgivable loans up to $20,000. What would you call a plan to give $20,000 loans to people who don't have to pay it back? Do you know how much theft there's going to be in loans that you don't have to pay back? Do you know how fast I would apply for a loan I didn't have to pay back? Well you still have to say that it's a loan for a business. Oh well yeah totally I'm going to start a business. What's your business? I'm going to sell I'll probably I'll make jewelry in my house. All right that's the business. When are you going to do it? Well soon as I get the $20,000. All right can you pay it back? Doesn't matter it's a loan I don't have to pay back. Oh that's right we said you don't have to pay it back. All right so you say you're going to do a business and you want 20,000. All right here's your 20,000. And then we check later how's your business going? Oh well I just spent the money on stuff. I didn't really start a business. Oh well you're not supposed to do that. I know but you know when you said I don't have to pay it back that was really telling me to just steal it. No no we said we want you to start a business. I know but what I heard was you're not going to be checking very carefully and I can just say I started a business and it didn't work out. I just spent your money and kept it all and you know good luck. It's basically just giving a whole bunch of criminals $20,000 because they asked for it. You don't have to live on this planet for very long before you know that this is nothing but an invitation for fraud. You don't have to be some kind of an expert to see this one. I refer you to everything that happened during the pandemic if you're wondering if this will be gamed. Yeah yeah it's going to be gamed.

Then what else? She's going to do education and mentorship for black men. I told you that that seemed like a good idea. More mentorships good. But why are you limiting it to black men? Because you're a racist. This is racist right? If the government says we're going to do something and you're not allowed to get any if anything the government says involves not for you whitey then that's racist. You should just put that right in there. It's not for you whitey.

Then they got the protect crypto investments so black men know their money is safe. How stupid do you think we all are? Because there's some special magic that's happening to black men. Are you so racist that you think black men uniquely cannot protect themselves from crypto? What the do you think is wrong with black men that they alone the only ones can't figure out how to handle crypto? Could you be more condescending? Could you be this is horrible. This is the only thing I've ever seen this racist against everybody. It's racist against anybody who's not included but it's also racist against the people included. What do you think black people somehow magically are the only ones who can't get a wallet and that they can't join Coinbase they don't know how to buy some crypto and protect it? I mean it's pretty hard to protect in crypto but this is ridiculous.

Then there's a national health initiative to focus on illnesses that disproportionately impact black men. I think that would make sense but only in the context that we should be looking to fix everybody's problem. So if there's somebody whose problem that is underserved yeah yeah let's do more of it. But if there's anybody who also has problems that are underserved why are you only helping black men? Why are only black men being helped with their category of underserved health problems? Yes we should help them. Yes we should do everything but nobody else. Purely racist.

And then the one that's the craziest is that they legalize recreational marijuana to create opportunities for black men to become drug dealers. So apparently there are some black men that are not drug dealers but the Harris campaign thinks that that needs to change. They'll make it legal so it'll be a legal drug but they'd really like to push men into the drug dealing business just you know legally. Sounds this sounds like parody doesn't it? It doesn't even sound like anybody who ever lived in this country came up with these ideas. It just sounds like a joke. It's pathetic. The word pathetic just describes everything coming out of the Harris campaign right now. You know you could say that what Trump does is scary or inappropriate or his tweets are too mean all that stuff that's true it's all true but you wouldn't use the word pathetic would you? Like if you look at Trump's lining up you know he's got Musk that will look into the government waste he's got RFK Junior's going to look into our food supply and maybe our meds. Serious serious important stuff. And then this pathetic you know how the Democrats want to keep pushing these departments of disinformation and you can't kill them you can't get rid of the disinformation because they're making them as fast as you can try to kill them.

I think Trump should promote creating the Department of Hoax Debunking not disinformation the Department of Hoax Debunking and they use it to debunk all of the hoaxes. Now it would have to do both sides because there are plenty of hoaxes on both sides but the Democrats do work on a creating hoax model. They're just doing it all the time. I think when it happens for Republicans it's usually some grassroots troll that got a little too much attention you like the Tim Walz accusation that would be like a hoax but again it comes from an individual and if he gets a lot of attention it keeps going.

What am I seeing here in the comments? Response needed. Okay I don't know what that's about anyway. The Department of Hoax Debunking this would be a case where you would embrace the disinformation world and say I'd like to double embrace it and when I'm president we're going to go really hard at disinformation and we're going to include NBC in the list CBS ABC CNN although CNN's moving toward the middle and MSNBC. And I would say that we're going to declare that their reporting is mostly hoaxes and it's going to be officially in the books as a hoax entity. Now do you think that the Democrats like their disinformation organizations now? Not as much because their entire point is they think it will only be used against their enemies. If Trump embraces the disinformation networks and says these are great but we need to make sure they're operating correctly so make sure they cover all of the hoaxes and that they identify the networks that are the promoters of the hoaxes so you can maybe guess the next one without help. Oh it came from a hoax entity. I get it. I don't have to pay attention to that one. Yeah the minute that Trump embraces the hoax disinformation process they're going to have to dismantle it because they thought it only went one way. It doesn't.

Anyway so here are some of the hoaxes I forgot to mention. There's a hoax that Nazis attended an Eric Trump boat rally. There's a hoax that Trump spaced out on stage for 30 minutes. I think somebody was it was somebody injured in the audience so we had to take a pause and he stayed on stage and so they just I think they ended up not continuing after a while so that was just a hoax. And all the news is hoaxes.

Let's see what else is happening. Do you know the story about the I've talked about the ghost trucks I'll call them the trucks that allegedly were filled with fake ballots from some specific postal service place. There was a whistleblower who said you know he had fake ballots on his truck but we can't find the trucks. And now according to Rasmussen account quote imagine having to fight the US Postal Service for years in federal courts just for the names of who paid the trucking companies. Did you know that? Do you know that somebody's trying to figure out who paid the trucking companies that allegedly had the fake ballots on it and it's taken two years in federal courts unsuccessfully? Is there some reason we can't know who paid the trucking companies that a whistleblower said had fake ballots in it? And you're going to trust the next election?

Now here's what I hope. If we know that this kind of process happened once or at least there's an allegation that happened once then can the Republican observers make sure that they're observing so they could catch it should it happen again? Now if it happened again I imagine it wouldn't look the same. If there was any bad behavior before they would know they needed to switch it up but it would still have the same element to it. There would still be trucks delivering things that were full of things that shouldn't be delivered. So can you catch that? It depends where the observers are and some of them are going to be kept out of certain places. So we'll see. We shall see.

Well Ukraine has souped up its drone success rate that used to be down around 10% because the Russians were good at jamming drones so they kept sending these drones and they got jammed and maybe one in 10 would hit a target. But now Ukraine has added AI to their drone so that they can fly without GPS which means they can get to their location they can do their own looking around and the jamming doesn't the jamming is applicable to the GPS so I think if you take that out of the mix you can make it somewhat autonomous and then the hit rate is up to 80%. So now 80% of the drones are killing people. That's pretty amazing.

And then there's some information suggesting that the Ukrainian leadership is open to trading some land for a peace situation. Now of course there are people who debunk that story and say no no no we're not even considering trading land for peace but that's the better negotiating position. You want to start from the position that my God no I'm giving you nothing in case you have to later give them something.

All right here's my update on Israel and Palestine and the Palestinians. I told you yesterday that I tried to get involved in a conversation online and I was just trying to clarify that the two parties were not on the same topic. I wasn't even taking a side just saying oh you're not on the same topic and I got just totally attacked for people assuming I'm one side or the other. And so here's what I've realized. I've told you before that lying is a bad thing and you'd all agree with that right? Lying is a bad thing. But there are some specific domains in which lying is not only acceptable it's preferred. It's preferred. One of those domains is when people ask you about your sex life. You have the right to lie about your sex life. Yeah if you're still in the closet and that's your preference I'm not saying it should be your preference I'm not involved in your personal life but if you want to tell somebody you're not bisexual but you are fine. That's a perfectly good use of a lie. I am 100% on your side. If somebody wants to get in your sex business and you just want to make them go away by lying yes absolutely lie all you want about your sex life.

There's another area in which lying is not just okay it's advised. It's advised and that would be self-defense. So let's say the terrorists capture you and they say do you have any guns in the house? You say no no no I hate guns I'm anti-gun and then maybe you got a chance to get close enough to your hidden handgun that you can shoot him. So there are situations in which it's dangerous to tell the truth. In those cases yes lie. Lying is not just okay it's advised. Very advised right? So in self-defense you can lie as much as you want.

Now this brings us back to Israel and the Palestinian situation. What do the Israelis believe they are doing? Defending themselves. What do the Palestinians believe they're doing? Defending themselves. Now October 7th was an offensive act but their take on what they were doing you know their interpretation not mine not mine I'm not involved their interpretation would be it's part of a larger defensive you know get your land back as they see it.

Now if you've got a situation where both entities and this is kind of weird you know normally there's an attacking entity and a defensive entity. Take the war in Ukraine. In that case Russia more clearly is the aggressor and Ukraine most of us think is on the defense right? So that would be the normal situation for a war. There's one attacking and one defending. But the weird thing about Israel and the Palestinian situation is that because of their complicated past they both claim to be in a defensive mode.

Now when you're in a defensive mode as I just explained lying is not just okay because you're defending yourself there's no rules in defense. It's advised. It's not just okay it's recommended if you're defending yourself or right if you're defending yourself it's recommended because you should use every tool. You should use lying you should use bombs you should use whatever whatever it takes. There's no rules in self-defense. So when I as a tourist you know blunder into this conversation between two entities that are in a defensive posture and then I try to insert something that I think is maybe a truth that both of them could agree on I am wasting my time because the only thing you know for sure is that neither side should be interested in the truth.

Now what will happen five minutes after I'm done I will go to my DMs and several people who are Jewish and friends of mine will say but you know you know I hear what you're saying Scott but you know Israelis they do have the better argument. And I'm going to say I don't care because if you're not in it you should not trust anything that either side says because they both have a free pass under their assumptions of what's true. They have a free pass. They have a free pass to lie about everything as long as they're in a defensive posture. So if Israel is lying about everything and I'm not saying they are that is not my claim I'm saying they have a right to lie about everything. So do the Palestinians under their interpretation of what's happening.

Now what I'm not going to do is give you my interpretation of what's happening because it all looks stupid to me because you can just pick some period and pick some interpretation you could come up with anything you want. So it doesn't matter what anybody else thinks. All that matters is who has the power to get what they want at the moment. Israel has power to get what they want and they're allies and we should treat them like allies and if they do things that we would do and they do it's hard to judge somebody for doing something exactly like what you would do. So I'm not going to judge either side. I'll leave that to people who believe that in a contest between two groups who consider themselves to be on defense that you can believe anything that's coming out of the war zone. If you believe anything that's coming out of a war zone between two people who are presenting themselves as on the defense don't do that. Don't do that.

So now do I have a preference of who wins? Yes I have a preference of who wins because in my world if you would call me a non-believer let's call me a non-believer. I don't call myself an atheist because that feels too certain. I'm simply not accepting popular belief systems. Who is more likely to be on my side in that situation? Jews. Yeah Jews are not tough on people who have different opinions at least you know the people in the United States and people unlikely to ever have any interaction with. So if the Jewish powers gained power and got into a better situation I say oh okay I don't see any problem with that. I've had tremendously good financial business dealings with many Jewish business people pretty much all great. I would just keep doing that. But what happens if the Islamic world grows and starts to encroach on my world? Well then I'm in a lot of trouble. So if you're asking me who do I want to win Israel Israel. Who do I want to dominate? Well I want the Jews to be in a superior position absolutely no question about it and it's because of self-defense. Because my greatest ability to remain free and unbothered is to not promote a side that would want to crush me if they had the power to do so. So I have no ambiguity about what side I want to win. I just don't believe anything that either of them say. That's my current stand. Nor should you. Nor should you.

All right and that's all I got for today and I'm going to talk to the locals people privately. I must have gone way over my longest one ever. All right you on YouTube and Rumble thanks for joining. Locals I'm coming at you. Sorry I'm so long today.

well we got a show to do today probably will be amazing all the stars are lining up comments are working no comments are working yes good morning everybody and welcome comments are working to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams and there's no better time if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that even Tim wals will be clapping like a seal for in a moment when I go when I hit play all you need for that is a cuper muger a glass of tank or CH din a Canen Jugger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your F favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure the dop me end of the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous Sip and it happens now go so good the only thing that could make this day better would be Tim Walls clapping like a seal see if we can make that happen thank you thank you yeah there we go all right cringey it's a little bit cringey but we like it uh if you'd like to know how to do the Tim Walls yeah you have to lean back you got to put your elbows together and you got to clap like a seal Lean Back elbows together and if you'd like uh a lesson on pointing the pointing is very important it's your non-p pointing hand has to be limp and soft your pointing hand is full fully mobile but the non-p pointing hand you want to be a little bit like this Y and the and the Bowing the the Tim wall bowing and the open Palms like he's surprised when he sees people every time he goes to a crowd he sees some people he's surprised if you're only listening to this and missing all of my amazing Impressions oh I'm so sorry for you it must be so sad sitting there with audio and no visual when I am so visual speaking of which if you need to find a merchandise for coffee with Scott Adams the features yes my bald head on shirts and hoodies and mugs uh just go to one of your favorite search engines and search for cwsa for coffee with Scott Adams merchandise to buy it'll pop right up here are some security tips for men courtesy of Joshua Steinman you should follow him on um onx Joshua Steinman and uh apparently uh uh the following thing has happened in at least one intelligence security meeting some somebody looked at the men in the uh in the room and said I'm paraphrasing but said uh there's nobody here who's more than a five and a 10 if somebody wants to date you who's a 10 it's a spy so apparently one of the problems with the the dating apps is that men who can't really pull very many beautiful women are still getting beautiful women uh if they work in some kind of secure military or intelligence job turns out that there will be a very nice Chinese woman who would be uh very happy to be your girlfriend and maybe you could have long conversations about what you do at work so here's how you know you're dating a spy your spy is twice as good-look as you now it gets complicated if you're also Rich because then you can't tell all right this is the funniest story of the day and I I laughed until I cried this morning I was sitting in my desk just crying with laughter now I hope this is as funny to you is this to me now it's funny because it's real now here's the background you you might know that uh Jordan Peterson was uh in some trouble with something called the Ontario College of psychologists now he's a Canadian and this is a Canadian entity that has some kind of control over the licensing of Canadian psychologists and if you want to remain in good standing in in your profession you've got to be good with this organization and this organization ruled that Dr.

Jordan Peterson uh needed to be re-educated because of his social media posts were so so inappropriate for someone in their profession that they needed to either take away his very license to practice or have him re-educated by a social media psychologist expert there are a lot of those I don't know but he had to be re-educated so the first thing that Dr.

Jordan Peterson did was he tried to uh I believe he tried to fight the process you know he challenged the process and that didn't work so now he's a a victim of the process and he eventually decided that he would in fact accept the re-education process now let me just set this up for you it's Dr.

Jordan Peterson the most famous and Poss most capable person who's ever existed in this plane of existence for for this domain of knowledge and and whatnot and now Canada's task is to find somebody who's smarter or no more knowledgeable on the topics of how to communicate in the context of being a psychologist and a social media person that's right they're going to find somebody who's better than Jordan Peterson in in his chosen field in which he's the literally the most famous and capable person you've ever seen in your life in any field and at the same time better at social media and communicating there's nobody better at social media and communicating so what do you think happened Well turns out in the entire nation of Canada there were zero volunteers for this job there's nobody in Canada who takes the job nobody in Canada wants to be so stupid that you that you would embarrass yourself and have your entire professional life destroyed by by teaching by teaching Jordan Peterson how to be Jordan Peterson like how in the world do you even do that but it gets better it gets better I can to read to you what Jordan Peterson wrote when he had some clarifying questions about the process all right this is so deliciously fun I can't even stand it all right hold on I can't read I'm tearing up all right so this is from Dr.

Jordan Peterson uh let's see he said uh uh so he has some questions for the college about uh how the qualifications of the quote social media expert would be determined so he asked this quote by what standards I'm not going to be able to get through this because he WR he writes it like he's being serious and he is being serious it's hard to take you seriously he goes uh by what standards do you accredit your social media experts is that a regulated profession are these experts also versed in the complexities of Clinical Psychology how else can they improve the professional activities of a psychological practitioner is there any concrete published and peer-reviewed evidence that the tender lesson the tender lesson they pervert to provide actually produce an improvement in the behavior of those they educate by what objective criteria are you going to measure my Improvement in that regard are there standardized tests for are there standardized tests of such progression how are those standards established if they exist oh my God nobody in the entire country of Canada was willing to take the bait I would like to know I would like to now give you my impression of every person in Canada who who may have once thought they were qualified for the job of educating Dr.

Jordan Peterson I now give you my impression this is me doing an impression you can't tell if you're listening on audio but it's really hilarious it's getting better it's funnier every minute it's getting a little bit funnier and see oh my goodness so I hope I sure hope that Canada saves Us by educating Dr.

Jordan Peterson because what if he just keeps going out there doing what he's doing just think of all the harm he's causing to the to the world if not your own family oh God please educate him okay I if you if you could have written a script of a movie about that situation and you didn't know how the movie would end and you couldn't come up with a good ending there could be no better ending than having nobody in the entire country of Canada willing to take the job there's no you can't get better than that I'm sorry there's nothing if he had like won his appeals and had it overturn ah boring if he'd taken a class and somebody gave it to him H icky boring but having nobody in the country capable of giving him a lesson you can't beat that you can't beat that that's as good as it gets so maybe our maybe our luck is changing what do you think but here's some more good news I got a whole bunch of good news today you you're going to have so much good news today you're going to be tired of it you'll be exhausted with the good news here's some more saw a video of a young woman who was deaf and she was trying out some new glasses that allow um captions to appear on the glasses just for the wearer so that when she's out and listening to things she can get closed captions on personal conversations as well as movies and anything else and you know they're kind of dorky looking so you'd know that they were you know not normal glasses but uh they look like they could be any design you want eventually the first ones look a little dorky but way better than not being able to hear in public I saw us and watching her tearfully put them on and being able to see sound in in the sense of a caption uh was just one of the most touching things now just imagine this is a real product I don't know what company made it I didn't see that in the video but just think about that what what would a golden age look like well one way it would look like is that the deaf would be able to see Sal I mean if you were going to say what's the Golden Age look like I I'd put that in there I would also love to see wokeness destroyed on under its own weight you know sort of like the Dr.

Jordan Peterson story where you just let it play out instead of fixing it or opposing it you just let it play out I've taught you the trick of embracing the thing that you don't like often if there's somebody who has a terrible idea in your company or your organization or the government if you simply follow the rules and embrace it it'll it'll fall apart on its own and it looks like that's what you know Peterson did at you know after first challenging it anyway uh the CEO of Rumble Rumble says that Google is burying their search results for D banino show and uh that appears be the case now of course they're uh they're competing they're competing with uh Rumble so you can imagine why they do it but given that You.

Tube has such a dominant position um and uh given that Google has such a dominant position you do think that this might be a uh some kind of a competitive problem I don't know if it triggers any antitrust triggers or not it triggers a a trigger can you trigger a trigger a little redundant um but here is my advice there is a comp competitor to Google and if you don't like how Google and You.

Tube that they own if you don't like how they're treating uh Rumble you could use an app called perplexity now I told you that I tried it the other day um for I don't know weeks and weeks people have been saying to me almost every day somebody says you got to try your perplexity and I honestly just got sick of hearing it because I thought I don't really need another app in my life right but I tried it I thought you know I'll just see what's going on here and uh so I tried it and uh if you use the perplexity app for five minutes there's a good chance you will never use Google again because when I use Google I get a bunch of sponsored ads and then I get a bunch of things I don't trust and it just doesn't look like it works anymore to me but I do get a better result within perplexity but perplexity has its own little uh story going on right now um and uh I didn't know it was back by Jeff Bezos so Jeff Bezos Amazon founder is uh one of the backers of perplexity and suddenly I understand why the interface is so good uh I can't say enough about how amazing uh Amazon is as a product do you do you ever have the feeling that you go on Amazon you buy something and it happens so seamlessly and the entire process including delivery and even if you have to return something they've made it dead easy that Amazon is like a one of the you know the ninth wonder of the world if you think of the complexity in that product and the fact that it works so well by one click seriously one click and I've got something in my door um so when I think what's the best user interface design I always think Amazon so if if anybody's watching from Amazon you guys are the best you the best interface people completely for what 20 years or however long Amazon's been around unbelievably high level of capability unbelievable just just mindblowing quality of Technical and user interface design so when I see Jeff Bezos is backing this perplexity app and when I turn it on I love the interface I go oh well that makes sense I don't I don't I can't imagine Jeff Bezos backing a search engine that had a bad interface he is all about the customer experience if you've ever heard Bezos give an interview if you if you ask what's the number one thing that makes uh you know Amazon work he'll tell you it's the uh obsessive focus on the customer experience and and he's willing to and he did you know lose money in a cash sense for however many years because he wasn't focusing on cash he was fing on the customer experience and boy did he succeed in the customer experience boy did he succeed I mean nothing's perfect but wow and so it seems that some of that magic is going over to perplexity if you use it once it'll be hard not to use it forever honestly it's that good however uh somebody asked me uh but is it full of wokeness yes yeah it can't be not full of wokeness because it searching based on what's in the real world and the real world is full of wokeness now I did a test this morning in which I asked it I did the you could call it the Gilman Amnesia test so Gilman is the physicist who famously noticed that when a story was about something he knew he could tell the story was fake or just wrong and if it was something he didn't know he couldn't tell the difference so he thought it was probably right so I asked both perplexity and Google a story about myself in which I can guarantee I know the correct story because literally it's myself and they both got it wrong they both had the wrong context the wrong uh frame for it and it was important one of the most important things about me yeah I don't need to get into it today but completely wrong it was the most fun FAL thing that somebody would mention if they talked about me wrong wrong to the point of being close to the opposite of right you know it wasn't just sort of misleading it was about as bad as it could have been and it's both of them because they're both reading public information and stuff like that I I asked a perplexity a question about me a separate question about me before I did this one and uh he used as his Source Gawker Gawker now if you know anything about the media Outlet Gawker is like let's see um if it were possible for a piece of to itself so that the the turd itself could defecate and create like a sub turd that's what gaer is gaer is so far from being any kind of a independent useful Source it's like a turd of a turd you it's it's like two levels away from being useful and and they used it as the only source to answer a question about me literally my political enemies used as a source so no so let me let me be as clear as possible the search results from any search engine are pretty close to useless at this point in the world if it has to do with people if has to do with maybe a fact you know is is H Starbucks is Starbucks open on Columbus Day that I call indigenous day because I'm not a racist like you well great yeah it does that great but as soon as it's a story about any human being it's completely up yeah so there's no such thing as searching accurately for information about people you should just give up on that that's never going to happen and anyway the The Wall Street Journal also says perplexity is getting uh getting in some legal trouble with the New York Times because it looks like the times says that they're summarizing the time stories without permission or something like that I did ask perlex the if it could see the contents of my books because if Jeff Bezos is backing a search engine the first question I have is uh do you have access to the contents of my books now I have mixed feelings about it on one hand I kind of like it you know because my books are non um most of them are non-fiction so I would love if somebody could just Google like the main idea in my book and it would pop up but you can't do that that would be useful uh and even though I maybe wouldn't like it as an author it was certainly be useful but it looks like books are kind of Walled off so it says so it can answer questions about what people said about my books in the public domain but it can't actually say in this chapter you said that well here's a new medical breakthrough that might be gigantic um apparently if you mix OIC with this other technology according to Newsmax Health you can get rid of the need for insulin if you're a diabetic if you have type two diabetes you can completely get rid of um insulin now this is a very small trial only 14 people but 12 of them no longer needed um insulin if you get 12 out of 14 who don't need insulin when you're done uh you could say I need a bigger trial and you're right but holy what 12 out of 14 don't need insulin now here's something that you need to know about new medical procedures can I educate you some of you are young so you've not had many medical procedures but let me explain one thing you need to know if there is a breakthrough medical procedure it will require one of the following things number one you will lose all of your hair it's depends on the medical breakthrough you know it's not every time you lose all of your hair but that's a common one another one is this will totally cure your problem but you'll never have sex again or be interested in it oh it'll totally cure your other problem though the other thing that they'll do is sometimes they'll say this will totally fix your problem but it will require shoving a large object way up your ass that's the other one so generally speaking it's either going to make you too tired to function you're going to lose your hair you'll lose your dick or something really L will be shoved way up your ass however if you're willing to put up with those four things they can cure just about anything and so this new thing that uh gets you out of your need for insulin involves sticking uh something way up your ass I think and then zapping it electrically in your something in your inner guts so it's an endos it's an endoscope now I think it could mean it goes down your throat throat but given that it's shooting the top of your intestines I think it's going up your butt however it's only once it's only once I don't know if they put you to sleep or you just enjoy the experience but um but imagine if you could go into the doctor's office maybe they put you to sleep maybe they don't I don't know they zap you for a few minutes there's no recovery there's no recovery you just walk out and the ymic I assume is just so you don't overeat um and then you're done is this possible is it possible that type 2 diabetes just got fixed with a five minute procedure is possible now I'm not going to say that this is real you know 14 people is not nearly enough you don't know the side effects you know you got to do the big test but maybe but maybe all right here's another one the first peer reviewed uh protocol on cancer using icon and another kind of antiviral thing called fendol and there's one like it that's similar so uh Dr mackus says he's already seeing incredible successes with these repurposed drugs uh he's using in his in his uh practice and he says icin targets cancer cells by disrupting their mitochondrial function just the way you'd expect it to I suppose um leading to cell death uh of the cancer it also blocks Key Energy Pathways blah blah blah so it's it's got um several ways it can work I guess and this Fen bendol and mebendazol they're both anti-parasitic drugs oh I should have said antiparasitic so these are three antiparasitic drugs ican and then these other two and they've been found to Halt cancer cell growth interfere with glucose metabolism trigger uh apoptosis in somee preclinical trials and he says remarkably three patients with stage four genitourinary cancers were treated with high doses of the fen benzol th000 Mig three times a week for several months and experienced complete remission complete remission now this is well short of a clinical trial but um today's today's uh theme is the golden age is it possible that cancer just got cured with existing drugs they have low or no side effects did is is type 2 diabetes cured is OIC curing obesity is is RFK Jr going to fix our food supply within a couple years are we on the edge of curing cancer did we just shoot a gigantic rocket into the air and catch it with two loving arms in a gigantic mechanized device as we're preparing to go to Mars are these all things happening did the did the poles just turn and did we find that con Harris is unlikely to win and instead the pirate ship of amazing people might come into power is it possible that a doom Loop of overspending would would be cured by the only person we trust to do it which is Elon Musk uh and he's all ramping up he's already ramping up in case Trump wins and he would be in charge of reducing or increasing the efficiency of the government by reducing the waste and that would basically put us back on the path to fiscal confidence I hate to get you all excited but everything is going our way here's some more Google just uh made a deal to buy the first private mini nuclear reactor so there's a company uh called uh California Kos power and apparently they can they haven't made any yet I don't think but they're going to make them and by 2030 they'll have at least one and by 2035 Maybe more and so our biggest companies the ones that you can trust to push our government for approval if if you and I decided to build a nuclear power plant we would run up against the government's bureaucracy and we wouldn't be able to raise money and we wouldn't be able to get anything done in the government so basically it just couldn't happen but what if you're Google if you're Google you tell the government what to do if you Google you don't need money because you have it if you're Google you just change the whole world change your search results make everybody suddenly like uh nuclear if you went to Google and you checked their search results about the downside of nuclear energy do you think it says as many negative things about nuclear energy risks as it used to I don't know but I'd be real surprised so keep in mind Google is who tells people what to think literally Google results tell people what to think we and we've seen it it can change your election results Etc if Google is building its own or buying its own nuclear energy plant what will Google who tells people what to think tell them what to think about nuclear power best thing ever not only best thing ever but required for survival you're going to need it for AI and if you don't have ai your country is going to be going to be defeated by the countries that do so it's not only a good idea it's essential Golden Age if Google is all in the America's all in there is no such thing as America disagreeing with Google because Google tells America what to think that's just the way it works now the media if it wanted to disagree could put up a good fight so if the media wanted to disagree with Google and say no we we think this nuclear power is a bad idea well they'd be going up against Google do you think they want to do that nope how about do they want to go up against Microsoft who who is also looking for its own nuclear energy plant nope do they want to go up against Oracle well Oracle is a little different but they don't so our most important um companies have just told the rest of America nuclear energy is not just good it's essential it's coming fast and we can't get enough of it do you remember in 2015 2016 really all through the First Years of the Trump Administration almost every day I came on social media and said everybody who thinks these nuclear energy things are a bad idea you're thinking of the old technology you don't know that the new technologies are safe they figured out how to store the waste and even reuse it in some cases everything solved we need nuclear you better go fast here it is Golden Age yeah it wouldn't be it wouldn't be the Golden Age unless you saw all the big American companies go down hard in favor of nuclear energy it's how hard they're going at it that's the thing it's not that they oh we're mildly interested in it no they're committed they're all in the biggest companies the most powerful guaranteed it's coming now I'm going to give you another prediction that goes like this you can you can predict the outcome of any nation in the world based on their nuclear program that's it if you look at the United States we started late I wish we'd started earlier but we're really good fast followers so I don't think it's going to hurt us too much that we didn't do something 10 years ago because that would have been 10 years ago's technology if we're starting to go hard today with many nuclear plants and Gen 4 in some cases and the best technology that we have and getting rid of some maybe some regulations as appropriate lots of experimenting with nuclear fuels that are better Etc uh and the uh to its credit the energy Department in America let me let me say this unambiguously so over two administrations the department of energy in the United States has been quite pro-nuclear power and has done very as far as I can tell really important work in making it possible to test newer nuclear um processes so if you think it's just like another bureaucracy the department of energy they might be Superstars that they seem to have quietly done as far as I can tell a whole bunch of correct things in the last several years across two administrations and that counts that counts because it means it's Administration um robust it's it's not going to be destroyed by getting the wrong president in it's still going to look good no matter who's in so good good job on Department of energy at least pushing nuclear stuff um but if you look at Great Britain they're about ready to phase out the last of their nuclear energy it doesn't look like they're going to go hard to get new ones and any country in Europe that you see phasing out their nuclear power I would say you're seeing the end of them as a important country um I think Britain doesn't have a chance of really surviving into the modern era without nuclear power so if that's the way they're going you're seeing the end of an Empire if that's what they want that's what they want anyway um did you know that the appeals court uh unless they've already ruled I don't think they have uh they were looking into the case of the uh half a billion dollars or whatever it was that Trump was supposed to pay because he allegedly defrauded banks by allegedly over uh overvaluing the price of his or the value of his assets now what did I tell you on day one of that story on day one of that story I said whoa whoa whoa the people in the media are idiots and they don't know anything about business and everything you're seeing about this story is based on idiots not knowing anything about business because if you're not an idiot and you know about business you knew that there was nothing wrong with that story in other words you knew that there was no reason that there should have been a legal process against Trump did he overvalue his assets doesn't matter that's what I told you because I was a banker if you're a banker and literally I was a lending officer I was approving loans for lenders I was actually not the lending officer I was in the back office that approved the loans made by The Lending officer so I was sort of I don't want to say Superior to them but I had to I had to make sure it was okay so I had to know what a loan is and how it works and whether they can repay I I had to know as much or more than the lenders to do to do my job and here's what I know the bank doesn't take your word for anything that's what I knew in the normal course of things your lender tells you a bunch of lies and then you say can you back that up and if they can't you go okay well that was a lie and when they can you rely on the document not what they said there is no scenario in which a bank ever ever relies on what A lender say or what a borrower says ever it's never happened never should happen Never Can Happen never will happen and yet they're pretending that the Trump situation was the one time thebly relied on relied on the statements of the borrower no they have a whole process in which they go out and they check the value of things on their own because they have to because that's their job and so the banks were happy with the loans because they checked it down Trump has always paid back his loans so he's good to do business with they made money he made money nobody even once concerned themselves with the fact that there was a big difference between what they Banks thought was the value and what Trump said was the value it had no impact in the real world and the systems in the real world the banking loaning systems guaranteed that it wouldn't be a problem guaranteed and of course Trump would know that he wouldn't be trying to get away with something because he would know it the same as the banks everybody in business knows that nobody relies on your impression of your assets value everybody knows that so now the appell court is sitting there just excor excoriating is that the word the uh the attorneys who brought this case and won they actually won in the most absurd case they won nobody was damaged nobody had a complaint and the people who were allegedly damaged would be happy to do business with them again because they just made money and had a good experience and the so the Appel judges who are not obviously Soros picked people are just saying um has this ever happened in the history of the world that you brought a case where there were no victims and everybody was happy and everybody understood the process and everybody understood the process gave them no risk whatsoever in this transaction and the lawyers are just blah blah blah blah they don't have nothing so I don't think it's been ruled on yet but I don't think there's any doubt how it will be ruled if you're judging from what the what questions are being asked and the comments of the appell at court Trump's going to get his half billion back I don't think he paid it but yeah he I think that just goes away I would love to see it go away before election day because the number of democrat idiots idiots Who challenged me on social media that this was a horrible crime and Trump should be in jail for it or at least pay half a billion dollars for it do will any of them come back and say oh you know it turns out that uh being a lending officer might give you some experience and knowledge about being a lending officer yes it does turns out it does um I've told you many times that understanding economics and I put banking under that category uh and persuasion are the two most predictive skills if you understand everything about money and I've got a background in economics and MBA and lots of business experience and you understand persuasion you can often predict the future um better than chance so that's how I predicted that Trump would win in 2016 it's also how I predicted that the appell at courts if they were honest would throw this out while laughing at it right so so watch this pattern the pattern is that people understand money and business and the people understand persuasion are really good at predicting if you see somebody who knows both of those things that's what I call a talent stack where you've intelligently combined things that work well together that person is going to guess the future better than other people it it's just those two skills are future future oriented skills that's how they work anyway so that's more good news uh New York Post is reporting that there's a Brooklyn based company that manages some apartments in the suburbs of Denver and they say that the fake news is fake news and that these Venezuelan gangs have in fact taken over their their Apartments um now taking over might be a phrase with some ambiguity to it but let's just say they can't get rid of them and if they want to beat up one of their employees apparently they do and they don't necessarily pay rent and uh so for all practical purposes quote gangs have taken control of several of our properties in Aurora Colorado can we put this to rest yeah are we done about the question of whether it's true the company that owns the buildings says they're taking over and not one multiple buildings and this is just one management company who's saying on the record saying in public showing you a picture of their employee who was beat to by the gang for I think trying to expel them or something can we agree that the news was always fake when it said that the new that this was fake that the gangs have in fact taken over the buildings can can we now say true or or is there some madeup brooklyn-based company if there's really a Brooklyn based company that owns buildings and they say that the gangs are controlling them not the people whose job it is to control them aren't we done arguing whether it's real I think we're done and then if you know what is real then you can deal with it pretending it wasn't real was the problem it's not that you can't can't know how to expel people from a building for doing illegal things if you have to here's a story you never heard uh this is on the George account on X did you know that years ago when Nelson Mandela got out of prison um he wanted to arrange a trip to the United States and for whatever reason the government of the United States couldn't arrange appropriate transportation I don't know what's beyond that but uh so Donald Trump uh offered his private plane so Donald Trump on his own dime sent his private jet to carry Nelson Mandela to the United States and today K Harris will be calling him a racist again because they made up some stuff I'll tell you he might be the most most misunderstood human being in the world if you look and and it's very consistent you've heard a lot of anecdotes about him paying off mortgages and helping people in trouble and stopping his car when somebody was being mugged and you know flying Nelson Mandela um somebody said that he attended Michael Jackson's trial every day because Michael Jackson was friends with his family like it the the Trump kids used to hang out with with Michael Jackson to like play video games and they were buddies they lived in the same building in the Trump Tower at least for a while so it's just amazing what kind of you know car or the the news will create of somebody um i' like to Circle back to social media I mentioned this without details a few times that there is a horrible sounding um rumor about Tim wals that I didn't detail because I said if it's not true I don't want to put it out there um my best current updated information is it's all made up it looks like it's all made up there's only one individual who's pushing it it's not somebody who has credibility it's not being picked up by any other entity either Pro or anti- wals nobody's touching it I'm going to call it fake so if you see online a story and again I don't even want to give the details because I think it's terribly unfair to wall he does give me a creepy Vibe and that's a fact so I'll say that because it's a fact about how he makes me feel but it's not a fact about anything he's done if you're talking about specific you know inappropriate acts of some kind you're really going to have to bring me some proof all right I'm not going to buy that based on a Vibe so be careful be careful out that Tim wals just be careful about what you see on social media all right uh how many hoaxes are there about uh Trump today let's see do we have how many there's a there's a hoax that Trump was going to use the military against his enemies of course that's just some weird thing taken out of context uh I saw um did you see Jake Tapper talking to James Carville last night now here again I'm not going to make a claim of fact because I wouldn't I don't know the fact I'll make a claim of how I'm responding to something I watched it and Carville looked obviously drunk and the things he said didn't make a big of a sense it looked like just a really drunk guy talking and uh so I don't know if he was drunk I just know that he sure acted drunk and here's one of the things he said that Trump isn't hiding it anymore that he's a Nazi what what are you talking about and he said it's because Trump's going to do a rally in Madison Square Garden and therefore obviously Nazi what what Trump does rallies all the time as do all politicians why would Trump's one rally be be a Hiller rally well uh that's what Jake Tapper asked Carville because it's not obvious to him either Jake Tapper had the same impression apparently um what uh what exactly are you seeing about this Madison Square Garden rally and he says well in 1939 uh some Nazis had a had a rally in that building now I don't even think it's the same building I believe the building is has been rebuilt like three times since then but I would like to point out uh that building's been used before does Carville drink so much that he thinks only Nazis use that building it's a sort of a public building I believe that sports teams do things in there maybe some of your favorite comedians have them stand up there how in the world do you drink so much that you go on CNN and say that having a rally in a public building where everybody has ralles and events is is proof it's not just like an indication but it's like and then that's proof that's proof he's a Nazi that is some badshit crazy stuff right there and then U then his other evidence was that Trump said he wanted to use the military against his enemies which you don't even have to research that to know that didn't happen that's so dumb that if you spend five minutes following politics you go didn't happen that's some weird anti context thing of course it is some weird out in the context thing um so the there were and there were two more that were just like crazy ones they sound like desperation uh I think it's pretty obvious that the haris team knows that they're they're in a doom Loop you know they're they're circling the drain at this point their campaign so they're I mean they're just flailing like oh well uh maybe uh the building he's in is a a Nazi building can we go with that can we can we go with the buildings a Nazi building well how about you go after his economic policies well that would be bad because the the public likes his Trump's Economic Policy well you could go after his his policies about the Ukraine war in the Middle East no because people like him better on that well okay so not the econ ICS and that war but how about the Border yet oh no we can't go after Trump and the Border because they like him best uh what do we got is he going to visit any real estate in the next few weeks uh let's check yeah he'll be in this building called a Madison Square Garden perfect we'll say it's a a Nazi facility because that's all they have imagine imagine sitting around and thinking where where will we put our limited resources today because everything is limited we'll put our limited resources into this new hoax about using the military and uh the hoax about this building being where only Nazis gather that is a lot of giving up right there that you know if if you could come up with different words for we surrender it would look like that oh I get it you're surrendering now so are you done with the race no we're going to you know we're going to take it to the election day but it sounds like you're giving up oh no we're fighting as hard as we can about real estate being Nazi indications no you're not no you're not fighting anymore you have given up the the eoma collapse is today today is the middle of February today is the day that we all knew that the fake polls would start to Che up we all knew that she couldn't keep this going we all knew that if she came out of her closet and spoke to real people she would be destroyed and now she's trying to make a case that Trump is the one hiding so kamla is saying in her in her speeches that Trump is not doing any interviews and refused to do a debate with her now obviously doing other debate doesn't help Trump I don't I mean maybe something could go wrong but there's nothing left to go right and here's the thing Trump has been talking to podcasters KL Harris says he's not doing interviews with the major media why would he do an interview with the major media who is literally just basically the KL Harris campaign she's really saying can you do an interview with the fake news who basically is an extension of my camp pain if you don't do an interview with the fake news that will only use your quotes out of context and edit you to make you look stupid the same way they edited me to make me look smart if you don't do the dumbest thing you could ever do as a politician talk to the main media who's going to malign you and make you look like you're some kind of a Nazi at Madison Square Garden if you don't do that you must be weak and unconfident okay here's what's really happening Trump has realized that if he goes on Joe Rogan which he might do soon or on any of these podcasts that have huge male audiences that he is scooping up male support like a vacuum cleaner on ants every time he goes on a podcast he's not being accused of being a racist he's showing himself in his very most relaxed basic um favorable light and he can go from one to the other get gigantic audiences that you'll never get of young men on any of these big platforms you'll never get you know the bad treatment and it's a 100% winning strategy especially if he closes it out with Joe Rogan and it gets better there is rumor not confirmed not confirmed that both Trump and Harris at different times will do Joe Rogan before the election are you having the same feeling about that that I am KLA Harris has only done interviews with friendlies now she's going to do one with uh Brett Bear on Fox news but he would be the friendliest um on Fox News Now friendly meaning that he's not an opinion person and he does a great great job job of avoiding opinion it it's got to be the hardest job in the world imagine how hard it would be to do what Brett Bear does talk about the news on Fox News and not you know just bias it because all of your co-workers are opinion people so he does a great job of that I'm always impressed when I when I see him work so that's the safest thing she could do but I think Brett Bear is going to tear her apart and not because he's biased but because she has some things to answer for that she has not answered for and I don't think she's that Brad bear is going to let her just talk over him and run out the clock I think he's going to make her answer and she's going to look like an idiot because we've seen her work enough and I don't say that lightly she seems like an idiot and that's a separate question but imagine them on Joe Rogan imagine Joe Rogan asking anything he wants to Trump how do you think that'll go pretty well pretty well now imagine and by the way I would expect that Joe Rogan would ask both of them hard questions uh I think Rogan would not want to do a softball interview with Trump I think he'd want to come with some fun because it is entertainment but he's going to come with some hard questions I I think Rogan would make him explain January 6 in the way nobody's ever done it I'm just guessing but I think he would hold them to some some high standards that's what I suspect because he wouldn't be afraid of them that's what you need so so Rogan would not be afraid to ask the hard question and put him in a spot and you know that's not the same for everybody else um but he would he would destroy KL Harris just by asking questions all he'd have to do is say people wonder about this give me an answer no that's not the answer to the question it should be destroyed anyway um I also saw that uh Harris was talking about Trump not releasing his medical records apparently she released her medical records now uh Trump hasn't since 20123 I guess but uh Trump has asked that conell Harris take a cognitive test I would like to double down on that by saying she should also take a drug test a drug test so KLA Harris tells us that her doctor gave her a um yeah that uh that the doctor gave her a clean bill of health did he I don't remember seeing the drug test did you did you see the cognitive test I didn't so KL Harris has not tested the two things that we have a question about when I look at her in public I do not say oh she looks like somebody who would be at health risk in the future I don't say that I I'm not even really super interested in what her doctor says about her body because it looks like her body's fine she's young enough vital enough she's been doing a full campaign you there's nothing about the campaign that suggests your body doesn't work I'm I'm fine that she has a good body and Superior Superior in body to Trump Trump's got a little extra weight although it looks like he's losing weight and Trump's far older so if she wants to compete on who's got a better body yeah yeah I'll give that to her I'll give her the win on body but it's not her body that runs the country it's her brain and if I don't know what drugs she's ingesting while it looks like she is and I don't know her cognitive ability when I can't explain why she's acting so much dumber than she used to act I kind of need to know those answers I'm very curious about whether she's had a hit to her cognitive ability because it looks like it I don't know why but it sure looks like it something's going on there so uh she's pushing that and she was pushing it I was watching the uh the rally and she slipped from politician mode into uh wife mode and I guess there's there's no you know nicer way to say it politician mode is most of what she says and most of what she has said you know like I will give you this policy yeah politician but when she was talking about the health differences she slipped into uh wife like just nagging just just the vibe and oh my god did it turn me off like you know I I hate to sound uh you know too sexist but the truth is that both male men and women have a mode that if they use that mode it's a turnoff to somebody right if Trump gets a little too braggy women just go I'm out uh what are you doing I I cannot listen to one more second of you bragging about yourself right that's the male version the female version is if you get that attitude oh he doesn't want to give us his his health records I can't do an impression of it but oh my god when either of them get out of political mode and get into their that mode total turnoff total turnoff all right um is it too too too soon to say we know the 2024 election is uh rigged the amuse account points out that uh Detroit reports that 40% of the mailin ballots have already been returned really is so this is on a long list of cities in Detroit and Detroit the place that you'd expect to be the worst managed biggest place that there would be a problem problem seems to have lapped the other cities and how many ballots have been returned early so the other cities are in that you know 26 to 38% range but the star is exactly the city you'd expect to be the number one recipient of mailin ballots if the cheat was on it's already obvious people now I don't have a factual basis to say that cheating is going on and and here it is but already we have one statistic that would make me not trust the election if the result were Harris one already if you're asking me do I accept the election of 2020 no I'm out or or 2024 I'm out I'm already out I don't trust the result already so I've already seen enough about this election that I don't trust it now if Trump wins I'm going to embrace it like crazy like I didn't see any problems and I'm not even going to pretend to be you know consistent because I'm going to assume that he managed to beat the margin of cheating I won't know that but it will be my working assumption so yes there's something strange going in in Detroit and I'm hoping that somebody's going to ask somebody this question this week and the question is kamla Harris and by the way this would be a good question for Brett Bear and it would be a good question even better for Joe Rogan KLA Harris if the election result shows that Trump wins and you see that there are some historically out of balanc results in other words there's some areas that uh voted for him in numbers that couldn't possibly be true based on historical patterns would you accept and certify the result based on what you're seeing well no NOP get back to the point if you see obvious things that are out of whack will you accept the election well in 2020 well not talking about 2020 get back to the question will you accept it if it looks an a whack to you well it's not going to look an awack no that's not the question if it looks an awack like Republicans say 2020 looked anac if it just looks an awac are you going to accept it well you and there's your election there's your election if she can't answer that question and she can't it's their biggest claim that uh you won't leave office and blah blah blah are here some more warning signs oh by the way Christopher rufo has found that one of Harris's books she copied five passages which we call plagiarism New York Times tried to slap him down because the New York Times wants her to win in my opinion um so they tried to minimize it by saying oh they just had were like five little areas you know five little areas that were copies ah nothing they admitted it was plagiarism uh but then they said that noticing the plagiarism is racist yeah so that's the New York Times that would be the standard bearer of news is that if you notice somebody plagiarized and you prove it and you show the sections so nobody can doubt your claims you my friends are being a racist according to the New York Times all right great job Christopher rufo well more on the ca collapse uh Harry Anon as CNN said that there are a lot of warning signs now going off he says that uh if the GOP is ahead in party identification pretty much they're guaranteed to win now party identification means that you signed up to be a Republican or you signed up to be a Democrat uh generally speaking Democrats have more people signed up and when they have more people signed up by a a goodly amount they win anytime it's close Republicans win but right now Republicans are ahead so Republicans this is according to Harry Anon CNN Republicans right now are doing even better than the average when they win uh so think about that so the the average number of people who identify as Republicans will give you a Republican win if it hits the average it's above that these signs are pointing to a landslide they're they're pretty clearly pointing to a landslide now what happens if all these signs are pointing to pointing toward Trump but in the last hours of the election counting he loses are you going to accept that election I'm not yeah let let me say as clearly as possible if all of these signs are pointing toward a win and at the last minute there's a bunch of mailin votes that counted I'm not accepting the election let me let me say that as clearly as I can and publicly this is a public statement if all the indicators or many of them indicate a strong win by Trump and in the last minute the mailin votes look suspicious I do not accept that result I want to make that clear yeah you're going to have to you the results are going to have to match the singles the signals if on Election Day the signals are all you they changed and they're all glaring that you know based on historical patterns um Harris is going to win and then she does win I'm not going to question you know whether any specific votes were in line or around a line even if something is found but is smish I'm going to say you know everything indicated she was going to win let's let's just move on but it's got to work both ways if everything's indicating that Trump is going to win and then the the Bell weathers go weird and the last minute accounting goes weird nope no that's a hard no on accepting that result all right rasmason is asking people are you better off than you were before uh before Biden was in office and by a 16-point margin most voters say no when you've got that kind of a result it is nearly impossible for the incumbent to win here again another glaring sign that Trump's going to win so Trump has ADD on the three biggest issues you know then abortion is its own thing but the three biggest issues he's well ahead which is the Wars the economy in the Border he's AE on are you better off and party identification he's ah and the polls say he he's add in depending on which polls uh and they haven't all caught up to the current situation yet but he's adding like six out of seven um swing States now let's say things stay the same and we go into the election and these are the things we know and then he loses by 10 million votes you going to accept that I think it depends how those votes come in and what it looks like like if it looked like it was organic maybe maybe but all right um uh Heraldo just said he's uh endorsing U so raldo Rivera is going to R endorse the Harris and uh that's because of January 6th and and uh the reason that Heraldo says he cannot endorse Trump even though they've been personal friends for a long time is that uh Trump did not acknowledge that he lost in 2020 can you believe that that that's his reason he went public with it with a with a long post on it it's because Trump won't accept that he lost in 2020 and that's the one reason that's the unacceptable reason so I responded to Heraldo and uh people like my response so much I think I will read it to you um oh and haraldo said that if you accept Trump's statements that he won in 2020 that makes you part of what they call the big lie so Democrats branded January 6 and the claim that 2020 was rigged as the big lie now the big lie is sort of uh trying to make you think of Nazism because the Nazis try to push the big lie so that comes from Nazism so Heraldo wants to know that uh Trump would be uh a big old terrible person for his lie and if you were to accept his lie you're part of the nazil likee people who would accept the big lie okay so here's what I said in a long post to Heraldo that people liked a lot I said Heraldo no one knows who won in 2020 or any other prior elections our system is designed intentionally to not be fully auditable we know the design is intentional because that's how design works if a design persists for decades despite the ability to change it then the design is intentional did did JFK win fair and square historians disagree you can know for sure that no court has ruled the 2020 election was invalid but you also know courts are not the tool for that job how would they know if an election got hacked without detection after years of the press demonizing Trump as the next Hitler every thinking person knows the incentive to cheat him out of the victory in 2020 was through the roof we also know State actors can hack any system usually without detection sometimes it requires an Insider which is no hurdle for State actors including our own we also know that if someone found a non-electronic way to cheat we would not necessarily catch it and it appears the mail in ballot situation is easily gained whenever A system can be gained and the incentives to do so are Skyhigh we observe that such gaming happens in every domain every time for although I can't enter the Dreamscape in which every thing in our country is corrupt and broken except our election systems speaking as a hypnotist and a longtime Observer of your usually wellth down opinions this opinion does not seem to be derived from reason so that's my take it is not derive from reason whatever is driving this it's not because he thought it through now most of us are not operating from reason we just rationalize after the fact but sometimes is a little more obvious than others all right here's some uh and I told you that uh Harris has a new plan for black men because she's losing with black men not losing totally but she's losing support from black men she wants to give a million forgivable loans up to $20,000 what would you call a plan to give $20,000 loans to people who don't have to pay it back do you know how much theft there's going to be in loans that you don't have to pay back do you know how fast I would apply for a loan I didn't have to pay back uh well you still have to say that it's a loan for a business oh well yeah totally I'm going to start a business what's the what's your business um I'm going to sell uh uh I'll probably uh I'll I'll I'll make I'll make jewelry in my house all right that's the business uh when are you going to do it uh well soon as I get to $20,000 all right can you pay it back doesn't matter it's a loan I don't have to pay back oh that's right we said you don't have to pay it back all right so you say you're going to do a business and uh you want 20,000 all right here's your 20,000 and then we check later how's your business going oh well well I just spent the money on stuff I didn't really start a business oh well you're not supposed to do that I know but you know when you said I don't have to pay it back that was really telling me to just steal it no no we we said we want you to start a business I know but what I heard what I heard was you're not going to be checking very carefully and I can just say I started a business and it didn't work out I just spent your money and kept it all and you know good luck is basically just giving a whole bunch of criminals $20,000 because they asked for it you don't have to live on this planet for very long before you know that this is nothing but an invitation for a fraud you don't have to be some kind of an expert to see this one uh I refer you to everything that happened during the pandemic if you're wondering if this will be gamed yeah yeah it's going to be gamed um then what else she's going to do education and mentorship for black men I told you that that seemed like a good idea more mentorships good but why are you limiting it to black men because you're a racist this is racist right if the government says we're going to to do something and you're not allowed to get any Whitey if anything the government says involves not for you Whitey then that's racist you should just put that right in there it's not for you Whitey um then they got the protect crypto Investments so black men know their money is safe how stupid do you think we all are because there's some special magic that's happening to black men are are you you so racist that you think black men uniquely cannot protect themselves from crypto race what the do you think is wrong with black men that they alone the only ones can't figure out how to handle crypto could you be more condescending could you be this is horrible this is this is the only thing I've ever seen this racist against everybody it's racist against anybody who's not included but it's also racist against the people included what do you think black people somehow magically are the only ones who can't get a like a wallet and that they can't join coinbase they don't know how to buy a don't how to buy some crypto and protect it I mean it's pretty hard to protect in crypto but this is ridiculous um then there's a national health initiative to focus on illnesses that disproportionately impact black men I think that would make sense but only in the context that that we should be looking to fix everybody's problem so if there's somebody whose problem that is underserved yeah yeah let's do more of it um but if there's anybody who also has problems that are underserved why are you only helping black men why are only black men being uh helped with their category of underserved health problems yes we should help them yes we should do everything but but nobody else purely racist and then the one that's the craziest is that they legalize recreational marijuana to create opportunities for black men to become drug dealers so apparently there are some black men that are not drug dealers but uh the Harris campaign thinks that that needs to change um they'll make it legal so it'll be a legal drug but uh they'd really like to push men into the drug dealing business just you know legally sounds this sounds like parody doesn't it it it doesn't even sound like anybody who' ever lived in this country came up with these ideas it just sounds like a joke it's pathetic the word pathetic just describes everything coming out of the Harris campaign right now you know you you could say that what Trump does is you know scary or inappropriate or he tweets are too mean all that stuff that's true it's all true but you wouldn't use the word pathetic would you like if you look at Trump's lining up you know he's got musk that will look into the government waste he's got you know RFK Junior's going look in her food supply and maybe our our meds serious serious important stuff and then this pathetic um you know how the Democrats want to keep pushing these Departments of disinform and you can't kill them you can't get rid of the disinformation because they're making them as fast as you can try to kill them uh I think Trump should uh promote creating the department of hoax debunking not disinformation the department of hoax debunking and they use it to debunk all of the hoaxes now it would have to do both sides because there are plenty of hoaxes on both sides but the Democrats do work on a creating hoax model they're just doing it all the time I think when it happens for Republicans it's usually some Grassroots troll that got a little too much attention you like the like the Tim Walls accusation that would be like a a hoax but again it comes from an individual and if he gets a lot of attention it keeps going what am I seeing here in the comments uh response needed okay I don't know what that's about anyway um the department of hoax debunking this would be a case where you would uh embrace the disinformation world and say I'd like to double embrace it and when I'm president we're going to go really hard at disinformation and we're going to include NBC in the list CBS ABC CNS although CNN's moving toward the middle in MSNBC and I would say that we're going to declare that they reporting is mostly hoaxes and uh it's going to be officially in the books as a hoax uh entity now do you think that the Democrats like their disinformation organizations now not as much because their entire point is they think it will only be used against their enemies if if Trump braced the disinformation networks and said these are great but we need to make sure they're operating correctly so make sure they cover all of the hoaxes and that they identify the the networks that are the promoters of the hoaxes so you can maybe guess the next one without help oh it came from a hoax entity I get it I don't have to pay attention to that one yeah the minute that Trump Embraces the hoax disinformation process process they're going to have to dismantle it because they thought it only went one way it doesn't anyway so here are some of the hoaxes I forgot to mention uh there's a hoax that Nazis attended an Eric Trump boat rally uh there's a hoax that Trump spaced down on stage for 30 minutes I think somebody was it was somebody injured in the audience so we had to take a pause and he stayed on stage and so they just I think they ended up not continuing after a while so that was just a hoax and all the news is hoaxes um let's see what else is happening um do you know the story about the uh I've talked about the the ghost trucks I'll call them the trucks that allegedly had were filled with fake B from some specific postal uh service place there was a whistleblower who said you know he had fake ballots on his truck but we can't find the trucks and now um according to rasmuson account quote uh imagine having to fight the US Postal Service for years in federal courts just for the names of who paid the trucking companies did you know that did do you know that somebody's trying to figure out who paid the trucking companies that allegedly had the fake ballots on it and it's taken two years in federal courts unsuccessfully is there some reason we can't know who paid the trucking companies that a whistleblower said had fake ballots in it and you're going to trust the next election now here's what I hope if we know that this kind of process happened once or at least there's a allegation that happened once then can the Republican observers make sure that they're observing so they could catch it should it happen again now if it happened again I imagine it wouldn't look the same if it if there was any bad behavior before they would know they needed to switch it up but it would still have the same element to it there would still be trucks delivering things that were full of things that shouldn't be delivered so can you catch that it depends where The Observers are and some of them are you know are going to be kept out of certain places so we'll see we'll shall see well Ukraine is uh souped up its drone success rate that used to be down around 10% because the Russians were good at jamming drones so they kept sending these drones and they got jammed and maybe one in 10 would hit a Target but now Ukraine has added AI to their drone so that they can fly without GPS which means they can get to their location they can do their own looking around and the jamming doesn't the jamming is applicable to the GPS so I think if you take that out of the mix you can make it somewhat autonomous and then the the hit rate is up to 80% so now 80% of the drones are killing people um that's pretty amazing and then there's some uh there's some information suggesting that the Ukraine the Ukrainian leadership is open to the trading some land for a peace situation now of course there are people who who debunk that story and say no no no we're not even considering trading land for peace but that's the better negotiating position you want to start from the position that my God no I'm giving you nothing uh in case you have to later give them something all right here's my update on Israel and Palestine Palestine and the Palestinians um I told you yesterday that I tried to get involved in a conversation online and I was just trying to clarify that the two parties were not on the same topic I wasn't even taking a side just saying oh you're not on the same topic and I got just totally attacked for people assuming I'm one one side or the other and so here's what I've realized I I've told you before that lying is a bad thing and you'd all agree with that right lying is a bad thing but there are some specific domains in which lying is not only acceptable it's preferred it's preferred one of those domains is when people ask you about your sex life you have the right to lie about your sex life yeah if you're still in the closet and that's your preference I'm not saying it should be your preference I I'm I'm not involved in your personal life but if you want to tell somebody you're not bisexual but you are fine that that's a perfectly good use of a lie I am 100% on your side if somebody wants to get in your sex business and you just want to make him go away by lying yes absolutely lie all you want about your sex life there's another area in which lying is not just okay it's advised it's advised and that would be self-defense so let's say the terrorists capture you and they say do you have any guns in the house you say no no no I I I hate guns I'm anti-gun and then maybe you got a chance to get close enough to your hidden handgun that you can you know shoot him so there are situations in which is dangerous to tell the truth in those cases yes lie lying is not just okay it's advised very advised right so in self-defense you can lie as much as you want now this brings us back to Israel and the Palestinian situation what do the Israelis believe they are doing defending themselves what do the Palestinians believe they're doing defending themselves now October 7th was an offensive act but their take on what they were doing you know their interpretation not mine not mine I'm I'm not involved their interpretation would be it's part of a larger defensive you know get your land back as they see it now if you've got a situation where both entities and this is kind of weird you know normally there's an attacking entity and a defensive entity take the war in Ukraine uh in that case um Russia more clearly is the aggressor and Ukraine most of us think is the on the defense right so that would be the normal situation for a war there's one one attacking and one defending but the weird thing about Israel and the Palestinian situation is that because of their complicated past uh they both claim to be in a defensive mode now when you're in a defensive mode as I just explained lying is not just okay because you're defending yourself there's there's no rules in defense it's advised it's not just okay it's recommended if you're defending yourself or right if you're defending yourself it's recommended because you should use every tool you should use lying you should use bombs you should use whatever whatever it takes there there's no rules in self-defense so when I as a tourist you know blunder into this conversation between two entities that are in a defensive posture and then I try to insert something that I think is maybe a truth that both of them could agree on I am wasting my time because the only thing you know for sure is that neither side should be interested in the truth now what will happen 5 minutes after I'm done I will go to my DMs and several people who are Jewish and friends of mine will say but you know you know I hear what you're saying Scott but you know Israelis they do have the better argument and I'm going to say I don't care because if you're not in it you should not trust anything that either side says because they both have a free pass under under their assumptions of what's true they have a free pass they have a free pass to lie about everything as long as they're in a defensive posture so if Israel is lying about everything and I'm not saying they are that is not my claim I'm saying they have a right to lie about everything so do the Palestinians under their interpretation of what's Happening Now what I'm not going to do is give you my interpretation of what's happening because it all looks stupid to me because you can just pick some period and pick some interpretation you could come up with anything you want so it doesn't matter what anybody else thinks all that matters is who has the power to get what they want at the moment Israel has power to get what they want and they're allies and we should treat them like allies and if they do things that we would do and they do it's hard to judge somebody for doing something exactly like you what you would do so I don't so I'm not going to judge either side I'll I'll leave that to people who believe that in a contest between two groups who consider themselves to be on defense that you can believe anything that's coming out of the war zone if you believe anything that's coming out of a war zone between two people who are presenting themselves as on the defense don't do that don't do that so now do I have a preference of who wins yes I have a preference of who wins because in my world um if you would call me a non-believer let's call me a non-believer I don't call myself an atheist because that feels too certain I'm simply not accepting popular belief systems who is more likely to be on my side in that situation Jews yeah Jews are not tough on people who have different opinions at least you know the people in the United States and people un likely to ever have any interaction with so if if the Jewish Powers gained power and got into a better situation uh I say oh okay I don't see any problem with that I I've had tremendously good Financial business dealings with many Jewish business people pretty much all great I would just keep doing that but what happens if the Islamic World grows and starts to encroach on my world well then I'm in a lot of trouble so if you're asking me who do I want to win Israel Israel who do I want to uh dominate well I want the Jews to be in a superior position absolutely no question about and it's because of self-defense because my greatest ability to remain free and unbothered is to not promote a side that would want to crush me if they had the power to do so so I have no ambiguity about what side I want to win I just don't believe anything that either of them say that's my current stand nor should you nor should you all right and that's all I got for today and I'm going to talk to the locals people privately I must have G way over my longest one ever all right you on You.

Tube and n and Rumble thanks for joining locals I'm coming at you sorry I'm so long today e e e e e e e e e

well we got a show to do

today probably will be

amazing all the stars are lining

up comments are

working no comments are

working yes

[Applause]

good morning everybody and welcome

comments are working to the highlight of

human

civilization it's called coffee with

Scott Adams and there's no better time

if you'd like to take your experience up

to levels that even Tim wals will be

clapping like a seal for in a moment

when I go when I hit play all you need

for that is a cuper muger a glass of

tank or CH din a Canen Jugger flask a

vessel of any kind fill it with your F

favorite liquid I like coffee and join

me now for the unparallel pleasure the

dop me end of the day the thing that

makes everything better it's called the

simultaneous Sip and it happens now

go so

good the only thing that could make this

day better would be Tim Walls clapping

like a

seal see if we can make that

happen thank you thank you

yeah there we

go all right

cringey it's a little bit cringey but we

like

it uh if you'd like to know how to do

the Tim

Walls yeah you have to lean back you got

to put your elbows together and you got

to clap like a seal Lean Back elbows

together

and if you'd like uh a lesson on

pointing the pointing is very important

it's your non-p pointing hand has to be

limp and soft your pointing hand is full

fully mobile but the non-p pointing hand

you want to be a little bit like

this

Y and the and the

Bowing the the Tim wall bowing and the

open Palms

like he's surprised when he sees people

every time he goes to a crowd he sees

some people he's

surprised if you're only listening to

this and missing all of my amazing

Impressions oh I'm so sorry for you it

must be so sad sitting there with audio

and no visual when I am so visual

speaking of which if you need to find a

merchandise for coffee with Scott Adams

the features yes my bald head on shirts

and hoodies and

mugs uh just go to one of your favorite

search engines and search for cwsa for

coffee with Scott Adams merchandise to

buy it'll pop right

up here are some security tips for men

courtesy of Joshua Steinman you should

follow him on um onx Joshua Steinman and

uh

apparently uh uh the following thing has

happened in at least one intelligence

security

meeting some somebody looked at the men

in the uh in the room and

said I'm paraphrasing but said uh

there's nobody here who's more than a

five and a 10 if somebody wants to date

you who's a 10 it's a

spy so apparently one of the problems

with the the dating apps is that men who

can't really pull very many beautiful

women are still getting beautiful

women uh if they work in some kind of

secure military or intelligence

job turns out that there will be a very

nice Chinese woman who would be uh very

happy to be your

girlfriend and maybe you could have long

conversations about what you do at work

so here's how you know you're dating a

spy

your spy is twice as good-look as

you now it gets complicated if you're

also

Rich because then you can't

tell all right this is the funniest

story of the day and I I laughed until I

cried this morning I was sitting in my

desk just crying with laughter now I

hope this is as funny to you is this to

me now it's funny because it's real now

here's the background you you might know

that uh Jordan

Peterson was uh in some trouble with

something called the Ontario College of

psychologists now he's a Canadian and

this is a Canadian entity that has some

kind of control over the licensing of

Canadian

psychologists and if you want to remain

in good standing in in your profession

you've got to be good with this

organization and this organization ruled

that Dr Jordan Peterson uh needed to be

re-educated because of his social media

posts were so so inappropriate for

someone in their profession that they

needed to either take away his very

license to practice or have him

re-educated by a social media

psychologist

expert there are a lot of those I don't

know but he had to be

re-educated so the first thing that Dr

Jordan Peterson did was he tried to uh I

believe he tried to fight the process

you know he challenged the process and

that didn't work so now he's a a victim

of the process and he eventually decided

that he would in fact accept the

re-education

process now let me just set this up for

you it's Dr Jordan Peterson the most

famous and Poss most capable person

who's ever existed in this plane of

existence for for this domain of

knowledge and and

whatnot and now Canada's task is to find

somebody who's smarter or no more

knowledgeable on the topics of how to

communicate in the context of being a

psychologist and a social media person

that's right they're going to find

somebody who's better than

Jordan Peterson in in his chosen field

in which he's the literally the most

famous and capable person you've ever

seen in your life in any

field and at the same time better at

social media and

communicating there's nobody better at

social media and

communicating so what do you think

happened Well turns out in the entire

nation of Canada there were zero

volunteers

for this job there's nobody in Canada

who takes the job nobody in

Canada wants to be so stupid that you

that you would embarrass yourself and

have your entire professional life

destroyed by by

teaching by teaching Jordan Peterson how

to be Jordan Peterson like how in the

world do you even do that but it gets

better it gets better I can to read to

you what Jordan Peterson wrote when he

had some clarifying questions about the

process all

right this is so deliciously fun I can't

even stand it all right hold on I can't

read I'm tearing

up all right so this is from Dr Jordan

Peterson uh let's see he said

uh uh so he has some questions for the

college about uh how the qualifications

of the quote social media expert would

be determined so he asked this quote by

what

standards I'm not going to be able to

get through this because he WR he writes

it like he's being serious and he is

being serious it's hard to take you

seriously he

goes uh by what standards do you

accredit your social media experts is

that a regulated profession

are these experts also versed in the

complexities of Clinical

Psychology how else can they improve the

professional activities of a

psychological practitioner is there any

concrete published and peer-reviewed

evidence that the tender lesson the

tender lesson they pervert to provide

actually produce an improvement in the

behavior of those they

educate by what objective criteria are

you going to measure my

Improvement in that regard are there

standardized tests

[Laughter]

for are there standardized tests of such

progression how are those standards

established if they

exist oh my

God nobody in the entire country of

Canada was willing to take the

bait I would like to

know I would like to now give you my

impression of every person in Canada who

who may have once thought they were

qualified for the job of educating Dr

Jordan Peterson I now give you my

impression

this is me doing an impression you can't

tell if you're listening on audio but

it's really hilarious it's getting

better it's funnier every minute it's

getting a little bit

funnier and

see oh my

goodness so I hope I sure hope that

Canada saves Us by educating Dr Jordan

Peterson because what if he just keeps

going out there doing what he's

doing just think of all the harm he's

causing to the to the

world if not your own

family oh God please educate

him

okay I if you if you could have written

a script of a movie about that

situation and you didn't know how the

movie would end and you couldn't come up

with a good

ending there could be no better ending

than having nobody in the entire country

of Canada willing to take the job

there's no you can't get better than

that I'm sorry there's nothing if he had

like won his appeals and had it overturn

ah boring if he'd taken a class and

somebody gave it to him H icky boring

but having nobody in the country capable

of giving him a

lesson you can't beat that you can't

beat that that's as good as it

gets so maybe our maybe our luck is

changing what do you

think but here's some more good news I

got a whole bunch of good news today you

you're going to have so much good news

today you're going to be tired of it

you'll be exhausted with the good news

here's some more saw a video of a young

woman who was deaf and she was trying

out some new glasses that allow um

captions to appear on the glasses just

for the wearer so that when she's out

and listening to things she can get

closed captions on personal

conversations as well as movies and

anything else and you know they're kind

of dorky looking so you'd know that they

were you know not normal glasses but uh

they look like they could be any design

you want eventually the first ones look

a little dorky but way better than not

being able to hear in public I saw us

and watching her tearfully put them on

and being able to see sound in in the

sense of a caption uh was just one of

the most touching things now just

imagine this is a real

product I don't know what company made

it I didn't see that in the video but

just think about

that what what would a golden age look

like well one way it would look like is

that the

deaf would be able to see Sal

I mean if you were going to say what's

the Golden Age look like I I'd put that

in there I would also love to see

wokeness destroyed on under its own

weight you know sort of like the Dr

Jordan Peterson

story where you just let it play

out instead of fixing it or opposing it

you just let it play out I've taught you

the trick of embracing the thing that

you don't

like often if there's somebody who has a

terrible idea in your company or your

organization or the government if you

simply follow the rules and embrace it

it'll it'll fall apart on its own and it

looks like that's what you know Peterson

did at you know after first challenging

it anyway uh the CEO of Rumble

Rumble says that Google is burying their

search results for D banino show and

uh that appears be the case now of

course they're uh they're

competing they're competing with uh

Rumble so you can imagine why they do it

but given that YouTube has such a

dominant

position um and uh given that Google has

such a dominant position you do think

that this might be a uh some kind of a

competitive problem I don't know if it

triggers any

antitrust triggers or not it triggers a

a trigger can you trigger a trigger a

little

redundant um but here is my

advice there is a comp competitor to

Google and if you don't like how Google

and YouTube that they own if you don't

like how they're treating uh Rumble you

could use an app called

perplexity now I told you that I tried

it the other day um for I don't know

weeks and weeks people have been saying

to me almost every day somebody says you

got to try your perplexity and I

honestly just got sick of hearing

it because I thought I don't really need

another app in my life right but I tried

it I thought you know I'll just see

what's going on

here and uh so I tried it and uh if you

use the perplexity app for five minutes

there's a good chance you will never use

Google again

because when I use Google I get a bunch

of sponsored ads and then I get a bunch

of things I don't trust and it just

doesn't look like it works anymore to me

but I do get a better result within

perplexity but perplexity has its own

little uh story going on right now um

and uh I didn't know it was back by Jeff

Bezos so Jeff Bezos Amazon founder is uh

one of the backers of perplexity and

suddenly I understand why the interface

is so

good uh I can't say enough about how

amazing uh Amazon is as a

product do you do you ever have the

feeling that you go on Amazon you buy

something and it happens so

seamlessly and the entire process

including delivery and even if you have

to return something they've made it dead

easy

that Amazon is like a one of the you

know the ninth wonder of the

world if you think of the complexity in

that product and the fact that it works

so well by one

click seriously one click and I've got

something in my door um so when I think

what's the best user interface design I

always think

Amazon so if if anybody's watching from

Amazon you guys are the best you the

best interface

people

completely for what 20 years or however

long Amazon's been around unbelievably

high level of capability unbelievable

just just

mindblowing quality of Technical and

user interface

design so when I see Jeff Bezos is

backing this perplexity app and when I

turn it on I love the interface

I go oh well that makes sense I don't I

don't I can't imagine Jeff Bezos backing

a search engine that had a bad interface

he is all about the customer experience

if you've ever heard Bezos give an

interview if you if you ask what's the

number one thing that makes uh you know

Amazon work he'll tell you it's the uh

obsessive focus on the customer

experience and and he's willing to and

he did you know lose money in a cash

sense for however many years because he

wasn't focusing on cash he was fing on

the customer experience and boy did he

succeed in the customer experience boy

did he succeed I mean nothing's perfect

but wow and so it seems that some of

that magic is going over to perplexity

if you use it once it'll be hard not to

use it forever honestly it's that good

however uh somebody asked me uh but is

it full of

wokeness

yes yeah it can't be not full of

wokeness because it searching based on

what's in the real world and the real

world is full of wokeness now I did a

test this morning in which I asked it I

did the you could call it the Gilman

Amnesia test so Gilman is the physicist

who famously noticed that when a story

was about something he knew he could

tell the story was fake or just wrong

and if it was something he didn't know

he couldn't tell the difference so he

thought it was probably right so I asked

both perplexity and Google a story about

myself in which I can guarantee I know

the correct story because literally it's

myself and they both got it wrong they

both had the wrong context the wrong uh

frame for it and it was important one of

the most important things about me yeah

I don't need to get into it today but

completely wrong it was the most fun FAL

thing that somebody would mention if

they talked about me

wrong wrong to the point of being close

to the opposite of right you know it

wasn't just sort of misleading it was

about as bad as it could have been and

it's both of them because they're both

reading public information and stuff

like that I I asked

a perplexity a question about me a

separate question about me before I did

this one and uh he used as his Source

Gawker

Gawker now if you know anything about

the media Outlet Gawker is

like let's

see um if it were possible for a piece

of to itself

so that the the turd itself could

defecate and create like a sub turd

that's what gaer is gaer is so far from

being any kind of a independent useful

Source it's like a turd of a turd you

it's it's like two levels away from

being useful and and they used it as the

only source to answer a question about

me literally my political enemies used

as a source so no so let me let me be as

clear as possible the search results

from any search engine are pretty close

to useless at this point in the world if

it has to do with people if has to do

with maybe a fact you know is is H

Starbucks is Starbucks open on Columbus

Day that I call indigenous day because

I'm not a racist like you well great

yeah it does that great but as soon as

it's a story about any human being it's

completely up yeah so there's no

such thing as searching accurately for

information about people you should just

give up on that that's never going to

happen and anyway the The Wall Street

Journal also says perplexity is getting

uh getting in some legal trouble with

the New York Times because it looks like

the times says that they're summarizing

the time stories without permission or

something like that I did ask perlex the

if it could see the contents of my books

because if Jeff Bezos is backing a

search engine the first question I have

is uh do you have access to the contents

of my books now I have mixed feelings

about it on one hand I kind of like it

you know because my books are non um

most of them are non-fiction so I would

love if somebody could just Google like

the main idea in my book and it would

pop up but you can't do

that that would be useful uh and even

though I maybe wouldn't like it as an

author it was certainly be useful but it

looks like books are kind of Walled off

so it says so it can answer questions

about what people said about my books in

the public domain but it can't actually

say in this chapter you said

that well here's a new medical

breakthrough that might be

gigantic um apparently if you mix OIC

with this other technology according to

Newsmax Health you can get rid of the

need for insulin if you're a diabetic if

you have type two diabetes you can

completely

get rid of um insulin now this is a very

small trial only 14 people but 12 of

them no longer needed um

insulin if you get 12 out of 14 who

don't need insulin when you're

done uh you could say I need a bigger

trial and you're right but holy

what 12 out of 14 don't need insulin now

here's something that you need to know

about new medical procedures can I

educate you some of you are young so

you've not had many medical procedures

but let me explain one thing you need to

know if there is a breakthrough medical

procedure it will require one of the

following things number one you will

lose all of your

hair it's depends on the medical

breakthrough you know it's not every

time you lose all of your hair but

that's a common one another one is this

will totally cure your problem but

you'll never have sex again or be

interested in it oh it'll totally cure

your other problem though the other

thing that they'll do is sometimes

they'll say this will totally fix your

problem but it will require shoving a

large object way up your ass that's the

other one so generally speaking it's

either going to make you too tired to

function you're going to lose your hair

you'll lose your dick or something

really L will be shoved way up your ass

however if you're willing to put up with

those four things they can cure just

about anything and so this new thing

that uh gets you out of your need for

insulin involves sticking uh something

way up your ass I think and then zapping

it electrically in your something in

your inner

guts so it's an endos it's an endoscope

now I think it could mean it goes down

your throat throat but given that it's

shooting the top of your intestines I

think it's going up your

butt however it's only

once it's only once I don't know if they

put you to sleep or you just enjoy the

experience but um but imagine if you

could go into the doctor's office maybe

they put you to sleep maybe they don't I

don't know they zap you for a few

minutes there's no recovery there's no

recovery you just walk out

and the ymic I assume is just so you

don't overeat um and then you're done is

this

possible is it possible that type 2

diabetes just got fixed with a five

minute

procedure is possible now I'm not going

to say that this is real you know 14

people is not nearly enough you don't

know the side effects you know you got

to do the big test

but maybe

but

maybe all right here's another

one the first peer reviewed uh protocol

on cancer using icon and another kind of

antiviral thing called

fendol and there's one like it that's

similar so uh Dr mackus says he's

already seeing incredible successes with

these repurposed drugs uh he's using in

his in his uh practice and he says icin

targets cancer cells by disrupting their

mitochondrial function just the way

you'd expect it

to I suppose um leading to cell death uh

of the cancer it also blocks Key Energy

Pathways blah blah blah so it's it's got

um several ways it can work I guess and

this Fen bendol and mebendazol they're

both anti-parasitic drugs oh I should

have said

antiparasitic so these are three

antiparasitic drugs ican and then these

other

two and they've been found to Halt

cancer cell growth interfere with

glucose metabolism trigger uh apoptosis

in somee preclinical trials and he says

remarkably three patients with stage

four genitourinary cancers were treated

with high doses of the fen benzol th000

Mig three times a week for several

months and experienced complete

remission complete

remission now this is well short of a

clinical

trial but

um today's today's uh theme is the

golden

age is it

possible that cancer just got

cured with existing drugs

they have low or no side

effects did is is type 2

diabetes cured is OIC curing

obesity is is RFK Jr going to fix our

food supply within a couple

years are we on the edge of curing

cancer did we just shoot a gigantic

rocket into the air and catch it

with two loving arms in a gigantic

mechanized device as we're preparing to

go to

Mars are these all things happening did

the did the poles just

turn and did we find that con Harris is

unlikely to win and instead the pirate

ship of amazing people might come into

power is it possible that a doom Loop of

overspending would would be cured by the

only person we trust to do it which is

Elon

Musk uh and he's all ramping up he's

already ramping up in case Trump wins

and he would be in charge of reducing or

increasing the efficiency of the

government by reducing the waste and

that would basically put us back on the

path to

fiscal

confidence I hate to get you all excited

but everything is going our

way here's some more Google just uh made

a deal to buy the first private mini

nuclear

reactor so there's a company uh called

uh California Kos power and apparently

they can they haven't made any yet I

don't think but they're going to make

them and by 2030 they'll have at least

one and by 2035 Maybe

more and so our biggest companies the

ones that you can trust to push our

government for approval if if you and I

decided to build a nuclear power plant

we would run up against the government's

bureaucracy and we wouldn't be able to

raise money and we wouldn't be able to

get anything done in the government so

basically it just couldn't happen but

what if you're Google if you're Google

you tell the government what to do if

you Google you don't need money because

you have it if you're Google you just

change the whole world change your

search results make everybody suddenly

like uh nuclear if you went to Google

and you checked their search results

about the downside of nuclear

energy do you think it says as many

negative things about nuclear energy

risks as it used

to I don't know

but I'd be real

surprised so keep in mind Google is who

tells people what to

think

literally Google results tell people

what to think we and we've seen it it

can change your election results Etc if

Google is building its own or buying its

own nuclear energy plant what will

Google who tells people what to think

tell them what to think about nuclear

power best thing ever not only best

thing ever but required for survival

you're going to need it for AI and if

you don't have ai your country is going

to be going to be defeated by the

countries that do so it's not only a

good idea it's

essential Golden

Age if Google is all

in the America's all

in there is no such thing as America

disagreeing with Google because Google

tells America what to think that's just

the way it works

now the media if it wanted to disagree

could put up a good fight so if the

media wanted to disagree with Google and

say no we we think this nuclear power is

a bad idea well they'd be going up

against Google do you think they want to

do

that

nope how about do they want to go up

against Microsoft who who is also

looking for its own nuclear energy plant

nope do they want to go up against

Oracle well Oracle is a little different

but they don't so our most important um

companies have just told the rest of

America nuclear energy is not just good

it's essential it's coming fast and we

can't get enough of

it do you remember in 2015 2016 really

all through the First Years of the Trump

Administration almost every day I came

on social media and said everybody who

thinks these nuclear energy things are a

bad idea you're thinking of the old

technology you don't know that the new

technologies are safe they figured out

how to store the waste and even reuse it

in some cases everything solved we need

nuclear you better go fast here it

is Golden

Age yeah it wouldn't be it wouldn't be

the Golden Age unless you saw all the

big American companies go down hard in

favor of nuclear energy it's how hard

they're going at it that's the thing

it's not that they oh we're mildly

interested in it no they're committed

they're all in the biggest companies the

most powerful guaranteed it's coming now

I'm going to give you another prediction

that goes like this you can you can

predict the outcome of any nation in the

world

based on their nuclear

program that's it if you look at the

United States we started late I wish

we'd started earlier but we're really

good fast

followers so I don't think it's going to

hurt us too much that we didn't do

something 10 years ago because that

would have been 10 years ago's

technology if we're starting to go hard

today with many nuclear plants and Gen 4

in some cases and the best technology

that we have and getting rid of some

maybe some regulations as appropriate

lots of experimenting with nuclear fuels

that are better Etc uh and the uh to its

credit the energy Department in America

let me let me say this unambiguously so

over two

administrations the department of energy

in the United States has been quite

pro-nuclear power and has done very as

far as I can tell really important work

in making it possible to test newer

nuclear um processes so if you think

it's just like another bureaucracy the

department of

energy they might be

Superstars that they seem to have

quietly done as far as I can tell a

whole bunch of correct things in the

last several years across two

administrations and that counts that

counts because it means it's

Administration um robust it's it's not

going to be destroyed by getting the

wrong president in it's still going to

look good no matter who's

in so good good job on Department of

energy at least pushing nuclear

stuff um but if you look at Great

Britain they're about ready to phase out

the last of their nuclear energy it

doesn't look like they're going to go

hard to get new ones and any country in

Europe that you see phasing out their

nuclear power I would say you're seeing

the end of them as a

important

country um I think Britain doesn't have

a chance of really surviving into the

modern era without nuclear power so if

that's the way they're going you're

seeing the end of an Empire if that's

what they want that's what they

want anyway um did you know that the

appeals court uh unless they've already

ruled I don't think they have uh they

were looking into the case of the uh

half a billion dollars or whatever it

was that Trump was supposed to pay

because he allegedly defrauded banks by

allegedly over uh overvaluing the price

of his or the value of his assets now

what did I tell you on day one of that

story on day one of that

story I said whoa whoa whoa the people

in the media are idiots and they don't

know anything about business and

everything you're seeing about this

story is based on idiots not knowing

anything about business because if

you're not an idiot and you know about

business you knew that there was nothing

wrong with that story in other words you

knew that there was no reason that there

should have been a legal process against

Trump did he overvalue his assets

doesn't

matter that's what I told you because I

was a banker if you're a banker and

literally I was a lending officer I was

approving loans for lenders I was

actually not the lending officer I was

in the back office that approved the

loans made by The Lending officer so I

was sort

of I don't want to say Superior to them

but I had to I had to make sure it was

okay so I had to know what a loan is and

how it works and whether they can repay

I I had to know as much or more than the

lenders to do to do my

job and here's what I

know the bank doesn't take your word for

anything that's what I knew in the

normal course of things your lender

tells you a bunch of lies and then you

say can you back that up and if they

can't you go okay well that was a lie

and when they can you rely on the

document not what they said there is no

scenario in which a bank ever ever

relies on what A lender say or what a

borrower says ever it's never happened

never should happen Never Can Happen

never will happen and yet they're

pretending that the Trump situation was

the one time thebly relied on relied on

the statements of the borrower no they

have a whole process in which they go

out and they check the value of things

on their own because they have to

because that's their job and so the

banks were happy with the loans because

they checked it down Trump has always

paid back his loans so he's good to do

business with they made money he made

money nobody even once concerned

themselves with the fact that there was

a big difference between what they Banks

thought was the value and what Trump

said was the value it had no impact in

the real world and the systems in the

real world the banking loaning systems

guaranteed that it wouldn't be a problem

guaranteed and of course Trump would

know that he wouldn't be trying to get

away with something because he would

know it the same as the banks everybody

in business knows that nobody relies on

your impression of your assets value

everybody knows that so now the appell

court is sitting there just excor

excoriating is that the word the uh the

attorneys who brought this case and won

they actually

won in the most absurd case they won

nobody was damaged nobody had a

complaint and the people who were

allegedly damaged would be happy to do

business with them again because they

just made money and had a good

experience and the so the Appel judges

who are not obviously Soros picked

people are just saying um has this ever

happened in the history of the world

that you brought a case where there were

no victims and everybody was happy and

everybody understood the process and

everybody understood the process gave

them no risk whatsoever in this

transaction and the lawyers are just

blah blah blah blah they don't have

nothing so I don't think it's been ruled

on yet

but I don't think there's any doubt how

it will be

ruled if you're judging from what the

what questions are being asked and the

comments of the appell at court Trump's

going to get his half billion back I

don't think he paid it but yeah he I

think that just goes away I would love

to see it go away before election

day because the number of democrat

idiots

idiots Who challenged me on social media

that this was a horrible crime and Trump

should be in jail for it or at least pay

half a billion dollars for

it do will any of them come back and say

oh you know it turns out that uh being a

lending officer might give you some

experience and knowledge about being a

lending officer yes it does turns out it

does um I've told you many times that

understanding economics and I put

banking under that category uh and

persuasion are the two most predictive

skills if you understand everything

about money and I've got a background in

economics and MBA and lots of business

experience and you understand

persuasion you can often predict the

future um better than

chance so that's how I predicted that

Trump would win in 2016 it's also how I

predicted that the appell at courts if

they were honest would throw this out

while laughing at it right so so watch

this pattern the pattern is that people

understand money and business and the

people understand persuasion are really

good at predicting if you see somebody

who knows both of those things that's

what I call a talent stack where you've

intelligently combined things that work

well together that person is going to

guess the future better than other

people it it's just those two skills are

future

future oriented skills that's how they

work anyway so that's more good news uh

New York Post is reporting that there's

a Brooklyn based company that manages

some apartments in the suburbs of Denver

and they say that the fake news is fake

news and that these Venezuelan gangs

have in fact taken over their their

Apartments um now taking over might be a

phrase with some

ambiguity to it but let's just say they

can't get rid of them and if they want

to beat up one of their employees

apparently they do and they don't

necessarily pay

rent and uh so for all practical

purposes quote gangs have taken control

of several of our properties in Aurora

Colorado can we put this to

rest yeah are we

done about the question of whether it's

true the company that owns the buildings

says they're taking over and not one

multiple buildings and this is just one

management company who's saying on the

record saying in public showing you a

picture of their employee who was beat

to by the gang for I think trying

to expel them or

something can we agree that the news was

always fake when it said that the new

that this was fake that the gangs have

in fact taken over the

buildings can can we now say true or or

is there some madeup brooklyn-based

company if there's really a Brooklyn

based company that owns buildings and

they say that the gangs are controlling

them not the people whose job it is to

control

them aren't we

done arguing whether it's

real I think we're done and then if you

know what is real then you can deal with

it pretending it wasn't real was the

problem it's not that you can't can't

know how to expel people from a building

for doing illegal things if you have

to here's a story you never

heard uh this is on the George account

on

X did you know that years ago when

Nelson Mandela got out of prison um he

wanted to arrange a trip to the United

States and for whatever reason the

government of the United States couldn't

arrange appropriate transportation I

don't know what's beyond that but uh so

Donald Trump uh offered his private

plane so Donald

Trump on his own dime sent his private

jet to carry Nelson Mandela to the

United

States and today K Harris will be

calling him a racist again because they

made up some

stuff I'll tell you he might be the most

most misunderstood human being in the

world if you look and and it's very

consistent you've heard a lot of

anecdotes about him paying off mortgages

and helping people in trouble and

stopping his car when somebody was being

mugged and you know flying Nelson

Mandela um somebody said that he

attended Michael Jackson's trial every

day because Michael Jackson was friends

with his family like it the the Trump

kids used to hang out with with Michael

Jackson to like play video games and

they were buddies they lived in the

same building in the Trump

Tower at least for a while

so it's just amazing what kind of you

know car or the the news will create of

somebody um i' like to Circle back to

social media I mentioned this without

details a few times that there is a

horrible sounding um rumor about Tim

wals that I didn't detail because I said

if it's not true I don't want to put it

out there um my best current

updated information is it's all made up

it looks like it's all made up there's

only one individual who's pushing it

it's not somebody who has credibility

it's not being picked up by any other

entity either Pro or anti- wals nobody's

touching it I'm going to call it fake so

if you see online a story and again I

don't even want to give the details

because I think it's terribly unfair to

wall he does give me a creepy Vibe and

that's a fact so I'll say that because

it's a fact about how he makes me feel

but it's not a fact about anything he's

done if you're talking about specific

you know inappropriate acts of some kind

you're really going to have to bring me

some proof all right I'm not going to

buy that based on a

Vibe so be careful be careful out that

Tim wals just be careful about what you

see on social

media all

right uh how many hoaxes are there about

uh Trump today let's see do we have how

many there's a there's a hoax that Trump

was going to use the military against

his enemies of course that's just some

weird thing taken out of context uh I

saw um did you see Jake Tapper talking

to James Carville last

night now here again I'm not going to

make a claim of fact because I wouldn't

I don't know the fact I'll make a claim

of how I'm responding to something I

watched it and Carville looked obviously

drunk and the things he said didn't make

a big of a sense it looked like

just a really drunk guy talking and

uh so I don't know if he was drunk I

just know that he sure acted drunk and

here's one of the things he said that

Trump isn't hiding it anymore that he's

a Nazi what what are you talking about

and he said it's because Trump's going

to do a rally in Madison Square Garden

and therefore obviously Nazi

what what Trump does rallies all the

time as do all politicians why would

Trump's one

rally be be a Hiller

rally well uh that's what Jake Tapper

asked Carville because it's not obvious

to him either Jake Tapper had the same

impression apparently um what uh what

exactly are you seeing about this

Madison Square Garden

rally and he says well in

1939 uh some Nazis had a had a rally in

that building now I don't even think

it's the same building I believe the

building is has been rebuilt like three

times since

then but I would like to point

out uh that building's been used

before does Carville drink so much that

he thinks only Nazis use that building

it's a sort of a public building I

believe that sports teams do things in

there maybe some of your favorite

comedians have them stand up there how

in the world

do you drink so much that you go on CNN

and say that having a rally in a public

building where everybody has ralles and

events is is proof it's not just like an

indication but it's like and then that's

proof that's proof he's a Nazi that is

some badshit crazy stuff right there and

then U then his other evidence was that

Trump said he wanted to use the military

against his enemies which you don't even

have to research that to know that

didn't happen

that's so dumb that if you spend five

minutes following politics you go didn't

happen that's some weird anti context

thing of course it is some weird out in

the context thing um so the there were

and there were two more that were just

like crazy ones they sound like

desperation uh I think it's pretty

obvious that the haris team knows that

they're they're in a doom Loop you know

they're they're circling the drain at

this point their campaign so they're I

mean they're just flailing like oh well

uh maybe uh the building he's in is a a

Nazi building can we go with that can we

can we go with the buildings a Nazi

building well how about you go after his

economic policies well that would be bad

because the the public likes his Trump's

Economic Policy well you could go after

his his policies about the Ukraine war

in the Middle East no because people

like him better on that well okay so not

the econ ICS and that war but how about

the Border yet oh no we can't go after

Trump and the Border because they like

him best uh what do we

got is he going to visit any real estate

in the next few weeks uh let's check

yeah he'll be in this building called a

Madison Square Garden perfect we'll say

it's a a Nazi

facility because that's all they

have imagine imagine sitting around and

thinking where where will we put our

limited resources

today because everything is limited

we'll put our limited resources into

this new hoax about using the military

and uh the hoax about this building

being where only Nazis

gather that is a lot of giving up right

there that you know if if you could come

up with different words for we surrender

it would look like that oh I get it

you're surrendering now so are you done

with the race no we're going to you know

we're going to take it to the election

day but it sounds like you're giving up

oh no we're fighting as hard as we can

about real estate being Nazi

indications no you're not no you're not

fighting anymore you have given

up the the eoma collapse is

today today is the middle of

February today is the day that we all

knew that the fake polls would start to

Che up we all knew that she couldn't

keep this going we all knew that if she

came out of her closet and spoke to real

people she would be destroyed and now

she's trying to make a case that Trump

is the one hiding so kamla is saying in

her in her speeches that Trump is not

doing any interviews and refused to do a

debate with her now

obviously doing other debate doesn't

help Trump I don't I mean maybe

something could go wrong but there's

nothing left to go right and here's the

thing Trump has been talking to

podcasters KL Harris says he's not doing

interviews with the major

media why would he do an interview with

the major media who is literally just

basically the KL Harris campaign she's

really saying can you do an interview

with the fake news who basically is an

extension of my camp pain if you don't

do an interview with the fake news that

will only use your quotes out of context

and edit you to make you look stupid the

same way they edited me to make me look

smart if you don't do the dumbest thing

you could ever do as a politician talk

to the main media who's going to malign

you and make you look like you're some

kind of a Nazi at Madison Square Garden

if you don't do that you must be weak

and

unconfident okay here's what's really

happening Trump has realized that if he

goes on Joe Rogan which he might do soon

or on any of these podcasts that have

huge male audiences that he is scooping

up male support like a vacuum

cleaner on ants every time he goes on a

podcast he's not being accused of being

a racist he's showing himself in his

very most relaxed basic um favorable

light and he can go from one to the

other get gigantic audiences that you'll

never get of young men on any of these

big platforms you'll never get you know

the bad treatment and it's a 100%

winning strategy especially if he closes

it out with Joe Rogan and it gets

better there is rumor not confirmed not

confirmed that both Trump and Harris at

different times will do Joe Rogan before

the election

are you having the same feeling about

that that I

am KLA Harris has only done interviews

with

friendlies now she's going to do one

with uh Brett Bear on Fox news but he

would be the

friendliest um on Fox News Now friendly

meaning that he's not an opinion person

and he does a great great job job of

avoiding opinion it it's got to be the

hardest job in the world imagine how

hard it would be to do what Brett Bear

does talk about the news on Fox

News and not you know just bias it

because all of your co-workers are

opinion people so he does a great job of

that I'm always impressed when I when I

see him work so that's the safest thing

she could

do but I

think Brett Bear is going to tear her

apart

and not because he's biased but because

she has some things to answer for that

she has not answered for and I don't

think she's that Brad bear is going to

let her just talk over him and run out

the clock I think he's going to make her

answer and she's going to look like an

idiot because we've seen her work enough

and I don't say that lightly she seems

like an idiot and that's a separate

question but imagine them on Joe Rogan

imagine Joe Rogan asking anything he

wants to Trump how do you think that'll

go pretty

well pretty well now imagine and by the

way I would expect that Joe Rogan would

ask both of them hard questions uh I

think Rogan would not want to do a

softball interview with Trump I think

he'd want to come with some fun because

it is entertainment but he's going to

come with some hard questions I I think

Rogan would make him explain January 6

in the way nobody's ever done it

I'm just guessing but I think he would

hold them to some some high

standards that's what I suspect because

he wouldn't be afraid of them that's

what you need so so Rogan would not be

afraid to ask the hard question and put

him in a spot and you know that's not

the same for everybody else um but he

would he would destroy KL Harris just by

asking questions all he'd have to do is

say people wonder about this give me an

answer no that's not the answer to the

question it should be

destroyed anyway um I also saw that

uh Harris was talking about Trump not

releasing his medical

records apparently she released her

medical records now uh Trump hasn't

since 20123 I

guess but uh Trump has asked that conell

Harris take a cognitive

test I would like to double down on that

by saying she should also take a drug

test a drug test so KLA Harris tells us

that her doctor gave her a

um yeah that uh that the doctor gave her

a clean bill of health did he I don't

remember seeing the drug test did

you did you see the cognitive test I

didn't so KL Harris has not tested the

two things that we have a question about

when I look at her in public I do not

say oh she looks like somebody who would

be at health risk in the future I don't

say that I I'm not even really super

interested in what her doctor says about

her body because it looks like her

body's fine she's young enough vital

enough she's been doing a full

campaign you there's nothing about the

campaign that suggests your body doesn't

work I'm I'm fine that she has a good

body and

Superior Superior in body to Trump

Trump's got a little extra weight

although it looks like he's losing

weight and Trump's far older so if she

wants to compete on who's got a better

body yeah yeah I'll give that to her

I'll give her the win on

body but it's not her body that runs the

country it's her

brain and if I don't know what drugs

she's ingesting while it looks like she

is

and I don't know her cognitive ability

when I can't explain why she's acting so

much dumber than she used to act I kind

of need to know those answers I'm very

curious about whether she's had a hit to

her cognitive ability because it looks

like it I don't know why but it sure

looks like it something's going on there

so uh she's pushing that and she was

pushing it I was watching the uh the

rally and she slipped from politician

mode

into uh wife

mode and I guess there's there's no you

know nicer way to say it politician mode

is most of what she says and most of

what she has said you know like I will

give you this policy yeah politician but

when she was talking about the health

differences she slipped into uh

wife like just

nagging just just the vibe and oh my god

did it turn me off like you know I I

hate to sound uh you know too

sexist but the truth is that both male

men and women have a mode that if they

use that mode it's a turnoff to somebody

right if Trump gets a little too braggy

women just go I'm out uh what are you

doing I I cannot listen to one more

second of you bragging about yourself

right that's the male version the female

version is if you get that

attitude oh he doesn't want to give us

his his health records I can't do an

impression of it but oh my god when

either of them get out of political mode

and get into

their that mode total turnoff total

turnoff all right um is it too too too

soon to say we know the 2024 election is

uh

rigged the amuse account points out that

uh Detroit reports that 40% of the

mailin ballots have already been

returned

really is so this is on a long list of

cities in Detroit and

Detroit the place that you'd expect to

be the worst managed biggest place that

there would be a problem

problem seems to have lapped the other

cities and how many ballots have been

returned early so the other cities are

in that you know 26 to 38% range but the

star is exactly the city you'd expect to

be the number one recipient of mailin

ballots if the cheat was

on it's already obvious

people now I don't have a factual basis

to say that cheating is going on and and

here it is but already we have one

statistic that would make me not trust

the election if the result were Harris

one already if you're asking me do I

accept the election of 2020 no I'm out

or or 2024 I'm out I'm already out I

don't trust the result

already so I've already seen enough

about this election that I don't trust

it now if Trump wins I'm going to

embrace it like crazy like I didn't see

any

problems and I'm not even going to

pretend to be you know

consistent because I'm going to assume

that he managed to beat the margin of

cheating I won't know that but it will

be my working

assumption so yes there's something

strange going in in Detroit and I'm

hoping that somebody's going to ask

somebody this question this week and the

question is kamla Harris and by the way

this would be a good question for Brett

Bear and it would be a good question

even better for Joe

Rogan KLA

Harris if the election result shows that

Trump wins and you see that there are

some historically out of balanc results

in other words there's some areas that

uh voted for him in numbers that

couldn't possibly be true based on

historical patterns would you accept and

certify the

result based on what you're

seeing well no NOP get back to the point

if you see obvious things that are out

of whack will you accept the election

well in 2020 well not talking about 2020

get back to the question will you accept

it if it looks an a whack to you well

it's not going to look an awack no

that's not the question if it looks an

awack

like Republicans say 2020 looked anac if

it just looks an awac are you going to

accept it well you and there's your

election there's your

election if she can't answer that

question and she

can't it's their biggest

claim that uh you won't leave office and

blah blah blah are here some more

warning signs oh by the way Christopher

rufo has found that one of Harris's

books she copied five passages which we

call plagiarism New York Times tried to

slap him down because the New York Times

wants her to win in my opinion um so

they tried to minimize it by saying oh

they just had were like five little

areas you know five little areas that

were copies ah nothing they admitted it

was

plagiarism uh but then they said that

noticing the plagiarism is racist yeah

so that's the New York Times that would

be the standard bearer of news is that

if you notice somebody plagiarized and

you prove it and you show the sections

so nobody can doubt your claims you my

friends are being a racist according to

the New York

Times all right great job Christopher

rufo well more on the ca collapse uh

Harry Anon as CNN said that there are a

lot of warning signs now going off he

says that uh if the GOP is ahead in

party

identification pretty much they're

guaranteed to win now party

identification means that you signed up

to be a Republican or you signed up to

be a

Democrat uh generally speaking Democrats

have more people signed up and when they

have more people signed up by a a goodly

amount they

win anytime it's close

Republicans

win but right now Republicans are

ahead

so Republicans this is according to

Harry Anon CNN Republicans right now are

doing even better than the average when

they

win

uh so think about

that so the the average number of people

who identify as

Republicans will give you a Republican

win if it hits the average it's above

that these signs are pointing to a

landslide they're they're pretty clearly

pointing to a landslide now what happens

if all these signs are pointing to

pointing toward Trump but in the last

hours of the election counting he loses

are you going to accept that election

I'm

not yeah let let me say as clearly as

possible if all of these signs are

pointing toward a win and at the last

minute there's a bunch of mailin votes

that counted I'm not accepting the

election let me let me say that as

clearly as I can and publicly this is a

public statement if all the indicators

or many of them indicate a strong win by

Trump and in the last minute the mailin

votes look suspicious I do not accept

that result

I want to make that clear yeah you're

going to have to you the results are

going to have to match the singles the

signals if on Election Day the signals

are all you they changed and they're all

glaring that you know based on

historical patterns um Harris is going

to win and then she does

win I'm not going to question you know

whether any specific votes were in line

or around a line even if something is

found but is smish I'm going to say you

know everything indicated she was going

to win let's let's just move on but it's

got to work both ways if everything's

indicating that Trump is going to win

and then the the Bell weathers go weird

and the last minute accounting goes

weird nope no that's a hard no on

accepting that

result all right rasmason is asking

people are you better off than you were

before uh before Biden was in office and

by a 16-point margin most voters say no

when you've got that kind of a result it

is nearly impossible for the incumbent

to

win here again another glaring sign that

Trump's going to

win so Trump has ADD on the three

biggest issues you know then abortion is

its own thing but the three biggest

issues he's well ahead which is the Wars

the economy in the

Border he's AE on are you better

off and party identification he's

ah and the polls say he he's add in

depending on which polls uh and they

haven't all caught up to the current

situation yet but he's adding like six

out of seven um swing States now let's

say things stay the same and we go into

the election and these are the things we

know and then he loses by 10 million

votes you going to accept

that I think it depends how those votes

come in and what it looks like like if

it looked like it was organic maybe

maybe

but all right

um uh Heraldo just said he's uh

endorsing U so raldo Rivera is going to

R endorse the Harris

and

uh that's because of January

6th and and uh the reason that Heraldo

says he cannot endorse Trump even though

they've been personal friends for a long

time is that uh Trump did not

acknowledge that he lost in

2020 can you believe that that that's

his reason he went public with it with a

with a long post on it it's because

Trump won't accept that he lost in

2020 and that's the one reason that's

the unacceptable

reason so I responded to

Heraldo and uh people like my response

so much I think I will read it to

you um oh and haraldo said that if you

accept Trump's statements that he won in

2020 that makes you part of what they

call the big lie so Democrats branded

January 6 and the claim that 2020 was

rigged as the big lie now the big lie is

sort of uh trying to make you think of

Nazism because the Nazis try to push the

big lie so that comes from Nazism so

Heraldo wants to know that uh Trump

would be uh a big old terrible person

for his lie and if you were to accept

his lie you're part of the nazil likee

people who would accept the big

lie okay so here's what I said in a long

post to Heraldo that people liked a lot

I said Heraldo no one knows who won in

2020 or any other prior elections our

system is designed

intentionally to not be fully

auditable we know the design is

intentional because that's how design

works if a design persists for decades

despite the ability to change it then

the design is intentional

did did JFK win fair and

square historians

disagree you can know for sure that no

court has ruled the 2020 election was

invalid but you also know courts are not

the tool for that job how would they

know if an election got hacked without

detection after years of the press

demonizing Trump as the next Hitler

every thinking person knows the

incentive to cheat him out of the

victory in 2020

was through the roof we also know State

actors can hack any system usually

without detection sometimes it requires

an Insider which is no hurdle for State

actors including our own we also know

that if someone found a non-electronic

way to cheat we would not necessarily

catch it and it appears the mail in

ballot situation is easily gained

whenever A system can be gained and the

incentives to do so are Skyhigh we

observe that such gaming happens in

every domain every

time for although I can't enter the

Dreamscape in which every thing

in our country is corrupt and broken

except our election

systems speaking as a hypnotist and a

longtime Observer of your usually wellth

down opinions this opinion does not seem

to be derived from

reason so that's my take it is not

derive from reason whatever is driving

this it's not because he thought it

through now most of us are not operating

from reason we just rationalize after

the fact but sometimes is a little more

obvious than

others all right here's some uh and I

told you that uh Harris has a new plan

for black men because she's losing with

black men not losing totally but she's

losing support from black men she wants

to give a million forgivable loans up to

$20,000 what would you call a plan to

give $20,000 loans to people who don't

have to pay it

back do you know how much theft there's

going to be in loans that you don't have

to pay

back do you know how fast I would apply

for a loan I didn't have to pay back uh

well you still have to say that it's a

loan for a business oh well yeah totally

I'm going to start a business what's the

what's your business um

I'm going to sell

uh uh I'll probably uh I'll I'll I'll

make I'll make jewelry in my house all

right that's the business uh when are

you going to do it uh well soon as I get

to

$20,000 all right can you pay it back

doesn't matter it's a loan I don't have

to pay back oh that's right we said you

don't have to pay it back all right so

you say you're going to do a

business and uh you want 20,000 all

right here's your

20,000 and then we check later how's

your business going oh

well well I just spent the money on

stuff I didn't really start a business

oh well you're not supposed to do that I

know but you know when you said I don't

have to pay it back that was really

telling me to just steal it no no we we

said we want you to start a business I

know but what I heard what I heard was

you're not going to be checking very

carefully and I can just say I started a

business and it didn't work out I just

spent your money and kept it all and you

know good

luck is basically just giving a whole

bunch of criminals $20,000 because they

asked for

it you don't have to live on this planet

for very long before you know

that this is nothing but an invitation

for a

fraud you don't have to be some kind of

an expert to see this

one uh I refer you to everything that

happened during the pandemic if you're

wondering if this will be

gamed yeah yeah it's going to be gamed

um then what else she's going to do

education and mentorship for black men I

told you that that seemed like a good

idea more mentorships good but why are

you limiting it to black

men because you're a

racist this is racist right if the

government says we're going to to do

something and you're not allowed to get

any

Whitey if anything the government says

involves not for you

Whitey then that's racist you should

just put that right in there it's not

for you

Whitey um then they got the protect

crypto Investments so black men know

their money is safe how stupid

do you think we all are because there's

some special magic that's happening to

black men are are you you so racist that

you think black men uniquely cannot

protect themselves from crypto race what

the do you think is wrong with

black men that they alone the only ones

can't figure out how to handle crypto

could you be more

condescending could you

be this is horrible this is this is the

only thing I've ever seen this racist

against

everybody it's racist against anybody

who's not included

but it's also racist against the people

included what do you think black people

somehow magically are the only ones who

can't get a like a wallet and that they

can't join coinbase they don't know how

to buy a don't how to buy some crypto

and protect it I mean it's pretty hard

to protect in crypto

but this is

ridiculous um then there's a national

health initiative to focus on illnesses

that disproportionately impact black men

I think that would make sense but only

in the context that that we should be

looking to fix everybody's problem so if

there's somebody whose problem that is

underserved yeah yeah let's do more of

it um but if there's anybody who also

has problems that are underserved why

are you only helping black

men why are only black men being uh

helped with their category of

underserved health problems yes we

should help them yes we should do

everything but but nobody else purely

racist

and then the one that's the craziest is

that they legalize recreational

marijuana to create opportunities for

black men to become drug dealers so

apparently there are some black men that

are not drug dealers but uh the Harris

campaign thinks that that needs to

change um they'll make it legal so it'll

be a legal drug but uh they'd really

like to push men into the drug dealing

business just you know legally

sounds this sounds like parody doesn't

it it it doesn't even sound like anybody

who' ever lived in this country came up

with these ideas it just sounds like a

joke it's

pathetic the word pathetic just

describes everything coming out of the

Harris campaign right now you know you

you could say that what Trump does is

you know scary or inappropriate or he

tweets are too mean all that stuff

that's true it's all true but you

wouldn't use the word pathetic would

you like if you look at Trump's lining

up you know he's got musk that will look

into the government waste he's got you

know RFK Junior's going look in her food

supply and maybe our our meds serious

serious important

stuff and then this

pathetic um you know how the Democrats

want to keep pushing these Departments

of disinform

and you can't kill them you can't get

rid of the disinformation because

they're making them as fast as you can

try to kill them uh I think Trump should

uh promote creating the department of

hoax

debunking not

disinformation the department of hoax

debunking and they use it to debunk all

of the

hoaxes now it would have to do both

sides because there are plenty of hoaxes

on both sides

but the Democrats do work on a creating

hoax model they're just doing it all the

time I think when it happens for

Republicans it's usually some Grassroots

troll that got a little too much

attention you like the like the Tim

Walls accusation that would be like a a

hoax but again it comes from an

individual and if he gets a lot of

attention it keeps going what am I

seeing here in the comments

uh response needed okay I don't know

what that's

about anyway um the department of hoax

debunking this would be a case

where you would uh embrace the

disinformation world and say I'd like to

double embrace it and when I'm president

we're going to go really hard at

disinformation and we're going to

include NBC in the list CBS ABC CNS

although CNN's moving toward the middle

in MSNBC and I would say that we're

going to declare that they reporting is

mostly

hoaxes and uh it's going to be

officially in the books as a hoax uh

entity now do you think that the

Democrats like their disinformation

organizations

now not as

much because their entire point is they

think it will only be used against their

enemies if if Trump braced the

disinformation networks and said these

are great but we need to make sure

they're operating correctly so make sure

they cover all of the hoaxes and that

they identify the the networks that are

the promoters of the hoaxes so you can

maybe guess the next one without help oh

it came from a hoax entity I get it I

don't have to pay attention to that one

yeah the minute that Trump

Embraces the hoax disinformation process

process they're going to have to

dismantle

it because they thought it only went one

way it

doesn't anyway so here are some of the

hoaxes I forgot to mention uh there's a

hoax that Nazis attended an Eric Trump

boat

rally uh there's a hoax that Trump

spaced down on stage for 30 minutes I

think somebody was it was somebody

injured in the audience so we had to

take a pause and he stayed on stage and

so they just I think they ended up not

continuing after a while so that was

just a hoax and all the news is

hoaxes um let's see what else is

happening

um do you know the story about the uh

I've talked about the the ghost trucks

I'll call them the trucks that allegedly

had were filled with fake B

from some specific postal uh service

place there was a whistleblower who said

you know he had fake ballots on his

truck but we can't find the trucks and

now um according to rasmuson account

quote uh imagine having to fight the US

Postal Service for years in federal

courts just for the names of who paid

the trucking

companies did you know that did do you

know that somebody's trying to figure

out who paid the trucking companies that

allegedly had the fake ballots on it and

it's taken two years in federal courts

unsuccessfully is there some reason we

can't know who paid the trucking

companies that a whistleblower said had

fake ballots in

it and you're going to trust the next

election now here's what I hope if we

know that this kind of process happened

once or at least there's a allegation

that happened once then can the

Republican

observers make sure that they're

observing so they could catch it should

it happen again now if it happened again

I imagine it wouldn't look the same if

it if there was any bad behavior before

they would know they needed to switch it

up but it would still have the same

element to it there would still be

trucks delivering things that were full

of things that shouldn't be

delivered so can you catch that

it depends where The Observers are and

some of them are you know are going to

be kept out of certain

places so we'll see we'll shall see well

Ukraine is uh souped up its drone

success rate that used to be down around

10% because the Russians were good at

jamming drones so they kept sending

these drones and they got jammed and

maybe one in 10 would hit a Target but

now Ukraine has added AI to their drone

so that they can fly without GPS which

means they can get to their location

they can do their own looking around and

the jamming doesn't the jamming is

applicable to the GPS so I think if you

take that out of the mix you can make it

somewhat autonomous and then the the hit

rate is up to

80% so now 80% of the drones are killing

people um that's pretty amazing and then

there's some uh there's some information

suggesting that the Ukraine the

Ukrainian

leadership is open to the trading some

land for a peace situation now of course

there are people who who debunk that

story and say no no no we're not even

considering trading land for peace but

that's the better negotiating position

you want to start from the position that

my God no I'm giving you nothing uh in

case you have to later give them

something

all right here's my update on Israel and

Palestine Palestine and the

Palestinians um I told you yesterday

that I tried to get involved in a

conversation online and I was just

trying to clarify that the two parties

were not on the same topic I wasn't even

taking a side just saying oh you're not

on the same topic and I got just totally

attacked for people assuming I'm one one

side or the other and so here's what

I've realized

I I've told you before that lying is a

bad thing and you'd all agree with that

right lying is a bad thing but there are

some specific domains in which lying is

not only acceptable it's preferred it's

preferred one of those domains is when

people ask you about your sex

life you have the right to lie about

your sex

life yeah if you're still in the closet

and that's your preference I'm not

saying it should be your preference I

I'm I'm not involved in your personal

life but if you want to tell somebody

you're not bisexual but you

are fine that that's a perfectly good

use of a lie I am 100% on your side if

somebody wants to get in your sex

business and you just want to make him

go away by lying yes absolutely lie all

you want about your sex life

there's another area in which lying is

not just okay it's advised it's advised

and that would be

self-defense so let's say the terrorists

capture you and they say do you have any

guns in the house you say no no no I I I

hate guns I'm anti-gun and then maybe

you got a chance to get close enough to

your hidden handgun that you can you

know shoot him so there are situations

in which is dangerous to tell the truth

in those cases yes lie lying is not just

okay it's

advised very advised right so in

self-defense you can lie as much as you

want now this brings us back to Israel

and the Palestinian situation what do

the Israelis believe they are

doing defending

themselves what do the Palestinians

believe they're doing

defending themselves now October 7th was

an offensive act but their take on what

they were doing you know their

interpretation not mine not mine I'm I'm

not involved their interpretation would

be it's part of a larger defensive you

know get your land back as they see it

now if you've got a situation where both

entities and this is kind of weird you

know normally there's an attacking

entity and a defensive entity take the

war in

Ukraine uh in that case um Russia more

clearly is the

aggressor and Ukraine most of us think

is the on the defense right so that

would be the normal situation for a war

there's one one attacking and one

defending but the weird thing about

Israel and the Palestinian situation is

that because of their complicated

past uh they both claim to be in a

defensive

mode now when you're in a defensive mode

as I just explained lying is not just

okay because you're defending yourself

there's there's no rules in

defense it's

advised it's not just okay it's

recommended if you're defending yourself

or right if you're defending yourself

it's recommended because you should use

every tool you should use lying you

should use bombs you should use whatever

whatever it takes there there's no rules

in

self-defense so when I as a tourist you

know blunder into this conversation

between two entities that are in a

defensive posture and then I try to

insert something that I think is maybe a

truth that both of them could agree on I

am wasting my

time because the only thing you know for

sure is that neither side should be

interested in the truth now what will

happen 5 minutes after I'm done I will

go to my DMs and several people who are

Jewish and friends of mine will say but

you know you know I hear what you're

saying Scott but you know Israelis they

do have the better argument and I'm

going to say I don't

care because if you're not in

it you should not trust anything that

either side says because they both have

a free

pass under under their assumptions of

what's true they have a free pass they

have a free pass to lie about everything

as long as they're in a defensive

posture so if Israel is lying about

everything and I'm not saying they are

that is not my claim I'm saying they

have a right to lie about everything so

do the

Palestinians under their interpretation

of what's

Happening Now what I'm not going to do

is give you my interpretation of what's

happening because it all looks stupid to

me because you can just pick some period

and pick some interpretation you could

come up with anything you want so it

doesn't matter what anybody else thinks

all that matters is who has the power to

get what they want at the

moment Israel has power to get what they

want and they're allies and we should

treat them like

allies and if they do things that we

would do and they do

it's hard to judge somebody for doing

something exactly like you what you

would

do so I don't so I'm not going to judge

either side I'll I'll leave that to

people who believe that in a contest

between two groups who consider

themselves to be on defense that you can

believe anything that's coming out of

the war zone if you believe anything

that's coming out of a war zone between

two people who are presenting themselves

as on the

defense don't do that don't do

that so now do I have a preference of

who wins yes I have a preference of who

wins because in my world um if you would

call me a non-believer let's call me a

non-believer I don't call myself an

atheist because that feels too certain

I'm simply not accepting popular belief

systems who is more likely to be on my

side in that situation

Jews yeah Jews are not tough on people

who have different opinions at least you

know the people in the United States and

people un likely to ever have any

interaction with so if if the Jewish

Powers gained power and got into a

better situation uh I say oh okay I

don't see any problem with that I I've

had tremendously good Financial business

dealings with many Jewish business

people pretty much all great I would

just keep doing that but what happens if

the Islamic World grows and starts to

encroach on my world well then I'm in a

lot of trouble so if you're asking me

who do I want to win Israel Israel who

do I want to uh

dominate well I want the Jews to be in a

superior position absolutely no question

about and it's because of

self-defense because my greatest ability

to remain free and

unbothered is to not promote a side that

would want to crush me if they had the

power to do so so I have no ambiguity

about what side I want to win I just

don't believe anything that either of

them say that's my current stand nor

should you nor should

you all right and that's all I got for

today and I'm going to talk to the

locals people privately I must have G

way over my longest one ever all right

you on YouTube and n and Rumble thanks

for joining locals I'm coming at you

sorry I'm so long

today

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e e