Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive October 9, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes › Episode #2660

Episode 2660 CWSA 11/15/24

Episode #2660 Nov 15, 2024 1:22:33 37,921 views

Democrat panic. DEI folds. More nominations ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.

Opening General Commentary

Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. A

View segment →
SimultaneousSip Energy & Mood Management

nd if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny human brains, all you need is a cup or mug or glass or tankard or chalice or a jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. Join me now for the unparalleled…

View segment →
NewsReaction Health & Biohacking

making the world a better place. It's all good. Well, here's some news about science. Turns out that eggs, according to a new study, might protect your brain health. So if you eat eggs, you're less likely to have cognitive dysfunction in your middle age and longer. Now I was quite interested in thi…

View segment →
NewsReaction Confirmation Bias

k that that's totally right and everybody else is totally wrong. It's true. It's true. I know it's a shocker. Shocker. But they found that, they say, people who favor Trump were more likely to believe fake news if it agreed with their team. Huh, raises an interesting question, doesn't it? Apparentl…

View segment →
MainContent AI & Technology

f you will. Now AI is good with languages, so it's good with human languages and it's good with every kind of computer programming language. So it's not a big surprise that when you show it DNA, it treats it like a language. Or it could. So in other words, in the same way it could arrange bits to ma…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

e wars. Quote, "The only way you make money in the UN is if you go to war. You get paid more." Who gets paid more if they go to war? What job gets paid more if you're at war? I mean, I could see if the actual military people are deployed they might get military pay or something, but do the managers…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

hen they would have had to do it if it was ordered. What choice did they have? Why would you fire somebody for following an order, you know, unless those generals knew it was an illegal order and the country wasn't treating it like it was illegal? So certainly there are some people at the top who ne…

View segment →
MainContent Cognitive Reframing

't get? For example, Joe Biden, I don't believe could get a job as a babysitter. You know what I mean? I don't think he could. How about Kamala Harris? Could she get a job as running your AA meetings? Probably not. Probably not. Could Kamala Harris get a job that required a drug test? I don't know.…

View segment →
MainContent The Golden Age

how about we just say thank you? How about we just say thank you? If there's any other Democrats who want to say something that's obviously true, I'm here for it. And I'm happy to say bygones are bygones. And if you were wrong before or you're playing for a team before but now you see things a littl…

View segment →
Closing Energy & Mood Management

it doesn't sound so bad because the words actually come out sounding like regular sentences and stuff. But if you look at the face, the face is just distorted with some kind of weird mental illness or lying or something. It just doesn't look right. And I'm not saying this is every Democrat has a wei…

View segment →

Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. And if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny human brains, all you need is a cup or mug or glass or tankard or chalice or a jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. Today with a little oxytocin to go. Now if that didn't make your loneliness go away, I don't know what will, because we're all here together today. We're live, we're figuring it out, we're making the world a better place. It's all good.

Well, here's some news about science. Turns out that eggs, according to a new study, might protect your brain health. So if you eat eggs, you're less likely to have cognitive dysfunction in your middle age and longer. Now I was quite interested in this study, and I was thinking about taking out a loan to get myself one of these eggs. If any of you have been lucky enough to be able to afford an egg, yeah, they're good. They're good for your brain. If you can afford one, go get one.

Meanwhile, in the biggest surprise in all of science, there's a study that says that alcohol might be bad for your brain and is linked to Alzheimer's risk. Huh, a gigantic surprise. Alcohol is not good for you.

Here's a fun one. SciTechDaily says there's a breakthrough in regeneration. They're adding synthetic peptides to your own blood, and it can mimic your own regenerative hematoma. So somehow they take your own blood and they give it a little boost with some peptides, and next thing you know you've got super blood. You will be enrolling in the X-Men School of Excellence with your super blood. Or possibly it'll just make you healthier.

There's a study that Quartz is talking about that shows that politics can trump truth. And it's funny they use the word Trump there. So here's what they did. They gave people various facts, some true, some fake, about politics, and they noticed that people were more likely to believe things that agreed with them politically. Huh, I wonder how they could have saved some money. Well, you could have just asked me. Yes, people do tend to agree with the people on their side and think that that's totally right and everybody else is totally wrong. It's true. It's true. I know it's a shocker. Shocker. But they found that, they say, people who favor Trump were more likely to believe fake news if it agreed with their team. Huh, raises an interesting question, doesn't it?

Apparently there is a group of scientists who know what news is real now. Wouldn't it be helpful, instead of wasting their time on this study, if they had simply said, "Hey, we're scientists. We know which news is real. Not only do we know which news is real, but we know it so certainly that we can have a test in which we put the news we know is real versus the news we know isn't real." So thank goodness there's some people who know which news is real. Okay, now I think they probably didn't use real news. They probably just made up some stuff. And I think almost anybody could tell made-up stuff. So I don't think there's any scientific validity to this whatsoever. But I still believe the conclusion, and you didn't really need to do a test to find out that people like to agree with their side. Oh, surprising.

I'm trying to figure out if the stories about InfoWars are true. Did I hear that Alex Jones debunked the report that the owner of The Onion bought InfoWars assets? So do we even know what happened there? I'm getting all kinds of weird conflicting stories. So the only thing I know is somebody in the comments felt it was necessary to remind me that I'm not a scientist. Should it also be necessary to mention that French press is a good way to make coffee, swimming is the best form of exercise, and that food, that universal food, it might be Soylent Green and something reminds you of The Matrix? So the NPCs are here to say all the obvious stuff.

So if anybody knows what happened to InfoWars, could you let me know? But I'm having trouble understanding why InfoWars needs assets. What assets do they need? I mean, a few cameras and a laptop. I mean, they don't really need the building, do they? You could do it from your bedroom. I don't know.

Well, here's something cool. According to a user on X called Vario, there's a new paper in Science, and they've used AI on DNA. Now DNA, you could think of it almost like a bunch of zeros and ones. It's almost like a code or a language, if you will. Now AI is good with languages, so it's good with human languages and it's good with every kind of computer programming language. So it's not a big surprise that when you show it DNA, it treats it like a language. Or it could. So in other words, in the same way it could arrange bits to make a computer program or it could arrange words to make sentences that you understand, apparently there's some indication that it can look at DNA and figure out how to arrange it and or modify it to get better results.

So apparently, here's how I understand it. It's possible that I don't understand this correctly because I'm trying to interpret it from material that's above my pay grade. But I think what it means is that it looks at DNA as if it were any other language, and then it can design its own sentences, which means it could rearrange DNA hypothetically. And then you could put it through some kind of CRISPR or some technology I don't understand to actually rearrange the DNA. And you could not only make new forms of medicines potentially, but you could also make new life forms. So we are right on the verge of being able to design and actually implement, actually implement using technology to actually arrange the DNA and create a new life form. So that's right around the corner. And you thought that flamethrower robot dogs were interesting. Ah, wait until we make a giant. Wouldn't it be cool to have giants? You know, like we just start creating military giants. Well, we got one who's 100 feet tall.

Well, Project Veritas has an undercover video of a UN worker, a manager, telling the person on the undercover video that the only way the UN can make some serious money is if there's a war. So they like wars, and they like Nikki Haley because they can make more money from the wars. Quote, "The only way you make money in the UN is if you go to war. You get paid more." Who gets paid more if they go to war? What job gets paid more if you're at war? I mean, I could see if the actual military people are deployed they might get military pay or something, but do the managers get paid more? How's that work? I don't know. I'm not sure I believe that.

And then this manager said 90% of the United Nations employees are squatting. "I could point to people every single day in the building who don't work." What is the UN? It's an amorphous body of nothingness. Now this is coming from a manager at the UN. Now I don't think that this one manager is necessarily expressing a universally accurate view, but certainly I would look at this whole UN situation to see if it's doing anything for us that we want done. I'm not entirely sure it's doing what we want done all the time. So it may, I'm sure it has benefits. I just don't know the pluses and minuses.

All right, this is funny. James Carville is actually going on the, he actually said in an interview, quote, "Our side won't tolerate lies." So James Carville, who's the smartest guy the Democrats have apparently, he believes, or at least he's willing to say in public, I don't know what he really believes, that because the corporate news on the left is more corporate and professional that they won't let the Democrats get away with lies. So the lies are mostly on the right because the media on the right lets them get away with lies. Joe Biden ran on the fine people hoax and didn't get fact-checked once by the entire media on the left. Not once. Not a single time. Not one time during the entire 2020 election. Not once did the left media fact-check him on the fine people hoax, the primary reason he ran for office. And Carville said no, we're all the honest ones.

So Carville thinks that Fox and Newsmax and One America, that they're just out there allowing all these lies. He goes, quote, "But our side won't tolerate lies." Okay, if a Democrat goes on TV and says some lie, The New Republic is going to say that's not right, or The New York Times is going to say that's not right. So how, and I'm serious when I say this, one side is constrained by the truth. Yeah, I sure feel sorry for those Democrats who are constrained by the truth. Does he believe any of this? What do you think? I think he couldn't possibly believe it. But on the other hand, he talks like he does because he's sort of a straight shooter. So you don't know when the straight shooter has decided that maybe a lie is what gets him what he needs. I don't know. It's hard to believe. If you believe this is true, you're kind of starting in a bad place.

All right, well, Nancy Pelosi, who's 84 years old, has filed for reelection. So we might get her into, she's like a thousand. Now, do you think the Democrats have learned anything if Nancy Pelosi gets reelected at age 84 or 85? Well, that's, she's going to run in 2026. Don't you think that that would be kind of evidence that they didn't learn a damn thing? Do you think the country is looking for maybe a little younger leadership on the left? On the right, Trump is getting up there in age, but he's surrounded by younger people who are pretty dynamic. So it looks different, and he doesn't act that old. He's got tons of energy still. But Nancy Pelosi, good luck, Democrats.

Meanwhile, California still has 1.7 million uncounted ballots. How long ago did we have that election, or alleged election? And California hasn't counted 1.7 million, and they're apparently taking pride in not being rushed. See, here's what I think was the problem where California went off the rails. They never should have decided to use the weed dispensaries as ballot counting centers. You should have just kept those separate the whole time. No, I made that up. They did not use weed dispensaries as ballot counting centers, because if they had, they'd be done by now.

Meanwhile, there are allegations of voting irregularities in Wisconsin. You've probably heard of them. Gateway Pundit is reporting more on it. But apparently there was reportedly a 4 a.m. dump of ballots that went 90% to one candidate. Which one do you think it was? Let's see. There was a late drop of ballots. 90% of them went to one candidate. Let's see how many of you could guess. Was it the Democrat or the Republican who do you think got the 90%? Just take a guess. See how close you can get. It's a 50/50, right? It's a toss-up. So did 90% of the votes go to the Democrat or the Republican? And anybody want to take a wild guess on this one? Oh yes, it was the Democrat. Yeah, quite surprisingly, 90% of the late-night dump went to the Democrat.

There is a widespread concern. They're trying to, let's see what else is, and now the Republican candidates are talking about it because it's, I guess it's, it seems to be according to them grossly obvious that there's cheating. Grossly obvious. What do you think? Maybe. I don't know. All I know for sure is there's a report. But there's suddenly 108,000 absentee ballots came in, and one person got 90% of the votes. Do you think you could ever have 90% of the 180,000? It's not really a thing, is it? Okay, if that's true. So you have to worry about any parts of the report being true. But if it's true that 90% of the votes were for one candidate out of 180,000 ballots, I would call that proof of rigging. Well, I don't even need to look into it really. If it came in at 4:00 a.m. and it was 90% for one person and it was 180,000 votes, you don't have to look into it too carefully. You can just throw the whole thing out. I mean, that's just obviously rigged. But the part you don't know is if the claim of 90% of the votes being one way is true, right? So if that's not true, then nothing was found. So I would look to get that validated with a couple of sources to make sure that you're not claiming a kraken when there is none.

Meanwhile over in Pennsylvania, the Republican who declared the winner by a number of sources, but there's still a recount. I think there's going to be a recount. And it looks like the Mark Elias and the Democrats might have a play here. So they might try to eliminate some votes or add some votes and see if they can get a changed election. So I didn't realize that Mark Elias was part of getting Al Franken elected in that election that was so close they had to do the recount. I think. And then Mark Elias managed to either include votes, new votes, or exclude some votes that had been counted until they changed the outcome. So that's a real thing that could happen.

So we've got two states that on the surface appear to be rigged. Do you think that's fair, on the surface? So I don't know if the claims are correct, but there are claims coming from credible people. So that doesn't mean they're right, but the people seem credible and the claims seem specific. Pretty specific claims. And I would think maybe there's a way to check on at least some of that. But the stuff that happens legally would be all transparent, and we just wouldn't like it if it goes the way you don't like.

Meanwhile, apparently some of the Democrat blue cities are trying to get rid of their migrant shelters before Trump is inaugurated because they think Trump will start deporting people. You know, if you were going to deport migrants, what would be more convenient than having them all in one migrant shelter? The easiest way to round them up is if they're in a sanctuary city in a big shelter. Yeah, are you telling me that entire hotel is filled with migrants? Yeah, we put them in the hotel. Okay, let's take everybody in the hotel and send them back. Now I don't think that works if they're asylum people, because the asylum people are here legally, at least temporarily legally. But I can see why they would be racing to get rid of their sanctuary cities now. Some of it is because I think there was a marked drop in people coming in. So I think that they're already trying to change their game because whoever comes in in the next few months is definitely going to get sent back. You know, anybody who comes in today has a pretty high chance of being sent back if they get caught.

So New York City had a migrant shelter on Randall's Island. It had up to 3,000 people in it. They're going to shut that down by February. And apparently the wave of new migrants arriving in New York has significantly slowed, and 170,000 are already in the shelter or have already moved on. So those were 170,000 migrants who were in shelters but have somehow moved on to something closer to a permanent situation.

But there is a conspiracy theory by the Democrats that Elon Musk stole the election somehow using Starlink. Now I don't know if there's any evidence that Starlink was used for any part of any of the election, but the Democrats need something. So according to Wired, there's a rumor going around on the Democrat side. I haven't seen it on social media, but they say it's going around that the election was stolen. Good luck with that.

The Daily Wire is reporting that Antony Blinken says that Biden's going to funnel as much money as possible to Ukraine before Trump takes over. Man, what does that sound like? I'd love to think that they're doing that for all the right reasons. But if they know that Trump's going to take over and just end the war, shouldn't they just end the war now? You know, wouldn't it be smarter for them to say, "Hey, Mr. Trump, you can end this anyway. Why don't we start? We'll get the end of the war going. We'll get them talking, set up a meeting, you know, get you all set up to end this war when you come in." No, instead they're going to send them as much money as possible. As much as possible. I'll tell you, everybody who voted for Trump is feeling happy about it at this moment. Yep, send our money to another country as fast as possible. Antony Blinken to achieve nothing, apparently.

Let's see. Then there's a report by Kristina Wong at Breitbart that the Pentagon is trying to get rid of its DEI records because Trump said he was going to fire the generals that were big on DEI. Now I've got a problem with that hypothesis or that strategy, I guess. I've never been in the military, but correct me if I'm wrong. Don't you think almost everybody who implemented DEI was just taking orders? Even the generals, were there generals who were just sort of doing their own thing and they decided that DEI was going to be what they were going to pursue? Or was it just a general military order to do more DEI, and then generals were maybe competing to see who could do more of it or do it better? But I don't quite understand firing people in the military for DEI when they would have had to do it if it was ordered. What choice did they have? Why would you fire somebody for following an order, you know, unless those generals knew it was an illegal order and the country wasn't treating it like it was illegal? So certainly there are some people at the top who need to be replaced. I feel confident in saying that. I don't know that you need to go all the way through all the generals. There got to be some generals who are just taking orders. So I don't know how you sort that out anyway.

But I love the fact that everybody's all worried that truth and the end of racism might be coming. All right, and they're struggling to hide in evidence. Well, I would too if I were them.

Rand Paul says he's going to reinstate Trump's Remain in Mexico policy. I guess he'll be the Senate committee chairman for whatever is the right committee for that, the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. So that's good.

Washington Times is reporting that meanwhile the editor-in-chief of Scientific American has resigned under pressure because she called all Trump voters fascists and bigots. She decided to take some time off and think about what comes next. Yeah, I looked at some of her posts. Just batshit crazy, racist, just crazy. And how did she become the editor-in-chief of Scientific American? Do you think that was DEI? Well, based on her social media posts, she doesn't seem very bright or very nice. She's definitely not nice. But to publicly put these opinions out there when you run a magazine, that's also stupid. So at the very least she's not very nice and she's stupid. So yeah, she needs to find maybe a job that doesn't have science in the name.

Here's a fun one if it's true. Zero Hedge is reporting that the FBI official who oversaw the January 6 pipe bomb probe, remember January 6 there was reports of pipe bombs and then we don't know who planted them. But luckily there's always cell phone information about where people are. So you could check the cell phone information and you could pretty well find out who was in that area at a certain time. And you could then match the time to the video because there's security video. And you would largely know for sure who planted them because you'd have the video, you'd have the phone information. There was only one person there at that time and there he is right on video. Pretty easy. And then we were told by the FBI official who's in charge of that that they received corrupted files from the phone company. And that amazingly, and they admitted it's just the weirdest thing, this never happens, but just the exact information that they needed about this one situation, the data was corrupt. Wow. So quite the gigantic coincidence because it really would be weird for that to be corrupt. And then we found out that the phone company say we didn't give anybody any corrupt information. And if we did, nobody mentioned it. And by the way, it doesn't look corrupt to us. The FBI lied about the pipe bombs. January 6 was probably exactly what you thought it was, a giant FBI op.

Now there is definitely not enough evidence to prove that's true. There's definitely enough evidence to prove it's the main theory. Would you agree with that? I can't say it's true. I can say it would be stupid to take it out from the top theory. It's the top theory, right? If nothing changes, it will still remain the top theory of what happened that day, right? Something big would have to change my mind at this point. If the pipe bombs were really covered up, yeah, we have to assume the worst about the FBI. And maybe the FBI will get fixed.

MSNBC had a guest on to call Pete Hegseth, everybody knows, a white supremacist. That according to the guest whose name was not on the screen, which is probably pretty smart because I wouldn't want anybody to know my name either if I said something like that. That just says casually that Pete Hegseth is a known white supremacist. And then Chris Hayes sits there and listens to it and does not say something such as, "Why would you say that?" or "What evidence do you have that he's a white supremacist?" Because obviously there is none. There's no evidence he's a white supremacist. Duh. But the guest on MSNBC was a racist, obviously. And Chris Hayes has some questions that need to be answered. Why would he platform a racist? I mean a real, obvious, overt, not hiding it kind of a racist. Why would they do that? And maybe that's why the total value of MSNBC is checking 75 cents. Yeah, can't sell it at all.

Well, Scott Jennings, who does a great job on CNN representing the Trump side of the world, some say he's up for discussion as the White House Press Secretary. And that's making some people at CNN wonder why they're keeping him on the air. Because if he's just sort of in the pocket for Trump, why should they have him on CNN? Can I explain this to the people at CNN who are confused why the person they hired to express the point of view of the Trump people might be under consideration to be a person who expresses the point of view of the Trump people? Which is exactly what he was hired on CNN to do, to express the point of view of the Trump people. And so it would be a problem if he's being considered for a job to represent the opinion of the Trump people. And that's CNN for you. Now I don't know which idiots on CNN thought that the person who is perfect for the job and was hired for that exact expressed purpose is now wrong for the job because it's been proven that he's right for the job by being considered for a job that's even better than that. That's the same job, expressing one side's point of view. Wow.

So anyway, the Washington Post was reporting that CNN's wondering about that. Jeremy Barr at the Washington Post. The newly elected LAPD chief says he's not going to help the feds with deportation. So Los Angeles has decided to leave the Union? On what basis does a local police department chief get to tell the United States government that they can't police the illegals? So I wonder how much weaponry they have in LA because they're going to go up against the entire military of the United States. How in the world is this going to work out? Don't you think he's going to have to fold? Right? I think it's the thing you say when you're first day on the job. But I don't think any of this sanctuary city stuff's going to hold. Tom Homan already said good luck. We're going to do what we're going to do. And he doesn't look like a guy who messes around. And he's going to have the backing of the president and the entire government. So good luck, Los Angeles.

I saw a video showing the El Salvador prisons. So as you know, President Bukele down in El Salvador is getting a lot of credit for lowering especially gang crime. But the way he did it was he just locked up basically everybody with a tattoo. I'm exaggerating, but that's pretty close because the gang members are heavily tattooed. So it looks like he just built enormous, three football stadiums, it was described, buildings that are just full of gang members. And they showed the conditions of the gang members. They have water, a little I don't know bucket or something that like 50 of them use for a bathroom. They're all in the same cell. But there are lots of these cells with a whole bunch of people in them. Every cell has a guard, an armed guard standing in front of the cell. Now there are multiple, multiple people in each little unit, but there's literally a guard 24 hours just standing there looking at them, armed guard, because they're the most dangerous people in the world. And they don't even have cushions on beds, so they're sleeping on hard ground, drinking water, probably not eating the best food. And I think they'll just be there forever.

So it's a weird situation because on one hand I'm completely in favor of it. On the other hand, I would add one thing. I think they should have a suicide option. Because if they're never getting out, I don't know who would want to live like that. So why don't you give them an option of killing themselves, you know, peacefully? Like you give them the suicide pills and you say, all right, we command your cell. We'll put you in this special cell. Just take these pills and then we'll take your body off to be cremated. Don't you think you would get rid of a lot of them? I mean assuming that they know they're going to be there forever and if they got out it wouldn't be that great either. Let them kill themselves. Because what I saw looked like torture. Again, I'm not saying they shouldn't torture them because it looks like they were pretty bad dudes. So maybe they deserve everything they get. Maybe it's better that they're tortured before they die. But it seems like you could save a lot of time and money and space if you gave them the option. I know that would seem like murder if you put them in a position where killing themselves was more pleasant than staying in jail. But Bukele made a joke on it and on X, so he's happy about it and certainly it's working. Anyway, do you think we're going to do something like that in the United States? No, we will not.

So Axios did a little study and said that none of the voters in their latest focus group, the Axios focus group that's the best one I guess, none of them think that Trump having a close relationship with Elon Musk is a good idea. Really? Really? You can't find anybody in a focus group who thinks that working with the smartest, most capable man on the planet could be good for you when he's working on the hardest problem in the world, which is reorganizing the government and the debt? And he's the person you would trust the most with that exact job. And you're worried about that? That's the thing they're worried about? Now I do understand they don't want him to be like a shadow president or something. But what do you think, you're going to get bad decisions? What happens if Elon Musk becomes a little bit too influential? What problem exactly does that cause? Because the whole time I'm just looking at it and I'm thinking, God, I hope he's influential. Like I hope Trump's taking him seriously. I hope he lets him do his thing. The only thing I want is for Elon to do his thing because I don't think there's any chance that he's in it for any reason other than to help the country. No, obviously it's good for business, but it should be good for everybody's business if they get the government out of their back pocket. So that's a weird opinion, but I guess it's widely held by some people in a focus group.

Speaking of, so Axios is also reporting that Trump's initial cabinet picks show that he's moving swiftly to implement anti-trans, anti-DEI, and anti-social justice agenda that underpinned his election. Does that sound like a fair way to say it? That he's moving to implement anti-trans, anti-DEI, and anti-social justice? Here's another way to word it. He is dismantling systemic racism in the government, and he won a mandate by a landslide to do that. Is that wrong? Right? Listen to my wording and then listen to Axios and tell me if my wording is more accurate. Right? There's again, is that he's anti-trans, anti-DEI, and anti-social justice. And I say that he's dismantling systemic racism. And by the way, he's not anti-trans. Nobody's anti-trans. This just not a thing. You might be anti-giving trans more rights than you think it makes sense for the other people in the public, but that's not exactly anti-trans. But he's anti-DEI, which is racist. So he's anti-racism. And he's anti-social justice because the way it's used is racist and sexist. So he's dismantling bigotry in the government. That's what he's doing.

Meanwhile, do you remember former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe back from the Russia collusion days? He says that Matt Gaetz, who's nominated to be the Attorney General, quote, "couldn't get hired by the FBI." Huh. So is that true? He couldn't get hired by the FBI but he could be the attorney general in charge of all that stuff? Well, probably true. I'm going to say true because there are enough allegations running around that maybe that'd be a problem. But I think this is a fun game and we should play some more of it. What kind of jobs our leaders couldn't get? For example, Joe Biden, I don't believe could get a job as a babysitter. You know what I mean? I don't think he could. How about Kamala Harris? Could she get a job as running your AA meetings? Probably not. Probably not. Could Kamala Harris get a job that required a drug test? I don't know. Good question. Could Kamala Harris get a job as the head of the FBI? Again, I'm pretty sure you'd have to pass a drug test. Vice president and president didn't have to pass any drug test, right? So I don't know. Just suspicions. I don't have any proof that she does any drugs.

All right, so that's a fun game. What you could not be hired to do. Hugh Hewitt is saying that maybe the Gaetz nomination is some kind of 4D chess. You ever heard that before? That Trump and Gaetz may be running a play and the real purpose of it is to get Gaetz out of his ethics probe. So he's under an ethics investigation in the House. They haven't completed it. But since he's resigned and he resigned under the cover of nomination for AG, that they would naturally drop the investigation. Although there's some thinking that the paper might be released but it wouldn't be binding on anything because he wouldn't be a member at that point.

So what do you think of that? Do you think that the whole thing was a clever plan to simply avoid him being covered by that proceeding? And do you think that, well I think it could be just one of the benefits. I think that genuinely Trump would feel more comfortable with his most loyal hellraiser in that position. So if it's not, if he doesn't want Matt Gaetz in that position, then my question would be who's better? Who are we going to see that would be a better choice? Now there definitely, you could get somebody who would be less controversial. So that's easy. And less controversy is worth something, right? That's not nothing. So you know indeed he could get somebody less controversial. But could he get somebody who he would trust more, who would more likely pull the weeds out by the roots than Gaetz? I don't think so. He might actually. He's very high on my list as first choice. So we'll see. It could be that he wants him as AG. It could be that it also solves the problem of the ethics thing. Could be. But let me say this as unambiguously as possible. I don't care what Matt Gaetz did as a single man. Some of the things he's being accused of, you know, it would be, you could say oh I wish he hadn't done that or he shouldn't brag about his success with the ladies. Yeah, okay. I don't care. You, I mean I could agree with you that maybe less of that would be better. But I don't care and you can't make me care about his sex life.

Now there's allegations that there was something illegal that I'm not even going to mention. But he's not being brought up on any legal charges. So if the government's legal mechanism can't find anything that they think is worth pursuing, then why am I going to listen to some report? If I've got a legal system that says nope, we'll take a pass on this, doesn't look like we could make him guilty, and yet there's some report that acts like he is guilty, I think I'm going to go with innocent till proven guilty. Like that's, I've said it a million times, that's got to be the standard. So if you can't prove it and you're not taking him to court, I don't want to hear it. Not even a little bit interested. If it's not illegal and something he did when he was single, I wouldn't even care if it was something he did when he was married because that's not my business. But yeah, I don't care. So you can't make me care. You cannot make me care what you did as a single man.

Well, Ezra Klein, who writes for the New York Times, which would make him one of the famous left-leaning people around, he was slamming the people who were saying that Fox News and the like are the reason that Trump won. And I like how he put it because he's not mincing any words. He goes, this idea that like, oh no, the economy is actually good or crime is actually down, that this is all just Fox News. He says like, shut the fuck up with that. Klein fumed. He was on one of those Pod Save podcasts. And he said if you just talked to people who lived in the cities you would know that people were really, really unhappy. And he said that if you'd spent any time basically talking to real people who lived in the cities you would have totally known that Trump was going to do better than the media was telling you because people were pissed. And he mentioned, he says the thing that surprised me least about the election was the sharp red shift in these big cities because if you talk to anybody who lives in them they are furious.

Now do you know why this is national news? This is just one person with an opinion and we all have opinions and there are like thousands of famous people with opinions. Why is this one, at least famous in politics, why is this one well-known person's opinion, why is it national news? Why is everybody talking about it? Do you know why? Because it's a Democrat telling the truth. That's, I'm not joking, that's actually the reason. There's a Democrat telling the truth. So it's national news, right? Because there's nothing about this opinion that's new, provocative, innovative. He's not reframing anything. He's saying what the majority of Americans already knew because they just voted in the new president. So all he's doing is agreeing with the majority of Americans who are looking at the same stuff he's looking at. And it's national news because he told the truth. Just hold that in your mind for a moment. Hold in your mind that it's national news that a Democrat told the truth. And like an obvious truth, like one that we all see is true. We don't have to do any research.

Well, I'm going to give him full credit. So you know it would be easy to go negative on this and say where were you before and why weren't you speaking out and why didn't you vote for Trump if you believe this and all that. But how about we just say thank you? How about we just say thank you? If there's any other Democrats who want to say something that's obviously true, I'm here for it. And I'm happy to say bygones are bygones. And if you were wrong before or you're playing for a team before but now you see things a little differently, I'm here for you. So unity, I think a little bit of at least being open to unity is absolutely worth doing. We're in the beginning of the golden age. So if I hear something I like from the team that was opposed to me up until now, I'm going to say good for you.

Now you heard the news that AOC removed her pronouns from her profile on X. I haven't heard why she did it but I assume it's for the obvious reason that she doesn't think that's the focus or where it should be. To which I say good for you. I can disagree with you on other stuff but how about I'll just say good for you. Find a little unity in that too. So it's not that unity is going to break out and we're all going to be singing Kumbaya. But just as a citizen of America that I want America to do well, I feel like anytime I see any movement toward just common sense and telling the truth that I'm going to give it a shout out. So good for Ezra Klein. I think that you did something useful for Democrats.

Meanwhile, even at least one judge has decided that with Trump coming into power and the likelihood that he will pardon the J6ers, at least one J6er's trial was postponed because there was no point in doing it. So I guess the judge said it's just a waste of time. He's going to get pardoned anyway. To which I say good work, judge. That is the correct answer. I like seeing the common sense also in the judiciary. So I don't know if this judge is leaning left or right or who appointed this judge, but it's true that no matter who appointed the judge this would be a waste of the public's money. There's no point in putting this person further into the system because they're going to be freed in a few weeks. So yes, this was the right decision.

Over in North Korea, Kim Jong-un apparently is going big on suicide drones. So they're going to do major manufacturing of suicide drones. To which I ask this following question: why isn't America making all kinds of suicide drones in America? I keep hearing that we can't catch up to China. China's manufacturing drones like crazy. What is it that makes us unable to make a drone? We obviously have the technology. We could obviously use robots to do most of the manufacturing. So it can't be that much more expensive to make it in the United States. And if North Korea can make swarms of drones, are you telling me that North Korea can spin up a drone factory and we can't? Because why? They get help from China or something? Maybe China's helping. Or is it Russia? Because we now know that thousands of North Korean troops have been sent to help Russia in the Ukraine war. So is it possible that Russia is the technical and maybe even investment help and they're building a less bombable drone factory? How about that? If you make a drone factory and you put it in Russia, do you think you could trust Ukraine not to bomb the drone factory? You cannot. No matter where you put it in Russia, Ukraine has already shown that they'll take out like a weapons depot. So of course they would take out your drone factory. But what if you put your drone factory in North Korea? Do you think Ukraine is going to take out a drone factory in North Korea? I don't think so. So it might be a pretty clever place for the bad guys to hide a drone factory. And I'm going to say that North Korea is not doing the hard lifting on their own. They must be getting some help either from Russia or China or both.

Wall Street Journal says that Trump has vowed to remake education in the US by getting rid of the woke stuff in the classroom. Yay. Funding private school tuition. We'll see how much of that happens. And abolishing the Department of Education. But he also has this idea of a government-accredited college that anybody could go to. Everybody gets in, I guess. And they can take what classes they want and get it accredited. Now I think most of that would be online and AI. So we'll see where that goes. But I don't think I'd want a college that you didn't have a physical experience with. If your college is totally online and you don't at least meet with your classmates or meet for study periods with people taking the same classes, that would be a pretty empty and cold experience for three or four years. So I think we need to work on the alternative education social part because I don't think it's good for kids to have no social contact. And I know the homeschoolers do a good job of it. The homeschoolers make sure they get together with other homeschoolers and stuff so they're already doing a good job of it. But if the government weighs in more heavily, I hope that they make sure that the physical connections with people are maintained somehow.

Well, RFK Jr. is picked as Health and Human Services secretary. So that's the group that's ahead of all the smaller federal health agencies. So that would give him power over everything health related. I can't even tell you how much I love this. I just absolutely love it. Are we getting, what is this? I'm seeing some anti-Semitism that needs to stop right now. Is there something going on in the comments over there? Yeah, well I just saw something go by that you need to stop that right away. None of that is okay. That is not okay.

All right, so I forgot that Rachel Levine was the Health and Human Services secretary before. So I don't have a comment on that. I'll just note that going from Rachel Levine to RFK Jr. is a pretty big change in priorities. Pretty big change. And I'm all in. I'm all in on this. Now I do think that if the way pharma works and even the way food works is radically changed, we are guaranteed to have two things happen. We're going to have some pretty deadly disruptions probably in our pharma business. In the long run I think will be way better. In the short run it might deny us some medicines that work better than they don't work. And in the long run though I think it's just giant potential improvement. Same with food. In the short run we might learn that some of the foods that we routinely eat are so dangerous they should be immediately taken off the market, which will cause other food prices to go up, which will cause us to have fewer choices. So my guess is that you can't do any major reforms for the pharma approvals or for the food approvals without major disruptions.

Now it's the fear of major disruption that makes anybody not change anything because you don't want the negative to be greater than the benefit you're trying to get. But when you reach a point where your food and your medicine is killing you and you don't trust either one, then the risk of a disruption becomes manageable. So here's the thing I want to tell you. If you think that RFK can do what he wants without major disruptions, pretty major to the way you live and maybe even people you know will have some health outcomes, that's all going to happen. You're going to get some problems, right? So just know for sure that you can't make a change this big without breaking a few eggs to make your omelette. Some eggs are going to get broken. But we have to get past this. We have institutions that are just broken and we've got to fix it. And the only way to do it is a bunch of people are going to leave and they're going to take with them some institutional knowledge. We'll have to build it back. We can build it back better, to borrow a phrase. But not until there's a lot of problems in between.

Now the fact that RFK Jr. is apparently fearless, he apparently has no fear of anything physical, social or political, or physical, social, he doesn't appear to have any fear. Or he operates as if he doesn't, which is even more awesome. But talk about the right guy for the right job at the right time. It's just the thing that's blowing my mind is the timing. You know, a number of people made the analogy that some of us call it a pirate ship, you know, Trump's collection of extraordinary people. Others are likening it to the founders and it's like a refounding, like we're being founded for a second time. But what are the odds that RFK Jr. would be available at the same time that Vivek and Elon Musk and Tulsi Gabbard are all available? And they're not really available, they're just willing to do it. You know, Elon Musk is the busiest person in the world but made himself available. I've never seen anything like that. I've never seen anything close to it.

Do you remember when you used to hear that Lincoln had the, what do you call it, the advisers that were on the other side? He had a team of adversaries. What was that called? There's a famous phrase for it. You'll see it in the comments. But Trump actually did that. Trump has the Republican administration team of rivals. Team of rivals, thank you. But he's got, I'll call them a team of rivals. Except that when it comes to this they're all on the same side. So he actually got the best version of a team of rivals you could ever get, which is a team of rivals who changed sides because the other side wasn't doing it. That's the best you can do. You know, you don't want a team of rivals that still thinks their side is right. That's just trouble. I mean I could see why there's some advantage to it as well because you get a hearty debate. But if you can get your team of rivals to be people who publicly repudiated the team they're leaving and said they just can't get this stuff done and this is going to kill us all and then they go to the team that might be able to get it done and save us all, you can't get better than that.

So I am so happy to be alive at this great coincidence that those particular characters are all up for the fight. And I'm not even naming all of them, right? I mean you could throw in Bill Ackman, you could throw in half a dozen other people, JD Vance. You know, there's a lot of people you could throw in who are all in on the fight. I know I am. I'm definitely all in.

But Elizabeth Warren is not so happy. She just said on MSNBC that Tulsi Gabbard, quote, "has clearly been in Putin's pocket." Really? Really? Tulsi Gabbard has clearly been in Putin's pocket? And what evidence do we have of that? None. But here's my advice. If you watch the Elizabeth Warren clip which is on X and probably going around today, turn off the sound and then just look at her crazy face. She can't hide the crazy. I mean her face, it looks like this distorted like demon face. If you hear the words it doesn't sound so bad because the words actually come out sounding like regular sentences and stuff. But if you look at the face, the face is just distorted with some kind of weird mental illness or lying or something. It just doesn't look right. And I'm not saying this is every Democrat has a weird liar face. But there's so many of them that do that it's weird. You don't see that on the Republicans at all. Like who has an Adam Schiff face? Who's a Republican? Or Elizabeth Warren distorted mentally ill face. Now you notice there are plenty of Democrats I don't say that about. I've seen Al Franken for example on TV. He doesn't seem to have a weird distorted face. He's just someone who might disagree with me politically. Doesn't appear to be crazy at all. Not even a little bit. I just disagree with him. But they have so many people that MSNBC platforms that you turn off the sound and you just go, oh, I wouldn't hire you to work at McDonald's or the FBI. So that's happening.

Anyway, today is Friday I'm told. So this is the day that the weekend starts. That is an hour of the finest entertainment you've ever had. But I want to see in the comments how many of you watch The Morning Show because it makes you feel less lonely. Like some of you are watching for the content I hope, but how many of you just feel like because it's sort of interactive and it's live it just feels like there's somebody in your house right now, me, and that there are a bunch of other people who are observers? Yeah, in the comments there are more people on Locals who are there to be less lonely. So let me make this pitch to those of you who are feeling lonely who are not on Locals. So Locals is a subscription service, seven bucks a month, but you could get a discount if you do a year in advance. And it's got the Dilbert comic and the Dilbert calendar comic and the robots read nudes comic which is naughty and then a bunch of political stuff and memes that you might find too much for you. So there's low censorship on Locals. So for some of you that won't work. You'll be seeing stuff you don't want to see. I'll be honest about that. But if you don't care about that or you find it fun, I find the memes, the more inappropriate they are the funnier they are to me. So on Locals we embrace the inappropriate as inappropriate. So we're not, I don't have to judge it. I just laugh at it. It's like oh that's so inappropriate but that doesn't mean you need to get canceled for saying it. If it's funny it's funny. If you didn't want to see things like that you would not be on Locals and so you wouldn't have to be exposed to it.

So I'm going to put out this offer to you. If you're not on Locals and you're having a problem with loneliness, I did not plan it this way but you know how products evolve on their own. Apparently the biggest benefit people get is that they're meeting the other people online. They have relationships. In the morning when I do the pre-show before I do the regular show I just do a handheld phone situation as I'm getting ready for the show, petting my dog and doing some fun stuff. Mostly they just don't even pay attention to me. It's just all the people checking in with their favorite people that they see every morning, same ones every morning. So there are about 500 people check in in the morning who all got to know each other. And I think they would all say that it makes them feel less lonely. It should. So loneliness is a gigantic problem. I can't solve it completely but if you want a digital friend and you want 500 extra digital friends or over 11,000 people on Locals subscription for just my community. So there's plenty of people there. They're not all there for the same reason. Some of them are there just to see the comments, see the memes. But a whole bunch of them are just there because they live alone and often they're a certain age and we make that okay.

So I do an evening program almost every night around dinner time California time. And that one is the one where the lonely are most served because it's more intimate and we don't worry about the news. We just hang out and I love it. So for me it's the same, has the same benefit. So I'm never lonely because I spend time with hundreds of people two hours every day and it helps.

All right, the Dilbert calendar is available too for 2025. You can only get it at the link at Dilbert.com. It's not on Amazon. It's not in the stores. It will only be at that link that you can find at Dilbert.com. And that's all I got for now. I'm going to talk to the Locals people privately and the rest of you I will see you tomorrow, same time, same place. Thanks on X and YouTube and Rumble. It's been great to see you. Bye for now. Have a great weekend.

those stocks are down a little bit but I'm hoping that won't last forever let's do a show to make this Golden Age magical get my comments working here there we go good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams and if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains all you need is a cuper muger glass of tanker Chels sign aen Jugger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee join me now for the unparalleled pleasure the dopamine hit of the day the thing that makes everything better today with a little oxytocin to go now if that didn't make your loneliness go away I don't know what will cuz we're all here together today we're live we're figuring it out we're making the world a better place it's it's all good well here's some news about um science turns out that eggs and according to a no study uh they're they might protect your brain health so if you eat eggs um you're less likely to have cognitive dysfunction in your middle age and longer now I was quite uh interested in this study and I was thinking about taking on a loan to get myself one of these eggs uh if any of you been lucky enough to be able to afford an egg yeah here they're good they're good for your brain if you can afford one go get one meanwhile in the biggest surprise and all of science there's a study that says that alcohol might be bad for your brain is linked to alzheimer's risk huh a gigantic surprise alcohol is not good for you here's another here's a fun one scitec daily says there's a breakthrough in uh regeneration let's say they're adding synthetic peptides to your own blood and it can mimic your own regenerative hematoma so somehow they take your own blood and they give it a little boost with some peptides and next thing you know you've got super blood you will be enrolling in the X-Men School of Excellence um with your super blood or possibly it'll just make you healthier there's a study at cost is talking about a study that shows that politics can Trump truth and it's funny they use the word Trump there so here's what they did they gave people various facts some true some fake about politics and they noticed that people were more likely to believe things that agreed with them politically huh I wonder how they could have saved some money well you could have just asked me yes people do tend to agree with the people on their side and think that that's totally right and everybody else is totally wrong it's true it's true I know it's a shocker shocker but they found that Trump they say that people who favor Trump were more likely more likely to believe fake news if it agreed with their team huh raises an interesting question doesn't it apparently there is a group of um scientists who know what news is real now wouldn't it be helpful instead of wasting their time on this study if they had simply said hey we're scientists that we know which news is real not only do we know which news is real but we know it's so C certainly that we can have a test in which we put the news we know is real versus the news we know isn't real so thank goodness there's some people who know which news is real okay now I think they probably didn't use real news they probably just made up some stuff and I think almost anybody could tell made up stuff so I don't think there's any scientific validity validity to this whatsoever but I still believe the conclusion and you didn't really need to do a test to find out that people like to agree with their side oh surprising I'm trying to figure out if the stories about Infowars are true did I hear that Alex Jones debunked the report that the owner of the onion bought Infowars assets so do we even know what happened there I I'm getting all kinds of weird conflicting stories so the only thing I know is uh somebody in the comments felt it was necessary to remind me that I'm not a scientist um should it also be necessary to mention that French Press is a good way to make coffee swimming is the best form of exercise and that food that Universal food it might be soil and green and something reminds you of The Matrix so the NPCs are here to say all the obvious stuff so if anybody knows what happened to Infowars could you let me know but I'm having trouble understanding why infow Wars needs assets what assets do they need I mean few cameras and a laptop I mean they don't really need the building do they you could do it from your bedroom I don't know well here's something cool according to a user on x called vorio vorio um there's a new paper in science and uh they've used AI on DNA now DNA you could think of it almost like a bunch of zeros and ones it's almost like a code or a language if you will now ai is good with languages so it's good with human languages and it's good with uh every kind of computer programming language so it's not a big surprise that when you show a DNA it treats it like a language or it could so in other words in in the same way it could arrange bits to make a computer program or it could arrange words to make sentences that you understand apparently there's some indication that it can look at DNA and figure out how to arrange it and or modify it to get better results so apparently so here's how I understand it it's POS it's possible that I don't understand this correctly because I'm trying to interpret it from Material that's above my pay grade but I think what it means is that it looks at DNA as if it were any other language and then it can design its own sentences which means it could rearrange DNA hypothetically and then you could put it through some kind of crisper or some technology I don't understand to actually rearrange the DNA and you could not only make new forms of medicines potentially but you could also make new life forms so we are uh right on the verge of being able to design and actually Implement actually Implement using using technology to actually arrange the DNA and create a new life form so that's right around the corner and you thought that flame thrower robot dogs were interesting ah wait until we make a giant wouldn't it be cool to have Giants you know like we just start creating military Giants Well we got one who's 100 feet tall well uh project Veritas has a uh undercover video of a un worker a manager uh telling telling the person on the undercover video that the only way the UN can make some serious money is if if there's a war so they like Wars and they like Nikki Haley because they can make more money from the wars quote the only way you make money in the UN is if you go to war you get paid more who gets paid more if they go to war what job gets paid more if you're at War I mean I could see if the the actual military people are deployed they might get military pay or something but do the managers get paid more how's that work I don't know I'm not sure I believe that um and then this manager said 90% of the United Nations employees are squatting I could point to people every single day in the building who don't work uh what is the UN it's an amorphous body of nothingness now this is coming from a manager at the UN now I don't think that this one manager is necessarily expressing a universally accurate view but certainly I would look at this whole un situation to see if it's doing anything for us that we want done I'm not entirely sure it's doing what we want done all the time so it may I'm sure it has benefits I just don't know the pluses and minuses all right this is funny James Carville uh is actually going on the da he he actually said in a in an interview quote our side won't tolerate lies so James Carville who's the smartest guy the Democrats have apparently um he believes or at least he's willing to say in public I don't know what he really believes that because the corporate news on the on the left is more you know corporate and professional that uh they won't let the Democrats get away with lies so the lies are mostly on the right because the media on the right lets them get away with lies Joe Biden ran on the fine people hoax and didn't get fact checked once by the entire media on the left not once not a single time not one time during an entire the 2020 election not once and all those not once did the left media fact check him on the fine people hoax the primary reason he ran for office and uh and Carville said no we got we're all the honest ones so Carville thinks that fox and Newsmax and one America that they're just out there allowing all these lies he goes quote but our side won't tolerate lies okay if a Democrat goes on TV and says some lie the new Republic's going to say that's not right or the New York Times is going to say that's not right so how and I'm serious when I say this one side is constrained by the truth yeah I sure feel sorry for those Democrats were constrained by the truth does he believe any of this what do you think I I think he couldn't possibly believe it but on the other hand he talks like he does because he's he's sort of a straight shooter so you don't know when the straight shooter is decided that you know maybe a lie is what gets him what he needs I don't know it's hard to believe if you believe this is true you're kind of starting in a bad place he says all right well uh Nancy Pelosi who's 84 years old has filed for reelection so we might get her into she's like a thousand um now do you think the Democrats have learned anything if Nancy Pelosi gets reelected at age 84 or 85 um well that's she's going to run in 2026 don't you think that that would be kind of evidence that they didn't learn a damn thing do you think the country is looking for maybe a little younger leadership on the left on the right Trump is getting up there in age but he's surrounded by younger people who are pretty Dynamic so it looks different and he doesn't act that old he's he's got tons of energy still but uh Nancy Pelosi good luck Democrats meanwhile California still has 1.7 million uncounted ballots how long ago did we have that election or alleged election and California hasn't counted 1.

7 million and they're apparently they're taking pride in not being rushed see here's what I think was the problem uh where California went off the rails is they never should have decided to use the weed dispensaries as ballot counting centers you should have just kept those separate the whole time no I made that up they did not use weed dispensaries as ballot counting centers because if they had they'd be done by now meanwhile there are allegations of voting irregularities in Wisconsin you've probably heard of them Gateway pundits reporting more on it but apparently there was a reportedly there was a 4 a.

dump of ballots that went 90% to one candidate which one do you think it was let's see there was a late drop of ballots 90% of them went to one candidate let's see how many of you could guess was it the Democrat or the Republican who who do you think got the 90% just take a guess see how close you can get it's a 50/50 right it's a toss up so did 90% of the votes go to the Democrat or the Republican and anybody want to take a wild guess on this one oh yes it was the Democrat yeah quite surprisingly 90% of the late night dump went to the Democrat um there is a widespread concern the they're trying to let's see what else is um and now the uh Republican candidates talking about it because it's I guess it's it seems to be according to them grossly obvious that there's cheating grossly obvious what do you think maybe I don't know all I know for sure is there's a report um but there's suddenly uh 108,000 absenc B came and one person got 90% of the votes do you think you could ever have 90% of the the 90% out of 180,000 it's not really a thing is it okay if that's true so you have to worry about any parts of the report being true but if it's true that 90% of the votes were for one candidate out of 180,000 ballots I I would I would call that proof of uh rigging well I don't even need to look into it really if it came in at 4:00 a.m.

and it was 90% for one person and it was 180,000 votes you don't have to look into it too carefully you can just throw the whole thing out I mean that's just obviously rigged but the part you don't know is if the claim of 90% of the votes being one way is true right so if that's not true then then nothing was found there was we so I would look to get that validated with a couple of sources to make sure that you're not claiming a cracken when there is none meanwhile over in uh Pennsylvania um the Republican who declared the winner by number of sources but there's still a recount I think there's going to be a recount and it looks like the mark Elias and the Democrats might have a play here so they might try to eliminate some votes or add some votes and see if they can get a changed election so I didn't realize that Mark Elias was part of getting uh Al Franken elected in that election that was so close they had to do the recount I think and then Mark Elias managed to either include votes new votes or exclude some votes that have been counted until they changed the outcome so that's a real thing that could happen um so we've got two states that on the surface appear to be rigged do you do you think that's fair on the surface so I don't know if the claims are correct but there are uh claims coming from credible people so that doesn't mean they're right but the people seem credible and the claims seem specific pretty specific claims and I would think maybe there's a way to check on at least some of that but the the stuff that happens legally would be all transparent and we just wouldn't like it if it goes the way you don't like meanwhile apparently some of the Democrat blue cities are uh trying to get rid of their migrant shelters before Trump's inaugurated because they think Trump will start deporting people you know if you were going to deport migrants what would be more convenient than having them all in one migrant shelter the easiest way to round them up is if they're in a sanctuary City in a big shelter yeah are you telling me that entire hotel is filled with migrants yeah we put them in the hotel okay uh let's take everybody in the hotel and send them back now I don't think that works if they're Asylum people because the Asylum people are here legally um at least temporarily legally but uh I can see why they would be racing to get rid of their San cities now some of it is because I think the uh there was a market drop in um people coming in so I I think that they're already trying to change their game because whoever comes in in the next few months is definitely going to get sent back you know anybody who comes in today has a pretty high chance of being set back if they get caught so New York City had a migrant shelter on Randall's Island it had up to 300 people in it they're going to shut that down by February and and there apparently the wave of new migrants arriving in New York has significantly slowed and 170,000 uh are already in the shelter oh have already moved on so those were 170,000 migrants were in shelters but have somehow moved on to something closer to a permanent situation but there is a conspiracy theory by the Democrats that Elon Musk stole the election somehow using starlink now I don't know if there's any evidence that starlink was used for any part of any of the election but the Democrats need something so according to wired there's a uh there's a rumor going around on the Democrat side I haven't seen it on social media but they say it's going around that the election was stolen good luck with that the daily wire is reporting that uh Anthony blinkin says that Biden's going to funnel as much money as possible to Ukraine before Trump takes over man what does that sound like I'd love to I'd love to think that they're doing that for all the right reasons but if they know that Trump's going to take over and just end the war shouldn't they just end the war now you know wouldn't it be smarter for them to say hey Mr.

Trump you can end this anyway why don't we start we'll get we'll get the end of the war going we'll get them talking set up a meeting you know get you all set up to end this war when you come in no instead they're going to send them as much money as possible as much as possible I'll tell you everybody who voted for Trump is feeling happy about it at this moment yep send our money to another country as fast as possible Tony blinkin to achieve uh nothing apparently let's see then there's a there's a report by Christina Wong and Breitbart that uh the Pentagon is trying to get rid of its Dei records because Trump said he was going to fire the generals that were big on Dei now I've got a problem with that hypothesis or that strategy I guess um I've never been in the military but correct me if I'm wrong don't you think almost everybody who implemented Dei was just taking orders even the generals were there generals who were just sort of doing their own thing and they decided that Dei was going to be what they were going to pursue or was it just a general military order to do more Dei and then generals were maybe competing to see who could do more of it or do it better but I don't quite understand fire ing people in the military for Dei when they would have had to do it if it was ordered what choice did they have why would you fire somebody for following an order you know unless those generals knew it was an illegal order and the country wasn't treating it like it was illegal so certainly there are some people at the top who need to be replaced I feel confident in saying that I don't know that you need to go all the way through all the generals there got to be some generals who are just taking orders so I don't know how you sort that out anyway um but I love the fact that everybody's all worried that uh truth and um the end of racism might be coming all right and they're struggling to hide in evidence well I would to if St them um ran Paul says he's going to reinstate Trump's remain in Mexico policy I guess he'll be the senate committee chairman for the whatever is the right committee for that the Senate Homeland Security and governmental Affairs committee so that's good uh Washington Times is reporting that meanwhile the uh editor-in-chief of the of Scientific American has resigned Under Pressure because she called all Trump voters fascists and bigots uh she she she decided to take some time off and think about what comes next yeah I looked at some of her uh posts just batshit crazy racist just crazy and uh how did she become the editorinchief of the Scientific American do you think that was Dei well based on her social media post she doesn't seem very bright or very nice she's she's definitely not nice but to publicly put these opinions out there when you run a magazine that's also stupid so at the very least she's not very nice and she's stupid so yeah she needs to find a find maybe a job that doesn't have science in the name um here's a fun one if it's true Zero Hedge is reporting that the FBI official who oversaw the January 6 pipe bomb probe remember January 6 there was reports of pipe bombs and then we don't know who planted them but luckily there's always cell phone information about where people are so you could check the cell phone information and you could pretty well find out who is in that area at a certain time and and you could then match the time to the video because there's security video and you would largely know for sure who planted them because you'd have the video you'd have the phone information there was only one person there at that time and there he is right on video pretty easy and then we were told by the FBI official who's in charge of that that they received corrupted files from the phone company and that amazingly and and they admitted it's just the weirdest thing this never happens but just the exact information that they needed about this one this one situation the data was corrupt wow so it quite the gigantic coincidence because it really it would be weird for that to be corrupt and then we found out that the phone company say we didn't give anybody any corrupt information and if we did nobody mentioned it and by the the way it doesn't look corrupt to us the the FBI lied about the pipe bombs January 6 was probably exactly what you thought it was a giant FBI op now there is definitely not enough evidence to prove that's true there's definitely enough evidence to prove it's the main Theory would you agree with that I can't say it's true I can say it would be stupid to take it out from the top Theory it's the top Theory right if nothing changes it will still remain the top theory of what happened that day right something something big would have to change my mind at this point if the pipe bombs were really covered up yeah we have to assume the worst about the FBI and maybe the FBI will get to get fixed uh MSNBC had a guest on to call Pete Heth uh everybody knows a white supremacist that according to the guest whose name was not on the screen which is probably pretty smart because I wouldn't want anybody to know my name either if I said something like that that just says casually that Pete Heth is a known white supremacist and then Chris Hayes sits there and listens to it and does not say something such such as why would you say that or what evidence do you have that he's a white supremacist because obviously there is none there's no evidence he's a white supr duh uh and uh but the guest on MSNBC was a racist obviously and uh Chris Hayes has some some questions that need to be answered to why would he platform a racist I mean a real obvious overt not hiding it kind of a racist why would they do that and maybe that's why the total value of MSNBC is checking 75 cents yeah can't sell it at all well Scott Jennings who does a great job on CNN uh representing the Trump side of the world some say he's up for discussion as the White House Press Secretary um and that's making some people of CNN wonder why they're keeping him on the air because if he's just sort of in the pocket for Trump why should they have him on CNN can uh I explain this to the people at CN who are confused why the person they hired to express the point of view of the Trump people might be under consideration to be a person who expresses the point of view of the Trump people which is exactly what he was hired on CNN to do to express the point of view of the Trump people and so it would be a problem if he's being considered for a job to represent the opinion of the Trump people and that's CNN for you now I don't know which idiots on CNN thought that the person who is perfect for the job and was hired for that exact Express purpose is now wrong for the job because it's been proven that he's right for the job by being considered for a job that's even better than that that's the same job expressing one size point of view wow so anyway the Washington Post was reporting that CNN's wondering about that Jeremy bar at the Washington Post um the the new elected LAPD Chief says he's not going to help the feds with deportation so Los Angeles has what decided to leave the Union uh on what basis does a local Police Department chief get to tell the United States government that they can't police the illegals so I wonder how much Weaponry they have in LA because they're going to go up against the the entire military of the United States how in the world is this going to work out don't you think he has he's going to have to fold right I think it's the thing you say when you your first day on the job but I don't think any of this Sanctuary City stuff's going to hold Tom homman already said good luck we're we're going to do what we're going to do and he doesn't look like a guy who messes around and he's going to have the backing of the president and the entire government so good luck Los Angeles um I saw saw a video showing the El Salvador prisons so as you know um president buelli down in El Salvador is getting a lot of credit for lowering uh especially gang crime but the way he did it was he just locked up basically everybody with a tattoo I'm exaggerating but that's pretty close because the gang members are heavily tattooed so it looks like he just built um enormous three football stadiums it was described buildings that are just full of gang members and they showed the conditions of the gang members they have water uh a little I don't know bucket or something that like 50 of them use for a bathroom they're all in the same cell but there are lots of these cells with a whole bunch of people in them every cell has a guard an armed guard standing in front of the cell now there are mult multiple multiple people in each little unit but there's literally a guard 24 hours just standing there looking at them armed guard because they're the most dangerous people in the world and uh they don't even have cushions on beds so they're sleeping on hard ground drinking water probably not eating the best food and I think they'll just be there forever so it's a weird situation because on one hand I'm completely in favor of it on the other hand I would add one thing I think they should have a suicide option because if they're never getting out I don't know who would want to live like that so why don't you give them an option of killing themselves you know peacefully like you give them the suicide pills and you say all right we command of your cell we'll put you in this special cell just take these pills and then we'll take your body off to be cremated don't you think you would get rid of a lot of them I mean assuming that they know they're going to be there forever and if they got out it wouldn't be that great either let them kill themselves because what I saw look like torture again I'm not saying they shouldn't torture him because it looks like they were pretty bad dudes so maybe they deserve everything they get maybe it's better that they're tortured before they they die but it seems like you could save a lot of time and money and space if you gave them the option I know that would seem it would seem like murder if you put them in a position where killing themselves was more pleasant than than staying in jail but um buelli made a joke on it and on X so he he's happy about it and certainly working anyway do you think we're going to do something like that in the United States no we will not um so a axios did a uh little study and said that uh none of the voters in their their latest focus group The engio SEO focus group that's the best one I guess none of them think that uh Trump being a having a close relationship with Elon Musk is a good idea really really you can't find anybody in a focus group who thinks that working with the smartest most capable man on the planet could be good for you when he's working on the hardest problem in the world which is the reorganizing the government and the debt and he's the person you would trust the most with that exact job and you're not you're worried about that that's the thing they're worried about now I do understand I do understand they don't want him to to you know be like a shadow president or something but what do you think you're going to get bad decisions what happens if Elon mus becomes a little bit too much too influential what what problem exactly does that cause cu the whole time I'm just looking at it and I'm thinking God I hope he's influential like I hope hope Trump's taking him seriously I hope he lets him you know do his thing the only thing I want is for Elon to do his thing because there's I don't think there's any chance that he's in it for any reason other than help the country um no obviously it's good for business but it should be good for everybody's business if they get the government out of their back pocket so that's a weird opinion but I guess it's widely held by some people in a focus group speaking of um so axios is also reporting that uh Trump's initial cabinet picks show that he's uh moving towards uh getting rid of the U an well he wants to be let's see how they say it he's moving swiftly to implement anti-trans anti- Dei and antisocial Justice agenda that underpinned his election does that sound like a fair way to say it that he's moving to implement anti-trans anti- Dei and antisocial Justice here's another way to word it he is dismantling systemic racism in the government and he won a mandate by a landslide to do that is that wrong right listen to my wording and then listen to axios and tell me if my wording is more accurate right there's again is that he's anti-trans anti- Dei and antisocial Justice and I say that he's dismantling systemic racism and by the way he's not anti-trans nobody's anti-trans this just not a thing you might be anti- giving trans more rights than you think it makes sense for the other people in the public but that's not exactly anti-trans um but he's anti- Dei which is racist so he's anti-ra R ISM and he's antisocial Justice because the way it's used is racist and sexist so he's dismantling bigotry in the government that's what he's doing meanwhile uh do you remember former FBI deputy director Andrew Mc.

Cabe back from the Russia collusion days he says that Matt Gates uh who's nominated to be the Attorney General quote couldn't get hired by the FBI huh so is that true he couldn't get hired by the FBI but he could be the attorney general in charge of all that stuff well probably true I'm going to say true because there are enough like allegations running around that maybe that'd be a problem but I think this is a fun game and we should play some more of it what kind of jobs our leaders couldn't get for example Joe Biden I don't believe could get a job as a babysitter you know what I mean I don't think he could how about K Harris could she get a job as running your uh AA meetings probably not probably not could com Harris get a job that required a drug test I don't know good question could she could k Harris get a job as the head of the FBI again I'm pretty sure you'd have to tra pass a drug test vice president and president didn't have to pass any drug test right so I don't know just just suspicions I don't have any proof that she does any drugs all right so that's a fun game what what you could not be hired to do um Hugh Hugh huitt is saying that maybe the gates nomination is some kind of 4D chess you ever heard that before that uh Trump and uh Gates may be running a play and the real purpose of it is to get Gates out of his ethics probe so he's under an Ethics investigation in the house they haven't completed it but since he's resigned and he resigned under the the cover of nomination for AJ that uh they would naturally drop the investigation although there's some thinking that the paper might be released but it wouldn't be it wouldn't be binding on anything because he wouldn't be a member at that point um so what do you think of that do you think that the whole thing was a clever plan to Simply avoid him being um covered by that proceeding and do you think that um well I think I think it could be just one of the benefits I think that genuinely um Trump would feel more comfortable with his you know most loyal uh Hellraiser in that position so if it's not if he doesn't want Matt gates in that position then my question would be who's better what who are we going to see that would be a better choice now there definitely you could get somebody who would be less controversial so that's easy and less controversy is worth something right that's not nothing so you know indeed he could get somebody less controversial but could he get somebody who would trust more who would more likely pull the weeds out by the roots than than uh Gates I don't think so he might actually he's very high on my list as first choice so we'll see it could be that he wants him as AG it could be that it also solves that the problem of the the ethics thing could be but let me say this as unambiguously as possible I don't care what Matt Gates did as a single man some of the things he's being accused of you know it would be you could say oh I wish he hadn't done that or he shouldn't brag about his you know his success with the ladies yeah okay I don't care you I mean I could agree with you that maybe less of that would be better but I don't care and you can't make me care about his sex life now there's allegations that there was something illegal that I'm not even going to mention but he's not being brought up on any legal charges so if the if the government's legal mechanism can't find anything that they think is worth pursuing then why am I going to listen to some report if I've got a legal system that says Nope we'll take a pass on this doesn't look like we could make him guilty and yet there's some report that acts like he is guilty I think I'm going to go with Innocent till proven guilty like that's I've said it a million times that's got to be the standard so if you can't prove it and you're not taking him to court I don't want to hear it not I'm not even a little bit interested if it's not illegal and something he did when he was single I wouldn't even care if it was something he did when is married because that's not my business but yeah I don't care so you can't make me care you cannot make me care what you did as a single man well Ezra clein who writes for the new yorktimes times which would make him one of the famous left-leaning people around um he was slamming the people who who were saying that Fox News and the like are the are the reason that Trump won um and I like how he put it because he's not he's not Min any words he goes this idea that like uh uh oh no the economy is actually good or crime is actually down that this is all just Fox News he says like shut the f up with that Klein fumed uh he was on he was on uh one of pod save one of those podcasts um and he said uh if you just talked to people who lived in the cities you would know that people were really really unhappy and he said that if you'd spent any time basically talking to real people who lived in the cities you would have totally known that Trump was going to do better than the media was telling you because people were pissed and um he said he mentioned he says the thing that surprised me least about the election was the sharp red shift in these big cities because if you talk to anybody who lives in them they are Furious now do you know why this is national news this is just one person with an opinion and we all have opinions and there are like thousands of famous people with opinions why is this one famous at least famous in politics why is this one well-known person his opinion why is it national news why is everybody talking about it do you know why because it's a Democrat telling the truth that that's I'm not joking that's actually the reason there's a Democrat telling the truth so it's national news right because there's nothing about this there's nothing about this opinion that's new provocative Innovative he's not reframing anything he's saying what the majority of Americans already knew because they just voted in the new president so all he's doing is agreeing with the majority of Americans were looking at the same stuff he's looking at and it's National news because he told the truth just hold that in your mind for a moment hold in your mind that it's national news that a Democrat told the truth and like an obvious truth like one that we all see is true we don't have to do any research well I'm going to give him full credit so you know it would be easy to go negative on this and say where were you before and why weren't you speaking out and why don't you why didn't you vote for Trump if you believe this and all that but how about how about we just say thank you how about we just say thank you if there's any other Democrats who want to say something that's obviously true I'm here for it and I'm happy to say bygones or bygones and if you were wrong before or you're playing for a team before but now you see things a little differently I'm here for you so Unity I think a little bit of at least at least being open to Unity is absolutely worth doing we're in you know it's the beginning of the golden age so if I hear something I like from the team that was opposed to me up until now I'm going to say good for you now you heard the news that AOC removed her pronouns from her profile on X I haven't heard why she did it but I assume it's for the obvious reason that she doesn't think that's the focus or where it should be to which I say good for you I can disagree with you on other stuff but how about I'll just say good for you find a little unity in that too so it's not that Unity is going to break out and we're all going to be singing Kumbaya but just as a citizen of America that I want America do to do well I feel like anytime I see any movement toward just common sense and telling the truth that I'm going to give it a shout out so good for as recline I think that you did something useful for Democrats meanwhile uh even at least one judge has decided that with Trump coming into power and the likelihood that he will uh he will pardon the J Sixers at least one J Sixers trial was postponed because there was no point in doing it so I guess the judge said just a waste of time he's going to get pardoned anyway to which I say good work judge that is the correct answer I like seeing the common sense also in the Judiciary so I don't know if this judge is leaning left or right or who appointed this judge but it's true that no matter who appointed the judge this would be a waste of the Public's money there's no point in putting this person further into the the system because they're going to be freed in a few weeks so yes this was the right right direction right decision over in North Korea Kim Jong-un apparently is going big on suicide drones so they're going to do major manufacturing of suicide drones to which I ask this following question why isn't America making all kinds of suicide drones in America I I keep hearing that we can't catch up to China China's manufacturing you know drones like crazy what is it that makes us unable to make a drone we obviously have the technology we could obviously use robotss to do most of the manufacturing so it can't be that much more expensive to make it in the United States and if North Korea can make swarms of drones are you telling me that North Korea can spin up a drone Factory and we can't because why they get help from China or something maybe China's helping um or is it Russia is the because we now know that um thousands of North Korean troops have been sent to help Russia in the Ukraine war so is it possible that Russia is the technical and maybe even investment help and they're building a less bombable drone Factory how about that if you if you make a drone Factory and you put it in Russia do you think you could trust Ukraine not to bomb the Drone Factory you canot no matter where you put it in Russia um Ukraine is already shown that they'll take out like a a weapons Depot so of course they would take out your drone Factory but what if you put your drone Factory in North Korea do you think Ukraine is going to take out a drone Factory in North Korea I don't think so so it might be a pretty clever place for the bad guys to hide a drone Factory and I'm going to say that North Korea is not doing the hard lifting on their own they must be getting some help either from Russia or China or both Wall Street Journal says that Trump is vowed to remake education in the US by getting rid of the woke stuff in the classroom yay funding private school tuition we'll see how much of that happens and abolishing the Department of Education uh but he also has this idea of accredited a a government accredited college that anybody could go to everybody gets in I guess and they can take what classes they want and get it accredited now I think most of that would be online and AI so we'll see where that goes but I don't think I'd want a college that you didn't have a physical experience with if your college is totally online and you don't at least meet with your classmates or meet for study periods with people taking the same classes uh that would be a pretty empty and cold experience for three or four years so I think we need to work on the alternative education social part because I don't think it's good for kids to have no social you know contact and I know the homeschoolers do a good job of it the homeschoolers you make sure they get together with other homeschoolers and stuff so they're already doing a good job of it but if the government weighs in more heavily um I hope that they make sure that the physical connections with people are maintained somehow well RFK Jr is picked as a Health and Human Services secretary so that's the the group that's ahead of all the smaller federal health agencies so that would give him power over everything health related I can't even tell you how much I love this I just absolutely love it are are we getting what is this I'm seeing some anti-Semitism that uh needs to stop right now is there something going on going on in the comments over there yeah well I just saw something go by that you need to stop that right away none of none of that is okay that is not okay all right uh um so I I forgot that Rachel La.

Vine was the uh Health and Human Services secretary before so I don't have a comment on that I'll just note that going from Rachel La.

Vine to RFK Jr is a pretty big change in priorities pretty big change and uh I'm all in I'm all in on this now I do think that if the way farmer works and even the way Food Works is uh is radically changed we are guaranteed to have two things happen we're going to have some pretty deadly disruptions probably in our Pharma uh business in the long run I think will be way better in the short run it might deny us some medicines that work better than they don't work and in the long run though I think it's just giant potential Improvement same with food in the short run we might learn that some of the foods that we routinely are so dangerous they should be immediately taken off the market which will cause other food prices to go up which will cause us to have fewer choices so my guess is that you can't do any major reforms for for the Pharma approvals or for the food approvals without major disruptions now it's the it's the fear of major disruption that makes anybody not change anything because you don't want the the negative to be greater than the benefit you're trying to get but when you reach a point where your food and your medicine is killing you and you don't trust either one then the risk of A disruption becomes manageable so here's the thing I want to tell you if you think that RFK can do what he wants without major disruptions pretty major to the way you live and maybe even people you know will have some health outcomes that's all going to happen you're you're going to get some problems right so Ju Just know for sure that you can't make a change this big without you know breaking a few eggs to make your omelette some eggs are going to get broken but we have to get past this we we have in institutions that are just broken and we we've got to fix it and the only way to do it is you know a bunch of people are going to leave and they're going to take with them some institutional knowledge we'll have to you know build it back we can build it back better to borrow a phrase but not until there's a lot of problems in between now the fact that RFK Jr is apparently Fearless he apparently has no fear of anything physical social or political uh or phys yeah physical social he doesn't appear to have any fear or he operates as if he doesn't which is even more awesome but talk about the right guy for the right job at the right time it's just the thing that's blowing my mind is the timing you know a number of people made the analogy that um I I some of us call it a pirate ship you know Trump's uh collection of Extraordinary People um others are liking it to the founders and it's like a refounding like we're being founded for a second time but what are the odds that RFK Jr would be available at the same time that vake and Elon Musk and tulsy gabard um are all available and they're not really available they're just willing to do it you know Elon Musk is the busiest person in the world but made himself available I've never seen anything like that I've never seen anything close to it do you remember when uh you used to hear that Lincoln had the uh what do you call it the advisers that were what was that phrase for the advisers that were on the other side he had a team of adversaries what was that called there's a famous phrase for it you'll see it in the comments um but Trump actually did that drump Trump has the Republican um the Republican Administration Team of Rivals Team of Rivals thank you um but he's got a I'll call them A Team of Rivals except that when it comes to this they're all on the same same side so he actually he he actually got the best version of a Team of Rivals you could ever get which is a Team of Rivals who change sides because the other side wasn't doing it that's the best you can do you know you don't want a Team of Rivals that still thinks their side is right that that's just trouble I mean I could see why there's some advantage to it as well because you get a hearty debate but if you can get your Team of Rivals to be people who publicly repudiated the team they're leaving and said they just can't get this stuff done and this is going to kill us all and then they go to the team that might be able to get it done and save us all you can't get better than that so I am so happy to be alive at at this great coincidence that those particular characters are all up for the fight and I'm and I'm not even naming all of them right I mean you could throw in Bill Amman you could throw in you know half a dozen other people JD Vance you know there's a lot of people you could throw in who are all in on the fight I know I am I'm definitely all in but Elizabeth Warren is not so happy she um she just said on msnb MSNBC uh that tulsy gabard quote has clearly been in Putin's pocket really really Tulsi gabard has clearly been in Putin's pocket and what evidence do we have of that none but here's my advice if you watch the Elizabeth Warren um clip which is on X and probably going around today turn off the sound and then just look at her crazy face she can't hide the crazy I mean her face it looks like this distorted like demon face if you hear the words it doesn't sound so bad because because the words actually come out sounding like regular sentences and stuff but if you look at the face the face is just torted with some kind of weird mental illness or lying or something it just doesn't look right and I'm not saying this is every Democrat has a weird liar face but there's so many of them that do that it's weird you don't see that on the Republicans at all like who has who has a Adam Schiff face shiff face who has an Adam Schiff face who's a Republican or or Elizabeth Warren distorted mentally ill face now you notice um there are plenty of Democrats I don't say that about um I've seen Al Franken for example on TV he doesn't seem to have a weird distorted face he's just someone who might disagree with me politically doesn't appear to be crazy at all not even a little bit I just disagree with them but they have so many people that msnb put snbc platforms that you turn off the sound and you just go oh I wouldn't hire you to work at Mc.

Donald's or the FBI so that's happening anyway today is Friday I'm told so this is the day that the weekend starts that is an hour of the finest entertainment you've ever had but uh I want to see in the comments how many of you watch The Morning Show because it makes you feel less lonely like some of you are watching for the content I hope but how many of you just feel like because it's sort of interactive and it's live it just it just feels like there's somebody in your house right now me and that there are a bunch of other people who are observers yeah in the comments there more people on locals who are there to be less uh lonely so let me make this PCT to those of you who are feeling lonely who are not on locals so locals is a subscription service seven bucks a month but you could get a discount if you do a year in advance and it's got the Dilbert comic and the Dilbert calendar comic and the robots read nudes comic which is Naughty and then a bunch of political stuff and memes that you might find too much for you so the there's low censorship on locals so for some of you that won't work you'll be seeing stuff you don't want to see I'll be honest about that but if you don't care about that or you find it fun I find I find the memes the more inappropriate they are the funnier they are to me so on locals we embrace the inappropriate as inappropriate so we're not I don't have to judge it I just laugh at it it's like oh that's so inappropriate but that doesn't mean you need to get canceled for saying it if it's funny it's funny if you didn't want to see like things like that you would not be on locals and so you wouldn't have to be exposed to it so I'm going to put out this uh this uh offer to you if you're not on locals and you're having a problem with loneliness I did not plan it this way but you know how products evolve on their own um apparently the biggest benefit people get is that they're meeting the other people online uh they have relationships in the morning when I do the pre-show before I do the Regular Show I just do a handheld phone situation as I'm getting ready for the show petting my dog and doing some fun stuff um mostly they just don't even pay attention to me it's just all the people checking in with their favorite people that they see every morning same ones every morning so they're about um 500 people check in in the morning who all got to know each other and um I think they would all say that it makes them feel less lonely should it should so loneliness is a gigantic problem I can't solve it completely but if you want an if you want a uh a digital friend and you want 500 extra digital friends or over 11,000 people on locals subscription for just just my community so there's plenty of people there they're not all there for the same reason some of them there are just want to see the comments see the see the memes but a whole bunch of them are just there because they live alone and often there a certain age and uh we make that okay so I do an evening program almost every night um around dinner time California time and that one is the one where the lonely are most served because it's more intimate and we don't worry about the news we just hang out and I love it so for me it's the same has the same benefit so I'm never lonely because I spend time with hundreds of people two hours every day and it helps all right the dilber calendar is available too for 2025 you can only get it at the link at dilbert.com it's not on Amazon it's not in the stores it will only be at that link that you can find at dilbert.com and and that's all I got for now I'm going to talk to the locals people uh privately and the rest of you I will see you tomorrow same time same place thanks on X and You.

Tube and Rumble it's been great to see you bye for now have a great weekend e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e

those stocks are down a little bit but

I'm hoping that won't last

forever let's do a

show to make this Golden Age

magical get my comments working

here there we go

[Music]

good morning everybody and welcome to

the highlight of human civilization it's

called coffee with Scott Adams and if

you'd like to take this experience up to

levels that nobody can even understand

with their tiny shiny human brains all

you need is a cuper muger glass of

tanker Chels sign aen Jugger flask a

vessel of any kind fill it with your

favorite liquid I like coffee join me

now for the unparalleled pleasure the

dopamine hit of the day the thing that

makes everything better today with a

little oxytocin to

go now if that didn't make your

loneliness go away I don't know what

will cuz we're all here together

today we're

live we're figuring it out we're making

the world a better place it's it's all

good well here's some news about um

science turns out that

eggs and according to a no

study uh they're they might protect your

brain health so if you eat

eggs um you're less likely to have

cognitive dysfunction in your middle age

and

longer now I was quite uh interested in

this study and I was thinking about

taking on a loan to get myself one of

these

eggs uh if any of you been lucky enough

to be able to afford an

egg yeah here they're good they're good

for your brain if you can afford one go

get

one meanwhile in the biggest surprise

and all of science there's a study that

says that alcohol might be bad for your

brain is linked to alzheimer's risk huh

a gigantic surprise alcohol is not good

for you

here's another here's a fun one scitec

daily says there's a

breakthrough in uh

regeneration let's say they're adding

synthetic peptides to your own blood and

it can mimic your own regenerative

hematoma so somehow they take your own

blood and they give it a little boost

with some

peptides and next thing you know you've

got super blood you will be enrolling in

the X-Men School of Excellence

um with your super blood or possibly

it'll just make you

healthier there's a study at cost is

talking about a study that shows that

politics can Trump truth and it's funny

they use the word Trump there so here's

what they

did they gave people various facts some

true some fake about politics and they

noticed that people were more likely to

believe things that agreed with them

politically

huh I wonder how they could have saved

some

money well you could have just asked me

yes people do tend to agree with the

people on their side and think that

that's totally right and everybody else

is totally wrong it's true it's true I

know it's a shocker shocker but they

found that

Trump they say that people who favor

Trump were more likely more likely to

believe

fake news if it agreed with their

team huh raises an interesting question

doesn't it

apparently there is a group of um

scientists who know what news is

real now wouldn't it be helpful instead

of wasting their time on this study if

they had simply said hey we're

scientists that we know which news is

real not only do we know which news is

real but we know it's so C certainly

that we can have a test in which we put

the news we know is real versus the news

we know isn't real so thank goodness

there's some people who know which news

is

real okay now I think they probably

didn't use real news they probably just

made up some stuff and I think almost

anybody could tell made up stuff so I

don't think there's any scientific

validity validity to this

whatsoever but I still believe the

conclusion and you didn't really need to

do a test to find out that people like

to agree with their

side oh

surprising I'm trying to figure out if

the stories about

Infowars are true did I hear that Alex

Jones

debunked the report that the owner of

the onion bought Infowars

assets so do we even know what happened

there I I'm getting all kinds of weird

conflicting stories so the only thing I

know

is

uh somebody in the comments felt it was

necessary to remind me that I'm not a

scientist um should it also be necessary

to mention that French Press is a good

way to make coffee swimming is the best

form of

exercise and that food that Universal

food it might be soil and green and

something reminds you of The Matrix so

the NPCs are here to say all the obvious

stuff so if anybody knows what happened

to Infowars could you let me know but

I'm having trouble understanding why

infow Wars needs

assets what assets do they need I mean

few cameras and a

laptop I mean they don't really need the

building do they you could do it from

your

bedroom I don't

know well here's something cool

according to a user on x called vorio

vorio um there's a new paper in

science and uh they've used AI on

DNA now DNA you could think of it almost

like a bunch of zeros and ones it's

almost like a code or a language if you

will now ai is good with languages so

it's good with human languages and it's

good with uh every kind of computer

programming language so it's not a big

surprise that when you show a DNA it

treats it like a language or it could so

in other words in in the same way it

could arrange bits to make a computer

program or it could arrange words to

make sentences that you understand

apparently there's some indication that

it can look at DNA and figure out how to

arrange it and or modify it to get

better results

so

apparently so here's how I understand it

it's POS it's possible that I don't

understand this correctly because I'm

trying to interpret it from Material

that's above my pay grade but I think

what it means is that it looks at DNA as

if it were any other language and then

it can design its own sentences which

means it could rearrange DNA

hypothetically and then you could put it

through some kind of crisper or some

technology I don't understand to

actually rearrange the DNA and you could

not only make new forms of

medicines potentially but you could also

make new life

forms so we are uh right on the

verge of being able to design and

actually

Implement actually Implement using using

technology to actually arrange the DNA

and create a new life form so that's

right around the corner and you thought

that flame thrower robot dogs were

interesting ah wait until we make a

giant wouldn't it be cool to have

Giants you know like we just start

creating military

Giants Well we got one who's 100 feet

tall well uh project Veritas has a uh

undercover video of a un worker a

manager uh telling telling the person on

the undercover video that the only way

the UN can make some serious money is if

if there's a war so they like Wars and

they like Nikki Haley because they can

make more money from the

wars quote the only way you make money

in the UN is if you go to war you get

paid more who gets paid more if they go

to

war what job gets paid more if you're at

War I mean I could see if the the actual

military people are deployed they might

get military pay or something but do the

managers get paid more how's that work I

don't

know I'm not sure I believe that um and

then this manager said 90% of the United

Nations employees are

squatting I could point to people every

single day in the building who don't

work uh what is the UN it's an amorphous

body of nothingness now this is coming

from a manager at the UN now I don't

think that this one manager is

necessarily expressing a universally

accurate view but certainly I would look

at this whole un situation to see if

it's doing anything for us that we want

done I'm not entirely sure it's doing

what we want done all the time so it may

I'm sure it has benefits I just don't

know the pluses and minuses all right

this is funny James Carville

uh is actually going on the da he he

actually said in a in an interview quote

our side won't tolerate

lies so James Carville who's the

smartest guy the Democrats have

apparently um he believes or at least

he's willing to say in public I don't

know what he really

believes that because the corporate news

on the on the left is more you know

corporate and

professional that uh they won't let the

Democrats get away with

lies so the lies are mostly on the right

because the media on the right lets them

get away with

lies Joe Biden ran on the fine people

hoax and didn't get fact checked once by

the entire media on the left not once

not a single time not one time during an

entire the 2020 election not once and

all those

not once did the left media fact check

him on the fine people hoax the primary

reason he ran for

office and uh and Carville said no we

got we're all the honest

ones so Carville thinks that fox and

Newsmax and one America that they're

just out there allowing all these lies

he goes quote but our side won't

tolerate lies okay if a Democrat goes on

TV and says some lie the new Republic's

going to say that's not right or the New

York Times is going to say that's not

right so how and I'm serious when I say

this one side is constrained by the

truth yeah I sure feel sorry for those

Democrats were constrained by the

truth does he believe any of this what

do you think I I think he couldn't

possibly believe it but on the other

hand he talks like he

does because he's he's sort of a

straight

shooter so you don't know when the

straight shooter is decided that you

know maybe a lie is what gets him what

he needs I don't know it's hard to

believe if you believe this is

true you're kind of starting in a bad

place he

says all right well uh Nancy Pelosi

who's 84 years old has filed for

reelection so we might get her into

she's like a

thousand um now do you think the

Democrats have learned

anything if Nancy Pelosi gets reelected

at age 84 or

85 um well that's she's going to run in

2026 don't you think that that would be

kind of evidence that they didn't learn

a damn

thing do you think the country is

looking

for maybe a little younger leadership on

the left

on the right Trump is getting up there

in age but he's surrounded by younger

people who are pretty Dynamic so it

looks different and he doesn't act that

old he's he's got tons of energy still

but uh Nancy Pelosi good luck

Democrats meanwhile California still has

1.7 million uncounted

ballots how long ago did we have that

election or alleged election and

California hasn't counted 1. 7 million

and they're apparently they're taking

pride in not being

rushed see here's what I think was the

problem uh where California went off the

rails is they never should have decided

to use the weed dispensaries as ballot

counting

centers you should have just kept those

separate the whole time no I made that

up they did not use weed dispensaries as

ballot counting centers because if they

had they'd be done by now

meanwhile there are allegations of

voting irregularities in Wisconsin

you've probably heard of them Gateway

pundits reporting more on it but

apparently there was a reportedly there

was a 4 a. dump of ballots that went 90%

to one candidate which one do you think

it was let's see there was a late drop

of ballots 90% of them went to one

candidate let's see how many of you

could guess was it the Democrat or the

Republican who who do you think got the

90% just take a guess see how close you

can get it's a 50/50 right it's a toss

up so did 90% of the votes go to the

Democrat or the

Republican and anybody want to take a

wild guess on this one oh yes it was the

Democrat yeah quite surprisingly 90% of

the late night dump went to the

Democrat um there is a widespread

concern

the they're trying to let's see what

else is um and now the uh Republican

candidates talking about it because it's

I guess it's it seems to be according to

them grossly obvious that there's

cheating grossly obvious what do you

think maybe I don't know all I know for

sure is there's a

report um but there's suddenly uh

108,000 absenc B came and one person got

90% of the votes do you think you could

ever have 90% of the the

90% out of

180,000 it's not really a thing is it

okay if that's

true so you have to worry about any

parts of the report being true but if

it's true that 90% of the votes were for

one candidate out of 180,000 ballots I I

would I would call that proof of uh

rigging

well I don't even need to look into it

really if it came in at 4:00 a.m. and it

was 90% for one person and it was

180,000 votes you don't have to look

into it too carefully you can just throw

the whole thing out I mean

that's just obviously

rigged but the part you don't know is if

the claim of 90% of the votes being one

way is

true right so if that's not true then

then nothing was found there was we so I

would look to get that validated with a

couple of sources to make sure that

you're not claiming a cracken when there

is none meanwhile over in uh

Pennsylvania um the Republican who

declared the winner by number of sources

but there's still a recount I think

there's going to be a recount and it

looks like the mark Elias and the

Democrats might have a play here so they

might try to eliminate some votes or add

some votes and see if they can get a

changed election so I didn't realize

that Mark Elias was part of getting uh

Al Franken elected in that election that

was so close they had to do the recount

I think and then Mark Elias managed to

either include votes new votes or

exclude some votes that have been

counted until they changed the outcome

so that's a real thing that could happen

um so we've got two states

that on the surface appear to be

rigged do you do you think that's fair

on the surface so I don't know if the

claims are

correct but there are uh claims coming

from credible people so that doesn't

mean they're right but the people seem

credible and the claims seem specific

pretty specific claims and I would think

maybe there's a way to check on at least

some of that but the the stuff that

happens legally would be all transparent

and we just wouldn't like it if it goes

the way you don't

like meanwhile apparently some of the

Democrat blue cities are uh trying to

get rid of their migrant shelters before

Trump's inaugurated because they think

Trump will start deporting people you

know if you were going to deport

migrants what would be more convenient

than having them all in one migrant

shelter the easiest way to round them up

is if they're in a sanctuary City in a

big

shelter yeah are you telling me that

entire hotel is filled with migrants

yeah we put them in the

hotel okay uh let's take everybody in

the hotel and send them back now I don't

think that works if they're Asylum

people because the Asylum people are

here legally um at least temporarily

legally but uh I can see why they would

be racing to get rid of their San cities

now some of it is because I think the uh

there was a market drop in um people

coming in so I I think that they're

already trying to change their game

because whoever comes in in the next few

months is definitely going to get sent

back you know anybody who comes in today

has a pretty high chance of being set

back if they get

caught so New York City had a migrant

shelter on Randall's Island it had up to

300 people in it they're going to shut

that down by

February and and there apparently the

wave of new migrants arriving in New

York has significantly slowed and

170,000 uh are already in the shelter oh

have already moved on so those were

170,000 migrants were in shelters but

have somehow moved on to something

closer to a permanent

situation but there is a conspiracy

theory by the Democrats that Elon Musk

stole the election somehow using

starlink now I don't know if there's any

evidence that starlink was used for any

part of any of the election but the

Democrats need something so according to

wired there's a uh there's a rumor going

around on the Democrat side I haven't

seen it on social media but they say

it's going around that the election was

stolen good luck with

that the daily wire is reporting that uh

Anthony

blinkin says that Biden's going to

funnel as much money as possible to

Ukraine before Trump takes over man what

does that sound

like I'd love to I'd love to think that

they're doing that for all the right

reasons but if they know that Trump's

going to take over and just end the war

shouldn't they just end the war now you

know wouldn't it be smarter for them to

say hey Mr Trump you can end this anyway

why don't we start we'll get we'll get

the end of the war going we'll get them

talking set up a meeting you know get

you all set up to end this war when you

come in no instead they're going to send

them as much money as

possible as much as possible I'll tell

you everybody who voted for Trump is

feeling happy about it at this

moment yep send our money to another

country as fast as possible Tony blinkin

to achieve uh nothing apparently

let's see then there's

a there's a report by Christina Wong and

Breitbart that uh the Pentagon is trying

to get rid of its Dei records because

Trump said he was going to fire the

generals that were big on Dei now I've

got a problem with

that

hypothesis or that strategy I guess um

I've never been in the

military but correct me if I'm wrong

don't you think almost everybody who

implemented Dei was just taking orders

even the

generals were there generals who were

just sort of doing their own thing and

they decided that Dei was going to be

what they were going to pursue or was it

just a general military order to do more

Dei and then generals were maybe

competing to see who could do more of it

or do it better but I don't quite

understand fire ing people in the

military for Dei when they would have

had to do it if it was ordered what

choice did they have why would you fire

somebody for following an

order you know unless those generals

knew it was an illegal order and the

country wasn't treating it like it was

illegal so certainly there are some

people at the top who need to be

replaced I feel confident in saying that

I don't know that you need to go

all the way through all the generals

there got to be some generals who are

just taking orders so I don't know how

you sort that

out

anyway um but I love the fact that

everybody's all worried that uh truth

and um the end of racism might be

coming all right and they're struggling

to hide in evidence well I would to if

St them um ran Paul says he's going to

reinstate Trump's remain in Mexico

policy I guess he'll be the senate

committee chairman for the whatever is

the right committee for that the Senate

Homeland Security and governmental

Affairs

committee so that's

good uh Washington Times is reporting

that meanwhile the uh editor-in-chief of

the of Scientific American has resigned

Under Pressure because she called all

Trump voters fascists and

bigots uh she she she decided to take

some time off and think about what comes

next yeah I looked at some of her uh

posts just batshit crazy

racist just crazy and uh how did she

become the editorinchief of the

Scientific

American do you think that was Dei

well based on her social media post she

doesn't seem very bright or very nice

she's she's definitely not nice but to

publicly put these opinions out there

when you run a magazine that's also

stupid so at the very least she's not

very nice and she's stupid so yeah she

needs to find a find maybe a job that

doesn't have science in the name

um here's a fun one if it's true Zero

Hedge is reporting that the FBI official

who oversaw the January 6 pipe bomb

probe remember January 6 there was

reports of pipe bombs and then we don't

know who planted them but luckily

there's always cell phone information

about where people are so you could

check the cell phone information and you

could pretty well find out who is in

that area at a certain time and and you

could then match the time to the video

because there's security video and you

would largely know for

sure who planted them because you'd have

the video you'd have the phone

information there was only one person

there at that time and there he is right

on

video pretty easy and then we were told

by the FBI official who's in charge of

that that they received corrupted files

from the phone company and that

amazingly and and they admitted it's

just the weirdest thing this never

happens but just the exact information

that they needed about this one this one

situation the data was corrupt wow so it

quite the gigantic coincidence because

it really it would be weird for that to

be

corrupt and then we found out that the

phone company say we didn't give anybody

any corrupt information and if we did

nobody mentioned it and by the the way

it doesn't look corrupt to

us the the FBI lied about the pipe

bombs January

6 was probably exactly what you thought

it was a giant FBI op now there is

definitely not enough evidence to prove

that's true there's definitely enough

evidence to prove it's the main

Theory would you agree with that I can't

say it's true I can say it would be

stupid to take it out from the top

Theory it's the top Theory right if

nothing changes it will still remain the

top theory of what happened that day

right something something big would have

to change my mind at this point if the

pipe bombs were really covered

up yeah we have to assume the worst

about the

FBI and maybe the FBI will get to get

fixed

uh MSNBC had a guest on to call Pete

Heth uh everybody knows a white

supremacist that according to the guest

whose name was not on the screen which

is probably pretty smart because I

wouldn't want anybody to know my name

either if I said something like that

that just says casually that Pete Heth

is a known white

supremacist and then Chris Hayes sits

there and listens to it and does not say

something such such as why would you say

that or what evidence do you have that

he's a white

supremacist because obviously there is

none there's no evidence he's a white

supr duh uh and uh but the guest on

MSNBC was a racist obviously and uh

Chris Hayes has some some questions that

need to be answered to why would he

platform a

racist I mean a real obvious overt not

hiding it kind of a racist why would

they do that and maybe that's why the

total value of MSNBC is checking 75

cents yeah can't sell it at

all well Scott Jennings who does a great

job on CNN uh representing the Trump

side of the world some say he's up for

discussion as the White House Press

Secretary um and that's making some

people of CNN wonder why they're keeping

him on the air because if he's just sort

of in the pocket for Trump why should

they have him on

CNN can uh I explain this to the people

at CN who are confused why the person

they hired to express the point of view

of the Trump people might be under

consideration to be a person who

expresses the point of view of the Trump

people which is exactly what he was

hired on CNN to do to express the point

of view of the Trump people and so it

would be a problem if he's being

considered for a job to represent the

opinion of the Trump people and that's

CNN for you now I don't know which

idiots on CNN thought that the person

who is perfect for the job and was hired

for that exact Express purpose is now

wrong for the job because it's been

proven that he's right for the job by

being considered for a job that's even

better than that that's the same

job expressing one size point of

view

wow so anyway the Washington Post was

reporting that CNN's wondering about

that Jeremy bar at the Washington

Post um the the new elected LAPD

Chief says he's not going to help the

feds with

deportation so Los Angeles has

what decided to leave the

Union uh on what basis does a local

Police Department chief get to tell the

United States government that they

can't police the

illegals so I wonder how much Weaponry

they have in LA because they're going to

go up against the the entire military of

the United

States how in the world is this going to

work out don't you think he has he's

going to have to fold

right I think it's the thing you say

when you your first day on the job but I

don't think any of this Sanctuary City

stuff's going to hold Tom homman already

said good luck we're we're going to do

what we're going to do and he doesn't

look like a guy who messes around and

he's going to have the backing of the

president and the entire

government

so good luck Los

Angeles um

I saw saw a video showing the El

Salvador prisons so as you know um

president buelli down in El Salvador is

getting a lot of credit for lowering uh

especially gang crime but the way he did

it was he just locked up basically

everybody with a tattoo I'm exaggerating

but that's pretty close because the gang

members are heavily tattooed so it looks

like he just built um

enormous three football stadiums it was

described buildings that are just full

of gang

members and they showed the conditions

of the gang

members they have

water uh a little I don't know bucket or

something that like 50 of them use for a

bathroom they're all in the same cell

but there are lots of these cells with a

whole bunch of people in them every cell

has a guard an armed guard standing in

front of the cell now there are mult

multiple multiple people in each little

unit but there's literally a guard 24

hours just standing there looking at

them armed guard because they're the

most dangerous people in the world

and uh they don't even have cushions on

beds so they're sleeping on hard ground

drinking water probably not eating the

best food and I think they'll just be

there

forever

so it's a weird situation

because on one hand I'm completely in

favor of it on the other hand I would

add one thing I think they should have a

suicide option because if they're never

getting out I don't know who would want

to live like that so why don't you give

them an option of killing

themselves you know peacefully like you

give them the suicide pills and you say

all right we command of your cell we'll

put you in this special cell just take

these pills

and then we'll take your body off to be

cremated don't you think you would get

rid of a lot of them I mean assuming

that they know they're going to be there

forever and if they got out it wouldn't

be that great

either let them kill themselves because

what I saw look like

torture again I'm not saying they

shouldn't torture him because it looks

like they were pretty bad dudes so maybe

they deserve everything they get maybe

it's better that they're tortured before

they they die but it seems like you

could save a lot of time and money and

space if you gave them the option I know

that would seem it would seem like

murder if you put them in a position

where killing themselves was more

pleasant than than staying in jail

but um buelli made a joke on it and on X

so he he's happy about it and certainly

working anyway do you think we're going

to do something like that in the United

States no we will not

um so a axios did a uh little study and

said that uh none of the voters in their

their latest focus group The engio SEO

focus group that's the best one I guess

none of them think that uh Trump being a

having a close relationship with Elon

Musk is a good

idea

really really you can't find anybody

in a focus group who thinks that working

with the smartest most capable man on

the planet could be good for you when

he's working on the hardest problem in

the world which is the reorganizing the

government and the debt and he's the

person you would trust the most with

that exact

job and you're not you're worried about

that that's the thing they're worried

about now I do understand I do

understand they don't want him to to you

know be like a shadow president or

something but what do you think you're

going to get bad

decisions what happens if Elon mus

becomes a little bit too much too

influential what what problem exactly

does that

cause cu the whole time I'm just looking

at it and I'm thinking God I hope he's

influential like I hope hope Trump's

taking him seriously I hope he lets him

you know do his

thing the only thing I want is for Elon

to do his thing because there's I don't

think there's any chance that he's in it

for any reason other than help the

country um no obviously it's good for

business but it should be good for

everybody's business if they get the

government out of their back

pocket so that's a weird opinion

but I guess it's widely held by some

people in a focus

group speaking of

um so axios is also reporting that uh

Trump's initial cabinet picks show that

he's uh moving towards uh getting rid of

the U an well he wants to be let's see

how they say it he's moving swiftly to

implement anti-trans anti- Dei and

antisocial Justice agenda that

underpinned his election does that sound

like a fair way to say it that he's

moving to implement anti-trans

anti- Dei and antisocial

Justice here's another way to word it he

is dismantling systemic racism in the

government and he won a mandate by a

landslide to do

that is that

wrong right listen to my wording and

then listen to axios and tell me if my

wording is more accurate right there's

again is that he's anti-trans anti- Dei

and antisocial

Justice and I say that he's dismantling

systemic

racism and by the way he's not

anti-trans nobody's

anti-trans this just not a thing you

might be anti- giving trans more rights

than you think it makes sense for the

other people in the public but that's

not exactly

anti-trans um but he's anti- Dei which

is racist so he's anti-ra R ISM and he's

antisocial Justice because the way it's

used is racist and sexist so he's

dismantling bigotry in the

government that's what he's doing

meanwhile uh do you remember former FBI

deputy director Andrew McCabe back from

the Russia collusion days he says that

Matt Gates uh who's nominated to be the

Attorney General quote couldn't get

hired by the FBI

huh so is that true he couldn't get

hired by the FBI but he could be the

attorney general in charge of all that

stuff

well probably true I'm going to say true

because there are enough like

allegations running around that maybe

that'd be a problem but I think this is

a fun game and we should play some more

of it what kind of jobs our leaders

couldn't get for example Joe Biden I

don't believe could get a job as a

babysitter you know what I

mean I don't think he

could how about K Harris could she get a

job as running your uh AA meetings

probably not probably

not could com Harris get a job that

required a drug

test I don't know good question

could

she could k Harris get a job as the head

of the

FBI again I'm pretty sure you'd have to

tra pass a drug test vice president and

president didn't have to pass any drug

test right so I don't know just just

suspicions I don't have any proof that

she does any

drugs all right so that's a fun game

what what you could not be hired to do

um Hugh Hugh huitt is saying that maybe

the gates nomination is some kind of 4D

chess you ever heard that

before that uh Trump and uh Gates may be

running a play and the real purpose of

it is to get Gates out of his ethics

probe so he's under an Ethics

investigation in the house they haven't

completed it but since he's resigned and

he resigned under the the cover of

nomination for AJ that uh they would

naturally drop the

investigation although there's some

thinking that the paper might be

released but it wouldn't be it wouldn't

be binding on anything because he

wouldn't be a member at that point um so

what do you think of that do you think

that the whole thing was a clever plan

to Simply avoid him being um covered by

that proceeding

and do you think

that

um well I think I think it could be just

one of the

benefits I think that genuinely um Trump

would feel more comfortable with his you

know most

loyal uh

Hellraiser in that position so if it's

not if he doesn't want Matt gates in

that position then my question would be

who's

better what who are we going to see that

would be a better choice now there

definitely you could get somebody who

would be less controversial so that's

easy and less controversy is worth

something right that's not nothing so

you know indeed he could get somebody

less controversial but could he get

somebody who would trust more who would

more likely pull the weeds out by the

roots

than than uh Gates I don't think so he

might actually he's very high on my list

as first

choice so we'll see it could be that he

wants him as AG it could be that it also

solves that the problem of the the

ethics thing could be but let me say

this as unambiguously as possible I

don't care what Matt Gates did as a

single

man some of the things he's being

accused

of you know it would be you could say oh

I wish he hadn't done that or he

shouldn't brag about his you know his

success with the ladies yeah okay I

don't

care you I mean I could agree with you

that maybe less of that would be better

but I don't care and you can't make me

care about his sex life now there's

allegations that there was something

illegal that I'm not even going to

mention but he's not being brought up on

any legal charges so if the if the

government's legal mechanism can't find

anything that they think is worth

pursuing then why am I going to listen

to some

report if I've got a legal system that

says Nope we'll take a pass on this

doesn't look like we could make him

guilty and yet there's some report that

acts like he is

guilty I think I'm going to go with

Innocent till proven guilty

like that's I've said it a million times

that's got to be the standard so if you

can't prove it and you're not taking him

to court I don't want to hear it not I'm

not even a little bit interested if it's

not illegal and something he did when he

was single I wouldn't even care if it

was something he did when is married

because that's not my business but yeah

I don't care so you can't make me care

you cannot make me care what you did as

a single

man well Ezra clein who writes for the

new yorktimes times which would make him

one of the famous left-leaning people

around um he was slamming the people who

who were saying that Fox News and the

like are the are the reason that Trump

won um and I like how he put it because

he's not he's not Min any words he goes

this idea that like uh uh oh no the

economy is actually good or crime is

actually down that this is all just Fox

News he says like shut the f up with

that Klein fumed

uh he was on he was on uh one of pod

save one of those podcasts um and he

said uh if you just talked to people who

lived in the cities you would know that

people were really really unhappy and he

said that if you'd spent any time

basically talking to real people who

lived in the cities you would have

totally known that Trump was going to do

better than the media was telling you

because people were pissed and

um he said he

mentioned he says the thing that

surprised me least about the election

was the sharp red shift in these big

cities because if you talk to anybody

who lives in them they are

Furious

now do you know why this is national

news this is just one person with an

opinion and we all have opinions and

there are like thousands of famous

people with opinions why is this one

famous at least famous in politics why

is this one well-known person his

opinion why is it national news why is

everybody talking about it do you know

why because it's a Democrat telling the

truth that that's I'm not joking that's

actually the reason there's a Democrat

telling the truth so it's national

news right because there's nothing about

this there's nothing about this opinion

that's new provocative Innovative he's

not reframing anything he's saying what

the majority of Americans already knew

because they just voted in the new

president so all he's doing is agreeing

with the majority of Americans were

looking at the same stuff he's looking

at and it's National news

because he told the

truth just hold that in your mind for a

moment hold in your mind that it's

national news

that a Democrat told the

truth and like an obvious truth like one

that we all see is true we don't have to

do any

research well I'm going to give him full

credit so you know it would be easy to

go negative on this and say where were

you before and why weren't you speaking

out and why don't you why didn't you

vote for Trump if you believe this and

all that but how about how about we just

say thank you how about we just say

thank

you if there's any other Democrats who

want to say something that's obviously

true I'm here for it and I'm happy to

say bygones or bygones and if you were

wrong before or you're playing for a

team before but now you see things a

little differently I'm here for you so

Unity I think a little bit of at least

at least being

open to Unity is absolutely worth doing

we're in you know it's the beginning of

the golden age so if I hear something I

like from the team that was opposed to

me up until now I'm going to say good

for you now you heard the news that AOC

removed her pronouns from her profile on

X I haven't heard why she did it but I

assume it's for the obvious reason that

she doesn't think that's the focus or

where it should be to which I say good

for you I can disagree with you on other

stuff but how about I'll just say good

for you find a little unity in that

too so it's not that Unity is going to

break out and we're all going to be

singing Kumbaya but just as a citizen of

America that I want America do to do

well I feel like anytime I see any

movement toward just common sense and

telling the truth that I'm going to give

it a shout out so good for as recline I

think that you did something useful for

Democrats

meanwhile uh even at least one judge has

decided that with Trump coming into

power and the likelihood that he will uh

he will pardon the J Sixers at least one

J Sixers trial was postponed because

there was no point in doing it so I

guess the judge said just a waste of

time he's going to get pardoned anyway

to which I say good work judge that is

the correct answer I like seeing the

common sense also

in the Judiciary so I don't know if this

judge is leaning left or right or who

appointed this judge but it's true that

no matter who appointed the judge this

would be a waste of the Public's money

there's no point in putting this person

further into the the system because

they're going to be freed in a few weeks

so yes this was the right right

direction right

decision over in North Korea Kim Jong-un

apparently is going big on suicide

drones so they're going to do major

manufacturing of suicide drones to which

I ask this following

question why isn't America making all

kinds of suicide drones in

America I I keep hearing that we can't

catch up to China China's manufacturing

you know drones like

crazy what is it that makes us unable to

make a

drone we obviously have the technology

we could obviously use robotss to do

most of the manufacturing so it can't be

that much more expensive to make it in

the United States and if North Korea can

make swarms of drones are you telling me

that North Korea can spin up a drone

Factory and we can't because why they

get help from China or something maybe

China's helping um or is it

Russia is the because we now know that

um thousands of North Korean troops have

been sent to help Russia in the Ukraine

war so is it possible that Russia is the

technical and maybe even investment help

and they're building a less bombable

drone Factory how about that if you if

you make a drone Factory and you put it

in

Russia do you think you could trust

Ukraine not to bomb the Drone Factory

you canot no matter where you put it in

Russia um Ukraine is already shown that

they'll take out like a a weapons Depot

so of course they would take out your

drone Factory but what if you put your

drone Factory in North

Korea do you think Ukraine is going to

take out a drone Factory in North

Korea I don't think so so it might be a

pretty clever place for the bad guys to

hide a drone Factory and I'm going to

say that North Korea is not doing the

hard lifting on their own they must be

getting some help either from Russia or

China or

both Wall Street Journal says that Trump

is vowed to remake education in the US

by getting rid of the woke stuff in the

classroom yay funding private school

tuition we'll see how much of that

happens and abolishing the Department of

Education uh but he also has this idea

of accredited a a government

accredited college that anybody could go

to everybody gets in I guess and they

can take what classes they want and get

it accredited now I think most of that

would be online and

AI so we'll see where that goes but I

don't think I'd want a college that you

didn't have a physical experience with

if your college is totally online and

you don't at least meet with your

classmates or meet for study periods

with people taking the same classes uh

that would be a pretty empty and cold

experience for three or four years

so I think we need to work on the

alternative

education social

part because I don't think it's good for

kids to have no

social you know contact and I know the

homeschoolers do a good job of it the

homeschoolers you make sure they get

together with other homeschoolers and

stuff so they're already doing a good

job of it but if the government weighs

in more heavily um I hope that they make

sure that the physical connections with

people are maintained

somehow well RFK Jr is picked as a

Health and Human Services secretary so

that's the the group that's ahead of all

the smaller federal health agencies so

that would give him power over

everything health

related I can't even tell you how much I

love this I just absolutely love

it are are we getting what is

this I'm seeing some

anti-Semitism that uh needs to stop

right

now is there something going on going on

in the comments over

there yeah well I just saw something go

by that you need to stop that right away

none of none of that is okay that is not

okay all right uh

um so I I forgot that Rachel LaVine was

the uh Health and Human Services

secretary

before so I don't have a comment on that

I'll just note that going from Rachel

LaVine to RFK Jr is a pretty big change

in priorities pretty big

change and uh I'm all in I'm all in on

this now I do think

that if the way farmer works and even

the way Food Works is uh is radically

changed we are guaranteed to have two

things happen we're going to have some

pretty deadly disruptions probably in

our

Pharma uh

business in the long run I think will be

way better in the short run it might

deny us some medicines that work better

than they don't work and in the long run

though I think it's just giant potential

Improvement same with food in the short

run we might learn that some of the

foods that we routinely are so dangerous

they should be immediately taken off the

market which will cause other food

prices to go up which will cause us to

have fewer

choices so my guess is that you can't do

any major reforms for for the Pharma

approvals or for the food

approvals without major disruptions now

it's the it's the fear of major

disruption that makes anybody not change

anything because you don't want the the

negative to be greater than the benefit

you're trying to get

but when you reach a point where your

food and your medicine is killing you

and you don't trust either one then the

risk of A disruption becomes

manageable so here's the thing I want to

tell you if you think that RFK can do

what he wants without major disruptions

pretty major to the way you live and

maybe even people you know will have

some health outcomes that's all going to

happen you're you're going to get some

problems right so Ju Just know for sure

that you can't make a change this big

without you know breaking a few eggs to

make your omelette some eggs are going

to get broken but we have to get past

this we we have in institutions that are

just broken and we we've got to fix it

and the only way to do it is you know a

bunch of people are going to leave and

they're going to take with them some

institutional knowledge we'll have to

you know build it back we can build it

back better to borrow a phrase but not

until there's a lot of problems in

between now the fact that RFK Jr is

apparently

Fearless he apparently has no fear of

anything physical social or political

uh or phys yeah physical social he

doesn't appear to have any fear or he

operates as if he doesn't which is even

more

awesome but talk about the right guy for

the right job at the right time it's

just the thing that's blowing my mind is

the

timing you know a number of people made

the analogy that um I I some of us call

it a pirate ship you know Trump's uh

collection of Extraordinary People um

others are liking it to the

founders and it's like a refounding like

we're being founded for a second time

but what are the odds that RFK Jr would

be available at the same time that vake

and Elon Musk and tulsy

gabard um are all

available and they're not really

available they're just willing to do it

you know Elon Musk is the busiest person

in the world but made himself available

I've never seen anything like that I've

never seen anything close to it do you

remember when

uh you used to hear that Lincoln had the

uh what do you call it the advisers that

were what was that phrase for the

advisers that were on the other side he

had a team of adversaries what was that

called there's a famous phrase for it

you'll see it in the comments um but

Trump actually did that drump Trump has

the

Republican um the Republican

Administration Team of Rivals Team of

Rivals thank you um but he's got a I'll

call them A Team of Rivals except that

when it comes to this they're all on the

same same

side so he actually he he actually got

the best version of a Team of Rivals you

could ever get which is a Team of Rivals

who change sides because the other side

wasn't doing it that's the best you can

do you know you don't want a Team of

Rivals that still thinks their side is

right that that's just trouble I mean I

could see why there's some advantage to

it as well because you get a hearty

debate but if you can get your Team of

Rivals to be people who publicly

repudiated the team they're leaving and

said they just can't get this stuff done

and this is going to kill us all and

then they go to the team that might be

able to get it done and save us all you

can't get better than that so I am so

happy to be

alive at at this great coincidence that

those particular characters are all up

for the fight and I'm and I'm not even

naming all of them right I mean you

could throw in Bill Amman you could

throw in you know half a dozen other

people JD Vance you know there's a lot

of people you could throw in who are all

in on the fight I know I am I'm

definitely all

in but Elizabeth Warren is not so happy

she um she just said on msnb

MSNBC uh that tulsy gabard quote has

clearly been in Putin's

pocket

really

really Tulsi gabard has clearly been in

Putin's pocket and what evidence do we

have of that

none but here's my

advice if you watch the Elizabeth Warren

um clip which is on X and probably going

around today turn off the sound and then

just look at her crazy face she can't

hide the crazy I mean her

face it looks like this

distorted like demon face if you hear

the words it doesn't sound so bad

because because the words actually come

out sounding like regular sentences and

stuff but if you look at the

face the face is just torted with some

kind of weird mental illness or lying or

something it just doesn't look right and

I'm not saying this is every Democrat

has a weird liar face but there's so

many of them that do that it's

weird you don't see that on the

Republicans at all like who has who has

a Adam Schiff

face shiff face who has an Adam Schiff

face who's a Republican or or Elizabeth

Warren distorted mentally ill face now

you notice um there are plenty of

Democrats I don't say that

about um I've seen Al Franken for

example on TV he doesn't seem to have a

weird distorted face he's just someone

who might disagree with me politically

doesn't appear to be crazy at all not

even a little bit I just disagree with

them but they have so many people that

msnb put snbc platforms that you turn

off the sound and you just go oh I

wouldn't hire you to work at McDonald's

or the

FBI

so that's

happening anyway today is Friday I'm

told so this is the day that the weekend

starts that is an hour of the finest

entertainment you've ever had but uh I

want to see in the comments how many of

you watch The Morning Show because it

makes you feel less

lonely like some of you are watching for

the content I hope but how many of you

just feel like because it's sort of

interactive and it's live it just it

just feels like there's somebody in your

house right now me and that there are a

bunch of other people who are

observers yeah in the comments there

more people on locals who are there to

be less uh

lonely so let me make this PCT to those

of you who are feeling lonely who are

not on locals so locals is a

subscription

service seven bucks a month but you

could get a discount if you do a year in

advance and it's got the Dilbert comic

and the Dilbert calendar comic and the

robots read nudes comic which is Naughty

and then a bunch of political stuff and

memes that you might find too much for

you so the there's low censorship on

locals so for some of you that won't

work you'll be seeing stuff you don't

want to see I'll be honest about that

but if you don't care about that or you

find it fun I find I find the memes the

more inappropriate they are the funnier

they are to me so on locals we embrace

the inappropriate as

inappropriate so we're not I don't have

to judge it I just laugh at it it's like

oh that's so inappropriate but that

doesn't mean you need to get canceled

for saying it if it's funny it's funny

if you didn't want to see like things

like that you would not be on locals and

so you wouldn't have to be exposed to

it so I'm going to put out this uh this

uh offer to you if you're not on locals

and you're having a problem with

loneliness I did not plan it this way

but you know how products evolve on

their own um apparently the biggest

benefit people get is that they're

meeting the other people online uh they

have relationships

in the morning when I do the pre-show

before I do the Regular Show I just do a

handheld phone situation as I'm getting

ready for the show petting my dog and

doing some fun stuff um mostly they just

don't even pay attention to me it's just

all the people checking in with their

favorite people that they see every

morning same ones every morning so

they're about um 500 people check in in

the morning who all got to know each

other and um I think they would all say

that it makes them feel less lonely

should it should so loneliness is a

gigantic problem I can't solve it

completely but if you want an if you

want a uh a digital friend and you want

500 extra digital friends or over 11,000

people on locals subscription for just

just my community so there's plenty of

people there they're not all there for

the same reason some of them there are

just want to see the comments

see the see the memes but a whole bunch

of them are just there because they live

alone and often there a certain age and

uh we make that okay so I do an evening

program almost every night um around

dinner time California time and that one

is the one where the

lonely are most served because it's more

intimate and we don't worry about the

news we just hang out and I love it

so for me it's the same has the same

benefit so I'm never

lonely because I spend time with

hundreds of people two hours every day

and it

helps all right the dilber calendar is

available too for 2025 you can only get

it at the link at dilbert.com it's not

on Amazon it's not in the stores it will

only be at that link that you can find

at dilbert.com and

and that's all I got for now I'm going

to talk to the locals people uh

privately and the rest of you I will see

you tomorrow same time same place thanks

on X and YouTube and Rumble it's been

great to see you bye for now have a

great

weekend

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e e