Episode 2674 CWSA 11/29/24
Get some news fun and your Dilbert Calendar ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Good morning. It looks like the stock market is off to a nice little run. Tesla's up. All right, not too bad. Even Rumble's up today. I think we're going to have the best show ever. Might not be obvious why, but it's because everything's awesome and you're going to have a good time. Just wait. You j…
View segment →ll right, almost ready. Good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. And darn it, you've never had a better time. But if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human brai…
View segment →elicious. By the way, if you're listening later on Spotify, where this gets uploaded after I'm done, I hear the commercials are insanely loud compared to the content. I don't think that happens on the other platforms, so you could always listen on a different platform because the studio I'm using o…
View segment →, but I'll look into it. Well, you would not be surprised. According to some post, that whole coffee cherry extract supplement might improve working memory. Now you might say to me, what is a coffee cherry and how do you take the cherry from the coffee? And the answer is a cherry is the coating to…
View segment →at all the cherries. So that's what I do. This would be a good time to remind you not to take any medical advice from me. Not once. By the way, if you notice behind me, where you can almost read it, there are the one, two, three, four, five best things you could buy as a gift. I actually promise yo…
View segment →d if they are Dilbert fans but they don't care about the politics or the persuasion, then get the 2025 Dilbert calendar. Now the important thing is that the calendar is only available at a link you can find at Dilbert.com. The books are on Amazon, so if you want the book just search Amazon, they'll…
View segment →all that chemistry right in your body, your brain isn't working, period. So your brain and your body are one tool. All right. Reportedly Elon Musk is going to use his AI called xAI and do a little standalone app. So right now it only exists in X as Grok, but they're going to make their own standalo…
View segment →put trillions and trillions of dollars into it. So why do we need to fix the models? I thought you told me the models already worked because you asked me for trillions of dollars. So why do I have a new story every single day about a new variable that they didn't know about that's very large, and so…
View segment →ate. Racism is worse. They have exactly the same percentage of Black enrollment and they got absolutely nothing out of it except people feeling bad about each other. So that's what they got for $250 million. Hey, does anybody know how they could have saved $250 million? Is there anything they could…
View segment →orld in terms of spending and how much attention they gave it looks like they're talking about just getting rid of it entirely. Everything's going my way. All right. Meanwhile, according to The Hill, America's opinion of the Republican Party is on the rise and America's opinion of the Democrats is…
View segment →t makes him smart is he doesn't act smart. Like he doesn't rub it in your face or wear a robe or something. He just lives his life. But if you sort of follow him for years as I have and many of you have, where are all the dumb things? Have you noticed there's no dumb things? Like everybody who talks…
View segment →ted to come on Joe Rogan's podcast. And according to Rogan, he said Zelensky tried to come on. Yeah, they tried to get Zelensky on. He says, I was like, what are you talking about? And he does sort of a weird voice because he's just joking. What are you talking about? So that was exactly the right r…
View segment →Putin's puppet, how could you believe what Putin said? No, nothing like that's going to happen. I'm going to tell you what Putin said. I'm going to tell you what effect I think it had. But I'm not going to tell you that Putin's the smartest person in the world and everything he says is true and we s…
View segment →doesn't happen, that alleged hypothetical vulnerability that nobody's quite seen yet, all of the signals say that crypto will just keep going up basically forever. So if you had for example a bunch of cash investments and you add a little bit of crypto, your situation should be that your cash will…
View segment →orrow, but it could go to zero over time just because of inflation. So not actually zero but it could become so little that you wish you didn't own it. Crypto could make up all of that difference. So if you had 20% crypto and 80% regular cash you might find that the one going up is about matching th…
View segment →to it makes me think that he might be thinking a few moves ahead of us. So having Trump in office surrounded by smart people who are pro-crypto, it feels good. I'm glad that the Trump administration — not Trump specifically, he's no crypto expert — but he's certainly surrounded by people who are goi…
View segment →, it's that everything about this just smells wrong. Just everything about it. So I agree with Eric. I think that's the way it's going to go. But it's a hunch on my part, not based on any knowledge. Well as you know Trump is planning to do the largest deportation ever. But Axios reports — and I was…
View segment →ounded so good I'm going to embrace it as my own. There is a reason that recent immigrants are less likely to do a crime. You're not going to like it. Here's a reason that recent immigrants are less likely to do crime. You ready for it? Because they're more likely to be employed, married with childr…
View segment →going to be the head of the border stuff, he was challenged by I guess a Denver mayor Mike Johnston because Mike Johnston said he's not going to let the citizens of his city who are maybe undocumented — he's not going to let them be rounded up, taken to jail, and that people like him will be putting…
View segment →t of money really that if you just looked at the percentage of users of any other platform — Facebook, X, anything else, anything else, Rumble — that you would find that Blue Sky probably has just through the roof therapy and mental health meds and every kind of anxiety and depression. And let's jus…
View segment →thing being politicized that the people with the worst brains — not necessarily born the worst but because their body is their brain if they didn't take care of it it's just not working very well — and they all ended up in Blue Sky. So I'd be real curious if I'm right that if you went to Blue Sky it…
View segment →oh have you checked the source. They were not saying your facts are wrong. They were not saying have you considered this. They were not saying here's the fact check. They were saying what can I say that will make this guy not want to spend another second on X and want to get a high-powered rifle and…
View segment →t the LA Times when Dilbert was in newspapers before I got canceled, the LA Times was the only one that was canceling Dilbert or editing it, censoring it actually. LA Times was the only newspaper that routinely censored Dilbert back in the days when Dilbert ran in every newspaper. The LA Times would…
View segment →Good morning. It looks like the stock market is off to a nice little run. Tesla's up. All right, not too bad. Even Rumble's up today. I think we're going to have the best show ever. Might not be obvious why, but it's because everything's awesome and you're going to have a good time. Just wait. You just wait.
All right, almost ready. Good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. And darn it, you've never had a better time. But if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains, all you need for that is a cup or mug or glass or stein or a canteen or jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.
Go. Delicious.
By the way, if you're listening later on Spotify, where this gets uploaded after I'm done, I hear the commercials are insanely loud compared to the content. I don't think that happens on the other platforms, so you could always listen on a different platform because the studio I'm using only sends one audio signal to all the different platforms. Oh, it doesn't send it to Spotify though, does it? I guess Spotify is adding the commercials on the platform, so I'm not sure how to fix that, but I'll look into it.
Well, you would not be surprised. According to some post, that whole coffee cherry extract supplement might improve working memory. Now you might say to me, what is a coffee cherry and how do you take the cherry from the coffee? And the answer is a cherry is the coating to the coffee bean, I guess. And normally when you drink coffee they remove that part, but the part they remove is awesome. It's awesome. So apparently if you were to eat the part they remove, you'd have good working memory.
Now I don't take a chance, so what I do is I grow a coffee tree in my backyard and then every morning I just go out and I lick the bark, you know, the leaves, and I definitely eat all the cherries. So that's what I do. This would be a good time to remind you not to take any medical advice from me. Not once.
By the way, if you notice behind me, where you can almost read it, there are the one, two, three, four, five best things you could buy as a gift. I actually promise you that if you know somebody who likes reading books, at least one of these books is going to work for everybody. You can hit every person. If it's somebody who doesn't know anything about me and doesn't know anything about Dilbert, you want to go for "Reframe Your Brain." That just works for everybody. "How to Fail at Almost Everything and Still Win Big" — those are guaranteed to make them happy. If they're political and they like stuff like how to learn persuasion, "Win Bigly" is the book. And if they're philosophical and they like to think about the nature of reality itself, then "God's Debris: The Complete Works" would be the way to go. And if they are Dilbert fans but they don't care about the politics or the persuasion, then get the 2025 Dilbert calendar.
Now the important thing is that the calendar is only available at a link you can find at Dilbert.com. The books are on Amazon, so if you want the book just search Amazon, they'll all pop up. But the calendar, I would get that right away because I can't guarantee that if you get it a week before Christmas it's going to show up right. So I wouldn't wait on the calendar. We're making those as we get orders, so sooner is better anyway.
Scientists, according to new research, have made magic polymers that can pull water from the thin air with less energy. So there's all kinds of scientific breakthroughs in creating water out of the air, but it all takes energy and this one takes way less energy. So it's not going to power your city, but it might help you in an emergency.
Well, there's the first asthma treatment breakthrough in half a century, according to Kent Live News. It's a game changer, they say. Some kind of vaccination, they say, will substantially decrease your asthma attacks. Well, I don't know. Might take a couple years before that works its way through the system. We'll see. I'm skeptical of everything.
There is a prebiotic supplement of something called inulin and of course fructooligosaccharide — pretty sure I pronounced that exactly right — and it boosts brain function in old people. But here's the interesting part. What it does is it changes your gut chemistry. And here's an actual sentence from the article. See if this sounds familiar to you. Quote: "Evidence for the close relationship between the gut and the brain is growing year after year." Now watch this part. See if this sounds like me. "Some experts are now so convinced by the results they refer to the gut as the body's second brain."
What do I tell you almost every day? Almost every day I tell you that your body is your brain. There's no such thing as the brain in its own little closed-off area and then your body is your body. No, your body is your brain. If you don't have all that chemistry right in your body, your brain isn't working, period. So your brain and your body are one tool.
All right. Reportedly Elon Musk is going to use his AI called xAI and do a little standalone app. So right now it only exists in X as Grok, but they're going to make their own standalone. As far as I can tell it seems way behind ChatGPT because Grok so far doesn't have images and it doesn't have the ability to talk to you. There's a lot it doesn't do. I don't know if it's going to catch up. I keep seeing stories that say that Elon Musk's version is going to catch up to ChatGPT, but it doesn't look like it's happening. So I mean it could happen quickly if they make some big change, I suppose, but I don't know.
Meanwhile the oceans cooled the planet more than we thought, but also according to new research. So it turns out that the ocean gives off some kind of sulfur gas and that hadn't been totally understood. And that sulfur gas cools the climate more than previously thought. So what they're doing is they're going back to all their climate models and now they're using this new knowledge about the sulfur that's coming out of the ocean and how it cools things to modify their models.
Now here's an interesting question. Why do they need to modify the models? I've been told quite reliably that 98% of all scientists say the models are telling us enough of what we need to know. I mean nothing's perfect, but they're telling us enough of what we need to know that we can put trillions and trillions of dollars into it. So why do we need to fix the models? I thought you told me the models already worked because you asked me for trillions of dollars. So why do I have a new story every single day about a new variable that they didn't know about that's very large, and so they're incorporating it into the models?
Any of you who have lived in the real world as long as I have, you know what that means, right? If you have a model that's telling you the truth and then you keep changing the model by adding variables almost every week, and the variables are kind of big, and no matter what you do you still get the same answer — if you're 25 you think that means that climate change is real and they've got a real good bead on it. When you're 65, the fact that they change it every week tells you that they don't know what they're doing. It's a real big difference in experience, am I right? Those of you who are older and have experience, when you see that they're adding a new variable to their complicated models and they're adding it every week and they're big variables, that tells you there's no other explanation. There literally is no other explanation. But if you're young you just think, oh the models were good before and they're getting better. No, that's not what's happening.
All right. Meanwhile, according to the Daily Caller News Foundation, America's most expensive DEI program is about to go away. So apparently the University of Michigan — they've spent $250 million on DEI since 2016 and students and faculty have reported deteriorating campus climate. Racism is worse. They have exactly the same percentage of Black enrollment and they got absolutely nothing out of it except people feeling bad about each other. So that's what they got for $250 million.
Hey, does anybody know how they could have saved $250 million? Is there anything they could have done? Anybody they could have asked? Hey, we just need your advice. Should we spend $250 million on this? Well they should have asked Scott because I would have told them, you know, if you divide people into groups and say that one of those groups is the oppressor and one group is the victim, what's going to happen? Huh? What's going to happen? Use my giant brain to predict into the future. You divide people into groups and you make one the oppressor and one the victim. How does that turn out? Oh, you wasted your $250 million. That's a quarter of a billion. Do you think that university could have done anything useful with a quarter of a billion dollars like teaching classes better and paying teachers more, stuff like that?
Well anyway, the university is talking about shutting the whole thing because the program created, quote, "a culture of grievance." Huh. Who could have seen that coming? A culture of grievance. Maybe they should have asked me.
Well you can see that it's all happening now. If the biggest employer isn't — is Walmart the biggest employer outside the government? So the government is the biggest employer. They're going to get rid of DEI under Trump. If you count the military, they're going to get rid of DEI. Walmart, I don't know if they're the biggest company at least employment-wise, but they're getting rid of DEI. And now the largest in the university world in terms of spending and how much attention they gave it looks like they're talking about just getting rid of it entirely. Everything's going my way.
All right. Meanwhile, according to The Hill, America's opinion of the Republican Party is on the rise and America's opinion of the Democrats is on the decline. Why? Well I don't know, but in the poll 45% of Americans said they feel favorable toward the Republicans. Now still under 50%, so it's not the best in the world, but 45%. How is that compared to how people feel about Democrats? Oh, not so well. So GOP went — who said they felt unfavorable? So both the GOP went down a little bit but it's still bigger than the Democrats. So Democrats are 39% had a good feeling about their party and more Republicans like their party. That makes sense. I mean nobody's surprised by that, right?
Joe Rogan made a little news again as he does. You know, I'll tell you the thing about Joe Rogan that is the least appreciated is the mistakes he doesn't make. So you know how the dog not barking is the one you don't notice. The mistakes that could easily be made that Joe Rogan doesn't make, it's kind of impressive. I'm more and more of the opinion that Joe Rogan is just one of the smartest people we've ever seen in the public sphere. But part of what makes him smart is he doesn't act smart. Like he doesn't rub it in your face or wear a robe or something. He just lives his life. But if you sort of follow him for years as I have and many of you have, where are all the dumb things? Have you noticed there's no dumb things? Like everybody who talks that much to that many people, they're going to have some dumb stuff in their catalog, right? The dumbest thing that Joe Rogan has done has turned out to be right, you know, like taking ivermectin and stuff like that. So even the things he was criticized for the most, well, kind of turned out right.
But here's another one. Apparently Zelensky wanted to come on Joe Rogan's podcast. And according to Rogan, he said Zelensky tried to come on. Yeah, they tried to get Zelensky on. He says, I was like, what are you talking about? And he does sort of a weird voice because he's just joking. What are you talking about? So that was exactly the right response. No, don't put Zelensky on Joe Rogan show. So Rogan quite correctly realized this was a propaganda run and nothing good could come from it.
Now remember he wanted to talk to both the presidential candidates. So if it was American business and it was political, he was all in. He had Bernie Sanders on. But Zelensky is not like the others. He's just pure propaganda. So Rogan's like no. Again, if he had never told you that story that Zelensky pitched it and he said no, I mean think about how big the ratings would have been. It's not like he was unaware that the ratings would have been monumental. Of course they would have been. And he still said no. That was the right answer. I think he got the right answer there.
Let's talk about Putin. So Putin's psychology game is — I was going to say second to none but it might be second to Trump. One of the reasons that I think those two bond a little bit, you know, as adversaries but they bond, is that they're both so good at the psychology. Just listen to what Putin says. And I'm not going to try to convince you that Putin means every word he says and it's all completely honest, right? We don't have to have that conversation, right? We don't need any NPCs storming in saying, oh you're Putin's puppet, how could you believe what Putin said? No, nothing like that's going to happen. I'm going to tell you what Putin said. I'm going to tell you what effect I think it had. But I'm not going to tell you that Putin's the smartest person in the world and everything he says is true and we should do what he says, right? So NPCs, calm down. Calm down. You can handle this, right?
So here are some of the things Putin said. I guess he was at some event, made some news. He said that Trump is intelligent and he will find a solution to the Ukraine war. So interesting. Trump gets criticized for calling Putin smart and capable and his critics say, what? How can you compliment that monster? Don't you know he's your enemy? Stop saying good things about him. But there's the enemy, allegedly Putin, and he's doing the same thing. He's returning the compliment. That's a pretty big compliment, you know, if Putin says that you're intelligent and you're going to find a solution to the war, like almost matter-of-factly, whereas the current president did not find a solution to the war and it doesn't look like there was any chance that was ever going to happen. You can see that Putin's trying to get on the good side of Trump.
Now do you think Putin has intel that if he praises Trump and makes his ego feel good that he might get a better deal? Of course he does, because literally every person in America says Trump just listens to the last person in the room and whoever kisses his ass the most. Now do you think anybody really knows that? No. Do you know why Trump listens to the last person in the room? Does anybody know why? Because at some point you have to be done. You have to be done, make a decision at some point. It's sort of like you find the lost thing in the last place you look because the last place you look is where you found it, so there's no place to look after you've found it. So when the last person leaves the room, that's when he realizes that he's made a decision because now he's heard both sides. But now he's heard the side he likes. He wants to hear that one more time. That's the one you want to hear before you make your decision, the one that you were leaning toward, just to make sure it still sounds good. So yes, it should be completely normal that in general you're going to agree with the last person out of the room. It's probably pretty normal. Doesn't mean every time, but a lot of times it's just the most normal way that anything works.
However, Putin said he was ready for peace talks with Ukraine without preconditions but on the same terms he laid out over the summer, which are preconditions. So Putin says he wants to have a talk without preconditions as long as we're taking all the preconditions into consideration. The preconditions would be Ukraine decides not to be part of NATO and that basically Putin keeps the four areas that he already conquered and he already owns basically. So that sounds like exactly the deal we all know is going to happen. So that's interesting.
Putin also said that he thinks Trump's life is in danger, was in danger and is now, and even the cabinet members at risk. You know that Tom Homan and at least someone else who was a cabinet pick got some death threats over the weekend. So things are looking dangerous and Putin is warning that there's a genuine threat to Trump.
So here's what I want to know. Do you think that Putin's intelligence, in other words his intel departments, do you think that they know enough about the American government that they know that the Democrats are planning or somebody is planning to try to kill Trump? Because there's no way we would know whether he is just saying that for a fact or if he actually has information, because he wouldn't want to give away that he has information because that would give away his sources and methods, right? So the thing I wonder is does Putin know more than we do about the threat?
Now here again I compliment Putin for his psychology game without being a supporter of him because he's a terrible, terrible murderer of people. It's really smart for him to talk about the risk to Trump because if nothing happens to Trump then he's sort of a good guy who showed some empathy for Trump and warned him. And if something does happen to Trump, he's the guy who warned him. So warning Trump about the danger is just a smart play. It's good no matter what happens. It's good for Putin. It's not good for us.
And Putin went and he legalized crypto in Russia and he slashed taxes on mining from crypto, I guess. I think that's what that means. And trading income will be taxed at 13% and blah blah blah, more if it's more. So basically he's big on crypto. What do you think of that? Well you know Trump is pro-crypto compared to any prior president. And I've heard some people say that crypto is the only way the US ends up financially okay. And what I mean by that is that if you own some crypto, let's say Bitcoin specifically, its odds of going up in value, the smart people say it's almost guaranteed. Now the counterargument would be there's something that we find out that we didn't know about and that's a pretty big risk. For example, finding out that there's some way to hack or steal your crypto wallet that nobody could have seen coming and no way to fix it. Now I haven't seen that, but you could sort of imagine that something that's a technology where there might be some vulnerability that you haven't seen yet. But if that doesn't happen, that alleged hypothetical vulnerability that nobody's quite seen yet, all of the signals say that crypto will just keep going up basically forever.
So if you had for example a bunch of cash investments and you add a little bit of crypto, your situation should be that your cash will inflate away to zero and your crypto will make up all the difference. So if you had, I don't know what the percentages would be because nobody knows what the future is, but I'll just give you numbers to like kind of tell the story but don't get caught up on the percentages, okay? So if for example 80% of your wealth was in cash-like things, you know like stocks and bonds and cash, that could actually go to zero. It could over time, I mean not tomorrow, but it could go to zero over time just because of inflation. So not actually zero but it could become so little that you wish you didn't own it. Crypto could make up all of that difference. So if you had 20% crypto and 80% regular cash you might find that the one going up is about matching the one going down. But I'm not smart enough or wise enough to say that 20% crypto is a smart number. It's not what I have. I have less. So I'm not giving you any advice on crypto. This is not financial advice.
But if you're trying to figure out how in the world does the United States survive crippling debt that just can't be paid back — basically it can't be paid back, let's be honest. We're not going to pay back any $35 trillion, $36 trillion. Nobody's getting paid back. We're getting inflated away and people will wish they didn't own it basically. So it could be that the only way out is crypto. If the government owns some as well as all the citizens then we could pay our taxes and etc.
So then if you take that context and then you look at Putin legalizing crypto and trying to get ahead of crypto, could it be that Putin knows because he's a pretty smart player that Russia also has to have crypto or else they're doomed? Or maybe he needs to own crypto to have some kind of leverage over the West. So when I see Putin going hard at crypto it makes me think that he might be thinking a few moves ahead of us. So having Trump in office surrounded by smart people who are pro-crypto, it feels good. I'm glad that the Trump administration — not Trump specifically, he's no crypto expert — but he's certainly surrounded by people who are going to advise him well on that I think.
Meanwhile France has announced that Netanyahu is entitled to immunity from the International Criminal Court because they're not a party to the court. Now why did it take me until today to realize that? So the International Criminal Court has a bunch of countries signed up but it does not include the United States and it does not include Israel for I guess obvious reasons because they would be basically the only ones taken to court. But France is saying we're not going to arrest somebody who never signed that treaty, to which I say, oh why did it never occur to me that you wouldn't arrest somebody who wasn't part of the treaty so they couldn't have broken it? Makes sense. Now obviously that was just a workaround because France doesn't want to be enemies with Israel. But it's just funny that I didn't see that obvious play that you can't arrest somebody who didn't sign up for it. It's worth a shot.
Eric Weinstein agrees with me on physics. The difference between us is that he's deeply invested and educated and experienced in the domain of physics and has his own well-educated, smart thoughts about string theory. And his well-educated thoughts match my own thoughts for the past 20 years. For at least 20 years I've been saying, you know this string theory thing, it sure has every signal for being — now obviously I have no science background whatsoever but everything that I kept hearing about it, every time I heard something about it I thought, you know I don't think that even looks real. Just doesn't even look real.
And Eric Weinstein says that string theory has sort of been the dominant thing people were trying to look at for the theory of everything to tie everything together. And then because it was so dominant as a promising direction that it blocked any real breakthroughs for 40 years. And that at least is a confident or optimistic — I'll say he's optimistic — that after 40 years of not getting the job done the physicists might be willing to look past it now. And if they look past it suddenly the possibility of major breakthroughs might be better.
Now this is sort of one of those hunch kind of ideas because you don't know what the future looks like. So you don't know that there's something out there that's better than string theory and that we have access to it and it'll make a difference. We don't know that. But to me it's a warm feeling to know that somebody who is as deep into this topic as Eric is has exactly the same opinion I did as just somebody who can spot pretty easily. The only thing I claim is not that I know what is true but I can often spot what isn't. So that's my only comment on string theory is like I don't know. Every time I read a story about this it's not that I think the science is wrong, it's that everything about this just smells wrong. Just everything about it. So I agree with Eric. I think that's the way it's going to go. But it's a hunch on my part, not based on any knowledge.
Well as you know Trump is planning to do the largest deportation ever. But Axios reports — and I was waiting for this to happen. I kind of suspected that sooner or later the news would start telling you the following thing. You're not going to get many illegal people. So Homan and Trump and everybody smart said the same thing. They said we're obviously going to focus all of our resources in getting rid of the criminals and we don't know how long that's going to take and there's so many of them. But it turns out if you put all your resources on it, yeah you might get a few. There just aren't many.
And Axios had a story here. I won't go through the details, you can read it yourself in Axios. But for example there are a whole bunch of people who are felons who have been convicted of horrible things like homicide and sexual assault but you can't deport any of them until they finish their jail sentences. So you've got 29,000 people who are the most hardened worst criminals and we have them in custody and they're not going to get deported because they're already in jail and jail is the place I guess the law says they got to be. And then there are a few other examples like that where there are people who are sort of here legally, etc.
So it's possible that Homan won't be able to find big busloads of people to send anywhere. So maybe what you're worried about, where you're seeing the military round up giant groups of people and keep them in detention centers until the military transport could get there and take them back, it's a terrible visual that you don't want to live in the country where you're seeing your military carrying anybody away like for anything. It's just a terrible look. I'm pro-deportation for the criminals especially, but it's a bad look. So I don't think we're going to have that look. I think there might be like an anecdotal here or there. You know there might be a bus full of people or a detention center that's there temporarily. But my current feeling is if we stop the new immigrants, you know the new illegal immigrants, if we stop that pretty well and I think Trump will do that, the gigantic migration immigration even if we try as hard as we can it's just hard. And I think it'll be half bus and it just won't be that much of a visual problem. That's my guess.
So my prediction is you'll see a few anecdotal reports. So there will be some reports of too much deportation but they'll be so limited and so just temporary that it's not really going to change the public view of things too much. That's what I think.
There is also the claim that immigrants do less crime than Americans and that's offered as the argument that you should not deport. So does that argument work with you? That the average immigrant — let's do two takes on this. All right, so here what we're going to do is just work through the thinking. So we're only talking about how to think about it. Should you say hey let's have more immigration because on average they lower our average crime rate? Does that make sense? Let's lower our average by having more immigration because apparently the more immigrants you have the lower your crime rate is because they have a lower crime rate. Do you buy that?
Let's say it's true just for a moment. Let's say they do have a lower crime rate. There are also 29,000 felons who are convicted of homicide or sexual assault. That's 29,000 people who would be alive if we didn't have illegal immigration. 29,000 people would be alive or not raped. Doesn't that feel like a lot? I mean I know it's a big country and the 29,000 would be over multiple years but doesn't your government and your citizens have the right to say I don't care that they have a better rate. I want them to kill zero people. If somebody comes into your house and slaughters your family and the police say whoa turns out that the odds of somebody coming in your house and slaughtering your family are way low so stop worrying about it. You'll be like but they slaughtered my family. I know but as a percentage of all the crime it's very low. But my family's dead. I think you need to be a little less racist about this. Yes they did get slaughtered by somebody but as a percentage it was very unlikely so if you could just get over it.
Yeah so I think that both things can be true. I did look a little bit at some of the studies and I would say that there is some good evidence that the recent immigrants are lower at crime. Now what they said was — I know what you're going to say, don't say it. I know what one of you is going to say because there's always at least one. Somebody here is going to say, Scott, the American crime rate is not like one average. Are they doing more or less crime than Black Americans, more or less than white Americans, more or less than Asian-Americans? Well I saw one study that said that they do less crime than white Americans do. You know they left out, as they always do, Asian-Americans. Do you know how often these stories just act like there are no Asian-Americans?
All right now let's ask the question again. I'm an Asian-American and you tell me that I'm bringing in immigrants but don't worry their crime rate is less than the white people. And as an Asian-American I say what? It's less than the white people? Is it less than Asian-Americans? No no it's more than Asian-Americans but it's less than the white people. How do you feel about that? So you're going to increase the rate of crime in my community? Yeah but it's still less than the white people.
I'm just amused that the Asian-Americans do such a good job of staying in a jail and making money and staying married and basically doing everything right just continuously and then get left out of the conversation because they do everything right. Anyway good job Asian-Americans.
But here was one of the hypotheses about why the immigrants are less likely to be involved in crime. And here comes the kill shot. Are you ready for this? This is not going to make you happy. I'm going to give you a reason and now this is just one person's speculation but it sounded so good I'm going to embrace it as my own. There is a reason that recent immigrants are less likely to do a crime. You're not going to like it. Here's a reason that recent immigrants are less likely to do crime. You ready for it? Because they're more likely to be employed, married with children, and in good health. Oh no no no no no no no. Is that true? Is it true recent immigrants are more likely to be employed, married with children, and in good health? Because those things are very predictive that you're not going to do a crime. I think these are true. You know, anecdotally it's true. Every time I think of something in my own life who came, was born in another country, they're married, they're employed, they have children and they go to church. Damn it. Damn it. They're Republicans.
Let me say it the fast way. Yes, the reason that recent immigrants do not commit as many crimes is because they're Republicans. They don't know they're Republicans. They just act like it. Get a job, get married, have kids, go to church. Republicans.
So if I said to you immigrants tend to be Republicans with all that comes with it — getting jobs and getting married and staying out of jail — that's easy. That's easy to accept, isn't it? If I tell you that immigrants don't have a high crime rate your first reaction is, it's not the rate I'm looking at. I'm looking at 29,000 people in jail for murder and rape. But if I told you we brought in a million people who are basically Republicans and I say whoa whoa whoa a million people what about all the crime? And then I say yes there's definitely crime because any group of people would have extra crime but they're essentially the same rate of crime as Republicans. And then what do I do? What do I do then?
Because let's say I'm a Republican and I like Republicans and I agree that they don't do a lot of crime anyway. So as I often say, if somebody tells you the raw number of something and doesn't tell you the percentage they are a propagandist. That's brainwashing and they're not trying to tell you something useful. Likewise if they tell you the percentage but not the raw number they are propagandists. They're trying to brainwash you. They're not trying to have an honest conversation. You need to look at both every time or you don't know anything.
And I think it can be 100% true that on average we're bringing in a pretty high class of people at least in terms of cultural compatibility with America. At the same time we're bringing in a whole bunch of criminals. They can both be true. We simply have to do a better job of everything that we're already doing and I think everybody agrees with that.
Meanwhile Tom Homan, who's going to be the head of the border stuff, he was challenged by I guess a Denver mayor Mike Johnston because Mike Johnston said he's not going to let the citizens of his city who are maybe undocumented — he's not going to let them be rounded up, taken to jail, and that people like him will be putting their bodies in the way basically, protesting in a physical way. And he doesn't care if he has to go to jail for it. He's willing to go to jail to defy Trump's deportation operation.
So somebody asked Tom Homan about the fact that the Denver mayor is willing to go to jail to stop deportation. And Tom Homan without cracking a smile says, and I paraphrase, well at least we found something we agree on. He's willing to go to jail and I'm willing to put him in jail. And may I drop my mic there? Mic drop. Yes, Tom Homan. That was kind of perfect communication right there. Yeah, Tom Homan is good in general. He's a good communicator. But every now and then he'll hit like a base-clearing home run. That's a base-clearing home run. Yep. We agree. You're willing to go to jail. I'm willing to put you there. What's next? Nicely done communication-wise.
I'm talking about I saw a video of Tulsi Gabbard and I didn't remember she did this but when she was talking about why she was leaving the Democrat Party and she mentioned there were warmongers which didn't make sense for her and that they were too woke. But also she said directly that they were anti-white racist. The Democrat Party. I don't remember her saying that directly but I'd like to thank her because that's both honest and true. So yes the Democrats are an anti-white racist party. I see them as racists primarily anyway.
So speaking of verbally being good, there's this representative Van Orden who was being challenged by a CNN guy. CNN host was asking about Trump's tariffs and that Trump's tariffs would increase food prices. So how would you answer that? Because everybody's worried about the price of eggs and whatnot. So food prices are you could argue our number one Main Street kind of issue. And Trump's talking about tariffs and tariffs would increase prices. Everybody understands that. And here's what Representative Van Orden said. Quote: "I'm willing to pay more for guacamole if it means fentanyl poison doesn't come across our border."
Oh wow. Oh wow. Now that's some good communicating. Now is it sort of accurate? No. Well no, I mean it's not guacamole to fentanyl. If it were only guacamole to fentanyl we would all eat fewer avocados and we wouldn't notice because we just eat other stuff. But the bigger problem is that all food prices or enough of the food goes up in price that it hits everybody. So it's certainly not as easy as avoiding avocados. However when Representative Van Orden puts it in that term it is so linguistically excellent in terms of an argument. So this is just a persuasion lesson. I'm not talking about the policy, just about the persuasion and the communication. So nice job.
So I'm going to — this raises my flag. So I've never heard of Representative Van Orden before but he said a second thing. He said about fentanyl he said everyone is now one degree of separation from somebody who died from a fentanyl death. I think that's close to true. That pretty much everybody knows somebody. I mean in my case my stepson, but you all know me so every one of you who knows me knows you're one degree away. And most of you know somebody else who is one degree away.
Now both of those sentences are really strong. You know of all the things you could have said about this topic Van Orden reached into the middle and picked out two of the best. That probably is not a coincidence. So what I'd ask you, just keep an eye on this guy because this is unusually good communication and when you see that it's usually a leading indicator you're going to see more of this person. So keep an eye on him.
Rob Reiner has allegedly deleted his account on X after Trump won. Breitbart News is reporting this and we think he's probably going over to Blue Sky. I think he is. Is that confirmed? I don't know. But Blue Sky is the new competitor to X. Jack Dorsey's new product and it's apparently the uptick is pretty good. It's getting a lot of people. But I just want to point out something that somebody pointed out in the comments to me earlier. You can be on X or you can be on Blue Sky. What would be the initials for Blue Sky if you're going to use an acronym? Blue Sky. Well I would use the B. I probably use the S from sky. That would be — oh it's literally BS.
All right but here's the thing I think is funny. If Blue Sky had started in a let's say an organic way where it was just a product and everybody had a chance to use it if they liked it they use it some more, they would probably have a normal mix of left and right political people because everybody would have seen it as just the product so it's not political it's just a product. But because we're highly politicized especially at the moment people see Blue Sky as where the good and noble Democrats can go and they see X as that polluted right-wing conspiracy place. So presumably Blue Sky now has the greatest number of people with mental health issues of any platform ever. And I mean that seriously. I would bet you any amount of money really that if you just looked at the percentage of users of any other platform — Facebook, X, anything else, anything else, Rumble — that you would find that Blue Sky probably has just through the roof therapy and mental health meds and every kind of anxiety and depression. And let's just say that they wouldn't know their whole body is also brain.
Have you noticed how many people on the left who seem to have defective brains? And by defective I mean either they're not very bright, which is a problem that's on the left and the right of course. There's always some people who are not bright. But the ones who seem crazy, have you noticed that their bodies also look deformed? Have you noticed? You have noticed, haven't you? Yeah you look at their bodies and then you listen to them. You go wow the things that are coming out of their brains sound just crazy. It's not their brain. Their body is their brain. All right if your body is destroyed as many of the people on the left have destroyed their bodies you're going to get just crazy stuff coming out of your mouth. And that would be a very typical, predictable, scientifically compatible prediction that you could feel pretty confident about. That if you have one group where their bodies are a mess and one group on the right especially young men who are very interested in keeping their physical fitness going you should have one group that's happy and one group that's sad. And I think because of the weird situation of everything being politicized that the people with the worst brains — not necessarily born the worst but because their body is their brain if they didn't take care of it it's just not working very well — and they all ended up in Blue Sky. So I'd be real curious if I'm right that if you went to Blue Sky it would look like a mental illness festival. And it wouldn't have if it had just been a non-political time when it was launched. So we'll see.
But at the same time that Rob Reiner left, all of my paid trolls are gone. I don't know if you were watching the feed but for the past year or so they're very obviously paid. And the way you know they're paid is that they show up like it's time for work. So if I would do a post that made any good point against Democrats or for Trump the first comment 100% of the time, the first one would be a troll. And the way you can know they're a troll is that they have maybe four or five messages that they repeat that are not the ones anybody else ever says. It's obvious that at some point in time somebody made a list of all the things you say to Scott. So you say to him, oh Scott your opinion of politics is as good as your taking care of your stepson who died of fentanyl. That was one of them, very common. Oh I guess that's why you're divorced which would have nothing to do with politics or anything I said. And oh that and I guess that's why you're canceled. So they would go for what they thought was the most psychologically destructive thing they could say completely divorced from whatever point I tried to make. So in other words they weren't saying oh have you checked the source. They were not saying your facts are wrong. They were not saying have you considered this. They were not saying here's the fact check. They were saying what can I say that will make this guy not want to spend another second on X and want to get a high-powered rifle and do something bad. And then they would pick that. It's very obvious that there were like five things on the list and that it was somebody's job to sit there and when it goes bing they know I've gone and they quickly go to their list. They go, oh Adams, five things, marriage, divorce, I'll pick number three. It was very obvious because nobody else was doing it except the first comment of everyone that was a political post. And if I posted something that was just interesting or fun, nope, don't show up.
So these were not political actors and I could tell they were not political in 2016. I have to admit I couldn't tell. I just thought there were terrible people on the internet because there are terrible people everywhere. I thought whoa some of these are more terrible than others. But once I understood that it was from — I guess that's the name of the guy who organized the trolls for the 2016 cycle. So we knew actually after the fact after 2016 election we knew who hired the trolls. We knew the budget. It was exactly what it looked like. What I couldn't tell then is whether some of the people were just organically bad and some of the people were paid. But I couldn't tell which are paid and which are organic. But this last cycle the paid ones were just so obvious. So every time they did it I would just respond "paid troll." And how many times did you see me do that? Because it was almost every day. Paid troll, paid troll. And it was always the first comment anyway. I'm glad they're gone. It's really different on X now.
Heather Mac Donald was doing some writing recently and I forget what publication but talking about how men and women generally differ and how they prioritize safety and inclusion versus accepting conflict. And goes to point out that there may be some evolutionary reason where men handle conflict differently from women. And the observation is this. I've made the same observation which is that men can fight and go at each other like crazy but if they find a reason to agree and work together they can almost instantly get over it. Like the past just goes away and we shake hands and we apologize and we accept apologies and we say oh well that was an ugly moment we had there together. Glad that's gone. And now we're friends or now we're allies or co-workers, whatever we need to be.
So the thought was that men knew that their best survival mechanism was to not turn every enemy into either dead or you stay an enemy but sometimes just get them on your side and then you have an extra person on your side. So having an extra man on your side is going to keep you alive. So the thinking is that we're just evolved. The men are easier to say all right I'm over it, let's move on. And that women would be less likely to get over it and sort of keep it as a permanent source of at least mental conflict. So in other words when men hear a provocative speech they might enjoy the debate, enjoy the fight, and also be able to get over it instantly. Whereas women if they go online and they see a debate they might also be drawn into the debate but they're not enjoying it and they're not getting over it. So it's a whole different approach.
So the point of this is that there might be a male warrior hypothesis that might be hardwired biologically that fits with my observation. So my observation is that men can get over disagreements pretty easily.
All right. The LA Times owner was doing an interview with ex-CNN star Oliver Darcy. I didn't know Oliver Darcy got fired from CNN or did he quit? He was terrible on CNN but he's went on his own now. So the LA Times, as you know, has some rich owner who didn't want to endorse Kamala Harris. He wanted to try to find some middle ground where he thought newspapers should be. So he got a lot of pushback from that. And apparently one of the new things he's doing is he wants to change up his LA Times editorial board and he's hired Scott Jennings. So Scott Jennings, the viral superstar on CNN, the Trump-supporting guy who embarrasses the other clowns at the table on a daily basis, it was selected to be part of the LA Times editorial board. So good job Scott Jennings. Again another Scott doing well.
But apparently the billionaire owner of the LA Times ended the call because Darcy just kept giving him a hard time about hiring Scott Jennings. And apparently Darcy ended up going full TDS and the owner of the newspaper and his handler whoever it was was like we're done here. Basically they just dismissed him as not even a serious character which was the right thing to do.
Now I should tell you that the LA Times when Dilbert was in newspapers before I got canceled, the LA Times was the only one that was canceling Dilbert or editing it, censoring it actually. LA Times was the only newspaper that routinely censored Dilbert back in the days when Dilbert ran in every newspaper. The LA Times would just sometimes just not run one and it got so it was just laughably predictable. I do a comic that was just a little bit edgy but still rated G because you can't really get past G in a newspaper. It's still rated G and the LA Times would say oh can't say that. Every other newspaper would say yes. So I'm very up on this new owner. It looks like he's trying to do a serious job of improving the newspaper and they certainly needed it.
Well I read I think it was in The Hill. They had a story about the Democrat bench for 2028. I'll tell you when you look at what the smart people think are their best next politicians for running for president it doesn't look like they have a chance. So here are the names that are floating as their best candidates. Kamala Harris. Seriously, literally the worst campaign of all time and she's running first. Gavin Newsom. Seriously Gavin Newsom. He's like right at the top of your list after destroying California. Gretchen Whitmer, Josh Shapiro, Pete Buttigieg, and J.B. Pritzker. Do you think any one of those could be a capable Republican? I can name I don't know probably 10 Republicans who could be any one of these people. Am I wrong about that? Am I wrong that there have to be at least 10 prominent Republicans that could be everyone on this list? These are not competitive. I don't think Democrats have any understanding of what would even make their side competitive. And the entertainment which I'm getting in watching them not understand anything. They don't understand anything. It's really amazing.
And I'm looking at some of your comments. Those are weird. Fetterman. You know what I don't think the Democrats would push Fetterman to the front of the line. He may be a little bit of a problem because he doesn't obey the Democrats enough. But if Fetterman wanted to take a run at it he would be the one I'd worry about. I don't want to give advice to the Democrats but if I heard that Fetterman was running for president in the next cycle I would say that's a problem. Yeah now AOC has been mentioned. I don't that doesn't seem serious to me. I can't imagine she would even win the primary. But Fetterman could really fool everybody because he does have the common touch and he doesn't seem to be willing to lie when everybody else is. And I hate to say that's a really attractive combination. You know he is smart. I mean it was hard to tell when he had his stroke but he's an unusually smart person and he clearly cares about the country and clearly cares about people and he clearly is smarter than the average Democrat. And he sees that there are some things that Republicans see that he says that makes sense. You can perfectly understand why the Republicans would feel this way. So he's the only one who seems to have anything close to an understanding of what's happening.
I think Fetterman knows exactly what's wrong. That the Democrats act like woke idiots. The Republicans acted like problem solvers. And we were not in a place where acting like a woke idiot was a luxury we could afford. It was once at one point it was a luxury we could afford. Not anymore. Now you just need the solution to the problems. So it was never to me it never seemed like they were a close competition even though the vote was closer than I thought it should be.
What if RFK goes back to the Democrat Party? I don't think RFK Jr. has a chance in a race like that. He's got so many points of attack that I think he's serious about having one mission left like he has his one mission: fix the food. And I have high hopes that he will.
I see you got a copy of "Loserthink." I don't know how you got it. It's no longer for sale. It was one of my canceled books so you must have got one of the used copies. But maybe at some point I'll reissue that.
Democrats do not allow an independent thinker. Yeah true that.
All right so I'll tell you again if you don't have your Dilbert calendar ordered just go to Dilbert.com and that's the only place you'll find the link to order it. You will not find that link anywhere else. It's not on Amazon. It's not on bookstores, not in Walmart. But the books are — my books make excellent gifts. They change lives. Yeah the first two, "Reframe Your Brain" and "How to Fail at Almost Everything and Still Win Big," those are total life changers. I hear it every day and I guarantee it. By the way if I weren't hearing it every single day I wouldn't say that but every day I hear people say oh changed my whole life. So it's a good gift if you want to change somebody's life.
Hey you got a lot of calendars there. If AOC is married and if she had children would she be a better politician? Um maybe. Loop speak. The media will pump up the chosen. Yeah but I don't know if the media has the ability to drag a bad candidate over the finish line anymore. They did with Biden but it looked like they couldn't with Harris. Maybe she was just extra bad. But it does seem that the rise of the podcasters is a real thing. It's going to last for a while.
All right ladies and gentlemen that's all I got for today. I'm going to talk to the locals people privately in a moment and I'll see the rest of you tomorrow. Thanks for joining on YouTube and X and Rumble. We'll see you tomorrow. Same time, same place. Locals I'm coming at you in 30 seconds.
morning it looks like the stock market is off to a nice little run Tesla's up all right not too bad even rumbles up today I think we're uh going to have the best show ever might not be obvious why but it's because everything's awesome and you're going to have a good time just wait you just wait all right almost ready good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams and darn it you've never had a better time but if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains all you need for that is a cuper Mugger glass tager CH Stein a canteen Jugger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure the dopamine h of the day thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous Sip and it happens now go Delicious By the way if you're listening later on Spotify where this gets it's uploaded after I'm done I I hear the commercials are insanely loud compared to the content I don't think that happens any on the other platforms so you could always listen on a different platform um because the studio I'm using only sends one audio signal to all the all the different platforms so oh it doesn't send it to Spotify though does it I guess ify is adding the commercials on the platform so I'm not sure how to fix that but I'll look into it well you would not be surprised according to s poost that whole coffee Cherry extract supplement might improve working memory now you might say to me what is a coffee cherry and how do you take the Cherry from the coffee and the answer is a cherry is the the coating to the uh to the Coffee Bean I guess and normally when you drink coffee they remove that part but the part they remove is awesome it's awesome so apparently if you were to eat the part that remove you'd have good working memory now I don't take a chance so what I do is I grow a Coffee Tree in my backyard and then every morning I just go out and I lick the bark you know the leaves and I definitely eat all the cherries so that's what what I do uh this would be a good time to remind you not to take any medical advice from me not once by the way if you notice behind me where you can almost read it there are the one two three four five best things you could buy as a gift I I I actually promise you that if you know somebody who likes reading books at least one of these books is going to work for everybody you can hit every every every person if it's somebody who doesn't know anything about me and doesn't know anything about Dilbert you want to go for the reframe your brain that just works for everybody and had failed almost everything and still went big those are guaranteed to make them happy if they're political and they like stuff like how to learn persuasion win bigle is the book and if they're philosophical and they like to think about the nature of reality itself then God's debris the complete works would be the way to go and if they are Dilbert um fans but they don't care about the politics or the persuasion then get the 2025 Dilbert calendar now the important thing is that the calendar is only available at a link you can find at dilbert.com the books are on Amazon so if you want the book just search Amazon they'll all pop up but the calendar I would get that right away because I can't guarantee that if you get it a week before Christmas it's going to show up right so I wouldn't wait on the calendar we're making those as we as we get orders so so sooner is better anyway um scientists according to no Ridge have made magic polymers that can pull water from the thin air with less energy so there's all kinds of um all kinds of scientific breakthroughs in creating water out of the air but it all takes energy and this one takes way less energy so it's not it's not going to you know power your city but it might help you in an emergency well there's the first asthma treatment breakthrough in half a century according to Kent live news it's a game changer they say some kind of vaccination they say will substantially decrease your asthma attacks well I don't know might take a couple years before that works its way through the system we'll see I'm I'm a skeptical of everything um there is a Prebiotic supplement of some something called inulin and of course frul gasa sakade pretty sure I pronounced that exactly right and it boosts brain function in old people h huh but here's the interesting part what it does is it changes your gut chemistry and here's an actual sentence from the article see if this sounds familiar to you uh quote evidence for the close relationship between the gut and the brain is growing year after year now watch this part see if this sounds like me some experts are now so convinced by the results they refer to the gut as the body's second brain what do I tell you almost every day almost every day I tell you that your body is your brain there's no such thing is the brain in its own little closed off area and then your body is your body no your body is your brain it if you don't have all that chemistry right in your body your brain isn't working period so your your brain and your body are one tool all right uh reportedly Elon Musk is going to use his AI called X Ai and do a little Standalone app so right now it only exists in in X as grock but they're going to make their own Standalone as far as I can tell it seems way behind chap GPT because Gro so far doesn't have images is and it doesn't have ability to talk to it you there's a lot it doesn't do I don't know if it's going to catch up I keep I keep seeing stories that say that Elon musk's version is going to catch up to Chad GPT but it doesn't look like it's happening so I mean it could happen quickly if they you know make some big change I suppose but I don't know meanwhile the oceans cooled the planet more than we thought but also according to no Ridge um so turns out that the ocean gives off some kind of sulfur gas and that hadn't been totally understood and that sulfur gas cools the climate more than previously thought so what they're doing is they're going back to all their climate models and now they're using this new knowledge about the sulfur that's coming out of the ocean and how it cools things to modify their models now here's an interesting question why do they need to modify the models I've been told quite reliably that 98% of all scientists say the models are telling us enough of what we need to know I mean nothing's perfect but they're telling us enough of what we need to know that we can put trillions and trillions of dollars into it so why do we need to fix the models uh I thought you told me the model models already worked cuz you asked me for trillions of dollars so why do I have a new story every single day about a new variable that they didn't know about that's very large and so they're incorporating it into the models any of you who have lived in the real world as long as I have you know what that means right if you have a model that's telling you the truth and then you keep changing the model by by adding variables almost every week and the variables are kind of big and no matter what you do you still get the same answer if if you're 25 you think that means that climate change is real and they've got a real good bead on it when you're 65 the fact that they change it every week tells you that they don't know what they're doing it's a it's a real big difference in experience am I right th those of you who are older and have experience when you see that they're adding a new variable to their complicated models and they're adding it every week and they're big they're big variables that tells you it's there's no other explanation there there literally is no other explanation but if you're young you just think oh the models were good before and they're getting better no that's not what's happening all right uh meanwhile according to Daily Caller news Foundation the America's most expensive uh Dei program is about to go away so apparently the University of Michigan had this uh they've they've spent $250 million on Dei since 2016 and students and faculty have reported deteriorating campus climate um racism is worse they have exactly the same percentage of black enrollment and they got absolutely nothing out of it except people feeling bad about each other so that's what they got for $250 million hey does anybody know how they could have saved $250 million is there anything they could have done anybody they could have asked hey we just need your advice should we spend $250 million on this well they should have asked Scott because I would have told them you know if you divide people into groups and say that one of those groups is the oppressor and one group is the victim uh what's going to happen huh what's going to happen use my giant brain to predict into the future you divide people into groups and you make won the oppressor and won the victim how does that turn out oh you wasted your $250 million that's a quarter of a billion do you think that uh University could have done anything useful with a quarter of a billion dollars like teaching classes better and paying teachers more stuff like that well anyway the uh University is talking about Shak handing the whole thing because the program created quote a culture of grievance huh who could have seen that coming a culture of grievance maybe they should have asked me well you can see that it's all happening now if the biggest I think the biggest employer isn't is Walmart the biggest employer outside the government so the government is the biggest employer they're going to get rid of Dei under Trump uh if you count the military they're going to get rid of Dei Walmart I don't know if they're the biggest company at least employment wise but they're getting they got rid of Dei and now the largest in the University World in terms of spending and how much attention they gave it looks like they're talking about just getting rid of it entirely everything's going my way all right meanwhile according to the hill America's opinion of the Republican party is on the rise and America's opinion of the Democrats is on the decline why well I don't know but in the poll 45% Americans said they feel favorable toward the Republicans now still under 50% so it's not the best in the world but 45% how is that compared to how they people feel about Democrats oh not so well so uh GOP went um uh who said they felt unfavorable oh so both the GOP went down a little bit but it's still bigger than the Democrats so Democrats are 39% had a good good feeling about their party and uh more Republicans like their party that makes sense I mean nobody's surprised by that right Joe Rogan made a little news again as he's as he does you know I'll tell you the thing about Joe Rogan that is the least appreciated is the mistakes he doesn't make so you know how the dog not barking is the one you don't notice the the mistakes that could easily be made that Joe Rogan doesn't make it's kind of impressive I I'm more and more of the opinion that Joe Rogan is just one of the smartest people we've ever seen in the public sphere but part of what makes him smart is he doesn't act smart like he doesn't you know rub it in your face or you know wear a you know wear a robe or something he he just lives his life but if you sort of follow him for years as I have and many of you have where are all the dumb things have you noticed there's no dumb things like everybody who talks that much to that many people they're going to have some dumb stuff in their catalog right that the dumbest thing that Joe Rogan has done has turned out to be right you know like taking Ivon and stuff like that so even the things he was criticized for the most well kind of turned out right but here's another one apparently zalinski uh wanted to come on Joe Rogan's podcast and according to Rogan he said zalinsky tried to come on yeah they tried to get zalinsky on he says I was like what are you talking about and he does sort of a weird voice because he's just joking what are you talking about so that was exactly the right response no don't put zilinski on Joe Rogan show so Rogan quite correctly realized this was a prop aganda run and nothing good could come from it now remember he he wanted to talk to both the presidential candidates so if it was American Business and it was you know political he was all in he had you know Bernie Sanders on but zalinski is not like the others he's just pure propaganda so Rog is like no again if he if he had never told you that story that zalinski pitched it and he said no I mean think about how big the ratings would have been it's not like he was unaware that the ratings would have been you know Monumental of course they would have been and he's still and he still said no that was the right answer I I think he I think he got the right answer there uh let's talk about Putin so Putin's psychology game is uh I I was going to say second to none but it might be second to Trump one of the reasons that I think those two Bond a little bit you know as adversaries but they bond is that they're both so good at the psychology just listen to what Putin says and I'm not going to try to convince you that Putin means every word he says and it's all completely honest right we don't have to have that conversation right we we don't need any NPCs stor me in saying oh you're Putin's puppet how could you believe what Putin said no nothing like that's going to happen I'm going to tell you what Putin said I'm going to tell you what effect I think it had but I'm not going to tell you that Putin's the smartest person in the world and everything he says is true and we should do what he says right so NPCs calm down calm down you can handle this right so here are some of the things Putin said I guess he was at some event made some news he said that Trump is intelligent and he will find a solution to the Ukraine war so interesting Trump gets criticized for calling Putin smart and capable and his critics say what how can you compliment that monster don't you know he's your enemy stop saying good things about him but there's the enemy allegedly Putin and he's doing the same thing he's returning the compliment that's a pretty big compliment you know if if Putin says that you're intelligent and you're going to find a solution to the war like almost matter of factly whereas the current president did not find a solution to the war and it doesn't look like there was any chance that was ever going to happen you you can see that Putin's trying to get on the good side of trump now do you think Putin has a Intel that if he Praises Trump and makes him his ego feel good that he might get a better deal of course he does because literally every person in America says Trump just listens to the last person in the room and whoever kisses his ass the most now do you think anybody really knows that no do you do you know why Trump listens to the last person in the room does anybody know why CU at some point you have to be done you you have to be done make a decision at some point it's sort of like you you find the lost thing in the last place you look because the last place you look is where you found it so there's no place to look after you've found it so when the last PE person leaves the room that's when he realizes that he's made a decision because now he's heard both sides but now he's heard the side he likes he wants to hear that one more time that's the one you want to hear before you make your decision the one that you were leaning toward just to make sure it still sounds good so yes it should be completely normal that in general you're going to agree with the last person out of the room it's probably pretty normal doesn't mean every time but bet a lot of times it's just the most normal way that anything Works however let's see sorry um he Putin said he was ready for peace talks with Ukraine without preconditions but on the same terms he laid out over the summer which are preconditions so Putin says he wants to have a talk without preconditions as long as we're taking all the preconditions into consideration the preconditions would be Ukraine decides not to be part of NATO and that um basically Putin keeps the four areas that he already conquered and he already owns basically so that sounds like exactly the deal we all know is going to happen so that's interesting Putin also said that he thinks Trump's life is in danger was in danger and is now and uh even the cab members at risk you know that Tom Holman and at least someone else who was a cabinet pick got some death threats over the weekend so things are looking dangerous and Putin is warning um that uh that there's a genuine threat to Trump uh so here's what I want to know do you think that Putin's intelligence in other words his Intel departments do you think that they know enough about the American government that they know that the Democrats are planning or somebody is planning to try to kill Trump because there's no way we would know whether he is just saying that for a fact or if he actually has information because he wouldn't want to give away that he has information because that would give away his sources and methods right so the thing I wonder is does Putin know more than we do about the threat now here again I compliment Putin for his psychology game without being a supporter of him because he's a terrible terrible murderer of people um it's it's really smart for him to talk about the risk to to Trump because if nothing happens to Trump then he's sort of a good guy who you know showed some empathy for Trump and warned him and if something does happen to Trump he's the guy who warned him so warning Trump about the danger is just a smart play like it it's good no matter what happens it's good for Putin it's not good for us and uh s Putin went and he legalized crypto in Russia and he slash taxes on mining mining from crypto I guess I think that's what that means um and he uh trading income will be taxed at 133% and blah blah blah more if it's more so basically uh he's big on crypto what do you think of that well you know Trump is pro crypto compared to any prior president and I've heard some people say that crypto is the only way the US ends up financially okay and what I mean by that is that if you own some crypto let's say Bitcoin specifically um its odds of going up in value the smart people say it's almost guaranteed now the the counterargument would be there's something that we find out that we didn't know about and that's a pretty big risk for example finding out that there's some way to hack or steal your crypto wallet that nobody could have seen coming and no way to fix it now I haven't seen that but you could sort of imagine that something that's a technology where there might be some vulnerability that you haven't uh seen yet but if that doesn't happen that alleged hypothetical vulnerability that nobody's quite seen yet um in all the all of the uh all of the signals say that crypto will just keep going up basically forever so if you had for example a bunch of cash Investments and you add a little bit of crypto your situation should be that your your cash will uh inflate away to zero and your crypto will make up all the difference so if you had I don't know what the percentages would be because nobody knows what the future is but I'll just give you numbers to like kind of tell the story but don't get caught up on the percentages okay so if for example 80% of your wealth was in cash-like things you know like stocks and bonds and cash that could actually go to zero it could over time I mean not tomorrow but it could go to zero over time just because of inflation so not actually zero but it but it could become so little that you know you wish you didn't Own It crypto could make up all of that difference so if you had 20% crypto and 80% regular cash you might find that the one going up is about matching the one going down but I'm not smart enough or wise enough to say that 20% crypto is a smart number it's not what I have I have less so I'm not giving you any advice on crypto this is not not Financial advice but if you're trying to figure out how in the world does the United States survive crippling debt that just can't be paid back basically it can't be paid back let's be honest we're not going to pay back any $ 35 trillion do 36 nobody's getting paid back we're getting inflated away and people will wish they didn't own it basically so it could be that the only way out is crypto if the government owns some as well as all the citizens then we could pay our taxes and Etc so then if you take that cont context and then you look at Putin legalizing crypto and trying to get ahead of crypto could it be that TR that Putin knows because he's a pretty smart player that uh Russia also has to have crypto or else they're doomed or maybe he needs to own crypto to have some kind of Leverage over the West so when I see Putin going hard at crypto it makes me think that he might be thinking a few moves ahead of us so having Trump in office surrounded by smart people who are pro crypto it feels good I I'm glad that the Trump Administration not Trump specifically he he's no crypto expert but he's certainly surrounded by people who are going to advise him well on that I think meanwhile France has announced that Netanyahu uh is entitled to immunity from the international criminal court because they're not a party to the court now why did it take me until today to realize that so the inter international criminal court uh has a bunch of countries ass signed up but it does not include the United States and it does not include Israel for I guess suppose obvious reason cuz they would be basically we'd be the only ones taken to court and but but France is saying we're not going to arrest somebody who never signed that treaty to which I say oh why why did it never occur to me that that you wouldn't arrest somebody who wasn't part of the treaty so they couldn't have broken it makes sense now obviously that was just a workaround because France doesn't want to be enemies with Israel but it's it's just funny that I didn't see that obvious play that you can't arrest somebody who didn't sign up for it it's worth a shot uh Eric Weinstein agrees with me on physics the difference between us is that he's uh deeply uh let's say deeply invested and educated and experienced in the domain of physics and has his own uh well educated smart thoughts about string theory and his well educated thoughts uh match my own thoughts for the past 20 years for at least 20 years I've been saying you know this String Theory thing it sure has every signal for being now obviously I have no Science Background whatsoever but everything that I kept hearing about it every time I heard something about it I thought you know I don't think that even looks real just doesn't even look real and Eric Weinstein says that uh that string theory has sort of been the dominant thing people were trying to look at for the you know The Theory of Everything to tie everything together and then because it was so dominant as a as a promising direction that it blocked any real breakthroughs for 40 years and that uh at least is a confident or optimistic I'll say he's optimistic that after 40 Years of not getting the job done the physicist might be willing to look past it now and if they look past it suddenly the the possibility of major major breakthroughs might be better now this is sort of one of those hunch kind of ideas because you don't know what the future looks like so you know you know you don't know that there's something out there that's better than string theory and that we have access to it and it'll make a difference we don't know that but to me it's uh it's a warm feeling to know that somebody who is as deep into this topic uh as Eric is has exactly the same opinion I did as just somebody who can spot pretty easily the the only thing I claim is not that I know what is true but I can often spot what isn't so that's my only my only comment on string theory is like I don't know every time I read a story about this it's not that I think the science is wrong it's that everything about this just smells wrong just just everything about it so I agree with Eric I think that's the way it's going to go but it's a hunch on my part not based on any knowledge well as you know Trump is planning to do this largest uh deportation ever but axios reports and I was waiting for this to happen I I kind of suspect that that sooner or later the news would start telling you the following thing you're not going to get many illegal people so I and Holman and Trump and everybody smart said the same thing they said we're obviously going to focus all of our resources in getting rid of the criminals and and we don't know how long that's going to take and there's so many of them but it turns out if you put all your resources on it yeah you might get a few there just aren't many and axos had a story here I won't go through the details you can read it yourself in axios but um for example there are a whole bunch of people who are felons who have been convicted of horrible things like homicide and sexual assault but you can't Deport any of them until they finish their jail sentences so you got 29,000 people who are the mo the most hardened worst criminals and we have them in custody and they're not going to get deported because they're already in jail and jail is the place I guess the law says they got to be and then there are a few other examples like that where there are people who are sort of here legally Etc um so it's possible that Holman won't be able to find Big Bus loads of people to send anywhere so maybe what you're worried about were where you're seeing the military round up giant groups of people and keep them in detention centers until the military transport could get there and take them back it's a terrible visual that you don't want to live in the country where you're seeing your military carrying anybody away like for anything it's just a terrible look I'm I'm Pro Deport ation for the criminals especially uh but it's a it's a bad look so I don't think we're going to have that look I I think there might be like an anecdotal here or there you know there might be a Bus full of people or a Detention Center that's there temporarily but my current feeling is if we stop the new immigrants you know the new illegal immigrants if we stop that pretty well and I think Trump will do that that the gigantic migration immigration even if we try as hard as we can it's just hard and I think it'll be half Buss and it just won't be that much of a visual problem that's my guess so my prediction is you'll see a few anecdotal reports so there will be some reports of too much deportation but they'll be so limited and so just you know temporary that it's not really going to change the public view of things too much that's what I think there is also the claim that uh immigrants do less crime than Americans and that's offered as the argument that you should not Deport so does that argument work with you that the average immigrant let let's let's do two takes on this all right so here what we're going to do is just work through the thinking so we're we're only talking about how to how to think about it should you say hey let's have more immigration because on average they lower our average crime rate does that make sense let's lower our average by having more immigration because apparently the more immigrants you have the lower your crime rate is because they have a lower crime rate do you buy that let's say it's true just for a moment let's say they do have a crime rate there are also 29,000 felons who are convicted of homicide or sexual assault that's 29,000 people who would be alive if we didn't have illegal immigration 29,000 people would be alive or not raped doesn't that feel like a lot I mean I know it's a big country and and the 29,000 would be over multiple years but doesn't your government and your citizens do not your citizens have the right to say I don't care that they have a better rate I want them to kill zero people if somebody comes into your house and Slaughters your family and the police say whoa turns out that the odds of somebody coming in your house and slaughtering your family are way low so stop worrying about it you'll be like but but they slaughtered my family I know but as a percentage of all the crime is very low but but my family's dead I think you need to be a little less racist about this yes they did get slaughtered by an you know by somebody but as a percentage it was very unlikely so if you could just get over it yeah so I think that both things can be true um the I did look a little bit at some of the studies and I would say that uh there is some good evidence that uh the recent immigrants are lower at crime now what they said was I know what you're going to say don't say it I know what one of you is going to say because there's always at least one somebody here is going to say Scott the american crime rate is not like one average you know are they are they doing more or less crime than black Americans more or less than white Americans more or less than um asian-americans well I saw one study that said that they had they do less crime than white Americans do you you know they left out as they always do asian-americans do do you know how often these stories just act like there's no they're no asian-americans all right now let's ask the question again I'm an Asian-American and you tell me that I'm bringing in immigrants but don't worry they're their crime rate is less than the white people and as an Asian-American I say what it's less than the white people is it less than asian-americans no no it's more than asian-americans but it's less than the white people how do you feel about that so you're going to increase the rate of crime in my community yeah but it's still less than the white people I I'm just amused that the asian-americans do such a good job of staying in a jail and making money and staying married and basically doing everything right just continuously and then get left out of the conversation because they do everything right anyway good job asian-americans um but here was one of the uh hypotheses about why the immigrants are less likely to be involved in crime and here comes the kill shot are you ready for this this is not going to make you happy I'm going to give you a reason and now this is just one person's speculation but it sounded so good I'm I'm going to embrace it as my own there is a reason that recent immigrants are more likely or less likely to do a crime you're not going to like it here's a reason that recent immigrants are less likely to do crime you ready for it because they're more likely to be employed Married with Children and in good health oh no no no no no no no is that true is it true recent immigrants are more likely to be employed Married with Children and in good health because those things are very predictive that you're not going to do a crime I think these are true you know anecdotally anecdotally it's true every time I think of something in my own life who came was born in another country they're married they're employed they have children and they go to church damn it damn it they're Republicans let me say it the fast way yes the reason that recent immigrants do not commit as many crimes is because they're Republicans they don't know the Republicans they just act like it get a job get married have kids go to church Republicans so so if I said to you immigrants tend to be Republicans with all that comes with it getting jobs and getting married and staying in a jail that's easy that's easy to accept isn't it if I tell you that immigrants don't have a high crime rate your first your first reaction is W it's not the rate I'm looking at I'm looking at 29,000 people in jail for murder and rape but if I told you uh we brought in a million people who are basically Republicans and I say whoa whoa whoa a million people what about all the crime and then I say yes there's definitely crime because any group of people would have extra crime but there essentially the same rate of crime as Republicans and then what do I do what do I do then because let's say I'm a Republican and I like Republicans and I and I agree that they don't do a lot of crime anyway so as I often say if somebody tells you the raw number of something and doesn't tell you the percentage they are a propagandist that's brainwashing and they're not trying to tell you something useful likewise if they tell you the percentage but not the raw number they are propagandists they're trying to to brainwash you they're not trying to have an honest conversation you need to look at both every time or you don't know anything and I think it can be 100% true that on average we're bringing in a pretty high high class of people at least in terms of cultural compatibility with America at the same time we're bringing in a whole bunch of criminals they can both be true we we simply have to do a better job of everything that we're already doing and and I think everybody agrees with that meanwhile um Tom Holan who's going to be the head of the Border stuff um he was challenged by I guess a Denver Mayor Mike Johnston because Mike Johnston said he's not going to let um the citizens of his City who are maybe undocumented he's not going to let them be rounded up taken to jail and that people like him will be putting their bodies in the way basically protesting in a physical way and uh he doesn't he doesn't care if he has to go to jail for it he's willing to go to jail to defy Trump's deportation operation so somebody asked Tom Holman about the fact that the Denver mayor is willing to go to jail to stop deportation and Tom Holan without cracking his smile says and I paraphrase well at least we found something we agree on he's willing to go to jail and I'm willing to put him in jail and May I drop my mic there mic drop yes Tom Holman that was kind of perfect communication right there yeah Tom Holman is good in general he's a good communicator uh but but every now and then he'll he'll hit like a you know just a base clearing home run that's a base clearing home run yep we agree you're willing to go to jail I'm willing to put you there what's next nicely done communication wise I'm talking about um I saw a video of tulsey Gabbert and I didn't remember she did this but when she was talking about why she was leaving the Democrat Party and she mentioned there were War mongers which didn't make sense for her and that they were too woke but also she said directly that they were anti-white racist the Democrat Party I don't remember her saying that directly but I'd like to thank her because that's both honest and true so yes the Democrats are an anti-white racist party I see them as racists primarily anyway So speaking of uh verbally being verbally good there's this representative of Van Orton who was being challenged by a CNN guy uh CNN host was asking about Trump's tariffs and that Trump's tariffs would increase food prices so how would you answer that because everybody's worried about the price of eggs and whatnot so food prices are you could argue our number one you know really Main Street kind of a issue and uh Trump's talking about tariffs and tariffs would increase prices everybody understands that and here's what rep representative van Orton said quote I'm willing to pay more for guacamole if it means fenel poison doesn't come across our border oh wow oh wow now that's some good communicating now is it sort of accurate No well no no I mean it's not it's not guacamole to fentanyl if it were only guacamole to fenel we would all eat fewer fewer avocados and we wouldn't notice because we just eat other stuff but G the bigger problem is at all food price or or enough of the food goes up in price that it hits everybody so it's certainly not as easy as avoiding avocados however when representative van Orton puts it in that term it is so linguistically excellent in terms of an argument so this is just a persuasion lesson I'm not talking about the policy just about the persuasion and the communication so nice job so I'm gonna this uh this raises my flag so I've never heard of Representative van Orton before uh but he he said a second thing he said uh about fenel he said everyone is now one degree of separation from somebody who died from a fenel death I think that's close to true that pretty much everybody knows somebody I mean in my case my stepson but you all know me so every one of you who knows me knows you're one one degree away um and most of you know somebody else who is one degree away now both of those sentences are really strong you know I of all the things you could have said about this topic U Van Orton reached into the middle and picked out two of the best that probably is not a coincidence so what I'd ask you just keep an eye on this guy because this is unusually good communication and when you see that it's usually a a leading indicator you're going to see more of this person so um keep an eye on him Rob Briner has allegedly deleted his account on X uh after Trump won breit bar news is reporting this and uh we think he's probably going over to Blue Sky um I think he's is that confirmed I don't know but blue sky is the new competitor decks uh Jack dorsy new uh product and it's apparently the uptick is pretty good it's getting a lot of people but I just want to point out something that somebody pointed out in the comments to me earlier you can be on a or you can be on Blue Sky what would be the initials for Blue Sky if you're going to use an acronym Blue Sky well I would use the B I probably use the S from sky that would be oh it's literally BS all right but here's the thing I think is funny um if if Blue Sky had started in a let's say an organic way where it was just a product and everybody had a chance to use it if they liked it they use it some more they would probably have a normal mix of you know left and right political people because everybody would have seen as just the product so it's not political it's just a product but because were highly politicized especially at the moment people see blue sky as where the good and Noble Democrats can go and they see X as that polluted right-wing conspiracy place so presumably Blue Sky now has the greatest number of people with mental health issues of any platform ever and I mean that seriously I would bet you any amount of money really that if you just looked at the percentage of users of you know any other platform Facebook X anything else anything else Rumble that you would find that blue sky probably has just through the roof therapy and uh you know on Mental Health meds and every kind of anxiety and depression and let's just say that they wouldn't know their whole body is also brain have you noticed how many people on the left who seem to have defective brains and by defective I mean either they're not very bright which is that's a problem that's on the left and the right of course there's always some people are not bright but the ones who seem crazy have you noticed that their bodies also look uh deformed have you noticed you have noticed haven't you yeah you look at their bodies and then you listen to them you go wow the things that are coming out of their brains sound just crazy it's not their brain their body is their brain all right if your if your body is destroyed as many of the people on the left have destroyed their bodies you're going to get just crazy stuff coming out of your mouth and that would be a very typical predictable scientifically compatible prediction that you could feel pretty confident about that if that if you have one group where their bodies are a mess and one group on the right especially young men who are very interested in keeping their physical fitness going you should have one group that's happy and one group that's sad and I think because of the weird situation of everything being politicized that the people with the the worst brains not necessarily born the worst but because their body is their brain if they didn't take care of it it's just not working very well and they all ended up in blue sky so I'd be real curious if if I'm right that if you went to Blue Sky it would look like a a mental illness festival and it wouldn't have if it had just been a non-political time when it was launched so we'll see but at the same time that Rob Brer left all of my PID trolls are gone I don't know if you were watching the fund but for the past year or so uh they're very obviously paid and the way you know they're paid is that they they show up like it's time for work so if I would do a post that made a any good point against Democrats or for Trump the first comment 100% of the time the first one would be a troll and the way you can know they're a troll is that they they have a maybe four or five messages that they repeat that are not the ones anybody else ever says it's obvious that at some point in time somebody made a list of all the things you say to Scott so you say to him oh Scott your your opinion of politics is as good as your taking care of your stepson who died of fenel that was one of them very common oh I guess that's why you're divorced which would have nothing to do with politics or anything I said so um and oh that and I guess that's why you're cancelled so they would go for what they thought was the most psychologically destructive thing they could say um completely divorced from whatever point I tried to make so in other words they weren't saying oh have you checked the source they were not saying your facts are wrong they were not saying uh have you considered this they were not saying here's the fact check they were saying what can I say that will make this guy not want to spend another second on X and want to you know get a high-powered rifle and do something bad and then they would pick that it's very obvious that there were like five things on the list and that it was somebody's job to sit there and when it goes Bing they know I've they know I've gone and they quickly go to their list they go o Adams five things marriage to know I'll pick number three it was very obvious like cuz nobody else was doing it except the first comment of everyone that was a political post and if I posted something that was just you know interesting or fun nope don't show up so these were not political actors and and I could tell they were not political in 2016 I have to admit I couldn't tell I just thought there were terrible people on the internet because there are terrible people everywhere I thought whoa some of these are more terrible than others but one but once I understood that um was it from I guess that's was that the name of the guy who organized the trolls for the 2016 cycle so we knew actually after the fact after 2016 election we knew who hired the trolls we we knew the budget it was exactly what it looked like what I couldn't tell then is whether some of the people were just organically bad and some of the people were paid but I couldn't tell which are paid and which are organic but this last cycle the paid ones were just so obvious so every time they did it I would just respond paid Troll and how many times did you see me do that because it was almost every day payrol payrol and it was always the first comment anyway I'm glad they're gone it's really different on X now um Heather Mc.
Donald was doing some writing recently and I forget what publication but um talking about how men and women generally uh differ and how they prioritize safety and inclusion versus accepting conflict um and goes to point out that there may be a uh maybe some evolutionary reason where men handle conflict different differently from women and the observation is this I've made the same observation which is that men can uh fight and go at each other like crazy but if they find a reason to agree and work together they can almost instantly get over it like the past just goes away and we shake hands and we apologize and we accept apologies and we say oh well that was an ugly moment we had there together glad that's gone and now we're friends or now we're allies or co-workers whatever we need to be so the thought was that men uh knew that their best survival mechanism was to not turn every enemy into either dead or you stay an enemy but sometimes just get them on your side and then you have an extra person on your side so having an extra man on your side is going to keep you alive so the thinking is that we're just evolved the men are easier to say all right I'm over it let's let's move on and that uh women would be less likely to get over it and sort of keep it as a permanent source of at least mental conflict so in other words when men hear a provocative speech um they might enjoy the debate enjoy the fight and also be able to get over it instantly whereas women if they go online and they see a debate they might also be drawn into the debate but they're not enjoying it and they're not getting over it so it's a whole different whole different approach so um so the the point of this is that uh there might be a male warrior hypothesis that might be hardwired biologically that that fits with my observation so my observation is that men can get over disagreements pretty easily all right um the LA Times owner uh was doing an interview with X CNN star Oliver Darcy I didn't know Oliver Darcy got fired from CNN or did he quit he he was terrible on CNN but he's went on his own now so the LA times as you know has a some rich owner who uh didn't want to endorse KL Harris he wanted to try to find some Middle Ground where he thought newspapers should be so he got a lot of push back from that and apparently one of the new things he's doing is he wants to change up his LA Times editorial board and he's hired Scott Jennings so Scott Jennings the you know viral Superstar on CNN the the Trump sporting guy who embarrasses the other clowns at the table on a daily basis it was selected to be part of the LA Times editorial board so good job Scott Jennings again another Scott doing well but uh apparently the billionaire owner of the LA Times ended the call because uh Darcy just kept um giving him a hard time about hiring uh Scott Jennings and uh apparently Darcy ended up going full TDS and uh and the the owner of the newspaper and his Handler whoever it was was like H we're done here B basically they just dismissed him as not even a a serious character which was the right thing to do now I should tell you that the LA Times when Dilbert was in newspapers before I got cancelled uh the LA Times was the only one that was cancelling Dilbert or or editing it censoring it actually uh LA Times was the only newspaper that routinely censored Dilbert back in the days when Dilbert ran in every newspaper the LA Times would just sometimes just not run one and it got so it was just like laughably predictable I do a comic that was just a little bit edgy but still rated G because you can't really get past G in a newspaper is still rated G and and the LA Times would say oh can't say that every other newspaper would say yes so um I I'm very up on the this new owner um it looks like he's trying to do a serious job of improving the newspaper and they certainly needed it well I read I think it was in the hill they had a story about the Democrat bench for 2028 I'll tell you when you look at what what the smart people think are their best next um politicians for running for president it doesn't look like they have a chance so here are the names that are floating as their best candidates kamla Harris seriously literally the worst campaign of all time and she's running first uh Gavin Nome seriously Gavin Nome he's like right at the top of your list after destroying California Gretchen Whitmer Josh Shapiro Pete Buddha judge and JB priter do you think any one of those could be a capable Republican and can name I don't know probably 10 Republicans who could be any one of these people am I wrong about that am I wrong that there are at least there have to be at least 10 prominent Republicans that could be everyone on this list these are not these are not competitive I don't think Democrats have any understanding of what would even make their side competitive and the the entertainment which I'm getting in watching them not understand anything they don't understand anything it's really amazing and uh I'm looking at some of your comments those are weird fedman you know what I I don't think the Democrats would push fentam fedman to the front of the line he may be a little bit of a problem because he doesn't obey the Democrats enough but if fedin wanted to take a run at it he would be the one I'd worry about I don't want to give advice to the Democrats but if I heard that fedman was running for president in the next cycle I would say that's a problem yeah now AOC has been mentioned I don't that doesn't seem serious to me I can't imagine she would even win the primary but fedman fedman could really fool everybody because he he does have he has the common touch and he doesn't seem to be willing to lie when everybody else is and I hate to say that's a really attractive combination you know he is smart I mean it was hard to tell when he had his his stroke but he's he's an unusually smart person and he clearly cares about the country and clearly cares about people and he clearly is smarter than the average Democrat and he sees that there are some things that Republicans see that he says that makes sense you can perfectly understand why the the Dem why the Republicans would feel this way so he's the only one who seems to have anything close to an understanding of what's happening I think fedman knows exactly what's wrong that the Democrats act like woke idiots the Republicans act like acted like problem solvers and we were not in a place where acting like a woke idiot was a luxury we could afford it it was once at one point it was a luxury we could afford not anymore now you just need the solution to the problems so it wasn't it was never to me it never seemed like they were a close competition even though the vote was closer than I thought it should be what if RFK goes back to the Democrat Party I don't think I don't think RFK uh Jor has a chance in a um a race like that I he's got he's got so many points of attack that I I think he's serious about having one Mission left like he has his One mission fix the food and uh I have high hopes that he will I see you got a copy of loser think I don't know how you got it it's no longer for a sale um it was one of my cancelled books so you must have got a you must have one of the used used copies but maybe at some point I'll reissue that um Democrats do not allow an independent thinker yeah true that all right so I'll tell you again if you don't have your Dilbert calendar ordered just go to dilbert.com and that's the only place you'll find the link to order it you will not find that link anywhere else it's not on Amazon it's not on bookstores not in Walmart uh but the books are my books make excellent gifts they change lives yeah the the the first two reframe your brain and had to failed almost everything those are total life Chang ders I I hear it every day and I guarantee it by the way um if I weren't hearing it every single day I wouldn't say that but every day I hear people say oh changed my whole life so it's a good gift if you want to change somebody's life hey you got a lot of calendars there if a well AOC is married and if she had children would she be a better politician um maybe uh loop speak the the media will pump up the chosen yeah but I don't know if the I don't know if the media has the ability to drag a bad candidate over the Finish Line anymore they did with Biden but it looked like they couldn't with Harris maybe she was just extra bad but it does seem that the rise of the podcasters is a real thing it's going to last for a while all right ladies and gentlemen um that's all I got for today um I'm going to talk to the locals people privately in a moment and uh I'll see the rest of you tomorrow thanks for joining on You.
Tube and x and uh Rumble we'll see you tomorrow same Time same place locals I'm coming at you 30 seconds e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e
morning it looks like the stock market
is off to a nice little
run Tesla's
up all right not too bad even rumbles up
today I think we're uh going to have the
best show
ever might not be obvious why but it's
because everything's
awesome and you're going to have a good
time just wait you just wait
all right almost
ready good morning everybody and welcome
to the highlight of human civilization
it's called coffee with Scott Adams and
darn it you've never had a better time
but if you'd like to take this
experience up to levels that nobody can
even understand with their tiny shiny
human brains
all you need for that is a cuper Mugger
glass tager CH Stein a canteen Jugger
flask a vessel of any kind fill it with
your favorite liquid I like
coffee and join me now for the
unparallel pleasure the dopamine h of
the day thing that makes everything
better it's called the simultaneous Sip
and it happens now
go Delicious By the way if you're
listening later on Spotify where this
gets it's uploaded after I'm done I I
hear the commercials are insanely
loud compared to the content I don't
think that happens any on the other
platforms so you could always listen on
a different
platform um because the studio I'm using
only sends one audio signal to all the
all the different
platforms so oh it doesn't send it to
Spotify though does
it I guess ify is adding the commercials
on the platform so I'm not sure how to
fix that but I'll look into it well you
would not be surprised according to s
poost that whole coffee Cherry extract
supplement might improve working memory
now you might say to me what is a coffee
cherry and how do you take the Cherry
from the coffee and the answer is a
cherry is the the coating to the uh to
the Coffee Bean I guess and normally
when you drink coffee they remove that
part but the part they remove is
awesome it's awesome so apparently if
you were to eat the part that remove
you'd have good working memory now I
don't take a chance so what I do is I
grow a Coffee Tree in my
backyard and then every morning I just
go out and I lick the bark you know the
leaves and I definitely eat all the
cherries so that's what what I do uh
this would be a good time to remind you
not to take any
medical advice from me not
once by the way if you notice behind
me where you can almost read it there
are the one two three four five best
things you could buy as a
gift I I I actually promise you that if
you know somebody who likes reading
books at least one of these books is
going to work for everybody you can hit
every every every person if it's
somebody who doesn't know anything about
me and doesn't know anything about
Dilbert you want to go for the reframe
your brain that just works for everybody
and had failed almost everything and
still went big those are guaranteed to
make them happy if they're political and
they like stuff like how to learn
persuasion win bigle is the book and if
they're philosophical and they like to
think about the nature of reality itself
then God's debris the complete works
would be the way to go and if they are
Dilbert um fans but they don't care
about the politics or the persuasion
then get the 2025 Dilbert calendar now
the important thing is that the calendar
is only available at a link you can find
at dilbert.com the books are on Amazon
so if you want the book just search
Amazon they'll all pop
up but the calendar I would get that
right away because I can't guarantee
that if you get it a week before
Christmas it's going to show up right so
I wouldn't wait on the calendar we're
making those as we as we get orders so
so sooner is better
anyway um scientists according to no
Ridge have made magic polymers that can
pull water from the thin air with less
energy so there's all kinds of um all
kinds of scientific breakthroughs in
creating water out of the air but it all
takes
energy and this one takes way less
energy so it's not it's not going to you
know power your city but it might help
you in an
emergency well there's the first asthma
treatment breakthrough in half a century
according to Kent live news it's a game
changer they say some kind of
vaccination they say will substantially
decrease your asthma attacks well I
don't know might take a couple years
before that works its way through the
system we'll see I'm I'm a skeptical of
everything um there is a Prebiotic
supplement of some something called
inulin and of course frul gasa
sakade pretty sure I pronounced that
exactly right and it boosts brain
function in old people h huh but here's
the interesting part what it does is it
changes your gut
chemistry and here's an actual sentence
from the article see if this sounds
familiar to
you uh quote evidence for the close
relationship between the gut and the
brain is growing year after year now
watch this part see if this sounds like
me some experts are now so convinced by
the results they refer to the gut as the
body's second
brain what do I tell you almost every
day almost every day I tell you that
your body is your brain there's no such
thing is the brain in its own little
closed off area and then your body is
your body no your body is your brain it
if you don't have all that chemistry
right in your body your brain isn't
working period so your your brain and
your body are one
tool all right uh reportedly Elon Musk
is going to use his AI called X Ai and
do a little Standalone app so right now
it only exists in in X as grock but
they're going to make their own
Standalone as far as I can tell it seems
way behind chap
GPT because Gro so far doesn't have
images is and it doesn't have ability to
talk to it you there's a lot it doesn't
do I don't know if it's going to catch
up I keep I keep seeing stories that say
that Elon musk's version is going to
catch up to Chad
GPT but it doesn't look like it's
happening so I mean it could happen
quickly if they you know make some big
change I suppose but I don't know
meanwhile the oceans cooled the planet
more than we thought but also according
to no
Ridge um so turns out that the ocean
gives off some kind of sulfur gas and
that hadn't been totally understood and
that sulfur gas cools the climate more
than previously thought so what they're
doing is they're going back to all their
climate models and now they're using
this new knowledge about the sulfur
that's coming out of the ocean and how
it cools things to modify their
models now here's an interesting
question why do they need to modify the
models I've been told quite reliably
that 98% of all scientists say the
models are telling us enough of what we
need to know I mean nothing's perfect
but they're telling us enough of what we
need to know that we can put trillions
and trillions of dollars into it
so why do we need to fix the
models uh I thought you told me the
model models already
worked cuz you asked me for trillions of
dollars
so why do I have a new story every
single day about a new variable that
they didn't know about that's very large
and so they're incorporating it into the
models any of you who have lived in the
real world as long as I have you know
what that means right if you have a
model that's telling you the truth and
then you keep changing the model by by
adding variables almost every week and
the variables are kind of big and no
matter what you do you still get the
same
answer if if you're 25 you think that
means that climate change is real and
they've got a real good bead on
it when you're 65 the fact that they
change it every week tells you that they
don't know what they're
doing it's a it's a real big difference
in experience
am I right th those of you who are older
and have experience when you see that
they're adding a new variable to their
complicated models and they're adding it
every week and they're big they're big
variables that tells you it's
there's no other explanation
there there literally is no other
explanation but if you're young you just
think oh the models were good before and
they're getting
better no that's not what's happening
all right uh meanwhile according to
Daily Caller news
Foundation the America's most expensive
uh Dei program is about to go away so
apparently the University of Michigan
had this uh they've they've spent $250
million on Dei since
2016 and students and faculty have
reported
deteriorating campus climate
um racism is worse they have exactly the
same percentage of black
enrollment and they got absolutely
nothing out of it except people feeling
bad about each
other so that's what they got for $250
million hey does anybody know how they
could have saved $250
million is there anything they could
have done anybody they could have asked
hey we just need your advice should we
spend $250 million on
this well they should have asked Scott
because I would have told
them you know if you divide people into
groups and say that one of those groups
is the oppressor and one group is the
victim uh what's going to happen
huh what's going to happen use my giant
brain to predict into the future you
divide people into groups and you make
won the oppressor and won the victim how
does that turn
out oh you wasted your $250 million
that's a quarter of a
billion do you think that uh University
could have done anything useful with a
quarter of a billion dollars like
teaching classes better and paying
teachers more stuff like that well
anyway the uh University is talking
about Shak handing the whole thing
because the program created quote a
culture of grievance huh who could have
seen that coming a culture of
grievance maybe they should have asked
me well you can see that it's all
happening now if the biggest I think the
biggest employer isn't is Walmart the
biggest employer outside the government
so the government is the biggest
employer they're going to get rid of Dei
under Trump
uh if you count the military they're
going to get rid of Dei Walmart I don't
know if they're the biggest company at
least employment wise but they're
getting they got rid of Dei and now the
largest in the University World in terms
of spending and how much attention they
gave it looks like they're talking about
just getting rid of it
entirely everything's going my
way all right meanwhile according to the
hill America's opinion of the Republican
party is on the rise and America's
opinion of the Democrats is on the
decline why well I don't know but in the
poll 45% Americans said they feel
favorable toward the Republicans now
still under 50% so it's not the best in
the world but 45% how is that compared
to how they people feel about Democrats
oh
not so well so uh GOP went
um uh who said they felt unfavorable oh
so both the GOP went down a little bit
but it's still bigger than the Democrats
so Democrats are 39% had a good good
feeling about their
party and uh more Republicans like their
party that makes sense I mean nobody's
surprised by that right
Joe Rogan made a little news again as
he's as he does you know I'll tell you
the thing about Joe
Rogan that is the least
appreciated is the mistakes he doesn't
make so you know how the dog not barking
is the one you don't
notice the the mistakes that could
easily be made that Joe Rogan doesn't
make it's kind of
impressive I I'm more and more of the
opinion that Joe Rogan is just one of
the smartest people we've ever seen in
the public sphere but part of what makes
him smart is he doesn't act smart like
he doesn't you know rub it in your face
or you know wear a you know wear a robe
or
something he he just lives his life but
if you sort of follow him for years as I
have and many of you have where are all
the dumb things have you noticed there's
no dumb things like everybody who talks
that much to that many people they're
going to have some dumb stuff in their
catalog
right that the dumbest thing that Joe
Rogan has done has turned out to be
right you know like taking Ivon and
stuff like that so even the things he
was criticized for the
most well kind of turned out right but
here's another one apparently
zalinski uh wanted to come on Joe
Rogan's podcast
and according to Rogan he said zalinsky
tried to come on yeah they tried to get
zalinsky on he says I was like what are
you talking about and he does sort of a
weird voice because he's just joking
what are you talking about so that was
exactly the right
response no don't put zilinski on Joe
Rogan show so Rogan quite correctly
realized this was a prop aganda run and
nothing good could come from it now
remember he he wanted to talk to both
the presidential candidates so if it was
American Business and it was you know
political he was all in he had you know
Bernie Sanders on but zalinski is not
like the others he's just pure
propaganda so Rog is like
no again if he if he had never told you
that
story that
zalinski pitched it and he said no I
mean think about how big the ratings
would have been it's not like he was
unaware that the ratings would have been
you know Monumental of course they would
have been and he's still and he still
said
no that was the right answer I I think
he I think he got the right answer
there uh let's talk about Putin so
Putin's psychology game is uh
I I was going to say second to none but
it might be second to Trump one of the
reasons that I think those two Bond a
little bit you know as adversaries but
they bond is that they're both so good
at the
psychology just listen to what Putin
says and I'm not going to try to
convince you that Putin means every word
he says and it's all completely honest
right we don't have to have that
conversation right we we don't need any
NPCs stor me in saying oh you're Putin's
puppet how could you believe what Putin
said no nothing like that's going to
happen I'm going to tell you what Putin
said I'm going to tell you what effect I
think it had but I'm not going to tell
you that Putin's the smartest person in
the world and everything he says is true
and we should do what he says right so
NPCs calm down calm down you can handle
this
right so here are some of the things
Putin said I guess he was at some event
made some news he said that Trump is
intelligent and he will find a solution
to the Ukraine war so interesting Trump
gets criticized for calling Putin smart
and capable and his critics say what how
can you compliment that monster don't
you know he's your enemy stop saying
good things about him but there's the
enemy allegedly Putin and he's doing the
same thing he's returning the compliment
that's a pretty big compliment you know
if if Putin says that you're intelligent
and you're going to find a solution to
the war like almost matter of factly
whereas the current president did not
find a solution to the war and it
doesn't look like there was any chance
that was ever going to
happen you you can see that Putin's
trying to get on the good side of trump
now do you think Putin has a
Intel that if he Praises Trump and makes
him his ego feel good that he might get
a better
deal of course he does because literally
every person in America says Trump just
listens to the last person in the room
and whoever kisses his ass the most now
do you think anybody really knows
that no do you do you know why Trump
listens to the last person in the
room does anybody know
why CU at some point you have to be
done you you have to be done make a
decision at some point it's sort of like
you you find the lost thing in the last
place you look because the last place
you look is where you found it so
there's no place to look after you've
found it so when the last PE person
leaves the
room that's when he realizes that he's
made a decision because now he's heard
both sides but now he's heard the side
he likes he wants to hear that one more
time that's the one you want to hear
before you make your decision the one
that you were leaning toward just to
make sure it still sounds good so yes it
should be completely
normal that in general you're going to
agree with the last person out of the
room it's probably pretty normal doesn't
mean every time but bet a lot of times
it's just the most normal way that
anything
Works however let's see
sorry
um he Putin said he was ready for peace
talks with Ukraine without
preconditions but on the same terms he
laid out over the summer which are
preconditions so Putin says he wants to
have a talk without preconditions as
long as we're taking all the
preconditions into consideration the
preconditions would be Ukraine decides
not to be part of
NATO and that um basically Putin keeps
the four areas that he already conquered
and he already owns basically so that
sounds like exactly the deal we all know
is going to
happen so that's interesting Putin also
said that he thinks Trump's life is in
danger was in danger and is now and uh
even the cab members at risk you know
that Tom Holman and at least someone
else who was a cabinet pick got some
death threats over the
weekend so things are looking dangerous
and Putin is
warning um that uh that there's a
genuine threat to
Trump uh so here's what I want to know
do you think that Putin's intelligence
in other words his Intel departments do
you think that they know enough about
the American
government that they know that the
Democrats are planning or somebody is
planning to try to kill
Trump because there's no way we would
know whether he is just saying that for
a fact or if he actually has
information because he wouldn't want to
give away that he has information
because that would give away his sources
and methods
right so the thing I wonder
is does Putin know more than we do about
the threat now here again I compliment
Putin for his psychology game without
being a supporter of him because he's a
terrible terrible murderer of
people
um it's it's really smart for him to
talk about the risk to to Trump because
if nothing happens to Trump then he's
sort of a good guy who you know showed
some empathy for Trump and warned him
and if something does happen to
Trump he's the guy who warned
him so warning Trump about the danger is
just a smart play like it it's good no
matter what happens it's good for Putin
it's not good for
us and uh s Putin went and he legalized
crypto in Russia and he slash taxes on
mining mining from crypto I guess I
think that's what that means
um and he uh trading income will be
taxed at 133% and blah blah blah more if
it's more so basically uh he's big on
crypto what do you think of that well
you know Trump is pro crypto compared to
any prior
president
and I've heard some people say that
crypto is the only way the US ends up
financially okay and what I mean by that
is that if you own some
crypto let's say Bitcoin specifically um
its odds of going up in value the smart
people say it's almost guaranteed now
the the counterargument would be there's
something that we find out that we
didn't know about and that's a pretty
big risk for example finding out that
there's some way to hack or steal your
crypto wallet that nobody could have
seen coming and no way to fix it now I
haven't seen that but you could sort of
imagine that something that's a
technology where there might be some
vulnerability that you haven't uh seen
yet but if that doesn't happen that
alleged hypothetical vulnerability that
nobody's quite seen yet um in all the
all of the uh all of the signals say
that crypto will just keep going up
basically
forever so if you had for example a
bunch of cash Investments and you add a
little bit of
crypto your situation should be that
your your cash will uh inflate away to
zero and your crypto will make up all
the
difference so if you had I don't know
what the percentages would be because
nobody knows what the future is but I'll
just give you numbers to like kind of
tell the story but don't get caught up
on the percentages okay so if for
example 80% of your wealth was in
cash-like things you know like stocks
and bonds and cash that could actually
go to
zero it could over time I mean not
tomorrow but it could go to zero over
time just because of inflation so not
actually zero but it but it could become
so little that you know you wish you
didn't Own It crypto could make up all
of that difference so if you had 20%
crypto and 80% regular cash you might
find that the one going up is about
matching the one going
down but I'm not smart enough or wise
enough to say that 20% crypto is a smart
number it's not what I have I have less
so I'm not giving you any advice on
crypto this is not not Financial advice
but if you're trying to figure out how
in the world does the United States
survive crippling debt that just can't
be paid back basically it can't be paid
back let's be honest we're not going to
pay back any $ 35 trillion do 36
nobody's getting paid back we're getting
inflated
away and people will wish they didn't
own it basically so it could be that the
only way out is
crypto if the government owns some as
well as all the citizens then we could
pay our taxes and Etc so then if you
take that cont context and then you look
at Putin legalizing crypto and trying to
get ahead of crypto could it be that TR
that Putin knows because he's a pretty
smart
player that uh Russia also has to have
crypto or else they're doomed or maybe
he needs to own crypto to have some kind
of Leverage over the West so when I see
Putin going hard at crypto it makes me
think that he might be thinking a few
moves ahead of us so having Trump in
office surrounded by smart people who
are pro
crypto it feels good I I'm glad that the
Trump Administration not Trump
specifically he he's no crypto expert
but he's certainly surrounded by people
who are going to advise him well on that
I
think meanwhile France has announced
that
Netanyahu uh is entitled to immunity
from the international criminal court
because they're not a party to the
court now why did it take me until today
to realize
that so the inter international criminal
court uh has a bunch of countries ass
signed up but it does not include the
United States and it does not include
Israel for I guess suppose obvious
reason
cuz they would be basically we'd be the
only ones taken to court and but but
France is saying we're not going to
arrest somebody who never signed that
treaty to which I say oh why why did it
never occur to me
that that you wouldn't arrest somebody
who wasn't part of the treaty so they
couldn't have broken
it makes sense now obviously that was
just a workaround because France doesn't
want to be enemies with
Israel but
it's it's just funny that I didn't see
that obvious play that you can't arrest
somebody who didn't sign up for
it it's worth a
shot uh Eric
Weinstein agrees with me on
physics the difference between us is
that he's uh
deeply uh let's say deeply invested and
educated and experienced in the domain
of physics and has his own uh well
educated smart thoughts about string
theory and his well educated thoughts uh
match my own thoughts for the past 20
years for at least 20 years I've been
saying you know this String Theory
thing it sure has every signal for being
now obviously I have no Science
Background whatsoever but everything
that I kept hearing about
it every time I heard something about it
I thought you know
I don't think that even looks real just
doesn't even look real and Eric
Weinstein says that uh that string
theory has sort of been the dominant
thing people were trying to look at for
the you know The Theory of Everything to
tie everything together and then because
it was so dominant as a as a promising
direction that it blocked any real
breakthroughs for 40
years and that uh at least is a
confident or optimistic I'll say he's
optimistic that after 40 Years of not
getting the job done the physicist might
be willing to look past it now and if
they look past it suddenly the the
possibility of major major
breakthroughs might be better
now this is sort of one of those hunch
kind of ideas because you don't know
what the future looks like so you know
you know you don't know that there's
something out there that's better than
string theory and that we have access to
it and it'll make a difference we don't
know that but to me it's uh it's a warm
feeling to know that somebody who is as
deep into this topic uh as Eric is has
exactly the same opinion I did as just
somebody who can spot pretty
easily the the only thing I
claim is not that I know what is
true but I can often spot what isn't so
that's my only my only comment on string
theory is like I don't know every time I
read a story about
this it's not that I think the science
is wrong it's that everything about this
just smells wrong just just everything
about it so I agree with Eric I think
that's the way it's going to go but it's
a hunch on my part not based on any
knowledge well as you know Trump is
planning to do this largest uh
deportation ever but axios reports and I
was waiting for this to happen I I kind
of suspect that that sooner or later the
news would start telling you the
following
thing you're not going to get many
illegal
people so I and Holman and Trump and
everybody smart said the same thing they
said we're obviously going to focus all
of our resources in getting rid of the
criminals and and we don't know how long
that's going to take and there's so many
of them but it turns out if you put all
your resources on it yeah you might get
a few there just aren't many and axos
had a story here I won't go through the
details you can read it yourself in
axios but um for example there are a
whole bunch of people who are felons who
have been convicted of horrible things
like homicide and sexual assault but you
can't Deport any of them until they
finish their jail sentences
so you got 29,000 people who are the mo
the most hardened worst criminals and we
have them in custody and they're not
going to get
deported because they're already in jail
and jail is the place I guess the law
says they got to be and then there are a
few other examples like
that where there are people who are sort
of here legally
Etc um
so it's
possible that Holman won't be able to
find Big Bus loads of people to send
anywhere so maybe what you're worried
about were where you're seeing the
military round up giant groups of people
and keep them in detention centers until
the military transport could get there
and take them back it's a terrible
visual that you don't want to live in
the country where you're seeing your
military carrying anybody away like for
anything it's just a terrible look I'm
I'm Pro Deport ation for the criminals
especially uh but it's a it's a bad look
so I don't think we're going to have
that look I I think there might be like
an anecdotal here or there you know
there might be a Bus full of people or a
Detention Center that's there
temporarily but my current feeling is if
we stop the new immigrants you know the
new illegal immigrants if we stop that
pretty well and I think Trump will do
that that the gigantic migration
immigration even if we try as hard as we
can it's just hard and I think it'll be
half Buss and it just won't be that much
of a visual problem that's my guess so
my prediction is you'll see a few
anecdotal reports so there will be some
reports of too much deportation but
they'll be so limited and so just you
know temporary that it's not really
going to change the public view of
things too much that's what I
think there is also the claim that uh
immigrants do less crime than
Americans and that's offered as the
argument that you should not
Deport so does that argument work with
you that the average immigrant let let's
let's do two takes on this all right so
here what we're going to do is just work
through the thinking so we're we're only
talking about how to how to think about
it should you say hey let's have more
immigration because on average they
lower our average crime rate does that
make
sense let's lower our average by having
more immigration because apparently the
more immigrants you have the lower your
crime rate is because they have a lower
crime
rate do you buy that let's say it's true
just for a moment let's say they do have
a crime
rate there are also 29,000 felons who
are convicted of homicide or sexual
assault that's 29,000 people who would
be
alive if we didn't have illegal
immigration 29,000 people would be alive
or not
raped doesn't that feel like a lot I
mean I know it's a big country and and
the 29,000 would be over multiple years
but doesn't your government and your
citizens do not your citizens have the
right to say I don't care that they have
a better
rate I want them to kill zero
people if somebody comes into your house
and Slaughters your
family and the police say whoa turns out
that the odds of somebody coming in your
house and slaughtering your family are
way low so stop worrying about it you'll
be like but but they slaughtered my
family I know but as a percentage of all
the crime is very low but but my
family's
dead I think you need to be a little
less racist about this yes they did get
slaughtered by an you know by somebody
but as a percentage it was very unlikely
so if you could just get over
it yeah
so I think that both things can be
true um the I did look a little bit at
some of the
studies and I would say that uh there is
some good evidence that uh the recent
immigrants are lower at
crime now what they said was I know what
you're going to say don't say it I know
what one of you is going to say because
there's always at least one somebody
here is going to say Scott the american
crime rate is not like one average you
know are they are they doing more or
less crime than black Americans more or
less than white Americans more or less
than um
asian-americans well I saw one study
that said that they had they do less
crime than white
Americans do you you know they left
out as they always do
asian-americans do do you know how often
these stories just act like there's no
they're no
asian-americans all right now let's ask
the question again I'm an Asian-American
and you tell me that I'm bringing in
immigrants but don't worry they're their
crime rate is less than the white
people and as an Asian-American I say
what it's less than the white people is
it less than
asian-americans no no it's more than
asian-americans but it's less than the
white
people how do you feel about that so
you're going to increase the rate of
crime in my community yeah but it's
still less than the white
people I I'm just amused that the
asian-americans do such a good job of
staying in a jail and making money and
staying married and basically doing
everything right just
continuously and then get left out of
the
conversation because they do everything
right anyway good job asian-americans
um but here was one of the uh hypotheses
about why the immigrants are less likely
to be involved in
crime and here comes the kill shot are
you ready for
this this is not going to make you
happy I'm going to give you a reason and
now this is just one person's
speculation but it sounded so good I'm
I'm going to embrace it as my
own there is a reason that recent
immigrants are more likely or less
likely to do a
crime you're not going to like
it here's a reason that recent
immigrants are less likely to do crime
you ready for it because they're more
likely to be employed Married with
Children and in good
health oh
no
no
no
no no
no no is that
true is it true recent immigrants are
more likely to be employed Married with
Children and in good
health because those things are very
predictive that you're not going to do a
crime I think these are true you know
anecdotally anecdotally it's true every
time I think of something in my own life
who came was born in another
country they're
married they're
employed they have
children and they go to church damn
it damn it they're
Republicans let me say it the fast way
yes the reason that recent immigrants do
not commit as many crimes is because
they're Republicans they don't know the
Republicans they just act like it
get a job get married have kids go to
church
Republicans so so if I said to you
immigrants tend to be Republicans with
all that comes with it getting jobs and
getting married and staying in a jail
that's easy that's easy to accept isn't
it if I tell you that immigrants don't
have a high crime rate your first your
first reaction is W it's not the rate
I'm looking at I'm looking at 29,000
people in jail for murder and
rape but if I told
you uh we brought in a million people
who are basically
Republicans and I say whoa whoa whoa a
million people what about all the crime
and then I say yes there's definitely
crime because any group of people would
have extra crime but there essentially
the same rate of crime as
Republicans and then what do I do
what do I do
then because let's say I'm a Republican
and I like Republicans and I and I agree
that they don't do a lot of
crime anyway so as I often say if
somebody tells you the raw number of
something and doesn't tell you the
percentage they are a propagandist
that's brainwashing and they're not
trying to tell you something useful
likewise if they tell you the percentage
but not the raw number they are
propagandists they're trying to to
brainwash you they're not trying to have
an honest conversation you need to look
at both every time or you don't know
anything and I think it can be 100% true
that on average we're bringing in a
pretty high high class of people at
least in terms of cultural compatibility
with America at the same time we're
bringing in a whole bunch of criminals
they can both be true we we simply have
to do a better job of everything that
we're already doing and and I think
everybody agrees with
that
meanwhile um Tom
Holan who's going to be the head of the
Border stuff um he was challenged by I
guess a Denver Mayor Mike Johnston
because Mike Johnston said he's not
going to let um the citizens of his City
who are maybe undocumented he's not
going to let them be rounded up taken to
jail and that people like him will be
putting their bodies in the way
basically protesting in a physical way
and uh he doesn't he doesn't care if he
has to go to jail for it he's willing to
go to jail to defy Trump's deportation
operation so somebody asked Tom Holman
about the fact that the Denver mayor is
willing to go to jail to stop
deportation and Tom Holan without
cracking his smile says
and I
paraphrase well at least we found
something we agree on he's willing to go
to jail and I'm willing to put him in
jail and May I drop my
mic there mic
drop yes Tom
Holman that was kind of perfect
communication right
there yeah Tom Holman is good in general
he's a good
communicator uh but but every now and
then he'll he'll hit like a you know
just a base clearing home run that's a
base clearing home run yep we agree
you're willing to go to jail I'm willing
to put you there what's
next nicely done communication wise I'm
talking
about
um I saw a video of tulsey Gabbert and I
didn't remember she did this but when
she was talking about why she was
leaving the Democrat Party and she
mentioned there were War mongers which
didn't make sense for her and that they
were too woke but also she said directly
that they were anti-white racist the
Democrat Party I don't remember her
saying that
directly but I'd like to thank her
because that's both honest and
true so yes the Democrats are an
anti-white racist party I see them as
racists
primarily anyway So speaking of uh
verbally being verbally good there's
this representative of Van
Orton who was being challenged by a CNN
guy uh CNN host was asking about Trump's
tariffs and that Trump's tariffs would
increase food
prices so how would you answer that
because everybody's worried about the
price of eggs and whatnot so food prices
are you could argue our number one you
know really Main Street kind of a issue
and uh Trump's talking about tariffs and
tariffs would increase prices everybody
understands that and here's what rep
representative van Orton said quote I'm
willing to pay more for guacamole if it
means fenel poison doesn't come across
our
border oh
wow oh wow now that's some good
communicating now is it sort of accurate
No well no no I mean it's not it's not
guacamole to fentanyl if it were only
guacamole to fenel we would all eat
fewer
fewer avocados and we wouldn't notice
because we just eat other stuff but G
the bigger problem is at all food price
or or enough of the food goes up in
price that it hits
everybody so it's certainly not as easy
as avoiding
avocados however when representative van
Orton puts it in that term it is so
linguistically excellent in terms of an
argument so this is just a persuasion
lesson I'm not talking about the policy
just about the persuasion and the
communication so nice job so I'm gonna
this uh this raises my flag so I've
never heard of Representative van Orton
before uh but he he said a second thing
he said uh about fenel he said everyone
is now one degree of separation from
somebody who died from a fenel
death I think that's close to true that
pretty much everybody knows somebody I
mean in my case my stepson but you all
know me so every one of you who knows me
knows you're one one degree away um and
most of you know somebody else who is
one degree away now both of those
sentences are really
strong you know I of all the things you
could have said about this
topic U Van Orton reached into the
middle and picked out two of the
best that probably is not a
coincidence so what I'd ask you just
keep an eye on this
guy because this is unusually good
communication and when you see that it's
usually a a leading indicator you're
going to see more of this person so um
keep an eye on him
Rob Briner has allegedly deleted his
account on
X uh after Trump won breit bar news is
reporting this and
uh we think he's probably going over to
Blue
Sky um I think he's is that confirmed I
don't know but blue sky is the new
competitor decks uh Jack dorsy new uh
product and it's apparently the uptick
is pretty good it's getting a lot of
people but
I just want to point out something that
somebody pointed out in the comments to
me
earlier you can be on
a or you can be on Blue Sky what would
be the initials for Blue
Sky if you're going to use an acronym
Blue Sky well I would use the B I
probably use the S from sky that would
be
oh it's literally
BS all right but here's the thing I
think is
funny um if if Blue Sky had started in a
let's say an organic way where it was
just a product and everybody had a
chance to use it if they liked it they
use it some more they would probably
have a normal mix of you know left and
right political people because everybody
would have seen as just the product so
it's not political it's just a product
but because were highly politicized
especially at the moment people see blue
sky as where the good and Noble
Democrats can go and they see X as that
polluted right-wing conspiracy place so
presumably Blue Sky now has the greatest
number of people with mental health
issues of any platform
ever and I mean that seriously I would
bet you any amount of money
really that if you just looked at the
percentage of users of you know any
other platform Facebook
X anything else anything else Rumble
that you would find that blue sky
probably has just through the
roof therapy and uh you know on Mental
Health meds and every kind of anxiety
and depression and let's just say that
they wouldn't know their whole body is
also
brain have you noticed how many people
on the left who seem to have defective
brains and by defective I mean either
they're not very bright which is that's
a problem that's on the left and the
right of course there's always some
people are not bright but the ones who
seem
crazy have you noticed that their bodies
also look uh
deformed have you noticed you have
noticed haven't you yeah you look at
their bodies and then you listen to them
you go wow the things that are coming
out of their brains sound just
crazy it's not their brain their body is
their brain all right if your if your
body is destroyed as many of the people
on the left have destroyed their bodies
you're going to get just crazy stuff
coming out of your mouth and that would
be a very typical
predictable scientifically compatible
prediction that you could feel pretty
confident about that if that if you have
one group where their bodies are a mess
and one group on the right especially
young men who are very interested in
keeping their physical fitness going you
should have one group that's happy and
one group that's sad and I think because
of the weird situation of everything
being politicized that the people with
the the worst
brains not necessarily born the worst
but because their body is their brain if
they didn't take care of it it's just
not working very well and they all ended
up in blue sky
so I'd be real curious if if I'm right
that if you went to Blue Sky it would
look like a a mental illness
festival and it wouldn't have if it had
just been a non-political time when it
was
launched so we'll see but at the same
time that Rob Brer left all of my PID
trolls are gone I don't know if you were
watching the fund but for the past year
or so uh they're very obviously paid and
the way you know they're paid is that
they they show up like it's time for
work so if I would do a post that made a
any good point against Democrats or for
Trump the first comment 100% of the time
the first one would be a troll and the
way you can know they're a troll is that
they they have a maybe four or five
messages that they repeat that are not
the ones anybody else ever says it's
obvious that at some point in time
somebody made a list of all the things
you say to
Scott so you say to him oh Scott your
your opinion of politics is as good as
your taking care of your stepson who
died of
fenel that was one of them very common
oh I guess that's why you're divorced
which would have nothing to do with
politics or anything I said so um and oh
that and I guess that's why you're
cancelled so they would go for what they
thought was the most
psychologically destructive thing they
could say um completely
divorced from whatever point I tried to
make so in other words they weren't
saying oh have you checked the source
they were not saying your facts are
wrong they were not saying uh have you
considered this they were not saying
here's the fact check they were saying
what can I say that will make this guy
not want to spend another second on X
and want to you know get a high-powered
rifle and do something bad and then they
would pick that it's very obvious that
there were like five things on the list
and that it was somebody's job to sit
there and when it goes Bing they know
I've they know I've gone and they
quickly go to their list they go o Adams
five things marriage to know I'll pick
number three it was very obvious like
cuz nobody else was doing it except the
first comment of everyone that was a
political post and if I posted something
that was just you know interesting or
fun nope don't show
up so these were not political actors
and and I could tell they were not
political in 2016 I have to admit I
couldn't
tell I just thought there were terrible
people on the internet because there are
terrible people everywhere I thought
whoa some of these are more terrible
than others but one but once I
understood that um was it
from I guess that's was that the name of
the guy who organized the trolls for the
2016 cycle so we knew actually after the
fact after 2016 election we knew who
hired the
trolls we we knew the budget it was
exactly what it looked like
what I couldn't tell then is whether
some of the people were just organically
bad and some of the people were paid but
I couldn't tell which are paid and which
are organic but this last cycle the paid
ones were just so
obvious so every time they did it I
would just respond paid
Troll and how many times did you see me
do that because it was almost every day
payrol payrol and it was always the
first comment
anyway I'm glad they're gone it's really
different on X
[Music]
now
um Heather McDonald was doing some
writing recently and I forget what
publication but um talking about how men
and women generally uh differ and how
they prioritize safety and inclusion
versus accepting
conflict
um and goes to point out that there may
be a uh maybe some evolutionary reason
where men handle conflict different
differently from women and the
observation is this I've made the same
observation which is that men can uh
fight and go at each other like
crazy but if they find a reason to agree
and work together they can almost
instantly get over it like the past just
goes away and we shake hands and we
apologize and we accept apologies and we
say oh well that was an ugly moment we
had there together glad that's gone and
now we're friends or now we're allies or
co-workers whatever we need to be so the
thought was that
men uh knew that their best survival
mechanism was to not turn every enemy
into either dead or you stay an enemy
but sometimes just get them on your side
and then you have an extra person on
your side
so having an extra man on your side is
going to keep you alive so the thinking
is that we're just
evolved the men are easier to say all
right I'm over it let's let's move on
and that uh women would be less likely
to get over it and sort of keep it as a
permanent source of at least mental
conflict so in other words when men hear
a provocative
speech um they might enjoy the debate
enjoy the fight and also be able to get
over it
instantly whereas women if they go
online and they see a
debate they might also be drawn into the
debate but they're not enjoying
it and they're not getting over it so
it's a whole different whole different
approach so
um so the the point of this is that uh
there might be a male warrior hypothesis
that might be hardwired biologically
that that fits with my
observation so my observation is that
men can get over disagreements pretty
easily all
right um the LA Times
owner uh was doing an interview with X
CNN star Oliver Darcy I didn't know
Oliver Darcy got fired from CNN or did
he quit
he he was terrible on CNN but he's went
on his own now so the LA times as you
know has a some rich owner who uh didn't
want to endorse KL Harris he wanted to
try to find some Middle Ground where he
thought newspapers should be so he got a
lot of push back from that and
apparently one of the new things he's
doing is he wants to change up his LA
Times editorial board and he's hired
Scott
Jennings so Scott Jennings the you know
viral Superstar on CNN the the Trump
sporting guy who embarrasses the other
clowns at the table on a daily basis it
was selected to be part of the LA Times
editorial board
so good job Scott Jennings again another
Scott doing
well but uh apparently the billionaire
owner of the LA Times ended the call
because uh Darcy just kept um giving him
a hard time about hiring uh Scott
Jennings and uh apparently Darcy ended
up going full TDS and uh and the the
owner of the newspaper and his Handler
whoever it was was like H we're done
here B basically they just dismissed him
as not even a a serious character which
was the right thing to do now I should
tell you that the LA Times when Dilbert
was in newspapers before I got cancelled
uh the LA Times was the only one that
was cancelling Dilbert or or editing it
censoring it actually uh LA Times was
the only newspaper that routinely
censored
Dilbert back in the days when Dilbert
ran in every
newspaper the LA Times would just
sometimes just not run one and it got so
it was just like laughably predictable I
do a comic that was just a little bit
edgy but still rated G because you can't
really get past G in a newspaper is
still rated G and and the LA Times would
say oh can't say that every other
newspaper would say yes so um I I'm very
up on the this new owner um it looks
like he's trying to do a serious job of
improving the newspaper and they
certainly needed
it well I read I think it was in the
hill they had a story about the Democrat
bench for 2028
I'll tell you when you look at what what
the smart people think are their best
next um politicians for running for
president it doesn't look like they have
a chance so here are the names that are
floating as their best
candidates kamla
Harris
seriously literally the worst campaign
of all time and she's running
first uh Gavin
Nome
seriously Gavin
Nome he's like right at the top of your
list after destroying California
Gretchen
Whitmer Josh
Shapiro Pete Buddha judge and JB
priter do you think any one of those
could be a capable Republican and can
name I don't know probably 10
Republicans who could be any one of
these people am I wrong about that am I
wrong that there are at least there have
to be at least 10 prominent Republicans
that could be everyone on this list
these are not these are not
competitive I don't think Democrats have
any understanding of what would even
make their side competitive and the the
entertainment which I'm getting in
watching them not understand anything
they don't understand
anything it's really
amazing
and
uh I'm looking at some of your comments
those are
weird fedman you know what I I don't
think the Democrats would push fentam
fedman to the front of the line he may
be a little bit of a problem because he
doesn't obey the Democrats enough but if
fedin wanted to take a run at it he
would be the one I'd worry about I don't
want to give advice to the Democrats but
if I heard that fedman was running for
president in the next
cycle I would say that's a
problem yeah now AOC has been mentioned
I don't that doesn't seem serious to me
I can't imagine she would even win the
primary but
fedman fedman could really fool
everybody
because he he does have he has the
common touch and he doesn't seem to be
willing to
lie when everybody else
is and I hate to say that's a really
attractive
combination you know he is smart I mean
it was hard to tell when he had his his
stroke but he's he's an unusually smart
person and he clearly cares about the
country and clearly cares about people
and he clearly is smarter than the
average Democrat and he sees that there
are some things that Republicans see
that he says that makes sense you can
perfectly understand why the the Dem why
the Republicans would feel this way so
he's the only one who seems to
have anything close to an understanding
of what's
happening I think fedman knows exactly
what's wrong that the Democrats act like
woke
idiots the Republicans act like acted
like problem solvers and we were not in
a place where acting like a woke idiot
was a luxury we could afford it it was
once at one point it was a luxury we
could afford not
anymore now you just need the solution
to the problems so it wasn't it was
never to me it never seemed like they
were a close competition even though the
vote was closer than I thought it should
be what if RFK goes back to the Democrat
Party I don't think I don't think RFK uh
Jor has a chance in a um a race like
that I he's got he's got so many points
of
attack that I I think he's serious about
having one Mission left like he has his
One mission fix the
food and uh I have high hopes that he
will I see you got a copy of loser think
I don't know how you got it it's no
longer for a sale um it was one of my
cancelled books so you must have got a
you must have one of the used used
copies but maybe at some point I'll
reissue
that
um Democrats do not allow an independent
thinker yeah true that
all right so I'll tell you again if you
don't have your Dilbert calendar ordered
just go to dilbert.com and that's the
only place you'll find the link to order
it you will not find that link anywhere
else it's not on Amazon it's not on
bookstores not in
Walmart uh but the books are my books
make excellent gifts they change lives
yeah the the the first two reframe your
brain and had to failed almost
everything those are total life Chang
ders I I hear it every day and I
guarantee it by the way um if I weren't
hearing it every single day I wouldn't
say that but every day I hear people say
oh changed my whole
life so it's a good gift if you want to
change somebody's
life hey you got a lot of calendars
there if a well AOC is married and if
she had children would she be a better
politician
um
maybe uh loop
speak the the media will pump up the
chosen yeah but I don't know if the I
don't know if the media has the ability
to drag a bad candidate over the Finish
Line anymore they did with Biden but it
looked like they couldn't with Harris
maybe she was just extra bad but it does
seem that the rise of the podcasters is
a real thing it's going to last for a
while all
right ladies and
gentlemen um that's all I got for today
um I'm going to talk to the locals
people privately in a
moment and uh I'll see the rest of you
tomorrow thanks for joining on YouTube
and
x and uh Rumble we'll see you tomorrow
same Time same place locals I'm coming
at you 30
seconds
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e e