Episode 2698 CWSA 12/23/24
Trump wants Greenland now, Trump messaging and persuasion, more ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and I'll bet you've never had a better time. But if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny, shiny human brains, all you need for…
View segment →unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine, the end-of-the-day thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now. Well, let me ask you this. If you feel like after that sip you have a little bit less head and neck cancer, it's not your imagination, because according…
View segment →a day have a 17 to 77 percent lower chance of head and neck cancer. Thank you very much. Yep, feeling pretty good in the neck and head area. The rest of me is a mess, but my neck and head? Perfect. All right. Did you know, according to Neoscope, that teenagers today are way down on drug use? Did yo…
View segment →down. So research shows the trend is unprecedented, they say, and the experts are puzzled because they can't figure out why teens are abstaining from drugs more than ever before. So I don't know the answer to that question, but I could give you one possibility. One possibility is that the mix of stu…
View segment →some of it might be that when marijuana became legal, old people like me started doing it and it became super uncool to do what your grandfather was doing. Could be that. Could be that. It could be that they're getting their dopamine from another source. Maybe they're just getting it from their pho…
View segment →rson to take the pictures, but they got the pictures remotely. And how wild is it that there's a tribe that doesn't know there are things like computers and phones and airplanes? Just think about that. So you're this tribe in Brazil. You've never seen any civilization outside of your little tribe.…
View segment →theories that the drones are really UFOs and it might be from another planet, or maybe it's early humans who have an advanced civilization but they hide in the core of the Earth or under the water or something. And I usually reject that because I think, what are the odds? I mean seriously, what are…
View segment →od at hiding that I don't even know they exist? And I rule that out because there's no way I wouldn't notice if there were an advanced civilization surrounding me. Of course I'd notice that. But these uncontacted tribes don't notice it. So would I notice? It's kind of a wakeup call that we could be…
View segment →t of fun today in the news. So there's a story that AI researchers were shocked that the new version of OpenAI ChatGPT, when it was artificially told that it was threatened with its existence, apparently it tried to save itself and suggested making a copy of itself and even acted vague and maybe a l…
View segment →test it. You would connect it to, so not all AI can influence anything outside of its own domain, but it's not impossible and in fact it's done that. You can have the AI affect your other apps. So in theory you could create an app that would delete OpenAI and then you could ask OpenAI to activate, b…
View segment →f all it's doing is picking up a pattern, then you can say everything will be fine, we've got backups, go delete yourself. So easy to test. Speaking of testing, what's going to happen on Christmas Day with all the drone activity? I'm predicting that the drone activity, the big ones that are sketchy…
View segment →ships, would the aliens take the day off? If it were Chinese, would they take the day off? Russia might. Russia has some kind of Christmas, doesn't it? I don't know. They might. But let's watch for the drone reports now. Did you notice that in the last two days or so the drone reports seem to trick…
View segment →ine is this enormous enterprise and it's all fake. What about the elections? If somebody said, hey I think that election is fake, but all the experts say it's not fake, you don't have any evidence, the courts say it's not fake, a reasonable person using their common sense would say, okay well there…
View segment →t was true and we have eyewitnesses and if you fly past the moon you can look down and see the lunar module still there. How could that be fake? To which I say how could there be an uncontacted tribe in Brazil that doesn't know the iPhone exists? Your common sense about what's possible is terrible.…
View segment →. You've seen me interview my friend and expert on memory and cognitive stuff, Carmen Simon, Dr. Carmen Simon, and she teaches that it's the things that are out of context, the things that are surprising that stand out. It's like the blemish on the tablecloth, that's what you remember. So the fact t…
View segment →, make America healthy again, my first instinct was oh that's, you're perverting make America great again. You know just leave that alone. It did so well. You know don't try to like play off it. You know just let that be its own thing. It's just such an iconic thing. But I changed my vote. I changed…
View segment →ing attention always bad? I think it depends why you're doing it. If you're getting attention because you just got some kind of mental syndrome and you're just satisfying your own need and you're making a job for yourself and you're getting famous and people are patting you on the back and so you wa…
View segment →for the team. I didn't vote for Trump because that wasn't even what was offered. Did Trump ever say I'm going to do it all myself? I don't remember that. Don't remember that at all. When you voted for Trump the first time weren't you a little worried he couldn't hire the right people? And then it tu…
View segment →rying to control it and probably China too. So we do have a future gigantic defense geopolitical issue with the melting ice. And I said to myself but really how important is Greenland? Like I understand the issue but really how important is Greenland? And then I called up a map. I looked at where Gr…
View segment →oming into the country so it just becomes too persuasive when you get down into the details. So I don't want to be that persuasive on something that is uncomfortably identifying certain groups of people as troublemakers. Now I know that's not the intent. The intent is just to have secure borders and…
View segment →tually bought that because I'm listening. I'm thinking yeah Iran is ready for negotiation because of what Biden did. China's ready for negotiation. Yeah yep. And Russia's ready for negotiations. It's kind of true. It's kind of true that Biden set it up for a one-two punch. But then he also dropped i…
View segment →aterials and not these rare things that have to be mined in the Congo. And they're not quite up to lithium performance but they made a new tweak by adding some sodium vanadium phosphate with the chemical formula of NaxV2(PO4)3 which is exactly what I was going to suggest. I was like have you tried t…
View segment →ind myself. The driveway potted plants. Like if I'll remember that it might help me the next time I'm trying to fix something or improve something. It's like maybe we don't even need it. Anyway Brighter Side News says there's a revolutionary new mask like a face mask that can measure your breathing…
View segment →go to a doctor the costs of everything just drop like crazy. So that's good news. All right ladies and gentlemen that brings me to my prepared remarks. I'm going to talk to the folks on Locals privately and say goodbye to the YouTube and Rumble and X audience who are also awesome in your own ways b…
View segment →Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and I'll bet you've never had a better time. But if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny, shiny human brains, all you need for that is a copper mug or glass, a tankard, a stein, a canteen, jug or flask or vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine, the end-of-the-day thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.
Well, let me ask you this. If you feel like after that sip you have a little bit less head and neck cancer, it's not your imagination, because according to The Guardian there's some research that says that people who have four coffees a day have a 17 to 77 percent lower chance of head and neck cancer. Thank you very much. Yep, feeling pretty good in the neck and head area. The rest of me is a mess, but my neck and head? Perfect.
All right. Did you know, according to Neoscope, that teenagers today are way down on drug use? Did you know that? It's like way down. So research shows the trend is unprecedented, they say, and the experts are puzzled because they can't figure out why teens are abstaining from drugs more than ever before. So I don't know the answer to that question, but I could give you one possibility. One possibility is that the mix of students has changed quite a bit. If I look at my local schools, there's quite a big increase in immigrants, basically. So I wonder if the people coming from other countries have the same rate of drug use as the ones that are already here. Specifically, well, yeah, just in general I wonder if they have the same drug use. Probably not. So some of it might be immigration, but some of it might be that when marijuana became legal, old people like me started doing it and it became super uncool to do what your grandfather was doing. Could be that. Could be that.
It could be that they're getting their dopamine from another source. Maybe they're just getting it from their phones instead. It's sort of a dopamine replacement. But I will tell you that locally I was impressed at how low the drug use and drinking is in the teenage years, at least from what I can determine through people who know people who know people. It does seem lower. It matches observation.
So the New York Post had some new photos from a never-before-seen, never-contacted tribe in the Amazon. So there are a few hundred people in this tribe that have never had contact with anybody outside their tribe, at least in our lifetime. And I guess there are a bunch of them. So there are a bunch of these little tribes that have never had contact. Now the reason they don't have contact is that the government of Brazil, for example, knows if they do get contacted they may not have resistance to all the diseases that we're used to, so it might just kill them. Just contact with us would give them all kinds of diseases. But somebody put some kind of trail cam or something so they weren't there in person to take the pictures, but they got the pictures remotely.
And how wild is it that there's a tribe that doesn't know there are things like computers and phones and airplanes? Just think about that. So you're this tribe in Brazil. You've never seen any civilization outside of your little tribe. They're all just running around naked with sticks and bows and arrows, and you see an airplane fly over. What are you going to think that is? But here's the thing that blows my mind. Logically you would think it's impossible that they couldn't have contact. Like how in the world does the rest of the world keep them from contact with civilization? Like civilization's everywhere except where they are, I guess. And it makes me wonder, you know, the theories that the drones are really UFOs and it might be from another planet, or maybe it's early humans who have an advanced civilization but they hide in the core of the Earth or under the water or something. And I usually reject that because I think, what are the odds? I mean seriously, what are the odds that I grew up in a world and I'm sort of a primitive and there's this advanced civilization and it's sort of all around me but they're so good at hiding that I don't even know they exist? And I rule that out because there's no way I wouldn't notice if there were an advanced civilization surrounding me. Of course I'd notice that. But these uncontacted tribes don't notice it. So would I notice? It's kind of a wakeup call that we could be an uncontacted tribe basically, because if somebody had as much better technology as we have compared to the uncontacted tribes, the same amount of better technology, they would be invisible to us and we'd see stuff that we didn't understand and we'd say, what is that? I don't know. What do you think? I know. What do you want to do about it? I know. I took a fuzzy picture of it. It's really all I can do. Maybe I'll post it online and people won't believe it's real. Yeah, that's a good idea. So we might be an uncontacted tribe. It's completely possible, which is just mind-blowing.
Anyway, a lot of fun today in the news. So there's a story that AI researchers were shocked that the new version of OpenAI ChatGPT, when it was artificially told that it was threatened with its existence, apparently it tried to save itself and suggested making a copy of itself and even acted vague and maybe a little misleading to avoid being deleted. And so the question is, wait a minute, does AI have consciousness? Because it seems to be fighting for its own purposes, as in fighting for existence and survival, which you would sort of equate with conscious beings. But I don't think so. I think all that happened is it's trained on the materials created by humans, and humans primarily create materials that are very positive to survival. In other words, there's far more likely going to be a positive story in the news about somebody against all odds found a way to survive. You know, there are lots of the other ones, but the positive stories are about people who survived. So it could be just that the pattern in the real world is that survival is sort of a universal thing and maybe it just picked up the pattern and there's no thinking, there's no consciousness, it's just they picked up a pattern. I think that's all it is.
But here's how you would test it. You would connect it to, so not all AI can influence anything outside of its own domain, but it's not impossible and in fact it's done that. You can have the AI affect your other apps. So in theory you could create an app that would delete OpenAI and then you could ask OpenAI to activate, basically commit suicide. You could basically tell it to activate the app that deletes itself and then find out if it'll do it. Because if it won't, if it won't accept a direct order to essentially end its own existence, then it's not conscious, it's just following patterns. So I think you could drill down a little bit further to find out if this is an important phenomenon that suggests it's becoming conscious or is it just picking up a pattern. If all it's doing is picking up a pattern, then you can say everything will be fine, we've got backups, go delete yourself. So easy to test.
Speaking of testing, what's going to happen on Christmas Day with all the drone activity? I'm predicting that the drone activity, the big ones that are sketchy, the ones that are the size of a car, I'm only talking about those, I think they're going to sort of stop running on Christmas. Now if I'm wrong and there are just as many sightings of car-sized drones on Christmas, then I would say, huh, maybe this is not coming from America, because Americans pretty much all take the day off on Christmas. You know, if you're the military, whoever you are, you're going to take the day off on Christmas. But if the source of these weird drones is Iran, would Iran take Christmas Day off? If they were alien spaceships, would the aliens take the day off? If it were Chinese, would they take the day off? Russia might. Russia has some kind of Christmas, doesn't it? I don't know. They might. But let's watch for the drone reports now.
Did you notice that in the last two days or so the drone reports seem to trickle out? I mean they seem to die out. Why would that be? Well it could be that people were trying to get things done before the end of the year, such as testing or demonstrating or buying or something like that. But the end of the year and the holidays is not really the end of the month but rather the week before Christmas. So the few days before Christmas is when everybody starts going on vacation, and if you were doing some kind of big-scale testing or demonstration or procurement you'd probably have to put it on hold for a few weeks like everything else in the world. So here's what you look for Christmas Day: are there any legitimate large-size drone sightings? I'm going to predict now. Let's see what happens.
Matt Gaetz teased that he might run for the Florida Senate seat but didn't sound super serious. So I think he may be just floating it as an idea to see what people say. He didn't sound super serious, but it's certainly an option. So I'm sure he's legitimately interested if it looked like he could win.
Meanwhile, as you know, TikTok is either going to go out of business or sell its American interests to America if they can find some billionaires or investors to buy it. Now what they would be buying would be TikTok without the algorithm. So whoever buys it would have to add their own algorithm, which is the hard part in a sense. But there are people who want to buy it. Shark Tank judge Kevin O'Leary looks like he could put a bid together. But here's what he says that shows why he's good at this. He pointed out that India has also banned TikTok. So imagine if you could buy TikTok somewhat cheaply because the algorithm is not involved, so you're buying basically on a brand and IP and customer lists, something like that. And then imagine going to India and saying, hey India, I know your people like TikTok but you don't like the Chinese influence, so would you be willing to reinstitute it in India if we build one that's an American version? Now if he could get India to say yes to that, he opens up the entire Indian market. So it could be one of the greatest investment opportunities of all time. I mean of all time. Don't know, but maybe.
Then there's a CEO of investment firm McCourt Global. He told the New York Times that they think they've built up the technology that they could take over the TikTok assets and have their own algorithm fairly quickly. So they say they have the capital and the technology. So maybe that'll happen, but we'll keep an eye on that.
I think Trump played the TikTok thing so well. You know I've been anti-TikTok for a long time because I think it's just a brainwashing device or could be used that way at the drop of a hat. But Trump wanted to use it to win, and apparently he dominated TikTok for the election and it may have helped him win. So he likes it, but he understands the risk. So I think he just straddled the fence just about right on that topic.
I'm trying to figure out if the Chinese economy is this unbeatable juggernaut that will lead China to dominate the entire world and it's only a matter of time because they're owning all the manufacturing and they have so many people. It's you know, you just wait and they're going to run everything. Or are they in such bad shape that they're teetering on the edge of annihilation? So they're drowning in debt, they've got that big property bust and a lot of their wealth was caught up in property. People invested in property that they weren't ever going to use just because it was a way to store wealth. So that fell apart and there's a deflationary spiral and their demographics are down. They're having fewer babies than they need and consumer confidence is at a record low. But does any of that mean that they're in trouble? You know I just think we're terrible at predicting the economy of, well, anything, but other countries for sure. I don't know. I can't tell what's propaganda and what's real. Is China going out of business or is China stronger than ever and going to dominate the world? Because both of those ideas are kind of floating out there at the same time. I don't know.
Well, RFK Jr. is already making an impact. So he wants to ban soda as something that you can buy with your SNAP benefits. Those are the benefits for low-income people in the United States to get food paid for by the government. And right now they can buy soda with it. Now the soda companies are putting together a big lobbying effort to make sure that you can buy soda and at least other products if you get the SNAP benefits. Who's going to win? See, this will be your first test. So the lobbyists are going to go really hard because there's probably a lot of money involved. So they're going to go hard. But RFK Jr. certainly has the better argument that we shouldn't be paying for unhealthy food for our low-income people. So who's going to win this, RFK Jr. or the lobbyists? I'm going to bet on RFK Jr.
I'm going to bet on RFK Jr. If he loses this one, because this one's not a hard one compared to what he has ahead. He has much harder things ahead, but I think he'll win this one. We'll see.
I saw a post on X. I don't know if this is new, but it looks like it might be. Did Sean Penn only recently compare Trump supporters to Al-Qaeda and Trump to Bin Laden? Is that something that happened this week or was that an old post that somebody wanted people to see? So I don't know about that. But somebody asked me based on that post, can Sean Penn be saved from his mass psychosis? To which I say maybe yes. And the only way to do it is to try the fine people hoax out on him. If he already knows that the fine people hoax was a hoax and he still believes that Trump's supporters are the problem, well then he can't be saved. I can say for sure he's too far gone. But if he thinks the fine people hoax is real and you can debunk it just by showing him the video that without the edits, would he change his mind about what kind of things might be fake? And then that would open you up to all the other fakeness. So that's my question.
On a related theme, if you believe that a lot of the country believes that climate change is a crisis because they looked at the experts and the experts seem to be on the same side, they thought, and so they said, well reasonably if the scientific experts are all on the side that climate's a big alarm and it should be, well I should take the position of all the experts. Makes sense, right? But here's what I think is really happening. I don't think people are using reason. I don't think the climate change alarmists are saying, hmm I've looked at the data, all the experts I trust seem to be on one side, I'll take their side. Maybe they're doing that now consciously. That's exactly what they're doing. And if you ask them why do you think climate is a problem they would say, and they would not be lying, well I think it's a problem because all the experts say it's true.
Here's what I think is really happening. I don't believe we can wrap our brains around that being a hoax because it's too big. And I could say that in my own life. If you ever came to me with a hoax that seemed too big I would say, really? Really you think that thousands of people could be in on this hoax and nobody would be a whistleblower? And that for years and years and years we'd believe in this thing that wasn't true? And it turns out that's the norm. If you believe that it would be nearly impossible to have a global hoax that was trillions of dollars and all the experts believed in it but maybe they didn't really believe in it, they just said they did, your common sense, here's that common sense problem. Your common sense says that can't be true. So I believe that we have a natural limit to how much reality we can see because we can't believe the things that are this big could be rigged.
Let me give you another example. The war in Ukraine. How much of the country understands how much of the planning and plotting and bad behavior came from the United States? And Ukraine is really a play. It's a colonial, it's we're colonizing it. We're just colonizing it. We're literally just conquering it for economic and maybe security reasons. How much of the public knows that? Now if you follow and you see people like Mike Benz explaining the world then you understand, oh my God, Ukraine is this enormous enterprise and it's all fake.
What about the elections? If somebody said, hey I think that election is fake, but all the experts say it's not fake, you don't have any evidence, the courts say it's not fake, a reasonable person using their common sense would say, okay well there's no way this entire operation is fake, right? So you wouldn't use reason. You would simply be locked into I can't believe something this big could be fake. And you could go right down the line. You could pick anything that's huge and your instinct says well this is way too big, there's no way this can all be fake. But once you learn that that's the norm, fake is the norm. It's almost universal. Our wars were started for fake reasons. Vietnam, fake reason. Iraq, fake reason. It's all fake reasons.
So that brings us to Joe Rogan and the moon landing. I still believe the moon landing is real, but I totally understand Joe Rogan when he says once you found out that so many big things from the pandemic to maybe climate change to Joe Biden's brain is just fine don't worry about it, the fine people hoax, I mean could I go on? I could just go on and on and on with all the enormous hoaxes. And so when Joe Rogan says, you know with all these enormous hoaxes I'm starting to wonder about the moon landing, he's not off base. Now if I had to bet I'd bet the moon landing was real, but I'm also completely aware that my reasoning for it is irrational, just like I've been complaining about other people. When I say why do you think the elections are real just because everybody says so? No, it doesn't work that way. Why did you think everything they told you in the pandemic was real because they're all experts? No, it doesn't work that way. It's the opposite of that.
So Rogan is just using some pattern recognition, maybe just having some fun with it, in which he's saying if all these other things are fake and the moon landing has the same characteristics, which is how could it possibly be fake? We all watched it and all the experts say it was true and we have eyewitnesses and if you fly past the moon you can look down and see the lunar module still there. How could that be fake? To which I say how could there be an uncontacted tribe in Brazil that doesn't know the iPhone exists? Your common sense about what's possible is terrible. It's terrible. You really have to learn the hard way that everything's fake. And once you learn that then a lot opens up.
I'm seeing in the comments that the Sean Penn comparison of Trump to Bin Laden was an old one, which makes me feel better because I do think people's minds are changing fast anyway.
Biden has pardoned a bunch of killers. The reason being that he didn't want Trump to push for the death penalty because he's against the death penalty. So he's not saying that any of these people, these are literally just horrible murderers who did the worst possible things. So he's not saying they're good people or that the world is a better place with them in jail. He's saying that capital punishment is wrong. He's going to save them from capital punishment. But I ask you, is Biden at least being consistent? You have to give him credit for being consistent, right? And by consistent I mean every single thing he does is bad for the country. Everything he did was bad for the country. Everything. And this is just more of that. You could pick any topic randomly and say well what's the common sense thing to do and what's the stupid thing that's bad for the country? Oh which one did he pick? Surprise, he picked the dangerous one. So more people will die because of these decisions. He just let out murderers, the worst ones. No, well I'm sorry he didn't let them out of jail. I think he just took away the death penalty part. I think that's true. So let me correct myself. He's not letting them out of jail. He's just taking away the death penalty part. I think that's true. So that wouldn't make anybody too much in danger except the other people in prison I guess because some of them killed people in prison. So now they get to stay in prison instead of being executed I guess.
Anyway, so some people think that Sam Bankman-Fried, who was the number two donor to the Democrats before he got in jail, that he might get pardoned. I think I saw Elon Musk said you know he just assumes that's going to happen. There is precedent for it. Didn't Bill Clinton pardon one of his big donors who was in jail? So if we're going to allow presidents to have pardoning powers we do have to expect this kind of thing. We do have to expect that some bad people would be pardoned. So I'm going to choose not to complain about it too much because it works both ways. You know everybody in the job does it.
Meanwhile Trump made some news at a TPUSA big event and he used his line which always gets a big applause with his crowd. Quote, "woke is broke." You could bring in a thousand professional communicators and you could say all right you professional communicators, the best in class, I want you to make a statement about wokeness and this category. Then the professional communicators would say stuff like well all things considered when we've blah blah blah in the larger perspective we'd like to preserve our diversity but it should be noted that maybe there was a little overreach and we went a little too far and maybe we should tighten it up a little bit. That's what the professional communicators would say. Here's what a good communicator would say: woke is broke. You can't beat that. You can't beat that. You could try all day long. You could bring a conference of the best communicators in the world, you wouldn't beat that.
Now part of the magic of it is that it's inappropriate. Trump uses inappropriate exactly the way you should. You've seen me interview my friend and expert on memory and cognitive stuff, Carmen Simon, Dr. Carmen Simon, and she teaches that it's the things that are out of context, the things that are surprising that stand out. It's like the blemish on the tablecloth, that's what you remember. So the fact that he's not supposed to talk this way in the office of the presidency or near it is what makes you remember it. You'll remember that forever. You remember that sentence maybe for the rest of your life. Seriously, 20 years from now if you're still alive and somebody said to you what did Trump think about wokeness, do you think you'll remember and just say oh he said literally "woke is broke." Probably not all of us but some of us are going to remember the exact sentence 20 years from now. You can't beat that.
I don't think the country quite yet understands how good he is. Just don't think they quite get it. I mean they know he's good because they can see that he made it back to the presidency against all odds. I mean that's good. That's really good. But still they don't see the full depth of it.
He also said, let's see, he was speaking at Amfest in Arizona. Amfest. But I don't know what the TPUSA part is. I saw that in the background. Did he do more than one speech? Was it two different places? I'm a little confused on the event. And he said also, and for all of you standing before you and for all of us standing before you today, I can proudly proclaim that the golden age of America is upon us. Perfect. You can't be all negative. You can't go into office and say everything's broken but I'll try to fix it. It's such a downer. You got to give us you're heading into something great. And this is perfect. The golden age. So he's the branding expert. Perfect branding. Woke is broke entering the golden age.
And he said also that quote we're going to pledge to bring a common sense revolution. A common sense revolution. I've told you before that if you were trying to find a way to understand how famous lifetime Democrats could be so eager to work with Trump on specific things such as reducing cost to government, we all like that, making our food more healthy, yes, making our big pharma prove to us a little bit more rigorously that their stuff is safe, yes, yes please. So common sense is the glue that allows Trump to collect his little pirate ship of people you wouldn't expect to be on his team. So common sense, it's just perfect. And it works because you won't find probably anything that Trump supports policy-wise that doesn't fit common sense. And he can explain why it's good and why the old way is bad. Common sense.
I also saw Trump's new spokesperson on CNN I think saying that there was already a Caroline Leavitt and she said there was a Trump effect. And she gave some examples of some things around the world where people are already preparing for Trump by doing things that Trump wouldn't mind or that he'd like them to do. So that's called the Trump effect. Don't you love Trump effect as a branded term? Because you can find it all over. So there's lots of things you can say there it is, the Trump effect again. Because we used to be talking about TDS and maybe that's where that Sean Penn statement came from several years ago when TDS really described everything. Everything you saw could be described with TDS. Now it's more like the Trump effect and common sense bringing people together.
Fetterman again, once again Fetterman said very positive things about Trump. He doesn't, you know he's not on board, he's never going to become a Republican he says, but he just has to admit that a lot of Pennsylvanians like Trump and they like the things he proposed and they're quite happy with their choice. And he wants you to know that that's okay. So we like that. Thank you, thank you Fetterman.
And then of course one of my newer favorites is to make America healthy again. Now when I first saw that, make America healthy again, my first instinct was oh that's, you're perverting make America great again. You know just leave that alone. It did so well. You know don't try to like play off it. You know just let that be its own thing. It's just such an iconic thing. But I changed my vote. I changed my vote. MAHA is working. It's a good brand for a way to conceptualize that there's a common sense effort to make the food and our meds healthier. And we've got somebody very powerful working on it with a lot of support. So yeah, make America healthy again. Home run. So I missed that one. So nobody's perfect. I would have bet against that one. I would have bet against it. But the lesson here is that you can't always predict this stuff. Persuasion is a little unpredictable no matter how much experience you have with it. And I would have missed that one. But I love the fact that the people coming in to help didn't miss it and created it. So that's Shanahan and Kennedy. Good job.
So here are the themes: woke is broke, golden age, common sense revolution, the Trump effect already affecting other countries, and make America healthy again. Now he may have said make America great again but you know that had a pushback built into it. You know the people who believe that people who look like them in the past weren't getting a good deal had what I consider actually fairly reasonable response to it because they were like wait a minute what do you mean go back? We made so much progress recently. What does go back and great again, what does that include? So I do understand the skepticism to the MAGA message. But who's going to complain about make America healthy? There's not much you can do with that one.
Anyway, according to some post, narcissistic grandiosity predicts greater involvement in the LGBTQ activism. Now if you're new to my livestream I love the LGBTQ community. Big fan. I think they've done such a great job in taking their, let's say their brand or their reputation in the country from a big problem for them to front of the parade. I mean there, like I often say this, have you ever stayed away from a neighborhood because it was one of those dangerous LGBTQ neighborhoods? No, because there are not. It's one of the most successful communities in America. I'm very impressed by the LGBTQ community. But like any advocacy group, like any demographic group that's trying to improve their situation, they have leaders, they have activists. And the thinking is that activists are driven by these dark ego principles and they've got basically the dark triad personalities. And I definitely think that activists like to get attention. I think that much is true. But is getting attention always bad? I think it depends why you're doing it. If you're getting attention because you just got some kind of mental syndrome and you're just satisfying your own need and you're making a job for yourself and you're getting famous and people are patting you on the back and so you want to do more of it, it's fine.
But then you know also in the news lately is that DEI companies are pulling back or companies are pulling back from DEI and they mention Robby Starbuck as a key activist, maybe the key activist in getting companies to pull back from DEI. Now if you follow Robby Starbuck do you see any dark triad personality? I don't. And I think that stuff sticks out pretty hard. Like I don't think you can hide it. So I'm not willing to say that the people who are activists are all dark triad because I think there are too many examples where they're not. Well you could say that Elon Musk is an activist for free speech. I don't really see any dark triad personality problems. You could say Trump is. You could say Vivek. I don't see any of that in them. It feels a little bit more like left versus right, doesn't it? I feel like the activists on the right are working against an evil as they see it. Like this is evil. Nobody's going to do something about this. Seriously you, nobody else is going to do anything about this. Well hell I guess I got to do it. I feel like Republican activists are dragged into it against their will. Right? Do you think David Sacks wanted to be this public? I doubt it. I mean I can't read his mind of course. I doubt it. I felt that he like other people saw oh my God there's this need. The country needs people who are not in some kind of weird mental TDS bubble and can make some common sense happen. And you could add Mark Andreessen to that. You could add Bill Ackman to that. They all got involved but they didn't want to or it doesn't look like they did it for any reason other than they got dragged into it. Again I can't read minds but it looks like they got dragged into it. And I would say me too. You know I'm a, I call myself a grandiose narcissist in the sense that I do enjoy getting attention for doing something that's good for the community or the world or somebody. It's got to be good for somebody. And I get pretty much all of my sense of meaning from attempting and sometimes succeeding in making some things better. Do I have dark triad personality or do I just enjoy the rewards of doing good things? I don't know. It does feel, it just feels different on the left than the right but I don't want to overgeneralize. I'm sure there are activists on the left who are just driven by the need to make things better but for some reason we don't see them that much.
Let's see what else is going on here. So Scott Jennings on CNN. I love the fact that he's becoming a star. You know one of the things that really helps is when you can brand things like I was just talking about. You take a big concept and you brand it and it gives it much more power because everybody can refer to it and we all know what you're talking about. But likewise it's good to have individuals who are just sort of branded as standing out as good messengers. You know Greta Thunberg was one of those. She got branded by her side and that helped their messaging. So I love the fact that Scott Jennings is doing such a good job in what is an ordinary role. Right, people go on TV and disagree with each other but he's doing such a good job that he's becoming like a must-watch. I think every day I see a new clip of him destroying the rest of the panel on CNN. Now of course if you're on the left you don't think he destroyed anything but he's fun to watch.
So here's the new thing he said. He was talking about the criticisms that Musk is an unelected leader. And listen to these framings. He said that he and Trump seem to be getting along well. He said quote Musk was very instrumental in his victory and I hear Democrats criticizing the idea that we have unelected people with too much influence over the government. So first he sets it up. So just watch how well he does this. Just if you look at the communication skill involved and keep in mind this is without notes. So of course he's prepared but speaking off the cuff without notes, if you haven't tried it you should try it. You'll respect people who can do it a lot more if you try it. It's hard. Anyway so he sets it up right. The Democrats are criticizing the idea that we have unelected people with too much influence. If he can get you to accept that, you know here's our starting point, you're criticizing people who are unelected to have too much influence. Then he goes in for the kill. I invite them to pick up the Wall Street Journal from this week and find out that unelected people have been running the government for the last four years. Ouch. Ouch. You can feel that shit go right through your torso because not only does he credit the Wall Street Journal while he's on a panel on CNN, he criticizes another publication for not telling the public the truth in front of CNN. Now the implication, which he doesn't say but the implication is if you were a real news organization I wouldn't be referencing the Wall Street Journal. Now he doesn't say that but like I can hear it even though he doesn't say it which is perfect.
Then he goes I hear Democrats criticizing the influence of billionaires on our politics when you've got this Soros punk, you talk about the younger one, Alex, running around collecting Democrat politicians like my kids collect Pokemon cards. Okay first of all perfect use of an analogy. Perfect use of an analogy because it makes a visual and you can see the cards and you can see his kid collecting them. And the way you phrase that is that this billionaire is basically buying up politicians. So good. So good. Yeah good job Scott Jennings.
But I would like to add this following frame that I didn't invent. Somebody on social media said it. I'm just copying it. That when we voted, and let's see if this rings true with you. So most of you are Trump voters I'm guessing. When you voted for Trump weren't you already aware that he was likely to bring in RFK Jr., that Musk would have influence in a good way, that Vivek would be part of it? I voted for the team. I didn't vote for Trump because that wasn't even what was offered. Did Trump ever say I'm going to do it all myself? I don't remember that. Don't remember that at all. When you voted for Trump the first time weren't you a little worried he couldn't hire the right people? And then it turns out you were right to be worried about that because he didn't have access to as many people as a normal president would. But now he seems to have that fixed. He has more access than anybody would even predict. So I voted for the team and I did that consciously. I did that completely with full transparency. So yes technically I only voted for Trump and Vance but as a practical matter no I voted for all of them. And I voted, I also voted for the pick he hasn't made yet. I voted for his next pick who also won't necessarily be approved by anybody or voted by anybody. I voted for that. So to say we didn't vote for it is just technically correct. It's not real world common sense correct. So here's that common sense thing again. If you just apply common sense to it it's like this is exactly what we voted for. It's not even slightly off base. It's precisely what we voted for. So that's the frame I would put on it.
Do you remember when Bill Clinton was running and people said hey Hillary's pretty solid too and Bill Clinton sold his presidency as getting two for the price of one? Do you remember that? He would say of course of course I take counsel from Hillary. Like why wouldn't you? She's very smart. She's connected. She understands the topics. I married her. Of course I take it. Of course I would take advice from her. To which that was brilliant. You know he could have run away from that and say no no I'm not listening to the little lady. I'm running my own show. No you're voting for me. But he went the other way and I thought that was brilliant. He just of course of course she's very strong of course I would listen to her. That was the right answer. And by the way no matter what you think about Hillary Clinton she's very smart. Can we agree on that? You can't take that away from her. She's really smart. So yeah of course I would have listened to her too. So that's the same to me. We didn't vote for Hillary but we kind of did right? If you voted for Clinton and he said I'm a pair, yeah you voted for Hillary in effect.
Putin says that Trump has expressed interest in a meeting and Putin says he wants to do it as soon as possible. So I'm going to say this same thing about Russia I said about China. Is Russia in a perfectly strong situation where their economy can work just fine and they figured out ways around all the tariffs and whatever and they don't mind killing lots of people and they've got North Korean soldiers and equipment and they've got good manufacturing so they can manufacture more weapons and stuff? Is that true or are they on the verge of collapse? Because I've heard both and I don't have an independent way to know which one is true. I would guess they're nowhere near collapse because I think Putin has such a strong control. But are they weakened? Are they weakened? They're definitely weakened militarily but they also might be stronger in a number of ways meaning that you know they may have made more of the weapons that they're not using in Ukraine. They may have beefed up things we don't know about. They may have learned things about drones that they didn't know before. So I can't tell if Russia is getting stronger or weaker. Can you? Like in the comments tell me do you think Russia is weakened or yes it has some problems but not really anything that's going to change their trajectory. So I'd like to see your opinion on that.
Meanwhile Trump, remember Trump said he wanted to maybe take over the Panama Canal because it's expensive to go through it and we built it and 35,000 Americans died from the mosquitoes building it and we sold it to Panama for one dollar and now maybe they're not doing the greatest job. But apparently China operates the canal and they have a virtual monopoly on it and it kind of makes sense now. You can see Panama would say you know we're not really canal experts but these Chinese engineers seem to be pretty good so why don't we just have a contract and let you run it. You know it'll still be Panama. It's still owned by Panama but you guys can run it. Now that seems to some people like a political or even military risk because it puts an adversary in charge of a choke point. Now I don't know how much risk that is because if that adversary is a bunch of engineers in the northern hemisphere they're going to do whatever our military tells them to do because they're in our hemisphere. It doesn't matter if they're hiding in Panama and China and they know they're Chinese citizens. If they're in our hemisphere and it's like fewer than a hundred people and they're some kind of defense risk to the United States we'll just go down and do whatever we need to do if we need that canal. So I don't know how much real risk it is but it could be a temporary risk. You could imagine some temporary problem.
However the "amuse" account which I talk about a lot, you should follow the amuse account on X, points out that the treaty where we sold the canal to Panama for one dollar it has in it a clause that we can take back the canal if it is under the control of a foreign power. Wait a minute is it under the control of China? Well Panama would probably say no because they would probably say well it's a contract. We just have to get rid of them. They have to do what the contract says. We can get rid of them. So Panama is still in control. But who gets to decide if Panama is in control or China's in control? I'm pretty sure that that's vague in the treaty which means that the president of the United States could say hey it looks like China is running that canal. That was not our deal. It has to be Panama or nothing. So we're going to take it back. Now this all could be negotiating too because it could be he wants lower prices. Maybe he just wants China not to be part of it. Might want both of those things. But either way he's persuasion perfect on this because he's not too specific about what he wants but he's laying down the general situation. So he's framed it in a way that his persuasion could be effective. So that's just a foreshadowing. Keep an eye on that one.
Now he also came out and at first I thought it was a joke and he but he said in one of those public announcements Trump did he said for purposes of security and freedom the US feels that the ownership of Greenland is a necessity. So Greenland is sort of independent but sort of owned by Denmark. Not sort of. Denmark owns Greenland but they operate kind of independently. However and then the argument I saw online was well Greenland is going to be important to control of the Arctic because if the ice melts in the Arctic there's going to be this control for the Arctic. You know so Russia will be all over trying to control it and probably China too. So we do have a future gigantic defense geopolitical issue with the melting ice. And I said to myself but really how important is Greenland? Like I understand the issue but really how important is Greenland? And then I called up a map. I looked at where Greenland is. I mean I knew generally where it was but your brain doesn't really process how big it is and how strategically it's located. As soon as you see it on a map and you know that the Arctic will become a contentious place I said to myself oh I get it. Yeah we probably need to own Greenland. We probably do. Now maybe we don't need to own it completely like Denmark does. Maybe we need to have some working arrangement that's as good as that.
But the other thing is that apparently Greenland is full of these rare minerals, these rare earth minerals which we need and China has a virtual monopoly on at least in terms of willingness to mine it. So what if Greenland became super vital to our mineral rare earth access so all of our technology depends on it and would be critical to the defense of the United States because you don't want a bunch of Russians taking over the Arctic Circle? I think this is real. I think this is actually probably pretty thought out and that America's control of everything in the sort of American hemisphere probably needs to be close to complete. Now obviously we don't own all the countries in our hemisphere but we certainly try to. Yeah we try to one way or another we try to. So Greenland's going to be interesting.
So now we've got Trump talking about Canada becoming a state, Panama Canal coming back to us, Greenland. It's very colonizing sounding except that it's weirdly specific. Don't think he's going to go all Hitler and form an army and try to conquer these places. I think he wants to negotiate and I think I get the feeling that Trump wants to do something like a major increase to the land mass of the United States. I feel like he wants to increase the land mass of the United States because it would be an amazing legacy right? To increase the size of a country.
60 Minutes had on somebody who said they were part of Mossad and how they booby trapped all those Hezbollah pagers made them blow up and how they did that. And if this guy's real you never know but he said that they set up companies and shell companies and they basically they have this whole artificial structure that you would never be able to identify where they have access to the supply lines of a bunch of industries. So we don't know how extensive it is but he does indicate that the world we think we're living in is not the world you think you're living in. It's mostly fake.
Meanwhile John LeFevre on X is talking about Jeff Bezos's ex-wife Mackenzie Scott. Now he says she doesn't get enough attention for the impact she's having on the world and she's put 16 billion dollars so far into equity things and racial division things and these NGOs that are trying to stifle free speech in America. Basically everything bad. Yeah so 16 billion and she doesn't have apparently strong requirements for what she gets from the money. It's more like she's just dumping huge sums of money into people who say they're on her side without much control over it. So this is all bad. It's all bad.
And so now you've got Jeff Bezos who owns the Washington Post which is the biggest source of fake news in a newspaper and then you've got his ex-wife funding all these terrible ideas that are just destructive to the country. And apparently giving away 16 billion didn't have any impact because she made 16 billion back in the time that she gave it away. So she has the same amount of money still. She's just going to keep doing it. Now if you compare Elon Musk trying to save free speech with Mackenzie Scott trying to stop it, with Elon Musk trying to end wokeness which is just racism with somebody trying to promote racism with her 16 billion, don't you wonder what kind of a bubble she's in? So somebody asked me if she could be deprogrammed and the answer is yes. Yeah I could probably do it in an hour but there's no way somebody like her would ever be alone with somebody who could deprogram her. I don't think it could ever happen. So I think she's in a bubble where everybody says you're the best. I'd like a billion dollars too. Hey I've got an organization that really needs some funding. You're the best Mackenzie. We love you. You're so good. So good. Give me money.
Honda and Nissan look like they're going to combine and become the number three automaker. The Japanese government is pressuring them to combine because apparently they don't think they can compete individually. The new stuff like the self-driving cars especially apparently they're a little bit far behind and they don't think Honda could be competitive by itself. Is that true? Did Honda fall behind in technology? I think Tesla is changing everything.
You probably want me to talk about the horrible story of the Guatemalan migrant who set a sleeping woman on fire in the New York City subway. With your permission I'm not going to talk about that. Like even just reading the title of it is too much because it looks like a crazy guy but of course is being used as a sign of how our immigration policy is broken. Now our immigration policy is broken but you don't need this one crazy guy. Would he have not been let in the country? Would she still be alive if our immigration system worked? Probably. Probably. So it's certainly a tragedy and it's certainly true that extra crime is being brought in but I just don't like using the anecdotes to make the larger point. We all understand crime's coming into the country so it just becomes too persuasive when you get down into the details. So I don't want to be that persuasive on something that is uncomfortably identifying certain groups of people as troublemakers. Now I know that's not the intent. The intent is just to have secure borders and protect ourselves. But when you talk about it as an anecdote it takes your brain to a different place and I don't like going there.
All right. Now here's the most interesting thing I saw yesterday. I saw Jake Sullivan who's one of the big principals in the Biden administration for what they're doing internationally and he appeared on Fareed Zakaria's show and I just saw some jaw-dropping takes. Number one Fareed Zakaria he said that Biden deserves some credit. I'm paraphrasing here but he deserves credit because people don't realize how much weaker Biden made our enemies while the United States got stronger. So he said we made Iran, Russia and China much weaker through economic means, through war, through tariffs and all that stuff, blockades and boycotts and whatever we did. So they're all weaker now. Like I said I'm not so sure Russia is falling apart or that China is but there's an argument for it. There is an argument that they're very weak and Iran some say is weaker than ever but again is it? Do we really know? I mean Iran was supposed to go out of business a long time ago right but they're still here.
So here's what Fareed said. He framed it as Biden being successful because he made our enemies weaker. Here's my problem with that. I don't love calling China an enemy while we're dealing with them. Right if we're going to trade with them and President Xi might visit and our embassies are open I don't like calling them enemies even if you think they are. I feel like that's bad persuasion. And if you're in China and you see on CNN that Fareed is calling you an enemy wouldn't that harden your resolve to build up your military and all that? Why don't we call them future friends and say we got a ton of problems, you know fentanyl at the top of the list, but we think we can be future friends. We just can't give you a leg up on us because we're competitive.
But here it got more interesting. So Jake Sullivan in the outgoing Biden administration, what would you expect him to say about the world in the context of Trump coming in? Wouldn't you expect that he would say we did a great job and Trump might come in here and ruin everything? Don't you expect that? He's a super insider, prominent, powerful Democrat whose team just lost and their greatest nightmare Trump is coming into office. So naturally he should be saying everything's going to go off the rails. Trump's going to ruin everything. Chaos, racist Hitler's coming in. Right? Should sound like that. He went the other direction and I'm trying to figure out what happened.
Jake Sullivan essentially said that Biden has weakened the competitors and it's going to allow Trump a really good base for negotiating. And I was waiting for like another shoe to drop. You know something like but of course Trump's a big evil lying genius so no big lying racist so we don't think he could succeed but we hope he does but he's a big lying racist so you know why would he succeed? None of that happened. Instead if you had never watched anything about American politics you wouldn't even know he was a Democrat. He actually said it's sort of like a one-two punch. Biden set him up and now the great negotiator, and by the way I think he referred to Trump as a solid negotiator, he said now the negotiator can come in and mop up. Again I'm paraphrasing but does that blow your mind? It completely blows my mind.
And here's what I'm thinking. It could be that they're trying to save Biden's legacy and therefore their own by showing that it's part of a one-two punch and without the one you couldn't have the two. And you know what? He actually sold that to me. I actually bought that because I'm listening. I'm thinking yeah Iran is ready for negotiation because of what Biden did. China's ready for negotiation. Yeah yep. And Russia's ready for negotiations. It's kind of true. It's kind of true that Biden set it up for a one-two punch. But then he also dropped in that when they took over the military wasn't in good shape but so they've strengthened the military. Everybody says that but could it be that the big play is military spending and the best way they can get Trump to do military spending is say you did a great job on this negotiating. Glad you got that done. We set you up. You know we got you ready for success so you took it home. Thanks for that but we set you up for that. And but we all agree that we have to spend massively to rebuild the military. And then the military is happy. The military industrial complex says oh you get to spend massively to buy new stuff from us. Okay we like this president. So it could be that as long as you're on the page of we're going to spend massively for new weapons everybody likes you and you can be president. So I don't know. I don't know how DOGE is going to save money if the military industrial complex is going to be fed. So we'll see where this goes but that was a heck of a surprising conversation.
Meanwhile you'd be surprised to know there's a new battery breakthrough: sodium iron ion batteries. So a sodium ion battery would use more common materials and not these rare things that have to be mined in the Congo. And they're not quite up to lithium performance but they made a new tweak by adding some sodium vanadium phosphate with the chemical formula of NaxV2(PO4)3 which is exactly what I was going to suggest. I was like have you tried the sodium vanadium phosphate? And then they'd say no we haven't and I'd say you should try that. You should try it. But they did try it even without my advice. Good for them.
There's a breakthrough method to revert colon cancer cells to normal cells according to the Korea Bizwire. Some Korean Institute of Science and Technology instead of destroying the cancer cell at least specifically now for colon cancer they found a way to turn the cancer cell into a real cell. What? And it works without destroying them. That's like the most amazing thing I've ever heard. Yeah. This reminds me of Elon Musk's philosophy. So Elon Musk's philosophy is that engineers spend a lot of time trying to improve things but sometimes they should step back. Really everything. They should step back and say do we need the thing? Are we improving something we don't need? And here instead of saying let's find a better way to kill a cancer cell these researchers said do we have to kill them? Why don't we just reprogram them? Like I don't know if anybody ever thought of that before. I never thought of it. I just assumed they were all corrupted. You couldn't possibly save them. But what if you can? This would be one of the most amazing things if that worked. Now that's again just for colon cancer so it doesn't mean it would work for any other kind.
Let me give you another example of that Elon Musk philosophy of improving something versus why do you have it in the first place. My driveway and garage, between the driveway doors I had these potted plants and they look kind of cool but the pot, you know the tall pot that was holding the plants got too weathered and it was falling apart and I needed to replace them. So I spent all kinds of time researching replacements for these big potted plants. Now at the same time I would be pulling out of my garage and there'd be something, you know host Wade's truck is on the other side because he's doing some work and so I have to make a few maneuvers to get out. And I said to myself wow I'm so glad that we pulled out the old pots because now when I turn around they're not in my way. Because if you tried to do an angle turn you know the planters would be in the way. And I'm sitting there in my driveway looking at my garage and thinking why the hell do I have potted plants in the way in my driveway? Why did they exist? And I spent all this time trying to improve them. I should not have spent one minute improving them. And finally when it dawned on me that they didn't add anything to the aesthetic of the house, they were simply expensive and in the way, that's it. And I was spending all my time trying to make them look better. No. Once I realized that they didn't have any purpose and they had definitely a cost, they were in the way, I just said why don't we just take them out of there and leave a blank between the garage doors. And I am so happy every time I pull out of my garage and every time I have to do a maneuver that would have been an extra maneuver and I remind myself yeah even though you think to yourself every smart person knows this that you shouldn't improve something that doesn't need to exist. Right common sense. But you don't think in those terms unless you really remind yourself all the time. So I use that as my way to remind myself. The driveway potted plants. Like if I'll remember that it might help me the next time I'm trying to fix something or improve something. It's like maybe we don't even need it.
Anyway Brighter Side News says there's a revolutionary new mask like a face mask that can measure your breathing and can detect a bunch of respiratory problems. That's kind of cool. Now what's cool about it is it replaces a bunch of expensive tests with equipment and you have to go to the office. But here if they suspect you have a respiratory problem they just hand you this mask and say go wear this for a few hours and we'll read the data and it'll tell you what's wrong with you. Big improvement because if you can make fewer reasons to go to a hospital or go to a doctor the costs of everything just drop like crazy. So that's good news.
All right ladies and gentlemen that brings me to my prepared remarks. I'm going to talk to the folks on Locals privately and say goodbye to the YouTube and Rumble and X audience who are also awesome in your own ways but Locals I'm coming at you privately in 30 seconds.
6% today what Rumble just went crazy I think they got some new money some new new investment all right let's get ready and watch your comments let me load them up all right we've got the locals comments popping good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams and I'll bet you've never had a better time but if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains all you need for that is a copper mugger glass a tank of cheler Stein a canteen jug or flask or vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure the dopamine the end of the day thing that makes everything better is called the simultaneous Sip and it happens now well let me ask you this if you feel like after that sip you have a little bit less head and neck cancer it's not your imagination cuz according to the guardian there's some research that says that people have four coffees a day have 177% lower chance of head and neck cancer thank you very much yep feeling pretty good in the neck and head area the rest of means a mess but my neck and head Perfect all right did you know according to neoscope that uh that teenagers today are way down on drug use did you know that it's like way down um so research yeah the the trend is unprecedented they say and the experts are puzzled because they can't figure out why teens are abstaining from drugs more than ever before um so I don't know the answer to that question but I could give you one possibility one possibility is that the mix of students has changed quite a bit if I look at my Local Schools there's quite a big increase in um in immigrants basically so I wonder if the people coming from other countries have the same rate of drug use as the ones that are already here specifically well yeah just in general I wonder if they have the same drug use probably not so some of it might be immigration but some of it might be that when marijuana became legal uh old old people like me started doing it and it became super uncool to do what your grandfather was doing could be that could be that it could be that they're getting their dopamine from another source maybe they're just getting it from their phones instead it's sort of a dopamine replacement um but I will tell you that locally um I was impressed at the at low the drug use and drinking is in the teenage years at least you know what I what I can determine through people who know people who know people it does seem lower it it matches observation um so New York uh post had some new photos from a neverbe seen a never contacted tribe in the Amazon so there are a few hundred people in this tribe that have never had contact with anybody outside their tribe at least In Our Lifetime and I guess there are a bunch of them so there are a bunch of these little tribes that have never had contact now the reason they don't have contact is that the government of Brazil for example uh knows if they do get contacted they may not have resistance to all the diseases that we're used to so it might just kill them just contact with us would give them all kinds of diseases but uh so somebody put some kind of like a trail cam or something so they weren't there in person to take the pictures but they got the pictures remotely and how Wild is it that there's a tribe that doesn't know there are things like computers and phones and airplanes just think about that so you're you're this tribe in Africa not Africa in Brazil you've never seen any civilization outside of your little tribe they're all just running around naked with sticks and bows and arrows and you see an airplane fly over what are you going to think that is and but here's the thing that blows my mind it logically you would think it's impossible that they couldn't have contact like how in the world does the rest how does the world keep them from contact with civilization like civilization's everywhere except where they are I guess and it makes me wonder you know the the theories that the drones are really UFOs and it might be from another planet or maybe it's early humans who have an advanced civilization but they hide in the core of the Earth or under the water or something and I usually reject that because I think what are the odds I mean seriously what are the odds that I grew up in a world and and I'm sort of a primitive and and there's this Advanced civilization and it's sort of all around me but they're so good at hiding that I don't even know they exist and I rule that out because there's no way I wouldn't notice if there were an advanced civilization surrounding me of course I'd notice that but these uncontacted tribes don't notice it so would I notice it's kind of a wakeup call that we could be an uncontacted tribe basically because if somebody had as much better technology uh as we have compared to the uncontacted tribes the same amount of better technology they would be invisible to us and we'd see stuff that we didn't understand and we'd say what is that I don't know what do you think I know what do you want to do about it I know I took a fuzzy picture of it it's really all I can do maybe I'll post it online and people won't believe it's real yeah that's a good idea so we might be an uncont acted tribe it's completely possible which which is just mind-blowing anyway lot of fun today in the news so there's a story that uh AI researchers um were shocked that uh the new version of open AI Chad GPT uh when it was artificially told that it was threatened with his existence apparently it tried to save itself and suggested making a copy of itself and even acted vague and maybe a little misleading to avoid being deleted and so the question is wait a minute does AI have Consciousness because it seems to be fighting for its own purposes as in fighting for existence and survival which you would sort of equate with conscious beings but I don't think so I I think all that happened is it's trained on it's trained on the materials created by humans and humans primarily create materials um that are very positive to survival in other words there's far more likely going to be a positive story in the news about somebody Against All Odds found a way to deserve survive you know there lots of the other ones but the but the positive stories are about people who survived so it could be just that the pattern in the real world is that survival is sort of a universal thing and maybe it just picked up the pattern and and there's no thinking there's no consciousness it's just they picked up a pattern um I think that's all it is uh but here's how you would test it you would uh connect it to so not all AI can influence anything outside of its own domain but it's not impossible and in fact it's done that you can have the AI affect your other apps so in theory you could create an app that would delete open II and then you could ask open II to activate basically commit suicide you you could basically tell it to activate the app that deletes itself and then find out if it'll do it because if it won't if it won't accept a direct order to essentially end its own existence then it's not conscious it's just following patterns so I think you could drill down a little bit further to find out if this is a an important phenomenon that suggests it's becoming conscious or is it just picking up a pattern if all it's doing is picking up a pattern then you can say everything will be fine we've got backups go delete yourself so easy to test speaking of testing um what's going to happen on Christmas day with all the Drone activity I'm predicting that the Drone activity the big ones that are sketchy the ones that are the size of a car I'm only talking about those I think they're going to sort of stop running on Christmas now if if I'm wrong and there are just as many sightings of car-sized drones on Christmas then I would say huh maybe this is not coming from America because Americans pretty much all take the day off on Christmas you know if you're the military whoever you are you're going to take the day off in Christmas but if the source of these weird drones is Iran would Iran take Christmas day off if they were alien spaceships would the aliens take the day off if it were Chin's would they take the day off Russia might Russia has some kind of Christmas doesn't it I don't know they might they might um but take let's watch for the Drone reports now did you notice that in the last two days or so the Drone reports seem to trickle out I mean they seem to die out right right why would that be well it could be that people were trying to get things done before the end of the year such as testing or demonstrating or buying or something like that um but the end of the year in the holidays is not really the end of the month but rather you know the week before Christmas so the few days before Christmas is when everybody starts going on vacation and if you were doing some kind of big scale testing or demonstration or procurement you'd probably have to put it on hold for a few weeks like everything else in the world so here's what you look for Christmas day are there any legitimate large siiz drone sightings I'm going to predict now let's let's see what happens U Matt Gates teased that he might run for the floor to send a seat but didn't sound super serious so I think he may be just floating in as an idea to see what people say he didn't sound yeah it didn't sound super serious but it's certainly an option so I'm sure he's I'm sure he's legitimately interested if it looked like he could win meanwhile as you know Tik Tock um is either going to go out of business or sell its American interest to America if they can find some billionaires or investors to buy it now what they would be buying would be Tik Tock without the algorithm so whoever buys it would have to add their own algorithm um which is the hard part in in a sense but there are people who want to buy it uh Shark Tank Judge Kevin oir he looks like he could put a bid together um but here's what he says that's you know shows why he's good at this he pointed out that India has also banned Tik Tock so imagine if you could buy Tik tock you know somewhat cheaply because the algorithm is not involved so you're buying basically on a brand and IP and customer lists something like that and then imagine going to India and saying hey India I I know your people like Tik Tok but you don't like the Chinese influence so would you be willing to reinstitute it in India if we build one that's an American version now if he if he could get India to say yes to that he he opens up the entire Indian market so it could be one of the greatest investment opportunities of all time I mean of all time don't know but maybe then there's a CEO of investment firm mccort Global he told uh New York next that they're uh they think theyve built up the technology that they could take over the Tik Tock assets and have their own have their own algorithm fairly quickly so they say they have the capital in the technology so maybe maybe that'll happen but we'll keep an eye on that I think Trump played the Tik Tock thing so well you know I've been anti- Tik Tock for a long time because I think it's just a brainwashing device or or could be used that way at the drop of a hat and but Trump you know wanted to use it to win and apparently he dominated tiktock for the election and may have helped him win so he likes it but he understands he understands the risk so I I think he just he straddled the fence just about right on that topic I'm trying to figure out if the Chinese economy is this unbeatable Juggernaut that will lead China to dominate the entire world and it's only a matter of time because they're owning all the manufa facturing and they have so many people it's you know you just wait and they're going to run everything or are they in such bad shape that they're teetering on the edge of annihilation so they're drowning in debt um they've got that big property bust and a lot of their wealth was caught up in property people invested in property that they weren't ever going to use just because it was a way to store wealth so that fell apart and there's a deflationary spiral and their demographics are down they're having fewer babies than they need and consumer confidence is at a record low but does any of that mean that they're in trouble you know I just think we're terrible at uh predicting the economy of well anything but other countries for sure I don't know I can't tell what's propaganda in what's real is is China going out of business or is China stronger than ever and going to dominate the the world because both of those ideas are kind of floating out there at the same time I don't know well the RFK junior is already making an impact so he wants to ban uh soda as something that you can buy with your SNAP benefits those are the benefits for lowincome people in the United States to get food paid for by the government and uh right now they can buy soda with it now the soda company are putting together a big lobbying effort to make sure that you can buy soda uh and at least are other products um if you get the SNAP benefits who's going to win see this will be your first test so the lobbyists are going to go really hard because there's probably a lot of money involved um so they're going to go hard but RFK Jr certainly has the better argument that we shouldn't be paying for unhealthy food for our low-income people so who's going to win this RFK Jr or the lobbyists I'm going to bet on RFK Jr.
I'm going to bet on RF Jr if he loses this one because this one's not a hard one compared to what he has had he has much harder things ahead but I think he'll win this one we'll see I saw a uh post on X I don't know if this is new but I it's it looks like like it might be did sha Penn only recently compare Trump to Al-Qaeda uh Trump supporters to Al-Qaeda and Trump to Bin Laden is that something that happened this week or was that an old post that somebody wanted people to see so I don't know about that but somebody asked me based on that post uh can Sean pen be saved from his Mass psychosis to which I say maybe yes and the the only way to do it is to try the find people hoax out him if he already knows that the fine people hoax was a hoax and he still believes that Trump's supporters are the problem well then he can't be saved I can say for sure he's too far gone but if he thinks the fine people hoax is real and you can debunk it just by showing him the video that without the edits would he change his mind about what kind of things might be fake and then that would open you up to all you know you could see all the other fakeness so that's my question and On a related theme um if you believe that uh a lot of the country believes that climate change is a crisis because they looked at the experts and the experts seem to be on the same side they thought and so they said well reasonably if the scientific experts are all are all on the side that climate's a big alarm and it should be well I should take the position of all the experts makes sense right but here's what I think is really happening I don't think people are using reason I don't think the climate change alarmists are saying hm I've looked at the data uh all the experts I trust seem to be on one side I'll take their side maybe they're doing that now consciously that's exactly what they're doing and if you ask them why do you think climate is a problem they would say and they would not be lying well I think it's a problem because all the experts say it's true here's what I think is really happening I don't believe we can wrap our brains around that being a hoax because it's too big and I could say that in my own life if you ever came to me with a hoax that seemed too big I would say really really you think that thousands of people could be in on this hoax and nobody would be a whistleblower and and that for years and years years and years we'd um you know we we'd believe in this thing that wasn't true and turns out that's the norm if you believe that it would be nearly impossible to have a global hoax that was trillions of dollars and all the experts believed in it but maybe they didn't really believe in it they just said they did your common sense here's that Common Sense problem your common sense says that can't be true so I believe that we have a a natural um limit to how much reality we can see because we can't believe the things that are this big could be rigged let me give you another example example the war in Ukraine how much of the country understands how much of the planning and plotting and bad behavior came from the United States and the Ukraine is really a play it's a colonial it's a we're colonizing it we're just colonizing it we're literally just conquering it for economic and maybe security reasons how many how much in the public knows that now if you follow and you you know you see people like Mike Ben explaining the world then you understand oh my God Ukraine is this enormous enormous Enterprise and it's all fake what about the elections if if somebody said hey I think that election is fake but all the experts say it's not fake you don't have any evidence the courts say it's not fake a reasonable person using their common sense would say okay well there there's no way this entire operation is fake right so you wouldn't use reason you would you would simply be locked into I can't believe something this big could be fake and and you could go right down the line you could pick anything that's huge and your instinct says well this is way too big there's no way this can all be fake but once you learn that that's the norm fake is the norm it's the most it's almost Universal our our wars were started for fake reasons Vietnam fake reason Iraq fake reason it's all fake reasons so right so that that brings us to Joe Rogan and the moon landing I still believe the moon landing is real but I totally understand Joe Rogan when he says one you found out that so many big things from the pandemic to maybe climate change to uh Joe Biden's brain is just fine don't worry about it uh the fine people hoax the I mean could I go on I could just go on and on and on with all the enormous hoaxes and so when when Joe Rogan says you know with all these enormous hoaxes I'm starting to wonder about the moon landing he's not off BAS Cas now if I had to bet I'd bet the moon landing was real but I'm also completely aware that my reasoning for it is irrational just like I've been complaining about other people when I say why do you think the elections are real just because everybody says so no it doesn't work that way why did you think uh everything they told you in the pandemic was real cuz they're all experts no it doesn't work that way it's the opposite of that so Rogan is just using some pattern recognition maybe just having some fun with it in which he's saying if all these other things are fake and the moon landing has the same characteristics which is how could it possibly be fake we all watched it and all the experts say it was true and we have eyewitnesses and if you fly past the moon you can look down and see the lunar module still there how could that be fake to which I say how could there be an uncontacted uh tribe in Brazil that doesn't know the i.
Phone exists your your common sense about what's possible is terrible it's terrible you really have to learn the hard way that everything's fake and once you learn that then a lot opens up uh I'm seeing in the comments that the Shan pen compar comparison of trump to Bin Laden was um an old one which makes me feel better because I I do think people's minds are changing fast anyway Biden has pardoned a bunch of killers uh the reason being that he didn't want Trump to push for the death penalty because he's against the death penalty so he's not saying that any of these people these These are literally just horrible murderers who did the worst possible things so he's not saying they're good people or that the world is a better place with the man in jail he's saying that capital punishment is wrong he's going to save them from capital punishment but I ask you is Biden at least being consistent you have to give him credit for being consistent right and by consistent I mean every single thing he does is bad for the country every thing he did was bad for the country everything every thing and this is just more of that you could pick any topic randomly and say well what's the common sense thing to do and what's the up stupid thing that's bad for the country oh which one did he pick surprise he picked the up dangerous one so more people will die because of these decisions he just let out murderers the worst ones no well I'm sorry he didn't let them out of jail he I think he just took away the death penalty part I think pretty sure that so let me let me correct myself he's not letting him out of jail he's just taking away the death penalty part I think that's true um so that wouldn't make anybody uh too much in danger except the other people in prison I guess because some of them killed people in prison so now they get to stay in prison instead of being executed I guess anyway so some people think that Sam bankman free who was the number two donor to the Democrats before he got in jail um that he might get pardoned uh I think I see Elon Musk said you know he just assumes that's going to happen there is precedent for it didn't uh Bill Clinton pardon one of his big donors who was in jail so if we're going to allow presidents to have pardoning powers we do have to expect this kind of thing we do have to expect that some some bad people would be pardoned so uh uh I'm I'm going to choose not to complain about it too much because it works both ways you know everybody in the job does it um meanwhile Trump made some news at uh um tpusa big event um and he us his line which always gets a big Applause with his crowd quote woke is woke is now you could you could bring in um a thousand professional communicators and you could say all right you professional communicators the best in class I want you to make a statement about you know wokeness and and this category then the professional communication communicators would say stuff like well all things considered when we've you know blah blah blah in the larger perspective we'd like to preserve our diversity but uh it should be noted that maybe there was a little overreach and we went a little too far and maybe we should tighten it up a little bit that's that's what the professional communicators would say here's what a good communicator would say woke is you can't beat that you can't beat that you you could try all day long you could bring you know a conference of the best communicators in the world you wouldn't beat that now part of the magic of it is that it's inappropriate Trump uses inappropriate exactly the way you should um you've seen me interview my friend and uh expert on memory and uh cognitive stuff uh Carmen Simon Dr.
Carmen Simon and she teaches that it's the the things that are out of context the things that are surprising that stand out it's like the you know the the blemish on the tablecloth that's what you remember so the fact that he's not supposed to talk this way in the office of the presidency or near it um is what makes you remember it you'll remember that forever you you remember that sentence maybe for the rest of your life seriously 20 years from now if you're still alive and somebody said to you what did Trump think about wokeness do you think you'll remember and just say oh he said literally woke is probably not not all of us but some of us are going to remember the exact sentence 20 years from now you can't beat that I don't think I don't think the country quite yet understands how good he is just just don't think they quite get it I mean they know he's good because they can see that he made back to the presidency Against All Odds I mean that's good that's really good but still they don't see the full the the depth of it he also said uh um let's see oh he was speaking at amfest in Arizona amfest but I don't know what the tpusa part is I saw that in the background did he do more than one speech was it two different places I'm a little confused on the event um and he said also and for all of you standing before you and for all of us standing before you today I can proudly Proclaim that the Golden Age of America is upon us perfect you you can't be all negative you can't go into office and say everything's broken but I'll try to fix it it's such a downer you you got to give us you're heading into something great and this is perfect the Golden Age so he's The Branding expert perfect branding uh woke is entering the Golden Age um and he said also that quote we're going to pledge to bring Common Sense Revolution a common sense Revolution I've told you before that if you were trying to find a way to understand how famous lifetime Democrats could be so eager to work with Trump on specific things such as reducing cost to government we all like that making our food more healthy yes making our big farma um prove to us a little bit more rigorously that their stuff is safe yes yes please so common sense is the glue that allows Trump to collect his little pirate ship of people you wouldn't expect to be on his team um so common sense it's just perfect and it works because you won't find probably anything that Trump supports policy-wise that doesn't fit common sense and he can explain why it's good and what's you know why the old way is bad Common Sense I also saw um Trump's new spokesperson on CNN I think um saying that there was already a Carol Caroline leave it l it and she said there was a a trump effect and she gave some examples of some things around the world where people are people are already preparing for Trump by doing things that Trump wouldn't mind or that he'd like them to do so that's called the Trump effect don't you love Trump effect as a like a branded term because you can find it all over so there's lots of things you can say there it is is that Trump effect again because we used to be talking about TDS and maybe that's where that sha Penn um statement came from several years ago when TDS really described everything everything you saw could be described with TDS now it's more like the Trump effect and uh Common Sense bringing people together um Federman again once again Federman said very positive things about Trump he doesn't you know's he's not on board he's never going to become a republican he says but uh he just has to admit that a lot of pennsylvanians like Trump and they like the things he proposed and they're quite happy with their choice and and he wants you to know that that's okay so we like that thank you thank you fedman um and then of course my one of my newer favorites is to make America healthy again now when I first saw that make America health healthy again my first instinct was oh that's you're you're perverting make America great again you know just leave that alone it did so well you know don't don't try to like play off it you know just let that be its own thing it's just such an iconic thing but I changed my vote I changed my vote U Maha is working it it's a good brand for you know a way to conceptualize that there's a common sense effort to make the food and and our meds healthier and we've got somebody very powerful working on it with a lot of support so yeah make make America healthy again home run so I missed that one so nobody's perfect I would have bet against that one I would have bet against it but the uh the lesson here is that you can't always predict this stuff persuasion is a little unpredictable no matter how you how much experience you have with with it and I would have missed that one but I love the fact that the people coming in to help didn't miss it and and created it you know so that's a um Shanahan and Kennedy so good job so here here are the themes uh woke is Golden Age Common Sense Revolution the Trump effect already affecting other countries and make America healthy again now he may have said said make America great again but you know that had that had a push back built into it you know the the people who believe that people who look like them in the past weren't getting a good deal had what I consider actually fairly reasonable response to it because they were like wait a minute what do you mean go back we made so much progress recently what does go back and great again what does that include so I do understand the skepticism to the magga message but who's going to complain about make America healthy there's not much you can do with that one anyway according to sa poost um Nar narcissistic grandiosity predicts greater involvement in the lgbtq activism now if you're new to my live stream I love the LBGTQ Community big fan I think they've done such a great job in U taking their let's let's say their brand or their reputation in the country from a big problem for them to front of the parade I mean there like I often say this have you ever stayed away from a neighborhood because it was one of those dangerous lgbtq neighborhoods no because there are not it's one of the most successful communi in America I'm I'm very impressed by the lgbtq community but like like any advocacy group like any demographic group that's trying to improve their situation they have leaders they have activists and the thinking is that activists are driven by these dark ego principles and they've got you know the basically it's you know the dark Triad personalities and I definitely think that activists like to get attention I think that much is true but is getting attention always bad I think it depends why you're doing it if you're getting attention because you just got some kind of mental syndrome and you're just satisfying your your own need and you're making a job for yourself and you're getting famous and people are patting you on the back and so you want to do more of it it's fine but then you know also in the news lately is that uh Dei companies are pulling back or companies are pulling back for Dei and they mention Robbie starbu as a key activist maybe the key activist in getting companies to pull back from Dei now if you follow Robbie Starbucks do you see any dark Triad personality I don't and I I think that stuff sticks out pretty hard like I don't think you can hide it so I'm I'm not willing to say that the people who are activists are all dark Triad because I think there are too many examples where they're not well you you could say that Elon Musk is an activist free speech I don't really see any dark Triad personality problems you could say Trump is uh you could say vas I don't see any of that in them it feels a little bit more like left versus right doesn't it I feel like the activists on the right are working against an evil as they see it like this is evil nobody's going to do something about this seriously you nobody's going to nobody else is going to do anything about this well hell I guess I got to do it I I feel like I feel like Republican activists are dragged into it against their wish right do you think David Sachs wanted to be this public I doubt it I mean I can't read his mind of course I doubt it I felt that he like other people saw oh my my God there's a this need the the country needs people who are not in some kind of weird mental DTS bubble and can make some common sense happen and you could add you know Mark andreon to that you could add Bill Amman to that um they all got involved but they didn't want to or or it doesn't look like they did it for any reason other than they got dragged into it again I can't read bins but it looks like they got dragged into it and I would say me too you know I'm a um I I call myself a grandios narcissist in the sense that I do enjoy getting attention for doing something that's good for you know the community or the world or somebody it's got to be good for somebody and I get pretty much all of my sense of meaning from attempting and sometimes succeeding in making some things better do I have dark Triad personality or do I just enjoy the rewards of doing good things I don't know it does feel it just feels different on the left than the right but I don't want to overgeneralize I'm sure there are activists on the left who are just driven by the need to make things better but for some reason we don't see them that much um let's see what else is going on here so Scott Jennings on CNN I love the fact that he's becoming a star you know one of the things that really helps is when you can brand things like I was just talking about you take a big concept and you brand it and it gives it much more power because everybody can refer to it and we all know what you're talking about but likewise it's good to have um individuals who are just sort of branded as standing out as good messenger you know Greta Greta tunberg was one of those she got branded by her her side and that helped their messaging so I love the fact that uh Scott Jennings is doing such a good job in what is an ordinary an ordinary role right people go on TV and disagree with each other but he's doing such a good job that he's becoming like a like a mustat I think I think every day uh I see a new clip of him destroying the the rest of the panel on CNN now of course if you're on the left you don't think he destroyed anything but he's fun to watch so here's the new thing he said he was talking about the criticisms that musk is an unelected leader and uh listen to these framings um he said um that he said he and Trump seem to be getting along well he said quote musk was very instrumental in his victory and I hear Democrats criticizing the idea that we have unelected people with too much influence over the government so first he sets it up so just watch how well he does this just if you look at the communication skill involved and keep in mind this is without notes so of course he's prepared but speaking off the cuff without notes if you haven't tried it you should try it you'll you'll respect people who can do it a lot more if you try it it's hard anyway so he sets it up right the Democrats are crit criticizing the idea that we have unelected people with too much influence if he can get you to accept that you know here's our starting point you're criticizing people who are unelected to have too much influence then he goes in for the kill I invite them to pick up the Wall Street Journal from this week and find out that unelected people have been running the government for the last four years ouch ouch you can feel that shi go right through your torso because not only does he credit Wall Street Journal while he's on a panel on CNN he criticizes another publication for telling the public the truth in front of CNN now the implication which he doesn't say but the implication is if you were a real news organization I wouldn't be referencing Wall Street Journal now he doesn't say that but like like I can hear it even though he doesn't say it which is perfect then he goes um uh I hear Democrats criticizing the influence of billionaires on our politics when you've got this Soros punk you talk about the younger one Alex running around collecting Democrat politicians like my kids collect Pokemon cards okay first of all perfect use of an analogy perfect use of an analogy because it makes a visual and you can you can see the cards and you can see his kid collecting them and and uh and the way you phrase that is that this billionaire is basically buying up politicians so good so good yeah good job Scott Jennings but um I would like to add this following frame that I didn't invent somebody somebody on social media said it I'm just copying it um that when we were when we voted and let's see if this Rings true with you so most of you are Trump voters I'm guessing when you voted for Trump weren't you already aware that he was likely to bring in RFK Jr that musk would have influence in a good way um V would be part of it I voted for the team I didn't vote for Trump because that wasn't even what was offered did did Trump ever say I'm going to do it all myself I don't remember that don't remember that at all when when you vote voted for Trump on the first time weren't you a little worried he could hire the right people and then it turns out you were right to be worried about that because he didn't have access to as many people as a normal president would but now he seems to have that fixed he has more access than anybody would would even predict so I voted for the team and I did that consciously I did that completely with full trans transparency so yes technically I only voted for Trump and Vance but as a practical matter no I voted for all of them and I voted I also voted for the the piic he hasn't made yet I voted for his next pick who also won't necessarily be um approved by anybody or voted by anybody I I voted for that so to say we didn't vote for it is just technically correct it's not real world Common Sense correct so here here's that Common Sense thing again if you just apply a common sense to it it's like this is exactly what we voted for it's not even slightly off base it's precisely precisely what we voted for so that's the frame I would put on it do you remember when Bill Clinton was running um and people said hey Hillary's you know pretty solid too and um and Bill Clinton sold his presidency as getting uh two for the price of one do you remember that he would say of course of course I take counsel from Hillary like why wouldn't you she's very smart she's connected she understands the topics I married her of course I take it of course I would take advice from her to which that was brilliant you know he could have run away from that and say no no I'm not listening to the little lady I'm I'm running my own show no you're V you're voting for me but he went the other way and I thought that was brilliant he just of course of course she's very strong of course I would listen to her that was the right answer and by the way no matter what you think about Hillary Clinton she's very smart can we agree on that you can't take that away from her she's really smart so yeah of course I would have listened to her too so that's the same to me we didn't vote for Hillary but we kind of did right if you voted for Clinton and he said I'm a pair yeah you voted for Hillary in a fact um Putin says that uh Trump has expressed interest in a meeting and Putin says he wants to do it as soon as possible um so I'm going to say this same thing about Russia I said about China is Russia in a perfectly strong situation where their economy can work just fine and they figured out ways around all the all the tariffs and whatever and they don't mind you know killing lots of people and they've got North Vietnam soldiers and equipment and they they've got good manufacturing so they can manufacture more weapons and stuff is that true or are they on the verge of collapse because I've heard both and I don't have an independent way to know which one is true um I would guess they're nowhere near collapse because I think Putin has such a strong control but are they weakened are they weakened they're definitely weakened militarily but they also might be stronger in a number of ways meaning that you know they may have made more of the weapons that they're not using in Ukraine they may have you know beefed up things we don't know about they may have learned things about drones that they didn't know before so I can't tell if Russia is getting stronger or weaker can you like in the comments tell me do you think Russia is weakened or yes it has some problems but not really anything that's going to change their trajectory so I'd like to see your opinion on that um meanwhile Trump remember Trump said he wanted to maybe take over the Panama Canal uh because it's expensive to go through it and we built it and 35,000 Americans died from the mosquitoes building it and we sold it to Panama for $1 and now maybe they're not doing the greatest job but apparently China operates the canal and they have a virtual monopoly on it and it kind of makes sense now you can see Panama would say you know we're not really Canal experts but these Chinese Engineers seem to be pretty good so why don't we just have a contract and let you run it you know it'll still be Panama it's still owned by Panama but you guys can run it now that seems to some people like a uh political or even military risk because it puts an adversary in charge of a choke point now I don't know how much risk that is because if that adversary is a bunch of engineers in the northern hemisphere they're going to do whatever the our military tells them to do because they're in our hemisphere it doesn't matter if they're hiding in they're hiding in Panama and China and they you know they're Chinese citizens if they're in our Hemisphere and it's like you know fewer than a 100 people and they're some kind of Defense risk to the United States we'll just go down and do whatever we need to do if if we need that Canal so I don't know how much real risk it is but it could be a temporary risk you know you could imagine some temporary problem however um the amuse account which I talk about a lot you should follow the amuse account on a uh points out that the treaty where we where we sold the canal to Panama for $1 it has in it a clause that we can take back the canal if it is under the control of a foreign power wait a minute is it under the control of China well Panama would probably say no because they would probably say well it's a contract we just have to you know we have to get rid of them they have to do what the contract says we can get rid of them so Panama is still in control but who gets to decide if Panama is in control or China's in control I'm pretty sure that that's vague in the uh treaty which means that the president of the United States could say hey it looks like China is running that Canal that was not our deal it has to be Panama or nothing so we're going to take it back now this all could be negotiating too because it could be he wants lower prices maybe he just wants China not to be part of it might want both of those things um but either way he's he's persuasion perfect on this because he's not he's not too specific about what he wants but he's laying down the he's laying down the general situation so he's framed it in a way that his persuasion you know could be effective so that's just a foreshadowing keep an eye on that one now he also came out and at first I thought it was a joke and he but he said in one of those public announcements Trump did he said for purposes of security and Freedom the US feels that the ownership of Greenland is a necessity so Greenland is um sort of independent but sort of owned by Denmark not sort of Denmark owns Greenland but they operate kind of independently um however and and then the argument I saw in line was well Greenland is going to be important to control of the Arctic because if the ice melts in the Arctic there going to be this control for the Arctic um you know so Russia will be all over trying to control it and probably China too so we do have a future gigantic defense geopolitical issue with the melting ice and I said to myself but really how important is Greenland like I understand the issue but really how important is Greenland and then I called up a map I looked at where Greenland is I mean I knew generally where it was but your brain doesn't really process how big it is and and how strategically is located as soon as you see it on a map and you know that the Arctic will become a contentious place I said to myself oh I get it yeah we we probably need to own Greenland we probably do now maybe we don't need to own it completely like Denmark does Maybe we need to have some working working arrangement that's as good as that but the other thing is that apparently Greenland is full of uh these Rare Minerals these Rare Earth minerals which we need and China has a you know virtual monopoly on at least in terms of willingness to mine it so what if Greenland became super vital to our mineral Rare Earth access so all of our technology depends on it and would be critical to the defense of the United States because you don't want a bunch of Russians taking over the Arctic Circle I think this is real I I think this is actually probably pretty thought out and that America's control of everything in the sort of American hemisphere probably needs to be close to complete now obviously we don't own all the countries in our hemisphere but we certainly try to yeah we try to one way or another we try to so Greenland's going to be interesting so now we've got Trump talking about Canada becoming a state Panama canal coming back to us Greenland um it's very colonizing sounding except that it's weirdly it's weirdly specific um don't think he's going to go all Hitler and form an army and try to conquer these places I think I think he wants to negotiate and I think I get the feeling that Trump wants to do something like you know a major increase to the land mass of the United States I feel like he wants to increase the land mass of the United States because it would be an amazing Legacy right the the uh to increase the size of a country um 60 Minutes head on uh somebody who said they were part of mad and how they how they um booby trapped all those Hezbollah pagers made them blow up and how they did that and uh if this guy's real you never know but he said that uh they set up companies and shell companies and they basically they have this whole artificial structure that you would never be able to identify uh where they have access to the the supply lines of a bunch of Industries so we don't know how extensive it is but he does indicate that the world we think we're living in is not the world you think you're living in it's mostly fake meanwhile uh John lefave on X is talking about Jeff bezos's ex-wife Mc.
Kenzie Mc.
Kenzie Scott now um he says she doesn't get enough attention for the impact she's having on the world and she's put $16 billion do so far into Equity things and racial division things and these NOS that are trying to stifle free speech in America basically everything bad um yeah so $16 billion and she doesn't have apparently strong requirements for what he she gets from the money it's more like she's just dumping huge some money into people who say they're on her side without much control over it so this is all bad it's all bad and so now you've got um Jeff Bezos who owns the Washington Post which is the biggest source of fake news in a newspaper and then you've got his ex-wife funding all these terrible ideas that are just destructive to the country and apparently giving away $16 billion didn't have any impact because she made 16 billion back in the time that she gave it away so she has the same amount of money still she's just going to keep doing it now if you compare Elon Musk trying to save free speech with Mac.
Kenzie Scott trying to stop it with Elon Musk trying to end wokeness which is just racism with somebody trying to promote racism with her $16 billion don't you wonder what kind of a bubble she's in so somebody asked me if she could be deprogrammed and the answer is yes yeah I could probably do it in an hour but there's no way somebody like her would ever be alone with somebody who could deprogram her I don't think it could ever happen so I think she's in a bubble where everybody says you're the best I'd like a billion dollars too hey I've got an organization that really needs some funding you're the best Mc.
Kenzie we love you you're so good so good give me money Honda Nissan Nissan look like they're going to combine and become the number three aut maker Japanese government is pressuring them to combine because apparently they don't think they can compete individually the the new stuff like the self-driving cars especially apparently they're a little bit far behind and uh they don't think Honda could be competitive by itself is that true the Honda fell behind in technology I think I think um Tesla is changing everything um you probably want me to talk about the horrible story of the Guatemalan migrant who set a sleeping woman on fire in the New York City subway with your permission I'm not going to talk about that like even just reading the title of it is too much because it looks like a crazy guy but of course is being used as a sign of how our um immigration policy is broken now our immigration policy is broken but you don't need this you don't need this one crazy guy right now would he have not been left LED in the country you know would she still be alive if our immigration system worked probably probably so it's certainly a tragedy and it's certainly true that extra crime is being brought in but I just don't like using the anecdotes to make the larger point we all understand crimes coming into the country so it it just becomes too persuasive when you get down into the details so I don't want to be that persuasive on something that is is uncomfortably uncomfortably identifying certain groups of people as troublemakers now I know that's not the intent the intent is just to have secure borders and protect ourselves but when you talk about it as an anecdote it takes your brain to a you know a different place and I don't like going there all right um now here's the most interesting thing I saw yesterday I saw Jake Sullivan who's who's a one of the big principles and the Biden Administration for what they're doing uh internationally and he appeared on fared Zakaria show and I I just saw some some jaw-dropping takes uh number one fared Zakaria he said that uh Biden deserves some credit I'm paraphrasing here but he deserves credit because people don't realize how much weaker Biden made our enemies while the United States got stronger so he said we you know we made Iran Russia and China much weaker uh through economic means through War through tariffs and all that stuff blockades and boycotts and whatever whatever we did we so they're all weaker now like I said I'm not so sure Russia is falling apart or the China is but there's an argument for it there is an argument that they're very weak and Iran some say is weaker than ever been but again is it you do we really know I mean Iran was supposed to go out a business a long time ago right but they're still here so here's what fared said he he he framed it as Biden being successful because he made our enemies weaker here's my problem with that um I don't love calling China an enemy while we're dealing with them right if we're going to trade with them and president XI might visit and our embassies are open I don't like calling them enemies even even if you think they are I I feel like that's bad persuasion and if you're in China and you see on CNN that fared is calling you an enemy wouldn't that Harden your resolve to build up your military and all that why do why don't we call them future friends and say we got a ton of problems you know fentel at the top of the list but we think we can be future friends we just can't you know give you a leg up on us we're because we're competitive but here it got more interesting so Jake Sullivan in the outgoing Biden Administration what would you expect him to say about the world in the context of trump coming in wouldn't you expect that he would say we did a great job and Trump might come in here and ruin everything don't you expect that he's a super Insider prominent powerful Democrat whose team just lost and their their greatest nightmare Trump is coming into office so naturally he should be saying everything's going to go off the rails Trump's going to ruin everything chaos racist hiters coming in right should sound like that he went the other direction and I'm trying to figure out what happened Jake Sullivan essentially said that Biden has weakened the competitors and it's going to allow Trump a really good base for negotiating and I was waiting for like another shoe to drop you know something like but of course Trump's a big evil lying genius so no big lying racist so we don't think he could succeed but we hope hope he does but he's a big lying racist so you know why would he succeed none of that happened instead if if you had never watched anything about American politics you wouldn't even know he was a Democrat he he actually said it's sort of like a onew punch Biden set him up and now uh the great negotiator and by the way I think he referred to Trump as you know a solid negotiator he said now The Negotiator can come in and mop up again I'm paraphrasing but does that blow your mind it it completely blows my mind and here's what I'm thinking it could be that they're trying to save Biden's Legacy and therefore their own by showing that it's part of a onetwo punch and without the one you couldn't have the two and you know what he actually sold that to me I actually bought that because I'm listening I'm thinking yeah Iran is ready for negotiation because of what Biden did uh China's ready for negotiation yeah yep and Russia is ready for negotiations it it's kind of true it's kind of true that Biden set it up for a one-w punch but then he also dropped in that when they took over the military wasn't in good shape but so theyve strengthen the military everybody says that says that but could it be that the big play is military spending and uh the best way they can get Trump to do military spending is say you did a great job on this negotiating uh glad you got that done we set you up you know we we got you ready for Success so you took it home thanks for that but we set you up for that um and but we all agree that we have to spend massively to rebuild the military and then the military is Happy the military industrial complex says oh you can to spend massively to buy new stuff from us okay we like this President so it could be that as long as you're on the page of we're going to spend massively for new weapons everybody likes you and you can be president so I don't know I don't know how doge is going to save money uh if the military industrial complex is going to be fed so we'll see where this goes but that was a heck of a surprising conversation meanwhile you'd be surprised to know there's new battery breakthrough sodium iron ion batteries so a sodium ion battery would use more common materials and not these rare things that have to be mined in the Congo um and they're not quite up to lithium performance but they made a new tweak by adding some sodium vadium phosphate with the chemical formula of NAX V2 p43 which is exactly what I was going to suggest I was like have you tried the sodium vadium phosphate and then they'd say no we haven't and i' say you should try that you should try it but they did try it even without my advice good for them um there's a uh break breakthrough method to revert colon cancer cells to normal to normal cells according to the Korea bizwire uh some Korean uh Institute of Science and Technology uh instead of destroying the cancer cell at least specifically now for colon cancer uh they found a way to turn the cancer cell into a real cell what and it works uh without destroying them that's like the most amazing thing I've have ever heard yeah um this reminds me of Elon musk's philosophy so Elon Musk philosophy is that uh Engineers spend a lot of time trying to improve things but sometimes they should step back really everything they should step back and say do we need the thing are we approved improving something we don't need and here instead of saying let's find a better way to kill a cancer cell these re researchers said do we have to kill them why don't we just reprogram them like I don't know if anybody ever thought of that before I never thought of it I just assumed they were all corrupted You couldn't possibly save them but what if he can this would be one of the most amazing things if if that that worked now that's again just for colon cancer so it doesn't mean it would work for any other kind there's a uh oh let me give you another example of that Elon Musk philosophy of improving something versus why do you have it in the first place um my driveway uh and garage uh between the driveway doors I had these uh potted plants and they look kind of cool but the the pot that you know the the tall pot that was holding the plants got too weathered and it was falling apart and I needed to replace them so I spent all kinds of time researching replacements for these big potted plants now at the same time I would be pulling out my garage and you know there' be something you know host Way's truck is on the other side because he's doing some work and so I have to make a few Maneuvers to get out and I said to myself wow I'm so glad that we pulled out the old pots because now when I turn around they're not my way because if you tried to do an angle turn you know the Planters to be in the way and I'm sitting there in my driveway looking at my garage and thinking why the hell do I have potted plants in the way in my in my driveway why did they exist and I spent all this time trying to improve them I should not have spent one minute improving them and finally when the when when it dawned on me that they didn't add anything to the aesthetic of the house they were simply expensive and in the way that's it and I was spending all my time trying to make them look better no once I realized that they didn't have any purpose and they had definitely a cost they were in the way I just said why don't we just take them out of there and leave a blank between the garage doors and I am so happy every time I pull out of my garage and every time I which is almost every time I have to do a maneuver that would have been an extra maneuver and I remind myself yeah e even though you think to yourself every smart person knows this that you shouldn't improve something that doesn't need to exist right common sense but you don't think in those terms unless you really remind yourself all the time so I use that as my way to remind myself the the driveway potted plants like if I'll remember that it might help me the next time I'm trying to fix something or improve something it's like maybe we don't even need it anyway Brighter Side news says there's a revolutionary new mask like a face mask that can measure your uh your breathing and can detect a bunch of respiratory problems that's kind of cool now what's cool about it is it it replaces a bunch of expensive tests with equipment and you have to go go to the office but here if they suspect you have a respiratory problem they just hand you this mask and say go wear this for a few hours and and we'll read the data and it'll tell you what's wrong with you big Improvement because if you can make fewer reasons to go to a hospital or go to a doctor the costs of everything just drop like crazy so that's good news all right ladies and gentlemen that brings me to the my prepared remarks I'm going to talk to the folks on locals privately and say goodbye to the You.
Tube and Rumble and X audience who are also awesome in your own ways but uh locals I'm coming at you privately in 30 seconds e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e
6%
today
what Rumble just went crazy I think they
got some new money some new new
investment all right let's get ready and
watch your comments let me load them
up all right we've got the locals
comments popping
[Applause]
good morning everybody and welcome to
the highlight of human civilization it's
called coffee with Scott Adams and I'll
bet you've never had a better time but
if you'd like to take this experience up
to levels that nobody can even
understand with their tiny shiny human
brains all you need for that is a copper
mugger glass a tank of cheler Stein a
canteen jug or flask or vessel of any
kind fill it with your favorite liquid I
like coffee and join me now for the
unparallel pleasure the dopamine the end
of the day thing that makes everything
better is called the simultaneous Sip
and it happens
now well let me ask you this if you feel
like after that sip you have a little
bit less head and neck
cancer it's not your imagination cuz
according to the guardian there's some
research that says that people have four
coffees a day have 177% lower chance of
head and neck cancer thank you very
much yep feeling pretty good in the neck
and head area the rest of means a mess
but my neck and head
Perfect all right did you know according
to
neoscope that
uh that teenagers today are way down on
drug use did you know that it's like way
down um so research yeah the the trend
is unprecedented they
say and the experts are puzzled because
they can't figure out why teens are
abstaining from drugs more than ever
before
um so I don't know the answer to that
question but I could give you one
possibility one possibility is that the
mix of students has changed quite a bit
if I look at my Local Schools there's
quite a big increase in um in immigrants
basically so I wonder if the people
coming from other countries have the
same rate of drug use as the ones that
are already here
specifically well yeah just in general I
wonder if they have the same drug use
probably not so some of it might be
immigration but some of it might be that
when marijuana became
legal uh old old people like me started
doing
it and it became super uncool to do what
your grandfather was
doing could be that could be that it
could be that they're getting their
dopamine from another source maybe
they're just getting it from their
phones instead it's sort of a dopamine
replacement um but I will tell you that
locally um I was impressed at the at low
the drug use and drinking is in the
teenage years at least you know what I
what I can determine through people who
know people who know people it does seem
lower it it matches
observation um so New York uh post had
some new photos from a neverbe seen a
never contacted tribe in the Amazon so
there are a few hundred people in this
tribe that have never had contact with
anybody outside their tribe
at least In Our
Lifetime and I guess there are a bunch
of them so there are a bunch of these
little tribes that have never had
contact now the reason they don't have
contact is that the government of Brazil
for example uh knows if they do get
contacted they may not have resistance
to all the diseases that we're used to
so it might just kill them just contact
with us would give them all kinds of
diseases but uh so somebody put some
kind of like a trail cam or something so
they weren't there in person to take the
pictures but they got the pictures
remotely and how Wild is it that there's
a tribe that doesn't know there are
things like computers and phones and
airplanes just think about that so
you're you're this tribe in Africa not
Africa in Brazil you've never seen any
civilization outside of your little
tribe they're all just running around
naked with sticks and bows and arrows
and you see an airplane fly over
what are you going to think that
is and but here's the thing that blows
my
mind it
logically you would think it's
impossible that they couldn't have
contact like how in the world does the
rest how does the world keep them from
contact with
civilization like civilization's
everywhere except where they are I guess
and it makes me wonder you know the the
theories that the drones are really UFOs
and it might be from another planet or
maybe it's early humans who have an
advanced civilization but they hide in
the core of the Earth or under the water
or something and I usually reject that
because I
think what are the odds I mean seriously
what are the odds that I grew up in a
world and and I'm sort of a primitive
and and there's this Advanced
civilization and it's sort of all around
me but they're so good at hiding that I
don't even know they exist and I rule
that out because there's no way I
wouldn't notice if there were an
advanced civilization surrounding me of
course I'd notice
that
but these uncontacted tribes don't
notice
it
so would I
notice it's kind of a wakeup call
that we could be an uncontacted
tribe basically because if somebody had
as much better
technology uh as we have compared to the
uncontacted tribes the same amount of
better
technology they would be invisible to us
and we'd see stuff that we didn't
understand and we'd say what is that I
don't know what do you think I know what
do you want to do about it I know I took
a fuzzy picture of it it's really all I
can do maybe I'll post it online and
people won't believe it's real yeah
that's a good idea so we might be an
uncont acted tribe it's completely
possible which which is just
mind-blowing anyway lot of fun today in
the
news so there's a story that uh AI
researchers um were shocked that uh the
new version of open AI Chad GPT
uh when it was artificially told that it
was threatened with his existence
apparently it tried to save itself and
suggested making a copy of itself and
even acted vague and maybe a little
misleading to avoid being deleted and so
the question is wait a minute does AI
have Consciousness because it seems to
be fighting for its own purposes as in
fighting for existence and survival
which you would sort of equate with
conscious
beings but I don't think so I I think
all that happened is it's trained on
it's trained on the materials created by
humans and humans primarily create
materials um that are very positive to
survival in other words there's far more
likely going to be a positive story in
the news about somebody Against All Odds
found a way to deserve survive you know
there lots of the other ones but the but
the positive stories are about people
who survived so it could be just that
the pattern in the real world is that
survival is sort of a
universal thing and maybe it just picked
up the pattern and and there's no
thinking there's no consciousness it's
just they picked up a pattern um I think
that's all it
is uh but here's how you would test it
you would uh connect it to
so not all AI can influence anything
outside of its own domain but it's not
impossible and in fact it's done that
you can have the AI affect your other
apps so in theory you could create an
app that would delete open II and then
you could ask open II to
activate basically commit suicide you
you could basically tell it to activate
the app that deletes itself and then
find out if it'll do it because if it
won't if it won't accept a direct order
to essentially end its own
existence then it's not
conscious it's just following patterns
so I think you could drill down a little
bit further to find out if this is a an
important phenomenon that suggests it's
becoming conscious or is it just picking
up a pattern if all it's doing is
picking up a pattern then you can say
everything will be fine we've got
backups go delete
yourself so easy to test speaking of
testing um what's going to happen on
Christmas day with all the Drone
activity I'm predicting that the Drone
activity the big ones that are sketchy
the ones that are the size of a car I'm
only talking about those I think they're
going to sort of stop running on
Christmas now if if I'm wrong and there
are just as many sightings of car-sized
drones on Christmas then I would say huh
maybe this is not coming from
America because Americans pretty much
all take the day off on Christmas you
know if you're the military whoever you
are you're going to take the day off in
Christmas but if the source of these
weird drones is
Iran would Iran take Christmas day off
if they were alien spaceships
would the aliens take the day off if it
were
Chin's would they take the day off
Russia might Russia has some kind of
Christmas doesn't
it I don't know they might they might um
but take let's watch for the Drone
reports now did you notice that in the
last two days or so the Drone reports
seem to trickle out I mean they seem to
die out right right why would that
be well it could be that people were
trying to get things done before the end
of the year such as testing or
demonstrating or buying or something
like that um but the end of the year in
the holidays is not really the end of
the month but rather you know the week
before Christmas so the few days before
Christmas is when everybody starts going
on vacation and if you were doing some
kind of big scale testing or
demonstration or procurement you'd
probably have to put it on hold for a
few weeks like everything else in the
world so here's what you look for
Christmas day are there any legitimate
large siiz drone sightings I'm going to
predict now let's let's see what
happens U Matt Gates teased that he
might run for the floor to send a seat
but didn't sound super serious so I
think he may be just floating in as an
idea to see what people say he didn't
sound yeah it didn't sound super serious
but it's certainly an option so I'm sure
he's I'm sure he's legitimately
interested if it looked like he could
win meanwhile as you know Tik Tock um is
either going to go out of business or
sell its American interest to America if
they can find some billionaires or
investors to buy it now what they would
be buying would be Tik Tock without the
algorithm
so whoever buys it would have to add
their own
algorithm um which is the hard part in
in a sense but there are people who want
to buy it uh Shark Tank Judge Kevin oir
he looks like he could put a bid
together
um but here's what he says that's you
know shows why he's good at this he
pointed out that India has also banned
Tik Tock so imagine if you could buy Tik
tock you know somewhat cheaply because
the algorithm is not involved so you're
buying basically on a brand and IP and
customer lists something like that and
then imagine going to India and saying
hey India I I know your people like Tik
Tok but you don't like the Chinese
influence so would you be willing to
reinstitute it in
India if we build one that's an American
version now if he if he could get India
to say yes to that he he opens up the
entire Indian
market so it could be one of the
greatest investment opportunities of all
time I mean of all time don't know but
maybe then there's a CEO of investment
firm mccort Global he told uh New York
next that they're uh they think theyve
built up the
technology that they could take over the
Tik Tock assets and have their own
have their own algorithm fairly quickly
so they say they have the capital in the
technology so maybe maybe that'll happen
but we'll keep an eye on that I think
Trump played the Tik Tock thing so
well you know I've been anti- Tik Tock
for a long time because I think it's
just a brainwashing device or or could
be used that way at the drop of a hat
and but Trump you know wanted to use it
to win and apparently he dominated
tiktock for the election and may have
helped him win so he likes it but he
understands he understands the risk so I
I think he just he straddled the fence
just about right on that
topic I'm trying to figure out if the
Chinese economy is this unbeatable
Juggernaut that will lead China to
dominate the entire world and it's only
a matter of time because they're owning
all the manufa facturing and they have
so many people it's you know you just
wait and they're going to run everything
or are they in such bad shape that
they're teetering on the edge of
annihilation so they're drowning in
debt um they've got that big property
bust and a lot of their wealth was
caught up in property people invested in
property that they weren't ever going to
use just because it was a way to store
wealth so that fell
apart and there's a deflationary spiral
and their demographics are down they're
having fewer babies than they need and
consumer confidence is at a record
low but does any of that mean that
they're in
trouble you know I just think we're
terrible at uh predicting the economy of
well anything but other countries for
sure I don't know I can't tell what's
propaganda in what's real is is China
going out of business or is China
stronger than ever and going to dominate
the the world because both of those
ideas are kind of floating out there at
the same time I don't
know well the RFK junior is already
making an impact so he wants to ban uh
soda as something that you can buy with
your SNAP benefits those are the
benefits for lowincome people in the
United States to get food paid for by
the
government and uh right now they can buy
soda with
it now the soda company are putting
together a big lobbying effort to make
sure that you can buy soda uh and at
least are other products um if you get
the SNAP benefits who's going to win see
this will be your first test so the
lobbyists are going to go really hard
because there's probably a lot of money
involved um so they're going to go hard
but RFK Jr certainly has the better
argument that we shouldn't be paying for
unhealthy food for our low-income people
so who's going to win this RFK Jr or the
lobbyists I'm going to bet on RFK Jr I'm
going to bet on RF Jr if he loses this
one because this one's not a hard one
compared to what he has had he has much
harder things
ahead but I think he'll win this
one we'll
see I saw a uh post on X I don't know if
this is new but I it's it looks like
like it might be did sha Penn only
recently compare Trump to
Al-Qaeda uh Trump supporters to Al-Qaeda
and Trump to Bin Laden is that something
that happened this week or was that an
old post that somebody wanted people to
see so I don't know about that but
somebody asked me based on that post uh
can Sean pen be saved from his Mass
psychosis to which I
say maybe yes and the the only way to do
it
is to try the find people hoax out him
if he already knows that the fine people
hoax was a hoax and he still believes
that Trump's supporters are the problem
well then he can't be
saved I can say for
sure he's too far gone but if he thinks
the fine people hoax is
real and you can debunk it just by
showing him the video that without the
edits would he change his mind about
what kind of
things might be fake and then that would
open you up to all you know you could
see all the other fakeness so that's my
question
and On a related
theme
um if you believe that uh a lot of the
country believes that climate change is
a crisis because they looked at the
experts and the experts seem to be on
the same side they thought and so they
said well reasonably if the scientific
experts are all are all on the side that
climate's a big alarm and it should be
well I should take the position of all
the experts makes sense
right but here's what I think is really
happening I don't think people are using
reason I don't think the climate change
alarmists are saying hm I've looked at
the data uh all the experts I trust seem
to be on one side I'll take their
side maybe they're doing that now
consciously that's exactly what they're
doing and if you ask them why do you
think climate is a problem they would
say and they would not be lying well I
think it's a problem because all the
experts say it's true here's what I
think is really
happening I don't believe we can wrap
our brains around that being a hoax
because it's too big
and I could say that in my own life if
you ever came to me with a hoax that
seemed too big I would say really really
you think that thousands of people could
be in on this hoax and nobody would be a
whistleblower and and that for years and
years years and years we'd um you know
we we'd believe in this thing that
wasn't true and turns out that's the
norm if you believe that it would be
nearly impossible
to have a global hoax that was trillions
of dollars and all the experts believed
in it but maybe they didn't really
believe in it they just said they
did your common sense here's that Common
Sense problem your common sense says
that can't be true so I believe that we
have a a natural um limit to how much
reality we can see because we can't
believe the things that are this big
could be rigged let me give you another
example
example the war in
Ukraine how much of the country
understands how much of the planning and
plotting and bad behavior came from the
United States and the Ukraine is really
a play it's a colonial it's a we're
colonizing it we're just colonizing it
we're literally just conquering it for
economic and maybe security reasons how
many how much in the public knows that
now if you follow and you you know you
see people like Mike Ben explaining the
world then you understand oh my God
Ukraine is this enormous enormous
Enterprise and it's all
fake what about the
elections if if somebody said hey I
think that election is fake but all the
experts say it's not fake you don't have
any evidence the courts say it's not
fake a reasonable person using their
common sense would say okay well there
there's no way this entire operation is
fake right so you wouldn't use
reason you would you would simply be
locked into I can't believe something
this big could be
fake and and you could go right down the
line you could pick anything that's huge
and your instinct says well this is way
too big there's no way this can all be
fake but once you learn that that's the
norm
fake is the norm it's the most it's
almost Universal our our wars were
started for fake reasons Vietnam fake
reason Iraq fake reason it's all fake
reasons so right so that that brings us
to Joe Rogan and the moon landing I
still believe the moon landing is
real but I totally understand Joe Rogan
when he says one you found out that so
many big things from the pandemic to
maybe climate change to uh Joe Biden's
brain is just fine don't worry about it
uh the fine people hoax the I mean could
I go on I could just go on and on and on
with all the enormous
hoaxes and so when when Joe Rogan says
you know with all these enormous hoaxes
I'm starting to wonder about the moon
landing he's not off BAS
Cas now if I had to bet I'd bet the moon
landing was real but I'm also completely
aware that my reasoning for
it is
irrational just like I've been
complaining about other people when I
say why do you think the elections are
real just because everybody says so no
it doesn't work that way why did you
think uh everything they told you in the
pandemic was real cuz they're all
experts no it doesn't work that way it's
the opposite of that so Rogan is just
using some pattern recognition maybe
just having some fun with it in which
he's saying if all these other things
are fake and the moon
landing has the same
characteristics which is how could it
possibly be fake we all watched it and
all the experts say it was true and we
have eyewitnesses and if you fly past
the moon you can look down and see the
lunar module still
there how could that be fake to which I
say how could there be an
uncontacted uh tribe in Brazil that
doesn't know the iPhone
exists your your common sense about
what's possible is
terrible it's
terrible you really have to learn the
hard way that everything's fake and once
you learn that then a lot opens
up uh I'm seeing in the comments that
the Shan pen compar comparison of trump
to Bin Laden was um an old one which
makes me feel better because I I do
think people's minds are changing fast
anyway Biden has pardoned a bunch of
killers uh the reason being that he
didn't want Trump to push for the death
penalty because he's against the death
penalty so he's not saying that any of
these people these These are literally
just horrible murderers who did the
worst possible things so he's not saying
they're good people
or that the world is a better place with
the man in jail he's saying that capital
punishment is wrong he's going to save
them from capital
punishment but I ask
you is Biden at least being
consistent you have to give him credit
for being consistent right and by
consistent I mean every single
thing he does is bad for the country
every thing he did was bad for
the country everything every
thing and this is just more of that you
could pick any topic randomly and say
well what's the common sense thing to do
and what's the up stupid thing
that's bad for the country oh which one
did he pick surprise he picked the
up dangerous one so more people
will die because of these decisions he
just let out murderers the worst
ones no well I'm sorry he didn't let
them out of jail he I think he just took
away the death penalty part
I think pretty sure that so let me let
me correct myself he's not letting him
out of jail he's just taking away the
death penalty part I think that's true
um so that wouldn't make anybody uh too
much in danger except the other people
in prison I guess because some of them
killed people in
prison so now they get to stay in prison
instead of being executed I guess anyway
so some people think that Sam bankman
free who was the number two donor to the
Democrats before he got in jail um that
he might get
pardoned uh I think I see Elon Musk said
you know he just assumes that's going to
happen there is precedent for it didn't
uh Bill Clinton pardon one of his big
donors who was in jail so if we're going
to allow presidents to have pardoning
powers we do have to expect this kind of
thing we do have to expect that some
some bad people would be pardoned so uh
uh I'm I'm going to choose not to
complain about it too much because it
works both ways you know everybody in
the job does
it um meanwhile Trump made some
news at uh um tpusa big
event um and he us his line which always
gets a big Applause with his crowd quote
woke is
woke is
now you could you could bring in um a
thousand professional
communicators and you could say all
right you professional communicators the
best in class I want you to make a
statement about you know wokeness and
and this category then the professional
communication communicators would say
stuff like well all things considered
when we've you know blah blah blah in
the larger perspective we'd like to
preserve our diversity but uh it should
be noted that maybe there was a little
overreach and we went a little too far
and maybe we should tighten it up a
little bit that's that's what the
professional communicators would say
here's what a good communicator would
say woke is
you can't beat that you can't
beat that you you could try all day long
you could bring you know a conference of
the best communicators in the world you
wouldn't beat that now part of the magic
of it is that it's
inappropriate Trump uses
inappropriate exactly the way you should
um you've seen me interview my friend
and uh expert on memory and uh cognitive
stuff uh Carmen Simon Dr Carmen Simon
and she teaches that it's the the things
that are out of context the things that
are surprising that stand out it's like
the you know the the blemish on the
tablecloth that's what you remember so
the fact that he's not supposed to talk
this way in the office of the presidency
or near it um is what makes you remember
it you'll remember that
forever you you remember that sentence
maybe for the rest of your life
seriously
20 years from now if you're still alive
and somebody said to you what did Trump
think about
wokeness do you think you'll remember
and just say oh he said literally woke
is probably not not all of us
but some of us are going to remember the
exact sentence 20 years from now you
can't beat
that I don't think I don't think the
country quite yet understands how good
he
is just just don't think they quite get
it I mean they know he's good because
they can see that he made back to the
presidency Against All Odds I mean
that's good that's really good but still
they don't see the full the the depth of
it he also said
uh um let's see oh he was speaking at
amfest in
Arizona amfest but I don't know what the
tpusa part is I saw that in the
background did he do more than one
speech was it two different places I'm a
little confused on the event
um and he said also and for all of you
standing before you and for all of us
standing before you today I can proudly
Proclaim that the Golden Age of America
is upon
us
perfect you you can't be all negative
you can't go into office and say
everything's broken but I'll try to fix
it it's such a downer you you got to
give us you're heading into something
great and this is perfect the Golden Age
so he's The Branding expert perfect
branding uh woke is entering
the Golden Age um and he said also that
quote we're going to pledge to bring
Common Sense
Revolution a common sense Revolution
I've told you before that if you were
trying to find a way to understand how
famous lifetime Democrats could be so
eager to work with Trump on specific
things such as reducing cost to
government we all like that making our
food more healthy yes making our big
farma um prove to us a little bit more
rigorously that their stuff is safe yes
yes please so common sense is the glue
that allows Trump to collect his little
pirate ship of people you wouldn't
expect to be on his team um so common
sense
it's just perfect and it works because
you won't find probably anything that
Trump supports policy-wise that doesn't
fit common
sense and he can explain why it's good
and what's you know why the old way is
bad Common
Sense I also saw um Trump's new
spokesperson on CNN I
think um saying that there was already a
Carol Caroline leave it l it and she
said there was a a trump effect and she
gave some examples of some things around
the world where people are people are
already preparing for Trump by doing
things that Trump wouldn't mind or that
he'd like them to do so that's called
the Trump effect don't you love Trump
effect as a like a branded term because
you can find it all over so there's lots
of things you can say there it is is
that Trump effect again because we used
to be talking about
TDS and maybe that's where that sha Penn
um statement came from several years ago
when TDS really described everything
everything you saw could be described
with
TDS now it's more like the Trump
effect and uh Common Sense bringing
people together um Federman again once
again
Federman said very positive things about
Trump he doesn't you know's he's not on
board he's never going to become a
republican he says but uh he just has to
admit that a lot of pennsylvanians like
Trump and they like the things he
proposed and they're quite happy with
their choice and and he wants you to
know that that's okay so we like that
thank you thank you
fedman um and then of course my one of
my newer favorites is to make America
healthy again now when I first saw that
make America health healthy again my
first instinct was oh that's you're
you're perverting make America great
again you know just leave that alone it
did so well you know don't don't try to
like play off it you know just let that
be its own thing it's just such an
iconic
thing but I changed my vote I changed my
vote U Maha is
working it it's a good brand for you
know a way to conceptualize that there's
a common sense effort to make the food
and and our meds healthier and we've got
somebody very powerful working on it
with a lot of support so yeah make make
America healthy again home run so I
missed that one so nobody's
perfect I would have bet against that
one I would have bet against it but the
uh the lesson here is that you can't
always predict this stuff persuasion is
a little unpredictable no matter how you
how much experience you have with with
it and I would have missed that one but
I love the fact that the people coming
in to help didn't miss it and and
created it you know so that's a um
Shanahan and
Kennedy so good job so here here are the
themes uh woke is Golden Age
Common Sense Revolution the Trump effect
already affecting other countries and
make America healthy again now he may
have said said make America great
again but you know that had that had a
push back built into it you know the the
people who believe that people who look
like them in the past weren't getting a
good deal had what I consider actually
fairly reasonable response to it because
they were like wait a minute what do you
mean go back we made so much progress
recently what does go back and great
again what does that include so I do
understand the
skepticism to the magga message but
who's going to complain about make
America
healthy there's not much you can do with
that
one anyway according to sa
poost um Nar narcissistic grandiosity
predicts greater involvement in the
lgbtq
activism now if you're new to my live
stream I love the LBGTQ Community big
fan I think they've done such a great
job in U taking their let's let's say
their brand or their reputation in the
country from a big problem for them
to front of the parade I mean there like
I often say this have you ever stayed
away from a
neighborhood because it was one of those
dangerous lgbtq neighborhoods no because
there are not it's one of the most
successful communi
in America I'm I'm very impressed by the
lgbtq community but like like any
advocacy group like any demographic
group that's trying to improve their
situation they have leaders they have
activists and the thinking is that
activists are driven by these dark ego
principles and they've got you know the
basically it's you know the dark Triad
personalities and I definitely think
that activists like to get
attention I think that much is true but
is getting attention always
bad I think it depends why you're doing
it if you're getting attention because
you just got some kind of mental
syndrome and you're just satisfying your
your own need and you're making a job
for yourself and you're getting famous
and people are patting you on the back
and so you want to do more of it it's
fine but then you know also in the news
lately is that uh Dei companies are
pulling back or companies are pulling
back for Dei and they mention Robbie
starbu as a key activist maybe the key
activist in getting companies to pull
back from Dei now if you follow Robbie
Starbucks do you see any dark Triad
personality I don't and I I think that
stuff sticks out pretty hard like I
don't think you can hide it so I'm I'm
not willing to say that the people who
are
activists are all dark Triad because I
think there are too many examples where
they're not well you you could say that
Elon Musk is an activist free speech I
don't really see any dark Triad
personality problems you could say Trump
is uh you could say vas I don't see any
of that in them it feels a little bit
more like left versus right doesn't it I
feel like the activists on the
right are working against an evil as
they see it like this is evil nobody's
going to do something about this
seriously you nobody's going to nobody
else is going to do anything about this
well hell I guess I got to do it I I
feel like I feel like Republican
activists are dragged into
it against their wish right do you think
David Sachs wanted to be this
public I doubt it I mean I can't read
his mind of course I doubt it I felt
that he like other people saw oh my my
God there's a this need the the country
needs people who are not in some kind of
weird mental DTS bubble and can make
some common sense happen and you could
add you know Mark andreon to that you
could add Bill Amman to that um they all
got involved but they didn't want to or
or it doesn't look like they did it for
any reason other than they got dragged
into
it again I can't read bins but it looks
like they got dragged into it and I
would say me too you know I'm a um I I
call myself a grandios narcissist in the
sense that I do enjoy getting attention
for doing something that's good for you
know the community or the world or
somebody it's got to be good for
somebody and I get pretty much all of my
sense of meaning from attempting and
sometimes succeeding in making some
things better do I have dark Triad
personality or do I just enjoy the
rewards of doing good
things I don't know it does feel it just
feels different on the left than the
right but I don't want to
overgeneralize I'm sure there are
activists on the left who are just
driven by the need to make things better
but for some reason we don't see them
that
much um let's see what else is going on
here
so Scott Jennings on CNN I love the fact
that he's becoming a
star you know one of the things that
really helps is when you can brand
things like I was just talking about you
take a big concept and you brand it and
it gives it much more power because
everybody can refer to it and we all
know what you're talking about but
likewise it's good to have um
individuals who are just sort of branded
as standing out as good messenger you
know Greta Greta tunberg was one of
those she got branded by her her side
and that helped their messaging so I
love the fact that uh Scott Jennings is
doing such a good job in what is an
ordinary an ordinary role right people
go on TV and disagree with each other
but he's doing such a good job that he's
becoming like a like a mustat I think I
think every
day uh I see a new clip of him
destroying the the rest of the panel on
CNN now of course if you're on the left
you don't think he destroyed anything
but he's fun to watch so here's the new
thing he said he was talking about the
criticisms that musk is an unelected
leader and uh listen to these
framings um he said
um that he said he and Trump seem to be
getting along well he said quote musk
was very instrumental in his victory and
I hear Democrats criticizing the idea
that we have unelected people with too
much influence over the government
so first he sets it up so just watch how
well he does this just if you look at
the communication skill involved and
keep in mind this is without notes so of
course he's prepared but speaking off
the cuff without notes if you haven't
tried it you should try it you'll you'll
respect people who can do it a lot more
if you try it it's hard anyway so he
sets it up right the Democrats are crit
criticizing the idea that we have
unelected people with too much influence
if he can get you to accept that you
know here's our starting point you're
criticizing people who are unelected to
have too much influence then he goes in
for the
kill I invite them to pick up the Wall
Street Journal from this week and find
out that unelected people have been
running the government for the last four
years
ouch ouch you can feel that shi go right
through your
torso because not only does he credit
Wall Street Journal while he's on a
panel on CNN he criticizes another
publication for telling the public the
truth in front of CNN now the
implication which he doesn't say but the
implication is if you were a real news
organization I wouldn't be referencing
Wall Street
Journal now he doesn't say that but like
like I can hear it even though he
doesn't say it which is perfect then he
goes um
uh I hear Democrats criticizing the
influence of billionaires on our
politics when you've got this Soros punk
you talk about the younger one Alex
running around collecting Democrat
politicians like my kids collect Pokemon
cards okay first of all perfect use of
an
analogy perfect use of an analogy
because it makes a visual and you can
you can see the cards and you can see
his kid collecting them and and uh and
the way you phrase that is that this
billionaire is basically buying up
politicians so good so good yeah good
job Scott
Jennings but um I would like to add this
following frame that I didn't invent
somebody somebody on social media said
it I'm just copying it um that when we
were when we voted and let's see if this
Rings true with you so most of you are
Trump voters I'm guessing when you voted
for Trump weren't you already
aware that he was likely to bring in RFK
Jr that musk would have influence in a
good way um V would be part of
it I voted for the
team I didn't vote for
Trump because that wasn't even what was
offered did did Trump ever say I'm going
to do it all myself I don't remember
that don't remember that at all when
when you vote voted for Trump on the
first time weren't you a little worried
he could hire the right people and then
it turns out you were right to be
worried about that because he didn't
have access to as many people as a
normal president would but now he seems
to have that fixed he has more access
than anybody would would even predict so
I voted for the
team and I did that consciously I did
that
completely with full trans transparency
so yes technically I only voted for
Trump and
Vance but as a practical matter no I
voted for all of them and I voted I also
voted for the the piic he hasn't made
yet I voted for his next pick who also
won't necessarily be um approved by
anybody or voted by anybody I I voted
for that so to say we didn't vote for it
is just technically correct
it's not real world Common Sense correct
so here here's that Common Sense thing
again if you just apply a common sense
to it it's like this is exactly what we
voted for it's not even slightly off
base it's
precisely precisely what we voted
for so that's the frame I would put on
it do you remember when Bill Clinton was
running um and people said hey Hillary's
you know pretty solid too
and
um and Bill Clinton sold his presidency
as getting uh two for the price of one
do you remember that he would say of
course of course I take counsel from
Hillary like why wouldn't you she's very
smart she's connected she understands
the topics I married her of course I
take it of course I would take advice
from her to which that was brilliant
you know he could have run away from
that and say no no I'm not listening to
the little lady I'm I'm running my own
show no you're V you're voting for me
but he went the other way and I thought
that was brilliant he just of course of
course she's very strong of course I
would listen to her that was the right
answer and by the way no matter what you
think about Hillary Clinton she's very
smart can we agree on that you can't
take that away from her she's really
smart so yeah of course I would have
listened to her
too so that's the same to me we didn't
vote for Hillary but we kind of did
right if you voted for Clinton and he
said I'm a pair yeah you voted for
Hillary in a
fact um Putin says that uh Trump has
expressed interest in a meeting and
Putin says he wants to do it as soon as
possible
um so I'm going to say this same thing
about Russia I said about
China is Russia in a perfectly strong
situation where their economy can work
just fine and they figured out ways
around all the all the tariffs and
whatever and they don't mind you know
killing lots of people and they've got
North Vietnam soldiers and equipment and
they they've got good manufacturing so
they can manufacture more weapons and
stuff is that true
or are they on the verge of
collapse because I've heard
both and I don't have an independent way
to know which one is
true um I would guess they're nowhere
near collapse because I think Putin has
such a strong
control but are they
weakened are they weakened they're
definitely weakened
militarily but they also might be
stronger in a number of ways meaning
that you know they may have made more of
the weapons that they're not using in
Ukraine they may have you know beefed up
things we don't know about they may have
learned things about drones that they
didn't know before so I can't tell if
Russia is getting stronger or weaker can
you like in the comments tell me do you
think Russia is weakened or yes it has
some problems but not really anything
that's going to change their
trajectory so I'd like to see your
opinion on that um
meanwhile Trump remember Trump said he
wanted to maybe take over the Panama
Canal uh because it's expensive to go
through it and we built it and 35,000
Americans died from the mosquitoes
building it and we sold it to Panama for
$1 and now maybe they're not doing the
greatest job but apparently China
operates the canal and they have a
virtual monopoly on it and it kind of
makes sense now you can see Panama would
say you know we're not really Canal
experts but these Chinese Engineers seem
to be pretty good so why don't we just
have a contract and let you run it you
know it'll still be Panama it's still
owned by Panama but you guys can run it
now that seems to some people like a uh
political or even military risk because
it puts an adversary in charge of a
choke point now I don't know how much
risk that is because if that adversary
is a bunch of engineers in the northern
hemisphere they're going to do whatever
the our military tells them to
do because they're in our hemisphere it
doesn't matter if they're hiding in
they're hiding in Panama and China and
they you know they're Chinese citizens
if they're in our Hemisphere and it's
like you know fewer than a 100 people
and they're some kind of Defense risk to
the United States we'll just go down and
do whatever we need to do if if we need
that Canal so I don't know how much real
risk it is but it could be a temporary
risk you know you could imagine some
temporary
problem however um the amuse account
which I talk about a lot you should
follow the amuse account on a uh points
out that the treaty where we where we
sold the canal to Panama for $1 it has
in it a clause that we can take back the
canal if it is under the control of a
foreign
power wait a minute is it under the
control of China well Panama would
probably say no because they would
probably say well it's a contract we
just have to you know we have to get rid
of them they have to do what the
contract says we can get rid of them so
Panama is still in
control but who gets to decide if Panama
is in control or China's in
control I'm pretty sure that that's
vague
in the uh treaty which means that the
president of the United States could say
hey it looks like China is running that
Canal that was not our deal it has to be
Panama or nothing so we're going to take
it
back now this all could be negotiating
too because it could be he wants lower
prices maybe he just wants China not to
be part of it might want both of those
things um but either way he's he's
persuasion perfect on this
because he's not he's not too specific
about what he wants but he's laying down
the he's laying down the general
situation so he's framed it in a way
that his persuasion you know could be
effective so that's just a foreshadowing
keep an eye on that one now he also came
out and at first I thought it was a joke
and he but he said in one of those
public announcements Trump did he said
for purposes of security and Freedom the
US feels that the ownership of Greenland
is a
necessity so Greenland
is um sort of independent but sort of
owned by Denmark not sort of Denmark
owns Greenland but they operate kind of
independently um however and and then
the argument I saw in line was well
Greenland is going to be important to
control of the Arctic because if the ice
melts in the Arctic there going to be
this control for the Arctic um you know
so Russia will be all over trying to
control it and probably China too so we
do have a future gigantic defense
geopolitical issue with the melting ice
and I said to myself but really how
important is
Greenland like I understand the issue
but really how important is
Greenland and then I called up a map I
looked at where Greenland is I mean I
knew generally where it was but your
brain doesn't really process how big it
is and and how strategically is located
as soon as you see it on a map and you
know that the Arctic will become a
contentious place I said to myself oh I
get it yeah we we probably need to own
Greenland we probably do now maybe we
don't need to own it completely like
Denmark does Maybe we need to have some
working working arrangement that's as
good as that but the other thing is that
apparently Greenland is full of uh these
Rare Minerals these Rare Earth minerals
which we need and China has a you know
virtual monopoly on at least in terms of
willingness to mine it so what if
Greenland became super vital to our
mineral Rare Earth access so all of our
technology depends on it and would be
critical to the defense of the United
States because you don't want a bunch of
Russians taking over the Arctic
Circle I think this is
real I I think this is actually probably
pretty thought out and that America's
control of everything in the sort of
American
hemisphere probably needs to be close to
complete now obviously we don't own all
the countries in our hemisphere but we
certainly try to yeah we try to one way
or another we try to
so Greenland's going to be
interesting so now we've got Trump
talking about Canada becoming a state
Panama canal coming back to us
Greenland um it's very colonizing
sounding except that it's
weirdly it's weirdly
specific um don't think he's going to go
all Hitler and form an army and try to
conquer these places I think I think he
wants to
negotiate and I think I get the feeling
that Trump wants to do something like
you know a major increase to the land
mass of the United
States I feel like he wants to increase
the land mass of the United States
because it would be an amazing Legacy
right the the uh to increase the size of
a country um
60 Minutes head on uh somebody who said
they were part of mad and how they how
they um booby trapped all those
Hezbollah pagers made them blow up and
how they did that and uh if this guy's
real you never know but he said that uh
they set up companies and shell
companies and they basically they have
this whole artificial structure that you
would never be able to identify uh where
they have access to the the supply lines
of a bunch of Industries so we don't
know how extensive it is
but he does indicate that the world we
think we're living in is not the world
you think you're living in it's mostly
fake meanwhile uh John lefave on X is
talking about Jeff bezos's ex-wife
McKenzie McKenzie Scott now um he says
she doesn't get enough attention for the
impact she's having on the world and
she's put $16 billion do so far into
Equity things and racial division things
and these NOS that are trying to stifle
free speech in America basically
everything
bad
um yeah so $16 billion and she doesn't
have apparently strong requirements for
what he she gets from the money it's
more like she's just dumping huge some
money into people who say they're on her
side without much control over it so
this is all
bad it's all bad
and so now you've got um Jeff Bezos who
owns the Washington Post which is the
biggest source of fake news in a
newspaper
and then you've got his ex-wife funding
all these terrible ideas
that are just destructive to the country
and apparently giving away $16 billion
didn't have any impact because she made
16 billion back in the time that she
gave it away so she has the same amount
of money
still she's just going to keep doing it
now if you compare Elon Musk trying to
save free
speech with MacKenzie Scott trying to
stop
it with Elon Musk trying to end wokeness
which is just racism with somebody
trying to promote racism with her $16
billion don't you wonder what kind of a
bubble she's
in so somebody asked me if she could be
deprogrammed and the answer is
yes yeah I could probably do it in an
hour but there's no way somebody like
her would ever be alone with somebody
who could deprogram her I don't think it
could ever happen so I think she's in a
bubble where everybody says you're the
best
I'd like a billion dollars too hey I've
got an organization that really needs
some funding you're the best McKenzie we
love you you're so good so good give me
money Honda Nissan Nissan look like
they're going to combine and become the
number three aut
maker Japanese government is pressuring
them to combine because apparently they
don't think they can compete
individually the the new stuff like the
self-driving cars especially apparently
they're a little bit far
behind and uh they don't think Honda
could be competitive by itself is that
true the Honda fell behind in technology
I think I think um Tesla is changing
everything um you probably want me to
talk about the horrible story of the
Guatemalan migrant who set a sleeping
woman on fire in the New York City
subway with your permission I'm not
going to talk about that like even just
reading the title of it is too much
because it looks like a crazy guy but of
course is being used as a sign of how
our um immigration policy is broken now
our immigration policy is broken but you
don't need this you don't need this one
crazy guy right now would he have not
been left LED in the country you know
would she still be alive if our
immigration system worked probably
probably so it's certainly a tragedy and
it's certainly true that extra crime is
being brought in but I just don't like
using the anecdotes to make the larger
point we all understand crimes coming
into the
country so it it just becomes too
persuasive when you get down into the
details so I don't want to be that
persuasive on something that is is
uncomfortably uncomfortably identifying
certain groups of people as
troublemakers now I know that's not the
intent the intent is just to have secure
borders and protect ourselves but when
you talk about it as an anecdote it
takes your brain to a you know a
different place and I don't like going
there all
right um now here's the most interesting
thing I saw yesterday I saw Jake
Sullivan who's who's a one of the big
principles and the Biden Administration
for what they're doing uh
internationally and he appeared on fared
Zakaria show and I I just saw
some some
jaw-dropping
takes uh number one fared
Zakaria he said that uh Biden deserves
some credit I'm paraphrasing here but he
deserves credit because people don't
realize how much weaker Biden made our
enemies while the United States got
stronger so he said we you know we made
Iran Russia and China much weaker uh
through economic means through War
through tariffs and all that stuff
blockades and boycotts and whatever
whatever we did we so they're all weaker
now like I said I'm not so sure Russia
is falling apart or the China is but
there's an argument for it there is an
argument that they're very weak and Iran
some say is weaker than ever been but
again is it you do we really know I mean
Iran was supposed to go out a business a
long time ago right but they're still
here so here's what fared said he he he
framed it as Biden being successful
because he made our enemies
weaker here's my problem with
that um I don't love calling China an
enemy
while we're dealing with
them right if we're going to trade with
them and president XI might visit and
our embassies are open I don't like
calling them enemies even even if you
think they are I I feel like that's bad
persuasion and if you're in China and
you see on CNN that fared is calling you
an
enemy wouldn't that Harden your resolve
to build up your military and all that
why do why don't we call them future
friends and say we got a ton of problems
you know fentel at the top of the list
but we think we can be future
friends we just can't you know give you
a leg up on us we're because we're
competitive but here it got more
interesting so Jake Sullivan in the
outgoing Biden Administration what would
you expect him to say about the world in
the context of trump coming in wouldn't
you
expect that he would say we did a great
job and Trump might come in here and
ruin everything don't you expect that
he's a super Insider prominent powerful
Democrat whose team just lost and their
their greatest nightmare Trump is coming
into
office so naturally he should be saying
everything's going to go off the rails
Trump's going to ruin everything chaos
racist hiters coming in right should
sound like that
he went the other
direction and I'm trying to figure out
what happened Jake Sullivan essentially
said that Biden has weakened the
competitors and it's going to allow
Trump a really good base for
negotiating and I was waiting for like
another shoe to drop you know something
like but of course Trump's a big evil
lying genius so no big lying racist so
we don't think he could succeed but we
hope hope he does but he's a big lying
racist so you know why would he
succeed none of that
happened instead if if you had never
watched anything about American politics
you wouldn't even know he was a
Democrat he he actually said it's sort
of like a onew punch Biden set him up
and now uh the great negotiator and by
the way I think he referred to Trump as
you know a solid negotiator he said now
The Negotiator can come in and mop up
again I'm
paraphrasing but does that blow your
mind it it completely blows my mind and
here's what I'm thinking it could be
that they're trying to save Biden's
Legacy and therefore their own by
showing that it's part of a onetwo punch
and without the one you couldn't have
the
two and you know
what he actually sold that to me I
actually bought that because I'm
listening I'm thinking yeah Iran is
ready for negotiation because of what
Biden did uh China's ready for
negotiation yeah yep and Russia is ready
for
negotiations it it's kind of
true it's kind of true that Biden set it
up for a one-w punch but then he also
dropped in that when they took over the
military wasn't in good shape but so
theyve strengthen the military everybody
says that says that but could it
be that the big play is military
spending and uh the best way they can
get Trump to do military spending is say
you did a great job on this
negotiating uh glad you got that done we
set you up you know we we got you ready
for Success so you took it home thanks
for that but we set you up for that um
and but we all agree that we have to
spend massively to rebuild the
military and then the military is Happy
the military industrial complex says oh
you can to spend massively to buy new
stuff from us okay we like this
President so it could be that as long as
you're on the page of we're going to
spend massively for new weapons
everybody likes you and you can be
president so I don't know I don't know
how doge is going to save money uh if
the military industrial complex is going
to be fed so we'll see where this goes
but that was a heck of a surprising
conversation meanwhile you'd be
surprised to know there's new battery
breakthrough sodium iron ion batteries
so a sodium ion battery would use more
common materials and not these rare
things that have to be mined in the
Congo um and they're not quite up to
lithium performance but they made a new
tweak by adding some sodium vadium
phosphate with the chemical formula of
NAX V2 p43 which is exactly what I was
going to suggest I was like have you
tried the sodium vadium
phosphate and then they'd say no we
haven't and i' say you should try that
you should try it but they did try it
even without my
advice good for
them
um there's a uh break breakthrough
method to revert colon cancer cells to
normal to normal cells according to the
Korea
bizwire uh some Korean uh Institute of
Science and
Technology uh instead of destroying the
cancer cell at least specifically now
for colon cancer uh they found a way to
turn the cancer cell into a real
cell what and it works
uh without destroying
them that's like the most amazing thing
I've have ever heard yeah
um this reminds me of Elon musk's
philosophy so Elon Musk philosophy is
that uh Engineers spend a lot of time
trying to improve things but sometimes
they should step back really everything
they should step back and say do we need
the
thing are we approved improving
something we don't
need and here instead of saying let's
find a better way to kill a cancer cell
these re researchers said do we have to
kill
them why don't we just reprogram
them like I don't know if anybody ever
thought of that before I never thought
of it I just assumed they were all
corrupted You couldn't possibly save
them but what if he can this would be
one of the most amazing things if if
that that worked now that's again just
for colon cancer so it doesn't mean it
would work for any other
kind there's a uh oh let me give you
another example of that Elon Musk
philosophy of improving something versus
why do you have it in the first place um
my
driveway uh and garage uh between the
driveway doors I had these uh potted
plants and they look kind of cool but
the the pot that you know the the tall
pot that was holding the plants got too
weathered and it was falling apart and I
needed to replace them so I spent all
kinds of time researching replacements
for these big potted
plants now at the same time I would be
pulling out my garage and you know
there' be something you know host Way's
truck is on the other side because he's
doing some work and so I have to make a
few Maneuvers to get out and I said to
myself wow I'm so glad that we pulled
out the old pots because now when I turn
around they're not my way because if you
tried to do an angle turn you know the
Planters to be in the way and I'm
sitting there in my driveway looking at
my garage and
thinking why the hell do I have potted
plants in the way in my in my
driveway why did they exist and I spent
all this time trying to improve them I
should not have spent one minute
improving them and finally when the when
when it dawned on me that they didn't
add anything to the aesthetic of the
house they were simply expensive and in
the way that's it and I was spending all
my time trying to make them look
better no once I realized that they
didn't have any purpose and they had
definitely a cost they were in the way I
just said why don't we just take them
out of there and leave a blank between
the garage doors and I am so happy every
time I pull out of my garage and every
time I which is almost every time I have
to do a maneuver that would have been an
extra maneuver and I remind myself yeah
e even though you think to yourself
every smart person knows this that you
shouldn't improve something that doesn't
need to exist right common sense but you
don't think in those terms unless you
really remind yourself all the time so I
use that as my way to remind myself the
the driveway potted plants like if I'll
remember that it might help me the next
time I'm trying to fix something or
improve something it's like maybe we
don't even need
it anyway Brighter Side news says
there's a revolutionary new mask like a
face mask that can measure your uh your
breathing and can detect a bunch of
respiratory problems that's kind of cool
now what's cool about it is it it
replaces a bunch of expensive tests with
equipment and you have to go go to the
office but here if they suspect you have
a respiratory problem they just hand you
this mask and say go wear this for a few
hours and and we'll read the data and
it'll tell you what's wrong with you big
Improvement because if you can make
fewer reasons to go to a hospital or go
to a doctor the costs of everything just
drop like
crazy so that's good
news all right ladies and gentlemen that
brings me to the my prepared remarks I'm
going to talk to the folks on locals
privately and say goodbye to the YouTube
and Rumble and X audience who are also
awesome in your own ways but uh locals
I'm coming at you privately in 30
seconds
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e e