Episode 2792 CWSA 03/28/25
DOGE update, massive frauds, Ukraine gets spicy, lots more ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Come on in. We're almost ready for the show. You deserve it. Well, I think you deserve it. Do you? Yeah, yeah, I think you do. You've been good. All right, let's check the stocks. Uh, well, not so good. All right, forget about that. There'll be better later. But I got to call up my comments here, ma…
View segment →. So much news. Oh my goodness. Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. You've never had a better time. But if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny, shiny human brain…
View segment →join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens right now. Yes. Exactly. Go. Fully recharged. I'm working at full strength today. We got news. We're going to pound right through it. Yo…
View segment →y in general, everything else in your life looks better. How many of you didn't know that? Was there anybody who thought, you know, if I were depressed but I got a better job, I'll bet that would cheer me up? No, doesn't work that way. If you're happy, then even your crap job seems pretty good to yo…
View segment →he wastewater project that would tell us that we live in a simulation. Let's see. The wastewater is being explained by Dr. Whizzing. So Dr. Whizzing can tell you about the wastewater. Apparently Dr. Pooping was not available. He's the number two. Yep, Dr. Whizzing for wastewater. Okay, okay. All rig…
View segment →and they've got time for comment, it becomes literally impossible. So it's not just that it didn't happen. It's that the system was impossible. So anybody who tried to apply to be one of the people who executed on these funded projects couldn't get through it. It would take you the rest of your lif…
View segment →and improve delivery. So he said they've had a bunch of geniuses come over to RFK Jr.'s domain to try to figure out how to do that. Can you imagine how much money could be driven out of healthcare if you only knew what worked and what doesn't? Separately, I saw another story, I didn't write this one…
View segment →od. You know, maybe sometimes he's more tired or the lighting's bad or whatever, but he looked great. Like he looked healthy and like completely in charge. So that was great. But the other thing that I noticed is that Musk is a talent stack guy, meaning that whatever talents he has, which are consi…
View segment →didn't know that there are 20. So if you were going to say how does this one guy get four of these Trump cases when it's one in 20 every time, well it would help if you knew that there's another Judge Cobb who has at least 10 Trump-related cases. But I've never heard that name, have you? Judge Cobb.…
View segment →'re all going to get half a dozen because even if you did it randomly, they're just so many cases that they're just all going to come up half a dozen times. That's exactly what's happening. But I don't believe it's random. Here's what I think. I think it depends who filed the lawsuit. I think if one…
View segment →hink is true, by the way, but it's a hoax that Trump ever mocked a reporter who had a disability with an arm. Now I saw Brendan Straka doing a great job of debunking that. I've seen Debunk America doing a great job at debunking. It's the most thoroughly debunked thing. And it's easy to debunk becaus…
View segment →nd AI. And she talks about how she's used a bunch of the AIs and she's doing it for her work in science. And that it often gives her sources that don't exist or there's a 404 error. It'll tell her that a document that says 2025 on it is from 2023. So she has to continually fact-check the AI's work.…
View segment →y Problems or the Imaginary Policies or something like that. The word "concerns" is what made this viral. So that's actually the active word. So if you didn't understand persuasion you would say concerns is too generic or it's off point or something. If you do understand it you know that that's the…
View segment →Come on in. We're almost ready for the show. You deserve it. Well, I think you deserve it. Do you? Yeah, yeah, I think you do. You've been good. All right, let's check the stocks. Uh, well, not so good. All right, forget about that. There'll be better later. But I got to call up my comments here, make sure everybody's on board. There we go. Boy, there's a lot of news today. So much news. Oh my goodness.
Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. You've never had a better time. But if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny, shiny human brains, all you need for that is a cup or a mug, a glass or a tankard, a stein, a can, a jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens right now.
Yes. Exactly. Go. Fully recharged. I'm working at full strength today. We got news. We're going to pound right through it. You ready for this? Happy Friday, by the way.
Let's see. Is there any new science that they could have completely skipped just by asking Scott? Oh yeah, here's one. The University of South Australia found out that being happy in your career doesn't make you happy in life, but being happy in general in your life can make you enjoy your career that you have more. They could have just asked me. Yes, it's called baseline happiness. And if you're happy in general, everything else in your life looks better. How many of you didn't know that? Was there anybody who thought, you know, if I were depressed but I got a better job, I'll bet that would cheer me up? No, doesn't work that way. If you're happy, then even your crap job seems pretty good to you. And if you're unhappy, it doesn't matter how good your job is. You're still going to be unhappy. So just ask me next time. I could have cleared that up, saved you a lot of money.
Well, according to Marine Insight publication over in Germany, there's this revolutionary new wastewater processing plant. It's a wastewater processing plant. And what's revolutionary is that they can convert the wastewater into methanol, which I guess is kind of climate neutral, and you can use that for marine fuels. Now, I wonder if there's anybody who works on the wastewater project that would tell us that we live in a simulation. Let's see. The wastewater is being explained by Dr. Whizzing. So Dr. Whizzing can tell you about the wastewater. Apparently Dr. Pooping was not available. He's the number two. Yep, Dr. Whizzing for wastewater. Okay, okay. All right, all right. Judge me. You can judge me on that one.
This you knew was coming. Next Defense is reporting that Maxar Intelligence, they've developed a vision-based software that can make GPS unnecessary for your drone. So in other words, if your drone gets jammed and it can't see the GPS signal, it doesn't care because Maxar Intelligence has these databases that are really detailed. They've got 3D terrain data for 34 million square miles. So it can just switch to, or maybe it doesn't even need GPS, which means that there's practically no defense against drones now. If your drone can't be jammed, if you can't jam the GPS, that seems like a problem.
So yes, as Naval Ravikant said recently, it's really inevitable that all warfare will be drones because why would you need anything else? It's all going to be drones.
Well, if you haven't yet seen Ezra Klein on Jon Stewart's podcast, oh, you have to see this. I so recommend this. So look for the clips. If you just see the clips, you'll see everything you need to see. But Ezra Klein is a co-author of the book "Abundance," and he's doing, you know, I have to say my first impression was, hey, you're just writing a book that says Democrats should act more like Republicans if they want to win anything. So I wasn't sure it was adding much to the world. But now I think it is. So I'm going to switch to full compliment to Ezra Klein and I guess Derek Thompson, the two co-authors.
So the thing that was amazing is that, you know, you've heard Ezra Klein talk about how the Democrats are good at funding impressive things, but then for reasons that I didn't quite understand, nothing got done. So there was the funding of the high-speed rail in California that didn't get done. There was the funding of the rural broadband that didn't get done. There was the funding of the nationwide charging stations that didn't get done. All good ideas in theory, but all they could do is give them money and not get anything done.
And if you wonder why it is that nothing gets done, you just have to hear Ezra Klein go through the 14 steps it would have taken to approve just the project for the car charging stations. Oh my God. I'm not going to run through the 14 because it's pretty pedantic, but you have to watch Jon Stewart for the first time understanding how completely doomed the Democrat way of work is, because the regulations are mostly, I'm thinking, mostly Democrat-created. And if you looked at any one of them individually, you'd probably say to yourself, all right, well, I could see why you'd want this group to review it, or I could see why you'd want to run it through this group for approval. But once you get to 14 different steps and everybody's got to review it and analyze it and they've got time for comment, it becomes literally impossible.
So it's not just that it didn't happen. It's that the system was impossible. So anybody who tried to apply to be one of the people who executed on these funded projects couldn't get through it. It would take you the rest of your life if you got through it at all. So there is no way to actually execute on these well-meaning Democrat gigantic projects. There is no way.
Now, what is it I always say about the difference between Republicans and Democrats? Democrats are really good at goals. High-speed rail, that's a goal. I like it. Rural internet broadband, I like it. Nationwide charging stations for electric cars sounds pretty good. Those are good goals. I like it. But they also developed a system that made it impossible.
Now let's compare that to the Republicans. Republicans would say get rid of all this red tape and then it works. That's it. So the Republicans have a system which is in general get rid of the red tape. Now beyond that, if you got rid of enough red tape, maybe you don't even need much government funding. Maybe the private sector can do it. But the Republicans consistently have systems that would work, and the Democrats consistently have pretty good goals. We'd like everybody to do well. We'd like the schools to do well. Take public education. The Democrats have a very good goal that no matter what your income is or what your situation is in life, you should get a good education and the government can help you on that. But then they overlay it with the Department of Education, which was a problem. They overlay it with the teachers union, and you very quickly get to the point where the system for providing that thing, which is a good, it just doesn't work. And that's what we observe. Scores are going down in every way. Whereas the Republicans would say, well, nothing works unless there's competition. So let's make sure there's a lot more competition for private schools or alternative schools. So again, in every domain it's the same. Democrats good on goals, don't have a system.
Let's check in on DEI. Charlie Kirk has a post where he's talking about a Daily Wire story by Luke Roszak. I guess he did a great job on this. And the story is about a group called the National Diversity Council. Now remember I tell you that it turns out that you can tell all the fraudulent organizations because they string together words that sound good. So instead of the National Diversity Council, it could have been the American Fairness Initiative. You can just put any words together. The Freedom Diversity Association. And then you start getting money.
Well, one of the founders, Dennis Kennedy, allegedly paid himself $450,000 a year for 10 hours of work a week. But then in 2022, allegedly at the peak of DEI mania, he and a few other executives decided that they really owed another $3 million in back pay. And so they looted the organization, is the accusation. And now the organization is filing for bankruptcy, with the board saying that Kennedy systematically looted it by funneling its assets to a for-profit firm controlled by himself. Does that sound familiar? That's exactly what we were finding out with all the NGOs. If the NGO gets a lot of funding, let's say from the government, could be private donations, then the first thing they'll do is say here's how we're spending that money. We're going to hire this for-profit entity that just happens to be my wife or just happens to be me with another name, and we're not going to have any accounting so that it's not as obvious what we're doing. It's the same scam everywhere. And once you realize the pattern, you can just pick it up instantly. It's like, oh, you got a bunch of money. You gave yourself a generic name like the National Diversity Council. And you can protect yourself by accusing any of your critics of being racists. Ah, see, that's important because if you don't have an audit process and you're planning to loot the organization, you want to make sure that if anybody blames you of anything, you could say, oh my God, what are you, some kind of white supremacist who hates diversity? Don't you see that diversity is in the name of our organization? Of course it's good because it says diversity right in it. It's right in the name, you racist. I think we're on to it now. I think we can spot these a little easier.
Well, Mario Nawfal is reporting that Trump has threatened to defund the Smithsonian over what he calls divisive narratives, and he's ordered JD Vance to go clean house, whatever that means. And what he wants to do is remove what he calls improper ideology or else lose federal funding. And he accuses the museum of pushing a decades-long effort to rewrite U.S. history with distorted ideological narratives instead of facts. So they're going to have to get rid of all the divisive content or else the government won't fund them anymore.
And to me, I can see why they're doing it. I'm sure it's a good idea. But history has always been fake. So when you take one version of fake history and somebody's trying to rewrite it to another version of fake history, it doesn't make it more accurate. But there is a version of history that's better for the country. And if you're deciding to change the history to "white people suck," now I haven't seen what the Smithsonian is up to, but I'm just going to take a wild guess that what they're saying is that white people are the problem. They killed all the Native Americans. They created all the slavery. They stole all the money. And white people are bad. Just a guess. I don't have any information that that's what this Smithsonian was doing. But what do you think? What else would it be? So yeah, it's very, very damaging to have a fake history that says the people who live here today are part of the problem. You don't want that. So it is better, even if it's fake history, to say that your country was awesome and you're still awesome. It's better.
Well, here's a story that really sounds great for America. Just listen to this. According to Interesting Engineering, an enormous, massive lithium deposit has been discovered in the U.S. worth $540 billion, so much that it would vastly reduce China's grip on the United States for lithium. So I'm reading this. I'm like, wow, $540 billion worth of lithium and it seems to be accessible. Isn't that the greatest story? The only thing that could be bad about this is if it's in California. Don't be in California. Please don't be in California. Please, please don't be in California. It's in California, beneath the surface of the Salton Sea. So I guess the value is not $540 billion. It would be closer to, let me call up Ezra Klein. Ezra, there's $540 billion worth of lithium in California under the Salton Sea. Do you think we can... okay, calm down, Ezra, calm down. Okay, yeah, I know we'll never get it. Yeah, I know, 14 steps. Okay, we'll just leave it there. Never mind. Thank you. Goodbye. Yeah, that's a complete waste of time because it's in California. I'd love to be wrong. I would love to be wrong. But no, it's worth nothing because it's in California. That's all you need to know.
Trump has floated the idea of maybe easing off on tariffs, according to Reuters, on China if China approves the sale of TikTok to an American entity. What do you think of that idea? Going easy on tariffs on China if they approve a TikTok deal? Here's the problem. That would be transferring wealth from the citizens of the United States to the rich people in the United States who bought TikTok. So the benefactors would be the billionaires who buy TikTok, and that would be paid for partly by money that would have otherwise gone into the treasury. So how is Trump going to... did he think this through? Now I'm not saying it's a bad idea, by the way. What I'm saying is how do you sell it? Because it's total oligarch-friendly, citizen-unfriendly, America last. I mean, to me it looks like it'd be kind of good for China and good for a few oligarchs who buy it who were his buddies. And I don't see how you sell this thing.
Now I will give you one possibility. One of the things that Trump said was that the U.S. government, if it's being helpful and making the deal happen, should get a percentage of TikTok. Oh, now that was not part of this story, but remember Trump has floated that idea and he was serious about it. And it makes sense. If the government is doing something important to make a private investment worth something, from zero to maybe be worth a trillion dollars someday, why don't we get a piece of it? If you give me a piece of it, meaning the citizens, I'm all in. Yeah. If you say we're going to reduce tariffs a little bit on China to get this deal done, but in the end the United States, let's say our sovereign fund, you know, I think we're going to have trouble funding the sovereign fund. There's some technical reason why the sovereign fund might be in jeopardy. But this seems like a perfect use for a sovereign fund where we invest literally zero and we get a percentage of TikTok. I'd be happy with more of that. So if Trump combines two things he's floated, one is the reduction of tariffs, get the deal done, and the other is U.S. gets a piece of the deal, you can sell that. That would be sellable.
Well, the House, according to Just the News, the House passed legislation to keep foreign influence out of higher education called the DETERRENT Act. And let's see what it does. It mandates that schools have to report foreign gifts. I think this is mostly universities and colleges have to report foreign gifts of at least $50,000 or more. And they have to report it to the... checking notes... they have to report that to the Department of Education. Huh. Do you see anything, see any problem with the legislation? Because the Department of Education is being closed. Don't they need to update that? I swear I don't even know what I'm reading at this point. Is this true? Did they just yesterday, the Republicans, this would only be through the House not the Senate, but did they really just pass some legislation in the House that says somebody has to report to the Department of no longer existing? There must be something wrong with the story, but maybe not.
Well, RFK Jr., who I thought was being a little bit quiet until he got his sea legs and figured out what was what, but boy he's not quiet now. I saw Wall Street Apes had a video. I couldn't tell how old it was, but he was talking how BlackRock owns all of the meat packers in the United States. There are only four big companies, but BlackRock owns them all. And they, according to RFK, they also own a lot of the big pharma. Now I don't know if "own" is the right description. They might own a percentage, but does BlackRock own a controlling interest in pharma? Because that would be something I'd never heard before. I definitely knew that they were heavily invested in everything that matters, you know, pretty much every industry that matters. But a controlling interest? I don't know. And do they have a controlling interest or already own the meat packers? So I have some questions about that, but that's something RFK Jr.'s bringing up. Seems important to me.
Then he also reported that some of the career civil servant bureaucrats were keeping RFK Jr. from accessing databases that would have information about risks and dangers of certain drugs and medical interventions. Can you imagine that? And RFK Jr. says that these bureaucrats are seemingly only serving the industries they were supposed to regulate. So everything that RFK Jr. has been telling us before he got the job, you know, to be in charge of all this stuff, it looks like it's all true. It looks like these are completely broken industries that are just serving the pharma industries. It just seems broken entirely.
But RFK Jr. was on Chris Cuomo's show on NewsNation, and he said the CDC, so that would be under him, is launching a new sub-agency to specialize in vaccine injuries. So that should make you happy. Now he's very careful about the fact that it's not going to be based on hearsay or anecdote. They're going to look into it with the best gold standard science that they can, which has not been applied to this question yet. So if the only thing he does is apply the best science to it, even if it finds out that the vaccines weren't as bad as you thought, you're going to be a lot happier. Now I think most of you are expecting to find out that the vaccinations, various ones, not just COVID, but I think you expect, at least this audience does, that it's going to find out that they were much more dangerous than you thought. But either way, we need to know. We need to know. I'm open to the fact that it might go either way. But we definitely need to know. It's right at the top of things we should be caring about.
And then RFK Jr. was talking about Elon Musk using AI to improve health and efficiency and improve delivery. So he said they've had a bunch of geniuses come over to RFK Jr.'s domain to try to figure out how to do that. Can you imagine how much money could be driven out of healthcare if you only knew what worked and what doesn't? Separately, I saw another story, I didn't write this one down, about how there's a large number of complications with medication that are very specific to your genetic makeup. So if you could, of course there's a problem. You know, anytime your genetic makeup is part of a database, you have to worry about that. But imagine if we just had those two databases: what's your genetic makeup, and how does this drug do for people with your genetic makeup? And you could get rid of something like 9% of all the injury. That's huge. That's huge.
So but think of all the different ways that AI could just make everything work better. Do you think you've ever taken a medication that didn't work well with the other medications you were taking and you just didn't know it? Probably. Probably. And AI could help you with that. So at the very least, you should take a picture of all your pill bottles with AI. And the next time you get a prescription and say I get a new prescription, is it going to work well with all the ones I already have? And by the way, if you use ChatGPT at the highest level, the expensive one, you can literally do that. You could just put all your pill bottles in a row and just put it on video and just take a picture of all your pill bottles and say I'm going to add this pill. My doctor said to add this one. And it will tell you. It'll tell you which ones don't work with other ones. More so I think even then your doctor would, I mean they're supposed to flag it, but you can't expect them to know every interaction. I've never seen a doctor look up an interaction while I was talking to him. I wonder if this system does that for him, you know. And my healthcare system is pretty well automated. So it might be that if they just prescribe it, maybe it puts up a warning. I don't know. I'm kind of skeptical that it's already built into the system, but it could be. Could be big.
Meanwhile, dumb Tim Walz, he was at some kind of event and he was urging Democrats to get more serious about DEI and immigration. He thinks that the problem was they didn't go hard enough on those things. So he goes, quote, "We'd let them define the issue on immigration. We'd let them define the issue on DEI. And we let them define what woke is. We got ourselves in this mess because we weren't bold enough to stand up and say you're damn right we're proud of these policies. We're going to put them in and see, and we're going to execute them." I think the only thing he executed were whatever was remaining of the Democrats' chance of ever having a president again. Let's be serious. Is this the dumbest guy you've ever seen in your life? Tim Walz is just not smart. He's just not smart. So wow. Every time I see one of their leaders say something, I just shake my head, you know. And keep in mind, I just want to give you some reference. When I used to watch Bill Clinton talk, I used to think, wow, he's really smart, even if I didn't agree with him. When I saw Obama talk, I would say, well, at least you're very smart, even if I didn't agree with him. But when I see Walz or Jasmine Crockett, I just think, God, you're dumb and I disagree with you. That's a tough combo, to be dumb and wrong at the same time.
All right. Many of you may have seen clips or watched Bret Baier on Fox News interview DOGE and Elon Musk. And I got to say I was so impressed. Now here's something that I say all the time and it's because I'm a nerd. But Fox News has the best producers. If you look at that again, just look how good the lighting is, the set, the makeup, the hair, the clothes, the physical setup and the whole thing. They're just so good at producing what they do. They're the best in the industry by far. So anyway, I've never seen Musk look so good. You know, maybe sometimes he's more tired or the lighting's bad or whatever, but he looked great. Like he looked healthy and like completely in charge. So that was great.
But the other thing that I noticed is that Musk is a talent stack guy, meaning that whatever talents he has, which are considerable of course, he is continually adding to them. And I believe that his close association with Trump is teaching him things about communication and things about persuasion that is taking him to the next level. Because very few people can master those domains as well as, let's say, a technical domain. But if you look at Musk today, his ability to come up with a sentence you'll remember forever is almost Trump-like. I mean, nobody can match Trump. He's category by himself. But you can see the transfer of skill. You can tell that he's impressed. This is just me reading minds. But you could tell that if he's normal, he's impressed by Trump's ability to communicate and to control a crowd and to control a narrative. And boy has he learned well.
So I watched a number of, mostly I saw the clips, I didn't see 100% of it, but I was impressed completely about how succinctly Musk can explain an idea and you'll remember it forever. I'll give you an example. He said that they're already finding, or their goal is to find, $4 billion per day in savings, and they're on track to be mostly done in 130 days, which is what he's authorized for. How clean and simple is that? And Bret Baier says, well, are you going to be doing reports? And Musk says we're doing the actual savings. So they're reporting the savings, but you don't need to report because every time they add another billion dollars or whatever the savings, they put it on the website. So you don't need a report because it's reported as it happens. So that's a perfect answer. The $4 billion per day, I'll remember that. If he had said something like, you can imagine somebody who was bad at it saying, well, we're finding anywhere from one to eight billion dollars per day and we're hoping that that's enough. No, he tells you $4 billion per day for roughly 130 days is going to get to, we think, a trillion dollars in savings, which is 50% of the deficit spending. The other trillion Trump is going to handle with growth, we hope. So that's perfect. Just communication-wise, absolutely perfect. You could not improve on that. It's so clean. $4 billion a day, 130 days to $1 trillion. I'll never forget that.
And then they add the anecdotes. Imagine all the complicated things that DOGE is looking into. And imagine if they tried to explain the complicated things. You'd be like, that sounds pretty complicated. But instead he gives the cleanest little anecdotal example to back up the numbers. And he says that at one point nearly a billion dollars was allocated, I think per year, for some company that would do a survey that apparently nobody needed or wanted. There didn't even seem to be any obvious customer for it. A billion dollars a year for one little survey that looked like it was done by a high school group. A complete ripoff as far as we can tell. Now, will you remember that? One billion, real easy to remember, for one survey that looks like it was done by high school kids. You'll remember that forever, right? That one's just perfect for communication.
So even having the other DOGE leaders sitting behind him, that was great. Then the other thing he said, and this is just perfect genius of communication. You know how the biggest problem with DOGE is, hey, you're using a chainsaw instead of a scalpel. Stop using the chainsaw when all of us smart people who are Democrats know you should be using a scalpel. Where's the scalpel? So the way he handled that was he said that they're measuring everything twice if not thrice before they cut. So the old saying is measure twice, cut once. So he's moving away from the scalpel-chainsaw thing, but he's letting you know that they're not making any cuts unless they've measured twice if not thrice. Do you notice that twice and thrice rhyme? Who's that remind you of? Johnny Cochran. If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit. If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit. We'll measure it twice if not thrice. It is a well-known persuasion fact that if something rhymes, it's more persuasive. When California tried to get people to wear seat belts and they told them they were going to get a ticket unless they did, the campaign was click it or ticket. Basically click your seat belt or you get a ticket. Click it or ticket. If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit. We're measuring it twice if not thrice. Perfect. Perfect.
Now if he had said, and I would have made this mistake I think, if he would have said you know but sometimes you need a chainsaw, that might be true. It might be smart. But it would not be the right answer for communicating to the public what the public wants to hear. And the only thing they want to hear is I'm going to measure it twice if not thrice. So what I saw was an absolute lesson on how to be perfect. That was from the producers of the show to Bret Baier's questions, which were excellent, he's always excellent in that domain, to Musk's specific answers, to the people who were the head of DOGE sitting behind him and backing him up with answers. Every part of that was the highest quality you'll ever see for something like this. It was really, really impressive.
Anyway, moving on. According to the Wall Street Journal, billions of taxpayer dollars have been wasted on duplicate Medicaid payments, and Musk has already said that DOGE will fix that. Now how did that happen? The Daily Wire is talking about it, but I think Wall Street Journal did the original investigation. And what they found was there are a number of cases where people should have been reimbursed by their insurance company, or I guess Medicaid was going to pay the insurance company, but then they moved. And so the systems were not clever enough to pick up the fact that it was the same person but at a different address. So apparently these big insurance companies, the biggest ones in the country, health insurance, were receiving two payments for a whole bunch of people if they had moved during some certain time. And the dollar amounts were massive, totaling up to at least $4.3 billion. $4.3 billion that went to insurance companies from the government. It didn't go to the individuals, so it wasn't like the people involved were involved in fraud. So they didn't break any laws. They just moved.
So UnitedHealth, remember UnitedHealth? I'm not going to say it. I'm not going to say it. I'm just going to say UnitedHealth was one of them. Elevance Health and Centene, I don't know any of those. They received hundreds of millions of dollars each in duplicate payments. You know what this story doesn't include? It doesn't include that those insurance companies are going to pay back the taxpayers who are owed that money, are they? It's such massive amounts that it probably would eliminate their profit for a year or two. I don't know what their profits are. But don't they have to pay that back? Because nobody's arguing that they were owed the payment. It seems like it's easy to demonstrate that these were duplicate payments. So where's our check? It feels to me we should be clawing that all back if it's possible.
Well, here's an update on Katherine Maher, the CEO of NPR. I picked up on this yesterday, but Brit Hume had a take on it on X. He says when you read or hear about NPR chief Katherine Maher being grilled about her hard left views as expressed on Twitter in 2020, remember that's five years ago. Remember it was three years after those tweets that she was made head of NPR. So did NPR know what her views were? Because she claims now that they're different, that her views have evolved in five years. But do you know what Katherine Maher calls five years? She calls it half a decade. I was listening to her being grilled by the Congress, and when she said but you know that was half a decade ago. Half a decade. That's five years. How many people have a complete transformation of political opinion in five years? And it's not on one topic. Like I could see how somebody would say oh I used to believe in this hoax but I found out blah blah blah. But how do you have a total revamp of your political opinions from crazy far left to something more moderate in half a decade? Half a decade. You lying, whatever.
Here's something I didn't know. I had to look it up. One to three percent of their funding comes from the government. So I don't really care about this too much. One to three percent of their funding. It seems like we should just yank the funding because one to three percent is something that can certainly handle. And why am I paying for any of this?
Christopher Rufo on X reminds us, he says don't forget the NPR CEO Katherine Maher is also the board chairman of Signal. She's the board chairman of Signal. Come on. Are we living in a simulation? How's that even possible? The only thing that could be weirder is if she were like the daughter of Judge Boasberg. She's not, by the way, but it's the only thing that would make this weirder. And then Rufo goes on and says and she spent a decade working on regime change operations in the Middle East and North Africa. Now I don't think anybody has had a more obvious connection to the CIA than she has. Now it's not, I can't confirm that. I don't have proof of that. But all of this from being CEO of NPR to being chairman of the board of Signal to working on regime change operations in the Middle East and North Africa. What does that sound like to you? Does that sound like just a bunch of coincidences? Sometimes things are just what you think.
Well, one of the biggest Tesla domestic terrorists has been caught in Las Vegas. I guess police made an arrest. It was the guy who did the most elaborate domestic violence. He's the one who set on fire multiple cars at a Tesla facility for repair, I think collision repair, and used a gun. He fired some shots and used some Molotov cocktails. And of course he has a history of being, he's 36 years old, has a history of being associated with the Communist Party and anything, everything else is bad. Anyway, he was booked on 15 counts. He could get up to 20 years in prison. Also a woman seen keying a Tesla in Washington has been identified. She's in trouble also. That 450-pound guy who was on some kind of a scooter thing and ramming the side of a car, he's been easily identified. And that's not a complete list. How many of the domestic terrorists have now been completely identified? Because I feel like we'll get just about all of them, you know, the ones that showed their faces. So it looks like the world is starting to get back in balance, meaning that as long as there's a continual drip of the domestic terrorists getting serious jail sentences, maybe it'll decrease. You know, maybe the Democrats will get tired of it. I don't know. Maybe they'll run out of crazy people.
I saw a post by Insurrection Barbie, who is a great follow by the way. If you're not following on X, Insurrection Barbie, you're missing a lot of great content. But Insurrection Barbie says the entire resistance to Donald Trump is made up of like 300 super connected Democrats and a bunch of paid protesters. Easy to realize why they lost the election and why they're continuously bleeding voters. But this is your daily reminder that 300 powerful Democrats and their NGOs are trying to hold the country hostage. And I think Elon Musk agreed with that estimate, that there are about 300 highly connected Democrats who are pretending to be the Democrats. Basically they're the ones in charge. That number completely agrees with my understanding of the world. About 300. And of course within the 300 there would be 50 who are super important and maybe 10 who are head of the pyramid. But we do see the same names, don't we? It feels like if there's something terrible happening, you know, lawfare or something else, it feels like the same set of people just keep popping up over and over again. So yeah, it's about 300. They just act like they're more.
So Trump wants an investigation of how it is possible, according to the Washington Times, that he keeps getting bad judges by chance. So apparently these DC judges should be assigned randomly. They've got some kind of wheel. But yet this Judge Boasberg, who is, let's say the Trump supporters think he's been highly biased and has conflicts, they would say, was nominated by Barack Obama, etc. And that somehow amazingly he got this newest case about the Signal app and whether that has to do with possibility of any federal records being destroyed because the app automatically deletes things. So what are the odds that he would be chosen yet again for another Trump-related case?
Well, turns out, as the Washington Times reports, and this is good reporting by the way, I didn't know that there are 20. So if you were going to say how does this one guy get four of these Trump cases when it's one in 20 every time, well it would help if you knew that there's another Judge Cobb who has at least 10 Trump-related cases. But I've never heard that name, have you? Judge Cobb. How could one judge have 10 Trump-related cases and I've never heard the name? My guess is that there are 10 cases that aren't that important. And there are three other judges that have six each, two of them have five each, and several judges have four. Well, the first thing you need to know is that there are so many of these lawfare situations against Trump that if you only have 20 judges, they're all going to get half a dozen because even if you did it randomly, they're just so many cases that they're just all going to come up half a dozen times. That's exactly what's happening. But I don't believe it's random. Here's what I think. I think it depends who filed the lawsuit. I think if one of the 300, which is really one of a half dozen, I think there are some lawyers that if they're involved they seem to get the right judge. I don't think that it's a coincidence that Judge Cobb has 10 cases and I've never heard that name. They can't be the important ones. So I've got a feeling it's not random even though a lot of people have a lot of cases.
So Trump, also according to the Washington Times, Jeff Mauro's writing about this, Trump is stripping security clearance from yet another law firm. What is it? WilmerHale. It's a high-powered Washington law firm and they had once employed special counsel Robert Mueller. And this is what the executive order banning them from working on government stuff says. It says that the law firm has abandoned the profession's highest ideals and abused its pro bono practice to engage in activities that undermine the justice and interest of the United States. And it gives some examples. It supported efforts to discriminate based on race. I assume that means DEI stuff. Backs the obstruction of efforts to prevent illegal aliens from committing horrific crimes and trafficking deadly drugs within our border and furthers a degradation of the quality of American elections, including supporting efforts designed to enable noncitizens to vote.
Here's my problem. That's sort of the job of lawyers. Lawyers don't just represent innocent people who are angels. Our system completely depends on qualified lawyers also taking cases that you and I hate and say why are you doing that? Why are you doing that pro bono thing for these terrible people? So to me this looks like lawfare. And remember I said from the beginning, I've told you if it looks like lawfare to me I'm going to call it out. It's a little hard to be a team player and be in favor of lawfare. However, I'm going to soften it a little bit because there's so much lawfare against the president that is completely out of the norm that this looks like a brushback pitch to me. As in, if I keep getting lawfared, I'm going to take you all down. And even if I lose every one of these in some upper court, I'm going to make sure you're spending all your time, wasting your time trying to fight this because you all suck and you're all political and you can pretend that you're just helping your clients but you're obviously just a lawfare organ of the Democrats. And we have a completely broken system where the lawyers are trying to basically run the whole country. Now under those conditions I'm okay with lawfare because the lawfare is a brushback pitch. I'm not in favor of going to a baseball game and watching the pitcher throw unlimited pitches at the head of the opposing batter. No, I don't want to watch that. But if that team does something really messed up and the pitcher decides to put one right into the body of the batter, you understand that, don't you? You understand that they're trying to get balance back. Now you might not love it because it's violent. I'm not recommending it. But we do see that in the real world. If you don't have mutually assured destruction, everything falls apart. So if you look at it as just lawfare, it's bad. But if you look at it as a response to lawfare, which is what it is, it's a response to lawfare. If they lawfare them back just as hard, that is establishing mutually assured destruction. And it may have more to do with suppressing the next thing they do than it does with addressing anything in the past. So I'm in favor of it. I'm in favor of it. And I think it's lawfare and I think it's appropriate.
According to Breitbart News, Simon Kent is writing that the Trump administration is going to suspend contributions to the WTO, the World Trade Organization. So I had to look up what the heck does the World Trade Organization do. What it does is allegedly, at least up till now, it has opened markets to 160 different countries and lowered tariffs and made it easier to dispute trade problems across borders and basically greased the wheels to make it easier for every country to do business with every other country. So you might ask why do we want to suspend our contribution to that? And I think the answer is because if your organization is trying to find a middle ground where everybody's happy, it's not America first. It could be, well let's make sure that China and the United States are both kind of happy but kind of unhappy, but maybe we could have done a better deal. So I don't know if this will work out or not work out. But the idea that we can handle our own tariffs and our own disputes and we've got enough market muscle to say look, if you don't handle this dispute we're just not going to do business with you or we're going to tear the bejesus out of you. So tentatively this looks like a good idea because the WTO is not meant to be America first. So maybe we can do better on our own. We'll see. That wouldn't be true for smaller countries I suppose, but for America maybe.
Well, as you know, this story you've heard before, that Jasmine Crockett called Governor Abbott of Texas Governor Hot Wheels because Abbott's in a wheelchair. And this of course caused the Democrats to bring up what they probably think is true, by the way, but it's a hoax that Trump ever mocked a reporter who had a disability with an arm. Now I saw Brendan Straka doing a great job of debunking that. I've seen Debunk America doing a great job at debunking. It's the most thoroughly debunked thing. And it's easy to debunk because you can show the video from before the incident with the reporter where he would do the same action when he was talking about anybody who couldn't answer a question or anybody who was doing a bad job communicating. Basically it was his way of mocking them. But you also know that Jasmine Crockett tried to explain her comment as not really being about the wheelchair and that the Hot Wheels comment was something about transporting immigrants or something.
So without further ado, I would like to do my impression of Jasmine Crockett trying to explain why she called Governor Abbott Hot Wheels but it really didn't have anything to do with his disability. And this is Jasmine Crockett: Whoa, whoa, whoa. See how that works?
All right. I saw Sabine Hossenfelder on X. She's a German physicist. She said I genuinely don't understand why some people are still bullish about LLMs, the technology behind AI. And she talks about how she's used a bunch of the AIs and she's doing it for her work in science. And that it often gives her sources that don't exist or there's a 404 error. It'll tell her that a document that says 2025 on it is from 2023. So she has to continually fact-check the AI's work. And it just looks kind of limited to her and wonders why people are so enthusiastic about its future.
Now I've said similar things and people's response to me and to other people who have had this experience, they say you just don't understand how exponential improvements work. So the smartest people who like AI are saying Scott, Scott, Scott, you're so dumb. Let me explain how the world works. Can I? AI is not supposed to be the best it will ever be today. It's going to get better like really fast and there's going to be this exponential growth that's going to happen any minute now. And when that kicks in you're going to look like such a fool. Oh man, a fool, because you don't understand how exponential growth works. Yeah, it seems slow, slow, slow, slow, but then when it kicks in, boom. And that's why you're not seeing it because you're not, you know, you don't understand technology like we do.
To which I say have you ever heard of Moore's law about the microchips getting better every year? It's a straight line, no exponential period. Have you ever heard of a thing called fusion, nuclear fusion, that was first proposed and worked on 93 years ago? 93 years, still waiting for the exponential growth part. 93 years. What about airline travel? I'm waiting for the exponential growth in that because since I was a child it's been largely the same and the planes don't even change. They're like 40 years old. Yeah, so we got that. So what else we got? What about batteries? I'm always talking about all these breakthroughs in batteries. Now that's a case where I think there will be an exponential growth. And the reason is that there are people all over the world who know there's enormous money to be made in making a better battery. Enormous. So you got all kinds of people, the best people working on it all over the world, and they're trying different technologies. So if you have the best people all over the world and giant money involved and working on different technologies, the odds of one of them being 10 times as good as the old one are pretty good.
So if you said to me Scott, don't you know that batteries may be chugging along for a while but once we get to a certain point man those batteries are going to be amazing, I would believe that one. I believe that one. It's just that not everything can turn into everything else. What about smartphones? So our smartphones got kind of awesome because they're smartphones. But how different is your current smartphone from the last one? I feel like smartphones sort of peaked. I'm waiting for that exponential growth but I don't think it's coming with smartphones. Probably some other technology.
So here's what I think. I used AI five times already this morning, mostly Grok. It was great because that's how I know that fusion has been worked on for 93 years. I just asked Grok. And that's how I knew what the WTO does. I asked Grok. So if you're a writer or you're working in this kind of world, this podcasting world, and you're trying to get context and you're trying to get an understanding of a new topic quickly, oh it is great. It is great. So in some professions, and Bill Gates was saying that medical profession, legal profession, some other ones, we're going to see AI takeover and I believe that. So I'm very pro-AI. It's just that I don't think the current technology, the large language models, are ever going to help Sabine do her science stuff because you can't rely on it being right. It might be that you always have to fact-check the facts if you're doing science stuff. The stuff I do, I could get a fact wrong and nobody would die. You know, tomorrow somebody would say on the show yesterday you said fusion's been around 93 years but really it's 50. I'd say oh okay. So it works great whenever you're in a domain where if something's wrong it's not the biggest problem in the world. But do you think an LLM will ever become the pilot of your commercial aircraft? I'm going to say no. Do you think LLM will be good enough to be the robot that can do generic tasks and you just have to show it or teach it? I'm skeptical because you wouldn't want a robot in your house that was lossy, meaning that you couldn't know exactly what was going to happen. So I'm going to say that the LLMs have amazing potential for a whole bunch of different things but we're going to need to invent a whole different kind of thing for this, you know, the artificial general intelligence, the one that thinks like we do and is less lossy. That's what I think anyway.
The Gateway Pundit is reporting on my idea of creating the Department of Imaginary Concerns to handle all the fake Democrat problems. Mike LaChance wrote about this. And if you hadn't heard about that, the idea is that Democrats have a whole bunch of imaginary problems. Everything from climate crisis to Russia collusion, the Signal controversy, Elon Musk stealing your Social Security numbers, like just a whole bunch of fake stuff. Trump's going to become Hitler. He's Putin's best friend. All that stuff. So you just put that in the Department of Imaginary Concerns.
Now the reason I brought it up is I want to give you a very quick persuasion lesson. A few people said hey don't call it the Department of Imaginary Concerns. Call it the Imaginary Problems or the Imaginary Policies or something like that. The word "concerns" is what made this viral. So that's actually the active word. So if you didn't understand persuasion you would say concerns is too generic or it's off point or something. If you do understand it you know that that's the word that sold it. When you see concerns it tells you that somebody's concerned as opposed to it's a problem or anything in the real world. And it's a non-standard word in this domain. You wouldn't expect to see the word concerns in the name or title of a department. So it's the mistake, or isn't the mistake, that makes it viral. So that's what made it sticky.
Meanwhile Zelensky is self-isolating. So he launched, according to the National Pulse, Christopher Tomlinson, he's attacking Trump's team. And he said the following stuff. He said that Europe unlike the United States has discipline and no chaos. Chaos? Who says the United States has chaos? Democrats, right? Have you ever heard a Republican say oh we got a bunch of chaos? Nope. It's just a Democrat thing. And now Zelensky is taking that approach. And he says Europe good, U.S. chaos. And then he accused Witkoff. He said I can't be ungrateful to the Americans for everything they did but they are often unfortunately under the influence of Russian narratives. And then he went off on Witkoff and he says he doesn't look like a military man. He doesn't look like a general and he doesn't have such experience. As far as I know he is very good at selling and buying real estate and this is a little different.
Well, Zelensky, good luck because America's out. You just made it impossible to get peace in Ukraine with America's help. Apparently he really wants a permanent war and Europe's on his team. And I say good luck guys. Good luck. You can fight Russia all day long but there's no freaking way after you've insulted Witkoff and Trump that you're going to get what you want from the United States. You just closed that door, you idiot. Or maybe he knows exactly what he's doing but there's no reason for us to be involved anymore. He made it easy to walk away.
And then he said that he's rejecting any idea for a peace deal that would not involve Russia giving back all the territory that they've conquered including Crimea. Now given that we know there's no way that's ever going to happen, has he just slammed the door shut on any kind of a peace deal and America being productive in any of it? He has. The door's shut. So I don't care what the news is tomorrow or the next day. I don't care if he changes his mind. I don't care if he apologizes. It's over. I'm going to call it. We're out. Now the United States has not said that. Trump has not said that. I don't think he's commented exactly. But I feel pretty confident that this just ended the productive relationship with the United States of Ukraine. We're definitely not going to be helping them defend themselves at this point. Now something could change I suppose but I think we're done.
But at the same time, and this is fascinating, Jack Posobiec of Human Events was talking to Scott Bessent and Scott Bessent says that they've got a 100-page Ukraine deal about the minerals, not about peace but about minerals, that he hopes will get signed next week. Now it is possible that we could make a mineral deal. It's not impossible because the mineral deal would not be promising anything about security. It would just be a way for them to make money and for us to make money. So they might say yes to making money because they need money to fight their war. And from our perspective it might give them a little, what, Bessent, not a security guarantee but it is an economic security pact. Now I'm not so sure the United States would want to get involved in some place that didn't have good defense against Russia coming in and taking the rest of the country. So I don't know if we can actually get private companies to do the work because that would be a pretty big risk. But if it works that'd be great. But I think in terms of the U.S. funding Ukraine's military adventure, I think that's over. I think we're done with that.
Meanwhile the Greenland trip is getting spicy. You knew that JD Vance and his wife were going over there but here's the funny part. Apparently Mike Waltz was always intended to be part of the trip but they had forgotten about him when they did the notice. So National Security Advisor Mike Waltz will also be attending the trip. All I can hope is they don't accidentally invite Jeffrey Goldberg on the trip. That's a callback. Yeah, okay. Can you imagine them being on the plane and they look over and it's like oh my God and Jeffrey Goldberg was accidentally invited on the trip.
All right, that's all I got for you. Thanks for putting up with me. That's all I've got for today. I'm going to talk to the local subscribers privately for a minute. The rest of you make sure you come back tomorrow, same time, same place. We'll have some more fun. So if you're on X or Rumble or YouTube, I appreciate you joining and I'll see you tomorrow. Locals, I'll be coming at you privately.
come on in we're almost ready for the show you deserve well I think you deserve it do you yeah yeah I think you do you've been good all right let's check the stocks uh well not so good all right forget about that there'll be better later but I got to call up my comments here make sure everybody's on board there we go boy there's a lot of news today so much news oh my goodness good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams you've never had a better time but if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains all you need for that is a cuper m glass of tanker Shel din the Cante juger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous Sip and it happens right now yes exactly go fully recharged I'm at working at full strength today we got news we're going to pound right through it you ready for this happy Friday by the way let's see is there any new science that they could have completely skipped just by asking Scott oh yeah here's one the University of South Australia found out that um being happy in your career doesn't make you happy in life but being happy in general in your life can make you enjoy your career that you have more um they could have just ask me yes it's called Baseline happiness and if you're happy in general everything else in your life looks better how how many of you didn't know that was there anybody who thought you know if I were depressed but I got a better job I'll bet that would cheer me up no doesn't work that way if you're happy then even your crap job seems pretty good to you and if you're unhappy it doesn't matter how good your job is you're still going to be unhappy so just ask me next time I could have cleared that up saved you a lot of money well according to Marine Insight publication uh over in Germany there's this revolutionary new Wastewater processing plant it's a Wastewater processing plant and what's revolutionary is that they can convert the Wastewater into methanol which I guess is kind of climate neutral and you can use that for marine fuels now I wonder if there's anybody who works on the Wastewater project that would tell us that we live in a simulation let's see um the waste water is being explained by Dr wizzing WSS iing whizzing so Dr whizzing can tell you about the waste water um apparently Dr pooping was not available he he's the number two yep Dr whizzing for Wastewater okay okay all right all right judge me you can judge me on that one um this you knew was coming nextg defense is reporting that Max our intelligence they've developed a a vision-based software that can make GPS unnecessary for your drone so in other words if your drone gets jammed and it can't see the GPS signal it doesn't care because maxar intelligence has this these databases that are really detailed uh they've got 3D terrain data for 34 million square miles so it can just switch to or maybe it doesn't even need GPS which means that there's practically no defense against drones now if your drone can't be jammed if you can't Jam the GPS uh that seems like a problem so you yes uh as nval ravan said recently it's really inevitable that all Warfare will be drones because why would you need anything else it's all going to be drones well if you haven't yet seen Ezra Klein on John Stewart's podcast oh you have to see this I so recommend this so look for the clips if you just see the clips you'll you'll see everything you need to see but uh so Ezra Klein is a co-author of the book abundance and he's doing you know I have to say my my first impression was hey you're just writing a book that says democrats should act more like Republicans if they want to win anything so I wasn't sure it was adding much to the world but now I think it is so I'm going to I'm going to switch to full compliment to Ezra Klein and I guess Derek Thompson the two co-authors so the the thing that was amazing is that um uh you know you've heard Ezra Klein talk about how the Democrats uh are good at funding impressive things but then for reasons that I didn't quite understand nothing got done so there was the funding of the highspeed rail in California that didn't get done there was the funding of the um the rural Broadband inter that didn't get done there was the funding of the Nationwide charging stations that didn't get done all good ideas in theory but all they could do is give them money and not get anything done and if you wonder why it is then nothing gets done you just have to you just have to here as reclin go through the 14 steps it would have taken to approve the just the the project for the car charging stations oh my God I'm not going to run through the 14 because it's pretty pedantic but you have to watch John Stewart for the first time understanding how completely doomed the Democrat way of work is because the regulations are mostly I'm thinking mostly Democrat created and if you looked at any one of them individually you'd probably say to yourself all right well I could see why you'd want this group to review it or I could see why you'd want to run it through this group for approval but once you get to 14 different steps and everybody's got to review it and analyze it and they got time for comment it becomes literally impossible so it's not just that it didn't happen it's that the system was impossible so anybody who tried to apply to you know be one of the people who executed on these funded um projects couldn't get through it it would take you the rest of your life if you got through it at all so there is no way to actually execute on these uh well-meaning Democrat gigantic projects there is no way now what is it I always say about the difference between Republicans and Democrats Democrats are really good at goals highspeed rail that's a goal I like it uh rural internet Broadband I like it uh a nationwide uh charging stations for electric cars sounds pretty good those are good goals I like it but they also developed a system that made it impossible now let's compare that to the Republicans Republicans would say get rid of all these uh this red tape and then it works that's it so the Republicans have a system which is in general get rid of the red tape now beyond that if you got rid of enough red tape maybe you don't even need much government funding maybe maybe the private sector can do it but the Republicans consistently have systems that would work and the Democrats consistently have pretty good goals we'd like everybody to do well we'd like the schools to do well take take uh public education the Democrats have a very good goal that uh no matter what your income is or what your situation is in life you should get a good education and the government government can help you on that but then they overlay it with you know the the the the Department of Education which was a problem they overlay it with the teachers union and you very quickly get to the point where the system for providing that thing which is a good it just doesn't work and that's what we observe scores are going down in every way the uh whereas the Republicans would say well nothing works unless there's competition so let's make sure there's a lot more competition for private schools or alternative schools so again in every domain it's the same Democrats good on goals don't have a systems let's check check in on Dei um Charlie Kirk has a post where he's talking about daily wire Story by uh Luke rosak I guess he did a great job on this and the story is about uh a group called The National diversity Council now remember I tell you that it it turns out that you can tell all the fraudulent organizations because they string together words that sound good so instead of the national diversity Council it could have been the American Ferness initiative you can just put any words together the Freedom diversity Association and then you start getting money well one of the founders uh Dennis Kennedy allegedly paid himself $450,000 a year for 10 hours of work a week but then in 2022 allegedly at the peak of Dei Mania uh he and a few other Executives decided that they really owed another $3 million in back pay uh and so they looted the organization is the accusation and now the now the organization is filing for bankruptcy with the board saying that Kennedy systematically looted it by funling its assets to an to a for-profit firm controlled by himself does that sound familiar that's exactly what we were finding out with all the NGS if the NGO gets a lot of funding let's say from the government could be private donations uh then the first thing they'll do is say here's how we're spending that money we're going to hire this for-profit entity that just happens to be my wife or just happens to be me with another name and we're not going to have any accounting so that it's not as obvious what we're doing it's the same scam everywhere and once you realize the pattern you can just pick it up instantly it's like oh you got a bunch of money you gave yourself a generic name like the national diversity Council and uh you can protect yourself by accusing any of your critics of being racists ah see that's important because if you don't have an audit process and you're planning to loot the organization you want to make sure that if anybody blames you of anything you could say oh my God what are you some kind of white supremacist who hates who hates diversity don't you see that diversity is in the name of our organization of course it's good because it says diversity right in it it's right in the name you racist I think we're on to it now I think we can spot these a little easier well Mario nul is reporting that uh Trump has threatened to defund the Smithsonian over what he calls divisive narratives and he's ordered JD Vance to go clean house whatever that means and what he wants to do is remove what he calls improper ideology or El to lose Federal funding and he accuses the Museum of pushing a decades long effort to rewrite US history with distorted ideological narratives instead of facts so they're going to have to get rid of all the divisive content or else the government won't fund them anymore and to me um I I can see why they're doing it I'm sure it's a good idea but history has always been fake so when you take one version of fake history and somebody's trying to rewrite it to another version of fake history it doesn't make it more accurate but there is a version of History that's better for the country and if you're deciding to change the history to white people suck now I haven't seen what the smithsonia is up to but I'm just going to take a WI wild guess that what they're saying is that white people are the problem they killed all the Native Americans they created all the slavery they stole all the money and white people are bad just a guess I I don't have any information that that's what this Smithsonian was doing but what do you think what else would it be so yeah it's very very damaging to have a fake history that says the people who live here today are part of the problem you don't want that so it is better even if it's fake history to say that your country was awesome and you're still awesome it's better well here's a story that really sounds great for America just listen to this according to interesting engineering uh an enormous um massive lithium deposits have been discovered in the us uh worth $540 billion so much that it would vastly reduce China's grip on the United States for lithium so I I'm reading this I'm like wow $540 billion worth of lithium and it seems to be accessible isn't that the greatest story the only thing that could be bad about this is if it's in California don't be in California please don't be in California please please don't be in Cali California it's in California uh beneath the surface of the sultan sea so I guess the value is not 540 billion it would be closer to uh let me call up Ezra Klein uh Ezra uh there's $540 billion worth of lithium in California under the sultan sea do you think we can okay calm down Ezra calm down okay yeah I I know we'll never get it yeah I know 14 steps okay we'll just leave it there never mind thank you goodbye yeah that's a complete waste of time because it's in California I'd love to be wrong I would love to be wrong but no it's worth nothing because it's in California that's all you need to know uh Trump has floated the idea of May be easing off on tariffs according to Reuters um on China if China approves the sale of tick tock to an American entity what do you think of that idea going easy on tariffs on China if they approve a ticktock deal here's the problem that would be transferring wealth from um from the citizens of the United States to the rich people in the United States who bought Tik Tock so the benefactors would be the billionaires who buy tiktock and that would be paid for partly by money that would have otherwise gone into the treasury so how is Trump going to did he think this through now I'm not saying it's a bad idea by the way what I'm saying is how do you sell it because it's it's total oligarch friendly citizen unfriendly American last I mean to me it looks like it'd be kind of good for China uh and good for a few oligarchs who buy it who were his buddies and I don't see how you sell this thing now I will give you one possibility one of the things that Trump said was that the US government if it's being helpful and making the deal happen should get a percentage of tick tock oh now that was not part of this story but remember Trump has floated that idea and he was serious about it and it makes sense if the government is doing something important to make a private investment worth something from zero to maybe be worth a trillion dollars someday why don't we get a piece of it if you give me a piece of it meaning the citizens I'm all in yeah if you say we're going to reduce tariffs a little bit on China um to get this deal done but in the end the United States let's say our Sovereign fund you know we I think we're going to have trouble funding The Sovereign fund there's some some technical reason why the Sovereign fund might be in Jeopardy um but this seems like a perfect use for for a sovereign fund where we invest literally zero and we get a percentage of take out I I'd be happy with more of that so if if Trump combines two things he's floated one is the reduction of tariffs get the deal done and the other is us gets a piece of the deal you can sell that that that would be sellable all well um the the house is is uh according to just the news the house passed a legislation to keep foreign influence and of higher education called the deterrent act and uh let's see what it does it mandates that schools have to report foreign gifts uh I think this is mostly universities and colleges have to report foreign gifts or at least $50,000 or more and they have to report it to the checking notes they have to report that to the Department of Education huh do do you see anything see any problem with the legislation because the Department of Education is being closed don't they need to update that I swear I don't even know what I'm reading at this point is this true did did they just yesterday the Republicans this would only be through the house not the Senate but did they really just passed some legislation in the house that says somebody has to report to the Department of no longer existing there must be something wrong with the story but maybe not well RFK Jr who I thought was being a little bit quiet you know until he got his SE legs and figured out what was what but boy he's not quiet now um I saw Wall Street Apes had a video I couldn't tell how old it was but he was talking how uh Black Rock owns all of the Meat Packers in the United States there are only four uh big companies but Black Rock owns them all and they um according to RFK they also own a lot of the big Pharma now I don't know if own is the right description they might own a percentage but does Black Rock own a controlling interest in Pharma because that would be something I'd never heard before I definitely knew that they were heavily invested in everything that matters you know pretty much every industry that matters but a controlling interest I don't know and do they have a controlling interest or already own the Meat Packers so I have some questions about that but that's something RFK jun's bringing up seems important to me um then he also reported that uh some of the career civil servant bureaucrats were keeping RFK Jr from accessing databases uh that would have information about risks and dangers of certain drugs and medical interventions can you imagine that and RV JR says that that these bureaucrats are seemingly only serving the industries they were supposed to regulate so everything that RFK Jr has been telling us before he got the job you know to be in charge of all this stuff it looks like it's all true it looks like these are completely broken industries that are just serving the uh the Pharma the far industries that it just seems broken entirely um but uh RFK junor was on Chris Cuomo show in news nation and he said the CDC so that would be under him is launching a new sub agency to specialize in vaccine injuries um so that should make you happy now he's very careful about the fact that you know it's not going to be based on the hearsay or anecdote they're going to look into it with the you know the best gold standard science that they can which has not been applied to this question yet so if the only thing he does is apply the best science to it even if it finds out that the vaccines weren't as bad as you thought you're going to be a lot happier now I think most of you are expecting to find out that the vaccinations various ones not just not just Co uh but I think you expect at least this audience does that it's going to find out that they were much more dangerous than you thought so but either way we need to know we need to know I'm open to the fact that it might go either way um but we definitely need to know it's it's right at the top of things we should be caring about and then uh RFK Jr was talk about Elon Musk using AI to improve health and efficiency and improve delivery so he said they've had a bunch of geniuses come over to RFK Jr's domain to try to figure out how to do that can you imagine how much money could be driven out of health care if you only knew what worked and what doesn't separately I saw another story I didn't I didn't write this one down um about how there's a a large number of complications with medication that are very specific to your genetic makeup so if you could of course there's a problem you know anytime your your genetic makeup is part of a database you have to worry about that but imagine if we just had those two databases what's your genetic makeup and how does this drug do for people with your genetic makeup and you could get rid of something like 9% of all the injury that's huge that's huge so but think of all the different ways that AI could just make everything work better do you think you've ever taken a medication that didn't work well with the other medications you were taking and you just didn't know it probably probably and AI could help you with that so at the very least you should take a picture of all your pill bottles with AI and the next time you get a next time you get a Pres prescription and say I get a new prescription is it going to work well with all the ones I already have and by the way if you use chat GPT at the the highest level expensive one you can literally do that you could just put all your pill bottles in a row and just put it on video and just take a picture of all your pill bottles and say I'm going to add this pill uh my doctor said to add this one and it will tell you it'll tell you which ones don't work with other ones more so I think even then your doctor would I mean they're supposed to flag it but you can't expect them to know every interaction I've never seen a doctor look up uh an interaction while I was talking to him I wonder wonder if this system does that for him you know and my health care system is pretty well automated um so it might be that they if they just prescribe it maybe it puts up a warning I don't know I'm I'm kind of skeptical that it's already built into the system but it could be could be big meanwhile demo Tim wals uh he was at a some kind of event and he was urging Democrats to uh to get more serious about Dei and immigration he thinks that uh the problem was they didn't go hard enough on those things so he goes quote we'd let them Define the issue on immigration we'd let them Define the issue on Dei and we let them Define what woke is we got ourselves in this mess because we weren't bold enough to stand up and say you're damn right we're proud of these policies we're going to put them in and see and and we're going to execute them I think the only thing he executed were whatever was remaining of the democrat's chance of ever ever having a president again let's be serious is this the dumbest guy you've ever seen in your life Tim wals is just not smart he's just not smart so wow uh every time I see one of their you know leaders say something I just shake my head you know and keep in mind you I just want to give you some reference when I used to watch Bill Clinton talk I used to think wow he's really smart even if I didn't agree with him when I saw Obama talk I would say well at least you're very smart even if I didn't agree with them but when I see wallst or Jasmine Crockett I just think God you're dumb and I disagree with you that's a that's a tough combo to be dumb and wrong at the same time all right many of you may have seen Clips or watched uh uh Brett Bear on Fox News interiew uh Doge and Elon Musk and I got to say I was so impressed now here's something that I say all the time and it's because I'm a nerd but Fox News has the best producers if you look at that again just look how good the lighting is the set the makeup the hair the clothes the the physical setup and the whole thing they they're just so good at producing what they do they're they're the best in the industry by far so anyway the F so uh I've never seen I've never seen musk look so good you know maybe sometimes he's more tired or you know the lighting's bad or whatever but he looked great like he looked healthy and like completely in charge so that was great um but the other thing that I noticed is that musk is a talent stack guy meaning that whatever talents he has which are considerable of course uh he is continually adding to them and I believe that his close association with Trump is teaching him things about Communications and things about persuasion that is taking him to the next level because very few people can Master those domains as as well as let's say a technical domain um but if you look at if you look at uh musk today his ability to come up with a sentence you'll remember forever is it's almost trump-like I mean nobody can match Trump he's he's category by himself but you can see you can see the transfer of skill you can tell that he's impressed this is just me reading mins but you could tell that if he's normal he's he's impressed by Trump's ability to communicate and to control a crowd and to control a narrative and boy as he learned well so I watched a number of mostly I saw the clips I didn't see 100% of it but I was impressed completely about how how succinctly musk can explain an idea and you'll remember her forever I'll give you an example um he said that they're already finding or they're goal is to find four billions per day in savings and they're on track to be mostly done in 130 days which is what he's authorized for how how clean and simple is that and Brett Bear says well uh you know are you going to be doing reports and mus says um we're doing the actual savings so they're I mean they're reporting the savings but you don't need to report because every time they add another you know billion dollars or whatever the savings they put it on the website so you don't need a report because it's reported as it happens so that's a perfect answer the 4 billion per day I'll remember that if he had said something like you can imagine somebody who was bad at it saying well we're finding anything from1 to8 billion doll per day and you know we're we're we're hoping that that's enough no he tells you $4 billion per day for roughly 130 days is going to get to you we think a trillion dollars in savings which is 50% of the the deficit spending the other trillion Trump is going to handle with growth he we hope so that's perfect just communication wise absolutely perfect you could you could not improve on that it's so clean 4 billion a day 130 days to1 trillion I I'll never forget that um and then then they add the anecdotes imagine all the complicated things that doge is looking into and imagine if they tried to explain the complicated things you'd be like that sounds pretty complicated but you you go wild instead he gives the cleanest little anecdotal example to back up you know the numbers and he says that at one point nearly a billion dollars um was allocated I think per year for some company that would do a survey that apparently nobody needed or wanted there was no there didn't even seem to be any obvious uh customer for it a billion dollars year for one little survey that looked like it was done by a high school group a complete ripoff as far as we can tell now will you remember that 1 billion real easy to remember for one survey that looks like it was done by high school kids you'll remember that forever right that one's just perfect for communication so even and even having the uh I guess it was the other Doge leaders sitting behind him um that was great then the other thing he said and this is just perfect Genius of communication you know how the biggest problem with doge is hey you're using a chainsaw instead of a scalpel stop using the chainsaw when all of us smart people who are Democrats know you should be using a scalpel where's the scalpel so the way he handled that was he said that uh they're they're measuring everything twice if not Thrice before they cut so this old the old saying is you know measure twice cut once so he's moving away from the you know the scalpel chainsaw thing but he's he's letting you know that they're not making any Cuts unless they've measured twice if not Thrice do you notice that twice and Thrice rhyme who's that remind you of Johnny Cochran if the glove doesn't fit you must equit if the glove doesn't fit you must equit we'll measure it twice if not Thrice it is a a well-known persuasion fact that if something Rhymes it's more persuasive when California tried to get people to wear uh seat belts and they told them they were going to get a a ticket unless they did the the uh campaign was click it or tick it basically click your your seat belt where you get a ticket it click it or tick it if the glove doesn't fit you must equit we're measuring it twice if not Thrice perfect perfect now if he had said and I would have made made this mistake I think if he would have said you know but sometimes you need a chainsaw that might be true it might be it might be smart but it would not be the right answer for communicating to the public what the public wants to hear and the only thing they want to hear is I'm going to measure it twice if not Thrice so what I saw was a absolute lesson on how to be perfect that was from from the producers of the show to Brett Bear's questions which were excellent he's always excellent in that domain to musk specific answers to the people who were the head of Doge sitting behind him and backing him up with answers every part of that was the highest quality you'll ever see for something like this it was really really impressive anyway moving on uh according to the Wall Street Journal uh billions of taxpayer dollars have been wasted on duplicate Medicaid payments and mus has already said that Doge will fix that now how did that happen the daily wire is talking about it but I think Wall Street Journal did the original uh investigation and what they found was there are a number of cases where people should have been reimbursed by their insurance company um and or I guess Medicaid was going to pay the insurance company but then they moved and so the systems were not clever enough to pick up the fact that it was the same person but at a different address so apparently these big insurance companies the biggest ones in the country health insurance were receiving two payments for a whole bunch of people if they had moved during some certain time and the the dollar amounts were massive um totaling up to at least $4.3 billion $4.3 billion that went to insurance companies from the government it didn't go to the individuals so it wasn't like that none of the people involved were involved in fraud so they didn't break any laws they just moved and so United Health remember United Health I'm not going to say it I'm not going to say it I'm just going to say United Health was one of them uh elevant Els or elant health and senteni I don't know any of those they received hundreds of millions of dollars each in duplicate payments you know what this story doesn't include it doesn't include that those insurance companies are going to pay back the taxpayers who are owed that money are they it's such massive amounts that it probably would eliminate their profit for a year or two I don't know what their profits are but don't they have to pay that back because nobody's arguing that they were owed the payment it it seems like it's easy to demonstrate that these were duplicate payments so where's our check uh if feels to me we should be clawing that all back um if it's possible well here's an update on uh Katherine Katherine marah the CEO of NBR um I picked up on this yesterday but Brit Brit Hume had a take on it on X he says uh when you read or hear about NPR Chief Katherine Maher being grilled about her hard left views as expressed on Twitter in 2020 remember that's five years ago remember it was three years after those tweets that she was made head of NPR so did NPR know what her views were because she claims now that they're different that her views have evolved in five years but do you know what Katherine Mah calls five years she calls it half a decade I was listening to her being uh grilled by the Congress and when she said but you you know that was half a decade ago half a decade that's 5 years how many people have a complete transformation of political opinion in five years and it's not on one topic like I I could see how somebody would say oh I used to believe in this hoax but I found out blah blah blah but how do you have a a total revamp of your political opinions from crazy far left to something more moderate in half a decade half a decade you lying whatever um here's something I didn't know I had to look it up 1 to 3% of their funding comes from the government so I don't really care about this too much one to three% of their funding it it seems like we should just yank the funding because 1 to 3% is something that can certainly handle and why am I paying for any of this then Christopher rufo on X reminds us he says don't forget the nprc CEO Katherine Mah is also the board chairman of signal she's the board chairman of signal come on are we living in a simulation how's that even possible the only thing that could be weirder is if she were like the daughter of Judge bosberg she's not by the way but it's the only thing that would make this weird and then uh rufo goes on and says and she spent a decade working on regime change operations in the Middle East and North Africa now I don't think anybody has had a more uh a more obvious connection to the CIA than she has now it's not I can't confirm that I don't have proof of that but uh all of this from being CEO of NPR to being on the chairman of the board of signal to being working on regime change operations in the Middle East and North Africa what does that sound like to you does that sound like just a bunch of coincidences sometimes things are just what you think well the uh one of the biggest Tesla domestic terrorists has been caught uh in Las Vegas I guess police made an arrest it was the the guy who did the most uh elaborate domestic violence he's the one who set on fire multiple cars at a uh I guess it was a um it was a Tesla facility for repair I think collision repair and used a gun he fired some shots and used some Molotov cocktails and of course he has a history of being he's 36 years old has a history of being associated with the Communist party and anything everything else is bad anyway he was booked on 15 counts he could get up to 20 years in prison uh also a woman seen keying at Tesla in Washington has been identified she's in trouble also that 450 lb guy who was on some kind of a scooter thing and ramming the side of a car he's been easily identified and that's not a complete list how many of the domestic terrorists have now been completely identified because I feel like we'll get just about all of them you know the ones that showed their faces so um it looks like the world is starting to get Back in Balance meaning that um as long as there's a continual drip of the domestic terrorists getting serious jail sentences um maybe it'll decrease you know maybe the Democrats will get tired of it I don't know maybe they'll run out of crazy people I saw a post by Insurrection Barbie who was a great follow by the way if you're not following on X Insurrection Barbie you're missing a lot of great content um but Insurrection Barbie says the entire resistance to Donald Trump is made up of like 300 super connected Democrats and a bunch of paid protesters easy to realize why they lost election and why they're continuously bleeding voters um but this is your daily reminder that 300 powerful Democrats and their NGO are trying to hold the country hostage and I think Keon musk agreed with that estimate that there are about 300 highly connected Democrats who are pretending to be de the Democrats basically they're the ones in charge that that number completely agrees with my understanding of the world about 300 and of course within the 300 there would be you know 50 who are super important and maybe you know 10 who are head of the pyramid but we do see the same names don't we it feels like you know if there's something terrible happening you know lawfare or something else it feels like the same set of people just keep popping up over and over again so yeah it's about 300 they just act like they're more so Trump wants an investigation of how it is possible according to the Washington Times uh that uh he keeps getting bad judges by chance so apparently these DC judges should be assigned randomly they've got some kind of wheel they spend uh but yet this judge bosberg who is uh let's say the Trump supporters think he's been highly biased and uh has conflicts they would say um he was nominated by Barack Obama Etc and that somehow amazingly he got this newest case about the signal appp and whether that has to do with uh possibility of any federal records being destroyed because the app automatically deletes things so what are the odds that he would be chosen yet again for another Trump related case Well turns out um as the Washington Times reports and this is good reporting by the way I didn't know that there are 20 so if you were going to say how does this one guy get four of these Trump cases when it's one and a 20 every time well it would help if you knew that there um there's another judge G Cobb who has at least 10 Trump related cases but I've never heard that name have you judge Cobb how could one judge have 10 Trump Rel cases and I've never heard the name my guess is that there are 10 cases that aren't that important and there are three other judges that have six each uh two of them have five each and several judges have four well the first thing you need to know is that there are so many of these lawfare situations against Trump that if you only have 20 judges they're all going to get half a dozen because even if you did it randomly they're just so many judges that they're they're just all going to come up half a dozen times that's exactly what's happening um but I don't believe it's random here's what I think I think it depends who filed the lawsuit I think if one of the 300 which is really one of a half dozen I think there are some lawyers that if they're involved they seem to get the right judge I don't think that it's a coincidence that judge Cobb has 10 cases and I've never heard that name they can't be the important ones so I've got a feeling it's not random even though a lot of people have a lot of cases um so Trump according also according to the Washington Times Jeff moro's writing about this uh Trump is stripping security clearance from yet another Law Firm um what is it Wilmer haale it's a high-powered Washington law firm and they had once employed special counselor Robert Mueller and this is what the the executive order Banning them from uh working on government stuff says it says that the law firm has abandon the profession's highest ideals and abused its pro bono practice to engage in activities that undermine the justice and interest of the United States and I gives some examples um it supported efforts to discriminate based on race uh I assume that means Dei stuff backs the obstruction of efforts to prevent illegal aliens from committing horrific crimes and trafficking deadly drugs within our border and furthers a degradation of the quality of American elections including supporting efforts designed to enable noncitizens to vote here's my problem that's sort of the job of lawyers lawyers don't just represent innocent people who are angels our system completely depends on qualified lawyers also taking cases that you and I hate and say why you doing that why you doing that pro bono thing for these terrible people so to me this looks like lawfare and remember I said from the beginning I've told you if if it looks like lawfare to me I'm going to call it out it's a little hard to be a team player and be in favor of lawfare however I'm going to soften it a little bit because there's so much lawfare against the president that is completely out of out of the norm that this looks like a brush back pitch to me as in if I keep getting lawed I'm going to take you all down and even if I lose every one of these in some upper Court I'm going to make sure you're spending all your time wasting your time trying to fight this because you all suck and you're all political and you can pretend that you're just helping your clients but you're obviously just a lawfare organ of the Democrats and we have a completely broken system where the lawyers are trying to basically run the whole Country Now under those conditions I'm okay with law fair because the law fair is a brushback pitch I'm not in favor of going to a baseball game and watching the pitcher throw unlimited pitches at the head of the opposing batter no I don't want to watch that but if that team does something really messed up and the Pitcher decides to put one right into the body of the batter you understand that don't you you understand that they're they're trying to get balance back now you might not love it because it's violent I'm not recommending it but we do see that in the real world if you don't have mutually assured destruction everything falls apart so if you look at it as just law fair it's bad but if you look at it as a response to lawfare which is what it is it's a response response to lawfare if they laware them back just as hard um that is establishing mutually assured destruction and it may have more to do with suppressing the next thing they do than it does with you know addressing anything in the past so I'm in favor of it I I'm in favor of it and I think it's lawfare and I think it's appropriate um according to bre Bart news Simon Kent is writing that uh Trump Administration is going to suspend contributions to the WTO the World Trade Organization so I had to look up what the heck does the World Trade Organization do what it does is allegedly uh at least up till now it has opened markets to 160 different countries and lowered tariffs and made it easier to dispute trade problems across borders and basically greased the wheels to make it easier for every country to do business with every other country so you might ask why do we want to suspend our contribution to that and I think the answer is because if your organization is trying to find a middle ground where everybody's happy it's not America first um it could be well let's let's make sure that you know China and the United States are both you know kind of Happy Happ but kind of unhappy but maybe we could have done a better deal so I don't know if this will work out or not work out but the idea that we can handle our own tariffs and our own disputes and we've got enough um Market muscle to say look if you don't handle this dispute we're just not going to do business with you or we're going to tear off the beesa S of you so tentatively this looks like a good idea because they're not the the WTO is not meant to be America first so maybe we can do better on our own we'll see that wouldn't be true for smaller countries I suppose but for America maybe well as you know this story you've heard before that Jasmine Crockett called the governor Abbott of Texas governor Hot Wheels because abits in a wheelchair and this of course caus the Democrats to bring up the uh what they probably think is true by the way um but it's a hoax that Trump ever mocked a reporter who had a disability with an arm now um I saw Brendan straa doing a great job of debunking that I've seen you know the debunk America doing a great job at debunking it's the most thoroughly debunked thing and it's easy to debunk because um you can show the video from before the incident with the reporter where he would do the same action when he was talking about anybody who couldn't answer a question or anybody who was doing a bad job communicating basically it was his way of mocking them um so i' but you also know that Jasmine Crockett tried to explain her comment as not really being about the wheelchair and that the Hot Wheels comment was something about transporting immigrants or something so without further Ado I would like to do my impression of Jasmine Crockett trying to explain why she called Governor Abbott Hot Wheels but it really didn't have anything to do with his uh his disability and this is Jasmine Crockett whoa whoa who see how that works all right um I saw Sabine Hassen Felder on X she's a German physicist saying she said I genuinely don't understand why some people are still bullish about llms the technology behind Ai and she talks about how she's used a bunch of the AIS and she's doing it for her work in s sence and that it often gives her um sources that don't exist or there's a 404 error um it'll tell her that a document that says 2025 on it is from 2023 so she has to continually fact check the ai's work and it just looks kind of limited to her and wonders why people are so so enthusiastic about his future now I've said similar things and people's response to me and to other people who have had this experience they say you you just don't understand how um you don't understand how what is it um oh what's the word don't understand how exponential improvements work so the smartest people who like AI are saying Scott Scott Scott you're so dumb uh let me explain how the world Works can I um AI is not supposed to be the best it will ever be today it's going to get better like really fast and there's going to be this exponential growth that's going to happen any minute now and when that kicks in you're going to look like such a fool oh man a fool because you don't understand how exponential growth works yeah it seems slow slow slow slow but then when it kicks in boom and that's why you're not seeing because you're not you know you don't understand technology like we do to which I say have you ever heard of Moore's law about the microchips getting better every year it's a straight line no exponential period have you ever heard of a thing called Fusion nuclear fusion that was first um proposed and worked on 93 years ago 93 years still waiting for the exponential growth part 93 years what about airline travel I'm waiting for the exponential growth in that because since I was a child it's been largely the same and the planes don't even change they're like 40 years old yeah so we got that um so what else we got um what about batteries I'm always talking about all these breakthroughs and batteries now that's a case where I think there will be an exponential growth and the reason is that there are people all over the world who know know there's enormous money to be made in making a better battery enormous so you got all kinds of people the best people working on it all over the world and they're trying different Technologies so if you have the best people all over the world and giant money involved and working on different Technologies the odds of one of them being 10 times as good as the old one are pretty good so if if you said to me Scott don't you know that batteries you know may be chugging along for a while but once we get you know we get to a certain point man those batteries are going to be amazing I would believe that one I believe that one it's just that not everything can turn into everything else what about smartphones so our smartphones kind of came kind of awesome because they're smartphones but how different is your current smartphone from the last one I feel like smartphones sort of peak I I'm waiting for that exponential growth but I don't think it's coming with smartphones probably some other technology so here's what I think um I used AI five times already this morning mostly grock it was great because that's how I know that Fusion has been worked on for 93 years I just asked grock and uh that's how I knew what the w UT does I ask Rock So if you're a writer or you're working in this kind of world this podcasting world and you're trying to get context and you're trying to get you know an understanding of a new topic quickly oh it is great it is great so in some professions and Bill Gates was saying that uh medical profession legal profession some other ones we're going to see AI takeover and I believe that so I'm very Pro AI it's just that I don't think the current technology the large language models are ever going to help Sabine do her science stuff because you can't rely on it being right it might be that you always have to fact check the facts if you're doing science stuff the the stuff I do I could get a fact wrong and it wouldn't nobody would die you know tomorrow's somebody would say um on the show yesterday you said Fusion's been around 93 years but really it's 50 I'd say oh okay so it works great whenever you're in a domain where if something's wrong it's not the biggest problem in the world but do you think an llm will ever become the pilot of your commercial aircraft I'm going to say no do you think llm will be good enough to be the robot that can do generic tasks and you just have to show it or teach it I'm skeptical because you wouldn't want a robot in your house that was lossy meaning that you couldn't you couldn't know exactly what was going to happen so I'm going to say that uh the llms have amazing potential for a whole bunch of different things but we're going to need to invent a whole different kind of thing for this you know the artificial general intelligence the one that thinks like we do and is less lossy that's what I think anyway the Gateway uh Gateway Punda is reporting on my idea of creating the department of imaginary concerns to handle all the fake Democrat problems Mike Lance wrote about this and uh if you hadn't heard about that the idea is that Democrats have a whole bunch of imaginary problems everything from climate crisis to um Russia collusion the signal controversy uh Elon mus stealing your social security numbers like just a whole bunch of fake stuff uh Trump's going to become Hitler um he's Putin's best friend all that stuff so you just put that in the um the department of imaginary concerns now the reason I brought it up is I want to give you a very quick um persuasion lesson a few people said hey don't call it the department of imaginary concerns call it the imaginary problems or the imaginary policies or something like that the word concerns is what made this viral so that's the actually the active word so if you didn't understand persuasion you would say hm concerns is too generic or it's off it's off point or something if you do understand it you know that that's the word that sold it when you see concerns it tells you that somebody's concerned as opposed to it's a problem or or anything in the real world and it's a non-standard word in this domain you wouldn't expect to see the word concerns in the name of a title of a department so it's the mistake or isn't the mistake that makes it do that makes it viral so that's what made it sticky meanwhile zinsky is uh self ulating so he launched according to the National pulse Christopher tomson he uh he's attacking Trump's team um and he said the following stuff he said the he said that the uh that Europe unlike the United States has discipline and no chaos chaos who says the United States has chaos Democrats right have you ever heard a republican say oh we got a bunch of chaos nope it's just a Democrat thing and now zilinsky is taking that that approach and he says Europe good us chaos and then he accused uh uh witkoff um he said uh I can't be ungrateful to the Americans for everything they did but they are often unfortunately under the influence of Russian narratives and then he said then he went off on wickoff and he says he doesn't look like a military man he doesn't look like a general and he doesn't have such experience as far as I know he is very good at selling and buying real estate and this is a little different um well zalinski good luck because America's out you you just made it impossible to get peace in Ukraine with America's help a apparently he really wants a permanent war and Europe's on his team and I say good luck guys good luck um you can fight Russia all day long but there's no freaking way after you've insulted wickoff and Trump that you're going to get what you want from the United States you just close that door you idiot or maybe he knows exactly what he's doing but there's no reason for us to be involved anymore he made it easy to walk away um and then he said that he's rejecting any idea for a peace deal that would involve uh that would not involve Russia giving back all the territory that they've conquered including Crimea now given that we know there's no way that's ever going to happen has he just slam the door shut on any kind of a peace deal and America being productive in any of it he has the door shut so I don't care what the news is tomorrow or the next day I don't care if he changes his mind I don't care if he apologizes it's over I'm going to call it we're out now the United States has not said that Trump has not said that I don't think he's commented exactly but I feel pretty confident that this just ended the productive relationship with the United States of UK gra we're definitely not going to be helping them defend themselves um at this point now something could change I suppose but I think we're done but at the same time and this is fascinating um Jack bobc of human events was talking to Scott bessent and Scott bent says that they've got 100 page Ukraine deal about the minerals not about peace but about minerals that he hopes will will be get signed next week now it is possible that we could make a mineral deal it's not impossible because the mineral deal would not be promising anything about security it would just be a way for them to make money and for us to make money so they might say yes to making money because they need money to fight their war and from our perspective it might give them a little what uh besten not a security guarantee but it is an economic security PCT now I'm not so sure the United States would want to get involved in some place that didn't have good defense against Russia coming in and taking the rest of the country so I don't know if we can actually get private companies to do the work because that would be a pretty big risk but if it works that'd be great but I I think in terms of the US funding Ukraine's military Adventure I think that's over I think we're done with that meanwhile the Greenland trip is getting spicy you knew that JD Vance and his wife were going over there but here's the funny part apparently um the the Mike walz was always uh intended to be part of the trip but they had forgotten about him uh when they did the the notice so National Security advisor Mike walls will also be attending the trip all I can hope is they don't accidentally invite Jeffrey Goldberg on the trip that's a call back yeah okay can you imagine them being on the plane and they look over and it's like oh my God and Jeffrey Goldberg was accidentally invited on the trip all right that's all I got for you thanks for thanks for putting up with me uh that's all I've got for today I'm going to talk to the local subscribers privately for a minute the rest of you make sure you come back tomorrow same time same place we'll have some more fun so if you're on exra rumble or You.
Tube I appreciate you joining and I'll see you tomorrow locals I'll be coming at you privately e e e e
come on in we're almost ready for the
show you
deserve well I think you deserve it do
you yeah yeah I think you do you've been
good all right let's check the stocks
uh well not so good all right forget
about that there'll be better
later but I got to call up my comments
here make sure
everybody's on
board there we
go boy there's a lot of news today so
much news oh my
goodness good morning everybody and
welcome to the highlight of human
civilization it's called coffee with
Scott Adams you've never had a better
time but if you'd like to take this
experience up to levels that nobody can
even understand with their tiny shiny
human brains all you need for that is a
cuper m glass of tanker Shel din the
Cante juger flask a vessel of any kind
fill it with your favorite liquid I like
coffee and join me now for the
unparallel pleasure of the dopamine hit
of the day the thing that makes
everything better it's called the
simultaneous Sip and it happens right
now yes exactly go
fully recharged I'm at working at full
strength
today we got news we're going to pound
right through it you ready for this
happy Friday by the
way let's see is there any new science
that they could have completely skipped
just by asking Scott oh yeah here's one
the University of South Australia found
out that
um being happy in your career doesn't
make you happy in life but being happy
in general in your life can make you
enjoy your career that you have
more um they could have just ask me yes
it's called Baseline happiness and if
you're happy in general everything else
in your life looks
better how how many of you didn't know
that was there anybody who thought you
know if I were depressed but I got a
better job I'll bet that would cheer me
up no doesn't work that way if you're
happy then even your crap job seems
pretty good to you and if you're
unhappy it doesn't matter how good your
job is you're still going to be unhappy
so just ask me next time I could have
cleared that up saved you a lot of
money well according to Marine Insight
publication uh over in Germany there's
this revolutionary new Wastewater
processing plant it's a Wastewater
processing plant and what's
revolutionary is that they can convert
the Wastewater into methanol which I
guess is kind of climate neutral and you
can use that for marine
fuels now I wonder if there's anybody
who works on the Wastewater
project that would tell us that we live
in a simulation let's see um the waste
water is being explained by Dr wizzing
WSS iing whizzing so Dr
whizzing can tell you about the waste
water um apparently Dr pooping was not
available he he's the number
two yep Dr whizzing for
Wastewater okay okay all right all right
judge me you can judge me on that
one um this you knew was coming nextg
defense is reporting that Max our
intelligence they've developed a a
vision-based software that can make GPS
unnecessary for your drone so in other
words if your drone gets jammed and it
can't see the GPS signal it doesn't care
because maxar intelligence has this
these databases that are really detailed
uh they've got 3D terrain data for 34
million square miles so it can just
switch to or maybe it doesn't even need
GPS which means that there's practically
no defense against drones
now if your drone can't be jammed if you
can't Jam the
GPS uh that seems like a problem so you
yes uh as nval ravan said recently it's
really inevitable that all Warfare will
be drones because why would you need
anything
else it's all going to be
drones well if you haven't yet seen Ezra
Klein on John Stewart's
podcast oh you have to see this I so
recommend this so look for the clips if
you just see the clips you'll you'll see
everything you need to see but uh so
Ezra Klein is a co-author of the book
abundance and he's doing you know I have
to say my my first
impression was hey you're just writing a
book that says democrats should act more
like Republicans if they want to win
anything so I wasn't sure it was adding
much to the
world but now I think it is so I'm going
to I'm going to switch to full
compliment to Ezra Klein and I guess
Derek Thompson the two co-authors so the
the thing that was amazing is that um uh
you know you've heard Ezra Klein talk
about how the Democrats uh are good at
funding impressive things but then for
reasons that I didn't quite understand
nothing got done so there was the
funding of the highspeed rail in
California that didn't get done there
was the funding of the um the rural
Broadband inter that didn't get done
there was the funding of the Nationwide
charging stations that didn't get done
all good ideas in theory but all they
could do is give them money and not get
anything
done and if you wonder why it is then
nothing gets done you just have to you
just have to here as reclin go through
the 14 steps it would have taken to
approve the just the
the project for the car charging
stations oh my God I'm not going to run
through the 14 because it's pretty
pedantic but you have to watch John
Stewart for the first time understanding
how completely doomed the Democrat way
of work is because the regulations are
mostly I'm thinking mostly Democrat
created and if you looked at any one of
them individually you'd probably say to
yourself all right well I could see why
you'd want this group to review
it or I could see why you'd want to run
it through this group for
approval but once you get to 14
different steps and everybody's got to
review it and analyze it and they got
time for comment it becomes literally
impossible so it's not just that it
didn't happen it's that the system was
impossible so anybody who tried to apply
to you know be one of the people who
executed on these funded um projects
couldn't get through it it would take
you the rest of your life if you got
through it at all so there is no
way to actually
execute on these uh well-meaning
Democrat gigantic
projects there is no way now what is it
I always say about the difference
between Republicans and
Democrats Democrats are really good at
goals highspeed rail that's a goal I
like it uh rural internet Broadband I
like it uh a
nationwide uh charging stations for
electric cars sounds pretty good those
are good goals I like it but they also
developed a system that made it
impossible now let's compare that to the
Republicans Republicans would say get
rid of all these uh this red
tape and then it
works that's it so the Republicans have
a
system which is in general get rid of
the red tape now beyond that if you got
rid of enough red tape maybe you don't
even need much government funding maybe
maybe the private sector can do it but
the Republicans
consistently have
systems that would work and the
Democrats consistently have pretty good
goals we'd like everybody to do well
we'd like the schools to do well take
take uh public
education the Democrats have a very good
goal that uh no matter what your income
is or what your situation is in life you
should get a good education and the
government government can help you on
that but then they overlay it with you
know the the the the Department of
Education which was a problem they
overlay it with the teachers union and
you very quickly get to the point where
the system for providing that thing
which is a good it just doesn't work and
that's what we observe scores are going
down in every way the uh whereas the
Republicans would say well nothing works
unless there's competition so let's make
sure there's a lot more competition for
private schools or alternative schools
so again in every domain it's the same
Democrats good on goals don't have a
systems let's check check in on
Dei
um Charlie Kirk has a post where he's
talking about daily wire Story by uh
Luke rosak I guess he did a great job on
this and the story is about uh a group
called The National diversity Council
now remember I tell you that it it turns
out that you can tell all the fraudulent
organizations because they string
together words that sound good so
instead of the national diversity
Council it could have been the American
Ferness
initiative you can just put any words
together the Freedom diversity
Association and then you start getting
money well one of the founders uh Dennis
Kennedy allegedly paid himself
$450,000 a year for 10 hours of work a
week but then in 2022 allegedly at the
peak of Dei
Mania uh he and a few other Executives
decided that they really owed another $3
million in back pay uh and so they
looted the organization is the
accusation and now the now the
organization is filing for
bankruptcy with the board saying that
Kennedy systematically looted it by
funling its assets to an to a for-profit
firm controlled by himself does that
sound
familiar that's exactly what we were
finding out with all the
NGS if the NGO gets a lot of funding
let's say from the government could be
private donations
uh then the first thing they'll do is
say here's how we're spending that money
we're going to hire this for-profit
entity that just happens to be my wife
or just happens to be me with another
name and we're not going to have any
accounting so that it's not as obvious
what we're doing it's the same
scam everywhere and once you realize the
pattern you can just pick it up
instantly it's like oh you got a bunch
of money you gave yourself a generic
name like the national diversity Council
and uh you can protect yourself by
accusing any of your critics of being
racists ah see that's
important because if you don't have an
audit process and you're planning to
loot the organization you want to make
sure that if anybody blames you of
anything you could say oh my God what
are you some kind of white supremacist
who hates who hates diversity
don't you see that diversity is in the
name of our
organization of course it's good because
it says diversity right in it it's right
in the name you
racist I think we're on to it now I
think we can spot these a little
easier well Mario nul is reporting that
uh Trump has threatened to defund the
Smithsonian over what he calls divisive
narratives and he's ordered JD Vance to
go clean house whatever that means and
what he wants to do is remove what he
calls improper ideology or El to lose
Federal funding and he accuses the
Museum of pushing a decades long effort
to rewrite US history with distorted
ideological narratives instead of
facts so they're going to have to get
rid of all the divisive content or else
the government won't fund them
anymore
and to me um I I can see why they're
doing it I'm sure it's a good idea but
history has always been fake so when you
take one version of fake history and
somebody's trying to rewrite it to
another version of fake
history it doesn't make it more accurate
but there is a version of History that's
better for the
country and if you're deciding to change
the history to white people suck now I
haven't seen what the smithsonia is up
to but I'm just going to take a WI wild
guess that what they're saying is that
white people are the problem they killed
all the Native Americans they created
all the slavery they stole all the money
and white people are bad just a guess I
I don't have any information that that's
what this Smithsonian was doing but what
do you
think what else would it be so yeah it's
very very damaging to have a fake
history that says the people who live
here today are part of the problem you
don't want that so it is better even if
it's fake history to say that your
country was awesome and you're still
awesome it's
better well here's a story that really
sounds great for America just listen to
this according to interesting
engineering uh an enormous um massive
lithium deposits have been discovered in
the
us uh worth $540 billion so much that it
would vastly reduce China's grip on the
United States for lithium so I I'm
reading this I'm like wow $540 billion
worth of lithium and it seems to be
accessible isn't that the greatest story
the only thing that could be bad about
this is if it's in
California don't be in California please
don't be in California please please
don't be in Cali
California it's in
California uh beneath the surface of the
sultan
sea so I guess the value is not 540
billion it would be closer
to uh let me call up Ezra Klein uh Ezra
uh there's $540 billion worth of lithium
in California under the sultan sea do
you think we can okay calm down Ezra
calm down
okay yeah I I know we'll never get it
yeah I know 14
steps okay we'll just leave it there
never mind thank you
goodbye yeah that's a complete waste of
time because it's in California I'd love
to be wrong I would love to be wrong but
no it's worth nothing because it's in
California that's all you need to
know uh Trump has floated the idea of
May be easing off on tariffs according
to Reuters um on China if China approves
the sale of tick tock to an American
entity what do you think of that idea
going easy on tariffs on China if they
approve a ticktock deal here's the
problem that would be transferring
wealth from um from the citizens of the
United States
to the rich people in the United States
who bought Tik Tock so the benefactors
would be the billionaires who buy
tiktock and that would be paid for
partly by money that would have
otherwise gone into the
treasury so how is Trump going to did he
think this
through now I'm not saying it's a bad
idea by the way what I'm saying is how
do you sell it because it's it's total
oligarch
friendly citizen unfriendly American
last I mean to me it looks like it'd be
kind of good for
China uh and good for a few oligarchs
who buy it who were his
buddies and I don't see how you sell
this thing now I will give you one
possibility one of the things that Trump
said was that the US
government if it's being helpful and
making the deal happen should get a
percentage of tick tock oh now that was
not part of this story but remember
Trump has floated that idea and he was
serious about it and it makes sense if
the government is doing something
important to make a private investment
worth something from zero to maybe be
worth a trillion dollars someday why
don't we get a piece of it if you give
me a piece of it meaning the citizens
I'm all in yeah if you say we're going
to reduce tariffs a little bit on China
um to get this deal done but in the end
the United States let's say our
Sovereign fund you know we I think we're
going to have trouble funding The
Sovereign fund there's some some
technical reason why the Sovereign fund
might be in Jeopardy um but this seems
like a perfect use for for a sovereign
fund where we invest literally
zero and we get a percentage of take
out I I'd be happy with more of that so
if if Trump combines two things he's
floated one is the reduction of tariffs
get the deal done and the other is us
gets a piece of the deal you can sell
that that that would be
sellable all well um the the house is is
uh according to just the news the house
passed a legislation to keep foreign
influence and of higher education called
the deterrent
act and uh let's see what it does it
mandates that schools have to report
foreign
gifts uh I think this is mostly
universities and colleges have to report
foreign gifts or at least $50,000 or
more and they have to report it to
the checking notes they have to report
that to the
Department of
Education
huh do do you see anything see any
problem with the
legislation because the Department of
Education is being
closed don't they need to update
[Laughter]
that I swear I don't even know what I'm
reading at this point is this true
did did they just
yesterday the Republicans this would
only be through the house not the Senate
but did they really just passed some
legislation in the house that says
somebody has to report to the Department
of no longer
existing there must be something wrong
with the
story but maybe
not well RFK Jr who I thought was being
a little bit
quiet you know until he got his SE legs
and figured out what was what but boy
he's not quiet now um I saw Wall Street
Apes had a video I couldn't tell how old
it was but he was talking how uh Black
Rock owns all of the Meat Packers in the
United States there are only four uh big
companies but Black Rock owns them
all and they um according to RFK they
also own a lot of the big Pharma
now I don't know if own is the
right description they might own a
percentage but does Black Rock own a
controlling interest in
Pharma because that would be something
I'd never heard before I definitely knew
that they were heavily invested in
everything that matters you know pretty
much every industry that matters but a
controlling interest I don't know and do
they have a controlling interest or
already own the Meat Packers so I have
some questions about that but that's
something RFK jun's bringing up seems
important to
me um then he also reported that uh some
of the career civil servant bureaucrats
were keeping RFK Jr from accessing
databases uh that would have information
about risks and dangers of certain drugs
and medical
interventions can you imagine that
and RV JR says that that these
bureaucrats are seemingly only serving
the industries they were supposed to
regulate so everything that RFK Jr has
been telling us before he got the job
you know to be in charge of all this
stuff it looks like it's all true it
looks like these are
completely broken industries that are
just serving the uh the Pharma the far
industries that it just seems broken
entirely um but uh RFK junor was on
Chris Cuomo show in news nation and he
said the CDC so that would be under him
is launching a new sub agency to
specialize in vaccine
injuries um so that should make you
happy now he's very careful about the
fact that you know it's not going to be
based on the hearsay or anecdote they're
going to look into it with the you know
the best gold standard science that they
can which has not been applied to this
question yet so if the only thing he
does is apply the best science to it
even if it finds out that the vaccines
weren't as bad as you
thought you're going to be a lot happier
now I think most of you are expecting to
find out that the vaccinations various
ones not just not just Co uh but I think
you expect at least this audience does
that it's going to find out that they
were much more dangerous than you
thought so but either way we need to
know we need to know I'm open to the
fact that it might go either way um but
we definitely need to know it's it's
right at the top of things we should be
caring about and then uh RFK Jr was talk
about Elon Musk using AI to improve
health and efficiency and improve
delivery so he said they've had a bunch
of geniuses come over to RFK Jr's domain
to try to figure out how to do that can
you
imagine how much money could be driven
out of health care if you only knew what
worked and what
doesn't separately I saw another story I
didn't I didn't write this one down um
about how there's a a large number of
complications with medication
that are very specific to your genetic
makeup so if you could of course there's
a problem you know anytime your your
genetic makeup is part of a database you
have to worry about that but imagine if
we just had those two databases what's
your genetic makeup and how does this
drug do for people with your genetic
makeup and you could get rid of
something like 9% of all the
injury that's huge that's huge
so but think of all the different
ways that AI could just make everything
work better do you think you've ever
taken a
medication that didn't work well with
the other medications you were taking
and you just didn't know it probably
probably and AI could help you with that
so at the very least you should take a
picture of all your pill bottles with AI
and the next time you get a next time
you get a Pres prescription and say I
get a new prescription is it going to
work well with all the ones I already
have and by the way if you use chat GPT
at the the highest level expensive one
you can literally do that you could just
put all your pill bottles in a row and
just put it on video and just take a
picture of all your pill bottles and say
I'm going to add this pill uh my doctor
said to add this one and it will tell
you it'll tell you which ones don't work
with other ones more so I think even
then your doctor would I mean they're
supposed to flag it but you can't expect
them to know every
interaction I've never seen a doctor
look
up uh an interaction while I was talking
to him I wonder wonder if this system
does that for him you know and my health
care system is pretty well
automated um so it might be that they if
they just prescribe it maybe it puts up
a warning I don't know I'm I'm kind of
skeptical that it's already built into
the system but it could be could be big
meanwhile demo Tim
wals uh he was at a some kind of event
and he was urging Democrats to uh to get
more serious about Dei and immigration
he thinks that uh the problem was they
didn't go hard enough on those things so
he goes quote we'd let them Define the
issue on immigration we'd let them
Define the issue on Dei and we let them
Define what woke is we got ourselves in
this mess because we weren't bold enough
to stand up and say you're damn right
we're proud of these policies we're
going to put them in and see and and
we're going to execute
them I think the only thing he executed
were whatever was remaining of the
democrat's chance of
ever ever having a president
again let's be serious is this the
dumbest guy you've ever seen in
your life Tim wals is just not smart
he's just not smart so wow uh every time
I see one of their you know leaders say
something I just shake my head you know
and keep in mind you I just want to give
you some reference when I used to watch
Bill Clinton talk I used to think wow
he's really smart even if I didn't agree
with him when I saw Obama talk I would
say well at least you're very smart even
if I didn't agree with them but when I
see wallst or Jasmine Crockett I just
think God you're
dumb and I disagree with
you that's a that's a tough combo to be
dumb and wrong at the same
time all right many of you may have seen
Clips or watched uh uh Brett Bear on Fox
News interiew uh Doge and Elon Musk and
I got to say I was so impressed now
here's something that I say all the time
and it's because I'm a nerd but Fox News
has the best
producers if you look at that again just
look how good the lighting is the set
the
makeup the hair the
clothes the the physical setup and the
whole thing they they're just so good at
producing what they do they're they're
the best in the industry by
far so anyway the F so uh I've never
seen I've never seen musk look so good
you know maybe sometimes he's more tired
or you know the lighting's bad or
whatever but he looked great like he
looked healthy and like completely in
charge so that was great um but the
other thing that I noticed is that
musk is a talent stack guy meaning that
whatever talents he has which are
considerable of course uh he is
continually adding to them and I believe
that his close association with Trump is
teaching him things about Communications
and things about
persuasion that is taking him to the
next level because very few people can
Master those domains as as well as let's
say a technical domain um but if you
look at if you look at uh musk today his
ability to come up with a sentence
you'll remember forever is it's almost
trump-like I mean nobody can match Trump
he's he's category by himself but you
can see you can see the transfer of
skill you can tell that he's impressed
this is just me reading mins but you
could tell that if he's normal he's he's
impressed by Trump's ability to
communicate and to control a crowd and
to control a narrative and boy as he
learned well so I watched a number of
mostly I saw the clips I didn't see 100%
of it but I was impressed completely
about how how
succinctly musk can explain an idea and
you'll remember her forever I'll give
you an example um he said that they're
already finding or they're goal is to
find four billions per day in savings
and they're on track to be mostly done
in 130 days which is what he's
authorized
for how how clean and simple is that and
Brett Bear says well uh you know are you
going to be doing reports and mus says
um we're doing the actual
savings so they're I mean they're
reporting the savings but you don't need
to report
because every time they add another you
know billion dollars or whatever the
savings they put it on the website
so you don't need a report because it's
reported as it happens so that's a
perfect
answer the 4 billion per day I'll
remember that if he had said something
like you can imagine somebody who was
bad at it saying well we're finding
anything from1 to8 billion doll per day
and you know we're we're we're hoping
that that's
enough no he tells you $4 billion per
day for roughly 130 days is going to get
to you we think a trillion dollars in
savings which is 50% of the the deficit
spending the other trillion Trump is
going to handle with growth he we
hope so that's perfect just
communication wise absolutely perfect
you could you could not improve on that
it's so clean 4 billion a day 130 days
to1
trillion I I'll never forget
that um and then then they add the
anecdotes imagine all the complicated
things that doge is looking into and
imagine if they tried to explain the
complicated things you'd be
like that sounds pretty complicated but
you you go
wild instead he gives the cleanest
little anecdotal example to back up you
know the numbers and he says that at one
point nearly a billion dollars um was
allocated I think per year for some
company that would do a survey that
apparently nobody needed or
wanted there was no there didn't even
seem to be any
obvious uh customer for it a billion
dollars year for one little
survey that looked like it was done by a
high school group a complete ripoff as
far as we can tell now will you remember
that 1 billion real easy to remember for
one survey that looks like it was done
by high school kids you'll remember that
forever right that one's just perfect
for
communication so even and even having
the uh I guess it was the other Doge
leaders sitting behind him um that was
great then the other thing he said and
this is just perfect Genius of
communication you know how the biggest
problem with doge is hey you're using a
chainsaw instead of a scalpel stop using
the chainsaw when all of us smart people
who are Democrats know you should be
using a scalpel where's the
scalpel so the way he handled that was
he said that uh they're they're
measuring everything twice if not
Thrice before they cut so this old the
old saying is you know measure twice cut
once so he's moving away from the you
know the scalpel chainsaw thing but he's
he's letting you know that they're not
making any Cuts unless they've measured
twice if not Thrice
do you notice that twice and Thrice
rhyme who's that remind you
of Johnny
Cochran if the glove doesn't fit you
must equit if the glove doesn't fit you
must equit we'll measure it twice if not
Thrice it is a a well-known persuasion
fact that if something Rhymes it's more
persuasive when California tried to get
people to wear uh seat belts and they
told them they were going to get a a
ticket unless they did the the uh
campaign was click it or tick it
basically click your your seat belt
where you get a ticket it click it or
tick it if the glove doesn't fit you
must equit we're measuring it twice if
not
Thrice
perfect perfect now if he had said and I
would have made made this mistake I
think if he would have said you know but
sometimes you need a
chainsaw that might be true it might be
it might be smart but it would not be
the right answer for communicating to
the public what the public wants to hear
and the only thing they want to hear is
I'm going to measure it
twice if not Thrice
so what I saw was a
absolute lesson on how to be
perfect that was from from the producers
of the show to Brett Bear's questions
which were excellent he's always
excellent in that domain to musk
specific answers to the people who were
the head of Doge sitting behind him and
backing him up with answers every part
of that was the highest quality you'll
ever see for something like this it was
really really
impressive
anyway moving on uh according to the
Wall Street Journal uh billions of
taxpayer dollars have been wasted on
duplicate Medicaid payments and mus has
already said that Doge will fix that now
how did that happen the daily wire is
talking about it but I think Wall Street
Journal did the original uh
investigation and what they found was
there are a number of cases where people
should have been reimbursed by their
insurance
company um and or I guess Medicaid was
going to pay the insurance company but
then they
moved and so the systems were not clever
enough to pick up the fact that it was
the same person but at a different
address so apparently these big
insurance companies the biggest ones in
the country health insurance were
receiving two
payments for a whole bunch of people if
they had moved during some certain time
and the the dollar amounts were
massive um totaling up to at least $4.3
billion $4.3
billion that went to insurance companies
from the government it didn't go to the
individuals so it wasn't like that none
of the people involved were involved in
fraud so they didn't break any laws they
just moved and so United Health remember
United
Health I'm not going to say
it I'm not going to say it I'm just
going to say United Health was one of
them uh elevant Els or elant health and
senteni I don't know any of those they
received hundreds of millions of dollars
each in duplicate payments you know what
this story doesn't
include it doesn't include that those
insurance companies are going to pay
back the taxpayers
who are owed that money are
they it's such massive amounts that it
probably would eliminate their profit
for a year or two I don't know what
their profits are but don't they have to
pay that back because nobody's arguing
that they were owed the
payment it it seems like it's easy to
demonstrate that these were duplicate
payments
so where's our
check uh if feels to me we should be
clawing that all back um if it's
possible well here's an update on uh
Katherine Katherine marah the CEO of
NBR um I picked up on this yesterday but
Brit Brit Hume had a take on it on X he
says uh when you read or hear about NPR
Chief Katherine Maher being grilled
about her hard left views as expressed
on Twitter in 2020 remember that's five
years ago remember it was three years
after those tweets that she was made
head of NPR so did NPR know what her
views were because she claims now that
they're different that her views have
evolved in five years but do you know
what Katherine Mah calls five
years she calls it half a
decade I was listening to her being uh
grilled by the Congress and when she
said but you you know that was half a
decade ago half a decade that's 5 years
how many people have a complete
transformation of political opinion in
five years and it's not on one topic
like I I could see how somebody would
say oh I used to believe in this hoax
but I found out blah blah blah but how
do you have a a total revamp of your
political opinions from crazy far left
to something more moderate in half a
decade half a decade you
lying whatever um here's something I
didn't know I had to look it up 1 to 3%
of their funding comes from the
government so I don't really care about
this too much one to three% of their
funding it it seems like we should just
yank the funding because 1 to 3% is
something that can certainly handle and
why am I paying for any of this
then Christopher rufo on X reminds us he
says don't forget the nprc CEO Katherine
Mah is also the board chairman of
signal she's the board chairman of
signal come on are we living in a
simulation how's that even possible the
only thing that could be weirder is if
she were like the daughter of Judge
bosberg she's not by the way but it's
the only thing that would make this
weird
and then uh rufo goes on and says and
she spent a decade working on regime
change operations in the Middle East and
North
Africa now I don't think anybody has had
a more uh a more obvious connection to
the CIA than she
has now it's not I can't confirm that I
don't have proof of that but uh all of
this from being CEO of NPR to being on
the chairman of the board of signal to
being working on regime change
operations in the Middle East and North
Africa what does that sound like to
you does that sound like just a bunch of
coincidences sometimes things are just
what you think well the uh one of the
biggest Tesla domestic terrorists has
been caught uh in Las Vegas I guess
police made an arrest it was the the guy
who did the most uh elaborate domestic
violence he's the one who set on fire
multiple cars at a uh I guess it was a
um it was a Tesla facility for repair I
think collision repair and used a gun he
fired some shots and used some Molotov
cocktails and of course he has a history
of being he's 36 years old has a history
of being associated with the Communist
party and anything everything else is
bad anyway he was booked on 15 counts he
could get up to 20 years in prison uh
also a woman seen keying at Tesla in
Washington has been identified she's in
trouble also that 450 lb guy who was on
some kind of a scooter thing and ramming
the side of a car he's been easily
identified and that's not a complete
list how many of the domestic terrorists
have now been completely identified
because I feel like we'll get just about
all of them you know the ones that
showed their faces so um it looks like
the world is starting to get Back in
Balance meaning that um as long as
there's a continual drip of the domestic
terrorists getting serious jail
sentences um maybe it'll decrease you
know maybe the Democrats will get tired
of it I don't know maybe they'll run out
of crazy
people I saw a post by Insurrection
Barbie who was a great follow by the way
if you're not following on X
Insurrection Barbie you're missing a lot
of great
content um but Insurrection Barbie says
the entire resistance to Donald Trump is
made up of like 300 super connected
Democrats and a bunch of paid protesters
easy to realize why they lost election
and why they're continuously bleeding
voters um but this is your daily
reminder that 300 powerful Democrats and
their NGO are trying to hold the country
hostage and I think Keon musk agreed
with that estimate that there are about
300 highly connected
Democrats who are pretending to be de
the Democrats basically they're the ones
in charge that that number completely
agrees with my understanding of the
world about 300 and of course within the
300 there would be you know 50 who are
super important and maybe you know 10
who are head of the pyramid but we do
see the same names don't we it feels
like you know if there's something
terrible happening you know lawfare or
something else it feels like the same
set of people just keep popping up over
and over again so yeah it's about 300
they just act like they're
more so Trump wants an investigation of
how it is possible according to the
Washington Times uh that uh he keeps
getting bad judges by chance so
apparently these DC judges should be
assigned randomly they've got some kind
of wheel they spend uh but yet this
judge bosberg who is uh let's say the
Trump supporters think he's been highly
biased and uh has conflicts they would
say um he was nominated by Barack Obama
Etc and that somehow amazingly he got
this newest case about the signal appp
and whether that has to do with uh
possibility of any federal records being
destroyed because the app automatically
deletes things so what are the odds that
he would be
chosen yet again for another Trump
related case Well turns out um as the
Washington Times reports and this is
good reporting by the way I didn't know
that there are
20 so if you were going to say how does
this one guy get four of these Trump
cases when it's one and a 20 every time
well it would help if you knew that
there um there's another judge G Cobb
who has at least 10 Trump related cases
but I've never heard that name have you
judge
Cobb how could one judge have 10 Trump
Rel
cases and I've never heard the
name my guess is that there are 10 cases
that aren't that
important and there are three other
judges that have six
each uh two of them have five each and
several judges have four well the first
thing you need to know is that there are
so many of these lawfare situations
against Trump that if you only have 20
judges they're all going to get half a
dozen
because even if you did it randomly
they're just so many judges that they're
they're just all going to come up half a
dozen
times that's exactly what's happening um
but I don't believe it's random here's
what I think I think it depends who
filed the lawsuit I think if one of the
300 which is really one of a half dozen
I think there are some
lawyers that if they're involved they
seem to get the right
judge I don't think that it's a
coincidence that judge Cobb has 10 cases
and I've never heard that name they
can't be the important
ones so I've got a feeling it's not
random even though a lot of people have
a lot of
cases um so Trump according also
according to the Washington Times Jeff
moro's writing about this uh Trump is
stripping security clearance from yet
another Law
Firm um what is it Wilmer haale it's a
high-powered Washington law firm and
they had once employed special counselor
Robert
Mueller and this is what the the
executive order Banning them from uh
working on government stuff says it says
that the law firm has abandon the
profession's highest
ideals and abused its pro bono practice
to engage in activities that undermine
the justice and interest of the United
States and I gives some
examples um it supported efforts to
discriminate based on race uh I assume
that means Dei stuff backs the
obstruction of efforts to prevent
illegal aliens from committing horrific
crimes and trafficking deadly drugs
within our border and furthers a
degradation of the quality of American
elections including supporting efforts
designed to enable noncitizens to vote
here's my
problem that's sort of the job of
lawyers lawyers don't just represent
innocent people who are
angels our system completely depends on
qualified lawyers also taking cases that
you and I hate and say why you doing
that why you doing that pro bono thing
for these terrible people so to me this
looks like lawfare
and remember I said from the beginning
I've told you if if it looks like
lawfare to me I'm going to call it out
it's a little hard to be a team player
and be in favor of lawfare however I'm
going to soften it a little
bit because there's so much lawfare
against the president that is completely
out of out of the
norm that this looks like a brush back
pitch to me as in if I keep getting
lawed I'm going to take you all down and
even if I lose every one of these in
some upper Court I'm going to make sure
you're spending all your time wasting
your time trying to fight this because
you all suck and you're all political
and you can pretend that you're just
helping your clients but you're
obviously just a lawfare organ of the
Democrats and we have a completely
broken system where the lawyers are
trying to basically run the whole
Country Now under those
conditions I'm okay with law fair
because the law fair is a brushback
pitch I'm not in favor of going to a
baseball game and watching the pitcher
throw unlimited pitches at the head of
the opposing batter no I don't want to
watch that but if that team does
something really messed up and the
Pitcher decides to put one right into
the body of the
batter you understand that don't you you
understand that they're they're trying
to get balance back now you might not
love it because it's violent I'm not
recommending it but we do see that in
the real world if you don't have
mutually assured
destruction everything falls
apart so if you look at it as just law
fair it's bad but if you look at it as a
response to
lawfare which is what it is it's a
response response to lawfare if they
laware them back just as hard um that is
establishing mutually assured
destruction and it may have more to do
with suppressing the next thing they do
than it does with you know addressing
anything in the past so I'm in favor of
it I I'm in favor of it and I think it's
lawfare and I think it's
appropriate um according to bre Bart
news Simon Kent is writing that uh Trump
Administration is going to suspend
contributions to the WTO the World Trade
Organization so I had to look up what
the heck does the World Trade
Organization do what it does is
allegedly uh at least up till now it has
opened markets to 160 different
countries and lowered tariffs and made
it easier to dispute trade problems
across borders and basically greased the
wheels to make it easier for every
country to do business with every other
country so you might ask why do we want
to suspend our contribution to that and
I think the answer is because if your
organization is trying to find a middle
ground where everybody's happy it's not
America
first um it could be well let's let's
make sure that you know China and the
United States are both you know kind of
Happy Happ but kind of unhappy but maybe
we could have done a better deal so I
don't know if this will work out or not
work out but the idea that we can handle
our own tariffs and our own disputes and
we've got enough um Market muscle to say
look if you don't handle this
dispute we're just not going to do
business with you or we're going to tear
off the beesa S of you so
tentatively this looks like a good idea
because they're not the the WTO is not
meant to be America first so maybe we
can do better on our own we'll
see that wouldn't be true for smaller
countries I suppose but for America
maybe well as you know this story you've
heard before that Jasmine Crockett
called the governor Abbott of Texas
governor Hot Wheels because abits in a
wheelchair and this of course caus the
Democrats to bring up the uh what they
probably think is true by the way um but
it's a hoax that Trump ever mocked a
reporter who had a disability with an
arm
now um I saw Brendan straa doing a great
job of debunking that I've seen you know
the debunk America doing a great job at
debunking it's the most thoroughly
debunked thing and it's easy to debunk
because
um you can show the video from before
the incident with the reporter where he
would do the same action when he was
talking about anybody who couldn't
answer a question or anybody who was
doing a bad job communicating basically
it was his way of mocking them
um so i' but you also know that Jasmine
Crockett tried to explain her comment as
not really being about the
wheelchair and that the Hot Wheels
comment was something about
transporting immigrants or
something so without further Ado I would
like to do my impression of Jasmine
Crockett trying to explain why she
called Governor Abbott Hot Wheels but it
really didn't have anything to do
with his uh his disability and this is
Jasmine
Crockett whoa whoa
who see how that
[Laughter]
works all
right um I saw Sabine Hassen Felder on X
she's a German physicist saying she said
I genuinely don't understand why some
people are still bullish about llms the
technology behind Ai and she talks about
how she's used a bunch of the AIS and
she's doing it for her work in s sence
and that it often gives her um sources
that don't exist or there's a 404 error
um it'll tell her that a document that
says 2025 on it is from
2023 so she has to continually fact
check the ai's work and it just looks
kind of limited to her and wonders why
people are so so enthusiastic about his
future now I've said similar things and
people's response to me and to other
people who have had this experience they
say you you just don't understand how
um you don't understand how what is
it
um oh what's the
word don't understand how exponential
improvements work so the smartest people
who like AI are saying Scott Scott
Scott you're so dumb uh let me explain
how the world Works can I um AI is not
supposed to be the best it will ever be
today it's going to get better like
really fast and there's going to be this
exponential growth that's going to
happen any minute now and when that
kicks in you're going to look like such
a fool oh man a fool because you don't
understand how exponential growth works
yeah it seems slow slow slow slow but
then when it kicks in
boom and that's why you're not seeing
because you're not you know you don't
understand technology like we
do to which I
say have you ever heard of Moore's law
about the microchips getting better
every year it's a straight
line no exponential period have you ever
heard of a thing called Fusion nuclear
fusion that was first um proposed and
worked on 93 years ago 93 years still
waiting for the exponential growth part
93 years what about airline travel I'm
waiting for the exponential growth in
that because since I was a child it's
been largely the same and the planes
don't even change they're like 40 years
old yeah so we got that
um so what else we got um what about
batteries I'm always talking about all
these breakthroughs and batteries now
that's a case where I think there will
be an exponential growth and the reason
is that there are people all over the
world who know know there's enormous
money to be made in making a better
battery enormous so you got all kinds of
people the best people working on it all
over the world and they're trying
different
Technologies so if you have the best
people all over the world and giant
money involved and working on different
Technologies the odds of one of them
being 10 times as good as the old one
are pretty good so if if you said to me
Scott don't you know that batteries you
know may be chugging along for a while
but once we get you know we get to a
certain point man those batteries are
going to be amazing I would believe that
one I believe that one it's just that
not everything can turn into everything
else what about
smartphones so our smartphones kind of
came kind of awesome because they're
smartphones but how different is your
current smartphone from the last
one I feel like smartphones sort of peak
I I'm waiting for that exponential
growth but I don't think it's coming
with smartphones probably some other
technology so here's what I think um I
used AI five times already this morning
mostly grock it was great because that's
how I know that Fusion has been worked
on for 93
years I just asked grock and uh that's
how I knew what the w UT does I ask Rock
So if you're a writer or you're working
in this kind of world this podcasting
world and you're trying to get context
and you're trying to get you know an
understanding of a new topic quickly oh
it is great it is great so in some
professions and Bill Gates was saying
that uh medical profession legal
profession some other ones we're going
to see
AI takeover and I believe that
so I'm very Pro AI it's just that I
don't think the current technology the
large language models are ever going to
help
Sabine do her science stuff because you
can't rely on it being right it might be
that you always have to fact check the
facts if you're doing science stuff the
the stuff I do I could get a fact wrong
and it wouldn't nobody would die you
know tomorrow's somebody would say um on
the show yesterday you said Fusion's
been around 93 years but really it's 50
I'd say oh okay so it works great
whenever you're in a domain where if
something's wrong it's not the biggest
problem in the world but do you think an
llm will ever become the pilot of your
commercial aircraft I'm going to say no
do you think llm will be good enough to
be the robot that can do generic tasks
and you just have to show it or teach
it I'm
skeptical because you wouldn't want a
robot in your
house that was lossy meaning that you
couldn't you couldn't know exactly what
was going to
happen so I'm going to say that uh the
llms have amazing potential for a whole
bunch of different things but we're
going to need to invent a whole
different kind of thing for this you
know the artificial general intelligence
the one that thinks like we do and is
less
lossy that's what I think anyway the
Gateway uh Gateway Punda is reporting on
my idea of creating the department of
imaginary concerns to handle all the
fake Democrat problems Mike Lance wrote
about this and uh if you hadn't heard
about that the idea is that Democrats
have a whole bunch of imaginary problems
everything from climate crisis to um
Russia collusion the signal controversy
uh Elon mus stealing your social
security numbers like just a whole bunch
of fake stuff uh Trump's going to become
Hitler um he's Putin's best friend all
that stuff so you just put that in the
um the department of imaginary concerns
now the reason I brought it up is I want
to give you a very quick um persuasion
lesson a few people said hey don't call
it the department of imaginary
concerns call it the imaginary problems
or the imaginary policies or something
like that the word concerns is what made
this
viral so that's the actually the active
word so if you didn't understand
persuasion you would say hm concerns is
too generic or it's off it's off point
or something if you do understand it you
know that that's the word that sold it
when you see
concerns it tells you that somebody's
concerned as opposed to it's a problem
or or anything in the real world and
it's a non-standard word in this domain
you wouldn't expect to see the word
concerns in the name of a title of a
department so it's the
mistake or isn't the mistake that makes
it do that makes it viral so that's what
made it sticky meanwhile zinsky is uh
self ulating so he launched according to
the National pulse Christopher tomson he
uh he's attacking Trump's team um and he
said the following stuff he said
the he said that the
uh that Europe unlike the United States
has discipline and no chaos chaos who
says the United States has chaos
Democrats
right have you ever heard a republican
say oh we got a bunch of chaos nope it's
just a Democrat thing and now zilinsky
is taking that that approach and he says
Europe good us chaos and then he accused
uh uh
witkoff um he said uh I can't be
ungrateful to the Americans for
everything they did but they are often
unfortunately under the influence of
Russian narratives and then he said then
he went off on wickoff and he says he
doesn't look like a military man he
doesn't look like a general and he
doesn't have such experience as far as I
know he is very good at selling and
buying real estate and this is a little
different um well
zalinski good luck because America's
out you you just made it impossible to
get peace in Ukraine with America's help
a apparently he really wants a permanent
war and Europe's on his team and I say
good luck guys good luck um you can
fight Russia all day long but there's no
freaking way after you've insulted
wickoff and Trump that you're going to
get what you want from the United States
you just close that door you idiot or
maybe he knows exactly what he's doing
but there's no reason for us to be
involved anymore
he made it easy to walk
away um and then he said that he's
rejecting any idea for a peace deal that
would involve uh that would not involve
Russia giving back all the territory
that they've conquered including Crimea
now given that we know there's no way
that's ever going to
happen has he just slam the door shut on
any kind of a peace deal and America
being productive in any of it he has the
door shut so I don't care what the news
is tomorrow or the next day I don't care
if he changes his mind I don't care if
he apologizes it's over I'm going to
call it we're out now the United States
has not said that Trump has not said
that I don't think he's commented
exactly
but I feel pretty confident that this
just ended the productive relationship
with the United States of UK gra we're
definitely not going to be helping them
defend themselves um at this point now
something could change I suppose but I
think we're done but at the same time
and this is
fascinating um Jack bobc of human events
was talking to Scott bessent and Scott
bent says that they've got 100 page
Ukraine deal about the minerals not
about peace but about minerals that he
hopes will will be get signed next week
now it is
possible that we could make a mineral
deal it's not impossible because the
mineral deal would not be promising
anything about security it would just be
a way for them to make money and for us
to make
money so they might say yes to making
money because they need money to fight
their war and from our perspective it
might give them a little what uh besten
not a security guarantee but it is an
economic security PCT now I'm not so
sure the United States would want to get
involved in some place that didn't have
good defense against Russia coming in
and taking the rest of the country so I
don't know if we can actually get
private companies to do the work because
that would be a pretty big risk but if
it works that'd be great but I I think
in terms of the US funding Ukraine's
military Adventure I think that's over I
think we're done with that meanwhile the
Greenland trip is getting spicy you knew
that JD Vance and his wife were going
over there but here's the funny part
apparently
um the the Mike walz was always uh
intended to be part of the trip but they
had forgotten about him uh when they did
the the notice so National Security
advisor Mike walls will also be
attending the
trip all I can hope is they don't
accidentally invite Jeffrey Goldberg on
the
[Laughter]
trip that's a call back yeah okay can
you imagine them being on the plane and
they look over and it's like oh my God
and Jeffrey Goldberg was accidentally
invited on the
[Laughter]
trip all right that's all I got for you
thanks for thanks for putting up with me
uh that's all I've got for today I'm
going to talk to the local subscribers
privately for a minute the rest of you
make sure you come back tomorrow same
time same place we'll have some more fun
so if you're on exra rumble or YouTube I
appreciate you joining and I'll see you
tomorrow locals I'll be coming at you
privately
e
e
e e