Episode 2985 CWSA 10/11/25
Qatar and Gaza and China trade and crypto and oh my. Fun news you can't use at all. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Good morning, everybody. Come on in here, and I hope you have a cat in your lap. That is the perfect way to watch the show. You should have a beverage by your dominant hand. Your non-dominant hand should be petting a cat like this. And then you know you're almost ready for the show. If only I could…
View segment →you mind? Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlights of human civilization. It's called Scott Adams. You've never had a better time. But if you'd like to take a chance of elevating your experience up to levels that no one can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains, all you n…
View segment →r you. It's called the simultaneous sip. It happens now. All right, everybody. Good. We're all good now. Good. Well, at the end of today's podcast, I'll probably have a reframe to change your life from my book, Reframe Your Brain. So don't leave before you get that. No. No. Why in the world can I…
View segment →y think about giving compliments. Usually giving compliments is awkward, creepy, or it feels manipulative, as in, you know, you're trying to get something for your compliment or something. Here's the reframe. Withholding a compliment is almost immoral. If you have a compliment in your mind about som…
View segment →know that psychedelics can have a temporary control on your mind. But more lately, we're finding out it could be a semi-permanent change where, you know, one small controlled dose of psilocybin could set your depression away, your anxiety away for, you know, months or years. And if that happens, in…
View segment →son in Congress for looking into or finding out about UFOs and UAPs and all that. Now, he seems convinced that they're real because people who talk to him who seem like credible people are whispering in his ear things that sound real. And there are some people who have said things under oath at this…
View segment →here. Even Hillary Clinton has commended—she even used that word—I commend President Trump for what she calls significant progress in the Gaza situation. How do you interpret that? How do you interpret that the most dependable critic of the president, obviously somebody who has a long history of ha…
View segment →be worse, but it doesn't include phones and it won't include laptops. Oh. Oh, you know. So it'll end up being defined smaller but also negotiated. So who knows? But it's a big deal. It's a big deal. I would, if I were giving advice, I would say the odds of us getting some kind of a workable solution…
View segment →just change the reality. So the reality was it looked like we were some kind of enemies and he just reframed it to we're friends. Oh, we're friends. You're my buddy. I'd like to come visit my friend. And then suddenly it didn't really make sense to be threatening each other with nuclear annihilation…
View segment →tance to Trump than there is. They might keep the government closed. Like that would be one of the reasons to keep it closed. Oh my god, our government is terrible. At least half of it is. Anyway, well, I don't know if that's the real reason, but I saw one of the organizers of that No Kings rally,…
View segment →nt property usually requires 25% or more. So if you're a brand new real estate investor with limited cash, there's a big incentive to call something a second home instead of an investment property. But that's why lenders make you sign a second home rider, a separate document where you specifically p…
View segment →ecause she needs him 100% to get whatever it is she wants, you know, for Venezuela. And talk about the best way you could get him on your side. So I don't know much about her but I know that if she got the attention of the Nobel Prize people there's something of substance there and then the one thin…
View segment →o here's what I like about Putin's persuasion game. Don't misquote me. I didn't say I like Putin. I'm just saying that he's got a really strong persuasion game and the fact that he's playing so nice with Melania. It's just more of that it is so smart that he's extra nice to Melania and that there's…
View segment →throughs, I kind of give them a little less credibility. Do you do that too? I feel like they at least just from an anecdotal perspective, I don't have any data on this, but it seems like the Japanese might be and maybe the South Koreans might be a little bit of overclaimers when it comes to science…
View segment →an. He said, "Joe, why won't you have me on the show?" He was on another podcast when he said this. He said, "He won't have me on the show. It's a one way and he has guests coming on attacking and bashing, but he won't have me on the show. Full stop. He should have me on the show." And basically cha…
View segment →who just have an affinity for it. No, no, but it's not like they have a leadership. Well, how are they collecting money if they don't have a leadership? Well, okay. Well, they have some ways for money to get around, but not in a leadership way. Well, how do they decide who gets what money? Well, so…
View segment →t to this point. And like I said, if Hillary Clinton is saying yes, it must be that there's so much money that's going to be funneled into that area for rebuilding and the Abraham Accords and everything else that probably all the big money people just said cha-ching. You know, I'm just guessing like…
View segment →Hollywood movie making business has already fallen apart. And if we did not have a boom in AI, even the tech business would look like it's winding down. So California is sort of looking good, but only because of AI. I think I don't think there's anything else driving anything else. And AI is probabl…
View segment →rtland is also so small that if you imagine it's a big problem, that's just imaginary. And I don't know what is right. Is it possible that the news is exaggerating the real danger in Portland? Because I think it could be a little of both. It could be that the danger is not that great, but at the sam…
View segment →t it would be 60 times fewer mistakes than before. Because, you know, gene editing, if you could do gene editing quickly and efficiently and economically, there's a whole bunch of stuff you can fix. And this is just a movement in the right direction. But if they could actually make that much of an i…
View segment →guess what? I get more confident. So no, I'm every day in every way I'm trying to figure out how to be like a little bit better version of myself. So if anybody ever tells you the key to success is be yourself, you're getting some bad advice. Be better. Just be better. All right, that is your refra…
View segment →Good morning, everybody. Come on in here, and I hope you have a cat in your lap. That is the perfect way to watch the show. You should have a beverage by your dominant hand. Your non-dominant hand should be petting a cat like this. And then you know you're almost ready for the show. If only I could get to my notes.
All right. First, I'm going to get my comments working on this other screen. We'll get back to you. You'll let me get this. You mind? Do you mind?
Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlights of human civilization. It's called Scott Adams. You've never had a better time. But if you'd like to take a chance of elevating your experience up to levels that no one can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains, all you need for that is a cup, a mug or a glass, a tankard, a chalice, a stein, a canteen, jug or flask, a vessel of any kind, and a cat. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day. The thing that makes everything better. Here you go. This one's for you. It's called the simultaneous sip. It happens now.
All right, everybody. Good. We're all good now. Good.
Well, at the end of today's podcast, I'll probably have a reframe to change your life from my book, Reframe Your Brain. So don't leave before you get that.
No. No. Why in the world can I not find my own comments? There we go. Success. Boom. Boom.
All right. As tradition dictates, Owen Gregorian will be hosting a spaces event immediately after—well, somewhat immediately after we're done here today. And you can find that just by searching on X for Owen Gregorian and look for the spaces notification.
So I do not have a source for this next—well, the first story—but I saw somebody say it and I knew it was true, so I'm going to repeat it. They did a study to find out what it is that women can say to men that would make the men feel as good as when the men say to the women, "I love you." Does anybody know the answer? What two words? The answer is "thank you." So apparently if you say thank you and show appreciation to a man, his brain lights up about the same as if you had said "I love you" to a woman. How many women knew that?
Now, I've always thought that one of the problems with relationships is that people feel like it's a power battle and that if you show appreciation to somebody, you're giving up your power and it's like you owe them. If you say thank you to your mate, it's like, oh, now I owe you something. So I feel like people don't want to say thank you too much.
Actually, I'm going to skip ahead. I told you that I might read a reframe from my book Reframe Your Brain, but I think I'll do it right now. So this is in the section on social life reframes and it's about compliments. So here's the usual frame. Here's what we usually think about giving compliments. Usually giving compliments is awkward, creepy, or it feels manipulative, as in, you know, you're trying to get something for your compliment or something. Here's the reframe. Withholding a compliment is almost immoral. If you have a compliment in your mind about somebody and they're standing right there or you could easily reach them and you don't give them the compliment even though you're thinking it, it's almost immoral. It's free and it would be highly valuable to the person who received it. So if you have something that you could deliver for free and it would help a person, it would be immoral to not do it. So when you think about potential compliments, think of them that way. It'll make your life a lot better. People will like you better if you're good at complimenting.
How many times have I started my show by telling you there's a new study on psychedelics that make your mental health better? Well, here's another one, except this is about your physical health. Specifically, they're finding that—and they're doing more testing—but they think that psilocybin will make your brain feel more relaxed. And when you relax the brain, it releases less cortisol and inflammatory stuff. And they believe that they can get more than a temporary decrease in inflammation in your body by using psychedelics to help you get control of your mind. Because we know that psychedelics can have a temporary control on your mind. But more lately, we're finding out it could be a semi-permanent change where, you know, one small controlled dose of psilocybin could set your depression away, your anxiety away for, you know, months or years. And if that happens, in theory, your full body inflammation will be less, and that would help you with a whole bunch of stuff. So is there anything that psychedelics can't do? Not that I know of.
Sorry, it's going to be a little slow because getting to my notes is more of a challenge this morning. There you go. Which cat is this? This must be—yeah, it's Roman. Roman the cat.
All right. And apparently the mushrooms would have an advantage over steroids because it wouldn't have the side effects whereas steroids do.
All right. So here's a little update on UFOs. Tim Burchett, Representative Burchett, was on Tucker Carlson. And I guess Tim has been sort of a point person in Congress for looking into or finding out about UFOs and UAPs and all that. Now, he seems convinced that they're real because people who talk to him who seem like credible people are whispering in his ear things that sound real. And there are some people who have said things under oath at this point. He says that would suggest that we have alien bodies or alien crafts. Now I'm going to come down firmly on the side of I don't believe any of it. I do not believe we have any alien bodies. I do not believe we've ever had access to an alien craft. It's just too far for me. And the fact that, you know, we never talk to the person who is directly involved. It's always the person who talked to the person who really.
So anyway, my update is this. I don't know if that asteroid that's coming into our solar system is really an advanced spacecraft. I don't know if the pyramids or any of our early stuff were influenced in any way by aliens who visited the earth. No idea. And I certainly don't know if we have access, you know, if we're holding on to any alien bodies. But do you enjoy it as much as I do just thinking about it? I just love thinking about it. So even though I wish I could kind of believe it, I can't really get there, but it's very entertaining. So it's a very entertaining belief. So every time Tim Burchett is on, you know, I'm like, ah, got to watch all this.
All right, the news is a little bit slow today. So it might be a little more science than news today.
According to the University of South Australia, a lot of people who have mental health problems have gut problems and they think that the gut microbes might be shaping your mental health. Do you know they could have just asked? That's right, me. Because I'm always telling you that your body is your brain. And if you think of them as separate units, then you will be confused. Because if you want your brain to work better, you put better food into it, better exercise, better sleep. Your body is your brain. So should you be surprised that changing the gut microbes might make some people mentally healthier? No, you should not be surprised.
Well, I guess Trump already went to Walter Reed, got them to say that his body is 14 years younger than his chronological age. He got his flu shot and got his COVID booster. You know, he's in sort of a tough position because even though his administration is reducing the recommendations for COVID boosters all the way to, well, you know, maybe if you're over 65, maybe if you have some comorbidities, and you know, maybe if you and your doctor think so. So the sort of still-allowed recommended range is small, but he's in it. So given that he would like to be thought of as having made the right decisions during the pandemic, it'd be kind of awkward if he didn't get a booster shot, wouldn't it? But at the same time, do you really think that he feels he's safer with a booster shot? I don't know. He might. If you told me later that he only pretended to get the booster shot, I wouldn't be super surprised. But there are a lot of witnesses, so probably got the real stuff. Anyway, so I think he has to get those shots to protect his legacy. So it still looks like at least maybe the shots for the old people made sense. He doesn't really have a perfect play there.
Even Hillary Clinton has commended—she even used that word—I commend President Trump for what she calls significant progress in the Gaza situation. How do you interpret that? How do you interpret that the most dependable critic of the president, obviously somebody who has a long history of hating him, that even she was not looking for the downside? How do you interpret that? Here's how I interpret it. I think it means that she found out how to make money. Don't you think? Because what this will lead to—this whole Abraham Accords thing—if the Abraham Accords expands, it looks like it might. But at the very least it'll be massive money flowing into the area. And don't you think that Hillary Clinton may have possibly even cut a deal to say, I'll support this as long as we get a taste, as long as one of my friends gets a big contract. I'll say I'm all on board for this. There's got to be a monetary incentive there. Because if it were just purely political, I think she'd say something like, "What took you so long?" or "It's going to fall apart," or "You did part of it wrong," or "The only way you got it is working with Russia." You know, something like that. She must have found a way to make some money there.
Well, the biggest news is that China—well, I won't say they started a trade war, but they accelerated it. So the details are a little murky. Still a little fog of war going on, but it looks like they're massively tightening up on their rare earth materials, which would be a gigantic problem for the economy of the United States. And our stock market responded by going in the toilet, as did the crypto market, all responding to the fact that international trade is at great risk or some risk. I don't know if it's great risk because the smart people are saying that what China is doing is creating assets to trade away because there's big trade talks coming up. So I'm always telling you that Trump is the champion of creating something out of nothing and then trading the nothing away for something. And that looks like what China just did. So they created a something out of nothing by creating massive barriers to getting their rare earth materials. Now when they negotiate, they have something to trade away that they made out of nothing. So it's a very Trumpian approach and clearly they've studied his approach so they know how to do this stuff.
So it's too early to know if this is a big deal or just a medium big deal. It's at least a medium big deal. But what we don't know is, is it really just a bargaining chip and it will get bargained away and we just have to be uncomfortable for three months until we know what's going on with that stuff? Maybe it could also be because it's so ill-defined that it won't be bargained away. It'll be defined away as in, well, you know, now that we give you the details, we didn't mean that it would apply to any phones and then that whole category will be excluded and then we'll be like, oh, I thought it was going to be worse, but it doesn't include phones and it won't include laptops. Oh. Oh, you know. So it'll end up being defined smaller but also negotiated. So who knows? But it's a big deal. It's a big deal. I would, if I were giving advice, I would say the odds of us getting some kind of a workable solution eventually is pretty high. So I'd be gambling that it does get worked out in, I don't know, several months, maybe if you're patient. Might even be faster. Could be a lot faster if both sides feel enough pain fast enough. Anyway, so we'll keep an eye on that.
There's talk that Trump might stop by and see his little buddy, Rocket Man, Kim Jong-un, while he's over there for something else. So he would be in Seoul visiting for something else, I guess. And they're thinking that he might have a little side visit and meet with his buddy. Now, remember how I kept telling you that Trump could succeed with this Gaza stuff because he changed reality. He didn't just negotiate. He just changed how they saw the whole thing. He turned a no into a yes and made them see it as a yes. And then they started acting like it was a yes. Well, that's kind of what you do with North Korea. So the North Korea question was, "What are you going to do about them threatening to nuke us?" That was the question. And he took that question and instead of negotiating, hey, don't nuke us, we'll give you this if you don't nuke us. Or if you do nuke us, we'll do this to you. That'd be more like direct negotiating. You just change the reality. So the reality was it looked like we were some kind of enemies and he just reframed it to we're friends. Oh, we're friends. You're my buddy. I'd like to come visit my friend. And then suddenly it didn't really make sense to be threatening each other with nuclear annihilation because he just reframed reality to why enemy? Who's your enemy? I'm not your enemy. I'm your friend. Let's get together. So only he can do that. That is a pure Trump play that's just not available to other people. They just wouldn't be able to pull it off. So we'll see if that happens. Should happen.
Well, I guess the government and Russ Vought is doing the layoffs they promised. He's the budget director. So they're going to use the government shutdown as their excuse to fire a bunch of Democrats who are working for the government or not for long, I guess. So I don't know if there'll be some kind of court cases to the firing. I feel like there will, right? Won't there be a rogue judge who says, "Well, we must block this nationwide." Seems like it. Seems like it.
Well, there's some thought and Speaker Johnson's kind of worked up about this. You can see why that the Democrats might want to keep the government closed to make it a better No Kings rally a week from now on October 18th. So there's another one of those big artificial paid-for rallies that are being planned, the No Kings. And I guess the No Kings rally wouldn't have enough to talk about because the Middle East is all solved. They wouldn't have enough to talk about unless the government was closed. So they'd have a good complaint. Ah, that mean old Trump closing that government. So it looks like the Democrats for that reason alone to support their fake paid protest so that they can pretend that there's more resistance to Trump than there is. They might keep the government closed. Like that would be one of the reasons to keep it closed. Oh my god, our government is terrible. At least half of it is.
Anyway, well, I don't know if that's the real reason, but I saw one of the organizers of that No Kings rally, and he was walking this real fine line because he wanted people to feel outraged about what's happening in the country so that they would be incentivized to go to the protest. So he wants them to feel unhappy to go to the protest, but he wanted to sell the protest as a good time so that more people would go because he's in the business of organizing protests. So he tried to tell you how much fun you would have with meeting new people and having friends and it'd be a nice day out. And he was trying to sell them at the same time that we're suffering this existential threat to our democracy. And by the way, it'll be a good time. Yeah, it's like a party. Oh, did I mention it's an existential threat to the entire country, but you'll meet some nice people. It's more about the nice people you meet along the way. And he totally can't sell it because you just can't do those same things at the same time. And watching how artificial and fake it is and then hearing that they might keep the government closed just to get enough people to go to the fake stupid completely irrational protests. Wow, good work, Democrats.
So one of the questions people had about this Letitia James indictment for bank fraud, they say, is are these claims going to hold up or is it just a bunch of BS and her lawyers will get it wiped away pretty soon? Well, I saw a gentleman on X who goes by the name SMB Attorney and he had an explanation about what probably went on with this bank loan fraud stuff based on his experience as years as a mortgage banker. Right? So he's going to give you inside information about a mortgage banker's knowledge of how this may or may not have happened. Now, what I'm talking about is Letitia James, the AG, who's been indicted for bank fraud, allegedly. Let's see what she claimed that she classified a property intentionally wrong or accidentally wrong. So that's what we're going to determine. But here's SMB Attorney describing what you need to know, some context.
All right. So first of all, he has lots of experience in that business. He was a mortgage lender for years, mortgage banker for years. He goes, "Here's the deal. How you classify a property as a primary, secondary, or investment home changes everything about the loan. The down payment, the interest rate, the underwriting, all of it. Primary or secondary homes can get by with as little as 3 to 10% down. Investment property usually requires 25% or more. So if you're a brand new real estate investor with limited cash, there's a big incentive to call something a second home instead of an investment property. But that's why lenders make you sign a second home rider, a separate document where you specifically promise you'll use it as a second residence and not rent it out. You also assert like nine times in the application process it will be owner occupied." This is good. This is good background stuff. I was a banker so I'm nerding in on this a little bit more.
And then SMB Attorney says, "Could this kind of thing ever be an honest mistake?" I doubt it. The facts, at least as reported, look pretty bad. You buy a house, say it's a second home, immediately rent it out, tell your insurer it's owner occupied, and then report rental income on your taxes. He goes, "That's not a misunderstanding. That's a pattern."
Now, remember the documentary effect that I warned you about? I've just given you one side of an argument with no attention to any counterargument. So it's pretty convincing, isn't it? When you heard that, didn't you say to yourself, "Oh man, she's fried. There's no way she's going to get out of that." Right? That's the documentary effect because you only heard one side of an argument. I don't know if there's another side of the argument, but I think they're pleading innocent. So that would suggest that they do have an argument. The fact that you haven't heard that argument at all should be at the top of your mind. You should be saying to yourself, "Yeah, but they do have an argument. We just haven't heard it yet." Okay, is that fair? Because I knew that that would be super persuasive. But don't be too persuaded by it. She—I still think it's unlikely that she'd have any jail time. I guess there's the possibility that there could be years and years of jail, but the reality for first offender for something like this time, you know, probably not. Suspended sentence, you know, and but there could be a fine according to Grok up to like half a million dollars. So it could be really expensive.
Anyway, as you know, President Trump did not win a Nobel Prize because the Nobel Prize that they're giving this year is mostly for stuff that happened last year and before. And most of his accomplishments happened this year. So it's not really a slap in the face or anything. It's just the way the process works, I think. But the woman who did win it, Maria Corina Machado, I guess she would be a freedom fighter for Venezuela, she was smart enough to call him and actually tell him personally, I'm accepting this in honor of you because you really deserved it. And then Trump got to tell that story that the person who won it called him and said that he deserved it. That's pretty good. Now, it makes you understand why she won the Nobel Peace Prize because how smart was that? That was so smart to call him immediately and give him credit and say, you know, you should have won because she needs him 100% to get whatever it is she wants, you know, for Venezuela. And talk about the best way you could get him on your side. So I don't know much about her but I know that if she got the attention of the Nobel Prize people there's something of substance there and then the one thing we observe is so on point that you just say okay there's some substance there so keep an eye on this one.
So maybe and then here's the extra fun of this. It could be that the only way that Trump could succeed with Venezuela to sort of decartelize it is if he's got somebody as strong as her to be the backstop, you know, the person who could actually become the new leader. So his fate and hers could be quite tied. You know, you don't get the Nobel Peace Prize if between now and the next time they award it you've started a war. Unless you finished it pretty quickly. So she could be the key to have some kind of relatively rapid wrap up of things in Venezuela in a positive way for the Venezuelans. So keep an eye on that relationship. That might really have some legs.
Meanwhile, Melania Trump continues to be awesome. I guess she worked on a deal separately with Putin to get some Ukrainian children released back to Ukraine and it was successful. Didn't seem like she got much pushback, if any. And I'm going to give of course Melania full credit because the Trumps are the world champions at getting hostages back, you know, getting prisoners back. Nobody's ever done this better. I mean, right? And nobody's even been close. This is unbelievable success in getting people back. Now Melania is doing it. So she's got her—she says now she has an open channel of communication with Putin.
So here's what I like about Putin's persuasion game. Don't misquote me. I didn't say I like Putin. I'm just saying that he's got a really strong persuasion game and the fact that he's playing so nice with Melania. It's just more of that it is so smart that he's extra nice to Melania and that there's just no friction whatsoever is created in that domain and it looks like he you know it looks like he's saving a cat and you know being the good guy. So he buys a whole bunch of goodwill for nothing. So both of them did a good job on that. Melania and Putin if you're just looking at the persuasion game.
Well, I saw a post by Masimo on X. And apparently there's some kind of breakthrough brain scan technique where they claim that Japanese scientists claim they can detect long COVID. Do you believe that? Do you believe that Japanese scientists have a new brain scan where they can actually find if you're suffering from long COVID by looking at part of your brain? I'm going to say I'm not even sure long COVID is real. Are we so sure it's real that if you look at the scan, you can see it? I don't know. Do you believe they could see if it were the vaccine injury instead? Do you think they could see that with their advanced scan? I don't know. I don't know. So and whenever I see Japanese breakthroughs, I kind of give them a little less credibility. Do you do that too? I feel like they at least just from an anecdotal perspective, I don't have any data on this, but it seems like the Japanese might be and maybe the South Koreans might be a little bit of overclaimers when it comes to science. You know what I mean? Just a little bit.
Well, podcaster, journalist—I don't know what he would call himself, but let's say podcaster, journalist, independent journalist—Benny Johnson has announced that apparently there was somebody been threatening his family and he got Pam Bondi involved and that person got arrested. So somebody had threatened to kill his wife and kids and nothing in person, I guess, just sent a letter. Who would be dumb enough to send a physical letter threatening somebody's life? How old do you have to be to think that that's the way to go about that? Like to write a physical letter threatening somebody's life? Wow.
Well, so good on you, Benny Johnson, for fighting back against that, being aggressive, and I'm glad that Bondi is responding to that.
Well, apparently Trump has now struck a deal with big pharma company AstraZeneca for what is being reported by Just the News as offering what do they call it the most favored nation pricing now. So that's what the news is, but I don't believe the news because here's the problem. In order for these big pharma companies to do what Trump wants, which is to give the United States the same low pricing as, you know, the best price another country gets, there is such a difference that the only way they can maintain their profitability if they were to lower the US prices since we're the biggest market. The only way they could do that is to massively increase their prices for third world countries until they wouldn't be able to afford their meds. Or is there some third thing I don't know about? They either have to not do it and keep making their money and hoping they get away with it or if they lower—if they actually do this and give the US the same prices as the lowest price. There isn't any way they could maintain profitability. So how did they do this? There's something in the story that's missing, right? Would you agree? There's something missing. It's either limited to just a few drugs because I think that's what—was it Pfizer? I think Pfizer was just limited to a few drugs. So it sounded like it was a bigger deal than it was. I didn't see that this is limited, but it's got to be limited somehow. There's no way they can just lower their prices.
Well, Gavin Newsom is doing his Gavin Newsom jazz hands cursing thing, which he believes is how he will jazz hands curse himself into the presidency. And he's playing this childlike mental game with Joe Rogan to try to get invited on the Joe Rogan podcast because Joe said some negative things about his chances of being president. And so here's how he responds to that. He boasted that he was quote punching back at that quote son of a bitch Joe Rogan. He said, "Joe, why won't you have me on the show?" He was on another podcast when he said this. He said, "He won't have me on the show. It's a one way and he has guests coming on attacking and bashing, but he won't have me on the show. Full stop. He should have me on the show." And basically challenged him to do it.
Now, does it seem to you that cursing and insulting Joe Rogan is how you get him to invite you on the show? Now, I will admit that it probably does stimulate Joe's competitive instincts and it probably makes him curious about what would happen. You know, it probably does make him want to invite him. On the other hand, you can't invite somebody if they do it that way. He's sort of eliminating himself by the way he's doing it. But at the same time, he probably—I can't read his mind, of course, but if I were Joe, I'd be thinking, "Damn it, I do want to invite you. But I can't do it now because you're so obviously trying to manipulate me in front of the public. I can't just like bow to the manipulation. I can't do it because you swore at me. It's going to look like I invited you because you cursed at me. So I'm going to guess that he doesn't get an invitation, but I could be wrong about that. I could be wrong. Again, I can't read anybody's mind. So Joe might just say, 'All right, this is fun.' And that might be the end of it. This would be fun. If he thinks it's fun, well, that's the end of the conversation. It'd be fun. Go ahead and do it." It would definitely make news.
You know what else? Joe Rogan could end Newsom's run for president without even really trying hard because I don't think Newsom's ever been challenged in quite the way that maybe he should be. And I think that Joe could pull that off probably better than anybody. Probably this—what else—using the word punching. I'm punching Joe Rogan. Oh, and then he goes, he's going to dismiss it. He's going to laugh it off. Tough guy and all that, but is he going to have me on? I don't know. It is kind of high school funny. Like I can't really turn away because he does make me watch. So that's one of the things that Newsom does well. He does make you not be able to turn away. You just got to watch whatever he's doing. So he's got that going for him.
So apparently the left has decided that their talking point about Antifa is that it really doesn't exist. Isn't that wild? And they can somewhat get away with it. Probably 40 to 50% of all the public will think that Antifa doesn't exist because they're going to hear that repeated over and over. Well, there's no Antifa. Well, what are those gigantic crowds of people that call themselves Antifa? Oh, that's just spontaneously organized people who just have an affinity for it. No, no, but it's not like they have a leadership. Well, how are they collecting money if they don't have a leadership? Well, okay. Well, they have some ways for money to get around, but not in a leadership way. Well, how do they decide who gets what money? Well, so but one of the people is Jimmy Kimmel. So he was mocking Christine Noem, I guess, and referring to Antifa as quote an entirely imaginary organization. And then some other people, there were some other talking heads that people had captured saying the same thing. Oh, it's imaginary. It's imaginary. And but they were the ones who were saying it's imaginary were saying it's not like the Proud Boys or the Patriot Front. Because they said those are real organizations, not like Antifa. That's just totally imaginary.
So I went to Grok and I said, "How many people are in the Proud Boys?" And the estimate was from 300 to 3,000. I guess at one point might have been a few thousand more than that, but it's losing a little bit of its esteem. But what if the Proud Boys is really only 300 people? And then I asked it about the Patriot Front because that was also mentioned and it said there were 200 to 300 people. This is in the entire nation. Don't you think that every single Antifa event had more than 300 people and more than a thousand? Probably. There's so many more Antifa people than there are Proud Boys or Patriot Front. So many more now, but there's no estimate. Grok doesn't have an estimate for Antifa. But don't you think if you did some kind of a survey, just asked people if they're Antifa, you guess something like 1%, which would be a lot of people. Definitely more than the Proud Boys and the Patriot Front.
So now we're hearing a little bit more about how this deal with Gaza got done. We're hearing that Jared Kushner might have been far more important to the process than has been reported so far. So that's one thing that it looks like. And it looks like Qatar—or Qatar as you like to say—is maybe one of the big stories behind the curtain. So Qatar wanted some things, but we wanted some things from Qatar, which is to back a peace deal. And what Qatar wanted was I guess they got some dedicated space where they can test their jets that we're selling them, the ones we're selling them. They can test them and train in the United States within the bounds of some American base. They'll have their own little space, but it'll be controlled by America. So they don't have their own base. They would just have some space for training that they would pay for that would be on an American base because apparently their country is so small they don't really have a good place to test jets. So they'll test them here, they'll buy them here, they'll put billions of dollars into buying more of them here. So it turns out it was a good deal for us because we sell some more jets and we'll have a place that they can test them so they feel comfortable getting them. And apparently Qatar wanted to get in better with the United States and not be seen as half a terrorist supporter and half a supporter of the West. You know, they want to be more on the clean side of things. So it's sort of a way for them to reposition themselves with the United States entirely by doing something for us that presumably will get them some favors in return. So Qatar seems to be a big part of the backstory. And the fact that we were able to cut a deal with Qatar probably has a lot to do with how we got to this point. And like I said, if Hillary Clinton is saying yes, it must be that there's so much money that's going to be funneled into that area for rebuilding and the Abraham Accords and everything else that probably all the big money people just said cha-ching. You know, I'm just guessing like did all the bankers just say, "All right, we can make some money on this." Did all the construction people, the Bechtels, did all the military-industrial complex people say, "Oh man, we can make some money on this." I think so, probably. You know, the hotel industry, probably the oil industry. I don't know. Maybe not. But it does seem to me like everybody just said, "Why don't we just make some money and we're done with this terrorism stuff?"
Let's see if I can get what's left of my notes here. So that's happening. Let's see what else is happening. One moment, please.
So according to a Harvard CAPS-Harris poll, 71% of Americans support Trump's strikes on the smuggling boats, the ones off of Venezuela. Republicans like it a lot, 89%, independents 67%, and even Democrats by a majority, 56%. So to me, this is another one of those Trump takes the strong side of the question and even if it doesn't work out, he's still the one who took the strong side of the issue. So I'm loving that.
Well, there's a new report, Wall Street Journal, that the wine industry in California where I am is having a tough time for two reasons. One, people are just drinking less. But number two, apparently the weather was unusually good. So that global warming stuff turned out to be one of the best summers ever. So there's like just a crap ton of grapes. So we have way too many grapes at the same time that there's lower demand. So the wine business is falling apart. It's California, so you know that the Hollywood movie making business has already fallen apart. And if we did not have a boom in AI, even the tech business would look like it's winding down. So California is sort of looking good, but only because of AI. I think I don't think there's anything else driving anything else. And AI is probably going to put quite a load on our energy infrastructure. So somehow California just keeps floating along, but I feel like we keep getting closer and closer to the edge. Yeah. How many entire industries could you wipe out in California and still have a state? I guess we're going to find out.
And the crypto market went to hell, as you know. But I don't know how much you should worry about the crypto market. Isn't the very nature of it that it's volatile and that if you're just in the weird little cryptos, you know, it was a big risk and if you're in Bitcoin, you're probably going to hodl it, which is hold it. So you probably don't care. I don't know. Is anybody panicked about crypto or you just sort of watching it? I think I would just watch it at this point.
You know, I kept telling you that there are all these tests going on for a vaccine to cure cancer or to keep it from happening. Here's another one. There's another next-gen vaccine to prevent up to 88% of multiple aggressive cancers according to Paul McClure in The New Atlas. So you don't need to know too much more about this one because I went to Grok and I said how many current trials are there where somebody's trying to fix cancer with a vaccine where they made the vaccine out of usually something about your body. So it's about you specifically the vaccine is and I said there were seven of them. So there were seven ongoing trials that were cancer vaccines. Now, I don't think any of them will be ready in time, you know, to save me. But it does look like maybe there's something there, you know, maybe for the rest of you. I'll see if I can last long enough to get to the vaccines, but it does look like some of that's going to work. Works on animals anyway. So working on animals is only like a one in 20 chance that it's going to work on humans.
The Portland Police Union is welcoming the federal help, you know, the federal troops. Whereas the government is saying, "We don't need no federal troops. We don't have a problem here." And so the Portland violence is also being called imaginary. So now we're being told that Antifa is an imaginary group and that the violence around the ICE facilities and stuff in Portland is also so small that if you imagine it's a big problem, that's just imaginary. And I don't know what is right. Is it possible that the news is exaggerating the real danger in Portland? Because I think it could be a little of both. It could be that the danger is not that great, but at the same time, the police do want help because the police have been degraded so much that they can't even handle a modest threat. So it could be a combination of not enough police and a little bit of trouble that wouldn't ordinarily be a lot of trouble because you would have a lot of police. So I don't know what's true there, but once again, as long as Trump takes the strong approach and he's the one who's looking to clamp down on crime and Portland is looking like the ones they don't care as much about crime, Trump wins. I think he wins just by being the strong one.
MIT says they have a new gene editing tool. Sounds kind of boring and nerdlike, but it would be 60 times fewer mistakes than before. Because, you know, gene editing, if you could do gene editing quickly and efficiently and economically, there's a whole bunch of stuff you can fix. And this is just a movement in the right direction. But if they could actually make that much of an improvement in the gene editing technology, well, you might get yourself a new head, you know, that new head you've been wanting. It's getting closer.
All right, that's all I have for today. It is a Saturday, so you should be petting your cats and having a good time.
I did promise you that I would read you a reframe from my book, Reframe Your Brain. I started with one, but I think I'm going to randomly pick another one because they're so useful. If this works out, maybe I'll make it a thing. So it's from my book, Reframe Your Brain. And I'll just pick the first one from the social life category. There's reframes for every domain, but in the social life reframe, the first one is the old frame used to be "be yourself." Anybody ever used to give you that advice to be yourself? Terrible advice. Here's the reframe. Become a better version of yourself. If you're satisfied being yourself, people aren't going to want to be around you. You're not that good. You need some work and you should admit that you're a work in progress. People will like you better if you admit you've got some work to do. Try being better. You should be working on some kind of a system or a process or finding some way to be the improved version of yourself. You should be getting smarter, healthier. You should become wiser, kinder. You should be trying to get your depression down and get your mental health better. You should be trying to get different in every possible way.
People ask me—I've told you this story before—but people asked me if when I hit it big with Dilbert and I went from not having money to—well, people asked me if being famous and successful changed me. Did it change me? And I'd always laugh and say, "Well, I hope so. That was the whole point. Why would I go through all that work to be the same person?" The whole everything that I do has at least a secondary ambition of changing me. Like I don't go to the gym because it doesn't change me. I don't work hard in my career because it won't change me. I do it so it will. If I want to feel confident, what am I supposed to do? Just sit in a chair and try to gin up some confidence. No, I'm going to go do something and then if it works, guess what? I get more confident. So no, I'm every day in every way I'm trying to figure out how to be like a little bit better version of myself. So if anybody ever tells you the key to success is be yourself, you're getting some bad advice. Be better. Just be better.
All right, that is your reframe of the day. Owen Gregorian will be hosting a spaces right after this. Give him a few minutes to—you can't become a millionaire without becoming the kind of person who becomes a millionaire. Exactly. Exactly.
All right. So Owen Gregorian, just go to X and you can search for his name and it'll pop up the spaces. And I'm going to say a few words to the Locals people, my beloved Locals people and the rest of you. I'll see you tomorrow. Thanks for coming.
Good morning everybody.
Come on in here and I hope you have a cat in your lap.
That is the perfect way to watch the show.
You should have a beverage by your dominant hand.
Your non-dominant hand should be petting a cat like this.
And then you know you're almost ready for the show.
If only I could get to my notes.
All right.
First, I'm going to get my comments working on this other screen.
We'll get back to you.
You'll let me get this.
You mind?
Do you mind?
Good morning everybody and welcome to the highlights of human civilization.
It's called Scott Adams.
You've never had a better time.
But if you'd like to take a chance of elevating your experience up to levels that no one can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains.
All you need for that is a cup, a mug or a glass, a tanker, shell, a st, a canteen, jug or flask, a vessel of any kind, and a cat.
Fill it with your favorite liquid.
I like coffee.
Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine day of the day.
The thing that makes everything better.
Here you go.
This one's for you.
It's called the simultaneous sip.
It happens now.
All right, everybody.
Good.
We're all good now.
Good.
Well, at the end of today's podcast, I'll probably have a uh reframe to change your life from my book, Reframe Your Brain.
So, don't leave before you get that.
No.
No.
Why in the world can I not find my own comments?
There we go.
Success.
Boom.
Boom.
All right.
As tradition dictates, Owen Gregorian will be hosting a spaces event immediately after, well, somewhat immediately after we're done here today.
And you can find that just by searching on X for Owen Gregorian and look for the spaces notification.
So, um, I do not have a source for this next, well, the fir first story, but, uh, I saw somebody say it and I knew it was true, so I'm going to repeat it.
They they did a study to find out what is it that women can say to men that would make the men feel as good as when the men say to the women, "I love you." Does anybody know the answer?
What what two words?
The the answer is thank you.
So apparently if you say thank you and show appreciation to a man, his brain lights up about the same as if you had said I love you to a woman.
How many women knew that?
Now, I've always thought that one of the problems with the relationships is that people feel like it's a power battle and that if you if you show appreciation to somebody, you're giving up your power and it's like you owe them.
If you say thank you to your mate, it's like, oh, now I owe you something.
So, I feel like people don't want to say thank you too much.
Actually, I'm going to skip ahead.
I told you that uh I might read a reframe from my book reframe your brain but I think I'll do it right now.
So this is in the section on social life reframes and it's about uh compliments and uh so here's the usual frame.
Here's what we usually think about giving compliments.
Um, usually giving compliments is awkward, creepy, or it feels manipulative, as in, you know, you're trying to guess something for your compliment or something.
Here's the reframe.
Withholding a compliment is almost immoral.
If you have a compliment in your mind about somebody and they're standing right there or you could easily reach them and you don't give them the compliment even though you're thinking it, it's almost immoral.
It's free and it would be highly valuable to the person who received it.
So if you have something that you could deliver for free and and it would help a person, it would be immoral to not do it.
So, when you think about potential compliments, think of them that way.
It'll make your life a lot better.
People will like you better if you're good at complimenting.
How many times have I started my show by telling you there's a new study on psychedelics that make your mental health better?
Well, here's another one, except this is about your physical health.
Specifically, they're finding that, and they're doing more testing, but they think that uh psilocybin will make your brain feel more relaxed.
And when you relax the brain, it releases less cortisol and inflammatory stuff.
And they believe that they can get more than a temporary more than a temporary decrease in inflammation in your body by using psychedelics to help you get control of your mind.
Because we know that psychedelics can have a temporary control on your mind.
But more lately, we're finding out it could be a semi-permanent change where, you know, one small controlled dose of psilocybin could set your depression away, your anxiety away for, you know, months or years.
And if that happens, in theory, your your full body inflammation will be less, and that would help you with a whole bunch of stuff.
So, is there anything that psychedelics can't do?
Not that I know of.
Sorry, it's going to be a little slow because getting to my notes is more of a challenge this morning.
There you go.
Which cat is this?
This must be Yeah, it's Roman.
Roman the cat.
All right.
Um and uh apparently the uh the mushrooms that would have a advantage over steroids because it wouldn't have a side effect whereas steroids do.
All right.
So here's a little update on UFOs.
Tim Burchett.
Uh, Representative Burchett was on Tucker Carlson.
And I guess Tim has been sort of a point person in Congress for looking into or finding out about UFOs and UAPs and all that.
Now, he seems convinced that they're real because people who talk to him who seem like credible people are whispering in his ear things that sound real.
And uh there are some people who have said things under oath at this point.
He says that would suggest that we have alien bodies or alien crafts.
Now I'm going to I'm going to come down firmly on the side of I don't believe any of it.
I do not believe we have any alien bodies.
I do not believe we've ever had access to an alien craft.
It's just too far for me.
and the fact that you know we never we never talk to the person who is directly involved.
It's always the person who talked to the person really.
So anyway uh so my update is this.
I don't know if that asteroid that's coming into our solar system is really a advanced spacecraft.
I don't know if the pyramids or any of our early stuff were influenced in any way by aliens who invisited the earth.
No idea.
And I I certainly don't know if we have access, you know, if we're holding on to any alien bodies.
But do you enjoy it as much as I do just thinking about it?
I just love thinking about it.
So even though I I wish I could kind of believe it, I can't really get there, but it's very entertaining.
So it's very entertaining belief.
So every time Tim Buret is Buret is on, you know, I'm like ah got to watch all this.
All right, the new the news is uh a little bit slow today.
So might be a little more science than the news today.
Um, according to the University of South Australia, a lot of people who have mental health problems have gut problems and they think that the gut microbes might be shaping your mental health.
Do you know they could have just asked?
That's right, me.
Cuz I always I'm always telling you that your your body is your your brain.
And if you think of them as separate units, then you will be confused.
Because if you want your brain to work better, you put better food into it, better exercise, better sleep.
Your your body is your brain.
So should you be surprised that changing the gut micro might make some people mentally healthier?
No, you should not be surprised.
Well, I guess Trump already went to Walter Reed, got them to say that he's his body is 14 years younger than his chronological age.
He got his flu shot and got his COVID booster.
you know, he's in sort of a tough position because even though his administration is, you know, reducing the recommendations for COVID boosters all the way to well, you know, maybe if you're over 65, maybe if you have some co-orbidities, and you know, maybe if you and your doctor think so, you know, so that so the sort of still allowed recommended range is small, but he's in it.
So given that he would like to be thought of as having made the right decisions during the pandemic, it'd be kind of awkward if he didn't get a booster shot, wouldn't it?
But at the same time, do you really think that that he feels he's safer with a booster shot?
I don't know.
He might be if you told me later that he only pretended to get the booster shot, I wouldn't be super surprised.
But there a lot of witnesses, so probably got the real stuff.
Anyway, so I think he has to get those shots to protect his legacy.
So it still looks like at least maybe the shots for the old people made sense.
He doesn't really have a perfect uh play there.
Um, even Hillary Clinton has commended, she even used that word, I commend uh, President Trump for the what she calls significant progress in the the Gaza situation.
How do you interpret that?
How do you interpret that the you know most dependable critic of the president obviously somebody thwarted uh who has a long history of hating him that even she was not looking for the downside.
How do you interpret that?
Here's how I interpret it.
Yeah.
I think it means that she found out how to make money.
Don't you think?
because what this will lead to this whole Abraham Accord thing if the Abraham Accords expands it looks like it might uh but at the very least it'll be massive money flowing into the area and don't you think that Hillary Clinton may have possibly even cut a deal to say I'll support this as long as we get a taste you as long as one of my one of my friends gets a big contract I'll I'll say, "I'm all on board for this." There's got to be a monetary incentive there.
Cuz if it were just purely political, I think she'd say something like, "What took you so long?" or "It's going to fall apart," or, "You did part of it wrong." Or, "The only way you got it is working with Russia." You know, something like that.
She must have found a way to make some money there.
Well, the biggest news is that China start uh well, I won't say they started a trade war, but they accelerated it.
So, the the details are a little murky.
Still a little fog of war going on, but looks like they're massively tightening up on their rare earth materials, which would be a gigantic problem for the economy of the United States.
And our stock market responded by going in the toilet as did the crypto market all responding to the fact that uh international trade is at great risk uh or some risk.
I don't I don't know if it's great risk because the smart people are saying that what China is doing is creating assets to trade away because there's a big trade talks coming up.
So, I'm always telling you that uh Trump is the champion of creating something out of nothing and then trading the nothing away for something.
And that looks like what China just did.
So, uh they created a something out of nothing by creating massive barriers to getting their rare earth materials.
Now, when they negotiate, they have something to trade away that they made out of nothing.
So, it's a very Trumpian approach and clearly they've studied his approach so they know how to do this stuff.
Um, so it's too early to know if this is a big deal or just a medium big deal.
It's at least a medium big deal.
But what we don't know is is it really just a bargaining chip and it will get bargained away and you know we just have to be uncomfortable for 3 months until we know what's going on with that stuff.
Maybe could also be because it's so illdefined that it won't be bargained away.
It'll be defined away as in well, you know, now that we give you the details, we didn't mean that it would apply to any phones and then that like whole category will be excluded and then we'll be like, oh, I thought it was going to be worse, but doesn't include phones and it won't include laptops.
Oh.
Oh, you know.
So, so it'll end up being defined smaller but also negotiated.
So, who knows?
Uh, but it's a big deal.
It's a big deal.
I would uh if I were giving advice, I would say the odds of us getting some kind of a workable solution eventually is pretty high.
So, I'd be gambling that it does get worked out in, I don't know, several months, maybe if you're patient.
Might even be faster.
Could be a lot faster if both sides feel enough pain fast enough.
Anyway, so we'll keep an eye on that.
Um, there's talk that Trump might stop by and see his little buddy, Rocket Man, Kim Jong-un, while he's uh um over there for something else.
So, he would be in Soul uh visiting for something else, I guess.
And uh they're thinking that he might uh have a little side visit and meet with his buddy.
Now, remember how I I kept telling you that uh Trump could succeed with this Gaza stuff because he changed reality.
He didn't just negotiate.
He just changed how they saw the whole thing.
He he turned a no into a yes and made them see it as a yes.
And then they started acting like it was a yes.
Well, that's kind of what you do with North Korea.
So the the the North Korea question was, "What are you going to do about them threatening to nuke us?" That was the question.
And and he took that question and instead of negotiating, hey, don't nuke us, we'll we'll give you this if you don't nuke us.
Or if you do nuke us, we'll do this to you.
That'd be more like direct negotiating.
You just change the reality.
So the reality was it looked like we were some kind of enemies and he just reframed it to we're friends.
Oh, we're friends.
You're my buddy.
I'd like to come visit my friend.
And then suddenly it didn't really make sense to me to be threatening each other with nuclear annihilation because he just reframed reality to why enemy.
Who's your enemy?
I'm not your enemy.
I'm your friend.
Let's get together.
So only he can do that.
That is a pure Trump play that's just it's just not available to other people.
They they just wouldn't be able to pull it off.
So we'll see if that happens.
Should happen.
Well, I guess the government and Russ vote is doing the layoffs they promise.
He's the budget director.
So, uh, they're going to use it use the government shutdown as their excuse to fire a bunch of Democrats who are working for the government or not for long, I guess.
So, I don't know if there'll be some kind of court cases to the firing.
I feel like there will, right?
Won't there be a rogue judge who says, "Well, we must block this nationwide." Seems like it.
Seems like it.
Well, there's some thought and Speaker Johnson's kind of worked up about this.
You can see why that uh that the Democrats might want to keep the the government closed to make it a better no kings rally a week from now um on October 18th.
So, so there's another one of those big uh artificial um paid for rallies that that are being planned, the no kings.
And I guess the no kings rally wouldn't have enough to talk about because because the Middle East is all solved.
They wouldn't have enough to talk about unless they uh unless the government was closed.
So, they'd have, you know, a good complaint.
Ah, that mean old Trump closing that government.
So it looks like the Democrats for that reason alone to support their fake paid protest so that it so they can pretend that there's more resistance to Trump than there is.
They might keep the government closed.
Like that would be one of the reasons to keep it closed.
Oh my god, our government is terrible.
At least half of it is.
Anyway, well, I don't know if that's the real reason, but I I was saw one of the organizers of that no kings uh rally, and he was walking this real fine line because he wanted people to feel outraged about what's happening in the country so that they would be incentivized to go to the, you know, go to the protest.
So he wants them to feel unhappy to go to the protest, but he wanted to sell the protest as a good time so that more people would go because he's in the business of organizing protests.
So he tried to tell you how much fun you would have with, you know, meeting new meeting new people and having friends and it'd be a nice day out.
And he was trying to sell them at the same time that, you know, that we're suffering this existential threat to our democracy.
And by the way, it'll be a good time.
Yeah, it's it's like a party.
Oh, did I mention it's an existential threat to the entire country, but but but you'll meet some nice people.
It's more about the nice people you meet along the way.
And he totally can't sell it because you just can't do those same same things at the same time.
and uh watching how artificial and fake it is and then hearing that they might keep the government closed just to get enough people to go to the fake stupid uh completely irrational protests.
Wow, good work, Democrats.
So, you know, one of the questions people had about this Leticia James um indictment for bank fraud, they say, is are these real are these claims going to hold up or is it just a bunch of BS and her lawyers will, you know, get it wiped away pretty soon?
Well, I saw a gentleman on X who goes by the name SMB attorney and he had an explanation about um what probably went on with this bank loan fraud stuff based on his experience as years as a mortgage banker.
Right?
So, he's going to give you inside information about a mortgage banker's knowledge of how this may or may not have happened.
Now, what I'm talking about is um Leticia James, the AG, who's been indicted for bank fraud, allegedly uh let's see what she claimed that uh how she she classified a property intentionally wrong or or accidentally wrong.
So, that's what we're going to determine.
But here's SMB attorney describing what uh what you need to know some context.
All right.
So, first of all, he has lots of experience in that business.
He was a mortgage lender for years, mortgage banker for years.
He goes, "Here's the deal.
How you classify a property as a primary, secondary, or investment home changes everything about the loan.
The down payment, the interest rate, the underwriting, all of it.
Primary or secondary homes can get by with as little as 3 to 15 3 to 10% down.
Investment property usually requires 25% or more.
So, if you're a brand new real estate investor with limited cash, there's a big incentive to call something a second home instead of an investment property.
But that's what u but that's why lenders make you sign a second home rider, a separate document where you specifically promise you'll use it as a second residence and not rent it out.
You also assert like nine times in the application process it will be owner occupied.
This is good.
This is good background stuff.
I was a banker so I'm nerding in on this a little bit more.
Um and then SMB attorney says, "Could this kind of thing ever be an honest mistake?" I doubt it.
The facts, at least as reported, look pretty bad.
You buy a house, say it's a second home, immediately rent it out, tell your insurer it's owner occupied, and then report rental income on your taxes.
He goes, "That's not a misunderstanding.
That's a pattern." Now, remember the documentary effect that I warned you about?
I've just given you one side of an argument with no no attention to any counterargument.
So, it's pretty it's pretty convincing, isn't it?
When you heard that, didn't you say to yourself, "Oh man, she's fried.
There's no way she's going to get out of that." Right?
That's the documentary effect because you only heard one side of an argument.
I don't know if there's another side of the argument, but I think they're pleading innocent.
So, that would suggest that they do have an argument.
The fact that you haven't heard that argument at all should should be at the top of your mind.
You should be saying to yourself, "Yeah, but they do have an argument.
We just haven't heard it yet." Okay, is that fair?
Cuz I knew that that would be super persuasive.
But don't be too persuaded by it.
She uh I still think it's unlikely that she'd have any jail time.
Um, I guess there's the possibility that there could be years and years of jail, but the reality for first offender for something like this time, you know, probably not suspended sentence, you know, and uh but there could be a fine according to Grock up to like half a million dollars.
So, it could be really expensive.
Anyway, um as you know, President Trump did not win a Nobel Prize because the Nobel Prize that they're giving this year is mostly for stuff that happened last year and before.
And most of uh his accomplishments happened this year.
So, it's no, it's not really a slap in the face or anything.
It's just the way the process works, I think.
But the the woman who did win it, Maria Karina Mashada, I guess um she would be a freedom fighter for Venezuela, she was smart enough to call him and actually tell him personally, I'm accepting this in honor of you because you really deserved it.
And then Trump got to tell that story that the person who won it called him and said that he deserved it.
That's pretty good.
Now, it makes you it makes you understand why she won the Nobel Peace Prize because how smart was that?
That was so smart to call him immediately and give him credit and say, you know, you should have won cuz she needs him 100% to get whatever it is she wants, you know, for Venezuela.
And uh talk about talk about the best way you could get him on your side.
So I don't know much about her but I know that if she you know got the attention of the Nobel Prize people there's there's something of substance there and then the one thing we observe is so so on point that you just say okay there's there's some substance there so keep an eye on this one.
So maybe and and then here's the you know the extra fun of this.
It could be that the only way that Trump could succeed with Venezuela to sort of decartellitize it is if he's got somebody as strong as her to be the the backs stop, you know, the person who could actually become the new leader.
So his fate and hers are could be quite tied.
You know, you don't get the uh Nobel Peace Prize if between now and the next time they award it uh you've started a war.
unless you finished it pretty quickly.
So, she could be the key to have some kind of relatively rapid wrap up of of things in Venezuela in a positive way for the Venezuelans.
So, keep an eye on that relationship.
That that might really have some legs.
Meanwhile, Melania Trump continues to be awesome.
I guess she worked on a deal separately with uh Putin to get some Ukrainian children released back to Ukraine and it was successful.
Didn't seem like she got much push back, if any.
And um I'm going to I'm going to give of course Melania full credit because the Trumps are the world champions at getting hostages back, you know, getting getting prisoners back.
No, nobody's ever done this better.
I mean, right?
And nobody's even been close.
This this is unbelievable um success in getting people back.
Now, Melania is doing it.
So, she's got her she says now she has an open channel of communication with Putin.
So, here's what I like about um Putin's persuasion game.
Don't misquote me.
I didn't say I like Putin.
I'm just saying that he's got a really strong persuasion game and the fact that he's playing um so nice with Melania.
It's just more of that it is so smart that he's extra nice to Melania and that there's just no friction whatsoever is created in that domain and it looks like he you know it looks like he's saving a cat and you know being the the good guy.
Uh, so he buys he buys a lot a whole bunch of goodwill for nothing.
So both of them did a good job on that.
Melania and Putin if you're just looking at the persuasion game.
Well, I saw a post by Masimo on X.
Um, and apparently there's some kind of breakthrough brain scan technique where they claim that uh Japanese scientists claim they can detect long CO.
Do you believe that?
Do you believe that giant Japanese scientists have a new brain scan where they can actually find if you're suffering from long CO by looking at part of your brain?
I'm going to say I'm not even sure long CO is real.
Are are we so sure it's real that if you look at the scan, you can see it?
I don't know.
Do you believe they could see if it were the vaccine injury instead?
Do you think they could see that with their advanced scan?
I don't know.
I don't know.
So, and I whenever I see Japanese breakthroughs, I I kind of give them a little less credibility.
Do you do that too?
I feel like they at least just from an anecdotal perspective, I don't have any data on this, but it seems like the Japanese might be and maybe the maybe the South Koreans might be a little bit of overclaimers when it comes to science.
You know what I mean?
Just a little bit.
Well, uh, podcaster, journalist, I don't know what he would call himself, but let's say podcaster, journalist, independent, independent journalist.
Benny Johnson, uh, has announced that apparently there was somebody been threatening his family and he got Pam Bondi involved and that person got arrested.
So, somebody had threatened to kill his wife and kids and uh, nothing in person, I guess, just sent a letter.
Who would be dumb enough to send a physical letter threatening somebody's life?
How old do you have to be to think that that's the way to go about that?
Like to write a physical letter threatening somebody's life?
Wow.
Well, um, so good on you, Benny Johnson, for fighting back against that, being aggressive, and I'm glad that, uh, Bondi is responding to that.
Well, apparently Trump has now struck a deal with big pharma company Astroenica for what is being reported by just the news as uh offering uh what do they call it the uh most favored nation pricing now.
So, so that's what the news is, but I don't believe the news because here's the problem.
In order for these big pharma companies to do what Trump wants, which is to give the United States the same low pricing as, you know, the best price another country gets, there is such a difference that the only way they can maintain their profitability if they were to lower the US prices since we're the biggest market.
The only way they could do that is to massively increase their prices for third world countries until they wouldn't be able to afford their meds.
Or what is there some third thing I don't know about?
They either have to not do it and keep making their money and hoping they get away with it or if they lower if they actually do this and give the US the same prices as the lowest price.
There isn't any way they could maintain profitability.
So how did they do this?
There's something there's something in the story that's missing, right?
Would you agree?
There's something missing.
It's either limited to just a few drugs because I think that's what uh was it Fizer?
I think Fizer was just limited to a few drugs.
So, it sounded like it was a bigger deal than it was.
I didn't see that this is limited, but it's got to be limited somehow.
There's no way they can just lower their prices.
Well, Gavin Newsome is doing his uh Gavin Newsome jazz hands cursing thing, which he believes is how he will jazz hands curse himself into the presidency.
and uh he he's playing this childlike uh mental game with Joe Rogan to try to get invited on the Joe Rogan podcast because Joe said some negative things about his chances of being president.
And uh so so here's how he responds to that.
Um he boasted that he was quote punching back at that quote son of a Joe Rogan.
He said, "Joe, why won't you have me on the show?" Uh, he was on another podcast when he said this.
He said, "He you he won't have me on the show.
It's a one way and he has guests coming on attacking and bashing, but he won't have me on the show.
Full stop.
He should have me on the show." And uh basically challenged him to do it.
Now, does it does it seem to you that cursing and insulting Joe Rogan is how you get him to invite you on the show?
Now, I will admit that it probably does uh stimulate Joe's competitive instincts and it probably makes him curious about what would happen.
You know, it probably it probably does make him want to invite him.
On the other hand, you can't invite somebody if they do it that way.
He he's sort of eliminating himself by the way he's doing it.
But at the same time, he probably probably I can't read his mind, of course, but if I were Joe, I'd be thinking, "Damn it, I do want to invite you.
But I can't do it now because you're you're so obviously trying to manipulate me in front of the public.
I I can't just like bow to the manipulation.
I can't do it because you swore at me.
It's going to look like it's going to look like I invited you because you cursed at me.
So, uh, I'm going to guess that he doesn't get an invitation, but I could be wrong about that.
I could be wrong.
Again, I can't read anybody's mind.
So, Joe might just say, "All right, this is fun." And that might be the end of it.
This would be fun.
If he thinks it's fun, well, that's the end of the conversation.
It'd be fun.
go ahead and do it.
Um, it would definitely make news.
You know what else?
Uh, Joe Rogan could end Newsome's run for president without even really trying hard because I don't think Newsome's ever been challenged in quite the way that maybe he should be.
And I think that Joe could pull that off probably better than anybody.
probably this what else using the word punching.
I'm punching Joe Rogan.
Oh, and then he goes, he's going to dismiss it.
He's going to laugh it off.
Tough guy and all that, but is he going to have me on?
I don't know.
It It is kind of It's sort of high school funny.
like I can't really turn away because he does make me watch.
So that's one of the things that Nuome does well.
He does make you not be able to turn away.
You just got to watch whatever he's doing.
So he's got that going for him.
Um so apparently the uh the left has decided that their talking point about Antifa is that it really doesn't exist.
Isn't that wild?
and they and they can somewhat get away with it.
Probably 40 to 50% of all the the public will think the Antifa doesn't exist because they're going to hear that repeated over and over.
Well, there's no Antifa.
Well, what are those gigantic crowds of people that call themselves Antifa?
Oh, that's just spontaneously organized people who just have an affinity for it.
No, no, but it's not like they have a leadership.
Well, how are they collecting money if they don't have a leadership?
Well, okay.
Well, they have some ways for money to get around, but not in a leadership way.
Well, how do they decide who gets what money?
Well, so u but one of the people is Jimmy Kimmel.
So, he was mocking Christine Gnome, I guess, and uh and and referring to Antifa as quote an entirely imaginary organization.
Uh, and then some other people, there were some other talking heads that people had captured saying the same thing.
Oh, it's imaginary.
It's imaginary.
And but they were the ones who were saying it's imaginary were saying it's not like the Proud Boys or the Patriot Front.
Because they said those are real real organizations, not like Antifa.
That's just totally imaginary.
So I went to Grock and I said, "How many people are in the Proud Boys?" And the estimate was from 300 to 3,000.
I guess at one point might have been a few thousand more than that, but uh it's it's uh losing a little bit of its esteem.
But what if the Proud Boys is really only 300 people?
And then I asked it about the Patriot Front because that was also mentioned and it said there were 200 to 300 people.
This is in the entire nation.
Don't you think that every single Antifa event had more than 300 people and more than a thousand?
Probably.
There's so many more Antifa people than there are Proud Boys or Patriot Front.
So many more now, but there's no estimate.
Grock doesn't have an estimate for Antifa.
But don't you think if you did some kind of a survey, just asked people if they're Antifa, you you guess something like 1%, which would be a lot of people.
Definitely more than the Proud Boys in the Patriot Front.
So, now we're hearing a little bit more about how this uh the deal with Gaza got done.
uh we're hearing that uh Jared Kushner might have been far more important to the process than has been reported so far.
So that's one thing that that it looks like.
Um and uh it looks like uh Qatar or Qatar as you like to say is maybe one of the big stories behind the curtain.
So Qatar wanted some things, but we wanted some things from Qatar, which is to back a peace deal.
And what Qatar wanted was uh I guess they got some uh dedicated space where they can test their their jets that were selling them, the ones who were selling them.
They can test them and train in the United States within the bounds of some American base.
They'll have their own little uh their own little space, but it'll be controlled by America.
So there they don't have their own base.
They would just have some space for training that they would pay for that would be on an American base because apparently there's their country is so small they don't really have a good place to test jets.
So they'll test them here, they'll buy them here, they'll put billions of dollars into buying more of them here.
So, it turns out it was a good deal for us because we sell some more jets and we'll have a place that they can test them so they feel comfortable getting them.
And um apparently Qar wanted to get in better with the United States and not be seen as half a terrorist supporter and half a supporter of the West.
you know, they want they want to be more of a more on the clean side of things.
So, it's sort of a way for them to reposition themselves with the United States entirely by doing something for us that presumably will get them some uh get them some favors in return.
So, Cutter seems to be a big part of the backstory.
And the fact that we were able to cut her a deal with Cutter, uh, probably has a lot to do with how we got to this point.
And like I said, if Hillary Clinton is saying yes, it must be that there's so much money that's going to be funneled into that area for rebuilding and the Abraham Accords and everything else that probably all the big money people just said ch-ching.
You know, I'm just guessing like did all the bankers just say, "All right, we can make some money on this." Did all the construction people, the betells, did all the military-industrial complex people say, "Oh man, we can make some money on this." I think so, probably.
You know, the the hotel industry, u probably the oil industry.
I don't know.
Maybe not.
But it does seem to me like everybody just said, "Why don't we just make some money and we're done with this terrorism stuff?" Let's see if I can get what's left of my notes here.
Um, so that's happening.
Let's see what else is happening.
One moment, please.
So, according to a Harvard Caps Harris poll, uh, 71% of Americans support Trump's strikes on the smuggling boats, the ones off of Venezuela.
Republicans like it a lot, 89%, independent 67, and even Democrats by a majority, 56%.
So, to me, this is another one of those Trump takes the strong side of the the question and uh even if it doesn't work out, he's still the one who took the strong side of the issue.
So, I'm loving that.
Well, there's a new report Wall Street Journal that the wine industry in California where I am is having a tough time for two reasons.
One, people are just drinking less.
But number two, apparently the weather was unusually good.
So that that global warming stuff uh turned out to be one of the best summers ever.
So there's like a just a crap ton of grapes.
So we have way too many grapes at the same time that there's, you know, lower demand.
So the wine business is falling apart.
Uh it's California, so you know that the Hollywood movie making business has already fallen apart.
And uh if we did not have a boom in AI, uh even the tech business would look like it's winding down.
So, California is sort of looking good, but only because of AI.
I think I don't think there's anything else driving anything else.
And AI is probably going to put quite a load on our energy infrastructure.
So, I know somehow somehow California just keeps floating along, but I feel like we keep getting closer and closer to the edge.
Yeah.
How how many entire industries could you wipe out in California and still have a state?
I guess we're going to find out.
Um, and the crypto market went to hell, as you know.
But, um, I don't know how much you should worry about the crypto market.
isn't the very nature of it that it's it's volatile and that uh if you're just in the weird little cryptos, you know, it was a big risk and if you're in Bitcoin, you're probably going to huddle it, which is hold it.
Um, so you probably don't care.
I don't know.
Does is anybody panicked about crypto or you just sort of watching it?
I think I would just watch it at this point.
You know, I kept telling you that there there are all these uh tests going on for a vaccine to cure cancer or to keep it from happening.
Uh here's another one.
There's another nextgen vaccine to prevent up to 88% of multiple aggressive cancers according to Paul Mccclure in the New Alice.
Um so you don't need to know too much more about this one.
Uh because I went to Grock and I said how many current trials are there where somebody's trying to fix cancer with a vaccine where they made the vaccine out of usually something about your body.
So it's about you specifically the vaccine is and I and I said there were seven of them.
So there were seven ongoing trials that were cancer vaccines.
Now, I don't think any of them will be ready in time, you know, to save me.
But it does look like maybe there's something there, you know, may maybe for the rest of you.
I'll see if I can last long enough to get to the vaccines, but it does look like some of that's going to work.
Works on animals anyway.
So, working on animals is only like a one in 20 chance that it's going to work on humans.
Um the Portland Police Union is welcoming the uh federal uh help, you know, the the federal troops.
Uh whereas the government is saying, "We don't need no federal troops.
We don't have a problem here." And so the Portland uh violence is also being called imaginary.
So now, so now we're being told that Antifa is an imaginary group and that the violence around the ICE facilities and stuff in Portland is also so small that if you imagine it's a it's a big problem, that's just imaginary.
And I don't know what is right.
Is it possible that the news is uh exaggerating the the real danger in Portland?
Because I think it could be a little of both.
It could be that the danger is not that great, but at the same time, the police do want help because the police have been degraded so much that they can't even handle, you know, a modest threat.
So, it could be a combination of not enough police and a little bit of trouble that wouldn't ordinarily be a lot of trouble because you would have a lot of police.
So, I don't know what's through there, but uh once again, as long as Trump takes the strong approach and he's the one who's looking to clamp down on crime and Portland is looking like the ones they don't care as much about crime, Trump wins.
I think he wins just by being the strong one.
MIT says they have a new gene editing tool.
Sounds kind of boring and nerdlike, but it would be 60 times fewer mistakes than before.
Because, you know, gene editing, if you could do gene editing quickly and efficiently and economically, there's a whole bunch of stuff you can fix.
And uh, you know, this is just a movement in the right direction.
But if they could actually make that much of a improvement in the gene editing technology, well, you you might get yourself a new head, you know, that new head you've been wanting.
It's getting closer.
All right, that's all I have for today.
It is a Saturday, so you should be petting your cats and having a good time.
Um, I did promise you that I would read you a reframe from my book, Reframe Your Brain.
I started with one, but I think I'm going to randomly pick another one because they're so useful.
If this works out, maybe I'll make it a thing.
So, it's from my book, Reframe Your Brain.
And uh I'll just pick the first one from the social life category.
There's reframes for every domain, but in the social life reframe, the first one is the old the old frame used to be be yourself.
Anybody ever used to give you that advice to be yourself?
Terrible advice.
Here's here's the reframe.
Become a better version of yourself.
If you're satisfied being yourself, people aren't going to want to be around you.
You're not that good.
You need some work and you should admit that you're a work in progress.
People will like you better if you admit you've got some work to do.
Try being better.
You should be working on some kind of a system or a process or uh finding some way to be the improved version of yourself.
You should be getting smarter, healthier.
You should become wiser, kinder.
You should be trying to get your, you know, your depression down and get your mental health better.
You should be trying to get different in every possible way.
People, people ask me when uh I've told you this story before, but uh people asked me if when I hit it big with Dilbert and I went from not having money to well, people asked me if uh being famous and successful changed me.
Did it change me?
And I'd always laugh and say, "Well, I hope so.
That was the whole point.
Why would I go through all that work to be the same person?
The the whole everything that I do has at least a secondary ambition of changing me.
Like I don't go to the gym because it doesn't change me.
I I don't work hard in my career because it won't change me.
I do it so it will.
If I want to feel confident, what am I supposed to do?
just sit in a chair and try to jin up some confidence.
No, I'm going to go do something and then if it works, guess what?
I get more confident.
So, no, I'm every day in every way I'm trying to figure out how to be like a little bit better version of myself.
So, if anybody ever tells you the key to success is be yourself, you're getting some bad advice.
Be better.
Just be better.
All right, that is your reframe of the day.
Owen Gregorian will be hosting a spaces right after this.
Give him a few minutes to uh uh you can't become a millionaire without becoming the kind of person who becomes a millionaire.
Exactly.
Exactly.
All right.
So, Owen Gregorian, just uh go to go to X and uh you can search for his name and it'll pop up the spaces.
And uh I'm going to say a few words to the locals people, my beloved beloved locals people and the rest of you.
I'll see you tomorrow.
Thanks for coming.
Good morning everybody.
Come on in here and
I hope you have a cat in your lap. That
is the perfect way to watch the show.
You should have a beverage by your
dominant hand.
Your non-dominant hand should be petting
a cat like this. And then you know
you're almost ready for the show.
If only I could get to my notes. All
right. First, I'm going to get my
comments working on this other screen.
We'll get back to you.
[Music]
You'll let me get this.
You mind? Do you mind?
Good morning everybody and welcome to
the highlights of human civilization.
It's called Scott Adams. You've never
had a better time. But if you'd like to
take a chance of elevating your
experience up to levels that no one can
even understand with their tiny shiny
human brains. All you need for that is
a cup, a mug or a glass, a tanker,
shell, a st, a canteen, jug or flask, a
vessel of any kind,
and a cat. Fill it with your favorite
liquid. I like coffee.
Join me now for the unparalleled
pleasure of the dopamine day of the day.
The thing that makes everything better.
Here you go. This one's for you. It's
called the simultaneous sip.
It happens now.
All right,
everybody. Good.
We're all good now. Good.
Well, at the end of today's podcast,
I'll probably have a uh reframe to
change your life from my book, Reframe
Your Brain. So, don't leave before you
get that. No. No. Why in the world can I
not find my own comments? There we go.
Success.
Boom. Boom. All right. As tradition
dictates, Owen Gregorian will be hosting
a spaces event immediately after, well,
somewhat immediately after we're done
here today. And you can find that just
by searching on X for Owen Gregorian and
look for the spaces notification.
So,
um, I do not have a source for this
next, well, the fir first story, but,
uh, I saw somebody say it and I knew it
was true, so I'm going to repeat it.
They they did a study to find out what
is it that women can say to men that
would make the men feel as good as when
the men say to the women, "I love you."
Does anybody know the answer? What what
two words?
The the answer is thank you. So
apparently if you say thank you and show
appreciation to a man, his brain lights
up about the same as if you had said I
love you to a woman. How many women knew
that?
Now, I've always thought that one of the
problems with the relationships is that
people feel like it's a power battle and
that if you if you show appreciation to
somebody, you're giving up your power
and it's like you owe them. If you say
thank you to your mate, it's like, oh,
now I owe you something. So, I feel like
people don't want to say thank you too
much.
Actually, I'm going to skip ahead. I
told you that uh I might read a reframe
from my book reframe your brain
but I think I'll do it right now. So
this is in the section on social life
reframes
and it's about uh compliments
and uh so here's the usual frame. Here's
what we usually think about giving
compliments. Um, usually giving
compliments is awkward, creepy, or it
feels manipulative, as in, you know,
you're trying to guess something for
your compliment or something. Here's the
reframe. Withholding a compliment is
almost immoral.
If you have a compliment in your mind
about somebody and they're standing
right there or you could easily reach
them and you don't give them the
compliment even though you're thinking
it, it's almost immoral. It's free and
it would be highly valuable to the
person who received it. So if you have
something that you could deliver for
free
and and it would help a person, it would
be immoral to not do it. So, when you
think about potential compliments,
think of them that way. It'll make your
life a lot better. People will like you
better if you're good at complimenting.
How many times have I started my show by
telling you there's a new study on
psychedelics that make your mental
health better? Well, here's another one,
except this is about your physical
health. Specifically, they're finding
that, and they're doing more testing,
but they think that uh psilocybin will
make your brain feel more relaxed. And
when you relax the brain, it releases
less cortisol and inflammatory stuff.
And they believe that they can get more
than a temporary more than a temporary
decrease in inflammation in your body
by using psychedelics to help you get
control of your mind. Because we know
that psychedelics can have a temporary
control on your mind.
But more lately, we're finding out it
could be a semi-permanent change where,
you know, one small controlled dose of
psilocybin could set your depression
away, your anxiety away for, you know,
months or years. And if that happens, in
theory, your your full body inflammation
will be less, and that would help you
with a whole bunch of stuff. So, is
there anything that psychedelics can't
do?
Not that I know of.
Sorry, it's going to be a little slow
because getting to my notes is more of a
challenge this morning.
There you go.
Which cat is this? This must be Yeah,
it's Roman. Roman the cat.
All right. Um
and uh apparently the uh the mushrooms
that would have a advantage over
steroids because it wouldn't have a side
effect
whereas steroids do. All right. So
here's a little update on UFOs. Tim
Burchett. Uh, Representative Burchett
was on Tucker Carlson. And I guess Tim
has been sort of a point person in
Congress for looking into or finding out
about UFOs and UAPs and all that. Now,
he seems convinced that they're real
because people who talk to him who seem
like credible people are whispering in
his ear things that sound real. And uh
there are some people who have said
things under oath at this point. He says
that would suggest that we have alien
bodies or alien crafts. Now I'm going to
I'm going to come down firmly on the
side of I don't believe any of it. I do
not believe we have any alien bodies. I
do not believe we've ever had access to
an alien craft. It's just too far for
me. and the fact that you know we never
we never talk to the person who is
directly involved. It's always the
person who talked to the person really.
So anyway uh so my update is this. I
don't know if that asteroid that's
coming into our solar system is really a
advanced spacecraft. I don't know if the
pyramids or any of our early stuff were
influenced in any way by aliens who
invisited the earth. No idea.
And I I certainly don't know if we have
access, you know, if we're holding on to
any alien bodies. But do you enjoy it as
much as I do just thinking about it? I
just love thinking about it. So even
though I I wish I could kind of believe
it, I can't really get there, but it's
very entertaining. So it's very
entertaining belief. So every time Tim
Buret is Buret is on, you know, I'm like
ah got to watch all this.
All right,
the new the news is uh a little bit slow
today. So might be a little more science
than the news today.
Um, according to the University of South
Australia,
a lot of people who have mental health
problems have gut problems and they
think that the gut microbes might be
shaping your mental health. Do you know
they could have just asked? That's
right, me. Cuz I always I'm always
telling you that your your body is your
your brain. And if you think of them as
separate units, then you will be
confused. Because if you want your brain
to work better, you put better food into
it, better exercise, better sleep. Your
your body is your brain. So should you
be surprised
that changing the gut micro might make
some people mentally healthier? No, you
should not be surprised.
Well, I guess Trump already went to
Walter Reed,
got them to say that he's his body is 14
years younger than his chronological
age. He got his flu shot and got his
COVID booster. you know, he's in sort of
a tough position
because even though his administration
is, you know, reducing the
recommendations for COVID boosters all
the way to well, you know, maybe if
you're over 65,
maybe if you have some co-orbidities,
and you know, maybe if you and your
doctor think so, you know, so that so
the sort of still allowed recommended
range is small, but he's in it. So given
that he would like to be thought of as
having made the right decisions during
the pandemic, it'd be kind of awkward if
he didn't get a booster shot, wouldn't
it? But at the same time, do you really
think that that he feels he's safer with
a booster shot? I don't know. He might
be
if you told me later that he only
pretended to get the booster shot, I
wouldn't be super surprised.
But there a lot of witnesses, so
probably got the real stuff. Anyway, so
I think he has to get those shots to
protect his legacy. So it still looks
like at least maybe the shots for the
old people made sense.
He doesn't really have a perfect uh play
there.
Um, even Hillary Clinton has commended,
she even used that word, I commend uh,
President Trump for the what she calls
significant progress in the the Gaza
situation. How do you interpret that?
How do you interpret that the you know
most dependable critic of the president
obviously somebody thwarted uh who has a
long history of hating him that even she
was not looking for the downside.
How do you interpret that? Here's how I
interpret it. Yeah. I think it means
that she found out how to make money.
Don't you think? because what this will
lead to this whole Abraham Accord thing
if the Abraham Accords expands it looks
like it might uh but at the very least
it'll be massive money flowing into the
area and don't you think that Hillary
Clinton may have possibly even cut a
deal to say I'll support this as long as
we get a taste you as long as one of my
one of my friends gets a big contract
I'll I'll say, "I'm all on board for
this." There's got to be a monetary
incentive there. Cuz if it were just
purely political, I think she'd say
something like, "What took you so long?"
or "It's going to fall apart," or, "You
did part of it wrong." Or, "The only way
you got it is working with Russia." You
know, something like that. She must have
found a way to make some money there.
Well, the biggest news is that China
start uh well, I won't say they started
a trade war, but they accelerated it.
So, the the details are a little murky.
Still a little fog of war going on, but
looks like they're massively tightening
up on their rare earth materials, which
would be a gigantic problem for the
economy of the United States. And our
stock market responded by going in the
toilet as did the crypto market all
responding to the fact that uh
international trade is at great risk
uh or some risk. I don't I don't know if
it's great risk because the smart people
are saying that what China is doing is
creating assets to trade away because
there's a big trade talks coming up. So,
I'm always telling you that uh Trump is
the champion of creating something out
of nothing and then trading the nothing
away for something.
And that looks like what China just did.
So, uh they created a something out of
nothing by creating massive barriers to
getting their rare earth materials. Now,
when they negotiate, they have something
to trade away that they made out of
nothing. So, it's a very Trumpian
approach and clearly they've studied his
approach so they know how to do this
stuff. Um, so it's too early to know if
this is a big deal or just a medium big
deal. It's at least a medium big deal.
But what we don't know is is it really
just a bargaining chip and it will get
bargained away and you know we just have
to be uncomfortable for 3 months until
we know what's going on with that stuff.
Maybe could also be because it's so
illdefined that it won't be bargained
away. It'll be defined away as in well,
you know, now that we give you the
details, we didn't mean that it would
apply to any phones and then that like
whole category will be excluded and then
we'll be like, oh, I thought it was
going to be worse, but doesn't include
phones and it won't include laptops.
Oh. Oh, you know. So, so it'll end up
being defined smaller but also
negotiated. So, who knows? Uh, but it's
a big deal. It's a big deal.
I would uh if I were giving advice,
I would say the odds of us getting some
kind of a workable solution eventually
is pretty high. So, I'd be gambling that
it does get worked out in, I don't know,
several months, maybe if you're patient.
Might even be faster. Could be a lot
faster if both sides feel enough pain
fast enough.
Anyway, so we'll keep an eye on that.
Um, there's talk that Trump might stop
by and see his little buddy, Rocket Man,
Kim Jong-un, while he's uh um over there
for something else. So, he would be in
Soul uh visiting for something else, I
guess. And uh they're thinking that he
might uh have a little side visit and
meet with his buddy. Now, remember how I
I kept telling you that uh Trump could
succeed with this Gaza stuff because he
changed reality. He didn't just
negotiate. He just changed how they saw
the whole thing. He he turned a no into
a yes and made them see it as a yes. And
then they started acting like it was a
yes. Well, that's kind of what you do
with North Korea. So the the the North
Korea question was, "What are you going
to do about them threatening to nuke
us?"
That was the question. And and he took
that question and instead of
negotiating, hey, don't nuke us, we'll
we'll give you this if you don't nuke
us. Or if you do nuke us, we'll do this
to you. That'd be more like direct
negotiating. You just change the
reality.
So the reality was it looked like we
were some kind of enemies and he just
reframed it to we're friends. Oh, we're
friends. You're my buddy. I'd like to
come visit my friend. And then suddenly
it didn't really make sense to me to be
threatening each other with nuclear
annihilation because he just reframed
reality to why enemy.
Who's your enemy? I'm not your enemy.
I'm your friend. Let's get together.
So only he can do that. That is a pure
Trump play that's just it's just not
available to other people. They they
just wouldn't be able to pull it off.
So we'll see if that happens. Should
happen. Well, I guess the government and
Russ vote is doing the layoffs they
promise. He's the budget director. So,
uh, they're going to use it use the
government shutdown as their excuse to
fire a bunch of Democrats who are
working for the government or not for
long, I guess. So, I don't know if
there'll be some kind of court cases to
the firing. I feel like there will,
right? Won't there be a rogue judge who
says, "Well,
we must block this nationwide."
Seems like it. Seems like it.
Well, there's some thought and Speaker
Johnson's kind of worked up about this.
You can see why that uh that the
Democrats might want to keep the the
government closed to make it a better no
kings rally a week from now um on
October 18th.
So, so there's another one of those big
uh artificial
um paid for rallies that that are being
planned, the no kings. And I guess the
no kings rally wouldn't have enough to
talk about because because the Middle
East is all solved.
They wouldn't have enough to talk about
unless they uh unless the government was
closed. So, they'd have, you know, a
good complaint. Ah, that mean old Trump
closing that government. So it looks
like the Democrats for that reason alone
to support their fake paid protest so
that it so they can pretend that there's
more resistance to Trump than there is.
They might keep the government closed.
Like that would be one of the reasons to
keep it closed. Oh my god, our
government is terrible. At least half of
it is.
Anyway, well, I don't know if that's the
real reason, but I I was saw one of the
organizers of that no kings uh rally,
and he was walking this real fine line
because he wanted people to feel
outraged about what's happening in the
country so that they would be
incentivized to go to the, you know, go
to the protest. So he wants them to feel
unhappy to go to the protest, but he
wanted to sell the protest as a good
time so that more people would go
because he's in the business of
organizing protests. So he tried to tell
you how much fun you would have with,
you know, meeting new meeting new people
and having friends and it'd be a nice
day out. And he was trying to sell them
at the same time that, you know, that
we're suffering this existential threat
to our democracy. And by the way, it'll
be a good time. Yeah, it's it's like a
party. Oh, did I mention it's an
existential threat to the entire
country, but but but you'll meet some
nice people. It's more about the nice
people you meet along the way. And he
totally can't sell it because you just
can't do those same same things at the
same time. and uh watching how
artificial and fake it is and then
hearing that they might keep the
government closed just to get enough
people to go to the fake stupid uh
completely irrational protests. Wow,
good work, Democrats.
So, you know, one of the questions
people had about this Leticia James um
indictment for bank fraud, they say, is
are these real are these claims going to
hold up or is it just a bunch of BS and
her lawyers will, you know, get it wiped
away pretty soon? Well, I saw a
gentleman on X who goes by the name SMB
attorney and he had an explanation about
um what probably went on with this bank
loan fraud stuff based on his experience
as years as a mortgage banker. Right?
So, he's going to give you inside
information about a mortgage banker's
knowledge of how this may or may not
have happened. Now, what I'm talking
about is um Leticia James, the AG, who's
been indicted for bank fraud, allegedly
uh let's see what she claimed that
uh how she she classified a property
intentionally wrong or or accidentally
wrong. So, that's what we're going to
determine. But here's SMB attorney
describing what uh what you need to know
some context. All right. So, first of
all, he has lots of experience in that
business. He was a mortgage lender for
years, mortgage banker for years. He
goes, "Here's the deal. How you classify
a property as a primary, secondary, or
investment home changes everything about
the loan. The down payment, the interest
rate, the underwriting, all of it.
Primary or secondary homes can get by
with as little as 3 to 15 3 to 10% down.
Investment property usually requires 25%
or more. So, if you're a brand new real
estate investor with limited cash,
there's a big incentive to call
something a second home instead of an
investment property.
But that's what u but that's why lenders
make you sign a second home rider, a
separate document where you specifically
promise you'll use it as a second
residence and not rent it out. You also
assert like nine times in the
application process it will be owner
occupied.
This is good. This is good background
stuff. I was a banker so I'm nerding in
on this a little bit more.
Um and then SMB
attorney says, "Could this kind of thing
ever be an honest mistake?" I doubt it.
The facts, at least as reported, look
pretty bad. You buy a house, say it's a
second home, immediately rent it out,
tell your insurer it's owner occupied,
and then report rental income on your
taxes. He goes, "That's not a
misunderstanding. That's a pattern."
Now, remember the documentary effect
that I warned you about? I've just given
you one side of an argument with no no
attention to any counterargument. So,
it's pretty it's pretty convincing,
isn't it?
When you heard that, didn't you say to
yourself, "Oh man, she's fried. There's
no way she's going to get out of that."
Right? That's the documentary effect
because you only heard one side of an
argument. I don't know if there's
another side of the argument, but I
think they're pleading innocent. So,
that would suggest that they do have an
argument. The fact that you haven't
heard that argument at all
should should be at the top of your
mind. You should be saying to yourself,
"Yeah, but they do have an argument. We
just haven't heard it yet." Okay, is
that fair?
Cuz I knew that that would be super
persuasive.
But don't be too persuaded by it. She uh
I still think it's unlikely that she'd
have any jail time. Um, I guess there's
the possibility that there could be
years and years of jail, but the reality
for first offender for something like
this
time, you know, probably not suspended
sentence,
you know, and uh but there could be a
fine according to Grock up to like half
a million dollars. So, it could be
really expensive.
Anyway, um as you know, President Trump
did not win a Nobel Prize because the
Nobel Prize that they're giving this
year is mostly for stuff that happened
last year and before. And most of uh his
accomplishments happened this year. So,
it's no, it's not really a slap in the
face or anything. It's just the way the
process works, I think. But the the
woman who did win it, Maria Karina
Mashada, I guess um she would be a
freedom fighter for Venezuela, she was
smart enough to call him and actually
tell him personally, I'm accepting this
in honor of you because you really
deserved it.
And then Trump got to tell that story
that the person who won it called him
and said that he deserved it. That's
pretty good. Now, it makes you it makes
you understand why she won the Nobel
Peace Prize because how smart was that?
That was so smart to call him
immediately and give him credit and say,
you know, you should have won cuz she
needs him 100% to get whatever it is she
wants, you know, for Venezuela. And uh
talk about talk about the best way you
could get him on your side.
So I don't know much about her but I
know that if she you know got the
attention of the Nobel Prize people
there's there's something of substance
there and then the one thing we observe
is so so on point that you just say okay
there's there's some substance there so
keep an eye on this one. So maybe and
and then here's the you know the extra
fun of this.
It could be that the only way that Trump
could succeed with Venezuela to sort of
decartellitize it is if he's got
somebody as strong as her to be the the
backs stop, you know, the person who
could actually become the new leader. So
his fate and hers are could be quite
tied. You know, you don't get the uh
Nobel Peace Prize if between now and the
next time they award it uh you've
started a war.
unless you finished it pretty quickly.
So, she could be the key to have some
kind of
relatively rapid wrap up of of things in
Venezuela in a positive way for the
Venezuelans.
So, keep an eye on that relationship.
That that might really have some legs.
Meanwhile, Melania Trump continues to be
awesome. I guess she worked on a deal
separately with uh Putin to get some
Ukrainian children released back to
Ukraine and it was successful. Didn't
seem like she got much push back, if
any. And um I'm going to I'm going to
give of course Melania full credit
because the Trumps are the world
champions at getting hostages back, you
know, getting getting prisoners back.
No, nobody's ever done this better. I
mean, right? And nobody's even been
close. This this is unbelievable
um success in getting people back. Now,
Melania is doing it. So, she's got her
she says now she has an open channel of
communication with Putin. So, here's
what I like about um Putin's persuasion
game. Don't misquote me. I didn't say I
like Putin. I'm just saying that he's
got a really strong persuasion game and
the fact that he's playing um so nice
with Melania.
It's just more of that
it is so smart that he's extra nice to
Melania and that there's just no
friction whatsoever is created in that
domain and it looks like he you know it
looks like he's saving a cat and you
know being the the good guy. Uh, so he
buys he buys a lot a whole bunch of
goodwill for nothing.
So both of them did a good job on that.
Melania and Putin if you're just looking
at the persuasion game.
Well, I saw a post by Masimo on X. Um,
and apparently there's some kind of
breakthrough brain scan technique where
they claim that uh Japanese scientists
claim they can detect long CO.
Do you believe that? Do you believe that
giant Japanese scientists have a new
brain scan where they can actually find
if you're suffering from long CO by
looking at part of your brain?
I'm going to say I'm not even sure long
CO is real.
Are are we so sure it's real that if you
look at the scan, you can see it? I
don't know. Do you believe they could
see if it were the vaccine injury
instead? Do you think they could see
that with their advanced scan? I don't
know. I don't know.
So,
and I whenever I see Japanese
breakthroughs,
I I kind of give them a little less
credibility. Do you do that too? I feel
like they at least just from an
anecdotal perspective, I don't have any
data on this, but it seems like the
Japanese might be and maybe the maybe
the South Koreans might be a little bit
of overclaimers
when it comes to science. You know what
I mean?
Just a little bit. Well, uh, podcaster,
journalist, I don't know what he would
call himself, but let's say podcaster,
journalist, independent, independent
journalist. Benny Johnson, uh, has
announced that apparently there was
somebody been threatening his family and
he got Pam Bondi involved and that
person got arrested. So, somebody had
threatened to kill his wife and kids and
uh, nothing in person, I guess, just
sent a letter.
Who would be dumb enough to send a
physical letter threatening somebody's
life? How old do you have to be to think
that that's the way to go about that?
Like to write a physical letter
threatening somebody's life?
Wow.
Well, um, so good on you, Benny Johnson,
for fighting back against that, being
aggressive, and I'm glad that, uh, Bondi
is responding to that.
Well, apparently Trump has now struck a
deal with big pharma company Astroenica
for what is being reported by just the
news as uh offering uh what do they call
it the uh most favored nation pricing
now. So, so that's what the news is, but
I don't believe the news because here's
the problem. In order for these big
pharma companies to do what Trump wants,
which is to give the United States the
same low pricing as, you know, the best
price another country gets, there is
such a difference that the only way they
can maintain their profitability if they
were to lower the US prices since we're
the biggest market. The only way they
could do that is to massively increase
their prices for third world countries
until they wouldn't be able to afford
their meds.
Or what is there some third thing I
don't know about? They either have to
not do it and keep making their money
and hoping they get away with it or if
they lower if they actually do this and
give the US the same prices as the
lowest price.
There isn't any way they could maintain
profitability. So how did they do this?
There's something there's something in
the story that's missing, right? Would
you agree? There's something missing.
It's either limited to just a few drugs
because I think that's what uh was it
Fizer? I think Fizer was just limited to
a few drugs. So, it sounded like it was
a bigger deal than it was. I didn't see
that this is limited, but it's got to be
limited somehow. There's no way they can
just lower their prices.
Well, Gavin Newsome is doing his uh
Gavin Newsome jazz hands cursing thing,
which he believes is how he will jazz
hands curse himself into the presidency.
and uh he he's playing this
childlike uh mental game with Joe Rogan
to try to get invited on the Joe Rogan
podcast because Joe said some negative
things about his chances of being
president. And uh so so here's how he
responds to that. Um he boasted that he
was quote punching back at that quote
son of a Joe Rogan.
He said, "Joe, why won't you have me on
the show?" Uh, he was on another podcast
when he said this. He said, "He you he
won't have me on the show. It's a one
way and he has guests coming on
attacking and bashing, but he won't have
me on the show. Full stop. He should
have me on the show."
And uh basically challenged him to do
it. Now, does it does it seem to you
that cursing and insulting Joe Rogan is
how you get him to invite you on the
show?
Now, I will admit
that it probably does uh stimulate Joe's
competitive
instincts and it probably makes him
curious about what would happen. You
know, it probably it probably does make
him want to invite him. On the other
hand, you can't invite somebody if they
do it that way. He he's sort of
eliminating himself by the way he's
doing it. But at the same time, he
probably probably I can't read his mind,
of course, but if I were Joe, I'd be
thinking, "Damn it, I do want to invite
you. But I can't do it now because
you're you're so obviously trying to
manipulate me in front of the public. I
I can't just like bow to the
manipulation. I can't do it because you
swore at me. It's going to look like
it's going to look like I invited you
because you cursed at me. So, uh, I'm
going to guess that he doesn't get an
invitation, but I could be wrong about
that. I could be wrong. Again, I can't
read anybody's mind. So, Joe might just
say, "All right, this is fun." And that
might be the end of it. This would be
fun. If he thinks it's fun, well, that's
the end of the conversation. It'd be
fun. go ahead and do it.
Um, it would definitely make news.
You know what else? Uh, Joe Rogan could
end Newsome's run for president
without even really trying hard
because I don't think
Newsome's ever been challenged in quite
the way that
maybe he should be. And I think that Joe
could pull that off probably better than
anybody.
probably
this what else using the word punching.
I'm punching Joe Rogan.
Oh, and then he goes, he's going to
dismiss it. He's going to laugh it off.
Tough guy and all that, but is he going
to have me on? I don't know.
It It is kind of
It's sort of high school funny. like I
can't really turn away because he does
make me watch. So that's one of the
things that Nuome does well. He does
make you not be able to turn away. You
just got to watch whatever he's doing.
So he's got that going for him.
Um so apparently the uh the left has
decided that their talking point about
Antifa is that it really doesn't exist.
Isn't that wild? and they and they can
somewhat get away with it. Probably 40
to 50% of all the the public will think
the Antifa doesn't exist because they're
going to hear that repeated over and
over. Well, there's no Antifa. Well,
what are those gigantic crowds of people
that call themselves Antifa? Oh, that's
just spontaneously organized people who
just have an affinity for it. No, no,
but it's not like they have a
leadership. Well, how are they
collecting money if they don't have a
leadership? Well, okay. Well, they have
some ways for money to get around, but
not in a leadership way. Well, how do
they decide who gets what money? Well,
so u but one of the people is Jimmy
Kimmel. So, he was mocking Christine
Gnome, I guess, and uh and and referring
to Antifa as quote an entirely imaginary
organization.
Uh, and then some other people, there
were some other talking heads that
people had captured saying the same
thing. Oh, it's imaginary. It's
imaginary. And but they were the ones
who were saying it's imaginary were
saying it's not like the Proud Boys or
the Patriot Front. Because they said
those are real real organizations, not
like Antifa. That's just totally
imaginary. So I went to Grock and I
said, "How many people are in the Proud
Boys?" And the estimate was from 300 to
3,000. I guess at one point might have
been a few thousand more than that, but
uh it's it's uh losing a little bit of
its esteem. But what if the Proud Boys
is really only 300 people?
And then I asked it about the Patriot
Front because that was also mentioned
and it said there were 200 to 300
people. This is in the entire nation.
Don't you think that every single Antifa
event had more than 300 people and more
than a thousand? Probably.
There's so many more Antifa people than
there are Proud Boys or Patriot Front.
So many more now, but there's no
estimate. Grock doesn't have an estimate
for Antifa. But don't you think if you
did some kind of a survey, just asked
people if they're Antifa, you you guess
something like 1%, which would be a lot
of people.
Definitely more than the Proud Boys in
the Patriot Front.
So, now we're hearing a little bit more
about how this uh the deal with Gaza got
done. uh we're hearing that uh Jared
Kushner might have been far more
important to the process than has been
reported so far. So that's one thing
that that it looks like. Um
and uh it looks like uh Qatar or Qatar
as you like to say is maybe one of the
big stories behind the curtain. So Qatar
wanted some things, but we wanted some
things from Qatar, which is to back a
peace deal. And what Qatar wanted was uh
I guess they got some uh dedicated space
where they can test their their jets
that were selling them, the ones who
were selling them. They can test them
and train in the United States within
the bounds of some American base.
They'll have their own little uh their
own little space, but it'll be
controlled by America. So there they
don't have their own base. They would
just have some space for training that
they would pay for that would be on an
American base because apparently there's
their country is so small they don't
really have a good place to test jets.
So they'll test them here, they'll buy
them here, they'll put billions of
dollars into buying more of them here.
So, it turns out it was a good deal for
us because we sell some more jets and
we'll have a place that they can test
them so they feel comfortable getting
them.
And
um
apparently Qar wanted to get in better
with the United States and not be seen
as half a terrorist supporter and half a
supporter of the West. you know, they
want they want to be more of a more on
the clean side of things. So, it's sort
of a way for them to reposition
themselves with the United States
entirely by doing something for us that
presumably will get them some uh get
them some favors in return. So,
Cutter seems to be a big part of the
backstory. And the fact that we were
able to cut her a deal with Cutter,
uh, probably has a lot to do with how we
got to this point. And like I said, if
Hillary Clinton is saying yes, it must
be that there's so much money that's
going to be funneled into that area for
rebuilding and the Abraham Accords and
everything else that probably all the
big money people just said ch-ching. You
know, I'm just guessing like did all the
bankers just say, "All right, we can
make some money on this." Did all the
construction people, the betells, did
all the military-industrial complex
people say, "Oh man, we can make some
money on this." I think so,
probably. You know, the the hotel
industry,
u probably the oil industry. I don't
know. Maybe not. But it does seem to me
like everybody just said, "Why don't we
just make some money and we're done with
this terrorism stuff?" Let's see if I
can get what's left of my notes here.
Um,
so that's happening.
Let's see what else is happening.
One moment, please.
So, according to a Harvard Caps Harris
poll, uh, 71% of Americans support
Trump's strikes on the smuggling boats,
the ones off of Venezuela.
Republicans like it a lot, 89%,
independent 67, and even Democrats by a
majority, 56%.
So,
to me, this is another one of those
Trump takes the strong side of the the
question and uh even if it doesn't work
out, he's still the one who took the
strong side of the issue. So, I'm loving
that. Well, there's a new report Wall
Street Journal that the wine industry in
California where I am is having a tough
time for two reasons. One, people are
just drinking less. But number two,
apparently the weather was unusually
good. So that that global warming stuff
uh turned out to be one of the best
summers ever. So there's like a just a
crap ton of grapes. So we have way too
many grapes at the same time that
there's, you know, lower demand. So the
wine business is falling apart. Uh it's
California, so you know that the
Hollywood movie making business has
already fallen apart. And uh if we did
not have a boom in AI,
uh even the tech business would look
like it's winding down. So, California
is
sort of looking good, but only because
of AI. I think I don't think there's
anything else driving anything else. And
AI is probably going to put quite a load
on our energy infrastructure. So, I know
somehow somehow California just keeps
floating along, but I feel like we keep
getting closer and closer to the edge.
Yeah. How how many entire industries
could you wipe out in California and
still have a state? I guess we're going
to find out.
Um, and the crypto market went to hell,
as you know. But, um, I don't know how
much you should worry about the crypto
market. isn't the very nature of it that
it's
it's volatile and that uh if you're just
in the weird little cryptos, you know,
it was a big risk and if you're in
Bitcoin, you're probably going to huddle
it, which is hold it. Um, so you
probably don't care. I don't know. Does
is anybody panicked about crypto or you
just sort of watching it? I think I
would just watch it at this point.
You know, I kept telling you that there
there are all these uh tests going on
for a vaccine to cure cancer or to keep
it from happening. Uh here's another
one. There's another nextgen vaccine to
prevent up to 88% of multiple aggressive
cancers according to Paul Mccclure in
the New Alice. Um so you don't need to
know too much more about this one. Uh
because I went to Grock and I said how
many current trials are there where
somebody's trying to fix cancer with a
vaccine where they made the vaccine out
of usually something about your body. So
it's about you specifically the vaccine
is and I and I said there were seven of
them. So there were seven ongoing trials
that were cancer vaccines. Now, I don't
think any of them will be ready in time,
you know, to save me. But it does look
like maybe there's something there, you
know, may maybe for the rest of you.
I'll see if I can last long enough to
get to the vaccines, but it does look
like some of that's going to work.
Works on animals anyway. So, working on
animals is only like a one in 20 chance
that it's going to work on humans.
Um
the Portland Police Union is welcoming
the uh federal uh help, you know, the
the federal troops. Uh whereas the
government is saying, "We don't need no
federal troops. We don't have a problem
here." And so the Portland uh violence
is also being called imaginary. So now,
so now we're being told that Antifa is
an imaginary group and that the violence
around the ICE facilities and stuff in
Portland is also so small that if you
imagine it's a it's a big problem,
that's just imaginary.
And
I don't know what is right.
Is it possible that the news is uh
exaggerating the the real danger in
Portland? Because I think it could be a
little of both. It could be that the
danger is not that great, but at the
same time, the police do want help
because the police have been degraded so
much that they can't even handle, you
know, a modest threat. So, it could be a
combination of not enough police and a
little bit of trouble that wouldn't
ordinarily be a lot of trouble because
you would have a lot of police. So, I
don't know what's through there, but uh
once again, as long as Trump takes the
strong approach and he's the one who's
looking to clamp down on crime and
Portland is looking like the ones they
don't care as much about crime, Trump
wins. I think he wins just by being the
strong one. MIT says they have a new
gene editing tool. Sounds kind of boring
and nerdlike, but it would be 60 times
fewer mistakes than before. Because, you
know, gene editing, if you could do gene
editing quickly and efficiently and
economically, there's a whole bunch of
stuff you can fix. And uh, you know,
this is just a movement in the right
direction. But if they could actually
make that much of a improvement in the
gene editing technology,
well, you you might get yourself a new
head, you know, that new head you've
been wanting. It's getting closer. All
right, that's all I have for today. It
is a Saturday, so you should be petting
your cats and having a good time. Um, I
did promise you that I would read you a
reframe from my book, Reframe Your
Brain. I started with one, but I think
I'm going to randomly pick another one
because they're so useful.
If this works out, maybe I'll make it a
thing. So, it's from my book, Reframe
Your Brain. And uh I'll just pick the
first one from the social life category.
There's reframes for every domain, but
in the social life reframe, the first
one is the old the old frame used to be
be yourself.
Anybody ever used to give you that
advice to be yourself?
Terrible advice.
Here's here's the reframe. Become a
better version of yourself.
If you're satisfied being yourself,
people aren't going to want to be around
you. You're not that good. You need some
work and you should admit that you're a
work in progress. People will like you
better if you admit you've got some work
to do. Try being better. You should be
working on some kind of a system or a
process or uh finding some way to be the
improved version of yourself. You should
be getting smarter, healthier. You
should become wiser, kinder. You should
be trying to get your, you know, your
depression down and get your mental
health better. You should be trying to
get different in every possible way.
People, people ask me when uh I've told
you this story before, but uh people
asked me if when I hit it big with
Dilbert and I went from not having money
to well, people asked me if uh being
famous and successful changed me. Did it
change me? And I'd always laugh and say,
"Well, I hope so.
That was the whole point. Why would I go
through all that work to be the same
person?
The the whole everything that I do
has at least a secondary ambition of
changing me. Like I don't go to the gym
because it doesn't change me. I I don't
work hard in my career because it won't
change me. I do it so it will. If I want
to feel confident, what am I supposed to
do? just sit in a chair and try to jin
up some confidence. No, I'm going to go
do something and then if it works, guess
what? I get more confident. So, no, I'm
every day in every way I'm trying to
figure out how to be like a little bit
better version of myself. So, if anybody
ever tells you the key to success is be
yourself, you're getting some bad
advice.
Be better. Just be better.
All right, that is your reframe of the
day. Owen Gregorian will be hosting a
spaces right after this. Give him a few
minutes to uh
uh
you can't become a millionaire without
becoming the kind of person who becomes
a millionaire. Exactly. Exactly. All
right. So, Owen Gregorian, just uh go to
go to X and uh you can search for his
name and it'll pop up the spaces. And uh
I'm going to say a few words to the
locals people, my beloved beloved locals
people and the rest of you. I'll see you
tomorrow. Thanks for coming.
[Music]