Episode 600 Scott Adams - Let’s Discuss a Tweet Because Everything Else Seems to be Fine
Trash talk tweets and trash talk outrage CNN “Opinions” labeled as “Analysis”…why? Conservatives have consistent rules, respect laws and constitution We’re born with a genetic propensity to be liberal or conservative “Woke” means there are good people and bigots, eliminate bigots “Enlightened” means you understand…everyone is a bigot Woke is broke President Trump’s likely reelection means… …Iran can’t wait for someone softer than POTUS Only ONE Iranian needs to change their mind and allow peace ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like my channel to have a wider audience and higher production quality, please donate via my startup (Whenhub.com) at this link: https://interface.my/ScottAdamsSays I use donations to pay for the daily conversions of the original Periscope videos into Youtube and podcast form, and to improve my production quality and search results over time. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Please subscribe to my channel…it REALLY helps. Like my video? Hate my video? Let me know, VOTE! Please leave a comment, let me know how I'm doing. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ba-bum, ba-bum. Hey everybody. Hey John, come on in here. Good to see you. You know what time it is. It's time for a Coffee with Scott Adams, the best time of the day. Get your dopamine pumping. That's the sound of dopamine pumping. And it doesn't take much to enjoy this moment. It takes very little…
View segment →All it takes is a cup or a glass, a stein, the chalice, a Thermos, a flask, maybe a canteen, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the simultaneous sip. Get your simultaneity going. Here we go. Ah. Tingly shivers. Shi…
View segment →Well, I'd like to talk about all the problems in the world first. Okay, that was me talking about all the problems in the world, because it turns out there aren't any real problems in the world, at least if you take it from the news, because the news is talking about a tweet. That's right. The bigge…
View segment →Now if I told you, yes I have many times, that's a way to evaluate your filter online. Let's say you're looking at the world one way and interpreting it one way. Somebody else is looking at it another way. Whether it's this presidential tweet, some people say, "My God, it's a racist outrage," and ot…
View segment →Let's take a little deeper into this whole "go back home" tweet. You all know the background. I don't need to give you the background. We're talking about President Trump's tweet that's causing everybody's hair to be on fire. So here, let me show you some of the craziness that this has caused. Over…
View segment →To that point, let me ask you this hypothetically. You're a black citizen of the United States. You've got two friends. One of your friends is a registered Democrat. One of your friends is a registered Republican. Which one's going to help you get a job? Which one's going to do you a favor? Well, ma…
View segment →Well, I think that something important has happened because this tweet, it seems to me that the charges of racism against each other have uncovered a truth that, like the dog that wasn't barking, it's a truth that we should rejoice at. During the time that we have been talking nonstop about whether…
View segment →Does it seem to you that now that everybody's a racist, meaning that literally just everybody's racist, and by the way I don't say this with hyperbole, when I say that the squad looks racist to me, I mean they look racist in the sense that they're framing things in racial terms and they think that s…
View segment →Let me give you a positive thing. So without getting into details of my personal life, I was listening to a conversation from some preteens, teens actually, some young teens in my local area. They were having the conversation and I was listening to it. The entire conversation was about race. It was…
View segment →All right, let's talk about some belts. This is one of the complaints. I think this was on CNN or somewhere. I can't, I think it wasn't CNN. There was some analyst who said that about Trump and his comments about the squad, someone said that he's playing a risky political game though it may be the o…
View segment →All right, so I saw some speculation that Iran might be convinced that President Trump is going to be reelected. I don't know how they would be convinced of that exactly because the polls clearly say that Biden will win. But all the smart people are pretty sure that Biden doesn't have a chance. So I…
View segment →All right, I think we said what we need to say. If the only thing that we're worried about today is we're all bigots, then maybe we can reach a higher level. And maybe that's this year. Who knows? I'll talk to you later.
View segment →Ba-bum, ba-bum. Hey everybody. Hey John, come on in here. Good to see you. You know what time it is. It's time for a Coffee with Scott Adams, the best time of the day. Get your dopamine pumping. That's the sound of dopamine pumping. And it doesn't take much to enjoy this moment. It takes very little, actually. All it takes is a cup or a glass, a stein, the chalice, a Thermos, a flask, maybe a canteen, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the simultaneous sip. Get your simultaneity going. Here we go. Ah. Tingly shivers. Shivers, I tell you. Wow. Oh, what a way to start the day.
Well, I'd like to talk about all the problems in the world first. Okay, that was me talking about all the problems in the world, because it turns out there aren't any real problems in the world, at least if you take it from the news, because the news is talking about a tweet. That's right. The biggest news in the world is a tweet that was worded in such a way that people feel bad for other people. When I say feel bad for other people, what I'm talking about is Anderson Cooper feeling very, very, very bad that these tweets might make other people feel bad. That's your big problem of the day. That's your headline news. Somebody's tweet might make somebody else maybe feel bad.
We would ask those people to come on, but we couldn't find anybody who feels bad. And although we couldn't find anybody who actually feels bad, we could find hundreds of people who feel bad for the people who don't feel bad. Now it used to be that if you did something that would make somebody feel bad, that was the story. Somebody did something, somebody else feels bad. Well, there's something to talk about. But we don't have that anymore. Now we have somebody does something, let's say it's a tweet, a provocative tweet, and instead of people feeling bad, they really don't care one way or the other. But there are people who feel bad for the people who should feel bad but they don't seem to feel bad because they don't really care.
Do you know who I think was the least bothered by the "go back home" tweets from the president? I don't know this for sure, so I'm just going to put this out here. I think the group least bothered by the "go back home" was American black people. I don't know that to be true, and I'm certainly not going to put myself in their heads, and I'm not going to speak for any other group. I certainly can't do that. But it feels to me like they understood the point, which is it's not about race. It's about loving your country. And if you have a loyalty to some other country, blah blah blah. But moreover, it was just bull trash talk. It wasn't even factually on point. It was just trash talk that made real people really feel bad for other people who, if you ask them, would say, "You know what? I have to worry about a lot more things than that tweet, that's for sure."
Now if I told you, yes I have many times, that's a way to evaluate your filter online. Let's say you're looking at the world one way and interpreting it one way. Somebody else is looking at it another way. Whether it's this presidential tweet, some people say, "My God, it's a racist outrage," and other people, "It's just trash talk." Two very different filters. One of the things that you can do to test your filter, to see which one is the right one, is to see which one predicts better.
One of the filters predicts that the president will do a bunch of racist stuff and that people who are good at spotting racist stuff will notice it. So you would imagine if you have one filter. The other filter says no, you're just imagining it. He does the simultaneous sip, if you missed it. So the other filter says no, he's just trash-talking like he always does, and you're imagining all the bad stuff. Which of those two filters would predict that Israel would name a settlement after President Trump? Is that the filter that says, "Oh yeah, he's backing the neo-Nazis"? Would Israel not be able to detect that someone was backing neo-Nazis if he were the President of the United States? Yeah, I think Israel would be able to detect that.
So my filter that says he's just talking seems to be consistent with observation. What we observe is that Israel says that's just politics. He seems like the greatest friend Israel ever had. Which of the filters would predict that President Trump would be strong on prison reform? Is it the one that says, "My God, he'll do anything that's bad for brown and black people," or is it the filter that says it's just politics? Of course he wants what's good for Americans. That's his job. And he wants to be evaluated. Presumably everybody wants to be evaluated by how they do with their job. So why would he be different?
So my filter predicts a hundred percent of everything that's happened. A hundred percent. My filter aligns and predicts everything you observe. But if your filter only predicts half of what happens and the other half is just inexplicable, well, maybe it's time to rethink your filter on life.
Let's take a little deeper into this whole "go back home" tweet. You all know the background. I don't need to give you the background. We're talking about President Trump's tweet that's causing everybody's hair to be on fire. So here, let me show you some of the craziness that this has caused. Over at CNN, where opinion and news are treated as the same thing, and I say that because CNN doesn't do a good job of separating what is opinion from what is news. They sort of smush it together so the viewer doesn't quite know what has been presented as a fact and what is just somebody's interpretation. Fox News, by anybody's measure, has lots of different opinions, and some of them you don't agree with, but they do a lot better job of labeling opinion. You know that Hannity's opinion, right? You know that Tucker's an opinion show.
But listen to this smushing. This is an analysis by Stefan Collinson. Now it's presented not as opinion. It's actually labeled on the CNN site as "analysis." Now you're just a dumb American and you're reading some stuff on the CNN news site. If it says "opinion," what do you think of it? You think, okay, well it's not necessarily fact, it's opinion. If it's labeled "analysis," what are you, the dumb American, think? They're doing analysis. Doesn't really sound like opinion, does it? I mean, I think that it allows it to be opinion-y. I think it does allow that. But the word seems to be chosen to blur the difference between opinion and fact.
So here's what Stefan Collinson's analysis says. He says, this is just part of it, "In the twilight zone of the White House, the man who unleashed the fury, Trump expressed disgust at the vile, horrible statements said by the woman he targeted over the color of their skin." So on a CNN site labeled "analysis," they slip in this unsupported statement: "he targeted over the color of their skin." At what point did the president target somebody over the color of their skin? It's presented like, well that's obvious, you know that, there's no point in supporting this fact, everybody can see it. That's not an evidence.
Do you know who else President Trump told to go back home? The British ambassador. Correct me if I'm wrong. Did he not send the British ambassador packing and call him stupid? Come on, it just happened. He just told the British ambassador to go back home. He didn't use those words, but is that the important part? He told him. He said he was stupid, incompetent, had never met him, and why he probably met him but didn't even know who he was. He told him to go back home. Yeah, the British ambassador. Did anybody say that the president is prejudiced against British people? No.
So to me, what Stefan Collinson did here by putting this sentence in his analysis, "said by the women he targeted over the color of their skin," to me that's a racist statement, isn't it? And my point being that if all you're doing is talking about whether or not somebody acted about race, and the frame is race and everything's race and race race race, isn't that making things worse?
You know the president has expressly said that if you're in the United States, he's going to be your best friend. If you're a citizen of the country, he's going to be your best friend and supporter and cheerleader. And if you're not, you're on the other team and he doesn't hate you but he's going to compete against you and make sure that his team does better than the other teams. Now that's the frame that he's continually and clearly put on all of his political actions. The critics continually and expressly, this is not an interpretation of mine, they continually frame things as racial issues. There's no way that isn't the race-ist. There's no way.
Now the Republicans don't make a big deal of calling the other side racist because it's just not their deal. But we have certainly reached the point where a hundred percent of us are racist. We actually have a situation yesterday, I tweeted about it, I think I had 5,000 retweets on it, and I said that the breaking news, the racist press is reporting to the racist public that racist Pelosi is accusing racist Trump of saying bad things about the racist four congresswomen. There's nobody in that story who hasn't been accused of racism. A hundred percent of all the people in the news have now been accused of racism. There's nobody left. There's nobody left.
I'm going to drink some black coffee right now and just try to experience the whatever this is, the cognitive dissonance we're all experiencing. And I drink this coffee, this black coffee, as a salute to the black citizens of this country who we support 100%. I'll drink to that.
To that point, let me ask you this hypothetically. You're a black citizen of the United States. You've got two friends. One of your friends is a registered Democrat. One of your friends is a registered Republican. Which one's going to help you get a job? Which one's going to do you a favor? Well, maybe both. But I'll tell you, have you ever met anybody who, let's say an African American who became a Republican? Have you ever seen an African-American Republican who said that other Republicans treat them poorly? Have you ever seen that? No, you've never seen that. Because Republicans have very clear rules. I'm not a Republican, by the way. All right, so I'm not a Republican, not a conservative. I always tell people I'm left of Bernie, but I have to admit I like Republicans better because they have a set of consistent rules that seem pretty fair to me and they try to live by them and treat other people by the rules.
The rules are the Constitution. If you follow the Constitution, you're good with me. If you follow the laws, you're good with me. And on top of that, I'm not religious, but for a lot of conservatives, if you're religious, it doesn't matter which one, if you've got a faith that informs the way you live, well then you're okay too. Republicans make it very easy to like you. How hard is it to be liked by a Republican? It's really, really easy. You just have to do legal things and work. That's it. In order to be loved by Republicans, just try. You don't even have to succeed. You just have to try. You have to follow the law. You know, sort of love your country, that helps, but that's not even necessary. You know, maybe you shouldn't talk about it so much if you don't love your country. But all Republicans ask is just follow the same rules and try. You don't even have to succeed and we'll love you.
I'll say "we" because I adopt that. I adopt the philosophy of if we're all here trying to do our best, following the same set of rules and respecting the same set of principles, then we're all good. I can't imagine what it would be like to be a person of color and be in the Democrat orbit because over there you've got to be good with a lot of different things. Yeah, it's sort of a shell game over there. Well I was good on this, but did I become a misogynist accidentally? And if I have, I define everything fairly in just the right way.
Well, I think that something important has happened because this tweet, it seems to me that the charges of racism against each other have uncovered a truth that, like the dog that wasn't barking, it's a truth that we should rejoice at. During the time that we have been talking nonstop about whether the words "go back home" are really racist or just trash talk, while we've been discussing that, how many real examples of racism have been reported in the news? Think about it. How many actual examples of somebody didn't get a job, got rejected from something? I know there was a racial murder. You know, I'm sure that these things were happening somewhere around the country, but we just have been jabbering nonstop about a couple of words in a tweet because it's the worst thing happening.
Is there anybody here who, let's say that, is there anybody here who has negative feelings about, I'll just make an example, any person of color, so long as they're following the rules, meaning the Constitution, the rule of law, working hard? Is there anybody here who has any bad feelings about anybody who does those three things? You know, respect the Constitution, follow the law, work hard, even if you don't succeed. Everybody here respects that, I'll bet. I'll bet there are zero exceptions. And this is a pretty, you know, we've got what, 2.3 thousand people watching this live. I'll bet there are zero people here, zero out of thousands, I'll bet there are zero people who would feel bad about any person of color, any gender, any other anything, as long as you follow the rules, same rules everybody else is following. That's it. You know, we'd love it if you loved your country, but it's optional. Just follow the rules and try. Just try.
But if you're over on the Democrat side, I don't know what the standards are over there. Must be harder. CNN has just completely gone into crazy land. They actually had white nationalist Richard Spencer on because they, I guess they thought they could get him to say some quote that sounded like positive for President Trump and then they would paint President Trump with Spencer. So it was, Spencer's the white nationalist, I guess. And here's what he said. So Richard Spencer complained on CNN that Trump "wasn't going far enough," saying he gave the movement nothing. So in other words, the leader of the white nationalist movement is saying that Trump is giving them nothing. CNN invited him on to get some love of Trump, I guess, so that they can paint Trump by this guy's reputation. And the guy says he's given us nothing. Yes, that's exactly right. He's given you nothing.
But he goes on, "outside racist tweets," and what did he say? "They seem like they came from a drunk uncle." So Richard Spencer says the only thing we had gotten from the president is, in Spencer's opinion, "racist tweets" that look like they came from a drunk uncle. Now here's the problem. Who does CNN agree with? Who's on the same team as CNN? Well, I don't think they planned it this way, but I can tell you two people who have the same view of life: CNN and apparently Richard Spencer, who also sees the president's tweet as racist. So somehow the left has managed to align themselves with white nationalists because they have the same opinion of these tweets. And they can't even get the white nationalists to go a little step further and say but he's done things right. It's not just the tweets that we don't look suspicious. He's actually done things right. And the white nationalist says that he hasn't done anything for us. Not a thing.
That must have been the saddest day on CNN when they couldn't get the white nationalist to do anything except have the same opinion. And CNN, not a good look.
Does it seem to you that now that everybody's a racist, meaning that literally just everybody's racist, and by the way I don't say this with hyperbole, when I say that the squad looks racist to me, I mean they look racist in the sense that they're framing things in racial terms and they think that something should be done differently because of something-something race. I think that's racist.
Now here's the funniest thing that I heard this morning. I wish I could give credit. Did I tweet it? I wish I could give credit because it's so brilliant. So if you're on this Periscope and you're the one who said this, it's a brilliant thought. It starts with this. Did you notice that there was some science recently, I don't know how recently, but there's some science to support the idea that you're born conservative or born liberal. You know that one of the defining characteristics is that conservatives are more creeped out by yucky stuff. They're more easily disgusted and more easily concerned about security and fear. So there's some thought that in terms of your DNA you're born with a certain propensity to be either disgusted by things that are not typical, or you also have maybe more concern about security, about safety.
Now suppose that's true, or don't you think that's true? Somebody says Jordan Peterson has talked about this for a long time. Now let's say that's true. Now let's also say that the squad and others have been mocking conservatives for a lot of different things. Is it not true that these two things are evidence? Are these facts so you can fact-check me? Now fact one: science says that being conservative or liberal is at least partly genetic. You're born that way. Partly true. Is it also true that the people on the left mock conservatives in general? They mock them specifically but they also mock them in general. Is that true? It is true.
Geordi is on it. You know where I'm going on this. If your political view is that you're mocking people because of things that they can't change, in other words genetic traits, in this case the genetic propensity to be a conservative, you are by your own definition a bigot. There would be no difference. No difference scientifically. There would be no difference between mocking somebody with a handicap and mocking somebody who had a genetic propensity toward conservatism. Am I right?
Now when somebody pointed that out to me, it was the first time I'd even heard that thought. It was just today on Twitter. And I thought that is a hundred percent true. There is nothing wrong with that thought. You know, my first thought was there was just sort of a funny political thing to say. You know, sometimes they're just clever political things to say that sound right but they're not actually scientifically rational. But this is actually a hundred percent scientifically rational. If you're making fun of conservatives as a group and that group has a genetic quality that makes them distinct, most of them, it doesn't have to be every single one but it doesn't work that way, as long as most of them have this characteristic in common, if you're mocking them for being uneducated toothless rubes who believe in conspiracy theories or whatever people are saying about conservatives these days, even if you're calling them racists, you're treating them as a class and it's a class they have a genetic component that makes them a class. They are a class because of a genetic component according to science.
So have we not reached the point where literally everyone is a bigot? Not always just racist because you could be bigoted against religion and you could be bigoted against gender and everything else. But have we not reached peak bigotry where absolutely, well here, what would be the best situation in the world? Can I tell you the best situation in the world to know that you're in the healthiest, best situation? I would look for the following things: everybody in the world realizing that everybody else in the world, including themselves, is a bigot just in different ways. So that there would be nothing healthier, in my opinion, there would be nothing healthier for this world than to realize that we're all bigoted sometimes. Because in my view that's the moment of greater understanding.
I would say that the people who would call themselves woke are a level below where they need to be. There's a level above woke that's enlightened. Woke says we must make a separation between these people who are bigots and the good people who are not. That's what woke means, right? There's some people who are not bigots. They're the good people and we should put some pressure on the people who are bigots to make them less bigoted. That's woke. The level above woke is enlightened. Enlightened says being less bigoted is not an option. We're all bigoted because we have a human brain. The human brain is not a rational device. The human brain operates on patterns and we're not good at patterns. Those are the two things you need to know about the human brain. It operates mostly on patterns and number two, we're not good at it. We see patterns where there are none and then we say, hey it's a pattern, I guess I'll treat this like the next one will be in the same pattern even if it isn't because it's all I have to go on. I usually don't have complete information about my reality so I have to look for these little patterns and use them as sort of a proxy or a guide to what's going to happen.
So I would say that we may have completely accidentally, President Trump's actions and our reactions to them have gotten us to the borderline between woke, where one person's calling another one a bigot, and enlightened, where we realize we're all bigots. We're all bigots because you can't turn off pattern recognition and number two you're not good at pattern recognition. Those are the things you need to know.
Now what do you do with it? What would an enlightened person do with the knowledge that bigotry is universal and it's not something the other guy does? What would you do differently when you achieve that enlightenment? Well if you're a good person, in my opinion, all right so here's my personal philosophical opinion. This is no, there's no news or fact here. This is my opinion. You could choose to reject it or accept it. In my opinion the best you can do as a person, the most respect I will give you, is if you say to yourself, yeah we're all bigots sometimes, it happens to me, and I'm going to use my best social reasoning to overcome it. I'm going to try to overcome it. If you're saying that, you're the best person a person can be. A person who says I'm not a bigot and you're a bigot are operating in a lower level of enlightenment. If they say you're a bigot and oh my God sometimes I am too, you're operating at a higher level. And then in order to be responsible, to be a responsible citizen of the world operating at that higher level where you say yeah it's all of us, but what can I do about it? If you're saying what can I do about it, you're good in my book. You're completely good. You're just dealing with what you know. How do you deal with the fact that the human brain is a pattern-recognizing machine and we're not good at it?
So I think the president has laid bare the fact that everybody is a bigot. That's the fact. I think we can no longer ignore it. Would you say, I would say that the entire conversation about the squad, the entire conversation about immigration, the entire conversation about whether conservatives or liberals are the good ones, that entire conversation should be revealing in the clearest possible way that woke is broke and that there's a level above it. And the president just completely accidentally, I don't think that he had any intention to do what I'm saying, but by showing that everything is bigoted and that even if you were to take the position that the country is the best organizing principle, the president consistently says country good, people outside the country are on the other team. And the so-called good people who think that bigotry is only something that other people have, those people have decided to flip out and go crazy and treat the country as if this is somehow the same as bigotry. So we may have completely accidentally blundered into a new level of enlightenment that I think is important.
Let me give you a positive thing. So without getting into details of my personal life, I was listening to a conversation from some preteens, teens actually, some young teens in my local area. They were having the conversation and I was listening to it. The entire conversation was about race. It was people talking about their friends. And they were saying, you know, this friend is one of these, this friend is one of these, and you know these people talk this way and these people have this funny accent and these people have this characteristic. And my first reaction to it was shock because all they talked about was race. My second reaction was that they all loved each other, which was shocking because the way they were talking about race was not really negative. In fact it was jokingly negative in the way that teenagers joke, but it wasn't negative in their hearts. You could tell that there was affection and that the race was a conversation and that they were sort of, let's just say they were interacting with the differences. They were talking about the differences, you know that this group has these tendencies whatever, but none of it seemed mean-spirited. It seemed like, you know, there's another, it seems like the generation coming up talks about race completely explicitly and all the time because it doesn't mean the same thing. It's lost its power now.
I'm not sure that this would be the same everywhere and with every group, but it's just one of those little things you see and you say, wow, you know it looks like it lost its power because the people who were talking were, you know, it was a mixed group. So I hope that's a good thing and I hope I'm not misunderstanding what was going on there. But it looks like, and I've seen this before by the way, it's not the one conversation, I've seen it, but it seems like the next generation is going to be just having fun with the differences but not taking them too seriously, which would be the gigantic leap forward for civilization, I think.
All right, let's talk about some belts. This is one of the complaints. I think this was on CNN or somewhere. I can't, I think it wasn't CNN. There was some analyst who said that about Trump and his comments about the squad, someone said that he's playing a risky political game though it may be the only one he really knows how to play. And I'm thinking you have to dig pretty deeply to find something to insult the president for if he has a strategy that keeps working. Yes, his strategy keeps working. But okay, what can we say about a strategy that keeps working? It may be the only one he really knows how to play. Well if there's only one strategy that might work and it's the one that he uses and it works, is it really an insightful analysis to say it may be the only one he knows how to play? Yeah, he doesn't know how to play the losing hands. He doesn't know how to do the things that don't work. What does that even mean? Everybody knows how to do things that don't work.
Now compare President Trump to a normal politician. So Mitch McConnell of course got dragged into all the controversy and CNN's Manu Raju asked McConnell, what would he say if someone told his wife Elaine Chao, Trump's transportation secretary, what would McConnell say if somebody told his wife to quote "go back to where she came from," which would be Taiwan I guess. And here's how McConnell answers that question. So McConnell is asked this big old racist, your racism question, and his answer was that he was a fan of legal immigration. McConnell just sucked all the life out of the question. It's like, what would you say if somebody told your wife to go home? What would you say, Mitch McConnell? Huh? Huh? Huh? Take the bait, take the bait, McConnell. You do it, do it. We're going to get a quote out of you. You're going to be all over the news. Will you say something stupid, Mitch McConnell? What are you going to say to that? We're going to ship your wife back home. What would you say to that? McConnell says, ah, I'm a big fan of legal immigration. And everybody says, I'm not even sure that's on topic but okay. You just bored us to death and we did not get a quote out of you.
All right, so I saw some speculation that Iran might be convinced that President Trump is going to be reelected. I don't know how they would be convinced of that exactly because the polls clearly say that Biden will win. But all the smart people are pretty sure that Biden doesn't have a chance. So I don't know how Iran is clever enough to sort that out because it seems like they would look at the polls and say, well it looks like every single Democrat who's in the top four could beat this president so we don't have to deal with this guy. He's going to be gone in 2020. But I think that Iran is clever enough that they listen to the right people and the right people are saying there's not going to be Biden and it looks like Trump is cruising to reelection. So what that does is it changes their calculation about who they're going to be negotiating with and it takes off the table the option of waiting until 2020 and getting somebody else to negotiate with who could give them, in their view, a better deal.
So the fact that the president's reelection looks likely gives the United States a tremendous bargaining advantage. And it's created, I think Iran is in this weird little zone where they're trying to make noise and they're trying to cause a little bit of trouble but they don't want to cause a lot of trouble because this president has created an impression that he is unpredictable and you don't know when you're going to cross the line. They probably thought they crossed the line already but he played it cool and now they're thinking about, all right, well if we do a little more than that are we going to get bombed? If we do a little more than we've done but doing less than we've done isn't going to make any difference, so what are you going to do? So I think the president has put Iran in the position in which their incentive to negotiate is pretty high.
And I'll say this again because it's so shocking. Peace in the Middle East. Just the phrase "peace in the Middle East" sounds so ridiculous. Then you tell yourself, well that's not even a thing. It's a perpetual war zone. There will always be a perpetual war zone. And on some level that might be true at the small level. But just think about this. At this point in time with this president, and some of it's luck but some of it is the way they treat the Middle East and the leaders there, etc., President Trump has gotten the Middle East, not by himself but he's a big part of it, the Middle East has reached a point where peace for the entire Middle East is down to one guy who's in his eighties, that Ayatollah Khomeini. So if the Supreme Leader of Iran ever decides to negotiate in good faith, we don't know if he ever will, but he's the last person. Now maybe there's somebody behind him. If he were replaced maybe you'd be just the same. But there's just one position. Just one person has to change their mind and we're done. One person has to say, you know I don't think anything that we do is going to change the reality that Israel exists and it's going to keep existing. Just one person. Think about that. Have we ever been this close that one person just needs to change their mind? And that one person is under tremendous pressure internally and externally to change his mind.
Some people are asking about Turkey. Turkey, Turkey is a weird situation because they're a NATO ally. At the same time we didn't want them to have anti-aircraft missiles because I guess they're taking shipment of some Russian anti-aircraft missiles. So I don't quite understand our position on Turkey because either you're a NATO ally or you're not. If you're a NATO ally, do we care that you have a way to defend yourself? I don't think that buying Russian missiles is our first choice but it's not the worst problem in the world, is it? Are we going to bomb Turkey? I don't think we're planning on bombing Turkey. So why do we care if they have good anti-aircraft? And by the way, who is Turkey defending against? I don't know the answer to that. Can somebody tell me who does Turkey think is going to attack them from the air? Why am I just thinking of this now? I don't even know why Turkey has a threat. Does anybody even know? Because ISIS doesn't have an air force. They are an occupied NATO ally. Somebody saying, well I don't know what that means. Yeah they're, they don't need the anti-aircraft missiles because of immigration. They don't need it because their neighbors, not really. Do you think Turkey has a risk from Iraq? Does Turkey have a risk from Iran from the air? I don't think so. I guess they need them. So those are the problems that we have, that one of our allies is buying weapons from somebody else. I don't know if we have the biggest problem in the world but I think we're very close to something like peace in the Middle East. One person's away and that person is tipping. That person is leaning.
Turkey can't use our equipment with Russian stuff. Yeah, well I'm sure that we would rather sell Turkey our own American equipment and there are probably lots of strategic and other advantages in doing that. Somebody says I lived in Turkey. I know I miss, what it is that you know, internal coups, Greece. Everybody has a different idea of why Turkey needs anti-aircraft missiles but I guess we're all guessing.
All right, I think we said what we need to say. If the only thing that we're worried about today is we're all bigots, then maybe we can reach a higher level. And maybe that's this year. Who knows? I'll talk to you later.
ba-bum ba-bum hey everybody hey John come on in here good to see you you know what time it is it's time for a coffee with Scott Adams the best time of the day get your dopamine pumping that's the sound of dopamine pumping and it doesn't take much to enjoy this moment it takes very little actually all it takes is a cup of our glass the stein the chalice detector - thermos a flask maybe a canteen a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the simultaneous sip get your simultaneity goin here we go ah tingly shivers shivers I tell you Wow Oh what it is what a way that starts today well I'd like to talk about all the problems in the world first okay that was me talking about all the problems in the world because it turns out there aren't any real problems in the world at least if you take it from the news because the news is talking about a tweet that's right the biggest news in the world is a tweet that was worded in such a way that people feel bad for other people when I say feel bad for other people what I'm talking about is Anderson Cooper feeling very very very bad that these tweets might make other people feel bad that's your big problem of the day that's your headline news somebody's tweet make somebody else maybe feel bad we would ask those people to come on but we couldn't find anybody who feels bad and although we couldn't find anybody who actually feels bad we could find hundreds of people who feel bad for the people who don't feel bad now it used to be that if you did something that would make somebody feel bad that was the story somebody did something somebody else feels bad well there's there's something to talk about but we don't have that anymore now we have somebody does something let's say it's a tweet a provocative tweet and instead of people feeling bad they really don't care one way or the other but there are people who feel bad for the people who should feel bad but they don't seem to feel bad because they don't really care do you know who I think was the least bothered by the go back home tweets from the president I don't know this for sure so I'm just gonna put this out here I think the group least bothered by the go back home was American black people I don't know that to be true and I'm certainly not going to put myself in their heads and I'm not going to you know speak for any other group I certainly can't do that but it feels to me like they understood the point which is it's not about race it's about loving your country and if you have a loyalty to some other country blah blah blah but moreover it was just a bull trash talk it wasn't even it wasn't even factually on point it was just trash talk that made real people really feel bad for other people who if you ask them would say do you know what I have to worry about a lot more things than that tweet that's for sure now if I told you yes I have many times that's a way to evaluate your filter online let's say you're looking at the world one way and interpreting it one way somebody else is looking at it another way whether it's this presidential tweet some people say my god it's it's a racist outrage and other people it's just trash darkus nothing very different filters one of the things that you can do to test your filter to see which one is the right one is to see which one predicts better one of the filters predicts that the president will do at a bunch of racist stuff and that people who were good at spotting racist stuff will notice that's why you would imagine if you have one filter the other filter says no you're just imagining I did do the simultaneous if you missed it so the other filter says no he's just trash-talking like he always does and you're imagining all the bad stuff which of those two filters would predict that Israel would name a settlement after President Trump is that the filter that says oh yeah he's I think he's back in the neo-nazis would Israel not be able to detect that someone was backing neo-nazis if he were the President of the United States yeah I think I think Israel would be able to detect that so my filter this says he's just talking seems to be consistent with observation what we observe is that Israel says that's just politics he seems like the greatest friend Israel ever ever had which of the filters would predict that that President Trump would be strong on prison reform is it the one that says my god he'll do anything that's bad for brown and black people or is it the filter that says it's just politics of course he wants what's good for Americans that's his job and he wants to be evaluated presumably everybody wants to be evaluated by how they do with their job so why would he be different so my filter predicts a hundred percent of everything that's happened a hundred percent my filter allows and protects everything you observe but if your filter uh-huh if your filter only predicts half of what happens and the other half is just inexplicable well maybe it's time to rethink your filter on life let's take a little deeper into this whole go back home tweet you all know the background I don't need to give you the background we're talking about president Trump's tweet that's causing everybody's hair to be on fire so here let me show you some of the craziness that this is cost so over at CNN where we're opinion and news are treated as the same thing and I say that because CNN doesn't do a good job of separating what is opinion from what is news they sort of smushed together so the viewer doesn't quite know what has been presented as a fact and what is just somebody's interpretation Fox News as by anybody's measure lots of different opinions and some of them you don't agree with but they do a lot better job of labeling opinion you know the Hannity's opinion right you know that Tucker's an opinion show but listen to this smooshing this is an analysis by Stefan do you pronounce it Stefan ste pH yeah Ian I never know if that's the right way to pronounce it Stefan Collinson now it's presented not as opinion it's actually labeled on the CNN site is labeled analysis now you're just a dumb American and you're reading some some stuff on the CNN news site if it says opinion what do you think of it you think okay well it's not necessarily fact is opinion if it's labeled analysis what are you the dumb American think they're doing analysis doesn't really sound like you're pinyin does it I mean I think that it allows it to be opinion II I think the does allow that but the word seems to be chosen to to blur the difference between the opinion and fact from our own analysis so here's what Stefan calling sense analysis says he says this is just part of it in the twilight zone of the white house the man who unleashed the fury Trump expressed disgust at the vial at the quote vile horrible statements said by the woman he targeted over the color of their skin so on a CNN site labeled analysis they slip in this unsupported statement he targeted over the color of their skin what what at what point that the president targets somebody over the color of their skin it's presented like well that's obvious is you know that there's no point in supporting this fact everybody can see it that's not an evidence do you know who else president Trump told to go back home the British ambassador correct me if I'm wrong did he not send the British ambassador packing and call him stupid come on it just happened he just told the British ambassador to go back home he didn't use those words but is that the important part he told him he said he was stupid incompetent had never met him and why he probably met him but doesn't doesn't didn't even know who he was I told him to go back home yeah I had the British ambassador did anybody say that the president is prejudiced against British people no so to me what Stephan Collinson did here by putting this sentence in his analysis said by the women he targeted over the color their skin to me that's a racist statement isn't it and my point being that if all you're doing is talking about whether or not somebody acted about race and the frame is raised and everything's race and race race race isn't isn't that making things worse you know the president has expressly said that if you're in the United States he's gonna be your best friend you're if you're if you're a citizen of the country he's gonna be your best friend and supporter and cheerleader and if you're not you're on the other team and he doesn't hate you but he's gonna compete against you and make sure that his team does better than the other teams now that's the frame that he's continually and clearly put on all of his political actions the critics continually and expressly this is not an interpretation of mine they continually frame things as racial issues there's no way that isn't the race aside there's no way now the Republicans don't make a big deal of calling the other side racist because it's just not their deal but we have certainly reached the point where a hundred percent of us are racist we actually have a situation yesterday I tweeted about it I think I had 5,000 retweets on it and I said that the you know breaking news the racist press is reporting to the racist public that racist President Trump or no that racist Pelosi is accusing racist Trump of saying bad things about the racist for a congresswoman there's nobody in that story who hasn't been accused of racism a hundred percent of all the people in the news have now been accused of racism there's nobody left there's nobody left I'm gonna drink some black coffee right now and just try to experience the whatever this is the cognitive dissonance we're all experiencing and I drink this coffee this black coffee as a salute to the black citizens of this country who we support 100% I'll drink to that to that point let me ask you this hypothetically you're a black citizen of the United States you've got two friends one of your friends is a registered Democrat one of your friends is a register registered Republican which one's gonna help you get a job which one's gonna do you a favor well maybe both but I'll tell you have you ever met anybody who let's say an African American who who became a Republican have you ever seen an african-american Republican who said that other Republicans treat them poorly have you ever seen that no you've never seen that because Republicans have very clear rules I'm not a Republican by the way all right so I'm not a Republican not a conservative I always tell people and left to Bernie but I have to admit I like Republicans better because they have a set of consistent rules that seem pretty fair to me and they try to live by them and treat other people by the rules the rules are the Constitution if you follow the Constitution you're good with me if you follow the laws you're good with me and on top of that I'm not religious but for a lot of conservatives if you if you're religious you doesn't matter which one if you've got you know a faith that informs the way you live well then you're okay too Republicans make it very easy to like you how hard is it to be liked by a Republican it's really really easy you just have to do legal things and work that's it it in order to be loved by Republicans just try you don't even have to succeed you just have to try you have to follow the law you know sort of love your country that helps but that's not even necessary you know maybe you shouldn't talk about it so much if you don't love your country but all Republicans ask is just follow the same rules and try you don't even have to succeed and we'll love you I'll say we because I adopt that I adopt the philosophy of if we're all here trying do it our best following the same set of rules and respecting the same set of you know principles that that were all good I can't imagine what it would be like to be a person of color can be in the Democrat orbit because over there you've got to be good with a lot of different things yeah it's it's sort of eight shells over there well I was I was good on this but did I become a misogynist accidentally and if I have I definite everything fairly in just the right way well I think that something important has happened because this tweet it seems to me that the charges of racism against each other have uncovered a truth that like the the dog that wasn't barking it's a truth that we should rejoice at during the time that we have been talking nonstop about whether the words go back home are really racist or just trash talk while we've been discussing that how many real examples of racism have been reported in the news right think about it how many actual examples of somebody I didn't get a job got rejected from something I know there was a racial murder you know I'm sure that these things were happening somewhere around the kind trait but we just have been jabbering non-stop about a couple of words in the tweet because it's the worst thing happening is there anybody here who well let's say that is there anybody here who has negative feelings about I'll just make an example any any person of color so long as they're following the rules meaning the Constitution the rule of law working hard is there anybody here who has any bad feelings about anybody who does those three things you know respect the Constitution follow the law work hard even if you don't succeed everybody here respects that I'll bet I'll bet there are zero exceptions and this is a pretty you know this is we've got what 2.3 thousand people watching this live I'll bet there are zero people here zero out of thousands I'll bet there are zero people who would feel bad about any person of color any any gender any any other anything as long as you follow the rules same rules everybody else is following that's it you know we'd love it if you like if you loved your country but it's optional just follow the rules and try just try but if you're over on the Democrat side I don't know what the standards are over there must be harder see you then has just completely gone into crazy land they actually had white nationalist Richard Spencer on because they I guess they thought they could get him to say some quote that sounded like positive for President Trump and then they would paint president Trump with Spencer so it was Spencer's the white nationalist I guess and here's what he said so Richard Spencer complained on CNN that Trump quote wasn't going far enough saying he gave the movement nothing so in other words the leader of the white nationalist movement is saying that Trump is giving them nothing CNN invited invited him on to guess some you know some love of Trump I guess so that they can paint Trump by this this guy's reputation and the guy says he's given us nothing yes that's exactly right he's given you nothing but he goes on outside racist tweets and what'd he say they seem like they came from a drunk uncle so Richard Spencer says the only thing we had gotten from the president is in in Spencer's opinion quote out racist tweets and look like they came from a drunk uncle now here's the problem who do who do see you then who does see you then agree with who's on the same team as CNN well I don't think they planned it this way but I can tell you two people who have the same view of life CNN and apparently Richard Spencer who also sees the president streets tweet says racist so somehow the left has managed to align themselves with white nationalists because they're they have the same opinion of these tweets and they can't even get the white nationalists to go a little step further and say but he's done things right it's not just the tweets that we don't you know look suspicious he's actually done things right and the white nationalist says that he hasn't done anything for us not a thing that must have been the saddest day on CNN when they couldn't get the white nationalists to do anything except have the same opinion and CNN not a good look CNN does it seem to you that now that everybody's a racist meaning that literally just everybody's racist and by the way I don't say this with hyperbole when I say that the the squad looks racist to me I mean they look racist in the sense that they're framing things in racial terms and they think that something should be done differently because of something-something race I think that's racist now here's you you want to hear the funniest thing that I heard this morning I wish I could give credit did I tweet it I wish I could give credit because it's so brilliant so if you're if you're on this periscope and you're the one who said this it's a brilliant thought it starts with this did you notice that there was some science recently I don't know how recently but there's some science to support the idea that you're born conservative or born liberal you know that one of the defining characteristics is that I guess conservatives are that are more creeped out by yucky stuff they're more easily disgusted and and more easily concerned about security and fear so so there's some some thought that from in terms of your DNA you're born with a certain propensity to be either disgusted by things that are not you know typical or but you also have maybe maybe more concern about security you know about safety now suppose that's true or do you think that's true somebody says Jordan Peterson is talked about this for a long time now let's say that's true now let's also say that the squad and others have been mocking conservatives for a lot of different things is it not true that are these two things not in are these two things and evidence are these facts so you can fact check me now fact one science says that being conservative or liberal is a is at least partly genetic you're born that way partly true is it also true that the the the people on the left mock conservatives in general they mock them specifically but they also mock them in general is that true it is true Geordi is animate Geordi you know where I'm going on this if your political view is that you're mocking people because of things that they can't change in other words genetic traits in this case the genetic propensity to be a conservative you are by your own definition a bigot there would be no difference no difference scientifically there would be no difference between mocking somebody with a handicap and mocking somebody who had a genetic propensity toward conservatism am i right now when somebody pointed that out to me it was the first time I'd even heard that thought it was just today I'm Twitter and I thought that is a hundred percent true there is nothing wrong with that thought you know my first thought was there was just sort of a funny political thing to say you know sometimes they're just clever political things to say that sound right but they're not they're not actually scientifically rational but this is actually a hundred percent scientifically rational if you're making fun of conservatives as a group and that group has a genetic quality that that makes them distinct most of them it doesn't have to be every single one but we does n't work that way if as long as most of them have this characteristic in common if you're if you're mocking them for being uneducated toothless rubes who believe in conspiracy theories or whatever people are saying about conservatives these days even if you're calling them racists you're treating them as a class and it's a class they have a genetic component that makes them a class they are a class because of a genetic component according to science so have we not reached the point where literally everyone is a bigot not always just racist because you could be bigoted against really and you could be bigoted against gender and everything else but have we not reached peak bigotry where absolutely well here what would be the the best situation in the world can I tell you can I tell you the best situation in the world to know that you're in the healthiest best situation I would look for the following things everybody in the world realizing that everybody else in the world including themselves is a bigot just in different ways so that there would be nothing healthier in my opinion there would be nothing healthier for this world than to realize that we're all bigoted sometimes because in my view that's that's the moment of greater understanding I would say that the people who would call themselves woke are a level below where they need to be there's a level above woke that's enlightened woke says we must we must make a separation between these people who are bigots and the good people who are not that's what woke means right there's some people who are not bigots they're the good people and we should put some pressure on the people who are bigots to make them less big in it that's woke the level above woke is enlightened enlightened says being less bigoted is not an option we're all bigoted because because we have a human brain the human brain is not a it's not a rational device the human brain operates on patterns and we're not good at patterns those are the two things you need to know about the human brain it operates mostly on patterns and number two we're not good at it we see patterns where there are none and then we say hey it's a pattern I guess I'll I guess I'll treat this like the next one will be in the same pattern even if it isn't because it's all I have to go on I usually don't have complete information about my reality so I have to look for these little patterns and use them as sort of a proxy or a guide to what's going to happen so I would say that we may have completely accidentally president Trump's actions and our reactions to them have gotten us to the borderline between woke where one person's calling another one a bigot and enlightened where we realize we're we're all bigots we're all bigots because you can't turn off pattern-recognition and number two you're not good at pattern recognition those are the things you need to know now what do you do with it what would an enlightened person do with the knowledge that bigotry is universal and it's not something the other guy does what would you do differently when you achieve that enlightenment well if you're a good person in my opinion all right so here's my personal philosophical opinion this is no there's no news or fact here this is my opinion you could choose to reject it or accept it in my opinion the best you can do as a person the most respect I will give you is if you say to yourself yeah we're all bigots sometimes it happens to me and I'm gonna use my my best social reasoning to overcome it I'm gonna try to overcome it if you're saying that you're the best person a person can be a person who says I'm not a bigot and you're a bigot are operating in a lower level of enlightenment if they say you're a bigot and oh my god sometimes I am - you're operating at a higher level and then in order to be responsible to be a responsible citizen of the world operating at that higher level where you say yeah it's all of us but what can I do about it if you're saying what can I do about it you're good at my book you're completely good you're you're just dealing with what you know how do you deal with the fact that the human brain is a pattern recognizing machine and we're not good at it so I think the president has laid bare the fact that everybody is a bigot that's the fact I think we can no longer ignore would you say I would say that the entire conversation about the squad the entire conversation about you know immigration the entire conversation about whether conservatives or liberals are the good ones that entire conversation should be revealing in the clearest possible way that woke is broke and that there's a level above it in the president just completely accidentally I don't think that he had any intention to do what I'm saying but by showing that everything is bigoted and that even if you were to take the position that the country is the the best organizing principle the president consistently says country good people outside the country are on the other team and the so-called good people who think that bigotry is only something that other people have those people have decided to flip out and go crazy and treat the country as if that's this is somehow the same as bigotry so we may have completely accidentally blundered into a new level of enlightenment that I think is important let me give you a positive thing so without getting into details of my personal life I was listening to a conversation from some preteens teens actually some young teens in my local area we're having the conversation and I was listening to it the entire conversation was about race it was people talking about their friends like and they were saying you know this friend is one of these if this friend is one of these and you know these people talk this way and these people have this funny accent and these people have this characteristic and and that my first reaction to it was shocked because all they talked about was race my second reaction was that they all loved each other which was shocking because the way they were talking about race was not really negative in fact you know it was jokingly negative in the way that teenagers joke but it wasn't negative in their hearts you could tell that there was affection and that the race was a conversation and that they were sort of let's just say they were well way to say they were they were interacting with the differences they were they were talking about the differences the you know that this group has these tendencies whatever but none of it seemed mean-spirited it seemed like you know there's there's another it seems like the generation coming up talks about race completely explicitly and all the time because it doesn't mean the same thing it's it's lost its power now I'm not sure that this would be the same everywhere and with every group but it's just one of those little things you see and you say wow you know it looks like it lost its power because the people who are talking were you know it was a mixed group so I hope that's a good thing and I hope it's not I hope I'm not misunderstanding what was going on there but it looks like and I've seen this before by the way it's not it's not the one conversation I've seen it but it seems like the next generation is going to be just having fun with the differences but not taking them to see which would be the gigantic leap forward for civilization I think all right let's talk about some belts this is one of the complaints I think this was on CNN or somewhere I can't I think wasn't CNN there's some analysts said that about Trump and and his comments about the squad someone said that he's playing a risky political game though it may be the only one he really knows how to play and I'm thinking you have to you have to dig pretty deeply to find something to insult the president for if he has a strategy that keeps working yes his strategy keeps working but ok what can we say about a strategy that keeps working it may be the only one he really knows how to play well if there's only one strategy that might work and it's the one that he uses and it works is it really an insightful analysis to say it may be the only one he knows how to play yeah he doesn't know how to play the losing hands he doesn't know how to do the things that don't work what does that even mean everybody knows how to do things that don't work now compare President Trump to a normal politician so Mitch Mc.
Connell of course got dragged into all the controversy and CNN's Manu Raju asked Mc.
Connell what would he say if someone told his wife Elaine Chao Trump's transportation secretary what would Mc.
Connell say have somebody told his wife to quote go back to where she came from which would be Taiwan I guess and here's how Mc.
Connell answers that question so Mc.
Connell is asked this big big old racist your racism question and his answer was that he was a fan of legal immigration Mc.
Connell just like just sucked all the life out of the question it's like what would you say if somebody told your wife to go home what would you say Mitch Mc.
Connell huh huh huh take the bait take the bait Mc.
Connell you do it do it we're gonna get a quote out of you you're gonna be all over the news will you say something stupid Mitch Mc.
Connell what are you going to say to that we're gonna ship your your wife back home what would you say to that Mc.
Connell says ah I'm a big fan of legal immigration and everybody says I'm not even sure that's on topic but okay you just bored us to death and we did not get a quote out of you all right so I saw some speculation that Iran might be might be convinced that President Trump is going to be reelected I don't know how they would be convinced that exactly because the polls clearly say that Biden will win but all the smart people are pretty sure that Biden doesn't have a chance so I don't know how Iran is clever enough to sort that out because it seems like they would look at the polls and say well it looks like every single Democrat who's in the top four could beat this president so we don't have to deal with this guy he's gonna be gone and gone in 2020 but I think that Iran is clever enough that they listen to the right people and the right people are saying there's not gonna be Biden and it looks like Trump is cruising to re-election so what that does is it changes their calculation about who they're going to be negotiating with and it takes off the table the option of waiting until 2020 and getting somebody else to negotiate with who could give them in their view a better deal so the fact that the president's reelection looks like it's there's likely gives the United States a tremendous bargaining advantage and it's created I think Iran is in this weird little zone where they're trying to make noise and they're trying to cause a little bit of trouble but they don't want to cause a lot of trouble because this president has created an impression that he is unpredictable and you don't know when you're gonna cross this line they probably thought they crossed this line you know already buddy but he played it cool and now they're thinking about all right well I know if we do a little more than that are we gonna get you know bombed if we do a little more than we've done but doing less than we've done isn't gonna make any difference so what are you gonna do so I think the president has put Iran in the position where in which their their incentive to negotiate is pretty high and I'll say this again because it's so shocking peace in the Middle East just you know the phrase pieces and at least sounds some ridiculous then you tell yourself well it's that's not even a thing it's a perpetual war zone there will always be a perpetual war zone and on some level that might be true you know at the small level but just think about this at this point in time with this president and some of its luck but some of it is is the way they treat the Middle East and the leaders there etc president Trump has gotten the Middle East not by himself but he's a big part of it yeah the Middle East has reached a point where peace abroad peace for the entire Middle East is down to one guy who's in his eighties that Ayatollah Khomeini so if the Supreme Leader of Iran ever decides to negotiate in in good faith we don't know if he ever will but he's the last person now maybe there's somebody you know behind him you know if if he were replaced maybe you'd be just the same but there's just one position just one person has to change their mind and we're done one person has to say you know I don't think anything that we do is going to change the reality that Israel exists and it's going to keep existing just one person think about that have we ever been this close that one person just needs to change their mind and that one person is under tremendous pressure internally and externally to change his mind some people are asking about turkey Turkey turkey is a weird situation because there are NATO ally at the same time we didn't want them to have anti-aircraft missiles because I guess they're they're taking shipment of some Russian anti-aircraft missiles so I don't quite understand our position on Turkey because either you're a NATO ally or you're not if your NATO ally do we care that you have a way to defend yourself I don't think that buying Russian missiles is our first choice but it's not the worst problem in the world is it are we going to bomb Turkey I don't think we're planning on bombing Turkey so why do we care if they have good anti-aircraft whoo and by the way who is Turkey defending against I don't know the answer to that can somebody tell me who does Turkey think is going to attack them from the air why am I just thinking of this now I don't even know why Turkey has a threat does anybody even know because Isis doesn't have an air force they are an occupied NATO ally somebody saying well I don't know what that means yeah they're they don't need the anti-aircraft missiles because of immigration they don't need it because their neighbors not really do you think Turkey has a risk from Iraq does turkey have a risk from Iran from the air I don't think so I know I guess they need them so is those are the problems that we have that one of our allies is buying weapons from somebody else I don't know if we have the biggest problem in the world but I think we're very close to something like peace in the Middle East one person's away and that person is tipping that person is leaning Turkey can't use our equipment with Russia stuff yeah well I'm sure that we would rather send a cell Turkey our own American equipment and there are probably lots of strategic and other advantages in doing that somebody says I lived in Turkey I know I missed I miss what what it is that you know internal coos Greece everybody has a different idea of why turkey needs anti-aircraft missiles but I guess we're all guessing all right I think we said what we need to say if the only thing that we're worried about today is we're all killing each other bigots then maybe we can reach a higher level and maybe that's this year who knows I'll talk to you later
[Music]
ba-bum ba-bum hey everybody hey John
come on in here good to see you you know
what time it is it's time for a coffee
with Scott Adams the best time of the
day get your dopamine pumping that's the
sound of dopamine pumping and it doesn't
take much to enjoy this moment it takes
very little actually all it takes is a
cup of our glass the stein the chalice
detector - thermos a flask maybe a
canteen a vessel of any kind fill it
with your favorite liquid I like coffee
and join me now for the unparalleled
pleasure of the simultaneous sip get
your simultaneity goin here we go ah
tingly shivers shivers I tell you
Wow Oh what it is what a way that starts
today well I'd like to talk about all
the problems in the world first okay
that was me talking about all the
problems in the world because it turns
out there aren't any real problems in
the world at least if you take it from
the news because the news is talking
about a tweet that's right the biggest
news in the world is a tweet that was
worded in such a way that people feel
bad for other people when I say feel bad
for other people what I'm talking about
is Anderson Cooper feeling very very
very bad that these tweets might make
other people feel bad that's your big
problem of the day that's your headline
news somebody's tweet make somebody else
maybe feel bad we would ask those people
to come on but we couldn't find anybody
who feels bad and although we couldn't
find anybody who actually feels bad
we could find hundreds of people who
feel bad for the people who don't feel
bad now it used to be that if you did
something that would make somebody feel
bad that was the story somebody did
something somebody else feels bad well
there's there's something to talk about
but we don't have that anymore now we
have somebody does something let's say
it's a tweet a provocative tweet and
instead of people feeling bad they
really don't care one way or the other
but there are people who feel bad for
the people who should feel bad but they
don't seem to feel bad because they
don't really care do you know who I
think was the least bothered by the go
back home tweets from the president I
don't know this for sure so I'm just
gonna put this out here I think the
group least bothered by the go back home
was American black people I don't know
that to be true and I'm certainly not
going to put myself in their heads and
I'm not going to you know speak for any
other group I certainly can't do that
but it feels to me like they understood
the point which is it's not about race
it's about loving your country and if
you have a loyalty to some other country
blah blah blah but moreover it was just
a bull trash talk it wasn't even it
wasn't even factually on point
it was just trash talk
that made real people really feel bad
for other people who if you ask them
would say do you know what I have to
worry about a lot more things than that
tweet that's for sure now if I told you
yes I have many times that's a way to
evaluate your filter online let's say
you're looking at the world one way and
interpreting it one way somebody else is
looking at it another way whether it's
this presidential tweet some people say
my god it's it's a racist outrage and
other people
it's just trash darkus nothing very
different filters one of the things that
you can do to test your filter to see
which one is the right one is to see
which one predicts better one of the
filters predicts that the president will
do at a bunch of racist stuff and that
people who were good at spotting racist
stuff will notice that's why you would
imagine if you have one filter the other
filter says no you're just imagining I
did do the simultaneous if you missed it
so the other filter says no he's just
trash-talking like he always does and
you're imagining all the bad stuff which
of those two filters would predict that
Israel would name a settlement after
President Trump is that the filter that
says oh yeah he's I think he's back in
the neo-nazis would Israel not be able
to detect that someone was backing
neo-nazis if he were the President of
the United States yeah I think I think
Israel would be able to detect that so
my filter this says he's just talking
seems to be consistent with observation
what we observe is that Israel says
that's just politics he seems like the
greatest friend Israel ever ever had
which of the filters would predict that
that President Trump would be strong on
prison reform is it the one that says my
god he'll do anything that's bad for
brown and black people or is it the
filter that says it's just politics of
course he wants what's good for
Americans that's his job and he wants to
be evaluated presumably everybody wants
to be evaluated by how they do with
their job so why would he be different
so my filter predicts a hundred percent
of everything that's happened a hundred
percent my filter allows and protects
everything you observe
but if your filter uh-huh if your filter
only predicts half of what happens and
the other half is just inexplicable well
maybe it's time to rethink your filter
on life let's take a little deeper into
this whole go back home tweet you all
know the background I don't need to give
you the background we're talking about
president Trump's tweet that's causing
everybody's hair to be on fire so here
let me show you some of the craziness
that this is cost so over at CNN where
we're opinion and news are treated as
the same thing and I say that because
CNN doesn't do a good job of separating
what is opinion from what is news they
sort of smushed together so the viewer
doesn't quite know what has been
presented as a fact and what is just
somebody's interpretation Fox News as by
anybody's measure lots of different
opinions and some of them you don't
agree with but they do a lot better job
of labeling opinion you know the
Hannity's opinion right you know that
Tucker's an opinion show but listen to
this smooshing this is an analysis by
Stefan do you pronounce it Stefan ste pH
yeah Ian I never know if that's the
right way to pronounce it
Stefan Collinson now it's presented not
as opinion it's actually labeled on the
CNN site is labeled analysis now you're
just a dumb American and you're reading
some some stuff on the CNN news site if
it says opinion what do you think of it
you think okay well it's not necessarily
fact is opinion if it's labeled analysis
what are you the dumb American think
they're doing analysis doesn't really
sound like you're pinyin does it I mean
I think that it allows it to be opinion
II I think the
does allow that but the word seems to be
chosen to to blur the difference between
the opinion and fact from our own
analysis so here's what Stefan calling
sense analysis says he says this is just
part of it in the twilight zone of the
white house
the man who unleashed the fury Trump
expressed disgust at the vial at the
quote vile horrible statements said by
the woman he targeted over the color of
their skin so on a CNN site labeled
analysis they slip in this unsupported
statement he targeted over the color of
their skin what what at what point that
the president targets somebody over the
color of their skin it's presented like
well that's obvious is you know that
there's no point in supporting this fact
everybody can see it that's not an
evidence do you know who else president
Trump told to go back home the British
ambassador correct me if I'm wrong did
he not send the British ambassador
packing and call him stupid come on
it just happened he just told the
British ambassador to go back home he
didn't use those words but is that the
important part he told him he said he
was stupid incompetent had never met him
and why he probably met him but doesn't
doesn't didn't even know who he was I
told him to go back home yeah I had the
British ambassador did anybody say that
the president is prejudiced against
British people no so to me what Stephan
Collinson did here by putting this
sentence in his analysis said by the
women he targeted over the color
their skin to me that's a racist
statement isn't it and my point being
that if all you're doing is talking
about whether or not somebody acted
about race and the frame is raised and
everything's race and race race race
isn't isn't that making things worse you
know the president has expressly said
that if you're in the United States he's
gonna be your best friend you're if
you're if you're a citizen of the
country he's gonna be your best friend
and supporter and cheerleader and if
you're not you're on the other team and
he doesn't hate you
but he's gonna compete against you and
make sure that his team does better than
the other teams now that's the frame
that he's continually and clearly put on
all of his political actions the critics
continually and expressly this is not an
interpretation of mine they continually
frame things as racial issues there's no
way that isn't the race aside there's no
way now the Republicans don't make a big
deal of calling the other side racist
because it's just not their deal but we
have certainly reached the point where a
hundred percent of us are racist we
actually have a situation yesterday I
tweeted about it I think I had 5,000
retweets on it and I said that the you
know breaking news the racist press is
reporting to the racist public that
racist President Trump or no that racist
Pelosi is accusing racist Trump of
saying bad things about the racist for a
congresswoman
there's nobody in that story who hasn't
been accused of racism a hundred percent
of all the people in the news have now
been accused of racism there's nobody
left there's nobody left I'm gonna drink
some black coffee right now and just try
to experience the
whatever this is the cognitive
dissonance we're all experiencing and I
drink this coffee this black coffee as a
salute to the black citizens of this
country who we support 100% I'll drink
to that
to that point let me ask you this
hypothetically you're a black citizen of
the United States you've got two friends
one of your friends is a registered
Democrat one of your friends is a
register registered Republican which
one's gonna help you get a job which
one's gonna do you a favor
well maybe both but I'll tell you have
you ever met anybody who let's say an
African American who who became a
Republican have you ever seen an
african-american Republican who said
that other Republicans treat them poorly
have you ever seen that no you've never
seen that because Republicans have very
clear rules I'm not a Republican by the
way all right so I'm not a Republican
not a conservative I always tell people
and left to Bernie but I have to admit I
like Republicans better because they
have a set of consistent rules that seem
pretty fair to me and they try to live
by them and treat other people by the
rules the rules are the Constitution if
you follow the Constitution you're good
with me if you follow the laws you're
good with me
and on top of that I'm not religious but
for a lot of conservatives if you if
you're religious you doesn't matter
which one if you've got you know a faith
that informs the way you live well then
you're okay too
Republicans make it very easy to like
you how hard is it to be liked by a
Republican it's really really easy you
just have to do legal things and work
that's it it in order to be loved by
Republicans just try you don't even have
to succeed you just have to try you have
to follow the law you know sort of love
your country that helps but that's not
even necessary you know maybe you
shouldn't talk about it so much if you
don't love your country but all
Republicans ask is just follow the same
rules and try you don't even have to
succeed and we'll love you I'll say we
because I adopt that I adopt the
philosophy of if we're all here trying
do it our best following the same set of
rules and respecting the same set of you
know principles that that were all good
I can't imagine what it would be like to
be a person of color can be in the
Democrat orbit because over there you've
got to be good with a lot of different
things yeah it's it's sort of eight
shells over there well I was I was good
on this but did I become a misogynist
accidentally and if I have I definite
everything fairly in just the right way
well I think that something important
has happened because this tweet it seems
to me that the charges of racism against
each other have uncovered a truth that
like the the dog that wasn't barking
it's a truth that we should rejoice at
during the time that we have been
talking nonstop about whether the words
go back home are really racist or just
trash talk while we've been discussing
that how many real examples of racism
have been reported in the news right
think about it how many actual examples
of somebody I didn't get a job got
rejected from something I know there was
a racial murder you know I'm sure that
these things were happening somewhere
around the kind
trait but we just have been jabbering
non-stop about a couple of words in the
tweet because it's the worst thing
happening is there anybody here who well
let's say that is there anybody here who
has negative feelings about I'll just
make an example any any person of color
so long as they're following the rules
meaning the Constitution the rule of law
working hard is there anybody here who
has any bad feelings about anybody who
does those three things you know respect
the Constitution follow the law work
hard even if you don't succeed
everybody here respects that I'll bet
I'll bet there are zero exceptions and
this is a pretty you know this is we've
got what 2.3 thousand people watching
this live I'll bet there are zero people
here zero out of thousands I'll bet
there are zero people who would feel bad
about any person of color any any gender
any any other anything as long as you
follow the rules same rules everybody
else is following that's it you know
we'd love it if you like if you loved
your country but it's optional just
follow the rules and try just try but if
you're over on the Democrat side I don't
know what the standards are over there
must be harder see you then has just
completely gone into crazy land they
actually had white nationalist Richard
Spencer on because they I guess they
thought they could get him to say some
quote that sounded like positive for
President Trump and then they would
paint president Trump with Spencer
so it was Spencer's the white
nationalist I guess and here's what he
said so Richard Spencer complained on
CNN that Trump quote wasn't going far
enough saying he gave the movement
nothing so in other words the leader of
the white nationalist movement is saying
that Trump is giving them nothing
CNN invited invited him on to guess some
you know some love of Trump I guess so
that they can paint Trump by this this
guy's reputation and the guy says he's
given us nothing yes that's exactly
right he's given you nothing but he goes
on outside racist tweets and what'd he
say they seem like they came from a
drunk uncle
so Richard Spencer says the only thing
we had gotten from the president is in
in Spencer's opinion quote out racist
tweets and look like they came from a
drunk uncle now here's the problem who
do who do see you then who does see you
then agree with who's on the same team
as CNN well I don't think they planned
it this way but I can tell you two
people who have the same view of life
CNN and apparently Richard Spencer who
also sees the president streets tweet
says racist so somehow the left has
managed to align themselves with white
nationalists because they're they have
the same opinion of these tweets and
they can't even get the white
nationalists to go a little step further
and say but he's done things right it's
not just the tweets that we don't you
know look suspicious he's actually done
things right and the white nationalist
says that he hasn't done anything for us
not a thing that must have been the
saddest day on CNN when they couldn't
get the white nationalists to do
anything except have the same opinion
and CNN
not a good look CNN does it seem to you
that now that everybody's a racist
meaning that literally just everybody's
racist and by the way I don't say this
with hyperbole when I say that the the
squad looks racist to me I mean they
look racist in the sense that they're
framing things in racial terms and they
think that something should be done
differently
because of something-something race I
think that's racist now here's you you
want to hear the funniest thing that I
heard this morning I wish I could give
credit did I tweet it I wish I could
give credit because it's so brilliant so
if you're if you're on this periscope
and you're the one who said this it's a
brilliant thought it starts with this
did you notice that there was some
science recently I don't know how
recently but there's some science to
support the idea that you're born
conservative or born liberal you know
that one of the defining characteristics
is that I guess conservatives are that
are more creeped out by yucky stuff
they're more easily disgusted and and
more easily concerned about security and
fear so so there's some some thought
that from in terms of your DNA you're
born with a certain propensity to be
either disgusted by things that are not
you know typical or but you also have
maybe maybe more concern about security
you know about safety
now suppose that's true or do you think
that's true somebody says Jordan
Peterson is talked about this for a long
time now let's say that's true now let's
also say that the squad and others have
been mocking conservatives for a lot of
different things is it not true that are
these two things not in are these two
things and evidence are these facts so
you can fact check me now fact one
science says that being conservative or
liberal is a is at least partly genetic
you're born that way partly true is it
also true that the the the people on the
left mock conservatives in general
they mock them specifically but they
also mock them in general is that true
it is true Geordi is animate Geordi you
know where I'm going on this if your
political view is that you're mocking
people because of things that they can't
change in other words genetic traits in
this case the genetic propensity to be a
conservative you are by your own
definition a bigot there would be no
difference no difference scientifically
there would be no difference between
mocking somebody with a handicap and
mocking somebody who had a genetic
propensity toward conservatism am i
right now when somebody pointed that out
to me it was the first time I'd even
heard that thought it was just
today I'm Twitter and I thought that is
a hundred percent true there is nothing
wrong with that thought you know my
first thought was there was just sort of
a funny political thing to say you know
sometimes they're just clever political
things to say that sound right but
they're not they're not actually
scientifically rational but this is
actually a hundred percent
scientifically rational if you're making
fun of conservatives as a group and that
group has a genetic quality that that
makes them distinct most of them it
doesn't have to be every single one but
we does n't work that way if as long as
most of them have this characteristic in
common if you're if you're mocking them
for being uneducated toothless rubes who
believe in conspiracy theories or
whatever people are saying about
conservatives these days even if you're
calling them racists you're treating
them as a class and it's a class they
have a genetic component that makes them
a class they are a class because of a
genetic component according to science
so have we not reached the point where
literally everyone is a bigot not always
just racist because you could be bigoted
against really
and you could be bigoted against gender
and everything else but have we not
reached peak bigotry where absolutely
well here what would be the the best
situation in the world can I tell you
can I tell you the best situation in the
world to know that you're in the
healthiest best situation I would look
for the following things everybody in
the world
realizing that everybody else in the
world
including themselves is a bigot just in
different ways so that there would be
nothing healthier in my opinion there
would be nothing healthier for this
world than to realize that we're all
bigoted sometimes because in my view
that's that's the moment of greater
[Music]
understanding I would say that the
people who would call themselves woke
are a level below where they need to be
there's a level above woke that's
enlightened woke says we must we must
make a separation between these people
who are bigots and the good people who
are not that's what woke means right
there's some people who are not bigots
they're the good people and we should
put some pressure on the people who are
bigots to make them less big in it
that's woke the level above woke is
enlightened enlightened says being less
bigoted is not an option we're all
bigoted because because we have a human
brain the human brain is not a it's not
a rational device the human brain
operates on patterns and we're not good
at patterns those are the two things you
need to know about the human brain it
operates mostly on patterns and number
two we're not good at it we see patterns
where there are none and then we say hey
it's a pattern
I guess I'll I guess I'll treat this
like the next one will be in the same
pattern even if it isn't because it's
all I have to go on I usually don't have
complete information about my reality so
I have to look for these little patterns
and use them as sort of a proxy or a
guide to what's going to happen so I
would say that we may have completely
accidentally president Trump's actions
and our reactions to them have gotten us
to the borderline between woke where one
person's calling another one a bigot and
enlightened where we realize we're we're
all bigots we're all bigots because you
can't turn off pattern-recognition
and number two you're not good at
pattern recognition those are the things
you need to know now what do you do with
it what would an enlightened person do
with the knowledge that bigotry is
universal and it's not something the
other guy does what would you do
differently when you achieve that
enlightenment well if you're a good
person in my opinion all right so here's
my personal philosophical opinion this
is no there's no news or fact here this
is my opinion you could choose to reject
it or accept it in my opinion the best
you can do as a person the most respect
I will give you is if you say to
yourself yeah we're all bigots sometimes
it happens to me and I'm gonna use my my
best social reasoning to overcome it I'm
gonna try to overcome it if you're
saying that you're the best person a
person can be a person who says I'm not
a bigot and you're a bigot are operating
in a lower level of enlightenment if
they say you're a bigot and oh my god
sometimes I am - you're operating at a
higher level and then in order to be
responsible to be a responsible citizen
of the world operating at that higher
level where you say yeah it's all of us
but what can I do
about it if you're saying what can I do
about it you're good at my book you're
completely good you're you're just
dealing with what you know how do you
deal with the fact that the human brain
is a pattern recognizing machine and
we're not good at it so I think the
president has laid bare the fact that
everybody is a bigot that's the fact I
think we can no longer ignore would you
say I would say that the entire
conversation about the squad the entire
conversation about you know immigration
the entire conversation about whether
conservatives or liberals are the good
ones that entire conversation should be
revealing in the clearest possible way
that woke is broke and that there's a
level above it in the president just
completely accidentally I don't think
that he had any intention to do what I'm
saying but by showing that everything is
bigoted and that even if you were to
take the position that the country is
the the best organizing principle the
president consistently says country good
people outside the country are on the
other team and the so-called good people
who think that bigotry is only something
that other people have those people have
decided to flip out and go crazy and
treat the country as if that's this is
somehow the same as bigotry so we may
have completely accidentally blundered
into a new level of enlightenment that I
think is important let me give you a
positive thing so without getting into
details of my personal life I was
listening to a conversation from some
preteens teens actually some young teens
in my local area we're having the
conversation and I was listening to it
the entire conversation was about race
it was people talking about their
friends like and they were saying you
know this friend is one of these if this
friend is one of these and you know
these people talk this way and these
people have this funny accent and these
people have this characteristic and and
that my first reaction to it was shocked
because all they talked about was race
my second reaction was that they all
loved each other which was shocking
because the way they were talking about
race was not really negative in fact you
know it was jokingly negative in the way
that teenagers joke but it wasn't
negative in their hearts you could tell
that there was affection and that the
race was a conversation and that they
were sort of let's just say they were
well way to say they were they were
interacting with the differences they
were they were talking about the
differences the you know that this group
has these tendencies whatever but none
of it seemed mean-spirited it seemed
like you know there's there's another it
seems like the generation coming up
talks about race completely explicitly
and all the time because it doesn't mean
the same thing it's it's lost its power
now I'm not sure that this would be the
same everywhere and with every group but
it's just one of those little things you
see and you say wow you know it looks
like it lost its power because the
people who are talking were you know it
was a mixed group so I hope that's a
good thing and I hope it's not I hope
I'm not misunderstanding what was going
on there but it looks like and I've seen
this before by the way it's not it's not
the one conversation I've seen it but it
seems like the next generation is going
to be just having fun with the
differences but not taking them to see
which would be the gigantic leap forward
for civilization I think all right let's
talk about some belts this is one of the
complaints I think this was on CNN or
somewhere I can't I think wasn't CNN
there's some analysts said that about
Trump and and his comments about the
squad someone said that he's playing a
risky political game though it may be
the only one he really knows how to play
and I'm thinking you have to you have to
dig pretty deeply to find something to
insult the president for if he has a
strategy that keeps working
yes his strategy keeps working but ok
what can we say about a strategy that
keeps working it may be the only one he
really knows how to play well if there's
only one strategy that might work and
it's the one that he uses and it works
is it really an insightful analysis to
say it may be the only one he knows how
to play yeah he doesn't know how to play
the losing hands he doesn't know how to
do the things that don't work what does
that even mean
everybody knows how to do things that
don't work now compare President Trump
to a normal politician so Mitch
McConnell of course got dragged into all
the controversy and CNN's Manu Raju
asked McConnell what would he say if
someone told his wife Elaine Chao
Trump's transportation secretary what
would McConnell say have somebody told
his wife to quote go back to where she
came from
which would be Taiwan I guess and here's
how McConnell answers that question
so McConnell is asked this big big old
racist your racism question and his
answer was that he was a fan of legal
immigration
McConnell just like just sucked all the
life out of the question it's like what
would you say if somebody told your wife
to go home
what would you say Mitch McConnell huh
huh huh take the bait take the bait
McConnell you do it do it we're gonna
get a quote out of you you're gonna be
all over the news will you say something
stupid Mitch McConnell what are you
going to say to that we're gonna ship
your your wife back home what would you
say to that McConnell says ah I'm a big
fan of legal immigration and everybody
says I'm not even sure that's on topic
but okay you just bored us to death and
we did not get a quote out of you all
right so I saw some speculation that
Iran might be might be convinced that
President Trump is going to be reelected
I don't know how they would be convinced
that exactly because the polls clearly
say that Biden will win but all the
smart people are pretty sure that Biden
doesn't have a chance so I don't know
how Iran is clever enough to sort that
out because it seems like they would
look at the polls and say well it looks
like every single Democrat who's in the
top four could beat this president so we
don't have to deal with this guy he's
gonna be gone and gone in 2020 but I
think that Iran is clever enough that
they listen to the right people and the
right people are saying there's not
gonna be Biden and it looks like Trump
is cruising to re-election so what that
does is it changes their calculation
about who they're going to be
negotiating with and it takes off the
table the option of waiting until 2020
and getting somebody else to negotiate
with who could give them in their view a
better deal so the fact that the
president's reelection looks like it's
there's likely gives the United States a
tremendous bargaining advantage
and it's created I think Iran is in this
weird little zone where they're trying
to make noise and they're trying to
cause a little bit of trouble but they
don't want to cause a lot of trouble
because this president has created an
impression that he is unpredictable and
you don't know when you're gonna cross
this line they probably thought they
crossed this line you know already
buddy but he played it cool and now
they're thinking about all right well I
know if we do a little more than that
are we gonna get you know bombed if we
do a little more than we've done but
doing less than we've done isn't gonna
make any difference so what are you
gonna do so I think the president has
put Iran in the position where in which
their their incentive to negotiate is
pretty high and I'll say this again
because it's so shocking peace in the
Middle East just you know the phrase
pieces and at least sounds some
ridiculous then you tell yourself well
it's that's not even a thing it's a
perpetual war zone there will always be
a perpetual war zone
and on some level that might be true you
know at the small level but just think
about this at this point in time with
this president and some of its luck but
some of it is is the way they treat the
Middle East and the leaders there etc
president Trump has gotten the Middle
East not by himself but he's a big part
of it
yeah the Middle East has reached a point
where peace abroad peace for the entire
Middle East is down to one guy who's in
his eighties that Ayatollah Khomeini so
if the Supreme Leader of Iran ever
decides to negotiate in in good faith we
don't know if he ever will but he's the
last person now maybe there's somebody
you know behind him you know if if he
were replaced maybe you'd be just the
same but there's just one position just
one person has to change their mind and
we're done
one person has to say you know I don't
think anything that we do is going to
change the reality that Israel exists
and it's going to keep existing just one
person think about that
have we ever been this close that one
person just needs to change their mind
and that one person is under tremendous
pressure internally and externally to
change his mind some people are asking
about turkey Turkey turkey is a weird
situation because there are NATO ally at
the same time we didn't want them to
have anti-aircraft missiles because I
guess they're they're taking shipment of
some Russian anti-aircraft missiles so I
don't quite understand our position on
Turkey because either you're a NATO ally
or you're not if your NATO ally do we
care that you have a way to defend
yourself I don't think that buying
Russian missiles is our first choice but
it's not the worst problem in the world
is it are we going to bomb Turkey I
don't think we're planning on bombing
Turkey so why do we care if they have
good anti-aircraft whoo and by the way
who is Turkey defending against I don't
know the answer to that can somebody
tell me who does Turkey think is going
to attack them from the air why am I
just thinking of this now I don't even
know why Turkey has a threat does
anybody even know because Isis doesn't
have an air force they are an occupied
NATO ally
somebody saying well I don't know what
that means yeah they're they don't need
the anti-aircraft missiles because of
immigration they don't need it because
their neighbors not really do you think
Turkey has a risk from Iraq does turkey
have a risk from Iran from the air I
don't think so
I know I guess they need them so is
those are the problems that we have that
one of our allies is buying weapons from
somebody else I don't know if we have
the biggest problem in the world but I
think we're very close to something like
peace in the Middle East
one person's away and that person is
tipping that person is leaning Turkey
can't use our equipment with Russia
stuff yeah well I'm sure that we would
rather send a cell Turkey our own
American equipment and there are
probably lots of strategic and other
advantages in doing that somebody says I
lived in Turkey I know I missed I miss
what what it is that you know internal
coos Greece everybody has a different
idea of why turkey needs anti-aircraft
missiles but I guess we're all guessing
all right I think we said what we need
to say if the only thing that we're
worried about today is we're all killing
each other bigots then maybe we can
reach a higher level and maybe that's
this year who knows I'll talk to you
later