Episode 944 Scott Adams - FBI Flynn-Flammers, A Slew of Fake News and some Funny Stuff Before Bed
My new book LOSERTHINK, available now on Amazon https://tinyurl.com/rqmjc2a Content: FBI handwritten meeting notes about General Flynn say WHAT? Has ANYONE ever been more exonerated than General Flynn? A classic CNN unnamed sources story about President Trump Ben Shapiro considers both costs and benefits, Twitter erupts Nate Silver, herd immunity and the testing error rate ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like my channel to have a wider audience and higher production quality, please donate via my startup (Whenhub.com) at this link: https://interface.my/ScottAdamsSays I use donations to pay for the daily conversions of the original Periscope videos into Youtube and podcast form, and to improve my production quality and search results over time. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Please subscribe to my channel…it REALLY helps. Like my video? Hate my video? Let me know, VOTE! Please leave a comment, let me know how I'm doing. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oh, this would be great ASMR. If you don't know what ASMR is, you've got to Google it. See what I got? Yes, it's Dave Rubin's new book. It's called "Don't Burn This Book." I will be talking to Dave Tuesday and we'll hear more about this, but I'm gonna do my homework first. Hey, how's it going every…
View segment →And of course one of the things that's making it interesting is this General Flynn stuff. Now I hope you're all up to date on this, because there's something so perfect about this if you've been following the whole Flynn saga. Because you know it was early on, it was rumored that he was just sort of…
View segment →So meanwhile Dr. Burke is up laughing about that for a while. Stock market is up. So here's a question that I haven't heard anybody ask. It looks like there are three or four therapeutics for the coronavirus that look promising and I haven't heard anybody ask if we can take them all at the same time…
View segment →You've heard a lot of updates about testing and it's probably very confusing to you. And so I did the work of researching it. So I've dug down. I learned everything there is to know about testing, all the various kinds of different sciences, the kits, where they're made, the swabs, the shortages. I'…
View segment →There's a new story. This is like a classic CNN story as you judge whether it's true. So apparently the president was shouting at his campaign manager Brad Parscale. You know he was on the phone and aides were in the room and I guess somebody leaked it. And he was shouting and he was shifting the bl…
View segment →So Twitter's mad at Ben Shapiro because he had the audacity to consider the costs and the benefits of reopening the economy and for the sin of including all of the costs and all of the benefits in this calculation. Because people were mad at him for other reasons I guess he is the worst person in th…
View segment →So it looks like Biden has lost CNN. So Chris Cillizza, who I would say would be their sort of chief hit man on the political side — if you want a bad story about Trump you call Chris Cillizza. So he's one of their stars who most often talks about what bad thing Trump has done today. But he's after…
View segment →All right, here's something I'm seeing a lot of people saying that the real reason for the coronavirus shutdown or the real reason for this is that they want to control you and it's about power. I don't know that anything about the coronavirus is about power. I don't get that meaning. I'm not detect…
View segment →All right, so the Trump War Room, which tweets for the Trump campaign, had a terrific tweet today and I will read it to you. And the timing, the comedic timing is even right because they leave a space and I always appreciate that because when you're writing humor in a tweet sometimes you want a litt…
View segment →Correct me if I'm wrong and I think that your mileage may vary on this but last week it looked like the following three things were not looking good. So last week we weren't sure that our herd immunity was even possible. Hydroxychloroquine was taking a hit for maybe killing people or not looking goo…
View segment →There is a video which some of you may have seen if you get all the conspiracy theory stuff. You know some of you are always looking in the right places for the conspiracy theory stuff. I saw today a video which I'm pretty sure is fake. So I'm going to tell you that in my opinion it looks, I'd say,…
View segment →All right. Did you know that Chinese companies are snapping up oil fields because they're cheap? So there's some big Chinese developer. I saw this on Jack Posobiec's tweet that some Chinese rich guy who's buying up oil fields in Texas. And I'm thinking to myself, okay that sounds bad but let me ask…
View segment →All right let me make sure that I've talked about all the delightful things that I was going to talk about. I don't want to leave a thing out because you would feel so used. All right, oh yes, I wanted to remind you that I'm moving some bonus content over to Locals and I've got a subscription site…
View segment →You didn't see that? Tell us what happened to last night's Periscope. Oh it was just a technical glitch. It just ended. And if I get that far into one and it gets a technical glitch and it ends I don't restart because I think well you know twenty minutes that's good enough. Research chlorine dioxid…
View segment →And on that thought I would like to wish you a great night and I hope tomorrow has as much good news as today because today was pretty cool. And I think we're going to be heading in a good situation. Remember I told you these two weeks gonna be some good stuff. There's more coming. I'll see you in t…
View segment →Oh, this would be great ASMR. If you don't know what ASMR is, you've got to Google it. See what I got? Yes, it's Dave Rubin's new book. It's called "Don't Burn This Book." I will be talking to Dave Tuesday and we'll hear more about this, but I'm gonna do my homework first.
Hey, how's it going everybody? What a day. Do you remember maybe a week ago I told you that the next couple of weeks would be insane, but it would be insane in a good way? I'm not sure that's a hundred percent true, but it's definitely true that the past week or so it's just been crazy.
And of course one of the things that's making it interesting is this General Flynn stuff. Now I hope you're all up to date on this, because there's something so perfect about this if you've been following the whole Flynn saga. Because you know it was early on, it was rumored that he was just sort of framed and they were just trying to take him out or get some dirt on Trump. And I remember when I first heard it I said to myself, well yeah, you know, maybe, but it didn't seem totally credible when I first started. And partly because who does that? Who just decides to take out a general because he's part of a campaign?
And part of it is in the back of my mind I was thinking, if there's somebody you're gonna try to take down, you know, if you had to pick anybody in the world, let's say in the United States, and there was somebody you wanted to take down, and there was somebody that if you tried to take them down you might not have finished the job, who would be the worst person to try to take down and not quite get the job done? Well, maybe a top military trained mind of the United States, possibly a general. That would be a really bad person to try to take out and not quite get it done.
So today the big story is that some of the notes have been revealed. You know, they had notes from the time of the interviews and before. And I think it was lawyer Baker's notes who said — if you haven't seen this story it's just gonna make you laugh because you know everything is a Dilbert cartoon. And ultimately, you know, maybe it's just my filter on the world, you know, and why wouldn't it be? But I just see the world as this giant Dilbert cartoon.
So where the rest of you see important people doing awesome things because they're strangers, you know, you always think those strangers are doing awesome things. It's only the people that you know who are morons and incompetent. And you say to yourself, why is it that everybody I know personally is incompetent? Well, not everybody, but you know what I mean. But yet there are people I don't know, strangers in important jobs, and they're so wildly awesome and competent. Maybe not every time. I'm just saying that sometimes it's a little more like a Dilbert comic no matter where you go. That's my experience. There's no level anywhere, no level where you can get away from it.
Case in point, FBI lawyer — I think he's an FBI lawyer but anyway, as part of this group that was going to talk to Flynn, and he writes a note to himself: "What's our goal? Truth slash admission or to get him to lie so we can prosecute him or get him fired?" So if you don't think that in approximately, I think it'll be about six to eight weeks, if you don't think there's gonna be a Dilbert cartoon about the guy who's taking notes at the meetings, but really he shouldn't be taking the notes because for one he might not get it right and then it'd be a record or something that might not even be accurate. I mean that's a risk. Or you could be in the middle of a plot to overthrow the government of the United States and one of your treasonous co-conspirators decides to write a note to himself: "Note to self, is this one of these meetings where we're just..."
Can you just see it? Like if he was at the meeting, I guess you just see this guy to be questioned. Clarification, I'm just a point of order and just I'm wondering if we're committing treason against the United States of America. Yeah, is this our first domino? Or were we just talking to this guy to try to get him fired? I'm just trying to get on the same page. Are we just taking him out, just trying to get him fired, or is this actually connected to our plot to take out the legally elected president of the United States by going through generals first? Literally. And the fact that this guy is at the meeting, like, am I exaggerating? Is this not a Dilbert comic? But there's always this guy.
You can imagine like Brandon and all these other guys who are thinking, you know, I think we got away with it. I think they're thinking, got clean away. Yeah, it was close. It looked like they were sniffing out our trail there for a while. Looked like they were getting close. No, we're good. We got away. We got away.
What they found — what was on the note? You know it's a bad day to be anybody associated with this except for General Flynn. Now there's a punch line to all of this by the way. I've never seen anybody more exonerated. Like if there was some kind of Nobel Prize for being exonerated and like it was a scale and some people were a little bit exonerated — it's like, well, you know, he's not that guilty, let's exonerate him a little bit. You've got to figure that there's a scale of exoneration, right? Well this guy just broke the gauge for the most exonerated you could ever be.
But it gets better. There's a punch line. The punch line's coming. It gets better, I promise. So General Flynn is just having what's got to be one of the best days that anybody ever had in the history of days. I'm just imagining he sends a tweet. Oh, I have dubbed this tweet the tweet of the century. Now Twitter hasn't been around for a hundred years but still I'm going to go out on a limb and say that this tweet from General Flynn is the tweet of the century. And I hope you can see it. All right, so I'll just describe it. So there's no words, there's no text. So what you see is just you're looking at this little woods here and keep watching. Oh that's just the best tweet ever. Oh I could not enjoy this day better.
So meanwhile Dr. Burke is up laughing about that for a while. Stock market is up. So here's a question that I haven't heard anybody ask. It looks like there are three or four therapeutics for the coronavirus that look promising and I haven't heard anybody ask if we can take them all at the same time. Because I have to admit so far I'm a little bit underwhelmed by the early information we have about all of it, from hydroxychloroquine to Remdesivir or whatever.
The good news on Remdesivir is that there didn't seem to be any statistical difference in the death rate but people were getting cleared and I guess getting out of the hospital sooner. And I thought to myself, yeah, but if it's the same death rate, like you might be forgetting one thing that your trial found while you're talking about all the good news is that it didn't make a difference in the death rate. Now I don't know what difference it did make. I mean I'm happy that people went home earlier. I'm glad that they maybe their cough went away a little bit sooner. I'm glad that they could breathe a little bit easier maybe a full four days earlier than otherwise. But it's kind of about keeping people alive. So unless there's more to this Remdesivir story than we've heard, it feels a little bit exaggerated. But I would not doubt that it has some effects.
So my question is if the hydroxychloroquine has some effect and the interferon has some effect, we heard that there's some other thing that has some effect, is there anybody smart enough or is there even a way to know? Because we wouldn't have time to test it. I don't think we'd be able to test just pumping all that stuff into somebody and see what happens. What do we — I mean maybe we would. I suppose we would test it at the same time we're giving it to people probably. Or is this the sort of thing you can run through a supercomputer and say, well these kinds of things almost never interfere with these kinds of things even if you add this other kind of thing. So is this the sort of thing we have AI at this point that we can at least narrow down the odds and say, well we can't be positive but it's a very low chance that these particular things will interact.
So it could be. And I understand that there's some trials that are winding up pretty soon. So in the next few weeks I think we're going to have really good information. And if it turns out we can take these as a cocktail — and I would think it's more likely we can than we can't, wouldn't you think if you had to guess? Yeah, if you put — given that the actual medical professionals have been wrong about just about everything so far, we can guess right. Let's be doctors for a minute. If you had to guess, let's say all of these, let's say there are three or four things that are all sort of pretty good but not great, what do you think of the odds that they can all work together?
Oh, you know, actually that's a good point because here I was assuming that these were new drugs and therefore there would not be any kind of drug interaction documentation. But of course yes, they're all existing drugs so the fact that they exist already means that the drug interaction documentation has been done. But those drug interaction things couldn't possibly already know what would happen with that combination. The odds that that combination is actually documented if there are three or four of them, they have never been used in that combination before. All right, so that's my question. But it could be we're right on the edge of having something that'll take the edge off that virus.
Yes, fifty-nine thousand people dead and nobody thinks it's gonna let up. So remember was it only a week ago that people were saying, you know, we told you if it's only gonna be sixty thousand dead, you know, that's not much worse than the regular flu. But we're gonna be past sixty thousand tomorrow and we may have another fifty thousand. Would you say — do you think the month of May will have two thousand a day which is sort of what we've had? Let's say it trails off. Let's say we did get on top of it and let's say it averages a thousand a day when we really get on top of it. We'd still be pushing a hundred thousand in the best success story and that's before the summer even starts. But more likely we're gonna blow through a hundred thousand well before June. And unless these therapeutics really stop people from dying, which was my question about the Remdesivir, I don't know.
It looks like the plan, if everything went according to plan, I feel like the plan is for two hundred to three hundred thousand people to die. I feel like, you know, without that being actually said.
You've heard a lot of updates about testing and it's probably very confusing to you. And so I did the work of researching it. So I've dug down. I learned everything there is to know about testing, all the various kinds of different sciences, the kits, where they're made, the swabs, the shortages. I've summarized this for you as: testing is all bullshit. Everything you've ever been told about testing is probably just as far as I can tell — because there's certainly nothing happening, there's any correlation to what you're hearing. So as far as I can tell it's all been bullshit from the start and I don't see any reason that that will change now. Eventually it'll change but I think we're talking months. Everything suggests that that will be months. So I don't think testing was going to be the magic bullet because it's just not going to be fast enough.
There's a new story. This is like a classic CNN story as you judge whether it's true. So apparently the president was shouting at his campaign manager Brad Parscale. You know he was on the phone and aides were in the room and I guess somebody leaked it. And he was shouting and he was shifting the blame to Parscale for the lower poll numbers he's getting recently. And reportedly Trump berated Parscale for a recent spate of damaging poll numbers, even at one point threatening to sue Parscale. Do you think that happened? I don't know. I mean as far as anything's possible. And then they say — this is from CNN — it's not clear how serious the president's threat of a lawsuit was. Well I'm gonna take a stab at it. Not too serious was my guess. I'm just gonna say because I'm no strategist, but if I were running for re-election this wouldn't be the optimal time to sue your campaign manager. So I'm just gonna say that maybe the president had that same thought. It's kind of an obscure thought. Maybe he didn't think of it but I think he probably did. Probably said to himself, I've got this election coming up, probably not the best time to get rid of my campaign manager.
So was there a tense phone call between the president and Brad Parscale? Could be. Do you think that that was captured by this reporting accurately? Probably not. Let me read to you the name of the sources. Oh, unnamed. How interesting. The sources are unnamed. It's a story about the president flipping out behind closed doors. How long will it be before the president says none of that happened and then Brad Parscale says that's funny but none of that happened? Probably tomorrow sometime.
Now I don't doubt that the president yells at pretty much everybody at one time or another so that part might be true. Who knows.
So Twitter's mad at Ben Shapiro because he had the audacity to consider the costs and the benefits of reopening the economy and for the sin of including all of the costs and all of the benefits in this calculation. Because people were mad at him for other reasons I guess he is the worst person in the world and he wants to kill your grandmother. That makes sense, right? If somebody considers all the costs and all the benefits and says they should be all weighed, therefore logically he wants to kill your grandmother. Well I didn't even know that until today but I found that on the internet.
I cannot speak for Ben Shapiro but I can say this. The adults in the room, the adults can pick who's going to die. And if nobody else can do it I guess we have to find some leaders who can. Because we're coming to decision points. You know, do you die from the economy killing you or does grandma get a few years shaved off? And of course there's risk to everybody else and there's the organ damage and yeah, there's a million things.
I would guess without personally asking Ben Shapiro that if I said to him, Ben do you think we should consider only some of the costs and some of the benefits or maybe just look at them all, I'm just guessing he would say, well why don't we look at them all, Scott? That's exactly what I would say. I'm just guessing. I'm not reading his mind so I could be way off on that but I'm not.
So it's just weird to see somebody get pilloried for being the adult. I mean you know I give him credit. You don't have to agree with it. In fact I don't know exactly what it is he thinks we should be doing that's different. But you have to appreciate that somebody can say here's my choice. It's going to be tough on a certain class of people. All things considered somebody's got to make the decision. That's the way I'd go. Now even if you don't agree with it you have to respect that, right? Because that's ultimately somebody's gonna have to do that. It'll be the president. But you know have some empathy for how hard that is. If you're not willing to do it yourself don't feel like you can criticize the president when he does. Because he's gonna have to do that. That's a super tough decision.
So it looks like Biden has lost CNN. So Chris Cillizza, who I would say would be their sort of chief hit man on the political side — if you want a bad story about Trump you call Chris Cillizza. So he's one of their stars who most often talks about what bad thing Trump has done today. But he's after the Biden campaign. So credit to Chris Cillizza. So this would be a fair and balanced approach.
And what he said was that the New York Times did their look into the accusations by Tara Reade and they said they basically couldn't prove it happened and they couldn't prove it didn't happen. So basically they didn't have a conclusion. So that was what the New York Times said. What Biden's campaign has directed the talking points to be, they've actually written talking points with a lie in it and actually directed all the Biden supporters to use this lie. And listen to this lie. It says Biden believes — this is the talking points, right — Biden believes that all women have the right to be heard and to have their claims thoroughly reviewed. In this case a thorough review by the New York Times has led to the truth: this incident did not happen.
And the New York Times of course did not conclude it did not happen. They just said well we don't know. That's it. So the Biden campaign is going quite cleverly, by the way, if I'm gonna be fair and judge it which I like to do on its effectiveness as a dirty trick, you know, separate from whether it's an ethical thing to do. Effectiveness wise it's pretty good. It's pretty good because you have to understand most people are low information. They're not going to go to the New York Times article. But by the third time that you hear somebody say that the New York Times investigated and found out it didn't happen, even though all three of them will be lies, by the third time an unsophisticated viewer hears that it's just a fact.
So they've actually come up with a way to inoculate him with their base and I think it's a good one. I gotta say it's totally solid. Now it will be debunked mercilessly. I mean CNN is debunking it. Chris Cillizza is directly debunking it and saying that the campaign is just telling their people to lie and showing you the evidence. I mean you show usually the actual words. I'm pretty interesting but it's totally gonna work. Very clever.
All right, here's something I'm seeing a lot of people saying that the real reason for the coronavirus shutdown or the real reason for this is that they want to control you and it's about power. I don't know that anything about the coronavirus is about power. I don't get that meaning. I'm not detecting that. It doesn't pass any of my experience filters. I don't detect any of that. So I say that just because a lot of what I like to do here is detect bullshit when I can. And then you can see later when we find out what's true you can find out. But I'm going to call BS on anybody having a motive about coronavirus except trying to get through it. Right? I feel like the public is pretty much on the same team. That we all want the best way through it. We just disagree maybe what's the best way.
You can ignore the politicians just lying at each other in public. That's not really anything but a show. That's for politics. So you know I doubt that at least with the coronavirus and the shutdown I doubt that anybody had that conscious thought that hey this would be a way to control people.
All right, so the Trump War Room, which tweets for the Trump campaign, had a terrific tweet today and I will read it to you. And the timing, the comedic timing is even right because they leave a space and I always appreciate that because when you're writing humor in a tweet sometimes you want a little timing space. So it's like bah bah bah bah bah space. That ah, you know, and there's the reveal. So they did this really well. Whoever tweeted this knows what they're doing.
And it goes like this: "Joe Biden is using crooked Hillary as a character reference." Space. Space. Space. Space. That's it. That's the tweet. Yeah, isn't that great? "Joe Biden is using crooked Hillary as a character reference." Space space space. That's it. That's the tweet.
That's sort of what I like about it. It's got in my world when I write comics there are times when I'll get my funniest — the funniest part of the comic sometimes comes before the end. And when that happens I do what I call sort of the afterglow which is sort of the just the finish or the dessert. So maybe the joke happens in the last panel and then the last panel is just a little extra on top of the joke. And that's what this tweet did because the first part is the joke and then the second part is "that's it. That's the tweet." And then you get a little dessert. Well tweeted.
Correct me if I'm wrong and I think that your mileage may vary on this but last week it looked like the following three things were not looking good. So last week we weren't sure that our herd immunity was even possible. Hydroxychloroquine was taking a hit for maybe killing people or not looking good but that was questionable. And then the Remdesivir. Last week there was that leaked report that made that look maybe not so good.
So in a week we've learned — well I would say that nothing is certain because what we think we know changes every week. So I would be foolish to say that this is the week it all got right. So let's just say that it's changed and who knows if it'll change again. But Nate Silver, you know him from politics and statistics, so he's the expert on mystics and whatnot. And even when I disagree with him which I sometimes do, famously in 2016, he's always smart and he's always a good read and he's always got a filter on things that I wouldn't have seen because I don't have his depth of experience in this field.
And he pointed out that the questions about whether people were reinfected happened to be by coincidence but probably not. The number of people who were showing up as maybe reinfected, which would say herd immunity might not work, happened to be about the same as the error rate on the tests. So in other words you could fully explain the anomalies in the herd immunity just because the tests are not that accurate. So you would expect actually statistically that you would get exactly the result they got. But if you interpreted it to mean that people had been reinfected it's probably more appropriate to say there was a test problem because it was about the same number.
Now you know I leave you to fact-check that. I'm just passing along that even I don't know. Forty-eight hours ago I told you that the odds of herd immunity were only maybe seventy-five percent because I was hearing these reports of like well maybe not. But after hearing Nate Silver's reframing of it I still don't know but I'm gonna bump up my odds to basically a hundred percent. Yeah you could make it ninety-nine if you don't want it to be a hundred. But so I would say that herd immunity is as of today and only today — this is the first time I'm willing to say I am positive there's herd immunity. As of yesterday I wasn't positive. Right now I'm positive because Nate pushed me over the line there.
So and you saw what happened to the stock market, right? The stock market just went nuts. So the stock market thinks good things are gonna happen but I don't think any of the things are going to be about testing. I think testing will just be the disappointment in all this.
There is a video which some of you may have seen if you get all the conspiracy theory stuff. You know some of you are always looking in the right places for the conspiracy theory stuff. I saw today a video which I'm pretty sure is fake. So I'm going to tell you that in my opinion it looks, I'd say, certainly fake. So if you see it I will inoculate you from believing it. Okay, so the video purports to be somebody with their phone surreptitiously recording some kind of a lecture and you know it's not a good picture and you can't quite see the slides too well and the guy talking, you know he's a little far away because he's up on the front of the class. And the audio suggests — and I'm only gonna give you the high level because I don't actually want to spread the rumor, right? So there's something horrible in there. I don't want to say it because it just makes it worse, right? So I'll give you a hint so that if you see it you'll know oh that's the one.
So it hints that the military was considering creating a very bad virus weapon. So that's the only thing I'll tell you. Right, so if you see a grainy video of somebody allegedly showing other military people, hey we've developed this awful thing. And that's all I'm going to tell you about it. As far as I can tell it's fake. It looks very fake to me.
All right. Did you know that Chinese companies are snapping up oil fields because they're cheap? So there's some big Chinese developer. I saw this on Jack Posobiec's tweet that some Chinese rich guy who's buying up oil fields in Texas. And I'm thinking to myself, okay that sounds bad but let me ask you another question. Why do we let them buy anything? Can somebody answer why we let them buy anything in this country? I mean other than products they can take with them. Because we can't buy stuff in China, right? If we could I would say oh that's fair. They buy some stuff here, we buy some stuff there. But given the relative sizes of the economies and the populations, don't we all expect that if we wait long enough China's economy will dwarf the United States just because of math and demographics, right? We all expect that. That's sort of a given unless something strange happens.
Well what happens when China is so big that the amount of money that they can spend on stuff is even more gigantic compared to what it is now which is already massive? How much of the United States could they buy and just own it? I mean they could buy all the good stuff. They could buy all the good real estate. They could buy all the good companies. What couldn't they buy if they had enough money? So the question I ask you is if we can't buy stuff in their country and I think that's the case, right? I mean I'm not going out on a limb to say you can't buy a nice little piece of real estate in Shanghai. So if we can't, why in the world do we let them buy here? No I get that rich people like it because they can sell stuff to them. But really they're literally buying the country, right? See if they own a piece of the country they sort of have a lot of control just by being rich and here and landowners. Yeah, seems like a bad idea, says me.
All right let me make sure that I've talked about all the delightful things that I was going to talk about. I don't want to leave a thing out because you would feel so used.
All right, oh yes, I wanted to remind you that I'm moving some bonus content over to Locals and I've got a subscription site therefore. I'll be moving all of my video content. I'll still be doing it here every day so you still can watch it the same ways. But if you wanted to find it there, if you want to watch it at higher speeds so you could hear me talk faster, you could do that there. You could message me. You could see some stuff that you won't see anywhere else. But best of all those people who were nice enough to contribute to me on Patreon need not do that. So if you're on Patreon feel free to cancel that. And I know some people had some problems with Patreon anyway. And if you like subscribe to Locals and cancel Patreon, either way I would say so. That's all for now. If you need to find that link go to my Twitter. It's in the profile.
You didn't see that? Tell us what happened to last night's Periscope. Oh it was just a technical glitch. It just ended. And if I get that far into one and it gets a technical glitch and it ends I don't restart because I think well you know twenty minutes that's good enough.
Research chlorine dioxide. I don't know why but okay. The China book "Unrestricted Warfare." Yeah I'm familiar with that. Zoom. Hollywood media must be stopped. Yeah Zoom apparently has made some changes but we don't know if they're the good kind.
Yeah somebody's pointing out that we're always afraid the United States is always afraid of some other country eating our lunch and it used to be Japan and then Japan just stopped being such a threat and then it became China. And is it possible that China will be like the coronavirus ironically and just sort of trail off on its own because everything has a season? Well we'll find out.
Meat supply. Yeah I guess the president ordered the unions and the workers to go back to work even if it's not safe. I don't love that situation but I don't disagree that the government should use its powers to keep the food supply solid. So this is one of those war situations. When the president referred to this as a war it really is a war. And these are commander-in-chief decisions. And the commander-in-chief basically just told the meat workers that congratulations you're on the front line. And they didn't sign up for that but none of us signed up for it. I didn't sign up to be in a higher risk group at a certain age. Nobody signed up for any of this so it's not fair. Certainly not fair that the meat workers would take a bigger burden than a number of other people. Not as big as the frontline health care workers but pretty big. And it's not fair.
And I think the only thing that we can say is thank you. Thank you for your service. This is like one of those weird times when saying thank you for your service makes sense in a non-military context because we are at war and the commander-in-chief just ordered the meat workers to the front lines and we should just respect it, thank them. I don't think we should stop it because I think even just the psychology of keeping the food chain solid — I mean I think the public wants to know that the government is going to do whatever it takes to keep the food chain working. So I think the public wants to see a little strength when it comes to food. Maybe not overshooting the mark with privacy and stuff like that. The public can get a little antsy about that and should. But when you talk about the food supply and it's a war, somebody's going to be a victim. I think we just have to respect them. That's it. We just have to respect them and thank them.
And on that thought I would like to wish you a great night and I hope tomorrow has as much good news as today because today was pretty cool. And I think we're going to be heading in a good situation. Remember I told you these two weeks gonna be some good stuff. There's more coming. I'll see you in the morning.
oh this would be great ASMR if you don't know what ASMR is you've got a Google see what did I get this yes it's Nev Reubens new book it's called don't burn this book I will be talking to Dave Tuesday and we'll we'll hear more about this but I'm gonna do my homework first hey how's it going everybody what a day do you remember maybe a week ago I told you that the next couple of weeks would be insane but it would be insane in a good way I'm not sure that's a hundred percent sure true but it's definitely true that the past week or so it's just been crazy and of course the one of the things that's making it interesting is this general Flynn stuff now I hope you're all up-to-date on this because there's something so perfect about this day if if you've been following the whole Flynn saga because you know it was early on it was rumored that he was he was just sort of framed and they were just trying to take him out or get some dirt on Trump and I remember when I first heard it I said to myself well yeah you know maybe maybe but it didn't seem totally credible when I first started and partly because who does that who just decides to take out a general because he's he's part of a campaign and part of it is in the back of my mind I was thinking if there's somebody you're gonna try to take down you know if you had to pick anybody in the world let's say let's say in the United States and there was somebody you wanted to take down and there was somebody that if you tried to take them down you might not have finished the job who would be the worst person to try to take down and not quite get the job done well maybe a top military trained mind of the United States possibly a general that would be that would be a really bad person to try to take out and not quite get it done so today the big story is that some of the notes have been revealed you know they had read notes from the time of the interviews and before and I think it was lawyer Baker's notes who said if you if you haven't seen this story it's just gonna make you laugh because you know everything is a Dilbert cartoon and ultimately you know maybe it's just my filter on the world you know and why wouldn't it be but I just see the world as this giant Dilbert cartoon so where the rest of you see important people doing awesome things because they're strangers you know you always think those strangers are doing awesome things it's only the people that you know who are morons and incompetent and you say to yourself why why is it that everybody I know personally is a and incompetent well not everybody but you know I mean but yet there are people I don't know strangers and important jobs and they're so wildly awesome and competent maybe not every time I'm just saying that sometimes it's a little more like a Dilbert comic no matter where you go that's my experience there's no level anywhere no level where you can get away from it case in point FBI and lawyer I think he's an FBI lawyer but anyway as part of this group they was going to talk to Flynn and he writes a note to himself no there's no he writes what is our goal truth slash admission or to get him to lie so so we can prosecute him or get him fired well now if you don't think that are approximately I think it'll be about six to eight weeks if you don't think there's gonna be a Dilbert cartoon about the guy who's taking notes at the meetings but really you shouldn't you know he really shouldn't be taking the notes because for one he might not get it right and then it'd be a record or something that might not even be accurate I mean that's a risk or or you could be in the middle of a plot to overthrow the government of the United States and one of your treasonous co-conspirators decides to write a note to himself note to self is this one of these meetings where we're just it's like yeah can you just see yeah like like if he was at the meeting I guess you okay you just see this guide to be questioned clarification I'm just a point of order and just I'm wondering if we're committing treason against the United States of America yeah this is our first domino or where we just talking to this guy to try to get him fired I I'm just trying to get on the same page are we are we just taking him out just trying to get fired or is this actually connected to our plot to take out the legally elected president of the United States by going through generals first literally and the fact that this guy is at the meeting like you it's a am i exaggerating is this not a Dilbert comic but there's always this guy give you a budget can imagine like you know Brandon and all these other guys who are thinking you know I think we got away with it I think of their thinking got clean away yeah it was close it looks like it looked like they were they were sniff about our trail there for a while looked like they were getting close no we're good we got away we got away what they they found what I know you say what was on the note what you know it's a bad day to to be anybody associated with this except for general Flynn now there's a punch line to all of us by the way I've never seen anybody more exonerated like if there was some kind of if there was some kind of Nobel Prize or Nobel Prize for being exonerated and like it was a scale and some people were a little bit exonerated it's like well you know I he's not that guilty let's let's let's exonerate him a little bit you've got to figure that there's a scale of exoneration right well this biscuit this guy just broke the gauge for the most exonerated you could ever be but it gets better there's a punch line the punch lights coming off this it gets better I promise so general Flynn just having what's got to be one of the best days that anybody ever had in the history of days I'm just imagining he sends a tweet oh I I have I have dubbed this tweet the tweet of the century now Twitter hasn't been around for a hundred years but still I'm going to go out and limb and say that this tweet from general Flynn is the tweet of the century and I hope you can see it alright so I'll just describe it so there's no words there's no text so what you see is just you're looking at this little woods here and keep watching oh that's just best we'd ever oh I could not enjoy this day better so meanwhile ah dr.
Burke is up laughing about that for a while stock work is up so um here's a question that I haven't heard anybody yeah hurt anybody I haven't heard anybody ask we so it looks like there are three or four therapeutics for the corona virus that look promising and I haven't heard anybody ask if we can take them all at the same time because I have to admit so far I'm a little bit underwhelmed by the the early information we have about all of it from hydroxychloroquine to run des of error whatever yeah the good news on REM des of ear is that there didn't seem to be any statistical difference in the death rate but people were getting you know getting cleared if and I guess in getting into the hospital sooner and I thought to myself yeah but if it's the same death rate like you might be forgetting one thing that your trial found while you're talking about all the good news is that it didn't make a difference in the death rate now I don't know what difference it did make I mean I'm happy that people went home earlier I'm glad that they maybe their cough went away a little bit sooner I'm glad that they could breathe a little bit easier maybe a full four days earlier than otherwise but it's kind of about keeping people alive so unless there's more to this rim does Avira story than we've heard it feels a little bit exaggerated but I would not I would not doubt that it has some effects so my question is if the hydroxychloroquine has some effect and the interferon has some effect we heard that there's some other thing they have some in fact is there is there anybody smart enough or is there even a way to know because we wouldn't have time to test it yeah I don't think we'd be able to test just pump it all that stuff into somebody and see what happens what do we I mean maybe we would I suppose we would test it at the same time we're giving it to people probably but or is this a sort of thing you can run through a supercomputer and say well these kinds of things almost never interfere with these kinds of things even if you add this other kind of thing so was the sort of thing we have ai at this point that we can at least narrow down the odds and say well we can't be positive but it's a very low chance that these particular things will interact so it could be and I understand that there's some trials that are winding up pretty soon so in the next few weeks I think we're going to have really good information and if it turns out we can take these as a cocktail and I would think is more likely we can then that we Kant wouldn't you think if you had to guess yeah if you put you get it given that the actual medical professionals have been wrong about just about everything so far we can guess right let's be doctors for a minute if you had to guess let's say all of these let's say there are three or four things that are all sort of pretty good but not great what what do you think of the odds that they can all work together oh oh you know actually that's a good point because here I was assuming that these were new drugs and therefore there would not be any kind of drug interaction documentation but of course yes they're they're all existing drugs so the fact that they exist already means that the drug interaction documentation has been done but fam oh yeah the other one was that other one but those drug interaction things couldn't possibly already know what would happen with that combination the the odds that that combination is actually documented if there are three or four of them they have never been used in that combination before all right so that's my question but it could be we're right on the on the edge of having something that'll take the edge off that virus yes I will fifty-nine thousand people dead and nobody thinks it's gonna let up so remember was it only a week ago that people were saying you know we told you if it's only gonna be sixty thousand dead you know that's not much worse than the regular flu but we're we're gonna be past sixty thousand tomorrow and we're not may may should have another fifty thousand would you say do you think the month of May will have 2,000 a day which is sort of what we've had let's say trails off let's say we did get on top of it and let's say it averages you know a thousand a day when we really get on top of it we'd still be pushing a hundred thousand in the best success story and that's before the summer even starts but more likely we're gonna blow through a hundred thousand well before June and unless these therapeutics really stop people from dying which was my question about the run dezerter I don't know it looks like it looks like the plan if everything went according to plan I feel like the plan is for two or 200 to 300,000 people to die I feel like you know without that being actually said here's an the you've you've heard a lot of updates about testing and it's probably very confusing to you and so I did the I did the work of researching it so I've dug down I learned everything there is to know about testing all the various kinds of different Sciences the you know the kits where they're made you know the swabs the shortages I've summarized this for you as testing is it's all everything everything you've ever been told about testings probably just as far as I can tell because there's certainly nothing happening there's any correlation to what you're hearing so as far as I can tell it's all been from the start and I don't see any reason that that will change now eventually it'll change but I think it's gonna be we're I think we're talking months everything suggests that that will be months so I don't think testing was going to be the magic bullet because it's just just not going to be fast enough there's a new story this is like a classic CNN story as you judge whether it's true so apparently the president shout was shouting as campaign manager Brad Paris Cal you know he was on the phone and aides were in the room and I guess somebody leaked it and he was shouting and he was shifting the blame to parse Calif or the you know the lower poll numbers he's getting recently and reportedly Trump berated parse Cal for a recent spate of damaging poll numbers even at one point threatening to sue parse Cal do you think that happened I don't know I mean as far as anything's possible and then they say isn't this is from CNN it's not clear how serious the president's threat of a lawsuit was well I'm gonna take a stab at it not too serious was my guess I'm just gonna because I'm no I'm no strategist I'm no strategist but if I were running for re-election this wouldn't be the optimal time to sue your campaign manager so I'm just gonna I'm just gonna say that maybe the president had that same thought it's kind of an obscure thought maybe maybe didn't think of it but I think he probably did I think he probably did probably said to himself I've got this election coming up probably not the best time to get rid of my campaign manager so was there a tense phone call between the president and Brad parse Cal could be do you think that that was captured by this reporting accurately probably not probably not let me let me read to you the name of the sources Oh unnamed how interesting the sources are unnamed it's a story about the president flipping out behind closed doors how long will it be before the president says none of that happened and then Brad parce qu'elle says that's funny but none of that happened probably tomorrow sometime now I don't I don't doubt that the president yells at you know pretty much everybody at one one time or another so that part might be true who knows so Twitter's mad at ben shapiro because he had the audacity to consider the costs and the benefits of reopening the economy and for the sin of including all of the costs of all the benefits in this calculation because people were mad at him for other reasons i guess he is the worst person in the world and he wants to kill your grandmother that makes sense right if somebody considers all the costs and all the benefits and says they should be all weighed therefore logically he wants to kill your grandmother well i didn't even know that until today but i found that on the internet I cannot speak for Ben Shapiro but I can say this the adults in the room the adults can pick who's going to die and if nobody else can do it I guess we have to find some leaders who can because we're coming to you know decision points you know do you die from the economy killing you you know or does grandma get a few years shaved off and of course there's wrist everybody else and there's the organ damage and yeah there's there's a million a million things I would guess without personally asking Ben Shapiro that if I said to him Ben do you think we should consider only some of the costs and some of the benefits or maybe just look at them all I'm just guessing he would say well why don't we look at the mall Scott that's exactly what I would say I'm just guessing I'm not my I'm not reading his mind so I could be way off on that but I'm not so it's just weird to see somebody get pilloried for being the adult I mean you know I give them credit you don't have to agree with I in fact I don't know exactly what it is he thinks we should be doing that's different but you have to appreciate that somebody can say here's my choice it's going to be tough on a certain class of people all things considered somebody's got to make the decision that's the way I'd go now even if you don't agree with it you have to respect that right because that's ultimately somebody's gonna have to do that it'll be the president but you know have some empathy for how hard that is if you're not willing to do it yourself don't feel like you can criticize the president when he doesn't because he's gonna have to do that you know that's a that's a super tough decision so it looks like Biden has lost a CNN so Chris ELISA who I would say would be there sort of sort of their chief hit man on the political side if you want a bad story about Trump you know you call Chris ELISA so he's one of their you know stars who most often talks about what bad thing Trump has done today but he's he's after the Biden campaign so credit to Chris ELISA so this would be a fair and balanced approach and what he said was that the so the New York Times did their their look into the accusations by terror read and they said they basically they couldn't prove happened and they couldn't prove it didn't happen so basically they didn't have a conclusion so that was what the New York Times said what Biden's campaign has directed the talking points to be they've actually written talking points with a lie in it and actually directed all the by the supporters to use this lie and listen to this lie it says Biden believes that this is the talking points right Biden believes that all women have the right to be heard and to have their claims thoroughly reviewed in this case a thorough review by the New York Times has led to the truth : this incident did not happen and the New York Times of course did not conclude it did not happen they just said well we don't know that's it so the the Biden campaign is going quite cleverly by the way if I if I'm gonna be fair and judge it which I like to do on its effectiveness as a dirty trick you know separate from whether it's a you know an ethical thing to do effectiveness wise it's pretty good it's pretty good because you have to understand most people are low information they're not going to go to the New York Times article but by the third time that you hear somebody say that the New York Times investigated and found out it didn't happen even though all three of them will be lies by the third time an unsophisticated viewer hears that it's just a fact so they've actually come up with a way to inoculate him with their base and I think it's a good one I gotta say it's totally solid now it will be debunked you know mercilessly I mean CNN is debunking it all right Chris ELISA is directly debunking it and saying that the the campaign is just telling their people to lie and and showing you the evidence I mean you show usually the actual words I'm pretty interesting but it's totally gonna work very clever all right here's something I'm seeing a lot of people saying that the real reason for the coronavirus shutdown or the real reason for this is that is that they want to control you and it's about power I don't know that anything about the coronavirus is about power I don't get that meaning I'm not detecting that it doesn't it doesn't pass any of my experience filters I don't detect any of that so I say that just because a lot of what I like to do here is detect bs when I can and then you can see you know later when we find out what's true you can find out but I'm going to call BS on anybody having a motive about coronavirus except trying to get through it right I feel like the public is pretty much on the same team that we all want the best way through it we just disagree maybe what's the best way you can you can ignore the politicians just you know lying at each other in public that's not really anything but a show that's for politics so you know I don't know I I doubt that at least with the corona virus and the shutdown I doubt that anybody had that conscious thought that hey this would be a way to control people all right so the Trump war room which Trump which tweets for the Trump campaign had a terrific tweet today and I will read it to you and and the the timing the comedic timing is even right because I they leave a space and I always appreciate that because when you're writing humor and a tweet sometimes you want a little little timing space so it's like bah bah bah bah bah space that ah you know and there's the the reveal so they they did this really well whoever remember tweeted this knows what they're doing and it goes like this Joe Biden is using crooked Hillary as a character reference space a space space space that's it that's the tweet yeah isn't that great Joe Biden is using crooked Hillary as a character reference space space space that's it that's the tweet that's sort of a what I like about it is sort of everything it's got in the in my world when I write comics there are times when I'll I'll get my funniest the funniest part of the comic sometimes comes before the end and when that happens I do what I call sort of the afterglow which is sort of the just the finish or the dessert so maybe the joke happens the next the last panel and then the last panel is just a little extra on top of the joke and that's what this tweet did because the first part is the joke and then the second part is that's it that's the tweet and then you get a little dessert well tweeted so correct me if I'm wrong and I think that your mileage may vary on this but so last week it looked like the following three things were not looking good so last week it we weren't sure that our herd immunity was even possible hydroxychloroquine was taking a hit you know for maybe killing people or not looking good but that was questionable and then the REM des affair last week there was that leaked report that made that look maybe not so good so in a week we've learned we've learned well I would say that nothing is certain because since the what we think we know changes every week so I would be foolish to say that this is the week it all got right so let's just say so let's just say that it's changed let and who knows if he'll change again but Nate Silver you know him from well you know him from politics and statistics so he's the expert on mystics and whatnot and even when I disagree with him which I sometimes do famously famously in 2016 he's always a smart and he's always a good read and he's always got a he's always going to filter on things that I wouldn't have seen because I don't have his his depth of experience in this field and he pointed out that the questions about whether people were reinfected happened to be by coincidence but probably not the the number of people who were showing up as may be reinfected which would say herd and the herd immunity might not work happened to be about the same as the error rate on the tests so in other words you could fully explain the anomalies in the herd immunity just because the tests are not that accurate so you would get you would expect actually statistically that you would get exactly the result they got but if you interpreted it to mean that people had been reinfected it's probably more appropriate to say there was a test problem because it was about the same number now you know I leave you to fact-check that I'm just passing along that even I don't know 48 hours ago I told you that the odds of herd immunity were only maybe 75 percent because I was hearing these reports of like well maybe not but after hearing nate silver's reframing of it i still don't know but i'm gonna bump up my odds to basically a hundred percent yeah you could make it 99 if you if you don't want it to be hundred but so I would say that herd immunity is as of today and and only today this is the first time I'm willing to say I am positive there's herd immunity as of yesterday I wasn't positive right now I'm positive because Nate pushed me over the line there so and you saw what happened to the stock market right this talk market just went nuts so the stock market thinks good things would happen but I don't think any of the things are going to be about testing I think testing will just be the disappointment in all this there is a video which some of you may have seen if you if you get all the conspiracy theory stuff you know some of you are always looking in the right places for the conspiracies Theory stuff I saw today a video which I'm pretty sure is fake so I'm going to tell you that in my opinion it looks I'd say certainly fake so if you see it I will inoculate you from believing and okay so the video purports to be somebody with that I don't look like their phone surreptitiously recording some kind of a lecture and you know it's not a good picture and you can't quite see the slides too well and you know the guy talking you know he's a little far away because he's up up on the you know front of the class and the audio suggests and I'm only gonna give you the the high level because I don't actually want to spread the rumor right so there's something horrible in there I don't want to say it because it just makes it worse right so I'll give you a hint so that if you see it you'll you'll know oh that's the one so it hints that the the military was considering creating a very bad very bad virus weapon so that's the only thing I'll tell you right so if you see a grainy video of some somebody allegedly showing other military people hey we've developed this awful thing and that's all I'm going to tell you about it as far as I can tell it's fake it looks very fake to me okay all right did you know that Chinese companies are snapping up oil fields because they're cheap so there's some big Chinese developer I saw this um Jack Pacific's tweet that some Chinese rich guy who's buying up oil fields in Texas and I'm thinking to myself okay that sounds bad but let me ask you another question why do we let them buy anything can somebody answer why we let them buy anything in this country I mean other than products they can take with them because we can't buy stuff in China right if we could I would say oh that's fair they buy some stuff here we buy some stuff there but given given the you know the relative sizes of the economies and the populations don't we all expect that if we wait long enough China's economy will dwarf the United States just because of math and demographics right we all expect that that's sort of a given you know unless something strange happens well what happens when China is so big that the amount of money that they can spend on stuff is even more gigantic compared to what it is now which is already massive how much of the United States could they buy and just and just own it you know I mean they could buy all the good stuff all right they could buy all the good real estate they could buy all the good companies what couldn't they buy if they had enough money so the question I ask you is if we can't buy stuff in their country and I think that's the case right I mean I'm not going out on a limb to say you can't buy a nice little piece of real estate in Shanghai so if we can't why in the world do we let them buy here no I get that rich people like it because I can sell stuff to them and but really they're they're literally buying the country right see if they own a piece of the country they sort of you know they've got a lot of control just by being rich and here and landowners yeah seems like a bad idea says me all right let me make sure that I've talked about all the delightful things that I was going to take talk about I don't want to I don't want to leave a thing out because how you would he would feel so so used all right oh yes I wanted to remind you that so I'm moving some bonus content over to locals LOC als column and I've got a subscription site therefore I'll be moving all of my video content I'll still be doing here every day so you still can watch it the same ways but if you wanted to find it there if you want to watch it at higher speeds so you could hear me talk faster you could do that there you could message me you could see some stuff that you won't see anywhere else but best of all those people who were nice enough to contribute to me on patreon need not do that so if you're on patreon feel free to cancel that and I know some people had some problems with patreon anyway and if you like subscribe to locals and cancel patreon either way I would say so that's all for now if you need to find that link go to my Twitter it's in the profile you didn't see that tell us what happened to last night's periscope oh it was just a technical glitch it just ended and if I get that far into one and it gets a tactical glitch and it ends I don't restart because I think well you know 20 minutes that's good enough research chlorine dioxide I don't know why but okay the china book unrestricted warfare yeah I'm familiar with that zoom Hollywood media must be stopped yeah zoom apparently has made some changes but we don't know if they're the good kind yeah somebody's pointing out that we're always afraid the United States is always afraid of some other country you know eating our lunch and it used to be Japan and then Japan just stopped being such a threat and then it became China you know and is it possible that China will be like the coronavirus ironically and just sort of trail off on its own because everything has a season well we'll find out meat supply yeah I guess the president ordered the the unions and the workers to go back to work even if it's not safe I I don't love that situation but I don't disagree that the government should use its powers to keep the food supply solid so this is one of the you know this is a war situation you know when when the president referred to this as a war it really is a war and these are commander-in-chief decisions and the commander-in-chief basically just told the meat workers that congratulations you on the front line and they didn't sign up for that but none of us signed up for it you know I didn't sign up to be in a in a higher risk group right yeah a certain age nobody signed up for any of this so it's not fair yeah certainly not fair that the meat workers are it would take a bigger burden than a number of other people not as big as you know the frontline health care workers but pretty big and it's not fair and I think the only thing that we can say is thank you you know thank you for your service this is like the one of those weird times when saying thank you for your service makes sense of a non-military context because we are at war and the commander in chief just ordered the meat workers to the frontlines and we should just respect it thank them I don't think we should stop it because I think even just the psychology of keeping the the food chain solid I mean I think the public wants to know that the government is going to do whatever it takes to keep the food chain working so I think the public wants to see a little strength when it comes to food maybe not you know overshooting the mark with privacy and stuff like that public can get a little antsy about that and should but when you talk about the food supply and it's a war somebody's going to be a victim you know I think we just have to respect them that's it we just have to respect them and thank them and on that thought I would like to wish you a great night and I hope tomorrow has as much good news as today because today was pretty cool and I think we're going to be heading in a good situation remember I told you these two weeks gonna be some good stuff there's more coming I'll see you in the morning
oh this would be great ASMR if you don't
know what ASMR is you've got a Google
see what did I get this
yes it's Nev Reubens new book it's
called don't burn this book I will be
talking to Dave Tuesday and we'll we'll
hear more about this but I'm gonna do my
homework first hey how's it going
everybody what a day do you remember
maybe a week ago I told you that the
next couple of weeks would be insane but
it would be insane in a good way I'm not
sure that's a hundred percent sure true
but it's definitely true that the past
week or so it's just been crazy and of
course the one of the things that's
making it interesting is this general
Flynn stuff now I hope you're all
up-to-date on this because there's
something so perfect about this day if
if you've been following the whole Flynn
saga because you know it was early on it
was rumored that he was he was just sort
of framed and they were just trying to
take him out or get some dirt on Trump
and I remember when I first heard it I
said to myself well yeah you know maybe
maybe but it didn't seem totally
credible when I first started and partly
because who does that who just decides
to take out a general because he's he's
part of a campaign and part of it is in
the back of my mind I was thinking
if there's somebody you're gonna try to
take down you know if you had to pick
anybody in the world let's say let's say
in the United States and there was
somebody you wanted to take down and
there was somebody that if you tried to
take them down you might not have
finished the job who would be the worst
person to try to take down and not quite
get the job done well maybe a top
military trained mind of the United
States possibly a general that would be
that would be a really bad person to try
to take out and not quite get it done so
today the big story is that some of the
notes have been revealed
you know they had read notes from the
time of the interviews and before and I
think it was lawyer Baker's notes who
said if you if you haven't seen this
story it's just gonna make you laugh
because you know everything is a Dilbert
cartoon and ultimately you know maybe
it's just my filter on the world you
know and why wouldn't it be but I just
see the world as this giant Dilbert
cartoon so where the rest of you see
important people doing awesome things
because they're strangers you know you
always think those strangers are doing
awesome things it's only the people that
you know who are morons and incompetent
and you say to yourself why why is it
that everybody I know personally is a
and incompetent well not everybody
but you know I mean but yet there are
people I don't know strangers and
important jobs and they're so wildly
awesome and competent maybe not every
time I'm just saying that sometimes it's
a little more like a Dilbert comic no
matter where you go that's my experience
there's no level anywhere no level where
you can get away from it
case in point
FBI and lawyer I think he's an FBI
lawyer but anyway as part of this group
they was going to talk to Flynn and he
writes a note to himself no there's no
he writes what is our goal
truth slash admission or to get him to
lie so so we can prosecute him or get
him fired well now if you don't think
that are approximately I think it'll be
about six to eight weeks if you don't
think there's gonna be a Dilbert cartoon
about the guy who's taking notes at the
meetings but really you shouldn't you
know he really shouldn't be taking the
notes because for one he might not get
it right and then it'd be a record or
something that might not even be
accurate I mean that's a risk or or you
could be in the middle of a plot to
overthrow the government of the United
States and one of your treasonous
co-conspirators decides to write a note
to himself
note to self is this one of these
meetings where we're just it's like yeah
can you just see yeah like like if he
was at the meeting I guess you okay you
just see this guide to be questioned
clarification I'm just a point of order
and just I'm wondering if we're
committing treason against the United
States of America yeah this is our first
domino or where we just talking to this
guy to try to get him fired I I'm just
trying to get on the same page are we
are we just taking him out just trying
to get fired or is this actually
connected to our plot to take out the
legally elected president of the United
States by going through
generals first literally and the fact
that this guy is at the meeting like you
it's a am i exaggerating is this not a
Dilbert comic but there's always this
guy give you a budget can imagine like
you know Brandon and all these other
guys who are thinking you know I think
we got away with it
I think of their thinking got clean away
yeah it was close it looks like it
looked like they were they were sniff
about our trail there for a while
looked like they were getting close no
we're good we got away we got away what
they they found what I know you say what
was on the note what you know it's a bad
day to to be anybody associated with
this except for general Flynn now
there's a punch line to all of us by the
way I've never seen anybody more
exonerated like if there was some kind
of if there was some kind of Nobel Prize
or Nobel Prize for being exonerated and
like it was a scale and some people were
a little bit exonerated it's like well
you know I he's not that guilty let's
let's let's exonerate him a little bit
you've got to figure that there's a
scale of exoneration right well this
biscuit
this guy just broke the gauge for the
most exonerated you could ever
be but it gets better
there's a punch line the punch lights
coming off this it gets better I promise
so general Flynn just having what's got
to be one of the best days that anybody
ever had in the history of days
I'm just imagining he sends a tweet oh I
I have I have dubbed this tweet the
tweet of the century now Twitter hasn't
been around for a hundred years but
still I'm going to go out and limb and
say that this tweet from general Flynn
is the tweet of the century and I hope
you can see it alright so I'll just
describe it so there's no words there's
no text so what you see is just you're
looking at this little woods here and
keep watching oh that's just best we'd
ever oh I could not enjoy this day
better so meanwhile ah dr. Burke is up
[Laughter]
laughing about that for a while
stock work is up so um here's a question
that I haven't heard anybody yeah hurt
anybody I haven't heard anybody ask we
so it looks like there are three or four
therapeutics for the corona virus that
look promising and I haven't heard
anybody ask if we can take them all at
the same time because I have to admit so
far I'm a little bit underwhelmed by the
the early information we have about all
of it from hydroxychloroquine to run des
of error whatever yeah the good news on
REM des of ear is that there didn't seem
to be any statistical difference in the
death rate but people were getting you
know getting cleared if and I guess in
getting into the hospital sooner and I
thought to myself yeah but if it's the
same death rate
like you might be forgetting one thing
that your trial found while you're
talking about all the good news is that
it didn't make a difference in the death
rate now I don't know what difference it
did make I mean I'm happy that people
went home earlier I'm glad that they
maybe their cough went away a little bit
sooner I'm glad that they could breathe
a little bit easier maybe a full four
days earlier than otherwise but it's
kind of about keeping people alive so
unless there's more to this rim does
Avira story than we've heard it feels a
little bit exaggerated but I would not I
would not doubt that it has some effects
so my question is if the
hydroxychloroquine has some effect and
the interferon has some effect we heard
that there's some other thing they have
some in fact is there is there anybody
smart enough or is there even a way to
know because we wouldn't have time to
test it yeah I don't think we'd be able
to test just pump it all that stuff into
somebody and see what happens what do we
I mean maybe we would I suppose we would
test it at the same time we're giving it
to people probably but or is this a sort
of thing you can run through a
supercomputer and say well these kinds
of things almost never interfere with
these kinds of things even if you add
this other kind of thing so was the sort
of thing we have ai at this point that
we can at least narrow down the odds and
say well we can't be positive but it's a
very low chance that these particular
things will interact so it could be and
I understand that there's some trials
that are winding up pretty soon so in
the next few weeks I think we're going
to have really good information and if
it turns out we can take these as a
cocktail and I would think is more
likely we can then that we
Kant wouldn't you think if you had to
guess yeah if you put you get it given
that the actual medical professionals
have been wrong about just about
everything so far we can guess right
let's be doctors for a minute if you had
to guess let's say all of these let's
say there are three or four things that
are all sort of pretty good but not
great what what do you think of the odds
that they can all work together oh oh
you know actually that's a good point
because here I was assuming that these
were new drugs and therefore there would
not be any kind of drug interaction
documentation but of course yes they're
they're all existing drugs so the fact
that they exist already means that the
drug interaction documentation has been
done but fam oh yeah the other one was
that other one but those drug
interaction things couldn't possibly
already know what would happen with that
combination the the odds that that
combination is actually documented if
there are three or four of them they
have never been used in that combination
before all right so that's my question
but it could be we're right on the on
the edge of having something that'll
take the edge off that virus yes I will
fifty-nine thousand people dead and
nobody thinks it's gonna let up so
remember was it only a week ago that
people were saying you know we told you
if it's only gonna be sixty thousand
dead you know that's not much worse than
the regular flu but we're we're gonna be
past sixty thousand tomorrow and we're
not may may should have another fifty
thousand would you say
do you think the month of May will have
2,000 a day which is sort of what we've
had let's say trails off
let's say we did get on top of it and
let's say it averages you know a
thousand a day when we really get on top
of it we'd still be pushing a hundred
thousand in the best success story and
that's before the summer even starts but
more likely we're gonna blow through a
hundred thousand well before June and
unless these therapeutics really stop
people from dying which was my question
about the run dezerter I don't know it
looks like it looks like the plan if
everything went according to plan I feel
like the plan is for two or 200 to
300,000 people to die I feel like you
know without that being actually said
here's an the you've you've heard a lot
of updates about testing and it's
probably very confusing to you and so I
did the I did the work of researching it
so I've dug down I learned everything
there is to know about testing all the
various kinds of different Sciences the
you know the kits where they're made you
know the swabs the shortages I've
summarized this for you as testing is
it's all everything
everything you've ever been told about
testings probably just as far
as I can tell because there's certainly
nothing happening there's any
correlation to what you're hearing so as
far as I can tell it's all been
from the start and I don't see any
reason that that will change now
eventually it'll change but I think it's
gonna be we're I think we're talking
months everything suggests that that
will be months so I don't think testing
was going to be the magic bullet because
it's just just not going to be fast
enough
there's a new story this is like a
classic CNN story as you judge whether
it's true so apparently the president
shout was shouting as campaign manager
Brad Paris Cal you know he was on the
phone and aides were in the room and I
guess somebody leaked it and he was
shouting and he was shifting the blame
to parse Calif or the you know the lower
poll numbers he's getting recently and
reportedly Trump berated parse Cal for a
recent spate of damaging poll numbers
even at one point threatening to sue
parse Cal do you think that happened I
don't know I mean as far as anything's
possible and then they say isn't this is
from CNN it's not clear how serious the
president's threat of a lawsuit was well
I'm gonna take a stab at it not too
serious was my guess I'm just gonna
because I'm no I'm no strategist I'm no
strategist but if I were running for
re-election this wouldn't be the optimal
time to sue your campaign manager so I'm
just gonna I'm just gonna say that maybe
the president had that same thought it's
kind of an obscure thought maybe maybe
didn't think of it but I think he
probably did I think he probably did
probably said to himself I've got this
election coming up probably not the best
time to get rid of my campaign manager
so was there a tense phone call between
the president and Brad parse Cal could
be do you think that that was captured
by this reporting accurately probably
not probably not let me let me read to
you the name of the sources Oh unnamed
how interesting the sources are unnamed
it's a story about the president
flipping out behind closed doors how
long will it be before the president
says
none of that happened and then Brad
parce qu'elle says that's funny but none
of that happened
probably tomorrow sometime now I don't I
don't doubt that the president yells at
you know pretty much everybody at one
one time or another so that part might
be true who knows
so Twitter's mad at ben shapiro because
he had the audacity to consider the
costs and the benefits of reopening the
economy and for the sin of including all
of the costs of all the benefits in this
calculation because people were mad at
him for other reasons i guess he is the
worst person in the world and he wants
to kill your grandmother that makes
sense right if somebody considers all
the costs and all the benefits and says
they should be all weighed therefore
logically he wants to kill your
grandmother well i didn't even know that
until today but i found that on the
internet I cannot speak for Ben Shapiro
but I can say this the adults in the
room the adults can pick who's going to
die and if nobody else can do it I guess
we have to find some leaders who can
because we're coming to you know
decision points you know do you die from
the economy killing you you know or does
grandma get a few years shaved off and
of course there's wrist everybody else
and there's the organ damage and yeah
there's there's a million a million
things I would guess without personally
asking Ben Shapiro that if I said to him
Ben do you think we should consider only
some of the costs and some of the
benefits or maybe just look at them all
I'm just guessing he would say well why
don't we look at the mall Scott that's
exactly what I would say I'm just
guessing I'm not my I'm not reading his
mind so I could be way off on that
but I'm not so it's just weird to see
somebody get pilloried for being the
adult I mean you know I give them credit
you don't have to agree with I in fact I
don't know exactly what it is he thinks
we should be doing that's different but
you have to appreciate that somebody can
say here's my choice it's going to be
tough on a certain class of people all
things considered somebody's got to make
the decision that's the way I'd go now
even if you don't agree with it you have
to respect that right because that's
ultimately somebody's gonna have to do
that it'll be the president but you know
have some empathy for how hard that is
if you're not willing to do it yourself
don't feel like you can criticize the
president when he doesn't because he's
gonna have to do that you know that's a
that's a super tough decision so it
looks like Biden has lost a CNN so Chris
ELISA who I would say would be there
sort of sort of their chief hit man on
the political side if you want a bad
story about Trump you know you call
Chris ELISA so he's one of their you
know stars who most often talks about
what bad thing Trump has done today but
he's he's after the Biden campaign so
credit to Chris ELISA
so this would be a fair and balanced
approach and what he said was that the
so the New York Times did their their
look into the accusations by terror read
and they said they basically they
couldn't prove happened and they
couldn't prove it didn't happen so
basically they didn't have a conclusion
so that was what the New York Times said
what Biden's campaign has directed the
talking points to be they've actually
written talking points with a lie in it
and actually directed all
the by the supporters to use this lie
and listen to this lie
it says Biden believes that this is the
talking points right
Biden believes that all women have the
right to be heard and to have their
claims thoroughly reviewed in this case
a thorough review by the New York Times
has led to the truth : this incident did
not happen and the New York Times of
course did not conclude it did not
happen they just said well we don't know
that's it so the the Biden campaign is
going quite cleverly by the way if I if
I'm gonna be fair and judge it which I
like to do on its effectiveness as a
dirty trick you know separate from
whether it's a you know an ethical thing
to do
effectiveness wise it's pretty good it's
pretty good because you have to
understand most people are low
information they're not going to go to
the New York Times article but by the
third time that you hear somebody say
that the New York Times investigated and
found out it didn't happen even though
all three of them will be lies by the
third time an unsophisticated viewer
hears that it's just a fact
so they've actually come up with a way
to inoculate him with their base and I
think it's a good one I gotta say it's
totally solid now it will be debunked
you know mercilessly
I mean CNN is debunking it all right
Chris ELISA is directly debunking it and
saying that the the campaign is just
telling their people to lie and and
showing you the evidence I mean you show
usually the actual words I'm pretty
interesting but it's totally gonna work
very clever all right here's something
I'm seeing a lot of people saying that
the real reason for the coronavirus
shutdown or the real reason for this is
that is that they want to control you
and it's about power I don't know that
anything about the coronavirus is about
power I don't get that meaning I'm not
detecting that it doesn't it doesn't
pass any of my experience filters
I don't detect any of that so I say that
just because a lot of what I like to do
here is detect bs when I can and then
you can see you know later when we find
out what's true you can find out but I'm
going to call BS on anybody having a
motive about coronavirus except trying
to get through it
right I feel like the public is pretty
much on the same team that we all want
the best way through it we just disagree
maybe what's the best way you can you
can ignore the politicians just you know
lying at each other in public that's not
really anything but a show that's for
politics so you know I don't know I I
doubt that at least with the corona
virus and the shutdown I doubt that
anybody had that conscious thought that
hey this would be a way to control
people all right so the Trump war room
which Trump which tweets for the Trump
campaign had a terrific tweet today and
I will read it to you and and the the
timing the comedic timing is even right
because I they leave a space and I
always appreciate that because when
you're writing humor and a tweet
sometimes you want a little little
timing space so it's like bah bah bah
bah bah space that ah you know and
there's the the reveal so they they did
this really well whoever remember
tweeted this knows what they're doing
and it goes like this Joe Biden is using
crooked Hillary as a character reference
space a space space space that's it
that's the tweet
yeah isn't that great Joe Biden is using
crooked Hillary as a character reference
space space space that's it that's the
tweet that's sort of a what I like about
it is sort of everything it's got in the
in my world when I write comics there
are times when I'll I'll get my funniest
the funniest part of the comic sometimes
comes before the end and when that
happens I do what I call sort of the
afterglow which is sort of the just the
finish or the dessert
so maybe the joke happens the next the
last panel and then the last panel is
just a little extra on top of the joke
and that's what this tweet did because
the first part is the joke and then the
second part is that's it that's the
tweet and then you get a little dessert
well tweeted so correct me if I'm wrong
and I think that your mileage may vary
on this but so last week it looked like
the following three things were not
looking good
so last week it we weren't sure that our
herd immunity was even possible
hydroxychloroquine was taking a hit you
know for maybe killing people or not
looking good but that was questionable
and then the REM des affair last week
there was that leaked report that made
that look maybe not so good so in a week
we've learned we've learned well I would
say that nothing is certain because
since the what we think we know changes
every week so I would be foolish to say
that this is the week it all got right
so let's just say so let's just say that
it's changed let and who knows if he'll
change again but Nate Silver you know
him from well you know him from politics
and statistics so he's the expert on
mystics and whatnot and even when I
disagree with him which I sometimes do
famously famously in 2016
he's always a smart and he's always a
good read and he's always got a he's
always going to filter on things that I
wouldn't have seen because I don't have
his his depth of experience in this
field and he pointed out that the
questions about whether people were
reinfected happened to be by coincidence
but probably not the the number of
people who were showing up as may be
reinfected which would say herd and the
herd immunity might not work happened to
be about the same as the error rate on
the tests so in other words you could
fully explain the anomalies in the herd
immunity just because the tests are not
that accurate so you would get you would
expect actually statistically that you
would get exactly the result they got
but if you interpreted it to mean that
people had been reinfected it's probably
more appropriate to say there was a test
problem because it was about the same
number now you know I leave you to
fact-check that I'm just passing along
that even I don't know 48 hours ago I
told you that the odds of herd immunity
were only maybe 75 percent because I was
hearing these reports of like well maybe
not but after hearing nate silver's
reframing of it i still don't know but
i'm gonna bump up my odds to basically a
hundred percent yeah you could make it
99 if you if you don't want it to be
hundred but so I would say that herd
immunity is as of today and and only
today this is the first time I'm willing
to say I am positive there's herd
immunity as of yesterday I wasn't
positive right now I'm positive because
Nate pushed me over the line there so
and you saw what happened to the stock
market right this talk market just went
nuts
so the stock market thinks good things
would happen but I don't think any of
the things are going to be about testing
I think testing will just be the
disappointment in all this there is a
video which some of you may have seen if
you if you get all the conspiracy theory
stuff
you know some of you are always looking
in the right places for the conspiracies
Theory stuff I saw today a video which
I'm pretty sure is fake so I'm going to
tell you that in my opinion it looks
I'd say certainly fake so if you see it
I will inoculate you from believing and
okay so the video purports to be
somebody with that I don't look like
their phone surreptitiously recording
some kind of a lecture and you know it's
not a good picture and you can't quite
see the slides too well and you know the
guy talking you know he's a little far
away because he's up up on the you know
front of the class and the audio
suggests and I'm only gonna give you the
the high level because I don't actually
want to spread the rumor right so
there's something horrible in there I
don't want to say it because it just
makes it worse right so I'll give you a
hint so that if you see it you'll you'll
know oh that's the one so it hints that
the the military was considering
creating a very bad very bad virus
weapon so that's the only thing I'll
tell you right so if you see a grainy
video of some somebody allegedly showing
other military people
hey we've developed this awful thing and
that's all I'm going to tell you about
it as far as I can tell it's fake
it looks very fake to me okay all right
did you know that Chinese companies are
snapping up oil fields because
they're cheap so there's some big
Chinese developer I saw this um Jack
Pacific's tweet that some Chinese rich
guy who's buying up oil fields in Texas
and I'm thinking to myself okay that
sounds bad but let me ask you another
question why do we let them buy anything
can somebody answer why we let them buy
anything in this country I mean other
than products they can take with them
because we can't buy stuff in China
right if we could I would say oh that's
fair they buy some stuff here we buy
some stuff there but given given the you
know the relative sizes of the economies
and the populations don't we all expect
that if we wait long enough China's
economy will dwarf the United States
just because of math and demographics
right we all expect that that's sort of
a given you know unless something
strange happens well what happens when
China is so big that the amount of money
that they can spend on stuff is even
more gigantic compared to what it is now
which is already massive how much of the
United States could they buy and just
and just own it
you know I mean they could buy all the
good stuff all right
they could buy all the good real estate
they could buy all the good companies
what couldn't they buy if they had
enough money so the question I ask you
is if we can't buy stuff in their
country and I think that's the case
right I mean I'm not going out on a limb
to say you can't buy a nice little piece
of real estate in Shanghai so if we
can't why in the world do we let them
buy here no I get that rich people like
it because I can sell stuff to them and
but really they're they're literally
buying the country right see if they own
a piece of the country they sort of you
know
they've got a lot of control just by
being rich and here and landowners yeah
seems like a bad idea
says me all right let me make sure that
I've talked about all the delightful
things that I was going to take talk
about I don't want to I don't want to
leave a thing out because how you would
he would feel so so used all right
oh yes I wanted to remind you that so
I'm moving some bonus content over to
locals LOC als column and I've got a
subscription site therefore I'll be
moving all of my video content I'll
still be doing here every day so you
still can watch it the same ways but if
you wanted to find it there if you want
to watch it at higher speeds so you
could hear me talk faster you could do
that there you could message me you
could see some stuff that you won't see
anywhere else but best of all those
people who were nice enough to
contribute to me on patreon need not do
that so if you're on patreon
feel free to cancel that and I know some
people had some problems with patreon
anyway and if you like subscribe to
locals and cancel patreon either way I
would say so that's all for now if you
need to find that link go to my Twitter
it's in the profile you didn't see that
tell us what happened to last night's
periscope oh it was just a technical
glitch it just ended and if I get that
far into one and it gets a tactical
glitch and it ends
I don't restart because I think well you
know 20 minutes that's good enough
research chlorine dioxide I don't know
why but okay
the china book unrestricted warfare yeah
I'm familiar with that
zoom Hollywood media must be stopped
yeah zoom apparently has made some
changes but we don't know if they're the
good kind yeah somebody's pointing out
that we're always afraid the United
States is always afraid of some other
country you know eating our lunch and it
used to be Japan and then Japan just
stopped being such a threat and then it
became China you know and is it possible
that China will be like the coronavirus
ironically and just sort of trail off on
its own because everything has a season
well we'll find out meat supply yeah I
guess the president ordered the the
unions and the workers to go back to
work even if it's not safe I I don't
love that situation but I don't disagree
that the government should use its
powers to keep the food supply solid so
this is one of the you know this is a
war situation you know when when the
president referred to this as a war it
really is a war and these are
commander-in-chief decisions and the
commander-in-chief basically just told
the meat workers that congratulations
you on the front line and they didn't
sign up for that but none of us signed
up for it you know I didn't sign up to
be in a in a higher risk group right
yeah a certain age nobody signed up for
any of this so it's not fair
yeah certainly not fair that the meat
workers are it would take a bigger
burden than a number of other people not
as big as you know the frontline health
care workers but pretty big and it's not
fair
and I think the only thing that we can
say is thank you you know thank you for
your service this is like the one of
those weird times
when saying thank you for your service
makes sense of a non-military context
because we are at war and the commander
in chief just ordered the meat workers
to the frontlines and we should just
respect it thank them I don't think we
should stop it because I think even just
the psychology of keeping the the food
chain solid I mean I think the public
wants to know that the government is
going to do whatever it takes to keep
the food chain working so I think the
public wants to see a little strength
when it comes to food maybe not you know
overshooting the mark with privacy and
stuff like that public can get a little
antsy about that and should but when you
talk about the food supply and it's a
war somebody's going to be a victim you
know I think we just have to respect
them that's it we just have to respect
them and thank them and on that thought
I would like to wish you a great night
and I hope tomorrow has as much good
news as today because today was pretty
cool
and I think we're going to be heading in
a good situation remember I told you
these two weeks gonna be some good stuff
there's more coming I'll see you in the
morning