Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive May 24, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #2608

Episode 2608 CWSA 09/25/24

Episode #2608 Sep 25, 2024 1:49:58 34,484 views

Every American institution is corrupt, and Trump versus Harris economics ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.

Opening General Commentary

Oh my goodness, what a good day it's going to be. Probably one of the best. Yeah, we're getting ready for the show of shows like you've never seen before. Good morning everybody and welcome. Oh, hello, that's different. Let's see, something's looking different here. Let me know if I just stopped bro…

View segment →
SimultaneousSip General Commentary

higher that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains, all you need for that is a cup, a mug, a glass, a tanker, a chalice, a canteen, a jar, a flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopami…

View segment →
NewsReaction Health & Biohacking

, fight inflammation, and protect cells from oxidative stress. But did you know that if you add milk to your coffee it's a little worse? Potentially it might not do as well at removing toxins or something. So just think about that. Black coffee will get you what you want. That's right. I've got a c…

View segment →
NewsReaction General Commentary

ke? How many of you knew that? I always just assumed they had big pumps and they just pumped the ocean water into the lock and then released it back into the ocean. But apparently to get the good economics, Panama has a lake that's higher than the canal is, so they can just use gravity to take the w…

View segment →
NewsReaction Health & Biohacking

lammatory drug that might boost motivation if you're depressed. Why would changing something in your body such as the inflammation change how you feel about your world as in depression or lessening of it? And the answer is, as I've told you 1 billion times, this is 1 billion and one, your body is yo…

View segment →
MainContent The Golden Age

it or not, as much as I love talking about indoor vertical farms, there's a new story about one. So New Atlas has a story about the world's first indoor vertical farm that's going to make just a whole bunch of strawberries, like more than they've ever made before. The Plenty Richmond farm. So here's…

View segment →
NewsReaction Health & Biohacking

nt and he points out it's unusual that they would be on the same side of things. Although it isn't unusual because Elon Musk is big about the environment, Bernie's big on the environment, so they do actually agree on some pretty big stuff. But here's what Sanders says. He said Elon Musk, who is not…

View segment →
MainContent Energy & Mood Management

not as good as you hope. But you know, everything's a mixed bag. But yeah, I would think that it'd be good for people to have this option. However, I would have been way happier if Sanders had said something along the lines of, you know, RFK Jr.'s on the right path. We've got to fix our food supply.…

View segment →
MainContent Cognitive Reframing

don't have the option of not thinking if we're awake. Well, even if you're asleep your brain is still active so you don't have an option of thinking nothing. And if your problem is that there are too many negative thoughts, that is something you can control. So you can't control whether you have tho…

View segment →
MainContent Hypnosis & Influence

'm not recommending any of this just so we're clear, this is very not recommended but it's a truth, it's just one of those hard to process truths, that there are some people who are on Adderall or uppers or speed who figure out, oh my God I'm already in the top 1% of smart hardworking people. If I p…

View segment →
NewsReaction AI & Technology

years. And I thought well that's something we need to fix. You don't want any discrimination in Department of Justice. But I wasn't completely aware that the entire enterprise is corrupt and it appears it is. So I would say the media, the Department of Justice, and the Democrats are one big ball of…

View segment →
NewsReaction AI & Technology

January 6 that if you don't have enough security and you know for sure a gigantic group of angry people are coming your way? No we didn't learn anything from it. There's nothing useful about knowing the details of January 6. I mean unless it helps you know how corrupt the system is I suppose. But ye…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

all right what do people who succeed do? Okay, okay, all right you're doing all right. What if I just do all that? And then he does all that and then he's really successful. Maybe it's that. Just figure out what everybody does and do it. I would describe my own path to, if you can call this success…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

ng up a building. You know if they were worried about drone attacks the best drone attack would get a few people. But they seem to be worried about something that would take out a whole building full of Congress people, right? Because it's not like they're all going to be all over the country and th…

View segment →
NewsReaction Talent Stack

me but the effect is that I can yell all day long things that Democrats don't like, they'll never hear them. So if the only speech I have, because the algorithm kind of connects me with people who already agree with me, if the only speech I have is to say things that people agree with that's exactly…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

ed in the Washington Post which is the furthest thing from a free speech entity which everybody assumes is just part of the government's organ of control, they started it. You think that's a coincidence? Nope. Nope. All right so just be aware that free speech probably has always been an illusion. T…

View segment →
MainContent Media & Fake News

tting close to it. And you have to say that energy is your economy. Everything else has to happen too but energy equals economy. Wall equals immigration. Energy is economy. Energy if you have enough you have a chance of paying down your national debt. Trump says that directly. He says we have trilli…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

ike there's just more. So here's my stereotype and again it doesn't apply to all the people in the stereotype but Asian Americans just seem to run their lives smartly. Can we all accept that? If you show me just randomly, just throw a dart, well not a dart you don't want to hurt anybody but just ran…

View segment →
MainContent The Golden Age

spending money we have we're spending money we don't have. And we always could have spent that you know more of the money we don't have by borrowing it. We could have always spent that in Black America but apparently we had figured out whatever level worked and we were at that level. I don't believe…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

buse that law right? It would change the argument quite a bit. So even the things that you think have nothing to do with data are data arguments and when the data is useless because we don't agree on it. But at least science is reliable. Thank God. Thank God we got science. Let's see in recent the…

View segment →
MainContent Confirmation Bias

olved and that Diddy I think a lot of people not just the bodyguard but people have come to believe that Diddy is part of a massive blackmail operation much like Epstein. So let's say if you're keeping track the entities that are corrupt are the media the Department of Justice the Democrats we got t…

View segment →
NewsReaction General Commentary

hing done quickly. So it could be they need to keep him around. It could be he's just harder to get but I don't feel like that's what's happening. I feel like they could get him when they want and it could be they're showing that they can get every single person but leaving the top one in place is b…

View segment →
Closing General Commentary

pen or something but that's what's happening. And so ladies and gentlemen that is my prepared remarks. Ran way too late so I'm going to say bye to everybody except Locals and I'll just very quickly say hi to them. So I'll see you tomorrow everybody else on X and Rumble and YouTube and Locals. I'm c…

View segment →

Oh my goodness, what a good day it's going to be. Probably one of the best. Yeah, we're getting ready for the show of shows like you've never seen before. Good morning everybody and welcome. Oh, hello, that's different. Let's see, something's looking different here. Let me know if I just stopped broadcasting on Locals because I hit a button that maybe stopped it. But I think we're good. All right, welcome to Coffee with Scott Adams, the best time you've ever had in your whole life. And if you'd like to take it up to levels that are even higher that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains, all you need for that is a cup, a mug, a glass, a tanker, a chalice, a canteen, a jar, a flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip and it happens right now. Go. The deliciousness is extreme.

Well, you already know that coffee can help your cardiovascular disease, cleanse your body, remove toxins from your cells. It can be an antioxidant, fight inflammation, and protect cells from oxidative stress. But did you know that if you add milk to your coffee it's a little worse? Potentially it might not do as well at removing toxins or something. So just think about that. Black coffee will get you what you want. That's right.

I've got a correction. Do you like it when I correct myself? Because I said something wrong. Come on, you all like it. You like it. Did you know, because I didn't know it, that the way the Panama Canal works is that it fills up the locks with water from a lake? How many of you knew that? I always just assumed they had big pumps and they just pumped the ocean water into the lock and then released it back into the ocean. But apparently to get the good economics, Panama has a lake that's higher than the canal is, so they can just use gravity to take the water from the lake and very quickly fill up a lock. So if you had to pump it, it would be pretty expensive. So when I said the other day that the Panama Canal was getting less efficient because of the water level, it may be some combination of there's a bit of a drought that may be affecting the lake. And then other people said no, no, it's not the amount of water they have, it's the silt building up in the locks. So it could be one of those. Anyway, the point is the Panama Canal is not as efficient as it had been. That's all.

Neuroscience news says there's an anti-inflammatory drug that might boost motivation if you're depressed. Why would changing something in your body such as the inflammation change how you feel about your world as in depression or lessening of it? And the answer is, as I've told you 1 billion times, this is 1 billion and one, your body is your brain. If you want your brain to feel better you can fix your body because your body is your brain. So if you take the pain away, you take the inflammation away, you make your body work better, more efficiently, you exercise it, you eat right, your brain is going to be a lot better. It won't fix every problem but it will fix a lot of them. So think of your body as your brain.

Well, believe it or not, as much as I love talking about indoor vertical farms, there's a new story about one. So New Atlas has a story about the world's first indoor vertical farm that's going to make just a whole bunch of strawberries, like more than they've ever made before. The Plenty Richmond farm. So here's what's new and interesting about this. Indoor farming is not economical compared to outdoor farming, but this is one example of which we're moving in the right direction. So there's a bunch of researcher scientist type people who are working hard to figure out how to tweak things so you can grow things indoors more economically than outdoors. Because you're going to save water, you're going to save pesticide, you might save on labor if you do it indoors. But you've got to carefully balance the light and the water and the nutrients and all that. And as they get better and better at it, I really think this is going to be the future.

I feel like the world is going to be lots of individual citizens who have a micro farm. So I'm imagining a city of the future which isn't too dense, where every living space optionally has something about half the size of your house that's a little indoor garden. And let's say that your job is only to grow one thing. So you're just the lettuce person and maybe somebody else manages it and you put it off to your local supermarkets. But I think you're going to have to grow the food where the people are that eat it. I just think there's no way around that because that's the only way you're going to get nutrients and good economics. So it's coming.

Speaking of food, Bernie Sanders says he agrees with Elon Musk on this point and he points out it's unusual that they would be on the same side of things. Although it isn't unusual because Elon Musk is big about the environment, Bernie's big on the environment, so they do actually agree on some pretty big stuff. But here's what Sanders says. He said Elon Musk, who is not one of my usual allies, recently tweeted that solving obesity reduces the risk of diseases like diabetes and improves quality of life. And Sanders says he's right. We need to make appetite inhibitors available to anyone who wants them.

Oh, that was so close to being a good thing that you did there, Bernie Sanders. Now I'm not going to disagree or agree with the idea that you should make appetite inhibitors more available to people because there's evidence that it's doing good stuff for some people and maybe not as good as you hope. But you know, everything's a mixed bag. But yeah, I would think that it'd be good for people to have this option. However, I would have been way happier if Sanders had said something along the lines of, you know, RFK Jr.'s on the right path. We've got to fix our food supply. And if you fix the food supply and you learn to exercise, you're not going to need any Ozempic.

May I make my case by pointing to myself? I'm exactly the way I wanted to be as an adult, like exactly right on, right to the pound. And I don't do Ozempic. All I do is watch my diet, don't eat crap, and I exercise on a regular basis. It really is that simple. Now I get that there's not free will so people can't as easily do it as I can. I've got money and I've got a flexible schedule and I don't have kids telling me to drive them places when I could be exercising. So it's easier for me. But I would like to make the following suggestion which I've now made several times but eventually you're going to see it as genius. It goes like this. I want a president who encourages people to get off the couch. And I'd love to start a habit, an American habit, because you can do that. You can actually start a national habit. You just need somebody to get the ball rolling.

Now if RFK Jr. gets the influence that I want and Trump gets the influence that I want, let's say he gets elected, I would love for Trump and RFK Jr. and anybody who's smart and influential to join in to say you should all take a walk in your own neighborhood if it's safe after dinner. Now after dinner can be whatever you want it to be so you don't have to do the same after dinner as anybody else. But wouldn't you like that if you're done with dinner, and by the way the scientists say that taking a walk right after you eat is the very best thing you can do, it just changes your whole digestive situation. So let's say you're done at 7:00 p.m. and you walk outside and you see your neighbors who are also going for a walk because they were done about the same time. But if you had gone at 6:00 p.m. or 8:00 p.m. there would be a different set of neighbors who would also finish at that time and they're going for a walk. And then if you're brave or if there are at least some friendly people out there they say, hey neighbor, join up. And next thing you know every time you leave your house between 6:00 and 8:30 at night there's a group of neighbors who are going for a walk and they'd love it if you just jump in. And you could meet them, you could feel safer because you're in a group. Now you're outdoors, it might be a little dark depending what time it is, and you don't have to go the whole way. You don't have to walk as far as they do. Just do what you want to do.

So it would be really easy to make that a habit and you'd be able to meet your neighbors and you would be far less caring if you're just taking a walk whether they're voting for one person and you're voting for somebody else. If you're just doing a thing, an activity, you're all fine. And let me say it again that the only way you can bring anybody together, whether it's making a friend personally or bringing the country together, it's over a shared activity. If you've got a World War the country is going to come together. If aliens from space attack the country or the world we're going to come together, right? So it's a shared activity that brings people together and nothing else. The intellectual stuff, not really. The intellectual stuff just makes you feel like you might be on somebody's team but the doing things together, that makes a difference. So that's my suggestion. Get the government to say at least take a walk after dinner and be with your neighbors and get some exercise.

Speaking of positive thoughts, I saw a Huberman video. If you're not watching all the Huberman videos you should be. And he had a guest on talking about how you can just force yourself to think more positive thoughts and it can have a whole bunch of health and mental health and other benefits. And I'm going to amplify that but I'm going to give you a different model for it, which is humans don't have the option of not thinking if we're awake. Well, even if you're asleep your brain is still active so you don't have an option of thinking nothing. And if your problem is that there are too many negative thoughts, that is something you can control. So you can't control whether you have thoughts but you can definitely control, 100%, you can control the percentage of them that are negative.

Now I call that shelf space because that's the idea that it's limited. There's not unlimited shelf space, it's just the shelf. So if your shelf has 50% negative and 50% positive, well you have room for improvement. You can just force yourself to think of some more positives and that automatically reduces the number of negatives because you only have so much shelf space. If you just jam it with good thoughts, which is what I do by the way, you can just squeeze them out. It's one of the most important mental hacks you could come up with. If I could give you only one thing to do differently in your whole life, just one thing, it would be this: to make sure you squeeze out the opportunity for negative thoughts by just forcing in the positive ones until your shelf space is all taken. That'll fix just about everything. It'll give you energy, optimism, people want to be around you, you'll take on bigger challenges which is good for you. Basically it fixes everything. And that's not too far from what your best self-help gurus would tell you. You've got to get that mental conversation right. That's the Tony Robbins big, probably the most basic thing he says that's the most important. You've got to get the conversation that's always happening. You can't stop it but you can change it. Change it to positive.

Sam Altman, who as you know is the big AI boss I guess you'd say, so he's the ChatGPT head, and he was asked according to a post I saw by Zarat on X, he was asked if he'd had any psychedelic experiences. And he did. He said that earlier in his life, so not nothing recently, but at least the life-changing part wasn't recently, he did psychedelics. And he said it changed him from being an anxious unhappy person into a very calm person who can work on hard and important things. I'm going to add to that and say this: you can tell he's done psychedelics by looking at his eyes. Now I know you don't believe that if you've never been around people who have done psychedelics. You can tell. You look at him talking for a minute and a half and you know that he's experienced a different reality than you have, came back and incorporated it into his worldview. You could just tell by looking at him and by listening to him. And it's important for you to know how transformational some of these experiences are.

But I'd like to tie this to a comment I saw from Marc Andreessen, big Silicon Valley investor, famous investor. And he said, I'm paraphrasing but something like, the dirty secret of Silicon Valley is that high agency people, I think that's the phrase he used, can use illegal drugs to great advantage. Now again that's just a paraphrase to which I say, oh my God, which I did say. I've wanted to say that in public my whole life but you can't because it's irresponsible. If you say to somebody, you know, the most successful people I know did illegal drugs but they were really smart about it so they didn't do the wrong illegal drugs, they did the ones that helped them. Now if you do ones that help you, can they also kill you? Oh yeah, oh yeah, yeah it'll kill you. But if you're one of these high agency, high willpower, high intelligence, you know you've really got it going on, there are rare cases, and I'm going to say it's rare, where people just use the drugs to great success.

So for example, and again I'm not recommending any of this just so we're clear, this is very not recommended but it's a truth, it's just one of those hard to process truths, that there are some people who are on Adderall or uppers or speed who figure out, oh my God I'm already in the top 1% of smart hardworking people. If I put myself in the 0.001% I can make a billion dollar unicorn company and change the world. And then they do. Now if they get a lifelong habit that ends up bad that was a bad decision. If they end up making something that changes the world and makes billions of dollars and then they get off it because they were high agency, high willpower, they were just doing it because it worked, well that's a huge win. But I don't recommend it because the odds of you being in the top 1% and being one of the few people who could handle literally addiction and then shake it off, you're not one of those. Let me say that again. You're not one of those. I might be wrong for 1% of you but you don't know if you're in the 1%. You really don't know. But it is true.

And then I look at Sam Altman with his psychedelic experience. I have heard maybe more of these stories than any other type, that somebody changed their life because of the psychedelic experience. That was also my experience early in my 20s and it was completely life-altering. So if you don't understand how one experience that lasts a few hours can change everything it's because you haven't experienced it. But when people say that they're not joking. They are completely different forever. Now could you also do it and have a terrible experience? Yeah, there was just a story yesterday about people doing ayahuasca and just puking their guts out and quitting their jobs and having all the opposite effects. So yes it's high risk. So if there's one thing you hear from this I want you to hear the high risk part. The part I don't want you to act on is guessing that you're in the top 1% and you're one of the few people who can ever do an illegal drug, get a benefit from it, and then get back from it. Don't do it. I'm just saying that some people do it.

All right, ChatGPT is coming out, speaking of AI, with their new advanced voice mode and that's good because the current model, I don't know if this only happens to me or you, when I talk to it it tends to act like a teenager who is pretending to have a bad cell phone connection. I don't know if you've tried to use the current ChatGPT voice mode but I'll ask something like this. ChatGPT, I have a mole that appeared on my arm. Let me describe it. I'll give you a picture of it and can you tell me if this is dangerous? And then ChatGPT will say in perfect English, there are two possibilities. Number one, there's nothing to worry about whatsoever. And I'll think, wow. And they'll say but number two possibility is that amputation. And I said, wait, wait, what? What did you just say? And then it will say in perfect English it could be nothing to worry about whatsoever. And I'm like, okay, okay, what was that other thing you said with amputation and bile? Like bile, I don't even know what that means. What is the bile? Good? Is the bile bad? What's it mean, ChatGPT? And then it'll say I'm having trouble connecting now. So that's been my experience with ChatGPT. If you really, really want to know the answer it's going to be a teenager or say, oh sorry Mom can't hear you. I should come home. No I can't hear you anyway.

So I have big hopes for the advanced voice mode. I have a hypothesis that all of those problems I just described are, some of it's just Wi-Fi, you know if you're in the car or something or losing connection over your 5G. But some of it I think might be that they don't have enough computing power because the amount of computing power you need is just almost unfathomable and I can't imagine that they got right where they wanted already. So I suspect that some of it is just more computing is more goodness. So all this is going to fix itself. None of this is permanent. So I have big hopes for this advanced voice mode. I'll let you know after I try it out.

Meanwhile Google allegedly paid $2.7 billion to hire a good AI guy. Let me say that again. Google, who wants to make sure it can stay competitive in this AI stuff and some would say it's maybe not in the top tier, so to fix that they paid $2.7 billion to hire back a guy who used to work with them and was one of the pioneers of inventing the LLM AI concept. And he left because Google was a little too conservative or slow or didn't want to pursue it as much as he did. So he created another company which didn't necessarily look like his other company called Character was going to ever make money. But he cleverly sold the company with an agreement that he would go work for Google. So he basically sold a company for $2.7 billion. His part of it was several hundred million just to do a job.

So let me give you this advice. If you ever find yourself in a position where somebody is willing to pay $2.7 billion just to hire you as an employee, know he didn't get the 2.7 billion but he got his share of the company, you should take that. Yeah, I don't give a lot of career advice but if somebody offers you $2.7 billion just to go to work, most of the time I'd say yes. I'd say yes on that. That's my advice.

Well meanwhile the InfoWars saga continues. The judge has ordered that Alex Jones can auction off, he has to actually because InfoWars is being closed down by the courts to pay the legal damages for the Sandy Hook families, and his entire life's work will be sold off to the highest bidder and liquidated. I saw some people joking and saying Elon Musk should buy it. I don't think that's going to happen because I don't know the assets are exactly. But even after he sells off all his assets, correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't this lawsuit judgment that he's under mean that every penny he makes for the rest of his life some of it has to go to the lawsuit? So haven't they crippled him economically forever? Like he can never come back because if he makes money he just has to give it away. Sort of the OJ Simpson, you know, doomed for life. You can never really make money in this world again.

Well so when you start looking at the number of people who were leaning in the same direction and got cancelled, from Tucker to Alex Jones to Roseanne to me, and you know you can add a bunch of names to that, would you say it's fair to say that the media and the Department of Justice and the Democrats collectively are crooked? And when you look at the lawfare against Trump and then you look at all the lawfare and related things against other characters, doesn't it seem like the media, the Department of Justice, and Democrats are fundamentally corrupt? It does to me. I remember thinking that the Justice Department was mostly on the up and up but you know it was probably bad if you were like a Black American especially earlier in years. And I thought well that's something we need to fix. You don't want any discrimination in Department of Justice. But I wasn't completely aware that the entire enterprise is corrupt and it appears it is. So I would say the media, the Department of Justice, and the Democrats are one big ball of corruption kind of collectively working with each other.

Here's a funny thing. MSNBC had a little town hall in which they asked a few people there, there were men, about January 6. Now I think MSNBC was hoping that they would say January 6, a stain on the American Republic, is totally going to make me turn against Trump and I would never ever vote for an insurrectionist like that. January 6 thing. That's probably what they hoped for. Here's what they got. You talking about the February 6 thing? Uh no it's January 6. He goes, oh I don't really feel any way about it. So they asked two young men who apparently were interested enough in politics that they'd probably vote and neither of them had any feelings about January 6. It was like it didn't happen.

Now MSNBC has been trying to brainwash the public like every day for years that that was the worst thing that's happened in the Republic. You know it's worse than Pearl Harbor, it's worse than 9/11, it's he's Trump is going to steal your democracy. And the young men, remember I keep telling you that young men are the solution in many ways. Young men are a problem group because we have a lot of crime and whatnot but young men are going to fix us because men know what an insurrection looks like. Let me be clear. Anybody who's a man with a little bit of testosterone, we know what a real insurrection looks like and nobody was fooled by that one. So maybe if you're a woman, and here I'm making a huge generalization that doesn't apply to the people watching the show, but if you're a woman maybe you don't recognize it. I don't know. I'm not a woman so I can't speculate how women think. But it seems to me that the beta males and women on MSNBC just assumed that the rest of the people would see things the way they saw it and that January 6 was this big scary thing where we almost lost the country. And the men who had some testosterone in them are sitting there and saying, you mean the February thing? No the January thing. The January 6, you've heard of it right? Yeah I didn't have much feelings about it.

I didn't have much feelings about it is the exact right take. That is the exact right take. There was nothing about that. Let me put it a different way. If history had a way to delete and you could just delete January 6 and just take it out of history, how would the country be worse off? It wouldn't be. Paying no attention to January 6 was probably the right play. Knowing about it didn't help you a bit. Nothing. What are you going to do differently? You know maybe you learned you should have better security if there's a big crowd of angry people coming toward you but really did you have to learn that? Was that something you just figured out in January 6 that if you don't have enough security and you know for sure a gigantic group of angry people are coming your way? No we didn't learn anything from it. There's nothing useful about knowing the details of January 6. I mean unless it helps you know how corrupt the system is I suppose. But yeah you can just delete that from your memory banks. Wouldn't make a difference. None.

Dan Bongino is tantalizing because he talks about, he acts like he knows maybe a little bit or even a lot more about one of the assassination attempts, the second one. And he says it has the possibility to be the scandal of our lifetime which would suggest more people were involved in this than just the shooter. The suggestion is that maybe there's an insider connection to it and that worse maybe it's internally politically motivated and it wasn't just a crazy guy. Now I don't personally know what that evidence would be but he does say, quote, this story is going to get worse. It's ugly. And he is very animated about where that's going. Now I consider Bongino one of the credible people who doesn't just take a BS story and run with it because he can get clicks. You know obviously he's a high energy presenter. He's one of my favorite people. I always use him as an example of talent stacks. Bongino is like the ultimate talent stack guy. Like he has just the right experiences and then things he's developed like his on camera persona and everything and even his physicality. You know he's just got a whole bunch of everything from networking to understanding politics to understanding the security situation, presentation, language, grammar. I mean he's got a talent stack. So does Hannity and a number of other people but he always stands out to me as a person who just said what do successful people do and then he just did that really hard. I hate to reduce people to something so simple but doesn't Bongino look like somebody who just woke up at some point in his life and said all right what do people who succeed do? Okay, okay, all right you're doing all right. What if I just do all that? And then he does all that and then he's really successful. Maybe it's that. Just figure out what everybody does and do it.

I would describe my own path to, if you can call this success, that I just studied all the successful people from my earliest age. You know from 11 years old if I saw a story about a successful person I was going to read it and I would find out what did you do? Like why was it luck? Is it something you did or the way you operated? Like I was always a real student of that and sometimes you can see that in other people anyway.

Mike Flynn. All right so so far we have the media, DOJ, and the Democrats are crooked and we've got some suggestion that the Secret Service is crooked. And let's see, Mike Flynn is talking about the fact that the House of Representatives is working on this plan, a bipartisan plan, to make sure that the government is staffed if there's a major casualty event in which the representatives who are elected are all killed or disabled. And I think the idea is that maybe the governor of their state would appoint somebody in the short term, something like that. But as Mike Flynn, General Flynn points out, and I would point out the same thing, why did this suddenly become very important? So important that there's a bipartisan push. You don't get bipartisan unless something's happening right now. You know what I mean? Here's what doesn't happen. There's some general problem that just sort of always been the problem throughout history and there's nothing immediately pressing about it but then Congress gets together and does a bipartisan bill. Has that ever happened? The suggestion here is that the people working on this bipartisan bill to deal with what happens when they all get killed is because there's a specific threat. And the question that I ask is are they going to do a State of the Union this year? Do you think you're going to put all of our congress critters in one room or even just the Senate or just the House? I feel like they must think there's some credible threat of something like a missile blowing up a building. You know if they were worried about drone attacks the best drone attack would get a few people. But they seem to be worried about something that would take out a whole building full of Congress people, right? Because it's not like they're all going to be all over the country and then die at the same time unless it's a pandemic I suppose. Maybe it's a pandemic but it does sound like they know something we don't know and I'd sure like to know what that is. Or maybe I wouldn't.

Well in your weird news that you did not expect, I'll put this at the top of the list. Former CDC director Robert Redfield, you remembered him from the pandemic and you probably said to yourself, oh former CDC director, he got a bunch of things wrong, he's a bad actor, he's a bad character. Why did he do so many bad things? I didn't like him during the pandemic. And you might know that RFK Jr. really was a critic of his and was kind of savage even in his book. He was a critic of him. And then this happened. According to RFK Jr. he says Robert Redfield, who I really go after in my Fauci book, wrote an editorial in Newsweek magazine today saying that he was endorsing President Trump because Trump was going to restore American health. And that quote, a lot of people might be surprised to hear me say this but he has chosen exactly the right person who can do this, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. And he says this was breathtaking to me. This is the guy who was head of the CDC who had been criticizing for years. And then separately they had lunch. So Redfield and RFK Jr., his biggest critic, and according to RFK Jr. when he met him in person the first thing Redfield said to RFK Jr. was, you were right about everything. Wow. Wow. You were right about everything.

And then RFK Jr. talks about how Redfield agrees, vigorously agrees, that our agencies are all captured. In other words they're not operating on your behalf, they're operating on behalf of companies that have some kind of control over the directors. So this is just mind-blowing. Like you have to know the players to be impressed by this but most of you do. I think you're in the top 5% of people who watch the news if you're watching this. This is mind-blowing. You know it's hard to even imagine that somebody, this is beyond my imagination. He's just completely endorsed patriotism. To me this is Redfield just becoming a pure patriot from whatever he was. I mean I think he probably tried to do the best job he could but it looks like he's admitting the forces were stronger than he was. And this is wild. It's just crazy.

It's not as crazy as a video, I think this is not new but I just was watching it again, Patrick Byrne. You might know him. He was the ex-CEO of Overstock.com. And according to him he was part of an operation to bribe Hillary Clinton on behalf of the FBI in 2016. And he successfully had a foreign company, country, foreign country bribe her with I don't know 18 or 20 million. And separately some Turkish entity bribed her with a similar amount. And the FBI got this all on tape and they got all the evidence and they were ready. They had everything they needed to put Hillary Clinton in jail in 2016. And then Byrne says they told him to drop the whole thing and forget it ever happened because they expected her to win the election in 2016 and then all the FBI people would be in trouble because she would have too much power by then and she could just fire them all.

Now that's the story they told him. Patrick believes the closer real story is that the FBI people were in the pocket of Obama, meaning they were Obama within the FBI, and that the real play was not to find any crimes done by a politician but rather to get blackmail so that Obama could control Hillary Clinton. Does that sound real? Now keep in mind he's not saying I heard this happen. He was in the op. He was like the central person who arranged the bribe. He didn't give the bribe or offer it but he arranged the person to bribe her to be in the same room and off the schedule I guess. Now do you think Patrick Byrne would make up that story? Does that sound like the kind of story that somebody would just make up? It doesn't to me. Yeah you know I feel like I'm pretty good at spotting BS. This doesn't look like BS.

Now if you take it further to what he speculates, you know people are thinking maybe then it could get a little more interesting. But he literally knows for sure because he was part of the op that Hillary Clinton took a gigantic bribe and the FBI was completely aware of it. That part I completely believe. So that would suggest that if you're keeping score, let's see, the media, the DOJ and the Democrats would be all crooked. The Secret Service would be crooked if Bongino's story is what we think it is. Every single entity in the government should be regulating things according to Robert Redfield and RFK Jr. are actually working against our interests not for us. And the FBI is completely compromised and owned by Obama's team if that's true. So how do you feel so far?

And of course Mike Benz tells us about the deep state and the blob and how the CIA may be more partners with the cartels than enemies. So if you're keeping score that would be a corrupt media, Department of Justice, Democrats, FBI, Secret Service, CIA. But I mean that's not bad. There's still a lot more parts of the country so don't start feeling like everything's corrupt.

Michael Shellenberger has an article in which he says that Gates, Soros, Biden, Harris, Walz, Clinton, Obama, the legacy media, the FBI, DHS and EU and Brazil and the Five Eyes nations are desperate to censor the internet. They're not hiding it. Look at them. They're trying to normalize it. So Michael Shellenberger talks about how all these various entities are coordinating to end your free speech and censor you in ways that they can get away with without constitutional problems. So if you're keeping track that would be a corrupt media, Department of Justice, Democrats, Secret Service, FBI, CIA, CDC, every regulating government, Gates, Soros, Biden, Harris, Walz, Clinton, Obama, the legacy media, Department of Homeland Security, the European Union, Brazil, and Five Eyes. But everything else is working perfectly. That's the important part. I don't want you to lose hope because they're the only ones that are corrupt. Everything else is kind of going along fine.

By the way a lot of people won't see this presentation because no matter what my content is YouTube caps it at 31,000 views. Okay so I mean you could add that one to the list. Sure, sure, maybe you've got a little corruption in the Department of Justice, the Democrats, the CIA, the FBI, the Secret Service, every regulating entity. Yeah I think you know where this is going. But thank goodness even if Google and others are trying to censor me, thank goodness I have free speech on X. No I don't. I don't know what's going on with X. I'm willing to believe it's just the algorithm is feeding me people who agree with me but the effect is that I can yell all day long things that Democrats don't like, they'll never hear them. So if the only speech I have, because the algorithm kind of connects me with people who already agree with me, if the only speech I have is to say things that people agree with that's exactly not free speech. That's the opposite of free speech. Free speech is only useful to say things that people don't want to hear and disagree with. Agreeing isn't anything. Nobody cares about that.

So while I do trust Elon Musk to be pro free speech and that he's making the platform as close to that as they can get, I feel like even maybe just accidentally the algorithm has removed any useful part of free speech because the useful part is the disagreeing part. That's the useful part. I don't have that. So I don't know why but I don't have it. But I would ask you this following question because you are smart enough to deal with a tough philosophical question. I'm not aware of any country that has ever survived free speech. Let me say that again because you're going to think you misheard it. There's no typo in that. I'm not aware of any country that has ever survived as a country that also had free speech.

Now you should be sitting at home and saying what? What the hell are you talking about? You've got all of Europe, you've got every democratic country, you've got the United States. You know maybe you've got some problems now but clearly we've survived a few hundred years. It to me it seems obvious Scott that the democratic countries have free speech and that they absolutely have survived and thrived and thrived. They've done better than other countries. Except nothing like that really happened in the real world. In the real world at least in my lifetime our media has always been controlled meaning that you only saw things that the CIA and the government wanted you to see. It's just that you didn't know it. You thought you were seeing the news when you weren't. The thing that's different now is that we know it. It's not that free speech didn't go away. It was never here. We did not lose free speech. We never had it and we found out we never had it. That's what happened.

Right now there are a million ways that the CIA and whoever in the deep state wants to block your free speech. Do you think it will ever be known why I got cancelled for example? Just pick one. Do you think the real story of that will ever be known? I mean even I don't know. Do you think it makes sense that I got cancelled worldwide and not a single person called to ask me what was that all about or would you like to try an apology? Maybe we can save you. Not one person. Thousands of people were involved directly or indirectly with my cancellation and not one person said would you like to revise that or were you taken out of context? You know maybe you weren't taken out of context but maybe you'd like to apologize for it and then we can keep working together. No. No.

So do I have any idea why I was cancelled? Well I have speculation but given that it started in the Washington Post which is the furthest thing from a free speech entity which everybody assumes is just part of the government's organ of control, they started it. You think that's a coincidence? Nope. Nope.

All right so just be aware that free speech probably has always been an illusion. There's definitely more of it you can have. You know there's definitely a way to get more of it and we should be trying to do that. But you have to understand that no country could survive free speech. It would be too chaotic. There has to be something like a common narrative to keep a country together. And I hate it. I hate that that's true but I've never seen the alternative.

All right there are strong hints that there was a third possible assassination attempt. So Axios is reporting that Trump said he had been briefed on efforts by Iran to assassinate him and that he believes Iran will try again. Now that's a little bit cryptic because try again could mean that there's some third or other attempt outside the two known assassination attempts but it also could, and this is pure speculation, suggest that the first or maybe even the second one had some Iranian involvement. So we don't know for sure if this is really a third attempt or if it's more information about one of the first two.

But here's what Trump says about that. He said big threats on my life by Iran. The entire US military is watching and waiting. Moves were already made by Iran that didn't work out but they will try again. Not a good situation for anyone. I'm surrounded by more men, guns, and weapons than I have ever seen before. And he thanked Congress for making all that available funding wise. I feel like he's sending a message when he's talking about how the weaponry to protect him. I think he's just trying to scare the next would-be assassin into thinking there's no way it's going to work. Because one of the problems is that the first two attempts would suggest to some third future hypothetical attacker that getting a shot at him wouldn't be that hard. So it's very important for Trump to persuade and say things have changed and while it might have been a little too easy to get a shot at me you're dead if you try it now. Now is he right? Well I hope so. I hope that his defenses are beefed up enough that anybody would be dead. So we hope so.

Also from Axios they talked about Iran's multi-pronged approach meaning that Iran is trying to hurt the United States with as many different ways to poke us as they can in different domains. And there was a summer cyber attack apparently. And there was anyway I don't know how Iran's going to beat us at this game but they're trying.

Trump had some interesting things to say. He was talking about how if we use our energy assets properly, in other words we exploit our own energy resources and we make energy just our sort of our biggest thing in America, that it will be a renaissance. It will be a golden period. He said I wish he'd said golden age but golden period is close enough. You know I've said that maybe his first term will seem like a golden age to us in retrospect but I do feel like maybe the pandemic could have postponed the golden age. Now as you know I don't believe we can have a golden age or even survive unless we figure out what to do about national debt. But the way Trump talks about it he makes it very clear that he understands not just recently but for a while now. He makes it really clear that he understands.

I'm seeing in the comments people suggesting that if Iran is trying to kill Trump that Iran has some kind of Obama connection. Do you buy that? I know that people think Obama was too friendly to Iran but do you think he could possibly be involved in an assassination attempt? I think that would be too dangerous so my guess is no. Even if he wanted to I can't imagine that. Seems like too big a risk.

Anyway so Trump's talking about the golden age and here's my take on that. Energy has always been the number one thing that drove an economy. So at least in our modern age whoever had the most energy did the best. Now it doesn't mean they did the best in terms of colonizing or conquering the world because not everybody was doing that but Saudi Arabia, lot of energy, doing great. Other countries in the Middle East they had a lot of energy, doing great. Russia is only surviving because of their energy stuff. China's biggest need, energy, so they're building tons of plants. Now that was before Bitcoin and before AI. If you add AI to what the civilization is going to need we are talking about 10 times more energy needed. 10 times. We're not even close. So there's going to be an energy boom of all energy booms. So not only if you had enough energy could you make more Bitcoins. If you had your own nuclear power plant you could maybe pump out some Bitcoins. You need a data center too. But given the massive, massive amount of energy that we're going to need in the pretty near future I'm going to take the following stand that energy equals success. Energy equals dollars. Energy equals defense. Energy equals survival. Energy is the whole play.

One of the things I continuously appreciate about Trump is he can take a complicated situation and boil it down to something that the public can understand and then approve of him acting on. So that's what the wall was. When he would say the wall his critics would say you simpleton that's such a small part of the bigger question. And it was. But if he could get you excited about the wall he was at least getting you in the right domain of worrying about the things that are most important. So directionally that's what Trump does best. He's directionally correct pretty much all the time. And I would say he is more than directionally correct on energy. That if we said to ourselves all right America energy equals money. If we get our energy cost down all of your products will be less expensive. If we get our energy prices down we'll have the greatest robotic revolution ever. If we get our energy plentiful and also down, biggest AI and we'll rule the world with AI before other people can get there. It's down to one variable people. It's one variable. Two if you count the border. There are two things we have to get right. Make sure that we don't have too much uncontrolled immigration because there's some level that destroys the country no doubt about it and we're getting close to it. And you have to say that energy is your economy. Everything else has to happen too but energy equals economy. Wall equals immigration. Energy is economy. Energy if you have enough you have a chance of paying down your national debt. Trump says that directly. He says we have trillions of dollars in the ground you know enough to pay off the national debt. Now you don't pay off the debt because the government doesn't own the oil but economic activity can boost your GDP and it can get you to the point where the government has enough income to pay the debt.

Now I do not believe that Trump will succeed in most of his plans about lowering taxes because it would have too much impact on the deficit. I do think I love his idea of having an ambassador to bring back manufacturing to the United States. Now that's not unlike what Biden was trying to do. Biden has had success in repatriating manufacturing. We could do a lot more so I'm not going to give Biden's administration a hard time on that. I think they were directionally right. I think that Trump might go harder and he said he'd get an ambassador. If you get the right person it makes a big difference. And secondly he wanted to have it sounded like maybe some lower taxes for manufacturing that would come back to the US because we would have to deal with the fact that our labor is more expensive. So maybe he can cut regulations which would lower prices if you do it right. Maybe he can lower the cost of energy which would make it cheaper to manufacture here. Maybe the fact that moving things internationally is getting harder because of the Houthis and everything else that if you get rid of the transportation costs the costs come down again. You make a lot of jobs with all this stuff.

So he's talking about lower corporate taxes for I think specifically for people who bring manufacturing back. Now what does Trump understand that I always say Democrats never get right? Human motivation. I would say Republicans consistently get right the human motivation part. Maybe not every time but far more consistently. So if you say everybody come back and manufacture in the US they say why? And Trump says how about I lower your taxes and make energy less expensive and give you some government land to build your factory and I'll get rid of some regulations. Then suddenly you go oh those are good incentives. I actually would look into that pretty seriously. So yes I think Trump maybe won't get all of his tax reductions that he wants but man what a crowd pleaser the no tax on tips is and what a crowd pleaser no tax on overtime is. I like both of those things because if you've got somebody who's so valuable that their company wants them to work twice as much I think that deserves a reward more than just overtime. You know if we could get our top I don't know 10% of employees and entrepreneurs to do even more that's going to be better than making the other 99% a little bit better. If you can make the real go-getters really go get a little more that's way bigger lever than helping everybody to be 5% better. In the long run everybody gets more that way.

All right also Sam Altman said that we might get AI super intelligent in a few thousand days and that it could lead to massive prosperity. Now massive disruption but I don't disagree with massive prosperity. Do you know what you would need to pay off the national debt? You would need massive prosperity which would require massive energy for the AI. So Trump is the one I would trust to give us massive energy. The other thing you'd have to do is find out how to cut expenses in the government. There's only one candidate who's offering a reasonable plan to do that. It's called Trump and Elon Musk as the person to help redesign government to make it cheaper. That's a real plan right? If you gave me almost any other name and said oh this other person will help reinvent government and make it cheaper do you know what I would have said about that? And no they won't. Maybe at the margins but you know nothing we'll look back at in 20 years and be impressed by it. But you tell me that Elon Musk has volunteered and he's enthusiastic about reinventing the government to lower expenses without losing function and I say okay it's go time. That's go time. Because I can't think of any harder, worse, less thankful job than that. And when you have your most capable entrepreneur, richest man in the world who just stood up and said basically he's going to risk his life to get it done because that's the only way he plays. The only way he plays is for keeps. You need that.

So let me put it all together. Economy is energy. Energy is Trump. If you tell me that Harris is the energy person well you're not paying attention. No energy is Trump. Energy is economy. Energy is the AI. AI is the productivity. And the only other thing you got to get right is cutting the government expenses and there's only one person with a real plan to do that and it's Trump. It's not close people. So what happens when you have one who is just obviously the right one on all the big stuff and one who's obviously wrong? Well you get 400 economists who back Harris. What do you know about economists? Let's see they went to a good school. What do you know about people who went to college? They've been brainwashed. Yeah so unfortunately you know I was joking that no economist had backed Harris on her price caps and maybe that's still true but she still somehow got 400 in the bag economists to ignore their entire professional fiduciary responsibility to back her because she's a Democrat too. So that happened. Yeah it's funny if you were a casual viewer of news and you saw that 400 economists backed Harris you would think that was real wouldn't you? Well here's what I think now that we know we have corruption in let's see the Department of Justice, the Democrats, the media, the Secret Service, the FBI, the CIA, every one of our regulatory bodies. Well I think you see where I'm going with this.

Anyway according to The Hill there are 22 states, the Democrat states of course, that want to employ a million people in climate apprenticeships by 2035. Is that because these Democrats have realized that we need to train the young people in the vital sciences that are important to the future of the world? No this is a brainwashing operation. If you can get a million young people to believe in climate change and it's the most important thing you've created a million brainwashed Democrat voters who will try to convince other people that dumb old Trump is going to destroy the world unless lots of Democrat vendors get money for things that won't work out. So that looks corrupt to me. Just an assumption. I don't have proof but it looks like it's just a brainwashing operation.

I saw that Asian Americans are very strongly in favor of Harris now. You might say to yourself wait a minute are Asian Americans the one who couldn't get into college because of Democrat policies about DEI? Yes. Wait a minute are Asian Americans still hired in corporations as much as they used to or is DEI working against them? Well I don't know actually. I don't know about corporations. I don't know if you're Asian American if is that a plus or a minus for getting a corporate job? Does it count? Does that count as diversity if you're Asian American? I feel like as soon as you're successful you get removed from the list of whether it counts and Asian Americans are super successful in the United States. So here's what I think. I think that the reason Asian Americans for Harris has to do with the fact that they're a highly educated part of the public. And I'm going to throw out a stereotype and you're allowed to criticize me but just remember no stereotype applies to all people in any group. Can we agree there's no stereotype that applies to all the people in the group? Yet there are some things that are true right? White people like to eat cheese. It's just true. We like cheese. It's not good or bad we just like cheese.

I would say that part of what makes Asian Americans so successful is not only that they have higher education levels but that they're also better at staying out of trouble. Just staying out of trouble. And the trouble in one sense is legal trouble and Asian Americans do a great job of staying out of jail but they also stay out of I think fights that aren't going to benefit them. Like there's just more. So here's my stereotype and again it doesn't apply to all the people in the stereotype but Asian Americans just seem to run their lives smartly. Can we all accept that? If you show me just randomly, just throw a dart, well not a dart you don't want to hurt anybody but just randomly pick an Asian American you know and say all right what's your plan for success and what are you doing? Well I'm not doing any drugs, I'm staying out of jail and I've got a plan to be an optometrist and my grades are good. And I look at that and go oh well that's pretty sensible and it's not dangerous. You're staying out of danger and you're pursuing success. If you show me a bunch of people who want to stay out of trouble I'll show you a bunch of people who are not going to admit that they vote for Trump. Am I right? Staying out of trouble includes not saying something so provocative that your career or your family life were impacted for no benefit. Right because remember what I'm saying about the Asian American community again a stereotype doesn't apply, does not apply to all people who are in it, is that as a group they seem insanely well strategized. And it's sort of a bad strategy to be a Trump supporter if you know somebody will not hire you because of it, if you know somebody won't date you because of it, if you know it's going to be a fight at work. Why do it? So does it surprise you that a highly educated, and when I say risk averse some in some context that sounds bad because you know like an entrepreneur wants to take some risk but in your everyday life you should be risk averse. Yeah you should not be thinking I think I could get away with that crime. No no. In your everyday life you should be risk averse except for embarrassment you know. But the Trump stuff would be more than embarrassment. It'd be you don't get the job. You literally don't get hired. I mean that's a big price for just having an opinion. So it makes sense to me that Asian Americans are with the mainstream opinion at least when they're polled and that they would have been influenced in college like most people are to be more left leaning.

But according to the account on X called George, because somebody named George runs this account now he is Black which if it matters to you in the context of the story, but he's a great follow so if you I've said that before so just look for George that's just the name of the account. And for somehow he has just great scoops and he gets them early and they all seem to be true so a good follow on X. But he says he points to a video in which Sage Steele, who you should know is also Black and but she's more she's more of a Trump person I think she's pro Trump I think that's true right? Sage Steele has she endorsed him or is she just not endorsing Harris? I can't remember. Sometimes just being not endorsing anybody feels the same as endorsing Trump so I don't know how far she's gone so I don't want to characterize her opinion there because I don't know. But here's the story. She said that Black people are coming up to her, maybe they just recognize her and they come up to her, and they say they're terrified of the future if Harris gets elected. Why would Black Americans be terrified of the future with Harris? Well what would make you terrified? And she said you know a bunch of Black people are coming up and saying that and I don't know what is it because of immigration? I feel like the vibe I've been getting is that Black America thinks that if so much money had not been spent on migrants it would be available to spend on Black Americans for everything from reparations to better schools and all that. Do you think that's true?

I would love there to be a true narrative in which more people would prefer Trump. I'm not so sure it's true that that money is liquid and fungible and you could just use it for something else if you don't use it for migrants. Because remember the money we're spending on migrants we literally don't have. We're not spending money we have we're spending money we don't have. And we always could have spent that you know more of the money we don't have by borrowing it. We could have always spent that in Black America but apparently we had figured out whatever level worked and we were at that level. I don't believe it's true that the more money you give to the migrant community the less is available for Black Americans. I think they just borrowed more than they would have. So but it feels that way doesn't it? Imagine if you were in the inner city and you saw that the Venezuelans were getting checks from the government and like free rent and stuff for a while and you weren't. You would definitely feel like the guy standing next to you who got a big check from the government because he's Venezuelan and you got nothing and you've been living here all your life. It would be quite normal to think that that could go to me if it didn't go to you. I don't think it's true. I think the decision of what you get is just a separate decision. It's not like they took your money but it's going to feel like it. Oh my goodness it's going to feel like it. Yeah well I don't know if it's envy. Envy might be the, it doesn't feel like the right word but I get I see where you're getting at. It would be yeah envy isn't quite the right word but it's in the right domain so I see why you're saying that anyway. We'll see what happens there. I think there's going to be a lot more support for Trump especially among Black male Americans that we've ever seen before.

People mock me for saying that all data about important stuff is unreliable. Sometimes they say it's not credible. Sometimes I say it's fake. But how many of you have a reaction to that like well that's not true. All data about everything important is fake. Does your body just rebel against that and say no it's not. Obviously Scott there is real data in the world. Are you sure? Are you sure there's real data in the world about important things? Now there's definitely real data about unimportant things but about important things do you think there's real data? Would you die on that hill that there's real data in the world? All right let's look at an example. What about crime in the United States? Did crime in the United States under Obama under Biden did it go up or is it now down? That's pretty easy right? We collect all this crime data so give me the answer. Is crime up or down because data is real right? For those of you who think data is real and you can do your own research and find out what the truth is say up or down.

Well today I saw two movies on one screen so I won't name names but a popular person on X showed some data showing that two cities were missing from the crime data and that's why it looks like it's low but that's fake. That's the story you've heard right? Have you all heard the story that the crime data from the FBI I guess left out Los Angeles and St. Louis and then I looked at it and sure enough it wasn't there. And then somebody else said oh this image is cropped. If you don't crop the image it is there. So which reality were you in? Were you in the reality where that information was left off which would have been ridiculous or are you in the reality where somebody cropped a data page so it looked like it was left off but of course it was there? So which reality are you in? Oh but the data is real right? The data is real and you can do your own research and find out the truth. Yeah you could find out more than you knew but all you're going to do is get to the next level of something that might also be fake. So you might learn a new thing but the new thing you don't know if that's real because you'd have to research that thing and then you'd have to research the thing that said that thing was real. You'd have to know all the players to know that the person who said it could be credible and not somebody's in the bag for one side or the other. No there's no data that's real. There is data that you can convince yourself is right. Oh that exists and I convince myself data is right all the time because we're built so we have to accept some reality. So we end up clicking to what do they call it snap to grid. If we get nearer reality we like to snap to it. All right that's my reality now. I'll think about something else. No all data is fake.

How about if you don't believe that about the crime how about the data on the economy? Is the economy better under Biden or was it better under Trump? I don't know because I don't believe any reports about this. If you assume that the pandemic was sort of in between the two administrations it just means that any data comparing them would be ridiculous. So even if the data is correct on the economy we don't know how to analyze. So you got one case where the data might be correct but half of the country is seeing a cropped view of it so they have a whole different opposite view. So that's useless. The economic information even if it were accurate which I doubt you still wouldn't know how to analyze it because the country doesn't know how to analyze somebody who had a pandemic at the end of his administration to somebody who had a pandemic at the beginning of their administration. Nobody knows how to do that. Like there might be a few experts who could do it but you don't know how to do it.

How about the border? Democrats believe they've looked at the border and immigration is at a low, illegal immigration, and Republicans think it's at an all time high. The truth probably has something to do with the fact that the administration has turned illegal immigration into legal immigration by putting them through the asylum door. So technically they're all legal. They're just not citizens. They're legal. They came under asylum but they lied about the asylum but since that's not proven in any kind of court they're innocent till proven guilty. So it's not really illegal unless it's proven illegal and you can't read somebody's mind to know that they really didn't have you know they were really not motivated by asylum and getting away from trouble. We have no way to know. So I would say that our information on the economy and the border are garbage. Crime we can't figure out what's going on there. Climate of course is just a big old mess. You know we're going to argue about whether climate can be even measured or predicted. Of course it can't. And of course you've seen that numbers on inflation. Harris says it's down. Trump says it's up but we're looking at different stuff. One is looking at the base the other is looking at the rate of increase. Now those are the biggest things.

Now even when you come to something like abortion where you think well abortion is not about data at all is it? There's no data argument about abortion. It's just is it a life is it not is it right is it wrong is bodily autonomy more important than what some would say is a life though we pretend that that matters but it's actually a data question and we don't agree on the data. Here's why. If I told you you know the Democrats do say that they would allow abortion for any reason at any age you know even up to the ninth month but suppose you knew that it never happened. I'm not saying that's the truth this is hypothetical. Suppose you knew that nobody had ever aborted a baby at 9 months for just not wanting a baby. They had done it maybe plenty of times when the mother actually thought they would die and the baby wasn't viable or you know special cases but it's a data argument. You wouldn't even care about the law if you knew that there was no case where anybody would abuse that law right? It would change the argument quite a bit. So even the things that you think have nothing to do with data are data arguments and when the data is useless because we don't agree on it. But at least science is reliable. Thank God. Thank God we got science.

Let's see in recent the number of retractions of scientific papers has risen sharply. Oh that's not good. For example in 2023 more than 10,000 research papers were retracted globally. 10,000. 10,000 scientific papers were withdrawn. How many do you think were fake that were not withdrawn? More than 10,000. These are just the ones that got caught. Just hold that in your mind. It's only the ones who got caught. 10,000 of them. Since how many was it in 2013? So a little more than 10 years ago it was only 1,500 that year. Only 1,500. And in 2023 it was 10,000. This year probably more. Over the entire time in the past decade how many scientific papers have been retracted? 39,000. 39,000 scientific research papers were retracted. And again it's a very important point they're only the ones who got caught. You tell me what is the real number of fake or inaccurate scientific papers if 39,000 of them got caught and it's hard to catch. 100,000? I don't know but I'd say 100,000 wouldn't be a crazy guess. A 100,000. So it's a good thing that science is accurate right?

Now for the NPCs I'd like to take a moment to talk to the NPCs. Camera two NPCs. NPCs nothing I said was relevant to the scientific process. The scientific process might be the best we have. I didn't say we should discontinue the scientific method. I did not criticize the scientific method. I simply said that 39,000 people got the wrong answer for one reason or another so you can't trust the output automatically. But still science and the scientific method might be the best we have. So if you're dying to come into the comments to say Scott Scott if you don't believe in science how are you going to know what's true so you can come in like a drunken NPC and act like you didn't hear the point. And that is my point that even if you get the right information in front of people we'll find a way to misinterpret it guaranteed.

And then 400 economists backing Harris that means that there are probably X number of economists who are backing Trump. What is the point of being an expert on economics if you can't tell the difference between their two plans and what would be better for the economy? Are economist opinions any good? No not if they're on different sides. Yeah the one time that economist opinions worked are when there were no economists who said that price controls were a good idea. Then it worked. That's a rare case. But when you're looking at like a complex set of variables that Harris would do versus the complex set of variables that Trump would do the economists end up disagreeing and oh surprise they end up agreeing with their political party that they're already registered for. So what good was the economics if all you're going to do is agree with your party after you did your economic analysis? Did you add anything? No you didn't.

Jamie Dimon who I believe is a lifelong Democrat and our most important banker, the biggest of the bankers, he loves Elon Musk's idea of making the government more efficient and cutting out the waste. He said that on a recent, I think it was the same interview, that countries have to have strong borders. Huh. Lifelong Democrat seems to be in favor of something that only Trump is going to do for reducing costs. Seems to be in favor of a Trump version of border security. Say it. Say it Jamie. Say it. You know you want to. You know you want to. Oh you're so close. Elon Musk said it. Bill Ackman said it. Mr. Wonderful said it. The All-In Pod guys some of them said it. It's safe. You can come out Jamie. You can come out. Come on you can do it. We're waiting for you. We love you. We love you Jamie. Come on come on come on you're so close.

Meanwhile manufacturing is slumped to a 15 month low as inflation goes up. So the urgency to pick a president who is the best on manufacturing is good. I'm still thinking that the real way to be a manufacturing powerhouse is with robots and we're not quite there but very very close to the point where we can build an entire probably build something in America that uses a robot and 3D printing and doesn't have to ship as far because it's locally. We may be at the point where manufacturing in the United States because you get rid of most of the labor could work. We're almost there.

Well according to the New York Post early mail-in voting in three of the swing states shows a huge let's say closing the gap by Trump because it used to be that the Democrats by a huge margin were voting by mail. And so the idea is that now that there are more Republicans relatively still less still fewer people voting who are Republican voting by mail but the gap has closed quite a bit in the early voting. I'm not sure that tells you anything. Are you with me on that? I don't think that's an indicator. You know you want to hear it as an indicator that it's good for Trump. I don't know that the indicator tells you one thing or another because don't you believe that the mail-in is about the cheating? No you and the cheating doesn't have to come early. That could come later. So I don't think that's telling you anything. I wouldn't get comfortable because of that.

Well meanwhile Diddy's former bodyguard says we're going to find out a whole bunch of stuff about his freak off parties and there are going to be famous people involved and that Diddy I think a lot of people not just the bodyguard but people have come to believe that Diddy is part of a massive blackmail operation much like Epstein. So let's say if you're keeping track the entities that are corrupt are the media the Department of Justice the Democrats we got the FBI the Secret Service the CIA the Department of Homeland Security the CDC corrupt every government regulatory body corrupt 400 economists corrupt and the music industry and entertainment is basically a raping situation. Raping and blackmail, child sex, raping and blackmail is your musical things now.

I would like to put an image in your mind that's going to make some of you laugh. Have you ever seen the movie Underworld with Kate Beckinsale playing a vampire? And there's this underworld between the vampires who were real and the werewolves the lycans. And you saw the head of the vampires is this very ancient old wrinkled white guy and he's kind of he kind of has a vibe about him. But as it turns out that the top vampire turned the other vampires by biting them and turning them into vampires and then those vampires bit other vampires and then they became vampires. Now think of the music industry and think of Clive Davis as the top vampire. Now I don't personally have any accusations against Clive Davis or anybody else because I don't know. I wasn't there and I don't trust stories in the news of this type. However if the rumors were true it would be that Clive Davis was the ancient head vampire who turned Diddy who turned Usher who turned Bieber and created this industry of hip-hop people who dressed in all black like vampires and they came out only at night like vampires. The correlation between that world that movie Underworld and the vampire world and what the current hip-hop music industry looks like it's really shockingly similar. You know if the rumors are true. And again I don't personally have any information that would say Clive Davis did anything illegal or immoral or unethical and you have to watch out because there's going to be accusations against people who were not involved in anything. But the indication are that there's some kind of a long-term flipping of people into blackmail situations and gay sex etc. Well I don't know if this is true but because Ben Shapiro reposted it he would do a better job of checking to make sure something is true than I would. So he showed a picture of Hezbollah leadership in like a graph and it showed that everybody below the top guys has already been killed by Israel. So I didn't count them but it looked like maybe I don't know 15 or 16 sub commanders under the top guy are all dead now.

Now here's my question. If that's true that 100% of the underlings are dead at the high the high level underlings there's probably more levels of underlings but if the top two levels of underlings below the number one guy are completely gone is it an accident that the top guy is still alive? And I'm going to say no. I think Israel is keeping the top guy alive intentionally. Here's why. Number one if you really really really hated this top guy and you really wanted to punish him and you really just hated him so it's more than war it's personal and I imagine it would be personal if you put me in that situation and I captured that top guy I would torture him before I killed him. I can't even pretend I wouldn't. Like if I lived in Israel and I had to worry about that guy that guy authorizing missiles that are coming at my house every freaking day yeah if I caught him myself I would torture him before I killed him like actually literally no joke. So how would I feel if I were in the Israeli IDF or the government? Same way. It would be personal. Not as personal for the individual terrorists because maybe they're just brainwashed or whatever but the top guy no that's personal. That's personal.

Now if you really really really wanted to torture the top guy what you would do is you would keep him alive so he could see that everything he built and everybody he loves gets killed right in front of him. And that's what they're doing. Now I don't know if they had any conscious thought along those lines probably not but you do notice that people tend to do the things that their subconscious really really really wants them to do even if they don't verbalize it. But the other possibility is you need to keep the top one to negotiate any kind of a settlement so you wouldn't have anybody to negotiate with if you get rid of him and you know you want to get something done quickly. So it could be they need to keep him around. It could be he's just harder to get but I don't feel like that's what's happening. I feel like they could get him when they want and it could be they're showing that they can get every single person but leaving the top one in place is basically a very very clear threat that says in two weeks you're going to be dead unless you stand down because that's what it feels like. It feels like they can do it anytime they want and so you need to change because we just took out your whole leadership. Will he change? I doubt it. But then they get the secondary fun of making him watch while they destroy everything he loved everything he cared about everything he built and it brings nothing but ruin upon his people and he's going to watch it and he's going to know that that was him. Now he might be such a terrorist that he still thinks it's wonderful because they're all going to happen or something but that's what's happening.

And so ladies and gentlemen that is my prepared remarks. Ran way too late so I'm going to say bye to everybody except Locals and I'll just very quickly say hi to them. So I'll see you tomorrow everybody else on X and Rumble and YouTube and Locals. I'm coming at you.

oh my goodness what a good day it's going to be probably one of the best yeah we're getting ready for the show of shows like you've never seen before good morning everybody and welcome oh oh hello that's different let's see something's looking different here um let me know if I just stopped broadcasting on locals because I hit a button that maybe maybe stopped it but I think we're good all right welcome to coffee with Scott Adams the best time you've ever had in your whole whole life and if you'd like to take it up to levels that are even higher that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains all you need for that is a CPP Mar a glass a tanker chel sign a canteen Jer flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure the dopamine here the day think makes everything better it's called the simultaneous Sip and it happens right now go the deliciousness is Extreme well you already know that uh coffee can help your cardiovascular disease cleanse your body remove toxins from your cells it can be an antioxidant with fighting inflation and protecting cells from oxidative stress but did you know that if you add milk to your coffee it's a little worse potentially it might not do as well uh might not do as well as removing toxins or something so just think about that black coffee it'll get you what you want that's right um I've got a correction do you like it when I correct myself because I said something wrong come on you all like it you like it did you know because I didn't know it that the way the Panama Canal works is that it fills up the locks with water from a lake how many of you knew that I always just assumed they had big pumps and they just pumped the ocean water into the lock and then released it back into the ocean but apparently to get the good economics um Panama has a Lake that's uh higher than the canal is so they can just use gravity to take the water from the lake and very quickly fill up a lock so if you had to pump it it would be pretty expensive so when I said the other day that the Panama Canal was getting less efficient because of the water level it may be some combination of the there's a bit of a drought that may be affecting the lake and then other people said no no it's not the amount of water they have it's the silt building up in the locks so it could be one of those anyway the point is the Panama Canal is not as efficient as it had been that's all um Neuroscience news says there's an anti-inflammatory drug that might boost motivation if you're depressed why would changing something in your body such as the inflammation change change how you feel about your world as in depression or lesson of it and the answer is as I've told you 1 billion times this is 1 billion in one your body is your brain if you want your brain to feel better you can fix your body because your body is your brain so if you take uh if you take the pain away you take the inflammation away you make your body work better more efficiently you exercise it you e right your brain is going to be a lot better it won't fix every problem but fix a lot of them so think of your body as your brain well believe it or not as much as I love talking about indoor vertical Farms there's a new story about one so new Atlas has a story about a the world first indoor vertical Farm that's going to make just a a whole bunch of strawberries like more than they've ever made before uh the Plenty Richmond farm so here's what's new new and interesting about this indoor farming is not economical compared to outdoor farming but uh this is one example of which uh we're moving in the right direction so there's a bunch of researcher scientist type people who are working hard to figure out how to tweak things so you can grow things indoors more economically than Outdoors because you're going to save uh water you're going to save pesticide you might save on labor if you do it indoors but you got to carefully balance the light and the water and the the uh nutrients and all that and as uh as they get better and better at it I really think this is going to be the future um I feel like the world is going to be lots of individual citizens who have a micro farm so I'm imagining a city of the future which isn't too dense where every living space optionally has you know something about half the size of your house that's a little indoor garden and let's say that your job is only to grow one thing so you're just the lettuce person and uh maybe somebody else manages it and you you put it off to your local supermarkets but I think you're going to have to grow the food where the people are that eat it I just think there's no way around that cuz that's the only way you're going to get nutrients and low economics good economics so it's coming speaking of food Bernie Sanders says he agrees with Elon Musk on this point and he points out it's unusual that they would be in the same side of things although it's it it isn't unusual because Elon Musk is Big about the environment Bernie's big on the environment so they do actually agree on some pretty big stuff but um here's what Sanders says um he said Elon Musk not is not one of my usual allies recently tweeted the solving obesity reduces the risk of diseases like diabetes and improves quality of life and sander says he's right we need to make appetite Inhibitors available to anyone who wants them oh that was so close to being a good thing that you did there Bernie Sanders now I'm not going to disagree or agree with the idea that you should make appetite Inhibitors more available to people because there's evidence that it's doing good stuff for some people and maybe not as good as you hope but you know it's everything's a mixed bag but yeah I would think that it'd be good for people have this option however I would have been way happier if Sanders had something said something along the lines of you know RFK Junior's on the right path we've got to fix our food supply and if you fix the food supply and you learn to exercise um you're not going to need any OIC may I make my case by pointing to myself I I'm exactly the way I wanted to be at as an adult like exactly right on right to the pound and I don't do a zumic all I do is watch my diet don't eat crap and I exercise on a regular basis it it really is that simple now I get that you know there's not free will so people you know can't as easily do it as I can I've got a I have money and I've got a flexible schedule and you know I don't have kids telling me to drive them places when I could be exercising so it's easier for me but I would like to make the following suggestion which I've now made several times but eventually you're going to see it as genius it goes like this I Want a President Who encourages people to get off the couch and I'd love to start a habit an American habit because you can do that you you can actually start a national habit you just need somebody to get the ball rolling now if RFK Jr gets the let's say the influence that I want and Trump gets the influence that I want let's say he gets elected I would love for Trump and RFK Jr and anybody who's smart and influential to join in to say you should all take a walk in your own neighborhood if it's safe uh after dinner now after dinner can be whatever you want it to be so it you don't have to do the same after dinner as anybody else but wouldn't you like that if you're done with dinner and by the way the scientists say that taking a walk right after you eat is the very best thing you can do it just changes your whole digestive situation um so let's say you're done at 700 p.m.

and you walk outside and you see your neighbors who are also going for a walk because they were done about the same time but if you had gone at 6:00 p.m.

or 8:00 p.m.

there would be a different set of neighbors who would also finish that that time and they're going for a walk and then if you're brave or if there are at least some friendly people out there they say hey neighbor join up and next thing you know every time you leave your house between 6:00 and 8:30 at night there's a group of neighbors who are going for a walk and they'd love it if you just jump in and you could meet them you could feel safer because you're in a group now so you're out doors it might be a little dark depending what it is and uh you don't have to go the whole way you don't have to walk as far as they do just do what you want to do so it would be really easy to make that a habit and you'd be able to meet your neighbors and you would be far less caring if you're just taking a walk whether they're voting for one person and you're voting for somebody else if you're just doing a thing you an activity you're all fine and let me say it again that the the only way you can bring anybody together whether it's making a friend personally or bringing the country together it's over a shared activity if you've got a World War the country is going to come together if aliens you know from space attack the country or the world we're going to come together right so it's a shared activity that brings people together and nothing else like the the intellectual stuff not really the intellectual stuff just makes you feel like you might be on somebody's team but the doing things together that makes a difference so that's my suggestion get the government to say at least take a walk after dinner and be your neighbors and get some exercise speaking of positive thoughts uh I saw huberman um huberman video If you're not watching all the hubman videos you should be and he had a guest on talking about uh how you can just force yourself to think more positive thoughts and it have a whole bunch of health and mental health and other benefits and I'm going to amplify that but I'm going to give you a different model for it which is humans don't have the option of not thinking if we're awake well even if you're asleep your brain is still active so you don't have an option to thinking nothing and if your problem is that there are too many negative thoughts that is something you can control so you can't control whether you have thoughts but you can definitely control 100% you can control the percentage of them that are negative now I call that shelf space because that's the idea that is limited there's there's not unlimited shelf space it's just the shelf so if your Shelf has 50% negative and 50% positive well you have room for improvement you can just force yourself to think of some more positives and that automatically reduces the number of negatives because you only have so much shelf space if you just jam it with good thoughts which is what I do by the way uh you can just squeeze them out it's one of the most important mental um hacks you could come up with if I could give you only one thing to do differently in your whole life just one thing it would be this to make sure you squeeze out the opportunity for negative thoughts by just forcing in the positive ones until your shelf space is all taken that'll fix just about everything it'll give you energy optimism people want to be around you uh you'll take on bigger challenges which is good for you basically it fixes everything and that's not too far from what your best self-help gurus would tell you you got to get that mental conversation right that's the the Tony Robbins you know big probably the most basic thing he says that's the most important you got to get the conversation that's always happening you can't stop it but you can change it change it to positive Sam mman who uh as you know is the uh big AI uh boss I guess you'd say so he's the chat GPT head and he was asked according to a post I saw by zarra on X um he was asked if he done any life had any psychedelic experiences and he did he said that earlier in his life so not nothing recently but uh or at least the life-changing part wasn't recently he did psychedelics and he said it changed him from being an anxious unhappy person into a very calm person who can work on hard and important things I'm going to add to that and say this you can tell he's done psychedelics by looking at his eyes now I know you don't believe that if you've never been around people who have done psychedelics you can tell you you look at him talking for a minute and a half and you know that he's experienced a different reality than you have came back and Incorporated it into his worldview you could just tell by looking at him and and by listening to him and um the it's important for you to know how transformational some of these experiences are but I'd like to tie this to a comment I saw from Mar dreon um big Silicon Valley investor famous investor and he said uh I'm paraphrasing but something like the dirty secret of Silicon Valley is that high agency people I think that's the phrase he used uh can use illegal drugs to Great advantage now again that's just a paraphrase to which I say oh my God which I did say I've wanted to say that in public my whole life but you can't because it's irresponsible if you say to somebody you know the most successful people I know did illegal drugs but they were really smart about it so they didn't do the wrong illegal drugs they did the ones that helped them now if you do ones that help you can they also kill you oh yeah oh yeah yeah it'll kill you but if you're one of these high agency High willpower uh High Intelligence you know you've really got it going on there are rare cases and I'm going to say is rare where people just use the drugs to great success so for example and again I'm not recommending any of this just so clear this is very not recommended but it's a truth it's just one of those hard to process truths that there are some people who are on you know Aderall or uppers or speed who figure out oh my God I'm already in the top 1% of smart hardworking people if I put myself in the 0.001% I can make a billion dooll unicorn company and change the world and then they do now if they get a lifelong habit that you know ends up bad that was a bad decision if they end up making something that changes the world and makes billions of dollars and then they get off it because they were high agency High willpower they were just doing it because it worked well that's a huge win but I don't recommend it because the odds of you being in the top 1% and be one of the few people who could handle literally addiction and then Shake It Off you're not one of those let me say that again you're not one of those I might be wrong for 1% of you but you don't know if you're in the 1% you really don't know but it is true and then I look at Sam mman with his psychedelic experience I have heard maybe more of these stories than any other type that somebody changed their life life because of the Psychedelic experience that was also my experience early in my 20s and it was completely life-altering so if you don't understand how one experience that lasts a few hours can change everything it's because you haven't experienced it but when people say that they're not joking they are completely different forever now could you also do it and have a terrible experience yeah it was just a story yesterday about people doing iasa and just like puking their guts out and quitting their jobs and having all the opposite effects so yes it's high risk so if there's one thing you hear from this I want you to hear the highrisk part the part I don't want you to act on is guessing that you're in the top 1% and you're the only person who you know one of the few people you know who can ever do an illegal drug get a benefit from it and then get back from it right don't do it I'm just saying that some people do it all right uh chat GPT is coming out speaking of AI with their new advanced voice mode and that's good because the current model I don't know if this only happens to me or you when I talk to it it's it tends to act like a teenager who is pretending to have a bad cell phone connection I don't know if you've tried to use the current chat GPD voice mode but I'll ask is something like this chat GPT I have a a mole that appeared on my arm um let me describe it I'll give you a picture of it and can you tell me if this is dangerous and then chat GPT will say in perfect English there are two possibilities number one there's nothing to worry about whatsoever and I'll think wow and they'll say but number two possibility is that amputation and I said wait wait what what what did you just say and then it will say in perfect English it could be nothing to worry about whatsoever and I'm like okay okay what was that other thing you said with amputation and bile like bile I don't even know what that means what is the bile good is the bile bad what's it mean Chad gbt and then it'll say I'm having trouble connecting now so that's been my experience with chat GPT if you really really want to know the answer it's going to be a teenager or say oh sorry Mom can't hear you I should come home no I can't hear you anyway so I have big hopes for the advanced voice mode I have a hypothesis that all of those problems I just described are some of it's just Wi-Fi you know if you're in the car or something or losing connection over your 5G but some of it I think might be that they don't have enough uh computing power because the amount of computing power you need is just almost unfathomable and I can't imagine that they got right where they wanted already so I suspect that some of it is just more Computing is more goodness so all the by the way all this is going to fix itself none of this is permanent so I have a big hopes for this advanced voice mode I'll let you know after I try it out meanwhile uh Google allegedly paid $2.7 billion dollar to hire a good AI guy let me say that again Google who wants to make sure it can stay competive in this AI stuff and some would say it's you know maybe not the in the top tier so to fix that they paid $2.7 billion to hire back a guy who used to work with them and was one of the pioneers of inventing the llm AI concept and he left because Google was a little too conservative or slow or didn't didn't want to pursue it as much as he did so he created another company which uh was not didn't necessarily look like his other company called character was going to ever make money but uh he cleverly sold the company with an agreement that he would you know go work for Google so he basically sold a company for $2.7 billion do his his part of it was several hundred million uh just to do a job so let me give you this advice if you ever find yourself in a position where somebody is willing to pay $2.7 billion just to hire you as an employee know he didn't get the 2.7 billion but he got his share of the company um you should take that yeah I don't give a lot of career advice but if somebody offers you $2.7 billion do just to go to work most of the time I'd say yes I'd say yes on that that's my advice well meanwhile the Info Wars saga continues the judge has ordered uh that Alex Jones can auction off he has to actually because infow Wars is being closed down by the courts to pay the legal damages for the Sandy Hook families and uh his entire life work will be sold off to the highest bidder and liquidated I saw some people joking and saying um you know Elon mus should buy it I don't think that's going to happen because I don't know the assets are exactly but even after he sells off all his assets correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't this lawsuit judgment that he's under mean that every penny he makes for the rest of his life some of it has to go to the lawsuit so haven't they crippled him economically forever like he can never come back because if he makes money he just has to give it away sort of the OJ Simpson you know doomed for life you can never really make money in this world again well so when you start looking at the number of people who were leaning in the same direction and got cancelled from Tucker to Alex Jones to Roseanne to me and you know you can add a bunch of names to that would you say it's fair to say that the media and the Department of Justice and the Democrats collectively are crooked and when you look at the law fair against Trump and then you look at all the law fair and you know related things against other characters doesn't it seem like the media the Department of Justice and Democrats are fundamentally corrupt it does to me I remember thinking that the justice department was mostly you know mostly on the up and up but you know it was probably bad if you were like a black American especially earlier in earlier uh years and and I thought well that's you know something we need to fix uh you don't want any discrimination in department of justice but I wasn't completely aware that the entire Enterprise is corrupt and it appears it is so I would say the media the Department of Justice and the Democrats are one big ball of corruption kind of collectively working with each other uh here's a funny thing MSN BC at a little town hall in which they asked a few people there there were men about January 6 now I think MSNBC was hoping that they would say January 6 a stain on the American Republic is totally going to make me turn against Trump and I would never ever vote for an insurrectionist like that January 6 thing that's probably what they hoped for here's what they got uh you talking about the February 6 thing uh no it's January 6 he goes oh I don't really feel any way about it so they asked two young men who apparently were interested enough in politics that they'd probably vote and neither of them had any feelings about January 6 it was like it didn't happen now MSNBC has been trying to brainwash the public like every day for years that that was the worst thing that's happened in the Republic you know it's worse than Pearl Harbor it's worse than 911 it's he's Trump is going to steal your democracy and and the young men remember I keep telling you that young men are are the solution in many ways young men are you know a problem group because we have a lot of crime and whatnot but young men are going to fix us because men know what a Insurrection looks like let let me let me be clear anybody who's a man with a little bit of testosterone we know what a real Insurrection looks like and nobody was fooled by that one so maybe if you're a woman and here I'm making a huge you know generalization that doesn't apply to the people watching the show but if you're a woman maybe you don't recogniz it I don't know I'm not a woman so I can't I can't speculate how women think but it seems to me that the the beta males and women on MSNBC just assumed that the rest of the people would see things the way they saw it and that January 6 was this big scary thing where we almost lost the country and the men who had some testosterone in them are sitting there and saying you mean the February thing no the January thing the January 6 you've heard of it right yeah I didn't have much feelings about it I didn't have much feelings about it is the exact right take that is the exact right take there was nothing about that let me put it a different way if history had a way to delete and you could just delete January 6 and just take it out of History how would the country be worse off it wouldn't be yeah uh paying no attention to January 6 was probably the right play knowing about it didn't help you a bit nothing what are you going to do differently you know maybe you learned you should have better security if there's a big crowd of angry people coming toward you but really did you have to learn that was that something you just figured out in January 6 that if you don't have enough security and you know for sure a gigantic group of angry people are coming your way no we didn't learn anything from it there's nothing useful about knowing the details of January 6 I mean unless it helps you know how corrupt the system is I suppose but yeah you can just delete that from your memory banks wouldn't make a difference none um Dan banino is uh tantalizing because he talks about he acts like he knows maybe a little bit or even a lot more about one of the assassination attempts um the second one and he he says uh has the possibility to be the scandal of our lifetime which would suggest more people were involved in this than just the shooter the suggestion is that maybe there's an Insider connection to it uh and that worse maybe it's internally politically motivated and it wasn't just a crazy guy now I don't personally know what that evidence would be but he does say quote this story is going to get worse it's ugly and uh he is very animated about where that's going now I consider banino one of the credible people who doesn't just take a BS story and run with it because he can get clicks um you know obviously he's a high energy presenter he's one of my favorite people I always use him as an example of talent Stacks Bonino is like the ultimate Talent stack guy like he has just the right experiences and then things he's developed like his his uh you know on camera Persona and everything and even his physicality you know he he he's just got a whole bunch of everything from networking to understanding politics to understanding the the security situation presentation language you know grammar I mean he's got a talent stack so does Hannity and number of other people but uh he always stands out to me is as a person who just said what do successful people do and then he just did that really hard I hate to reduce people to something so simple but doesn't banino look like somebody who just woke up you know at some point in his life and said all right what do people who succeed do okay okay all right you're doing all right what if I just do all that and then he does all that and then he's really successful maybe maybe it's that just figure out what everybody does and do it that I would describe my own path to if you can call this success um that I just studied all the successful people from from my earliest age you know from 11 years old if I saw a story about a successful person I was going to read it and I would find out what did you do like why was it luck is it something you did or the way you operated like I was always a real student of that and sometimes you can that in other people anyway Mike Flynn um all right so so far we have the media doj and the Democrats are crooked um and we've got some suggestion that the Secret Service is crooked and uh let's see Mike Flynn is talking about the fact that the um the House of Representatives is working on this uh plan and bipartisan plan to make sure that the um government is staffed if there's a major casualty event in which the representatives who are elected are all killed or disabled and uh I I think the idea is that maybe the governor of their state would appoint somebody in the short term something like that but as Mike Flynn General Flynn points out and uh I would point out the same thing why did this suddenly become very important so important that there's a bipartisan push you don't get bipartisan unless something's happening right now you know what I mean here here's what doesn't happen there's some general problem that just sort of always been the problem throughout history and there's nothing immediately pressing about it but then Congress gets together and does a bipartisan bill has that ever happened the the suggestion here is that the people working on this bipartisan Bill to deal with what happens when they all get killed is because there's a specific threat and the question that I ask is are they going to do a state of the union this year do do you think you're going to put all of our uh Congress crors in one room or even you know even just the senate or just the house I feel like they must think there's some credible threat of something like a missile blowing up a building you know if they were worried about drone attacks you know the best drone attack would get a few people um but there they seem to be worried about something that would take out a whole building full of Congress people right because it's not like they're all going to be all over the country and then die at the same time unless it's a pandemic I suppose maybe it's a pandemic but it does sound like they know something we don't know and uh I'd sure like to know what that is or maybe I wouldn't well in your weird news that you did not expect I'll put this at the top of the list former CDC director Robert Redfield you remembered him from the um pandemic and you probably said to yourself oh former CDC director he got a bunch of things wrong he's a bad actor he's a bad character why do he do so many bad things I didn't like during the pandemic and you might know that RFK Jr um really was a Critic of his and was kind of savage even in his book he was a Critic of him and then this happened uh according to RFK Jr he says Robert Redford field Robert Redfield who I really go after in my fouchy book wrote an editorial in Newsweek magazine today saying that he was endorsing president Trump because he was because Trump was going to restore American Health and that quote a lot of people might be surprised to hear me say this but he has chosen exactly the right person who can do this Robert F Kennedy Jr and he says this was breathtaking to me this is the guy who was head of the CDC who had been criticizing for years and then separately they had lunch so Redfield and RFK Jr his biggest critic and and according to RFK Jr when he met him you know in person the first thing the Redfield said to RFK Jr was you were right about everything wow wow you were right about everything and then RFK Jr talks about how I guess Redfield agrees vigorously agrees that our uh our agencies are all captured in other words they're not operating on your behalf they're operating on behalf of companies that have some kind of control over the directors so this is just mind-blowing like you have to know the players to be impressed by this but most of you do I think you're in the you know top 5% of people watch the news if you're watching this this is mind-blowing you know it's hard to even imagine that somebody this is beyond my imagination he he's just completely endorsed uh patriotism to me to me this is Redfield just becoming a pure Patriot from whatever he was I mean I think he probably tried to do the best job he could but it looks like he's admitting the forces were stronger than he was and uh This is Wild it's just crazy it's not as crazy as a video I think this is not new but I just was watching it again uh Patrick burn you might know him he was the xcoo of overstock.com and according to him he was part of an operation to bribe Hillary Clinton on behalf of the FBI in 2016 and he successfully had a foreign company country foreign country bribe her with I don't know1 18 or20 million and separately some Turkish entity bribed her with a similar amount and the FBI got this all on tape and you know they got all the evidence and they were ready they had everything they needed to put Hillary Clinton in jail in 2016 and then p burn says they told him to drop the whole thing and forget it ever happened because they expected her to win the election in 2016 and then all the FBI people would be in trouble because she would have too much power by then and she could just fire them all now that's the story they told them Patrick uh believes the closer real story is that uh the FBI people were in the pocket of Obama meaning they were Obama within the FBI and that the real play was not to find any crimes done by a politician but rather to get blackmail so that Obama could control Hillary Clinton does that sound real now keep in mind he's not saying I heard this happen he was in the op he was like the central person who arranged the bribe he didn't give the bribe offer it but he arranged the person to bribe her to be in the same room and off the schedule I guess now do you think do you think that Patrick burnt would make up that story does that sound like the kind of story that somebody would just make up it doesn't to me yeah you know I'm I feel like I'm pretty good at spotting BS this doesn't look like BS now if you take it further to what he speculates you know people are thinking you know maybe then make get a little uh little more interesting but he he literally knows for sure because he was part of the op that Hillary Clinton took a gigantic bribe and the FBI was completely aware of it that part I completely believe so that would suggest that if you're keeping score let's see uh the media the doj and the Democrats would be all crooked the Secret Service would be crooked if bino's story is what we think it is every single entity in the government should be regulating things according to Robert Redfield and RFK Jr are actually working against our interests not for us and uh the FBI is completely compromised and owned by Obama's team if that's true so how do you feel so far and of course Mike Ben tells us about the Deep State and the blob and how are the CIA may be more partners with the cartels than enemies so if you're keeping score that would be a corrupt uh media Department of Justice Democrats FBI Secret Service CIA but I mean that's that's not bad there's still a lot more a lot more parts of the country so don't start feeling like everything's corrupt uh Michael shenberger has a article in which he says that Gates Soros Biden Harris walls Clinton Obama the Legacy Media the FBI DHS and EU and Brazil and the five eyes nations are desperate to censor the internet they're not hiding it look at them they're trying to normalize it so Michael shellenberger talks about how all these various entities are coordinating to end your free speech and censor you in ways that they can get away with without constitutional problems so if you're keep keeping track that would be a corrupt media Department of Justice Democrats Secret Service FBI CIA uh CDC every regulating government uh Gates Soros Biden Harris walls Clinton Obama the Legacy Media uh Department of Homeland Security the European Union Brazil and five eyes but everything else is working perfectly that's the important part I don't want you to lose hope because they're the only ones that are corrupt everything else is kind of going along fine by the way a lot of people won't see this um presentation because no matter what my content is You.

Tube caps it at 31,000 views okay so I mean you could add that one the list sure sure maybe you've got a little corruption in the Department of Justice the Democrats the CIA the FBI the Secret Service every every regulating entity yeah I think you know where this is going but thank goodness even if Google and others are trying to censor me thank goodness I have free speech on X no I don't I don't know what's going on with X um I'm willing to believe it's just the algorithm is feeding me people who agree with me but the effect is that I can yell all day long things that Democrats don't like they'll never hear them so if the only speech I have because the the the algorithm kind of connects me with people who already agree with me if the only speech I Have Is to say things that people agree with that's exactly not free speech right that's the opposite of free speech free speech is only it's only useful to say things that people don't want to hear and disagree with agreeing isn't anything you know nobody cares about that so while I do trust Elon Musk to be you know Pro free speech and and that he's making the uh platform as close to that as they can get I feel like even maybe just accidentally the algorithm has removed any useful part of free speech because the useful part is the disagreeing part that's the useful part I don't have that so I don't know why but I don't have it but I would ask you this following question because you are smart enough to deal with a tough philosophical question I'm not aware of any country that has ever survived free speech let me say that again because you're going to think you misheard it there's no typo in that I'm not aware of any country that has ever survived as a country that also had free speech now you should be sitting at home and saying what what the hell are you talking about you got all of Europe you've got every Democratic country you've got the United States you know maybe you got some problems now but clearly we've survived a few hundred years it to me it seems obvious Scott that the Democratic countries have free speech and that they absolutely have survived and thrived and thrived they've done better than other countries except nothing like that really happened in the real world in the real world at least in my lifetime our media has always been controlled meaning that you only saw things that the CIA and the government wanted you to see it's just that you didn't know it you thought you were seeing the news when you weren't the thing that's different now is that we know it it it's not that Free Speech didn't go away it was never here we did not lose Free Speech we never had it and we found out we never had it that's what happened right now there are a million ways that the CIA and whoever in the Deep State wants to block your free speech do you think it will ever be known why I got cancelled for example just pick one do you think the real story of that will ever be known I mean even I don't know do do you think it makes sense that I got cancelled worldwide and not a single person called to ask me what was that all about or would you like to try an apology maybe we can save you not one person thousands of people were invol were involved directly or indirectly with my cancellation and not one person said would you like to revise that or were you taking in a context you know maybe you weren't taking in a context but maybe you'd like to apologize from it and then we can keep working together no no so do I have any idea why I was cancelled well I have speculation but given that it started into Washington Post which is the furthest thing from a free speech entity which everybody assumes is just part of the government's organ of control they started it you think that's a coincidence nope nope all right um so just be aware that Free Speech probably has always been an illusion there's definitely more of it you can have you know there there's definitely a way to get more of it and we should be trying to do that but you have to understand that no country could survive Free Speech it would be too chaotic there there has to be something like a common narrative to keep a country together and I hate it I hate that that's true but I've never seen the alternative all right um there is a strong hints that there was a third possible assassination attempt so axios is reporting that uh Trump said um they he had been briefed on efforts by Iran to assassinate him and that he believes tran tran will quote try again now that's a little bit cryptic because try again could mean that there's some third or other attempt outside the two known assassination attempts but it also could and this is pure speculation suggests that the first or maybe even the second one had some Iranian involvement so we don't know for sure if this is really a third attempt or if it's more information about one of the first two um but here's what Trump says about that he said big threats this in a post big threats on My Life by Iran the entire US military is watching and waiting moves were already made by Iran that didn't work out but they will try again not a good situation for anyone I'm surrounded by more men guns and weapons than I have ever seen before and they thanked Congress for you know making all that available funding wise I feel like he's sending a message when he's talking about how the the Weaponry to protect him I I think he's just trying to scare the next wouldbe assassin into thinking there's no way it's going to work because one of the problems is that the first two attempts would suggest to the you know some third future hypothetical attacker that getting a shot at him wouldn't be that hard so it's very important for Trump to persuade and say um things have changed and while it might have been a little too easy to get a shot at me you're dead if you try it now now is he right well I hope so I hope that he's his defenses are beefed up enough that anybody would be uh be dead so we hope so um then uh also from axios they talked about Iran's multi-pronged approach meaning that Iran is trying to hurt the United States with as many different you know ways to Pocus as they can in different domains um and there was a summer Cyber attack apparently and there was uh anyway um I don't know how they're going to Iran's going to beat us at this game but they're trying um Trump had some interesting things to say he was talking about uh how if we uh if we use our energy assets properly in other words we exploit our own energy resources and we make energy you know just our sort of our biggest thing in America that uh it will be a renaissance it will be a golden period he said I wish he'd said golden age but golden period is close enough um you know I've said that maybe his first term will seem like a golden age to us you know in retrospect but I do feel like maybe the pandemic could have postponed the Golden Age now as you know I don't believe we can have a golden age or even survive unless we figure out what to do about national debt but the way the way Trump talks about it um he makes it very clear that he understands not just recently but for a while now he makes it really clear that he understands I'm seeing in the comments people suggesting that if Iran is trying to call kill Trump that Iran has some kind of Obama connection do you buy that I know that people think Obama was too friendly to aan but do you think he could possibly be involved in an assassination attempt I think that would be too dangerous so my guess is no even if he wanted to I can't imagine that seems like too big a risk um anyway so John's talking about the Golden Age and here's my take on that energy has always been the number one thing that drove an economy so at least in our Modern Age whoever had the most energy did the best now it doesn't mean they did the best in terms of you know colonizing or Conquering the world because not everybody was doing that but Saudi Arabia lot of energy doing great uh other countries in the Middle East they had a lot of energy doing great uh Russia is only surviving because their energy stuff China's biggest need energy so they're building tons of plants now that was before Bitcoin and before um AI if you add AI to what the civilization is going to need we are talking about 10 times more energy needed 10 times we're not even close so there's going to be an energy boom of all energy booms so not only if you had enough energy could you make more Bitcoins you if you had your own nuclear power plant you could you know maybe pump out some Bitcoins you need a data center too but uh given the uh massive massive amount of energy that were we're going to need in the pretty near future I'm going to take the following stand that uh energy equals success energy equals dollars energy equals defense energy equals survival energy is the whole play one of the things I you know I continuously appreciate about uh Trump is he can take a complicated situation and boil it down to something that the public can understand and then approve of him acting on so that's what the wall was when he would say the wall his critics would say you simpleton that's such a small part of the bigger question and it was but if he could get you excited about the wall he was at least getting you in the right domain of of worrying about the things that are most important so directionally that's what Trump does best he's directionally correct pretty much all the time and I would say he is he is more than directionally correct on energy that if we said to ourselves all right America energy equals money if we get our energy cost down all of your products will be less expensive if we get our Energy prices down we'll have the greatest robotic Revolution ever if we get our energy you know plentiful and also down biggest Ai and we'll rule the world with AI before other people can get there it's down to one variable people it's one variable two if you count the Border there are two things we have to get right make sure that we don't have too much uh uncontrolled immigration because there's some level that destroys the country no doubt about it and we're getting close to it and you have to say that energy is your economy everything else has to happen too but energy equals economy wall equals immigration energy is economy energy if you have enough you have a you have a chance of paying down your national debt Trump says that directly he says we have trillions of dollars in the ground you know enough to pay off the national debt now you don't pay off the debt because the government doesn't own the oil but economic activity can boost your GDP and it can get you to the point where the government has enough income to pay the debt now I do not believe that Trump will succeed in most of his plans about lowering taxes because it would have too much impact on the deficit I do think I love his idea of having an ambassador to bring back uh manufacturing to the United States now that's not unlike what Biden was trying to do Biden has had success in you know repatriating manufacturing we could do a lot more so I'm not going to I'm not going to give Biden's Administration a hard time on that I think they were directionally right I think that Trump might go harder and he said you know he'd get an ambassador if you get the right person it makes a big difference and secondly he wanted to have it sounded like maybe some lower taxes for manufacturing that would come back to the us because we would have to deal with the fact that our labor is more expensive so maybe he can cut regulations which would lower prices if you do it right maybe he can lower the cost of energy which would make it cheaper to manufacture here maybe the fact that uh moving things internationally is getting harder because of the hoties and everything else that if you get rid of the transportation costs the costs come down again uh you make a lot of jobs with all this stuff so he's talking about lower corporate taxes um for I think specifically for people who bring manufacturing back now what does Trump understand that I always say Democrats never get right human motivation I would say Republicans consistently get right the human motivation part maybe not every time but far more consistently so if you say uh everybody come back and manufactur in the US they say why and Trump says how about I lower your taxes and make energy less expensive and you know give you some government land to build your factory and I'll get rid of some regulations then suddenly you go oh I those are good incentives I actually would look into that pretty seriously so yes I think Trump uh is maybe won't get all of his tax reductions that he wants um but man what a what a crowd pleaser the no tax on tips is and what a crowd pleaser no tax on overtime is uh I like both of those things because if you've somebody who's so valuable that their company wants them to work twice as much I I think that deserves a reward more than just overtime you know if we could get our top I don't know 10% of employees and and entrepreneurs to to do even more that's going to be better than making the other 99% you know a little bit better if you if you can make the real go-getters really go get a little more that's way bigger lever than helping everybody to be 5% better in in the long run everybody gets more that way all right uh also uh Sam Alman said that we might get AI super intelligent in a few thousand days and that uh it could lead to massive Prosperity now massive disruption but I don't disagree with massive Prosperity do you know what you would need to pay off the national debt you would need massive Prosperity which would require massive energy for the AI so Trump is the one I would trust to give us massive energy the other thing you'd have to do is find out how to cut expenses in the government there's only one candidate who's offering a reasonable plan to do that it's called Trump and Elon Musk as the person to help red designed government to make it cheaper that's a real plan right if you gave me almost any other name and said oh this other person will help reinvent government and make it cheaper do you know what I would have said about that and no they won't maybe at the margins but you know nothing nothing we'll look back at in 20 years and be impressed by it but you tell me that Elon Musk has volunteered and he's enthusiastic about Reinventing the government to lower expenses without losing function and I say okay it's go time that's go time because I can't think of any harder worse less thankful job than that and when you have your most capable entrepreneur richest man in the world who just stood stood up and said basically he's going to risk his life to get it done because that's the only way he plays the only way he plays is for Keeps you need that so let let me put it all together economy is energy energy is Trump if you tell me that Harris is the energy person well you're not paying attention no energy is Trump energy is economy energy is the ai ai is the productivity and the only other thing you got to get right is cutting the government expenses and there's only one person with a real plan to do that and it's Trump it's not close people so what happened when you have one who is just obviously the right one on all the big stuff and one who's obviously wrong well you get 400 economists who back Harris what do you know about economists let's see they went to a good school what what do you know about people who went to college they've been brainwashed yeah so unfortunately you know I was joking that no Economist had backed um Harris on her uh price gaps and maybe that's still true but she still somehow got 400 in the bag Economist to ignore their entire professional fiduciary responsibility to back her because she's a Democrat too so that happened yeah it's funny if you were a casual viewer of news and you saw that 400 Economist backed Harris you would think that was real wouldn't you well here's what I think now that we know we have corruption in let's see the Department of Justice the Democrats the media the Secret Service the FBI the CIA every one of our um regulatory bodies well I think you go you see where I'm going with this anyway according to the hill there are 22 States uh the Democrat states of course that want to employ a million people in climate apprenticeships by 2035 is that because these Democrats have realized that we need to train the young people in the vital sciences that are important to the future of the world no this is a brainwashing operation if you can get a million young people to believe in climate change and it's the most important thing you've created a million brainwashed Democrat voters who will try to convince other people that dumb old Trump is going to destroy the world unless lots of democrat vendors get money for things that won't work out so that looks corrupt to me just an assumption I don't have proof but it looks like it's just a brainwashing operation um I saw that asian-americans saw in the news are uh very strongly in favor of Harris now you might say to yourself s wait a minute are asian-americans the one who couldn't get into college because of democrat policies about Dei yes wait a minute are asian-americans still hired in corporations as much as they used to or is Dei working against them well I don't know actually I don't know about corporations I don't know if if you're Asian-American if is that a plus or a minus for getting a corporate job does it count does that count as diversity if you're Asian-American I feel like as soon as you're successful you get removed from the list of whether a counts and asian-americans are super successful in the United States so here's what I think I think that the reason asian-americans for Harris has to do with the fact that they're a highly educated part of the public and I'm going to throw out a stereotype and you're allowed to criticize me but just remember no stereotype applies to all people in any group can we agree there's no stereotype that applies to all the people in the group yet there are some things that are true right white people like to eat cheese it's just true we like cheese it's not good or bad we just like cheese um I would say that part of what makes asian-americans so successful is not only that they have higher education levels but that they're also also better is staying out of trouble just staying out of trouble and the trouble in one in one sense is legal trouble and asian-americans are do a great job of staying out of jail but they also stay out of I think fights that aren't going to benefit them like there there's just more so here here's my stereotype and again it doesn't apply to all the people in The Stereotype but asian-americans just seem to run their lives smartly can we all accept that if if you you show me just randomly just throw a throw a dart well not a dart you don't want to hurt anybody but just randomly pick an Asian-American you know and say all right what's your plan for success and what are you doing well I'm not doing any drugs I'm staying in a jail and I've got a plan to be a optometrist and my grades are good and I look at that and go oh well that's pretty sensible and it's not dangerous it's not dangerous you're staying in a danger and you're pursuing success if you show me a bunch of people who want to stay out of trouble I'll show you a bunch of people who are not going to admit that they vote for Trump am I right staying out of trouble includes not saying something so provocative that your career or your family life were impacted for no benefit right because remember what I'm saying about the Asian-American Community again a stereotype doesn't apply does not apply to all people who are in it is that as a group they seem insanely well um strategized and it's sort of a bad strategy to be a trump supporter if you know somebody will not hire you because of it if you know somebody won't date you because of it if you know it's going to be a fight at work why do it so does it surprise you that a highly educated and I I'm going to when I say risk averse um some in some context that sounds bad because you know like an entrepreneur wants to take some risk but in your everyday life you should be risk averse yeah you should not be thinking I think I could get away with that crime no no in your everyday life you should be risk averse except for embarrassment you know but but the the Trump stuff would be more than embarrassment it' be you don't get the job you literally don't get hired I mean that's that's a big price for just having an opinion so it makes sense to me that asian-americans are uh with the mainstream opinion at least when they're ped and that they would have been influenced in college like most people are to be more left leaning um um but according to the account on X called George because somebody named George runs this account now he is black which if it matters to you in the context of the story but uh he's a great follow so if you I've said that before so just look for George that's just the name of the account um and for somehow he has just great Scoops and he gets them early and they all seem to be true so a good good follow on X um but he says uh he points to a video in which uh Sage Steel who you should know is also black and but she's more she's more of a prump person uh I think she's prump I think that's true right Sage Steel has she endorsed him or is she just not endorsing Harris I can't remember sometimes just being not endorsing anybody feels the same is endorsing Trump so I don't know how far she's gone so I don't want to characterize her opinion there because I don't know but here's the story she said uh um that black people are coming up to her maybe they just recognize her and they come up to her and they say they're terrified of the future if Harris gets elected why would black Americans be terrified of the future with Harris well what would make you terrified um and she said uh you know a bunch of black people are coming up and saying that and I don't know what is it because of immigration I feel like the the the vibe I've been getting is that black America thinks that if so much money had not been spent on migrants it would be available to spend on black Americans for everything from reparations to you know better schools and all that do you think that's true I you know I would love there to be a true narrative in which more people would prefer Trump I'm not so sure it's true that that money is liquid and fungible and you could just use it for something else if you don't use it for migrants because remember the money we're spending on migrants we literally don't have we're not SP we're not spending money we have we're spending money we don't have and we always could have spent that you know more of the money we don't have by borrowing it we could have always spent that in Black America but apparently we had figured out whatever level worked and we were at that level I don't believe it's true that the more money you give to the migrant Community the less is available for black Americans I think they just borrowed more than they would have so um but it feels that way doesn't it imagine if you were in the in inner city and you saw that the Venezuelans were getting checks from the government and like free rent and stuff for a while and you weren't you would definitely feel like the guy standing next to you who got a big check from the government because he's Venezuelan and you got nothing and you've been living here all your life it would be quite normal to think that that could go to me if it didn't go to you I don't think it's true I think the decision of what you get is just a separate decision it's not like they took your money but it's going to feel like it oh my goodness it's going to feel like it yeah well I don't know if it's Envy Envy might be the it doesn't feel like the right word but I get I see where you're getting at it would be uh yeah Envy isn't quite the right word but but it's in the right domain so I see why you're saying that anyway um we'll see uh see what happens there I think there's going to be a lot more support for Trump especially among black male Americans that we've ever seen before uh people mock me for saying that all data about important stuff is unreliable some sometimes they say it's not credible sometimes times I say it's fake but how many of you have a reaction to that like well that's not true all data about everything important is fake does your bodies just rebel against that and say no it's not obviously Scott there is real data in the world is there are you sure are you sure there's real data in the world about important things now there's definitely real data about unimportant things but about important things do you think there's real data would you would you die in that Hill that there's real data in the world all right let's look at an example um what about uh crime in the United States did crime in the United States under Obama uh under Biden did it go up or is it now down that's pretty easy right we collect all this crime data so give me the answer is is crime up or down because data is real right for those of you who think data is real and you can do your own research and find out what the truth is say up or down well today I saw um I saw two movies on one screen so uh I won't name names but a uh a popular person on X U showed some data showing that uh two cities were missing from the crime data and that's why it looks like it's low but that's fake that's the story you've heard right have you all heard the story that the crime data from the FBI I guess left out Los Angeles and St.

Louis and then I looked at it and sure enough it wasn't there and then somebody else said oh this image is cropped if you don't crop the image it is there so which reality were you in were you in the reality where that information was left off which would have been ridiculous or are you in the reality where somebody cropped a data page so it looked like it was left off but of course it was there so which reality are you in oh oh but the data is real right the data is real and you can do your own research and find out the truth yeah you could find out more than you knew but you all you're going to do is get to the next level of something that might also be fake so you might learn a new thing but the new thing you don't know if that's real because you'd have to research that thing and then you'd have to research the thing that said that thing was real you'd have to know all the players to know that the person who said it could be credible and not somebody's in the bag for one side or the other no there's no there's no data that's real able there is data that you can convince yourself is right oh that exists and I convince myself data is right all the time because we're built we're built so we have to accept some reality so we we end up you know uh clicking to what do they call it snap to grid if we get nearer reality we like to snap to it all right all right that's my reality now I'll think about something else no all data is fake how about uh if you don't believe that about the crime how about the data on the economy is the economy better under Biden or was it better under Trump I don't know because I don't believe any reports about this if you if you assume that the pandemic you know was sort of in between the two administrations it just means that any data comparing them would be ridiculous so even if the data is correct on the economy we don't know how to analyze so you got one case where the data might be correct but half of the country is is seeing a cropped view of it so they have a whole different opposite of view so that's useless the econ economic information even if it were accurate which I doubt you still wouldn't know how to analyze it because the country doesn't know how to analyze somebody who had a pandemic at the end of his M Administration to somebody who had a pandemic at the beginning of their Administration nobody knows how to do that like there might be a few experts who could do it but you don't know how to do it how about uh the the Border Democrats believe they've looked at the border and uh immigration is at a low um illegal immigration and Republicans think it's at an all-time high the truth probably has something to do with the fact that uh We've we've turned not we the the Administration has turned illegal immigration into legal immigration by putting them through the Asylum door so technically they're all legal they're just not citizens they're legal they came under Asylum but they lied about the Asylum but since that's not proven in any kind of Court they're innocent till proven guilty so it's not really illegal unless it's proven illegal and you can't read somebody's mind to know that they they really didn't have you know they were really not motivated by Asylum and getting away from trouble we have no way to know so I would say that our information on the economy and the Border or Garbage crime we can't figure out what's going on there climate of course is just a big old mess you know we're going to argue about whether climate can be even measured or predicted of course it can't and of course you've seen that numbers on inflation um Harris says says it's down Trump says it's up but we're looking at different stuff one is looking at the base the other is looking at the rate of increase now those are the biggest things now even even when you come to something like uh abortion where you think well abortion is not about data at all is it there's no data argument about abortion it's just is it you know is it a life is it not is it right is it wrong is bodily autonomy more important than what some would say is a life though we pretend that that matters but it's actually a data question and we don't agree on the data here's why if I told you you know the Democrats do say that they would allow abortion under for any reason at any age you know even up the ninth month but suppose you knew that it never happened I'm not saying that's the truth this is hypothetical suppose you knew that nobody had ever aborted a baby at 9 months for just not wanting a baby they had done it maybe plenty of times when uh the mother actually thought they would die and the baby wasn't viable or you know special cases but it's a data argument you you wouldn't even care about the law if you knew that there was no case where anybody would abuse that law right it would change the argument quite a bit so even the things that you think have nothing to do with data are data arguments and we when the data is useless because we don't agree on it uh but at least science is reliable thank God thank God we got science let's see in recent number the number of retractions of scientific papers has risen sharply oh that's not good uh for example in 2023 more than 10,000 research papers were retracted globally 10,000 10,000 scientific papers were with withdrawn how many do you think were fake that were not withdrawn more than 10,000 these are just the ones that got caught just hold that in your mind it's only the ones who got caught 10,000 of them since uh how many was it in 2013 so a little more than 10 years ago it was only 1,500 that year only 1,500 and in 2023 it was 10,000 this year probably more over the entire time in the past decade how many scientific papers have been retracted 39,000 39,000 scientific research papers were retracted and again it's very important point they're only the ones who got caught you you tell me what is the real number of fake or inaccurate scientific papers if 39,000 of them got caught and it's hard to catch 100,000 I don't know but but I'd say 100,000 wouldn't be a crazy guess a 100,000 so it's a good thing that science is accurate right now for the NPCs i' like to take a moment to talk to the NPCs camera two NPCs uh NPCs uh nothing I said was relevant to the scientific process the scientific process might be the best we have I didn't say we should discontinue the scientific method I did not criticize the scientific method I simply said that 39,000 people got the wrong answer for one reason or another so you can't trust the output or automatically but still science and the scientific method might be the best we have so if you're dying to come into the comments to say Scott Scott if you don't believe in science how are you going to know what's true so you can come in like a drunken NPC and act like you didn't hear the point and that is my point that even if you get the right information in front of people we'll find a way to misinterpret it guaranteed and then 400 economists backing KL Harris that means that there are probably you know X number of economists who are backing Trump what is the point of being an expert on economics if you can't tell the difference between their two plans and what would be better for the economy our Economist opinions any good no not if they're on different sides yeah the the one time that Economist opinions worked are when there were no economists who said that price controls were a good idea then then it worked that's a rare case but when you're looking at like a complex set of variables that Harris would do versus the complex set of variables that Trump would do the the the economists end up disagreeing and oh surprise they end up agreeing with their political party that they're already registered for so what good was the economics if all you're going to do is agree with your party after you did your economic analysis did you add anything no you didn't Jamie Diamond who I believe is a lifelong Democrat and our most important Banker the biggest of the bankers um he loves Elan mus idea of making the government more efficient and cutting out the waste you said that on a recent idea he also said I think it was the same interview that uh countries have to have strong borders huh lifelong Democrat seems to be in favor of something that only Trump is going to do for reducing costs seems to be in favor of a trump version of border security say it say it Jamie say it you know you want to you know you want to oh you're so close Elon mus said it Bill Amman said it Mr.

Wonderful said it uh the all-in Pod guys some of them said it it's safe you can come out Jamie you can come out come on you can do it we're waiting for you we love you we love you Jamie come on come on come on you're so close meanwhile manufacturing is slumped to a 15mon low as inflation goes up um so the the urgency to pick a president who is the best on manufacturing is good um I'm still thinking that the real way to be a manufacturing Powerhouse is with robots and we're not quite quite there but very very close to the point where we can build an entire um probably build uh something in America that uses a robot and 3D printing and doesn't have to ship as far because it's locally um we we may be at the point where Manufacturing in the United States because you get rid of the get rid of the most of the labor uh could work we're almost there well according to the New York Post early mailin voting in three of the Swing States shows a huge uh let's say closing the Gap by Trump because it used to be that the Democrats by a huge margin were voting by mail and uh so the idea is that now that there are more Republicans relatively still less still fewer people voting who are Republican voting by mail but the Gap has closed quite a bit in the early voting I'm not sure that tells you anything are you with me on that I don't think that's an indicator you know you want to hear it as an indicator that it's good for Trump I don't know that the indicator tells you one thing or another because don't you believe that the mailin is about the cheating know you and the cheating doesn't have to come early that that could come later so I don't think that's telling you anything I wouldn't get comfortable because of that well meanwhile Diddy's former bodyguard says we're going to find out a whole bunch of stuff about his freak off parties and there going to be famous people involved and that uh did he uh I think a lot of people not the not just The Bodyguard but uh people have come to believe that Diddy is part of a massive you know blackmail operation much like Epstein so let's say if you're keeping track the entities that are corrupt are the media the Department of Justice the Democrats we got the FBI the Secret Service the CIA the Department of Homeland Security the CDC corrupt every government regulatory body corrupt 400 econom IST corrupt and uh music the music industry and entertainment is basically a raping situation raping and blackmail child sex raping and blackmail is your musical things now I would like to put an image in your mind that's going to make some of you laugh have you ever see the movie uh underworld with Kate Beck andol playing a vampire and uh there's this underworld between the vampires who were real and the werewolves the lyans and you saw the the head of the vampires is this you know uh very ancient old wrinkled white guy and he's kind of he kind of has a Vibe about him but as it turns out that the top vampire you know turned the other Vampires by biting them and turning them into vampires and then those vampires bit other vampires and then they became vampires now think of the music industry and think of Clive Davis as the top vampire now I don't personally have any accusations against Clive Davis or anybody else because I don't know I wasn't there and and I don't trust stories in the news of this type however if the rumors were true it would be be that Clive Davis was the ancient head vampire who turned Diddy who turned Usher who turned Bieber and and created this industry of hip-hop people who dressed in all black like vampires and and they came out only at night like vampires the the correlation between that world that movie Underworld and the and the vampire world and what the current hip-hop music industry looks like it's really shockingly similar you know if the rumors are true and again I don't personally have any information that would say Clive Davis did anything illegal or immoral or unethical and you have to watch you have to watch out because there's going to be accusations against people who were not involved in anything but the the indication are that there's some kind of a long-term flipping of people into black male situations and gay sex Etc well I don't know if this is true but because uh Ben Shapiro reposted it um he would do a better job of checking to some to make sure something is true than I would so uh he showed a picture of Hezbollah leadership in like a a graph and it showed that everybody below the top guys already been killed by Israel so I didn't count them but it looked like maybe I don't know 15 or 16 sub commanders under the top guy are all dead now now here's my question if that's true that 100% of the you know the the underlings are dead at the the high the high level underlings there's probably more levels of underlings but if but if the top two levels of underlings below the number one guy are completely gone is it an accident that the top guy is still alive and I'm going to say no I think Israel is keeping the top guy alive intentionally here's why number one if you really really really hated this top guy and you really wanted to punish him and you really just hated him so it's more than War it's personal and I imagine it would be personal if you put me in that situation and I captured that top guy I would torture him before I killed him I can't even pretend I wouldn't like if I lived in Israel and I had to worry about that guy that guy authorizing missiles that are coming at my house every freaking day yeah if I caught him myself I would torture him before I killed them like actually literally no joke so how would I feel if I were in the Israeli IDF or the government same way it would be personal um not as personal for the individual terrorists because maybe they're just brainwashed or whatever but the top guy no that's personal that's personal now if you really really really wanted to torture the top guy what you would do is you would keep him alive so he could see that everything he built and everybody he loves gets killed right in front of him and that's what they're doing now I don't know if they had any you know conscious thought along those lines probably not but you do notice that people tend to do the things that their subconscious really really really wants them to do even if they don't verbalize it but the other possibility is you need to keep the top one to negotiate any kind of a settlement so you wouldn't have anybody to negotiate with if you you know get rid of him and you know you want to get something done quickly so it could be they need to keep him around it could be he's just harder to get but I don't feel like that's what's happening I feel like they could get them when they want and it could be they're showing that they can get every single person but leaving the top one in place is basically a very very clear threat that says in two weeks you're going to be dead unless you stand down because that's what it feels like it feels like they can do it anytime they want and so you need to change because we just took out your whole leadership will he change I doubt it but then they get the secondary fun of making him watch will they destroy everything he loved everything he cared about everything he built and brings nothing but ruin upon his people and he's going to watch it and he's going to know that that was him now he might be such a such a terrorist that he still thinks it's wonderful because they're all going to happen or something but that's what's happening and so ladies and gentlemen uh that is my prepared remarks ran way too late so I'm going to say bye to everybody except locals and I'll just very quickly say hi to them so uh I'll see you tomorrow everybody else on X and Rumble and You.

Tube and locals I'm coming at you e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e

[Music]

oh my goodness what a good day it's

going to

be probably one of the

best yeah we're getting ready for the

show of

shows like you've never seen

[Music]

before good morning everybody and

welcome oh oh hello that's

different let's

see something's looking different

here um let me know if I just stopped

broadcasting on locals because I hit a

button that maybe maybe stopped it but I

think we're good all

right welcome to coffee with Scott Adams

the best time you've ever had in your

whole whole life and if you'd like to

take it up to levels that are even

higher that nobody can even understand

with their tiny shiny human brains all

you need for that is a CPP Mar a glass a

tanker chel sign a canteen Jer flask a

vessel of any kind fill it with your

favorite liquid I like coffee and join

me now for the unparallel pleasure the

dopamine here the day think makes

everything better it's called the

simultaneous Sip and it happens right

now go

the

deliciousness is

Extreme well you already know that uh

coffee can help your cardiovascular

disease cleanse your body remove toxins

from your cells it can be an antioxidant

with fighting inflation and protecting

cells from oxidative

stress but did you know that if you add

milk to your coffee it's a little worse

potentially it might not do as well uh

might not do as well as removing toxins

or something so just think about that

black

coffee it'll get you what you

want that's

right

um I've got a

correction do you like it when I correct

myself because I said something wrong

come on you all like it you like it did

you know because I didn't know it that

the way the Panama Canal works is that

it fills up the locks with water from a

lake how many of you knew

that I always just assumed they had big

pumps and they just pumped the ocean

water into the lock and then released it

back into the ocean but apparently to

get the good economics um Panama has a

Lake that's uh higher than the canal is

so they can just use gravity to take the

water from the lake and very quickly

fill up a lock so if you had to pump it

it would be pretty expensive so when I

said the other day that the Panama Canal

was getting less efficient because of

the water level it may be some

combination of the there's

a bit of a drought that may be affecting

the lake and then other people said no

no it's not the amount of water they

have it's the silt building up in the

locks so it could be one of those anyway

the point is the Panama Canal is not as

efficient as it had

been that's

all um Neuroscience news says there's an

anti-inflammatory drug that might boost

motivation if you're

depressed why would changing something

in your body such as the inflammation

change change how you feel about your

world as in depression or lesson of it

and the answer is as I've told you 1

billion times this is 1 billion in one

your body is your

brain if you want your brain to feel

better you can fix your body because

your body is your brain so if you take

uh if you take the pain away you take

the inflammation away you make your body

work better more efficiently you

exercise it you e right your brain is

going to be a lot better it won't fix

every

problem but fix a lot of them so think

of your body as your

brain well believe it or not as much as

I love talking about indoor vertical

Farms there's a new story about one so

new Atlas has a story about a the world

first indoor vertical Farm that's going

to make just a a whole bunch of

strawberries like more than they've ever

made

before uh the Plenty Richmond farm so

here's what's new new and interesting

about this indoor farming is not

economical compared to outdoor

farming but uh this is one example of

which uh we're moving in the right

direction so there's a bunch of

researcher scientist type people who are

working hard to figure out how to tweak

things so you can grow things indoors

more economically than Outdoors because

you're going to save uh water you're

going to save pesticide you might save

on labor if you do it indoors but you

got to carefully balance the light and

the water and the the uh nutrients and

all that and as uh as they get better

and better at it I really think this is

going to be the

future um I feel like the world is going

to be lots of individual citizens who

have a micro farm so I'm imagining a

city of the future which isn't too dense

where every living space optionally has

you know something about half the size

of your house that's a little indoor

garden and let's say that your job is

only to grow one thing so you're just

the lettuce person and uh maybe somebody

else manages it and you you put it off

to your local

supermarkets

but I think you're going to have to grow

the food where the people are that eat

it I just think there's no way around

that cuz that's the only way you're

going to get nutrients and low economics

good

economics so it's coming speaking of

food Bernie Sanders says he agrees with

Elon Musk on this point and he points

out it's unusual that they would be in

the same side of things although it's it

it isn't

unusual because Elon Musk is Big about

the environment Bernie's big on the

environment so they do actually agree on

some pretty big stuff but

um here's what Sanders

says um he said Elon Musk not is not one

of my usual allies recently tweeted the

solving obesity reduces the risk of

diseases like diabetes and improves

quality of life and sander says he's

right we need to make appetite

Inhibitors available to anyone who wants

them oh that was so close to being a

good thing that you did there Bernie

Sanders now I'm not going to disagree or

agree with the idea that you should make

appetite Inhibitors more available to

people because there's evidence that

it's doing good stuff for some people

and maybe not as good as you hope but

you know it's everything's a mixed bag

but yeah I would think that it'd be good

for people have this option however I

would have been way happier if Sanders

had something said something along the

lines of you know RFK Junior's on the

right path we've got to fix our food

supply and if you fix the food supply

and you learn to

exercise um you're not going to need any

OIC may I make my case by pointing to

myself I I'm exactly the way I wanted to

be at as an adult like exactly right on

right to the pound and I don't do a

zumic all I do is watch my diet don't

eat crap and I exercise on a regular

basis

it it really is that simple now I get

that you know there's not free will so

people you know can't as easily do it as

I can I've got a I have money and I've

got a flexible schedule and you know I

don't have kids telling me to drive them

places when I could be exercising so

it's easier for me but I would like to

make the following suggestion which I've

now made several times but eventually

you're going to see it as genius

it goes like this I Want a President Who

encourages people to get off the

couch and I'd love to start a habit an

American habit because you can do that

you you can actually start a national

habit you just need somebody to get the

ball rolling now if RFK Jr gets the

let's say the influence that I want and

Trump gets the influence that I want

let's say he gets elected I would love

for Trump and RFK Jr and anybody who's

smart and influential to join in to say

you should all take a walk in your own

neighborhood if it's safe uh after

dinner now after dinner can be whatever

you want it to be so it you don't have

to do the same after dinner as anybody

else but wouldn't you like that if

you're done with dinner and by the way

the scientists say that taking a walk

right after you eat is the very best

thing you can do it just changes your

whole digestive

situation um so let's say you're done at

700 p.m. and you walk outside and you

see your neighbors who are also going

for a walk because they were done about

the same time but if you had gone at

6:00 p.m. or 8:00 p.m. there would be a

different set of neighbors who would

also finish that that time and they're

going for a walk and then if you're

brave or if there are at least some

friendly people out there they say hey

neighbor join up and next thing you know

every time you leave your house between

6:00 and 8:30 at night there's a group

of neighbors who are going for a walk

and they'd love it if you just jump in

and you could meet them you could feel

safer because you're in a group now so

you're out doors it might be a little

dark depending what it is and uh you

don't have to go the whole way you don't

have to walk as far as they do just do

what you want to

do so it would be really easy to make

that a habit and you'd be able to meet

your neighbors and you would be far less

caring if you're just taking a walk

whether they're voting for one person

and you're voting for somebody else if

you're just doing a thing you an

activity you're all fine and let me say

it again that the the only way you can

bring anybody together whether it's

making a friend personally or bringing

the country together it's over a shared

activity

if you've got a World War the country is

going to come together if aliens you

know from space attack the country or

the world we're going to come together

right so it's a shared activity that

brings people together and nothing else

like the the intellectual stuff not

really the intellectual stuff just makes

you feel like you might be on somebody's

team but the doing things together that

makes a difference so that's my

suggestion get the government to say at

least take a walk after dinner and be

your neighbors and get some

exercise speaking of positive thoughts

uh I saw huberman um huberman video If

you're not watching all the hubman

videos you should be and he had a guest

on talking about uh how you can just

force yourself to think more positive

thoughts and it have a whole bunch of

health and mental health and other

benefits

and I'm going to amplify that but I'm

going to give you a different model for

it which

is humans don't have the option of not

thinking if we're awake well even if

you're asleep your brain is still active

so you don't have an option to thinking

nothing and if your problem is that

there are too many negative thoughts

that is something you can control so you

can't control whether you have thoughts

but you can definitely control 100% you

can control

the percentage of them that are negative

now I call that shelf space because

that's the idea that is limited there's

there's not unlimited shelf space it's

just the shelf so if your Shelf has 50%

negative and 50% positive well you have

room for improvement you can just force

yourself to think of some more positives

and that automatically reduces the

number of negatives because you only

have so much shelf space if you just jam

it with good thoughts which is what I do

by the way uh you can just squeeze them

out it's one of the most important

mental um hacks you could come up with

if I could give you only one thing to do

differently in your whole life just one

thing it would be this to make sure you

squeeze out the opportunity for negative

thoughts by just forcing in the positive

ones until your shelf space is all taken

that'll fix just about

everything it'll give you energy

optimism people want to be around you uh

you'll take on bigger challenges which

is good for you basically it fixes

everything and that's not too far from

what your best

self-help gurus would tell you you got

to get that mental conversation right

that's the the Tony Robbins you know big

probably the most basic thing he says

that's the most important you got to get

the conversation that's always happening

you can't stop it but you can change it

change it to

positive Sam mman who uh as you know is

the uh big AI

uh boss I guess you'd say so he's the

chat GPT

head and he was asked according to a

post I saw by zarra on X um he was asked

if he done any life had any psychedelic

experiences and he did he said that

earlier in his life so not nothing

recently but uh or at least the

life-changing part wasn't recently he

did psychedelics and he said it changed

him from being an anxious unhappy person

into a very calm person who can work on

hard and important

things I'm going to add to that and say

this you can tell he's done psychedelics

by looking at his eyes

now I know you don't believe that if

you've never been around people who have

done

psychedelics you can tell you you look

at him talking for a minute and a half

and you know that he's experienced a

different reality than you have came

back and Incorporated it into his

worldview you could just tell by looking

at him and and by listening to him and

um the it's important for you to know

how

transformational some of these

experiences are but I'd like to tie this

to a comment I saw from Mar

dreon um big Silicon Valley investor

famous investor and he said uh I'm

paraphrasing but something like the

dirty secret of Silicon Valley is that

high agency people I think that's the

phrase he used uh can use illegal drugs

to Great advantage now again that's just

a

paraphrase to which I say oh my God

which I did say I've wanted to say that

in public my whole life but you can't

because it's

irresponsible if you say to somebody you

know the most successful people I know

did illegal drugs but they were really

smart about it so they didn't do the

wrong illegal drugs they did the ones

that helped them now if you do ones that

help you can they also kill you oh yeah

oh yeah yeah it'll kill you but if

you're one of these high agency High

willpower uh High Intelligence you know

you've really got it going on there are

rare cases and I'm going to say is rare

where people just use the drugs to great

success so for example and again I'm not

recommending any of this just so clear

this is very not

recommended but it's a truth it's just

one of

those hard to process truths that there

are some people who are on you know

Aderall or uppers or speed who figure

out oh my God I'm already in the top 1%

of smart hardworking people if I put

myself in the

0.001% I can make a billion dooll

unicorn company and change the world and

then they do now if they get a lifelong

habit that you know ends up bad that was

a bad decision if they end up making

something that changes the world and

makes billions of dollars and then they

get off it because they were high agency

High willpower they were just doing it

because it

worked well that's a huge win but I

don't recommend it because the odds of

you being in the top

1% and be one of the few people who

could handle literally addiction and

then Shake It Off you're not one of

those let me say that again you're not

one of

those I might be wrong for 1% of you but

you don't know if you're in the 1% you

really don't know but it is true and

then I look at Sam mman with his

psychedelic experience I have

heard maybe more of these stories than

any other type that somebody changed

their life life because of the

Psychedelic experience that was also my

experience early in my 20s and it was

completely life-altering so if you don't

understand how one experience that lasts

a few hours can change

everything it's because you haven't

experienced it but when people say that

they're not joking they are completely

different

forever now could you also do it and

have a terrible experience yeah it was

just a story yesterday about people

doing iasa and just like puking their

guts out and quitting their jobs and

having all the opposite effects so yes

it's high risk so if there's one thing

you hear from this I want you to hear

the highrisk part the part I don't want

you to act on is guessing that you're in

the top 1% and you're the only person

who you know one of the few people you

know who can ever do an illegal drug get

a benefit from it and then get back from

it right don't do it

I'm just saying that some people do

it all right uh chat GPT is coming out

speaking of AI with their new advanced

voice

mode and that's good because the current

model I don't know if this only happens

to me or you when I talk to it it's it

tends to act like a teenager who is

pretending to have a bad cell phone

connection I don't know if you've tried

to use the current chat GPD voice mode

but I'll ask is something like this chat

GPT I have a a mole that appeared on my

arm um let me describe it I'll give you

a picture of it and can you tell me if

this is dangerous and then chat GPT will

say in perfect

English there are two possibilities

number one there's nothing to worry

about whatsoever and I'll think wow and

they'll say but number two possibility

is that

amputation and I said wait wait what

what what did you just say and then it

will say in perfect English it could be

nothing to worry about whatsoever and

I'm like okay okay what was that other

thing you said with amputation

[Music]

and bile like bile I don't even know

what that means what is the bile good is

the bile bad what's it mean Chad gbt and

then it'll

say I'm having trouble connecting now so

that's been my experience with chat GPT

if you really really want to know the

answer it's going to be a teenager or

say oh sorry

Mom can't hear you I should come home no

I can't hear

you anyway so I have big hopes for the

advanced voice

mode I have a

hypothesis that all of those problems I

just described are some of it's just

Wi-Fi you know if you're in the car or

something or losing connection over your

5G but some of it I think might be that

they don't have enough uh computing

power because the amount of computing

power you need is just almost

unfathomable and I can't imagine that

they got right where they wanted already

so I suspect that some of it is just

more Computing is more goodness so all

the by the way all this is going to fix

itself none of this is

permanent so I have a big hopes for this

advanced voice mode I'll let you know

after I try it

out meanwhile uh Google allegedly paid

$2.7 billion dollar to hire a good AI

guy let me say that again Google who

wants to make sure it can stay competive

in this AI stuff and some would say it's

you know maybe not the in the top

tier so to fix that they paid $2.7

billion to hire back a guy who used to

work with them and was one of the

pioneers of inventing the llm AI concept

and he left because Google was a little

too conservative or slow or didn't

didn't want to pursue it as much as he

did so he created another company which

uh was not didn't necessarily look like

his other company called character was

going to ever make money but uh he

cleverly sold the company with an

agreement that he would you know go work

for Google so he

basically sold a company for $2.7

billion do his his part of it was

several hundred

million uh just to do a

job so let me give you this advice

if you ever find yourself in a position

where somebody is willing to pay $2.7

billion just to hire you as an employee

know he didn't get the 2.7 billion but

he got his share of the

company um you should take that yeah I

don't give a lot of career advice but if

somebody offers you $2.7 billion do just

to go to work most of the time I'd say

yes I'd say yes on that that's my

advice well meanwhile the Info Wars saga

continues the judge has ordered uh that

Alex Jones can auction off he has to

actually because infow Wars is being

closed down by the courts to pay the

legal damages for the Sandy Hook

families and uh his entire life work

will be sold off to the highest bidder

and liquidated I saw some people joking

and

saying um you know Elon mus should buy

it I don't think that's going to happen

because I don't know the assets are

exactly but even after he sells off all

his assets correct me if I'm wrong but

doesn't this lawsuit judgment that he's

under mean that every penny he makes for

the rest of his life some of it has to

go to the

lawsuit so haven't they crippled him

economically

forever like he can never come back

because if he makes money he just has to

give it

away sort of the OJ Simpson you know

doomed for life you can never really

make money in this world

again well so when you start looking at

the number of people who were leaning in

the same direction and got cancelled

from Tucker to Alex Jones to Roseanne to

me and you know you can add a bunch of

names to

that would you say it's fair to say that

the media and the Department of Justice

and the Democrats collectively are

crooked

and when you look at the law fair

against Trump and then you look at all

the law fair and you know related things

against other characters doesn't it seem

like the media the Department of Justice

and Democrats are fundamentally

corrupt it does to me I remember

thinking that the justice department was

mostly you know mostly on the up and up

but you know it was probably bad if you

were like a black American especially

earlier in earlier uh years and and I

thought well that's you know something

we need to fix uh you don't want any

discrimination in department of justice

but I wasn't completely aware that the

entire

Enterprise is

corrupt and it appears it is so I would

say the media the Department of Justice

and the Democrats are one big ball of

corruption kind of collectively working

with each

other uh here's a funny thing MSN BC at

a little town hall in which they asked a

few people there there were men about

January 6 now I think MSNBC was hoping

that they would say January 6 a stain on

the American Republic is totally going

to make me turn against Trump and I

would never ever vote for an

insurrectionist like that January 6

thing that's probably what they hoped

for here's what they

got uh you talking about the February 6

thing uh no it's January 6 he goes oh I

don't really feel any way about

it so they asked two young men who

apparently were interested enough in

politics that they'd probably vote and

neither of them had any feelings about

January 6 it was like it didn't

happen now MSNBC has been trying to

brainwash the public like every day for

years that that was the worst thing

that's happened in the Republic you know

it's worse than Pearl Harbor it's worse

than 911 it's he's Trump is going to

steal your

democracy and and the young men remember

I keep telling you that young men are

are the solution in many ways young men

are you know a problem group because we

have a lot of crime and whatnot but

young men are going to fix us because

men know what a Insurrection

looks like let let me let me be clear

anybody who's a man with a little bit of

testosterone we know what a real

Insurrection looks like and nobody was

fooled by that

one so maybe if you're a woman and here

I'm making a huge you know

generalization that doesn't apply to the

people watching the

show but if you're a woman maybe you

don't recogniz it I don't know I'm not a

woman so I can't I can't speculate how

women think but it seems to me that the

the beta males and women on MSNBC just

assumed that the rest of the people

would see things the way they saw it and

that January 6 was this big scary thing

where we almost lost the

country and the men who had some

testosterone in them are sitting there

and

saying you mean the February thing no

the January thing the January 6 you've

heard of it right yeah I didn't have

much feelings about it

[Laughter]

I didn't have much feelings about it is

the exact right

take that is the exact right take there

was nothing about that let me put it a

different way if history had a way to

delete and you could just delete January

6 and just take it out of History how

would the country be worse

off it wouldn't be yeah uh paying no

attention to January 6 was probably the

right play knowing about it didn't help

you a

bit nothing what are you going to do

differently you know maybe you learned

you should have better security if

there's a big crowd of angry people

coming toward you but really did you

have to learn that was that something

you just figured out in January 6 that

if you don't have enough security and

you know for sure a gigantic group of

angry people are coming your way no we

didn't learn anything from it there's

nothing useful about knowing the details

of January 6 I mean unless it helps you

know how corrupt the system is I

suppose but yeah you can just delete

that from your memory banks wouldn't

make a difference

none um Dan banino is uh tantalizing

because he talks about he acts like he

knows maybe a little bit or even a lot

more about one of the assassination

attempts um the second one and he he

says uh has the possibility to be the

scandal of our lifetime

which would suggest more people were

involved in this than just the shooter

the suggestion is that maybe there's an

Insider connection to it uh and that

worse maybe it's internally politically

motivated and it wasn't just a crazy guy

now I don't personally know what that

evidence would be but he does say quote

this story is going to get worse it's

ugly and uh he is very animated

about where that's going now I consider

banino one of the credible people who

doesn't just take a BS story and run

with it because he can get

clicks um you know obviously he's a high

energy presenter he's one of my favorite

people I always use him as an example of

talent Stacks Bonino is like the

ultimate Talent stack guy like he has

just the right experiences and then

things he's developed like his his uh

you know on camera Persona and

everything and even his physicality you

know he he he's just got a whole bunch

of everything from networking to

understanding politics to understanding

the the security

situation presentation language you know

grammar I mean he's got a talent stack

so does Hannity and number of other

people but uh he always stands out to me

is as a person who just

said what do successful people do and

then he just did that really

hard I hate to reduce people to

something so simple but doesn't banino

look like somebody who just woke up you

know at some point in his life and said

all right what do people who succeed do

okay okay all right you're doing all

right what if I just do all that and

then he does all that and then he's

really

successful maybe maybe it's that just

figure out what everybody does and do it

that I would describe my own path to if

you can call this success um that I just

studied all the successful people from

from my earliest age you know from 11

years old if I saw a story about a

successful person I was going to read it

and I would find out what did you do

like why was it luck is it something you

did or the way you operated like I was

always a real student of that and

sometimes you can that in other

people anyway Mike

Flynn um all right so so far we have the

media doj and the Democrats are

crooked um and we've got some suggestion

that the Secret Service is

crooked and uh let's see Mike Flynn is

talking about the fact that the um the

House of Representatives is working on

this uh plan and bipartisan plan

to make sure that the um government is

staffed if there's a major casualty

event in which the representatives who

are elected are all killed or

disabled and uh I I think the idea is

that maybe the governor of their state

would appoint somebody in the short term

something like that but as Mike Flynn

General Flynn points out and uh I would

point out the same thing why did this

suddenly become very important so

important that there's a bipartisan push

you don't get bipartisan unless

something's happening right now you know

what I mean here here's what doesn't

happen there's some general problem that

just sort of always been the problem

throughout history and there's nothing

immediately pressing about it but then

Congress gets together and does a

bipartisan

bill has that ever happened

the the suggestion here is that the

people working on this bipartisan Bill

to deal with what happens when they all

get

killed is because there's a specific

threat and the question that I ask is

are they going to do a state of the

union this

year do do you think you're going to put

all of our uh Congress crors in one room

or even you know even just the senate or

just the

house I feel like they must think

there's some credible threat of

something like a missile blowing up a

building you know if they were worried

about drone attacks you know the best

drone attack would get a few

people um but there they seem to be

worried about something that would take

out a whole building full of Congress

people right because it's not like

they're all going to be all over the

country and then die at the same

time unless it's a pandemic I suppose

maybe it's a pandemic but it does sound

like they know something we don't know

and uh I'd sure like to know what that

is or maybe I

wouldn't well in your weird news that

you did not expect I'll put this at the

top of the list former CDC director

Robert Redfield you remembered him from

the um

pandemic and you probably said to

yourself oh former CDC director he got a

bunch of things wrong he's a bad actor

he's a bad character why do he do so

many bad things I didn't like during the

pandemic and you might know that RFK Jr

um really was a Critic of his and was

kind of savage even in his book he was a

Critic of him and

then this

happened uh according to RFK Jr he says

Robert Redford field Robert Redfield who

I really go after in my fouchy book

wrote an editorial in Newsweek magazine

today saying that he was endorsing

president

Trump because he was because Trump was

going to restore American Health and

that quote a lot of people might be

surprised to hear me say this but he has

chosen exactly the right person who can

do this Robert F Kennedy

Jr and he says this was breathtaking to

me this is the guy who was head of the

CDC who had been criticizing for years

and then separately they had lunch so

Redfield and RFK Jr his biggest

critic and and according to RFK Jr when

he met him you know in person the first

thing the Redfield said to RFK Jr was

you were right about

everything

[Laughter]

wow wow

you were right about

everything and then RFK Jr talks about

how I guess Redfield

agrees vigorously agrees that our uh our

agencies are all captured in other words

they're not operating on your behalf

they're operating on behalf of companies

that have some kind of control over the

directors

so this is just mind-blowing like you

have to know the players to be impressed

by this but most of you do I think

you're in the you know top 5% of people

watch the news if you're watching this

this is

mind-blowing you know it's hard to even

imagine that

somebody this is beyond my imagination

he he's just completely endorsed uh

patriotism to me to me this is

Redfield just becoming a pure Patriot

from whatever he

was I mean I think he probably tried to

do the best job he

could but it looks like he's admitting

the forces were stronger than he was and

uh This is Wild it's just crazy it's not

as crazy as a video I think this is not

new but I just was watching it again uh

Patrick burn you might know him he was

the xcoo of overstock.com and according

to him he was part of an operation to

bribe Hillary Clinton on behalf of the

FBI in

2016 and he successfully had a foreign

company country foreign country bribe

her with I don't know1 18 or20 million

and separately some Turkish entity

bribed her with a similar amount and the

FBI got this all on tape and you know

they got all the evidence and they were

ready they had everything they needed to

put Hillary Clinton in jail in

2016 and then p burn says they told him

to drop the whole thing and forget it

ever happened because they expected her

to win the election in 2016 and then all

the FBI people would be in trouble

because she would have too much power by

then and she could just fire them all

now that's the story they told them

Patrick uh believes the closer real

story is that uh the FBI people were in

the pocket of Obama meaning they were

Obama

within the FBI and that the real play

was not to find any crimes done by a

politician but rather to get

blackmail so that Obama could control

Hillary

Clinton does that sound

real now keep in mind he's not saying I

heard this happen he was in the op he

was like the central person who arranged

the bribe he didn't give the bribe offer

it but he arranged the person to bribe

her to be in the same room and off the

schedule I

guess now do you think do you think that

Patrick burnt would make up that

story does that sound like the kind of

story that somebody would just make

up it doesn't to me yeah you know I'm I

feel like I'm pretty good at spotting BS

this doesn't look like BS now if you

take it

further to what he speculates you know

people are thinking you know maybe then

make get a little uh little more

interesting but he he literally knows

for sure because he was part of the op

that Hillary Clinton took a gigantic

bribe and the FBI was completely aware

of it that part I completely

believe so that would suggest that if

you're keeping score let's see uh the

media the doj and the Democrats would be

all crooked the Secret Service would be

crooked if bino's story is what we think

it is every single entity in the

government should be regulating things

according to Robert Redfield and RFK Jr

are actually working against our

interests not for us and uh the FBI is

completely compromised and owned by

Obama's team if that's

true so how do you feel so far

and of course Mike Ben tells us about

the Deep State and the blob and how are

the CIA may be more partners with the

cartels than

enemies so if you're keeping score that

would be a corrupt uh media Department

of Justice Democrats FBI Secret Service

CIA but I mean that's that's not bad

there's still a lot more a lot more

parts of the country so don't start

feeling like everything's

corrupt uh Michael shenberger has a

article in which he says that Gates

Soros Biden Harris walls Clinton Obama

the Legacy Media the FBI DHS and EU and

Brazil and the five eyes nations are

desperate to censor the internet they're

not hiding it look at them they're

trying to normalize it so Michael

shellenberger talks about how all these

various entities are coordinating to end

your free speech and censor you in ways

that they can get away with without

constitutional

problems so if you're keep keeping

track that would be a

corrupt media Department of Justice

Democrats Secret Service FBI CIA uh CDC

every regulating government uh Gates

Soros Biden Harris walls Clinton Obama

the Legacy Media uh Department of

Homeland Security the European Union

Brazil and five eyes but everything else

is working

perfectly that's the important part I

don't want you to lose hope because

they're the only ones that are corrupt

everything else is kind of going along

fine by the way a lot of people won't

see this um presentation because no

matter what my content is YouTube caps

it at 31,000

views okay so I mean you could add that

one the list

sure sure maybe you've got a little

corruption in

the Department of Justice the Democrats

the CIA the FBI the Secret Service every

every regulating

entity yeah I think you know where this

is going but thank

goodness even if Google and others are

trying to censor me thank goodness I

have free speech on X no I don't

I don't know what's going on with X um

I'm willing to believe it's just the

algorithm is feeding me people who agree

with me but the effect is that I can

yell all day long things that Democrats

don't like they'll never hear them so if

the only speech I have because the the

the algorithm kind of connects me with

people who already agree with me if the

only speech I Have Is to say things that

people agree with that's exactly not

free

speech

right that's the opposite of free speech

free speech is only it's only useful to

say things that people don't want to

hear and disagree with agreeing isn't

anything you know nobody cares about

that so while I do trust Elon Musk to be

you know Pro free speech and and that

he's making the uh platform as close to

that as they can get I feel like even

maybe just

accidentally the algorithm has removed

any useful part of free speech because

the useful part is the disagreeing part

that's the useful part I don't have that

so I don't know why but I don't have

it but I would ask you this following

question because you are smart enough to

deal with a tough philosophical question

I'm not aware of any country that has

ever survived free speech

let me say that again because you're

going to think you misheard it there's

no typo in that I'm not aware of any

country that has ever survived as a

country that also had free

speech now you should be sitting at home

and saying what what the hell are you

talking about you got all of Europe

you've got every Democratic country

you've got the United States you know

maybe you got some problems now but

clearly we've survived a few hundred

years it to me it seems obvious Scott

that the Democratic countries have free

speech and that they absolutely have

survived and thrived and thrived they've

done better than other

countries except nothing like that

really happened in the real

world in the real world at least in my

lifetime our media has always been

controlled meaning that you only saw

things that the CIA and the government

wanted you to see it's just that you

didn't know it you thought you were

seeing the news when you weren't

the thing that's different now is that

we know

it it it's not that Free Speech didn't

go away it was never

here we did not lose Free Speech we

never had it and we found out we never

had it that's what happened right now

there are a million ways that the CIA

and whoever in the Deep State wants to

block your free speech do you think it

will ever be known why I got cancelled

for example just pick one do you think

the real story of that will ever be

known I mean even I don't know do do you

think it makes sense that I got

cancelled worldwide and not a single

person called to ask me what was that

all about or would you like to try an

apology maybe we can save you not one

person thousands of people were invol

were involved directly or indirectly

with my cancellation and not one person

said would you like to revise that or

were you taking in a context you know

maybe you weren't taking in a context

but maybe you'd like to apologize from

it and then we can keep working together

no no so do I have any idea why I was

cancelled well I have

speculation but given that it started

into Washington Post which is the

furthest thing from a free speech entity

which everybody assumes is just part of

the government's organ of control they

started it you think that's a

coincidence nope

nope all

right um so just be aware that Free

Speech probably has always been an

illusion there's definitely more of it

you can have you know there there's

definitely a way to get more of it and

we should be trying to do that but you

have to understand that no country could

survive Free Speech it would be too

chaotic there there has to be something

like a common narrative to keep a

country together and I hate it I hate

that that's true but I've never seen the

alternative all

right um there is a strong hints that

there was a third possible assassination

attempt so axios is reporting that uh

Trump said um they he had been briefed

on efforts by Iran to assassinate him

and that he believes tran tran will

quote try again

now that's a little bit

cryptic because try

again could mean that there's some third

or other attempt outside the two known

assassination attempts but it

also could and this is pure speculation

suggests that the first or maybe even

the second one had some Iranian

involvement so we don't know for sure if

this is really a third attempt or if

it's more information

about one of the first two um but here's

what Trump says about that he said big

threats this in a post big threats on My

Life by Iran the entire US military is

watching and waiting moves were already

made by Iran that didn't work out but

they will try again not a good situation

for anyone I'm surrounded by more men

guns and weapons than I have ever seen

before and they thanked Congress for you

know making all that available funding

wise I feel like he's sending a message

when he's talking about how the the

Weaponry to protect him I I think he's

just trying to scare the next wouldbe

assassin into thinking there's no way

it's going to work because one of the

problems is that the first two

attempts would suggest to the you know

some third future hypothetical attacker

that getting a shot at him wouldn't be

that

hard so it's very important for Trump to

persuade and say um things have changed

and while it might have been a little

too easy to get a shot at me you're dead

if you try it now now is he right well I

hope so I hope that he's his defenses

are beefed up enough that anybody would

be uh be

dead so we hope

so

um then uh also from axios they talked

about Iran's multi-pronged approach

meaning that Iran is trying to hurt the

United States with as many different you

know ways to Pocus as they can in

different

domains um and there was a summer Cyber

attack apparently and there was

uh anyway um I don't know how they're

going

to Iran's going to beat us at this game

but they're

trying um Trump had some interesting

things to say he was talking about uh

how if we uh if we use our energy assets

properly in other words we exploit our

own energy resources and we make energy

you know just our sort of our biggest

thing in America that uh it will be a

renaissance it will be a golden period

he said I wish he'd said golden age but

golden period is close

enough um you know I've said that maybe

his first term will seem like a golden

age to us

you know in retrospect but I do feel

like maybe the

pandemic could have postponed the Golden

Age now as you know I don't believe we

can have a golden age or even survive

unless we figure out what to do about

national debt but the way the way Trump

talks about it um he makes it very clear

that he understands not just recently

but for a while now he makes it really

clear that he understands

I'm seeing in the comments people

suggesting that if Iran is trying to

call kill Trump that Iran has some kind

of Obama

connection do you buy

that I know that people think Obama was

too friendly to aan but do you think he

could possibly be involved in an

assassination

attempt I think that would be too

dangerous so my guess is

no even if he wanted to I can't imagine

that seems like too big a risk um anyway

so John's talking about the Golden Age

and here's my take on

that energy has always been the number

one thing that drove an

economy so at least in our Modern Age

whoever had the most energy did the best

now it doesn't mean they did the best in

terms of you know colonizing or

Conquering the world because not

everybody was doing that but Saudi

Arabia lot of energy doing great uh

other countries in the Middle East they

had a lot of energy doing great uh

Russia is only surviving because their

energy stuff China's biggest need energy

so they're building tons of plants now

that was

before Bitcoin and

before um

AI if you add AI to what the

civilization is going to need we are

talking about 10 times more energy

needed 10

times we're not even close so there's

going to be an energy boom of all energy

booms so not only if you had enough

energy could you make more Bitcoins you

if you had your own nuclear power plant

you could you know maybe pump out some

Bitcoins you need a data center

too but uh given the uh massive massive

amount of energy that were we're going

to need in the pretty near future I'm

going to take the following stand that

uh energy equals success energy equals

dollars energy equals

defense energy equals

survival energy is the whole play one of

the things I you know I continuously

appreciate about uh Trump is he can take

a complicated situation and boil it down

to something that the public can

understand and then approve of him

acting on so that's what the wall was

when he would say the wall his critics

would say you simpleton that's such a

small part of the bigger question and it

was but if he could get you excited

about the wall he was at least getting

you in the right domain of of worrying

about the things that are most important

so

directionally that's what Trump does

best he's directionally correct pretty

much all the time and I would say he is

he is more than directionally correct on

energy that if we said to ourselves all

right America energy equals money if we

get our energy cost down all of your

products will be less expensive if we

get our Energy prices down we'll have

the greatest robotic Revolution ever if

we get our energy you know plentiful and

also down biggest Ai and we'll rule the

world with AI before other people can

get there it's down to one variable

people it's one variable two if you

count the Border there are two things we

have to get right make sure that we

don't have too much uh uncontrolled

immigration because there's some level

that destroys the country no doubt about

it and we're getting close to it and you

have to say that energy is your economy

everything else has to happen too but

energy equals

economy wall equals

immigration energy is economy energy if

you have enough you have a you have a

chance of paying down your national debt

Trump says that directly he says we have

trillions of dollars in the ground you

know enough to pay off the national debt

now you don't pay off the debt because

the government doesn't own the oil but

economic activity can boost your GDP and

it can get you to the point where the

government has enough income to pay the

debt

now I do not believe that Trump will

succeed in most of his plans about

lowering taxes because it would have too

much impact on the deficit I do think I

love his idea of having an ambassador to

bring back uh manufacturing to the

United States now that's not unlike what

Biden was trying to do Biden has had

success in you know repatriating

manufacturing we could do a lot more so

I'm not going to I'm not going to give

Biden's Administration a hard time on

that I think they were directionally

right I think that Trump might go harder

and he said you know he'd get an

ambassador if you get the right person

it makes a big difference and secondly

he wanted to have it sounded like maybe

some lower taxes for manufacturing that

would come back to the us because we

would have to deal with the fact that

our labor is more

expensive so maybe he can cut

regulations which would lower prices if

you do it right maybe he can lower the

cost of energy which would make it

cheaper to manufacture here

maybe the fact that uh moving things

internationally is getting harder

because of the hoties and everything

else that if you get rid of the

transportation costs the costs come down

again uh you make a lot of jobs with all

this

stuff so he's talking about lower

corporate taxes um for I think

specifically for people who bring

manufacturing back now what does Trump

understand that I always say Democrats

never get

right human

motivation I would say Republicans

consistently get right the human

motivation part maybe not every time but

far more consistently so if you say uh

everybody come back and manufactur in

the US they say why and Trump says how

about I lower your taxes and make energy

less expensive and you know give you

some government land to build your

factory and I'll get rid of some

regulations then suddenly you go oh I

those are good incentives I actually

would look into that pretty seriously so

yes I think Trump uh is maybe won't get

all of his tax reductions that he

wants um but man what a what a crowd

pleaser the no tax on tips is and what a

crowd pleaser no tax on overtime

is uh I like both of those things

because if you've somebody who's so

valuable that their company wants them

to work twice as

much I I think that deserves a reward

more than just

overtime you know if we could get our

top I don't know 10% of employees and

and entrepreneurs to to do even more

that's going to be better than making

the other 99% you know a little bit

better if you if you can make the real

go-getters really go get a little more

that's way bigger lever than helping

everybody to be 5%

better in in the long run everybody gets

more that

way all right uh also uh Sam Alman said

that we might get AI super intelligent

in a few thousand

days and that uh it could lead to

massive

Prosperity now massive disruption but I

don't disagree with massive Prosperity

do you know what you would need to pay

off the national debt you would need

massive

Prosperity which would require massive

energy for the AI so Trump is the one I

would trust to give us massive energy

the other thing you'd have to do is find

out how to cut expenses in the

government there's only one candidate

who's offering a reasonable plan to do

that it's called Trump and Elon Musk as

the person to help red designed

government to make it cheaper that's a

real plan right if you gave me almost

any other name and said oh this other

person will help reinvent government and

make it cheaper do you know what I would

have said about that and no they won't

maybe at the margins but you know

nothing nothing we'll look back at in 20

years and be impressed by

it but you tell me that Elon Musk has

volunteered and he's enthusiastic about

Reinventing the government to lower

expenses without losing function and I

say okay it's go time that's go time

because I can't think of any harder

worse less thankful job than that and

when you have your most capable

entrepreneur richest man in the world

who just stood stood up and said

basically he's going to risk his life to

get it done because that's the only way

he plays the only way he plays is for

Keeps you need that so let let me put it

all together economy is energy

energy is Trump if you tell me that

Harris is the energy person well you're

not paying attention no energy is Trump

energy is

economy energy is the

ai ai is the

productivity and the only other thing

you got to get right is cutting the

government expenses and there's only one

person with a real plan to do that and

it's

Trump it's not close

people so what happened when you have

one who is just obviously the right one

on all the big stuff and one who's

obviously wrong well you get 400

economists who back

Harris what do you know about economists

let's see they went to a good

school what what do you know about

people who went to college they've been

brainwashed yeah so unfortunately you

know I was joking that no Economist had

backed um Harris on her

uh price

gaps and maybe that's still true but she

still somehow got 400 in the bag

Economist to ignore their entire

professional fiduciary responsibility to

back her because she's a Democrat

too so that happened yeah it's funny if

you were a casual viewer of news and you

saw that 400 Economist backed Harris you

would think that was real wouldn't

you well here's what I think now that we

know we have corruption in let's see the

Department of Justice the Democrats the

media the Secret Service the FBI the CIA

every one of our um regulatory

bodies well I think you go you see where

I'm going with

this anyway according to the hill there

are 22 States uh the Democrat states of

course that want to employ a million

people in climate apprenticeships by

2035 is that because these Democrats

have realized that we need to train the

young people in the vital sciences that

are important to the future of the

world no this is a brainwashing

operation if you can get a million young

people to believe in climate change and

it's the most important thing you've

created a million

brainwashed Democrat voters who will try

to convince other people that dumb old

Trump is going to destroy the world

unless lots of democrat vendors get

money for things that won't work

out so that looks corrupt to me just an

assumption I don't have proof but it

looks like it's just a brainwashing

operation um I saw that asian-americans

saw in the news are uh very strongly in

favor of

Harris now you might say to yourself s

wait a minute are asian-americans the

one who couldn't get into college

because of democrat policies about Dei

yes wait a minute are

asian-americans still hired in

corporations as much as they used to or

is Dei working against them well I don't

know actually I don't know about

corporations I don't know if if you're

Asian-American if is that a plus or a

minus for getting a corporate job does

it count does that count as diversity if

you're

Asian-American I feel like as soon as

you're successful you get removed from

the list of whether a counts and

asian-americans are super successful in

the United States so here's what I think

I think that the reason asian-americans

for Harris has to do with the fact that

they're a highly educated part of the

public and I'm going to throw out a

stereotype and you're allowed to

criticize me but just remember no

stereotype applies to all people in any

group can we agree there's no stereotype

that applies to all the people in the

group yet there are some things that are

true right white people like to eat

cheese it's just true we like cheese

it's not good or bad we just like

cheese um I would say that part of what

makes asian-americans so successful is

not only that they have higher education

levels but that they're also also better

is staying out of

trouble just staying out of trouble and

the trouble in one in one sense is legal

trouble and asian-americans are do a

great job of staying out of jail but

they also stay out of I think fights

that aren't going to benefit them like

there there's just more so here here's

my stereotype and again it doesn't apply

to all the people in The Stereotype but

asian-americans just seem to run their

lives

smartly can we all accept that if if you

you show me just randomly just throw a

throw a dart well not a dart you don't

want to hurt anybody but just randomly

pick an Asian-American you know and say

all right what's your plan for success

and what are you doing well I'm not

doing any drugs I'm staying in a jail

and I've got a plan to be a optometrist

and my grades are good and I look at

that and go oh well that's pretty

sensible and it's not dangerous it's not

dangerous you're staying in a danger and

you're pursuing

success if you show me a bunch of people

who want to stay out of trouble I'll

show you a bunch of people who are not

going to admit that they vote for Trump

am I right staying out of trouble

includes not saying something so

provocative that your career or your

family life were impacted for no

benefit right because remember what I'm

saying about the Asian-American

Community again a stereotype doesn't

apply does not apply to all people who

are in it is that as a group they seem

insanely

well um

strategized and it's sort of a bad

strategy to be a trump supporter if you

know somebody will not hire you because

of it if you know somebody won't date

you because of it if you know it's going

to be a fight at work why do it so does

it surprise you that a highly educated

and I I'm going to when I say risk

averse um some in some context that

sounds bad because you know like an

entrepreneur wants to take some risk but

in your everyday life you should be risk

averse yeah you should not be thinking I

think I could get away with that crime

no no in your everyday life you should

be risk averse except for embarrassment

you know but but the the Trump stuff

would be more than embarrassment it' be

you don't get the job you literally

don't get hired I mean that's that's a

big

price for just having an

opinion so it makes sense to me that

asian-americans are uh with the

mainstream opinion at least when they're

ped and that they would have been

influenced in college like most people

are to be more left

leaning um

um but according to the account on X

called George because somebody named

George runs this account now he is black

which if it matters to you in the

context of the story but uh he's a great

follow so if you I've said that before

so just look for George that's just the

name of the account um and for somehow

he has just great Scoops and he gets

them early and they all seem to be true

so a good good follow on

X um but he says uh he points to a video

in which uh Sage Steel who you should

know is also black and but she's more

she's more of a prump person uh I think

she's prump I think that's true right

Sage Steel has she endorsed him or is

she just not endorsing Harris I can't

remember sometimes just being not

endorsing anybody feels the same is

endorsing Trump so I don't know how far

she's gone so I don't want to

characterize her opinion there because I

don't know but here's the

story she said

uh um that black people are coming up to

her maybe they just recognize her and

they come up to her and they say they're

terrified of the future if Harris gets

elected why would black Americans be

terrified of the future with Harris

well what would make you

terrified um and she said uh you know a

bunch of black people are coming up and

saying that and I don't

know what is it because of

immigration I feel like the the the vibe

I've been getting is that black America

thinks that if so much money had not

been spent on migrants it would be

available to spend on black Americans

for everything from reparations to you

know better schools and all that do you

think that's

true I you know I would love there to be

a true narrative in which more people

would prefer Trump I'm not so sure it's

true that that money is liquid and

fungible and you could just use it for

something else if you don't use it for

migrants because remember the money

we're spending on migrants we literally

don't have

we're not SP we're not spending money we

have we're spending money we don't have

and we always could have spent that you

know more of the money we don't have by

borrowing it we could have always spent

that in Black America but apparently we

had figured out whatever level worked

and we were at that

level I don't believe it's

true that the more money you give to the

migrant Community the less is available

for black

Americans I think they just borrowed

more than they would

have so um but it feels that way doesn't

it imagine if you were in the in inner

city and you saw that the Venezuelans

were getting checks from the government

and like free rent and stuff for a while

and you

weren't you would definitely feel like

the guy standing next to you who got a

big check from the government because

he's Venezuelan and you got nothing and

you've been living here all your life

it would be quite normal to think that

that could go to me if it didn't go to

you I don't think it's true I think the

decision of what you get is just a

separate decision it's not like they

took your money but it's going to feel

like it oh my goodness it's going to

feel like it yeah well I don't know if

it's Envy Envy might be the it doesn't

feel like the right word but I get I see

where you're getting at it would be uh

yeah Envy isn't quite the right word but

but it's in the right domain so I see

why you're saying

that anyway

um we'll see uh see what happens there I

think there's going to be a lot more

support for Trump especially among black

male Americans that we've ever seen

before uh people mock me for saying that

all data about important stuff is

unreliable some sometimes they say it's

not credible sometimes times I say it's

fake but how many of you have a reaction

to that like well that's not

true all data about everything important

is

fake does your bodies just rebel against

that and say no it's

not obviously Scott there is real data

in the

world is

there are you sure are you sure there's

real data in the world about important

things now there's definitely real data

about unimportant

things but about important things do you

think there's real

data would you would you die in that

Hill that there's real data in the

world all right let's look at an

example um what about uh crime in the

United States did crime in the United

States under Obama uh under Biden did it

go up or is it now

down that's pretty easy right we collect

all this crime

data so give me the answer is is crime

up or

down because data is real right for

those of you who think data is real and

you can do your own research and find

out what the truth is say up or down

well today I saw

um I saw two movies on one screen so uh

I won't name names but a uh a popular

person on X U showed some data showing

that uh two cities were missing from the

crime data and that's why it looks like

it's low but that's fake that's the

story you've heard right have you all

heard the story that the crime data from

the FBI I guess left out Los Angeles and

St

Louis and then I looked at it and sure

enough it wasn't there and then somebody

else said oh this image is cropped if

you don't crop the image it is

there so which reality were you in were

you in the reality where that

information was left off which would

have been

ridiculous or are you in the reality

where somebody cropped a data page so it

looked like it was left off but of

course it was there so which reality are

you in oh oh but the data is real right

the data is real and you can do your own

research and find out the truth

yeah you could find out more than you

knew but you all you're going to do is

get to the next level of something that

might also be

fake so you might learn a new thing but

the new thing you don't know if that's

real because you'd have to research that

thing and then you'd have to research

the thing that said that thing was real

you'd have to know all the players to

know that the person who said it could

be credible and not somebody's in the

bag for one side or the other no there's

no there's no data that's real able

there is data that you can convince

yourself is right oh that exists and I

convince myself data is right all the

time because we're built we're built so

we have to accept some reality so we we

end up you know uh clicking to what do

they call it snap to grid if we get

nearer reality we like to snap to it all

right all right that's my reality now

I'll think about something

else no all data is fake how about uh if

you don't believe that about the crime

how about the data on the

economy is the economy better under

Biden or was it better under

Trump I don't

know because I don't believe any reports

about this if you if you assume that the

pandemic you know was sort of in between

the two administrations it just means

that any data comparing them would be

ridiculous so even if the data is

correct on the economy we don't know how

to analyze

so you got one case where the data might

be correct but half of the country is is

seeing a cropped view of it so they have

a whole different opposite of view so

that's useless the econ economic

information even if it were accurate

which I

doubt you still wouldn't know how to

analyze it because the country doesn't

know how to analyze somebody who had a

pandemic at the end of his M

Administration to somebody who had a

pandemic at the beginning of their

Administration nobody knows how to do

that like there might be a few experts

who could do it but you don't know how

to do

it how about uh the the

Border Democrats believe they've looked

at the border and uh immigration is at a

low um illegal immigration and

Republicans think it's at an all-time

high the truth probably has something to

do with the fact that uh We've we've

turned not we the the Administration has

turned illegal immigration into legal

immigration by putting them through the

Asylum door so technically they're all

legal they're just not citizens they're

legal they came under Asylum but they

lied about the Asylum but since that's

not proven in any kind of Court they're

innocent till proven guilty so it's not

really illegal unless it's proven

illegal and you can't read somebody's

mind to know that they they really

didn't have you know they were really

not motivated by Asylum and getting away

from trouble we have no way to

know so I would say that our information

on the economy and the Border or Garbage

crime we can't figure out what's going

on there climate of course is just a big

old mess you know we're going to argue

about whether climate can be even

measured or predicted of course it can't

and of course you've seen that numbers

on

inflation um Harris says says it's down

Trump says it's up but we're looking at

different stuff one is looking at the

base the other is looking at the rate of

increase

now those are the biggest

things now even even when you come to

something like uh abortion where you

think well abortion is not about data at

all is it there's no data argument about

abortion it's just is it you know is it

a life is it not is it right is it wrong

is bodily autonomy more important than

what some would say is a life though we

pretend that that matters but it's

actually a data question and we don't

agree on the data here's why if I told

you you know the Democrats do say that

they would allow abortion under for any

reason at any age you know even up the

ninth

month but suppose you

knew that it never happened

I'm not saying that's the truth this is

hypothetical suppose you knew that

nobody had ever aborted a baby at 9

months for just not wanting a baby they

had done it maybe plenty of times when

uh the mother actually thought they

would die and the baby wasn't viable or

you know special

cases but it's a data argument you you

wouldn't even care about the law if you

knew that there was no case where

anybody would abuse that

law right it would change the argument

quite a bit so even the things that you

think have nothing to do with data are

data arguments and we when the data is

useless because we don't agree on

it uh but at least science is reliable

thank God thank God we got science let's

see in recent number the number of

retractions of scientific papers has

risen sharply oh that's not good uh for

example in

2023 more than 10,000 research papers

were retracted

globally

10,000

10,000 scientific

papers were with

withdrawn how many do you think were

fake that were not

withdrawn more than

10,000 these are just the ones that got

caught just hold that in your

mind it's only the ones who got caught

10,000 of

them since uh how many was it in 2013 so

a little more than 10 years ago it was

only 1,500 that

year only

1,500 and in 2023 it was 10,000 this

year probably

more over the entire time in the past

decade how many scientific papers have

been retracted

39,000

39,000 scientific research papers were

retracted and again it's very important

point they're only the ones who got

caught you you tell me what is the real

number of fake or inaccurate scientific

papers if 39,000 of them got

caught and it's hard to

catch

100,000 I don't know but but I'd say

100,000 wouldn't be a crazy guess a

100,000 so it's a good thing that

science is accurate right now for the

NPCs i' like to take a moment to talk to

the

NPCs camera

two

NPCs uh NPCs

uh nothing I said was relevant to the

scientific

process the

scientific

process might be the best we

have I didn't say we should discontinue

the scientific

method I did not criticize the

scientific

method I simply said that 39,000 people

got the wrong answer for one reason or

another so you can't trust the output or

automatically but

still science and the scientific method

might be the best we have so if you're

dying to come into the comments to say

Scott Scott if you don't believe in

science how are you going to know what's

true so you can come in like a drunken

NPC and act like you didn't hear the

point and that is my

point that even if you get the right

information in front of people we'll

find a way to misinterpret it

guaranteed and then 400 economists

backing KL Harris that means that there

are probably you know X number of

economists who are backing Trump what is

the point of being an expert on

economics if you can't tell the

difference between their two plans and

what would be better for the economy our

Economist opinions any good no not if

they're on different

sides yeah the the one time that

Economist opinions worked are when there

were no economists who said that price

controls were a good

idea then then it worked that's a rare

case but when you're looking at like a

complex set of variables that Harris

would do versus the complex set of

variables that Trump would

do the the the economists end up

disagreeing and oh surprise they end up

agreeing with their political party that

they're already registered for so what

good was the

economics if all you're going to do is

agree with your party after you did your

economic

analysis did you add anything no you

didn't Jamie Diamond who I believe is a

lifelong Democrat and our most important

Banker the biggest of the

bankers um he loves Elan mus idea of

making the government more efficient and

cutting out the waste

you said that on a recent idea he also

said I think it was the same interview

that uh countries have to have strong

borders huh lifelong

Democrat seems to be in favor of

something that only Trump is going to do

for reducing

costs seems to be in favor of a trump

version of border

security say it say it

Jamie say it you know you want to you

know you want to oh you're so close Elon

mus said

it Bill Amman said

it Mr Wonderful said

it uh the all-in Pod guys some of them

said it it's safe you can come out Jamie

you can come out come on you can do it

we're waiting for you we love you we

love you Jamie come on come on come on

you're so

close meanwhile manufacturing is slumped

to a 15mon low as inflation goes

up um so the the urgency to pick a

president who is the best on

manufacturing is good um I'm still

thinking that

the real way to be a manufacturing

Powerhouse is with robots and we're not

quite quite there but very very close to

the point where we can build an entire

um probably build uh something in

America that uses a robot and 3D

printing and doesn't have to ship as far

because it's

locally um we we may be at the point

where Manufacturing in the United States

because you get rid of the get rid of

the most of the labor

uh could

work we're almost

there well according to the New York

Post early mailin voting in three of the

Swing States shows a huge uh let's say

closing the Gap by Trump because it used

to be that the Democrats by a huge

margin were voting by mail and uh so the

idea is that now that there are more

Republicans relatively still less still

fewer people voting who are Republican

voting by mail but the Gap has closed

quite a bit in the early voting I'm not

sure that tells you

anything are you with me on that I don't

think that's an indicator you know you

want to hear it as an indicator that

it's good for

Trump I don't know that the indicator

tells you one thing or another because

don't you believe that the mailin is

about the

cheating know you and the cheating

doesn't have to come early that that

could come later so I don't think that's

telling you anything I wouldn't get

comfortable because of

that well meanwhile Diddy's former

bodyguard says we're going to find out a

whole bunch of stuff about his freak off

parties and there going to be famous

people involved and that uh did he uh I

think a lot of people not the not just

The Bodyguard but uh people have come to

believe that Diddy is part of a massive

you know

blackmail operation much like

Epstein so let's

say if you're keeping

track the entities that are corrupt

are the media the Department of Justice

the Democrats we got the FBI the Secret

Service the CIA the Department of

Homeland Security the

CDC corrupt every government regulatory

body corrupt 400 econom IST corrupt and

uh music the music industry and

entertainment is basically a raping

situation raping and

blackmail child sex raping and blackmail

is your musical things now I would like

to put an image in your mind that's

going to make some of you

laugh have you ever see the movie uh

underworld with Kate Beck andol playing

a

vampire and uh there's this underworld

between the vampires who were real and

the werewolves the

lyans and you saw the the head of the

vampires is this you know uh very

ancient old wrinkled white

guy and he's kind of he kind of has a

Vibe about him but as it turns out that

the top vampire you know turned the

other Vampires by biting them and

turning them into vampires and then

those vampires bit other

vampires and then they became

vampires now think of the music industry

and think of Clive Davis as the top

vampire now I don't personally have any

accusations against Clive Davis or

anybody else because I don't know I

wasn't there and and I don't

trust stories in the news of this

type however if the rumors were true it

would be be that Clive Davis was the

ancient head vampire who turned Diddy

who turned

Usher who turned

Bieber and and created this industry of

hip-hop people who dressed in all

black like

vampires and and they came out only at

night like

vampires the the correlation between

that world that movie Underworld and the

and the vampire world and what the

current hip-hop music industry looks

like it's really shockingly

similar you know if the rumors are true

and again I don't personally have any

information that would say Clive Davis

did anything illegal or immoral or

unethical and you have to watch you have

to watch out because there's going to be

accusations against people who were not

involved in anything but the the

indication are that there's some kind of

a

long-term flipping of people into black

male situations and gay sex

Etc well I don't know if this is true

but because uh Ben Shapiro reposted it

um he would do a better job of checking

to some to make sure something is true

than I would so uh he showed a picture

of Hezbollah leadership in like a a

graph and it showed that everybody below

the top guys already been killed by

Israel so I didn't count them but it

looked like maybe I don't know 15 or 16

sub commanders under the top guy are all

dead now now here's my

question if that's true that 100% of the

you know the the underlings are dead at

the the high the high level underlings

there's probably more levels of

underlings but if but if the top two

levels of underlings below the number

one guy are completely

gone is it an accident that the top guy

is still

alive and I'm going to say

no I think Israel is keeping the top guy

alive

intentionally here's why number

one if you really really really hated

this top guy and you really wanted to

punish him and you really just hated him

so it's more than War it's personal and

I imagine it would be personal if you

put me in that situation and I captured

that top guy I would torture him before

I killed

him I can't even pretend I wouldn't like

if I lived in Israel and I had to worry

about that guy that guy authorizing

missiles that are coming at my house

every freaking day yeah if I caught him

myself I would torture him before I

killed them like actually literally no

joke so how would I feel if I were in

the Israeli IDF or the government same

way it would be

personal um not as personal for the

individual terrorists because maybe

they're just brainwashed or whatever but

the top guy no that's personal that's

personal now if you really really really

wanted to torture the top guy

what you would do is you would keep him

alive so he could see that everything he

built and everybody he loves gets killed

right in front of

him and that's what they're

doing now I don't know if they had any

you know conscious thought along those

lines probably

not but you do notice that people tend

to do the things that their subconscious

really really really wants them to do

even if they don't verbalize it but the

other possibility is you need to keep

the top one to negotiate any kind of a

settlement so you wouldn't have anybody

to negotiate with if you you know get

rid of him and you know you want to get

something done quickly so it could be

they need to keep him around it could be

he's just harder to get but I don't feel

like that's what's happening I feel like

they could get them when they want and

it could be they're showing that they

can get every single person but leaving

the top one in place is basically a very

very clear threat that says in two weeks

you're going to be dead unless you stand

down because that's what it feels like

it feels like they can do it anytime

they want and so you need to change

because we just took out your whole

leadership will he change I doubt it but

then they get the secondary fun of

making him watch will they destroy

everything he loved everything he cared

about everything he built and brings

nothing but ruin upon his people and

he's going to watch it and he's going to

know that that was him now he might be

such

a such a terrorist that he still thinks

it's wonderful because they're all going

to happen or something

but that's what's happening and so

ladies and gentlemen uh that is my

prepared

remarks ran way too late so I'm going to

say bye to everybody except locals and

I'll just very quickly say hi to them so

uh I'll see you tomorrow everybody else

on X and Rumble and YouTube and locals

I'm coming at

you

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e e