Episode 2702 CWSA 12/27/24
Let's talk about foreign workers and The Trump Effect ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Stocks are down a little bit, but nobody really cares about the day before the weekend of Christmas week. That doesn't even count. Let's find my comments. Make sure these are working. Perfect. Everything's going my way today. Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilizati…
View segment →r time. But if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that no one can even comprehend with their tiny shiny human brains, all you need is a cup or mug or a glass or a tanker or a chalice or a canteen or a jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee…
View segment →study that says that coffee is good for your health. Checking notes. Oh yeah, there is. There's a new study. It says that coffee consumption can improve the gut bacteria and reduces your cancer risk. It strengthens your immune system and reduces your inflammation, according to Nutrition Insight. And…
View segment →t calendar yet, you could probably still get it around the first week of January, which is almost just as good. I guess I should tell you this. It wouldn't be fair not to tell you this. I just realized probably at some point in January, if not before, the annual Dilbert calendar, the little page-a-d…
View segment →eir DEI group. But then I also check the one that was 10 years ago, because I put that on a digital calendar which has nothing to do with the paper calendar. And today is one of those days where both the 10-year-ago comic and the one I wrote for today are really funny. Sometimes I'll look at the two…
View segment →you turn off the sound and you just look at her, she looks really high. Yeah, if she's not drunk or totally intoxicated in that video, I don't know how you'd explain her face. You know, I can't even do an impression of it. It's something you would have to be on drugs to even make that face. I've nev…
View segment →. So felony theft charges have surged by 154% just this month after O'Neal Burke took over. So here's my question. I, of course, am completely in favor of improving the laws and the enforcement in the big cities, right, because it's a problem everywhere. So I'm totally in favor of this. But there i…
View segment →se you mentioned. So you didn't like some of his policies, and I get that. I would just note that if you're trying to figure out who's the bad guy in this situation, Cat Turd lied about me in public. Cat Turd went after my reputation with lies, or maybe just wrong. I can't tell if he was just stupid…
View segment →ld you that there was somebody who got fired for criticizing Black Lives Matter, critical race theory, and COVID, aren't you thinking to yourself, sounds like some basic white conservative here? Here's what we know about this Filipina American doctor. So first of all, Filipina. Second of all, she ha…
View segment →cess depended on people thinking I could do that and I could do more, I probably would exaggerate my success early and I'd tell everybody, ah, it's working, it's working like crazy, it's so fast, I'll do more of it. So on one hand I don't mind. I mean it seems a functional bit of marketing if you sa…
View segment →chief who was hiding the most vital information from the commander in chief? Now I don't think it's illegal, but you should never work in that job again. Anybody who's hiding the most important information from the president while working for the president, it's got to be fired right away. I mean th…
View segment →told him he was going to win. It literally predicted the future. So yes, there will be other ways to do that too. I believe that AI will use pattern recognition to predict the future for individuals. But it won't be able to do that until it knows enough about those individuals, which I don't know ho…
View segment →about the topic. My old view, my old view prior to Biden, and it's now changed because of Biden, but my old view is that you want to keep everybody smart. So if somebody wants to come in and they've got a high education in some valuable field or even if they just want to be an optometrist or make mo…
View segment →vor of them not having these programs that let them game the system to bring in cheap labor. So can we all agree on the following statement of assumptions? Our current systems are wholly inadequate to getting what you want as a citizen of the United States. They do seem to work in the favor of quit…
View segment →jects I was doing and it's a nightmare if you're not Google and Apple and you want to get somebody who can do a good job. So you find somebody in India who says oh yeah just tell us what you want, we'll give you a price, we'll assign some programmers and we'll write that code for you. Absolutely non…
View segment →r neighbor. We like the neighbor. So I would just say this. I just wish they, I kind of hope they do it. I hope they take their strongest play to try to keep them out of office. They will fail. But this is the ultimate you know F around and find out situation. I'd really love them to find out. Not w…
View segment →. If this new leap, let's see it's according to Mark Maynard in the Pasadena Star News, the new breakthrough just uses a new kind of material and it uses 10 times less anode material which is a big deal and might cut the cost someday of the battery by a huge amount. Did you know that the cost of the…
View segment →they're operating from or who's in charge. So in those cases a decapitation strike's no good. The one time it's good is if you happen to have massive digital footprints everywhere so you can find stuff and the entity has not created a structure that can go on easily without the leaders. In other wor…
View segment →y become rational because Trump's going into office? They're clearly not. They're not afraid of dying and the captives give them a little bit of leverage. So why would they? I can't see any reason that they would do it now. I think that they'll keep the hostages and then when Trump comes in he's goi…
View segment →ut she seems to be well adjusted and healthy. She's perfectly healthy and she's also quite ethical. She discloses it. I wish the best for her. I don't mean to be mean but she's having fun with it I think. Yeah there's at least some part of it that she probably thinks is fun. So in that spirit I only…
View segment →Stocks are down a little bit, but nobody really cares about the day before the weekend of Christmas week. That doesn't even count. Let's find my comments. Make sure these are working. Perfect. Everything's going my way today.
Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and I'll bet you've never had a better time. But if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that no one can even comprehend with their tiny shiny human brains, all you need is a cup or mug or a glass or a tanker or a chalice or a canteen or a jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip. Oh, so good.
Well, I wonder if I'll have a new study that says that coffee is good for your health. Checking notes. Oh yeah, there is. There's a new study. It says that coffee consumption can improve the gut bacteria and reduces your cancer risk. It strengthens your immune system and reduces your inflammation, according to Nutrition Insight. And you know this, of course. I'm a professional humorist, so suddenly I'm wondering about, you know, I'm not a Biblical scholar, so there's some things I don't know about. But I wonder if back in Jesus's time, do you think he ever just said, well, I think I can cure your leprosy. Boom. And he'd use his heavenly powers. But what if somebody had a smaller problem? They're like, hey, I've got this little inflammation in my back. Did Jesus also use his heavenly powers, or did he say, let's just have a coffee? Why don't you come have a coffee with me? You'll be fine. That's just something I wonder as a professional writer.
All right, so if you haven't bought your Dilbert calendar yet, you could probably still get it around the first week of January, which is almost just as good. I guess I should tell you this. It wouldn't be fair not to tell you this. I just realized probably at some point in January, if not before, the annual Dilbert calendar, the little page-a-day calendar that you can only buy on Dilbert.com, by the way. There's no other source. Go to Dilbert.com and see the link. But if you were to get it sometime in January, it's probably going to be 10% cheaper. So we haven't lowered the price because it's just a technical question about just how long that takes or if that's easy or hard. But probably soon, if you want to wait till next week, probably 10% cheaper. But I can't guarantee it. It would make sense.
Meanwhile, you probably know that I still produce Dilbert. Dilbert Reborn, it's called. And only the subscribers to me on X and also on the Locals platform get to see it. But I publish in both places the new one for the day, which in this case is about Dilbert's company shutting down their DEI group. But then I also check the one that was 10 years ago, because I put that on a digital calendar which has nothing to do with the paper calendar. And today is one of those days where both the 10-year-ago comic and the one I wrote for today are really funny. Sometimes I'll look at the two of them and I'll say, oh, the calendar was better than today's comic, or the comic is better than the calendar was, which would have been 10 years ago. But today they're both right on point. So check that out.
You may have seen a video of Kamala Harris praising the wonders of Kwanzaa and how much she enjoyed celebrating as a young person. Now, of course, everybody's mocking her for various different things. But I'll just point out one thing. If you turn off the sound and you just look at her, she looks really high. Yeah, if she's not drunk or totally intoxicated in that video, I don't know how you'd explain her face. You know, I can't even do an impression of it. It's something you would have to be on drugs to even make that face. I've never seen anybody who wasn't on drugs who had any kind of mannerisms like that. So I think we dodged a bullet there.
Meanwhile, over in Chicago, where you thought Chicago was totally lost, the End Woke account tells us that arrests are way up. So shoplifting and theft may be finally not legal. So why is there suddenly a big improvement in Chicago? Well, it turns out that that Soros-funded DA Kim Foxx is out, and there's some new DA in. And the new DA wants to actually make crime illegal, I guess. So felony theft charges have surged by 154% just this month after O'Neal Burke took over.
So here's my question. I, of course, am completely in favor of improving the laws and the enforcement in the big cities, right, because it's a problem everywhere. So I'm totally in favor of this. But there is a question that pops up that I feel like we need to be adult about. And it goes like this. You probably saw a video. It was kind of viral of two young black women. I don't know if they were over 18, but they were somewhere in that age range. And they were casually doing some shoplifting at some box store. And they were captured at the exit, and they were putting handcuffs on, and they were acting surprised. And there was a video of them talking to each other in the back of the squad car where they're saying, it's illegal now. Like they didn't know that the law, that there had been a change in society and that the enforcement would be aggressive.
And I get that not everybody follows the news, and certainly not everybody follows the political news. So if you're a young person, did you really know? I mean, seriously, was there any way you would know that the situation had changed from there's no real risk to you're going to jail now? Here's where it gets tricky. Again, I'm going to tell you I'm completely in favor of the new enforcement, so don't interpret this as softening my stance. Completely in favor of it. But I'm going to ask you this question just as a human, stepping outside of just the political or the legal or the how do you save the city. Those are all important, and they're more important than what I'm going to say next. But I feel like it's necessary. Those cities created an attractive nuisance. Do you know what that means? An attractive nuisance. In other words, by making it legal to shoplift, they essentially encouraged it. Would you agree? Here's some free stuff. There's no penalty. And then word gets around and people are taking advantage of the free stuff with no penalty.
Yes, they need to go to jail. Remember, I'm not arguing against it. But does that seem fair to you? Now, remember, I always make fun of fairness because fairness is what I say was invented so children and idiots could have conversations with each other. Fairness isn't a real thing. But sometimes there are things that just strike you as a human. Here's what I think. I think if you pick up an 18-year-old who has no criminal record, who did not know that this was now more criminalized, it was always illegal but it's more criminalized, if they didn't know, I would blame the city for creating an attractive hazard. The attractive hazard was the city itself had basically said come steal our stuff. And so when two 18-year-old young women went to do exactly that, the rules had changed. Honestly, I'd let them go. I'd let them go because I would blame the city for putting them in a situation where they were attracted to crime. Your city should be pushing you from crime. If the city spent one minute making crime attractive, which they did for a lot longer than a minute, I feel like there needs to be some kind of period of forgiveness.
So arresting them and putting them in handcuffs and putting them in the back of the squad car, 100% on board, 100%. But once they enter the legal system, I would like to hear their lawyers say, your honor, this law only recently changed. The city had created an attractive hazard. I think that has to be taken into account. And I would love the judge to say, ladies, if you do that again, you're going straight to jail. But your defense has a reasonable argument that reasonable people can agree on. I wasn't comfortable putting them in jail once the city had set them up. I'm not for that. But again, we have to have laws and they have to be enforced.
Apparently online there's a debate between Representative Crenshaw and a popular X personality, Cat Turd. Now apparently Cat Turd's made some claims about Crenshaw, and Crenshaw said that claims are fake and suggested they would sue them. Some of you are taking sides. You don't like Crenshaw's views on war and there was something else you mentioned. So you didn't like some of his policies, and I get that. I would just note that if you're trying to figure out who's the bad guy in this situation, Cat Turd lied about me in public. Cat Turd went after my reputation with lies, or maybe just wrong. I can't tell if he was just stupid or wrong. But I blocked him a long time ago because he's not a good guy and he's not smart. He's entertaining. He's very entertaining. But he's not a good guy. He's not smart. Just make sure you know that because he's a public figure and it's fair to just know who you're dealing with. So I'm not going to take sides on this because I don't know exactly the issue. But I'll tell you that Cat Turd is not a good guy. I don't consider him a good guy. He's entertaining. So if you're following him for the entertainment, sure.
Jonathan Turley is writing today about a big win for free speech. So there was this doctor, Dr. Tara Gustilo. So she won a big free speech appellate court victory against her health care system where she worked. So she was removed from her position after she criticized Black Lives Matter, critical race theory, and some parts of the COVID narrative. Just free speech. She just criticized those things and she got fired. And that was reversed. Now here's the payoff. If I told you that there was somebody who got fired for criticizing Black Lives Matter, critical race theory, and COVID, aren't you thinking to yourself, sounds like some basic white conservative here? Here's what we know about this Filipina American doctor. So first of all, Filipina. Second of all, she had a stellar record. She raised black children. Oh wait. What if somebody who raises black children criticizes Black Lives Matter and you're canceling her? What? That's pretty extreme. I mean, I don't know how much each of these things figured into it. But apparently she is credited, according to Jonathan Turley, with creating a program to reflect cultural differences in birthing practices to better serve her diverse patients. Now, you know I'm not the woke guy, but isn't that like a really good piece of work? Changing the birthing practices so they take into account any cultural differences. Now to me that's just good. That's all good, right? You know, I get the argument you don't want the country overrun with new cultures and stuff. But if you're dealing with real human beings and real medical situations in America, yes, their specific cultural situation should be accounted for.
And then apparently she argued that her colleagues turned it into a program for quote racially segregated care, which was not the idea. That's not the idea. I mean that's completely ruining the idea. And objected to certain orthodoxy over race essential views. So Dr. Tara Gustilo sounds like one of the best human beings I've ever heard of from top to bottom. And she won. Sometimes good people win.
Argentina. Their new president Milei announced something that confused me. So I spread some fake news that I quickly deleted after I found out. But somebody summarized the news in a way that was misleading and it fooled me. But it said Milei has announced that he's abolished over 90% of Argentina's taxes. Now I thought that that meant he got rid of 90% of Argentinian taxes. But apparently getting rid of 90% of Argentina's taxes, what it really means is sources of taxes. It's not 90% of the taxes. It's 90% of the sources of taxation. So apparently they got taxed for just about everything they did. He thinks he can get it down to six kinds of taxes, which would be good. But I'm going to go on record, just so I've said it, this Argentina miracle does not look real to me. It's pinging every one of my warning flags. Warning, warning, this story might be a little bit too hyperbolic because it looks a little too magically successful. The real world is way messier than this sounds. I mean, you know, if you come in and you make these major structural changes, I do believe that the kinds of changes he's making will set up Argentina for a very bright future. So I do believe it's all good. I don't believe that it's all good so fast. It's the so fast part that I'm like, really? On the other hand, so we'll argue both sides of this. If I were the person transforming the country and part of my success depended on people thinking I could do that and I could do more, I probably would exaggerate my success early and I'd tell everybody, ah, it's working, it's working like crazy, it's so fast, I'll do more of it. So on one hand I don't mind. I mean it seems a functional bit of marketing if you say you're doing a little bit better than you are. I just feel like if he can get everything good without any notable negatives, that would be the first time in history anybody did it. Like hey, maybe you never know. Anything's possible. I'm rooting for him and I think everything he's doing makes sense. I'm just thinking maybe we're getting ahead of ourselves on the actual produced results. Just a hunch.
Well, meanwhile the conversation about Trump wanting to buy Canada has created a little attention by Kevin O'Leary. He's one of the Shark Tank stars but better known as being one of the more successful investors. And he's Canadian. And he says that there's actually interest in Canada in merging with the United States. Now he just means conversationally, not in the government. Government is probably 100% against it. But he thinks he wants to try to sell it. So he wants to see if he can pitch it and maybe broker a deal with Trump and some kind and form some kind of what he calls an economic union. So an economic union would not be merger. So they'd still have some regular government, I guess. But yeah, maybe. I don't know what he has in mind. But he is a serious person who wants what's best for both countries and probably has a good idea what would get us there. So if Kevin O'Leary is weighing in, I feel like Kevin O'Leary is in that category of the pirate ship. So not only did Trump attract people who used to be Democrats or still are Democrats, but he also got a Canadian. He got a Canadian. Like the Trump effect is so strong that there's somebody, you know, actually I don't know his current nationality. So I don't know if he's probably still a Canadian citizen. I think yeah, he's called the Canadian investor. But I just love the fact that the incoming Trump administration seems solid enough and capable enough that somebody like Kevin O'Leary would say let me spend a bunch of time seeing if I can get this very big thing done that might be great for both countries. Just people volunteering. It's like DOGE, right? It's like people volunteering to put their own lives on hold, really good lives. Like we're talking about people who could just go to the beach all day if they wanted to. And they've decided to sacrifice for some kind of national or double national benefit. I just appreciate it. So I'm just going to give a shout out to Kevin O'Leary for putting his risk capital out there in favor of two nations that need a little help. Thanks.
Well, there's a new update in the New York Post. Of course we'll talk about the foreign worker thing just waiting for people to stream in so we can hit that when we're all here at the same time. Apparently the intelligence spy bosses, they silenced the Defense Department back when the COVID leak was still being discussed and people were saying is it a lab leak or is it a natural thing. And apparently the Defense Department had good evidence it was a designed thing in the lab. And the spy bosses decided to take that out of the briefing so that Biden did not hear that it came from a lab. What would you do with a spy chief who was hiding the most vital information from the commander in chief? Now I don't think it's illegal, but you should never work in that job again. Anybody who's hiding the most important information from the president while working for the president, it's got to be fired right away. I mean there's no real second chance for that kind of stuff. So I don't know who it was. But maybe when Trump gets in there we can get a better idea which spy chief silenced the truth from the commander in chief.
On the other hand, Biden wasn't really totally functional. So and the funniest thing about this story is when they talk about the spy chiefs and the Pentagon and they did all their research and they found out things that nobody could have ever known. And then it's taken years for them to finally tell you what they think they know. And I've told you before but it's funny. I think probably like maybe a week after the COVID pandemic hit that one of my smartest friends called me and said here's a picture on Google Maps. That wet market is directly across the street from the Wuhan lab that creates, that does exactly this kind of work. So on week one I knew for sure. Was I doubting that the lab that was across the street was a real problem as opposed to the wet markets that have operated forever and never had this kind of problem? Exactly. So pretending that anybody didn't know on day one or at least day seven is just kind of funny because if I knew, I mean I knew for sure in a week. I was just waiting for the rest of the country to catch up. I thought it'd be easy but it took years.
All right. DARPA, according to Reclaim the Net, DARPA has created this what they call a theory of mind. So they're using technology and software to predict and influence behavior. So apparently they think they can predict what people do and they claim that they'll use it against our adversaries because if you know what your adversaries are going to do, well you have an advantage. Now do you think this would stay limited to use against our adversaries? Of course not. Because every time the intelligence people find something that works against their adversaries, unless it's a kinetic thing like a bomb, it ends up getting employed domestically. Because if we're trying to control people in other countries, sooner or later somebody says you know there are a few people in this country who could use a little control. Why don't we use that external thing to control these rogues inside the country? So of course it will come internally. Of course it will.
Now the question is do you think it's real? Do you think even if they try really hard and the smartest people and they use AI that they will be able to predict people's actions in the future? Well how could they if you have free will? If you have free will there's no way they're going to predict what you're going to do. I'm just joking. You don't have free will. So they'll totally be able to predict what you're going to do. It's really an information problem. If they knew enough about you they could get it 80% of the time. They could probably do populations faster. They could probably look at a politician's message and then look at how that'll affect the election and know who's going to win based on the messaging or maybe even the personality. So there's some things that it definitely will be able to predict more so than anything we're doing today. Because polling predicts, if you do it legitimately. A lot of our polling is not legitimate. But if you did it legitimately like the internal polling for the Trump campaign, it told him he was going to win. It literally predicted the future. So yes, there will be other ways to do that too. I believe that AI will use pattern recognition to predict the future for individuals. But it won't be able to do that until it knows enough about those individuals, which I don't know how they'll do that. Maybe if they knew everything about your social media and everything you've ever done, all resumes and everything you've ever written, probably it could do it. But it'd have to have access to all that information. Probably will have that access.
Well the Trump effect continues to get things done without him actually doing anything yet. Well he's doing a lot but not specifically this. So Mexico is going to open shelters to house over 12,000 of its own citizens who might get deported when Trump takes over. 25 planned shelters and it's a strategic plan to accommodate exclusively the people who get deported after January 20th. And Mexico says they're taking Trump's threats seriously and they're preparing the facilities to accept them. Now doesn't that make his job a lot easier if Mexico has already built the receiving facilities? It's going to be a lot more humane and a lot more politically acceptable if Mexico, instead of arguing like crazy you shouldn't send them back, is building facilities to accept them. That's the Trump effect. They're acting in a way that is the adult way to act simply because Dad came home. Like everybody started to pick up their toys. Oh Dad's home. I don't need to be told. I'm going to pick up all my toys because it would be way worse if I don't pick up my toys. So that's what's happening.
All right. You probably know that yesterday there was a big brouhaha on the internet on X about the issue of issuing what visas or whatever the approval is to work in the United States for foreign workers. And the debate comes down to hey, if we're America First, why would you bring in any foreign workers? But Elon Musk, it took him all day to clarify, but he said we're really talking about the 0.1% of the top engineers. Now those are, according to Elon, those are jobs which are really, really hard to fill and there are tons of openings. And it wouldn't really be possible to train some Americans to be in the top 0.1% of engineering in the next few years. If you have a 20-year buildup, yes, you know in 20 years we might create enough top engineers that we don't think about taking anybody from another country. Maybe possible. But at the moment if you want to compete in AI and crypto and quantum computing and robots, those are all the things that are going to drive economies in the future. And the people who drive them the most are going to be the engineers in the top 0.1%. In fact OpenAI only exists because Sam Altman brought over some Indian engineer who made the breakthroughs that made AI essentially possible. So even AI wouldn't even exist if we hadn't brought in one of those 0.1% engineers and he hadn't done what he did. So keep that in mind.
Now I weighed in and immediately it just caused more problems than it solved because what I didn't understand is that people were not on the same topic. So there are a few topics and individually they're all important but they all got sort of conflated. And people were mad about things that they were on the wrong topic. So let me tell you what my view is and then we'll talk about the topic. My old view, my old view prior to Biden, and it's now changed because of Biden, but my old view is that you want to keep everybody smart. So if somebody wants to come in and they've got a high education in some valuable field or even if they just want to be an optometrist or make money, that the country is better off every time you bring in somebody who's going to add to the tax base, in other words pay taxes, and is not going to take much. So my old view, and again this is revised, but my old view is you take everybody who is smart and additive. Now how you decide whether somebody's smart enough and additive, I don't think we have a good system for that. So my desires are not supported by any kind of good system.
After Biden opened the border and MAGA became the dominant majority opinion in the country, they were very, very, very clear about limiting immigration. Under that environment it probably makes sense to not allow in the country people who would be additive. Do you get that? So under the current cultural political situation I think it would just disturb too many people to bring in people who even would add to the country even if you're sure of it they would add. So at the moment I'm opposed because Biden essentially ruined the atmosphere for immigrants. He ruined it by making it just everybody come on in. Then all the nuances just drained out of it and we probably have to work pretty hard to correct things. But the argument does not apply to the 0.1% engineer. So let me say this as completely, this is the most firm confident opinion I'll ever give. You cannot have enough 0.1% top engineers because engineers are not like optometrists and doctors and lawyers. The 0.01% engineer is developing the future, like the very civilization-changing work. You want all of those and we don't have anywhere near enough. Not even close. You know, as Elon Musk reminds us.
Now a lot of people argue that Elon Musk doesn't understand the topic of hiring top engineers, to which if I may do a facepalm. So I spent some of my time explaining that Elon Musk probably knows a little bit about hiring top engineers. I don't think I need to develop my argument on that too hard. But there was a, so that's the first thing. So it's unambiguously good for the country to bring in the top engineers and anybody who would argue that that would be stupid. Honestly I wouldn't even listen to the argument on the other side. It would just be stupid because you're not talking about changing the culture of the United States. You're talking about people who almost always already speak English better than you do and are the top, top, top students. It's a completely different situation than bringing in Uber drivers. I'm not in favor of that at the moment. Now I think you can say all those things while still saying that immigrants are the reason the country is strong and etc. That's all true. It's just that Biden ruined the atmosphere for bringing in immigrants, even the ones who could add. He just ruined it. We might be able to get back to that but not until Trump gets things under control. So that's where I'm at now.
Secondly, the argument that I just gave you is a conceptual argument. Wouldn't it be nice to have only these people? And at the moment it would be impractical really to just open it up to everybody. But second to that, that's sort of the goal or where you'd like to end up. Is that the systems we have for deciding who comes in are completely corrupted. So some people were getting really mad that they thought I didn't understand that our current systems are not picking just the best of the best. They're pretty much abused by big companies just to get cheap labor. Everybody on board with that? Our current systems, all of them, 100% of our current systems are so gameable that big companies are using them not in the way that you want them to be used. Now there is a question about what would happen to your inflation if they hired more expensive labor from the US. So if you're willing to pay for more inflation then you would also be in favor of them not having these programs that let them game the system to bring in cheap labor.
So can we all agree on the following statement of assumptions? Our current systems are wholly inadequate to getting what you want as a citizen of the United States. They do seem to work in the favor of quite a number of corporations. And the corporations are the ones who argue for keeping the current completely broken and corrupt system because it works for them. It just doesn't work for workers, for example American workers. So I think we can all agree on the fact that the current system is broken.
Now what is Trump's take on this? I actually don't know, which is the weirdest thing about this conversation. I don't know where Trump's at. At one point he was at where I was at. One point he agreed with my old view that as long as they're additive, yes, yes, everybody additive, everybody additive. So that used to be his view as well. But after he's watched this whole brouhaha and after Biden let in everybody, I feel like he may have adjusted his own views but I haven't seen it yet. So that's the most fascinating thing about the story is that the base was having this heated argument yesterday all over social media. Of course Trump was watching. Of course he was. And it's helping him, I'm sure helping him come up with his statement on the thing.
But there are a number of things that come up. The other thing that we can agree on is that big companies like Google and Apple have the resources to put people in another country and really, really vet the top engineers. But that's not going to work for a small company. Somebody said my opinions were invalid because I never tried to hire foreign engineers. Well I've actually tried hiring India-based programmers at least twice for side projects I was doing and it's a nightmare if you're not Google and Apple and you want to get somebody who can do a good job. So you find somebody in India who says oh yeah just tell us what you want, we'll give you a price, we'll assign some programmers and we'll write that code for you. Absolutely none of that worked because I talked to somebody smart who would make the sale but then they would assign it to somebody who was completely incompetent. So nobody could perform anything. I paid money and got nothing twice. So hiring employees to work from the other country, if you were thinking about it, I wouldn't do it. Everything I saw says it doesn't work. If they're not in the same room with you, don't do a tech project. Not at all. So certainly that's part of something that needs to be fixed.
So I was listening to Theo Wold who was the former deputy assistant to Trump in the first administration and he was in charge of drafting the legislation to create a new legal immigration framework. So he's the one who said that when he looked at all the various, and there are quite a few of them, the various pathways that foreign workers can get into the United States, that they're all corrupt. So yesterday I was seeing some people saying well you're talking about this H1B visa thing. Yeah that's bad but there's this other thing to get the geniuses that's not so bad. Well in the real world according to Theo Wold, the guy who was in charge of making it all work, he said no they're all corrupt. So you should assume 100% of our foreign worker acquisition is totally broken and has to be fixed. That was the best context I've seen.
So when I talk about this topic I talk about what we want to achieve. Usually I talk about systems. You know I always say systems are better than goals. But there sometimes it's obvious what you want to achieve. We want American workers to have jobs that are good jobs and blah blah blah. But this brought up a really troubling thing. So Vivek Ramaswamy weighed into the debate. He said one of the reasons that maybe foreign workers are being favored by tech companies is that there's a cultural difference. And he described the cultural difference as some of the Asian and Indian companies or countries, but their families he described would put a focus on educational attainment and professional success whereas in America you might have far less of it. Now that caused all the dumb people to assume that his generality was referring to every family in both countries. So if you fell into that trap and you said wait a minute that's not true. I know this one American family that does everything right. Or if you said wait a minute I've seen pictures of India and it's people living in garbage piles. Why do I want the people living in garbage piles to teach me how to have a better culture? I don't want to live in a garbage pile. Now those are ridiculous comments because he's using a generality. Is it a useful generality that the Indian and Asian employees that are at least the topic of conversation, the ones who have technical skills, is it true that they probably had a lot of family support? Probably. Are they the majority of Indians? I don't know but probably not. But they're the only ones we care about because they're the ones who are getting technical skills and they may or may not come to the United States. That's the population we're talking about. They definitely have the tiger moms, most of them. But again we're not talking about the exceptions.
So here's how people took it. They said Vivek, first of all a number of people didn't think Vivek was an American citizen. May I give myself another facepalm? This is to the people who argued with me that he's not an American citizen. Okay I just had to do that. Born in this country, risking his life to fix the DOGE thing. He's risking his life. Elon Musk risking his life. Not hyperbole. Not hyperbole. Death threats, death threats, death threats. They're risking their lives for your benefit. Do you think that they're doing it to make extra money? Well they might. I mean they might make extra money but clearly that's not the main incentive. Vivek is more American. I said this to somebody. I said he's more American than you are. He's more supportive of the American experience, the American you know whatever makes us good people. He probably knows more about American history than just about any one of you. You can't get more American than that. That's like peak American. And people got on me for defending because I got pretty aggressive yesterday on social media for defending Vivek's take about our cultures and also Elon's take about needing engineers. And people said to me you know are you just making money? Is it because Elon pays you? Pays me? I mean obviously you know I'm monetized on X but you think that's why I'm doing it? You think I'm supporting the idea of bringing the top 1% engineers because I get paid on X? That was literally the last thing I was even in my mind. Never once did that even occur to me.
Here's what occurred to me. When I watch Elon and Vivek take on the hard, most thankless job that America has ever produced short of war, which is to take on trimming the government, that's patriotism at a level that I can't even conceive. I mean it's beyond me. Given that and given my current age, I've kind of done what I need to do. I would take a bullet for either one of them. Actually I'll take a bullet because the two of them are doing the only thing that can save our country. If we can't get the debt under control we're all dead. We're all dead. And there are only two people who happen to be extraordinarily brilliant, incredibly brave, capable beyond anything that you and I can really understand, and are taking on the hardest job in the world for you if you're American, for you and also for me. I would take a bullet to keep them in that job. Like actually I'd take a bullet. Like if you said to me you're going to have to die but you'll save one of those two people, I would take the bullet. Like actually literally. That's not a joke. So if you see me defending them aggressively on social media, I would take a bullet for them because they would take a bullet for me. Right? They're doing it right in front of you. I don't have to guess if they would take a bullet because they put themselves in a position where the odds of danger and death threats is through the roof. So if they would do that for me I would do it for them. And same with Trump. How did you feel when Trump took a bullet for you? Right? That's different. If somebody takes a bullet for you and Trump did that, you get bonded to them and you should.
So a lot of people were on that. So let me say this. So some people interpreted Vivek as this Indian guy who was criticizing white American culture in the United States. And a lot of people thought it was kind of a put down, kind of an insult to American culture. To which I said what are you talking about an insult to American culture? What American culture are you talking about? The American culture that I live in has free speech and we have a superpower. Our culture, American culture has a superpower and it looks like this. When we fail and we get ashamed we learn, things get stronger. We eat that shame. We eat that failure and then we go and win. In other countries and in other cultures they do not criticize their culture. And if they fail, well they don't want to fail so they don't do a startup. They just take a job where they're less likely to fail. So when you say that Vivek is somehow insulting America by saying that the culture needs a tweak, needs an upgrade, that's the most American thing you can do. Criticizing how an American system and culture is basically a system, criticizing an American system even down to the family level if it's necessary, that's what we do. You can't get more American than that. We criticize ourselves in public because we have the gift of free speech. And if something needs to be fixed and you're going to get a big blowback for saying it, we'll still say it. I said what I needed to say at the risk of getting canceled. Very American, right? You could disagree with everything I said or did. That's fine. But would you agree that me saying what I thought I needed to say at the moment and I had good intentions, that's a longer story, but and then getting canceled for it, failing basically, that would be a failure. My career wiped out. You watched me. You watched what happened when I got canceled, right? I just recovered, got stronger. I got a million followers on X. It basically supercharged me. So that was a failure. It was a shame. I didn't feel any shame but you could imagine that it would be accompanied usually. And so I just took that failure. I ate it for breakfast. I used it for energy and I went on and in some ways accomplished more than I would have accomplished if I had not been canceled because it creates a lot of attention. So yes, you can criticize any American system from culture to finance to government. That's what I want. I want our smartest people telling us where we should focus even if he's wrong sometimes. We're not looking for perfection.
So yes I'm defending Vivek aggressively. Now this brought up a number of comments because people were, the other the hidden topic within this foreign employee stuff is a number of people kept saying but Scott don't you understand I'm a trained engineer and I can't get a job. What do I say to somebody who says that on social media? Don't know them. They say I'm a trained engineer, experienced, and I can't get a job. I say what color are you? You're white, right? So mixed in with this whole foreign worker thing is the fact that there's been massive systemic racism against white men for what Sequoia partner Sean Maguire thinks may have been going on for the past 10 years. Here's what he said. He said I was told I can't be promoted for being a white man explicitly at Google. And then he suggested that that's been going on for at least 10 years. Do you know when I got that talk, the first time I got the talk I can't promote you because you're a white male? The 80s. 37 years ago. For 37 years this has been the way everything in corporate America worked. No we're not going to promote you. You're a white man.
Prudent Thinker on X says I've had the same experience elsewhere in big tech. Also been told we want less people who look like you because it messes up our DEI commitment. Also been told whatever you do do not hire a white man. This is a white man. Also been told everyone is invited except you. We want to put out the image of diversity. And I've even been plagiarized by the DEI hire later to learn I was hired for that very purpose. Oh no. And then Deplorable Garbage, that's the name of his account, was told the same thing by a big law firm and notes if an entity like that, a big law firm, isn't afraid to openly discriminate against race he says it's everywhere. Russell says at an Intel Corporation we restricted hiring white males unless approved at senior VP level and that was more than 10 years ago. Imagine what it's like now. No this has been 37 years at least. That's when it hit me. It may have been earlier in California where I was. So why didn't people know this? It's because white guys just suck it up and get to work. That's it. White guys will complain privately, will complain to our family, complain to our spouse, but we're not necessarily organizing a protest. We just say all right I'm not going to work there. I'll go work somewhere else. So that's why you don't know.
Also I found out 30 years ago that if I mentioned in public that I was being discriminated against for being white, what did people call me? A white racist liar. So they already decided I'm a white racist just cuz I'm white. And then I say I was unable to be promoted in two corporations in a row because they told me I'm white and male and I can't promote you. And I say that and they say oh well you're lying. Oh great. So if I tell you the truth I'm a white racist and now also a liar. 30 years, over three decades, almost four decades white men had to keep this secret because if you said it out loud you were a liar. And that's a real thing that happened in the United States for decades. Still happening.
All right. Then somebody weighed in thinking they would add some nuance and said no it's cuz somebody else labeled it as an anti-white bias which it is. And then a commenter said well you know technically is it an anti-white bias? It might have also been anti-Asian American because I'm sure they discriminated against Asians. I need one more facepalm. Can I give it to you? In colleges they definitely discriminated against Asians. True. In corporations they hired the Asians not the white guy. If you had lots of diversity of Asian Americans it was considered like the what's the good analogy like the methadone for the heroin or something. They wanted heroin which would be black women, lesbian employees. You know that would be like oh home run. But if they couldn't get that they definitely wanted as many Asian-looking people to put on the company picture. So no I've never once, I've never even heard of it. Have you? Is there anybody in the comments who's ever even heard of an Asian American being turned down at big corporation because that wasn't diverse enough? I've never heard of it. Now if it turned out the Asian Americans have been keeping this secret for 40 years like white Americans you know I guess I'd have to say I shouldn't be surprised. So it could be true but I've never seen it or heard of it. Never once.
Well then Wired publication, this was the, they say it's the year of the influencer political takeover. So of course a lot of people are writing about how the podcasters and the online influencers are now the important thing and the mainstream news and the New York Times are unimportant etc. But here's what I think about that conversation. I think this is sort of putting the Dilbert filter on it. When all these smart people, the Democrats, say that they finally understand that what they needed to do better was take advantage of the influencer podcasting ecosystem and that the Republicans really had that nailed down. You know they really had a good ecosystem for that. So that maybe is why they lost. So do you think that's why they lost? Watching Democrats not understand anything. It never gets less entertaining. It is true that Trump did a much better job with the podcaster influencer situation. That's true. But the reason they lost is that they did everything wrong. They had the worst candidate running against the best candidate of all time. They had no policies that were in the top three of the American public. They wasted $1.5 billion on God knows what. Probably half of it was stolen. You could just make a list of all the things you should do right and the only things they did well were the ones that don't matter to the election. The ground game. They always tease Trump for not having a ground game but never ask themselves the Elon Musk question which is do we need a ground game? And the answer is probably not in the current age. There was a time when the ground game was everything but probably not now. You know people learn online. They don't need the ground game.
But here's my Dilbert filter take on it. The fact that the Democrats think the podcaster world is just where they need to go. I think that the Democrat, let's say the people who would be helping with campaigns in the future, if you are going to work on a campaign which thing would you rather do? Organize a door-knocking thing or do another boring interview, print interview with the New York Times, or interact with some of the coolest hottest podcasters and influencers in the world? Which way do you want to spend your day? Do you want to spend your day talking to famous sexy young people killing it so that you can take a picture and show it to your kid? It's the easiest job in the world because you get to sit in the studio and maybe watch the podcast and that's your job for that day. I've got a feeling that the Democrats are moving toward this whole we've got to have more podcasting and influencers because that's fun. And then they justify it as like oh this is the big problem. Got to fix this podcasting situation. There's no way we can be competitive until we have a Joe Rogan of our own. I don't know. So there's something true about it which is they probably need to be better in that domain. But there's also something that screams we would rather do things that are pleasurable than things that are hard. And I don't think that's a winner's attitude. We'd rather do things that are pleasurable than hard. That might be their entire problem anyway.
And I also think it's funny harking back to the prior conversation that they canceled me at exactly the time when I was the most dangerous because the podcasting world was starting to dominate. Again dumbest mistake they could have made. They should have said Scott we'd like you to spend all of your time on cartooning so why don't we give you a big contract to write twice as many cartoons. If they had done that they could have bought me out of the race. Well I don't know but it would have been worth the shot if they offered enough.
Anyway according to Study Finds scientists figured out how to transform red blood cells into precision cancer fighting drones. And I guess they can tweak it as your cancer morphs into a different form. They can tweak it again so it gets at it again. So this is actually pretty exciting. They've got some kind of molecule that'll stick to parts of the RNA and then regular activities. So the reason that this is important is if it feels less destructive. Meaning if you do something that's just put some destruction on your body but you hope the cancer cells die faster than your healthy cells, you know like chemo. Yeah you're just hoping that your healthy cells survive but they're going to get whacked. And so this is the second anti-cancer possibility which doesn't seem to have that mechanism which it attacks your healthy stuff. Don't know if it'll work yet but I love all the new news about it.
Now there's an article in The Hill, an opinion piece by Evan Davis and David Schultz, and they say Congress has the power to block Trump from taking office but lawmakers must act now. So the idea is according to them the Constitution provides that any oath-breaking insurrectionist can't run for office. And then they gave their evidence for how Trump is an oath-breaking insurrectionist. Of course all their evidence was completely debunked and laughed at by people like Jeff Clark, also an attorney who got in trouble for that January 6 stuff for doing basically nothing, nothing that anybody should have ever gotten in trouble for. That's another story. But so apparently I didn't know this but apparently if they try to make this move to not allow Trump to take office it would take a two-thirds vote. Did I have that right? Two-thirds vote in each house. So in both Senate and the House, two-thirds vote. Now I don't think there's, would you agree there's not a chance in the world that two-thirds of the people are going to vote to not put Trump in office, right? So there's not any practical way this is going to happen as far as I can tell. But I kind of want them to try. Don't you? Don't you want them to try? Because the Democrat Party is on life support. If they try to keep Trump out of office with some weird lawfare somebody's going to yank the life support out of whatever's left of the Democratic Party. That would be the end. That would just be the end.
Now I know you want me to say oh if that happened there would be an armed revolution. No there won't. Against who? What are you going to do shoot your neighbor because some politicians did something? You're not going to shoot your neighbor. We like the neighbor. So I would just say this. I just wish they, I kind of hope they do it. I hope they take their strongest play to try to keep them out of office. They will fail. But this is the ultimate you know F around and find out situation. I'd really love them to find out. Not with violence. No violence please. But no violence would be necessary because we would just look at the situation and say nope, nope.
Now speaking of violence which I do not recommend but you can state facts about violence, right? So that's fair. You can say somebody did some violence. There's a risk of some violence but I don't recommend it. Don't do any violence. However can you imagine the security situation for anybody who voted to keep Trump out of office at this point? If in Congress they voted to use this insurrection thing to keep him out, can you imagine what that would do to their security situation? Again please don't do any violence but we live in a country where people wouldn't take this sitting down. And anybody who voted to keep Trump out of office for this insurrection I would recommend you look at your budget because if you don't have a budget for increasing security I wouldn't vote this way. Now I wouldn't say that about many things. I can't even think of one other thing I would ever have said that about. But the people who vote for this are really going to put themselves in a physical jeopardy. Don't do anything to them. Don't, don't, don't. We want peace. We don't want to be that kind of country. But the reality is we live in a dangerous country full of guns and people have the guns for that reason. They have the guns for this reason. Don't use them for this reason. This isn't good enough reason but that's why they have them. So if they think that it would be safe to vote that they're not going to put the winner of the popular vote into office just think about your budget. Just think about it.
Well Russia is open to conversation about Ukraine but they say Trump has to go first. He has to make the first move to improve ties according to Breitbart, Simon Kent. And what would the first move be? So let's talk about that. If Russia says yeah we're open but you got to make the first move. All right here's the wrong answer. The first move should not be a peace proposal. By the way Lavrov, so he's the Russian, what would you call him? He's the main guy who talks to the United States about foreign policy and stuff like that. So Lavrov says that a truce is a path to nowhere. So a ceasefire doesn't have any interest for Russia. Russia is saying we're looking for a big deal, you know something enduring, something comprehensive. We're not looking for let's stop shooting on Tuesday. Is he right about that? Yes. Yes. Yeah Lavrov is completely right. Having a ceasefire would save lives but beyond that it wouldn't hasten the end of the war I don't think so.
What would Trump do? He can't say listen to a ceasefire. I agree Russia is correct on that. But here's what he's being set up for. Negotiating with himself. Have you ever heard that term? In the negotiating world there's a thing that's considered a classic error and the error is to negotiate against yourself. And the way that looks is you say first all right here's the deal I'll do this if you do that. And then the other side says no. And then you go back and here's the error and you come back with a new offer and they haven't made an offer. If you do that it's called negotiating against yourself and you've been tricked into making the first offer and then responding to them making a new offer and you've already talked yourself down. They haven't even made an offer and you talked yourself down. So that's considered a classic mistake. I learned that when I was negotiating with Disney years ago. There was an idea of making a Dilbert Disney animated movie and we made an offer to Disney and Disney said no that's not good enough come back with another offer. And the head of my syndication company said how about we're done now and we'll never work with you again. That's how it ended and I completely supported it. Yeah you don't negotiate with yourself period. And by the way he told them we're not going to negotiate with ourselves. If you've got an offer we'll look at it. So they knew why but they didn't want to make an offer. So we said well maybe we'll make an offer with somebody who knows how negotiation works. Now maybe it works for Disney. Maybe sometimes they get somebody dumb enough to do that. But thank goodness the professional I was working with knows how this works and he just closed them down. So nope don't negotiate with ourselves. We'll take this somewhere else. And that's why there's no Dilbert movie. No we did take it somewhere else but you know things didn't work out in other places either anyway.
So he shouldn't make an offer but he has to do something. So what would it look like if Trump did something first but it wasn't an offer for a peace deal? What would that look like? I don't know but Trump is the best at this. Suppose Trump said how about let's have a summit. Would that be an offer? Kind of. Kind of an offer to do a summit with himself and Putin. I would feel like that would be going first but without making the offer. So I think there's room to play. I think there's room to play. And when Russia says you have to go first what they're doing is trying to dominate Trump because they're trying to say all right we made you do the first thing. Like why does Trump have to go first? Why does he have to go first? They both want peace. So if Lavrov can sort of manipulate Trump into going first then he has sort of won the first round. Trump will know that because unlike ordinary politicians Trump knows how this works. He's done this before. So he's not going to fall for the you have to go first unless it looks like something that would be ordinary to do. Now a summit at least with Trump would be an ordinary thing to do. So I think that would not look like going first but would still be close enough to get things done. So we'll see.
There's a giant breakthrough coming in EV batteries. Are you surprised? I tell you one of these stories every day. The reason I do it is to help you predict the future. And here's the future. If this new leap, let's see it's according to Mark Maynard in the Pasadena Star News, the new breakthrough just uses a new kind of material and it uses 10 times less anode material which is a big deal and might cut the cost someday of the battery by a huge amount. Did you know that the cost of the battery in an electric car could be up to 40% of the cost of the car? And that this battery that works in the lab and if it worked in the real world would cut that cost by about half. So 40% of your car cut by half just because the battery. So we're at the point where we're probably one more big battery breakthrough, like one of these many ones that I talk about every day on the show. They're all different but one of them is going to break through. And if it doubles capacity and halves the cost of batteries that's just, that's not just better stuff like if you're thinking oh I'd like to get a few extra miles on my car battery if I have electric car. No we're not talking about that. You'd get that too. What we're talking about is a complete transformation of civilization because it's what makes your robot a good deal. It's what allows you to get off the grid. If you had a real cheap battery that you could put on the side of your house and collect the sun during the day and use it at night you might just get off the grid. You might have electric airplanes. So the major source of CO2 if you're worried about that would be removed because airlines are really, really bad on that. So one more leap, just one more big leap in batteries. I'm not talking about the 10% 20% improvement. I'm talking about the big leap. And there are a bunch of them that are brewing. One more big leap changes all of air travel, travel, our entire transportation would change. It would lower costs to the point where it would make a difference in inflation. It would lower inflation. Transportation would be different. The time you spent charging would go down to minutes instead of hours. It would be really transformational and it's definitely going to happen.
Meanwhile Israel has declared on Tuesday that it's going to start killing the leaders of the Houthis. So the Houthis in Yemen have been shooting rockets into Israel and prior to that they've been putting missiles at shipping boats in the area. So the Houthis are real bad news and they're backed by Iran and Iran is weakened but the Houthis are still active. Now when Israel says we're going to take out your leaders it just tells me we're at a strange point in history. So nobody's talking about taking out Putin in some kind of a decapitation strike because he's got nukes and he's got backup and whoever comes after him isn't necessarily going to be the good guy. And probably the same is true with an American president. If you're Russia or China you're probably not thinking even for one second about a decapitation strike on the United States because we'd still be too strong. Likewise we will not think even for one second about a decapitation strike on China because it would just be destabilizing and it would just ruin everything. So decapitation strikes definitely don't work once a country reaches a certain status. And they also don't work when your little scrappy terrorist cells are so small that you can't even figure out where they're operating from or who's in charge. So in those cases a decapitation strike's no good. The one time it's good is if you happen to have massive digital footprints everywhere so you can find stuff and the entity has not created a structure that can go on easily without the leaders. In other words the leaders are kind of key to keeping it together. And that's not the case in America. We change out our leaders all the time. So there's this one little area of history where we can find them easily because we've got satellites, we've got cell phones, we've got AI so we can find them. And we have missiles and drones that can hit anything from anywhere. So I would say the Houthis are in a lot of trouble because it seems to be Israel's ability to take out the leaders of any group that's against them is now 100% operational and all the Houthi leaders are going to just start disappearing. And I think it works because they're leader-driven organizations. So good luck. Good hunting, Israel.
I saw an article by Barak Ravid on X. He says that the people in Israel and the US even who are negotiating for the release of the hostages that it's unlikely that they're going to get that done before Trump takes office. I would go further and say that's not going to happen. Why would Hamas suddenly become rational because Trump's going into office? They're clearly not. They're not afraid of dying and the captives give them a little bit of leverage. So why would they? I can't see any reason that they would do it now. I think that they'll keep the hostages and then when Trump comes in he's going to say all right you had a chance but I'll give you one more chance now that I'm actually in office. You know you've got a few days. I want the hostages all back and we're not negotiating for it. You just give them all back. Now that probably won't happen and then Trump will have to figure out how to respond. And I feel sorry for Gaza because if the hostages don't come back there will never be a life there. And I don't think they're coming back. So I think Gaza is just permanently out of business. There's no such thing as Gaza is going to rebuild and they're all going to go live there happily. I think it's just Israel's territory and the cost of that unfortunately is going to be these hostages. As long as the hostages are held yeah it's hard to criticize Israel for anything people do but I wouldn't.
Meanwhile the New York Post is reporting that there's a woman who was born with two vaginas that are fully functional and even possibly capable of both of them getting pregnant. So she has two vaginas. She's a grown woman and she says it's been a very difficult dating because as soon as she tells her date that she has two vaginas more often than not they get an idea. Hey two of them you say two of them. I'm just going to spitball here a little brainstorming something that I have never done before but I've got a buddy. And then she has to shut him down right away. No you can stop there. I know you have a male friend. Stop. Nope nope nope stop stop. And I was thinking to myself she could never date a professional humorist such as myself. I wouldn't be able to think of anything else. If you put me in that situation where I'm dating the woman with two vaginas I'm going to think of a lot of puns and they're not going to be appreciated. So I'm sure she has a sense of humor but you know there are also men, this is rare but some men are born with two penises. I've got two words to describe a situation of the woman with two vaginas and the man with two penises. Soulmates. Soulmates. Is that one word or two? I guess that's one word. Soulmates. Well I wish her luck. And the funniest comment I saw in this was from one of the local subscribers who said and I quote did she save one for after marriage. Slow clap. Very good.
All right we don't mean to make fun of this woman but she seems to be well adjusted and healthy. She's perfectly healthy and she's also quite ethical. She discloses it. I wish the best for her. I don't mean to be mean but she's having fun with it I think. Yeah there's at least some part of it that she probably thinks is fun. So in that spirit I only have good thoughts.
All right ladies and gentlemen I'm going to go talk to the local subscribers privately. I don't know if there's anything I forgot about today. All right ladies and gentlemen if you're on YouTube or X or Rumble I will see you tomorrow. Locals I'm coming at you in 30 seconds.
stocks are down a little bit but nobody really cares about the day before the weekend of Christmas week that doesn't even count let's find my comments make sure these are working perfect everything's going my way today good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams and I'll bet you've never had a better time but if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that no one can under even comprehend with their tiny shiny human brains all you need is a cuper muger a glass of tanker Chell suin of canteen Jugger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure the dopamine H the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous Z oh so good well I wonder if I'll have a new study that says that coffee is good for your health H checking notes oh yeah there is there's a new study it says that uh coffee consumption can improve the gut bacteria and reduces your cancer risk it strengthens your immune system and reduces your inflammation according to nutrition insight and uh you know this of course I'm a professional humorist so suddenly I'm wondering about you know I'm not but I'm not a Biblical scholar so there's some things I don't know about but I wonder if back in Jesus's time do you think he ever do do you think he ever just said uh well I think I can cure your leprosy boom and he'd use his Heavenly Powers but what if somebody had a smaller problem they're like hey I've got this little got a little inflammation in my back did Jesus also use his Heavenly powers or did he say let just have a coffee why don't you come have a coffee with me you'll be fine that's just something I wonder as a professional writer all right so if you haven't bought your Dilbert calendar yet um you could probably still get it around the first week of January which is almost just as good um I'm I'm I I guess I should tell you this it wouldn't be fair to tell you this I I just realized probably at some point in January is if not before the the annual Dilbert calendar the little page day calendar that you can only buy on dilbert.com by the way there's no other source go to dilbert.com and see the the link but if you were to get it the sometime in January it's probably going to be 10% cheaper so we haven't lowered the price because it's just there's a a technical uh question about just how long that takes or if that's easy or hard but uh probably soon if you want to wait till next week probably 10% cheaper but I can't guarantee it it would make sense uh meanwhile um you you probably know that I still produced Dilbert Dilbert reborn it's called and only the subscribers to me on X and also on the locals platform get to see it but I publish in both places the new one for the day which in this case is about Dilbert's company shutting down their Dei group um but then I also checked the one that was 10 years ago cuz I put that on a I put that on a digital calendar which has nothing to do with the paper calendar and today is one of those days where both the 10 year ago comic and the one I wrote for today are really funny yeah sometimes I'll look at the two of them and I'll say oh the calendar was better than today's comic or or the comic is better than the calendar was which was would have been 10 years ago uh but today they're they're both they're both right on point so check that out um you may have seen a video of AA Harris uh praising the wonders of Quanza and how much she enjoyed celebrating as a young person now of course everybody's mocking her for various different things but I'll just point out one thing if you turn off the sound and you just look at her she looks really high yeah if she's not drunk or totally inated in that video I don't know how you'd explain her face you know I can't even do an impression of it it's something you would have to be on drugs to even make that face I've never seen anybody who wasn't on drugs Who had who had any kind of mannerisms like that so I think we dodged a bullet there meanwhile over in Chicago where you thought Chicago was totally lost the end woke account tells us that arrests are way up so shoplifting and theft may be finally not legal um so why why is suddenly a big Improvement in Chicago Well turns out that that Soros funded da Kim Fox is out and there's some new DA in and the new DEA wants to actually make crime illegal I guess so felony theft charges are have surged by 154% just this month after O'Neal Burke took over so here's my question uh I of course am completely in favor of you know improving the the laws and the enforcement in in the big cities right because it's a problem everywhere so I'm totally in favor of this but there's a there is a question that pops up that I feel like we need to be adult about and it goes like this you probably saw a video it was kind of viral of two young uh black women I don't know if they were over 18 but they were somewhere in that age range and they were casually doing some shoplifting at some you know box store and they were they were captured at the uh the exit and they were putting handcuffs and they were acting surprised and there was a video of them talking to each other in the back of the squad car where where they're saying it's it's illegal now like they didn't know that the law that you know that there been a change in society and that the the enforcement would be um aggressive and I get that not everybody follows the news and certainly not everybody follows the political news so if you're a young person did you really know I mean seriously was there any way you would know that the situation had changed from there's no real risk to you're going to jail now here's where it gets tricky again I'm going to tell you I'm completely in favor of the new enforcement so don't don't interpret this as softening my stance completely in favor of it but I'm going to ask you this question just as a human stepping outside of just the political or the legal or the how do you save the city those are all important and they're more important than what I'm going to say next but I feel like it's necessary those cities created an attractive nuisance do do you know what that means an attractive nuisance in other words by making it legal to shoplift they essentially encouraged it would you agree here's some free stuff there's no penalty and then word gets around and people are taking advantage of the free stuff with no penalty yes they need to go to jail remember I'm not arguing against it but does that seem fair to you now remember I always make fun of fairness because fairness is uh what I say was invented so children and idiots could have conversations with each other um fairness isn't a real thing but sometimes there are things that just strike you as a human H here's what I think I think if you pick up a 18-year-old who has no criminal record who did not know that this was now more criminalized it was always illegal but it's more criminalized if they didn't know I would blame the city for creating an attractive Hazard the attractive Hazard was the city itself had basically said come steal our and so when two 18-year-old young women went to do exactly that the rules had changed honestly I'd let him go I'd let him go because I would blame the City for putting them in a situation where they were attracted to Crime your city should be pushing you from crime if the city spent one minute making crime attractive which they did for a lot longer than a minute I feel like there needs to be some kind of um some kind of period of forgiveness so arresting them and putting them in handcuffs and putting them in the back of the squad car 100% on board 100% but once they enter the legal system I would like to hear their lawyers say your honor this this law only recently changed the city had created an attractive Hazard um I think that has to be taken into account and I would love the judge to say ladies if you do that again you're going straight to jail but your defense has a a reasonable argument that reasonable people can agree on I wasn't comfortable putting them in jail once the city had set them up I'm not for that but again we we have to have laws and they have to be enforced um apparently online there's a debate between uh representative krenshaw and a popular ex personality cat turd now apparently Cat turd's made some claims about crenchaw and crenchaw said that claims are fake and suggested they would sue them um some of you are taking sides you don't like Keno's views on war and there was something else you mentioned um so you didn't like some of his policies and I get that um I would just uh note that if you're trying to figure out who's the bad guy in this situation um cat turd lied about me in public cat turd went after my reputation with lies well or maybe just wrong I can't tell if he was just stupid or or wrong but I blocked him a long time ago because he's not a good guy and he's not smart he's entertaining he's very entertaining but he's not a good guy he's not smart just just make sure you know that because he's a public figure and it's fair to just know who you're dealing with so I'm not going to take sides on this because I don't know exactly the issue but I'll tell you that cat turd is not a good guy I I don't consider him a good guy he's entertaining so if you're following him for the entertainment sure uh Jonathan Turley is writing today about uh big win for free speech so there was this doctor um Dr.
Tara gustillo so she won a big free speech appell at court Victory against her health care System where she worked so she was removed from her position after she criti ized black lives matter critical race Theory and some parts of the co narrative just free speech she just criticized those things and she got fired and that was reversed now here's here's the payoff if I told you that there was somebody who got fired for criticizing black lives matter critical race Theory and Co aren't you thinking to yourself uh sounds like some basic white concern ative here here's what we know about this Filipina American doctor so first of all Filipina second of all she had a Stella record she raised black children oh wait what if somebody who raises black children criticizes black lives matter and you're canceling her what what that's pretty that's pretty extreme I mean I don't know how much the each of these things figured into it but uh and apparently she credited with according to Jonathan Charley she's credited with creating a program to reflect cultural differences in birthing practices to better serve her diverse patients now you know I'm not the woke guy but isn't that like a really good piece of work changing the um the birthing practices so they take into account any uh cultural differences now to me that's just good that's all good right you know I get the argument you don't want the country overrun with new cultures and stuff but if you're dealing with real human beings and real medical situations in America yes their their specific cultural situation should be accounted for and then apparently she argued that her colleagues turned it into a program for quote racially segregated care which was not the idea that's not the idea you're I mean that's completely ruining the idea and objected to certain Orthodoxy over RAC essential views so Dr.
Tara gtill sounds like one of the best human beings I've ever heard like from top to bottom and uh she won sometimes good people win um Argentina their new president M um he announced something that confused me so I I spread some fake news that I quickly deleted after I found out but uh somebody somebody summarized the news in a way that was misleading and it fooled me but uh said M has announced that he's abolished over 90% of Argentina's taxes now I thought that that meant he got rid of 90% of Argent taxes but apparently getting rid of 90% of Argentina's taxes what it really means is sources of taxes it's not 90% of the taxes it's 90% of the sources of Taxation so apparently they got taxed for just about everything they did he thinks he can get it down to six kinds of taxes which would be good but I'm going to go on record uh just so I've said it this argen a miracle does not look real to me it it's it's pinging every one of my warning flags warning warning this story might be a little bit too hyperbolic because it looks a little too magically successful the real world is way messier than this sounds I mean you know if you come in and you make these major structural changes I do believe that the kinds of changes he's making will set up Argentina for a very bright future so I do believe it's all good I don't believe that it's all good so fast it's the so fast part that I'm like really on the other hand so we'll we'll argue both sides of this if I were the person transforming the country and and part of My Success depended on people thinking I could do that and I could do more I probably would exaggerate My Success early and I'd tell everybody ah it's it's working it's working like crazy it's so fast I'll do more of it so on one hand I don't mind I mean it seems a a functional bit of marketing if you say you're doing a little bit better than you are I just feel like if he can get everything good without any notable negatives that would be the first time in history anybody did it like hey maybe you never know anything's possible I'm rooting for him and I think everything he's doing makes sense I'm just think maybe we're getting ahead of ahead of ourselves on on the actual produced results just a hunch well meanwhile the conversation about Trump wanting to buy Canada has uh has created uh little attention by Kevin oir he's one of the Shark Tank stars but better known as being one of the more successful investors uh and he's Canadian and he says that there's actually interest in Canada in merging with the United States now he just means conversationally not in the government government is probably 100% against it but he thinks he wants to try to sell it so he wants to see if he can pitch it and maybe uh broker a deal with Trump and some kind and form some kind of what he calls an economic Union um so an economic Union would not be you know merger so they'd still have some some you know regular government I guess but uh yeah maybe I I don't know what he has in mind but he is a serious person who wants what's best for both countries and probably has a good idea what would get us there so if Kevin o is weighing in I feel like I feel like Kevin o is in that category of the pirate ship so not only did Trump attract people who used to be Democrats or still are Democrats but he also got a Canadian he got a Canadian like like the the Trump effect is so strong that there's somebody you know actually I don't know his I don't know his uh current nationality so he I don't know if he he's probably still a Canadian citizen I think yeah he's called the Canadian investor um but I just love the fact that the the the incoming Trump Administration seems solid enough and capable enough that somebody like Kevin olir would say let me spend a bunch of time seeing if I can get this very big thing done that might be great for both countries just people volunteering it's like Doge right it's like people volunteering to put their own lives on hold really good lives like we're talking about people who could just go to the beach all day if they wanted to and theyve decided to sacrifice for some kind of national or double National benefit I just appreciate it so I'm just going to give a shout out to cavan oiry for putting his risk Capital out there in favor of two Nations that need a little help thanks well there's a new update in New York Post of course we'll talk about the foreign worker thing just waiting for people to stream in so we can hit that when we're all we're all here at the same time um apparently the uh intelligence spy bosses they they silenced the defense department back when the covid leak was still being discussed and people were saying is it a lab leak or is it a natural thing and apparently the defense department had good evidence it was a designed designed thing in the lab and the Spy bosses decided to take that out of the briefing so that Biden did not hear that it came from a lab what would you do with a spy Chief who was hiding the most Vital Information from the commanderin-chief now I don't think it's IL legal but you should never work in that job again anybody who's hiding the most important information from the president while working for the president it's got to be fired right away I mean there that there's no real second chance for that kind of stuff so I don't know who it was but uh maybe when Trump gets in there we can get a better idea which spy Chief silenced the truth from the commander-in-chief on the other hand Biden wasn't really totally functional so and and the funniest thing about this story is when they talk about the Spy Chiefs and and the Pentagon and they did all their research and they found out things that nobody could have ever known and then it's taken years for them to come you know finally tell you what they think they know and and I've told you before but it's funny I think a probably like maybe a week after the covid pandemic hit that one of my smartest friends called me and said here's a picture on Google Google Maps that wet La that wet Market is directly across the street from the Wuhan lab that creates that does exactly this kind of work so on week one I knew for sure did was I doubting that the that the lab that was across the street was a real problem as opposed to the wet markets that have operated forever and never had this kind of problem exactly so pretending that anybody didn't know on day one or at least day seven is just kind of funny because if I knew I mean I knew for sure in a week I was just waiting for the rest of the country to catch up I thought it'd be easy but it took years all right um DARPA according to reclaim the net uh DARPA has created this what they call a theory of mind so they're using technology and software to predict an influence behavior what um so apparently they think they can predict what people do and they claim that they'll use it against our adversaries because if you know what your adversaries are going to do well you got you have an advantage now do you think this would stay limited to use against our adversaries of course not because every time the intelligence people find something that works against their adversaries unless it's a kinetic thing you know like like a bomb it ends up getting employed domestically because if we're trying to control people in other countries sooner or later somebody says you know there are a few people in this country who could use a little control why don't we use that external thing to control these Rogues inside the country so of course it will come internally of course it will now the question is do you think it's real do you think even if they try really hard and the smartest people and they use AI that they will be able to predict people's actions in the future well how could they if you have free will if you have free will there's no way they're going to predict what you're going to do I'm just joking you don't have free will so they they'll totally be able to predict what you're going to do it's really an information problem if they knew enough about you they could get it 80% of the time they could probably do populations faster they could probably they could probably look at a politicians message and then look at how that'll affect the election and know who's going to win based on the messaging or or maybe even the personality so there's some things that it definitely will be able to predict you know more so than anything we're doing today um because polling predicts if you do it legitimately a lot of our polling is not legitimate but but if he did it legitimately like the internal polling for the Trump campaign it told him he was going to win it literally predicted the future so yes uh there will be other ways to do that too I believe that AI will use pattern recognition to predict the future for individuals but it won't be able to do that until it knows enough about those individuals which I don't know how they'll do that maybe if they knew everything about your social media and everything you've ever done all resumés and everything you've ever written probably it could do it but it'd have to have access to all that information probably will have that access well the Trump effect continues to get things done without him actually doing anything yet well he's doing a lot but not specifically this so Mexico is going to open shelters to house over 12,000 of its own citizens who might get deported when Trump takes over um 25 plann shelters and it's a strategic plan to accommodate exclusively the people who get deported after January 20th and uh Mexico says they're taking Trump's threats seriously and they're preparing the facilities to accept now doesn't that make his job a lot easier if Mexico has already built the receiving facilities it's going to be a lot more Humane and a lot lot polit more politically acceptable if Mexico instead of arguing like crazy you shouldn't send them back is building facilities to accept them that's the Trump effect they're acting in a way that is the adult way to act simply because Dad came home like everybody started to pick up their toys oh Dad's home I don't need to be told I'm going to pick up all my toys because it would be way worse if I don't pick up my toys so that's what's happening all right right you probably know that yesterday there's a big brewhaha on the internet on X about the issue of issuing um what visas or whatever the approval is to work in the United States for foreign workers and the debate comes down to hey if we're America First why would you bring in any foreign workers but Elon Musk says uh it took him all to clarify but he said we're really talking about the 0.1% of the top Engineers now those are now according to Elon uh those are jobs which are really really hard to fill and there tons of openings and it wouldn't really be possible to train some Americans to be in the top 0 1% of Engineering in the next few years if you have a 20-year you know buildup yes you know in 20 years we might create enough top Engineers that we don't think about taking anybody from another country maybe possible but at the moment if you want to compete in Ai and uh crypto and uh bit uh yeah Quantum Computing and robots those are all the things that are going to drive economies in the future and the people who drive them the most are going to be the engineers in the top 01 in fact open AI only exists because um Sam mman brought over some uh Indian engineer who made the breakthroughs that made AI essentially possible so even AI wouldn't even exist if we hadn't brought in one of those 01 engineers and he hadn't done what he did so keep that in mind now I waigh in and immediately it just caused more problems than it solved because what I didn't understand is that people were not on the same topic so there there are a few topics and individually they're all important but they all got sort of conflated and people people were mad about things that they were on the wrong topic so let me tell you what my view is and then we'll talk about the topic my old view my old view prior to Biden and it's it's now changed because of Biden but my old view is that you want to keep everybody smart so if somebody wants to come in and they've got a you know high education in some valuable field or even if they just want to be an optometrist or make money that the country is better off every time you bring in somebody who's going to add to the tax base in other words pay taxes and is not going to take much so so my old View and again this is revised but my old view is you take everybody who is smart and additive now how you decide whether somebody's smart enough and additive uh I don't think we have a good system for that so my desires are not supported by any kind of good system after B after Biden opened the border and magga became the the dominant majority opinion in the country they were very very very clear about limiting immigration under that environment it probably makes sense to not allow in the country people who would be additive do you get that so under the current cultural political situation I think it would just disturb too many people to bring in people who even would add to the country even you're sure of it they would would add so at the moment I'm opposed because Biden Biden essentially ruined the atmosphere for immigrants he ruined it by by making it just everybody come on then all the nuances just drained out of it and we probably have to work pretty hard to you know correct things but the argument does not apply to the 01 engineer so let me say this as um completely this is the most firm confident opinion I'll ever get you you cannot have enough 01 top Engineers because Engineers are not like optometrists and doctors and lawyers the 0.01 engineer is developing the future like the very civilization changing work you want all of those and we don't have anywhere near enough not even close you know as Elon Musk reminds us now a lot of people argue that Elon Musk doesn't understand the topic of hiring top Engineers to which if I may do a face plant so I spent some of my time explaining that Elon Musk probably knows a little bit about hiring top Engineers I I don't think I need to develop my argument on that too hard but there was a um so so that's the first thing so it's unambiguously good for the country to bring in the top top engineers and anybody would argue that that would be stupid honestly I wouldn't even listen to the argument on the other side it would just be stupid because you're not talking about changing the culture of the United States you're talking about people who almost always already speak English better than you do and are the top top top top top top students that's it's a completely different situation than bringing in Uber drivers I'm not in favor of that at the moment at the moment now I think you can say all those things while still saying that immigrants are the you know the the reason the country is strong and Etc that's all true it's just that Biden ruined the atmosphere for bringing in immigrants even the ones who could add he just ruined it we might be able to get back to that but not until Trump gets things under control so um that's where I'm at now secondly um that the argument that I just gave you is a conceptual argument wouldn't it be nice to have only these people and at the moment it would be impractical really to just open it up to everybody but second to that that's sort of the goal or where you'd like to end up um is that the systems we have for deciding who comes in are completely corrupted so some people were getting really mad that they thought I didn't understand that our current systems are not picking just the best of the best they're pretty much abused by big companies just to get cheap labor everybody on board with that our current systems all of them 100% of our current systems are so gameable that big companies are using them not in the way that you want them to be used now there is a question about what would happen to your inflation if they hired more expensive labor from the US so if you're willing to pay for more inflation then you would also be in favor of them not having these programs that let them game the system to bring in cheap labor um so can we all agree on the following statement of assumptions our current systems are wholly inadequate to getting what you want as a citizen of the United States they do seem to work in the favor of quite a number of Corporations and the corporations are the ones who argue for keeping the current completely broken and corrupt system because it works for them it just doesn't work for you know workers for example American workers so I think we can all agree on the fact that the current system is broken now what is what is Trump's take on this I actually don't know which is the weirdest thing about this conversation I don't know where Trump's at at one point he was at where I was at one point he agreed with my old view that as long as they're additive yes yes everybody additive everybody additive so that used to be his view as well but after he's watched this whole brewhaha and after you know Biden let in everybody I feel like he may have he may have uh adjusted his own views but I haven't seen it yet so that's the most fascinating thing about the story is that is that the Bas was having this heated argument yesterday all over social media of course Trump was watching of course he was and it's helping him I'm sure helping him you know come up with his statement on on the the thing but there are a number of uh things that come up uh number one um oh the the other thing that we can agree on is that big companies like Google and apple have the resources to put people in another country and really really vet the top Engineers but that's not going to work for a small company um somebody somebody said my opinions were invalid because I never tried to hire foreign Engineers well I've actually tried hiring uh India based program programmers at least twice for side projects I was doing and it's a nightmare if you're not Google and apple and you want to get somebody who can do a good job so you find somebody in India who says oh yeah just tell us what you want we'll give you a price we'll assign some programmers and we'll write that code for you absolutely none of that worked because I talked to somebody smart who would make the sale but then they would assign it to somebody who was completely incompetent so nobody could perform anything I I didn't get anything I paid money and got nothing twice so hiring hiring employees to work from the other country if you were thinking about it I wouldn't do it everything I saw says it doesn't work if they're not in the same room with you don't do a tech project not at all so certainly that's part part of something needs to be fixed um so I I was listening to uh Theo Wald who was the former deputy assistant to Trump in the first Administration and he was in charge of uh drafting the legislation to create a new legal immigration framework so he the one who said that when he looked at all the various and there quite a few of them the various Pathways that foreign workers can get into the United States that they're all corrupt so yesterday I was seeing some people saying well you're talking about this H1B visa thing yeah that's bad but there's this other thing to get the Geniuses that's not so bad well in the real world according to Theo Wald the guy who was in charge of making it all work he said no they're all corrupt so you should assume 100% of our foreign worker acquisition is totally broken and has to be fixed um that was the best context I've seen so when I talk about this topic I talk about what we want to achieve usually I talk about systems you know I always say systems are better than goals but there sometimes it's obvious what you want to achieve we we want American workers to have jobs that are good jobs and blah blah blah so U but this uh brought up a a really troubling thing so V ramaswami weighed into the debate he said one of the reasons that maybe uh foreign workers are being favored by tech companies is that there's a cultural difference and he described the cultural difference as some of the Asian and Indian companies or countries but their families he described would put a focus on educational attainment and you know professional success whereas in America you might have far less of it now that caused all the dumb people to assume that his generality was referring to every family in both countries so if you fell into that trap and you said wait a minute that's not true I know this one American family that does everything right or if you said wait a minute I've seen pictures of India and it's people living in garbage piles why do I want the people living in garbage piles to teach me how to have a better culture I don't want to live in a garbage pile now those are ridiculous those are ridiculous comments because he's using a generality is it a useful generality that the Indian and Asian employees that are at least the topic of conversation the ones who have technical skills is it true that they probably had a lot of family support probably are they the majority of indan I don't know but probably not but they're the only ones we care about because they're the ones who are getting technical skills and they may or may not come to the United States that's the population we're talking about they definitely have the tiger moms most of them but again we're not talking about the exceptions so here's how people took it they said uh V first of all a number of people didn't think V was an American citizen may I may I give myself another face palm this is to the people who argued with me that he's not an American citizen okay I just had to do that born in this country risking his life to fix the Doge thing he's risking his life Elon Musk risking his life not hyperbole not hyperbole death threats death threats death threats they're risking their lives for your benefit do you think that they're doing it to make extra money well they might I mean that they might make extra money but clearly that's not the main incentive V is more American I I said this to somebody I said he's more American than you are he he's more supportive of the American Experience the the American you know what whatever makes us good people he's he probably knows more about American history than just about any one of you you can't get more American than the that's like Peak American and and people got on me for defending because I I got pretty aggressive yesterday on social media for def defending V's take about our cultures and also elon's take about needing engineers and people said to me um you know are are you just making money is it because Elon pays you pays me I mean obviously you know I'm monetized on X but you think that's why I'm doing it you think you think I'm supporting the idea of bringing the top 1% Engineers because I get paid on X that was literally the last thing I was even in my mind never never once did that even occur to me here's what occurred to me when I watch Elon and V do take on the hard most thankless job that America has ever produced short of War which is to take on trimming the government that's patriotism at a level that I I can't even conceive I mean it's beyond me given that and given you know my current age I've I've kind of done what I need to do I would take a bullet for either one of them actually l Al take a bullet because the two of them are doing the only thing that can save our country if we can't get the debt under control we're all dead we're all dead and there are only two people who happen to be extraordinarily brilliant incredibly Brave capable beyond anything that you and I can really understand and are taking on the hardest job in the world for you if you're American for you and also for me I would take a bullet to keep them in that job like actually I'd take a bullet like if you said to me you know you're going to have to die but you'll save one of those two people I would take the bullet like actually literally that's not a joke so if you see me defending them aggressively on social media I would take a bullet for them because they would take a bullet for me right they're doing it right in front of you I don't have to guess if they would take a bullet because they put themselves in a position where the the odds of danger and death threats is through the roof so if they would do that for me I would do it for them and same with Trump how did you feel when Trump took a bullet for you right that's different if somebody takes a bullet for you and Trump did that that's a you you get bonded to them and and you should so um that uh so a lot of people were on that so let me let me say this so some people interpreted VI as this uh Indian guy uh who was criticizing white American culture in the United States and a lot of people thought it was kind of a put down kind of an insult to American culture to which I said what are you talking about an insult to American culture what American culture are you talking about the American culture that I live in has free speech and we have a superpower our culture American culture has a superpower and it looks like this when we fail and we get ashamed we learn things get stronger we eat that shame we eat that failure and then we go and win in other countries and in other cultures they do not criticize their culture and if they fail well they don't want to fail so they don't do a startup they just take a job where they're less likely to fail so when you say that V is somehow insulting America by saying that the culture needs a a tweak needs an upgrade that's the most American thing you can do criticizing how an American system and culture is basically a system criticizing an American System even down to the family level if it's necessary that's what we do you can't get more American than that we criticize ourselves in public because we have the gift of free speech is and and um if something needs to be fixed and you're going to get a big blowback for saying it we'll still say it uh I said what I needed to say at the risk of getting cancelled very American right you you could disagree with everything I said or did that's fine but would you agree that me saying what I thought I needed to say at the moment and I had good intentions that's a longer story but and then getting cancelled for it failing basically that would be a failure my ire career wiped out you watched me you watch what happened when I got canceled right I just recovered got stronger I got a million followers on X it it basically supercharged me so that was a failure it was a shame I I you I didn't feel any shame but you could imagine that it would be accompanied usually um and so I just took that failure I ate it for breakfast I used it for energy and I went on and and in some ways accomplished more than I would have accomplished if I had not been cancelled because it you know creates a lot of attention so yes the uh you can criticize any American system from culture to finance to government that's what I want I want our smartest people telling us where we should focus even if he's wrong something sometimes right we're we're not looking for Perfection so um yes I'm defending V aggressively now this brought up a number of comments because people were the the other the hidden topic within this foreign employee stuff is a number of people kept saying but Scott don't you understand uh I'm a trained engineer and I can't get a job what do I say to somebody who says that on social media don't know them they say I'm a trained engineer experienced and I can't get a job I say what color are you you're white right so mixed in with this whole foreign foreign worker thing is the fact that there's been massive systemic racism against white men for what um sequa parner um Sean Maguire thinks may have been going on for the past 10 years here's what he said he said I was told I can't be promoted for being a white man explicitly at Google and then he he suggested that that's been going on for at least 10 years do you know when I got that talk the first time I got the talk I can't promote you because you're a white male the 80s 37 years ago for 37 years this has been the way everything in Corporate America worked no we're not going to promote you for a white man prudent thinker onx says I've had the same experience elsewhere in big Tech also been told we want less people who look like you because it messes up our Dei commitment also been told whatever you do do not hire a white man um this is a white man also been told everyone is invited except you we want to put out the image of diversity um and and I've even been plagiarized by the Dei hire later to learn I was hired for that very purpose oh no and then deplorable garbage um that's the name of his account was told the same thing by a big law firm and notes if an entity like that a big law firm uh isn't afraid to openly do it discriminate against race he says it's everywhere um Russell says at an Intel Corporation we restricted hiring white males unless approved senior VP level and that was more than 10 years ago imagine what it's like now no this has been 37 years at least that's when it hit me it may may have been earlier in California where I was so why didn't people know this it's because white guys just suck it up and get to work that's it white guys are will complain privately will complain to our family complain to our spouse but we're not necessarily organizing a protest we just say all right I'm not going to work there I'll go work somewhere else so that's why you don't know also I found out 30 years ago that if I mentioned in public that I was being discriminated against for being white what did people call me a white racist liar so they already decided I'm a white racist just cuz I'm white and then I say I was unable to be promoted in two corporations in a row because they told me I'm white and male and I can't promote you and and I say that and they say oh well you're lying oh great so if I tell you the truth I'm a white racist and now also a liar 30 years over three decades almost four decades white men had to keep this secret because if you said it out loud you were a liar and that's a real thing that happened in the United States for decades still happening um all right um then somebody weighed in thinking they would add some nuance and said uh no it's cuz somebody else labeled it as an anti-white bias which it is and then a commenter said well you know technically is it an anti-white bias um it might have also been anti- Asian-American because I'm sure they discriminated against Asians I need one more face plant can I give it to you in colleges they definitely discriminated against Asians true in corporations they hired the Asians not the white guy if you if you had lots of diversity of asian-americans it was considered like the uh what's the good analogy like the methadone for the heroin or something they wanted heroin which would be black women lesbian employees you know that would be like oh home run but if they couldn't get that they definitely wanted as many asian-looking people to put on to put on the you know the company picture so no I've never once I've never even heard of it have you is there anybody in the comments who's ever even heard of an Asian-American being turned down at Big Corporation because that wasn't diverse enough I've never heard of it now if it turned out the asian-americans have been keeping this secret for 40 years like white Americans you know I guess I'd have to say I shouldn't be surprised so it could be it could be true but I've never seen it or heard of it never once well then wired wired publication uh this was the they say it's the year of the influencer political takeover so uh of course A lot of people are writing about how the podcasters and the online influencers are now the important thing and the mainstream news and the New York Times Are unimportant Etc but here's what I think about that conversation I I I think this is sort of putting the dilber filter on it when all these smart people the Democrats say that uh they finally understand that what they needed to do better was take advantage of the influencer podcasting ecosystem and that the the Republicans really had that nailed down you know they really had a good good ecosystem for that so so that maybe is why they lost so do you think that's why they lost to watching Democrats not understand anything it never gets less entertaining it is true that Trump did a much better job with the podcaster influencer situation that's true but the reason they lost is that they did everything wrong they had the worst candidate running against the worst candidate the best candidate of all time they had no policies that were in the top three of the American public they they wasted $1.5 billion on God knows what probably half of it was stolen you could just you could make a list of all the things you should do right and the only things they did well were the ones that don't matter to the election the ground game said they always tease Trump for not having a ground game but never ask themselves the Elon Musk question which is do we need a ground game and the answer is probably not in in the current age there there was a time when the ground game was everything but probably not now you know people learn online they don't need the ground game um but here's my dilbur filter take on it the the fact that the Democrat think the podcaster world is just where they need to go um I think that the Democrat um let's say the the people who would be helping with campaigns in the future if you are going to work on a campaign which thing would you rather do uh organize a door- knocking thing or do another boring interview print interview with the New York Times or uh interact with some of the coolest hottest podcasters and influencers in the world which way do you want to spend your day do you want to spend your day talking to famous sexy young like people killing it so that you can take a picture and show it to your kid it's the easiest job in the world because you get to sit in the studio and maybe watch the podcast and that's your job for that day I've got a feeling that the Democrats are moving toward this whole we've got to have more podcasting and influencers because that's fun and then they justify it as like oh this is the big problem got to fix this podcasting situation there's no way we can be competitive until we have a Joe Rogan of our own I don't know so there there's something true about it which is they probably need to be better in in that domain but but there's also something that screams we would rather do things that are pleasurable than things that are hard and I don't think that's a Winner's attitude we'd rather do things that are pleasurable than hard that might be their entire problem anyway um I and I also think it's funny harking back to the prior conversation that they canceled me at exact the time when I was the most dangerous because the podcasting world was starting to dominate again dumbest mistake they could have made they they should have said Scott we'd like you to spend all of your time on cartooning so why don't we give you a big contract to write a twice as many cont cartoons if they had done that they could have bought me out of the race well I don't know but it would have been worth the shot if they offered enough um anyway according to study finds scientists figured out how to transform red blood cells into Precision cancer fighting drones um and I guess I guess they can tweak it as your cancer morphs into a different form they can tweak it again so it it gets at it again so this is actually pretty exciting um they've got some kind of Mo molecule that'll stick to parts of the RNA and then regular activities so the reason that this is important is if it feels less destructive meaning if you if you do something that's just put some destruction on your body but you hope the the cancer cells die faster than your healthy cells you know like chemo yeah you're just hoping that your healthy cells survive but they're going to get whacked um and the so this is the second anti-cancer possibility which doesn't seem to have that mechanism which it attacks your your healthy stuff don't know if it'll work yet but I love I I love all the new news about it now there's an article in the hill in opinion piece by Evan Davis and David Schult and they say Congress has the power to block Trump from taking office but lawmakers must act now so the idea is according to them the Constitution provides that any oath-breaking insurrectionist can't run for office and then they gave their evidence for how Trump is an oath breing insurrectionist of course all their evidence was completely debunked and laughed at by people like Jeff Clark uh also an attorney who got in trouble for that January 6 stuff for doing basically nothing nothing that anybody should have ever gotten in trouble for that's another story but um so apparently I didn't know this but apparently if they try to make this move to not allow Trump to take office it would take a 2third vote did I have that right 2third vote of the in each house so in both uh Senate and the house uh two-thirds vote now I don't think there's would you agree there's not a chance in the world that two-thirds of the people are going to vote to not put Trump in office right so there's not any practical way this is going to happen as far as I can tell but um I kind of want them to to try don't you don't you want them to try because the the Democrat Party is is on life support if they try to keep Trump out of office with some weird lawfare somebody's going to yank the life support out of whatever's left of the Democratic Party that would be the end that would just be the end now I know you want me to say oh if that happened there would be an armed an armed uh Revolution no there won't against who what are you going to do shoot your neighbor because some politicians did something you're not going to shoot your neighbor we like the neighbor so um I would just say this um I just wish they I kind of hope they do it I I hope they take their strongest play to try to keep them out of office they will fail um but this is the ultimate you know F around and find out situation I'd really love him to find out not with violence no violence please but no violence would be necessary because we would just look at the situation and say nope nope now speaking of violence which I do not recommend but you can state facts about violence right so that's fair you can say somebody did some violence there's a risk of some violence but I don't recommend it don't do any violence however can you imagine the security situation for anybody who voted to keep Trump out of office at this point if in Congress they voted to to use this Insurrection thing to keep them can you imagine what that would do to their security situation again please don't do any violence but we live in a country where people wouldn't take this sitting down and and anybody who voted to keep Trump out of office for this Insurrection I would recommend you look at your budget because if you don't have a budget for increasing security I wouldn't vote this way now I wouldn't say that about many things I can't even think of one other thing I would ever ever said that about but the people Vote for This are really going to put themselves in a physical Jeopardy don't do anything to them don't don't don't we want peace we don't want to be that kind of country but the reality is we live in a dangerous country full of guns and people have the guns for that reason they have the guns for this reason don't use them for this reason this isn't good enough reason but that's why they have them so if they think that it would be safe to to vote that they're not going to put the winner of the popular vote into office just think about your budget just think about it well Russia is open to conversation about Ukraine but uh they say Trump has to go first he has to make the first move to improve ties according to Breitbart Simon Kent and um what would the first move be so let's talk about that if if Russia says yeah we're open but you got to make the first move all right here's the wrong answer the first move should not be a peace proposal um by the way lavro um so he's he's the uh he's the Russian what would you call him he's the main guy who talks to the United States um about foreign policy and stuff like that so lavro um says uh lro says that um that a truce is a path to nowhere so a ceas fire doesn't have any interest for Russia Russia is saying we're looking for a big deal you know something enduring something comprehensive we're not looking for let's stop shooting on Tuesday is he right about that yes yes yeah lavro is completely right having a ceasefire would save lives but beyond that it would wouldn't it wouldn't hasten the end of the war I don't think so what would Trump do he can't say listen to a ceasefire I agree Russia is correct on that uh but here's what he's being set up for negotiating with himself have you ever heard that term in the negotiating world there's a thing that's considered a classic error and the error is to negotiate against yourself and the way that looks is you is you say first all right here's the deal I'll do this if you do that and then the other side says no and then you go back and here's the error and you come back with a new offer and they haven't made an offer if you do that it's called negotiating against yourself and you've been tricked into making the first offer and then responding to them making a new offer and you've already talked to yourself down they haven't even made an offer and you talked to yourself down so that's considered a classic mistake um I learned that when I was negotiating with Disney years ago there was an idea of making a Dilbert Disney animated movie uh and we made an offer to Disney and Disney said no that's not good enough come back with another offer and the head of my syndication company said um how about we're done now and we'll never work with you again that that's how it ended and I completely supported it yeah you don't negotiate with yourself period And by the way he told them we're not going to negotiate with ourselves if you've got an offer we'll look at it so they knew why but they didn't want to make an offer so we said well maybe we'll make an offer with somebody who knows how negotiation works now I maybe it works for Disney maybe sometimes they get somebody dumb enough to do that but but thank goodness you know the professional I was working with knows how this works and he just closed them down so nope don't negotiate it with ourselves we'll take this somewhere else and that's why there's no Dilbert movie no we did take it somewhere else but you know things didn't work out in other places either anyway um so he shouldn't make an offer but he has to do something so what would what would it look like if Trump did something first but it wasn't an offer for a peace deal what would that look like I don't know but Trump is the best at this suppose Trump said how about let's have a summit would that be an offer kind of kind of and an offer to do a summit with you know himself and Putin I would feel like that would be going first but without making the offer so I think there's there's room to play I think there's room to play and when Russia says you have to go first what they're doing is trying to dominate Trump because they're trying to say all right we made you do the first thing like why does Trump have to go first why does he have to go first they both want peace so if lavro can sort of manipulate Trump into going first then he is sort of won the first round Trump will know that because unlike ordinary politic Ians Trump knows how this works he's done this before so he's not going to he's not going to fall for the UF to go first unless it looks like something that would be ordinary to do now a summit at least with Trump would be an ordinary thing to do so I think that would not look like going first but would still be close enough to to get things done so we'll see there's a giant breakthrough coming in e batter is are you surprised I tell you one of these stories every day the reason I do it is to help you predict the future and here's the future if this new leap let's see it's according to the mark mayard in the Pasadena Star News um the new breakthrough just uses a new new kind of material and it uh uses 10 times less anode material which is a big deal uh and uh might cut the cost someday of the battery by a huge amount did you know that the cost of the battery in an electric car um could be up to 40% of the cost of the car and that this is a battery that works in the lab and if it worked in uh the real world would cut that cost by about half so 40% of your car cut by half just because the battery so we're we're at the point where we're probably one more big battery breakthrough like one one of these many ones that I talk about every day on the show they're all different but one of them is going to break through and if it doubles capacity and doubles batteries that's just that's not just better stuff like if you're thinking oh I'd like to get a few extra miles on my car battery if I have electric car no we're not talking about that you'd get that too what we're talking about is a complete transformation of civiliz ation because it's what makes your your robot a good deal it's what allows you to get off the grid if you had a real cheap battery that you could put on the side of your house and collect the Sun during the day and use it at the night you might just get off the grid you might have electric airplanes so the major source of uh CO2 if you're worried about that would be removed because airlines are really really bad on that so one more leap just one more big leap in batteries I'm not talking about the 10% 20% Improvement I'm talking about the big leap and there are a bunch of them that are Brewing one more big leap changes all of air travel well travel the our entire Transportation would change it would lower costs to the point where it would make a difference in inflation it would lower inflation Transportation would be different your your your the time you spent charging would go down to minutes instead of hours it would be really transformational and uh it's definitely going to happen meanwhile Israel has declared on Tuesday that it's going to start killing the leaders of the hoodies so the hoodies in Yemen been uh shooting Rockets into Israel and prior to that they've been putting missiles at shipping shipping boats in the area so the hoodis are real bad news and they're backed by um Iran and Iran is weakened but the hoodis are still active now when Israel says we're going to take out your leaders um it just tells me we're at a strange point in history so nobody's talking about taking out Putin in a you know some kind of a decapitation strike because he's got nukes and he's got backup and whoever comes after him isn't necessarily going to be the good guy so and probably the same is true with an American president if you're Russia or China you're probably not thinking even for one second about a decapitation strike on the United States because we'd still be too strong likewise we will not think even for one second about a decapitation strike on China because it would just be destabilizing and it would just ruin everything so decapitation strikes definitely don't work you know once a country is reach is a certain status and they also don't work when your your little scrappy terrorist cells are so small that you can't even figure out where they're operating from or who's in charge so in those cases a decapitation strikes no good the one time it's good is if you happen to have massive digital Footprints everywhere so you can find stuff and the entity has not created a structure that can go up on easily without the leaders in other words the leaders are kind of key to keeping it together and that's not the case in America we TR we change out our leaders all the time so there's this one little area of History where we can find them easily because we got satellites we've got cell phones we've got AI so we can find them and we have uh missiles and drones that can hit anything from anywhere so I would say The Who are in a lot of trouble because it seems to be Israel's ability to take out the leaders of any group that's against them is now 100% operational and all the hoodie leaders are going to just start disappearing um and I think it works because they're they're leader driven organizations so good luck good hunting Israel uh I saw a article by uh Barack Ravid on X he says that uh the people in Israel and uh the US even who are negotiating for the end of the hostages uh not the end but the release um that it's unlikely that they're going to get that done before Trump takes office um I would go further and say that's not going to happen what why would Hamas suddenly become rational because Trump's going into office they're clearly not they're not afraid of dying and the and the captives give them a little bit of Leverage so why would they I can't see any reason that they would do it now I think that they'll keep the hostages and then when Trump comes in he's going to say all right you had a chance but I'll give you one more chance now that I'm actually in office you know you've got a few days I want the hostages all back and we're not negotiating for it you just give them all back now that probably won't happen and then Trump will have to figure out how to respond and I feel sorry for Gaza because if the hostages don't come back there will never be a life there and I don't think they're coming back so I think Gaza is just permanently out of business there's no such thing as you know Gaza is going to rebuild and they're all going to go live there happily I think it's just is Israel's territory and the cost of that unfortunately is going to be these hostages as long as the hostages are held yeah it's hard to criticize Israel for anything people do but I wouldn't meanwhile the New York Post is uh reporting that there's a woman who was born with two vaginas that are fully functional and even possibly capable of both of them uh getting pregnant so she has two vaginas she's a grown woman and uh she says it's it's been a very difficult dating because as soon as she tells her her date that she has two vaginas uh more often than not they get an idea hey two of them you say two of them uh I'm just going to spit ball here a little brainstorming something that I have never done before but but I've got a buddy and then she has to shut him down right away no you can stop there uh I know you have a male friend stop nope nope nope stop stop and I was thinking to myself she could never date a professional humorist such as myself I wouldn't be able to think of anything else if if you put me in that situation where I'm dating the woman with two vaginas I'm going to think of a lot of puns and they're not going to be appreciated so I'm sure she has a sense of humor but um you know there are also men this is rare but some men are born with two penises I've got two words to describe a situation of the woman with two V CH and the man with two penises soulmates soulmates is that one word or two I guess that's one word soulmates well I wish her luck um and the funniest comment I saw in this was from one of the local subscribers who said and I quote did she save one for after marriage slow clap very good all right we don't mean to make fun of this woman but she seems to be well adjusted and healthy she's perfectly healthy and uh and she's also quite ethical she discloses it um I wish the best for her I don't mean to I I don't mean to be mean uh but she's having fun with it I think yeah there there's at least some part of it that she probably thinks is fun so in that Spirit um I only have good thoughts all right ladies and gentlemen I'm going to go talk to the local subscribers privately um I don't know if there's anything I forgot about today all right ladies and gentlemen uh if you're on You.
Tube or X or Rumble I will see you tomorrow locals I'm coming at you in 30 seconds for e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e for
stocks are down a little bit but nobody
really cares about the day before the
weekend of Christmas week that doesn't
even
count let's find my comments make sure
these are
working
perfect everything's going my way today
good morning everybody and welcome to
the highlight of human civilization it's
called coffee with Scott Adams and I'll
bet you've never had a better time but
if you'd like to take this experience up
to levels that no one can under even
comprehend with their tiny shiny human
brains all you need is a cuper muger a
glass of tanker Chell suin of canteen
Jugger flask a vessel of any kind fill
it with your favorite liquid I like
coffee and join me now for the
unparallel pleasure the dopamine H the
day the thing that makes everything
better it's called the simultaneous
Z oh so
good well I wonder if I'll have a new
study that says that coffee is good for
your health H checking notes oh yeah
there is there's a new study it says
that uh coffee consumption
can improve the gut bacteria and reduces
your cancer risk it strengthens your
immune system and reduces your
inflammation according to nutrition
insight and uh you know this of course
I'm a professional
humorist so suddenly I'm wondering
about you know I'm not but I'm not a
Biblical scholar so there's some things
I don't know about but I wonder if back
in Jesus's time
do you think he ever do do you think he
ever just said uh well I think I can
cure your leprosy boom and he'd use his
Heavenly Powers but what if somebody had
a smaller problem they're like hey I've
got this little got a little
inflammation in my back did Jesus also
use his Heavenly powers or did he say
let just have a coffee why don't you
come have a coffee with me you'll be
fine that's just something I wonder as a
professional writer all right so if you
haven't bought your Dilbert calendar
yet um you could probably still get it
around the first week of January which
is almost just as
good
um I'm I'm I I guess I should tell you
this it wouldn't be fair to tell you
this I I just
realized probably at some point in
January is if not before the the annual
Dilbert calendar the little page day
calendar that you can only buy on
dilbert.com by the way there's no other
source go to dilbert.com and see the the
link but if you were to get it the
sometime in January it's probably going
to be 10% cheaper so we haven't lowered
the price because it's just there's a a
technical uh question about just how
long that takes or if that's easy or
hard but uh probably soon if you want to
wait till next
week probably 10% cheaper but I can't
guarantee
it it would make
sense uh meanwhile um you you probably
know that I still produced Dilbert
Dilbert reborn it's called and only the
subscribers to me on X and also on the
locals platform get to see it but I
publish in both places the new one for
the day which in this case is about
Dilbert's company shutting down their
Dei
group um but then I also checked the one
that was 10 years ago cuz I put that on
a I put that on a digital calendar which
has nothing to do with the paper
calendar and today is one of those days
where both the 10 year ago comic and the
one I wrote for today are really
funny yeah sometimes I'll look at the
two of them and I'll say oh the calendar
was better than today's comic or or the
comic is better than the calendar was
which was would have been 10 years ago
uh but today they're they're both
they're both right on point so check
that
out um you may have seen a video of AA
Harris uh praising the wonders of Quanza
and how much she enjoyed celebrating as
a young person now of course everybody's
mocking her for various different things
but I'll just point out one thing if you
turn off the sound and you just look at
her she looks really high
yeah if she's not drunk or totally
inated in that video I don't know how
you'd explain her face you know I can't
even do an impression of it it's
something you would have to be on drugs
to even make that face I've never seen
anybody who wasn't on drugs Who had who
had any kind of mannerisms like that so
I think we dodged a bullet there
meanwhile over in Chicago where you
thought Chicago was totally lost the end
woke
account tells us that arrests are way up
so shoplifting and
theft may be finally not legal um so why
why is suddenly a big Improvement in
Chicago Well turns out that that Soros
funded da Kim Fox is out and there's
some new DA in and the new DEA wants to
actually make crime illegal I guess so
felony theft charges are have surged by
154% just this month after O'Neal Burke
took over
so here's my
question uh I of course am completely in
favor of you know improving the the laws
and the enforcement in in the big cities
right because it's a problem everywhere
so I'm totally in favor of this but
there's a there is a question that pops
up that I feel like we need to be
adult about and it goes like this you
probably saw a video it was kind of
viral of two young uh black women I
don't know if they were over 18 but they
were somewhere in that age range and
they were casually doing some
shoplifting at some you know box store
and they were they were captured at the
uh the exit and they were putting
handcuffs and they were acting
surprised and there was a video of them
talking to each other in the back of the
squad car where where they're saying
it's it's illegal now like they didn't
know that the law that you know that
there been a change in society and that
the the enforcement would be um
aggressive and I get that not everybody
follows the news and certainly not
everybody follows the political news so
if you're a young person did you really
know I mean seriously was there any way
you would know that the situation had
changed from there's no real risk to
you're going to
jail now here's where it gets tricky
again I'm going to tell you I'm
completely in favor of the new
enforcement so don't don't interpret
this as softening my stance completely
in favor of it but I'm going to ask you
this question just as a human stepping
outside
of just the political or the legal or
the how do you save the city those are
all important and they're more important
than what I'm going to say next but I
feel like it's
necessary those cities created an
attractive
nuisance do do you know what that means
an attractive nuisance in other words by
making it legal to shoplift they
essentially encouraged it would you
agree here's some free stuff there's no
penalty and then word gets around and
people are taking advantage of the free
stuff with no penalty yes they need to
go to jail remember I'm not arguing
against
it but does that seem fair to you now
remember I always make fun of fairness
because fairness is uh what I say was
invented so children and idiots could
have conversations with each other um
fairness isn't a real thing but
sometimes there are things that just
strike you as a human H here's what I
think I think if you pick up a
18-year-old who has no criminal record
who did not know that this was now more
criminalized it was always illegal but
it's more criminalized if they didn't
know I would blame the city for creating
an attractive Hazard the attractive
Hazard was the city itself had basically
said come steal our and so when two
18-year-old young women went to do
exactly that the rules had
changed honestly I'd let him go I'd let
him go because I would blame the City
for putting them in a situation where
they were attracted to Crime your city
should be pushing you from crime if the
city spent one minute making
crime attractive which they did for a
lot longer than a
minute I feel like there needs to be
some kind of um some kind of period
of
forgiveness so arresting them and
putting them in handcuffs and putting
them in the back of the squad car 100%
on board
100% but once they enter the legal
system I would like to hear their
lawyers say your honor this this law
only recently changed the city had
created an attractive Hazard um I think
that has to be taken into account and I
would love the judge to say ladies if
you do that again you're going straight
to
jail but your defense has a a reasonable
argument that reasonable people can
agree on
I wasn't comfortable putting them in
jail once the city had set them up I'm
not for
that but again we we have to have laws
and they have to be
enforced um apparently online there's a
debate between uh representative
krenshaw and a popular ex
personality cat turd now apparently Cat
turd's made some claims about crenchaw
and crenchaw said that claims are fake
and suggested they would sue them um
some of you are taking sides you don't
like Keno's views on war and there was
something else you mentioned um so you
didn't like some of his policies and I
get that um I would just uh note that if
you're trying to figure out who's the
bad guy in this
situation um cat turd lied about me in
public cat turd went after my reputation
with lies well or maybe just wrong I
can't tell if he was just stupid or or
wrong but I blocked him a long time ago
because he's not a good guy and he's not
smart he's entertaining he's very
entertaining but he's not a good guy
he's not smart just just make sure you
know that because he's a public figure
and it's fair to just know who you're
dealing with so I'm not going to take
sides on this because I don't know
exactly the issue but I'll tell you that
cat turd is not a good guy I I don't
consider him a good guy he's
entertaining so if you're following him
for the entertainment
sure uh Jonathan Turley is writing today
about uh big win for free speech so
there was this doctor um Dr Tara
gustillo so she won a big free speech
appell at court Victory against her
health care System where she worked so
she was removed from her position after
she criti ized black lives matter
critical race Theory and some parts of
the co
narrative just free speech she just
criticized those things and she got
fired and that was reversed now here's
here's the
payoff if I told you that there was
somebody who got fired for criticizing
black lives matter critical race Theory
and Co aren't you thinking to
yourself uh sounds like some basic white
concern
ative here here's what we know about
this Filipina American doctor so first
of all Filipina second of all she had a
Stella record she raised black children
oh wait
what if somebody who raises black
children criticizes black lives matter
and you're canceling
her
what what that's pretty that's pretty
extreme I mean I don't know how much the
each of these things figured into it but
uh and apparently she credited with
according to Jonathan Charley she's
credited with creating a program to
reflect cultural differences in birthing
practices to better serve her diverse
patients now you know I'm not the woke
guy but isn't that like a really good
piece of work changing the um the
birthing practices so they take into
account any uh cultural
differences now to me that's just good
that's all good right you know I get the
argument you don't want the country
overrun with new cultures and stuff but
if you're dealing with real human beings
and real medical situations in America
yes their their specific cultural
situation should be accounted for and
then apparently she argued that her
colleagues turned it into a program for
quote racially segregated care which was
not the
idea that's not the idea you're I mean
that's completely ruining the
idea and objected to certain Orthodoxy
over RAC essential views so Dr Tara
gtill sounds like one of the best human
beings I've ever
heard like from top to
bottom and uh she
won sometimes good people
win um Argentina
their new president
M um he announced something that
confused me so I I spread some fake news
that I quickly deleted after I found out
but uh somebody somebody summarized the
news in a way that was misleading and it
fooled me but uh said M has announced
that he's abolished over 90% of
Argentina's
taxes now I thought that that meant he
got rid of 90% of Argent
taxes but apparently getting rid of 90%
of Argentina's taxes what it really
means is sources of taxes it's not 90%
of the taxes it's 90% of the sources of
Taxation so apparently they got taxed
for just about everything they did he
thinks he can get it down to six kinds
of taxes which would be good but I'm
going to go on
record uh just so I've said
it this argen a miracle does not look
real to
me it it's it's pinging every one of my
warning flags warning warning this story
might be a little bit too
hyperbolic because it looks a little
too magically
successful the real world is way messier
than this sounds I mean you know if you
come in and you make these major
structural changes I do believe that the
kinds of changes he's making will set up
Argentina for a very bright future so I
do believe it's all good I don't believe
that it's all good so fast it's the so
fast part that I'm like really on the
other hand so we'll we'll argue both
sides of this if I were the person
transforming the country and and part of
My Success depended on people thinking I
could do that and I could do more I
probably would exaggerate My Success
early and I'd tell everybody ah it's
it's working it's working like crazy
it's so fast I'll do more of it so on
one hand I don't mind I mean it seems a
a functional bit of marketing if you say
you're doing a little bit better than
you are I just feel like if he can get
everything good without any notable
negatives that would be the first time
in history anybody did it like hey maybe
you never know
anything's possible I'm rooting for him
and I think everything he's doing makes
sense I'm just think maybe we're getting
ahead of ahead of ourselves on on the
actual produced
results just a hunch well meanwhile the
conversation about Trump wanting to buy
Canada has uh has created uh little
attention by Kevin oir he's one of the
Shark Tank stars but better known as
being one of the more successful
investors uh and he's Canadian and he
says that there's actually interest in
Canada in merging with the United States
now he just means conversationally not
in the government government is probably
100% against it but he thinks he wants
to try to sell
it so he wants to see if he can pitch it
and maybe uh broker a deal with Trump
and some kind and form some kind of what
he calls an economic
Union um so an economic Union would not
be you know merger so they'd still have
some some you know regular government I
guess but uh yeah maybe I I don't know
what he has in mind but he is a serious
person who wants what's best for both
countries and probably has a good idea
what would get us there so if Kevin o is
weighing in I feel like I feel like
Kevin o is in that category of the
pirate
ship so not only did Trump attract
people who used to be
Democrats or still are
Democrats but he also got a
Canadian he got a Canadian like like the
the Trump effect is so strong that
there's somebody you know actually I
don't know his I don't know his uh
current nationality so he I don't know
if he he's probably still a Canadian
citizen I think
yeah he's called the Canadian investor
um but I just love the fact that the the
the incoming Trump Administration seems
solid enough and capable
enough that somebody like Kevin olir
would say let me spend a bunch of time
seeing if I can get this very big thing
done that might be great for both
countries just people volunteering it's
like Doge right it's like people
volunteering to put their own lives on
hold really good lives like we're
talking about people who could just go
to the beach all day if they wanted to
and theyve decided to sacrifice for some
kind of national or double National
benefit I just appreciate it so I'm just
going to give a shout out to cavan oiry
for putting his risk Capital out there
in favor of two Nations that need a
little help
thanks well there's a new update in New
York Post of course we'll talk about the
foreign worker thing just waiting for
people to stream in so we can hit that
when we're all we're all here at the
same time um apparently the uh
intelligence spy bosses they they
silenced the defense department back
when the covid leak was still being
discussed and people were saying is it a
lab leak or is it a natural thing and
apparently the defense department had
good evidence it was a designed
designed thing in the lab and the Spy
bosses decided to take that out of the
briefing so that Biden did not
hear that it came from a
lab what would you do with a spy Chief
who was hiding the most Vital
Information from the commanderin-chief
now I don't think it's IL legal but you
should never work in that job again
anybody who's hiding the most important
information from the president while
working for the president it's got to be
fired right away I mean there that
there's no real second chance for that
kind of stuff so I don't know who it was
but uh maybe when Trump gets in there we
can get a better idea which spy Chief
silenced the truth from the
commander-in-chief on the other
hand Biden wasn't really totally
functional so and and the funniest thing
about this story is when they talk about
the Spy Chiefs and and the Pentagon and
they did all their research and they
found out things that nobody could have
ever known and then it's taken years for
them to come you know finally tell you
what they think they know and and I've
told you before but it's funny I think a
probably like maybe a week after the
covid pandemic hit that one of my
smartest friends called me and said
here's a picture on Google Google Maps
that wet La that wet Market is directly
across the street from the Wuhan lab
that creates that does exactly this kind
of work so on week one I knew for
sure did was I doubting that the that
the lab that was across the street was a
real problem as opposed to the wet
markets that have operated forever and
never had this kind of problem
exactly so pretending that anybody
didn't know on day one
or at least day seven is just kind of
funny because if I
knew I mean I knew for sure in a week I
was just waiting for the rest of the
country to catch up I thought it'd be
easy but it took years all
right um DARPA according to reclaim the
net uh DARPA has created this what they
call a theory of mind so they're using
technology and software to predict an
influence behavior
what um so apparently they think they
can predict what people do and they
claim that they'll use it against our
adversaries because if you know what
your adversaries are going to do well
you got you have an advantage now do you
think this would stay limited to use
against our
adversaries of course not because every
time the intelligence people find
something that works against their
adversaries unless it's a kinetic thing
you know like like a bomb it ends up
getting employed domestically because if
we're trying to control people in other
countries sooner or later somebody says
you know there are a few people in this
country who could use a little control
why don't we use that external thing to
control these Rogues inside the country
so of course it will come internally of
course it will now the question is do
you think it's
real do you think even if they try
really hard and the smartest people and
they use AI that they will be able to
predict people's actions in the
future well how could they if you have
free
will if you have free will there's no
way they're going to predict what you're
going to
do I'm just joking you don't have free
will so they they'll totally be able to
predict what you're going to do it's
really an information problem if they
knew enough about you they could get it
80% of the time they could probably do
populations faster they could probably
they could probably look at a
politicians message and then look at how
that'll affect the election and know
who's going to win based on the
messaging or or maybe even the
personality so there's some
things that it definitely will be able
to predict you know more so than
anything we're doing today um because
polling predicts if you do it
legitimately a lot of our polling is not
legitimate but but if he did it
legitimately like the internal polling
for the Trump campaign it told him he
was going to win it literally predicted
the future so yes uh there will be other
ways to do that too I believe that AI
will use pattern recognition to predict
the future for individuals but it won't
be able to do that until it knows enough
about those individuals which I don't
know how they'll do that maybe if they
knew everything about your social media
and everything you've ever done all
resumés and everything you've ever
written probably it could do it but it'd
have to have access to all that
information probably will have that
access well the Trump effect continues
to get things done without him actually
doing anything yet well he's doing a lot
but not specifically this so Mexico is
going to open shelters to house over
12,000 of its own citizens who might get
deported when Trump takes
over um 25 plann shelters and it's a
strategic plan to accommodate
exclusively the people who get deported
after January 20th and uh Mexico says
they're taking Trump's threats seriously
and they're preparing the facilities to
accept
now doesn't that make his job a lot
easier if Mexico has already built the
receiving
facilities it's going to be a lot more
Humane and a lot lot polit more
politically
acceptable if Mexico instead of arguing
like crazy you shouldn't send them back
is building facilities to accept them
that's the Trump
effect they're acting in a way that is
the adult way to act simply because Dad
came home like everybody started to pick
up their toys oh Dad's home I don't need
to be told I'm going to pick up all my
toys because it would be way worse if I
don't pick up my
toys so that's what's happening all
right right you probably know that
yesterday there's a big brewhaha on the
internet on
X about the issue of
issuing
um what visas or whatever the approval
is to work in the United States for
foreign workers and the debate comes
down to hey if we're America First why
would you bring in any foreign workers
but Elon Musk says uh it took him all to
clarify but he said we're really talking
about the
0.1% of the top
Engineers now those are now according to
Elon uh those are jobs which are really
really hard to fill and there tons of
openings and it wouldn't really be
possible to train some Americans to be
in the top 0 1% of Engineering in the
next few years if you have a
20-year you know buildup yes you know in
20 years we might create enough top
Engineers that we don't think about
taking anybody from another country
maybe possible but at the moment if you
want to compete in Ai and uh crypto and
uh bit uh yeah Quantum Computing and
robots those are all the things that are
going to drive economies in the future
and the people who drive them the most
are going to be the engineers in the top
01 in fact open AI only exists because
um Sam mman brought over some uh Indian
engineer who made the breakthroughs that
made AI essentially possible so even AI
wouldn't even exist if we hadn't brought
in one of those 01 engineers and he
hadn't done what he did so keep that in
mind now I waigh in and immediately it
just caused more problems than it solved
because what I didn't understand is that
people were not on the same
topic so there there are a few topics
and individually they're all important
but they all got sort of conflated and
people people were mad about things that
they were on the wrong
topic so let me tell you what my view is
and then we'll talk about the topic my
old view my old view prior to
Biden and it's it's now changed because
of Biden but my old view is that you
want to keep everybody smart so if
somebody wants to come in and they've
got a you know high education in some
valuable field or even if they just want
to be an optometrist or make money that
the country is better off every time you
bring in somebody who's going to add to
the tax base in other words pay taxes
and is not going to take much so so my
old View and again this is revised but
my old view is you take everybody who is
smart and additive now how you decide
whether somebody's smart enough and
additive uh I don't think we have a good
system for that so my desires are not
supported by any kind of good
system after B after Biden opened the
border and magga became the the dominant
majority opinion in the country they
were very very very clear about limiting
immigration under that
environment it probably makes sense to
not allow in the country people who
would be
additive do you get
that so under the
current cultural political situation I
think it would just disturb too many
people to bring in people who even would
add to the country even you're sure of
it they would would add so at the moment
I'm opposed because Biden Biden
essentially ruined the atmosphere for
immigrants he ruined it by by making it
just everybody come on then all the
nuances just drained out of it and we
probably have to work pretty hard to you
know correct things but the argument
does not apply to the 01 engineer so let
me say this as um
completely this is the most firm
confident opinion I'll ever get you you
cannot have enough 01 top Engineers
because Engineers are not like
optometrists and doctors and lawyers the
0.01 engineer is developing the
future like the very civilization
changing work you want all of those and
we don't have anywhere near enough not
even close
you know as Elon Musk reminds us now a
lot of people argue that Elon Musk
doesn't understand the topic of hiring
top
Engineers to which if I may do a face
plant so I spent some of my time
explaining that Elon Musk probably knows
a little bit about hiring top
Engineers I I don't think I need to
develop my argument on that too hard
but there was a
um so so that's the first thing so it's
unambiguously good for the country to
bring in the top top
engineers and anybody would argue that
that would be stupid honestly I wouldn't
even listen to the argument on the other
side it would just be stupid because
you're not talking about changing the
culture of the United States you're
talking about people who almost always
already speak English better than you do
and are the top top top top top top
students that's it's a completely
different situation than bringing in
Uber
drivers I'm not in favor of that at the
moment at the moment now I think you can
say all those things while still saying
that immigrants are the you know the the
reason the country is strong and Etc
that's all true it's just that Biden
ruined the atmosphere for bringing in
immigrants even the ones who could add
he just ruined
it we might be able to get back to that
but not until Trump gets things under
control
so um that's where I'm at now
secondly um that the argument that I
just gave you is a conceptual argument
wouldn't it be nice to have only these
people and at the moment it would be
impractical really to just open it up to
everybody but second to that that's sort
of the goal or where you'd like to end
up um is that the systems we have for
deciding who comes in are completely
corrupted so some people were getting
really mad that they thought I didn't
understand that our current systems are
not picking just the best of the best
they're pretty much abused by big
companies just to get cheap labor
everybody on board with that our current
systems all of them 100% of our current
systems are so gameable that big
companies are using them not in the way
that you want them to be used now there
is a question about what would happen to
your inflation if they hired more
expensive labor from the
US so if you're willing to pay for more
inflation then you would also be in
favor of them not having these programs
that let them game the system to bring
in cheap
labor
um so can we all agree on the following
statement of assumptions our current
systems are wholly
inadequate to getting what you want as a
citizen of the United States they do
seem to work in the favor of quite a
number of Corporations and the
corporations are the ones who argue for
keeping the current completely broken
and corrupt system because it works for
them it just doesn't work for you know
workers for example American workers so
I think we can all agree on the fact
that the current system is
broken now what is what is Trump's take
on this I actually don't
know which is the weirdest thing about
this conversation I don't know where
Trump's at at one point he was at where
I was at one point he agreed with my old
view that as long as they're additive
yes yes everybody additive everybody
additive so that used to be his view as
well but after he's watched this whole
brewhaha and after you know Biden let in
everybody
I feel like he may have he may have uh
adjusted his own views but I haven't
seen it yet so that's the most
fascinating thing about the story is
that is that the Bas was having this
heated argument yesterday all over
social media of course Trump was
watching of course he was and it's
helping him I'm sure helping him you
know come up with his statement on on
the the thing but there are a number of
uh things that come up
uh number
one um oh the the other thing that we
can agree on is that big companies like
Google and apple have the resources to
put people in another country and really
really vet the top
Engineers but that's not going to work
for a small
company um somebody somebody said my
opinions were invalid because I never
tried to hire foreign
Engineers well I've actually tried
hiring uh India based program
programmers at least twice for side
projects I was doing and it's a
nightmare if you're not Google and apple
and you want to get somebody who can do
a good job so you find somebody in India
who says oh yeah just tell us what you
want we'll give you a price we'll assign
some programmers and we'll write that
code for you absolutely none of that
worked because I talked to somebody
smart who would make the sale but then
they would assign it to somebody who was
completely incompetent
so nobody could perform anything I I
didn't get anything I paid money and got
nothing twice so hiring hiring employees
to work from the other country if you
were thinking about it I wouldn't do it
everything I saw says it doesn't work if
they're not in the same room with you
don't do a tech project not at
all so certainly that's part part of
something needs to be fixed
um so I I was listening to
uh Theo Wald who was the former deputy
assistant to Trump in the first
Administration and he was in charge of
uh drafting the legislation to create a
new legal immigration framework so he
the one who said that when he looked at
all the various and there quite a few of
them the various Pathways that foreign
workers can get into the United States
that they're all corrupt
so yesterday I was seeing some people
saying well you're talking about this
H1B visa thing yeah that's bad but
there's this other thing to get the
Geniuses that's not so bad well in the
real world according to Theo Wald the
guy who was in charge of making it all
work he said no they're all corrupt so
you should assume 100% of our foreign
worker acquisition is totally broken and
has to be fixed um that was the best
context I've
seen so when I talk about this topic I
talk about what we want to
achieve usually I talk about systems you
know I always say systems are better
than goals but there sometimes it's
obvious what you want to
achieve we we want American workers to
have jobs that are good jobs and blah
blah blah so U but this uh brought up a
a
really troubling thing so V ramaswami
weighed into the debate he said one of
the reasons that maybe uh foreign
workers are being favored by tech
companies is that there's a cultural
difference and he described the cultural
difference as some of the Asian and
Indian companies or countries but their
families he described would put a focus
on educational attainment and you know
professional success whereas in America
you might have far less of it now that
caused all the dumb people to assume
that his generality was referring to
every family in both
countries so if you fell into that trap
and you said wait a minute that's not
true I know this one American family
that does everything right or if you
said wait a minute I've seen pictures of
India and it's people living in garbage
piles why do I want the people living in
garbage piles to teach me how to have a
better culture I don't want to live in a
garbage pile now those are
ridiculous those are ridiculous comments
because he's using a
generality is it a useful generality
that the Indian and Asian employees that
are at least the topic of conversation
the ones who have technical skills is it
true that they probably had a lot of
family support probably are they the
majority of indan
I don't know but probably
not but they're the only ones we care
about because they're the ones who are
getting technical skills and they may or
may not come to the United States that's
the population we're talking about they
definitely have the tiger moms most of
them but again we're not talking about
the exceptions so here's how people took
it they said uh V first of all a number
of people didn't think V was an American
citizen may I may I give myself another
face palm this is to the people who
argued with me that he's not an American
citizen okay I just had to do
that born in this country risking his
life to fix the Doge thing he's
risking his life Elon Musk risking his
life not hyperbole not hyperbole death
threats death threats death threats
they're risking their lives for
your benefit do you think that they're
doing it to make extra money well they
might I mean that they might make extra
money but clearly that's not the main
incentive V is more American I I said
this to somebody I said he's more
American than you are he he's more
supportive of the American Experience
the the American you know what whatever
makes us good people he's he probably
knows more about American history than
just about any one of you
you can't get more American than the
that's like Peak
American and and people got on me for
defending because I I got pretty
aggressive yesterday on social media for
def defending V's take about our
cultures and also elon's take about
needing engineers and people said to me
um you know are are you just making
money is it because Elon pays you pays
me
I mean obviously you know I'm monetized
on X but you think that's why I'm doing
it you think you think I'm supporting
the idea of bringing the top 1%
Engineers because I get paid on
X that was literally the last thing I
was even in my mind never never once did
that even occur to me here's what
occurred to
me when I watch Elon and V do take on
the hard
most thankless job that America has ever
produced short of War which is to take
on trimming the government that's
patriotism at a level that I I can't
even conceive I mean it's beyond
me given
that and given you know my current age
I've I've kind of done what I need to do
I would take a bullet for either one of
them actually l Al take a bullet because
the two of them are doing the only thing
that can save our country if we can't
get the debt under control we're all
dead we're all
dead and there are only two people who
happen to be extraordinarily brilliant
incredibly Brave capable beyond anything
that you and I can really understand and
are taking on the hardest job in the
world for you if you're American for you
and also for me I would take a bullet to
keep them in that
job like actually I'd take a bullet like
if you said to me you know you're going
to have to die but you'll save one of
those two people I would take the bullet
like actually literally that's not a
joke so if you see me defending them
aggressively on social media I would
take a bullet for them because they
would take a bullet for
me right
they're doing it right in front of you I
don't have to guess if they would take a
bullet because they put themselves in a
position where the the odds of danger
and death threats is through the roof so
if they would do that for me I would do
it for them and same with
Trump how did you feel when Trump took a
bullet for
you
right that's different if somebody takes
a bullet for you and Trump did
that that's a you you get bonded to them
and and you
should so
um that uh so a lot of people were on
that so let me let me say this so some
people interpreted VI as this uh Indian
guy uh who was criticizing white
American culture in the United States
and a lot of people thought it was kind
of a put down kind of an insult to
American culture
to which I said what are you talking
about an insult to American
culture what American culture are you
talking about the American culture that
I live in has free speech and we have a
superpower our culture American culture
has a superpower and it looks like this
when we
fail and we get
ashamed we learn things get stronger we
eat that shame we eat that failure and
then we go and
win in other countries and in other
cultures they do not criticize their
culture and if they
fail well they don't want to fail so
they don't do a startup they just take a
job where they're less likely to
fail so when you say that V is somehow
insulting
America by saying that the culture needs
a a tweak needs an
upgrade that's the most American thing
you can do criticizing how an American
system and culture is basically a system
criticizing an American System even down
to the family level if it's necessary
that's what we
do you can't get more American than that
we criticize ourselves in public because
we have the gift of free speech
is and and um if something needs to be
fixed and you're going to get a big
blowback for saying it we'll still say
it uh I said what I needed to say at the
risk of getting cancelled very American
right you you could disagree with
everything I said or did that's fine but
would you agree that me saying what I
thought I needed to say at the moment
and I had good intentions that's a
longer story but and then getting
cancelled for it failing basically that
would be a failure my ire career wiped
out you watched me you watch what
happened when I got canceled
right I just recovered got stronger I
got a million followers on X it it
basically supercharged me so that was a
failure it was a shame I I you I didn't
feel any shame but you could imagine
that it would be accompanied usually um
and so I just took that failure I ate it
for breakfast I used it for energy and I
went on and and in some ways
accomplished more than I would have
accomplished if I had not been cancelled
because it you know creates a lot of
attention so yes the uh you can
criticize any American system from
culture to finance to government that's
what I want I want our smartest people
telling us where we should focus even if
he's wrong something sometimes right
we're we're not looking for Perfection
so um yes I'm defending V aggressively
now this brought up a number of
comments because people were the the
other the hidden topic within this
foreign employee stuff is a number of
people kept saying but Scott don't you
understand uh I'm a trained engineer and
I can't get a
job what do I say to somebody who says
that on social media don't know them
they say I'm a trained engineer
experienced and I can't get a job I say
what color are you you're white right so
mixed in with this whole foreign foreign
worker thing is the fact that there's
been massive systemic racism against
white men for what um sequa parner um
Sean Maguire thinks may have been going
on for the past 10 years
here's what he said he said I was told I
can't be promoted for being a white man
explicitly at
Google and then he he suggested that
that's been going on for at least 10
years do you know when I got that talk
the first time I got the talk I can't
promote you because you're a white
male the
80s 37 years ago for 37 years
this has been the way everything in
Corporate America worked no we're not
going to promote you for a white man
prudent thinker onx says I've had the
same experience elsewhere in big Tech
also been told we want less people who
look like you because it messes up our
Dei commitment also been told whatever
you do do not hire a white
man um this is a white man also been
told everyone is invited except you we
want to put out the image of diversity
um and and I've even been plagiarized by
the Dei hire later to learn I was hired
for that very
purpose oh no and then deplorable
garbage um that's the name of his
account was told the same thing by a big
law firm and notes if an entity like
that a big law firm uh isn't afraid to
openly do it discriminate against race
he says it's
everywhere um Russell says at an Intel
Corporation we restricted hiring white
males unless approved senior VP level
and that was more than 10 years ago
imagine what it's like now no this has
been 37 years at least that's
when it hit me it may may have been
earlier in California where I was
so why didn't people know
this it's because white guys just suck
it up and get to
work that's it white guys are will
complain privately will complain to our
family complain to our spouse but we're
not necessarily organizing a
protest we just say all right I'm not
going to work there I'll go work
somewhere else so that's why you don't
know also I found out 30 years ago that
if I mentioned in public that I was
being discriminated against for being
white what did people call
me a white racist
liar so they already decided I'm a white
racist just cuz I'm white and then I say
I was unable to be promoted in two
corporations in a row because they told
me I'm white and male and I can't
promote you and and I say that and they
say oh well you're lying oh great so if
I tell you the truth I'm a white racist
and now also a
liar 30 years over three decades almost
four decades white men had to keep this
secret because if you said it out loud
you were a
liar and that's a real thing that
happened in the United States for
decades still
happening um all
right um then somebody weighed in
thinking they would add some nuance and
said uh no it's cuz somebody else
labeled it as an anti-white bias
which it is and then a commenter said
well you know technically is it an
anti-white bias um it might have also
been anti-
Asian-American because I'm sure they
discriminated against
Asians I need one more face plant can I
give it to
you in colleges they definitely
discriminated against Asians true
in
corporations they hired the Asians not
the white
guy if you if you had lots of diversity
of asian-americans it was considered
like the uh what's the good analogy like
the methadone for the heroin or
something they wanted heroin which would
be black women lesbian employees you
know that would be like oh home run but
if they couldn't get that they
definitely wanted as many asian-looking
people to put on to put on the you know
the company picture so no I've never
once I've never even heard of it have
you is there anybody in the comments
who's ever even heard of an
Asian-American being turned down at Big
Corporation because that wasn't diverse
enough I've never heard of it now if it
turned out the asian-americans have been
keeping this secret for 40
years like white Americans
you know I guess I'd have to say I
shouldn't be surprised so it could be it
could be true but I've never seen it or
heard of it never
once well then wired wired publication
uh this was the they say it's the year
of the influencer political
takeover so uh of course A lot of people
are writing about how the podcasters and
the online influencers are now the
important thing and the mainstream news
and the New York Times Are unimportant
Etc but here's what I think about that
conversation I I I think this is sort of
putting the dilber filter on it when all
these smart people the
Democrats say that uh they finally
understand that what they needed to do
better was take advantage of the
influencer
podcasting ecosystem and that the the
Republicans really had that nailed down
you know they really had a good good
ecosystem for that so so that maybe is
why they
lost so do you think that's why they
[Laughter]
lost to watching Democrats not
understand anything it never gets less
entertaining it is true that Trump did a
much better job with the podcaster
influencer situation that's true but the
reason they lost is that they did
everything wrong they had the worst
candidate running against the worst
candidate the best candidate of all
time they had no policies that were in
the top three of the American
public they they wasted $1.5 billion on
God knows what probably half of it was
stolen you could just you could make a
list of all the things you should do
right and the only things they did well
were the ones that don't matter to the
election the ground game
said they always tease Trump for not
having a ground game but never ask
themselves the Elon Musk question which
is do we need a ground game and the
answer is probably not in in the current
age there there was a time when the
ground game was everything but probably
not now you know people learn online
they don't need the ground
game um but here's my dilbur filter take
on it the the fact that the Democrat
think the podcaster world is just where
they need to go
um I
think that the Democrat um let's say the
the people who would be helping with
campaigns in the future if you are going
to work on a campaign which thing would
you rather do uh organize a door-
knocking
thing or do another boring interview
print interview with the New York Times
or uh interact with some of the coolest
hottest podcasters and influencers in
the
world which way do you want to spend
your day do you want to spend your day
talking
to famous sexy young like people killing
it so that you can take a picture and
show it to your kid it's the easiest job
in the world because you get to sit in
the studio and maybe watch the podcast
and that's your job for that
day I've got a feeling that the
Democrats are moving toward this whole
we've got to have more podcasting and
influencers because that's
fun and then they justify it as like oh
this is the big problem got to fix this
podcasting situation there's no way we
can be competitive until we have a Joe
Rogan of our
own I don't know so there there's
something true about it which is they
probably need to be better in in that
domain but but there's also something
that
screams we would rather do things that
are pleasurable than things that are
hard and I don't think that's a Winner's
attitude we'd rather do things that are
pleasurable than hard that might be
their entire
problem
anyway
um I and I also think it's funny harking
back to the prior conversation that they
canceled me at exact the time when I was
the most dangerous because the
podcasting world was starting to
dominate again dumbest mistake they
could have made they they should have
said Scott we'd like you to spend all of
your time on cartooning so why don't we
give you a big contract to write a twice
as many cont cartoons if they had done
that they could have bought me out of
the race well I don't know but it would
have been worth the shot if they offered
enough um
anyway according to study finds
scientists figured out how to transform
red blood cells into Precision cancer
fighting
drones
um and I guess I guess they can tweak it
as your cancer morphs into a different
form they can tweak it again so it it
gets at it again so this is actually
pretty
exciting um they've got some kind of Mo
molecule that'll stick to parts of the
RNA and then regular activities so the
reason that this is important is if it
feels less
destructive meaning if you if you do
something that's just put some
destruction on your body but you hope
the the cancer cells die faster than
your healthy cells you know like
chemo yeah you're just hoping that your
healthy cells survive but they're going
to get
whacked um and the so this is the second
anti-cancer possibility which doesn't
seem to have that mechanism which it
attacks your your healthy stuff don't
know if it'll work
yet but I
love I I love all the new news about
it now there's an article in the hill in
opinion piece by Evan Davis and David
Schult and they say Congress has the
power to block Trump from taking office
but lawmakers must act now so the idea
is according to them the Constitution
provides that any oath-breaking
insurrectionist can't run for office and
then they gave their evidence for how
Trump is an oath breing insurrectionist
of course all their evidence was
completely debunked and laughed at by
people like Jeff Clark uh also an
attorney who got in trouble for that
January 6 stuff for doing basically
nothing nothing that anybody should have
ever gotten in trouble for that's
another
story but
um so apparently I didn't know this but
apparently if they try to make this move
to not allow Trump to take office it
would take a 2third vote did I have that
right 2third vote of the in each house
so in both uh Senate and the house uh
two-thirds vote now I don't think
there's would you agree there's not a
chance in the world that two-thirds of
the people are going to vote to not put
Trump in office right so there's not any
practical way this is going to happen as
far as I can tell but um I kind of want
them to to
try don't you don't you want them to
try because the the Democrat Party is is
on life
support if they try to keep Trump out of
office with some weird
lawfare somebody's going to yank the
life support out of whatever's left of
the Democratic Party that would be the
end that would just be the end
now I know you want me to say oh if that
happened there would be an armed an
armed uh Revolution no there
won't against who what are you going to
do shoot your neighbor because some
politicians did something you're not
going to shoot your neighbor we like the
neighbor
so um I would just say
this um I just wish they I kind of hope
they do it I I hope they take their
strongest play to try to keep them out
of office they will fail um but this is
the ultimate you know F around and find
out situation I'd really love him to
find out not with violence no violence
please but no violence would be
necessary because we would just look at
the situation and say nope nope now
speaking of violence which I do not
recommend but you can state facts about
violence right so that's fair you can
say somebody did some violence there's a
risk of some violence but I don't
recommend it don't do any
violence however can you imagine the
security situation for anybody who voted
to keep Trump out of office at this
point if in Congress they voted to to
use this Insurrection thing to keep them
can you imagine what that would do to
their security situation again please
don't do any violence but we live in a
country where people wouldn't take this
sitting down and and anybody who voted
to keep Trump out of office for this
Insurrection
I would recommend you look at
your budget because if you don't have a
budget for increasing
security I wouldn't vote this way now I
wouldn't say that about many things I
can't even think of one other thing I
would ever ever said that about
but the people Vote for This are really
going to put themselves in a physical
Jeopardy don't do anything to them don't
don't don't we want peace we don't want
to be that kind of country but the
reality is we live in a dangerous
country full of guns and people have the
guns for that
reason they have the guns for this
reason don't use them for this reason
this isn't good enough reason but that's
why they have them so if they think that
it would be safe to to vote that they're
not going to put the winner of the
popular vote into
office just think about your budget just
think about
it well Russia is open to conversation
about Ukraine but uh they say Trump has
to go first he has to make the first
move to improve ties according to
Breitbart Simon
Kent
and um what would the first move be so
let's talk about that if if Russia says
yeah we're open but you got to make the
first move all right here's the wrong
answer the first move should not be a
peace
proposal um by the way lavro um so he's
he's the uh he's the
Russian what would you call him he's the
main guy who talks to the United States
um about foreign policy and stuff like
that so
lavro
um says
uh lro says that um that a truce is a
path to nowhere so a ceas fire doesn't
have any interest for Russia Russia is
saying we're looking for a big deal you
know something enduring something
comprehensive we're not looking for
let's stop shooting on Tuesday is he
right about that yes yes yeah lavro is
completely right having a ceasefire
would save lives but beyond that it
would wouldn't it wouldn't hasten the
end of the war I don't think so what
would Trump do he can't say listen to a
ceasefire I agree Russia is correct on
that uh but here's what he's being set
up
for negotiating with himself have you
ever heard that term in the negotiating
world there's a thing that's considered
a classic error and the error is to
negotiate against yourself and the way
that looks is you is you say first
all right here's the deal I'll do this
if you do that and then the other side
says
no and then you go back and here's the
error and you come back with a new offer
and they haven't made an offer if you do
that it's called negotiating against
yourself and you've been tricked into
making the first offer and then
responding to them making a new offer
and you've already talked to yourself
down they haven't even made an offer and
you talked to yourself down
so that's considered a classic
mistake um I learned that when I was
negotiating with Disney years ago there
was an idea of making a Dilbert Disney
animated
movie uh and we made an offer to Disney
and Disney said no that's not good
enough come back with another offer and
the head of my syndication company said
um how about we're done now and we'll
never work with you again
that that's how it ended and I
completely supported it yeah you don't
negotiate with yourself period And by
the way he told them we're not going to
negotiate with ourselves if you've got
an offer we'll look at it so they knew
why but they didn't want to make an
offer so we said well maybe we'll make
an offer with somebody who knows how
negotiation works now I maybe it works
for Disney maybe sometimes they get
somebody dumb enough to do that but but
thank goodness you know the professional
I was working with knows how this works
and he just closed them down so nope
don't negotiate it with ourselves we'll
take this somewhere else and that's why
there's no Dilbert movie no we did take
it somewhere else but you know things
didn't work out in other places
either anyway um so he shouldn't make an
offer but he has to do
something so what would what would it
look like if Trump did something
first but it wasn't an offer for a peace
deal what would that look
like I don't know but Trump is the best
at this suppose Trump said how about
let's have a
summit would that be an offer kind of
kind of and an offer to do a summit with
you know himself and Putin I would feel
like that would be going
first but without making the offer so I
think there's there's room to play I
think there's room to play and when
Russia says you have to go first what
they're doing is trying
to dominate
Trump because they're trying to say all
right we made you do the first
thing like why does Trump have to go
first why does he have to go first they
both want peace so if lavro can sort of
manipulate Trump into going
first then he is sort of won the first
round Trump will know that because
unlike ordinary politic Ians Trump knows
how this works he's done this before so
he's not going to he's not going to fall
for the UF to go first unless it looks
like something that would be ordinary to
do now a summit at least with Trump
would be an ordinary thing to do so I
think that would not look like going
first but would still be close enough to
to get things done so we'll
see there's a giant breakthrough coming
in e batter is are you surprised I tell
you one of these stories every day the
reason I do it is to help you predict
the
future and here's the future if this new
leap let's see it's according to the
mark mayard in the Pasadena Star News um
the new breakthrough just uses a new new
kind of material and it uh uses 10 times
less anode material which is a big deal
uh and uh might cut the cost someday of
the battery by a huge amount did you
know that the cost of the battery in an
electric car um could be up to 40% of
the cost of the
car and that this is a battery that
works in the lab and if it worked in uh
the real world would cut that cost by
about
half so 40% of your car cut by half just
because the battery so we're we're at
the
point where we're probably one more big
battery breakthrough like one one of
these many ones that I talk about every
day on the show they're all different
but one of them is going to break
through and if it doubles capacity and
doubles batteries that's just that's not
just better stuff like if you're
thinking oh I'd like to get a few extra
miles on my car battery if I have
electric car no we're not talking about
that you'd get that too what we're
talking about is a complete
transformation of civiliz
ation because it's what makes your your
robot a good
deal it's what allows you to get off the
grid if you had a real cheap battery
that you could put on the side of your
house and collect the Sun during the day
and use it at the night you might just
get off the grid you might have electric
airplanes so the major source of uh CO2
if you're worried about that would be
removed because airlines are really
really bad on that so
one more leap just one more big leap in
batteries I'm not talking about the 10%
20% Improvement I'm talking about the
big leap and there are a bunch of them
that are Brewing one more big leap
changes all of air travel well travel
the our entire Transportation would
change it would lower costs to the point
where it would make a difference in
inflation it would lower
inflation Transportation would be
different your your your the time you
spent charging would go down to minutes
instead of hours it would be really
transformational and uh it's definitely
going to happen meanwhile Israel has
declared on Tuesday that it's going to
start killing the leaders of the
hoodies so the hoodies in Yemen been uh
shooting Rockets into Israel and prior
to that they've been putting missiles at
shipping shipping boats in the area so
the hoodis are real bad news and they're
backed by um Iran and Iran is weakened
but the hoodis are still active now when
Israel says we're going to take out your
leaders
um it just tells me we're at a strange
point in
history so nobody's talking about taking
out Putin in a you know some kind of a
decapitation strike because he's got
nukes and he's got backup and whoever
comes after him isn't necessarily going
to be the good guy so
and probably the same is true with an
American president if you're Russia or
China you're probably not thinking even
for one second about a decapitation
strike on the United States because we'd
still be too strong likewise we will not
think even for one second about a
decapitation strike on China because it
would just be destabilizing and it would
just ruin everything so decapitation
strikes definitely don't work you know
once a country is reach is a certain
status and they also don't work when
your your little scrappy terrorist cells
are so small that you can't even figure
out where they're operating from or
who's in charge so in those cases a
decapitation strikes no good the one
time it's good is if you happen to have
massive digital Footprints everywhere so
you can find stuff and the entity has
not created a structure that can go up
on easily without the leaders in other
words the leaders are kind of key to
keeping it together and that's not the
case in America we TR we change out our
leaders all the
time so there's this one little area of
History where we can find them easily
because we got satellites we've got cell
phones we've got AI so we can find them
and we have uh missiles and drones that
can hit anything from
anywhere so I would say The Who are in a
lot of
trouble because it seems to be Israel's
ability to take out the leaders of any
group that's against them is now 100%
operational and all the hoodie leaders
are going to just start
disappearing um and I think it works
because they're they're leader driven
organizations so good luck good hunting
Israel uh I saw a article by uh Barack
Ravid on X he says that uh the people in
Israel and uh the US even who are
negotiating for the end of the
hostages uh not the end but the release
um that it's unlikely that they're going
to get that done before Trump takes
office um I would go further and say
that's not going to happen what why
would Hamas suddenly become rational
because Trump's going into office
they're clearly not they're not afraid
of
dying and the and the captives give them
a little bit of Leverage so why would
they I can't see any reason that they
would do it now I think that they'll
keep the hostages and then when Trump
comes in he's going to say all right you
had a chance but I'll give you one more
chance now that I'm actually in office
you know you've got a few days I want
the hostages all back and we're not
negotiating for it you just give them
all back now that probably won't happen
and then Trump will have to figure out
how to respond and I feel sorry for
Gaza because if the hostages don't come
back there will never be a life there
and I don't think they're coming back so
I think Gaza is just
permanently out of business there's no
such thing as you know Gaza is going to
rebuild and they're all going to go live
there happily I think it's just is
Israel's territory and the cost of that
unfortunately is going to be these
hostages as long as the hostages are
held yeah it's hard to criticize Israel
for
anything people do but I wouldn't
meanwhile the New York Post is uh
reporting that there's a woman who was
born with two
vaginas that are fully functional and
even possibly capable of both of them uh
getting pregnant so she has two vaginas
she's a grown woman and uh she says it's
it's been a very difficult dating
because as soon as she tells her her
date that she has two vaginas uh more
often than
not they get an
idea hey two of them you say two of
them uh I'm just going to spit ball here
a little
brainstorming something that I have
never done before but
but I've got a
buddy and then she has to shut him down
right away no you can stop there uh I
know you have a male friend stop nope
nope nope stop
stop and I was thinking to
myself she could never date a
professional humorist such as
myself I wouldn't be able to think of
anything
else if if you put me in that situation
where I'm dating the woman with two
vaginas I'm going
to think of a lot of
puns and they're not going to be
appreciated so I'm sure she has a sense
of humor but um you know there are also
men this is rare but some men are born
with two
penises I've got two words to describe a
situation of the woman with two V CH and
the man with two
penises soulmates soulmates is that one
word or two I guess that's one word
soulmates well I wish her
luck um and the funniest comment I saw
in this was from one of the local
subscribers who said and I quote did she
save one for after
marriage slow clap
[Applause]
very good all right we don't mean to
make fun of this woman but she seems to
be well adjusted and healthy she's
perfectly healthy and uh and she's
also quite ethical she discloses it um I
wish the best for her I don't mean to I
I don't mean to be mean uh but she's
having fun with it I think yeah there
there's at least some part of it that
she probably thinks is fun
so in that
Spirit um I only have good thoughts all
right ladies and gentlemen I'm going to
go talk to the local subscribers
privately um I don't know if there's
anything I forgot about
today all right ladies and
gentlemen uh if you're on YouTube or X
or Rumble I will see you tomorrow locals
I'm coming at you in 30 seconds
for
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e for