Episode 2716 CWSA 01/10/25
LA Fire and all the incredible stories, Trump, robots, and more ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and I'm fairly confident you've never had a better time. B
View segment →ut if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that nobody can understand with their tiny, shiny human brains, all you need for that is a coffee mug or a glass or a tankard, a chalice, a flagon, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the un…
View segment →t of the day that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip. Go. Ah, delightful. I feel connected to you all through the invisible umbilical cord of the coffee cup. Give me an update in the comments if something happens while I'm talking, because I think Trump is supposedly going…
View segment →does that make him a felon? In what world? In what world would I consider him a felon if he's in a legal process and it's likely, and here's what makes it interesting. I think the experts say the case was so flawed that it's far more likely it will be overturned than upheld. Isn't that true? So if s…
View segment →t judge Arthur Engoron from Trump's other case, the civil fraud case. And Laura Loomer reminds you that she exclusively broke the story about Judge Engoron's bias and how his wife was posting memes about Trump. And apparently that worked. So Laura Loomer gets the big win. She's got a blue check back…
View segment →she's got a blue check and she's getting the credit today. Good job, Laura Loomer. We'll of course talk about the fire. I need a little bit of palate cleansing. You know, if you live in California, even if you're not in the center of the burn area, you're thinking about it all day long and you're p…
View segment →mething like that. Or maybe just surveilling things. Here's what I don't expect. I do not expect that on day two or whatever, Trump will say, all right, here's the secret of the drones. We've been allowing Chinese drones to surveil our sensitive sites. Do you think he's going to announce that even…
View segment →ots of goals. But as I've been teaching you for a long time, systems are what you need because goals can't be supported without a system. So it's a system that's the important part. And as Victor Davis Hanson points out, the water storage system was bad. The forest management was bad. Handling the…
View segment →he's a Black man, but that is a coincidence and you can't say that that's DEI-related. That's just one person who's acting badly. Now, but at least in the fire department, you know, you don't have so much of a DEI problem, right? Well, I mean the head of the fire department is a lesbian, but nobody…
View segment →So you've got three lesbians in executive positions. But I warn you that if you're thinking there's a problem with lesbians because of these three, no, that doesn't follow. It doesn't follow that there's some other lesbian who isn't the best person to be the chief of police or the chief of the fire…
View segment →ittle change just by itself is certainly enough to destroy an entire city if you just let it run forward. But we should not allow ourselves to assume that any individual is a DEI hire. You'd really have to do some deeper dive and we don't often have that level of information from the outside. Tom…
View segment →nced that ivermectin and fenbendazole are cures for at least some kinds of cancers. Here's what you need to know. Remember when I tell you that an anonymous source, if you have one anonymous source, how much credibility would that be? The answer is zero in politics. So that's a different domain. In…
View segment →ny questions, you couldn't do a deep dive, but you knew the name and somebody else had told you the claim. You didn't even hear from the person. Is that credible? No, no, that's zero credibility. Is there a reason that we do clinical trials instead of watching what three people said as reported by a…
View segment →was stage four and they added these other drugs and then they got cured. So we're saying it's the other drugs they added. To which I say but they were on all the treatments that we know are cures. So here's what I need. I need an incurable cancer, one that doesn't have any treatment as far as anybod…
View segment →his second term. Everything's different. All right. That was a little side conversation there. Apparently there was a fake alert that went out to everybody's phone in LA County saying that they needed to get ready to evacuate. This turned out to be just a mistake. The alert told people to gather lo…
View segment →tuff before any houses burned down. Now that's just about the most evil crime you can imagine, setting somebody's house on fire so you can rob it. The level of evil in that is hard to imagine. There was however one poor individual, a criminal, who had a little blowtorch and he was trying to alleged…
View segment →to do worse they would have taken the only choice because I don't think that guy was going to walk out of that neighborhood. And things are getting really dicey. So when there is something that looks to residents like a complete breakdown of the social order, by the way I'll probably get demonetized…
View segment →if you look at one argument and you see a lot on that one argument you will be convinced beyond any doubt. You will be 100% convinced. And that has nothing to do with whether the thing you're looking at is true or not. Completely unrelated to the underlying truth is a guarantee that if you see one a…
View segment →eters might be imperfect. And if they can do it then you'd have a reasonably good idea that maybe they've at least seen both sides. If they don't know what you're talking about and they insult you and call you a cretin and change the topic it means they've never looked into it. So here's what. If y…
View segment →ourself anything you want. That's not an issue. It's just that the state doesn't have to recognize it. So they don't have to recognize it as your sex. They may choose to recognize that you have a gender preference but they don't have to say yes you're a woman because you say so. So a lot of people a…
View segment →so. If I just do what you pay me to do which is look at the topic and then decide which way I think it goes independent of where the politics are, you will allow me to run the whole country. And all I have to do is do the thing that you paid me to do as opposed to all my co-workers who are doing the…
View segment →men. And the conversation didn't go much further after that. So that claim just sort of stayed there. Do you think it's true that the most educated demographic is Black women? It's almost true. It's actually almost true. It's not true if you look at the entire population of Black women compared to t…
View segment →challenged it even though it wasn't true. So to me that's more racist than not even though I support the general idea that Black women are doing great lately. Elon says it's going to take years to rebuild LA. When they try to get permits it's going to be a problem. And I put out the following state…
View segment →p, you're going to move further than it would be comfortable to be the owner of something being rebuilt because you really need to visit the site a lot. If you've ever built a home you kind of need to go there a lot. I think people are going to assume they'll rebuild but when they get settled somewh…
View segment →railing against fake news. The continuous creation and spread of fake news he said distorts facts but also perceptions. So the pope is going full MAGA, full MAGA, and he's against fake news. Well all I got to say is thank God all the religions agree with each other because I'd hate for one of them t…
View segment →things. And I've said if we can improve our technology for cheaply building holes and tunnels we're going to be able to have everything from geothermal to better mining to now nuclear. Of course you could use it for geothermal where you're looking for the hot water under the Earth to create power. B…
View segment →eal rounds. It's shooting something fake. But how far away are we from telling your robot rifle dog to go attack the German front line? All right rifle dog, there's a bunch of Russian soldiers two miles away in a trench. I want you to go there and in the order if you see anybody who looks like an of…
View segment →e. Human husband says okay, can you pose for a photo first? Mic drop. All right ladies and gentlemen that's all I have to say. It's 8:07 where I am. Did I miss anything? Any big stories that are happening? Yeah let me get a good picture of you before you go. I'm going to upgrade. All right ladies…
View segment →e. And you see Obama and Trump chatting and joking with each other. Nothing's real. Nothing's real. Oh Pence, right. Mike Pence was there and Mike Pence was destroyed by Trump as well. Was there a Bush there? I don't know. The Bush dynasty got destroyed. Not George Bush but so yeah it was quite ama…
View segment →Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and I'm fairly confident you've never had a better time. But if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that nobody can understand with their tiny, shiny human brains, all you need for that is a coffee mug or a glass or a tankard, a chalice, a flagon, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip.
Go.
Ah, delightful. I feel connected to you all through the invisible umbilical cord of the coffee cup.
Give me an update in the comments if something happens while I'm talking, because I think Trump is supposedly going to be talking to Judge Merchan today. So there will be sentencing. He's doing it over Zoom, right? He's not going in person. I don't know. I'm not sure yet, but I think he's not going in person. And Judge Merchan has already indicated he's going to do some kind of unconditional discharge, meaning that he'll be guilty of a felony but won't go to jail. And no matter what the sentence is, they plan to appeal. So Trump will be officially a felon maybe, but then it's on appeal.
So my question to you, dear legal experts, is if your case is approved for appeal, are you still a felon? Because it's not guaranteed you're a felon if your appeal is going through, right? So I feel like you'd say it's you're conditionally possibly a felon, just like before. So if the legal process has not come to an end, it seems to me that the legal process is still cooking along. Why would you say he's a felon? I don't understand what you're saying. So the process is still going forward. It could end with him being a felon or not a felon. So why are you saying he's a felon? He should be innocent until the appeals process is over. Now they don't say that, but I do, right?
It'd be one thing if you said I'm going to appeal, but given that we could be reasonably confident the appeal will be accepted at least to be processed, how is that guilty? How does that make him a felon? In what world? In what world would I consider him a felon if he's in a legal process and it's likely, and here's what makes it interesting. I think the experts say the case was so flawed that it's far more likely it will be overturned than upheld. Isn't that true? So if so, can you be called a felon if the process is still going and all the smart people think it will end with you not being a felon? How do you call that a felon? It's like they don't understand the process. We'll see.
Meanwhile, New York court is removing the corrupt judge. We call him corrupt. This is Laura Loomer's reporting. And remove the corrupt judge Arthur Engoron from Trump's other case, the civil fraud case. And Laura Loomer reminds you that she exclusively broke the story about Judge Engoron's bias and how his wife was posting memes about Trump. And apparently that worked. So Laura Loomer gets the big win. She's got a blue check back. I don't know what this current situation is with her freedom of speech, but she got a big win and she's got a blue check and she's getting the credit today. Good job, Laura Loomer.
We'll of course talk about the fire. I need a little bit of palate cleansing. You know, if you live in California, even if you're not in the center of the burn area, you're thinking about it all day long and you're probably doing something about it too. So we're pretty exhausted in the state and it's just the beginning of the process. So forgive me if I'm a little obsessed by it, but when it hits you locally, it's hard not to be.
Trump says on day one-ish, after he's sworn in, he's going to share information about the drones. And he does say that the government knows. It sounds like maybe he doesn't know, or maybe it's been whispered that the government knows it's their stuff. It's one of those. But I would expect it to be something like the government was doing a little testing or something. Probably something like that. Or maybe just surveilling things.
Here's what I don't expect. I do not expect that on day two or whatever, Trump will say, all right, here's the secret of the drones. We've been allowing Chinese drones to surveil our sensitive sites. Do you think he's going to announce that even if it's true? Even if it's true, do you think he would tell you? I hope not. I think he would take care of it and keep it as a military secret if there was a way to do that. But I think he's getting a little bit ahead of himself that he would necessarily tell us no matter what the answer is. So we'll see. I think he means it. I just don't know he'll be able to deliver.
Victor Davis Hanson summed up the LA problem as a total systems breakdown. Now, a system breakdown. Do you think LA was operating as a systems-being-more-important-than-goals entity? Or do you think that they seem to have goals without systems that supported them? So they had goals for diversity. They had goals for the environment. They had goals for saving the smelt. They had goals for protecting the water in the oceans. Lots of goals. But as I've been teaching you for a long time, systems are what you need because goals can't be supported without a system. So it's a system that's the important part.
And as Victor Davis Hanson points out, the water storage system was bad. The forest management was bad. Handling the insurance industry was bad. And he mentions the DEI hierarchy of the leadership. And he called it a DEI Green New Deal hydrogen bomb. Like a perfect system collapse because every part of the system kind of collapsed.
Now, do you think it's fair in this case? Now I've been railing against the people who say as soon as there's a problem, you look at the people in charge and if you see they're a certain demographic, the people on the right say, oh, DEI. And I try to caution you that's not proof of DEI being a problem. All you can know for sure is that DEI was a big influence over hiring. You can't know that that's the problem. However, if you do a little research into the people involved, it might give you some insight.
It might, for example, Karen Bass. Did you know that when she was in the '70s she used to travel to Cuba to work with something called the Venceremos Brigade, which was a group that organized annual trips to Cuba for young leftist Americans for many years? Do you know why Cuba would host leftists to come do some awesome things in Cuba, which is just building stuff I guess? Why would they do that? It's to brainwash them against the United States, but gently. You know, just brainwash them that maybe the socialist way is better and then they'll come back to the United States and destroy it or convert it.
So she was actually part of a brainwashing operation. And let me be very clear, a brainwashing operation by Cuba. You bring young people in and you give them this one experience that's very artificial from the general Cuban experience and everything's great and look, we'll just show you the things we want. And did you know the United States is evil? She is unquestionably a brainwash victim. That's not even in debate. If she went there multiple times and was part of a group that was by design a bunch of brainwash victims, how did she un-brainwash herself? I don't believe there's a process for that. If she was brainwashed, it's still in her. You can't undo that.
So do you think that if people were well aware of that, that she would have been in charge of the city, the mayor? No, this one does look like a DEI hire problem, doesn't it? It looks like nobody in their right mind would have hired her for her background and qualifications. But maybe it was a DEI-related want to have a diversity mayor. So I would say you can't say that DEI broke anything, but you could say that that one mayor probably only has her job because people either didn't understand or voted dumb. Maybe it's the public's fault. The public just picked the wrong person.
But at least she's got a strong deputy mayor, so you can't say it's not like one person, right? That often the next level down are doing the real decision-making and stuff. So next level down you get the Los Angeles deputy mayor. So at least he's strong. Oh wait, he's under investigation for allegedly calling in a bomb threat to City Hall. The FBI raided his home recently and he's placed on leave. Okay, he's a Black man, but that is a coincidence and you can't say that that's DEI-related. That's just one person who's acting badly.
Now, but at least in the fire department, you know, you don't have so much of a DEI problem, right? Well, I mean the head of the fire department is a lesbian, but nobody's saying that lesbians can't do fire department jobs. And she's got tons of experience relevant. So if you're going to say oh, she's only there because she's a lesbian, that would ignore all of her many, many years of very relevant experience.
And as luck would have it, the person just below her, I think would be the assistant chief. Well, another lesbian. Two lesbians at the top. But I think that you could call that a coincidence. Yeah, there are plenty of lesbians. It's not like the biggest coincidence in the world that two of them would be the number one and number two. Let's look at the third in line. Let's see. I don't know if it's third in line, but the equity chief. Well, lesbian. So you've got three lesbians in executive positions.
But I warn you that if you're thinking there's a problem with lesbians because of these three, no, that doesn't follow. It doesn't follow that there's some other lesbian who isn't the best person to be the chief of police or the chief of the fire department. So this is sticky stuff. If you're just assuming that somebody is a DEI hire and therefore they're bad, that's not fair. It's also the situation we find ourselves in because DEI is pushed so hard that we assume it's creating problems. We just, it's unfair to point to any specific individual.
And I point out that Gavin Newsom is the least diverse governor you could ever imagine and he's being criticized as much or more than any of the other people I just mentioned. So what do we have? We've got some Black leaders who seem to be terrible. We've got some lesbian leaders who I don't really know if they're being terrible. If they don't have water, which is somebody else's job, so I'm not going to say the fire department's doing a terrible job. Does anybody even say that? I'm not even sure that the fire department has been criticized, have they? I don't think I've seen any criticism of the fire department. So I would say the lesbians are clear.
But you have to ask yourself what a big coincidence. They got a lot of lesbian representation there. And then you look at Newsom, who is not diverse at all, and he's a total disaster. You can't blame DEI for that, right? So let me say again, I don't see the fingerprint that DEI caused this. It's just that you know DEI will cause this. Whether it caused this one, that's hard to say. But will it cause another one? Of course, yeah. Will it cause the complete destruction of another city? Guaranteed. It's built into the system. Remember, Victor Davis Hanson says it's a system collapse. DEI guarantees system collapse because it guarantees that instead of merit and experience, you can look for demographics and identity. So that little change just by itself is certainly enough to destroy an entire city if you just let it run forward.
But we should not allow ourselves to assume that any individual is a DEI hire. You'd really have to do some deeper dive and we don't often have that level of information from the outside.
Tom Ellsworth was on the PBD podcast and he was saying that the reason State Farm pulled out from the state and is no longer offering fire insurance is that they pulled out because the county of LA and the city of LA had suspended brush removal in Palisades. Really? It is the connection to the incompetence of the city. Is it that clean? I thought this was going to be a little messier, where you couldn't really tell who was responsible for what. But seriously, they canceled the brush removal and that caused the insurance companies to pull out. And they didn't immediately remove the brush and say, oh hold on, we will remove the brush, just give us a month. Nothing like that. The level of incompetence, system-wise or individuals, I don't know. It's astounding.
Now of course remember, here's something to remember. Today we're still in the fog of war. We're still getting all kinds of news that isn't real. So I think it's real but don't know. So far the fire has destroyed 29,000 acres. Would you like an estimate of how big that is? That's two Manhattan islands. Manhattan is 14,000 acres. This fire has already, and still burning, already destroyed two Manhattans. So if you're not getting the scale of this, imagine all of Manhattan gone and then another one, all of it gone, and it's still going. So if you hadn't quite understood the scale of it, that's it.
We're talking about $57 billion in economic damage. If you want to put that in perspective, the entire tax revenue of California in a recent year was 25 billion. Do you think you can lay that $57 billion on top? I mean obviously the government's going to be constrained in what it can do to help people. A lot of them are uninsured. Biden did say that the federal government was going to help for 180 days in the recovery, but that's only the cleanup and the salaries of the recovery people and the crews that are working and I think removal of the burn debris. Now those are very important, so we're very happy to have that help, but it's not going to help anybody buy a house or build a house.
Mel Gibson tragically, while he was doing the Joe Rogan podcast, his own $14.5 million Malibu mansion burned down. Now I know you're not feeling sorry for him because he is worth, I don't know, hundreds of millions or something. But it's your house. It's your house, you know. No way you're going to feel good about that. So I feel terrible.
One of the things that Mel Gibson said when he was on the Joe Rogan is that he had three friends who were cured of cancer with ivermectin and fenbendazole. And then the internet is saying, whoa, you know, there are other claims and other claims and other claims. And now they're pretty convinced that ivermectin and fenbendazole are cures for at least some kinds of cancers.
Here's what you need to know. Remember when I tell you that an anonymous source, if you have one anonymous source, how much credibility would that be? The answer is zero in politics. So that's a different domain. In politics one anonymous source is usually just a made-up lie. What if you have multiple sources? What if you had three and they basically said something that sounded the same? Three anonymous sources. Now is that credible? No, no, it's completely non-credible. Anonymous sources, always non-credible.
Suppose you knew the name of the source but you hadn't any contact with them so you couldn't ask any questions, you couldn't do a deep dive, but you knew the name and somebody else had told you the claim. You didn't even hear from the person. Is that credible? No, no, that's zero credibility. Is there a reason that we do clinical trials instead of watching what three people said as reported by another person? No, no, there's a reason we do the clinical trials because that has no evidentiary value. None.
So I'm going to cause some trouble today. So I said I don't think it's true. I'm going to be attacked all day long by people who say, Scott, you fool, don't you know that Big Pharma is just trying to sell their cures and they don't want you to know that ivermectin and fenbendazole is literally curing. The claims are that people with stage four cancer are cured, you know, not just helped them, completely cleared. And so I ask this. Let's talk to one of them. Just one. Show me one live human being who says something like I had an incurable cancer and I'm now completely clear. Here's my test results. I'm sitting next to my doctor. My doctor can confirm that I'm completely clear of a cancer that was incurable.
Now what happens if you talk to them and they say well it wasn't an incurable cancer and the other complimentary things we were doing have cured it before. But this person was stage four and they added these other drugs and then they got cured. So we're saying it's the other drugs they added. To which I say but they were on all the treatments that we know are cures. So here's what I need. I need an incurable cancer, one that doesn't have any treatment as far as anybody knows. And even if they combined it with these drugs, which is the claim that maybe the drugs aren't working exactly alone, but there are also claims that they would work alone. And show me the doctor, show me the patient, and show me that it was incurable except for this intervention. Then I'm going to get serious. I'm still going to say I need a clinical trial, but at least you went from anonymous people being talked about by other people to well these look like real people and their doctor says and I'm looking at their chart. Maybe yes.
So I'd say we'll see.
New York Judge Merchan discharges Trump without imprisonment, fine or probation in the Stormy Daniels case, wishes him well in his second term. Everything's different. All right. That was a little side conversation there.
Apparently there was a fake alert that went out to everybody's phone in LA County saying that they needed to get ready to evacuate. This turned out to be just a mistake. The alert told people to gather loved ones, pets and supplies and get out of town. And it happened when people were the most frightened and thought it could be coming for them. And it was fake, meaning it was an accident. So remember that Victor Davis Hanson analysis that it was a total system breakdown? Well here it is again. They didn't even have a system to make sure that fake emergency alerts didn't go out in the middle of an emergency. That's the level of competence it would take to get there is pretty extraordinary. But the incompetence is probably the system. I don't think it's necessarily that one person pushed the wrong button. It could be. But why is that the system? Why is one person allowed to push that button? It seems like at least a few people should be standing around when the button gets pushed to make sure that that's the intention. I don't know. Get a better system.
Elon Musk donated a bunch of Starlinks in LA and this is cool. Apparently T-Mobile customers were having trouble because probably the towers got burned or something. But now Musk very quickly tied T-Mobile into Starlink and you can text. So if you're on T-Mobile and you suddenly can text, you can't make a phone call but you can text. That's because of Elon Musk. Without Elon Musk everybody with T-Mobile would be completely cut off during an emergency. I mean it looks like they have been for some time, but this is gigantic. The level that Elon Musk can contribute to a Ukraine war or an emergency now twice I guess, several times I think, it's extraordinary. So just congratulations on that.
Meanwhile the California National Guard is moving in. We've seen out-of-state police moving in. So the fires have turned into an organized crime and unorganized crime problem. The looters are organized. There are lots of them and it gets worse. Now this is fog of war stuff but it's what's being reported. Could be overblown, could be underblown, I don't know. That some of the bad guys, and they seem to be from a migrant community, and again that's speculative, they seem to be setting fires to increase the number of places that they have to loot. Because if they can get people to evacuate while they're there they can get the good stuff before any houses burned down. Now that's just about the most evil crime you can imagine, setting somebody's house on fire so you can rob it. The level of evil in that is hard to imagine.
There was however one poor individual, a criminal, who had a little blowtorch and he was trying to allegedly set something on fire, presumably for that purpose. We don't know what he was thinking but he looked like he was doing it probably as part of that gang burning down homes. And he got spotted by some of the locals. The locals sent their men out. I saw the video of it and you might be surprised that none of the women came to help, which is good. I didn't want them to. But if you want to have like a little glimmer, just a little glimmer of hope, you watch the video of the maybe half a dozen men who confront this guy who still got the torch. One of the men is armed but he doesn't point it at him. He just has it ready in case he needs it, warns him to stand down. The other men surround the situation and they take him out. Now I mean they took him to the ground and handcuffed him and waited for the police.
And watching those men not have any backdown in them, there was no backdown. They were going to take him out one way or another. They were going to shoot him, they were going to kill him if they had to. Preferably they would capture him and hand him to police so we could know more about whatever he's up to. And that's what they did. But I'm pretty sure if their only choice had been to do worse they would have taken the only choice because I don't think that guy was going to walk out of that neighborhood. And things are getting really dicey. So when there is something that looks to residents like a complete breakdown of the social order, by the way I'll probably get demonetized on YouTube again. I got demonetized yesterday. I got demonetized for I don't know what but my best guess is suggesting that there's a danger that's approaching with this kind of behavior. So I don't know exactly what it is. I'm probably demonetized again just for this conversation.
Newsom says there'll be 8,000 of these National Guards. I saw Joel Pollak who lives in that area, whose house seems to have survived. We don't know if it's habitable. But he notes that there are more pro-Second Amendment people in the Pacific Palisades than the bad guys might expect. So if the bad guys are expecting a bunch of anti-gun people that they can easily handle, they should be warned that there's some serious personal protection in that area. So people have the assets to protect themselves. So I don't know where it's heading but it does look like a complete breakdown of order.
There's still a lot of talk about whether climate change is a small cause or the cause or no cause or is that just being political. And I wanted to give you a frame for understanding the climate change issue and one that you haven't seen before. And it can explain a little bit why the two sides can't really talk. You know, the yes I believe climate change is an immediate crisis versus the people Elon Musk would be on the other side, which is climate change could be real in terms of the climate might be changing but it's going to be slower than the alarmist believe. So why can't they have a productive conversation and figure out what's really true? And I'll give you my take on that, sort of the hypnotist take.
So if you can see my whiteboard, let me adjust it a little bit. So I just made this up. I call it the climate awareness chart. So the highest level of awareness is at the top but we'll get there. We're going to start at the bottom and see. Here we go. At the bottom level of awareness, and this is where I used to be as a young man, I would hear that 98, 99% of scientists were on the same side and I'd say well I'm done there. There's nothing else I need to know, right? I love science. Science is the best way to find the truth. It's imperfect, it's imperfect, but you know it's the best we have. So you tell me 99% of scientists have been looking into it deeply and they're all on the same side. I'm convinced. And I was. I was convinced.
Now I would say that level of awareness is roughly equivalent to the people who say how can they predict the climate when they can't even predict the weather and I don't believe in climate change because it's cold outside, right? So one is believing it, one is not believing climate change, but these are both the lowest level of understanding and I've been at this level. I've been there.
If you go up a little higher, let's say you decide, huh, I'm seeing two sides of this. I'm just going to look into it. So you look, you do a deep dive. Maybe you see Al Gore documentary. Maybe you read the most official statements from the biggest scientists. And when you're done with that you're going to say okay, okay, I can see why 99% of scientists are saying it because I've done my own research and yeah I mean it's like guaranteed climate change, the crisis, because you did your own research. And then there are also people who do a deep dive on the skeptic side. So maybe they never believe the 99% of scientists or didn't want to believe it so they did their deep dive on the other side. So they only looked at the skeptic's arguments. Both of them would be completely dudded by this process. It doesn't matter which one you're looking at. If you're looking at either the yes it's a crisis or no it's not, they both have the documentary effect. Which is if you look at one argument and you see a lot on that one argument you will be convinced beyond any doubt. You will be 100% convinced. And that has nothing to do with whether the thing you're looking at is true or not. Completely unrelated to the underlying truth is a guarantee that if you see one argument and it's really well developed and you spend hours on it you'll believe it every time. And you can see that it's the same no matter whether you believe the skeptics or you believe the claims. Still completely believable, still absolutely no evidentiary value. No evidentiary value because documentaries are always convincing even when they're not true. So the only thing you would know when you're done with this process is that you're convinced. That's nothing. You're going to be convinced even if you saw the other side. You'd be convinced and that's nothing too. These are both nothings.
Let's go up a level. Let's say you get to the point where you did a deep dive on both sides, which I find relatively rare. I'm not sure I've seen anybody who's done it. I've tried to do it. So I spent a lot of time. I've looked at the claims, I've looked at the debunk to the claims, and then I've looked at the debunk to the debunk of the claims. If you haven't done all three you haven't done anything. You've done nothing. Because if you look at the claim you can say well that looks pretty true and then you look at the debunk to the claim you're like whoa I didn't see that. Oh I didn't know about how they measure that. Whoa yeah the debunk looks totally convincing. If you're done you're not done because you've got to circle back and see what happens to the people who made the original claim when they were faced with the debunk. And then they come back and say but the debunk is debunked and here's why. And you read that you go yeah that's a pretty good argument. So the problem is that if you do a deep dive on both sides you're going to find they're both convincing and both not convincing and you won't know.
At the highest level are people who understand that all data that matters is fake and that all projection models are fake and that it has nothing to do with climate change. These are universal truths. If I were talking about let's say the data for jobs in America, you think that's real? No. How about the history? Do you think our history books are based on what's real or what was allowed to be written? It's not real. Do you think there's anything that's important and scale like big and it matters that's real? No, because our systems don't allow that. Whoever's in charge of the data is going to have so much power that somebody's going to distort them with a bribe or you know. So when you get to the point where it really, really matters it's 100% fake or it's 100% sure that you won't tell the difference because the fakes will be so good that you think they're real.
And the reason I know the prediction models are fake is that everybody who's worked in this field, including me, now I didn't work in climate but I did projection models for a living, financial ones, they all know that the projection model is based on the assumptions you put into it. It's not the data. So if you're way down here at the lowest level you think that the projection models are raisable because 99% of the scientists said yeah these are real. But you'll never learn that they can make those models anything they want just by changing the assumptions without even changing the data. And then they can say well this data is bad so we're going to put in a little adjustment to it. What's that? It's not science. It's just adjusting it so it comes into the same range that people expect it to come into.
So in our current world 99% of the people being on one side has no evidentiary value. How many of you would agree with that statement? 99% of scientists agree doesn't have any evidentiary value. Now that's not true if you're talking about something simple like does gravity apply everywhere on earth, right? 100% of scientists would say yes. They'd be right. So I'm not talking about like one variable things. I'm talking about this big, complicated, hard to understand things where there are people on both sides and the variables are changing and every day we have a new variable that should have been in models but wasn't. It's like oh we just found out the ocean can absorb way more than we thought. Well was that in the model? We just found a new technology that can allow us to produce things without the pollution. What was that in the model? Did you know they were going to invent something?
So the models are 100% unreliable. And if you believe that because the scientist told you they are reliable, you don't understand how money works. If you understand how money works you'll be with me up here that all the models are fake and the data is either unreliable or fake. And that has to be true because the design of our economic system, our economic system and you could add the fake news and the interest groups etc., they kind of guarantee that people will say it's true while it isn't true. It's guaranteed that our system would be there.
Now here's a good test for you. If you're talking to somebody and you're having some debates down here in the documentary effect level where you've both seen some stuff but you saw different stuff and you were convinced, ask the person who thinks that the climate models are real to list three reasons that the terrestrial thermometers might be imperfect. And if they can do it then you'd have a reasonably good idea that maybe they've at least seen both sides. If they don't know what you're talking about and they insult you and call you a cretin and change the topic it means they've never looked into it.
So here's what. If you can make a good argument that the climate change stuff is real, here's what you should know. You should know what the heat island effect is. That's because the thermometer stations were once away from the cities but the cities grew and the heat from the city is not really what the planet heat is. It would artificially change the thermometers. Would you know that? Did you know that the little enclosure measures for the thermometers are in buildings that are painted, usually painted white, and that when the paint fades as it does it can change the temperature of the thermometer having nothing to do with the planet and everything to do with just the paint faded? Did you know that? Did you know that if a thermometer breaks or is missing sometimes they'll just plug in a number of what they think it would have been? Did you know that?
All right, so if you can't list at least three reasons that you should doubt the terrestrial thermometers, oh here's another one. How much of the world are they measuring? And when you talk about the ocean which would be a different measurement technique, how much of the ocean is being measured? And isn't it true that the ocean can store heat in different places that are unpredictable and in amounts that we don't exactly know? So that if the temperature somewhere went up maybe it went down somewhere but that down is in the ocean and nobody's looking at it.
If you can't answer the questions at least at that level that you know that these are issues even if you don't know what the answer to the issue is, you haven't looked into it. And if you believe that 99% of scientists being on one side has any credibility I can't have a conversation with you.
So here's my problem. I keep running into people online who are operating at the lowest level of awareness and they're pretty sure I'm the biggest freaking idiot they've ever seen in their life. It's like God, 99% of scientists. Are you a trite? 99, Scott, do you understand that 99 is almost 100? Do you understand? And I'm up here saying do you really think the news is real? You think the news is real? I can't have a conversation with you if you think news is real. I can't have a conversation with you if you think the people getting paid to say it's real are saying it's real and that means it's real. I can't have a conversation with you. So I end up like sort of giving up because before you could have a conversation on climate change you'd have to start with how the entire system works, what the economics are, how people lie, how every other system like this is clearly and demonstrably rigged. And once I understood that everything of this type is rigged, everything, there's nothing where you can't exactly tell and there are billions of dollars involved that isn't rigged. They're all rigged. If somebody could make a lot of money from it and it's big and complicated and you'll never know exactly what the truth is, that's all rigged. And there's probably never going to be an exception to that.
If you don't understand that I can't have a conversation with you about climate change because you're so lost. And again I say I spent most of my early life at the bottom level of awareness because I hadn't looked into it and I thought 99% of scientists they must be right. How many physicists do you believe told us that string theory was the future of physics? I don't know the answer to that but I'll bet most said yeah string theory, you know it's not all worked out yet but pretty sure this is going to give us something like what civilization looks like or reality looks like. Did it? No it didn't. I would say that all the physicists probably just parroted the same thing, string theory, string theory. And a lot of them were getting money so they really were in favor of string theory because they could get funded that way. So no you should not believe anything that most of the scientists believe is true but it's hard to know if it's hard to know.
In other news the Supreme Court did a ruling on Title IX and they're not going to say that trans women are women in sports. So the court has made the distinction between your sex versus your gender identity. You can call yourself anything you want. That's not an issue. It's just that the state doesn't have to recognize it. So they don't have to recognize it as your sex. They may choose to recognize that you have a gender preference but they don't have to say yes you're a woman because you say so. So a lot of people are happy about that. I'm sure people are unhappy about it but more people I think are happy.
Senator Fetterman is going to Mar-a-Lago. I think he's the first. Well it's kind of unusual now. Fetterman, I know you're getting tired of me saying Fetterman is kind of awesome but he keeps doing smart things. And when I talk about Fetterman it's not because I love his Democrat preferences. It's because I like to evaluate the persuasion techniques separate from whether I like what they're persuading. So Fetterman just keeps hitting line drives after line drive. I don't know if he's hitting home runs but he's hitting line drive after line drive in the persuasion communication realm. Very impressive.
And here's what I love about this. So Joe Manchin is retiring and Joe Manchin I always respected because he did such a smart thing of being somebody who would be willing sometimes to vote on the other side from his team. And when things are so close that that one vote makes all the difference, Joe Manchin was the only one smart enough to say wait a minute. All I have to do is, are you serious? I can run the whole country if I'm just willing to consider voting either way. Like you pay me to do so. If I just do what you pay me to do which is look at the topic and then decide which way I think it goes independent of where the politics are, you will allow me to run the whole country. And all I have to do is do the thing that you paid me to do as opposed to all my co-workers who are doing the opposite of what you're paying me to do. Huh? Am I missing something?
But seriously I have to ask again. All I have to do to be in charge of the whole country is simply do what you're paying me to do. Evaluate things on their merit independent of politics. That's it. And that is it. And apparently he's the only one who's smart enough to figure it out who's not named Joe Manchin. So I mean you could say Kyrsten Sinema was sort of in that same game but she's out of it too now, right? So at the moment the Senate is now swinging on one vote but that could happen really quickly. Couple years from now straight up tie, Fetterman is in charge of the country virtually, right? Because he controls Congress anyway.
Trump was saying that an outing that all the, he's getting everybody to come. He's got the heads of the social media companies, the big are all coming to visit him. Fetterman coming to visit him. And he had some kind of quote like you know maybe we're all changing. And he says that the people who are coming to visit him from all walks are quite productive and positive, meaning that they're there to get something done and they're not there to fight and it's not about Trump's personality. They just think can you do these things because we need to do these things. So that's all looking positive. Little golden age.
Meanwhile CNN has this, I'm going to say a racist panelist. There's a Black woman, Jasmine Crockett, who's on their panel a lot. And she pointed out the other day she was in a little debate with Scott Jennings who's their conservative Republican kind of voice on the panel. And Jasmine Crockett claimed that the most educated demographic in the country is Black women. And the conversation didn't go much further after that. So that claim just sort of stayed there. Do you think it's true that the most educated demographic is Black women? It's almost true. It's actually almost true. It's not true if you look at the entire population of Black women compared to the entire population of other demographic groups. So that felt like that was the claim and that's definitely not true.
Is it my imagination or can you hear a leaf blower right outside my window? You can hear that right? Anyway that tells me what time it is I think.
Here's what I believe is true but I'll take a fact check on it. I've told you before that Black women are killing it in terms of careers and success. So I'm going to agree with Jasmine Crockett sort of directionally but she got the fact wrong. I think directionally I believe it's true that more Black women are getting college degrees than white men and more than Black men too. Is that true? Which would be impressive. Now it also presumably there would be a DEI element to that meaning some people are getting recruited and some people are getting tuition paid and stuff like that. So that's a factor. I don't know how much of that is but you don't want to throw the baby out with the bath water.
So on one hand I think it's a completely racist and inaccurate claim that Black women are the most educated group in the country. I think it's just plain false. But I think what she was getting at is true which is that Black women as a class at the moment, the young ones who are getting a college and getting their first jobs and stuff, they are killing it. They are killing it. So I like to give full congratulations to any group that works hard and gets what they want. So congratulations. I say the same thing about the LGBTQ group. I think they've really killed it in terms of improving their overall situation. I'm so impressed about how they've changed their situation in a few decades. Very impressive. And Black women, same thing. They are in fact killing it but they haven't overtaken the other groups yet because there's a lot to overtake, a lot of work to do. But it's certainly racist to imagine that her group is the most educated. So if it's just a factual thing I don't think a white person could have said that. What if Scott Jennings said you know the white people are the most educated in the country? Ouch. I don't know if that's true by the way but he wouldn't be able to say it but she could say it and nobody challenged it even though it wasn't true. So to me that's more racist than not even though I support the general idea that Black women are doing great lately.
Elon says it's going to take years to rebuild LA. When they try to get permits it's going to be a problem. And I put out the following statements about rebuilding that you should know that I'm asking for a fact check so I don't know which ones of these are true but this is my starting point. The starting point is that it can take years to get anything approved in normal times. In normal times it would take years to get things approved in California. I know that from personal experience. So what would it take when everybody like 100,000 people are trying to apply for things at the same time or whatever the number is? How are they going to handle that? They don't have enough resources. So if it used to take more than a year in normal times how long is it going to take in abnormal times where everybody's trying to do it and all the resources are constrained and nobody knows what they're talking about and the environmentalists are saying no you can't do that and you can't even rebuild. The environmentalists will say you can't even rebuild. You're too close to the ocean or there's a fish we didn't know about before but now we do or there's a bird or something. So I think it could take five to ten years to rebuild a house. Five to ten years.
Now what happens to, what do you think it would cost to rebuild those homes? So if you had a home that was worth five million what do you think it would cost to rebuild it? And let's say it was insured for five million or it wasn't insured at all. Five million home, what would it cost to rebuild it? The answer is about ten million. If you're building a community like a big developer is doing a whole community then they can bring the cost of each unit down because they're working in bulk and they're mass designed and there aren't that many different designs and stuff so they can build the house for cheaper than they sell it. That's how they make money. But if you're building one house and you want the rooms that you want and it's on the hill and first you have to do a big cleanup and all that stuff it's going to cost closer to ten million to build a five million house.
What happens to your property tax if you spend ten million to build a five million house? Well I think that they would either, I've heard that there's a rule that if you're building back on the same footprint so it's the same size as the one that was destroyed then you get to keep the old tax basis, the old lower tax basis. But if you wanted to make your house while you're doing it you're like well you know this would be a good time to add that spare room. As soon as you do that your property tax will quadruple. You won't be able to afford to live there. So they've created a situation where all these people get at least the good news if they could afford it. The good news was hey those changes you wanted to make to your house you can make them now because the house is gone so design it the way you want. But it will have to be the same footprint or their taxes will double or quadruple. That's going to be a big problem I think.
Then what happens when the fire risk returns because everything's going to regrow and then the insurance companies either haven't come back or they leave because nothing's going to burn while it's all rubble but as soon as you build and replant and all the trees are back, do you think you could ever get insurance? Would you rebuild if you didn't think you could ever get insurance? I wouldn't. Why would you rebuild if you thought you could never get insurance? If you had kids and you say to yourself this is the best place in the world to raise kids. The kids are going to be out of the house in five to ten years depending on the age. If the kids are going to be out of the house in five to ten years they're going to be living in a burned out rubble most of that time. That's the place you go because the lifestyle is amazing.
The one thing I learned about it, I didn't know anything about the place. The one thing I learned about it is apparently the lifestyle there wasn't just good. Did you know that it wasn't just good? It was sort of like heaven. When I hear people talk about it it's like oh my God it was just the best. People, the best place. The downtown, the businesses, everything was close. It was on the beach. It was the temperature so you didn't have the extreme hot because you're on the beach. Like I don't know if any of those reasons are going to apply because it's going to take so long to clean up. So I don't know what that does.
What happens when you go to get a builder and 50,000 people are ahead of you for the few builders? How in the world are you going to get a qualified builder? Maybe they come from another state. If you get a builder from another state they're not going to know how to build in California and they would be crazy to come to California to start because the rules are too hard. If you were a builder and somebody said hey come to California you'd say is that the only place I could be a builder? No you could stay where you are and build things more easily. But if I come to California it's just going to be a hot mess every single thing I do and I won't even make a dollar because I can't even start and when I do start they're going to stop me because there's going to be some fish there. Next thing I know I can't possibly make money and then I have to learn this whole state weird stuff. The approvals are different than any other place. I don't know where they're going to get the builders. So that has to add some years to the rebuilding.
And then you've got unchecked crime. Let me give you the worst case scenario. It could be that the people who live there have enough male energy to stop this from happening. We'll see. But what happens when things settle down? Most of the properties will be abandoned right because most are burned to the ground and they're going to be working on approvals and even the cleanup is going to take a long time. What happens then? Let me tell you. I think the homeless are going to move in. They're going to put up a tent on what used to be your home. They won't care so much about all the debris. They'll like the view and the temperature. And when you go to kick them out they'll say well sorry I'm a squatter. I got squatter rights. And you're going to say you can have squatter rights on a tent on my own property? And then they say this is California. You can't move me. What happens then?
And what happens when it's not one but the entire hillside is full of people who heard that they'll never be kicked out and they could be living on the best property in the world as long as they don't mind living among the debris which couldn't be any worse than what they were doing on the streets. The thing I'd worry most about is the homeless coming in putting up tents because California doesn't remove homeless people in tents. I mean rarely. And then where are people going to live? And also people might worry that it becomes a horrible crime place that they don't want to live in the first place. I hope not.
And where do people live while the rebuilding is happening? How in the world are all of those 100,000 plus going to be able to live close enough to LA that they have some kind of continuity in their life? Maybe even close enough to the school. Almost nobody will be close enough to the school they were at and I think some of them burned. So you're going to end up in a different school in a different place and now your kids go to that other school and they get used to it and they got friends in the new school and five to ten years are going by and they're 17 now. Do they want to move back? I don't know. I feel like the fact that you can't stay local while it's being built and there's nothing local that you used to like, it's all burned up, you're going to move further than it would be comfortable to be the owner of something being rebuilt because you really need to visit the site a lot. If you've ever built a home you kind of need to go there a lot. I think people are going to assume they'll rebuild but when they get settled somewhere else that won't be that close maybe the new life looks better than trying to go back. So I think it's highly unpredictable.
If you want the positive news on that it would be that it is like the best place on Earth. It is just one of the best places. So if it's land, land, land, if that's the real estate rule then it will be rebuilt and maybe we'll be surprised that California bends some rules, makes it easier to do. Here's one thing they could do. They could say you could put an ADU on your property right away if it meets these minimum requirements. So ADU stands for additional dwelling unit. So that'd be like a little, it'd be the size of a mobile home but they're more like a regular home and you could plop it on the property if you have a backyard and if you wanted to you could live there. But even that's going to take a long time. So there might be some fast approval of ADUs just so people can be close, can have some continuity and live near their friends. But I don't know how many people would take that option.
Meanwhile the pope is now the latest victim of what I call the Trump effect. Well other people call it that too. The pope is railing on a January 9th speech. He's railing against fake news. The continuous creation and spread of fake news he said distorts facts but also perceptions. So the pope is going full MAGA, full MAGA, and he's against fake news. Well all I got to say is thank God all the religions agree with each other because I'd hate for one of them to be spreading any fake news. But the pope assures us he's got it under control.
In interesting engineering there's an article by Aman Chhabra. Apparently there's a US firm in the nuclear business that wants to build a one mile underground tunnel or hole, I'm not sure if it's a tunnel or hole, to power data centers. So the reason they want to put the nuke in the hole one mile down is if there's a problem it's easier to contain. But if there's a problem it contains itself because it can't explode because it would be held up by the entire Earth would be the surround for it. So I don't know if that really works but these aren't the biggest reactors. They would be I think micro reactors, smaller reactors. And they would stick them in the ground and then that would make a big difference.
Some of the benefits are robust containment just because of the Earth around it and continuous pressure so that way you don't have massive concrete structures. Oh so it's much cheaper. So you don't have to build the whole structure if you can make a good mile deep hole. And it minimizes the environmental impact. And I've told you a number of times that holes are the future of energy and maybe of other things. And I've said if we can improve our technology for cheaply building holes and tunnels we're going to be able to have everything from geothermal to better mining to now nuclear. Of course you could use it for geothermal where you're looking for the hot water under the Earth to create power. But what's the one where you're just using the temperature difference underground to either moderate the hotness or the coldness of your house above ground? What's that called? But that's another reason to have good hole building technology. Holes are the future.
There's a hobbyist who built an AI assisted rifle robot using ChatGPT and there's a video that went viral on TikTok I guess and it shows the inventor with a robot. Now it's a tabletop robot. Wouldn't be too hard to attach it to a robot dog or something I guess. But it's just a rifle that can point anywhere in a moment and he just talks to it. He says there's a threat on the left and it just goes. So the one he's using doesn't use real rounds. It's shooting something fake. But how far away are we from telling your robot rifle dog to go attack the German front line? All right rifle dog, there's a bunch of Russian soldiers two miles away in a trench. I want you to go there and in the order if you see anybody who looks like an officer shoot them first or something like that and then set it to attack. But AI or robot rifle dogs, they're coming.
The CES show is highlighting all the big technical breakthroughs and so we're seeing news at least two companies that built human robots that look like real women. But one of them will build a real woman with the face of your choice. So I guess you just give them a photograph of who you want it to look like and they'll put an artificial skin face on it that looks like the person you want. Now at the moment these robots are not impressive because they just look like mannequins who happen to be able to talk. So it's not like you're going to want to take that robot home if you know what I mean. It's more of a suggestion of what's to come. It's not there yet.
But I have a prediction about what one year from now looks like because the robots will develop quickly. Here's a conversation between a married couple one year from now. Human wife says to her husband I want a divorce. Human husband says okay, can you pose for a photo first? Mic drop.
All right ladies and gentlemen that's all I have to say. It's 8:07 where I am. Did I miss anything? Any big stories that are happening? Yeah let me get a good picture of you before you go. I'm going to upgrade.
All right ladies and gentlemen I have some stories I think I'm going to save for later but I got some good ones. The Carter funeral. Yeah I didn't talk about the Jimmy Carter funeral. So here's the fascinating thing about the Jimmy Carter funeral. So of course the ex-presidents are all invited. So you had the Clintons. You had only Barack Obama. Michelle did not come. We're not sure why. And then you had the Harrises, so Kamala and her husband. And then I'm forgetting who else was there. But I was looking at all the people sitting up front and it turned out it was Trump and all the people he's destroyed. It was Trump and all the people he's destroyed sitting together chatting. Oh Biden. Biden was the other one. So Biden he destroyed. The Clintons destroyed via destroying Hillary. Barack Obama destroyed. Michelle Obama couldn't even come. So and then the funny part is he ends up sitting right next to Barack Obama who just warned the world that Trump was Hitler and that he called the neo-Nazis fine people. And you see Obama and Trump chatting and joking with each other. Nothing's real. Nothing's real.
Oh Pence, right. Mike Pence was there and Mike Pence was destroyed by Trump as well. Was there a Bush there? I don't know. The Bush dynasty got destroyed. Not George Bush but so yeah it was quite amazing. It was Trump and all the people he destroyed. It was kind of amazing.
You know I think Trump has a superpower in forgetting what people said about him. Not forgetting, he never forgets, but willingness to just work with you if it makes sense. I just love that. Yeah, Trump-o in the room.
All right I'm going to talk for a moment privately with the locals subscribers. The rest of you I will see you tomorrow for more fun and games. See you tomorrow.
it's time for another great show let me make sure I got my comments working here so I can see what you're up to yep it's working move that over there then over there perfect just perfect oh I need some notes hold on good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams and I'm fairly confident you've never had a better time but if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that nobody can understand with their tiny shiny human brains all you need for that is a cou Mar glass of tanker CH Cen J FL of V of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure of the dopamine here the day thing makes everything better it's called the simultaneous sip go ah delightful I feel connected to you all through the invisible umbilical cord of the coffee cup well give me an update in the comments if something happens while I'm talking because I think Trump is supposedly let's see he's going to be talking to judge Maran today um so there will be sentencing is he's he's doing it over Zoom right he's not going in person I don't know I'm not sure yet but I think he's not going in person and judge michan has already indicated he's going to do some kind of uh uncondition discharge meaning that he'll be guilty of a felony but won't go to jail uh and no matter yeah and no matter what the sentence is they plan to appeal so Trump will be officially a felon maybe but then it's on appeal so my question to you dear legal experts is if your case is approved for appeal are you still a felon because it's not guaranteed you're a felon if your appeal is going through right so I feel like you'd say it's you're you're conditionally possibly a felon just like before so if the legal process has not come to an end I would say h seems to me that the legal process is still cooking along why why would you say he's a felon I don't understand what you're saying so the process is still going forward it could with him being a felon or not a felon so why are you saying he's a felon he should be innocent until the appeals process is over now they don't say that but I do right it'd be one thing if you said I'm going to appeal but given that we could be reasonably confident the appeal will be accepted at least to be processed how is that guilty how does that make him a felon in what world in what world would I consider him a felon if he's in a legal process and it's likely and here here's what makes it interesting I think the experts say the case was so flawed that it's far more likely it will be be overturned than upheld isn't that true so if so can you be a called a felon if the process is still going and all the smart people think it will end with you not being a felon how do you call that a felon it's like they don't understand the process we'll see meanwhile uh New York Court is removing the corrupt judge we call him corrupt uh this is a Laura loomer's reporting and remove the corrupt judge Arthur angorian from the Trump's other case the Civil fraud case and um Laura Lum reminds you that she exclusively broke the story about Judge Eng goran's bias and how his wife was posting memes uh about Trump and apparently that worked so Laura Luber gets the big win she's got a blue check back I don't know what this current situation is with her freedom of speech but she got a big win and she's got a blue check and she's getting the credit today good job Laura lummer um jet we we'll of course talk about the fire like I I need a little little bit of pallet cleansing you know if you live in California even if you're not in the center of the burn area you're thinking about it all day long and you're probably doing something about it too so we're we're pretty exhausted in the state and it's just the beginning of the process so forgive me if I'm a little obsessed by it but when it hits you locally it's hard not to be um so Trump says on day oneish when after he's worn in he's going to share information about the drones and he does say that the government knows it sounds like maybe he doesn't know or maybe he's it's been whispered that the government knows it's their stuff it's one of those but I would expect it to be something like the government was doing a little testing or something probably something like that or maybe just surveilling things here's what I don't expect I do not expect that on day two or whatever Trump will say all right here's the secret of the drones uh we've been allowing Chinese drones to surveil our sensitive sites do you think he's going to announce that even if it's true even if it's true do you think he would tell you I hope not I I I think he would take care of it and keep it as a military secret if there was a way to do that but I think he's getting a little bit ahead of himself that he would necessarily tell us no matter what the answer is so we'll see I think he means it I just don't know he'll be able to deliver uh Victor Davis Hansen summed up the LA problem as a total systems breakdown now a system breakdown do you think the LA was operating as a systems being more important than goals entity or do you think that they seem to have goals without systems that supported them so they had goals for diversity they had goals for the environment um right they had goals for saving the smelt they had goals for protecting the water in the oceans lots of goals but uh as uh you know I've been teaching you for a long time systems are what you need because you know goals can't be supported without a system so it's a system that's the important part and uh as Victor Davis Hansen points out that the water storage system was bad the forest management was bad handling the insurance industry was bad and he mentions the Dei hierarchy of the leadership and he called it a Dei Green New Deal hydrogen bomb like a perfect a perfect system collapse because every part the system kind of collapsed um now do you think it's fair in this case now I've been I've been railing against the people who say as soon as there's a problem you know you look at the people in charge and if you see there certain demographic the people on the right say oh Dei dii and I try to caution you that's not proof of Dei being a problem all you can know for sure is that that you know Dei was a big influence over hiring you can't know that that's the problem however if you do a little research into the people involved might give you some insight it might for example Karen bass did you know that when she was in the 70s she used to travel to Cuba with to work with something called the veneros Brigade which was a group that organized annual trips to Cuba for young leftist Americans for many years do you know why Cuba would host leftists to come do some awesome things in Cuba which is just building stuff I guess why would they do that it's to brainwash them against the United States but gently you know just brainwash them that maybe the Socialist way is better and then they'll come back to the United States and destroy it or convert it so she was actually part of a brainwashing operation and let me be very clear a brainwashing operation by Cuba you bring young people in and you you give them this one experience that's very artificial from you know the general Cuban experience and everything's great and look we'll just show you the things we want and did you know the United States is evil she is unquestionably a brainwash victim that's not even in debate if she went there multiple times and was part of a group that was by design a bunch of brainwash victims how did she un-brainwash herself I don't believe there's a process for that if she was brainwashed it's still in her you can't you can't undo that so do you think that if people were well aware of that that she would have been In.
Charge of the city the mayor no this one does look like a Dei hire problem doesn't it it it looks like nobody in the right mind would have hired her for her background and qualifications but maybe it was a you know Dei related want to have a diversity mayor so I would say you can't say that Dei broke anything but you could say that that one mayor probably only has your job because people either didn't understand or voted dumb you maybe it's the Public's it could be the Public's fault the public just picked the wrong person but at least uh she's got a uh a strong Deputy Mayor so you can't say it's not like one person right that often the the next level down are doing the real decision- making and stuff so next level down you get the Los Angeles Deputy Mayor so at least he's strong oh wait he's under investigation for allegedly calling in a bomb threat to City Hall the FBI raided his home recently and uh he's placed on leave okay he's he's a black man but that is a coincidence and not you can't say that that's Dei related that's just one person one person Who's acting badly now but at least at least in the fire department you know you don't have so much of a Dei problem right um well I mean the the head of the fire department is is a lesbian but you know nobody's saying that lesbians can't do Fire Department jobs and you know she's got tons of experiences relevant so if you're if you're going to say oh she's only there because she's a lesbian that would ignore all of her many many years of very relevant experience and as luck would have it uh the the person just below her I think would be the assistant chief well another lesbian two lesbians at the top but I think that you could call that a coincidence um yeah they're plenty of lesbians it's not like a the biggest coincidence in the world that two of them would be the number one and number two let's look at the third in line let's see I don't know if it's third in line but the the equity Chief well lesbian the lesbian so you got three lesbians in uh executive positions but I I warn you that you know if you're thinking there's a problem with lesbians because of these three no that doesn't follow it doesn't follow that there's some other lesbian who isn't the best person to be the chief of police or the chief of the fire department so this is sticky stuff if if you're just assuming that somebody is a Dei higher and therefore they're bad that's not fair it's also the situation we find ourselves in because Dei is pushed so hard that we assume is creating problems we just it's unfair to point to any specific individual and I point out that g kin Nome is the least diverse Governor you could ever imagine and he's being criticized as much or more than any of the other people I just mentioned so what do we have we got uh we got some uh black leaders who seem to be terrible we've got some lesbian leaders who I don't really know if they're being terrible if they they don't have water which is somebody else's job so I'm not going to say the fire department's doing a terrible job does anybody even say that I'm not even sure that the fire department has been criticized have they I I don't think I've seen any criticism of the fire department so I would I would say the lesbians are clear but you have to ask yourself what a big coincidence they got a lot of lesbian representative there and then you look at Nome who is not diverse at all and he's a total disaster you can't blame Dei on you know for that right so let me say again I don't see the the fingerprint that Dei caused this it's just that you know the Dei will cause this whether it cause this one that's hard to say but will it cause another one of course yeah will it cause the complete destruction of another city guaranteed it's built into the system remember Victor Davis Hansen says it's a system collapse Dei guarantees system collapse because it guarantees that instead of Merit and experience you can look for you know demographics and identity so that little change just by itself is certainly enough to destroy an entire city if you let just let it run forward but we should not uh we should not allow ourselves to assume that any individual is a de Dei hire you'd really have to do some deeper dive and we don't often have that level of information from the outside Tom Ellsworth was on the PB podcast and he was saying that the reason State Farm pulled out um from the state and is no longer offering fire insurance is that uh they pulled out because the County of LA in the city of La had suspended brush removal in Palisades really really it is the connection to the incompetence of the city is it that clean I thought this was going to be a little Messier where you where you couldn't really tell who was responsible for what but seriously they they canceled the brush removal and that caused the insurance companies to pull out and they didn't immediately remove the brush and say oh hold on we will remove the brush just give us a month nothing like that the the level of incompetence system-wise or individuals I don't know it's astounding now of course remember here's something to remember today we're still in the fog of War we're still getting all kinds of news that isn't real so I you know I think it's I think it's real but don't know so far the fire has destroyed 29,000 Acres would you like a estimate of how big that is that's two Manhattan Islands Manhattan is 14,000 square um uh 14,000 Acres this fire has already and still burning already destroyed two Manhattans so if if you're not getting the scale of this imagine all of Manhattan gone and then another one all of it gone and it's still going so if you if you hadn't quite understood the scale of it that's it we're talking about $57 billion in economic damage if you want to put that in perspective uh the the entire tax revenue of California in a recent year was 25 billion do you think you can lay that 157 Bill 57 billion on top of I mean obviously the government's going to be constrained in what it can do to help people a lot of them are uninsured uh Biden did say that the federal government was going to help for 180 days in the recovery but that's only the cleanup in the salaries of the recovery people you know and the crews that are working at um and I think removal of the you know the burn debris now those are very important so we're we're very happy to have that help but it's not going to help anybody buy a house or build a house Mel Gibson tragically was on the he well was doing The Joe Rogan podcast while he was filming it uh his own $14.5 million Malibu mansion burned down now I know you're not feeling sorry for him because he is not worth his I don't know hundreds of millions or something but uh it's your house it's your house you know no no way you're going to feel good about that so I feel terrible one of the things that Mel Gibson said when he was on the Joe Rogen is that he had three friends who were cured of cancer with ivin and fendol and then the internet is saying whoa you know there are other claims and other claims and other claims and now they're pretty convinced that ior mchan and Fen bendol are cures for at least some kinds of cancers here's what you need to know remember when I tell you that uh an anonymous source if you have one anonymous source how much credibility would that be the answer is zero in politics so that's a different domain in politics one anonymous source is usually just a madeup lie what if you have multiple sources what if you had three and they basically said something that sounded the same three Anonymous sources now is that credible no no it it's completely non-credible Anonymous sources always non incedible suppose you knew the name of the source but you hadn't any contact with them so you couldn't ask any questions you couldn't do a deep dive but you knew the name and somebody else had tell you told you the claim you didn't even hear from the person is that credible no no that's zero credibility is there a reason that we do clinical trials instead of watching what three people said as reported by another person no no there's reason we do the clinical trials because that has no evidentiary value none so I'm going to cause some trouble today so I said I don't think it's true I'm going to be attacked all day long by people who say Scott you fool don't you know that big doctor or you know big Pharma is just trying to sell their curers and they don't want you to know that ior mechon and Fen bendol is literally curing the claims are that people was stage four or cancer are cured you know not just help them completely cleared and so I asked this let's talk to one of them just one sh me one live human being who says something like I had an incurable cancer and I'm now completely clear here's my you know here's my test results um I'm sitting next to my doctor my doctor can confirm that I'm completely clear of a cancer that was incurable now what happens if you talk to them and they say well it wasn't an incurable cancer and the the other complimentary things we were doing have cured it before but this person was stage four and they added these other drugs and then they got cured so we're saying it's the other drugs they added to which I say but they were on all the treatments that we know are cures so here's what I need I need an incurable cancer one that doesn't have any treatment as far as anybody knows and and even if they combined it with these drugs which is the claim that the maybe the drugs aren't working exactly alone but there's there are also claims that they would work alone and show me the doctor show me the patient and show me that it was incurable except for this intervention then I'm going to get serious I'm still going to say I need a clinical Tri but at least you went from you know Anonymous people being talked about by other people to well these look like real people and their doctor says and I'm looking at their chart maybe yes so I'd say we're U I'll see New York judge Maran discharges Trump without imprisonment fine or probation in the stormy Daniel's case wishes him well in his second term everything's different all all right uh that was a little uh a little uh side conversation there all right uh apparently there was a fake alert that went out to everybody's phone in LA county saying that uh they needed to um get ready to evacuate this turned out to be just a mistake the alert told people to gather loved ones pets and supplies and get out of town and uh it happened when people were the most frightened and thought it could be coming for them and it was fake meaning it was an accident so remember that Richard Davis Hansen analysis that it was a total system breakdown well here it is again they didn't even have a system to make sure that fake emergency alerts didn't go out in the middle of an emergency that's the level of competence it would take to get there is pretty extraordinary but the incompetence is probably the system like I I don't think it's necessarily that one person push the wrong button it could be but why is that the system why why is one person allowed to push that button you know it seems like at least a few people should be standing around when the button gets pushed to make sure that that's the intention I don't know get a better system Elon Musk donated a bunch of starlinks in LA and uh this is cool apparently T-Mobile customers were having trouble um because probably the towers got burned or something um but now musk very quickly tied T-Mobile into starlink and you can text so if you're on T-Mobile and you suddenly can text you can't make a phone call but you can text that's because of Elon Musk without Elon Musk everybody with T-Mobile would be completely cut off during an emergency I mean looks like they have been for some time but this is gigantic like the the level that Elon Musk can contribute to a Ukraine war or or an emergency now twice I guess several times I think it's extraordinary so just congratulations on that uh meanwhile the California National Guard is moving in we've seen out ofate police moving in so the fires have turned into an organized crime and unorganized crime problem the lutters are are organized there are lots of them and it gets worse now this is fog of War stuff but it's what's being reported could be could be overblown could be under blown I don't know that uh some of the bad guys and and they seem to be from a migrant Community um and again that's speculative um they seem to be setting fires to increase the number of places that they have to loot cuz if they can get to to evacuate while they're there they can get the good stuff before any houses burned down now that's just about the most evil crime you can imagine sending somebody's house on fire so you can rob it the the level of evil in that is hard to imagine there was however one poor individual a criminal who had a little blowtorch and he was trying to allegedly set something on fire presumably for that purpose we don't know what he was thinking but he you looked like he was doing it probably as part of that gang burning down homes and he got spotted by some of the locals the locals sent their men out I saw the video of it and you know you might be surprised that none of the women came to help which is good I I didn't want them to but if you want to have like a little glimmer just a little glimmer of hope you watch the video of the maybe half a dozen men who confront this guy who still got the torch one of the men is armed but he doesn't he doesn't point it at him he just has it ready in case he needs it warns him to stand down the other men surround the situation and they take him out now I mean they they took him to the ground and handcuffed him and waited waited for the police and watching watching those men not have any backdown in them there was no backdown that they were going to take him out one way or another they were going to shoot him they were going to kill him if they had to preferably they would capture him and head him to police so we could know more about whatever he's up to and that's what they did but I'm pretty sure if their only CH Choice had been to you know do worse they would have taken the only choice because I don't think that guy was going to walk out of that neighborhood and things are getting really dicey so when there is something that looks to resident like a complete breakdown of the social order by the way I'll probably get demonetized on You.
Tube again I got demonetized yesterday I got demonetized for I don't know what but my best guess is suggesting that you know there there's a danger that's approaching with h with this kind of behavior so I don't know exactly what it is I'm probably demonetized again just for this conversation um Nome says uh there'll be 8,000 of these National Guards um I saw Joel Pollock who lives in that area whose house seems to have survived we don't know if it's um habitable but um you noce that there are more pro- Second Amendment people in the Pacific Palisades than the bad guys might expect so if the bad guys are expecting a bunch of you know anti-gun people that they can easily handle uh they should be warned that there's some serious personal protection in that area so people have the assets to protect themselves so I don't know where it's heading but it does look like a complete breakdown of of order um let's see uh so you know that there's still a lot of talk about whether climate change is a small cause or the cause or no cause or you know is that just being political and I wanted to give you a frame for understanding the climate change issue and one that you haven't seen before and it can explain a little bit why the the two sides can't really talk you know the the yes I believe climate change is an immediate crisis versus the people Elon Musk would be on the other side which is climate change could be real in terms of the climate might be changing but it's going to be slower than you know the the alarmist Bel um so why can't they have a productive conversation and like figure out what's really true and I'll give you my take on that sort of the the hypnotist take so if you can see my whiteboard let me adjust it a little bit so I just made this up I call it the climate awareness chart so the highest level of awareness is at the top but we'll get there we're going to start at the bottom and see here we go at the bottom level of awareness and this is where I used to be as a Young Man uh I would hear that 98 99% of scientists were on the same side and I'd say well I'm done there there's nothing else I need to know right I love science science is the best way to find the truth it's imperfect it's imperfect but you know it's it's the best we have so you tell me 99% of scientists have been looking into it deeply and they're all on the same side I'm convinced and I was I was convinced now I would say that level of awareness is roughly equivalent to the people who say uh how can they predict the climate when they can't even predict the weather and I don't believe in climate change because it's cold outside right so one is believing it one is not believing climate change but this is these are both the lowest level of understanding and I've been at this level I've been there if you go up a little higher let's say you decide huh I'm seeing two sides of this I'm just going to look into it so you look you do a deep dive maybe you see Alor documentary uh maybe you read the most official statements from the biggest scientists and when you're done with that you're going to say okay okay I can see whether 99% of scientists are saying it because I've done my own research and yeah I mean it's it's like guaranteed climate change the crisis because you did your own research and then there are also people who do a deep dive on the skeptic side so maybe they never believe the 99% of scientists or didn't want to believe it so they did their deep dive on the other side so they only looked at the skeptic's arguments both of them would be completely duded by this process it doesn't matter which one you're looking at if you're looking at either the yes it's a crisis or no it's not they both have the documentary effect which is if you look at one argument and you see a lot on that one argument you will be convinced be Beyond any doubt you will be 100% convinced and that has nothing to do with whether the thing you're looking for looking at is true or not completely unrelated to the underlying truth is a guarantee that if you see one argument and it's really welld developed and you spend hours on it you'll believe it every time and you can see that it's the same no matter whether you believe the Skeptics or you believe the the claims still completely believable still absolutely no evidentiary value no evidentiary value because documentaries are always convincing even when they're not true so the only thing you would know when you're done with this process is that you're convinced that's nothing you're going to be convinced even if you saw the other side you'd be convinced and that's nothing too these are both nothings let's go up a level let's say you get to the point where you did a deep dive on both sides which I find relatively rare I'm not sure I've seen anybody who's done it i' I've tried to do it so I spent a lot of time I've looked at the claims I've looked at the debunk to the claims and then I've looked at the debunk to the debunk of the claims if you haven't done all three you haven't done anything you've done nothing because if you look at the claim you can say well that looks pretty true and then you look at the debunk to the claim you're like whoa I didn't see that oh I didn't know about how they measure that whoa yeah the debunk looks totally convin vincing if you're done you're not done because you got to Circle back and see what happens to the people who made the original claim when they were faced with the debunk and then they come back and say but the debunk is debunked and here's why and you read that you go yeah that's a pretty good argument so the problem is that if you do a deep dive on both sides you're going to find they're both convincing and both not convincing and you won't know at the highest level are people who understand that all data that matters is fake and that all projection models are fake and that it has nothing to do with climate change these are Universal truths if I were talking about let's say the data for um jobs in America you think that's real no how about the history do you think our history books are based on what's real or what was allowed to be written it's not real do you think do you think uh do you think there's anything that's important and scale like big and it matters that's real no because our systems don't allow that who whoever's in charge of the data is going to have so much power that somebody's going to you distort them with a bribe or you know so when you get to the point where it really really matters it's 100% fake or it's 100% sure that you won't tell the difference because you know the fakes The Fakes will be so good that you think they're real and the reason I know the prediction models are fake is that everybody who's worked in this field including me now I didn't work in climate but I did projection models for a living Financial ones they all know that the projection model is based on the assumptions you put into it it's not the data so if you're way down here at the lowest level you think that the projection models are raisable because 99% of the scientists said yeah these are real but you'll never learn that they can make those models anything they want just by changing the assumptions without even changing the data and then they can say well this data is bad so we're going to put in a you know a little adjustment to it what's that it's not science it's just adjusting it so it comes into the same range that people expect it to come into so in our current world 99% of the people being on one side has no evidentiary value how many of you would agree with that statement 99% of scientists agree doesn't have any evidentiary value now that's not true if you're talking about something simple like you know does gravity apply everywhere on earth right 100% of scientists would say yes they'd be right so I'm not talking about like one variable things I'm talking about this big complicated hard to understand things where there are people on both sides and the variables are changing and every day we have a new variable that should have been in models but wasn't it's like oh we just found out the the ocean you know can absorb way more than we thought well was that in the model uh we just found a new technology that can allow us to produce things without the pollution what was was that in the model did you know they were going to invent something um so the models are 100% unreliable and if you believe that because the scientist told you the reliable they are you don't understand how money works if you understand how money works you'll be with me up here that the all the models are fake and the data is either unreliable or fake and that has to be true because the design of our economic system our economic system and you could add the you know the fake news and the interest the interest groups Etc they kind of guarantee that people will say it's true while it isn't true it's guaranteed that our system would be there now here's a good test for you if you're talking to somebody and you're having some debates down here in the documentary effect level where you've you've both seen some stuff but you saw different stuff and you were conf convinced ask the person who thinks that there's that the climate models are real to list three reasons that the terrestrial thermometers might be imperfect and if they can do it then you'd have a reasonable good idea that maybe they've at least seen both sides if they don't know what you're talking about and they insult you and call you a creedon and change the topic it means they've never looked into it so here's what if if you can make a good argument that the climate change stuff is real here here's what you should know you should know what the heat island effect is that's because the thermometer stations were once away from the cities but the cities grew and the heat from the city is not really what the planet heat is it would artificially Chang the ther thermometers would you know that did you know that the little enclosure measures for the thermometers are in buildings that are painted usually painted white and that when the paint Fades as it does it can change the temperature of the thermometer having nothing to do with the planet and everything to do with just the paint faded did you know that did you know that if a thermometer breaks or is missing sometimes they'll just plug in a number of what they think it would have been did you know that all right so if you can't list at least three reasons that you should doubt the terrestrial thermometers oh here's another one how much of the world are they measuring and when you talk about the ocean which would be a different measurement technique how much of the ocean is being measured and isn't it true that the ocean can store heat in different places that are unpredictable and in amounts that we don't exactly know so that if the temperature somewhere went up maybe it went down somewhere but that down is in the ocean and nobody's looking at it if you can't answer the questions at least at that level that you know that these are issues even if you don't know what the answer to the issue is you haven't looked into it and if you believe that 99% of scientists being on one side has any any credibility I can't have a conversation with you so here's my problem I keep running into people online who are operating at the lowest level of awareness and and they're pretty sure I'm the biggest freaking idiot they've ever seen in their life it's like God God 99% of scientist are you an are you a trite 99 Scott do you understand that 99 is almost 100 do you understand and I'm up here saying do you really think the news is real you think the news is real I can't have a conversation with you if you think news is real real I can't have conversation with you if you think the people getting paid to say it's real or saying it's real and that means it's real I don't I have a conversation with you I can't so I end up like sort of giving up because before you could have a conversation on climate change you'd have to start with how the entire system works what the economics are how people lie how every other system like this is clearly and demonstrably rigged and once I understood that everything of this uh everything of this type is rigged everything there there's nothing where you can't exactly tell and there are billions of dollars involved that isn't rigged they're all rigged if somebody could make a lot of money from it and it's big and complicated and you'll never know exactly what the truth is that's all rigged and there's probably never going to be an exception to that if you don't understand that I can't have a conversation with you about climate change because you're so lost and and again I say I spent most of my early life at the bottom level of awareness because I hadn't looked into it and I thought 99% of scientist they must be right how many of uh how many physicists do you believe told us that uh string theory was the future of physics I don't know the answer to that but I'll bet most I'll bet most said yeah String Theory you know it's not all worked out yet but pretty sure this is going to give us something like you know what what civilization looks like or reality looks like did it no it didn't I would I would say that all the physicists probably just pared the same thing String Theory string theory and a lot of them were getting money so they really were in favor of string theory because they could get funded that way so no you should not believe anything that most of the scientists believe is true but it's hard to know if it's hard to know ah scam in other news the Supreme Court uh did a ruling on Title Nine and they're not going to say that trans women are women in sports so the court has made the distinction between your sex versus your gender identity you can call yourself anything you want that's not an issue it's just that the state doesn't have to recognize it so they don't have to recognize it as your sex they may choose to recognize that you have a gender preference but they don't have to say yes you're a woman because you say so so a lot of people are happy about that I'm sure people are unhappy about it but more people I think are happy um Federman Senator fedman is going to maralago I think he the first well it it's kind of unusual now Federman I know you're getting tired of me saying Federman is kind of awesome but he keeps doing smart things and when I talk about Federman it's not because I love his Democrat preferences it's because I like to evaluate the persuasion techniques separate from whether I like what they're persuading so Federman just keeps he's hitting you know line drives after line drive I don't know if he's hitting home runs but he's hitting line drive after line drive in in the persuasion communication realm very impressive and here's what I love about this so Joe Mansion is retiring and Joe Mansion I always I always respected because he did such a smart thing of being somebody who would be willing sometimes to vote on the other side from his team and when things are so close that that one vote makes all the difference Joe Mansion was the only one smart enough to say wait a minute all I have to do is are you serious I can run the whole country if I'm just willing to consider voting either way like you pay me to do so if I just do what you pay me to do which is look at the topic and then decide which way I think it goes independent of where the politics are you will allow me to run the whole country and all I have to do is do the thing that you paid me to do as opposed to all my co-workers who are doing the opposite of what you're paying me to do huh am I missing something but seriously I have to ask again all I have to do to be in charge of the whole country is simply do what you're paying me to do evaluate things on their Merit independent of politics that's it and that is it and apparently he's the only one who's smart enough to figure it out who's not named Joe Mansion so I mean you could say Kirsten CA was sort of in that same game but she's she's out of it too now right so at the moment the Senate is now swinging on you know one vote but it could that could happen really quickly you know couple years from now straight up tie Federman is in charge of the country virtually right because he control Congress anyway uh Trump was saying that an outing that all the he he's getting everybody to come he's got the heads of the social media companies the big are all coming to visit him Federman coming to visit him and he had some kind of quote like you know maybe we're all changing and he and he says that the people are who are coming to visit him from all walks are quite productive and positive meaning that they're there to get something done and they're not there to fight and and it's not you know it's not about Trump's personality they just think can you do these things because we need to do these things so that's all looking positive little gold and Agy um meanwhile CNN has this I'm going to say a racist panelist there's a black woman Jasmine Crockett who's on their panel a lot and she pointed out the other day she was a little debate with Scott Jennings who's their Conservative Republican kind of voice on the panel and Jasmine Crockett claimed that uh the most educated demographic in the country is black women and um the conversation didn't go much further after that so that that claim just sort of stay there do you think it's true that the most educated demographic is black women it's almost true it's actually almost true it's not true if you look at the entire population of black women compared to the entire population of other demographic groups so that that felt like that was the claim and that's definitely not true is it my imagination or can you hear a leaf blower right outside my window you can hear that right anyway um that tells me what time it is I think um here's what I believe is true but I'll take a fact check on it um I've told you before that black women are killing it in terms of careers and success so I'm going to agree with Jasmine Crockett sort of directionally but she got the fact wrong I think directionally I believe it's true that more black women are getting uh college degrees than white men and more than black men too is that true uh which would be impressive now it also presumably be there there would be a Dei element to that meaning some people are getting recruited and some people are getting you know maybe tuition paid and stuff like that so that's a factor I don't know how much of that is but you know you don't want to you don't want to throw out the baby with the bath water so on one hand I think it's a completely racist and inaccurate claim that uh black women are the most educated group in the country I think it's just plain false but I think what she was getting at is true which is that black women as a class at the moment you know the young ones who are getting an a colle and getting their first jobs and stuff they are killing it they are killing it so I like to give like full congratulations to any group that works hard and gets what they want so congratulations I say the same thing about the lgbtq lgbtq group um I think they've really killed it in terms of improving their overall situation I I'm so impressed about how they've changed their situation in a future decades very impressive and black women same thing they they are in fact killing it but they haven't overtaken the other groups yet because there's a lot to overtake a lot of work to do but it's certainly racist to imagine that uh her group is the most educated um so if it's just a factual factual thing I don't think it you know I don't think a white person could have said that what if Scott Jennings said you know the white people are the most educated in the country ouch I don't know if that's true by the way but he wouldn't be able to say it but she could say it and nobody challenged it even though it wasn't true so to me that's more racist than not even though I support the general idea that black women are doing great lately all right uh Elon says it's going to take years to rebuild La um when they try to get permits it's going to be a problem and I put out the following statements about rebuilding that you should know that uh I'm asking for a fact check so I don't know which ones of these are true but this is my this is my starting point the starting point is that it can take years to get anything proved in normal times in normal times it would take years to get things approved in California I know that from personal experience so what would it take when everybody like 100,000 people are trying to apply for things at the same time or whatever the number is how are they going to handle that they don't have enough resources so if it used to take more than a year in normal times how long is it going to take in abnormal times where everybody's trying to do it and all the resources are constrained and nobody knows what they're talking about and the the environmentalists are saying no you can't do that and you can't even rebuild the environmentalists will say you can't even rebuild you're too close to the ocean or there's a fish we didn't know about before but now we do or there's a bird or something so I think it could take 5 to 10 years to rebuild a house 5 to 10 years now what happens to uh what what do you think it would cost to rebuild those homes so if you had a home that was worth $5 million what do you think it would cost to rebuild it and let's say it was let's say it was uh insured for $5 million or it wasn't insured at all $5 million home what would it cost to rebuild it the answer is about 10 million if if you're building a let's say a community like a big developer is doing a whole Community then they can bring the the cost of each unit down because they're they're working in bulk and they're they're Mass designed and there aren't that many different designs and stuff so they can build the house for uh cheaper than they sell it that's how they make money but if you're building one house and you've you know you want the rooms that you want and it's on the hill and it's you know first you have to do a big cleanup and all that stuff it's going to cost closer to $10 million to build a $5 million house what happens to your property tax if you spend 10 million to build a $5 million house well I think that they would either um I I've heard that there's a rule that if you're building back on the same footprint so it's the same size as the one that was destroyed then you get to keep the old tax bases the the old lower tax bases but if you wanted to make your house while you're doing it you're like well you know this would be a good time to add that spare room as soon as you do that your property tax will quadruple you won't be able to afford to live there so they've created a situation where all these people get at least the good news if they could afford it the good news was hey those changes you wanted to make your house you can make them now because the house is gone so you know design it the way you want but it will have to be the same footprint or their taxes will double or quadruple that's going to be a big problem I think um then what happens when the fire risk returns because everything's going to regrow and then the insurance companies either haven't come back or or they leave because you know nothing's going to burn while it's all Rubble but as soon as you build and replant and all the you know the trees are behind you do you think you could ever get insurance would you rebuild if you didn't think you could ever get insurance I wouldn't why would you rebuild if you thought you could never get insurance if if you had kids and you say to yourself This is the best place in the world to raise kids the kids are going to be out of the house in 5 to 10 years you know depending on the age if the kids are going to be out of the house in 5 to 10 um years they're going to be living in a burned out Rubble most of that time that's the place you go because the lifestyle is amazing the one thing I learned about it I didn't know anything about the place the one thing I learned about it is apparently the lifestyle there wasn't just good did you know that it wasn't just good it was sort of like heaven that when I hear people talk about it it's like oh my God it was just the best people the best place the downtown the businesses everything was close it was on the beach it was just the be it was the temperature so you didn't have the extreme hot because you're on the beach like I don't know if any of those reasons are going to apply because it's going to take so long to clean up so I don't know what that does um what happens when you go to get a builder and 50,000 people are ahead of you for the few Builders how in the world are you going to get a qualified Builder maybe they come from Mana state if you get a builder from ANA state they're not going to know how to build in California and and they would be crazy to come to California to start because the rules are too hard if you were a builder and somebody said hey come to California you're going to say is that the only place I could be a builder no you could you could stay where you are and you know build things more easily but if I come to California it's just going to be a hot mess every single thing I do and I won't even make a dollar because I can't even start and when I do start they're going to stop me because there's going to be some fish there next thing I know I can't possibly make money and then I have to learn this whole state weird stuff the approvals are different than any other place I don't know where they're going to get the builders so that has to add some years to the rebuilding um and then you've got unchecked crime let me give you the worst case scenario it could be that the people who live there have enough you know male energy to stop this from happening we'll see but what happens when you know things settle down most of the properties will be abandoned right because most are burned to the ground and they're going to be working on approvals and you know even the clean up is going to take a long time what happens then let me tell you I think the homeless are going to move in they're going to put up a tent on what used to be your home they won't care so much about all the debris they'll like the view and the temperature and when you go to kick them out they'll say well sorry I'm a squatter I got squatter rights and you're going to say you can have squatter rights on a tent on my own property and then they say this is California you can't move me what happens then and what happens when it's not one but the entire Hillside is full of people who heard that they'll never be kicked out and they could be living on the best property in the world as long as they don't mind living among the debris which couldn't be any worse than what they were doing on the streets the thing I'd worry most about is the homeless coming in putting on tents because California doesn't remove homeless people in tents I mean rarely um and then where are people going to live and also people might worry that it becomes you know a crime you know horrible crime place that they don't want to live in the first place I I hope not and where do people live while the rebuilding is happening how in the world are all of those you know 100,000 plus going to be able to live close enough to La that they have some kind of continuity in their life you know maybe even close enough to the school almost no almost nobody will be close enough to the school they were at and I think some of them burned so you're going to end up in a different School in a different place and now your kids go to that other school and they get used to it and they got friends in the new school and 5 to 10 years are going by and they're 17 now do they want to move back I don't know I I feel like the fact that you can't stay local while it's being built and there's there's nothing local that you used the like it's all burned up you're going to move further than it would be comfortable to be the owner of something being rebuilt because you really need to visit the site a lot you know if you've ever built a home you kind of need to go there a lot I think people are going to assume they'll rebuild but when they get settled somewhere else that won't be that close maybe the new life looks better than trying to go back so I think it's highly unpredictable if you want the positive news on that it would be that the it is like the best place on Earth you it's just one of the best places so if it's land land land if that's the real estate rule then it will be rebuilt and maybe we'll be surprised that California bends some rules makes it easier to do um here's one thing they could do they could say you could put an Adu on your property right away if it meets you know these minimum minimum requirements so these are the the uh Adu stands for uh additional dwelling unit is it additional dwelling unit so that'd be like a little uh it' be the size of a mobile home but they're more like a regular home and you could plop it on the property if you have a backyard and if you wanted to you could live there but even that's going to take a long time so there might be some fast approval of adus just so people want be close can have some continuity and live near their friends but I don't know how many people would take that option meanwhile the pope is now the latest victim of what I call the Trump effect well other people call it that too um the pope is railing on a January 9th speech he's railing against fake news The Continuous creation and spread of fake news he said distorts facts but also perceptions so the pope is going full magga full magga and uh he's against fake news well all I got to say is thank God all the religions agree with each other because I'd hate for one of them to be spreading any fake news but the pope assures us he's got it under control meanwhile um in interesting engineering there's an article by Aman chapati apparently the there's a US firm in the nuclear business that wants to build a one ground a one mile underground tunnel or hole I'm not sure if it's a tunnel or hole to uh Power data centers so the reason they want to put the nuke in the hole one mile down is if there's a problem it's easier to contain but if there's a problem it contains itself because it can't explode because it would be you know held up by the entire Earth would be the you know the surround for it so I don't know if that really works but these aren't the biggest reactors they would be uh I think micro reactors smaller reactors and uh they would stick them in the ground and then that would make a big difference uh some of the benefits are let's see uh robust containment just because of the Earth around it and continuous pressure so that way you don't have massive concrete structures oh so it's much cheaper so you don't have to build the whole structure if you can make a good mild deep hole um and it minimizes the environmental impact and you know I've told you a number of times that holes are the future of energy and maybe of other things and I've said if we can improve our technology for cheaply building holes and tunnels we're going to be able to have everything from geothermal to you know better mining to now nuclear um of course you could use it what's the other thing uh geothermal is where you're looking for the the hot water under the Earth to to create power uh but what's the one where you're just using the temperature difference underground to either moderate the hotness or the coldness of your house above ground what's that called but that's another reason to have you know good hole building tech technology holes are the future um there's a hobbyist who built a an AI assisted rifle robot using chat GPT and there's a there's a video that went viral on Tik Tok I guess and it shows the inventor with a robot now it's a tabletop robot wouldn't be too hard to attach it to a a robot dog or something I guess but it's just a a rifle that can you know Point anywhere in a moment and he just talks to it he says there's a threat you know on the left and it just goes so um he the one he's using doesn't use real real rounds is shooting something fake but how far away are we from telling your robot rifle dog to go attack the German front line all right rifle dog uh there's a bunch of ger bunch of I'm sorry bunch of Russian uh soldiers two miles away in a in a trench I want you to go there and in the order uh if you see anybody who looks like an officer shoot them first you or something like that and then that set it to attack but AI or robot rifle dogs they're coming um the C CES show is highlighting all the Big Technical breakthroughs and so we're seeing news at least two companies that built human robots that look like real women uh but one of them will will build a real woman with the face of your choice so I guess you just give them a photograph of who you want it to look like and they'll put an artificial skin face on it that looks like the person you want now at the moment these robots are not impressive because they just look like mannequins who happen to be able to talk so there it's not like you're going to want to take that robot home if you know what I mean the it's more of a suggestion of what's to come it's not there yet but I have a prediction about what one year from now looks like because the robots will develop quickly here's a conversation between a married couple one year from now human wife says to her husband I want a divorce human husband says okay can you pose for a photo first mic drop all right ladies and gentlemen that's all I have to say it's 807 well where I am and uh did I miss anything any big stories that are happening yeah let me get a good picture of you before you go I'm going to upgrade all right all right ladies and gentlemen um uh I have I have some stories I think I'm going to say for later but uh I got some good ones The Carter Funeral yeah I didn't talk about the Jimmy Carter Funeral so um here's the fascinating thing about the Jimmy Carter Funeral so of course the ex-presidents are all invited so you had the clintons uh you had only um Barack Obama Michelle did not come we're not sure why um and then uh you had the harrises so K and her husband and then I forgetting who else was there um but I was looking at all the people sitting up front and it turned to be it was Trump and all the people he's destroyed it was Trump and all the people he's destroyed sitting together chatting oh Biden Biden was the other one so so Biden he destroyed uh the Clinton destroyed you know via destroying Hillary um Barack Obama destroyed Michelle Obama couldn't even come so and then the funny part is um he ends up sitting right next to Barack Obama who just warned the world that Trump was heler and that he he he called the neo-nazis fine people and you see Obama and Trump chatting and joking with each other nothing's real nothing's real oh Pence right Mike Pence was there and Mike Pence was destroyed by Trump as well uh was there a bush there I don't know mean the bush uh the bush Dynasty got destroyed you know not George Bush but so yeah it was quite amazing it was it was Trump and all the people he destroyed it it was kind of amazing all right uh you know I think Trump has a superpower in forgetting what people said about him not forgetting he never forgets but willingness to just work with you if it makes sense I just love that uh yeah trumpo in the room all right all right uh I'm going to talk for a moment privately with the uh locals subscribers the rest of you I will see you tomorrow for more fun in games see you tomorrow e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e
it's time for another great show let me
make sure I got my comments working here
so I can see what you're up
to yep it's
working move that over there then over
there
perfect just
perfect oh I need some notes hold on
good morning everybody and welcome to
the highlight of human civilization it's
called coffee with Scott Adams and I'm
fairly confident you've never had a
better time but if you'd like to take
your experience up to levels that nobody
can understand with their tiny shiny
human brains all you need for that is a
cou Mar glass of tanker CH Cen J FL of V
of any kind fill it with your favorite
liquid I like coffee and join me now for
the unparallel pleasure of the dopamine
here the day thing makes everything
better it's called the simultaneous sip
go ah
delightful I feel connected to you all
through the invisible umbilical cord of
the coffee cup
well give me an update in the comments
if something happens while I'm talking
because I think Trump is
supposedly let's see he's going to be
talking to judge Maran
today um so there will be
sentencing is he's he's doing it over
Zoom right he's not going in person I
don't know I'm not sure yet but I think
he's not going in person and judge
michan has already indicated he's going
to do some kind of uh uncondition
discharge meaning that he'll be guilty
of a felony but won't go to
jail uh and no matter yeah and no matter
what the sentence is they plan to
appeal so Trump will be officially a
felon maybe but then it's on appeal so
my question to you dear legal experts is
if your case is approved for appeal
are you still a felon because it's not
guaranteed you're a felon if your appeal
is going through right so I feel like
you'd say it's you're you're
conditionally possibly a felon just like
before so if the legal process has not
come to an end I would say h seems to me
that the legal process is still cooking
along why why would you say he's a felon
I don't understand what you're saying so
the process is still going forward it
could with him being a felon or not a
felon so why are you saying he's a felon
he should be innocent until the appeals
process is over now they don't say that
but I
do right it'd be one thing if you said
I'm going to appeal but given that we
could be reasonably confident the appeal
will be accepted at least to be
processed how is that guilty how does
that make him a felon in what world in
what world would I consider him a felon
if he's in a legal process and it's
likely and here here's what makes it
interesting I think the experts say the
case was so flawed that it's far more
likely it will be be overturned than
upheld isn't that true so if so can you
be a called a felon if the process is
still going and all the smart people
think it will end with you not being a
felon how do you call that a felon it's
like they don't understand the process
we'll see meanwhile uh New York Court is
removing the corrupt judge we call him
corrupt uh this is
a Laura loomer's reporting and remove
the corrupt judge Arthur angorian from
the Trump's other case the Civil fraud
case
and um Laura Lum reminds you that she
exclusively broke the story about Judge
Eng goran's bias and how his wife was
posting
memes uh about Trump and apparently that
worked so Laura Luber gets the big win
she's got a blue check back I don't know
what this current situation is with her
freedom of speech but she got a big win
and she's got a blue check and she's
getting the credit today good job Laura
lummer um jet we we'll of course talk
about the fire like I I need a little
little bit of pallet cleansing you know
if you live in California even if you're
not in the center of the burn area
you're thinking about it all day long
and you're probably doing something
about it too so we're we're pretty
exhausted in the state and it's just the
beginning of the process so forgive me
if I'm a little obsessed by it but when
it hits you locally it's hard not to
be
um so Trump says on day
oneish when after he's worn in he's
going to share information about the
drones and he does say that the
government knows it sounds like maybe he
doesn't know or maybe he's it's been
whispered that the government knows it's
their stuff it's one of those but I
would expect it to be something like the
government was doing a little testing or
something probably something like that
or maybe just surveilling things here's
what I don't expect I do not expect that
on day two or whatever Trump will say
all right here's the secret of the
drones uh we've been allowing Chinese
drones to surveil our sensitive sites do
you think he's going to announce that
even if it's true even if it's true do
you think he would tell you I hope
not I I I think he would take care of it
and keep it as a military secret if
there was a way to do that but I think
he's getting a little bit ahead of
himself that he would necessarily tell
us no matter what the answer
is so we'll see I think he means it I
just don't know he'll be able to
deliver uh Victor Davis Hansen summed up
the
LA problem as a total systems
breakdown now a system
breakdown do you think the LA was
operating as a systems being more
important than goals
entity or do you think that they seem to
have goals without systems that
supported them so they had goals for
diversity they had goals for the
environment um right they had goals for
saving the smelt they had goals for
protecting the water in the oceans lots
of
goals but uh as uh you know I've been
teaching you for a long time systems are
what you need because you know goals
can't be supported without a system so
it's a system that's the important part
and uh as Victor Davis Hansen points out
that the water storage system was bad
the forest management was bad handling
the insurance industry was bad and he
mentions the Dei hierarchy of the
leadership and he called it a Dei Green
New Deal hydrogen
bomb like a perfect a perfect system
collapse because every part the system
kind of
collapsed um now do you think it's fair
in this case now I've been I've been
railing against the people who say as
soon as there's a problem you know you
look at the people in charge and if you
see there certain
demographic the people on the right say
oh Dei dii and I try to caution you
that's not proof of Dei being a
problem all you can know for sure is
that that you know Dei was a big
influence over hiring you can't know
that that's the
problem however if you do a little
research into the people involved might
give you some insight it might for
example Karen bass did you know that
when she was in the 70s she used to
travel to Cuba with to work with
something called the veneros Brigade
which was a group that organized annual
trips to Cuba for young leftist
Americans for many years do you know why
Cuba would host leftists to come do some
awesome things in Cuba which is just
building stuff I guess why would they do
that it's to brainwash them against the
United States but gently you know just
brainwash them that maybe the Socialist
way is better and then they'll come back
to the United States and destroy it or
convert it so she was actually part of a
brainwashing operation and let me be
very clear a brainwashing operation by
Cuba you bring young people in and you
you give them this one experience that's
very artificial from you know the
general Cuban experience and
everything's great and look we'll just
show you the things we want and did you
know the United States is
evil she is
unquestionably a brainwash victim that's
not even in debate if she went there
multiple times and was part of a group
that was by
design a bunch of brainwash victims how
did she un-brainwash
herself I don't believe there's a
process for that if she was brainwashed
it's still in her you can't you can't
undo
that so do you think that if people were
well aware of that that she would have
been InCharge of the city the mayor no
this one does look like a Dei hire
problem doesn't it it it looks like
nobody in the right mind would have
hired her for her background and
qualifications but maybe it was a you
know Dei
related want to have a diversity
mayor so I would say you can't say that
Dei broke anything but you could say
that that one mayor probably only has
your job because people either didn't
understand or voted dumb you maybe it's
the Public's it could be the Public's
fault the public just picked the wrong
person but at least uh she's got a uh a
strong Deputy Mayor so you can't say
it's not like one person right that
often the the next level down are doing
the real decision- making and stuff so
next level down you get the Los Angeles
Deputy Mayor so at least he's strong oh
wait he's under investigation for
allegedly calling in a bomb threat to
City Hall the FBI raided his home
recently and uh he's placed on leave
okay he's he's a black man but that is a
coincidence and not you can't say that
that's Dei related that's just one
person one person Who's acting
badly
now but at least at least in the fire
department you know you don't have so
much of a Dei problem right um well I
mean the the head of the fire department
is is a lesbian but you know nobody's
saying that lesbians can't do Fire
Department jobs and you know she's got
tons of experiences relevant so if
you're if you're going to say oh she's
only there because she's a lesbian that
would ignore all of her many many years
of very relevant
experience and as luck would have it uh
the the person just below her I think
would be the assistant chief well
another lesbian two lesbians at the top
but I think that you could call that a
coincidence um yeah they're plenty of
lesbians it's not like a the biggest
coincidence in the world that two of
them would be the number one and number
two let's look at the third in line
let's see I don't know if it's third in
line but the the equity Chief well
lesbian the lesbian so you got three
lesbians in uh executive positions but I
I warn you that you know if you're
thinking there's a problem with lesbians
because of these three no that doesn't
follow it doesn't follow that there's
some other lesbian who isn't the best
person to be the chief of police or the
chief of the fire department so this is
sticky stuff if if you're just assuming
that somebody is a Dei higher and
therefore they're bad that's not fair
it's also the situation we find
ourselves in because Dei is pushed so
hard that we assume is creating problems
we just it's unfair to point to any
specific individual and I point out that
g kin Nome is the least diverse Governor
you could ever imagine and he's being
criticized as much or more than any of
the other people I just
mentioned so what do we have we got uh
we got some uh black leaders who seem to
be terrible we've got some lesbian
leaders who I don't really know if
they're being terrible if they they
don't have water which is somebody
else's job so I'm not going to say the
fire department's doing a terrible job
does anybody even say that
I'm not even sure that the fire
department has been criticized have
they I I don't think I've seen any
criticism of the fire department so I
would I would say the lesbians are clear
but you have to ask yourself what a big
coincidence they got a lot of lesbian
representative there and then you look
at Nome who is not diverse at all and
he's a total disaster you can't blame
Dei on you know for that right so let me
say again I don't see the
the fingerprint that Dei caused this
it's just that you know the Dei will
cause this whether it cause this one
that's hard to say but will it cause
another one of course yeah will it cause
the complete destruction of another city
guaranteed it's built into the system
remember Victor Davis Hansen says it's a
system collapse Dei guarantees system
collapse because it guarantees that
instead of Merit
and experience you can look for you know
demographics and identity so that little
change just by itself is certainly
enough to destroy an entire city if you
let just let it run
forward but we should not uh we should
not allow ourselves to assume that any
individual is a de Dei hire you'd really
have to do some deeper dive and we don't
often have that level of information
from the
outside Tom Ellsworth was on the PB
podcast and he was saying that the
reason State Farm pulled out um from the
state and is no longer offering fire
insurance is that uh they pulled out
because the County of LA in the city of
La had suspended brush removal in
Palisades really
really it is the connection to the
incompetence of the city is it that
clean I thought this was going to be a
little Messier where you where you
couldn't really tell who was responsible
for what but seriously they they
canceled the brush removal and that
caused the insurance companies to pull
out and they didn't immediately remove
the brush and say oh hold on we will
remove the brush just give us a month
nothing like that the the level of
incompetence system-wise or individuals
I don't
know it's astounding now of course
remember here's something to remember
today we're still in the fog of War
we're still getting all kinds of news
that isn't real
so I you know I think it's I think it's
real but don't know so far the fire has
destroyed 29,000 Acres would you like a
estimate of how big that is that's two
Manhattan
Islands Manhattan is 14,000 square um uh
14,000
Acres this fire has already and still
burning already destroyed two
Manhattans so if if you're not getting
the scale of this imagine all of
Manhattan gone and then another one all
of it gone and it's still going
so if you if you hadn't quite understood
the scale of it that's it we're talking
about $57 billion in economic damage if
you want to put that in perspective uh
the the entire tax revenue of California
in a recent year was 25 billion do you
think you can lay that 157 Bill 57
billion on top of I mean obviously the
government's going to be constrained in
what it can do to help people a lot of
them are uninsured
uh Biden did say that the federal
government was going to help for 180
days in the recovery but that's only the
cleanup in the salaries of the recovery
people you know and the crews that are
working at um and I think removal of the
you know the burn debris now those are
very important so we're we're very happy
to have that help but it's not going to
help anybody buy a house or build a
house Mel Gibson tragically was on the
he well was doing The Joe Rogan podcast
while he was filming it uh his own $14.5
million Malibu mansion burned
down now I know you're not feeling sorry
for him because he is not worth his I
don't know hundreds of millions or
something but uh it's your house it's
your
house you know no no way you're going to
feel good about that so I feel terrible
one of the things that Mel Gibson said
when he was on the Joe Rogen is that he
had three friends who were cured of
cancer with ivin and fendol and then the
internet is saying whoa you know there
are other claims and other claims and
other claims and now they're pretty
convinced that ior mchan and Fen bendol
are cures for at least some kinds of
cancers here's what you need to know
remember when I tell you that uh an
anonymous source if you have one
anonymous source how much credibility
would that be the answer is zero in
politics so that's a different domain in
politics one anonymous source is usually
just a madeup lie what if you have
multiple sources what if you had three
and they basically said something that
sounded the same three Anonymous sources
now is that credible no no it it's
completely
non-credible Anonymous sources always
non incedible suppose you knew the name
of the source but you hadn't any contact
with them so you couldn't ask any
questions you couldn't do a deep dive
but you knew the name and somebody else
had tell you told you the claim you
didn't even hear from the person is that
credible no no that's zero
credibility is there a reason that we do
clinical trials instead of watching what
three people said as reported by another
person no no there's reason we do the
clinical trials because that has no
evidentiary value none so I'm going to
cause some trouble today so I said I
don't think it's true I'm going to be
attacked all day long by people who say
Scott you fool don't you know that big
doctor or you know big Pharma is just
trying to sell their curers and they
don't want you to know that ior mechon
and Fen bendol is literally curing the
claims are that people was stage four or
cancer are cured you know not just help
them completely
cleared and so I asked this let's talk
to one of them just one sh me one live
human being who says something like I
had an incurable
cancer and I'm now completely clear
here's my you know here's my test
results um I'm sitting next to my doctor
my doctor can confirm that I'm
completely clear of a cancer that was
incurable now what happens if you talk
to them and they say well it wasn't an
incurable cancer and the the other
complimentary things we were doing have
cured it
before but this person was stage four
and they added these other drugs and
then they got cured so we're saying it's
the other drugs they added to which I
say but they were on all the treatments
that we know are cures so here's what I
need
I need an
incurable cancer one that doesn't have
any treatment as far as anybody knows
and and even if they combined it with
these drugs which is the claim that the
maybe the drugs aren't working exactly
alone but there's there are also claims
that they would work alone and show me
the doctor show me the patient and show
me that it was incurable except for this
intervention then I'm going to get
serious I'm still going to say I need a
clinical Tri
but at least you went from you know
Anonymous people being talked about by
other people to well these look like
real people and their doctor says and
I'm looking at their
chart maybe yes so I'd say we're U I'll
see New York judge Maran discharges
Trump without imprisonment fine or
probation in the stormy Daniel's case
wishes him well in his second
term everything's different all all
right uh that was a little
uh a little uh side conversation there
all right uh apparently there was a fake
alert that went out to everybody's phone
in LA county saying that uh they needed
to um get ready to evacuate this turned
out to be just a mistake the alert told
people to gather loved ones pets and
supplies and get out of town and uh it
happened when people were the most
frightened and thought it could be
coming for them and it was fake meaning
it was an
accident so remember that Richard Davis
Hansen analysis that it was a total
system breakdown well here it is again
they didn't even have a system to make
sure that fake emergency alerts didn't
go out in the middle of an
emergency that's the level of competence
it would take to get there is pretty
extraordinary but the incompetence is
probably the system like I I don't think
it's necessarily that one person push
the wrong button it could be but why is
that the system why why is one person
allowed to push that button you know it
seems like at least a few people should
be standing around when the button gets
pushed to make sure that that's the
intention I don't know get a better
system Elon Musk donated a bunch of
starlinks in LA and uh this is cool
apparently T-Mobile customers were
having trouble um because probably the
towers got burned or something um but
now musk very quickly tied T-Mobile into
starlink and you can
text so if you're on T-Mobile and you
suddenly can text you can't make a phone
call but you can text that's because of
Elon
Musk without Elon Musk everybody with
T-Mobile would be completely cut off
during an emergency I mean looks like
they have been for some time
but this is gigantic like the the level
that Elon Musk can contribute to a
Ukraine war or or an emergency now twice
I guess several times I think it's
extraordinary so just congratulations on
that uh meanwhile the California
National Guard is moving in we've seen
out ofate police moving in so the fires
have turned into an organized crime and
unorganized crime problem the lutters
are are organized there are lots of them
and it gets worse now this is fog of War
stuff but it's what's being reported
could be could be overblown could be
under blown I don't know that uh some of
the bad guys and and they seem to be
from a migrant
Community um and again that's
speculative
um they seem to be setting fires to
increase the number of places that they
have to
loot cuz if they can get to to
evacuate while they're there they can
get the good stuff before any houses
burned down now that's just about the
most evil crime you can imagine sending
somebody's house on fire so you can rob
it the the level of evil in that is hard
to imagine there was however one poor
individual a criminal who had a little
blowtorch and he was trying to allegedly
set something on fire presumably for
that purpose we don't know what he was
thinking but he you looked like he was
doing it probably as part of that gang
burning down homes and he got spotted by
some of the
locals the locals sent their men out I
saw the video of it and you know you
might be surprised that none of the
women came to
help which is good I I didn't want them
to but if you want to have like a little
glimmer just a little glimmer of
hope you watch the video of the
maybe half a dozen men who confront this
guy who still got the torch one of the
men is armed but he doesn't he doesn't
point it at him he just has it ready in
case he needs it warns him to stand down
the other men surround the situation and
they take him out now I mean they they
took him to the ground and handcuffed
him and waited waited for the police and
watching watching those
men not have any backdown in them there
was no backdown that they were going to
take him out one way or another they
were going to shoot him they were going
to kill him if they had to preferably
they would capture him and head him to
police so we could know more about
whatever he's up to and that's what they
did but I'm pretty sure if their only CH
Choice had been to you know do worse
they would have taken the only choice
because I don't think that guy was going
to walk out of that
neighborhood and things are getting
really dicey so when there is something
that looks to resident like a complete
breakdown of the social order by the way
I'll probably get demonetized on YouTube
again I got demonetized yesterday I got
demonetized for I don't know what but my
best guess is suggesting that you know
there there's a danger that's
approaching with h with this kind of
behavior so I don't know exactly what it
is I'm probably demonetized again just
for this
conversation um Nome says uh there'll be
8,000 of these National Guards
um I saw Joel Pollock who lives in that
area whose house seems to have survived
we don't know if it's um habitable but
um you noce that there are more pro-
Second Amendment people in the Pacific
Palisades than the bad guys might expect
so if the bad guys are expecting a bunch
of you know anti-gun people that they
can easily
handle uh they should be warned that
there's some serious personal protection
in that area so people have the assets
to protect themselves so I don't know
where it's heading but it does look like
a complete breakdown of of
order
um let's
see uh so you know that there's still a
lot of talk about whether climate change
is a small cause or the cause or no
cause or you know is that just being
political and I wanted to give you a
frame for understanding the climate
change issue and one that you haven't
seen before and it can explain a little
bit why the the two sides can't really
talk you know the the yes I believe
climate change is an immediate crisis
versus the people Elon Musk would be on
the other side which is climate change
could be real in terms of the climate
might be changing but it's going to be
slower than you know the the alarmist
Bel um so why can't they have a
productive conversation and like figure
out what's really true and I'll give you
my take on
that sort of the the hypnotist
take so if you can see my
whiteboard let me adjust it a little
bit so I just made this up I call it the
climate awareness chart so the highest
level of awareness is at the top but
we'll get there we're going to start at
the
bottom and
see here we go at the bottom level of
awareness and this is where I used to be
as a Young Man uh I would hear that 98
99% of scientists were on the same side
and I'd say well I'm done there there's
nothing else I need to know right I love
science science is the best way to find
the truth it's imperfect it's imperfect
but you know it's it's the best we have
so you tell me 99% of scientists have
been looking into it deeply and they're
all on the same side I'm convinced and I
was I was convinced now I would say that
level of awareness is roughly equivalent
to the people who say uh how can they
predict the climate when they can't even
predict the weather and I don't believe
in climate change because it's cold
outside
right so one is believing it one is not
believing climate change but this is
these are both the lowest level of
understanding and I've been at this
level I've been there if you go up a
little higher let's say you decide huh
I'm seeing two sides of this I'm just
going to look into it so you look you do
a deep dive maybe you see Alor
documentary uh maybe you read the most
official statements from the biggest
scientists and when you're done with
that you're going to say okay okay I can
see whether 99% of scientists are saying
it because I've done my own research and
yeah I mean it's it's like guaranteed
climate change the crisis because you
did your own research and then there are
also people who do a deep dive on the
skeptic side so maybe they never believe
the 99% of scientists or didn't want to
believe it so they did their deep dive
on the other side so they only looked at
the skeptic's arguments both of them
would be completely duded by this
process it doesn't matter which one
you're looking at if you're looking at
either the yes it's a crisis or no it's
not they both have the documentary
effect which is if you look at one
argument and you see a lot on that one
argument you will be convinced be Beyond
any doubt you will be 100% convinced and
that has nothing to do with whether the
thing you're looking for looking at is
true or not completely unrelated to the
underlying truth is a guarantee that if
you see one argument and it's really
welld developed and you spend hours on
it you'll believe it every time and you
can see that it's the same no matter
whether you believe the Skeptics or you
believe the the claims still completely
believable still absolutely no
evidentiary value no evidentiary value
because documentaries are always
convincing
even when they're not true so the only
thing you would know when you're done
with this process is that you're
convinced that's
nothing you're going to be convinced
even if you saw the other side you'd be
convinced and that's nothing too these
are both
nothings let's go up a level let's say
you get to the point where you did a
deep dive on both
sides which I find relatively rare I'm
not sure I've seen anybody who's done it
i' I've tried to do it so I spent a lot
of time I've looked at the claims I've
looked at the debunk to the claims and
then I've looked at the debunk to the
debunk of the claims if you haven't done
all three you haven't done anything
you've done nothing because if you look
at the claim you can say well that looks
pretty true and then you look at the
debunk to the claim you're like whoa I
didn't see that oh I didn't know about
how they measure that whoa yeah the
debunk looks totally convin vincing if
you're done you're not done because you
got to Circle back and see what happens
to the people who made the original
claim when they were faced with the
debunk and then they come back and say
but the debunk is debunked and here's
why and you read that you go yeah that's
a pretty good
argument so the problem is that if you
do a deep dive on both sides you're
going to find they're both convincing
and both not convincing
and you won't
know at the highest
level are people who understand that all
data that matters is fake and that all
projection models are fake and that it
has nothing to do with climate change
these are Universal truths if I were
talking about let's say the data for um
jobs in America you think that's real no
how about the history do you think our
history books are based on what's real
or what was allowed to be written it's
not
real do you think do you think uh do you
think there's anything that's important
and scale like big and it matters that's
real no because our systems don't allow
that who whoever's in charge of the data
is going to have so much power that
somebody's going to you distort them
with a bribe or you know so when you get
to the point where it really really
matters it's 100% fake or it's 100% sure
that you won't tell the difference
because you know the fakes The Fakes
will be so good that you think they're
real and the reason I know the
prediction models are fake is that
everybody who's worked in this field
including me now I didn't work in
climate but I did projection models for
a living Financial ones they all know
that the projection model is based on
the assumptions you put into it it's not
the data so if you're way down here at
the lowest level you think that the
projection models are raisable because
99% of the scientists said yeah these
are real but you'll never learn that
they can make those models anything they
want just by changing the assumptions
without even changing the data and then
they can say well this data is bad so
we're going to put in a you know a
little adjustment to it what's that it's
not science it's just adjusting it so it
comes into the same range that people
expect it to come into so in our current
world 99% of the people being on one
side has no evidentiary
value how many of you would agree with
that statement 99% of scientists agree
doesn't have any evidentiary value now
that's not true if you're talking about
something simple like you know does
gravity apply everywhere on earth right
100% of scientists would say yes they'd
be right so I'm not talking about like
one variable things I'm talking about
this big complicated hard to understand
things where there are people on both
sides and the variables are changing and
every day we have a new variable that
should have been in models but wasn't
it's like oh we just found out the the
ocean you know can absorb way more than
we thought well was that in the model uh
we just found a new technology
that can allow us to produce things
without the
pollution what was was that in the model
did you know they were going to invent
something um so the models are 100%
unreliable and if you believe that
because the scientist told you the
reliable they are you don't understand
how money works if you understand how
money works you'll be with me up here
that the all the models are fake and the
data is either unreliable or fake and
that has to be true because the design
of our economic system our economic
system and you could add the you know
the fake news and the interest the
interest groups Etc they kind of
guarantee that people will say it's true
while it isn't
true it's guaranteed that our system
would be there now here's a good test
for you if you're talking to somebody
and you're having some debates down here
in the documentary effect level where
you've you've both seen some stuff but
you saw different stuff and you were
conf convinced ask the person who thinks
that there's that the climate models are
real to list three
reasons that the terrestrial
thermometers might be
imperfect and if they can do it then
you'd have a reasonable good idea that
maybe they've at least seen both sides
if they don't know what you're talking
about and they insult you and call you a
creedon and change the topic it means
they've never looked into it
so here's what if if you can make a good
argument that the climate change stuff
is
real here here's what you should know
you should know what the heat island
effect is that's because the thermometer
stations were once away from the cities
but the cities grew and the heat from
the city is not really what the planet
heat is it would artificially Chang the
ther thermometers would you know that
did you know that the little enclosure
measures for the
thermometers are in buildings that are
painted usually painted white and that
when the paint Fades as it does it can
change the temperature of the
thermometer having nothing to do with
the planet and everything to do with
just the paint faded did you know that
did you know that if a thermometer
breaks or is missing sometimes they'll
just plug in a number of what they think
it would have been did you know that all
right so if you can't list at least
three reasons that you should doubt the
terrestrial thermometers oh here's
another one how much of the world are
they measuring and when you talk about
the ocean which would be a different
measurement technique how much of the
ocean is being measured and isn't it
true that the ocean can store heat in
different places that are unpredictable
and in amounts that we don't exactly
know so that if the temperature
somewhere went up maybe it went down
somewhere but that down is in the ocean
and nobody's looking at it if you can't
answer the questions at least at that
level that you know that these are
issues even if you don't know what the
answer to the issue is you haven't
looked into it and if you believe that
99% of scientists being on one side has
any any credibility I can't have a
conversation with you so here's my
problem I keep running into people
online who are operating at the lowest
level of awareness and and they're
pretty sure I'm the biggest freaking
idiot they've ever seen in their life
it's like God God 99% of scientist are
you an are you a trite 99 Scott do you
understand that 99 is almost 100 do you
understand and I'm up here saying do you
really think the news is real you think
the news is
real I can't have a conversation with
you if you think news is real real I
can't have conversation with you if you
think the people getting paid to say
it's real or saying it's real and that
means it's real I don't I have a
conversation with you I can't so I end
up like sort of giving up because before
you could have a conversation on climate
change you'd have to start with how the
entire system works what the economics
are how people lie how every other
system like this is clearly and
demonstrably rigged and once I
understood that everything of this uh
everything of this type is rigged
everything there there's nothing where
you can't exactly tell and there are
billions of dollars involved that isn't
rigged they're all rigged if somebody
could make a lot of money from it and
it's big and complicated and you'll
never know exactly what the truth is
that's all rigged and there's probably
never going to be an exception to that
if you don't understand
that I can't have a conversation with
you about climate change because you're
so
lost and and again I say I spent most of
my early life at the bottom level of
awareness because I hadn't looked into
it and I thought 99% of
scientist they must be
right how many of uh how many physicists
do you
believe told us that uh string theory
was the future of
physics I don't know the answer to that
but I'll bet most I'll bet most said
yeah String Theory you know it's not all
worked out yet but pretty sure this is
going to give us something like you know
what what civilization looks like or
reality looks like did it no it didn't I
would I would say that all the
physicists probably just pared the same
thing String Theory string theory and a
lot of them were getting
money so they really were in favor of
string theory because they could get
funded that way so no you should not
believe anything that most of the
scientists believe is true but it's hard
to know if it's hard to know ah
scam in other news the Supreme Court uh
did a ruling on Title Nine and they're
not going to say that trans women are
women in sports so the court has made
the distinction between your sex versus
your gender identity you can call
yourself anything you want that's not an
issue it's just that the state doesn't
have to recognize it so they don't have
to recognize it as your
sex they may choose to recognize that
you have a gender preference but they
don't have to say yes you're a woman
because you say so so a lot of people
are happy about that I'm sure people are
unhappy about it but more people I think
are
happy um Federman Senator fedman is
going to maralago I think he the first
well it it's kind of unusual now
Federman I know you're getting tired of
me saying Federman is kind of awesome
but he keeps doing smart things and when
I talk about Federman it's not because I
love his Democrat preferences it's
because I like to evaluate the
persuasion techniques separate from
whether I like what they're persuading
so Federman just keeps he's hitting you
know line drives after line drive I
don't know if he's hitting home runs but
he's hitting line drive after line drive
in in the persuasion communication realm
very impressive and here's what I love
about this so Joe Mansion is retiring
and Joe Mansion I always I always
respected because he did such a smart
thing of being somebody who would be
willing sometimes to vote on the other
side from his team and when things are
so close that that one vote makes all
the difference Joe Mansion was the only
one smart enough to say wait a minute
all I have to do is are you serious I
can run the whole country if I'm just
willing to consider voting either way
like you pay me to do so if I just do
what you pay me to do which is look at
the topic and then decide which way I
think it goes independent of where the
politics are you will allow me to run
the whole country and all I have to do
is do the thing that you paid me to do
as opposed to all my co-workers who are
doing the opposite of what you're paying
me to
do
huh am I missing
something but seriously I have to ask
again all I have to do to be in charge
of the whole country is simply do what
you're paying me to do evaluate things
on their Merit independent of politics
that's
it and that is
it and apparently he's the only one
who's smart enough to figure it out
who's not named Joe
Mansion so I mean you could say Kirsten
CA was sort of in that same game but
she's she's out of it too now right so
at the moment the Senate is now swinging
on you know one vote but it
could that could happen really quickly
you know couple years from now straight
up tie Federman is in charge of the
country virtually right because he
control
Congress anyway uh Trump was saying that
an outing that all the he he's getting
everybody to come he's got the heads of
the social media companies the big are
all coming to visit him Federman coming
to visit him and he had some kind of
quote like you know maybe we're all
changing and he and he says that the
people are who are coming to visit him
from all walks are quite productive and
positive meaning that they're there to
get something done and they're not there
to fight and and it's not you know it's
not about Trump's
personality they just think can you do
these things because we need to do these
things
so that's all looking positive little
gold and
Agy um meanwhile CNN has this I'm going
to say a racist panelist there's a black
woman Jasmine Crockett who's on their
panel a lot and she pointed out the
other day she was a little debate with
Scott Jennings who's their Conservative
Republican kind of voice on the panel
and Jasmine Crockett claimed that uh the
most educated demographic in the country
is black
women and um the conversation didn't go
much further after that so that that
claim just sort of stay there do you
think it's true that the most educated
demographic is black
women it's almost true it's actually
almost true it's not true if you look at
the entire population of black women
compared to the entire population of
other demographic groups so that that
felt like that was the claim and that's
definitely not
true is it my imagination or can you
hear a leaf blower right outside my
window you can hear that
right anyway um that tells me what time
it is I think um here's what I believe
is true but I'll take a fact check on it
um I've told you before that black women
are killing it in terms of careers and
success so I'm going to agree with
Jasmine
Crockett sort of directionally but she
got the fact wrong I think directionally
I believe it's true that more black
women are getting uh college degrees
than white men and more than black men
too is that
true uh which would be impressive now it
also presumably be there there would be
a Dei element to that meaning some
people are getting recruited and some
people are getting you know maybe
tuition paid and stuff like that so
that's a factor I don't know how much of
that is but you know you don't want to
you don't want to throw out the baby
with the bath water so on one hand I
think it's a completely racist and
inaccurate claim that uh black women are
the most educated group in the country I
think it's just plain false but I think
what she was getting at is true which is
that black women as a class at the
moment you know the young ones who are
getting an a colle and getting their
first jobs and stuff they are killing it
they are killing it so I like to give
like full congratulations to any group
that works hard and gets what they want
so
congratulations I say the same thing
about the
lgbtq
lgbtq group um I think they've really
killed it in terms of improving their
overall situation I I'm so impressed
about how they've changed their
situation in a future decades very
impressive and black women same thing
they they are in fact killing it but
they haven't overtaken the other groups
yet because there's a lot to overtake a
lot of work to do but it's certainly
racist to imagine that uh her group is
the most educated um so if it's just a
factual factual thing I don't think it
you know I don't think a white person
could have said
that what if Scott Jennings said you
know the white people are the most
educated in the country
ouch I don't know if that's true by the
way but he wouldn't be able to say it
but she could say it and nobody
challenged it even though it wasn't true
so to me
that's more racist than not even though
I support the general idea that black
women are doing great
lately all right uh Elon says it's going
to take years to rebuild La um when they
try to get permits it's going to be a
problem and I put out the following
statements about rebuilding that you
should know that uh I'm asking for a
fact check so I don't know which ones of
these are true but this is my this is my
starting point the starting point is
that it can take years to get anything
proved in normal times in normal times
it would take years to get things
approved in California I know that from
personal
experience so what would it take when
everybody like 100,000 people are trying
to apply for things at the same time or
whatever the number is how are they
going to handle that they don't have
enough resources so if it used to take
more than a year in normal times how
long is it going to take in abnormal
times where everybody's trying to do it
and all the resources are constrained
and nobody knows what they're talking
about and the the environmentalists are
saying no you can't do that and you
can't even rebuild the environmentalists
will say you can't even rebuild you're
too close to the ocean
or there's a fish we didn't know about
before but now we do or there's a bird
or something so I think it could
take 5 to 10 years to rebuild a house 5
to 10
years now what
happens to uh what what do you think it
would cost to rebuild those
homes so if you had a home that was
worth $5
million what do you think it would cost
to rebuild it and let's say it was let's
say it was uh insured for $5
million or it wasn't insured at all $5
million home what would it cost to
rebuild it the answer is about 10
million if if you're building a let's
say a community like a big developer is
doing a whole Community then they can
bring the the cost of each unit down
because they're they're working in bulk
and they're they're Mass designed and
there aren't that many different designs
and stuff so they can build the house
for uh cheaper than they sell it that's
how they make
money but if you're building one house
and you've you know you want the rooms
that you want and it's on the hill and
it's you know first you have to do a big
cleanup and all that
stuff it's going to cost closer to $10
million to build a $5 million
house what happens to your property tax
if you spend 10 million to build a $5
million house well I think that they
would either um I I've heard that
there's a rule that if you're building
back on the same footprint so it's the
same size as the one that was destroyed
then you get to keep the old tax bases
the the old lower tax bases but if you
wanted to make your house while you're
doing it you're like well you know this
would be a good time to add that spare
room as soon as you do that your
property tax will quadruple you won't be
able to afford to live there so they've
created a situation where all these
people get at least the good news if
they could afford it the good news was
hey those changes you wanted to make
your house you can make them now because
the house is gone so you know design it
the way you want but it will have to be
the same footprint or their taxes will
double or
quadruple that's going to be a big
problem I
think um then what happens when the fire
risk returns because everything's going
to regrow and then the insurance
companies either haven't come back or or
they leave because you know nothing's
going to burn while it's all Rubble but
as soon as you build and replant and all
the you know the trees are behind you do
you think you could ever get insurance
would you rebuild if you didn't think
you could ever get insurance I
wouldn't why would you rebuild if you
thought you could never get insurance if
if you had kids and you say to yourself
This is the best place in the world to
raise
kids the kids are going to be out of the
house in 5 to 10 years you know
depending on the age if the kids are
going to be out of the house in 5 to 10
um years they're going to be living in a
burned out
Rubble most of that
time that's the place you go because the
lifestyle is amazing the one thing I
learned about it I didn't know anything
about the place the one thing I learned
about it is apparently the lifestyle
there wasn't just
good did you know that it wasn't just
good it was sort of like heaven that
when I hear people talk about it it's
like oh my God it was just the best
people the best place the downtown the
businesses everything was close it was
on the beach it was just the be it was
the temperature so you didn't have the
extreme hot because you're on the beach
like I don't know if any of those
reasons are going to apply
because it's going to take so long to
clean up so I don't know what that
does um what happens when you go to get
a builder and 50,000 people are ahead of
you for the few
Builders how in the world are you going
to get a qualified Builder maybe they
come from Mana state if you get a
builder from ANA state they're not going
to know how to build in California and
and they would be crazy to come to
California to start because the rules
are too hard if you were a builder and
somebody said hey come to California
you're going to say is that the only
place I could be a builder no you could
you could stay where you are and you
know build things more easily but if I
come to California it's just going to be
a hot mess every single thing I do and I
won't even make a dollar because I can't
even start and when I do start they're
going to stop me because there's going
to be some fish there next thing I know
I can't possibly make money and then I
have to learn this whole state weird
stuff the approvals are different than
any other place I don't know where
they're going to get the builders
so that has to add some years to the
rebuilding um and then you've got
unchecked crime let me give you the
worst case scenario it could be that the
people who live there have enough you
know male energy to stop this from
happening we'll see but what happens
when you know things settle down most of
the properties will be abandoned right
because most are burned to the ground
and they're going to be working on
approvals and you know even the clean up
is going to take a long time what
happens then let me tell you I think the
homeless are going to move in they're
going to put up a tent on what used to
be your home they won't care so much
about all the debris they'll like the
view and the temperature and when you go
to kick them out they'll say well sorry
I'm a squatter I got squatter rights and
you're going to say you can have
squatter rights on a tent on my own
property and then they say this is
California you can't move
me what happens then and what happens
when it's not one but the entire
Hillside is full of people who heard
that they'll never be kicked out and
they could be living on the best
property in the world as long as they
don't mind living among the debris which
couldn't be any worse than what they
were doing on the
streets the thing I'd worry most
about is the homeless coming in putting
on tents because California doesn't
remove homeless people in tents I mean
rarely um
and then where are people going to live
and also people might worry that it
becomes you know a crime you know
horrible crime place that they don't
want to live in the first place I I hope
not and where do people live while the
rebuilding is happening how in the world
are all of those you know 100,000 plus
going to be able to live close enough to
La that they have some kind of
continuity in their life you know maybe
even close enough to the school almost
no
almost nobody will be close enough to
the school they were at and I think some
of them burned so you're going to end up
in a different School in a different
place and now your kids go to that other
school and they get used to it and they
got friends in the new school and 5 to
10 years are going by and they're 17 now
do they want to move
back I don't know I I feel like the fact
that you can't stay local while it's
being built and there's there's nothing
local that you used the like it's all
burned up you're going to move further
than it would be comfortable to be the
owner of something being rebuilt because
you really need to visit the site a lot
you know if you've ever built a home you
kind of need to go there a
lot I think people are going to assume
they'll
rebuild but when they get settled
somewhere else that won't be that
close maybe the new life looks better
than trying to go
back so I think it's highly
unpredictable if you want the positive
news on that it would be that the it is
like the best place on
Earth you it's just one of the best
places so if it's land land land if
that's the real estate rule then it will
be rebuilt and maybe we'll be surprised
that California bends some rules makes
it easier to do um here's one thing they
could do they could say you could put an
Adu on your property right away if it
meets you know these minimum minimum
requirements so these are the the uh Adu
stands for
uh additional dwelling unit is it
additional dwelling unit so that'd be
like a little uh it' be the size of a
mobile home but they're more like a
regular home and you could plop it on
the property if you have a backyard and
if you wanted
to you could live there but even that's
going to take a long time so there might
be some fast approval of adus just so
people want be close can have some
continuity and live near their friends
but I don't know how many people would
take that option meanwhile the pope is
now the latest victim of what I call the
Trump effect well other people call it
that too um the pope is railing on a
January 9th speech he's railing against
fake
news The Continuous creation and spread
of fake news he said distorts facts but
also
perceptions so the pope is going full
magga
full
magga and uh he's against fake
news well all I got to say is thank God
all the religions agree with each other
because I'd hate for one of them to be
spreading any fake news but the pope
assures us he's got it under
control meanwhile um in interesting
engineering there's an article by Aman
chapati apparently the there's a US firm
in the nuclear business that wants to
build a one ground a one mile
underground tunnel or hole I'm not sure
if it's a tunnel or hole to uh Power
data centers so the reason they want to
put the nuke in the hole one mile down
is if there's a problem it's easier to
contain but if there's a problem it
contains itself because it can't
explode because it would be you know
held up by the entire Earth would be the
you know the surround for it so I don't
know if that really works but these
aren't the biggest reactors they would
be uh I think micro reactors smaller
reactors and uh they would stick them in
the ground and then that would make a
big difference uh some of the benefits
are let's see uh robust containment just
because of the Earth around it and
continuous pressure so that way you
don't have massive concrete structures
oh so it's much cheaper so you don't
have to build the whole structure if you
can make a good mild deep
hole
um and it minimizes the environmental
impact and you know I've told you a
number of times that holes are the
future of energy and maybe of other
things and I've said if we can improve
our technology for cheaply building
holes and tunnels we're going to be able
to have everything from geothermal to
you know better mining to now nuclear um
of course you could use it what's the
other thing uh geothermal is where
you're looking for the the hot water
under the Earth to to create power uh
but what's the one where you're just
using the temperature difference
underground to either moderate the
hotness or the coldness of your house
above ground what's that called but
that's another reason to have you know
good hole building tech technology holes
are the future
um there's a hobbyist who built a an AI
assisted rifle robot using chat GPT and
there's a there's a video that went
viral on Tik Tok I guess and it shows
the inventor with a robot now it's a
tabletop robot wouldn't be too hard to
attach it to a a robot dog or something
I guess but it's just a a rifle that can
you know Point anywhere in a moment and
he just talks to it he says there's a
threat you know on the left and it just
goes so um he the one he's using doesn't
use real real rounds is shooting
something fake
but how far away are we from telling
your robot rifle dog to go attack the
German front line all right rifle dog uh
there's a bunch of ger bunch of I'm
sorry bunch of Russian uh soldiers two
miles away in a in a trench I want you
to go there and in the order uh if you
see anybody who looks like an officer
shoot them first you or something like
that and then that set it to attack but
AI or robot rifle dogs they're
coming um the C CES show is highlighting
all the Big Technical breakthroughs and
so we're seeing news at least two
companies that built human robots that
look like real
women uh but one of them will will build
a real woman with the face of your
choice so I guess you just give them a
photograph of who you want it to look
like and they'll put an artificial skin
face on it that looks like the person
you want now at the moment these robots
are not impressive because they just
look like mannequins who happen to be
able to talk so there it's not like
you're going to want to take that robot
home if you know what I mean the it's
more of a suggestion of what's to come
it's not there yet but I have a
prediction about what one year from now
looks like because the robots will
develop quickly here's a conversation
between a married couple one year from
now human wife says to her husband I
want a
divorce human husband says okay can you
pose for a photo
first mic
drop all right ladies and gentlemen
that's all I have to
say it's
807 well where I am and uh did I miss
anything any big stories that are
happening yeah let me get a good picture
of you before you
go I'm going to
upgrade all
right all right ladies and gentlemen
um uh I have
I have some stories I think I'm going to
say for later but uh I got some good
ones The Carter Funeral yeah I didn't
talk about the Jimmy Carter Funeral so
um here's the fascinating thing about
the Jimmy Carter Funeral so of course
the ex-presidents are all invited so you
had the clintons uh you had only um
Barack Obama Michelle did not come we're
not sure why
um and then uh you had the
harrises so K and her husband and
then I forgetting who else was there um
but I was looking at all the people
sitting up front and it turned to be it
was Trump and all the people he's
destroyed it was Trump and all the
people he's destroyed sitting together
chatting oh Biden Biden was the other
one so so Biden he destroyed uh the
Clinton destroyed you know via
destroying Hillary um Barack Obama
destroyed Michelle Obama couldn't even
come so and then the funny part is um he
ends up sitting right next to Barack
Obama who just warned the world that
Trump was
heler and that he he he called the
neo-nazis fine people and you see Obama
and Trump chatting and joking with each
other
nothing's
real nothing's real oh Pence right Mike
Pence was there and Mike Pence was
destroyed by Trump as well uh was there
a bush there I don't know mean the bush
uh the bush Dynasty got destroyed you
know not George Bush but
so yeah it was quite amazing it was it
was Trump and all the people he
destroyed it it was kind of amazing
all right
uh you know I think Trump has a
superpower in forgetting what people
said about him not forgetting he never
forgets but willingness to just work
with you if it makes sense I just love
that
uh yeah trumpo in the
room all right all right uh I'm going to
talk for a moment privately with the uh
locals subscribers the rest of you I
will see you tomorrow for more fun in
games see you
tomorrow
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e e