Episode 2182 Scott Adams - UFOs, Hunter, Trump Indictments, Lots More Fun
Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com
Fixing a little technical problem over on the Locals platform, but it looks like the Locals platform is deader than a doornail today. I'll try it one more time. Hey, is it looking better? Not so much. Well, we're having a terrible time here technically. Normally I'd be halfway through the simultaneo…
View segment →o start from the beginning? Good morning. Would you like to take this experience up to levels that you don't even believe are possible? Yes, you do. And all you need for that is a coffee mug or a glass, a tankard, a Chelsea-style mug, a canteen, a chocolate flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with…
View segment →. Go. That's good stuff. All right, ladies and gentlemen, have you seen any news today? Well, there's news all over the place. It's like news happening like you can't even believe it. But let's go through it. So the Wall Street Journal is saying that the economy grew by 2.4 percent. We'll talk abou…
View segment →e we go. Remember I told you I was all excited preliminarily yesterday about this story that researchers had made a room temperature superconductor? Do you remember that story? Took about 10 minutes for people to crap all over it and say, well, let's wait to see if anybody can reproduce this, and t…
View segment →Well, there's a new photo of Wagner leader Prigozhin allegedly in Russia, and he's just shaking hands with some African guy who's visiting. So that's true, right? Prigozhin's fine. He's just hanging out in Russia. Sure. Yeah, there was even CNN reported that. They reported that there was a picture o…
View segment →ng his RV around St. Petersburg? No, no, he's not driving his RV around. If he's alive, he's certainly controlled by Putin at this point. Did you read in the news that it was the warmest summer? How many of you think we had the warmest summer because of climate change? The news said so. Well, it ma…
View segment →warm. Now this is my problem with averages. If somebody told you that the average temperature of the Earth was going up, that's pretty scary, right? But what if they told you that it's warming up in the places that are too cold and the places that are already hot? Nobody lives there because it's a d…
View segment →not work hard but maybe not send that same message to, let's say, China? What would be a platform that would do that? I mean, who would tell Americans to be lazier because it's awesome while not telling Chinese citizens to be lazy because it's not awesome? Who would do that? The answer is TikTok. Ar…
View segment →ecrets, right? If he had boxes that were full of, let's say, sensitive conversations with a foreign adversary or for an ally or maybe something that we'd found about a foreign adversary, we would have heard that. We just wouldn't hear the details of it, right? What's the one thing that could be in t…
View segment →I haven't found yet, and then I never watch any content. So the amount of content made watching content impractical. Would you agree? You understand what I'm saying, right? It's like going to the Cheesecake Factory and they've got the 50-page menu and you're sitting there with somebody who's not goo…
View segment →crat-leaning independents are much more likely than Republicans and Republican leaners to support the U.S. government taking steps to restrict false information. Now this isn't just free speech. It's specifically about false information. So 70 percent of Democrats and leaning Democrats think the gov…
View segment →? And you know that if somebody in particular is in charge of telling you what's true, you know that you're in big trouble, right? Yeah, that's true. I mean, I don't think anybody actually holds this opinion. Isn't that weird? People are giving opinions they don't hold because they think you probabl…
View segment →rman, Feinstein, and now Mitch McConnell. How is this okay? How is this okay? I mean, really, there's nobody who can tell Mitch McConnell it's time. I'm pretty disappointed in Republicans. You know, let me just say this. If you're a Republican or a conservative and you've been saying that Joe Biden…
View segment →on both during slavery and after. And it would be better to have a skill than not to have a skill. They both say that. Not only is the entire debate about something that nobody said, nobody said the part that the slaves had a good deal. Everybody said the part that they learn skills and everybody ag…
View segment →uded. So they're trying to figure out how to do it. What's the process? How do I get to be more extreme? And of course the point of it is it's a ridiculous concept. There's no such thing as an extreme MAGA. It's all made up. So you want to embrace it so that you can mock it. That's different than em…
View segment →ying defense you could just shoot the ball when it's in the air. So I think you just take regular sports and you add shooting. You got your extreme MAGA games. Extreme MAGA we've got basketball with shooting. We've got soccer with shooting. We've got curling with shooting. That's it. All right, we'v…
View segment →ntlemen I think I've done what I need to do and we've accomplished everything except getting the Locals platform to work. So I guess I'll work on that when I'm done. Yeah the wet t-shirt contest. This up is old man. Cornhole with grenades. Now you're talking. Jousting with baguettes. Okay. Yeah Sine…
View segment →Fixing a little technical problem over on the Locals platform, but it looks like the Locals platform is deader than a doornail today. I'll try it one more time. Hey, is it looking better? Not so much. Well, we're having a terrible time here technically. Normally I'd be halfway through the simultaneous sip, but it looks like we've got nothing today. So we'll be closing up Locals and opening it up on my phone, which should work. But we'll see. Watch me scramble to make all this work while you wait, wishing there was actually a show going on. Yeah, it looks like Locals is dead. All right, today it's all you. It's all you today.
Would you like to start from the beginning? Good morning. Would you like to take this experience up to levels that you don't even believe are possible? Yes, you do. And all you need for that is a coffee mug or a glass, a tankard, a Chelsea-style mug, a canteen, a chocolate flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamines of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip. It happens now. Go.
That's good stuff. All right, ladies and gentlemen, have you seen any news today? Well, there's news all over the place. It's like news happening like you can't even believe it. But let's go through it. So the Wall Street Journal is saying that the economy grew by 2.4 percent. We'll talk about Hunter and UFOs and stuff, but it'll take a minute for all the Locals people to give up and come over here. Sorry. But what I thought was interesting about this is it's good news that the economy is doing well, but the headline was U.S. economic growth defies slowdown expectations. Whose expectations? Whose expectations? Because this was my prediction. So I would like to add to my most accurate political predictions and most accurate pandemic predictions and most accurate Ukraine predictions the most accurate economic prediction, because I actually said we would not go into a recession. There we go.
Remember I told you I was all excited preliminarily yesterday about this story that researchers had made a room temperature superconductor? Do you remember that story? Took about 10 minutes for people to crap all over it and say, well, let's wait to see if anybody can reproduce this, and there's something sketchy going on. And so I would say that all of my optimism about superconductivity is completely gone. Completely gone. Yeah, it doesn't sound like it's real, but I would love to be surprised. So don't wait for any room temperature superconductivity. It might be as likely as UFOs.
Well, there's a new photo of Wagner leader Prigozhin allegedly in Russia, and he's just shaking hands with some African guy who's visiting. So that's true, right? Prigozhin's fine. He's just hanging out in Russia. Sure. Yeah, there was even CNN reported that. They reported that there was a picture of him. They didn't report the library thing. They just said there's a picture of him, which is fair. And does anybody want to think that he's still free and just doing his own thing? He's just driving his RV around St. Petersburg? No, no, he's not driving his RV around. If he's alive, he's certainly controlled by Putin at this point.
Did you read in the news that it was the warmest summer? How many of you think we had the warmest summer because of climate change? The news said so. Well, it may be. It might actually be the warmest summer, but I'd like to give you a counterpoint which doesn't necessarily refute everything you've heard but gives you context. So here's some better context from Alex Epstein. He said anyone commentating responsibly on summer temperatures must acknowledge four facts. All right, see if you agree with these four facts. Cold-related deaths are much greater than heat-related deaths. Do you know that? The number of people who died because it's too cold is way higher than the number of people who die because it's warm. So in theory you could imagine that depending on where it got warmer, it would save lives, right? So as the cold places got warmer but the places that are already hot didn't get warmer or didn't get much warmer, we'd be better off, wouldn't we? Well, and then the reverse would be true. If the hot places got hotter and the cool places got colder, that probably would be worse. But according to Alex, Earth is warming slowly and less in warm places. Oh, so that's good. So the warming is more concentrated in the cold places, which should save lives. Fossil fuels, number three, fossil fuels make us safer from dangerous temperatures. Yeah, what would you do if you didn't have fossil fuels? Wouldn't you be more exposed to what the weather can do if you can't sit in your car or heat your house? And anti-fossil fuel policies increase the danger from cold. Indeed. Well, that makes sense. If fossil fuels protect you from temperature extremes, then not having them would make you less safe.
So I think a lot of this turns on these two points. It's better to be warmer than cold, and it's not warming as much in the places that are already warm. Now this is my problem with averages. If somebody told you that the average temperature of the Earth was going up, that's pretty scary, right? But what if they told you that it's warming up in the places that are too cold and the places that are already hot? Nobody lives there because it's a desert anyway, for example. Now that's the extreme. I'm exaggerating the effect here, but that's your counterargument. So I'm not saying that the warming is not a problem. I don't know. Might be. But we're pretty good at dealing with that kind of problem.
All right, here's a quiz for you, and the answer is not 25 percent. All right, I'm going to see if you can get this right. You know, put on your thinking caps. All right, there was an article by Katie Mogg in the Wall Street Journal, and apparently there's a trend called the hashtag lazy girl job. And a lazy girl job would be defined as a job, often you could work at home, you don't put in too many hours. It might be an online kind of thing. You don't make that much money, but you make enough, especially if you live with your boyfriend or something. So apparently it's this big old trend to have a job that you can just sort of pay the rent but you're not looking to kill it. This would be the opposite of leaning in. This would be like sleeping in. So apparently leaning in has turned into sleeping in. But that's not the question. Here's the question. This phenomenon has been growing lately, and it's racked up close to 18 million views on a particular social media network. Go. Which social media network? Well, just a hypothetical. What would be a social media network that would encourage working-age humans in the United States to not work hard but maybe not send that same message to, let's say, China? What would be a platform that would do that? I mean, who would tell Americans to be lazier because it's awesome while not telling Chinese citizens to be lazy because it's not awesome? Who would do that? The answer is TikTok. Are you surprised? Oh, big surprise. A trend that's really bad for Americans seems to be running on TikTok, which does not run in the same form in China. So why are people talked into being trans if they never thought of it in their life before on TikTok but not in China? They don't run it there. And why are people told to not work so hard? Well, it doesn't happen in China. And what is Congress looking at this week? The fact that it's obvious that we have a brainwashing technology that's been inserted in the phone of every young American? Or we have a hearing on that today? No, no, it's about aliens and UFOs because it's summer and you don't talk about real stuff in the summer, you fool.
Let's talk about UFOs. As you know, the Congress had some hearings about whether the government has secret UFOs that they're keeping from us. And I don't know about you, but after listening to some of the testimony about the UFOs, I'm left with more questions than answers. More questions than answers. Here are some of the questions I have. How much money did Hunter get from the UFOs? I assume he shall come down. I just don't know how much money he made. Number two, are we using this advanced alien technology that we have to make video cameras for the White House that can't see Hunter? Yeah, special technology. The security cameras can see everybody except Hunter. He's just invisible on camera. And most importantly, number three, how many aliens are in Trump's boxes? Must be a few, because one thing we know is that we can't be told what's in the boxes. I can't think of anything else that they wouldn't tell us, because anything else they could tell us. Am I right? They could tell us in a general way. Again, let me give you an example. If Trump's boxes of secrets had attack plans for Iran, we would hear that. They just wouldn't tell us the details. If there were nuclear secrets, we would hear that. They just wouldn't tell us the actual secrets, right? If he had boxes that were full of, let's say, sensitive conversations with a foreign adversary or for an ally or maybe something that we'd found about a foreign adversary, we would have heard that. We just wouldn't hear the details of it, right? What's the one thing that could be in the boxes that even the government wouldn't even say anything about? Aliens. Aliens. There have to be aliens in the boxes because it's the only thing they wouldn't want to say anything about. Otherwise they would just say, well, yes, he has them. We just can't tell you the details. But they can't tell you that they do have aliens. They just don't want to tell you which ones. See, they can't tell you that. Okay, I'm joking. If you can't tell, I'm joking. I'm joking.
All right. Elon Musk weighed in on an Andrew Tate tweet. Tate was talking about men who sleep with a lot of women and vice versa, and Musk tweeted to that. He said, to sleep with women endlessly without love is a cursed and hollow life. Well, if you were not already hating Elon Musk for being the richest person in the world, can you hate him now for apparently knowing the answer to this question? How you feel when you have slept with endless women without love. It didn't sound like he was guessing. I feel like if you're the richest man in the world and you're unmarried, you have experienced sleeping with endless women without love. I think that's probably what a Tuesday looks like for him. Number three, make sure there's no love. So we hate him for knowing the answer to that question. What does it feel like to have sex with endless women? But I'm glad that he did it so we don't have to. Am I right, guys? Are you glad that Elon Musk told us what it feels like to sleep with endless women without love? Because I was going to go out and do it. I had plans for the week. I was like, you know what I'm going to do this week? I haven't tried this before, but I'm going to try having endless sex with women who don't love me, see what it's all about. But then I would have found out it was a cursed and hollow life, and so I'm glad that Musk did it so I don't have to.
But there is something left out of this analysis. Sleeping with women endlessly without love is a cursed and hollow life. How does it compare to being married to one person? I mean, I think that's the valid comparison. I would agree with him that maybe it isn't a cursed and hollow life, but how does it compare to the alternative? You know what the worst advice anybody ever gave is? The worst advice is "follow your passion." You know what the second worst advice is? "Find a good mate." It's the worst advice anybody's ever given. Find a good mate, you know, one that will make your life better. And do you know why that's the worst advice in the world? Because I'm no expert. I'm not a marriage expert. I'm just going to put this out there. See, you can do with it what you will. I'm almost positive that a hundred percent of people who get married think they picked the right one. Do you have a different feeling about that? Are there a lot of people getting married saying, you know, this mate I picked is total shit but I just feel like getting married? No. I believe that everybody enters an illusion in which they figure that whatever flaws the other person has, they'll work it out, and there are no new flaws. There won't be any new ones. You've seen everything there is to see. And so therefore a reasonable and a smart person using good judgment can go out and find a good solid mate and have a solid life because of it.
Now some of you say, Scott, you idiot, you idiot. There are plenty of examples. I mean, maybe it's not over 50 percent of the population, but there are plenty of examples of people who looked and they found the right person. Are you going to tell me that? Would you like to tell me that there are many examples? You've seen it yourself. Many of you are the example where the correct mate, which you wisely and with your good judgment and your free will, you chose that good mate and because of your good choice things are better for you. How many years? Raise your hand if you're in that category. You wisely picked the right mate and it totally worked out for you. Go. How many of you? So and therefore it would be a good technique, right? Yeah, all right. Does anybody see what's wrong with your analysis? Do I have to be the first one to tell you? You see what's wrong with the analysis? All right, you take a million people and you randomly pair them with each other, just randomly. Would some of them have happy marriages, just randomly paired? What do you say? Of course they would. Of course they would. Yeah. Suppose you had an AI match people. Would some of them have amazing marriages? I think so. I think so. Yeah. Does that indicate that you can choose the right mate because lots of people have done it? Alexa, cancel. I don't know what that was all about. But so would you say that the evidence is there? There are plenty of examples of people who consciously, and this is the important part, they were consciously looking for a good mate. They found one. They lived their whole life happy that they found one, and that's proof that it's a good idea. Would you agree with that statement? It's basically solid. Well, maybe not proof in a scientific sense, but it's very solid evidence because you know lots of people. You personally know lots of people who put the effort in, found somebody, and it worked and it worked their whole life and they were really happy about it, right? That's not really thinking what you're doing there. There's no sense of reason or logic to that whatsoever. It's just the law of big numbers. If you have a lot of people doing something, somebody's going to win. That's it. That's the whole story. If a lot of people are doing a thing, some of them are going to get lucky every time. Not sometimes. Every time.
So what would you imagine would be the rate of people getting lucky that would indicate it's luck versus something that would indicate it's a solid plan? Well, let me give you an example. Another solid plan would be if you wanted a good life, you would stay in school, you'd learn some skills, you'd basically stay off drugs, do some things. How often does that keep you from being poor? If you do those few simple things that anybody can do, it's hard but anybody can do it, and the answer is almost no poor people in that group. If you build skills, go to school, stay in school, do the basics, pretty much all of you are successful. What's the success rate for picking a spouse? Now remember, you're not discounting the people who get divorced. You have to include the people who stayed married but kind of wish they hadn't, right? So marriage is more of a maybe. I'd say a 25 percent success rate if you talk about your whole life. 25 percent. Does 25 percent sound like chance or the result of people who knew exactly what they were doing? They knew exactly what a good mate would look like and they went out and tried to get one. Does it look like that? Have you ever noticed that people tend to marry the people they work with? What are the odds you met your soulmate at work? It's mostly where people meet people, right? The thing we know about people is that they can fall in love with whoever's around. Would you agree with that statement? We're not looking for our soulmate among the 8 billion people on Earth. We easily fall in love with whoever's nearby. Just proximity seems to be enough. So how many of the people who just fell in love because they happened to be in the proximity of another person who was willing to say yes, how many of them are a good match? It would be kind of weird if they were. So I would say that 25 percent success rate of picking the right mate and making it last a lifetime could be a little more, could be a little less. It's definitely not over 50 percent. So what kind of advice is it to give somebody advice that could not work more than half the time? Is that a solid advice? Advice that will not work at least half of the time? I would call that bad advice because you do not have a mechanism or the capability to pick a good mate. Now I suppose there's some really super obvious stuff like somebody who's been in and out of jail their entire life and with no intention of stopping. I wouldn't marry that person, right? But I don't think that's what anybody's talking about. I think most people are looking at average-looking people and saying, I think that's my person. I think that's the one that will work. But it's not because they're so smart or they knew how to pick a good person. No, I think it's pure magical thinking that you can pick the right person. That said, you should try as hard as you can to pick the right person. I'm just saying it's magical thinking to think that's some kind of formula for success. It's not. Something you should try to do, but you really don't know how to do it. Nobody does, because it's mostly luck.
All right, there's yet another announcement about AI movies, and now this Gen 2, I don't know if it's Runway or Gen 2 or whatever it is, but there's some new AI that can make movies, make an entire movie just from some prompts. Here's my prediction about movies made by AI. Do you know why I don't watch television right now besides the fact the content is bad? It's because there are so many streaming services and each one takes a lot of effort to make it work on any given day. Like I've got streaming services that work on some devices but not others. I could probably fix that, but sometimes I just want to watch a show so I'll just go to the other streaming device. So I've got all these streaming devices, and as I've said many times, instead of watching content, which is what I used to do, now I just look for content and I'm sure that there's something better I haven't found yet, and then I never watch any content. So the amount of content made watching content impractical. Would you agree? You understand what I'm saying, right? It's like going to the Cheesecake Factory and they've got the 50-page menu and you're sitting there with somebody who's not good at making decisions about food. Don't go to the Cheesecake Factory. DoorDash. Do not go there with somebody who's not good with decisions. You're going to be there a long time. Would you like to see my impression of going to the Cheesecake Factory vegetarian page? All right, seafood, vegetarian. I'll do the same thing I did last time. Good. And decision made. And here's me for the rest of the 15 minutes. That's me eating at the Cheesecake Factory with anybody.
So where was I going on that? Oh, AI movies. I think when AI can make movies, everybody's going to make an AI movie. Would you agree? The moment you can make a movie just by typing in some text, there's going to be so many AI movies. How are you ever going to watch anything? Do you think any of these AI movies are going to be good? Probably not. I mean, it's based on human patterns and only one in a thousand movies are good, so it's not going to be better than one in a thousand. But you know it's going to be different. There will be a billion of them, right? When you go to look for a movie, there will be a billion movies, like actually a billion. And how many of those will be good? Maybe none. Maybe one in a thousand. How long are you going to look for the good ones? How much time are you going to spend looking for the good one?
Now here's even a deeper analysis of this. Years ago I made the mistake of trying to become a script writer for movies. So I was going to make a Dilbert movie and I read some books and studied up on the structure of scripts. Unfortunately that process ruined movies for me forever, because once you know how a script has to be written in order to make it onto the screen, you realize it's a formula. And if you don't use the formula, you're not going to get it made. Nobody's going to fund it because they need the formula. That's what works. But once you see the formula and you're like, oh, it's a three-act play, I get it. This is the first act. We have to go through somebody got hurt. Something bad happened. All right, then third act. And then you know that the B plot interferes with the A plot. You know that anything you see that's called out in the first act has to be important in the last act or else they wouldn't call it out in the first act. And once you see the whole process and the structure, it doesn't look like art anymore. And when it stops looking like art, it loses all of its punch. So I would say that, and other people have had the same experience I've talked to them, the moment you can see the gears, you lose all your love of the movies. I don't know how people make movies and watch them because they just should know too much. Maybe they watch them for a different reason, to see how well they're made or something. I don't know. But once there are tons of AI movies and they're all using the same formulas that humans use and there's billions of them, I think this will destroy movies as an art form. I just don't think movies will be a thing. Reels might be a thing but not movies. And of course when I say that, it's more like radio. You know, radio lasted forever even though television was supposed to get rid of it. So there will be probably some AI movies and other movies, but movies as a major cultural phenomenon should shrink to a niche.
All right, Democrats really don't like free speech. You know everybody says that, but when you see these numbers it's shocking. So Pew Research or the Pew group or whatever they found that Democrats and Democrat-leaning independents are much more likely than Republicans and Republican leaners to support the U.S. government taking steps to restrict false information. Now this isn't just free speech. It's specifically about false information. So 70 percent of Democrats and leaning Democrats think the government should restrict what is in their opinion false information, and 39 percent of Republicans say the same. So before any of you Republicans get all feeling good about yourself, 39 percent of Republicans think the government should restrict bad information. Really? How did we get to this place? You see the problem is that this requires somebody to know what information is good. As soon as you say somebody's going to be the judge of what good information is and what's bad information, you're dead. You are so dead. If you let somebody decide for you what's true, you cannot live in that world. That is the end. That's the end of the Republic. How do 70 percent of Democrats and 39 percent of Republicans not know that allowing the government to tell you what's true would be the end of the Republic? How do they not know that? What's going wrong here? And my best guess is at least with the Democrats is that they've been so propagandized that Republicans are putting out bad information that they can't see that their own information is bad as well. Is that what's happening? Would you say that the propaganda makes them think that the only bad information is coming from their enemies? They don't understand that the bad information is coming from inside the house, as they still don't know it even after the pandemic. Think about that. Even after the pandemic, when we've learned almost everything the government told us was a known lie, they weren't just wrong, they knew they were lying. And yet the Democrats, 70 percent of them, somehow are not influenced by the fact that we know the government lied to us massively, not only about that but everything from the laptop to you name it. And that doesn't have an influence. Seventy percent of the Democrat leaders and Democrats are not influenced by recent events. They still want somebody to tell them what's true or more importantly to tell the other side what's true.
Here's my take on this. I think it's just a team play response. I think that when people answered the question they were answering as Democrats. Well, I would like my enemies not to talk as much. I think that's what it is. But if you ask them, if you took any of these 70 percent and sat them down and said, what I just had, just the two of you talking, not a poll, say, all right, you know that both sides have put out bad information. Well, yes, that's true, right? And you know that if somebody in particular is in charge of telling you what's true, you know that you're in big trouble, right? Yeah, that's true. I mean, I don't think anybody actually holds this opinion. Isn't that weird? People are giving opinions they don't hold because they think you probably have a strategic benefit. I think so. I think people are just answering what would be a philosophical question. I think they're answering it strategically. Partly what's happening.
All right, but is it more than just false information? Wouldn't you say that there's also a suppression by the left of opinion? Don't you think that it's more than just what's true or what's false but that opinion is also being suppressed? You know, stuff that's clearly opinion, because some of the opinion is about what's true and what's not true. So you end up blocking opinion when you try to block fact.
All right, now it might be just because there's so many Democrats who are unable to speak in coherent sentences. You've got your Kamala Harris, your Joe Biden, your Fetterman, your Senator Feinstein, who actually can't communicate anymore. But now we can add to that Mitch McConnell. If you saw Mitch McConnell's tragic press announcement and he stood there and actually couldn't speak and he looked like he was having some kind of an event in his head, he apparently can speak, so he did because he did come back, but he's in bad shape. So by my count that is five major members of our government who can't form sentences. Is that right? Tell me I'm wrong. There are four elected people who are really prominent. These are not minor people. These are prominent politicians: Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, Fetterman, Feinstein, and now Mitch McConnell. How is this okay? How is this okay? I mean, really, there's nobody who can tell Mitch McConnell it's time. I'm pretty disappointed in Republicans. You know, let me just say this. If you're a Republican or a conservative and you've been saying that Joe Biden needs to step down because of age but you're not saying it about Mitch McConnell, then we can't take you seriously. You're not a real serious person. Both of them need to step down like really soon. Yeah, Grassley actually is weirdly, Grassley seems pretty capable, doesn't he, relatively speaking? But you know, like you said, he's close. So yeah, I mean the team play here is just disgusting because none of these people would be in power if people were trying to pick good people, right? So picking a good mate is like picking a good politician. You have every good intention of doing it but then you know there are reasons. There are reasons why you gotta pick these bad ones and we're going to use those raisins.
Speaking of bad ones, Adam Schiff was at it. Adam Schiff is so entertaining because I don't know what's in his head but it seems that he must be aware that he can say anything and the news won't check him on his side. You know, only the Republicans will fact check him and nobody he doesn't care about them because his base and his voters will never see it. So he said, quote, the Republican desire to impeach someone, anyone, no matter if there's any evidence, just shows how they have descended into chaos. Right, so the Republicans are crazy because they want to impeach the person who's in charge of the border who's just letting everybody in. That's crazy. It's crazy to want to impeach somebody who's just not doing the job on a vital thing. And of course the Biden stuff is just beyond the pale at this point. So at the same time there might be a Trump indictment today. Has there been any news yet on a Trump indictment? Don't they usually happen in the morning? Can we say there will be no Trump indictment today? Am I wrong that they always happen in the morning or is that just me imagining it? Maybe I'm imagining that. All right, but we'll keep waiting on that.
So I tweeted because I thought it was funny that the news today has UFOs and the possible Trump indictment. That's got to tell you that Hunter's in trouble. But then somebody pointed out to ruin my fun that the UFOs, that's all the Republican process. So the Republicans are not trying to cover up any Hunter stories. But it is funny that we get these two flashy stories at the same time. Hunter's in trouble. All right, coincidence anyway.
You all heard by now that Hunter lost his sweetheart plea deal. Now I'm no lawyer so I'm going to give you the idiot's version of what I understand about this. So Hunter had this sweetheart deal worked out in which he would plead guilty to some minor stuff among a large bag of potential stuff that could have been even worse. Now that's unusual. Normally you would plead guilty to, well let me take another tact on this. So the idea was, at least these smart people are saying, that it seems to have been crafted explicitly to get Hunter off but more importantly to prevent anybody from ever finding out more information. And the way they would do that is have a deal in which there's no trial so you don't have the discovery of the trial. But moreover if the press asked questions they would still be able to say that the investigations are ongoing. So somehow they were going to say we've made a deal and all the investigations are closed while also saying they're still open so we can't talk about it. It was some weird situation that was ridiculous on its surface and was really transparent even to the judge who overturned it because it seemed obvious this was so non-standard it could only be put together for the purpose of protecting Hunter. Could not have been done in any reasonable person's opinion for any kind of justice or normal process that another person would go through.
So here's my big question. Is this going to unravel everything? Will everything become daylight now? Because if Hunter can be prosecuted, doesn't that open up the ability to investigate everything related to it which would necessarily include the entire Biden criminal family organization? And by the way I have no problem saying it's a Biden crime family because I think the evidence in the news is now overwhelming. And it seems to me that the 20 shell companies and the six banks and all that stuff, you could do away with all the alleged audio tapes. You know, let's say we never hear any of these alleged Ukrainian audio tapes. I don't think we ever will. You could say that all the documents like that 1023, you could say those are all fake. But all you need is to know that a huge amount of money flowed from other countries into a labyrinth of shell companies and banks that has no purpose other than to hide your activity. And that's the whole story. You don't need any documentation. All you have to do is show this flow of money and the structure it flowed into and then where it ended up. Now we do have direct witnesses, right? We've got the Devon Archer and Tony Bobulinski. So we have direct eyewitnesses under oath and we've got the bank records and the money and where it went. Right now, although I would, yeah you make a good point. I always say people are innocent until proven guilty but if I watch somebody shoot somebody in my living room with my own eyes and I'm standing right next to him, I'm not going to say that that person is innocent. You know, I don't need the court to validate it because I can observe it directly. This is one of those cases where you can observe it directly because Hunter's defense has offered no explanation for why you would have all these shell companies and banks and even what they did for the money. You know, what was the product they gave for the money? Without that I would say this is as obvious as watching somebody murder somebody right in front of you. And that would be a real, it's a very rare exception to innocent until proven guilty.
Now somebody who definitely should be innocent until proven guilty would be Andrew Tate because we don't really know anything about that, do we? We know these allegations but nothing really sounds right about any of it. As Romania, you don't know if there's corruption. So Tate is the perfect example of innocent until proven guilty no matter what the truth is. Whereas this Hunter situation was so well understood that I think you can go beyond the court opinion to have your own opinion about it. Now I would say that's different than the Trump boxes because the Trump box case really relies on a lot of legal theory and who did what exactly when. And I would say that's innocent until proven guilty. I mean it looks like maybe there were some technical violations that nobody should care about but yeah anyway. So we'll see what comes of that.
But it does look like I would say there's no chance of Joe Biden being the next president. Do you think there's any chance of that now? Because I think the evidence that we have already would guarantee he can't win against any Republican who's sane. And you're going to have, you can have strong Republicans going into the race. Whoever it is, you know it looks like Trump at the moment but no matter who it is, any of the top four is going to just destroy Biden. I mean all you have to do, imagine the debate. Imagine a debate in which Trump or somebody says, look we've discovered 20 shell companies, six banks and whatever the number is, 17 million dollars that flowed into the family and no explanation of what services were provided for that and no explanation of why you needed to hide that money. Now ladies and gentlemen of America, I submit to you that if they offered a defense you should consider it. They've now offered a defense and the facts are no longer under dispute. Look with your own eyes. See it with your own eyes. This is the swamp. This is what I'm trying to get rid of and I'm trying to get rid of the head of the swamp first. Let me take the head of the snake and we'll worry about the rest of the snake when I get elected. But I think all of you can see what I see. You know although I agree that people are innocent until proven guilty there is no other explanation for this money flowing from other countries and from the countries that were exactly the portfolios that Biden was controlling in terms of policy. So let's not get caught up into the legal details. You can all see the stuff that nobody's arguing about. You can all see for yourself. It's been proven. We have the documents. The money flowed from other countries. There was no product or service provided. This is the swamp. This is what you need to get rid of. Everybody wins in that case.
Yeah, now I believe that the Democrats are unwilling to rig the election for Biden even if they could and there's no evidence that they ever did. But if they could hypothetically I don't think they would because I think they don't want him to run. It's too much trouble. So even CNN is starting to run some anti-Biden commentary. All right, so yeah I think Biden's done. That's my prediction. My prediction is that Biden can't win. So I'm going to go with it doesn't matter who does win. It matters but that's not part of the prediction. Prediction is Biden will not be president whether he gets the primary or not. He doesn't have I'd say any chance of winning at this point.
This will be a good test. Have you heard anybody else say that Biden can't win based on the Hunter stuff especially? Has anybody in the pundit space said that? Because I think most people are still on the page the Democrats are thinking he can win and Republicans are thinking he can win because something will happen with the election, right, where the Democrats don't care if he's sentient or not, right? So I don't know how many people have predicted this if any. I haven't heard it from anybody but I'm going to say there isn't any chance he can be president again. So between his health and the Hunter stuff and the fact that the Democrats don't want to put up with it again and even CNN started to change his tune a little bit on the reporting, yeah.
Now remember you're saying that the cheating can make him president. I'm saying that they wouldn't cheat in this case because they don't want him to be president. So if they were going to be cheating it would make far more sense to put in a better candidate ahead of time so you don't have to cheat. See where I'm going? If you imagine there's such a thing as some Democrat conspiracy to cheat they would be pretty well organized, would you agree? If that existed and there's no evidence of it but if it existed they'd be well organized. But there would certainly be well organized enough to make sure they were not in that position, to make sure that Biden was not running. And I think they could make that happen. The imaginary people in charge. So that's all just imagining that such people exist. Maybe they do, maybe they don't. I don't know.
All right, how bad should we be about this? I think we found something we can all come together on and that's rare. The left, the right, black, white, LGBTQ. There's one thing we can come together as. I think we can come together as a nation and universally condemn those things that nobody ever said. Can we agree? Would you join with me and condemn the terrible things that nobody's ever said? For example, nobody's ever said that slaves had a good deal. Nobody ever said that slaves were benefiting in a way that made slavery sort of a good deal by having skills. Right? Nobody's ever thought it. Nobody's ever said it. But the entire country is deciding to argue over it. The thing that nobody said and nobody believes. Am I wrong about that? Nobody said it. Nobody believes it. And we're having a big argument about the thing that nobody said that nobody believes. So that's happening. But at least we can come together on condemning the things that never happened that nobody ever said.
And the funniest part about that story, it's the topic is history teaching in Florida and whether it should say that the slaves were acquiring skills they had some benefit to them later on. And it turns out that the people who are really mad about the DeSantis plan for history lessons want to replace it with a more generic one that they're happy with. And do you know what the difference is between the generic one that the unhappy people would like to replace and the one that DeSantis wants? Do you know what the difference is on this question? None. It says the same thing. Same thing that slaves learn skills which they could take with them later on both during slavery and after. And it would be better to have a skill than not to have a skill. They both say that. Not only is the entire debate about something that nobody said, nobody said the part that the slaves had a good deal. Everybody said the part that they learn skills and everybody agrees that learning skills is better than not learning skills. So this is like a double triple absurdity situation. This is summer squared. Stories that aren't real but we have something to talk about.
All right, I would like to give you the best part of my presentation today which is how to deal with the Republicans, mostly the Biden camp. If we're calling Republicans extreme MAGA, does it seem to you they're getting some traction on this extreme MAGA situation? Does it feel like it's working? Because it feels like other people are picking it up. But I'm going to teach you a persuasion trick for removing extreme MAGA from the attack. You ready? Now it's not much different from other techniques so you'll recognize the technique as embrace and amplify. But I'm tweaking embrace and amplify a little bit because embrace and amplify means you just embrace somebody's dumbass idea and then you pretend you agree with it and they're pretending you agree surfaces all the problem with the idea. This is a little bit different but it's a close cousin to that.
All right, imagine a video. It would be a viral video using actors. All right, the actors are a couple of very Republican ordinary looking people just like the most ordinary Republicans you could have. But let's say they're a little bit overweight just so you can imagine this. I'm going to draw you a picture in your head. It's a little bit overweight. They're very middle class. So you see them in their living room sitting on the couch. Maybe mom is knitting or something and dad's there with a man's beer, not a Bud Light. And they're watching the news and you hear Joe Biden say something about extreme MAGA, extreme MAGA, extreme MAGA. And you see the two looking at each other and they're like, well we're regular MAGA. What was that, an upgrade? Is that like a promotion? Like I'd like to be more extreme. And so you see the two people trying to figure out how they can get to extreme. And so they talk to their friends. You know it all happens really quickly because it's like a quick video. They talk to their friends and they're like we'd like to be more extreme. And they're like well you could wear this hat that has embossed lettering on it. Like is that extreme? Well compared to the regular hat that has no embossed lettering it's way more extreme. So you would do like little skits of regular Republicans trying to become or get upgraded to the excitement of being an extreme MAGA but they can't figure out what is included. So they're trying to figure out how to do it. What's the process? How do I get to be more extreme? And of course the point of it is it's a ridiculous concept. There's no such thing as an extreme MAGA. It's all made up. So you want to embrace it so that you can mock it. That's different than embrace and amplify because when you embrace and amplify the mocking is sort of embedded in your actions but you're not actively mocking it. You're pretending like you're just playing it straight. In this case you would be actively mocking it but you're embracing it before you actively mock it. So close cousin of embrace and amplify.
Now in my opinion the silliness of extreme MAGA, you could immediately take it from extreme MAGA is like racist, right? Yeah, crazy racist. But you can make extreme MAGA just seem silly and cute and ridiculous just by having more attention to the counterpoint. What do you think? Would it work? Lots of videos of the extreme MAGA and then you also get, you'd also want your Republicans to make fun of it. You know, can you imagine Vivek or somebody who's got a personality saying, you know are you extreme MAGA? Do you agree with this? Because we MAGA. There's an extreme MAGA. Wow, is there any kind of a sign up for that or is it more of a self-identification? How do I become more extreme MAGA? You know just mock the thing by smiling and laughing at it. You know I don't think I'm extreme MAGA enough. I'm gonna, or how about this. All right, here's another idea. You show somebody with a Make America Great Again hat on, you know the red hat, and then they're trying to figure out how to become extreme and then one of them has an idea and they turn the hat around backwards and everybody's like I think you did it. That's like crazy. Oh my God, could we do that too? How did you do that? And then they're all like huh and they turned their hats around. They're like and suddenly they're all excited. We've done it. We've done it. And they go to have a drink but it's only Bud Light. They're like ah. It'd be hilarious. You should make 50 of these. We should use that AI. That's what you do.
So since now we've been told and I'm sure it's true because people said so that you can just write text to create a whole movie so you can just write some text to create this little play of the MAGA people trying to be extreme MAGA and it'll be totally watchable because AI made it, right? No it won't. If you want to show yourself that hey I can't make a movie no matter how many posts you see about it, at least now it can't make a movie. Try to do that. Try to do just that little short film, a two-minute clip with a very clear message, and see, tell your AI to make that and watch how much you don't want to watch it when it's done. By humans could make the hell out of that and AI can't do that. Yeah, you need a human's animating period because the machine can't tell what's working and what isn't. That's a human job.
Make your bed will always be the funniest thing a MAGA person could do. That in the humorous world would look extreme but would be silly. Now I was also imagining what would be extreme MAGA sporting events. You know if you had like because extreme MAGA sounds like extreme sports. So I was imagining suppose all the extreme MAGAs had some kind of Olympics just for extreme MAGAs. What events would be there? And I thought you know the real Olympics already has the skiing and shooting. I have this feeling that a Republican extreme MAGA events would just be regular sports but also shooting. So it'd be like tennis but you could shoot. You know you can hit the ball or you can shoot it in the air. It'd be like basketball but instead of playing defense you could just shoot the ball when it's in the air. So I think you just take regular sports and you add shooting. You got your extreme MAGA games. Extreme MAGA we've got basketball with shooting. We've got soccer with shooting. We've got curling with shooting. That's it. All right, we've got racing with shooting. We've got lawn darts. Well the lawn darts standalone. That's the only one with no shooting. We've just got lawn darts but you can fire them at each other. It's more it's not less target practice and more team against team. That cornhole, it's cornhole but we're shooting. And no Bud Light. Yeah, maybe it's mowing your lawn and not drinking a Bud Light. I've been mowing. I'm so thirsty. Yeah that would be the competition. You have to mow your lawn on a hot day and there has to be a cold Bud Light sitting in front of you and you see who can go the longest without taking a sip of the Bud Light. You have to just keep mowing in the sun and you can't use sunscreen. You're just getting redder. And then whoever can last the longest wins that competition. Yeah the mowing and resisting the Bud Light would be a good extreme MAGA. What else? What would be extreme? Chess boxing. Chess box. All right that's more mocking Republicans. You could kind of see a chess board and then two Republicans wearing boxing gloves and they don't know the rules of the chess game so they just punch each other instead. That'd be pretty funny. NASCAR with shooting.
All right ladies and gentlemen I think I've done what I need to do and we've accomplished everything except getting the Locals platform to work. So I guess I'll work on that when I'm done. Yeah the wet t-shirt contest. This up is old man. Cornhole with grenades. Now you're talking. Jousting with baguettes. Okay. Yeah Sinead O'Connor passed away. I didn't hear of what. Chess boxing is a thing? Is it really? The wife. All right, competitive get off my lawn. Get off my porch. All right I think we've done it. Thank you for joining and I will see you tomorrow ladies and gentlemen. And if you are a member of the local subscription service I will probably see you tonight but I don't know how many are listening here. Bye for now.
fix a little technical problem over in the locals platform but looks like the locals platform is better than a door nail today I'll try it one more time hey he's looking better not so much well we're uh we're having a terrible time here technically normally I'd be halfway through the simultaneous sip but it looks like we got nothing today so we'll be closing up closing up locals and open it up on my phone which should work but we'll see watch me scramble to make all this work while you wait wishing there was actually a show going on yeah it looks like locals is dead all right today it's all you it's all you today would you like to start from the beginning good morning would you like to take this experience up to levels that you don't even believe are possible yes you do and all you need for that is a cupboard mugger gloss a tanker Chelsea style in the canteen chocolate flaska vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamines of the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous sip it happens now go that's good stuff all right ladies and gentlemen have you seen any news today well there's news all over the place it's like news happening like you can't even believe it but uh let's go through it so the Wall Street Journal is saying that the economy grew by 2.4 percent we'll talk about Hunter and UFOs and stuff but it'll take a minute for all the locals people to give up and come over here sorry um but what I thought was interesting about this is it's good news that the economy is doing well but the headline was uh U.S economic growth defies a slow down expectations whose expectations whose expectations because this was my prediction so I would like to add to my most accurate political predictions and most accurate pandemic predictions and most accurate Ukraine predictions the most accurate economic tradition because I actually said we would not go into a recession there we go remember I told you I I was all excited preliminarily yesterday about this story that researchers had made a room temperature superconductor do you remember that story took about 10 minutes for people to crap all over it and say well let's wait to see if anybody can reproduce this and there's something sketchy going on and so I would say that all of my optimism about superconductivity completely gone completely gone yeah it doesn't sound like it's real but I would love to be surprised so don't wait for any room temperature superconductivity it might be as likely as UFOs well there's a new photo of uh uh Wagner leader progosian allegedly in Russia and he's just shaking hands with some African guy who's visiting so that's true right pregosian's fine he's just hanging out hanging out in Russia sure yeah there was a even CNN reported that they reported that there was a picture of him they didn't report to use the library thing they just said there's a picture of him which is fair and uh does anybody want to think that he's still free and just doing his own thing he's just driving his RV around St.
Petersburg no no he's not driving his RV around the CPS he's certainly in uh if he's alive he's certainly controlled by Putin at this point um did you read it in the news that it was the warmest summer how many of you think we had the warmest summer because of climate change the news said so well it may be it might actually be the warmest summer but I'd like to give you a Counterpoint which doesn't it doesn't necessarily refute everything you've heard but it gives you context so here's some better context from Alex Epstein uh you said anyone comment uh commentating responsibly on summer temperatures must acknowledge four facts all right see if you agree with these four facts cold related deaths are much greater than he related to us do you know that that the number of people who died because it's too cold is way higher than the number of people who die because it's warm so in theory you could imagine that depending on where it got warmer it would save lives right so as the cold places got warmer but the places that are already hot didn't get warmer or didn't get much warmer we'd be better off wouldn't we well and then then the reverse would be true if the hot places got hotter and the cool places got colder that probably would be worse um but according to Alex Earth is warming slowly and less in warm places oh so that's good so the warming is more concentrated in the cold places which should save lives um fossil fuels number three fossil fuels make us safer from dangerous temperatures yeah what would you do if you didn't have fossil fuels wouldn't you be more exposed to what the weather can do if you can't sit in your car or eat your house and um anti-fossil fuel policies increase the danger from cold indeed well that makes sense if fossil fuels protect you from temperature extremes then not having them would make you less safe so I think a lot of this turns on these two points it's better to be warmer than cold and it's um and it's not warming as much in the places that are already warm now this is my problem with averages if somebody told you that the average temperature the Earth was going up that's pretty scary right but what if they told you that it's warming up in the places that are too cold and the places that are already hot nobody lives there because it's a desert anyway for example now that's the extreme that's I'm exaggerating the effect here but uh that's your counter argument so I'm not saying that the warming the warming is not a problem I don't know might be but we're pretty good at dealing with that kind of problem all right here's a quiz for you and the answer is not 25 percent all right I'm going to see I can see if you can get this right you know put on your thinking gaps all right there was a article by Katie mogg in the Wall Street Journal and apparently there's a trend called the hashtag lazygirljob and a lazy girl job would be defined as a job often you could work at home you don't put in too many hours it might be an online kind of thing you don't make that much money but you make enough especially if you live with your boyfriend or something so apparently it's this big old trend um to have a job that you can just sort of pay the rent but you're not looking to kill you know kill it this would be the opposite of leaning in this would be like sleeping in so apparently leaning in has turned into sleeping in uh but that's not the question here's the question this phenomenon has been growing lately and it's racked up close to 18 million views on a particular social media Network go Which social media Network well just a hypothetic well what would be a social media Network that would encourage working age humans in the United States do not work hard but maybe not send that same message to let's say China what what would be what would be a platform that would do that I mean who would tell Americans to be lazier because it's awesome while not telling Chinese citizens to be lazy because it's not awesome who would do that the answer is tick tock are you surprised oh big surprise a trend that's really bad for Americans seems to be running on Tick Tock which does not run in the same form in China so why are people talked into being trans if they never thought of it in their life before Tick Tock but not in China they don't run it there and why are people told to not work so hard well it doesn't happen in China and what is uh what's Congress looking at this week the fact that it's obvious that we have a brainwashing technology that's been inserted in the phone of every Young American or we have a hearing on that today no no it's about aliens UFOs because it's summer and you don't talk about real stuff in the summer you fool let's talk about UFOs as you know the Congress had some hearings about whether the government has secret UFOs that they're keeping from us and I don't know about you but after listening to some of the testimony about the UFOs I'm left with more questions than answers more questions than answers here are some of the questions I have how much money did Hunter get from the UFOs I assume you shall come down I just don't know how much money he made there's no reporting on that number two are we using this Advanced alien technology that we have to make video cameras for the White House that can't see Hunter yeah Special technology the security cameras can see everybody except Hunter he's just invisible on camera and most importantly number three how many aliens are in Trump's boxes must be a few because one thing we know is that we can't be told what's in the boxes I can't think of anything else that they wouldn't tell us because anything else they could tell us am I right they could tell us in a general way again let me give you example if Trump's boxes of Secrets had attack plans for Iran we would hear that they just wouldn't tell us the details if there were nuclear secrets we would hear that they just wouldn't tell us the actual Secrets right if he had boxes that were full of let's say sensitive conversations with a foreign adversary or for an ally or maybe some something that we'd found about a foreign adversary we would have heard that we just wouldn't hear the details of it right what's the one thing that could be in the boxes that even the government wouldn't even say anything about aliens aliens there have to be aliens in the boxes because it's the only thing they wouldn't want to say anything about otherwise they would just say well yes he hasn't we just can't tell you the details but they can't tell you that they do have aliens they just don't want to tell you which ones see they can't tell you that okay I'm joking if you can't tell if you can't tell I'm joking I'm joking all right um Elon Musk weighed in on a Andrew Tate tweet um then Tate was talking about you know men who sleep with a lot of women and vice versa and musk tweeted to that he said to sleep with women endlessly without love is a cursed and hollow life well if you were not already aiding Elon Musk for being the richest person in the world can you he can you hate him now for apparently knowing the answer to this question how you feel when you have slept with endless women without love it didn't sound like he was guessing I feel like if you're the richest man in the world and you're unmarried you have experienced sleeping with endless women without love I think that's probably what a Tuesday looks for him looks like for him sending number three make sure there's no love so we hate him for knowing the answer to that question what does it feel like to have sex with endless women you know but but I'm glad that he did it so we don't have to do it am I right guys are you glad that Elon Musk told us what it feels like to sleep with endless women without love because I was going to go out and do it I had plans for the week I was like you know what I'm going to do this week I haven't tried this before but I'm gonna try having endless sex with women who don't love me see what it's all about but then I would have found out it was cursed in all her life and so I'm glad that must did it so I don't have to but there is something left out of this analysis they're sleeping with women endlessly without love is a cursed and hollow life how does it compare to being married to one person I mean I think that's the valid comparison I would agree with them that maybe it isn't you know a cursed and hollow life but how does it compare to the alternative you know what is the worst advice anybody ever gave the worst advice is Follow Your Passion you know you know what the second worst advice is find a find a good mate it's the worst device anybody's ever given find a good mate you know one that will make your life better and do you know why that's the worst advice in the world because I'm no expert I'm not a marriage expert I'm just going to put this out there see you can do with it what you will I'm almost positive that a hundred percent of people who get married think they picked the right one do you have a different feeling about that are there a lot of people getting married saying you know this mate I picked is total but I just feel like getting married no I believe that everybody enters an illusion in which they figure that whatever flaws the other person has they'll they'll work it out and there are no new flaws there won't be any new ones you've seen everything there is to see and so that therefore a reasonable and a smart person using good judgment can go out and find a good solid mate and have a solid life because of it now some of you say it was cut you idiot you idiot there are plenty of examples I mean maybe it's not over 50 percent of the population but there are plenty of plenty of examples of people who looked and they found the right person are you going to tell me that would you would you like to tell me that there are many examples you've seen it yourself many of you are the example where the the correct mate which you wisely and with your good judgments and your free will you chose that good mate and because of your good choice things are better for you how many years raise your hand if you're in that category you were you wisely picked the right mate and it totally worked out for you go how many of you so and there and therefore would be a good technique right yeah all right does anybody see what's wrong with your analysis do I have to be the first one to tell you you see what's wrong with the analysis all right you take a million people and you randomly pair them with each other just randomly would some of them uh have happy marriages just randomly paired what do you say of course they would of course they would yeah suppose you had an AI match people would you know if you had a million of them would some of them have amazing marriages I think so I think so yeah does that does that indicate that you can choose the right mate because lots of people have done it Alexa cancel I don't know what that was all about but so so would you say that the evidence is there there are plenty of examples of people who consciously and this is the important part they were consciously looking for a good mate they found one they lived their whole life happy that they found one and that's proof that it's a good idea would you agree with that statement is basically solid well maybe not proof in a scientific sense but it's very solid solid evidence because you know lots of people you personally know lots of people who put the effort in found somebody and it worked and it worked their whole life and they were really happy about it right that's not that's not really thinking what you're doing there there's no there's no sense of reason or logic to that whatsoever it's just the law of big numbers if you have a lot of people doing something somebody's going to win that's it that's the whole story if a lot of people are doing a thing some of them are going to get lucky every time not sometimes every time so what would you imagine would be the rate of people getting lucky that would indicate his luck versus something that would indicate it's a solid plan well let me give you an example another solid plan would be if you wanted a good life you would stay in the jail you'd learn some skills uh you know you'd basically stay off drugs do some things how often does that keep you from being poor if you do those few simple things that anybody can do it's hard but anybody can do it and the answer is almost no poor people in that group if you you know build skills go to school stay in a jail do the basics pretty much all of you are successful what's the success rate for picking a spouse now remember you've got to you you're not discounting the people who get divorced you have to include the people who stayed married but kind of wish they hadn't right so so marriage is more of a maybe I'd say a 25 success rate if you talk about your whole life 25 percent does 25 percent sound like chance or the result of people who knew exactly what they were doing they knew exactly what a good mate would look like and they went out and tried to get one does it look like that have you ever noticed that people tend to marry the people they work with what are the odds you met your soulmate at work it's mostly where people meet people right the thing we know of people about people is that they can fall in love with whoever's around would you agree with that statement we're not looking for our soulmate among the 8 billion people on earth we easily fall in love with whoever's nearby just proximity seems to be enough so do you how many of the people who just fell in love because they happen to be in the proximity of another person who is willing to you know say yes how many of them are a good match it would be kind of weird if they were so I would say that 25 success rate of picking the right mate and making it last a lifetime could be a little more could be a little less it's definitely not over 50 percent so what kind of advice is it to give somebody advice that could not work more than half the time is that a solid advice advice that will not work at least half of the time I would call that bad advice because you do not have a mechanism or the capability to pick a good mate now I suppose there's some really super obvious stuff like you know somebody who's been in and out of jail their entire life and it was no intention of stopping crying I wouldn't marry that person right but I don't think that's what anybody's talking about I think most people are looking at average looking people and saying I think that's my person I think that's the one that will work but it's not because they're so smart or they knew how to pick a good person yeah no I think it's pure magical thinking that you can pick the right person that said that said you should try as hard as you can to pick the right person I'm just saying it's magical thinking to think that's some kind of formula for Success it's not something you should try to do but you really don't know how to do it nobody does uh because it's mostly luck all right um there's yet another announcement about AI movies and now this Gen 2 I don't know if it's hn or Gen 2 or whatever it is but there's some new AI that can make movies make an entire movie just from some prompts um here's my prediction about movies made by AI do you know why I don't watch television right now besides the fact the content is bad is because there are so many streaming services and each one takes a lot of effort to make it work on any given day like I've got streaming services that work on some some devices but not others I could probably fix that but I sometimes I just want to watch a show so I'll just go to the other streaming device so I've got all these streaming devices and as I've said many times instead of watching content which is what I used to do now I just look for content and I'm sure that there's something better I haven't found yet and then I never watch any content so the amount of content made watching content impractical would you agree you understand what I'm saying right it's like going to The Cheesecake Factory and they've got the 50 page menu and you're sitting there with somebody who's not good at making decisions about food it's don't go to The Cheesecake Factory door Dash do not go there with somebody who's not good with decisions you're going to be there a long time yeah would you like to see my impression of going to The Cheesecake Factory vegetarian page all right see a fish vegetarian I'll do the same thing I did last time good and decision mate and here's me for the rest of the 15 minutes that's me eating at the Cheesecake Factory with anybody um so where was I going on that oh AI movies I think when AI can make movies everybody's going to make an AI movie would you agree the moment you can make a movie just by typing in some text there's going to be so many AI movies how are you ever going to watch anything do you think any of these AI movies are going to be good probably not I mean it's based on human patterns and only want to have you know a thousand movies are good so it's not going to be better than one in a thousand but you know it's going to be different there will be a billion of them right when you go to look for a movie there will be a billion a billion movies like actually a billion and how many of those will be good maybe none maybe one in a thousand how long are you going to look for the good ones how much time are you going to spend looking for the good one now here's even like a deeper a deeper analysis of this uh years ago I made the mistake of trying to become a script writer for movies so I was going to make a Dilbert movie and I you know read some books and studied up on the structure of scripts unfortunately that process ruined movies for me forever because once you know how a script has to be written in order to make it onto the screen you realize it's a formula and if you don't use the formula you're not going to get it made nobody's going to fund it because they need the formula that's what works but once you see the formula and you're like oh it's a three-act play I get it this is the First Act we have to go through somebody got hurt something bad happened all right then third act so and then you know that the B plot interferes with the a plot you know that anything you see that's called out the First Act has to be important in the last act or else they wouldn't call it on the First Act and once you see the whole process and the the structure it doesn't look like art anymore and when it stops looking like art it loses all of its punch so I would say that and other people have had the same experience I've talked to them the moment you can see the gears you you lose all your love of the movies I don't know how people make movies make make movies and watch them because they just should know too much maybe they watch them for a different reason to see how well they're made or something I don't know but once there are tons of AI mu movies and they're all using the same formulas that humans use and there's billions of them I think this will destroy movies as an art form I just don't think movies will be a thing reels might be a thing but not movies and of course when I say that is more like radio you know radio lasted forever even though television was supposed to get rid of it so there will be probably some AI movies and other movies but you know movies as a major cultural phenomenon should shrink to a niche all right uh Democrats really don't like free speech you know everybody says that but when you see these numbers it's shocking so Pew research or the Pew group or wherever there found that Democrats and Democrat leading Independents are much more likely than Republicans and Republican leaners to support the U.S government taking steps to restrict false information now this isn't just free speech it's specifically about false information so 70 percent of Democrats and leaning Democrats think the government should restrict what is in their opinion false information and 39 of Republicans say the same so before any of you Republicans get all feeling good about yourself 39 percent of Republicans think the government should restrict bad information really how did we get to this place you see the problem is that this requires somebody to know what information is good as soon as you you say somebody's going to be the judge of what good information is and what's bad information you're dead you are so dead if you let somebody decide for you what's true you cannot live in that world that is the end that's the end of the Republic how do 70 percent of uh Democrats and 39 percent of Republicans not know that allowing the government to tell you what's true would be the end of the Republic how do they not know that what's going wrong here and my best guess is at least with the Democrats is that they've been so propagandized that Republicans are are putting out bad information that they can't see that their own information is bad as well is that what's happening would you say that the propaganda makes them think that the only bad information is coming from their enemies they don't understand that the bad information is coming from inside the house as they still don't know it even after the pandemic think about that even after the pandemic when we've learned almost everything the government told us was a known lie they weren't just wrong they knew they were lying and yet the Democrats 70 percent of them somehow are not influenced by the fact that we know the government lied to us massively not only about that but everything from the laptop to you name it and and that doesn't have an influence seventy percent of the Democrat leaders and Democrats are not influenced by recent events they still want somebody to tell them what's true or more importantly to tell the other side what's true here's here's my take on this I think this is I think that it's just a team play response I think that when people answered the question they were answering as Democrats uh well I would like my enemies not to talk as much I think that's what it is but if you ask them if you I think if you took any of these 70 percent and sat him down and said what I just had just the two of you talking not a poll say all right you know that both sides have put out bad information well yes that's true right and you know that if somebody in particular is in charge of telling you what's true you know that you're in big trouble right yeah that's true I mean I don't think anybody actually holds this opinion isn't that weird people are giving opinions they don't hold because they they think you probably have a Strategic Benefit I think so I think people are just asking the answering what would be a philosophical question I think they're answering it strategically partly what's happening all right um but is it more than just false information wouldn't you say that um there's also a suppression by the left of opinion don't you think that it's more than just what's true or what's false but that opinion is also being suppressed you know stuff that's clearly opinion because some of the opinion is about what's true and what's not true so you end up blocking opinion when you try to Black Block fact all right um now it might be just because there's so many Democrats who are unable to speak in coherent sentences you got your commonly Harris your Joe Biden your fetamine your Senator Feinstein Feinstein who actually can't communicate anymore but now we can add to that Mitch Mc.
Connell if you saw Mitch Mc.
Connell's tragic press announcement and he stood there and actually couldn't speak and he looked like he was having some kind of an event in his head uh he apparently can speak so he did because he did come back but he's in bad shape so by my count that is five major members of our government who can't form sentences is that right tell me I'm wrong there are four elected people who are really prominent these are not minor people these are prominent politicians Kamala Harris Joe Biden uh fetterman Feinstein and now Mitch Mc.
Connell how's this okay how is this okay I mean really there's nobody who can tell Mitch Mc.
Connell it's it's time I'm uh I'm pretty disappointed in Republicans you know let me just say this if you're a Republican or a conservative and you've been saying that Joe Biden needs to step down because of age but you're not saying about Mitch Mc.
Connell then we can't take you seriously you're not a real serious person both of them need to step down like really soon yeah Grassley actually is weirdly Grassley seems pretty capable doesn't he relatively speaking but you know like you said he's close so yeah I mean the the team play here is just disgusting because none of these people would be in power if people were trying to pick good people right so picky a good mate is like picking a good politician you have every good intention of doing it but then you know there are reasons there are reasons why you gotta pick these bad ones and we're going to use those raisins speaking of bad ones um Adam Schiff was at Adam Schiff is so entertaining because he I don't know what's in his head but it seems that he must be aware that he can say anything and the News won't check him on his side you know only the Republicans will fact check him and nobody he doesn't care about them because his base and his voters will never see it so he said quote the Republican desire to impeach someone anyone no matter if there's any evidence just shows how they have descended into chaos right so the Republicans are crazy because they want to impeach the person who's in charge of the Border who's just letting everybody in that's crazy it's crazy to want to impeach somebody who's just not doing the job on a vital thing and of course the Biden stuff is just beyond the pale at this point so at the same time there might be a trump indictment today has there been any news yet on a trump indictment don't they usually happen in the morning can we say there will be no Trump indictment today am I wrong that they always happen in the morning or is that just me imagining it maybe I'm imagining that all right but we'll keep waiting that so I tweeted because I thought it was funny that uh the news today has UFOs and the possible Trump indictment uh that's got to tell you the Hunter's in trouble but then somebody pointed out to ruin my fund that the UFOs are that's all the Republican process so the Republicans are not trying to cover up any hunter stories but it is funny that we get these two flashy stories at the same time Hunter Hunter is in trouble all right coincidence anyway you all heard by now that hunter lost his sweetheart plea deal now I'm no lawyer so I'm going to give you the idiots version of what I understand about this so Hunter had this sweetheart deal worked out in which you would plead guilty to some minor stuff among a large bag of potential stuff that could have been even worse now that's unusual normally you would you know plead guilty to well let me take another tact on this so the idea was at least these smart people are saying that it seems to have been crafted explicitly to get Hunter off but more importantly to prevent anybody from ever finding out more information and the way they would do that is have a deal in which there's no trial so you don't have the discovery of the trial but moreover if the Press asks for asked questions they would still be able to say that the investigations are ongoing so somehow they were going to say we've made a deal and all the investigations are closed while also saying they're still open so we can't talk about it it was some weird situation that it was ridiculous on its surface and was really transparent even to the judge who overturned it because it seemed obvious this this was so non-standard it could only be put together for the purpose of protecting Hunter could not have been done in any reasonable person's opinion for any kind of Justice or you know normal process that another person would go through so here's my big question is this going to unravel everything will everything become Delight now because if Hunter can be prosecuted doesn't that open up the the ability to investigate everything related to it which would necessarily include the entire Biden criminal family organization and by the way I have no problem saying it's a Biden crime family because I think I think the evidence in the news is now overwhelming and it seems to me that the uh the 20 shell companies and the six Banks and all that stuff you could you could do away with all the alleged audio tapes you know let's say we never hear any of these alleged Ukrainian audio tapes I don't think we ever will uh you could say that all the the documents like that 1023 you could say those are all fake but all you need is to know that a huge amount of money flowed from other countries into a Labyrinth of shell companies and banks that has no purpose other than to hide your activity and that's the whole that's the whole story you don't need any documentation all you have to do is show this flow of money and the structure it flowed into and then where it ended up you know now now we do have direct Witnesses right we've got the Devon Archer and Etc Tony bobolinski so we have we have direct uh eyewitnesses under oath and we've got the bank records and the money and where it went right now although I would yeah you make a good point I always say people are innocent until proven guilty but if I watch somebody shoot somebody in my living room with my own eyes and I'm standing right next to him I'm not going to say that that person is innocent you know I don't need that I don't need the court to validate it because I can observe it directly this is one of those cases where you can observe it directly because um Hunter's defense has offered no explanation for why you would have all these shell companies and Banks and even what they did for the money you know what was the product they gave for the money without that I would say this is as obvious as watching somebody murder somebody right in front of you and that that would be a real it's a very rare exception to innocent until proven guilty now somebody who definitely should be innocent until proven guilty would be Andrew Tate because we don't really know anything about that do we we know these allegations but nothing nothing really sounds right about any of it as Romania you don't know if there's corruption so edutate is the perfect example of innocent until proven guilty no matter what the truth is whereas the this Hunter situation is was so well understood that I think you can you can go beyond the the court opinion to have your own opinion about it now I would say that's different than the Trump boxes because the Trump box case um really relies on a lot of legal Theory and who did what exactly when and I would say that's innocent until proven guilty I mean it looks like maybe there were some technical violations that nobody should care about but yeah anyway um so we'll see what comes to that but it does look like uh I would say there's no chance of Joe Biden um being the next president do you think there's any chance of that now because I think the evidence that we have already would guarantee he can't win against any Republican who's sane and you're going to have you can have strong Republicans going into the race whoever it is you know it looks like Trump at the moment but no matter who it is you know any of the top four is going to just destroy Biden I mean all you have to do imagine the debate imagine a debate in which Trump or somebody says look we've discovered 20 shell companies six Banks and whatever the number is 17 million dollars that flowed into the family and no explanation of what services were provided for that and no explanation of why you needed to hide that money Now ladies and gentlemen of America I submit to you that if they offered a defense you should consider it they've now offered a defense and the the facts are no longer under dispute look with your own eyes see it with your own eyes this is the swamp this is what I'm trying to get rid of and I'm trying to get rid of the head of the swamp first let me take the head of the snake and we'll worry about the rest of the snake when I get elected but I think all of you can see what I see you know although I agree that people are innocent until proven guilty there is no other explanation for this money flowing from other countries and from the countries that were exactly the portfolios that Biden was controlling in terms of policy so let's not get caught up into the legal details you can all see the stuff that nobody's arguing about you can all see for yourself it's been proven we have the documents the money flowed from other countries there was no there was no product or service provided this is the swamp this is what you need to get rid of everybody wins in that case yeah now I believe that the Democrats are unwilling to rig the election for Biden even if they could and there's no evidence that they ever did but if they could hypothetically I don't think they would because I think they don't want him to run it's too much trouble so even CNN you know is starting to run some anti-biden commentary all right so yeah I think I think uh Biden's done that's my prediction my prediction is that Biden uh can't win so I'm going to go with doesn't matter who does win it matters but that's not part of the prediction prediction is Biden will not be president whether he gets whether he gets the primary or not he doesn't have I'd say any chance of winning at this point um this will be a good test have you heard anybody else say that Biden can't win you know based on the hunter stuff especially as anybody in the bunded space said because I think most people are still on the page the Democrats are thinking he can win and Republicans are thinking he can win because something will happen with the election right where the Democrats don't care if he's sentient or not right so I I don't know how many people have predicted this if any I haven't heard it from anybody but I'm going to say there isn't any chance he can be president again so between his health and the hunter stuff and the fact that the Democrats don't want to put up with it again and even CNN started to change his tune a little bit on the reporting uh yeah now remember you're saying that the cheating can make him president I'm saying that they wouldn't cheat in this case because they don't want him to be president so if they were going to be cheating it would make far more sense to put in a better candidate ahead of time so you don't have to cheat see where I'm going if you imagine there's such a thing as some you know Democrat conspiracy to cheat they would be pretty well organized would you agree if that existed and there's no evidence of it but if it existed they'd be well organized but there would certainly be well organized enough to make sure they were not in that position to make sure that Biden was not running and I think they could make that happen they they the imaginary people in charge so that's all just imagining that such people exist maybe they do maybe don't I don't know all right um how bad should we uh be about this I I think we found something we can all come together on um and that's rare the left the right black white uh lgbtq there's one thing we can come together as I think we can come together as nation and universally condemn those things that nobody ever said can we agree would you would you join with me and to condemn the terrible things that nobody's ever said for example nobody's ever said that slaves had a good deal nobody ever said that slaves were benefiting by those you know in a way that made slavery sort of a good deal by having skills right nobody's ever thought it nobody's ever said it but the entire country is deciding to argue over it the thing that nobody said and nobody believes am I wrong about that nobody said it nobody believes it and we're having a big argument about it the thing that nobody said that nobody believes so that's happening but at least we can come together on condemning the things that never happened that nobody ever said and the funniest part about that story it's um you know the the topic is uh uh history teaching in Florida and whether it should say that that the slaves were acquiring skills they had some benefit to them later on and it turns out that the people who are really mad about the De.
Santis plan for history lessons uh want to replace it with a more generic one that they're happy with and do you know what the difference is between the generic one that the unhappy people would like to replace and the one that De.
Santis wants do you know what the difference is on this question none it says the same thing same thing that slaves learn skills which they could take with them later both you know during during slavery and after and it would be better to have a skill than not to have a skill they both say that not only is the entire debate about something that nobody said nobody said the part that that the slaves had a good deal everybody said the part that they learn skills and everybody agrees that learning skills is better than not learning skills so this is like a double triple absurdity situation this is summer squared stories that aren't real but we're you know we have something to talk about all right I would like to give you the best part of my presentation today which is how to deal with the Republicans mostly the Biden Camp if we're calling Republicans extreme Mega does it seem to you they're getting some traction on this extreme Maga situation does it feel like it's working because it feels like other people are picking it up but I'm going to teach you a persuasion trick for removing extreme Mega from the attack you ready now it's not much different from other techniques so you'll recognize the technique as and embrace and amplify but I'm tweaking Embrace and amplify a little bit because Embrace and Amplified means you just Embrace somebody's dumbass idea and then you pretend you you agree with it and and they're pretending you agree surfaces all the problem with the idea this is a little bit different but it's a close cousin to that all right imagine a video skipped so it would be a viral video using actors all right the actors are a couple of very Republican ordinary looking people just like the most ordinary Republicans you could have but let's say they're a little bit overweight just so you can imagine this I'm going to draw you a picture in your head it's a little bit overweight they're very middle class so you see them in their living room sitting on the couch maybe mom is knitting or something and Dad's there with a or a man's beer not a Bud Light and they're watching the news and you hear Joe Biden say something about extreme Mega extreme Mega extreme Mega and you see the two looking at each other and they're like well we're regular mega what what would was that an upgrade is that like a promotion like I'd like to be more extreme and so you see the two people trying to figure out how they can get to extreme and so they talk to their friends you know it all happens really quickly because it's like a quick video they talk to their friends and they're like we'd like to we'd like to be more extreme and they're like well you could wear this you know this hat that has embossed lettering on it like is that extreme well compared to the regular hat that has no embossed lettering is way more extreme so you would do like little skits of regular Republicans trying to become or get upgraded to the excitement of being an extreme Mega but they can't figure out what is included so they're trying to figure out how to do it what's the process how do I get to be more extreme and of course the point of it is it's a ridiculous concept there's no such thing as an extreme Mega it's all made up so you want to embrace it so that you can mock it that's different than Embrace and amplify because when you Embrace and amplify the mocking is sort of embedded in your actions but you're not actively mocking it you're pretending like you're just playing it straight in this case you would be actively mocking it but you're embracing it before you actively mock it so close cousin of embrace and Amplified now in my opinion the silliness of extreme Mega you could immediately take it from extreme magazines like racist right yeah crazy racist but you can make extreme bag it just seems silly and cute and ridiculous just by having uh more attention to the you know the counter point what do you think would it work lots of videos of the extreme Mega and then you also get you'd also want your Republicans to make fun of it you know can you imagine Vivek or you know somebody who's got a personality saying you know are you extreme Mega do you agree with this because we Mega there's an extreme Mega wow is there any kind of a sign up for that or is it more of a self-identification how do I become more extreme Mega you know just and just just mock The Thing by smiling and laughing at it you know I don't think I'm extreme Mega enough I'm gonna you know or or how about this all right here's another idea you show somebody with a make America a great again hat on you know the red hat and then they're trying to figure out how to become extreme and then one of them has an idea and they turn the head around backwards and everybody's like I think you did it that that's like crazy oh my God my God could we do that too how did you do that and then they're all like huh and they turned their hats around they're like and suddenly they're all excited we've done it we've done it and they they go to have a drink but it's only Bud Light they're like ah it'd be hilarious you should make you should make 50 of these we should use that AI that's what you do uh so since now we've been told and I'm sure it's true because people said so that you can just write text to create a whole movie so you can just write some text to create this little play of the Maga people trying to be extreme Mega and it'll be totally watchable because AI made it right no it won't if you want if you want to if you want to show yourself that hey I can't make a movie no matter how many posts you see about it at least now it can't make a movie try to do that try to do just that little short film a two minute clip with a very clear you know message and and see you tell your AI to make that and watch how much you don't want to watch it when it's done by humans could make the hell out of that an a I can't do that yeah you need a human's annotating period because the the machine can't tell what's working and what isn't that's a human job make your bed will always be the funniest thing a mega person could do that in the humorous world would look extreme but would be silly now I was also imagining uh what would be extreme Mega sporting events you know if you had like because extreme Mega sounds like extreme sports so as imagining suppose all the extreme Magus had some kind of Olympics just for extreme magnets what what events would be there and I thought you know the the real Olympics already has the skiing and shooting I have this feeling that a republican extreme Mega events would just be regular Sports but also shooting so it'd be like tennis but you could shoot you know you can hit the ball or you can shoot it on the air you'd be like basketball but instead of playing defense you could just shoot the ball when it's in the air so I think you just take regular Sports and you add shootings you got your extreme Mega games extreme Mega we've got basketball we're shooting we've got soccer we're shooting we've got curling with shooting that's that's it all right uh we've got racing when shooting we've got lawn darts well the law and darts Standalone we that's the only one with no shooting we've just got lawn darts but you can fire them at each other it's more it's not less target practice and more team against team that cornhole it's corn it's cornhole but we're shooting and no Bud Light yeah maybe it's mowing your lawn and not drinking a Bud Light I've been mowing I'm so thirsty yeah that would be the competition you have to mow your lawn on a hot day and there has to be a cold Bud uh Bud Light sitting in front of you and you see who can go the longest without taking a sip of the Bud Light you have to just keep mowing in the Sun and you can't use sunscreen you're just getting ready yeah and then whoever whoever can last the longest uh wins that competition yeah the Mowing and resisting the Bud Light would be a good extreme Mega what else uh what would be extreme chest boxing chest box all right that's more mocking Republicans you could kind of see a chess board and then two Republicans wearing boxing gloves and they they don't know the rules of the chess game so they just punch each other instead that'd be pretty funny NASCAR we shooting all right ladies and gentlemen I think I've done what I need to do and we've accomplished uh everything except getting the locals platform to work so I'll guess I'll I'll work on that when I'm done yeah the wet t-shirt contest this up is old man uh cornhole With Grenades now you're talking jousting with baguettes okay uh yeah Sinead O'Connor passed away I didn't hear of what chess boxing is a thing is it really the wife all right competitive get off my lawn get off my porch all right I think we've done it thank you for joining and I will see you tomorrow ladies and gentlemen and if you are a member of the local Subscription Service I will probably see you tonight but I don't know how many are listening here bye for now
fix a little technical problem over in
the locals platform
but looks like the locals platform is
better than a door nail today
I'll try it one more time
hey he's looking better
not so much
well we're uh we're having a terrible
time here technically normally I'd be
halfway through the simultaneous sip but
it looks like we got nothing today
so we'll be closing up
closing up locals
and open it up on my phone
which should work
but we'll see
watch me scramble to make all this work
while you wait wishing there was
actually a show going on
yeah it looks like locals is dead
all right
today
it's all you it's all you today
would you like to start from the
beginning
good morning
would you like to take this experience
up to levels that you don't even believe
are possible
yes you do
and all you need for that is a cupboard
mugger gloss a tanker Chelsea style in
the canteen chocolate flaska vessel of
any kind fill it with your favorite
liquid I like coffee
and join me now for the
unparalleled pleasure of the dopamines
of the day the thing that makes
everything better it's called the
simultaneous sip
it happens now go
that's good stuff
all right ladies and gentlemen
have you seen any news today
well there's news all over the place
it's like news happening like you can't
even believe it
but uh let's go through it
so the Wall Street Journal is saying
that the economy grew by 2.4 percent
we'll talk about Hunter and UFOs and
stuff but it'll take a minute for all
the locals people to give up and come
over here
sorry
um
but what I thought was interesting about
this is it's good news that the economy
is doing well
but the headline was uh
U.S economic growth defies a slow down
expectations
whose expectations
whose expectations because this was my
prediction so I would like to add to my
most accurate political predictions and
most accurate pandemic predictions and
most accurate Ukraine predictions the
most accurate economic tradition
because I actually said we would not go
into a recession there we go
remember I told you I I was all excited
preliminarily yesterday about this story
that researchers had made a room
temperature superconductor
do you remember that story
took about 10 minutes for people to crap
all over it and say well let's wait to
see if anybody can reproduce this and
there's something sketchy going on and
so I would say that all of my optimism
about superconductivity completely gone
completely gone yeah it doesn't sound
like it's real but I would love to be
surprised so don't wait for any room
temperature
superconductivity it might be as likely
as
UFOs
well there's a new photo of uh
uh Wagner leader progosian
allegedly in Russia and he's just
shaking hands with some African guy
who's visiting
so that's true right
pregosian's fine he's just hanging out
hanging out in Russia
sure
yeah there was a even CNN reported that
they reported that there was a picture
of him they didn't report to use the
library thing they just said there's a
picture of him which is fair
and
uh does anybody want to think that he's
still free and just doing his own thing
he's just driving his RV around St
Petersburg
no no he's not driving his RV around the
CPS
he's certainly in uh if he's alive he's
certainly controlled by Putin at this
point
um
did you read it in the news that it was
the warmest summer
how many of you think we had the warmest
summer because of climate change the
news said so
well it may be it might actually be the
warmest summer but
I'd like to give you a Counterpoint
which doesn't it doesn't necessarily
refute everything you've heard but it
gives you context so here's some better
context from Alex Epstein
uh you said anyone comment uh
commentating responsibly on summer
temperatures must acknowledge four facts
all right see if you agree with these
four facts
cold related deaths are much greater
than he related to us do you know that
that the number of people who died
because it's too cold is way higher than
the number of people who die because
it's warm
so in theory
you could imagine that depending on
where it got warmer
it would save lives right so as the cold
places got warmer but the places that
are already hot didn't get warmer or
didn't get much warmer we'd be better
off wouldn't we well and then then the
reverse would be true if the hot places
got hotter and the cool places got
colder that probably would be worse
um
but according to Alex Earth is warming
slowly and less in warm places oh so
that's good so the warming is more
concentrated in the cold places
which should save lives
um fossil fuels number three fossil
fuels make us safer from dangerous
temperatures
yeah what would you do if you didn't
have fossil fuels
wouldn't you be more exposed to what the
weather can do if you can't sit in your
car or eat your house
and um
anti-fossil fuel policies increase the
danger from cold indeed well that makes
sense if fossil fuels protect you from
temperature extremes then not having
them would make you less safe
so I think a lot of this turns on these
two points it's better to be warmer than
cold
and it's
um
and it's not warming as much in the
places that are already warm now this is
my problem with averages
if somebody told you that the average
temperature the Earth was going up
that's pretty scary right but what if
they told you that it's warming up in
the places that are too cold
and the places that are already hot
nobody lives there because it's a desert
anyway
for example now that's the extreme
that's I'm exaggerating the effect here
but uh
that's your counter argument
so I'm not saying that the warming the
warming is not a problem
I don't know might be but we're pretty
good at dealing with that kind of
problem
all right here's a quiz for you and the
answer is not 25 percent
all right I'm going to see I can see if
you can get this right
you know put on your thinking gaps all
right there was a article by Katie mogg
in the Wall Street Journal and
apparently there's a trend called the
hashtag lazygirljob
and a lazy girl job would be defined as
a job often you could work at home you
don't put in too many hours it might be
an online kind of thing you don't make
that much money but you make enough
especially if you live with your
boyfriend or something
so apparently it's this big old trend
um to
have a job that you can just sort of
pay the rent but you're not looking to
kill you know kill it this would be the
opposite of leaning in
this would be like sleeping in
so apparently leaning in has turned into
sleeping in
uh but that's not the question here's
the question
this phenomenon has been growing lately
and it's racked up close to 18 million
views on a particular social media
Network go Which social media Network
well just a hypothetic well what would
be a social media Network that would
encourage working age humans in the
United States do not work hard
but maybe not send that same message to
let's say China
what what would be
what would be a platform that would do
that
I mean who would tell Americans to be
lazier because it's awesome while not
telling Chinese citizens to be lazy
because it's not awesome who would do
that
the answer is
tick tock
are you surprised
oh big surprise a trend that's really
bad for Americans seems to be running on
Tick Tock which does not run in the same
form in China
so why are people talked into being
trans if they never thought of it in
their life before Tick Tock but not in
China they don't run it there
and why are people told to not work so
hard
well it doesn't happen in China
and
what is uh what's Congress looking at
this week
the fact that it's obvious that we have
a brainwashing technology that's been
inserted in the phone of every Young
American
or we have a hearing on that today no no
it's about aliens UFOs
because it's summer and you don't talk
about real stuff in the summer you fool
let's talk about UFOs
as you know the Congress had some
hearings about whether the government
has secret UFOs that they're keeping
from us and I don't know about you
but after listening to some of the
testimony about the UFOs
I'm left with more questions than
answers
more questions than answers here are
some of the questions I have
how much money did Hunter get from the
UFOs
I assume you shall come down I just
don't know how much money he made
there's no reporting on that number two
are we using this Advanced alien
technology that we have to make video
cameras for the White House that can't
see Hunter
yeah Special technology the security
cameras can see everybody
except Hunter he's just invisible on
camera
and most importantly number three how
many aliens are in Trump's boxes
must be a few because one thing we know
is that we can't be told what's in the
boxes
I can't think of anything else that they
wouldn't tell us
because anything else they could tell us
am I right they could tell us in a
general way
again let me give you example if Trump's
boxes of Secrets had attack plans for
Iran
we would hear that they just wouldn't
tell us the details if there were
nuclear secrets
we would hear that they just wouldn't
tell us the actual Secrets right if he
had boxes that were full of let's say
sensitive conversations with a foreign
adversary or for an ally or maybe some
something that we'd found about a
foreign adversary
we would have heard that we just
wouldn't hear the details of it right
what's the one thing that could be in
the boxes
that even the government wouldn't even
say anything about
aliens aliens there have to be aliens in
the boxes because it's the only thing
they wouldn't want to say anything about
otherwise they would just say well yes
he hasn't we just can't tell you the
details but they can't tell you that
they do have aliens they just don't want
to tell you which ones see they can't
tell you that okay I'm joking if you
can't tell if you can't tell I'm joking
I'm joking all right
um
Elon Musk weighed in on a Andrew Tate
tweet
um then Tate was talking about you know
men who sleep with a lot of women and
vice versa and musk tweeted to that he
said to sleep with women endlessly
without love is a cursed and hollow life
well
if you were not already aiding Elon Musk
for being the richest person in the
world
can you he can you hate him now for
apparently knowing the answer to this
question
how you feel when you have slept with
endless women without love
it didn't sound like he was guessing
I feel like if you're the richest man in
the world and you're unmarried you have
experienced sleeping with endless women
without love
I think that's probably what a Tuesday
looks for him looks like for him
sending number three
make sure there's no love
so we hate him for knowing the answer to
that question what does it feel like to
have sex with endless women
you know but but I'm glad that he did it
so we don't have to do it am I right
guys are you glad that Elon Musk
told us what it feels like to sleep with
endless women without love because I was
going to go out and do it
I had plans for the week I was like you
know what I'm going to do this week I
haven't tried this before but I'm gonna
try having endless sex with women who
don't love me
see what it's all about but then I would
have found out it was cursed in all her
life and so I'm glad that must did it so
I don't have to but there is something
left out of this analysis
they're sleeping with women endlessly
without love is a cursed and hollow life
how does it compare to being married to
one person
I mean I think that's the valid
comparison
I would agree with them that maybe it
isn't you know a cursed and hollow life
but how does it compare to the
alternative
you know what is the worst advice
anybody ever gave
the worst advice is Follow Your Passion
you know you know what the second worst
advice is
find a find a good mate
it's the worst device anybody's ever
given find a good mate you know one that
will make your life better and do you
know why that's the worst advice in the
world
because I'm no expert I'm not a marriage
expert I'm just going to put this out
there
see you can do with it what you will
I'm almost positive
that a hundred percent of people who get
married
think they picked the right one
do you have a different feeling about
that are there a lot of people getting
married saying you know this mate I
picked is total but I just feel
like getting married
no I believe that everybody enters an
illusion in which they figure that
whatever flaws the other person has
they'll they'll work it out
and there are no new flaws there won't
be any new ones you've seen everything
there is to see
and so that therefore a reasonable and a
smart person using good judgment can go
out and find a good solid mate and have
a solid life because of it
now some of you say it was cut you
idiot you idiot there are plenty
of examples I mean maybe it's not over
50 percent of the population but there
are plenty of plenty of examples of
people who looked and they found the
right person
are you going to tell me that would you
would you like to tell me that there are
many examples you've seen it yourself
many of you are the example where the
the correct mate which you wisely and
with your good judgments and your free
will you chose that good mate and
because of your good choice things are
better for you how many years raise your
hand if you're in that category you were
you wisely picked the right mate and it
totally worked out for you go how many
of you
so and there and therefore would be a
good technique right yeah
all right does anybody see what's wrong
with your analysis do I have to be the
first one to tell you
you see what's wrong with the analysis
all right you take a million people and
you randomly pair them with each other
just randomly
would some of them uh have happy
marriages
just randomly paired
what do you say
of course they would of course they
would yeah suppose you had an AI match
people
would you know if you had a million of
them would some of them have amazing
marriages
I think so I think so yeah does that
does that indicate that you can choose
the right mate
because lots of people have done it
Alexa cancel
I don't know what that was all about but
so so would you say that the evidence is
there there are plenty of examples of
people who consciously and this is the
important part they were consciously
looking for a good mate
they found one they lived their whole
life happy that they found one and
that's proof that it's a good idea would
you agree with that statement
is basically solid well maybe not proof
in a scientific sense but it's very
solid solid evidence
because you know lots of people you
personally know lots of people who put
the effort in found somebody and it
worked and it worked their whole life
and they were really happy about it
right
that's not that's not really thinking
what you're doing there
there's no there's no sense of reason or
logic to that whatsoever
it's just the law of big numbers
if you have a lot of people doing
something somebody's going to win
that's it that's the whole story if a
lot of people are doing a thing
some of them are going to get lucky
every time not sometimes every time
so what would you imagine would be the
rate of people getting lucky that would
indicate his luck
versus something that would indicate
it's a solid plan
well let me give you an example another
solid plan would be if you wanted a good
life you would stay in the jail you'd
learn some skills uh
you know you'd basically
stay off drugs do some things how often
does that keep you from being poor
if you do those few simple things that
anybody can do it's hard but anybody can
do it and the answer is
almost no poor people in that group
if you you know build skills go to
school stay in a jail do the basics
pretty much all of you are successful
what's the success rate for picking a
spouse
now remember you've got to you you're
not discounting the people who get
divorced you have to include the people
who stayed married but kind of wish they
hadn't
right
so so marriage is more of a maybe I'd
say a 25 success rate
if you talk about your whole life 25
percent
does 25 percent sound like chance
or the result of people who knew exactly
what they were doing they knew exactly
what a good mate would look like and
they went out and tried to get one
does it look like that
have you ever noticed that people tend
to marry the people they work with
what are the odds you met your soulmate
at work
it's mostly where people meet people
right
the thing we know of people about people
is that they can fall in love with
whoever's around
would you agree with that statement
we're not looking for our soulmate among
the 8 billion people on earth
we easily fall in love with whoever's
nearby
just proximity seems to be enough so do
you how many of the people who just fell
in love because they happen to be in the
proximity of another person who is
willing to you know say yes
how many of them are a good match
it would be kind of weird if they were
so I would say that 25 success rate of
picking the right mate and making it
last a lifetime
could be a little more could be a little
less it's definitely not over 50 percent
so what kind of advice is it to give
somebody advice that could not work more
than half the time
is that a solid advice
advice that will not work
at least half of the time
I would call that bad advice
because you do not have a mechanism or
the capability to pick a good mate
now I suppose there's some really super
obvious stuff like you know somebody
who's been in and out of jail their
entire life
and it was no intention of stopping
crying I wouldn't marry that person
right
but I don't think that's what anybody's
talking about I think most people are
looking at average looking people
and saying I think that's my person I
think that's the one that will work but
it's not because they're so smart or
they knew how to pick a good person
yeah no I think it's pure magical
thinking that you can pick the right
person that said that said you should
try as hard as you can to pick the right
person
I'm just saying it's magical thinking to
think that's some kind of formula for
Success it's not
something you should try to do but you
really don't know how to do it nobody
does
uh because it's mostly luck
all right
um there's yet another
announcement about AI movies and now
this Gen 2
I don't know if it's hn or Gen 2 or
whatever it is but there's some new AI
that
can make movies make an entire movie
just from some prompts
um here's my prediction about movies
made by AI
do you know why I don't watch television
right now
besides the fact the content is bad is
because there are so many streaming
services and each one takes a lot of
effort to make it work on any given day
like I've got streaming services that
work on some some devices but not others
I could probably fix that
but I sometimes I just want to watch a
show
so I'll just go to the other streaming
device
so I've got all these streaming devices
and as I've said many times instead of
watching content which is what I used to
do now I just look for content and I'm
sure that there's something better I
haven't found yet and then I never watch
any content
so the amount of content
made watching content impractical
would you agree you understand what I'm
saying right it's like going to The
Cheesecake Factory and they've got the
50 page menu
and you're sitting there with somebody
who's not good at making decisions about
food
it's don't go to The Cheesecake Factory
door Dash do not go there with somebody
who's not good with decisions you're
going to be there a long time
yeah would you like to see my impression
of going to The Cheesecake Factory
vegetarian page
all right see a fish vegetarian I'll do
the same thing I did last time good and
decision mate
and here's me for the rest of the 15
minutes
[Music]
that's me eating at the Cheesecake
Factory with anybody
um
so where was I going on that oh AI
movies I think when AI can make movies
everybody's going to make an AI movie
would you agree
the moment you can make a movie just by
typing in some text
there's going to be so many AI movies
how are you ever going to watch anything
do you think any of these AI movies are
going to be good
probably not I mean it's based on human
patterns and only want to have you know
a thousand movies are good
so it's not going to be better than one
in a thousand but you know it's going to
be different
there will be a billion of them
right when you go to look for a movie
there will be a billion
a billion movies
like actually a billion
and how many of those will be good maybe
none
maybe one in a thousand
how long are you going to look for the
good ones
how much time are you going to spend
looking for the good one now here's even
like a deeper a deeper analysis of this
uh years ago I made the mistake of
trying to become a script writer for
movies so I was going to make a Dilbert
movie and I you know read some books and
studied up on the structure of scripts
unfortunately that process ruined movies
for me forever
because once you know how a script has
to be written in order to make it onto
the screen
you realize it's a formula and if you
don't use the formula you're not going
to get it made nobody's going to fund it
because they need the formula that's
what works but once you see the formula
and you're like oh it's a three-act play
I get it this is the First Act we have
to go through somebody got hurt
something bad happened all right then
third act so and then you know that the
B plot interferes with the a plot you
know that anything you see that's called
out the First Act has to be important in
the last act or else they wouldn't call
it on the First Act and once you see the
whole process and the the structure it
doesn't look like art anymore
and when it stops looking like art it
loses all of its punch
so I would say that and other people
have had the same experience I've talked
to them the moment you can see the gears
you you lose all your love of the movies
I don't know how people make movies make
make movies and watch them because they
just should know too much maybe they
watch them for a different reason to see
how well they're made or something I
don't know
but once there are tons of AI mu movies
and they're all using the same formulas
that humans use and there's billions of
them I think this will destroy movies as
an art form
I just don't think movies will be a
thing
reels might be a thing
but not movies
and of course when I say that is more
like radio you know radio lasted forever
even though television was supposed to
get rid of it so there will be probably
some AI movies and other movies but you
know movies as a major cultural
phenomenon should shrink to a niche
all right
uh Democrats really don't like free
speech you know everybody says that but
when you see these numbers it's shocking
so Pew research or the Pew group or
wherever there found that Democrats and
Democrat leading Independents are much
more likely than Republicans and
Republican leaners
to support the U.S government taking
steps to restrict false information now
this isn't just free speech it's
specifically about false information
so 70 percent of Democrats and leaning
Democrats think the government should
restrict what is in their opinion false
information
and 39 of Republicans say the same
so before any of you Republicans get all
feeling good about yourself
39 percent of Republicans think the
government should restrict bad
information
really how did we get to this place you
see the problem is that this requires
somebody to know what information is
good
as soon as you you say somebody's going
to be the judge of what good information
is and what's bad information you're
dead
you are so dead if you let somebody
decide for you what's true
you cannot live in that world that is
the end
that's the end of the Republic
how do 70 percent of uh
Democrats and 39 percent of Republicans
not know
that allowing the government to tell you
what's true
would be the end of the Republic how do
they not know that
what's going wrong here
and my best guess is at least with the
Democrats is that they've been so
propagandized
that Republicans are are putting out bad
information
that they can't see that their own
information is bad as well
is that what's happening
would you say that the propaganda makes
them think that the only bad information
is coming from their enemies
they don't understand that the bad
information is coming from inside the
house
as they still don't know it even after
the pandemic
think about that even after the pandemic
when we've learned almost everything the
government told us was a known lie they
weren't just wrong they knew they were
lying
and yet
the Democrats 70 percent of them somehow
are not influenced by the fact that we
know the government lied to us massively
not only about that but everything from
the laptop to you name it and
and that doesn't have an influence
seventy percent of the Democrat leaders
and Democrats are not influenced by
recent events
they still want somebody to tell them
what's true or more importantly to tell
the other side what's true here's here's
my take on this I think this is
I think that it's just a team play
response I think that when people
answered the question they were
answering as Democrats
uh well I would like my enemies not to
talk as much I think that's what it is
but if you ask them if you I think if
you took any of these 70 percent and sat
him down and said what I just had just
the two of you talking not a poll say
all right you know that both sides have
put out bad information
well yes that's true right
and you know that if somebody in
particular is in charge of telling you
what's true
you know that you're in big trouble
right
yeah that's true I mean I don't think
anybody actually holds this opinion
isn't that weird people are giving
opinions they don't hold
because they they think you probably
have a Strategic Benefit I think so I
think people are just asking the
answering what would be a philosophical
question
I think they're answering it
strategically
partly what's happening
all right
um but is it more than just false
information wouldn't you say that
um there's also a suppression by the
left of opinion
don't you think that it's more than just
what's true or what's false
but that opinion is also being
suppressed you know stuff that's clearly
opinion
because some of the opinion is about
what's true and what's not true so you
end up blocking opinion
when you try to Black Block fact
all right
um
now it might be just because there's so
many Democrats who are unable to speak
in coherent sentences you got your
commonly Harris your Joe Biden your
fetamine your Senator Feinstein
Feinstein who
actually can't communicate anymore
but now we can add to that Mitch
McConnell if you saw Mitch McConnell's
tragic press announcement and he stood
there and actually couldn't speak
and he looked like he was having some
kind of an event in his head
uh he apparently can speak so he did
because he did come back but he's in bad
shape
so by my count that is five major
members of our government who can't form
sentences
is that right tell me I'm wrong there
are four elected people who are really
prominent these are not minor people
these are prominent politicians Kamala
Harris Joe Biden uh fetterman Feinstein
and now Mitch McConnell
how's this okay
how is this okay
I mean really
there's nobody who can tell Mitch
McConnell it's it's time
I'm uh I'm pretty disappointed in
Republicans
you know let me just say this if you're
a Republican or a conservative and
you've been saying that Joe Biden needs
to step down because of age
but you're not saying about Mitch
McConnell
then we can't take you seriously you're
not a real serious person both of them
need to step down
like really soon
yeah Grassley actually is weirdly
Grassley seems pretty capable doesn't he
relatively speaking but you know like
you said he's close
so
yeah I mean the the team play here is
just disgusting because none of these
people would be in power if people were
trying to pick good people
right so picky a good mate is like
picking a good politician
you have every good intention of doing
it but then you know there are reasons
there are reasons why you gotta pick
these bad ones
and we're going to use those raisins
speaking of bad ones
um Adam Schiff was at
Adam Schiff is so entertaining
because he
I don't know what's in his head
but it seems that he must be aware
that he can say anything
and the News won't check him on his side
you know only the Republicans will fact
check him and nobody he doesn't care
about them because his base and his
voters will never see it
so he said quote the Republican desire
to impeach someone anyone no matter if
there's any evidence just shows how they
have descended into chaos
right so the Republicans are crazy
because they want to impeach the person
who's in charge of the Border who's just
letting everybody in
that's crazy it's crazy to want to
impeach somebody who's just not doing
the job on a vital thing
and of course the Biden stuff is just
beyond the pale at this point
so at the same time there might be a
trump indictment today has there been
any news yet on a trump indictment don't
they usually happen in the morning
can we say there will be no Trump
indictment today
am I wrong that they always happen in
the morning
or is that just me imagining it
maybe I'm imagining that all right
but we'll keep waiting that so I tweeted
because I thought it was funny that uh
the news today has UFOs and the possible
Trump indictment uh that's got to tell
you the Hunter's in trouble
but then somebody pointed out to ruin my
fund that the UFOs are that's all the
Republican process
so the Republicans are not trying to
cover up any hunter stories but it is
funny that we get these two flashy
stories at the same time Hunter
Hunter is in trouble
all right coincidence anyway you all
heard by now that hunter lost his
sweetheart plea deal
now I'm no lawyer so I'm going to give
you the idiots version of what I
understand about this so Hunter had this
sweetheart deal worked out in which you
would plead guilty to some minor stuff
among a large bag of potential stuff
that could have been even worse
now that's unusual normally you would
you know plead guilty to
well let me take another tact on this
so the idea was
at least these smart people are saying
that it seems to have been crafted
explicitly to get Hunter off but more
importantly to prevent anybody from ever
finding out more information
and the way they would do that is have a
deal in which there's no trial so you
don't have the discovery of the trial
but moreover if the Press asks for asked
questions they would still be able to
say that the investigations are ongoing
so somehow they were going to say we've
made a deal and all the investigations
are closed while also saying they're
still open so we can't talk about it it
was some weird situation that
it was ridiculous on its surface
and was really transparent even to the
judge who overturned it because it
seemed obvious this this was so
non-standard it could only be put
together for the purpose of protecting
Hunter could not have been done in any
reasonable person's opinion for any kind
of Justice or you know normal process
that another person would go through
so here's my big question
is this going to unravel everything
will everything become Delight now
because
if Hunter can be prosecuted
doesn't that open up the the ability to
investigate everything related to it
which would necessarily include the
entire Biden criminal family
organization
and by the way I have no problem saying
it's a Biden crime family
because I think I think the evidence in
the news is now overwhelming
and
it seems to me that the uh the 20 shell
companies and the six Banks and all that
stuff
you could you could do away with all the
alleged audio tapes you know let's say
we never hear any of these alleged
Ukrainian audio tapes I don't think we
ever will
uh you could say that all the the
documents like that 1023 you could say
those are all fake
but all you need is to know that a huge
amount of money flowed from other
countries into a Labyrinth of shell
companies and banks that has no purpose
other than to hide your activity
and that's the whole that's the whole
story you don't need any documentation
all you have to do is show this flow of
money and the structure it flowed into
and then where it ended up
you know now now we do have direct
Witnesses right we've got the Devon
Archer and
Etc Tony bobolinski so we have we have
direct
uh eyewitnesses under oath
and we've got the bank records and the
money and where it went
right
now
although I would yeah you make a good
point I always say people are innocent
until proven guilty
but if I watch somebody shoot somebody
in my living room with my own eyes and
I'm standing right next to him I'm not
going to say that that person is
innocent
you know I don't need that I don't need
the court to validate it because I can
observe it directly this is one of those
cases where you can observe it directly
because
um Hunter's defense has offered no
explanation for why you would have all
these shell companies and Banks and even
what they did for the money you know
what was the product they gave for the
money without that I would say this is
as obvious as watching somebody murder
somebody right in front of you
and that that would be a real it's a
very rare exception to innocent until
proven guilty now somebody who
definitely should be innocent until
proven guilty would be Andrew Tate
because we don't really know anything
about that do we we know these
allegations but nothing nothing really
sounds right about any of it as Romania
you don't know if there's corruption so
edutate is the perfect example of
innocent until proven guilty
no matter what the truth is
whereas the this Hunter situation is was
so well understood
that I think you can you can go beyond
the the court opinion to have your own
opinion about it
now I would say that's different than
the Trump boxes
because the Trump box case
um
really relies on a lot of legal Theory
and who did what exactly when and I
would say that's innocent until proven
guilty I mean it looks like maybe there
were some technical violations that
nobody should care about but
yeah anyway
um
so we'll see what comes to that but it
does look like uh I would say there's no
chance of Joe Biden
um
being the next president
do you think there's any chance of that
now
because I think the evidence that we
have already would guarantee he can't
win against any Republican who's sane
and you're going to have you can have
strong Republicans going into the race
whoever it is you know it looks like
Trump at the moment
but no matter who it is you know any of
the top four is going to just destroy
Biden
I mean all you have to do imagine the
debate
imagine a debate in which Trump or
somebody says look we've discovered 20
shell companies six Banks and whatever
the number is 17 million dollars that
flowed into the family and no
explanation of what services were
provided for that
and no explanation of why you needed to
hide that money
Now ladies and gentlemen of America I
submit to you
that if they offered a defense
you should consider it they've now
offered a defense
and the the facts are no longer under
dispute
look with your own eyes see it with your
own eyes this is the swamp
this is what I'm trying to get rid of
and I'm trying to get rid of the head of
the swamp first let me take the head of
the snake and we'll worry about the rest
of the snake when I get elected but I
think all of you can see what I see
you know although I agree that people
are innocent until proven guilty there
is no other explanation for this money
flowing from other countries and from
the countries that were exactly the
portfolios that Biden was controlling in
terms of policy
so let's not get caught up into the
legal details you can all see the stuff
that nobody's arguing about
you can all see for yourself it's been
proven we have the documents the money
flowed from other countries there was no
there was no product or service provided
this is the swamp this is what you need
to get rid of
everybody wins in that case
yeah
now
I believe that the Democrats are
unwilling to rig the election for Biden
even if they could
and there's no evidence that they ever
did
but if they could hypothetically I don't
think they would
because I think they don't want him to
run
it's too much trouble
so even CNN you know is starting to run
some anti-biden commentary
all right so yeah I think I think uh
Biden's done that's my prediction my
prediction is that Biden uh can't win
so I'm going to go with doesn't matter
who does win
it matters but that's not part of the
prediction prediction is Biden will not
be president whether he gets whether he
gets the primary or not
he doesn't have I'd say any chance of
winning at this point
um
this will be a good test
have you heard anybody else say that
Biden can't win you know based on the
hunter stuff especially
as anybody in the
bunded space said because I think most
people are still on the page the
Democrats are thinking he can win
and Republicans are thinking he can win
because something will happen with the
election right where the Democrats don't
care if he's sentient or not
right so I
I don't know how many people have
predicted this if any I haven't heard it
from anybody but I'm going to say there
isn't any chance he can be president
again
so between his health and the hunter
stuff and the fact that the Democrats
don't want to put up with it again and
even CNN started to change his tune a
little bit on the reporting uh yeah now
remember you're saying that the cheating
can make him president I'm saying that
they wouldn't cheat in this case
because they don't want him to be
president
so if they were going to be cheating it
would make far more sense to put in a
better candidate ahead of time so you
don't have to cheat
see where I'm going if you imagine
there's such a thing
as some you know Democrat conspiracy to
cheat
they would be pretty well organized
would you agree if that existed and
there's no evidence of it but if it
existed they'd be well organized but
there would certainly be well organized
enough
to make sure they were not in that
position to make sure that Biden was not
running and I think they could make that
happen they they the imaginary people in
charge
so that's all just imagining that such
people exist maybe they do maybe don't I
don't know
all right um
how bad should we uh be about this I I
think we found something we can all come
together on
um and that's rare the left the right
black white
uh lgbtq there's one thing we can come
together as I think we can come together
as nation and universally condemn those
things that nobody ever said
can we agree
would you would you join with me and to
condemn
the terrible things that nobody's ever
said
for example nobody's ever said that
slaves had a good deal
nobody ever said that slaves were
benefiting by those you know in a way
that made slavery sort of a good deal by
having skills right nobody's ever
thought it nobody's ever said it
but the entire country is deciding to
argue over it the thing that nobody said
and nobody believes
am I wrong about that nobody said it
nobody believes it and we're having a
big argument about it the thing that
nobody said that nobody believes
so that's happening
but at least we can come together on
condemning the things that never
happened that nobody ever said
and the funniest part about that story
it's
um
you know the the topic is uh
uh history teaching in Florida and
whether it should
say that that the slaves were acquiring
skills they had some benefit to them
later on
and it turns out that the people who are
really mad about the DeSantis plan for
history lessons
uh want to replace it with a more
generic one that they're happy with
and do you know what the difference is
between the generic one that the unhappy
people would like to replace and the one
that DeSantis wants do you know what the
difference is
on this question
none it says the same thing
same thing that slaves learn skills
which they could take with them later
both you know during during slavery and
after and it would be better to have a
skill than not to have a skill
they both say that
not only is the entire debate about
something that nobody said
nobody said the part that that the
slaves had a good deal everybody said
the part that they learn skills and
everybody agrees that learning skills is
better than not learning skills
so
this is like a double triple absurdity
situation this is summer squared
stories that aren't real
but we're you know we have something to
talk about
all right I would like to give you the
best part of my presentation today which
is how to deal with the Republicans
mostly the Biden Camp if we're calling
Republicans extreme Mega
does it seem to you they're getting some
traction on this extreme Maga situation
does it feel like it's working
because it feels like other people are
picking it up
but I'm going to teach you a persuasion
trick
for removing extreme Mega from the
attack you ready
now it's not much different from other
techniques so you'll recognize the
technique as and embrace and amplify
but I'm tweaking Embrace and amplify a
little bit because Embrace and Amplified
means you just Embrace somebody's
dumbass idea and then you pretend you
you agree with it and and they're
pretending you agree
surfaces all the problem with the idea
this is a little bit different but it's
a close cousin to that all right imagine
a video skipped so it would be a viral
video using actors
all right the actors are a couple of
very Republican ordinary looking people
just like the most ordinary Republicans
you could have but let's say they're a
little bit overweight just so you can
imagine this I'm going to draw you a
picture in your head it's a little bit
overweight they're very middle class so
you see them in their living room
sitting on the couch
maybe mom is knitting or something and
Dad's there with a or a man's beer not a
Bud Light and they're watching the news
and you hear Joe Biden say something
about extreme Mega extreme Mega extreme
Mega and you see the two looking at each
other and they're like
well we're regular mega
what what would was that an upgrade is
that like a promotion
like I'd like to be more extreme
and so you see the two people trying to
figure out how they can get to extreme
and so they talk to their friends you
know it all happens really quickly
because it's like a quick video they
talk to their friends and they're like
we'd like to we'd like to be more
extreme
and they're like well
you could wear this you know this hat
that has embossed lettering on it like
is that extreme well compared to the
regular hat that has no embossed
lettering
is way more extreme
so you would do like little skits of
regular Republicans trying to become or
get upgraded to the excitement of being
an extreme Mega but they can't figure
out what is included
so they're trying to figure out how to
do it what's the process how do I get to
be more extreme and of course the point
of it is it's a ridiculous concept
there's no such thing as an extreme Mega
it's all made up
so you want to embrace it
so that you can mock it
that's different than Embrace and
amplify because when you Embrace and
amplify the mocking is sort of embedded
in your actions but you're not actively
mocking it you're pretending like you're
just playing it straight in this case
you would be actively mocking it
but you're embracing it before you
actively mock it
so close cousin of embrace and Amplified
now in my opinion the silliness of
extreme Mega
you could immediately take it from
extreme magazines like racist right
yeah crazy racist
but you can make extreme bag it just
seems silly and cute and ridiculous
just by having uh more attention to the
you know the counter point
what do you think
would it work
lots of videos of the extreme Mega and
then you also get you'd also want your
Republicans to make fun of it
you know can you imagine Vivek or you
know somebody who's got a personality
saying you know are you extreme Mega do
you agree with this because we Mega
there's an extreme Mega
wow is there any kind of a sign up for
that or is it more of a
self-identification how do I become more
extreme Mega
you know just and just just mock The
Thing by smiling and laughing at it you
know I don't think I'm extreme Mega
enough
I'm gonna you know or or how about this
all right here's another idea you show
somebody with a make America a great
again hat on you know the red hat and
then they're trying to figure out how to
become extreme and then one of them has
an idea
and they turn the head around backwards
and everybody's like I think you did it
that that's like crazy
oh my God my God could we do that too
how did you do that and then they're all
like
huh
and they turned their hats around
they're like
and suddenly they're all excited we've
done it we've done it and they they go
to have a drink but it's only Bud Light
they're like ah
[Music]
it'd be hilarious
you should make you should make 50 of
these we should use that AI
that's what you do uh so since now we've
been told and I'm sure it's true because
people said so that you can just write
text to create a whole movie
so you can just write some text to
create this little play of the Maga
people trying to be extreme Mega and
it'll be totally watchable because AI
made it right
no it won't if you want if you want to
if you want to show yourself that hey I
can't make a movie no matter how many
posts you see about it
at least now it can't make a movie try
to do that try to do just that little
short film a two minute clip
with a very clear you know message and
and see you tell your AI to make that
and watch how much you don't want to
watch it when it's done
by humans
could make the hell out of that
an a I can't do that
yeah you need a human's annotating
period because the the machine can't
tell what's working and what isn't
that's a human job
make your bed
will always be the funniest thing a mega
person could do
that in the humorous world
would look extreme
but would be silly
now I was also imagining uh what would
be extreme Mega sporting events
you know if you had like because extreme
Mega sounds like extreme sports
so as imagining suppose all the extreme
Magus had some kind of Olympics just for
extreme magnets what what events would
be there and I thought you know the the
real Olympics already has the skiing and
shooting
I have this feeling that a republican
extreme Mega events
would just be regular Sports
but also shooting
so it'd be like tennis
but you could shoot
you know you can hit the ball or you can
shoot it on the air you'd be like
basketball
but instead of playing defense you could
just shoot the ball when it's in the air
so I think you just take regular Sports
and you add shootings
you got your extreme Mega games
extreme Mega we've got basketball we're
shooting we've got soccer we're shooting
we've got curling with shooting that's
that's it
all right uh
we've got racing when shooting
we've got lawn darts well the law and
darts Standalone we that's the only one
with no shooting we've just got lawn
darts but you can fire them at each
other it's more it's not less target
practice and more
team against team
that cornhole
it's corn it's cornhole but we're
shooting
and no Bud Light
yeah maybe it's mowing your lawn and not
drinking a Bud Light
I've been mowing I'm so thirsty yeah
that would be the competition
you have to mow your lawn on a hot day
and there has to be a cold Bud uh Bud
Light sitting in front of you and you
see who can go the longest without
taking a sip of the Bud Light you have
to just keep mowing in the Sun
and you can't use sunscreen
you're just getting ready
yeah and then whoever whoever can last
the longest uh wins that competition
yeah the Mowing and resisting the Bud
Light would be a good extreme Mega
what else
uh
what would be extreme
chest boxing
chest box
all right that's more mocking
Republicans you could kind of see a
chess board and then two Republicans
wearing boxing gloves
and they they don't know the rules of
the chess game so they just punch each
other instead
that'd be pretty funny NASCAR
we shooting
all right ladies and gentlemen I think
I've done what I need to do and we've
accomplished uh everything except
getting the locals platform to work so
I'll guess I'll I'll work on that when
I'm done
yeah the wet t-shirt contest
this up is old man
uh
cornhole With Grenades
now you're talking
jousting with baguettes okay
uh
yeah Sinead O'Connor passed away I
didn't hear of what
chess boxing is a thing
is it really
the wife
all right competitive get off my lawn
get off my porch
all right I think we've done it thank
you for joining and I will see you
tomorrow
ladies and gentlemen and if you are a
member of the local Subscription Service
I will probably see you tonight
but I don't know how many are listening
here bye for now