Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive July 10, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #2442

Episode 2442 CWSA 04/12/24

Episode #2442 Apr 12, 2024 1:19:41 28,349 views

Wow, best day of news reveals ever. Don't miss this one. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.

Opening General Commentary

Just killing time until all the feeds are here and everybody's here. All right, I feel like it's time. Is everybody here? Good. Well, this is Coffee with Scott Adams, the best time you're ever going to have in your life. If you'd like to take it up to levels that

View segment →
SimultaneousSip General Commentary

nobody can even understand with their pea-sized human brains, all you need for that is a copper mug or glass, a tankard or a giant jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day, the t…

View segment →
NewsReaction General Commentary

be better ones after this, but if ever there was a time when I thought I was running the simulation, it would be today. And you're going to see this in every story. Every story today is going to look like, "Scott, did you cause that to happen? Did you will that out of the universe and it just happen…

View segment →
MainContent Systems vs Goals

cers not so sure? Well, do you think that the medical examiner is a DEI hire? What do you think? What are the odds? Could it be a DEI hire? What if it's not? There are two possibilities. If it's a DEI hire, it could be somebody who's just trying to set things right and let's say a Marc Lamont Hill…

View segment →
MainContent Health & Biohacking

or my members in the Locals group. So I do little micro lessons, two to four minutes, that gives you a life skill. So after two minutes you learn something you'll know how to do for the rest of your life. Now, if you do about 200 of them, which I have, over 200 micro lessons at scottadams.locals.com…

View segment →
MainContent Media & Fake News

more about how to make boring food taste good? That'll get you a lot. So no, science should talk to the other parts of science which do know that willpower and free will don't exist. But they studied it. Do you know why they studied the thing that doesn't exist? Because they're experts. They're exp…

View segment →
NewsReaction AI & Technology

o funny. It's the smugness. The smugness. If somebody's just mentally ill, it's just disturbing. If somebody is perfectly sane and smug, sometimes they're just popular. I would say Hannity is kind of smug, wouldn't you? Sean Hannity. He seems a little smug. Maybe you'd say he's just confident, but a…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

leak is about something called Q-star, a rumored super intelligence that will come out of OpenAI fairly soon. Who believes that? How many of you believe that the leaks were about a super AI and they were on the verge of something we've never seen before? I'm going to say no. I'm going to bet against…

View segment →
MainContent Climate & Environment

d or you can be super racist, but you cannot be both. That's too much. That's too much, Harvard. So Harvard said, well, as much as we love being super racist, I guess it would be better to be high paid. So they chose the money over the principle. Experts. Here's to the experts at Harvard who are tea…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

ore attractive are more likely to win cases? I just told you that. This is exactly that. This is just more of that. We all know that tall presidents or tall candidates do better than short ones. Do you know why? Because people want to sleep with tall ones. Same as dating. Exactly the same. Taller is…

View segment →
MainContent Media & Fake News

Now, the answers I've seen are that they're making the deadly virus so that they would be better prepared if somebody else made a deadly virus. Does that sound real? Because you could do that with everything. You could have a little laboratory coming up with every damn thing that could go wrong just…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

sy. And so Iran is saying that, you know, hey, that's like our own territory, so we're going to have to respond. And the intel people think that if it's going to happen, it's going to happen in the next few days. Here's what I think. I think that Israel is getting the Trumpian benefit of unpredicta…

View segment →
Closing General Commentary

's going to see it that way. I've never seen anything like it. This is the day of all days in the news. Never seen anything like it. All right, I'm going to end the non-subscription platforms. So bye to YouTube, bye to Rumble, bye to X. I'll be talking to the folks here on Locals. I understand ther…

View segment →

Just killing time until all the feeds are here and everybody's here. All right, I feel like it's time. Is everybody here? Good.

Well, this is Coffee with Scott Adams, the best time you're ever going to have in your life. If you'd like to take it up to levels that nobody can even understand with their pea-sized human brains, all you need for that is a copper mug or glass, a tankard or a giant jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it's going to happen now.

Go.

Ah. Sound is working. Video is working. WiFi is streaming. This might be the best day you've ever had. Yeah, it might be. I mean, there could be better ones after this, but if ever there was a time when I thought I was running the simulation, it would be today. And you're going to see this in every story. Every story today is going to look like, "Scott, did you cause that to happen? Did you will that out of the universe and it just happened?"

Let me begin with exhibit A for me running the universe. Story number one: daily coffee consumption is at a 20-year high, up nearly 40%. Probably a coincidence, sure, but if you put it on a graph, I think you'd find that coffee consumption tracks very well with Coffee with Scott Adams' rise into dominance in the media world. No coincidence. Nope. You think about coffee enough.

All right. OJ Simpson is dead. Reportedly he died of cancer, but I think doctors are still looking for the real killer. And is there any way that they could get more ridiculous? Is there anything we could do to this story to completely discredit DEI and all the race grifters? Because that's exactly the sort of thing that Scott would want to happen in the real world.

Well, let's check. CUNY Professor Marc Lamont Hill posted that OJ Simpson's death and his acquittal for murder, well, he said that OJ's acquittal for murder was the correct and necessary result of a racist criminal legal system. Sure, he killed two people, but because it's part of a racist system, it was fine that he goes free.

Now, I kind of appreciate this story because it's so ridiculous that it just makes you laugh. Like, that's a good story. But I'd like to recount to you my only OJ story. Some of you have heard this before, but it's a winner, and because OJ passed, it's time to say it again. True story. Years ago when I had a problem with my voice, many of you know that story, before I got it corrected surgically, I went to a famous voice doctor in Brentwood, California. Remember, Brentwood, home of OJ.

And this doctor told me that one of his prior patients had been OJ Simpson. So OJ Simpson had gone to a voice doctor to improve his dictation or something. And when the voice doctor, who was very well known, he was famous in his field, when he decided to write a book about his work as a voice doctor, he thought, wouldn't it be great to get OJ Simpson as one of the endorsements on the back of the book? So he goes to OJ, and OJ says, sure, of course, gives him a nice endorsement for his work.

And then the doctor takes it to his publisher, and the publisher says, you know that he murdered two people, right? And that we probably shouldn't put OJ Simpson, accused murderer, as a recommendation for your book. And then my voice doctor, with the all-time best quip of all time, looked at his publisher and said of OJ, he only had one bad day. And that's how I'd like OJ to be remembered. He only had one bad day. If you were to take the average, the average would look fine. I mean, so I guess I have to agree with Marc Lamont Hill. You should let him get away with murder because how else can you correct systemic racism?

Speaking of which, a man dies in custody saying, I can't breathe, and police held him down, and then he died. What do you think the medical examiner ruled it? It was a Black man who died doing a George Floyd impression. Maybe the same reason, we don't know. But just like George Floyd, white police officers were restraining him. He was saying he couldn't breathe. He died. And then the medical examiner ruled it a homicide, but no charges were filed. Huh.

Let's see if I can understand this. The medical examiner rules it a homicide. Now, that's exactly the kind of situation that would trigger some kind of criminal charges, but it's a Dallas situation, and maybe they looked at it and said no. Now, how could you possibly explain a medical examiner who says it's homicide and yet the other police officers not so sure? Well, do you think that the medical examiner is a DEI hire? What do you think? What are the odds? Could it be a DEI hire?

What if it's not? There are two possibilities. If it's a DEI hire, it could be somebody who's just trying to set things right and let's say a Marc Lamont Hill way, as in, well, this is one way I can work to correct the racism that's been endemic in this country for hundreds of years. I can fix this one thing by saying it's homicide. It could be. But it's also possible it's just a generic white guy, and the generic white guy knows he'll be killed if he says it's not homicide. Does that sound familiar?

If you were the generic white guy and it was your job to say, was this homicide or accidental, do you think after the George Floyd situation that a generic white guy medical examiner could say, you know, I looked at this and it just looks like an accident to me, and then he would just go on with his life? Everything would be fine after that, right? Because he was honest. He gave you his real professional opinion, and then he just goes on with his life. Am I right? No. In no world is that medical examiner safe. The medical examiner has to say homicide because it's the only way you can stay alive. Because trust the experts. Am I right?

Let's sip a little coffee to the experts. Well, I'm sure glad that the expert in the medical examination field told us what's true because you can believe it because the experts said it, right? Let's drink to the experts. Experts. We trust them. We trust them.

All right. How perfect is that story? Well, there's a study that says that good-looking lawyers, both male and female, have more success in court. So if you're attractive, you're more likely to win, and it's for both men and women and at all levels of experience. So you know, this really supports my decision to go into the cartooning field. Some of you might know my story. When I went to college, I thought I was pre-law. My initial plan was I'm going to get an economics degree, but I'll make it sort of a pre-law thing, and then I'll go to law school. And then I looked in the mirror and I said, my God, you're never going to win a case with that face. So I immediately looked for a job in which nobody could see me. So I thought, well, radio. I do have a face for radio. But cartooning, even better. Yeah. So if you're not good-looking enough to be a lawyer, try to be a cartoonist. That's my career advice.

Well, here's some fake science. Fake science. Fake science. There's a study that says people who use willpower alone to achieve goals and resist temptation are deemed more trustworthy than those who use tricks. Now, a trick would be like, oh, I have to put five dollars in the swear jar because I swore, or telling other people to bust you if you break your diet. So basically if you use any external crutch to help you do something, people will say you have less willpower, and so we don't trust you as much.

Why is this fake science? There's no such thing as willpower. Willpower is not a thing. They should have talked to the other parts of science. They were actually studying a thing that's imaginary. Literally, willpower doesn't exist. I just did a lesson for my members in the Locals group. So I do little micro lessons, two to four minutes, that gives you a life skill. So after two minutes you learn something you'll know how to do for the rest of your life. Now, if you do about 200 of them, which I have, over 200 micro lessons at scottadams.locals.com, you would know that willpower is literally imaginary. So they did a whole study on a thing that literally doesn't exist, and then they came to a result because they're the experts.

Let me tell you. I'll give you the quick version of why willpower doesn't exist. There are only differences in preferences. If you say, Scott, I'm not going to feed you for two weeks, and then I'm going to put some ice cream in front of you, would I resist? I haven't eaten in two weeks, but you know, I don't want ice cream because it's bad for me. A little too much sugar. Do you think I'd resist starving after two weeks? No, I'd eat it. I would eat a Lunchable. That's how hungry I would be. Right now, where's the willpower in that story? None. No. I was more hungry than I was caring about a few calories.

Now, you could take that silly example and you could extend it to literally everything, and in every case you'll see it's very clear. Somebody just picked the choice that was the better choice. There's no willpower. Do you know how I keep my weight exactly at the right number? I'm literally precisely at my target adult weight. I don't want to gain a pound, don't want to lose a pound. I'm exactly right. Do you know how much willpower it took? None. Because it doesn't exist. All I did was I did stuff like remove junk food from my house, learned a little bit more about what's good for me. So I did learning. I removed things from my environment. Where's the willpower? There's no willpower.

And then I learned through trial and error what things were causing me inflammation and causing me to gain weight. So it turns out for me, probably wheat. I'm not a scientific study, but anecdotally, when I got rid of wheat and some other sugary things, I can't even gain weight. It wouldn't even be possible. So if you live your life like willpower doesn't exist, you're going to get much better results. Because instead of going willpower, trying really hard, that doesn't get you much. How about just removing the junk food from your house? That'll get you a lot. How about learning more about how to make boring food taste good? That'll get you a lot.

So no, science should talk to the other parts of science which do know that willpower and free will don't exist. But they studied it. Do you know why they studied the thing that doesn't exist? Because they're experts. They're experts. Let's drink to the experts, shall we? To the experts. Love those experts.

Let's see if anything else in the news along those lines. All right, here's a recommendation that I don't know how much of this is real, but it feels real. I think I may have told you this before. You know Andrew Huberman. He talks about the importance of getting early morning sun, taking off your sunglasses and standing in the sun for five minutes in the morning. And that's if it's sunny. I guess you stand there longer if it's a cloudy day. And that's supposed to set your body rhythms for the rest of the day. Now, I'm not an expert, so I don't know if that's true or not.

But also there are claims from other people that you can, if you take off your shoes and go outside, you can do grounding where it resets your electrical forces or something. I don't know if that's real. I have no idea. And then there's also the Huberman breathing technique where you do the two long inhales through your nose and then one exhale, and you only have to do it three or four times, and that resets some of your bodily nervous system or something.

So what I discovered, or it's sort of obvious actually, is that you can do all three at the same time. Do any of them have any real scientific backing? I don't know, because science is not something that I would trust. Do you know why I don't trust and don't know if grounding, getting sun, or the breathing technique work? Because it comes from experts. Anybody who trusts the experts in 2024 is just guessing.

But I'll tell you what I did do. Since I could do all three of these at the same time, I mean, what are you going to do when you're standing there in the sun? So I take off my shoes outdoors, stand in the sun, do a few Huberman breaths, and I've done all three things now. So there's a, you know, I've got three shots that at least one of those things makes a difference in the real world. I don't know. So here's my experience. Oh my God, do I feel good when I do it immediately. It's the damnedest thing. I just walk outside, take off my shoes, do that breathing in the sun, and I feel extraordinary. And it does in fact feel as though it kicks your day off to a good day. Can I prove it? Nope. Do I believe it's true because the experts told me? Nope. I just know it's three things that can't hurt me. They can't hurt me, right? So I do them, and then it makes me feel happy.

What if it's not really working but it makes me think it's working? That's called working. You get that, right? Since I'm trying to, I'm resetting my mental state as much as anything else. If I walk away thinking it worked, it worked. I don't need to hook any electrodes to my body. If I think I'm happy, good enough.

All right, so that's worth trying. Have you ever had this experience that if you try to explain the real world to people, you know, the Mike Benz version, you can't do it without sounding crazy? And it's in this category of things which can't be communicated. It's one of my favorite mental things to think about. I just love thinking about things which are true and can be put into words but still can't be communicated.

Let me give you an example. The little boy who cried wolf, right? He pretended he saw a wolf until finally when he saw a real wolf, he tried to tell people in clear language that was true. There's a wolf. But he couldn't communicate it because he created a situation where they were just sort of deaf to his statements about wolves.

Now, the Mike Benz, let's say I like to use him as just a simple way to describe the larger blob of the government working with NGOs and the Atlantic Council and how Soros is connected as their banker, and it might involve all these other international things and how they affected the platforms and the news. And it's so complicated that as soon as you start explaining it to a normie, you know, somebody who's had no exposure to this idea whatsoever and they think they're living in a democracy or some kind of republic, which I don't think we have for decades, you can't explain it.

And I'm only bringing it up because it's fascinating how you can hide stuff. One of the ways you can hide stuff is right in front of people. You just have to make it complicated. That's it. Yeah. As long as something's complicated, you can hide anything. Do you know what's complicated? Climate change. It's complicated. You know what's complicated? Elections. I'm not in the concept level, but when you get down to who's doing what and how many moving parts, it's kind of complicated. So everywhere that there's something that's complicated, it's probably really bad because that's where you hide all the bad stuff, is in the complications. Yeah, manufactured consent. Yeah, that's part of it anyway.

I finally figured out what it is that makes MSNBC look different from CNN. CNN looks like people who are sometimes knowing they're lying and sometimes don't know they're lying. You know, they might actually believe their own news. But here's what they don't look like. They don't always look crazy. That's my take. When I watch CNN, nobody has crazy eyes. You know, I keep calling out people who have obvious mental illness problems. You can see it in their eyes. When I look at Jake Tapper, do I say to myself that guy's crazy? No, no, he's completely sane. When I look at Wolf Blitzer, totally sane. Totally sane.

When you look at Rachel Maddow, does she look sane to you? I mean, really. When you look at Lawrence O'Donnell, does he look sane? I mean, really, does he? Now, let me give you a contrast just so I'm not making fun of all of their hosts. When I look at Ari Melber, does he look insane? No, not even a little bit. He could leave MSNBC and work on CNN tomorrow because he looks like the CNN people. They might be misled about something. They might be wrong. But they don't look crazy. They look like people doing their job as they see it.

Now, here's what really sets me over the top and makes MSNBC a comedy for me. CNN is fascinating, and I recommend you watch it just to find out what they're telling their people, just to be well informed about what people you don't agree with necessarily are saying. But when I watch MSNBC, I'm actually watching it for the jokes, meaning that I find it hilarious. And I finally figured out what it was that makes it so funny. It's the smugness. The smugness. If somebody's just mentally ill, it's just disturbing. If somebody is perfectly sane and smug, sometimes they're just popular. I would say Hannity is kind of smug, wouldn't you? Sean Hannity. He seems a little smug. Maybe you'd say he's just confident, but a little smug. But he doesn't come off as comedy because he looks like he's doing his job. And you know, even if he knows he's exaggerating, he probably knows it. You know, nothing crazy.

But if you look at Lawrence O'Donnell or Rachel Maddow, they're super smug, but the things they say are crazy. If you had smug and crazy, it's hilarious. So when I watch it, I'm like, oh my God, what am I watching? This is the funniest thing. Smug and crazy at the same time.

Anyway, there are some people thinking that so-called AGI or super AI intelligence is coming and it's real close. OpenAI fired two people for allegedly leaking information. Now, I saw online some speculation that, you know, it's obvious what it was they leaked. Well, that's not obvious to me. But the speculation is that the leak is about something called Q-star, a rumored super intelligence that will come out of OpenAI fairly soon. Who believes that? How many of you believe that the leaks were about a super AI and they were on the verge of something we've never seen before? I'm going to say no. I'm going to bet against it. I think it was probably a leak. I mean, that part might be true, but I doubt it was about a super intelligence which we'll all be frightened to hear about. I think everything's going to be incremental. That's what I think. I think all AI improvement will be incremental but still astonishing when anybody looks back at it. So I think the things we think are going to happen in a month are going to take two years, and they'll be amazing, but we'll have so much time to adjust to it that the amazing part might wear off. You know, you'll just be, well, there's another that's a little five percent better than that last one. So I'm going to be on the underwhelmed side of things for AI, and I'm happy to be wrong. I'd love to be wrong, but I think it would be underwhelming.

Well, you probably all saw the story of Representative Sheila Jackson Lee at a public event speculating out loud how we could possibly settle the moon because it's made of gas. And how exactly do you build something on top of gas so that big old round moon, she said, was just a big gaseous thing. And okay, now you probably say to yourself, okay, but she's a politician, so you don't really expect your politicians to know everything about science. It'd be good if they knew the basics, but you know, you give them a pass. They're the representative. The public wanted them there. So if the public wanted them as a representative and they're not having much to do with any science-y stuff, that would be fair. I mean, as long as she's not involved directly in any kind of science decision, does it really matter?

Well, here's a little background you didn't know. She used to be on the House Space and Aeronautics Subcommittee. Yeah, yeah. One of our experts in the government who was on the House Space and Aeronautics Subcommittee thinks the moon is made of gas. Well, let's have a drink to our experts, shall we? Not just the scientific experts but the political experts, the ones who are serving on the House Space and Aeronautics Subcommittee who think the moon is made of gas. Here's to you.

But you know, even as I tell you how many experts are wrong about things, at least they got climate change right. Am I right? Like, thank God. I mean, because that's so important. But all these experts in all these fields clearly lying or wrong or batshit crazy. But at least climate change is believable, incredible, and pure science. Really?

Let's see. Next story. Harvard, Yale, MIT, and Brown are all returning to standardized tests. Now, that's a surprise because you think that the smartest people in the country, you know, the people running these higher-level institutions, when they decided that not testing people before admitting them was a good idea, I'm really surprised that that didn't work out, huh?

Have I ever told you that if you don't measure, you're not managing? That's one of those little bumper sticker rules that pops up all the time. If you're not measuring it with some kind of legitimate measurement system, you're not managing. It's not managing to say, well, I'd like to have more of this or less of that. You need to have a real idea of what you're shooting at or you're not really managing. And if you're not watching if you're going in the right direction or the wrong, it can't be called managing.

But the smartest institutions, in fact Harvard wants to teach you how to make decisions and be an economist and a business person, and they didn't know that the number one rule of management is you've got to measure things. So if you'd like to get your MBA at Harvard, just know you're taught by people who were caught by surprise that measuring things made a difference when they were trying to manage things. Didn't work out.

So it looks like they had a choice of being super racist at the same time of being overpriced, and those are two things that they couldn't pull off at the same time. We'd like to be overpriced, but we'd also really like to be super racist. And then the public said, hold on, hold on, that's too far. You can be overpriced or you can be super racist, but you cannot be both. That's too much. That's too much, Harvard. So Harvard said, well, as much as we love being super racist, I guess it would be better to be high paid. So they chose the money over the principle. Experts. Here's to the experts at Harvard who are teaching you how to manage without measuring things. To them. To them.

So good. Well, even though your highest educational facilities who teach people science and business, even though they apparently don't understand science or business, the one thing we can feel confident in is that they did produce scientists who really got climate change right. Because if there's one thing the scientists can do outside of the college environment, they can measure the temperature of the planet. Am I right? They can measure the temperature of the planet. So at least we've got that working for us. So good news on that front.

Oh, this is awkward. Wow. Kind of bad luck that this story came up in the order it did. Well, now I just feel like a dope. Zero Hedge is reporting that as many as 30% of all the thermometers that they use for the temperatures don't exist. I wonder if that's a problem in the accuracy. So they're called ghost thermometers, and they're thermometers that used to exist at one point but now they no longer do. So what they do, the people who are measuring the data, let's call them the experts, probably all came from Harvard and MIT and Yale, but I don't know that for sure. But when they go to measure and they realize that there used to be a thermometer there but now there isn't, what they do is they take the average of other thermometers.

So let's say you used to have an old one but now the old one's gone. Now it's been replaced with a new one, and it's not even necessarily in the same place. So you take the average of the temperatures of the thermometers that are not where the old one was, and you throw that in the mix. 30% of them. 30%. That's the claim.

Mr. Shuchuk said the USHCN stations, they reached a maximum of over 1,200. So in 1957 we had over 1,200 temperature measuring stations or thermometers. But after 1990 the number of active stations became declining due to aging equipment and personnel retirements. Huh. You know, I lived in the real world for a while, and I worked in a laboratory in which all we did was work with equipment and technology every day. Equipment and technology. And you know what I learned when I was working with equipment and technology? All that equipment and technology is 100% effective all the time, and it never breaks, never gets out of calibration, never gets out of tune, and is completely unaffected by temperature and the incompetence of the people involved. No, that's the opposite of what I learned.

Now, I would like to take a bow in a moment, but only after I tell you why, and then I'll see if you believe I deserve a bow, okay? You get to decide. If you say yes, Scott, you can take a bow, then I'll do it. But if you say no, they'll say, all right, all right, you have spoken. Who told you? Name anybody else who told you this, that in the real world you can't trust on people to read thousands of thermometers and compare it to 100 years ago when we didn't have thermometers and we had tree rings and ice core samples and come up with a believable, credible line that passes all scientific integrity. And I said in the real world that is literally not possible. There is no situation in which you could have 1,200 thermometers and maybe a thousand people involved, and that they're measuring the temperature and getting something like a real result.

Do you believe that with having no scientific background whatsoever, that using the Dilbert filter, which is what I did, I used the Dilbert filter, that the real world does not have any kind of competence that could possibly produce accurate temperature readings with the equipment used, things changing over time, and then human beings involved in the process? Who told you that that isn't even possible? Just me. Who else predicted that if you actually looked into it, it would look absurd? Just me. I'm the only one. Do I deserve a bow? You tell me. What do you mean no? Damn you. Damn you.

All right, all right. Did Linden know? So let me give you a different take on that. So somebody said that a professional climate scientist said that, well, the climate scientist didn't say exactly this story, but the climate scientists do say, you know, for this reason or that reason, the accuracy is not good. Now, from a scientific perspective and somebody within the industry, that may be an accurate take. But I'm not even in the industry, and I'm saying that you don't need to be a climate scientist who has worked deeply in the industry. You just have to listen to what they said. Wait, you just told me you measured the temperature of the earth so accurately that you can tell what direction it's going in. Why? I don't believe that. I don't believe that for a second.

So the Dilbert principle of just general incompetence really guarantees this isn't doable because it's too manual, has too many pieces of equipment involved, too much moving things around, too much temperature and weather destruction, too much bureaucracy. Yes, I would say that this is pretty solid evidence that we don't know if the temperature is going up or down. It's not my opinion that I know, by the way. So it's not my opinion that I know everything's fine climate-wise. It's my opinion that we can't measure it. That's a very big difference. So it could be a crisis. Maybe. How would I know? In order to know, I would have to trust science. Really? It's 2024. Who trusts science? Doesn't even feel like a thing.

Now, let me ask you this. How long do you think it will take Trump and let's say Vivek to turn that, and let's say this needs some confirmation, so it would be great if we had some confirmation of this, but suppose we get confirmation that 30% of the thermometers are ghost thermometers. How long would it take Vivek and Trump to turn that into a victory dance and say, well, we can't tell you what the temperature is doing. We can just tell you that they didn't know, and maybe it was a hoax. Would you say it's a hoax if I told you that 30% of the thermometers don't exist? Would you say it's a hoax? Maybe not, but it's not that far away, is it?

All right. Trump did the funniest Trump thing. I mean, every time Trump does something you don't quite expect, it feels like he's just operating on some different level. So here's what he did. He just did some video commercials recommending RFK Jr., his competitor, and he actually meant it because he's aware that Democrats are more likely to vote for him. So he just comes right out and says in videos, he said that RFK Jr. is a better man than Biden. And he says, quote, RFK Jr. is, as you know, the most radical left candidate. So he's making sure that there are no Republicans who want to go that way. So he characterizes him as the most radical left. That should eliminate all the Republicans from voting for him.

But he says he is more so than the Green Party, even lefter than the Green Party, says Trump. And says he's more so even than Crooked Joe Biden. But he's got some nice things about him. I happen to like him. And then Trump says, I guess I would mean RFK Jr. is going to be taking away votes from Crooked Joe Biden, and he should because he's actually better than Biden. He's much better than Biden. He's much better than Biden.

Now, how much do you love that? Have you ever seen that? Have you ever seen somebody just come right out and say, you know what, this other guy is better than the guy you're voting for. He's not as good as me, but you should at least not vote for that other guy because that's a disaster.

Would you like to hear what the young people in my town say? Here's what the young people in my town say about Joe Biden and RFK Jr. And I'm told that there are no exceptions. No exceptions. Now, I can't prove that, but I'm told there are no exceptions to what I'm just going to say at the young person sort of teenager, young adult level. When asked about politics, they'll say, you know, RFK Jr. is kind of attractive, but there's no way in hell I'd support Biden. And those are Democrats. You know, those are people who come from Democrat backgrounds. They're literally saying Biden is not even close to being a possibility. They're saying RFK Jr. all the way. The young people. Now, they're not saying Trump. The boys are more likely to say Trump, but the girls are saying, you know what, RFK Jr. looks a lot better than Biden.

Do you know what makes women decide on a candidate? Is whether they'd have sex with them. Is that too far? Nope. No, that would be a normal way that all human beings act. Did I not just tell you they did a study that said that lawyers who are more attractive are more likely to win cases? I just told you that. This is exactly that. This is just more of that. We all know that tall presidents or tall candidates do better than short ones. Do you know why? Because people want to sleep with tall ones. Same as dating. Exactly the same. Taller is better.

So if you look at Joe Biden, who is literally a desiccated pile of twigs, and you compare him to RFK Jr., who's ripped, you can understand why young women are saying, you know, I think I politically agree with RFK Jr. They have no idea what any of their policies are. There's no policy decision. Yeah, do you think an 18-year-old looking at RFK Jr. and Biden knows the policy differences between those two? Not a chance. They just know which one they'd bang. That's it. And that's enough. That's enough. Should guarantee a Trump win unless it's rigged.

Anyway, let's talk about RFK Jr., who did the most amazing thing on Erin Burnett's show on CNN. So the Vigilant Fox is reporting about this, has a nice summary on X. The Vigilant Fox, another good follow on X. Just look for it. The Vigilant Fox. Anyway, RFK Jr. says that Erin Burnett's brain stopped working when he made the stunning argument about Biden on CNN.

All right, so let's see if you think this is as good as the Vigilant Fox does. Right, so here was the argument. Kennedy said there's no court that found that President Trump tried to steal the election or tried to derail the election or tried to start an insurrection. However, there are courts that have found that President Biden was censoring his opponents and not just me. And then Kennedy said, although he did censor me and I did win that suit, so it's not just me making it up.

Oh my God, how much do I love that man right now? RFK Jr. is the person who I could disagree with the most and love the most at the same time because what he's done is he's dismantled their strongest argument against the election being rigged. But he doesn't know he did it. Well, he might know. But the conversation is about whether the president is an insurrectionist. That happens to be Biden's strongest argument against Trump because Biden went from what he went from Bidenomics, which now everybody's reporting he got rid of because of inflation. So he had to give up on Bidenomics. He did the whole the Army is full of white supremacists, and when they tried to root them out, they didn't find any. And then it seems like they've been silent about all the white supremacists lately. Have you noticed that? Like Biden was all about the white supremacists, but there hasn't been really a problem, and nobody was buying it, and there weren't any in the military. So the white supremacist thing like Bidenomics was something they tried and doesn't look like it worked.

So they've settled on this whole threat to democracy, threat to democracy, and also specifically that he doubted the elections. And when they say he must be a dictator because he doubted the elections, do you know why they can say that? They can only say it because no court found that the election was rigged. And now RFK Jr. comes at him with the judo reframe of all time and says there's no court that found that President Trump tried to steal the election, derail it, or start an insurrection. And that's just a fact. So you can't have it both ways. If you're going to claim the election was good because no court found it wasn't, you're going to have to find that no court found he was an insurrectionist, and you're going to have to eat that. And RFK Jr. is going to shove it down your throat on live TV if you don't like it.

So to me, RFK Jr. just dismantled the entire gaslighting operation of the Democrats right in front of you. That's kind of amazing. Now, what I hope is that Vivek and Trump see this and pick up that argument because it's a killer. It's an absolute killer. And here's what I'd love to see. And maybe you don't want to start too soon. It looks like the Democrats want to ride this whole insurrectionist threat to democracy. I think Trump should allow them to keep that argument until they're so committed to it it's just the brand, and then he should mock it out of existence.

You could mock the dictator thing away just by acting like a normal person. Imagine Trump going into Chick-fil-A. Some of you saw the video. Everybody loved him. He was hugging and taking selfies with a lot of Black women who were there, which is a great look for a politician. Imagine him going into Chick-fil-A, and while the camera is running and somebody's taking a selfie with him, let's say just to make the picture good, it's a young Black woman who's just thrilled to be in his presence. And then he turns to her and says, the news says I'm going to be a dictator. Do I seem like a dictator to you? And then just laugh. And then the person will laugh, and you will learn that there are no people who think it. It's just a news thing. There are no people who think it. And by the way, if you did think it and you met him, you would stop thinking it within five seconds.

Let me give you a demonstration of Trump changing somebody who believes he's a dictator into someone who doesn't believe it. Pat on the back, shake of the hands. How are you doing today? Oh wow, looks like you're doing great. I'm glad you're supporting me. How are the sandwiches here? And you're done. And people would say, how did anybody think he was a dictator? That was the least Stalinish thing I've ever seen in my life. He asked me about my sandwich. He came into Chick-fil-A, you know, where anybody could hurt him because he's right in the middle of the crowd. By the way, did you notice the Secret Service did not keep the people away? How about that's the biggest story. How about that? How about you missed the biggest story? Trump walked into the middle of a crowd unannounced, a very largely Black crowd, unannounced, just walked in. Now, the Secret Service was there, but there's no way they could have protected him. People literally had their arms around him. You can't protect somebody if somebody's up to no good. Yeah, he basically trusted the crowd, and they immediately reciprocated immediately. All he has to do is trust the crowd.

Now, it's dangerous because you know there could be, it only takes one crazy person. But Trump trusting the public is such a good look, and I would love to see him engage the public and just ask the question, do I look like a dictator to you? And to imagine that he thinks that would be his best play. In what world would that be his best play to become a dictator at age whatever? It's not a good play. It would guarantee his entire family got slaughtered. What kind of a good play is that? It would guarantee his businesses were destroyed. It would guarantee like civil war. Now, compare that to the alternative. The alternative of just doing a good job and then leaving office after his four years. Which one is better for Trump and his family? Unambiguously better to restore America to its former greatness as best he can and to walk out with dignity, having proven everything he needed to prove, and then let his business thrive, let history think well of him, and become the most popular president in the history of the United States. You don't think he wants that? You think he'd rather be a dictator and hated by everyone? It's crazy.

Now, if there's one thing that Trump wants, he wants the public to like him. He doesn't want to be a dictator. That'd be crazy. But a lot of crazy people are convinced it's true.

All right. Speaker Johnson finally told the truth about why he changed his mind about FISA. Now he is pro-FISA where he used to be anti-FISA. And he says, and Mike Cernovich phrases this exactly correct, he got the talk. He got the talk. Now, who told you? Name anybody else who told you this, that I believe that the top people, the president and the leaders of the parties, that when they get power, but not until then, only after they have their power, that the intelligence groups call them in and they say, here's all the stuff you didn't know before. Here's all the stuff you didn't know before. And this is why nothing you knew is real, and you better do it this way. That was me. And he's saying it. He's saying it directly, that when he found out what the intelligence people told him, he can't tell you what they said, but he's pretty sure he's got to do what they said.

Now, here's something Tucker added that I think is a real good addition to that idea. How does Speaker Johnson know that what the intelligence people told him is true? No way. There's no way he knows what's true. So if he doesn't know what's true, who's running the country? Because probably Speaker Johnson thinks he's one of the people running the country or at least a big part of the government because he knows this new information. But what if it's not true? If it's not true, then the intelligence people are running the country. What if it is true but it's also what the intelligence people want to happen? Well, then the intelligence people are running the country. So there are two possibilities. What they told him is true, which means the intelligence people are determining how things go. They're in charge. Or it's not true, and they're still in charge because they're telling you something to make you act in the way they want based on false. But either way, this is confirmation that the government is not the government. And Johnson said it directly. He said they showed him things, and if you knew what he saw, you would change your mind.

Now, if he had to guess, do you think he saw real things? I honestly doubt it because again I'm going to put the Dilbert filter on this. If you put the Dilbert filter on it and you give somebody unlimited power, the unlimited power to lie to the government and make them act like they believe it, who doesn't use unlimited power in the history of everything? If you give somebody that kind of power, they're going to use it. Of course they are. They're going to use it every chance they get. Now, they might not use it for small stuff, you know, because they don't care about the small stuff. But if let's say it was a difference between funding Ukraine and not funding Ukraine, do you think anybody's going to tell them the truth? I don't think so. Not a chance.

Here's what I think probably happened. I think they called him and said, here's why we need FISA. We can't tell the public, but FISA is the only reason we thwarted three nuclear terrorist attacks. And he'd be like, what? I never heard there were any nuclear terrorist attacks. He goes, well, that's because we did such a good job. We kept it from the public so they wouldn't panic and also that people wouldn't know our sources and means. But we have thwarted three terrorist attacks. I'm just making this up. If you're joining me late, none of this is real. But we thwarted three nuclear terrorist attacks. And here's the thing, Speaker Johnson, you can't tell anybody. Do you promise? Oh, well, really, if you thwarted three nuclear attacks, I have to admit I didn't want this FISA stuff, but I mean, the responsible thing to do is to make sure we don't get nuked. I don't want that on my record. So I guess I'm going to trust you. Yeah, going to trust you.

So it seems to me that whether or not Speaker Johnson heard something true or false, he did confirm that he's not in charge and that the government's not in charge. Now, do you think this trick would work on the president? If you said, Joe Biden, you don't know this but we know this, and you better not tell anybody. Of course it would. It would literally work on everyone. You put me in that situation and I'm totally aware of all the risk, right? I know what tricks they might play. They could turn me so fast it would be one second and I'd be flipped because this situation is irresistible. Nobody's going to say, yeah, I do want to take a healthy 30% chance that you're lying to me and I'm going to ignore the nuclear risk you just told me we avoided with FISA. Nobody makes that decision. You say if they told you, you're going to rely on them even if it's because that's just the better play.

All right. Marjorie Taylor Greene is still against the FISA stuff, but she has not been read into the secret things. Here's what I like. Yeah, you want to compromise? I'll give you a compromise, Speaker Johnson. I will be on your team and I will agree with extending FISA under the following conditions. You put Marjorie Taylor Greene in the SCIF and you tell her what they told you. If her detector doesn't ring off the hook and she says, oh jeez, I didn't know that, okay, okay, now that I know that I'm going to change my mind, I would be a lot more comfortable if you put somebody with the world-sized balls of Marjorie Taylor Greene in that room and she tells me so.

Let me say it again. I don't trust Speaker Johnson. I don't know him. I'm not saying he's a liar. I just don't know him, so I don't trust him. But I've been watching Marjorie Taylor Greene for some time. And by the way, if you put Matt Gaetz in there, I wouldn't believe him, right? I don't have that level of trust with him. Not that there's some specific thing. It's just I don't know. So but Marjorie Taylor Greene, I've got a feeling is purely a patriot. I mean, every signal she sends is that she's in it for the right reason. You know, even if you don't like her style or whatever, she really seems like she's in this for the right reason. Having been in the military probably makes a difference. So that would be my take.

So in Marjorie Taylor Greene and let her come out and tell me that she saw the same thing Speaker Johnson did, and if they both are on the same team, I'm going to get a little flexible about FISA. Yeah, I'm going to get a little bit flexible.

All right. Coincidentally, FBI director says there are more threats than there have ever been. Well, doesn't that work perfectly? Doesn't it? Oh, isn't it great that that FBI director says there's more terrorist threats than we've ever seen at the same time they're talking about FISA, the best way to stop those terrorist threats? So that fits kind of snugly, doesn't it? Just a coincidence.

Well, there's a new COVID whistleblower. This says that, well, it's everything you knew was true. The United States or members of it, including Fauci, absolutely did plan and execute and were funded the gain-of-function research to make coronavirus more deadly. I'm going to say that's confirmed, as confirmed as anything could be. Now, you have to worry about fake news and fake whistleblowers, but you know, everything about this looks just so obvious. Do you all agree that we could now say it's just the fact that Fauci was crooked? Fauci lied. It was obviously some secret government program. But here are the two questions that we have not seen addressed. Why were they doing that? Why were they making a deadly virus?

Now, the answers I've seen are that they're making the deadly virus so that they would be better prepared if somebody else made a deadly virus. Does that sound real? Because you could do that with everything. You could have a little laboratory coming up with every damn thing that could go wrong just so you're ready in case somebody else does it. No, no, that's not believable. That sounds like total bullshit. So why was it that we ever believed that Fauci maybe didn't do this and it was some kind of pangolin and had sex with a bat kind of situation? Why did we ever believe that or anybody? I don't know. Maybe you didn't, but why did anybody believe that? It's because of the experts. Let's drink to the experts. They got this COVID stuff. They got this climate change, and they've studied things. Yeah, here's the experts.

All right, let's see. Oh, and we have another whistleblower. Breitbart News reporting that there was a guy, Mike McCormick, who's got a new book, and apparently he was like a super insider. Like he was in the room. So I see him described as Biden's stenographer, but do they mean that metaphorically or literally a stenographer? But he was in the room. Here's what he says. He says he personally witnessed Biden negotiate the Burisma kickback scheme: U.S. funding to Ukraine energy, primarily Burisma, in exchange for putting Hunter Biden on Burisma's board of directors on a trip to Poland in 2014. Wow. He says Biden's former National Security aide Jake Sullivan is at the center of the scandal. And McCormick recalled he told that Sullivan told reporters in 2014 on Air Force Two as an anonymous senior administration, so it must have been on background or something, that the United States intended to help Ukraine's natural gas industry.

So everything you thought was true as a direct witness. Now, oh my God. And I think you've heard, I think Breitbart and other places you've heard that Jake Sullivan has always seemed like he was the center of all of this. And now we've got a witness that says he was, and it's every bit as corrupt as it looks like. So Ukraine was an energy play, a corruption play, a CIA play. But what it wasn't is defending democracy against Putin, although there might have been some people who cared about that as well.

So I think that the United States is essentially a criminal cartel, and it's been using essentially Mafia tactics to take over Russia and get control of their energy. And that Russia too is basically a mobster situation with a lot of energy. So to me it looks like two criminal elements, organized criminal gangs, United States versus Russia, fighting over resources. That's what I see. How's history going to write it now? When history writes this story, are they going to say, well, United States has been a criminal organization maybe for decades, and they ran a play. There was essentially a criminal RICO kind of situation to take over Russia's energy and told the United States it was all about freedom or some damn thing. Meanwhile, Russia of course is not a real country. It's just a gas station with an army, basically a criminal enterprise. So really it was a contest between two criminal enterprises with billions of dollars at stake. Do you think your history book is going to say that? Well, probably not.

Let's see what could possibly bolster this claim that the Biden administration is corrupt. I wonder if there's any other story in the news right now that would make you scratch your head and say, well, there it is. Next story. CBS News reporter Catherine Herridge says the network CBS fired her, took all their notes, and she's never seen anything like that. They took her personal notes. They took her computer when they fired her. And what was she working on at the time? Oh, a story involving Joe Biden's corruption. So CBS moved on her like OJ on Nicole because they found out she was working on a story about Biden's corruption. And I'm guessing she found some. I'm guessing she found some. So they shut her down.

How many of you thought that the news was real and that the news organizations are they're just doing their news organization thing? Nope. They've always just been a Democrat tool, at least in recent years. And here it is. Everything you thought about climate change was right. They can't measure it. Everything you thought about Fauci and COVID was true. It was a big old cover-up, and we don't even know why they were doing it. We still don't even know why. We just know what happened. And then the Biden corruption stuff in Ukraine and the Ukraine war, it's exactly what it looks like. Exactly what it looks like. What a day.

Well, there are reports that Iran is planning a calibrated attack. So as you know, Israel took out some of its commanders, and I think they had an embassy, an Iranian embassy in Syria or something. And if you had an embassy, that's a whole higher level of war because the embassy is considered sovereign territory of the country that has the consulate, a consulate, not an embassy. And so Iran is saying that, you know, hey, that's like our own territory, so we're going to have to respond. And the intel people think that if it's going to happen, it's going to happen in the next few days.

Here's what I think. I think that Israel is getting the Trumpian benefit of unpredictability. And what I mean by that is when Hamas did their attack on Israel, I heard reports some of them thought they were going to take over Israel. That sounds crazy to me. But I think they assumed, I'm just observing it like everybody else, it seems to me that Hamas must have assumed that Israel's response to the attack would be somewhat similar to how they've responded to other attacks in other words. There would be some proportional response, and maybe a thousand Hamas people get killed, but they still have 29,000 left over and they just start over. But instead Israel called their bluff, took Gaza away from them forever, destroyed their civilization, and it's never coming back. Now, do you think they expected that? Nope.

And what did that buy Israel as a permanent asset? Trumpian unpredictability. Now Iran has a new situation they've never seen before, which is always before they could sort of predict if we do this they'll probably do something that's similar. Not anymore. In fact, I'll go further. If Israel ever intended to take out the leadership of Iran, all they need is for Iran to make an attack on the homeland or just do something provocative even if it's not on Israel proper. Israel just needs a reason, and they're going to take out the Ayatollah. Now, in any other situation, could they take out the Ayatollah? Nope, nope. Only this one. Only this one. Because they said we're going to kill everybody who is responsible. Who else was responsible? The Iranian leadership. I mean, that's what we're told. I mean, I can't, I don't have direct reporting, but everybody seems to think that Iranian leadership was behind the Hamas attack. Israel said directly we're going to kill every one of them. That would include the Iranian leadership. Just give them a reason.

This is the only time in history that I can think of that if Israel literally took out the entire leadership, they could get away with it. Now, you say to yourself, not guaranteed. You're right. It's not guaranteed. Nothing's guaranteed. It's war. It's a war for existence. Nothing's guaranteed. But there has never been a more ideal time for Israel to end the risk of the Iranians nuking them in the future than right now. All they have to do is say, look, we told you we were going to get everybody involved. We took out the head of the snake. And by the way, we have no quarrel whatsoever with even the Iranian military. We have no quarrel. We only wanted the people who are behind the planning and execution of this attack. And I'm sorry it just happened to include the Ayatollah and all of his generals. So they're gone now. We'd love to help you, Iran, recover. We'd love to bring you into the fold, make you part of the Abraham Accords plus someday. But at the moment we are completely unpredictable, and anything you thought we wouldn't do last year we will do this year. This year is not last year. Whatever you think might be our proportional response, stop thinking that. There's no limit to our proportional response, meaning it's not going to be proportional.

That, ladies and gentlemen, is the Trump premium. Trump taught you that being predictable basically dooms you. Being predictable dooms you because you can't negotiate and you can't frighten. Everybody knows what's going to happen. So you have to create a realistic frame that if you hit us we might take you out completely. And you have to set a precedent because if you haven't done it in the real world, it's just talk. Now Gaza is being basically disappeared. Do you think there's anybody in Iran who is watching what's happening in Gaza and says to them, I think those Israelis are in the mood to be proportional? No, no, they are not in the mood to be proportional. They're certainly going to be rational, but they're not going to be proportional. They're not in the mood, and they don't need to be. They just don't need to be.

So I'm not recommending it, and I'm not predicting it. I'm just saying Iran needs to understand that if they did something serious to Israel and Israel in response took out their entire leadership, the world would yawn. The world would yawn. That's never been the case before, and it may never be again. There may never be another time you could do this and get away with it. And by the way, I don't know if they could get away with it, but all the other times they definitely couldn't. You know, a year ago, do you think they could have taken out the Iranian leadership? No, absolutely not. But what if they did it today? Today is a coin flip. Today you would actually say, you know what, we might disagree, too aggressive. And then other people would say, no, that was just aggressive enough. You would never get that conversation any other time. And by the way, that benefit will decrease every day. So every day that Israel doesn't take out Iranian leadership is going to be harder tomorrow.

So the ideal situation for Israel, depending on how aggressive they're feeling, is that Iran does strike back. If Iran strikes back and they make it a serious strike, all bets are off. So that's how you negotiate. I don't know if I've mentioned that Netanyahu is smart. When you're dealing with a leader that smart, I mean, and I'm talking just raw intelligence, you know, forget about policies and preferences and who's left and who's right. If you have that much raw computing power on one side, I would be afraid of that. That's a lot of raw computing power, and I wouldn't want to be on the other team.

So I remind you I don't support Israel anymore because the ADL has targeted me. And yes, of course I know the ADL doesn't work for Israel. Of course I know they're independent. But it's not my problem. I can't solve their problem. My problem is, hey, if your friend attacks me, that's how it works, right? If you could stop your friend from attacking me and you don't do it, there we are, right? Don't expect me to solve your problem. I'm not going to solve your problem. So the problem is the ADL, and so I don't support Israel because of that. I don't think we should fund them a single penny. Not a penny. And that's a little bit personal in my case.

All right. Yeah, right. So I'm looking at a comment. If Israel took out the Iranian leadership, the Arab world would be so pretend mad at least. Before they to the they've ever seen in their entire life. We've now, and by the way, have I made my case? You got a little glitch. That's interesting. Might have had a glitch. We're back.

All right. I was just telling you that this is probably the best livestream you've ever seen, maybe ever will. But can you give me a fact check on this? Give me a fact check. It's my belief that I've proven I run the simulation based on today's headlines. Yes or no? Does it seem to you like all the news was what I wanted it to be today? Now, if you're new to me, I'm always joking about this. Or am I? I've never seen the news so perfectly tailored to everything that I've already told you and believe and reveals the endgame. I've never seen anything like this. Today is today is just lit. Am I wrong? I mean, I'm having like a moment here. Like before the show, my moment was I've never seen the news so right, so accurate and having the right context, etc. So quite remarkable. This is quite a day. I mean, this is really a remarkable day. I don't know if everybody's going to see it that way. I've never seen anything like it. This is the day of all days in the news. Never seen anything like it.

All right, I'm going to end the non-subscription platforms. So bye to YouTube, bye to Rumble, bye to X. I'll be talking to the folks here on Locals. I understand there's some kind of weird time lag, so I'm going to say goodbye, but I think I have to wait a little bit before I actually click the button so it doesn't look like I've rudely cut you off. So what I'm doing now is completely unnecessary talking from this point forward. There's no point in you watching this because nothing useful will happen. I'm just calling for about 30 seconds until, how do I know when it's time to do it? Well, anyway, if you watch this part, this was my polite goodbye, and I hope it doesn't cut off. What? Push the right button. That would help. Local supporters only. Engaged. Not working. All right, not working. Let me turn it. Let me just turn off this feed and see if you stay on on the other feed. Oh, it won't end. It looks like that option just disappeared. So yesterday we did it right. So I think I'm, well actually I don't know. I think all the platforms, yeah, all the platforms are live. So for some reason it's not letting me delete the other ones. It's probably because I have two streams going. I crossed streams. Yeah, I've got two devices running. One of them is on Locals independently, and then the other one's going through the Rumble Studio. I'm not really supposed to do that, so I think that's what the problem is. So I'm gonna have to say goodbye to everybody at the same time. I'm going to first kill this feed. If I'm pointing at you, if I'm pointing at you right now, you're defeated. I'm going to kill, and then I'm going to kill the other one. So don't go to the other one 'cause that'll die at the same time. Bye for now. See you in the man cave. All right. And before I go now, I'll tell you tomorrow. Bye for now. All right, it doesn't end the stream, so I'm going to have to kill it and reopen it and end this stream.

just killing time until all the feeds are here and everybody's here all right I feel like it's time it's time is everybody here good well this is coffee with Scott ads the best time you're ever going to have in your life if you'd like to take it up to levels that nobody can even understand with their pey human brains all you need for that is a copper mugger glass a tanker cherin a Cen Jugger flask a vessel of any gu fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous Sip and it's going to happen now go ah sound is working video is working Wi.

Fi is screaming this might be the best day you've ever had yeah it might be I mean there could be better ones after this but if ever there was a time when I thought I was running the simulation it would be today and you're going to see this in every story every every story today is going to look like Scott did did you cause that to happen did you did you will that out of the universe and it just happened let me begin with exhibit a for me running the universe Story number one daily coffee consumption is at a 20-year high up nearly 40% probably a coincidence sure but if you put it on a graph I think you'd find that coffee consumption tracks very well with coffee WIS Scott Adams rise into dominance in the media world no coincidence nope you think about coffee enough all right OJ Simpson is dead um reportedly he died of cancer but uh I think doctors are still looking for the real killer and uh is there any way that they could get more ridiculous is there anything we could do to this story to completely discredit Dei and all the race grifters because that's exactly the sort of thing that Scott would want to happen in the real world well let's check uh CNY Professor Mark Lamont Hill he posted that uh OJ Simpson's death um and his acquittal for murder well he said that OJ's acquittal for murder was the correct and necessary result of a racist criminal legal system sure he killed two people but because he's part of a racist system part of a racist system it was fine that he goes free now I kind of appreciate this story uh because it's so ridiculous that it just makes you laugh like that's a good story but I'd like to recount to you my only OJ story uh some of you have heard this before but it's a winner and because OJ passed it's time to say it again true story years ago when I had a problem with my voice many of you know that story uh before I got a corrected surgically I went to a a famous voice doctor in brenwood California to remember brenwood home of OJ and uh this doctor he told me that one of his prior patients had been OJ Simpson So OJ Simpson had gone to a voice doctor to improve his I don't know dictation or something and uh when the when the voice Doctor Who was very well known he's he was was F famous in his field when he decided to write a book about his work as a voice doctor he thought wouldn't it be great to get OJ Simpson as one of the endorsements on the back of the book so he goes to OJ and OJ says sure of course gives him a nice endorsement for his work and then the doctor takes it to his publisher and the publisher says you know that he murdered two people right and that we probably shouldn't put OJ Simpson accused murderer as a recommendation for your book and then my voice doctor with the all-time best quip of all time looked at his publisher and said of OJ he only had one bad day and that's how I'd like OJ to be remembered he only had one bad day if you were to take the average the average would look fine I mean so I guess I have to agree with Mark Lon Hill you should let him let him get away with murder because how else can you correct systemic racism speaking of which a man dies in custody uh saying I can't breathe and police held him down and then he died what do you think the uh medical examiner ruled it it was a black man who died uh doing a George Floyd impression maybe the same reason we don't know but just like George Floyd white police officers were restraining him he was saying he couldn't breathe he died and then the medical examiner ruled it a homicide but no charges were filed huh let's see if I can understand this the medical examiner rules it a homicide now that's exactly the kind of situation that would trigger some kind of criminal charges but it's a Dallas situation and maybe they looked at it and said no now how could you possibly explain a medical examiner who says it's homicide and yet the other police officers not so sure well do you think that the medical examiner is a Dei hire what do you think what are what are the odds could it be a Dei hire what if it's not there are two possibilities if it's a Dei hire it could be somebody who's just trying to set things right and let's say a mark Lamont Hillway as in well this is one way I can work to correct the racism that's been in demic in this country for hundreds of years I can fix this one thing by saying it's homicide it could be but it's also possible it's just a generic white guy and the generic white guy knows he'll be killed if he says it's not homicide does that sound familiar if you were the generic white guy and it was your job to say was was this homicide or accidental do you think after the George Floyd situation that a generic white guy medical examiner could say you know I looked at this and it just looks like an accident to me and then he would just go on with his life everything would be fine after that right because he was honest he gave you his real professional opinion and he then he just goes on with his life am I right no in no world is that medical examiner safe the medical examiner has to say homicide because is the only way you can stay alive because trust the experts am I right let's let's sip a little coffee to The Experts well I'm sure glad that expert uh the expert in the medical examination field told us what's true because you can believe it because the experts said it right let's drink to The Experts experts we trust them we trust them all right how perfect is that story well uh there's a study that says that good-look lawyers both male and female have more success in court so if you're attractive you're more likely to win and it's for both men and women and at all levels of experience so you know this really supports my decision to uh go into the cartooning field some of you might know my story when I went to college I thought I was preaw my initial plan was I'm going to get an economics degree and but I'll make it sort of a pre-law thing and then I'll go to law school and then I looked in the mirror and I said my God you're never going to win a case with that face so I immediately looked for a job in which nobody could see me so I thought well radio I do have a face for radio but cartooning even better yeah so if you're not good-look enough to be a lawyer try to be a cartoonist that's my career advice well here's some fake science fake science fake science there's a study that says people who use willpower alone to achieve goals and resist temptation are deemed uh more trustworthy than those who use tricks now a trick would be like oh I have to put $5 in the swear jar because I swore or telling other people to bust you if you uh break your diet so basically if you use any external crotch to help you do something people will say you have less willpower and so we don't trust you as much why is this fake science there's no such thing as willpower willpower is not a thing they they should have talked to the other parts of science they were actually studying a thing that's imaginary literally willpower doesn't exist I just did a lesson for my members in the uh the locals group so I do little micro lessons two to four minutes that gives you a life skill so after two minutes you learn something you'll you'll know how to do for the rest of your life life now if you do about 200 of them which I have over 200 microl lessons at the Scott adams.

locals.com um you would know that willpower is literally imaginary so they did a whole study on a thing that's literally doesn't exist and then they came to a result because they're the experts let me tell you I'll give you the quick version of why willpower doesn't exist there are only differences and preferences if you say Scott I'm not going to feed you for two weeks and then I'm going to put some ice cream in front of you would I resist I haven't eaten in two weeks but you know I don't want ice cream because it's bad for me a little too much sugar do you think I'd resist starving after two weeks no I'd eat it I would eat a Lunchables that that's how hungry I would be right now where's the willpower in that story none no I was more hungry than I was carrying about a few calories now you could take that silly example and you could extend it to literally everything and in every case you'll see it's very clear somebody just picked the choice that was the better choice there's no willpower do you know how I keep my weight exactly at the right number I'm I'm literally precisely at my target adult weight I I don't want to gain a pound don't want to lose a pound I'm exactly right do you know how much willpower it took none because it doesn't exist all I did was I did stuff like remove junk food from my house learned a little bit more about you know what's good for me so I did learning I removed things from my environment where's the willpower there's no willpower and then I learned um you know through trial and error I learned what things were causing me inflammation and causing me to gain weight so it turns out for me probably wheat I'm not you know it's not a scientific study but anecdotally when when I got rid of Wheat and some other sugary things I can't even gain weight it wouldn't even be possible so if you live your life like willpower doesn't exist you're going to get much better results because instead of going willpower trying really hard that doesn't get you much how about just removing the junk food from your house that'll get you a lot how about learning more about how to make um boring food taste good that'll get you a lot so no science should talk to the other parts of science which do know that willpower and Free Will don't exist but they studied it do you know why they studied the thing that doesn't exist because they're experts they're experts let's drink to The Experts shall we to The Experts love those experts let's see if anything else in the news along those lines all right here's a recommendation that um I don't know how much of this is real but it feels real um I think I may have told you this before you know Andrew huberman he talks about the importance of getting early morning sun taking off your sunglasses and standing in the Sun for 5 minutes in the morning and that's a bit sunny I guess you stand there longer if it's a cloudy day and that's supposed to set your set your body rhythms for the rest of the day now I'm not an expert so I don't know if that's true or not but also there are claims from other people that you can if you take off your shoes and go outside you can do grounding where it I know resets your electrical forces or something I don't know if that's real I have no idea and then there's also the huberman breathing technique where you do the two long inhales through your nose and then one exhale and you only have to do it I don't know three or four times and that resets some of your bodily nervous system or something so what I discovered or it's sort of obvious actually is that you can do all three at the same time do any of them have any real scientific backing I don't know because science is not something that I would trust do you know why I don't trust and don't know if grounding getting Sun or the breathing technique work because it comes from experts anybody who trusts the experts in 2024 is just guessing but I'll tell you what I did do since I could do all three of these at the same time I mean what are you going to do when you're standing there in the Sun so I take off my shoes Outdoors stand in the sun do a few hubman breaths and I've done all three things now so there's a you know I've got three shots that at least one of those things makes a difference in the real world I don't know so here's my experience oh my god do I feel good when I do it immediately it's the damnest thing I just walk outside take off my shoes do that breathing in the Sun and I feel extraordinary and it does in fact feel as though it kicks your day off to a good day can I prove it nope do I believe it's true because the experts told me nope I just know it's three things that can't hurt me they can't hurt me right so I do them and then it makes me feel happy what if it's not really working but it makes me think it's working that's called working you get that right since I'm trying to I'm resetting my mental state as as much as anything else if I walk away thinking it worked it worked I don't need I don't need to hook any electrodes to my body if I think I'm happy good enough all right so that's uh that's worth trying have you ever had this experience that if you try to explain the real world to people you know the Mike Ben's version you you you can't do it without sounding crazy and it's in this category of things which can't be communicated it's one of my favorite like mental things to think about I just love thinking about things which are true and can be put into words but it still can't be communicated let me give you an example the little boy who cried wolf right he he pretended he saw a wolf until finally when he saw a real wolf he tried to tell people in clear language that was true there's a wolf but he couldn't communicate it because he created a situation where they were just sort of you know deaf to his statements about wolves now the the Mike Ben's let's say I like to use him as just a simple way to describe the the larger blob of you know the government working with Nos and the Atlantic Council and how Soros is connected as their banker and it might involve all the these other International things and how they affected the the the platforms and the news and it's so complicated that as soon as you start explaining it to a normie you know somebody who's had no exposure to this idea whatsoever and they think they're living in a democracy or a some kind of Republic which I don't think we have for decades um you can't explain it and I'm I'm not I'm only bringing up because it's fascinating how you can hide stuff one of the ways you can hide stuff is right in front of people you just have to make it complicated that's it yeah as long as something's complicated you can hide anything do you know what's complicated climate change it's complicated you know what's complicated are elections I'm not in the concept level but when you get down to who's doing what and how many moving Parts it's kind of complicated so everywhere that there's something that's complicated it's probably really bad because that's where you hide all the bad stuff is in the complications yeah manufactured consent yeah that's part of it anyway um I finally figured out what it is that makes MSNBC look different from CNN CNN looks like people who are sometimes knowing they're lying and sometimes don't know they're lying you know they might actually believe their own news but here's what they don't look like they don't always look crazy that's my take I when I watch CNN nobody has crazy eyes you know I I keep calling out people who have obvious mental illness problems you can see it in their eyes I don't I when I look at Jake Tapper do I say to myself that guy's crazy no no he's completely sane when I look at Wolf Blitzer totally same totally same when you look at ra Rachel madow does she look sane to you I mean really when you look at uh Lawrence O'Donnell does he look sane I mean really does he now let me give you a contrast just so I'm not making fun of all of their hosts when I look at Ary melber does he look insane no not even a little bit he could leave MSNBC and work on CNN tomorrow because he looks like the CNN people they might be misled about something they might be wrong but don't look crazy they look like people doing their job as they see it now here's what really sets me over the top and makes MSNBC a comedy for me CNN is fascinating and I I recommend you watch it just to find out what they're telling their people just to be well informed about what uh people you don't agree with necessarily are saying but when I watch MSNBC I'm actually watching it for the jokes meaning that I find it hilarious and I finally figured out what it was that makes it so funny it's the smugness the smugness if somebody's just mentally ill it's just disturbing if somebody is perfectly sane and smug sometimes sometimes they're just popular I would say Hannity is kind of smug wouldn't you Sean Hannity he seems a little smug maybe you'd say he's just confident but little smoke but he doesn't come off as as like comedy cuz he looks like he's doing his job and you know even if he knows he's exaggerating he probably knows it you know nothing crazy but if you look at Lawrence O'Donnell or Rachel madow they're super smug but the things they say are crazy if you had smug and crazy it's hilarious so when I watch it I'm like oh my God what am I watching this is the funniest thing smug and crazy at the same time anyway um there some people are thinking that so-called AGI or super AI intelligence is coming and it's real close open AI fired two people um for allegedly for leaking information now um I I saw online some speculation that you know it's obvious what it was they leaked well that's not obvious to me but the speculation is that um the leak is about something called qar a rumored super intelligence that will come out of AI open AI fairly soon who believes that how many of you believe that the leaks were about as super Ai and they were on the verge of something we've never seen before I'm going to say no I'm going to bet against it I think it was probably a league I mean that part might be true but I doubt it was about a super intelligence which will'll all be frightened to hear about I think everything's going to be incremental that's what I think I think all AI Improvement will be incremental but still astonishing when anybody looks back at it so I think the things we think are going to happen in a month are going to take two years and they'll be amazing but we'll have so much time to adjust to it that the amazing part might wear off you know you'll just be well there's another that's a little 5% better than that last one so I'm going to be I'm on the uh underwhelmed side of things for AI and I'm happy to be wrong i' love to be wrong but I think it would be underwhelmed well you probably all saw the story of Representative Sheila Lee Jackson at a public event speculating out loud how we could possibly settle the moon because it's made of gas and uh how how exactly do you build something on top of gas so that big old Round Moon she said was a just a big gaseous thing and okay now you probably say to yourself okay but she's a politician so you don't really expect your politicians to know everything about science it'd be good if they knew the basics but you know you give them a pass they're the representative want wanted them there so if the public wanted them as a representative and you know they're not having much to do with any sciency stuff that would be fair I mean as long as she's not involved directly in any kind of science decision does it really matter well here's a little background you didn't know she used to be on the house space and Aeronautics subcommittee yeah yeah one of our experts in the government uh who was on the house space and aono committee thinks the moon is made of gas well let's have a drink to our experts shall we not just the scientific experts but the political experts the ones who are serving on the house space and Aeronautics subcommittee who think the moon is made of gas here's to you but you know even as I tell you how many experts are wrong about things at least they got climate change right am I right like thank God I mean because that's it so important but all these experts in all these fields clearly lying or wrong or bash crazy but at least at least climate change is believable incredible and pure science really let see next story uh Harvard Yale MIT and brown are all returning to standardized tests now that's a surprise because you think that the smartest people in the country you know the people running these higher level institutions when they decided that not testing people before uh admitting them was a good idea I'm really surprised that that didn't work out huh have I ever told you that if you don't measure you're not managing that's one of your one of those little bumper scker rules that pops up all the time if you're not measuring it you know with some kind of legitimate measurement system you're not managing it's not managing to say well i' should like to have more of this or less of that you need to have a real idea of what you're shooting at or you're not really managing and you're if you're not watching if you're going in the right direction of the wrong it can't be called managing but the smartest institutions in fact Harvard wants to teach you how to make decisions and be an economist and a and a business person and uh and they didn't know that the number one rule of management is you got to you got to measure things so if you'd like to get your MBA at Harvard just know you're taught by people who were caught by surprise that measuring things made a difference when they were trying to manage things didn't work out so it looks like they had a choice of being super racist at the same time of being overpriced and those are two things that they couldn't pull off at the same time we'd like to be overpriced but we'd also really like to be super racist and then the public said hold on hold on that's too far you can be overpriced or you can be super racist but you cannot be both that's too much that's too much Harvard so Harvard said well as much as we love being super racist I guess it would be better to be high paid so they chose the money over the principal experts here's to the experts at Harvard who are teaching you how to manage without measuring things to them to them so good well even though your highest uh educational facilities who teach people science and business even though they apparently don't understand science or business the one thing we can feel confident in is that they did produce scientists who really got climate change right because if there's one thing the scientists can do outside of the college you know environment they they can measure the temperature of the planet am I right they can measure the temperature of the planet so at least that's we got that working for us so good news on on that front oh this is awkward wow kind of bad luck that this story came up in the order it did well now I just feel like a dope Zero Hedge is reporting that as many as 30% of all the thermometers that they use for the temperatures don't exist H I wonder if that's a problem in the accuracy so they're called ghost thermometers and they're thermometers that used to exist at one point but now they no longer do so what they do the the people who are measuring the data let's call them the experts probably all came from Harvard and MIT and Yale but I don't know that for sure but um when they go to measure and they realize that there used to be a thermometer there but now there isn't what they do is they take the average of other therm om so let's say you used to have an old one but now the old one's gone now it's been replaced with a new one and it's not even necessarily in the same place so you take the average of the temperatures of the thermometers that are not where the old one was and you throw that in mix 30% of them 30% that's the claim um let's see uh Mr shuchuk said the US hcn stations they reached a maximum of over 1,200 so in 1957 we had over 1,200 temperature measuring stations or thermometers but after 1990 the number of active stations became declining due to aging equipment and Personnel retirements huh you know I lived in the real world for a while and I worked in a laboratory in which all we did was work with equipment and Technology every day equipment and technology and uh you know what I learned when I was working with equipment and Technology all that equipment and technology is 100% effective all the time and it never breaks never gets out of calibration never gets out of tune and is completely unaffected by temperature and the incompetence of the people involved no that's the opposite of what I learned now I would like to take a bow in a moment but only after I tell you why and and then I'll I'll see if you believe I I deserve a bow okay you you get to decide if you say yes Scott you can take a bow then I'll do it but if you say no if you say no they'll say all right all right you have spoken who told you name anybody else who told you this that in the real world you can't trust on people to read thousands of thermometers and compare it to 100 years ago when we didn't have thermometers and we had tree rings and Ice core samples and come up with a believable credible line that passes all scientific integrity and I said in the real world that is literally not possible there is no situation in which you could have 12200 thermometers and maybe a thousand people involved and that they're measuring the temperature and getting something like a real result do you believe that with having no scientific background whatsoever that using the dilber filter which is what I did I used the dilber filter that the real world does not have any kind of competence that could possibly produce accurate temperature readings with the equipment used things changing over time and then human beings involved in the process who told you that that isn't even possible just me who who who else predicted that if you actually looked into it it would look absurd just me I'm the only one do I do I deserve bow you tell me what do you mean no damn you damn you all right all right did Linden no the so let me uh let me give you a different take on that so somebody said that a professional climate scientist said that well the climate scientist didn't say exactly this story but the climate scientists do say you know for this reason or that reason the accuracy is not good now from a scientific perspective and somebody within the industry you that may be an accurate take but I'm not even in the industry and I'm saying that you don't need to be a climate scientist who has worked deeply in Industry you just have to listen to what they said wait you just told me you measured the temperature of the earth so accurately that you can tell what direction it's going in why I don't believe that I don't believe that for a second so the the dilbur principle of just general incompetence really guarantees this isn't doable because it's too manual has too many pieces of equipment involved too much you know moving things around too much temperature and weather destruction too much bureaucracy yes I would say that uh this is pretty solid evidence that we don't know if the temperatur is going up or down it's not my opinion that I know by the way so it's not my opinion that I know everything's fine climate wise it's my opinion that we can't measure it that's a very big difference so it could be a crisis maybe how would I know in order to know I would have to trust science really it's 2024 who trusts science doesn't even feel like a thing now let me ask you this how long do you think it will take Trump and let's say V to turn the and let's say this needs some uh confirmation so it would be great if we had some confirmation of this but suppose we get confirmation that 30% of the thermometers or ghost thermometers how long would it take V and Trump to turn that into a victory dance and say well we can't tell you what the temperature is doing we can just tell you that they didn't know and maybe it was a hoax would you say it's a hoax if I told you that 30% of the thermometers don't exist would you say it's a hoax maybe not but it's not that far away is it all right um Trump did the funniest Trump thing I mean I every time Trump does something you don't quite expect it feels like he's just operating on some different level so here's what he did he just did some video commercials uh recommending RFK Jr his competitor and he and he actually meant it because he's aware that Democrats are more likely to vote for him so he just comes right out and says in videos um he said that RFK J is a better man than Biden and he says quote Ark Jr is as you know the most radical left candidate so he's making sure that that there are no Republicans who want to go that way so he characterizes them as the most radical left that should that should eliminate all the Republicans from voting for him but he says uh he is uh more so than the green party even lefter than the green party says Trump and says he's uh more so even than crooked Joe Biden but he's got some nice things about him I happen to like him uh and and then Trump says I guess I would mean RFK junor is going to be taking away votes from crooked Joe Biden and he should because he's actually better than Biden he's much better than Biden he's much better than Biden now how much do you love that have you ever seen that have you ever some seen somebody just come right out and say you know what the this other guy is better than the guy you're voting for he's not as good as me but you should at least at least not vote for that other guy because that's a disaster would you like to hear what the young people in my town say here's what the young people in my town say about Joe Biden and RFK Jr and I'm told that there are no exceptions no exceptions now I I can't Pro that but I'm told there are no exceptions to what I'm just going to say at the uh young person sort of you know teenager young adult level when asked about politics they'll say you know RFK Jr is kind of attractive but there's no way in hell I'd support Biden and those are Democrats you know those are people who come from Democrat backgrounds they're literally saying Biden is not even not even close to being a possibil they're saying RFK Jr all the way the young people now they're not saying Trump the boys are the bo the boys are more likely to say Trump but the girls are saying you know what RFK Jr looks a lot better than Biden do you know what makes uh women decide on a candidate is whether they'd have sex with them it's whether they' have sex with them is that is that too far nope no that would would be a normal way that all human beings uh act did I not just tell you they did a study that said that lawyers who are more attractive are more likely to win cases I just told you that this is exactly that this is just more of that we all know that tall presidents or tall candidates do better than short ones do you know why because people want to sleep with tall ones same as dating exactly the same taller is better so if you look at Joe Biden who is literally you know a desicated pile of twigs and you compare him to RFK Jr who's ripped you can understand why young women are saying you know I think I politically agree with RFK Jr they have no idea what any of their policies are there's no policy decision yeah do you think an 18-year-old looking at RFK Jr and Biden knows the policy differences between those two not a chance they just know which one they'd bang that's it and that's enough that's enough should guarantee a Trump trump a win unless it's rigged anyway let's talk about RFK Jr who did the most amazing thing on Aaron Bernett show and CNN so the Vigilant Fox is reporting about this has a nice summary on X the Vigilant Fox another good another good follow on X just look for it the Vigilant Fox anyway um RFK JR says that Aaron Bernett brain stopped working when he made the stunning argument on about Biden on CNN all right so let's see if you think this is as good as uh the Vigilant Fox does right so here was the argument Kenny said there's no court that found that President Trump tried to steal the election or tried to derail the election or tried to start an insurrection however there are courts that have found that President Biden was censoring his opponents and not just me and then Kennedy said although he did sensor me and I did win that suit so it's not just me making it up oh my God how much do I love that man right now RFK Jr is the person who I could disagree with the most and love the most at the same time because what he's done is he's dismantled their strongest argument against the election being rigged but he doesn't know he did it well he might know but um so that the conversation is about whether the president is an insurrectionist that happens to be Biden's strongest argument against Trump because Biden went from what uh he went from Biden omic which now everybody's reporting he got rid of because of inflation so he had to give up on bomic he did the whole the the Army is full of white supremacists and and then when they tried to root them out they didn't find any and then it seems like they've been silent about all the white supremacists lately have you noticed that like Biden was all about the white supremacist but there hasn't been really a problem and nobody was buying it and there weren't any in the military so the white supremacist thing like biomics was something they tried and doesn't look like it worked so they've settled on this whole threat to democracy threat to democracy and also specifically that he doubted the elections and when they say he must be a a he must be a dictator because he doubted the elections do you know why they can say that they can only say it because no court found that the election was rigged and now our K Jr comes at comes at him with the Judo reframe of all time and says there's no court that found that President Trump tried to steal the election derail it or start an Insurrection and that's just a fact so you can't have it both ways if you're going to claim the election was good because no court found it wasn't you're going to have to find that no court founding was an insurrectionist and you're going to have to eat that and Earth G Jr is going to shove it down your throat on live TV if you if you don't like it so to me RFK Jr just dismantled the entire uh gaslighting operation of the Democrats right in front of you that's kind of amazing now what I hope is that uh VI and Trump see this and pick up that argument because it's a killer it's a it's a absolute killer absolute killer and here's what I'd love to see and maybe you don't want to start too soon it looks like um the Democrats want to ride this whole insurrectionist threat to democracy I think Trump should allow them to keep that argument until they're so committed to it it's just the brand and then he should mock it out of existence you could mock the uh dictator thing away just by acting like a normal person imagine Trump going into Chick-fil-A some of you saw the video everybody loved him he was he was hugging on and taking selfies with a lot of black women were there was you know which is a great look for a politician imagine him going into Chick-fil-A and while the camera is running and somebody's taking a selfie with them let's let's say just to make the picture good it's a it's a young black woman who's just thrilled to be in his presence and then he turns to her and says the news says I'm going to be a dictator do I seem like a dictator to you and then just laugh and then the person will laugh and you will learn that there are no people who think it it's just a news thing there are no people who think it and by the way if you did think it and you met him you would stop thinking it within 5 Seconds let me give you a demonstration of trump changing somebody who believe who believes he's a dictator into someone who doesn't believe it pat in the back Shake of the hands how are you doing today oh wow looks like you're doing great I'm glad you're supporting me how are the sandwiches here and you're done and people would say how did anybody think he was a dictator that that was the least stalish thing I've ever seen in my life he asked me about my sandwich he came into Chick-fil-A you know where anybody could hurt him because he's right in the middle of the crowd by the way did you notice the Secret Service did not keep the people away how about that's the biggest Story how about that how about you missed the biggest story Trump walked into a middle of a crowd unannounced a very largely black crowd unannounced just walked in now the Secret Service was there but there's no way they could have protected them people literally had their arms around them you you can't protect somebody if somebody's up to no good yeah he basically trusted the crowd and they immediately reciprocated immediately all he has to do is trust the crowd now it's dangerous because you know there could be it only takes one crazy person but Trump trusting the public is such a good look and I would love to see him engage to the public and just ask the question do I do I look like a dictator to you and and to imagine that he thinks that would be his best play in What world would that be his best play to become a dictator at age whatever it's not a good play it would guarantee his entire family got slaughtered what kind of a good play is that it would guarantee his businesses were destroyed it would guarantee like Civil War now compare that to the alternative the alternative of just doing a good job and then leaving office after his four years which one is better for Trump and his family unambiguously better to restore America to his former greatness as best he can and to walk out with dignity having proven everything he need to prove and then let his business Thrive let history think well of him and become the most popular president in the history of the United States you don't think he wants that you think he'd rather be a dictator and hated by everyone it's crazy now if there's one thing that Trump wants he wants the public to like him he doesn't want to be a dictator that'd be crazy but a lot of crazy people are convinced it's true all right speaker Johnson finally told the truth about why he changed his mind about fisa now he is pro- fisa where he used to be anti fisa and he says and Mike cernovich phrases this exactly correct he got the talk he got the talk now who told you name anybody else who told you this that I believe that the top people the president and you know the leaders of the parties that when they when they get power but not until then only after they have their power that the intelligence groups call them in and they say here's all the stuff you didn't know before here's all the stuff you didn't know before and this is why nothing you knew is real and you better you better do it this way that was me and he's saying it he's saying it directly that when he found out what the intelligence people told him he can't tell you what they said but he's pretty sure he's got to do what they said now here's something Tucker added that I think is a real good addition to that idea how does speaker Johnson know that what the intelligence people told him is true no way there's no way he knows what's true so if he doesn't know what's true who's running the country because probably speaker Johnson thinks he's one of the people running the country or at least you know big part of the government because he knows this new information but what if it's not true if it's not true then the intelligence people are running the country what if it is true but it's also what the intelligence people want to happen well then the intelligence people are running the country so there are two possibilities what they told them is true which means the intelligence people are determining how things go they're in charge or it's not true and they're still in charge because they're telling you something to make you act in the way they want based on false but either way this is confirmation that the government is not the government and Johnson said it directly he said they showed him things and if and if you knew what he saw you would change your mind now if he had to guess do you think he saw real things I honestly doubt it because again I'm going to put the dilbur filter on this if you put the dilbur filter on it and you give somebody unlimited power the unlimited power to lie to the government and make them act like they believe it who doesn't use unlimited power in the history of everything if you give somebody that kind of power they're going to not use it of course they are they're going to use it every chance they get now they might not use it for small stuff you know because they don't care about the small stuff but if let's say it was a difference between funding Ukraine and not funding Ukraine do you think anybody's going to tell them the truth I don't think so not not a chance here's what I think probably happen I think they called him and said here's why we need fisa we can't tell the public but we fisa is the only reason we thed three nuclear terrorist attacks and he'd be like what I never heard there were any nuclear terrorist attacks he goes well that's because we did such a good job we kept it from the public so they wouldn't panic and and also that people wouldn't know our sources and means but we have thwarted three terrorist I'm just making this up if you're joining me late none of this is real but we we thwarted three nuclear terrorist attacks and here's the thing speaker Johnson you can't tell anybody do you promise oh well really if you thwarted three nuclear attacks I have to admit I didn't want this fisa stuff but I mean the responsible thing to do is to make sure we don't get nuked I don't want that on my record so I guess I'm going to trust you yeah going to trust you so it seems to me that whether or not speaker Johnson heard something true or false he did confirm that he's not in charge and that the government's not in charge now do you think this trick would work on the president if you if you said Joe Biden you don't know this but we know this and you better at not tell anybody of course it would it would literally work on everyone you put me in that situation and I'm totally aware of all the risk right I know what tricks they might play they could turn me so fast it would be one second and I'd be flipped because this situation is unre it's it's irresistible nobody's going to say yeah I do want to take a a healthy 30% chance that you're lying to me and I'm going to ignore the nuclear risk you just told me we avoided with fisa nobody makes that decision you you say if they told you you're going to rely on them even if it's because that's just the better play all right Marjorie Taylor green is still against the fisa stuff but she is not been read into the uh the secret things here's what I like yeah you want to compromise I'll give you a compromise speaker Johnson I will be on your team and I will agree with extending fisa under the following conditions you put Marjorie Taylor Green in the skiff and you tell her what they told you if her detector doesn't ring off the hook and she says oh jeez I didn't know that okay okay now that I know that I'm going to change my mind I would be a lot more comfortable if you put somebody with the you know the world siiz balls of Margery tailor Green in that room and she tells me so let me say it again I don't trust speaker Johnson I don't know him you know I'm not saying he's a liar I just don't know him so I don't trust him but I've been watching margerie Taylor green for some time and and by the way if you put Matt gates in there I wouldn't believe him right I don't I don't have that level of trust with him not you know not that I you not that there's some specific thing it's just I don't know so but Marjorie Taylor green I've Got a Feeling is purely a a patriot I mean every signal she sends is that she's in it for the right reason you know even if you don't like her style or whatever she really seems like she's in this for the right reason you Ben in the military probably makes a difference so that would be that's that's my take so in marjerie Taylor green and let her come out and tell me that she saw the same thing speaker Johnson did and if they both are on the same team I'm going to get a little flexible about fisa yeah I'm going to get a little bit flexible all right coincidentally FBI director says there are more threats than there have ever been well doesn't that work perfectly doesn't it oh isn't it great that that FBI director says there's more terrorist threats than we've ever seen at the same time they're talking about fisa the best way to stop those terrorist threats so that that fits kind of snugly doesn't it just a coincidence well there's a new covid whistleblower um this says that uh well it's everything you knew was true the United States or members of it including fouchi absolutely did plan and execute and and were funded um the gain of function research to make Corona virus more deadly I'm going to say that's confirmed as confirmed as anything could be now you have to worry about fake news and fake whistleblowers but you know everything about this looks just so obvious do you all agree that that we could now say it's just the fact the fouchi was crooked fouchi lied it was obviously some secret government program but here are the two questions that we have not seen addressed why were they doing that what why were they making a deadly virus now the the answers I've seen are that they're making the deadly virus so that they would be better prepared if somebody else made a deadly virus does that sound real because you could do that with everything you could you could have a little laboratory coming up with every damn thing that could go wrong just so you're ready in case somebody else does it no no that's not believable that sounds like total yeah so why was it that we ever believed that fouchi maybe didn't do this and it was some kind of you know some kind of pangol and had sex with the back kind of situation why did we ever believe that or anybody I don't maybe you didn't but why did anybody believe that it's because of the experts let's drink to The Experts they got this Co stuff they got this climate change and they've they've studied things yeah here's the experts all right let's see oh and we have another whistleblower bre B news reporting that uh there was a guy Mike mccormic who's got a new book and apparently he was like a super Insider like he was in the room so uh I I see him described as Biden's stenographer but do they mean that metaphorically or literally a stenographer but he was in the room here's what he says he says he personally witnessed Biden negotiate the burisma kickback scheme us funding to Ukraine energy primarily burisma in exchange for putting Hunter Biden on bre's board of directors on a trip to Poland in 2014 um wow he says uh Biden's former National Security Aid Jake Sullivan is at the center of the Scandal um and uh Mc.

Cormack recalled he told that Sullivan told reporters in 2014 on Air Force 2 um as an anonymous senior Administration so it must have been on background or something that the United States intended to help Ukraine's natural gas industry so everything you thought was true as a direct witness now oh my God and and uh I think you've heard I think breit Bard and other places you've heard that Jake Sullivan has always seemed like he was the center of all of this and now we've got a witness that says he was and uh it's every bit as corrupt as it looks like so Ukraine was an energy play a corruption play a CIA play but what it wasn't is defending democracy against Putin although there might have been some people who cared about that as well so I think that the United States is essentially a criminal cartel and it's been using essentially Mafia tactics to take over Russia and get control of their energy um and that Russia too is basically a you know a mobster situation with a lot of energy so to me it looks like two criminal elements organized criminal gangs United States versus Russia fighting over uh resources that's what I see how's history going to write it now when history writes this story are they going to say well United States has been a criminal organization maybe for decades and they ran a play there was essentially a criminal Rico kind of situation to take over Russia's energy and told the United States it was all about Freedom or some damn thing meanwhile Russia of course is not a real country it's just a gas station with an army basically a criminal Enterprise so really it was a contest between two criminal Enterprises with Bill ions of dollars at stake do you think your history book is going to say that well probably not um let's see what what could possibly bolster this claim that the Biden Administration is corrupt I wonder if there's any other story in the news right now that would make you scratch your head and say well there it is next story uh CBS news reporter Katherine herriage says the network CBS fired her took all their notes and she's never seen anything like that they took her personal notes they took her computer when they fired her and what was she working on at the time oh a story involving Joe Biden's corruption so CBS moved on her like OJ on Nicole because they found out she was working on a story about Biden's corruption and I'm guessing she found some I'm guessing she found some so they shut her down how many of you thought that the news was real and that the news organizations are they're just doing their news organization thing nope they've always just been a Democrat tool at least in recent years and uh here it is everything you thought about climate change was right they can't measure it everything you thought about fouchy and Co was true it was a big old cover up and we don't even know why they were doing it we still don't even know why we just know what happened and then the Biden corruption stuff in Ukraine and Ukraine war it's exactly what it looks like exactly what it looks like what a day well there reports that Iran is planning a calibrated attack so as you know uh Israel took out some of its uh commanders and I think they had an embassy an Iranian Embassy in Syria or something and if you had an embassy that's a whole higher level of War because the embassy is considered sovereign territory of the country that has the or consulate a consulate not an embassy um and so Iran Iran is saying that you know hey that's like our it's like our own territory so we're going to have to respond and the uh Intel people think that if it's going to happen it's going to happen in the next few days um here's what I think I think that Israel is getting the trumpan benefit of unpredictability and what what I mean by that is when Hamas did their attack on Israel um I Heard reports of some them thought they were going to take over Israel that sounds crazy to me but um I think they assumed I'm just observing it like everybody else it seems to me that Hamas must have assumed that Israel's response to the attack would be somewhat similar to how they've responded to other attacks in other words there would be some uh some proportional response and you know maybe a thousand Hamas people get killed but they still have 29 th000 left over and they just start over but instead Israel called their Bluff took G away from them forever destroyed their civilization and it's never coming back now do you think they expected that nope and what did that buy Israel as a permanent asset trumpian unpredictability now Iran has a new situation they've never seen before which is always before they could sort of predict if we do this they'll probably do something that's similar not anymore in fact I'll go further if Israel ever intended to take out the leadership of Iran all they need is for Iran to make an attack on the Homeland or or just do something provocative even if it's not on Israel proper Israel just needs a reason and they're going to take out the Ayatollah now in in any other situation could they take out the Ayatollah nope nope only this one only this one because they said we're going to kill everybody who is responsible who else was responsible the Israeli lead I'm sorry the Iranian leadership I mean that's what we're told I mean I can't I I don't have direct reporting but everybody seems to think that an Iranian leadership was behind the Hamas attack Israel said directly we're going to kill every one of them that would include Iranian the Iranian leadership just give them a reason this is the only time in history that I can think of that if Israel literally took out the entire leadership they could get away with it now you say to yourself not guaranteed you're right it's not guaranteed nothing's guaranteed gued it's War it's a it's a war for existence nothing's guaranteed but there has never been a more ideal time for Israel to end the risk of the Iranians nuking them in the future than right now all they have to do is say look we told you we were going to get everybody involved we we took out the head of the snake and by the way we have no quarrel whatsoever with even the Iranian military we have no quarrel we only wanted the people who are behind the planning and execution of this attack and I'm sorry it just happened to include the Ayatollah and all of his generals so they're gone now we'd love to help you Iran recover we'd love to bring you into the fold make you part of the you know Abraham Accords plus someday but at the moment we are completely unpredictable and anything you thought we wouldn't do last year we will to do this year this year is not last year whatever you think might be our proportional response stop thinking that there's no limit to our proportional response meaning it's not going to be proportional that ladies and gentlemen is the Trump premium Trump taught you that being predictable basically Dooms you being predictable Dooms you you because you can't negotiate and you can't frighten everybody knows what's going to happen so you have to create a realistic frame that if you hit us we might take you around completely and you have to you have to set a precedent because if you haven't done it in the real world it's just talk now Gaza is being basically disappeared do you think there's anybody in Iran who is watching what's happening in Gaza and says to them I think those Israelis are in the mood to be proportional no no they are not in the mood to be proportional they're certainly going to be rational but they're not going to be proportional they're not in the mood and they don't need to be they just don't need to be so I'm not recommending it and I'm not predicting it I'm just saying Iran needs to understand that if they did something serious to Israel and Israel in response took out their entire leadership the world would yawn the world would yawn that's never been the case before and it may never be again there may never be another time you could do this and get away with it and by the way I don't know if they could get away with it but all the other times they definitely couldn't you know a year ago do you think they could have taken out the Uranian leadership no absolutely not but what if they did it today today is a coin flip today you would actually say you know what we might disagree too aggressive and then other other people would say no that was just aggressive enough that they had a come you would never get that conversation any other time and by the way that benefit will decrease every day so every every day that Israel doesn't take out Iranian leadership is going to be harder tomorrow so the ideal situation for Israel depending on how aggressive they're feeling is that Iran does Strike Back if Iran strikes back and they Mak it a serious strike all bets are off so that's how you negotiate I don't know if I've mentioned that Netanyahu is smart when you're dealing with a leader that smart I mean and I'm talking just raw intelligence you know forget about policies and preferences and who's left and who's right if you have that much raw computing power on on on one side I would be afraid of that that's a lot of raw computing power and I wouldn't want to wouldn't want to be on the other team so I remind you I don't support Israel anymore um because the ADL has targeted me and yes of course I know the ADL doesn't work for Israel of course I know they're independent but it's not my problem I can't solve their problem my problem is hey if if your friend attacks me that's how it works right if you could stop your friend from attacking me and you don't do it there we are right don't don't expect me to solve your problem I'm not going to solve your problem so problem is the ADL and so I don't support Israel because of that I don't think we should fund them a single penny not a penny and that's a little bit personal in my case all right yeah right so I'm looking at a comment if Israel took out the Iranian uh leadership the Arab world would be so so pretend mad at least before they to the they've ever seen in their entire life we've now uh and by the way have I have I made my case you got a little H glitch that's interesting U might have had a glitch we're back all right I was just telling you that uh this is probably the best live stream you've ever seen maybe ever will but can you uh give me a fact check on this give me a fact check it's uh it's my belief that I've proven I run the simulation based on today's headlines yes or no does it seem to you like all the news was what I wanted it to be today now if you're new to me I'm always joking about this or am I I've never seen the news so perfectly tailored to everything that I've already told you and believe and reveals the endgame I've never seen anything like this today is today is just lit am am I wrong I mean I'm having like a moment here like be before the show My Moment was I've never I've never seen the news so right so accurate and having the right context Etc so quite remarkable this is quite a day I mean this is really a remarkable day I don't know if I don't know if everybody's going to see it that way I've never seen anything like it this this is the day of all days in the news never see anything like it all right I'm going to end the uh the non-subscription platforms so bye to You.

Tube bye to rumble bye to X I'll be talking to the folks here on locals I understand there's some some kind of weird time lag so I'm going to say goodbye but uh I think I have to wait a little bit before I actually click the button so it doesn't look like I've rudely cut you off so what I'm doing now is completely unnecessary talking from this point forward there's no point in you watching this because nothing useful will happen I'm just calling for about 30 seconds until how do I know when it's time to do it well anyway if you watch this part this was my polite good day and I hope it doesn't cut off what push the right button that would help local supporters only engaged not working all right not working let me turn it let me just turn off this feed and see if you stay on on the other feed oh it won't end it looks like that option just disappeared so yesterday we did it right so I think I'm I think well actually I don't know I think all the platforms yeah all the platforms are live so for some reason it's not letting me delete the other ones it's probably because I have two streams going I cross streams yeah I've got two devices running one of them is on locals independently and then the other one's going through the rumble Studio I'm not really supposed to do that so I I think that's what the problem is so I'm gonna have to say goodbye to everybody at the same time I'm going to first uh kill this feed if I'm pointing at you if I'm pointing at you right now you're de feat I'm going to kill and then I'm going to kill the other one so don't go to the other one cuz that'll die at the same time bye for now see you in the man cave all right and before I go now I'll tell you tomorrow bye for now all right it doesn't end the stream so so I'm going to have to kill it and reopen it and end this stream for

[Music]

just killing time until all the feeds

are here and everybody's

here all right I feel like it's

time it's

time is everybody here

good well this is coffee with Scott ads

the best time you're ever going to have

in your life if you'd like to take it up

to levels that nobody can even

understand with their pey human brains

all you need for that is a copper mugger

glass a tanker cherin a Cen Jugger flask

a vessel of any gu fill it with your

favorite liquid I like coffee and join

me now for the unparallel pleasure of

the dopamine hit of the

day the thing that makes everything

better it's called the simultaneous Sip

and it's going to happen now go

ah sound is working video is working

WiFi is screaming this might be the best

day you've ever

had yeah it might

be I mean there could be better ones

after this but if ever there was a time

when I thought I was running the

simulation it would be

today and you're going to see this in

every

story every every story today is going

to look like Scott did did you cause

that to happen did you did you will that

out of the universe and it just happened

let me begin with exhibit a for me

running the universe Story number one

daily coffee consumption is at a 20-year

high up nearly

40% probably a coincidence

sure but if you put it on a graph I

think you'd find that coffee consumption

tracks very well with coffee WIS Scott

Adams rise into dominance in the media

world no

coincidence nope you think about coffee

enough all right OJ Simpson is

dead um reportedly he died of

cancer but uh I think doctors are still

looking for the real

killer and uh is there any way that they

could get more ridiculous is there

anything we could do to this

story to completely discredit

Dei and all the race grifters because

that's exactly the sort of thing that

Scott would want to happen in the real

world well let's

check uh CNY Professor Mark Lamont Hill

he posted that uh OJ Simpson's

death um and his acquittal for murder

well he said that OJ's acquittal for

murder was the correct and necessary

result of a racist criminal legal system

sure he killed two people but because

he's part of a racist

system part of a racist system it was

fine that he goes free now I kind of

appreciate this

story uh because it's so

ridiculous that it just makes you

laugh like that's a good story but I'd

like to recount to you my only OJ story

uh some of you have heard this before

but it's a winner and because OJ passed

it's time to say it again true story

years ago when I had a problem with my

voice many of you know that story uh

before I got a corrected surgically I

went to a a famous voice doctor in

brenwood California to remember brenwood

home of OJ and uh this doctor he told me

that one of his prior patients had been

OJ Simpson So OJ Simpson had gone to a

voice doctor to improve his I don't know

dictation or something and uh when the

when the voice Doctor Who was very well

known he's he was was F famous in his

field when he decided to write a book

about his work as a voice doctor he

thought wouldn't it be great to get OJ

Simpson as one of the endorsements on

the back of the book so he goes to OJ

and OJ says sure of course gives him a

nice endorsement for his work and then

the doctor takes it to his publisher and

the publisher

says you know that he murdered two

people

right and that we probably shouldn't put

OJ Simpson accused murderer as a

recommendation for your

book and then my voice

doctor with the all-time best quip of

all time looked at his publisher and

said of

OJ he only had one bad

day and that's how I'd like OJ to be

remembered he only had one bad

day if you were to take the

average the average would look fine I

mean so I guess I have to agree with

Mark Lon Hill you should let him let him

get away with murder because how else

can you correct systemic

racism speaking of which a man dies in

custody uh saying I can't breathe and

police held him down and then he died

what do you think the uh medical

examiner ruled it

it was a black man who died uh doing a

George Floyd

impression maybe the same reason we

don't know but just like George Floyd

white police officers were restraining

him he was saying he couldn't breathe he

died and then the medical examiner ruled

it a homicide but no charges were filed

huh let's see if I can understand this

the medical examiner rules it a homicide

now that's exactly the kind of situation

that would trigger some kind of criminal

charges but it's a Dallas situation and

maybe they looked at it and said

no now how could you possibly explain a

medical

examiner who says it's homicide and yet

the other police

officers not so

sure well do you think that the medical

examiner is a Dei hire

what do you think what are what are the

odds could it be a Dei hire what if it's

not there are two possibilities if it's

a Dei hire it could be somebody who's

just trying to set things right and

let's say a mark Lamont Hillway as in

well this is one way I can work to

correct the racism that's been in demic

in this country for hundreds of years I

can fix this one thing by saying it's

homicide it could be

but it's also possible it's just a

generic white guy and the generic white

guy knows he'll be killed if he says

it's not homicide does that sound

familiar if you were the generic white

guy and it was your job to say was was

this homicide or accidental do you think

after the George Floyd situation that a

generic white guy medical examiner could

say you know I looked at this and it

just looks like an accident to me and

then he would just go on with his

life everything would be fine after that

right because he was honest he gave you

his real professional opinion and he

then he just goes on with his life am I

right no in no world is that medical

examiner safe the medical examiner has

to say homicide because is the only way

you can stay

alive because trust the experts am I

right let's let's sip a little coffee to

The

Experts well I'm sure glad that expert

uh the expert in the medical examination

field told us what's true because you

can believe it because the experts said

it right let's drink to The

Experts

experts we trust them we trust

them all right

how perfect is that

story well uh there's a study that says

that good-look lawyers both male and

female have more success in court so if

you're attractive you're more likely to

win and it's for both men and women and

at all levels of

experience

so you know this really supports my

decision to uh go into the cartooning

field some of you might know my story

when I went to college I thought I was

preaw my initial plan was I'm going to

get an economics degree and but I'll

make it sort of a pre-law thing and then

I'll go to law

school and then I looked in the mirror

and I said my God you're never going to

win a case with that face so I

immediately looked for a job in which

nobody could see

me so I thought well radio I do have a

face for radio

but cartooning even better yeah so if

you're not good-look enough to be a

lawyer try to be a cartoonist that's my

career

advice well here's some fake

science fake science fake

science there's a study that says people

who use willpower alone to achieve goals

and resist temptation are deemed uh more

trustworthy than those who use

tricks now a trick would be like oh I

have to put $5 in the swear jar because

I

swore or telling other people to bust

you if you uh break your diet so

basically if you use any

external crotch to help you do something

people will say you have less willpower

and so we don't trust you as much why is

this fake science

there's no such thing as

willpower willpower is not a

thing they they should have talked to

the other parts of

science they were actually studying a

thing that's

imaginary literally willpower doesn't

exist I just did a lesson for my members

in the uh the locals group so I do

little micro lessons two to four minutes

that gives you a life skill so after two

minutes you learn something you'll

you'll know how to do for the rest of

your life life now if you do about 200

of them which I have over 200 microl

lessons at the Scott adams. locals.com

um you would know that willpower is

literally imaginary so they did a whole

study on a thing that's literally

doesn't exist and then they came to a

result because they're the experts let

me tell you I'll give you the quick

version of why willpower doesn't

exist there are only differences and

preferences

if you say Scott I'm not going to feed

you for two weeks and then I'm going to

put some ice cream in front of you would

I resist I haven't eaten in two weeks

but you know I don't want ice cream

because it's bad for me a little too

much sugar do you think I'd resist

starving after two weeks no I'd eat it I

would eat a Lunchables that that's how

hungry I would be right now where's the

willpower in that story none no I was

more hungry than I was carrying about a

few calories now you could take that

silly example and you could extend it to

literally everything and in every case

you'll see it's very clear somebody just

picked the choice that was the better

choice there's no willpower do you know

how I keep my weight exactly at the

right number I'm I'm literally precisely

at my target adult weight I I don't want

to gain a pound don't want to lose a

pound I'm exactly right do you know how

much willpower it took none because it

doesn't exist all I did was I did stuff

like remove junk food from my house

learned a little bit more about you know

what's good for me so I did learning I

removed things from my environment

where's the willpower there's no

willpower and then I learned um you know

through trial and error I learned what

things were causing me inflammation and

causing me to gain weight so it turns

out for me probably wheat I'm not you

know it's not a scientific study but

anecdotally when when I got rid of Wheat

and some other sugary things I can't

even gain weight it wouldn't even be

possible so if you live your life like

willpower doesn't exist you're going to

get much better results because instead

of

going willpower trying really hard that

doesn't get you much how about just

removing the junk food from your house

that'll get you a lot how about learning

more about how to make um boring food

taste good that'll get you a

lot so no science should talk to the

other parts of science which do know

that willpower and Free Will don't exist

but they studied it do you know why they

studied the thing that doesn't

exist because they're experts they're

experts let's drink to The Experts shall

we to The

Experts love those experts

let's see if anything else in the news

along those

lines all right here's a recommendation

that um I don't know how much of this is

real but it feels

real um I think I may have told you this

before you know Andrew huberman he talks

about the importance of getting early

morning

sun taking off your sunglasses and

standing in the Sun for 5 minutes in the

morning and that's a bit sunny I guess

you stand there longer if it's a cloudy

day and that's supposed to set your set

your body rhythms for the rest of the

day now I'm not an expert so I don't

know if that's true or not but also

there are claims from other people that

you can if you take off your shoes and

go outside you can do grounding where it

I know resets your electrical forces or

something I don't know if that's real I

have no idea and then there's also the

huberman breathing technique where you

do the two long inhales through your

nose

and then one exhale and you only have to

do it I don't know three or four times

and that resets some of your bodily

nervous system or something so what I

discovered or it's sort of obvious

actually is that you can do all three at

the same time do any of them have any

real scientific backing I don't know

because science is not something that I

would trust do you know why I don't

trust and don't know if grounding

getting Sun or the breathing technique

work

because it comes from

experts anybody who trusts the experts

in 2024 is just guessing but I'll tell

you what I did do since I could do all

three of these at the same time I mean

what are you going to do when you're

standing there in the Sun so I take off

my shoes Outdoors stand in the sun do a

few hubman breaths and I've done all

three things now so there's a you know

I've got three shots that at least one

of those things makes a difference in

the real world I don't know so here's my

experience oh my god do I feel good when

I do it

immediately it's the damnest thing I

just walk outside take off my shoes do

that breathing in the Sun and I feel

extraordinary and it does in fact feel

as though it kicks your day off to a

good day can I prove it nope do I

believe it's true because the experts

told me nope I just know it's three

things that can't hurt me they can't

hurt me right so I do them and then it

makes me feel happy what if it's not

really working but it makes me think

it's

working that's called

working you get that right since I'm

trying to I'm resetting my mental state

as as much as anything else if I walk

away thinking it worked it worked I

don't need I don't need to hook any

electrodes to my body

if I think I'm

happy good enough all right so that's uh

that's worth

trying have you ever had this experience

that if you try to explain the real

world to people you know the Mike Ben's

version you you you can't do it without

sounding

crazy and it's in this category of

things which can't be communicated it's

one of my favorite like mental things to

think about I just love thinking about

things which are true and can be put

into words but it still can't be

communicated let me give you an example

the little boy who cried wolf right he

he pretended he saw a wolf until finally

when he saw a real wolf he tried to tell

people in clear language that was true

there's a wolf but he couldn't

communicate it because he created a

situation where they were just sort of

you know deaf to his statements about

wolves now the the Mike Ben's let's say

I like to use him as just a simple way

to describe the the larger blob of you

know the government working with Nos and

the Atlantic Council and how Soros is

connected as their banker and it might

involve all the these other

International things and how they

affected the the the platforms and the

news and it's so

complicated that as soon as you start

explaining it to a normie you know

somebody who's had no exposure to this

idea whatsoever and they think they're

living in a democracy or a some kind of

Republic which I don't think we have for

decades um you can't explain it and I'm

I'm not I'm only bringing up because

it's

fascinating how you can hide stuff one

of the ways you can hide

stuff is right in front of people you

just have to make it complicated that's

it yeah as long as something's

complicated you can hide anything do you

know what's complicated

climate

change it's complicated you know what's

complicated are

elections I'm not in the concept level

but when you get down to who's doing

what and how many moving Parts it's kind

of

complicated so everywhere that there's

something that's

complicated it's probably really bad

because that's where you hide all the

bad stuff is in the

complications yeah manufactured consent

yeah that's part of it

anyway um I finally figured out what it

is that makes MSNBC look different from

CNN CNN looks like people who are

sometimes knowing they're

lying and sometimes don't know they're

lying you know they might actually

believe their own news but here's what

they don't look

like they don't always look

crazy that's my take I when I watch CNN

nobody has crazy eyes you know I I keep

calling out people who have obvious

mental illness problems you can see it

in their eyes I don't I when I look at

Jake Tapper do I say to myself that

guy's crazy no no he's completely sane

when I look at Wolf Blitzer totally same

totally same when you look at ra Rachel

madow does she look sane to you I mean

really when you look at

uh Lawrence

O'Donnell does he look

sane I mean really does he now let me

give you a contrast just so I'm not

making fun of all of their hosts when I

look at Ary melber does he look insane

no not even a little bit he could leave

MSNBC and work on CNN tomorrow because

he looks like the CNN people they might

be misled about something they might be

wrong but don't look crazy they look

like people doing their job as they see

it now here's what really sets me over

the top and makes

MSNBC a comedy for me CNN is fascinating

and I I recommend you watch it just to

find out what they're telling their

people just to be well informed about

what uh people you don't agree with

necessarily are saying but when I watch

MSNBC I'm actually watching it for the

jokes meaning that I find it hilarious

and I finally figured out what it was

that makes it so

funny it's the

smugness the

smugness if somebody's just mentally ill

it's just

disturbing if somebody is perfectly sane

and

smug sometimes sometimes they're just

popular I would say Hannity is kind of

smug wouldn't you Sean Hannity he seems

a little smug maybe you'd say he's just

confident but little smoke but he

doesn't come off as as like

comedy cuz he looks like he's doing his

job and you know even if he knows he's

exaggerating he probably knows it you

know nothing

crazy but if you look at Lawrence

O'Donnell or Rachel

madow they're super

smug but the things they say are crazy

if you had smug and crazy it's

hilarious so when I watch it I'm like oh

my God what am I watching

this is the funniest thing smug and

crazy at the same

time anyway um there some people are

thinking that so-called AGI or super AI

intelligence is coming and it's real

close open AI fired two

people um for allegedly for leaking

information now um I I saw online some

speculation that you know it's obvious

what it was they leaked well that's not

obvious to me but the speculation is

that um the leak is about something

called

qar a rumored super intelligence that

will come out of AI open AI fairly

soon who believes that how many of you

believe that the leaks were about as

super Ai and they were on the verge of

something we've never seen

before I'm going to say no I'm going to

bet against it I think it was probably a

league I mean that part might be true

but I doubt it was about a super

intelligence which will'll all be

frightened to hear about I think

everything's going to be

incremental that's what I think I think

all AI Improvement will be incremental

but still astonishing when anybody looks

back at it so I think the things we

think are going to happen in a month are

going to take two

years and they'll be amazing but we'll

have so much time to adjust to it that

the amazing part might wear off you know

you'll just be well there's another

that's a little 5% better than that last

one so I'm going to be I'm on the uh

underwhelmed side of things for

AI and I'm happy to be wrong i' love to

be wrong but I think it would be

underwhelmed well you probably all saw

the story of Representative Sheila Lee

Jackson at a public event speculating

out loud how we could possibly settle

the moon because it's made of gas and uh

how how exactly do you build something

on top of gas so that big old Round Moon

she said was a just a big gaseous thing

and okay now you probably say to

yourself okay but she's a politician so

you don't really expect your politicians

to know everything about

science it'd be good if they knew the

basics but you know you give them a pass

they're the representative want wanted

them there so if the public wanted them

as a representative and you know they're

not having much to do with any sciency

stuff that would be fair I mean as long

as she's not involved directly in any

kind of science decision does it really

matter well here's a little background

you didn't know she used to be on the

house space and Aeronautics

subcommittee yeah yeah one of our

experts in the

government uh who was on the house space

and aono committee thinks the moon is

made of gas well let's have a drink to

our experts shall

we not just the scientific experts but

the political experts the ones who are

serving on the house space and

Aeronautics subcommittee who think the

moon is made of gas here's to

you but you know even as I tell you how

many experts are wrong about

things at least they got climate change

right am I right like thank God I mean

because that's it so important but all

these experts in all these fields

clearly lying or wrong or bash crazy but

at least at least climate change is

believable incredible and pure science

really let see next

story uh Harvard Yale MIT and brown are

all returning to standardized tests now

that's a surprise because you think that

the smartest people in the country you

know the people running these higher

level institutions when they decided

that not testing people before uh

admitting them was a good idea I'm

really surprised that that didn't work

out huh have I ever told you that if you

don't measure you're not

managing that's one of your one of those

little bumper scker rules that pops up

all the time if you're not measuring it

you know with some kind of legitimate

measurement system you're not

managing it's not managing to say well

i' should like to have more of this or

less of that you need to have a real

idea of what you're shooting at or

you're not really managing and you're if

you're not watching if you're going in

the right direction of the wrong it

can't be called managing but the

smartest institutions in fact Harvard

wants to teach you how to make decisions

and be an economist and a and a business

person and uh and they didn't know that

the number one rule of management is you

got to you got to measure things so if

you'd like to get your MBA at Harvard

just know you're taught by people who

were caught by

surprise that measuring things made a

difference when they were trying to

manage things didn't work out so it

looks like they had a choice of being

super racist at the same time of being

overpriced and those are two things that

they couldn't pull off at the same time

we'd like to be

overpriced but we'd also really like to

be super racist and then the public said

hold on hold on that's too

far you can be overpriced or you can be

super racist but you cannot be both

that's too much that's too much Harvard

so Harvard said well as much as we love

being super racist I guess it would be

better to be high

paid so they chose the money over the

principal

experts here's to the experts at Harvard

who are teaching you how to manage

without measuring things to them to

them so good well even though your

highest uh educational facilities who

teach people science and business even

though they apparently don't understand

science or business the one thing we can

feel confident in is that they did

produce

scientists who really got climate change

right because if there's one thing the

scientists can do outside of the college

you know environment they they can

measure the temperature of the planet am

I right they can measure the temperature

of the planet so at least that's we got

that working for us so good news on on

that

front oh this is

awkward wow kind of bad luck that this

story came up in the order it did well

now I just feel like a dope Zero Hedge

is reporting that as many as 30% of all

the

thermometers that they use for the

temperatures don't

exist H I wonder if that's a problem in

the accuracy

so they're called ghost

thermometers and they're thermometers

that used to exist at one point but now

they no longer do so what they do the

the people who are measuring the

data let's call them the experts

probably all came from Harvard and MIT

and Yale but I don't know that for sure

but um when they go to measure and they

realize that there used to be a

thermometer there but now there isn't

what they do is they take the average of

other therm

om so let's say you used to have an old

one but now the old one's gone now it's

been replaced with a new one and it's

not even necessarily in the same

place so you take the average of the

temperatures of the thermometers that

are not where the old one was and you

throw that in

mix 30% of

them 30%

that's the

claim um let's see uh Mr

shuchuk said the US hcn stations they

reached a maximum of over 1,200 so in

1957 we had over

1,200 temperature measuring stations or

thermometers but after 1990 the number

of active stations became declining due

to aging equipment and Personnel

retirements huh

you know I lived in the real world for a

while and I worked in a laboratory in

which all we did was work with equipment

and Technology every day equipment and

technology and uh you know what I

learned when I was working with

equipment and

Technology all that equipment and

technology is 100% effective all the

time and it never breaks never gets out

of

calibration never gets out of tune and

is completely unaffected by temperature

and the incompetence of the people

involved no that's the opposite of what

I

learned now I would like to take a bow

in a moment but only after I tell you

why and and then I'll I'll see if you

believe I I deserve a bow okay you you

get to decide if you say yes Scott you

can take a bow then I'll do it but if

you say no if you say no they'll say all

right all right you have

spoken who told you name anybody else

who told you this that in the real world

you can't trust on people to read

thousands of

thermometers and compare it to 100 years

ago when we didn't have thermometers and

we had tree rings and Ice core samples

and come up with a believable credible

line that passes all scientific

integrity

and I said in the real world that is

literally not possible there is no

situation in which you could have 12200

thermometers and maybe a thousand people

involved and that they're measuring the

temperature and getting something like a

real

result do you believe that with having

no scientific background

whatsoever that using the dilber filter

which is what I did I used the dilber

filter that the real world does not have

any kind of competence that could

possibly produce accurate temperature

readings with the equipment used things

changing over time and then human beings

involved in the process who told you

that that isn't even possible just

me who who who else

predicted that if you actually looked

into it it would look

absurd just me I'm the only

one do I do I deserve

bow you tell

me what do you mean no damn

you damn

you all right all right did Linden no

the so let me

uh let me give you a different take on

that so somebody said that a

professional climate scientist said that

well the climate scientist didn't say

exactly this story but the climate

scientists do say you know for this

reason or that reason the accuracy is

not good now from a scientific

perspective and somebody within the

industry you that may be an accurate

take but I'm not even in the industry

and I'm saying that you don't need to be

a climate scientist who has worked

deeply in Industry you just have to

listen to what they said wait you just

told me you measured the temperature of

the earth so accurately that you can

tell what direction it's going in why I

don't believe that I don't believe that

for a second so the the dilbur

principle of just general incompetence

really guarantees this isn't doable

because it's too manual has too many

pieces of equipment involved too much

you know moving things around too much

temperature and weather

destruction too much bureaucracy yes I

would say that uh this is pretty solid

evidence that we don't know if the

temperatur is going up or down it's not

my opinion that I know by the way so

it's not my opinion that I know

everything's fine climate wise it's my

opinion that we can't measure

it that's a very big difference so it

could be a crisis maybe how would I know

in order to know I would have to trust

science

really it's 2024 who trusts science

doesn't even feel like a

thing now let me ask you

this how long do you think it will take

Trump and let's say

V to turn the and let's say this needs

some uh confirmation so it would be

great if we had some confirmation of

this but suppose we get confirmation

that 30% of the thermometers or ghost

thermometers how long would it take V

and

Trump to turn that into a victory dance

and say well we can't tell you what the

temperature is doing we can just tell

you that they didn't

know and maybe it was a hoax would you

say it's a

hoax if I told you that 30% of the

thermometers don't exist would you say

it's a

hoax maybe not but it's not that far

away is

it all

right um Trump did the funniest Trump

thing I mean I every time Trump does

something you don't quite

expect it feels

like he's just operating on some

different level so here's what he did he

just did some video commercials uh

recommending RFK

Jr his

competitor and he and he actually meant

it because he's aware that Democrats are

more likely to vote for him so he just

comes right out and says in

videos um he said that RFK J is a better

man than Biden and he says quote Ark Jr

is as you know the most radical left

candidate so he's making sure that that

there are no Republicans who want to go

that way so he characterizes them as the

most radical left that should that

should eliminate all the Republicans

from voting for him but he says uh he is

uh more so than the green party even

lefter than the green party says Trump

and says he's uh more so even than

crooked Joe Biden but he's got some nice

things about him I happen to like

him

uh and and then Trump says I guess I

would mean RFK junor is going to be

taking away votes from crooked Joe Biden

and he should because he's actually

better than Biden he's much better than

Biden he's much better than

Biden now how much do you love that have

you ever seen that have you ever some

seen somebody just come right out and

say you know what

the this other guy is better than the

guy you're voting for he's not as good

as me but you should at least at least

not vote for that other guy because

that's a

disaster would you like to hear what the

young people in my town

say here's what the young people in my

town say about Joe

Biden and RFK

Jr and I'm told that there are no

exceptions no exceptions now I I can't

Pro that but I'm told there are no

exceptions to what I'm just going to say

at the uh young person sort of you know

teenager young adult level when asked

about politics they'll say you know RFK

Jr is kind of attractive but there's no

way in hell I'd support Biden and those

are

Democrats you know those are people who

come from Democrat backgrounds they're

literally saying Biden is not even not

even close to being a possibil

they're saying RFK Jr all the way the

young people now they're not saying

Trump the boys are the bo the boys are

more likely to say Trump but the girls

are saying you know what RFK Jr looks a

lot better than

Biden do you know what makes uh women

decide on a

candidate is whether they'd have sex

with

them it's whether they' have sex with

them is that is that too far nope no

that would would be a normal way that

all human beings uh act did I not just

tell you they did a study that said that

lawyers who are more attractive are more

likely to win cases I just told you that

this is exactly that this is just more

of that we all know that tall presidents

or tall candidates do better than short

ones do you know why because people want

to sleep with tall ones same as dating

exactly the same taller is

better so if you look at Joe Biden who

is literally you know a desicated pile

of twigs and you compare him to RFK Jr

who's

ripped you can understand why young

women are saying you know I think I

politically agree with RFK Jr they have

no idea what any of their policies are

there's no policy decision yeah do you

think an 18-year-old looking at RFK Jr

and Biden knows the policy differences

between those two not a chance they just

know which one they'd bang that's it and

that's enough that's enough should

guarantee a Trump trump a win unless

it's

rigged anyway let's talk about RFK Jr

who did the most amazing thing on Aaron

Bernett show and CNN so the Vigilant Fox

is reporting about this has a nice

summary on X the Vigilant Fox another

good another good follow on X just look

for it the Vigilant Fox anyway um RFK JR

says that Aaron Bernett brain stopped

working when he made the stunning

argument on about Biden on CNN all right

so let's see if you think this is as

good as uh the Vigilant Fox does right

so here was the

argument Kenny said there's no court

that found that President Trump tried to

steal the election or tried to derail

the election or tried to start an

insurrection

however there are courts that have found

that President Biden was censoring his

opponents and not just

me and then Kennedy said although he did

sensor me and I did win that

suit so it's not just me making it

up oh my

God how much do I love that man right

now RFK Jr is the person who I could

disagree with the most and love the most

at the same

time because what he's done is he's

dismantled their strongest argument

against the election being rigged but he

doesn't know he did it well he might

know but um so that the

conversation is about whether the

president is an insurrectionist that

happens to be Biden's strongest argument

against Trump because Biden went from

what uh he went from Biden omic which

now everybody's reporting he got rid of

because of inflation so he had to give

up on bomic he did the whole the the

Army is full of white supremacists and

and then when they tried to root them

out they didn't find any and then it

seems like they've been silent about all

the white supremacists lately have you

noticed that like Biden was all about

the white supremacist but there hasn't

been really a problem and nobody was

buying it and there weren't any in the

military so the white supremacist thing

like biomics was something they tried

and doesn't look like it

worked so they've settled on this whole

threat to

democracy threat to democracy and also

specifically that he doubted the

elections and when they say he must be a

a he must be a dictator because he

doubted the

elections do you know why they can say

that they can only say it because no

court found that the election was

rigged and now our K Jr comes at comes

at him with the Judo reframe of all time

and says there's no court that found

that President Trump tried to steal the

election derail it or start an

Insurrection and that's just a

fact so you can't have it both ways if

you're going to claim the election was

good because no court found it wasn't

you're going to have to find that no

court founding was an insurrectionist

and you're going to have to eat that

and Earth G Jr is going to shove it

down your throat on live TV if you if

you don't like

it so to me RFK Jr just

dismantled the entire uh gaslighting

operation of the Democrats right in

front of

you that's kind of

amazing now what I hope is that uh VI

and Trump see this and pick up that

argument because it's a killer it's a

it's a absolute

killer absolute killer and here's what

I'd love to

see and maybe you don't want to start

too soon it looks like um the Democrats

want to ride this whole

insurrectionist threat to

democracy I think Trump should allow

them to keep that argument until they're

so committed to it it's just the

brand and then he should mock it out of

existence you could mock the uh dictator

thing away just by acting like a normal

person imagine Trump going into

Chick-fil-A some of you saw the video

everybody loved him he was he was

hugging on and taking selfies with a lot

of black women were there was you know

which is a great look for a

politician imagine him going into

Chick-fil-A and while the camera is

running

and somebody's taking a selfie with them

let's let's say just to make the picture

good it's a it's a young black woman

who's just thrilled to be in his

presence and then he turns to her and

says the news says I'm going to be a

dictator do I seem like a dictator to

you and then just laugh and then the

person will laugh and you will learn

that there are no people who think it

it's just a news thing there are no

people who think it and by the way if

you did think it and you met him you

would stop thinking it within 5 Seconds

let me give you a

demonstration of trump changing somebody

who believe who believes he's a dictator

into someone who doesn't believe

it pat in the back Shake of the hands

how are you doing today oh wow looks

like you're doing great I'm glad you're

supporting me how are the sandwiches

here and you're done and people would

say how did anybody think he was a

dictator that that was the least stalish

thing I've ever seen in my life he asked

me about my sandwich he came into

Chick-fil-A you know where anybody could

hurt him because he's right in the

middle of the crowd by the way did you

notice the Secret Service did not keep

the people away how about that's the

biggest

Story how about that how about you

missed the biggest story Trump walked

into a middle of a crowd unannounced

a very largely black crowd

unannounced just walked in now the

Secret Service was there but there's no

way they could have protected them

people literally had their arms around

them you you can't protect somebody if

somebody's up to no

good yeah he basically trusted the crowd

and they immediately

reciprocated immediately all he has to

do is trust the crowd now it's dangerous

because you know there could be it only

takes one crazy person but Trump

trusting the public is such a good look

and I would love to see him engage to

the public and just ask the

question do I do I look like a dictator

to

you and and to imagine that he thinks

that would be his best

play in What world would that be his

best play to become a dictator at age

whatever it's not a good play it would

guarantee his entire family got

slaughtered what kind of a good play is

that it would guarantee his businesses

were destroyed it would guarantee like

Civil War now compare that to the

alternative the alternative of just

doing a good job and then leaving office

after his four years which one is better

for Trump and his

family unambiguously

better to restore America to his former

greatness as best he can

and to walk out with dignity having

proven everything he need to prove and

then let his business Thrive let history

think well of him and become the most

popular president in the history of the

United States you don't think he wants

that you think he'd rather be a dictator

and hated by everyone it's crazy now if

there's one thing that Trump wants he

wants the public to like him he doesn't

want to be a dictator that'd be crazy

but a lot of crazy people are convinced

it's

true all right speaker Johnson finally

told the truth about why he changed his

mind about fisa now he is pro- fisa

where he used to be anti fisa and he

says and Mike cernovich phrases this

exactly correct he got the

talk he got the talk now who told you

name anybody else who told you this that

I believe that the top people the

president and you know the leaders of

the parties that when they when they get

power but not until then only after they

have their power that the intelligence

groups call them in and they say here's

all the stuff you didn't know

before here's all the stuff you didn't

know before and this is why nothing you

knew is real and you better you better

do it this

way that was me

and he's saying it he's saying it

directly that when he found out what the

intelligence people told him he can't

tell you what they said but he's pretty

sure he's got to do what they said now

here's something Tucker added that I

think is a real good addition to that

idea how does speaker Johnson know that

what the intelligence people told him is

true no way there's no way he knows

what's true so if he doesn't know what's

true who's running the

country because probably speaker Johnson

thinks he's one of the people running

the country or at least you know big

part of the government because he knows

this new

information but what if it's not

true if it's not

true then the intelligence people are

running the

country what if it is true but it's also

what the intelligence people want to

happen well then the intelligence people

are running the country so there are two

possibilities what they told them is

true which means the intelligence people

are determining how things go they're in

charge or it's not

true and they're still in charge because

they're telling you something to make

you act in the way they want based on

false but either

way this is confirmation that the

government is not the

government and Johnson said it directly

he said they showed him things and if

and if you knew what he saw you would

change your

mind now if he had to guess do you think

he saw real

things I honestly doubt it because again

I'm going to put the dilbur filter on

this if you put the dilbur filter on it

and you give somebody unlimited power

the unlimited power to lie to the

government and make them act like they

believe

it who doesn't use unlimited

power in the history of everything if

you give somebody that kind of power

they're going to not use it of course

they are they're going to use it every

chance they get now they might not use

it for small stuff you know because they

don't care about the small stuff but if

let's say it was a difference between

funding Ukraine and not funding Ukraine

do you think anybody's going to tell

them the

truth I don't think

so not not a chance here's what I think

probably happen I think they called him

and said here's why we need fisa we

can't tell the public but we fisa is the

only reason we thed three nuclear

terrorist

attacks and he'd be like what I never

heard there were any nuclear terrorist

attacks he goes well that's because we

did such a good job we kept it from the

public so they wouldn't panic and and

also that people wouldn't know our

sources and means but we have thwarted

three terrorist I'm just making this up

if you're joining me late none of this

is real but we we thwarted three nuclear

terrorist attacks and here's the thing

speaker Johnson you can't tell

anybody do you

promise oh well really if you thwarted

three nuclear attacks I have to admit I

didn't want this fisa stuff but I mean

the responsible thing to do is to make

sure we don't get nuked I don't want

that on my record so I guess I'm going

to trust you yeah going to trust you

so it seems to me that whether or not

speaker Johnson heard something true or

false he did confirm that he's not in

charge and that the government's not in

charge now do you think this trick would

work on the president if you if you said

Joe Biden you don't know this but we

know this and you better at not tell

anybody of course it would it would

literally work on

everyone you put me in that situation

and I'm totally aware of all the risk

right I know what tricks they might play

they could turn me so fast it

would be one second and I'd be flipped

because this situation is unre it's it's

irresistible nobody's going to say yeah

I do want to take a a healthy 30% chance

that you're lying to me and I'm going to

ignore the nuclear risk you just told me

we avoided with

fisa nobody makes that decision you you

say if they told you you're going to

rely on them even if it's

because that's just the better

play all right Marjorie Taylor green is

still against the fisa stuff but she is

not been read into the uh the secret

things here's what I

like yeah you want to compromise I'll

give you a

compromise speaker

Johnson I will be on your team

and I will agree with extending fisa

under the following

conditions you put Marjorie Taylor Green

in the skiff and you tell her what they

told you if her detector

doesn't ring off the hook and she says

oh jeez I didn't know that okay okay now

that I know that I'm going to change my

mind I would be a lot more comfortable

if you put somebody with the

you know the world siiz balls of Margery

tailor Green in that room and she tells

me so let me say it again I don't trust

speaker Johnson I don't know him you

know I'm not saying he's a liar I just

don't know him so I don't trust him but

I've been watching margerie Taylor green

for some

time and and by the way if you put Matt

gates in there I wouldn't believe

him right I don't I don't have that

level of trust with

him not you know not that I you not that

there's some specific thing it's just I

don't know

so but Marjorie Taylor green I've Got a

Feeling is purely a a

patriot I mean every signal she sends is

that she's in it for the right reason

you know even if you don't like her

style or whatever she really seems like

she's in this for the right reason you

Ben in the military probably makes a

difference so that would be that's

that's my take so in marjerie Taylor

green and let her come out and tell me

that she saw the same thing speaker

Johnson did and if they both are on the

same team I'm going to get a little

flexible about

fisa yeah I'm going to get a little bit

flexible all right coincidentally FBI

director says there are more threats

than there have ever been well doesn't

that work perfectly doesn't it oh isn't

it great that that FBI director says

there's more terrorist threats than

we've ever seen at the same time they're

talking about fisa the best way to stop

those terrorist

threats so that that fits kind of snugly

doesn't it just a

coincidence well there's a new covid

whistleblower

um this

says that uh well it's everything you

knew was true the United States or

members of it including fouchi

absolutely did plan and execute and and

were

funded um the gain of function research

to make Corona virus more

deadly I'm going to say that's confirmed

as confirmed as anything could be now

you have to worry about fake news and

fake whistleblowers but you know

everything about this looks just so

obvious do you all agree that that we

could now say it's just the fact the

fouchi was crooked fouchi lied it was

obviously some secret government program

but here are the two questions that we

have not seen

addressed why were they doing

that what why were they making a deadly

virus now the the answers I've seen are

that they're making the deadly virus so

that they would be better prepared if

somebody else made a deadly

virus does that sound

real because you could do that with

everything you could you could have a

little laboratory coming up with every

damn thing that could go wrong just so

you're ready in case somebody else does

it

no no that's not

believable that sounds like total

yeah so why was it that we ever

believed that fouchi maybe didn't do

this and it was some kind of you know

some kind of pangol and had sex with the

back kind of situation why did we ever

believe that or anybody I don't maybe

you didn't but why did anybody believe

that it's because of the experts let's

drink to The

Experts they got this Co stuff they got

this climate change and they've they've

studied things yeah here's the

experts all right let's see oh and we

have another

whistleblower bre B news

reporting that uh there was a guy Mike

mccormic who's got a new book and

apparently he was like a super Insider

like he was in the

room so uh I I see him described as

Biden's

stenographer but do they mean that

metaphorically or literally a

stenographer but he was in the room

here's what he says he says he

personally witnessed Biden negotiate the

burisma kickback scheme us funding to

Ukraine energy primarily burisma in

exchange for putting Hunter Biden on

bre's board of directors on a trip to

Poland in

2014

um

wow he says uh Biden's former National

Security Aid Jake Sullivan is at the

center of the

Scandal

um and uh McCormack recalled he told

that Sullivan told reporters in 2014 on

Air Force

2

um as an anonymous senior Administration

so it must have been on background or

something that the United States

intended to help Ukraine's natural gas

industry

so everything you thought was

true as a direct witness

now oh my God and and uh I think you've

heard I think breit Bard and other

places you've heard that Jake Sullivan

has always seemed like he was the center

of all of this and now we've got a

witness that says he was and uh it's

every bit as corrupt as it looks like so

Ukraine was an energy play a corruption

play a CIA play but what it wasn't is

defending democracy against Putin

although there might have been some

people who cared about that as well so I

think that the United States is

essentially a criminal cartel and it's

been using essentially Mafia tactics to

take over Russia and get control of

their energy um and that Russia too is

basically a you know a mobster situation

with a lot of energy so to me it looks

like two criminal elements organized

criminal gangs United States versus

Russia fighting over

uh resources

that's what I see how's history going to

write it now when history writes this

story are they going to say well United

States has been a criminal organization

maybe for decades and they ran a play

there was essentially a criminal Rico

kind of situation to take over Russia's

energy and told the United States it was

all about Freedom or some damn thing

meanwhile Russia of course is not a real

country it's just a gas station with an

army basically a criminal Enterprise so

really it was a contest between two

criminal Enterprises with Bill ions of

dollars at stake do you think your

history book is going to say

that well probably

not um let's see what what could

possibly bolster this claim that the

Biden Administration is corrupt I wonder

if there's any other story in the news

right now that would make you scratch

your head and say well there it

is next

story uh

CBS news reporter Katherine herriage

says the network

CBS fired her took all their notes and

she's never seen anything like that they

took her personal notes they took her

computer when they fired her and what

was she working on at the

time oh a story involving Joe Biden's

corruption so

CBS moved on her like OJ on Nicole

because they found out she was working

on a story about Biden's

corruption and I'm guessing she found

some I'm guessing she found

some so they shut her down how many of

you thought that the news was real and

that the news organizations are they're

just doing their news organization thing

nope they've always just been a Democrat

tool at least in recent years and uh

here it is everything you thought

about climate change was right they

can't measure it everything you thought

about fouchy and

Co was

true it was a big old cover up and we

don't even know why they were doing it

we still don't even know why we just

know what

happened and then the Biden corruption

stuff in Ukraine and Ukraine war it's

exactly what it looks like exactly what

it looks like

what a

day well there reports that Iran is

planning a calibrated attack so as you

know uh Israel took out some of its uh

commanders and I think they had an

embassy an Iranian Embassy in Syria or

something and if you had an embassy

that's a whole higher level of War

because the embassy is considered

sovereign territory of the country that

has the or consulate a consulate not an

embassy um

and so Iran Iran is saying that you know

hey that's like our it's like our own

territory so we're going to have to

respond and the uh Intel people think

that if it's going to happen it's going

to happen in the next few days um here's

what I

think I think that Israel is getting the

trumpan benefit of

unpredictability and what what I mean by

that is when Hamas did their attack on

Israel um I Heard reports of some them

thought they were going to take over

Israel that sounds crazy to me but um I

think they assumed I'm just observing it

like everybody else it seems to me that

Hamas must have assumed that Israel's

response to the attack would be somewhat

similar to how they've responded to

other attacks in other words there would

be some uh some proportional response

and you know maybe a thousand Hamas

people get killed but they still have 29

th000 left over and they just start over

but instead Israel called their

Bluff took G away from them forever

destroyed their civilization and it's

never coming back now do you think they

expected that nope and what did that buy

Israel as a permanent

asset trumpian

unpredictability now Iran has a new

situation they've never seen before

which is always before they could sort

of predict if we do this they'll

probably do something that's similar not

anymore in fact I'll go further if

Israel ever intended to take out the

leadership of

Iran all they need is for Iran to make

an attack on the

Homeland or or just do something

provocative even if it's not on Israel

proper Israel just needs a reason and

they're going to take out the

Ayatollah now in in any other situation

could they take out the

Ayatollah nope nope only this one only

this one because they said we're going

to kill everybody who is

responsible who else was

responsible the Israeli lead I'm sorry

the Iranian leadership I mean that's

what we're told I mean I can't I I don't

have direct reporting but everybody

seems to think that an Iranian

leadership was behind the Hamas attack

Israel said directly we're going to kill

every one of them that would include

Iranian the Iranian

leadership just give them a

reason this is the only time in history

that I can think of that if Israel

literally took out the entire

leadership they could get away with

it now you say to yourself not

guaranteed you're right it's not

guaranteed nothing's guaranteed gued

it's War it's a it's a war for existence

nothing's

guaranteed but there has never been a

more ideal time for Israel to end the

risk of the Iranians nuking them in the

future than right now all they have to

do is say look we told you we were going

to get everybody involved we we took out

the head of the snake and by the way we

have no quarrel whatsoever with even the

Iranian military we have no

quarrel we only wanted the people who

are behind the planning and execution of

this attack and I'm sorry it just

happened to include the Ayatollah and

all of his generals so they're

gone now we'd love to help you Iran

recover we'd love to bring you into the

fold make you part of the you know

Abraham Accords plus someday but at the

moment we are completely

unpredictable and anything you thought

we wouldn't do last year we will to do

this year this year is not last year

whatever you think might be our

proportional response stop thinking that

there's no limit to our proportional

response meaning it's not going to be

proportional that ladies and gentlemen

is the

Trump

premium Trump taught you that being

predictable basically Dooms you being

predictable Dooms you you because you

can't negotiate and you can't frighten

everybody knows what's going to happen

so you have to create a

realistic frame that if you hit us we

might take you around completely and you

have to you have to set a precedent

because if you haven't done it in the

real world it's just talk now Gaza is

being basically disappeared do you think

there's anybody in Iran who is watching

what's happening in Gaza and says to

them

I think those Israelis are in the mood

to be

proportional no no they are not in the

mood to be proportional they're

certainly going to be rational but

they're not going to be proportional

they're not in the mood and they don't

need to be they just don't need to be so

I'm not recommending it and I'm not

predicting

it I'm just saying Iran needs to

understand that if they did something

serious to Israel and Israel in response

took out their entire

leadership the world would

yawn the world would yawn that's never

been the case before and it may never be

again there may never be another time

you could do this and get away with it

and by the way I don't know if they

could get away with it but all the other

times they definitely couldn't you know

a year ago do you think they could have

taken out the Uranian leadership

no absolutely not

but what if they did it today today is a

coin

flip today you would actually say you

know what we might disagree too

aggressive and then other other people

would say no that was just aggressive

enough that they had a

come you would never get that

conversation any other time and by the

way that benefit will decrease every day

so every every day that Israel doesn't

take out Iranian leadership is going to

be harder

tomorrow so the ideal situation for

Israel depending on how aggressive

they're feeling is that Iran does Strike

Back if Iran strikes back and they Mak

it a serious

strike all bets are

off so that's how you negotiate I don't

know if I've mentioned that Netanyahu is

smart when you're dealing with a leader

that smart I mean and I'm talking just

raw intelligence you know forget about

policies and preferences and who's left

and who's right if you have that much

raw computing power on on on one

side I would be afraid of that that's a

lot of raw computing power and I

wouldn't want to wouldn't want to be on

the other

team so I remind you I don't support

Israel anymore um because the ADL has

targeted me

and yes of course I know the ADL doesn't

work for Israel of course I know they're

independent but it's not my

problem I can't solve their problem my

problem

is hey if if your friend attacks

me that's how it works right if you

could stop your friend from attacking me

and you don't do

it there we are right don't don't expect

me to solve your problem I'm not going

to solve your problem so problem is the

ADL and so I don't support Israel

because of that I don't think we should

fund them a single penny not a

penny and that's a little bit personal

in my case all

right yeah right so I'm looking at a

comment if Israel took out the Iranian

uh leadership the Arab world would be so

so pretend

mad at least

before

they to

the they've ever seen in their entire

life we've now uh and by the way have I

have I made my

case you got a little H

glitch that's interesting U might have

had a glitch

we're back all right I was just telling

you that

uh this is probably the best live stream

you've ever seen maybe ever will but can

you uh give me a fact check on

this give me a fact check it's uh it's

my

belief that I've proven I run the

simulation based on today's headlines

yes or

no does it seem to you like all the news

was what I wanted it to be today

now if you're new to me I'm always

joking about this or am

I I've never seen the news so perfectly

tailored to everything that I've already

told you and believe and reveals the

endgame I've never seen anything like

this today is today is just

lit am am I wrong I mean I'm having like

a moment here like be before the

show My Moment was I've never I've never

seen the news so right so accurate and

having the right context Etc so quite

remarkable this is quite a day I mean

this is really a remarkable day I don't

know if I don't know if everybody's

going to see it that

way I've never seen anything like it

this this is the day of all days in the

news never see anything like it all

right I'm going to end the uh the

non-subscription platforms so bye to

YouTube bye to rumble bye to X I'll be

talking to the folks here on locals I

understand there's some some kind of

weird time lag so I'm going to say

goodbye but uh I think I have to wait a

little bit before I actually click the

button so it doesn't look like I've

rudely cut you off so what I'm doing now

is completely unnecessary talking from

this point forward there's no point in

you watching this because nothing useful

will happen I'm just calling for about

30

seconds

until how do I know when it's time to do

it well anyway if you watch this part

this was my polite good day and I hope

it doesn't cut

off

what push the right button that would

help local supporters only

engaged not

working all right not

working let me turn it let me just turn

off this feed and see if you stay on on

the other

feed oh it won't

end it looks like that option just

disappeared so yesterday we did it right

so I think I'm I think well actually I

don't know I think all the platforms

yeah all the platforms are live

so for some reason it's not letting me

delete the other ones it's probably

because I have two streams going I cross

streams yeah I've got two devices

running one of them is on locals

independently and then the other one's

going through the rumble Studio I'm not

really supposed to do that so I I think

that's what the problem is so I'm gonna

have to say goodbye to everybody at the

same time I'm going to first uh kill

this feed if I'm pointing at you if I'm

pointing at you right now you're de feat

I'm going to kill and then I'm going to

kill the other one so don't go to the

other one cuz that'll die at the same

time bye for now see you in the man

cave all right and before I go now I'll

tell you tomorrow bye for

now all right it doesn't end the

stream so so I'm going to have to kill

it and reopen it and end this

stream for